The Charlie Kirk Show - December 16, 2020


How to Lose Georgia in 24 Seconds


Episode Stats


Length

41 minutes

Words per minute

150.66345

Word count

6,245

Sentence count

408


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcripts from "The Charlie Kirk Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody.
00:00:01.000 How do you lose the Georgia runoff in 24 seconds?
00:00:04.000 Well, we dive into that and so much more on how establishment Republicans are not handling the Georgia runoffs correctly.
00:00:11.000 And we want them to win, but they have got to change their tone.
00:00:15.000 Email us your questions, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:00:17.000 Please consider supporting us, charliekirk.com/slash support.
00:00:22.000 If you want to get involved at Turning Point USA, go to tpusa.com.
00:00:26.000 How do you lose the Georgia runoffs in 24 seconds or less?
00:00:29.000 Buckle up.
00:00:30.000 Here we go.
00:00:31.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
00:00:33.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
00:00:35.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
00:00:39.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
00:00:42.000 I want to thank Charlie.
00:00:43.000 He's an incredible guy.
00:00:44.000 His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
00:00:51.000 Turning point USA.
00:00:52.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:01.000 That's why we are here.
00:01:04.000 I want to tell you guys about Angel Tree.
00:01:06.000 We've talked about this before on the Charlie Kirk show.
00:01:09.000 If you want to give back this Christmas season, I highly encourage you to go to charliekirk.com, scroll down a little bit, and there's an Angel Tree banner.
00:01:18.000 If you check it out, Angel Tree does amazing work.
00:01:21.000 It is a prison fellowship that helps young children who have parents in prison.
00:01:27.000 It gives them an opportunity to hear from their parents.
00:01:30.000 It gives them a Bible this Christmas season.
00:01:33.000 It's a phenomenal fellowship.
00:01:35.000 If you go to charliekirk.com and you scroll down, click on that Angel Tree banner.
00:01:40.000 We have actually exceeded our goal.
00:01:43.000 We wanted to serve 1,477 children, and we have actually done 2,138.
00:01:50.000 You guys did that.
00:01:51.000 So let's try and keep going.
00:01:53.000 If you guys go above that, that will be amazing.
00:01:56.000 If you go to charliekirk.com and click on the Angel Tree banner.
00:02:04.000 Joe Biden gave a speech, but what I thought was super interesting, I meant to mention this with Martha, but when you're on live TV, you get so many different thoughts and you just have to do your best to package it.
00:02:14.000 And I was more responding to Geraldo than anything else.
00:02:17.000 And it was a good conversation.
00:02:19.000 I mean that.
00:02:20.000 But it was super interesting.
00:02:21.000 But Joe Biden, as he was leaving the stage, he ignored a reporter's question that was screaming at him saying, what do you have to say about your son who's under federal investigation?
00:02:32.000 Just very interesting.
00:02:34.000 Joe Biden went through a speech trying to rub in the face the fact that the Electoral College certified him as the winner.
00:02:43.000 And what I found to be very interesting is Joe Biden was continually saying, it's time to move on.
00:02:51.000 It's time to move on.
00:02:52.000 Now, many Republicans are also saying this.
00:02:56.000 This was kind of a fundamental part of Mitch McConnell's kind of speech, just kind of, it's time to turn the page.
00:03:07.000 What a lot of these people don't understand, because they live in an atmosphere of just people that agree completely with their technocratic corporatist worldview, is that most of the country actually does not want that to happen.
00:03:22.000 Most of the country actually wants to see intense, thorough investigations into precisely what happened in this election.
00:03:33.000 And this kind of insistence from the ruling class to turn the page at all costs makes us question the motives and only makes us want to see Donald Trump in there even more.
00:03:46.000 And this is kind of a failure to recognize exactly why Republicans won Senate races in Iowa, Montana, and North Carolina.
00:03:55.000 If Mitch McConnell thinks that Joni Ernst won in Iowa because of Joni Ernst, you're a fool.
00:04:02.000 Do you actually think that Tom Tillis won because he's Tom Tillis?
00:04:06.000 They won because Donald Trump had the highest turnout for a Republican ever and expanded the Republican base beyond anything that anyone could have ever possibly imagined.
00:04:17.000 And some people are actually taking a stand.
00:04:21.000 I want to go to Congressman Mo Brooks, Cut 31, talking about how he's going to fight and object.
00:04:30.000 Go to Cut 31, then I want to play Cut 32 right after.
00:04:33.000 Play Cut 31.
00:04:35.000 I'm quite confident that if we only counted lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens, Donald Trump won the Electoral College.
00:04:46.000 So I have a choice.
