00:00:00.000Hey everybody, today on the Charlie Kirk Show, John Salier joins us to talk about Ohio State University, Texas Tech, NIH, and the deep state leviathan known as DEI, the DEI Commissars.
00:00:11.000A really important episode about how entrenched DEI is.
00:00:15.000The Soviets had commissars, the Maoists had the Red Guard, the French Revolution had Jacobins, and all were tasked with enforcing party orthodoxy and punishing anyone who stepped out of line.
00:00:25.000And DEI bureaucrats are America's commissars of wokeness.
00:00:29.000Email us as alwaysfreedom at charliekirk.com.
00:00:32.000Fight back against all this nonsense with Turning PointUSA at tpusa.com.
00:01:18.000I mean, these speakers, hold your phone.
00:01:21.000Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck, Patrick Bett David, Candace Owens, Rob Schneider, Roseanne Barr, Dennis Prager, Allie Beth Stuckey, James O'Keefe, Riley Gaines, Ben Carson, Jason Whitlock, Gad Sad, Brandon Tatum, Seth Dylan, Jack Pesovic, Benny Johnson, Yan Mee Park, Michael Seifert, James Lindsey, Steve Bannon, Eric Metaxas, Donald Trump Jr., Josh Hawley, Marjorie Taylor Green, Matt Gates, and bigger names than even that to be announced soon.
00:02:30.000This four-day event is packed with empowering speakers, hundreds of patriotic partner organizations, and the America-loving community that you have been searching for.
00:02:39.000Don't miss on the amazing concert two.
00:02:43.000Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Rob Schneider, Roseanne Barr, Dennis Prager, Allie Beth Stuckey, James O'Keefe, Patrick Bett David, Glenn Beck.
00:02:51.000I mean, just drop everything and come to Phoenix.
00:03:18.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:03:30.000Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at AndrewandTodd.com.
00:03:39.000Joining us now is John Salier, Senior Fellow and Director of University Policy at the National Association of Scholars, a great organization and also contributor at the Wall Street Journal.
00:04:09.000It's been a tough couple days for the Buckeye Faithful, but beyond a football game in Ann Arbor, this is real damage to Ohio State University.
00:04:18.000Yeah, thanks so much for having me on.
00:04:20.000So, part of my role is to investigate what's happening at universities.
00:04:25.000And I think you can't understand the university culture and all of the problems that we can see in it from the outside without looking at how faculty are hired.
00:04:38.000And so, I was given a tip from a professor at Ohio State that every single search committee in their College of Arts and Sciences, which is a big part of the university, was required to submit a diversity faculty recruitment report.
00:04:57.000In order to bring job candidates onto campus to interview them, they had to do this.
00:05:04.000So, they had to describe on this forum how the search committee discussed diversity, how they used diversity statements to evaluate candidates, and how each of the candidates they were proposing to bring to the university contributed to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
00:05:26.000And now, there's something very interesting about these documents because Ohio State stands out for its commitment to DEI.
00:05:34.000They have 189 diversity officers who are compensated at $20 million a year total.
00:05:44.000Their president two years ago announced a massive DEI-focused faculty hiring initiative saying that we're going to hire as many as 150 new professors who focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion.
00:05:58.000And so, what these documents really do is give us an inside look into what universities mean when they say they're going to invest heavily in DEI.
00:06:26.000What I think is striking, though, is that Ohio has become, both gubernatorially and from a state legislative perspective, a red state.
00:06:36.000The taxpayers of Ohio on all elections, they do not want this DEI thing.
00:06:41.000If a candidate like Sherrod Brown were to run for the United States Senate re-election on the message of DEI, he would lose by 10 points, right?
00:06:50.000Tim Ryan, when he would run against JD Vance, if he would say, Look, I want black-only dormitories and white people are to blame.
00:06:59.000Yeah, you're not going to win Ohio with that message.
00:07:03.000I'm saying this for a reason: is that the Ohio State University, which is a flagship publicly funded institution of the great state of Ohio, is out of lockstep with their voters.
00:07:13.000This is not State University in New York, Albany, right, where critical race theory is really embraced by the Manhattanites.
00:07:28.000You would expect this kind of initiative in the University of California system, but this is just about the worst I have ever seen.
