The Charlie Kirk Show - Hunter Biden and the Media's Criminal Coverup

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, on an action-packed episode, we talk about Hunter Biden, big tech, the Chinese Communist Party's influence in our country, and also the 1876 election.

00:00:09.000 We tie it all together.

00:00:11.000 Please consider supporting our hard work at charliekirk.com/slash support.

00:00:16.000 We do two podcasts today.

00:00:18.000 We are on top of the news thanks to your support at charliekirk.com slash support.

00:00:23.000 Email us your questions, freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:00:27.000 And if you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, where we play offense with a sense of urgency to win America's culture war on college campuses across the country, go to tpusa.com.

00:00:37.000 Critical episode, lots of insight.

00:00:41.000 Buckle up.

00:00:42.000 Here we go.

00:00:43.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

00:00:45.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.

00:00:47.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

00:00:50.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

00:00:54.000 I want to thank Charlie.

00:00:55.000 He's an incredible guy.

00:00:56.000 His spirit, his love of this country.

00:00:58.000 He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.

00:01:03.000 Turning point USA.

00:01:04.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

00:01:13.000 That's why we are here.

00:01:16.000 Each episode of The American Story aims to reveal a small piece of the truth about what makes America beautiful, good, and worthy of love.

00:01:24.000 From our country's beginning, from Sea to Shining Sea, stories about America, about the big things and little things we share as a people, inspire us to be more devoted to our country, connect us with those who have come before us, and help us be better friends with our fellow Americans.

00:01:36.000 These are stories of pioneers, presidents, athletes, neighbors, artists, veterans, inventors, natives, and immigrants.

00:01:42.000 Americans whose aspirations, sufferings, achievements, and sacrifices are woven into the fabric of our country.

00:01:48.000 The American Story is a weekly podcast that tells the stories of the men and women who answer with their lives.

00:01:53.000 Every generation, the defining question is: how should we live?

00:01:57.000 It is their answer to this question that have made America beautiful and worthy of love.

00:02:01.000 It is our answers that will keep it that way.

00:02:02.000 Listen to the American Story for free on iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, and Stitcher.

00:02:08.000 To learn more about the American Story, visit the AmericanStorypodcast.org.

00:02:13.000 The AmericanStorypodcast.org.

00:02:18.000 The last 12 hours has been some of the most frustrating for all of us here on the Charlie Kirk show that I can remember.

00:02:30.000 Back going to the primary, we knew that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden were involved in international criminal espionage, selling access to the highest levels of government to enrich themselves and enrich their family.

00:02:48.000 Peter Schweitzer wrote an entire book about this.

00:02:51.000 This was not even up for debate.

00:02:53.000 The activist media didn't care at all.

00:02:56.000 Democrat primary voters seemed to not care at all, especially as there was a unifying call just to defeat Donald Trump.

00:03:05.000 Then, in a stunning turn of events in late September and early October, Mr. Costello, working with Rudy Giuliani, had stumbled across a laptop,

00:03:19.000 a laptop that, according to all appearances, was that of Hunter Biden's, that he signed over the rights of forgotten and abandoned property to a laptop store repair shop in Delaware.

00:03:40.000 In the laptop were some of the most graphic pictures of some people would say illegal child pornography.

00:03:51.000 In the laptop were intense and intricate text messages between Hunter Biden and business associates and his father.

00:04:03.000 Now, you might not know about any of this because you weren't even allowed to discuss this on social media.

00:04:09.000 You weren't even allowed to mention the laptop.

00:04:12.000 In fact, the story that broke this, the New York Post, they were locked out of their Twitter account during the critical 15-day period that it took to cover this story.

00:04:26.000 And then, after the laptop was discovered by Rudy Giuliani, we then met a new character, Tony Bobulinsky, an American patriot,

00:04:41.000 who came out in long extended form on Tucker Carlson and went methodically piece by piece on how Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were selling their name and access to their family for personal and financial gain.

00:05:00.000 Still, none of that was covered by the mainstream media.

00:05:04.000 None of that was covered by BuzzFeed or even Axios or CNN or Huffington Post.

00:05:10.000 And the reason being is no member of the activist media wanted to be blamed for reelecting President Trump.

00:05:18.000 They turned a blind eye and they said, We are not going to do our job because of all the social pressure that exists in the American social circle of activist journalists.

00:05:33.000 Then, after Tony Bobulinsky goes public, James Rosen reported on October 30th: Tony Bobulinsky says the team of FBI agents who interviewed him for five hours last Friday were, quote, taking extensive notes and asked multiple questions about Hunter Biden's texts on Burisma and Ukraine.

00:05:54.000 Even beyond that, Tony Bobulinsky shared that Hunter Biden was the subject of a criminal investigation.

00:06:02.000 The Department of Justice official confirmed an FBI 2019 criminal investigation into Hunter Biden is, quote, still active.

00:06:13.000 Now, none of this was covered.

00:06:15.000 None of this was discussed whatsoever.