00:04:48.000 I can either sit back and surrender and be a part of the surrender caucus, or I can fight for our country.
00:04:53.000 And that's what I'm going to do.
00:04:55.000 We expect our leaders to fight.
00:04:57.000 That's why we knock on doors for them.
00:04:59.000 That's why we support them.
00:05:00.000 That's why what we do at Turning Point Action is in support of them.
00:05:04.000 Go to Cut 32, Mo Brooks, saying he's going to object to the Electoral College votes.
00:05:08.000 I'm going to tell you the significance of this.
00:05:09.000 Cut 32.
00:05:11.000 So on January the 6th, I'm going to object to the submissions of Electoral College votes from various states that, in my judgment, have such flawed election systems that their vote counts are unworthy of our ratification of the United States Congress.
00:05:27.000 What I need is a United States senator who will join me.
00:05:30.000 If we have a House member and a senator, then by golly, that forces a House vote and a four vote on whether to accept this systematically flawed election system or to reject it.
00:05:41.000 I want to reject it so that we can have an honest and fair and accurate election.
00:05:46.000 So as soon as Congressman Mo Brooks objects, then it goes to House debate.
00:05:52.000 However, he does need a senator to join him so they can force a House vote.
00:05:57.000 Just one U.S. Senator.
00:06:00.000 My guess is that Josh Hawley or Rand Paul or some member of the United States Senate is going to join Congressman Mo Brooks in that.
00:06:08.000 And that is the next frontier and that is the next fight.
00:06:11.000 You want to win the runoffs in Georgia.
00:06:14.000 You want to win an election where all of a sudden people are a little groggy after the New Year's.
00:06:18.000 Get them excited that you're going to fight.
00:06:21.000 Get them excited that all of a sudden that the Trump movement is not going away, that we're not going to go back to the warmongering, open borders, pro-corporate, pharmaceutical, pandering Republican Party where we congratulate the other side.
00:06:38.000 Do you congratulate somebody after they rob a bank?
00:06:41.000 Of course not.
00:06:45.000 Getting in shape doesn't have to be about losing a specific amount of weight.
00:06:49.000 All of you that are going in Christmas season, I know it's easy to put on a couple extra pounds, just a little less activity than usual.
00:06:55.000 I get it.
00:06:56.000 Also, commit yourself to lose weight.
00:06:58.000 And that's what Noom is all about.
00:06:59.000 But it's more than just losing weight, it is a lifestyle changer.
00:07:03.000 They take a physical, psychological, and social approach.
00:07:06.000 You can integrate Noom into your life because you trust yourself to make good choices.
00:07:11.000 The psychological part of it is the ability to make healthy choices more easily, understand your thought patterns better, a stronger sense of self-worth.
00:07:16.000 Noom is the habit-changing solution that helps users learn to develop a new relationship with food through personalized courses.
00:07:22.000 Based in psychology, Noom teaches you why you do the things you do and empowers you with the tools you need to break bad habits and replace them with better ones.
00:07:30.000 If you go off track, that's okay.
00:07:32.000 You're human.
00:07:32.000 It's understandable.
00:07:34.000 But Noom is able to really be able to encourage you and give you the data that you need because it's based in psychology.
00:07:41.000 Chat with a goal specialist and Noom Community to get and give help to people going through the same things.
00:07:46.000 You don't have to change it all in one day.
00:07:48.000 Small steps, make big progress.
00:07:50.000 Sign up today at noom.com, N-O-O-M dot com/slash Charlie.
00:07:54.000 That's noom.com/slash Charlie.
00:08:01.000 I was on Fox News with Martha McCallum with Geraldo Rivera.
00:08:07.000 This was after Joe Biden's speech.
00:08:09.000 So let's just kind of frame this first.
00:08:11.000 For those of you that missed Joe Biden's speech, this is basically the best montage I could give you.
00:08:14.000 Let's play cut 24.
00:08:17.000 Once again, the American America, the rule of law.
00:08:21.000 More Americans voted this year than have ever voted in the history of the United States votes counted in a pence received when they won in 2016.
00:08:30.000 Excuse me.
00:08:32.000 Or dispute the results.
00:08:35.000 Margin four years ago.
00:08:37.000 And yet I thank them.
00:08:40.000 And I'm convinced we can work together for the good of the nation on many subjects.
00:08:45.000 What's the over-under on how long he actually will serve as president if he gets sworn in?
00:08:52.000 I'd like to actually see that.
00:08:54.000 I mean, that's what we're supposed to believe that 80 million people voted for.
00:08:58.000 They were so fired up that they voted for that more than Barack Obama filling acres of support in Dane County, Chicago, Denver.
00:09:11.000 You remember the Denver convention in 2008?
