00:00:37.000We have DeSantis, we have Trump, we have Kayleigh McEnany, Cruz, Josh Hawley, Greg Gutfeld, we have Kat Temp, we have Jesse Waters, Pete Hegseth, and more.
00:01:11.000He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:01:18.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:29.000Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
00:01:32.000For personalized loan services, you can count on.
00:01:34.000Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandtodd.com.
00:01:42.000I have been keeping an eye on SCODUSBlog.com.
00:01:46.000I actually think SCOTUS blog is pretty fair.
00:01:49.000I'd love to hear our guests' opinion on SCOTUS blog in just a second.
00:01:54.000But SCOTUS blog is where we would find the rulings as they happen.
00:01:59.000June is always the month where the Supreme Court justices issue their opinions.
00:02:03.000It looks like there's been a lot of delays, but there is no better person to help us navigate all of the Supreme Court drama than someone who's actually argued in front of the Supreme Court.
00:02:13.000In fact, I believe has a case in front of the Supreme Court right now.
00:02:16.000He runs one of the most important organizations in America, First Liberty, and he's with us right now, Kelly Shackelford, great American patriot.
00:03:41.000We're down to two weeks and those decisions aren't down yet.
00:03:44.000So it's coming to the crunch into the very end.
00:03:47.000What is the Second Amendment case that's in front of the court?
00:03:50.000It's a case out of New York about whether you can restrict people's gun rights.
00:03:54.000I mean, I think it's going to be a ruling.
00:03:56.000My guess is in favor of the Second Amendment.
00:04:00.000And I think all these cases, if you look at them, you know, the Dobbs case and what leaked out, the Second Amendment case, the Coach Kennedy case, which will be a huge case on religion in our schools, the school choice case, really big case, the border.
00:04:18.000I think they're all going to be massive losses for the left.
00:04:23.000And so I've been predicting for a while now that since these are all coming here at the end, as soon as we get through the end of this month, we're going to see the biggest force and energy we've ever seen from really the Marxists for court packing, which would destroy our courts.
00:04:40.000So this is why I've been saying that, because they're not going to like the fact that we're moving back to the Constitution and they're going to react to it.
00:04:50.000And this is the one thing they don't control right now is our courts.
00:04:54.000And so the Constitution is still in place.
00:04:57.000And I think they're going to try to destroy our courts by adding four justices.
00:05:04.000They've been pushing it already, but I think they're really going to come with everything they've got after these decisions are handed down the next couple of weeks.
00:05:11.000I mean, 10 years ago, Kelly, honestly, do you think Roe was ever even in the like in the cards?
00:05:18.000I mean, this is something that we were told was impossible.
00:05:22.000Well, it would have been absent Donald Trump.
00:05:26.000I mean, you know, the three justices that were appointed.
00:05:31.000You know, and I'll say it's obviously a little broader than that, but he was the key.
00:05:35.000For years, Republicans always had this approach sort of since Bork of let's pick a justice who's really conservative, but who, you know, has doesn't have a paper trail.
00:05:48.000Well, you know, when you're 50 years old and you're so-called conservative and you don't have a paper trail, maybe you're not really that conservative.
00:06:41.000And all of a sudden it became, okay, let's pick real, real judges who have a real originalist approach.
00:06:49.000And that sort of led to then Trump following on that with doing the best he could in his situation with a 5149 Senate and all the situations he was dealing with.
00:07:00.000And we now, and we're going to find out.
00:07:02.000I mean, you can't really be an originalist, which is look to the original text and the original meaning and believe in Roe v. Wade.
00:07:13.000So this should be a really easy case for the originals to say, you know, this is a political issue because it's not covered in the Constitution.
00:07:30.000It's about whether or not the federal government has jurisdiction of creating a new right and whether or not the states should be involved in that.
00:07:37.000Can you just kind of elaborate on that a little bit, Kelly?
00:07:40.000Yeah, no, that's, I mean, people think, you know, this is the weird thing.
00:07:43.000When you ask people, do you want Roe v. Wade overturned?
00:07:47.000And they answer, it's, you get these skewed answers because of what they think Roe v. Wade means.
00:07:52.000If you overturn Roe, they think it means every state is pro-life.
00:07:59.000What Roe did is it overturned about two-thirds of the state's laws, which said that they disagreed with abortion and they made abortion something that wasn't allowed in their states.
00:08:10.000So if you overturn Roe, all this means is that it's up to the people and the states.