00:07:40.000Look, we have positions in freshwater biology, molecular genetics, a whole just wide array of sciences where search committees very explicitly said we're going to focus on DEI and prioritize it heavily throughout the hiring process.
00:07:59.000And if you look at the way that they actually evaluated these scientists, it involves basically the use of a political litmus test throughout.
00:08:13.000This is happening not in California, not in Illinois, where there's not really any, you wouldn't expect political pushback.
00:08:20.000This has happened in Ohio and it's been allowed to happen in Ohio, which is really, I think, stunning because you're right.
00:08:30.000This kind of thing is remarkably unpopular, even amongst faculty.
00:08:34.000When I made this request, the College of Arts and Sciences at Ohio State emailed all of the faculty in the college and said, we're going to turn over these documents to the National Association of Scholars.
00:08:48.000What happened after that was I got multiple faculty members reaching out to me telling me, you need to look here too, telling me, here's some tips.
00:08:59.000I heard from one faculty member, look, there is a total sense of impunity.
00:09:04.000And ultimately, that's not just a problem with a few rogue actors.
00:09:08.000That's ultimately a problem of priority that starts from the top.
00:09:13.000And I think that there's really some, you know, anyone reading this should think really hard about how we got to this point where Ohio State is the exemplar of, you know, basically the craziest DEI policies you could possibly put down in writing.
00:09:34.000Yeah, I mean, MAGA might be winning politically in Ohio, but DEI is winning culturally and academically.
00:09:41.000I mean, Ohio used to be a battleground state.
00:09:52.000I mean, there's some truth to that, I guess, but I don't know why they have to racialize it.
00:09:55.000But again, the average person in Athens, Ohio, whose grandfather used to work at the steel mill that got shut down, and they've seen their wages go down, they want to hear that there's some bureaucrat at Ohio State University earning $108,000 a year.
00:10:24.000And, you know, in some ways, it's a mystery to me how they could possibly employ 189 people in these kinds of roles.
00:10:33.000But the documents I acquired give a few hints as to what they do on the day-to-day.
00:10:39.000So for instance, there was this really crazy moment in one of the documents.
00:10:43.000It was a search for an astrophysicist.
00:10:46.000So a professor who studies astrophysics and teaches astrophysics.
00:10:50.000And they said that they required a DEI statement.
00:10:54.000So a statement from the candidate on how they contribute to DEI.
00:10:58.000And they then go on to say that the DEI statement was given equal weight to the professor's research and teaching statements.
00:11:06.000You know, research and teaching are really the only two other things professors do.
00:11:11.000So they're saying that DEI was on par with the most basic thing a professor should do.
00:11:16.000Now, what's really interesting about that document is then they make a comment right in those notes that say we prioritize DEI just as much as teaching and research.
00:11:26.000They said that this was basically explicit instruction in the diversity faculty hiring training, which was conducted by, you might expect, some of these diversity officers.
00:11:43.000So often what these diversity officers end up doing is they end up telling professors what they should do.
00:11:50.000They end up telling faculty, this is how you should prioritize these diversity criteria throughout the selection process and in other parts of the whole university life.
00:12:05.000So $20 million a year, 189 people that basically create a DEI administrative state that are like a permanent DEI deep state at Ohio State University.
00:12:16.000So the astrophysicist has to bend their knee to that all white people are racist or whatever garbage that Nicole Hanna-Jones is publishing.
00:12:28.000With the world quickly descending into chaos, the next medical crisis is just around the corner.
00:12:33.000Whether it's another pandemic or something closer to home, preparedness is no longer an option.
00:12:38.000That's where the wellness company comes in.
00:12:40.000From something innocent and natural like a tick bite to COVID to the next bioweapon manufacturer in a lab, the wellness company's medical emergency kit is what you need to be prepared.
00:12:49.000It contains life-saving medications like ivermectin, emergency antibiotics, a ZPAC, and more, as well as a guidebook to aid in the use of these life-saving medications.
00:13:00.000The wellness company and their doctors, including Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. James Thorpe, Dr. Harvey Riesch, Dr. Drupinski, and Dr. Robert Seek, and more are medical professionals that you can trust.
00:13:12.000Rest assured knowing that you're ready for whatever the globalists throw at us next.
00:13:15.000To order this kit, which I use and I have ready at disposal, everybody.