00:06:19.000 You weren't even allowed to discuss this on social media.

00:06:25.000 You would lose your account.

00:06:26.000 They would deactivate you.

00:06:28.000 They would suppress your posts.

00:06:30.000 You want to talk about election meddling and election interference? 1.00

00:06:34.000 And when Democrats were asked about this, Eric Swawell, who we'll get to in a second, because it actually all connects to this, Adam Schiff, and all the Democrat leadership, they said that this was Russian disinformation, basically telling you, you're stupid, don't challenge us. 0.99

00:06:55.000 You know better than this. 0.99

00:07:00.000 James Rosen reported it, who is very well respected from Sinclair.

00:07:04.000 Tony Bobulinsky said it.

00:07:08.000 And then the story just kind of went away.

00:07:11.000 The election happened fraudulently, I might add.

00:07:16.000 And as of now, Joe Biden has more votes in the states that matter, and we'll get into that in great length.

00:07:24.000 However, a media research study, Media Research Center study, shows that 36% of Biden voters were not aware of the evidence linking Joe Biden to corrupt financial dealings with China through his son, Hunter.

00:07:42.000 36%.

00:07:45.000 13% of those voters, or 4.6% of all of Biden's total vote, said had they known these facts, they would not have voted for former Vice President Joe Biden.

00:07:57.000 The most flagrant, apparent campaign of election meddling and interference in American history.

00:08:08.000 And so yesterday evening, suspiciously and unexpectedly, I might add, the Biden-Harris transition team released a very short and almost cryptic press release saying that Hunter Biden was under federal examination for his taxes.

00:08:27.000 Joe Biden then cynically started to say that his son is dealing with a lot of issues, and I'm sure he'll get through this, is what they said.

00:08:43.000 The exact wording is this.

00:08:45.000 I learned yesterday for the first time that the U.S. Attorney's Office from Hunter in Delaware advised my legal counsel, they're investigating my tax affairs.

00:08:53.000 I take this matter very seriously, but I'm confident that a professional and objective review of these matters will demonstrate that I handled my affairs legally and appropriately, including with the benefit of professional tax advisors.

00:09:06.000 President-elect Biden says he's deeply proud of his son who fought through difficult challenges, including the vicious personal tax of recent months, only to emerge stronger.

00:09:16.000 Right, it's all Trump's fault.

00:09:19.000 So, number one, the reason that they're issuing this statement means that this is a big deal.

00:09:24.000 Now, as soon as this statement came out, I said this is not the full story.

00:09:30.000 Producer Connor and producer Andrew, they'll tell you, I said, look, if a U.S. attorney is only investigating tax matters, somebody's lying.

00:09:39.000 That's something that a civil audit could easily be conducted from the Internal Revenue Service.

00:09:46.000 The reason a U.S. attorney would be involved is foreign agent registration issues, money laundering, embezzlement, concealment, and national security issues.

00:09:58.000 You don't get a U.S. attorney involved because you're $30,000 a year short on taxes.

00:10:04.000 That's something that a revenue agent can easily take care of with a CPA.

00:10:10.000 And that happens hundreds of thousands of times a year when people misreport on their taxes.

00:10:17.000 Now, if it really was just about tax fraud, there are three big ways that you can violate taxes.

00:10:23.000 You can underreport your income.

00:10:25.000 You can claim fake and false deductions.

00:10:28.000 And you can use fake numbers.

00:10:30.000 Now, remember, the tax issues is exactly how they got Al Capone because they couldn't get him on anything else.

00:10:35.000 So use the tax laws to eventually put him in prison.

00:10:40.000 But it's much more likely that this is deeper than just a tax issue.

00:10:48.000 The Hunter Biden tax probe is examining the Chinese business dealings, according to AP News.

00:10:55.000 That's what this is really about.

00:11:00.000 Am I the only one that is just taking a step back and saying, why is it that all of a sudden the director of national intelligence, Ratcliffe, goes on Tucker Carlson, starts talking about China?

00:11:10.000 Then we have the story about Fang Fang and then the story about Hunter Biden all within this 48-hour window when we're talking about election fraud.

00:11:17.000 Why all of a sudden this huge focus on China when those of us that are actually China hawks have been talking about this for 18 months?

00:11:26.000 I think there's a reason for this, and everyone is missing it.

00:11:33.000 Look, it's not often you get a gift for yourself, but I need to tell you about something that you got to buy.

00:11:38.000 It's called a hedge against all the craziness in the market.

00:11:42.000 It's a free 22-carat American gold eagle coin.

00:11:46.000 Not bad, right?

00:11:47.000 A free 22-carat American gold eagle coin in a special presentation box.

00:11:52.000 To qualify, you have to take out a precious metals IRA or 401k rollover with Noble Gold.

00:11:57.000 Makes a lot of sense right now to keep your savings and investment safe.

00:12:01.000 Who knows what the next administration will do or what's going to happen?

00:12:04.000 So look, we don't know what's coming next.

00:12:06.000 And you have to have a hedge.