00:08:17.000The way the Constitution is work, it's enumerated rights.
00:08:21.000So the Constitution is there to cover specific things, specific rights, specific issues.
00:08:27.000But if it's not in the Constitution, those are your rights.
00:08:33.000So they're leaving those moral decisions to the people at the local level where you can make your own decisions and where you don't have five justices in some back room, you know, making all the big moral decisions of the day.
00:08:46.000They're supposed to simply interpret the constitutional provisions that are there.
00:08:55.000There's no right to an abortion there.
00:08:56.000So that means this will go back if they do what is expected with the opinion that was leaked.
00:09:03.000If they do that, it will go back to the people.
00:09:05.000And every state will be battling this out about whether you want to protect life or not.
00:09:11.000And of course, a number of these states have trigger laws already in place that as soon as Roe v. Wade is overturned, whatever law they had goes back into place.
00:09:36.000What's so funny, though, is that I remember for years, pro-life groups would say, Charlie, these politicians, they passed these laws where they say if Roe v. Wade gets repealed, then all of a sudden, the trigger law.
00:09:51.000And these pro-life groups were so angry because they said that will never happen.
00:09:55.000So it's kind of hilarious that those laws actually were really important when they passed them.
00:10:02.000And because a lot of the pro-life groups thought they were just kind of meaningless kind of show votes.
00:10:18.000There's a lot of nonprofits out there, but First Liberty is at the top of the list.
00:10:23.000Kelly, tell us about the Coach Kennedy case and the sports illustrated drama that is surrounding that.
00:10:31.000You know, Charlie, I've been doing this kind of work for 33 years, and this is the first.
00:10:36.000I'm going to have cases at the Supreme Court, high-profile cases.
00:10:39.000Never have I seen the media do a story that is so biased and so ridiculous that the general public reacted with such an explosion that that became a media story for the next three days.
00:10:53.000And that's what happened with Sports Illustrated.
00:10:56.000They did a story on Coach Kennedy, over 7,000 words.
00:11:00.000But the headlines tell you everything.
00:11:03.000What they say in the headlines is that if Coach Kennedy were to win and get a 20-second silent prayer after the game by himself, it could be the beginning of the end of democracy.
00:11:18.000And so that, I don't know, that cracked me up on a lot of levels when I first saw it.
00:11:26.000Yeah, I was going to say, we're a constitutional republic.
00:11:29.000And, you know, free speech and free exercise of religion are kind of important in a constitutional republic.
00:11:36.000But just unbelievable that they did this.
00:11:40.000And boy, the general public was not having any part of this.
00:11:45.000They took them to task pretty quickly.
00:11:47.000And now you see, if you look, you see stories just across the media.
00:11:51.000I mean, Fox, the Brightwide, you know, all across talking about what the heck is Sports Illustrated doing.
00:11:58.000It was really embarrassing, I think, for them and showed that maybe they should stick to sports because they're not very good at the Constitution or religious freedom or certainly Supreme Court cases.
00:12:11.000I think it's the Lemon case, if I'm not mistaken.
00:12:14.000Can you talk, can you tell our audience, remind them how significant this Coach Kennedy case could be to kind of chart a new positive path forward for religious liberty in America?
00:12:26.000Yeah, let me, in fact, let me mention that if they want to see the facts of the case and if they want to listen to the oral argument at the Supreme Court, we actually have that.
00:12:37.000If you just go to firstliberty.org and click on the Coach Kennedy case, you can read the facts.
00:13:00.000So basically, what happened is the Lemon case, we have the free exercise clause, but we also have what's called the establishment clause.
00:13:09.000The establishment clause says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
00:13:13.000What that means is our founders didn't want there to be a nationally established church that we were all forced to support because they knew that would take away from their religious freedom.
00:13:23.000But 50 years ago, a liberal Supreme Court at the time issued a decision called Lemon.
00:13:29.000It's perfectly named because it is a lemon, in which they said, no, no, the establishment clause means more than that.
00:13:36.000It means separation of church and state.
00:13:39.000It means if you're offended, you can bring lawsuits.
00:13:42.000You can't bring lawsuits because you're offended in the United States.
00:13:46.000So, but only if you're offended by religion.
00:13:48.000So, our whole lives, we've seen attacks on nativity scenes or menorahs, you know, a Ten Commandments monument, you name it.
00:14:02.000And so, two years ago, we had a case at the Supreme Court, Charlie, which you'll remember the Bladensburg Cross, which was a cross that was put up almost 100 years ago by mothers who lost their sons in World War I.