00:09:14.000 It was electric.
00:09:15.000 It's one of the most amazing political Obama support, of course, but Obama had real support, not artificial astroturf like this.
00:09:24.000 So that was the speech.
00:09:25.000 And so I was on with Geraldo last evening.
00:09:28.000 I have a lot of respect for Geraldo.
00:09:29.000 I've always really enjoyed him.
00:09:31.000 I always think he's very interesting.
00:09:32.000 I think he's generally very fair.
00:09:35.000 This is what Geraldo said to me: Cut 35.
00:09:40.000 And you suppressed that conversation.
00:09:42.000 That is not healthy for our country, Geraldo.
00:09:43.000 All right, so that raises a question.
00:09:46.000 For six weeks, we have litigated this for six weeks.
00:09:50.000 Twice the Supreme Court of the United States have rejected it.
00:09:53.000 Nine to nothing, including all three Trump associate justices.
00:09:57.000 But Geraldo, the question is, Geraldo.
00:10:00.000 Basically, it's Geraldo saying that it's time to move on.
00:10:03.000 You have to stop this.
00:10:05.000 And so one of the arguments that Geraldo was making was that it's long past time to move on because of all these lawsuits.
00:10:13.000 Now, mind you, we've had such a compressed period of time, and we knew all along that the courts are very difficult.
00:10:20.000 They're difficult mechanisms to be able to have emergency relief, especially with elections.
00:10:26.000 Once a Secretary of State says something, it's very difficult to overthrow that.
00:10:30.000 However, to use Geraldo's own logic against him, what did we Republicans do back in 2017 when Democrats were saying they were worried that our election was tampered with?
00:10:45.000 What did we Republicans do when Democrats were saying that Russia significantly influenced our election?
00:10:54.000 What did we do?
00:10:56.000 What we did as Republicans is we said we're worried that half the country may never trust our elections again.
00:11:06.000 We as Republicans had the very same argument that we have today.
00:11:10.000 We just handled it way too generously, in my opinion.
00:11:15.000 What we did, because of a fake narrative that was launched by a phony dossier after the firing of James Comey, a Republican Congress, Paul Ryan, authorized Bob Mueller unconstitutionally, illegally, to be a roaming special prosecutor.
00:11:39.000 It was never, ever about Russia.
00:11:42.000 They had just enough nonsense in the narrative.
00:11:46.000 Now, why did Republicans agree to this?
00:11:49.000 Some corporate Republicans like Paul Ryan, for bad reasons, but some grassroots Republicans, and Ron DeSantis voted against it, who's terrific, but others fought back against it.
00:12:01.000 But why?
00:12:03.000 They fought back against it.
00:12:05.000 I mean, they supported it, I should say, because they were worried that if we did not get to the bottom of what possibly could be foreign interference in the election, then 60 million people might lose trust in the process.
00:12:20.000 Where are those Democrats now?
00:12:22.000 We satisfied the Democrats' demands in 2017 and all of 2018, giving Bob Mueller and his dozen angry Democrats and Andrew Weissman full and total authority to go through a metaphorical colonoscopy of legal colonoscopy of every person who was ever in the proximity of President Donald Trump,
00:12:47.000 Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn.
00:12:53.000 Lives were completely and totally ruined, shattered, never again made whole.
00:12:59.000 Did we actually find the aforementioned Russian collusion?
00:13:03.000 No.
00:13:03.000 What we found is a seventh-grade style troll farm of people that were, I think, in the country Macedonia and Russia running what I think they called the Internet Research Agency, if I remember correctly, the IRA.
00:13:23.000 It was so pathetic that it was a collection of a couple dozen memes that they ran.
00:13:30.000 And we're supposed to believe that this was the big reason why Donald Trump won in 2016.
00:13:37.000 No communications with Russia, no meetings with Russia, no collusion with Russia, none of it.
00:13:45.000 Instead, it turned out that the Democrats were the ones that were colluding with Russia.
00:13:51.000 Now, what does this have to do with what we're dealing with now, what Geraldo talked about?
00:13:54.000 The reason we tolerated it is that well-meaning Republicans were like, well, if there is something to this, then I want to know.
00:14:05.000 If there is something to this, we want to make sure that we get to the bottom of it.
00:14:12.000 And what ended up happening was the greatest gift to the Democrats that we could have ever possibly have imagined.
00:14:24.000 We're playing bad minton, and they're playing military warfare.
00:14:31.000 They're coming in with tanks and with drone reconnaissance, and we're playing tennis in our backyard.
00:14:41.000 And so the question needs to be asked, and I would have asked Geraldo, I would have made this argument, but we kind of went in a different direction.