00:12:08.000 They're creating money.

00:12:10.000 Austrian School of Economics is completely under attack.

00:12:13.000 So if you guys want to hedge against all the market volatility and we know what's coming, inflation is coming.

00:12:18.000 Call 877-646-5347 and get the special coin offer, but don't hang around.

00:12:23.000 That's 877-646-5347.

00:12:26.000 Tell them that Charlie Kirk sent you.

00:12:27.000 Again, that's Noble Gold, 877-646-5347.

00:12:34.000 So Hunter Biden now comes out preemptively and says that he's under federal investigation for taxes, despite being investigated by a U.S. attorney.

00:12:45.000 If it was just taxes, it would be nothing more than a civil audit being done by the Internal Revenue Service.

00:12:51.000 This is more than taxes.

00:12:53.000 This is potential money laundering, CCP connections, foreign espionage, and the entire Biden crime family.

00:13:00.000 Not to mention his uncle, Joe Biden's brother, James, is under federal investigation for a corrupt hospital deal gone wrong.

00:13:13.000 There's so many different things I need to unpack about this.

00:13:15.000 Let's just start here.

00:13:16.000 Do you understand how evil it is that those of us that were talking about this in October were suppressed, kicked off social media, and we are not able to make the case to independent and swing voters?

00:13:28.000 And now this is being published widely by CNN, CBS.

00:13:36.000 Now everyone is covering this.

00:13:39.000 Tony Bobulinsky was called a traitor, everybody.

00:13:42.000 Seditious.

00:13:44.000 Do we have a clip of Joe Biden addressing this at the debate?

00:13:46.000 Is that what we have here?

00:13:48.000 That's a different one.

00:13:49.000 We do have Tony Bobulinsky, though, don't we?

00:13:52.000 Let's play a clip of Tony Bobulinsky.

00:13:55.000 Then I want to play James Rosen.

00:13:57.000 Now, the reason I'm playing this is that none of this is breaking news.

00:14:02.000 None of it.

00:14:03.000 I was just watching cable television.

00:14:04.000 It said breaking Hunter Biden under federal investigation.

00:14:08.000 No, if you did your job, you would have realized that was admitted by Tony Bobulinsky and the Department of Justice back in late October.

00:14:17.000 The reason you didn't cover it is because you would not like what would happen next, which is swing voters and independent voters, specifically in Georgia and Arizona, who might not like Trump, but they certainly don't like Democrat political corruption not vote for Joe Biden.

00:14:35.000 That's why you didn't cover it.

00:14:38.000 Play tape of Tony Bobulinsky.

00:14:41.000 It was prior to the final presidential debate in Nashville on October 22nd that Bob Yulinsky, a former naval nuclear command officer with a Q-level security clearance, now a wealthy corporate investor, first went public with his charges about the Biden family, including his account of two face-to-face meetings with the former vice president.

00:14:58.000 The FBI interviewed Bob Yelinski the very next day.

00:15:02.000 Did you get the sense that the FBI had already been working on these related issues and matters prior to you making that public statement in Nashville?

00:15:12.000 My impression is everyone in that room was very aware of the sensitivity of the parties involved here and potential multiple impacts to this country.

00:15:24.000 So nothing you're reading right now should be a surprise to you about Hunter Biden under federal investigation.

00:15:31.000 This is something that Bob Yulinsky revealed.

00:15:34.000 This was in late October.

00:15:36.000 And none of the networks, no one was even allowed to discuss this whatsoever.

00:15:42.000 And then Adam Schiff went on television and said, this is Russian disinformation hatched out of the Kremlin.

00:15:48.000 These are people that are in charge of our intelligence committee.

00:15:51.000 Play tape of Adam Schiff saying that this is Russian disinformation from the Kremlin.

00:15:58.000 Play tape.

00:15:59.000 Well, we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin.

00:16:05.000 That's been clear for well over a year now that they've been pushing this false narrative about the vice president and his son.

00:16:13.000 Comes from the Kremlin.

00:16:15.000 No, we don't know that, Congressman Adam Schiff.

00:16:18.000 You understand how pathological these people are.

00:16:22.000 That now we have U.S. attorneys and federal agencies investigating this.

00:16:33.000 And despite the mountain of evidence that existed in October, we're not even allowed to have a conversation about it before the election.

00:16:45.000 And the tech companies banned Kaylee McEnaney's account when she mentioned it.

00:16:50.000 They locked out the New York Post.

00:16:54.000 And the Biden transition team is only preemptively mentioning this because these investigations are so far down the runway.

00:17:08.000 They're so close to completion that even if Joe Biden becomes president, he will not be able to cover this up.

00:17:16.000 Too many agents are involved.

00:17:17.000 Too many people have been looking into this.

00:17:22.000 I believe that Joe Biden only ran for the presidency to save his family from even more intense criminal prosecution.

00:17:32.000 And Joe Biden is intimately involved in this.

00:17:35.000 Tony Bob Yelensky outed him as the chairman, the big man.