00:13:19.000I'm not here to give medical advice, but it is the gold standard.
00:14:22.000John, what did you learn about Texas Tech University?
00:14:26.000So in the summer of 2020, Texas Tech University's Department of Biological Sciences passed a DEI resolution that created all sorts of policies that the department was supposed to follow to essentially embed Kennedy style anti-racism into the biology department's basic operating system.
00:14:50.000And so one part of that resolution happened to say something that was of interest to me since I use Freedom of Information Act requests and public records requests to do a lot of my investigative reporting.
00:15:03.000It said that for every job candidate, they have to submit a diversity statement describing all of the ways they contribute to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
00:15:13.000I mean, already that's pretty remarkable for a department of biology to even require.
00:15:19.000And they said they're gonna heavily weigh that statement and that they have a rubric for evaluating the statement, which was, I would say, very ideologically charged.
00:15:31.000But it also noted that every single candidate who was evaluated would get a specific report done on their contributions to DEI, the way that the committees evaluated them.
00:15:46.000So using the public records law in Texas, I asked for those evaluations.
00:15:52.000And what I found was truly remarkable.
00:15:55.000So we have instances where candidates were said to be weaker because they couldn't describe the difference between equality and equity, which, as I'm sure you know, is pretty much a progressive political talking point.
00:16:09.000Most of the time, people say, well, equality is equality of opportunity.
00:16:13.000But in order to achieve true justice, you need to do more than just strive for equality.
00:16:19.000You have to strive for equity, which is really equality of outcomes.
00:16:23.000You have people like Kamala Harris on record saying basically exactly that.
00:16:27.000So now, if you're applying to these positions in high-stakes science at Texas Tech University, until recently, you could have been docked for not making that progressive distinct, that distinction about basically progressive politics.
00:16:45.000Other candidates were praised for things like starting their job talk with a land acknowledgement.
00:16:53.000And the list just goes on, but what you saw here was not just that they evaluated it in a politically charged way, which is probably in violation of the First Amendment because it constitutes compelled speech, but it was also a significant part of faculty evaluation.
00:17:11.000We're talking about 30% of their total score went to these DEI statements.
00:17:17.000That means that you have candidates and positions applying for positions in virology, immunology, cell biology, which is integral to studying things like the cures for cancer.
00:17:31.000You have people applying for those positions, scientists hoping to do serious science instead being weeded out on the basis of their political views.
00:17:39.000It was truly, this was the first time we ever got a look into how these statements were evaluated.
00:17:45.000It confirmed everything that people like, you know, groups like NAS have been saying for a long time, that these constitute political litmus tests and that they're basically a disgrace to academia.
00:18:00.000After your reporting, the Texas Tech Chancellor testified saying that race would not trump merit play cut 39.
00:18:09.000It was a single department in a single school within the university, but and the way the article read, it made it look like it was university policy.
00:18:26.000And then you take action to make sure it's not going to occur in other departments as well.
00:18:31.000That preventative action, Chancellor Mitchell said, is underway right now, calling for a thorough review of the hiring practices in all departments to ensure they focus on merit and not ideology.
00:21:09.000You mentioned this at Ohio State University, the astrophysicists, but now are you saying that the federal granting system is laced with DEI requirements?
00:21:20.000Yeah, so the policy at Texas Tech might have ended because Governor Abbott took action, because state legislators took action.
00:21:32.000In Texas, at least in theory, it's no longer allowed to require a job candidate to submit a diversity statement, which I think is a big win for academic freedom and for the universities in Texas.
00:21:47.000But I don't think that policy is going away anytime soon.
00:21:50.000And I have really good reason to think that, because right now, the NIH, the National Institutes of Health, has a quarter billion dollar program funding faculty hiring.
00:22:03.000The main mechanism that they are pushing with that program is precisely this policy, using DEI statements as a heavy criterion for assessing all faculty candidates.
00:22:16.000Now, what's particularly noteworthy is the NIH is the predominant way that we fund medical science in the United States.
00:22:25.000Really, if you think of medical schools, if you think of medical research, you should be thinking of the NIH because that's the way that academic medical researchers think about their job.
00:22:39.000So what's really remarkable is exactly what they're doing.
00:22:42.000They created this grant program, which gives money to universities across the country for faculty hiring.
