The Charlie Kirk Show - June 16, 2022


Google's Shadow Operation to Kill Gendered Language with Allum Bokhari


Episode Stats


Length

33 minutes

Words per minute

174.19162

Word count

5,818

Sentence count

452

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

15

sentences flagged

Hate speech

5

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the Charlie Kirk Show, we dive into Google s new lawsuit against the government, why Google is more powerful than our government, and a Supreme Court update from the great Kelly Shackelford on when will the Roe v. Wade ruling come down.

Transcript

Transcripts from "The Charlie Kirk Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hello, everybody.
00:00:00.000 Today in the Charlie Kirk Show, we dive into Google.
00:00:03.000 What is Google doing with Google documents?
00:00:05.000 Google is more powerful than our government.
00:00:07.000 We dive into it with Alam Bakari and also a Supreme Court update from the great Kelly Shackelford from firstliberty.org.
00:00:15.000 When will the Roe versus Wade ruling come down?
00:00:17.000 What will it be?
00:00:18.000 That and so much more.
00:00:20.000 Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:00:23.000 And make sure you come to SAS, our Student Action Summit.
00:00:26.000 People of all ages, welcome.
00:00:28.000 It is a student-focused event, tpusa.com slash S-A-S.
00:00:33.000 That is tpusa.com slash S-A-S.
00:00:37.000 We have DeSantis, we have Trump, we have Kayleigh McEnany, Cruz, Josh Hawley, Greg Gutfeld, we have Kat Temp, we have Jesse Waters, Pete Hegseth, and more.
00:00:37.000 Be there.
00:00:47.000 tpusa.com slash s-as that is tpusa.com slash s-as.
00:00:54.000 Buckle up, everybody.
00:00:55.000 Here we go.
00:00:57.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
00:00:58.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.
00:01:00.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
00:01:04.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
00:01:07.000 I want to thank Charlie.
00:01:08.000 He's an incredible guy.
00:01:09.000 His spirit is love of this country.
00:01:11.000 He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:01:18.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:26.000 That's why we are here.
00:01:29.000 Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
00:01:32.000 For personalized loan services, you can count on.
00:01:34.000 Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandtodd.com.
00:01:42.000 I have been keeping an eye on SCODUSBlog.com.
00:01:46.000 I actually think SCOTUS blog is pretty fair.
00:01:49.000 I'd love to hear our guests' opinion on SCOTUS blog in just a second.
00:01:54.000 But SCOTUS blog is where we would find the rulings as they happen.
00:01:59.000 June is always the month where the Supreme Court justices issue their opinions.
00:02:03.000 It looks like there's been a lot of delays, but there is no better person to help us navigate all of the Supreme Court drama than someone who's actually argued in front of the Supreme Court.
00:02:13.000 In fact, I believe has a case in front of the Supreme Court right now.
00:02:16.000 He runs one of the most important organizations in America, First Liberty, and he's with us right now, Kelly Shackelford, great American patriot.
00:02:24.000 Kelly, welcome back to the program.
00:02:25.000 Great to be with you.
00:02:26.000 So what is the latest with the Supreme Court?
00:02:30.000 It seems like they're delaying the Roe ruling.
00:02:32.000 When do you think we'll hear about that?
00:02:35.000 You know, what's been going on has been really different, Charlie.
00:02:37.000 I mean, if people don't realize, they get about 9,000 requests a year, 8,000 requests, and they took 65 cases this year.
00:02:45.000 And those were all argued starting in October.
00:02:48.000 And just, I guess, two weeks ago, I think we still had like 30 cases out of the 65 that hadn't been handed down.
00:02:57.000 And that was a record.
00:02:58.000 It was like back to 1950 that you had that much of a backlog.
00:03:02.000 So they've been sort of whittling that down some.
00:03:06.000 We're now down to 18 cases left, but all the big cases, the controversial cases, the ones that you'd be talking about, are still left.
00:03:15.000 Obviously, the Dobbs case, the Second Amendment case.
00:03:21.000 You mentioned Religious Liberty.
00:03:23.000 I actually have, we have two cases right now at the Supreme Court.
00:03:26.000 The two Religious Liberty cases left.
00:03:29.000 One's the school choice case.
00:03:30.000 One's the Coach Kennedy are both.
00:03:33.000 We're waiting for those.
00:03:34.000 Additionally, there's the Remain in Mexico, the border case.
00:03:38.000 All these really hot button cases.
00:03:41.000 We're down to two weeks and those decisions aren't down yet.