00:14:49.000 And the argument I made, I'll make again, and I think it's the winning argument, which is that if you do not satisfy the questions of 74 million people, they're never going to trust another election again.
00:15:01.000 And all of a sudden, this talk about creating new countries and kind of separating yourself is not something I support, but it becomes inevitable.
00:15:11.000 Don't be surprised when people like Alan West and Rush Limbaugh start to talk like this.
00:15:17.000 Let's play cuts 37 of Alan West starting to talk about this and a fracture in our Constitutional Republic.
00:15:24.000 I want to be very clear for media matters.
00:15:27.000 I do not support secession, okay?
00:15:29.000 What I'm talking about is an analysis of what ends up becoming inevitable when you shut up 74 million people.
00:15:39.000 Play cut 37.
00:15:41.000 And the fact that the Supreme Court would not hear this case, which is the original jurisdiction for states who redress petition to redress their grievances against another state, that's a fracture in the foundation of our constitutional republic.
00:15:54.000 Well, first of all, I would like to see the Supreme Court take up this case because if the Supreme Court would not hear another state petition grievous against another state, then where do those states go?
00:16:07.000 I think it's very important that law-abiding states, states who want to follow the law, are coming together with their attorneys' journals, coming together with their state legislators.
00:16:18.000 If you continually suppress, stifle, and try to ignore bubbling up frustration, that frustration does not go away.
00:16:29.000 It will only manifest itself in different ways.
00:16:35.000 It might manifest itself into a different political movement, a fracturing, or it could go in a way that none of us want to see.
00:16:43.000 And he's the Texas GOP chair.
00:16:45.000 So Geraldo's argument is he said, for the good of the country, we must move on.
00:16:51.000 I say the opposite.
00:16:52.000 I say, for the good of the country, we must not move on.
00:16:57.000 Because when you start, if you talk to somebody that has come from Venezuela in the last couple of years, they laugh at their elections and they laugh at their leaders and they laugh at what their leaders do because they say none of it matters.
00:17:09.000 The military will come in and just crown the reigning Communist Party elected.
00:17:14.000 None of that is healthy for our republic.
00:17:18.000 For the goodness of our country, we must lean in on this election fight and double down.
00:17:30.000 Looking for some entertainment that will lift you up and leave you inspired?
00:17:34.000 I want to encourage you to go to salemnow.com and watch Poor to CEO: The Incredible Journey of Herman Cain.
00:17:41.000 Herman was beloved by all in his rise from humble beginnings to CEO of Godfather's Pizza.
00:17:46.000 I had the opportunity to meet him many times.
00:17:48.000 He was an amazing person.
00:17:50.000 Add to that a presidential run in 2012, a victorious battle over cancer, and a flourishing career in Atlanta radio.
00:17:57.000 Herman was an amazing man whose life embodied the values we strive to live and pass along to our kids and grandkids.
00:18:03.000 Belief in God, the power of personal responsibility, hard work, a good education, living each day with a thankful heart.
00:18:11.000 Poor to CEO is one of the most inspirational, entertaining films I've ever watched, and you can watch it right now at salemnow.com.
00:18:20.000 That's salemnow.com.
00:18:22.000 Use the promo code Kirk and save 20%.
00:18:25.000 Watch Poor to CEO, the Herman Kane story at salemnow.com.
00:18:32.000 There's an article in USA Today, Madeline Albright, who may be one of my least favorite people that served in government in the last couple decades, says that, and Michael Chertoff, who single-handedly eroded more civil liberties than any other person in government in the last 20 years, he ran George W. Bush's Department of Homeland Security.
00:18:55.000 You can thank him for the incompetence of the TSA.
00:18:59.000 Thank you, Michael Chertoff.
00:19:00.000 Trump's behavior is a threat to America's democracy.
00:19:05.000 Again, I could write this stuff for them.
00:19:08.000 It comes from a boilerplate college intern at Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
00:19:14.000 They just say, hey, can you go write the usual platitudes, how long our country has been around and all these sorts of things.
00:19:20.000 And so it says here, it says, over the years, American citizens have grown to expect certain things of their political leaders, among them, respect of the free press, firm opposition to political violence, and a willingness to accept election results.
00:19:35.000 Presidents cannot be prosecuted for violating these norms, but they endure public outrage and political consequences.
00:19:41.000 President Trump's wanton attitude toward tradition is not new.
00:19:45.000 Over the past years, he has called for imprisoning political opponents, wrong dangled pardons for those willing to commit crimes.
00:19:52.000 Oh, you mean like how Bill Clinton pardoned Rick Hendrick?
00:19:55.000 You remember that one?
00:19:56.000 Not covered at all.