00:17:38.000 We have emails that say that.

00:17:40.000 Let's read the emails that were on the laptop that we were not even allowed to talk about.

00:17:46.000 Elections are supposed to be choices of a public that is well informed on who's going to govern their country.

00:17:55.000 That did not happen.

00:17:56.000 This election was rigged.

00:18:01.000 Good Ranchers began with the standard of bringing top quality, 100% American-born, raised, and harvested meat to families across America.

00:18:09.000 This vision was instilled into them from their grandparents that owned community grocery stores and believed in trust, charity, and family values.

00:18:15.000 Look, we've talked about Good Ranchers before.

00:18:17.000 They sent us an unbelievable box of meat.

00:18:20.000 And producer Connor, he brought it home and he said it was unbelievable.

00:18:25.000 Seriously, he started talking about it uninterrupted for quite some time.

00:18:30.000 It was perfectly marbled.

00:18:32.000 It was unbelievable.

00:18:33.000 In fact, he was sending us videos of him cooking the meat.

00:18:38.000 We haven't been able to calm him down because then they sent us a ham and it got completely out of control.

00:18:43.000 So look, Good Ranchers is a good partner.

00:18:44.000 They do a great job.

00:18:45.000 And as always, Good Ranchers is 100% American beef and chicken.

00:18:49.000 And now they have pork.

00:18:50.000 Steaks are always USADA choice and higher.

00:18:53.000 Chicken is 100% all-natural, no hormones.

00:18:55.000 And it's individually wrapped, vacuum-sealed, and ready to grill.

00:18:58.000 So look, I'm going to tell you this again.

00:19:00.000 Good ranchers, quality meat.

00:19:02.000 You love your country.

00:19:03.000 Then you have to buy meat from our country.

00:19:05.000 It's the envy of the world, okay?

00:19:07.000 Most of the rest of the world, they don't have meat like we have in America.

00:19:10.000 Here's what good ranchers do.

00:19:12.000 You go to goodranchers.com, you browse through their beautiful website, easy to use.

00:19:16.000 So go do that.

00:19:17.000 And then all of a sudden you say, I want to order dinner for the next two weeks.

00:19:21.000 That's where Good Ranchers comes in.

00:19:22.000 They send you a box of meat, and then use that promo code Charlie and they send you a free Berkshire Hickory ham.

00:19:28.000 Boom.

00:19:29.000 Win.

00:19:30.000 Problem solved.

00:19:31.000 Love America.

00:19:32.000 Goodranters.com, promo code Charlie, and then just email us how much you love the meet.

00:19:36.000 Thanks so much.

00:19:40.000 It would have been great if we had an election with the news about the vaccine being made public, not the Monday after the election. 0.80

00:19:51.000 It would have been nice if we would have known that there was a Chinese plot to infiltrate the highest levels of our House of Representatives.

00:20:01.000 And it would have been great if we would have had the media cover all of this story when it came to James Rosen, Tony Bobulinsky, money laundering, all of it.

00:20:10.000 Instead, all of this was intentionally not covered to just get Joe Biden across the finish line.

00:20:20.000 And that fight is far from over.

00:20:22.000 We're going to dive into the election of 1876.

00:20:25.000 We're going to dive into actually what I believe is the last line of defense, and it's not the state legislatures.

00:20:31.000 It's not.

00:20:35.000 But I really want to zero in on something that I just find very interesting and suspicious.

00:20:42.000 And I think there's a couple explanations here, potential explanations.

00:20:48.000 Why is it that all of a sudden we have the director of national intelligence, Ratcliffe, going on TV with Tucker Carlson, warning against Chinese infiltration at the highest levels of our government? 0.55

00:21:02.000 He does that.

00:21:04.000 And then very early the next morning, an Axios report comes out saying that Fang Fang, a Chinese spy, or her job was to, let's just say, get in good favor with men in politics, including Sua Well.

00:21:29.000 Fang Fang is a spy of the Chinese Communist Party.

00:21:32.000 Sua Well was alerted to this and allegedly disconnected all contact.

00:21:40.000 Basically, Xi Jinping pimped out Fang Fang to infiltrate America.

00:21:50.000 So she went around, and there was even FBI reconnaissance that shows that she was, let's just say, engaging in very personal relationships with, I think, a Midwestern mayor.

00:22:02.000 So that was unsettling enough.

00:22:04.000 But then, 36 hours later, we get a self-declared admission from the Biden campaign where they're saying, oh, actually, Hunter Biden is under federal investigation.

00:22:17.000 Nothing to see here.

00:22:18.000 It's just taxes, even though it's a U.S. Attorney's Office.

00:22:21.000 And again, we've been through, that is not a U.S. attorney investigation.

00:22:24.000 The IRS would be handling this if it was back taxes or if it was undeclared income or taking fake or false deductions.

00:22:33.000 There is a criminal division of the IRS, okay?

00:22:36.000 There's a civil division and there's a criminal division.

