00:00:00.000Hey everybody, on an action-packed episode, we talk about Hunter Biden, big tech, the Chinese Communist Party's influence in our country, and also the 1876 election.
00:00:18.000We are on top of the news thanks to your support at charliekirk.com slash support.
00:00:23.000Email us your questions, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:00:27.000And if you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, where we play offense with a sense of urgency to win America's culture war on college campuses across the country, go to tpusa.com.
00:01:04.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:16.000Each episode of The American Story aims to reveal a small piece of the truth about what makes America beautiful, good, and worthy of love.
00:01:24.000From our country's beginning, from Sea to Shining Sea, stories about America, about the big things and little things we share as a people, inspire us to be more devoted to our country, connect us with those who have come before us, and help us be better friends with our fellow Americans.
00:01:36.000These are stories of pioneers, presidents, athletes, neighbors, artists, veterans, inventors, natives, and immigrants.
00:01:42.000Americans whose aspirations, sufferings, achievements, and sacrifices are woven into the fabric of our country.
00:01:48.000The American Story is a weekly podcast that tells the stories of the men and women who answer with their lives.
00:01:53.000Every generation, the defining question is: how should we live?
00:01:57.000It is their answer to this question that have made America beautiful and worthy of love.
00:02:01.000It is our answers that will keep it that way.
00:02:02.000Listen to the American Story for free on iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, and Stitcher.
00:02:08.000To learn more about the American Story, visit the AmericanStorypodcast.org.
00:02:18.000The last 12 hours has been some of the most frustrating for all of us here on the Charlie Kirk show that I can remember.
00:02:30.000Back going to the primary, we knew that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden were involved in international criminal espionage, selling access to the highest levels of government to enrich themselves and enrich their family.
00:02:48.000Peter Schweitzer wrote an entire book about this.
00:02:53.000The activist media didn't care at all.
00:02:56.000Democrat primary voters seemed to not care at all, especially as there was a unifying call just to defeat Donald Trump.
00:03:05.000Then, in a stunning turn of events in late September and early October, Mr. Costello, working with Rudy Giuliani, had stumbled across a laptop,
00:03:19.000a laptop that, according to all appearances, was that of Hunter Biden's, that he signed over the rights of forgotten and abandoned property to a laptop store repair shop in Delaware.
00:03:40.000In the laptop were some of the most graphic pictures of some people would say illegal child pornography.
00:03:51.000In the laptop were intense and intricate text messages between Hunter Biden and business associates and his father.
00:04:03.000Now, you might not know about any of this because you weren't even allowed to discuss this on social media.
00:04:09.000You weren't even allowed to mention the laptop.
00:04:12.000In fact, the story that broke this, the New York Post, they were locked out of their Twitter account during the critical 15-day period that it took to cover this story.
00:04:26.000And then, after the laptop was discovered by Rudy Giuliani, we then met a new character, Tony Bobulinsky, an American patriot,
00:04:41.000who came out in long extended form on Tucker Carlson and went methodically piece by piece on how Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were selling their name and access to their family for personal and financial gain.
00:05:00.000Still, none of that was covered by the mainstream media.
00:05:04.000None of that was covered by BuzzFeed or even Axios or CNN or Huffington Post.
00:05:10.000And the reason being is no member of the activist media wanted to be blamed for reelecting President Trump.
00:05:18.000They turned a blind eye and they said, We are not going to do our job because of all the social pressure that exists in the American social circle of activist journalists.
00:05:33.000Then, after Tony Bobulinsky goes public, James Rosen reported on October 30th: Tony Bobulinsky says the team of FBI agents who interviewed him for five hours last Friday were, quote, taking extensive notes and asked multiple questions about Hunter Biden's texts on Burisma and Ukraine.
00:05:54.000Even beyond that, Tony Bobulinsky shared that Hunter Biden was the subject of a criminal investigation.
00:06:02.000The Department of Justice official confirmed an FBI 2019 criminal investigation into Hunter Biden is, quote, still active.
00:06:30.000You want to talk about election meddling and election interference?
00:06:34.000And when Democrats were asked about this, Eric Swawell, who we'll get to in a second, because it actually all connects to this, Adam Schiff, and all the Democrat leadership, they said that this was Russian disinformation, basically telling you, you're stupid, don't challenge us.
00:07:08.000And then the story just kind of went away.
00:07:11.000The election happened fraudulently, I might add.
00:07:16.000And as of now, Joe Biden has more votes in the states that matter, and we'll get into that in great length.