00:03:44.000 So it's coming to the crunch into the very end.
00:03:47.000 What is the Second Amendment case that's in front of the court?
00:03:50.000 It's a case out of New York about whether you can restrict people's gun rights.
00:03:54.000 I mean, I think it's going to be a ruling.
00:03:56.000 My guess is in favor of the Second Amendment.
00:04:00.000 And I think all these cases, if you look at them, you know, the Dobbs case and what leaked out, the Second Amendment case, the Coach Kennedy case, which will be a huge case on religion in our schools, the school choice case, really big case, the border.
00:04:18.000 I think they're all going to be massive losses for the left.
00:04:23.000 And so I've been predicting for a while now that since these are all coming here at the end, as soon as we get through the end of this month, we're going to see the biggest force and energy we've ever seen from really the Marxists for court packing, which would destroy our courts.
00:04:40.000 So this is why I've been saying that, because they're not going to like the fact that we're moving back to the Constitution and they're going to react to it.
00:04:50.000 And this is the one thing they don't control right now is our courts.
00:04:54.000 And so the Constitution is still in place.
00:04:57.000 And I think they're going to try to destroy our courts by adding four justices.
00:05:02.000 They've got bills on this.
00:05:04.000 They've been pushing it already, but I think they're really going to come with everything they've got after these decisions are handed down the next couple of weeks.
00:05:11.000 I mean, 10 years ago, Kelly, honestly, do you think Roe was ever even in the like in the cards?
00:05:18.000 I mean, this is something that we were told was impossible.
00:05:20.000 Am I right?
00:05:22.000 Well, it would have been absent Donald Trump.
00:05:26.000 I mean, you know, the three justices that were appointed.
00:05:31.000 You know, and I'll say it's obviously a little broader than that, but he was the key.
00:05:35.000 For years, Republicans always had this approach sort of since Bork of let's pick a justice who's really conservative, but who, you know, has doesn't have a paper trail.
00:05:48.000 Well, you know, when you're 50 years old and you're so-called conservative and you don't have a paper trail, maybe you're not really that conservative.
00:05:58.000 And so it didn't work very well.
00:06:00.000 And they kept picking people and they ended up disappointing.
00:06:04.000 And I think Alito is the turning point.
00:06:06.000 I agree.
00:06:07.000 I think Alito is the great winner on the court that no one talks about.
00:06:10.000 It's the best thing.
00:06:12.000 The best thing Bush gave us was Alito.
00:06:14.000 I believe that.
00:06:14.000 And that wasn't his first pick, right?
00:06:16.000 I mean, he picked, he was going to pick his friend Harriet Myers.
00:06:19.000 And finally, the base said, no more of this.
00:06:21.000 No, we refuse.
00:06:23.000 And there was somewhat a revolt.
00:06:25.000 And so he kind of said, okay, I'm going to pick a guy with the most extensive record of conservatism that you've seen.
00:06:31.000 You know, spoke out against Roe v. Wade when he was in the Justice Department, has all these rulings.
00:06:37.000 And you know what?
00:06:38.000 He got through.
00:06:39.000 And I think that was the change.
00:06:41.000 And all of a sudden it became, okay, let's pick real, real judges who have a real originalist approach.
00:06:49.000 And that sort of led to then Trump following on that with doing the best he could in his situation with a 5149 Senate and all the situations he was dealing with.
00:07:00.000 And we now, and we're going to find out.
00:07:02.000 I mean, you can't really be an originalist, which is look to the original text and the original meaning and believe in Roe v. Wade.
00:07:10.000 It's just not in the Constitution.
00:07:11.000 You can read it as much as you want.
00:07:12.000 It's not there.
00:07:13.000 So this should be a really easy case for the originals to say, you know, this is a political issue because it's not covered in the Constitution.
00:07:21.000 And so it's up to you, the people.
00:07:23.000 Yeah, I mean, I'm very pro-life.
00:07:24.000 I know a lot of our listeners are.
00:07:26.000 We have some listeners that aren't very passionate about the topic.
00:07:28.000 It's actually not about abortion.
00:07:30.000 It's about whether or not the federal government has jurisdiction of creating a new right and whether or not the states should be involved in that.
00:07:37.000 Can you just kind of elaborate on that a little bit, Kelly?
00:07:40.000 Yeah, no, that's, I mean, people think, you know, this is the weird thing.
00:07:43.000 When you ask people, do you want Roe v. Wade overturned?
00:07:47.000 And they answer, it's, you get these skewed answers because of what they think Roe v. Wade means.