00:22:48.000And they say, go out and hire university professors.
00:22:52.000And what they do is they say as a condition for getting this money, your grant has to show how you are going to, or that you're going to require the use of these diversity statements and that you're going to heavily weigh them in the evaluation process.
00:23:07.000And doing some investigation on this, I found that when I asked for the rubrics at public universities that received this grant, the way that they evaluated diversity statements, here's the most remarkable part of that.
00:23:22.000One of the rubrics that was used at the University of New Mexico and the University of South Carolina explicitly gives a low score to job candidates who say they want to treat everyone the same.
00:24:08.000Give us some evidence of where this leads us.
00:24:11.000I would say there are a couple of things.
00:24:13.000So first, when you make ideologically charged statements a requirement for hiring faculty, what you're going to do is create a political echo chamber on campus.
00:24:25.000And I think that that's so important to recognize when we see university professors increasingly say crazier and crazier things.
00:24:37.000I think university professors should be allowed to say crazy things if that's what they believe.
00:24:41.000But you have to ask, why do they exist in an environment where they can say that kind of thing and not be completely embarrassed by a number of people they who are colleagues pushing back and saying, no, you know, equivocating about a terrorist attack or something like that is just a really bad and dumb thing to do.
00:25:06.000The reason they can get away with, the reason they can get away without being horribly embarrassed is because they live in a political echo chamber.
00:25:14.000And why do they live in a political echo chamber?
00:25:17.000It's policies like these that either formally or informally weed out any dissenting voice.
00:25:23.000And that's really, really important that we have dissenting voices.
00:25:27.000Otherwise, it just totally discredits academia.
00:25:32.000And so, you know, that's one of the main things I focus on.
00:25:35.000But I think that there are also a lot of other reasons that this kind of policy is really bad.
00:25:40.000So for instance, I think often it also just feeds into overt discrimination.
00:25:45.000I actually think it's a good thing that we have moved to a point where we say, no, you should never be hired on the basis of race.
00:25:53.000But now that's kind of what people are trying to do.
00:25:56.000And I think often when you see these diversity statement policies, what you should think is you should be asking the question, is this an attempt to get around civil rights law that prevents discrimination?
00:26:08.000I know of instances where it absolutely was.
00:26:11.000And lastly, I would say it speaks to a kind of lack of seriousness.
00:26:16.000This is the way we fund medical research.
00:26:18.000There are still numerous forms of cancer that we have not cured.
00:26:23.000We need to be spending our money on things that are going to improve people's lives.
00:26:28.000And to say that we should instead spend money to prioritizing DEI is really an absolute shame.
00:26:34.000And it just makes a mockery of what science is for.
00:26:39.000Well, yeah, I mean, how about the NIH worries about why Americans are so overweight or why so many young people are killing themselves?
00:26:46.000I mean, I just, it is almost gets to an obsession by certain ideologues that the greatest sin is to be racist.
00:26:54.000Now, you deal a lot in kind of academic waters.
00:26:58.000Is that, for example, when they write the AI code for Chat GPT, it's so interesting because elite values are mirrored into AI chat boxes.
00:27:06.000If you really want to find out what the intelligentsia believe, just type something in the chat GPT and it can't say anything racist as if that's like the ultimate prime directive to use Star Trek language, right?
00:27:18.000Like do not interfere with Native populations and you can never say anything racist.
00:27:23.000But in their quest not to say anything racist, they almost create this new worldview of anti-racism that in reality is incredibly bigoted and hateful and spiteful.
00:27:45.000I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago, where in Evanston High School, they say we have black classrooms and white classrooms.
00:27:51.000That's all done in the spirit of anti-racism.
00:27:54.000Now, when I say that to a regular everyday American, they almost refuse to believe it.
00:27:58.000So I think part of our job is to say, hey, you know, that DEI commissar that's walking around, they actually do want you to end up in some form of segregation.
00:28:07.000I think that's, you know, it's correct.
00:28:10.000And it's also correct that it's hard to believe.
00:28:12.000That's the kind of thing that prior to my, you know, career as somebody who does reporting, I would have had a hard time believing that.
00:28:22.000But again and again, I find evidence that that kind of thing is happening.
00:28:25.000You know, what you're describing is a form of racial affinity groups where people for trainings or classes or, you know, a variety of activities are separated by race.