00:07:24.000However, a media research study, Media Research Center study, shows that 36% of Biden voters were not aware of the evidence linking Joe Biden to corrupt financial dealings with China through his son, Hunter.
00:07:45.00013% of those voters, or 4.6% of all of Biden's total vote, said had they known these facts, they would not have voted for former Vice President Joe Biden.
00:07:57.000The most flagrant, apparent campaign of election meddling and interference in American history.
00:08:08.000And so yesterday evening, suspiciously and unexpectedly, I might add, the Biden-Harris transition team released a very short and almost cryptic press release saying that Hunter Biden was under federal examination for his taxes.
00:08:27.000Joe Biden then cynically started to say that his son is dealing with a lot of issues, and I'm sure he'll get through this, is what they said.
00:08:45.000I learned yesterday for the first time that the U.S. Attorney's Office from Hunter in Delaware advised my legal counsel, they're investigating my tax affairs.
00:08:53.000I take this matter very seriously, but I'm confident that a professional and objective review of these matters will demonstrate that I handled my affairs legally and appropriately, including with the benefit of professional tax advisors.
00:09:06.000President-elect Biden says he's deeply proud of his son who fought through difficult challenges, including the vicious personal tax of recent months, only to emerge stronger.
00:09:19.000So, number one, the reason that they're issuing this statement means that this is a big deal.
00:09:24.000Now, as soon as this statement came out, I said this is not the full story.
00:09:30.000Producer Connor and producer Andrew, they'll tell you, I said, look, if a U.S. attorney is only investigating tax matters, somebody's lying.
00:09:39.000That's something that a civil audit could easily be conducted from the Internal Revenue Service.
00:09:46.000The reason a U.S. attorney would be involved is foreign agent registration issues, money laundering, embezzlement, concealment, and national security issues.
00:09:58.000You don't get a U.S. attorney involved because you're $30,000 a year short on taxes.
00:10:04.000That's something that a revenue agent can easily take care of with a CPA.
00:10:10.000And that happens hundreds of thousands of times a year when people misreport on their taxes.
00:10:17.000Now, if it really was just about tax fraud, there are three big ways that you can violate taxes.
00:11:00.000Am I the only one that is just taking a step back and saying, why is it that all of a sudden the director of national intelligence, Ratcliffe, goes on Tucker Carlson, starts talking about China?
00:11:10.000Then we have the story about Fang Fang and then the story about Hunter Biden all within this 48-hour window when we're talking about election fraud.
00:11:17.000Why all of a sudden this huge focus on China when those of us that are actually China hawks have been talking about this for 18 months?
00:11:26.000I think there's a reason for this, and everyone is missing it.
00:11:33.000Look, it's not often you get a gift for yourself, but I need to tell you about something that you got to buy.
00:11:38.000It's called a hedge against all the craziness in the market.
00:11:42.000It's a free 22-carat American gold eagle coin.
00:12:34.000So Hunter Biden now comes out preemptively and says that he's under federal investigation for taxes, despite being investigated by a U.S. attorney.
00:12:45.000If it was just taxes, it would be nothing more than a civil audit being done by the Internal Revenue Service.
00:13:16.000Do you understand how evil it is that those of us that were talking about this in October were suppressed, kicked off social media, and we are not able to make the case to independent and swing voters?
00:13:28.000And now this is being published widely by CNN, CBS.
00:14:04.000It said breaking Hunter Biden under federal investigation.
00:14:08.000No, if you did your job, you would have realized that was admitted by Tony Bobulinsky and the Department of Justice back in late October.
00:14:17.000The reason you didn't cover it is because you would not like what would happen next, which is swing voters and independent voters, specifically in Georgia and Arizona, who might not like Trump, but they certainly don't like Democrat political corruption not vote for Joe Biden.
00:14:41.000It was prior to the final presidential debate in Nashville on October 22nd that Bob Yulinsky, a former naval nuclear command officer with a Q-level security clearance, now a wealthy corporate investor, first went public with his charges about the Biden family, including his account of two face-to-face meetings with the former vice president.
00:14:58.000The FBI interviewed Bob Yelinski the very next day.
00:15:02.000Did you get the sense that the FBI had already been working on these related issues and matters prior to you making that public statement in Nashville?
00:15:12.000My impression is everyone in that room was very aware of the sensitivity of the parties involved here and potential multiple impacts to this country.
00:15:24.000So nothing you're reading right now should be a surprise to you about Hunter Biden under federal investigation.
00:15:31.000This is something that Bob Yulinsky revealed.