00:20:00.000 Demonized journalists who dare to question these actions.
00:20:04.000 And it says here that Trump's claims are not based in fact.
00:20:10.000 The president's behavior is causing both long-term dangers to our system and presenting more immediate challenges to the crises we face today.
00:20:20.000 I understand now.
00:20:22.000 So when Democrats, like you, Madeline Albright, resisted at all costs against President Trump's election in 2016, and you blamed the Kremlin, not Hillary Clinton, for not visiting Wisconsin or Michigan or Pennsylvania, particularly Wisconsin and Michigan in 2016, but you blame the Kremlin.
00:20:46.000 How exactly was that unifying the country?
00:20:49.000 How is that bringing us all together?
00:20:53.000 So the debate that is now going to rage, and I kind of saw this a little bit between two people I really trust, Larry Schweikert and Joel Pollock, is how do Republicans now handle this?
00:21:04.000 If Joe Biden is going to become president of the United States, which is not inevitable, but it is becoming more and more likely with the Electoral College and the Supreme Court tossing out election results, it is not inevitable.
00:21:17.000 There are still measures that can be done, including the United States Senate standing up and refusing to certify the election results, of which they absolutely should do.
00:21:26.000 The U.S. Senate should do that.
00:21:27.000 However, it's very unlikely because moderate Republicans are indistinguishable at times from Democrats, especially when it comes to not wanting to be called angry names from the Washington Post and the New York Times.
00:21:42.000 And so, how should Republicans handle this moment now?
00:21:47.000 Some people are saying that it's time for Republicans to move on.
00:21:51.000 You guys ever heard the organization moveon.org?
00:21:54.000 Well, it is a George Soros-funded activist organization.
00:21:58.000 MoveOn.org literally started under the idea that we must move on post Bill Clinton's impeachment from all the, let's say, less than desirable activity that Bill Clinton engaged in, that we must move on past that.
00:22:16.000 We now have move-on Republicans.
00:22:18.000 Many of these move-on Republicans are engaging endlessly in trying to say we must turn the page.
00:22:30.000 This is a very dangerous, foolish, and short-sighted viewpoint that somehow Democrats are going to be more than willing to accept Republicans, accept a country that is whole again, as if it's this post-World War II moment.
00:22:52.000 Democrats are more focused on how on earth did 74 million people vote for this man?
00:22:59.000 How do we punish them?
00:23:00.000 Just look at the Trump accountability project.
00:23:03.000 So some people are saying that what the Democrats did when they were perpetually resisting was unhealthy for the country.
00:23:11.000 There's probably a good argument to that.
00:23:13.000 However, it was also politically a winner.
00:23:18.000 Not to saying that they necessarily legitimately won this in 2020, but look at 2018.
00:23:24.000 In 2018, we did not have as many widespread allegations of voting issues as we have had here in 2020.
00:23:32.000 And Democrats won convincing races in 2018.
00:23:36.000 Not convincing, but they won a lot of house races across the country.
00:23:39.000 So how is it that we should handle it?
00:23:41.000 What is the blueprint?
00:23:42.000 And also, what are the measures that we have left?
00:23:46.000 The Senate.
00:23:47.000 Is there anything to what's going on with these investigations in the Dominion voting systems?
00:23:52.000 Senator Mitt Romney, right on schedule, says Senator Romney congratulated President-elect Biden on his win and expressed admiration for his willingness to endure the rigors of a presidential campaign and serve in the nation's highest office.
00:24:08.000 They also discussed the challenging environment the president-elect will confront with a divided nation, the ongoing pandemic, a struggling economy, and a rising China.
00:24:17.000 The senator wished him well.
00:24:18.000 Well, one thing Mitt Romney and Joe Biden have in common is selling our country out to China.
00:24:24.000 I love this kind of Chinese revisionism that these private equity corporate types all of a sudden have.
00:24:30.000 I encourage you guys to go to bain.com/slash offices/slash Beijing.
00:24:35.000 You'll see that Bain Capital, which Mitt Romney is a co-founder of, has a wonderfully vibrant and active office in China.
00:24:42.000 Rising China, really, why don't you go tell your buddies at Bain Capital to go shut down the office in Beijing?
00:24:49.000 Inspired by the vast potential of the Chinese nation and its people, Bain was the first foreign strategy firm to plant its roost in Beijing.
00:24:56.000 Interesting, Mitt.
00:24:58.000 For more than 25 years, our team has partnered with the change-oriented clients across the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
00:25:05.000 We operate as part of Bain Greater China, along with our offices in Shanghai and Hong Kong.
00:25:13.000 Bain, Beijing is nestled in the city's central business district, just above the Da Wang Road Station of Metro Line 1, beside the sophisticated Shin Kong Place shopping mall.