00:07:52.000 If you overturn Roe, they think it means every state is pro-life.
00:07:57.000 And they just don't understand.
00:07:59.000 What Roe did is it overturned about two-thirds of the state's laws, which said that they disagreed with abortion and they made abortion something that wasn't allowed in their states.
00:08:10.000 So if you overturn Roe, all this means is that it's up to the people and the states.
00:08:17.000 The way the Constitution is work, it's enumerated rights.
00:08:21.000 So the Constitution is there to cover specific things, specific rights, specific issues.
00:08:27.000 But if it's not in the Constitution, those are your rights.
00:08:31.000 Those are taken in your state.
00:08:33.000 So they're leaving those moral decisions to the people at the local level where you can make your own decisions and where you don't have five justices in some back room, you know, making all the big moral decisions of the day.
00:08:46.000 They're supposed to simply interpret the constitutional provisions that are there.
00:08:50.000 So free speech, absolutely.
00:08:52.000 Free exercise of religion, yes.
00:08:55.000 There's no right to an abortion there. 1.00
00:08:56.000 So that means this will go back if they do what is expected with the opinion that was leaked.
00:09:03.000 If they do that, it will go back to the people. 0.56
00:09:05.000 And every state will be battling this out about whether you want to protect life or not.
00:09:11.000 And of course, a number of these states have trigger laws already in place that as soon as Roe v. Wade is overturned, whatever law they had goes back into place.
00:09:21.000 That's both good and bad.
00:09:22.000 You have some states where it's very pro-life, and then you have places like New York and others that it's very much not pro-life.
00:09:30.000 But a lot of states will be in play, and it'll be up to people to argue this out, which is the way it should have been.
00:09:35.000 Self-in-local government.
00:09:36.000 What's so funny, though, is that I remember for years, pro-life groups would say, Charlie, these politicians, they passed these laws where they say if Roe v. Wade gets repealed, then all of a sudden, the trigger law.
00:09:51.000 And these pro-life groups were so angry because they said that will never happen.
00:09:55.000 So it's kind of hilarious that those laws actually were really important when they passed them.
00:10:02.000 And because a lot of the pro-life groups thought they were just kind of meaningless kind of show votes.
00:10:06.000 You know what I mean?
00:10:07.000 It's kind of a way to show you're pro-life without it.
00:10:09.000 And now they're actually going to have very serious significance.
00:10:12.000 Firstliberty.org is such a phenomenal organization.
00:10:14.000 I have spoken at their events.
00:10:16.000 I see the work that they do.
00:10:18.000 There's a lot of nonprofits out there, but First Liberty is at the top of the list.
00:10:23.000 Kelly, tell us about the Coach Kennedy case and the sports illustrated drama that is surrounding that.
00:10:31.000 You know, Charlie, I've been doing this kind of work for 33 years, and this is the first.
00:10:36.000 I'm going to have cases at the Supreme Court, high-profile cases.
00:10:39.000 Never have I seen the media do a story that is so biased and so ridiculous that the general public reacted with such an explosion that that became a media story for the next three days.
00:10:53.000 And that's what happened with Sports Illustrated.
00:10:56.000 They did a story on Coach Kennedy, over 7,000 words.
00:11:00.000 But the headlines tell you everything.
00:11:03.000 What they say in the headlines is that if Coach Kennedy were to win and get a 20-second silent prayer after the game by himself, it could be the beginning of the end of democracy.
00:11:18.000 And so that, I don't know, that cracked me up on a lot of levels when I first saw it.
00:11:24.000 Number one, we're not a democracy.
00:11:26.000 Yeah, I was going to say, we're a constitutional republic.
00:11:29.000 And, you know, free speech and free exercise of religion are kind of important in a constitutional republic.
00:11:36.000 But just unbelievable that they did this.
00:11:40.000 And boy, the general public was not having any part of this.
00:11:45.000 They took them to task pretty quickly.
00:11:47.000 And now you see, if you look, you see stories just across the media.
00:11:51.000 I mean, Fox, the Brightwide, you know, all across talking about what the heck is Sports Illustrated doing.
00:11:58.000 It was really embarrassing, I think, for them and showed that maybe they should stick to sports because they're not very good at the Constitution or religious freedom or certainly Supreme Court cases.
00:12:09.000 So I don't remember the exact term.
00:12:11.000 I think it's the Lemon case, if I'm not mistaken.