00:14:16.000And a lawsuit was brought to tear it down by the American Humanist Association.
00:14:21.000And at the Court of Appeals, one of the judges, the Obama appointee, said, why don't we just cut the arms off the cross?
00:14:32.000They declared this unconstitutional after 100 years.
00:14:36.000And instead of just saying, let's protect this memorial, this veterans memorial, we said, you know, maybe we've got enough votes now with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch on the court to get rid of Lemon.
00:16:31.000We as conservatives do not like centralized power.
00:16:34.000We believe in checks and balances and separation of powers.
00:16:37.000There's a moral argument to believe that human beings deserve a right to consent to how they are ruled.
00:16:46.000Unfortunately, we do not have consent to how we are ruled by the tech tyrants.
00:16:53.000We've talked at great length about Google and Facebook and Twitter.
00:16:56.000We haven't touched on Google in quite some time, though.
00:16:59.000They seem to have been hiding in the shadows.
00:17:01.000Well, someone who has done some of the most incredible research when it comes to Google's tyranny of the masses is Alam Bakari from Breitbart, and he joins us right now.
00:17:23.000Yeah, so we got this massive story at Breitbart from a very brave whistleblower inside Google, who remains anonymous to protect his career and his reputation, everything like that.
00:17:35.000If you search the site for it, it's called Exclusive: the Code Behind Google's Woke Autocorrect.
00:17:43.000And what this leak shows is how Google is trying to get its users who use Google Documents to change the way they're writing, to change the words they use as they're writing documents.
00:18:00.000So the way this code works is while you're typing into Google Documents, if you type a word that Google considers to be non-exclusive, non-inclusive, then Google is going to suggest a woke alternative.
00:18:14.000And some of the examples of this are quite amusing.
00:18:17.000So, you know, it will suggest replacing the word manhole with maintenance hole.
00:18:22.000It'll suggest replacing the word white paper with reports.
00:18:27.000And in other cases, they're sort of struggling to find alternatives.
00:18:30.000They're trying to replace the word motherhood, for example, with the experience of being a parent or guardian, because I suppose motherhood has no gender now.
00:18:41.000There are numerous examples like this.
00:18:43.000And the focus seems to be to get rid of any notion of gender and to get rid of any mention of the word white.
00:18:52.000So I just want, I want to make sure our audience understands this because I think some people don't know what a Google Doc is, right?
00:18:58.000And it just kind of might be a little bit above them.
00:19:00.000So a Google document was a pretty amazing innovation, quite honestly, by Google, the company, which was an ability to be able to have a Microsoft Word equivalent on the cloud.
00:19:11.000That you could have it on the internet.
00:19:13.000You could have people in real time collaborate and put their thoughts in multiple participants.
00:19:19.000I started using Google Docs in high school.
00:19:21.000And in fact, it was the standard operating procedure to do so.
00:19:24.000We use Google Docs still at Turning Point USA.
00:19:27.000We haven't found a competitor even close that has a platform as good as them.
00:19:31.000But we always consider to be Google Docs to kind of be non-political.
00:19:34.000I mean, how could you possibly make a Google document political?
00:19:38.000But what you're telling me, though, is that when you are writing actively in the Google document, that there is an algorithm or a code behind the Google document itself that is watching what you are writing and potentially going to be recommending or suggesting autocorrects to your language if it's not appropriately woke to the regime.
00:20:01.000And on the one hand, it's kind of ridiculous and amusing.
00:20:04.000You see things like the word cowboy being replaced with the word animal herd because you can't use the word boy, apparently.
00:20:11.000But on the other hand, it's very insidious.
00:20:14.000Because if you think about how an autocorrect feature works, you know, everyone who uses an iPhone, you know, it's probably been auto-corrected at some point.
00:20:22.000It's meant to replace grammatical errors and you're not supposed to think about it.
00:20:26.000So it's supposed to happen automatically.
00:20:28.000And a lot of people today, when they're texting, you know, the iPhone will auto-correct them and they won't even think about it.
00:20:35.000And that's the danger with this as well, that people are going to be, people are going to be typing out their documents, their emails or whatever.
00:20:42.000And Google is going to just replace their words with woke alternatives and they're not even going to notice.
00:20:49.000Now, I will say, this feature was only rolled out to certain enterprise versions of Google Docs.
00:21:23.000Okay, like maintenance whole manhole, that's insane and awful.