00:18:01.000Good Ranchers began with the standard of bringing top quality, 100% American-born, raised, and harvested meat to families across America.
00:18:09.000This vision was instilled into them from their grandparents that owned community grocery stores and believed in trust, charity, and family values.
00:18:15.000Look, we've talked about Good Ranchers before.
00:18:17.000They sent us an unbelievable box of meat.
00:18:20.000And producer Connor, he brought it home and he said it was unbelievable.
00:18:25.000Seriously, he started talking about it uninterrupted for quite some time.
00:19:40.000It would have been great if we had an election with the news about the vaccine being made public, not the Monday after the election.
00:19:51.000It would have been nice if we would have known that there was a Chinese plot to infiltrate the highest levels of our House of Representatives.
00:20:01.000And it would have been great if we would have had the media cover all of this story when it came to James Rosen, Tony Bobulinsky, money laundering, all of it.
00:20:10.000Instead, all of this was intentionally not covered to just get Joe Biden across the finish line.
00:20:35.000But I really want to zero in on something that I just find very interesting and suspicious.
00:20:42.000And I think there's a couple explanations here, potential explanations.
00:20:48.000Why is it that all of a sudden we have the director of national intelligence, Ratcliffe, going on TV with Tucker Carlson, warning against Chinese infiltration at the highest levels of our government?
00:21:04.000And then very early the next morning, an Axios report comes out saying that Fang Fang, a Chinese spy, or her job was to, let's just say, get in good favor with men in politics, including Sua Well.
00:21:29.000Fang Fang is a spy of the Chinese Communist Party.
00:21:32.000Sua Well was alerted to this and allegedly disconnected all contact.
00:21:40.000Basically, Xi Jinping pimped out Fang Fang to infiltrate America.
00:21:50.000So she went around, and there was even FBI reconnaissance that shows that she was, let's just say, engaging in very personal relationships with, I think, a Midwestern mayor.
00:22:04.000But then, 36 hours later, we get a self-declared admission from the Biden campaign where they're saying, oh, actually, Hunter Biden is under federal investigation.
00:22:18.000It's just taxes, even though it's a U.S. Attorney's Office.
00:22:21.000And again, we've been through, that is not a U.S. attorney investigation.
00:22:24.000The IRS would be handling this if it was back taxes or if it was undeclared income or taking fake or false deductions.
00:22:33.000There is a criminal division of the IRS, okay?
00:22:36.000There's a civil division and there's a criminal division.
00:22:39.000If it was just tax fraud, the IRS would be probably handling this.
00:22:42.000That's not to say a U.S. attorney can't also use tax fraud, but if you're going to use it, use up a U.S. attorney investigation with federal subpoenas.
00:22:49.000These are people that go after the cartel.
00:22:51.000These are people that go after the crime families.
00:22:55.000This is not something where they just worry about someone who expensed a private jet flight, that it really was for personal use, not business use.
00:23:03.000That's typically the focus of the Internal Revenue Service.
00:23:09.000And now the AP, the Associated Press, has come out and said that the Chinese Communist Party and Hunter Biden, that's what's really being examined.
00:23:19.000And then we have the Chinese professor that came out.
00:23:39.000Why is it that we are seeing this sudden deluge of declassifications and information and reports about the Chinese Communist Party purchasing and owning people in our country?
00:24:30.000Let's start with the non-political explanation.
00:24:36.000The non-political explanation is that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is getting tired of the criticism that is being launched at them from even our show and from other programs where they're getting a little tired, they're getting a little worn down of being called doing nothing in the face of injustice.
00:24:56.000Maybe there is a stand down order when it comes to election fraud, but the good men and women of the FBI, which there are plenty, and my criticism is against the suits, not the boots of the FBI.
00:25:08.000All of a sudden, they're growing a little uneasy, and to prevent a revolt within the Federal Bureau of Investigation, all of a sudden, they're getting green lights to start declassifying, going after, issuing subpoenas and arrests for the Chinese influence in our country.
00:25:24.000Maybe Bill Barr is trying to save his reputation.
00:25:27.000And if he's doing it via clamping down on the Chinese Communist Party's sinister, evil, malicious influence, good for him.
00:25:37.000We have been on top of this issue more so than any other program, calling for a complete and total suspension of trade with China, calling them what they are, the great evil in America's sight and on the geopolitical chess game that is being played.
00:26:00.000So maybe it's the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the CIA trying to save their reputation.
00:26:05.000Maybe they're trying to play a little catch up because they see what I see, which is a country that no longer trusts them, which is a country that no longer believes we even have a justice system.