00:12:14.000 Can you talk, can you tell our audience, remind them how significant this Coach Kennedy case could be to kind of chart a new positive path forward for religious liberty in America?
00:12:14.000 That's right.
00:12:26.000 Yeah, let me, in fact, let me mention that if they want to see the facts of the case and if they want to listen to the oral argument at the Supreme Court, we actually have that.
00:12:37.000 If you just go to firstliberty.org and click on the Coach Kennedy case, you can read the facts.
00:12:43.000 I mean, laid out.
00:12:44.000 You can go back to the record sites if you want everything, but you can actually listen to the Supreme Court argument.
00:12:49.000 I mean, fascinating if you haven't done that.
00:12:52.000 It's a very aggressive thing.
00:12:53.000 So you'll find out very quickly.
00:12:55.000 It's not a bad mitten match.
00:13:00.000 So basically, what happened is the Lemon case, we have the free exercise clause, but we also have what's called the establishment clause.
00:13:09.000 The establishment clause says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
00:13:13.000 What that means is our founders didn't want there to be a nationally established church that we were all forced to support because they knew that would take away from their religious freedom.
00:13:23.000 But 50 years ago, a liberal Supreme Court at the time issued a decision called Lemon.
00:13:29.000 It's perfectly named because it is a lemon, in which they said, no, no, the establishment clause means more than that.
00:13:36.000 It means separation of church and state. 0.76
00:13:39.000 It means if you're offended, you can bring lawsuits.
00:13:42.000 You can't bring lawsuits because you're offended in the United States.
00:13:46.000 So, but only if you're offended by religion.
00:13:48.000 So, our whole lives, we've seen attacks on nativity scenes or menorahs, you know, a Ten Commandments monument, you name it.
00:13:56.000 Why?
00:13:57.000 Because the founders had any problem with these things?
00:14:00.000 No, because of this Lemon case.
00:14:02.000 And so, two years ago, we had a case at the Supreme Court, Charlie, which you'll remember the Bladensburg Cross, which was a cross that was put up almost 100 years ago by mothers who lost their sons in World War I.
00:14:16.000 And a lawsuit was brought to tear it down by the American Humanist Association.
00:14:21.000 And at the Court of Appeals, one of the judges, the Obama appointee, said, why don't we just cut the arms off the cross?
00:14:27.000 That way nobody will be offended.
00:14:29.000 We won't have to tear it down.
00:14:31.000 And we went to the Supreme Court.
00:14:32.000 They declared this unconstitutional after 100 years.
00:14:36.000 And instead of just saying, let's protect this memorial, this veterans memorial, we said, you know, maybe we've got enough votes now with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch on the court to get rid of Lemon.
00:14:46.000 And we argued for that.
00:14:47.000 And we won the case 7-2, but more importantly, 5-4, they refused to follow Lemon for the first time.
00:14:55.000 And that was a huge sea change.
00:14:57.000 We sort of moved from this hostility to religion, but it was only in the context of like public displays.
00:15:04.000 So I literally sat down with my staff and I said, look, this is great, but we've got to expand this into the schools.
00:15:11.000 And that's going to take 15 years.
00:15:13.000 After the oral argument in the Coach Kennedy case, I think they might be willing to do it in this case, which would be a sea change.
00:15:21.000 And it's thanks to the great work that you guys have done at firstliberty.org.
00:15:25.000 And we're going to keep our eyes peeled.
00:15:26.000 Kelly, I want to have you back on the program as these decisions start to come down because our audience is on the edge of their seat.
00:15:32.000 Thank you so much, Kelly.
00:15:33.000 We deeply appreciate it.
00:15:34.000 Thank you, Charlie.
00:15:37.000 Hey, everybody.
00:15:38.000 As you know, our friend Mike Lindell has an amazing passion to help everyone get the best sleep of your life.
00:15:43.000 He didn't stop by simply creating the best pillow.
00:15:46.000 Nope.
00:15:46.000 You know, Mike, he's got lots of energy.
00:15:48.000 He's done it again by introducing his MySlippers.
00:15:50.000 For a limited time, you'll only save $90 on a pair of MySlippers.
00:15:53.000 This blowout sale of the year won't last, so order now.
00:15:56.000 Mike has taken over two years to develop it.
00:15:58.000 The MySlippers are designed to wear indoor and out all day long.
00:16:01.000 Made with MyPillow, foam, and impact gel to help protect fatigue, made with quality leather suede.
00:16:06.000 I love Mike Lindell.
00:16:07.000 I know you do too.