00:22:39.000 If it was just tax fraud, the IRS would be probably handling this.

00:22:42.000 That's not to say a U.S. attorney can't also use tax fraud, but if you're going to use it, use up a U.S. attorney investigation with federal subpoenas.

00:22:49.000 These are people that go after the cartel.

00:22:51.000 These are people that go after the crime families.

00:22:55.000 This is not something where they just worry about someone who expensed a private jet flight, that it really was for personal use, not business use.

00:23:03.000 That's typically the focus of the Internal Revenue Service.

00:23:07.000 So we know it's more than that.

00:23:09.000 And now the AP, the Associated Press, has come out and said that the Chinese Communist Party and Hunter Biden, that's what's really being examined.

00:23:19.000 And then we have the Chinese professor that came out.

00:23:22.000 Do we have tape of that?

00:23:23.000 The Chinese professor, and I'll just paraphrase it, who came out and said, We own people at the highest levels of government.

00:23:32.000 We control the country.

00:23:36.000 So why now?

00:23:39.000 Why is it that we are seeing this sudden deluge of declassifications and information and reports about the Chinese Communist Party purchasing and owning people in our country?

00:23:54.000 Why now?

00:23:55.000 Why not on October 1st?

00:23:57.000 Why not on July 1st?

00:23:58.000 It's not as if any of this information is compelling or new.

00:24:02.000 Fang Fang has not been in the country in five years.

00:24:07.000 Hunter Biden has been embezzling money since he's been doing cocaine, which is probably since he's been 16 years old.

00:24:13.000 It's not exactly a new thing for Hunter Biden.

00:24:15.000 It's a practice that was perfected by his father, allegedly, and the crime syndicate of the Biden family.

00:24:24.000 So why now?

00:24:28.000 There's a couple explanations.

00:24:30.000 Let's start with the non-political explanation.

00:24:36.000 The non-political explanation is that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is getting tired of the criticism that is being launched at them from even our show and from other programs where they're getting a little tired, they're getting a little worn down of being called doing nothing in the face of injustice.

00:24:56.000 Maybe there is a stand down order when it comes to election fraud, but the good men and women of the FBI, which there are plenty, and my criticism is against the suits, not the boots of the FBI.

00:25:08.000 All of a sudden, they're growing a little uneasy, and to prevent a revolt within the Federal Bureau of Investigation, all of a sudden, they're getting green lights to start declassifying, going after, issuing subpoenas and arrests for the Chinese influence in our country.

00:25:24.000 Maybe Bill Barr is trying to save his reputation. 0.93

00:25:27.000 And if he's doing it via clamping down on the Chinese Communist Party's sinister, evil, malicious influence, good for him. 0.97

00:25:35.000 There is no greater enemy than China. 0.99

00:25:37.000 We have been on top of this issue more so than any other program, calling for a complete and total suspension of trade with China, calling them what they are, the great evil in America's sight and on the geopolitical chess game that is being played. 0.91

00:26:00.000 So maybe it's the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the CIA trying to save their reputation. 0.60

00:26:05.000 Maybe they're trying to play a little catch up because they see what I see, which is a country that no longer trusts them, which is a country that no longer believes we even have a justice system.

00:26:18.000 And if they're trying to compensate for lost trust, then show us.

00:26:23.000 Don't just investigate. 1.00

00:26:25.000 Start indicting Chinese nationals for purchasing our government. 1.00

00:26:31.000 That's one explanation. 0.99

00:26:34.000 Another explanation, which we were the first, I think, show and team on our Twitter account to float this out.

00:26:40.000 And all of a sudden, this is getting a lot of traction and popularity.

00:26:45.000 If I was the Soros-Harris coalition that wants a radical and complete transformation of government, I would be very displeased with some of Joe Biden's cabinet picks lately.

00:26:57.000 If you're under the belief that Joe Biden is going to become president of the United States, if you really wanted to break the back of the United States economic system, if you really wanted a great reset, people like Janet Yellen are not exactly helpful.

00:27:20.000 Now, by the way, I think Janet Yellen is terrible. 0.99

00:27:22.000 She's a corporatist, billionaire pandering internationalist. 1.00

00:27:28.000 But Janet Yellen will still, in some way or fashion, pander to the interests of Goldman Sachs. 1.00

00:27:34.000 She won't break the back of the entire economic system intentionally. 0.99

00:27:38.000 That's not Janet Yellen's agenda. 0.99

00:27:40.000 You see, if it was Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders, they would completely do that from the Treasury Department.

00:27:45.000 So as Joe Biden has been placing corporatists into government, as Joe Biden has been basically staffing his transition team with Fortune 50 CEOs and board members, the radicals, the Kamala Harris types, they're getting a little uneasy.

00:28:06.000 And it very well could be that Kamala and the AOCs, Rashida Talibs, and Elon Omars, that kind of coalition of power-hungry Democrats competing in a political game of thrones right now, they're starting to make their position clear.

00:28:26.000 Their position is this.