00:28:38.000So you have the black caucus or the Hispanic caucus or the white caucus.
00:28:43.000Now, that already, to many, just sounds like segregation.
00:28:46.000And really, that's what it should be called.
00:28:49.000And we've seen really disastrous effects.
00:28:52.000You know, we're creating a world where students, young people have started to think of race as one of the most important parts of their lives.
00:29:02.000And that I think is a huge step backwards.
00:29:05.000But, you know, one thing to tie it back to the story that I wrote about the NIH, the rubrics that I found through a public records request at the University of South Carolina and the University of Mexico, both of them also gave a low score to anyone who expressed skepticism about racial affinity groups.
00:29:27.000That's literally a part of the rubric.
00:29:29.000So you have these layered effects where first you have the policy, which itself, you know, creates an environment where people might be afraid to speak up.
00:29:38.000You know, if you're a white student and you've suddenly been put in an all-white racial affinity group to undergo a kind of diversity training, it might already be pretty hard for you to say, hey, I think you're thinking about this the wrong way.
00:29:53.000But then you have a layer of bureaucrats and policies that are adopted over time and kind of pick up steam over time that make it even harder to question at the second level, to question the very existence of those policies.
00:30:10.000And that's what we have with this, you know, diversity statement requirement.
00:30:14.000If you say in a diversity statement that I think we should live in a race neutral society where we are not separated out on the basis of our race, because that is not the kind of thing Americans should do.
00:30:24.000And that is more an expression of true diversity as it should be than anything else.
00:31:06.000It's right in the article, Wall Street Journal.
00:31:08.000Federal anti-discrimination laws prevent public schools from mandatorily separating students by race, but education lawyers say optional courses can comply with the law.
00:31:16.000I mean, the obvious thing is white-only classes are coming next.
00:31:20.000It's just this is where we're coming to, you know, a rebirth of white identitarianism in public education, which you have to wonder is that what they're trying to provoke, right?
00:31:31.000And by the way, they changed their whole criteria as soon as the Wall Street Journal started to reach out.
00:31:36.000And they're right here, the district offers middle school and high school students electives focused on black history and social-emotional learning support specifically for black students because they say it's an easier way for them to learn.
00:31:52.000You're exciting news to share about saving babies by providing ultrasounds.
00:31:55.000Right now, there is a dollar-for-dollar match, doubling the number of babies you'll save with pre-born.
00:31:59.000There are babies alive today about to celebrate their first Christmas because of what we did together a year ago at this time providing ultrasounds.
00:32:06.000And right now, you can save twice as many babies.
00:32:09.000Maybe you're already wondering about end of the year giving and want to give every dollar, get the most results.
00:32:13.000Or maybe you just want to know that a girl making this decision deserves the truth.
00:32:17.000So that next year at this time, she's picking out a Christmas stocking for her baby's first Christmas.
00:33:25.000And at the same time, I do a lot of my reporting on, you know, I post it a lot on Twitter.
00:33:31.000So you can follow me at John D. Saylor, S-A-I-L-E-R.
00:33:36.000I have something on this story about Ohio State coming out a little bit later today, talking about what's really inside some of those documents following up on the Wall Street Journal story.
00:33:47.000And yeah, you know, I have over the last year submitted over 250 public records requests.
00:33:54.000I'm constantly talking to professors and trying to get to the bottom of what's happening in higher education and show people, you know, what I think is a true scandal.
00:35:31.000I think donors, I mean, it's, it's, we have still have yet to see what's going to happen because honestly, donors have been very slow to pull out funds.
00:35:40.000I think that they should be a lot more aggressive about saying this stuff is bad.
00:36:26.000I've paid attention to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for a long time.
00:36:30.000And what their Board of Trustees and Board of Governors have done has been a fantastic start.
00:36:38.000They eliminated, they explicitly banned compelled speech, no more diversity statements.
00:36:44.000They explicitly followed up on the Supreme Court's decision saying we are absolutely not going to try to bypass this ruling.
00:36:53.000And they've created a school of, I would say, intellectual freedom where they really want to hire, from what it looks like, they want to hire people who share this vision for open, free intellectual discourse.
00:37:10.000And I think that that kind of thing is amazing to see.
00:37:12.000I'm really excited about what's going on.