00:21:27.000But I mean, it could get to the place where you say, you know, I plan to vote for Trump autocorrect Biden.
00:21:32.000I mean, you're talking about this is as close to mind manipulation that I've seen in quite some like interactive real-time mind manipulation.
00:21:49.000Google has a, and many other tech companies as well as Google, they have this focus now on what they call machine learning fairness, which is kind of a blend of critical race theory and computer science.
00:22:02.000They want to, you know, have algorithms that correct out what they believe to be our biases, our racial biases, our gender biases.
00:22:12.000And this autocorrect program is clearly a result of those efforts.
00:22:56.000It's one of the great, and Elon Musk pointed this out.
00:22:58.000I've said this for a while, but the fact Elon is saying it is hilarious, which is in the same sentence, they'll say, there's no such thing as a woman, but trans women are women.
00:23:12.000And I just, I just want to, I've plugged it so many times.
00:23:15.000Matt Walsh's just precise focus on this question of what is a woman is one of the most brilliant approaches to the trans calamity that I've seen in quite some time.
00:23:26.000But let's talk about kind of Google as a whole.
00:23:28.000Do you think that they've been kind of quiet in the last couple of months?
00:23:50.000I actually don't see any back to reality inside Google.
00:23:53.000And I've always considered Google to be the worst of Silicon Valley tech giants.
00:23:57.000Twitter arguably has a more woke culture, but they have less, because Twitter is a smaller company with a smaller user base, they have less impact on the information we receive.
00:24:07.000Whereas with Google, everyone uses Google.
00:24:10.000And Facebook, you know, they sometimes try and throw a bone to the right.
00:24:16.000They don't always do what the left says.
00:24:20.000But Google suppressed Bright.news completely during the 2020 election.
00:24:25.000They took our visibility on certain search results to almost zero.
00:24:28.000You could even type in Bright.news headlines and they wouldn't show up in Google, even when you're typing in the exact headline.
00:24:34.000So they clearly intervened in the 2020 election.
00:24:37.000And we even got a tape of their executives discussing doing that after the 2016 election.
00:24:43.000So they are there openly and brazenly incurring an election.
00:24:46.000We've seen them manipulating search results related to referendums around the world.
00:24:52.000And nothing is stopping them from doing that again.
00:24:56.000So I think Google is definitely one we should continue watching.
00:25:00.000We should look for discrepancies in search results, discrepancies in traffic from Google to the mainstream media as opposed to Google to conservative media.
00:25:09.000That's all things we should keep an eye on.
00:26:47.000It'd be one thing if they hated one another and Google wanted to use their power to what do no evil, that stupid little thing they used to say.
00:29:27.000WHO Director General Tedros Adamama Jeba Baroussis said at a briefing that the WHO, quote, is working with partners and experts from around the world on changing the name of the monkeypox virus, its clades and disease it causes.
00:29:46.000A group of over 30 international scientists called for a name change last week, writing in a letter that, quote, continued reference to and nomenclature of this virus being African is not only inaccurate, but it's also discriminatory and stigmatizing.
00:30:03.000The most obvious manifestation of this is the use of photos of African patients to depict the pox lesions in mainstream media in the global north.
00:30:13.000As any other diseases, it can occur in any region in the world and afflict anyone regardless of race or ethnicity.
00:30:20.000Hey, 30 scientists signing this letter, why don't you go look into childhood vaccination schedules and worry less about whether or not monkeypox might be racist, even though you're the ones that are being incredibly, like, dementedly racist if you think that people think racist things just because you say monkeys.
00:31:06.000As if the public health authorities around the world have already lost all credibility.
00:31:12.000They're not focusing on the suicide epidemic, the alcohol issue, alcoholism, drug addiction, self-harm, obesity, diabetes.
00:31:24.000No, you can rest assured that your public health officials are moving at an urgent and rapid and breakneck pace to say that if we call something a monkeypox, you might be trying, you might think racist things.
00:31:42.000Lyme disease came from a river in Connecticut.
00:31:58.000We called it the China virus for a reason.
00:32:02.000One of our great contributions to Western civilization here on the Charlie Kirk show is when we tweeted out China virus and President Trump, he just picked it up and we could have a direct line back there because it came from China.
00:33:01.000A racist white liberal scientist who has nothing better to do but tell people how to live their life, who's smug and arrogant and super miserable, that's who stats the World Health Organization.
00:33:12.000Thank you so much for listening, everybody.
00:33:13.000Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.