00:28:28.000 Joe, if you want your son to go to jail for the rest of your life, keep acting as if you're president.

00:28:34.000 But let's be clear, we're in charge.

00:28:38.000 This is a warning shot.

00:28:44.000 This is a red line, to use an Obama term, of something he never enforced when it came to Syria.

00:28:50.000 Don't cross this line, Joe.

00:28:51.000 When you get that phone call and we tell you what to do, you know why.

00:28:58.000 The same way they tried to extort and trap President Trump into not moving the embassy to Jerusalem and not canceling the Iran deal and not withdrawing TPP and not renegotiating NAFTA, the same way they tried to do that via Mueller, they're going to do it with Joe Biden.

00:29:13.000 The only difference, for Donald Trump, there were no crimes to try and prevent his action.

00:29:20.000 Donald Trump said, this is annoying, this is awful, it's illegal, but sure, go look into Don Jr. and Eric and Ivanka and they came up empty with the Mueller report.

00:29:30.000 Their attempted criminal extortion scheme failed.

00:29:33.000 With Joe Biden, they have the goods on him.

00:29:36.000 Because Joe Biden never built buildings, he never built hotels, he never managed golf courses, he never had the number one TV show, he never had the number one book, The Art of the Deal.

00:29:44.000 Joe Biden sold access to your government for his own family to get enriched.

00:29:48.000 What does that do?

00:29:49.000 Opens up a massive criminal liability for you, which means you could be controlled.

00:29:57.000 Can you imagine if Donald Trump Jr. had been under federal investigation for tax fraud for two years and no one had told the voters while the media was looking the other way?

00:30:07.000 That would never happen, of course.

00:30:09.000 If Donald Trump Jr. was gallivaning around the planet to the CCP, selling out access to our government, he'd be in Rikers by now.

00:30:20.000 So that's the second explanation, is that this is a Kamala Harris warning shot saying, I'm in charge, you're not, and maybe I'll ask you to resign at the correct time.

00:30:29.000 But don't worry, Joe, we'll protect your legacy as the person that always spared us from Donald Trump, and we'll make sure your son doesn't get into too much trouble.

00:30:38.000 We'll give him probation because remember, Kamala Harris ran the California's Attorney General Office.

00:30:46.000 She knows how to run an AG office for the corrupt, for the elite, and for the radical. 1.00

00:30:53.000 She knows what she's doing.

00:30:55.000 Joe Biden is so compromised, so corrupt, so weak, quite honestly, that this announcement from the U.S. Attorney's Office is either our Department of Justice trying to actually do their job and trying to show the public they're doing their job.

00:31:12.000 And if so, I applaud them for that because where has this been?

00:31:17.000 Now, I'm extremely frustrated they did not make this announcement back in September or June, but they didn't want to meddle into the election, but not by not meddling, by not announcing, they meddled into the election.

00:31:28.000 By the media not covering this, and by big data and big tech not covering this, they meddled into the election.

00:31:34.000 But there's a third explanation here, actually, that I don't think anyone is talking about.

00:31:42.000 There's a third potential explanation of why this is happening now, and it has to do with the unsettled election.

00:31:52.000 What if this is smokescreen by the FBI and DOJ to get us to take our eye off the unsettled election?

00:32:03.000 The election that still has so many questions.

00:32:06.000 What if this is all a distraction?

00:32:09.000 Why now?

00:32:11.000 It would have been really useful to have all of this information before the election.

00:32:18.000 In fact, it would have been instructive of exactly how people should have viewed the Biden crime syndicate.

00:32:35.000 Look, we're coming up to Christmas.

00:32:39.000 And this Christmas season, I know a lot of you want to give back.

00:32:44.000 Some of you have had great years.

00:32:45.000 Some of you have had the worst year you can ever remember.

00:32:49.000 But we're called to give back no matter what.

00:32:51.000 And that's why we are partnering with Angel Tree.

00:32:54.000 Angel Tree does an amazing job.

00:32:56.000 Angel Tree partners with many different groups and radio shows, including ours, to help children who have parents in prison.

00:33:06.000 It's not their fault.

00:33:07.000 Their parents are in prison.

00:33:09.000 Yet these children, they really have a tough time.

00:33:13.000 And so, what Angel Tree does is they give them a gift from their parents showing the love of Christ this Christmas season.

00:33:20.000 You guys can go to charliekirk.com.

00:33:22.000 If you scroll down, there's an Angel Tree banner.

00:33:24.000 I know some of you were saying that you couldn't find it.

00:33:27.000 So if you scroll down, you just see an Angel Tree banner right there.

00:33:30.000 You click on it, give $22.

00:33:33.000 It helps immensely.

00:33:34.000 $110 will help reach five children.

00:33:37.000 $220 will help reach 10 children.

00:33:42.000 And so it will help a lot.

00:33:43.000 We have served, by the way, we've served 1,268 children thanks to the Charlie Kirk show.

00:33:49.000 That's what you guys helped us do.