00:16:08.000 Support him and get something comfortable in return.
00:16:10.000 Call 800-875-0425.
00:16:12.000 Use promo code Kirk or just go to mypillow.com and click on the radio listener square and use promo code Kirk.
00:16:18.000 This offer will not last long.
00:16:19.000 So order now with promo code Kirk at mypillow.com.
00:16:22.000 Mypillow.com, promo code Kirk.
00:16:28.000 Google has too much power.
00:16:31.000 We as conservatives do not like centralized power.
00:16:34.000 We believe in checks and balances and separation of powers.
00:16:37.000 There's a moral argument to believe that human beings deserve a right to consent to how they are ruled.
00:16:46.000 Unfortunately, we do not have consent to how we are ruled by the tech tyrants.
00:16:53.000 We've talked at great length about Google and Facebook and Twitter.
00:16:56.000 We haven't touched on Google in quite some time, though.
00:16:59.000 They seem to have been hiding in the shadows.
00:17:01.000 Well, someone who has done some of the most incredible research when it comes to Google's tyranny of the masses is Alam Bakari from Breitbart, and he joins us right now.
00:17:11.000 Alam, welcome back to the program.
00:17:13.000 Good to be on.
00:17:13.000 Hi, Charlie.
00:17:14.000 Tell us about this story that you're going to break with us today about the code behind Google's woke autocorrect.
00:17:22.000 Tell us about it.
00:17:23.000 Yeah, so we got this massive story at Breitbart from a very brave whistleblower inside Google, who remains anonymous to protect his career and his reputation, everything like that.
00:17:33.000 It's just gone live on Breitbart.com.
00:17:35.000 If you search the site for it, it's called Exclusive: the Code Behind Google's Woke Autocorrect.
00:17:43.000 And what this leak shows is how Google is trying to get its users who use Google Documents to change the way they're writing, to change the words they use as they're writing documents.
00:18:00.000 So the way this code works is while you're typing into Google Documents, if you type a word that Google considers to be non-exclusive, non-inclusive, then Google is going to suggest a woke alternative.
00:18:14.000 And some of the examples of this are quite amusing.
00:18:17.000 So, you know, it will suggest replacing the word manhole with maintenance hole.
00:18:22.000 It'll suggest replacing the word white paper with reports.
00:18:27.000 And in other cases, they're sort of struggling to find alternatives.
00:18:30.000 They're trying to replace the word motherhood, for example, with the experience of being a parent or guardian, because I suppose motherhood has no gender now.
00:18:40.000 And you can read the report.
00:18:41.000 There are numerous examples like this.
00:18:43.000 And the focus seems to be to get rid of any notion of gender and to get rid of any mention of the word white.
00:18:52.000 So I just want, I want to make sure our audience understands this because I think some people don't know what a Google Doc is, right?
00:18:58.000 And it just kind of might be a little bit above them.
00:19:00.000 So a Google document was a pretty amazing innovation, quite honestly, by Google, the company, which was an ability to be able to have a Microsoft Word equivalent on the cloud.
00:19:11.000 That you could have it on the internet.
00:19:13.000 You could have people in real time collaborate and put their thoughts in multiple participants.
00:19:19.000 I started using Google Docs in high school.
00:19:21.000 And in fact, it was the standard operating procedure to do so.
00:19:24.000 We use Google Docs still at Turning Point USA.
00:19:27.000 We haven't found a competitor even close that has a platform as good as them.
00:19:31.000 But we always consider to be Google Docs to kind of be non-political.
00:19:34.000 I mean, how could you possibly make a Google document political?
00:19:38.000 But what you're telling me, though, is that when you are writing actively in the Google document, that there is an algorithm or a code behind the Google document itself that is watching what you are writing and potentially going to be recommending or suggesting autocorrects to your language if it's not appropriately woke to the regime.
00:19:58.000 Did I get that right?
00:20:00.000 That is correct. 0.95
00:20:01.000 And on the one hand, it's kind of ridiculous and amusing. 0.77
00:20:04.000 You see things like the word cowboy being replaced with the word animal herd because you can't use the word boy, apparently. 0.87
00:20:11.000 But on the other hand, it's very insidious.
00:20:14.000 Because if you think about how an autocorrect feature works, you know, everyone who uses an iPhone, you know, it's probably been auto-corrected at some point.
00:20:22.000 It's meant to replace grammatical errors and you're not supposed to think about it.
00:20:26.000 So it's supposed to happen automatically.