00:26:18.000And if they're trying to compensate for lost trust, then show us.
00:26:34.000Another explanation, which we were the first, I think, show and team on our Twitter account to float this out.
00:26:40.000And all of a sudden, this is getting a lot of traction and popularity.
00:26:45.000If I was the Soros-Harris coalition that wants a radical and complete transformation of government, I would be very displeased with some of Joe Biden's cabinet picks lately.
00:26:57.000If you're under the belief that Joe Biden is going to become president of the United States, if you really wanted to break the back of the United States economic system, if you really wanted a great reset, people like Janet Yellen are not exactly helpful.
00:27:20.000Now, by the way, I think Janet Yellen is terrible.
00:27:22.000She's a corporatist, billionaire pandering internationalist.
00:27:28.000But Janet Yellen will still, in some way or fashion, pander to the interests of Goldman Sachs.
00:27:34.000She won't break the back of the entire economic system intentionally.
00:27:40.000You see, if it was Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders, they would completely do that from the Treasury Department.
00:27:45.000So as Joe Biden has been placing corporatists into government, as Joe Biden has been basically staffing his transition team with Fortune 50 CEOs and board members, the radicals, the Kamala Harris types, they're getting a little uneasy.
00:28:06.000And it very well could be that Kamala and the AOCs, Rashida Talibs, and Elon Omars, that kind of coalition of power-hungry Democrats competing in a political game of thrones right now, they're starting to make their position clear.
00:28:51.000When you get that phone call and we tell you what to do, you know why.
00:28:58.000The same way they tried to extort and trap President Trump into not moving the embassy to Jerusalem and not canceling the Iran deal and not withdrawing TPP and not renegotiating NAFTA, the same way they tried to do that via Mueller, they're going to do it with Joe Biden.
00:29:13.000The only difference, for Donald Trump, there were no crimes to try and prevent his action.
00:29:20.000Donald Trump said, this is annoying, this is awful, it's illegal, but sure, go look into Don Jr. and Eric and Ivanka and they came up empty with the Mueller report.
00:29:33.000With Joe Biden, they have the goods on him.
00:29:36.000Because Joe Biden never built buildings, he never built hotels, he never managed golf courses, he never had the number one TV show, he never had the number one book, The Art of the Deal.
00:29:44.000Joe Biden sold access to your government for his own family to get enriched.
00:29:49.000Opens up a massive criminal liability for you, which means you could be controlled.
00:29:57.000Can you imagine if Donald Trump Jr. had been under federal investigation for tax fraud for two years and no one had told the voters while the media was looking the other way?
00:30:09.000If Donald Trump Jr. was gallivaning around the planet to the CCP, selling out access to our government, he'd be in Rikers by now.
00:30:20.000So that's the second explanation, is that this is a Kamala Harris warning shot saying, I'm in charge, you're not, and maybe I'll ask you to resign at the correct time.
00:30:29.000But don't worry, Joe, we'll protect your legacy as the person that always spared us from Donald Trump, and we'll make sure your son doesn't get into too much trouble.
00:30:38.000We'll give him probation because remember, Kamala Harris ran the California's Attorney General Office.
00:30:46.000She knows how to run an AG office for the corrupt, for the elite, and for the radical.
00:30:55.000Joe Biden is so compromised, so corrupt, so weak, quite honestly, that this announcement from the U.S. Attorney's Office is either our Department of Justice trying to actually do their job and trying to show the public they're doing their job.
00:31:12.000And if so, I applaud them for that because where has this been?
00:31:17.000Now, I'm extremely frustrated they did not make this announcement back in September or June, but they didn't want to meddle into the election, but not by not meddling, by not announcing, they meddled into the election.
00:31:28.000By the media not covering this, and by big data and big tech not covering this, they meddled into the election.
00:31:34.000But there's a third explanation here, actually, that I don't think anyone is talking about.
00:31:42.000There's a third potential explanation of why this is happening now, and it has to do with the unsettled election.
00:31:52.000What if this is smokescreen by the FBI and DOJ to get us to take our eye off the unsettled election?
00:32:03.000The election that still has so many questions.
00:33:58.000So if you go to charliekirk.com and you click on the Angel Tree banner, we're honored to partner with them, give back a little bit this Christmas season.
00:34:46.000You're okay with our interests being sold out to profit Joe Biden and his family when we're suffering during a pandemic from communist China.
00:34:55.000He's doing shady business deals with Jesus China.
00:36:03.000If they were selling vitamins, misleading people as much as they were selling news, they'd go to jail for deceiving practices.