00:25:24.000 After that gut-wrenching, disgusting poetry on Bain's website, we're supposed to believe that Mitt Romney and all of his buddies at Bain Capital really want to confront a rising China.
00:25:35.000 No, that's not the case whatsoever.
00:25:38.000 Mitt Romney and all the corporate types are using the China saber-rattling as a way to try and increase defense budget so they can go invade more countries in the Middle East so they can pander to the war-incorporated lobby that satisfies their corporate open-border interests.
00:25:56.000 I am ashamed that I ever supported Mitt Romney, and I know a lot of you are exactly the same.
00:26:01.000 In fact, I could make the argument that Mitt Romney not winning in 2012 helped give us Donald Trump and some reprieve from the constant bipartisan leftist tilt that our country was on.
00:26:13.000 In fact, Barack Obama got no Supreme Court justices in his second term.
00:26:17.000 He did get the Iran deal.
00:26:18.000 He did almost nothing in his second term that Donald Trump did not undo.
00:26:23.000 And Mitt Romney goes and he says, I want to congratulate him for his wonderful perseverance.
00:26:28.000 It's such a phenomenal thing.
00:26:31.000 Why is it that Mitt Romney talks nicer about Joe Biden, who sold our country out to China via Hunter Biden, sold our country out to Ukraine, Joe Biden, who's the chairman of the company?
00:26:44.000 I really wonder if Senator Romney and Mitt Romney, if they're hiding something themselves.
00:26:48.000 Mitt Romney is such a self-righteous politician.
00:26:54.000 I'll be nice with the word I use after that.
00:26:56.000 That he really believes he's a better person than everybody else.
00:26:59.000 He really believes that he possesses a higher quality moral fiber than the rest of the country.
00:27:10.000 And the Republican Party is going to have a series of questions that we must answer.
00:27:19.000 What kind of party do we want to be?
00:27:21.000 And this question is actually being asked right now in Georgia.
00:27:25.000 Mitch McConnell failed when he went to the Senate floor and offered his congratulations to Joe Biden.
00:27:32.000 You can offer recognition, but as soon as you offer congratulations, you are validating the process and you're applauding what was done.
00:27:44.000 What kind of party do we actually want to be?
00:27:46.000 What kind of movement are we going to be?
00:27:52.000 Remember, Mitt Romney actually wanted to be a member of the Trump administration.
00:27:56.000 Mitt Romney went out and asked for Donald Trump's endorsement in Utah, asked for it, and he got it.
00:28:03.000 Donald Trump was the bigger man and gave him that endorsement.
00:28:10.000 What's going to happen in Georgia?
00:28:11.000 People are wondering.
00:28:12.000 I'm going to tell you right now, people are not going to show up and they're not going to vote if they think that there is no difference.
00:28:18.000 It's indistinguishable between corporate Republicans and moderate Democrats.
00:28:26.000 Especially when there is a Senate floor speech that is given by the Senate majority leader, almost provoking a response.
00:28:41.000 Now, I do want to get to this article here, but I want to go into this at length.
00:28:47.000 It's going to be very dangerous to talk about this, so we'll see what happens.
00:28:52.000 I'm dangerous because the glawt, the Soviet censors might get rid of us at any time right now.
00:29:00.000 So a company came out called Allied Universal Security, and they issued a report about Dominion voting systems, specifically in Michigan.
00:29:12.000 Now, mind you, if you type in Allied Universal Security Dominion, it shows up nowhere on Google, nowhere on news.
00:29:20.000 It is the most complete and total suppression that I have seen of an article in recent times.
00:29:27.000 Because if you read this report done by Allied Universal Services, you'll start to realize that their report shows that there are a lot of questions around these Dominion voting systems in Michigan.
00:29:43.000 The Allied Security Operations Group, which does a great job, they're hired by people all across the country to look into technical issues and security issues.
00:29:54.000 They came up and they said the following.
00:29:57.000 We conclude that Dominion voting systems is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.
00:30:10.000 The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors.
00:30:17.000 The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication.
00:30:22.000 The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.
00:30:29.000 This leads to voter or election fraud.
00:30:32.000 Now, Allied Security Operations Group, if you look them up online, they're a very reputable security company.
00:30:42.000 You go to their website.
00:30:45.000 They have top-tier clients.
00:30:48.000 They do a really amazing job.
00:30:51.000 The Allied Security Operations Group has been around for quite some time.
00:30:56.000 The person who published this report has an MBA from Harvard University and a political science degree from Duke University, worked for NASA and worked for MIT.
00:31:07.000 But this is exactly why people are becoming so incredibly uneasy.