00:33:51.000 Served 1,268 children.

00:33:54.000 And we want to help serve 1,477.

00:33:57.000 That's our goal.

00:33:58.000 So if you go to charliekirk.com and you click on the Angel Tree banner, we're honored to partner with them, give back a little bit this Christmas season.

00:34:06.000 It really helps a lot.

00:34:07.000 And we've looked into them.

00:34:08.000 They do a great job.

00:34:10.000 And I know a lot of people that have put their name behind it.

00:34:12.000 So go to AngelTree, go to charliekirk.com and check out that Angel Tree banner.

00:34:21.000 I want to play tape of Christine Amanpour.

00:34:24.000 This is the most stunning tape I think we have of the media bias back before the election.

00:34:29.000 Not even bias.

00:34:30.000 It's not even, it's not even bias.

00:34:32.000 There's a better word for it.

00:34:33.000 I'll think of it when you hear this.

00:34:35.000 Play tape.

00:34:37.000 To look at that, but that's not what we're hearing from you.

00:34:39.000 Why don't you want to report this?

00:34:40.000 This is one of the most powerful families in Washington.

00:34:44.000 This is the Biden family.

00:34:45.000 And you're okay?

00:34:46.000 You're okay with our interests being sold out to profit Joe Biden and his family when we're suffering during a pandemic from communist China. 0.66

00:34:55.000 He's doing shady business deals with Jesus China.

00:34:58.000 You're comfortable, okay? 0.79

00:34:59.000 As you know perfectly well, I'm a journalist and a reporter, and I follow the facts.

00:35:04.000 And there has never been any issues in terms of corruption.

00:35:07.000 Now, let me ask you this.

00:35:09.000 Yesterday, the FBI.

00:35:11.000 Wait, wait, wait, FBI.

00:35:12.000 How do you know that?

00:35:14.000 I'm talking about reporting and any evidence.

00:35:17.000 I'm talking to you now.

00:35:19.000 Okay, I would love to start doing that verification.

00:35:23.000 No, we're not going to do your work for you.

00:35:25.000 I want to ask you a question.

00:35:27.000 The FBI is a journalist.

00:35:29.000 It's a journalist.

00:35:29.000 It's a culture.

00:35:30.000 It's a job to find out if this is verified.

00:35:35.000 I want to ask you a question about the FBI press conference.

00:35:38.000 Unbelievable.

00:35:40.000 We had journalists that looked into this, James Rosen, Tony Bobulinsky, and said, Yeah, the FBI is looking at this.

00:35:48.000 By the way, this is CNN.

00:35:50.000 This is an indictment.

00:35:52.000 CNN should be under federal investigation for operating as a Democrat super PAC, not as a news network.

00:36:00.000 That could be a fraud.

00:36:02.000 It really could.

00:36:03.000 If they were selling vitamins, misleading people as much as they were selling news, they'd go to jail for deceiving practices.

00:36:13.000 If I ran an advertisement that said, I have vitamins that can make you live forever, it is as deceiving as Christine Amanpour doing that segment.

00:36:24.000 And if I ran those ads on TV, I would be locked down by the Federal Trade Commission for deceiving practices.

00:36:30.000 Why is CNN not locked down?

00:36:32.000 There's no evidence of this.

00:36:34.000 It wasn't that there's no evidence.

00:36:35.000 It's that there was an overwhelming amount of evidence.

00:36:38.000 But what it was is Christine Amanpour, very proper, she didn't want to comment on it because she was afraid of the tweets that were going to be sent to her.

00:36:49.000 She was afraid of the text messages.

00:36:51.000 She was afraid that she wasn't going to get invited to the Christmas party at the Kennedy Center.

00:36:57.000 She was afraid all of a sudden that her kids might have to get different looks.

00:37:01.000 She was afraid that she might be ostracized.

00:37:04.000 And it wasn't just her.

00:37:05.000 It was all of the people that were once journalists that are now member of a social society of people with television time and large staffs that do nothing more than peddle the propaganda narrative to advance a far left-wing globalist agenda.

00:37:24.000 They're not journalists.

00:37:27.000 They're socialites and activists.

00:37:30.000 So outside of the signature verification, mail-in ballots, Dominion voting systems, hammer and scorecard, the granny farming, the nursing homes, the Nevada Native Project, outside of the dead people voting, the felons voting, all of that, the 8,000 fraudulent voter registration applications that were found to be in Los Angeles, just that one example.

00:37:52.000 Outside of all of that, there was direct election interference that shows that this election was rigged from the tech companies.

00:38:04.000 The tech companies did not allow discussion or dissemination around anything to do with Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, the Biden crime syndicate, or Tony Bobulinsky.

00:38:18.000 36% of Joe Biden voters had no idea that Joe Biden was materially or financially connected to China.

00:38:25.000 No idea.

00:38:27.000 36%.

00:38:28.000 And 13%, I want to get the exact numbers here.

00:38:33.000 13%, which would have been 4.6% of Joe Biden's total, said they wouldn't have voted for Joe Biden if they would have known the news.