00:36:13.000If I ran an advertisement that said, I have vitamins that can make you live forever, it is as deceiving as Christine Amanpour doing that segment.
00:36:24.000And if I ran those ads on TV, I would be locked down by the Federal Trade Commission for deceiving practices.
00:36:35.000It's that there was an overwhelming amount of evidence.
00:36:38.000But what it was is Christine Amanpour, very proper, she didn't want to comment on it because she was afraid of the tweets that were going to be sent to her.
00:37:05.000It was all of the people that were once journalists that are now member of a social society of people with television time and large staffs that do nothing more than peddle the propaganda narrative to advance a far left-wing globalist agenda.
00:37:30.000So outside of the signature verification, mail-in ballots, Dominion voting systems, hammer and scorecard, the granny farming, the nursing homes, the Nevada Native Project, outside of the dead people voting, the felons voting, all of that, the 8,000 fraudulent voter registration applications that were found to be in Los Angeles, just that one example.
00:37:52.000Outside of all of that, there was direct election interference that shows that this election was rigged from the tech companies.
00:38:04.000The tech companies did not allow discussion or dissemination around anything to do with Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, the Biden crime syndicate, or Tony Bobulinsky.
00:38:18.00036% of Joe Biden voters had no idea that Joe Biden was materially or financially connected to China.
00:39:06.000There's one last line of defense that we have.
00:39:13.000And before I get into that, I want to talk more about the Chinese Communist Party threat.
00:39:19.000Do we have Joe Kennedy talking about this?
00:39:21.000I haven't even heard this clip, but I find it interesting because he's so entertaining.
00:39:26.000So let's listen to Senator Kennedy from Louisiana play tape.
00:39:32.000I think this issue is, or this new disclosure rather, is also going to raise the issue again of how and why many major news organizations and social media platforms tried to tap down the New York Post story about the laptop.
00:39:55.000So that's Senator Kennedy talking about the interference in our election.
00:40:00.000It's not even a question of whether or not this election was interfered with.
00:40:04.000It's which point of interference do you actually want to focus on?
00:40:08.000This election was the most interfered election in American history from tech companies, from trillion-dollar companies, from foreign countries, the Chinese Communist Party.
00:40:19.000Let's play cut 70 of Senator Josh Hawley talking about Joe Biden and his son's foreign business dealings.
00:40:31.000But I say again, the idea that Joe Biden has nothing to do with this and we should just take his word that he never talked to Hunter about his business dealings.
00:40:57.000And we're going to make sure that these questions get answered and that the investigation goes forward.
00:41:01.000The greatest of all time from Iowa, Chuck Grassley, gave a very impassioned speech this morning, basically just skewering the media for ignoring them.
00:41:11.000Let's play Cut 69, Josh Hawley on America's Newsroom.
00:41:39.000Well, I tell you what is absolutely certain is that if Joe Biden is sworn in as president at the end of January, the United States attorneys who are spearheading these investigations must remain in office.
00:41:49.000I mean, there is no doubt there cannot be a transition of anybody who is working on this case.
00:41:57.000It involves the vice president, at least indirectly.
00:41:59.000And if he is going to become the president, if that happens at the end of January, this investigation must go forward and everyone involved with it must remain in place.
00:42:09.000And the details of all of it must be made public.
00:42:13.000So if you're a U.S. Senator and you're given a chance to vote in the U.S. Senate whether or not you want a Chinese agent who benefited from an interfered with, flawed, polluted, and corrupt election, would you vote for that?
00:43:16.000However, if there is just one objection in the House of Representatives and one objection in the United States Senate, then the joint session recesses and two houses separate and debate the question in their respective chambers for a maximum of two hours.
00:43:38.000Under federal law, each session cannot last more than two hours.
00:43:43.000And quote, no member of either house may speak for more than two for five minutes.
00:43:48.000The two houses then vote separately to accept or reject the objection.
00:43:53.000If both the Senate and the House agree, then the state's votes are tossed and the threshold to electal victory would shrink.
00:44:00.000The House is still controlled by Democrats, albeit a very slim margin, right?
00:44:04.000It's only going to be a seven-vote margin for Nancy Pelosi.
00:44:09.000So even if the Republican-controlled Senate were to reject a state, there's no chance that the House would, but it wouldn't certify it, which it takes both chambers to do that.
00:44:24.000No U.S. Senator that is a Republican should vote for certification, especially Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania.
00:44:38.000And for no other reason, they would be certifying the election of a Chinese Communist Party, spy, agent, surrogate, affiliate, whatever word you want to use.