00:31:13.000 Because they're reading these reports and they see their leaders intentionally decide to ignore it, make the step of defiance.
00:31:25.000 There's a great poem by Langston Hughes.
00:31:30.000 What happens to a dream deferred?
00:31:33.000 Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun or fester like a sore and then run?
00:31:41.000 Does it stink like rotten meat or crust and sugar over?
00:31:46.000 Like a syrupy sweet, maybe it just sags like a heavy load.
00:31:51.000 Or does it explode?
00:31:55.000 That's a beautiful poem by Langston Hughes.
00:31:58.000 A friend, one of our producers sent it to me.
00:32:00.000 Langston Hughes, an American poet, very talented, and lived kind of in the early parts of the 1900s.
00:32:10.000 But that poem asking, what happens when you don't get something that you believe, a dream that you believe was going to happen, something that you think was stolen from you?
00:32:25.000 Does it dry up?
00:32:26.000 Does it fester?
00:32:27.000 Does it stink?
00:32:30.000 Or does it explode?
00:32:33.000 And this is part of the warning that I have been given for quite some time.
00:32:37.000 The warnings that we have been giving here on the Charlie Kirk show, and very few people actually took this seriously.
00:32:44.000 In fact, we were mocked, is that when you have half the country that no longer wants to live with the other half of the country, half the country with nothing in common, no shared history, culture, or language, background, or direction of how to proceed, what do we have in common besides a unified currency?
00:33:04.000 And then if they don't trust the leaders, they don't trust the process that we elect our leaders, what exactly are the metaphorical ties that bind us together?
00:33:17.000 What keeps us all united?
00:33:24.000 What used to keep us united was a belief in the American Trinity, liberty, in God we trust, e pluribus unim, as my good friend Dennis Prager talks about often.
00:33:33.000 What used to keep us in common is a belief that America is the greatest country ever to exist in the history of the world.
00:33:40.000 Our children were taught that.
00:33:42.000 We stood for the pledge.
00:33:43.000 We believed that America was a beautiful place, worthy of preservation, necessary to fight, critical to defend.
00:33:54.000 Now we don't have that.
00:33:56.000 Now half the country believes it's time for an internal revolution to overthrow anything that pre-existed it, that it is time to throw away our history, which they're already doing, misrepresent it intentionally.
00:34:15.000 And don't be surprised all of a sudden when people like Alan West and Rush Limbaugh start asking the question, what exactly are we doing here?
00:34:23.000 What does Texas have in common with Rhode Island?
00:34:29.000 What does Louisiana have in common with Connecticut?
00:34:33.000 Outside of a unified currency.
00:34:34.000 By the way, I'm not supporting any of this.
00:34:37.000 I'm commenting on what is happening.
00:34:39.000 I think it's unhealthy.
00:34:40.000 I think it's wrong.
00:34:41.000 And I don't like the direction that we're headed.
00:34:44.000 You're able to have an analysis of a provocative topic without endorsing it.
00:34:49.000 But you're going to see very real movements of people that want to separate into their own versions and forms of America very, very soon.
00:34:57.000 People here on the Charlie Kirk show, our team, they'll tell you, I've been warning against this for quite some time.
00:35:02.000 Many liberals don't want to live in the country with conservatives and conservatives don't want to live in the country with liberals.
00:35:08.000 They can't agree on whether or not we're even a good country, our history, what language to speak, what does the culture mean.
00:35:16.000 And this would be one of the greatest gifts we could give China is a fractured America, an America where there's 10 or 15 states that kind of compartmentalize themselves into their own new America.
00:35:30.000 It might be Texas and Kansas, Oklahoma, Wyoming, and the Dakotas, maybe Louisiana.
00:35:35.000 And they say, now we're America, we're siphoning ourselves off, which very well could be what we've talked about here on this program for quite some time, an inevitable national divorce.
00:35:47.000 And you want that to happen quickly?
00:35:49.000 You want that to happen abruptly?
00:35:52.000 Do what Geraldo Rivera asked us to do.
00:35:55.000 Sit down, shut up.
00:35:57.000 You're an idiot.
00:35:57.000 There's nothing to see here except the results.
00:36:01.000 That's not a way to build trust and build unity.
00:36:05.000 That's how you get a divorce.
00:36:10.000 Let's play a scene from one of the all-time great movies, Airplane.
00:36:14.000 Is there a doctor in the house?
00:36:16.000 I'm sorry I had to wake you.
00:36:17.000 I'm just looking for a doctor.
00:36:19.000 There's nothing to worry about.
00:36:20.000 Stewardess, I think the man sitting next to me is a doctor.
00:36:24.000 Sir, excuse me, sir.
00:36:26.000 I'm sorry I have to wake you.