00:20:28.000 And a lot of people today, when they're texting, you know, the iPhone will auto-correct them and they won't even think about it.
00:20:33.000 It'll just accept the autocorrect.
00:20:35.000 And that's the danger with this as well, that people are going to be, people are going to be typing out their documents, their emails or whatever.
00:20:42.000 And Google is going to just replace their words with woke alternatives and they're not even going to notice.
00:20:49.000 Now, I will say, this feature was only rolled out to certain enterprise versions of Google Docs.
00:20:55.000 So it's an optional feature.
00:20:57.000 It's not going to be rolled out to every user just yet.
00:21:00.000 And they've actually, because this was such a disaster, it got terrible reviews even from left-wing journalists.
00:21:06.000 Google is now considering pulling it back.
00:21:09.000 But you can see the direction of travel of Silicon Valley, where they're going.
00:21:12.000 They're trying to change the way we use language.
00:21:15.000 And by doing that, they're trying to change the way we think.
00:21:19.000 So that's just, I mean, but you think they're going to stop here, right?
00:21:22.000 If this continues?
00:21:23.000 Okay, like maintenance whole manhole, that's insane and awful.
00:21:27.000 But I mean, it could get to the place where you say, you know, I plan to vote for Trump autocorrect Biden.
00:21:32.000 I mean, you're talking about this is as close to mind manipulation that I've seen in quite some like interactive real-time mind manipulation.
00:21:43.000 Am I wrong?
00:21:45.000 I think so.
00:21:46.000 I think that's what they're aiming at.
00:21:47.000 And if you, I've covered this before.
00:21:49.000 Google has a, and many other tech companies as well as Google, they have this focus now on what they call machine learning fairness, which is kind of a blend of critical race theory and computer science.
00:22:02.000 They want to, you know, have algorithms that correct out what they believe to be our biases, our racial biases, our gender biases.
00:22:12.000 And this autocorrect program is clearly a result of those efforts.
00:22:16.000 It's just remarkable.
00:22:18.000 So let's just kind of talk more broadly about Google right now.
00:22:21.000 And this is a phenomenal story.
00:22:22.000 You guys could check it out at thegreatbreitbart.com.
00:22:24.000 We love Breitbart.com.
00:22:26.000 By the way, a story right next to your story, Alam, I just have to say this.
00:22:29.000 We'll talk about it.
00:22:30.000 Miss Universe insists not all people who menstruate are women.
00:22:35.000 This is where we're at.
00:22:36.000 This is a Breitbart.com story.
00:22:38.000 Go ahead, Alam.
00:22:39.000 Well, yeah, that's exactly the kind of thinking that's driving this Google, this happenings at Google.
00:22:46.000 You know, there are no men and women.
00:22:48.000 If you even use the word men or women or mother or boy, then you're somehow being non-inclusive.
00:22:54.000 That's the way they want us to do it.
00:22:56.000 It's one of the great, and Elon Musk pointed this out.
00:22:58.000 I've said this for a while, but the fact Elon is saying it is hilarious, which is in the same sentence, they'll say, there's no such thing as a woman, but trans women are women.
00:23:07.000 Oh, really?
00:23:08.000 So which is it?
00:23:10.000 Are trans women women? 1.00
00:23:11.000 What is that word woman? 1.00
00:23:12.000 And I just, I just want to, I've plugged it so many times.
00:23:15.000 Matt Walsh's just precise focus on this question of what is a woman is one of the most brilliant approaches to the trans calamity that I've seen in quite some time. 1.00
00:23:26.000 But let's talk about kind of Google as a whole.
00:23:28.000 Do you think that they've been kind of quiet in the last couple of months?
00:23:32.000 At least this is not my beat.
00:23:34.000 I know you're a reporter on this stuff.
00:23:37.000 What have they been up to?
00:23:38.000 What do we have to keep our eyes on when it comes to Google?
00:23:41.000 They're still manipulating search results.
00:23:43.000 Are they woker than ever?
00:23:44.000 Are you seeing any sort of kind of back to reality movement at Google?
00:23:49.000 What's going on there?
00:23:50.000 I actually don't see any back to reality inside Google.
00:23:53.000 And I've always considered Google to be the worst of Silicon Valley tech giants.
00:23:57.000 Twitter arguably has a more woke culture, but they have less, because Twitter is a smaller company with a smaller user base, they have less impact on the information we receive.
00:24:07.000 Whereas with Google, everyone uses Google.
00:24:10.000 And Facebook, you know, they sometimes try and throw a bone to the right.
00:24:16.000 They don't always do what the left says.
00:24:18.000 They're still extremely left-wing.