00:44:50.000The last part of this entire saga, state legislatures, electors, governors certify, secretary of states, frauds, board of elections, the last piece of all of it is our U.S. senators that is in Republican control, have to give a thumbs up or a thumbs down like Commodus would in Gladiator of whether or not they want a Chinese Communist Party agent to become president of the United States.
00:45:24.000Now, some people say, well, what about Mitt Romney and Murkowski and Collins who mightn't have enough votes?
00:45:32.000I want to know an entire roll call of the entire United States Senate of where they will stand on putting a corrupt, flawed, and polluted election behind their name.
00:45:48.000This has happened before in American history.
00:46:03.000For over a year, Senator Johnson and I investigated the Biden financial family dealings.
00:46:12.000We found that they engaged in potential criminal financial deals across the globe, including China, which created counterintelligence concerns.
00:46:24.000We showed our work and we made our findings very public.
00:46:30.000But the liberal media and members of the other political party chose to dismiss our work.
00:46:38.000They even falsely claimed that our work was Russian disinformation.
00:46:46.000Russian disinformation is how they criticized it.
00:46:51.000It's how they cross-examined the important work of the United States Senate, looking into Hunter Biden.
00:46:59.000And so, what if the United States Senate decides to take a stand against all of this?
00:47:04.000The big tech manipulation, the data manipulation, the corporate influence, the Center for Technology and Civic Life, the signature verification issue, the witness requirement issue, the Dominion voting systems, the ballots that are missing, the changing the polling places.
00:47:18.000What if the U.S. Senate decided to not certify the election?
00:47:43.000Samuel Tilden won the popular vote with 4.2 million votes.
00:47:48.000Rutherford B. Hayes lost the popular vote.
00:47:51.000However, the popular vote is completely irrelevant.
00:47:55.000Rutherford B. Hayes ended up winning the electoral vote by one vote, 185 to 184.
00:48:01.000However, there were allegations of widespread fraud.
00:48:08.000There were allegations of ballots gone missing, of irregularities.
00:48:16.000One elector was replaced after being declared illegal for being, quote, elected or an appointed official.
00:48:23.000The question of who should have been awarded the electoral votes is the source of the controversy, specifically in Oregon, which Rutherford B. Hayes won.
00:48:33.000This is before statehood for Oklahoma, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington, Montana, and the Dakotas.
00:49:11.000They certified Rutherford B. Hayes as the winner.
00:49:17.000And it goes to Congress for the final step of certification.
00:49:23.000The House of Representatives was controlled by Democrats, which, of course, favored Samuel J. Tilden, but the Senate was still very strongly Republican, which favored Hayes.
00:49:38.000So that what ensued was what is called the Compromise of 1877.
00:49:43.000I'm not defending what happened after.
00:49:48.000It was a bargain that ended Reconstruction and re-implemented Jim Crow, poll taxes, all the stuff that is morally reprehensible.
00:50:04.000And it ended up being this compromise allowed the South to stay in control of their own governing strategy to kind of reassert some of their more racially despicable policies in exchange for a Republican becoming president, Rutherford B. Hayes.
00:50:30.000This is because the two houses could not decide, or the two chambers, I should say that's the correct term, could not decide on who should become president.
00:50:44.000If the United States Senate and these senators are serious about saving the Republic, they should do the same on January 6th.
00:50:52.000On January 6th, this is going to come in front of Congress.
00:50:58.000All it takes is for one House member, which is already going to happen, Mo Brooks, and for one senator, who we do not have a senator yet that has decided to do this, to challenge the legality of the results.
00:51:08.000I would bet Rand Paul is going to do this because Rand Paul, he's awesome, which will then force a roll call vote.
00:51:19.000And we'll see where they land of whether they're willing, the United States senators and the Republican Party are willing to put their name behind Joe Biden.
00:51:28.000I think there's 15 to 17 states that have now joined on to this lawsuit of Texas v. Georgia v. Pennsylvania, v. Michigan v. Wisconsin.
00:51:40.000Now, due to original jurisdiction, what Texas has done, intentionally or unintentionally, probably intentionally, is when one state sues another, the only court that can remedy that disagreement or that suit is the United States Supreme Court.
00:52:00.000And so it's really important to note, though, and this is where John Cornyn and Jeb Bush really deserve to be repudiated for the way they've been handling this, which is that some people are saying, I don't understand the legal standing for this case.
00:52:17.000Well, obviously, they haven't read the lawsuit.