00:36:27.000 You a doctor?
00:36:29.000 That's right.
00:36:30.000 We have some passengers that are very sick.
00:36:32.000 Could you come take a look at them?
00:36:33.000 Yes.
00:36:34.000 Yes, of course.
00:36:49.000 I'll be back in a minute.
00:36:56.000 You better tell the captain we've got to land as soon as we can.
00:36:58.000 This woman has to be gotten to a hospital.
00:37:00.000 A hospital?
00:37:01.000 What is it?
00:37:02.000 It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now.
00:37:05.000 Tell the captain I must speak to him.
00:37:07.000 Captain, how soon can you land?
00:37:09.000 I can't tell.
00:37:10.000 You can tell me I'm a doctor.
00:37:12.000 No, I mean, I'm just not sure.
00:37:13.000 Or can't you take a guess?
00:37:15.000 Well, not for another two hours.
00:37:18.000 You can't take a guess for another two hours?
00:37:20.000 No, no, no.
00:37:21.000 I mean, we can't land for another two hours.
00:37:23.000 So for those of you that are just saying, what did I just listen to?
00:37:27.000 It is one of the all-time great movies, Airplane.
00:37:32.000 And if you are on an airplane and you happen to be seated near Jill Biden, let it be very clear that there is not a doctor in the house.
00:37:43.000 So there was an op-ed that was written recently in Wall Street Journal, Paul Gijot.
00:37:50.000 I think that's the right name to say it, way to say it.
00:37:52.000 He's a good guy.
00:37:53.000 And he published an article that basically said the following: is there a doctor in the White House, not if you need an MD?
00:38:01.000 And basically, the criticism, which is a correct one, is that it was written by Joseph Epstein, but it was the publisher is Paul Gijot, who oversees the opinion section.
00:38:15.000 Basically, the idea was that Dr. Jill Biden is not a real doctor.
00:38:20.000 She has a doctorate in education, but she keeps on putting doctor in front of her name.
00:38:25.000 And especially in the time where everything is so overemphasized with medicine, it's very much deceiving.
00:38:36.000 And so how many of our listeners here'd be super interesting when those of you guys went to college, did you call your professors doctor or did you call them professor?
00:38:47.000 Or when they sign it, it's usually PhD.
00:38:50.000 So using the doctor as kind of a as a prefix, as a title, in a lot of different ways, It's not just misleading, but it almost insinuates that she has some formal training in medicine.
00:39:11.000 And now, this really wouldn't be that big of a story.
00:39:13.000 It's a, you know, it's an op-ed, but the Biden team responded so unbelievably aggressively.
00:39:19.000 Michelle Obama came out and defended her.
00:39:21.000 I mean, the lady doth protest too much.
00:39:25.000 I mean, the amount of backlash that was received around this very simple and thoughtful op-ed was extraordinary.
00:39:34.000 It was an overwhelming avalanche from the Biden team.
00:39:39.000 I mean, it was a counter punch that kind of goes to show that the aggressive media response is how the next four years, if Biden gets in, they're basically saying the Biden family is off limits.
00:39:51.000 Remember, Barron was not off limits.
00:39:53.000 Ivanka's son was not off limits when whether or not he built a Lego castle.
00:39:59.000 Remember, more media attention went towards Ivanka's four-year-old son than Joe Biden's adult son for selling us out to China.
00:40:08.000 There was more media attention put forward on whether or not Ivanka Trump's son built a Lego castle than whether or not Hunter Biden actually sold us out to the Ukrainians, the Chinese, and sat on foreign boards.
00:40:20.000 Melania was never off limits.
00:40:22.000 Don Jr. is certainly not off limits.
00:40:25.000 Eric was never off limits.
00:40:26.000 Tiffany was never off limits.
00:40:28.000 But that's really what the Biden team is trying to say here: our family is off limits.
00:40:32.000 Excuse me.
00:40:33.000 You sold out our country through an international criminal network that has been proven through Senate reports.
00:40:40.000 Now we know federal investigations.
00:40:42.000 Whether or not anything happens to the Biden crime family remains to be seen.
00:40:46.000 But it is very clear.
00:40:48.000 I mean, they sold access for money and they use their power for cash.
00:40:53.000 The Biden team is trying to say this is a no-fly zone.
00:41:01.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
00:41:03.000 If you want to support our program, go to charliekirk.com/slash support.
00:41:06.000 Email us your questions, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:41:09.000 And if you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, where we play offense with a sense of urgency to win America's culture war, thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of students across the country fighting for America, go to tpusa.com.
00:41:22.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
00:41:24.000 Big interviews coming up soon.
00:41:26.000 Talk to you soon.