00:24:20.000 But Google suppressed Bright.news completely during the 2020 election.
00:24:25.000 They took our visibility on certain search results to almost zero.
00:24:28.000 You could even type in Bright.news headlines and they wouldn't show up in Google, even when you're typing in the exact headline.
00:24:34.000 So they clearly intervened in the 2020 election.
00:24:37.000 And we even got a tape of their executives discussing doing that after the 2016 election.
00:24:43.000 So they are there openly and brazenly incurring an election.
00:24:46.000 We've seen them manipulating search results related to referendums around the world.
00:24:52.000 And nothing is stopping them from doing that again.
00:24:56.000 So I think Google is definitely one we should continue watching.
00:25:00.000 We should look for discrepancies in search results, discrepancies in traffic from Google to the mainstream media as opposed to Google to conservative media.
00:25:09.000 That's all things we should keep an eye on.
00:25:12.000 You're an expert in this.
00:25:13.000 What is a realistic public policy prescription look to start to solve some of these problems?
00:25:20.000 Well, with Google, it's very difficult because you can't just solve it with Section 230.
00:25:25.000 With the social media censorship, you can kind of look at Section 230 reform to give users a right of action to challenge censorship.
00:25:33.000 That's what Texas is trying to do. 1.00
00:25:35.000 That bill is now being contested through the courts.
00:25:38.000 With Google, it's a lot trickier because you're dealing with a set of search results.
00:25:46.000 So in that case, you really need to be looking at really opening up the algorithms and giving users choice of what algorithms they use.
00:25:56.000 Because right now, everyone has to use the algorithm that Google gives you.
00:26:01.000 There have been some proposals to make that more transparent and more optional to users.
00:26:05.000 So you can turn off Google's filtering if you like, or even have an open marketplace of filters.
00:26:11.000 This is my ideal solution, that anyone can write a program to filter the search results of Google depending on various criteria.
00:26:20.000 And then you'll be able to choose from them in a kind of app store-like marketplace.
00:26:24.000 That would be ideal.
00:26:25.000 That would really break Google's power.
00:26:27.000 But how to do that at a policy level, you know, it's a massive, massive challenge.
00:26:30.000 Phenomenal reporting.
00:26:31.000 Alam, thank you so much for joining us, Breitbart.com.
00:26:34.000 This is something we want to have you back on just to talk about this more as it continues to develop.
00:26:39.000 I believe Google is more powerful than our government.
00:26:42.000 The scary thing is our government is too often in bed with Google.
00:26:45.000 They're not at odds with one another. 1.00
00:26:47.000 It'd be one thing if they hated one another and Google wanted to use their power to what do no evil, that stupid little thing they used to say. 0.99
00:26:52.000 Now it's do good. 0.97
00:26:54.000 Actually, I liked the don't do evil things better than the do good.
00:26:58.000 There's a moral argument for that.
00:27:00.000 That's it for another time.
00:27:01.000 Alam, thank you so much for joining us.
00:27:02.000 Thanks, Charlie.
00:27:03.000 Great to be on.
00:27:04.000 Yes, thank you.
00:27:07.000 Look, did you get hit with a big tax spill you were not expecting?
00:27:10.000 With rates still being very low and home equity being high, it's the perfect time to refinance and get some cash out of your home.
00:27:17.000 Look, you could go to one of these woke banks, Citibank, Chase, where they hate you, they hate the country, and they hate Christianity.
00:27:25.000 Or you could refinance right now all of your mortgage needs with my friends.
00:27:29.000 Guess what?
00:27:30.000 It's so easy to remember the website, andrewandTodd.com.
00:27:32.000 Just write it down.
00:27:33.000 AndrewandTodd.com.
00:27:34.000 They're with Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
00:27:36.000 They're people I know and trust and work with them, and you should too.
00:27:39.000 Just go to andrewandtodd.com.
00:27:41.000 It takes 30 seconds to answer a couple of questions.
00:27:43.000 This gives them the information they need to give you valuable information often on the first call.
00:27:49.000 Andrew and Todd, they are not brokers.
00:27:51.000 They are bankers, which means they handle your loan from start to finish.
00:27:55.000 So you always have someone in your corner.
00:27:56.000 Take that first step towards getting that cash you need today.
00:27:59.000 AndrewandTodd.com.
00:28:01.000 That's AndrewandTodd.com or called 888-888-1172, 888-888-1172.
00:28:07.000 Do not use the banks that hate you.
00:28:10.000 Use Andrew and Todd.