00:52:20.000The lawsuit coming from Texas to the other states is actually not about fraud.
00:52:41.000And quite honestly, a procedural complaint at this moment might actually be more successful than proving fraud.
00:52:48.000For example, Texas is saying that they were disenfranchised because Georgia changed the way they did elections via signature verification and vote by mail in defiance to the state legislatures.
00:53:06.000That Stacey Abrams, because she came in with $40 million and sued Rauffensberger and Kemp, and they settled out of court, and it was not ratified by the state legislatures under emergency proceedings of the Chinese coronavirus, that Texas is standing to sue.
00:53:31.000And it's a pretty good argument, to be honest.
00:53:34.000The argument is: why should Texas and their electors be invalidated by another state that did not follow the process?
00:53:49.000This is getting misrepresented as a fraud complaint.
00:54:32.000Now, the reason why Texas probably did this is because there are over 8,000 cases that try to get in front of the United States Supreme Court.
00:54:48.000Only about 80 of them are heard, and it's a long process.
00:54:54.000In the rare case, though, that a state is suing another state, which does not happen very often, just because they don't want to get into conflict and the attorney generals, they usually know each other and they're part of the same associations, the Republican Association of Attorney Generals or Democrat Association of Attorney Generals.
00:55:12.000It's probably the only time it's happened in recent memory is over property rights issues, probably.
00:55:18.000Or interstate commerce or highways or reservoirs or national parks.
00:55:24.000That's probably the most recent time that one state suing another goes to the Supreme Court.
00:55:29.000And then they're probably happy to hear the case.
00:55:32.000But over an election issue, this is pretty ingenious, I have to say.
00:55:38.000If you want to get action on the U.S. Supreme Court, this is one way to do it.
00:55:43.000And there's Amy Kony Barrett, I'm wearing an Amy Kony Barrett shirt right now.
00:55:47.000Clarence Thomas, Ilito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.
00:55:51.000Thank you, President Trump, for three of those five.
00:55:53.000Then you have the Democrats, John Roberts, Sutta Mayor, Breyer, and Kagan.
00:55:59.000And so the Democrats will all rule probably against whatever is common sense.
00:56:05.000John Roberts has made a spectacle of ruling in a corrupt, self-interested, anti-American fashion, Bush appointee, I might add.
00:56:14.000The Trump appointees have been amazing.
00:56:16.000Amy Coney Barrett, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh have been terrific.
00:56:22.000And so the question is, constitutionally speaking, can a state change the way they do elections without using the process of the state legislature?
00:57:21.000What they could also do, though, is they could say that they have a court order from the U.S. Supreme Court to have a new election in January for Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
00:57:36.000I'd love to see Joe Biden campaign again in the month of January with all these new revelations that have come out about the federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden.
00:57:45.000You want to see the country go into bedlam?
00:57:51.000The U.S. Supreme Court could say, we're going to kick this down to the states, and we are mandating you guys have a bipartisan board of elections that comes to a determination by a certain date.
00:58:35.000The reason that we found that decision to be so surprising, to quite honestly be so awful, if I could use that word, is that it overturned state law, is that it almost made new law.
00:58:51.000The U.S. Supreme Court was kind of creeping in this direction for years.
00:58:56.000Roe versus Wade was very similar to this.
00:58:59.000But the Berger Court, they overturned state mandates that restricted abortion.
00:59:09.000They nationalized the abortion debate.
00:59:13.000So what's the consequence of all this?
00:59:15.000Well, the Supreme Court, since they're supreme, and there really is no check or balance against the Supreme Court except potentially impeaching and removing Supreme Court justices.
00:59:26.000The U.S. Constitution actually says there is no set number of Supreme Court justices, and there is no appellate form.
00:59:35.000It is the only court in the country that is final.
00:59:39.000That's why they take their rulings so seriously.
00:59:42.000That is why they are so selective to hear only 80 out of 8,000 cases a year, because they know once they rule on something, it sets something called judicial precedent as well, which other justices might use as a reason to not overthrow a decision.
00:59:59.000Now, judicial precedent is not everything.
01:00:02.000The poor decision, if my memory serves me correctly, again, I'm diving deep into my Supreme Court history here of all the independent research we do.
01:00:09.000I think it was the Dred Scott decision that was terrible, if I'm not mistaken.
01:00:13.000And the civil rights interpretations overthrew that.
01:00:17.000Basically, precedent has been overthrown before.
01:00:22.000It just takes a lot of public support as well.
01:00:26.000So the point is that the U.S. Supreme Court, with this Texas decision, should rule that the elections in Georgia and Pennsylvania and Michigan and Wisconsin were conducted unconstitutionally.
01:01:05.000Yeah, Dred Scott was the bad decision under Article 3 or 4.
01:01:09.000It said that slaves were not citizens of the U.S., right?
01:01:11.000So then a later decision overturned that.
01:01:22.000And so it really comes down to whether or not the U.S. Supreme Court is going to view themselves in their proper role as making sense of a pending collision crash course.
01:01:43.000We are barreling towards something that none of us want to live through.
01:01:49.000With a president that no one trusts that represents a Chinese Communist Party crime syndicate.
01:01:54.000Now, what the U.S. Supreme Court could do, though, and this is where the U.S. Senate comes in with their final certification, what the U.S. Supreme Court could do through this Texas lawsuit is they could give the U.S. Senators the intellectual and the political permission, I could say, to then all of a sudden not certify.
01:02:16.000What the U.S. Supreme Court could say is this, is this is actually, this was done unconstitutionally, but we are not going to overthrow it in our opinion.
01:02:25.000We're going to leave it to your constitutional devices.
01:02:27.000If that happens, then all of a sudden the Republicans in the U.S. Senate have a really good argument not to certify.
01:02:34.000And what the compromise of 1877 would be, I don't know.
01:02:39.000I don't know what that compromise or what that remedy would be.
01:02:44.000What the U.S. Supreme Court could do is give a little bit of cover fire to House members and to senators and state legislatures.
01:02:55.000Now, unfortunately, a lot of the state legislatures are running to the hills.
01:03:01.000They are not doing what they said they were going to be doing.
01:03:05.000They're hiding behind perfunctory and procedural excuses, Arizona being one of them.
01:03:12.000The Arizona Speaker of the House is a coward who says he's not going to hold hearings on this or a vote or a special session, whatever.
01:03:44.000And that's where you come in and what you can do.
01:03:47.000A storm is coming for those people that have been selling out our country to China.
01:03:55.000I think that the intelligence community is split.
01:04:00.000I reel on the FBI a lot, and I probably should be more specific.
01:04:04.000As I've mentioned before, my criticism is against the suits, not the boots.
01:04:08.000And I think the boots are getting uneasy.
01:04:12.000I think the federal Bureau of Investigation now realizes the sinister Chinese threat, and they want to all of a sudden start putting points on the board.
01:04:22.000A lot of members of the FBI are patriots.
01:04:40.000Gordon Chang confirming that the professor who says that he has surrogates within the U.S. government of Chinese agents, he confirms it's true.
01:04:52.000So he's out there less than a month after our presidential election saying essentially, we admit it, we are in control.
01:05:00.000Our friends in the business community in the United States, Wall Street specifically, are on our side over and against the U.S. government itself, the current presidential administration, and we pull the strings.
01:05:36.000The reason this is starting to leak out and the FBI is sending warning shots.
01:05:40.000Remember, it was Bill Barr who warned over the summer that even CEOs who are doing business with China might be subject to foreign registration laws and requirements.
01:05:58.000And I can tell you without giving away too much intelligence, this is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the leverage that China is putting on our politicians.
01:06:36.000They've all received defensive briefings, which means that they...
01:06:40.000Now, if only Donald Trump received the defensive briefing from our own government before they spied on him.
01:06:47.000Our own government was acting like the CCP, and Trump never got a defensive briefing like, oh, hey, by the way, James Coney and Peter Strzzok are spying on you.
01:06:55.000I'm glad that people that are in bed, literally, with the Chinese Communist Party get defensive briefings.
01:07:05.000Our government has been purchased by the CCP.
01:07:09.000And we did this under the Chamber of Commerce lie of free trade, of open borders, pro-pharmaceutical, and pro-plastic.
01:07:30.000There's going to be some very shocking revelations when it comes to the Chinese Communist Party's infiltration of America coming out very soon.
01:07:38.000Maybe a report, maybe declassifications.
01:07:42.000But something tells me that the intelligence agencies have been confined to a box and they're not going to take it anymore.
01:07:51.000They've been told don't interfere with the election.
01:07:53.000And the patriots that are still within the FBI, that are still within the DOJ, and there's plenty of them, and many have been shackled by the deep state influences.
01:08:02.000They're ripping off the handcuffs and they say, fine, we can't look into voter fraud.
01:08:06.000Then we're going to punish somebody here.
01:08:27.000Diane Feinstein, Eric Swawell, Kamala Harris, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, all of them who sold out our country to the Chinese Communist Party.