00:28:11.000 They will do a great job for you, everybody.
00:28:13.000 AndrewandTodd.com.
00:28:14.000 That's AndrewandTodd.com.
00:28:19.000 I'm going to be pretty precise in how I talk about this and careful in how I talk about this, but it's just an unbelievable story.
00:28:28.000 It's just remarkable.
00:28:29.000 Imagine how racist you must be if you hear monkeypox and you think of something racist. 0.99
00:28:37.000 You must be a sick and demented individual if you think of monkeypox and you immediately associate that with racism. 0.96
00:28:45.000 The WHO will rename monkeypox virus to combat racism and stigma, Axios reports. 0.97
00:28:53.000 The World Health Organization said Tuesday it will rename the monkeypox virus after concern that it could stoke racism and stigma.
00:29:00.000 Really?
00:29:01.000 Who what concern about racism and stigma?
00:29:04.000 What are you thinking about, World Health Organization?
00:29:08.000 The current name for the virus, which has infected over 1,600 people in 39 countries, was first reported in Africa.
00:29:15.000 It does not adhere to WHO guidelines that discourage the use of geographic regions or animals.
00:29:21.000 Like chickenpox or the swine flu.
00:29:27.000 WHO Director General Tedros Adamama Jeba Baroussis said at a briefing that the WHO, quote, is working with partners and experts from around the world on changing the name of the monkeypox virus, its clades and disease it causes.
00:29:46.000 A group of over 30 international scientists called for a name change last week, writing in a letter that, quote, continued reference to and nomenclature of this virus being African is not only inaccurate, but it's also discriminatory and stigmatizing.
00:30:03.000 The most obvious manifestation of this is the use of photos of African patients to depict the pox lesions in mainstream media in the global north.
00:30:13.000 As any other diseases, it can occur in any region in the world and afflict anyone regardless of race or ethnicity.
00:30:20.000 Hey, 30 scientists signing this letter, why don't you go look into childhood vaccination schedules and worry less about whether or not monkeypox might be racist, even though you're the ones that are being incredibly, like, dementedly racist if you think that people think racist things just because you say monkeys. 0.99
00:30:42.000 You're sick. 0.98
00:30:44.000 The article continues. 0.99
00:30:46.000 The letter writes, as any other disease, it can concur in any region of the world and afflict anyone regardless of race or ethnicity.
00:30:52.000 As such, we believe that there is no race or skin complexion should be the face of this disease. 1.00
00:30:57.000 Who is the face of this disease exactly?
00:31:00.000 What are you trying to say?
00:31:03.000 World Health Organization?
00:31:06.000 As if the public health authorities around the world have already lost all credibility.
00:31:12.000 They're not focusing on the suicide epidemic, the alcohol issue, alcoholism, drug addiction, self-harm, obesity, diabetes.
00:31:24.000 No, you can rest assured that your public health officials are moving at an urgent and rapid and breakneck pace to say that if we call something a monkeypox, you might be trying, you might think racist things.
00:31:42.000 Lyme disease came from a river in Connecticut.
00:31:46.000 How about the swine flu?
00:31:47.000 Or how about Ebola?
00:31:50.000 What do you think Ebola is?
00:31:53.000 It's a river in Africa.
00:31:58.000 We called it the China virus for a reason. 1.00
00:32:02.000 One of our great contributions to Western civilization here on the Charlie Kirk show is when we tweeted out China virus and President Trump, he just picked it up and we could have a direct line back there because it came from China.
00:32:20.000 The World Health Organization.
00:32:22.000 They are too busy trying to kick people off of scientific board reviews, a certification.
00:32:31.000 They don't care about vaccine injuries or any of these other things.
00:32:35.000 No, instead, Axios reports the WHO will rename monkeypox virus to combat racism and stigma.
00:32:45.000 How about the West Nile virus?
00:32:47.000 Remember that?
00:32:49.000 This is not even...
00:32:52.000 The doctors do realize there are monkeys on every continent except Antarctica.
00:32:58.000 Monkeys are not contained to one part of the world.
00:33:00.000 No, no, no. 0.99
00:33:01.000 A racist white liberal scientist who has nothing better to do but tell people how to live their life, who's smug and arrogant and super miserable, that's who stats the World Health Organization. 0.99
00:33:12.000 Thank you so much for listening, everybody. 0.98
00:33:13.000 Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:33:16.000 Thanks so much for listening.
00:33:17.000 God bless.
00:33:20.000 For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.