00:38:43.000 Even if it's 1%, Trump wins Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, even with the fraud.

00:38:50.000 So now we have a new form of fraud that has polluted this election.

00:38:56.000 This election in the key states should be thrown out.

00:39:02.000 And it still can be.

00:39:06.000 There's one last line of defense that we have. 0.67

00:39:13.000 And before I get into that, I want to talk more about the Chinese Communist Party threat.

00:39:19.000 Do we have Joe Kennedy talking about this?

00:39:21.000 I haven't even heard this clip, but I find it interesting because he's so entertaining.

00:39:26.000 So let's listen to Senator Kennedy from Louisiana play tape.

00:39:32.000 I think this issue is, or this new disclosure rather, is also going to raise the issue again of how and why many major news organizations and social media platforms tried to tap down the New York Post story about the laptop.

00:39:52.000 He made the things on it.

00:39:55.000 So that's Senator Kennedy talking about the interference in our election.

00:40:00.000 It's not even a question of whether or not this election was interfered with.

00:40:04.000 It's which point of interference do you actually want to focus on?

00:40:08.000 This election was the most interfered election in American history from tech companies, from trillion-dollar companies, from foreign countries, the Chinese Communist Party.

00:40:19.000 Let's play cut 70 of Senator Josh Hawley talking about Joe Biden and his son's foreign business dealings.

00:40:29.000 Play cut 70.

00:40:31.000 But I say again, the idea that Joe Biden has nothing to do with this and we should just take his word that he never talked to Hunter about his business dealings.

00:40:39.000 We know that's not true.

00:40:40.000 The laptop emails make clear that that's not true.

00:40:43.000 There's going to be a lot of questions that need to be answered.

00:40:45.000 To the Homeland Security Committee on which I said, and to Senator Johnson, who you're quoting, he's the chair there.

00:40:50.000 We issued a report about Hunter Biden's business dealings.

00:40:53.000 The mainstream media dismissed it.

00:40:55.000 They were wrong.

00:40:56.000 We were right.

00:40:57.000 And we're going to make sure that these questions get answered and that the investigation goes forward.

00:41:01.000 The greatest of all time from Iowa, Chuck Grassley, gave a very impassioned speech this morning, basically just skewering the media for ignoring them.

00:41:11.000 Let's play Cut 69, Josh Hawley on America's Newsroom.

00:41:15.000 I'm playing senators for a reason.

00:41:16.000 Let me tell you why I'm playing senators, because they're making the argument that Joe Biden is a Chinese agent.

00:41:24.000 If Joe Biden is a Chinese agent, would you vote for a Chinese agent to become president?

00:41:31.000 Now, you might say, well, Charlie, they don't get to vote for president. 0.82

00:41:34.000 Oh, yes, they do.

00:41:36.000 Play Cut 69.

00:41:39.000 Well, I tell you what is absolutely certain is that if Joe Biden is sworn in as president at the end of January, the United States attorneys who are spearheading these investigations must remain in office.

00:41:49.000 I mean, there is no doubt there cannot be a transition of anybody who is working on this case.

00:41:53.000 It's too high profile.

00:41:54.000 It's too important.

00:41:55.000 It involves federal crimes.

00:41:57.000 It involves the vice president, at least indirectly.

00:41:59.000 And if he is going to become the president, if that happens at the end of January, this investigation must go forward and everyone involved with it must remain in place.

00:42:09.000 And the details of all of it must be made public.

00:42:13.000 So if you're a U.S. Senator and you're given a chance to vote in the U.S. Senate whether or not you want a Chinese agent who benefited from an interfered with, flawed, polluted, and corrupt election, would you vote for that? 0.64

00:42:28.000 Probably not. 0.94

00:42:30.000 Did you know that the United States Senate is the final vote that has to occur before an inaugural can be officially certified?

00:42:43.000 So yes, all the Electoral College meets.

00:42:45.000 The Electoral College goes through the state by state, but that is not the final step.

00:42:51.000 The final step actually is the United States Congress has to certify the election.

00:43:00.000 Congress in both the House and the Senate have an opportunity to vote on whether or not to certify the election.

00:43:08.000 Now, Usually there's no controversy.

00:43:13.000 Usually the Senate and the House just votes on it.

00:43:15.000 There's no objection.

00:43:16.000 However, if there is just one objection in the House of Representatives and one objection in the United States Senate, then the joint session recesses and two houses separate and debate the question in their respective chambers for a maximum of two hours.

00:43:38.000 Under federal law, each session cannot last more than two hours.

00:43:43.000 And quote, no member of either house may speak for more than two for five minutes.

00:43:48.000 The two houses then vote separately to accept or reject the objection.

00:43:53.000 If both the Senate and the House agree, then the state's votes are tossed and the threshold to electal victory would shrink.

00:44:00.000 The House is still controlled by Democrats, albeit a very slim margin, right? 0.93

00:44:04.000 It's only going to be a seven-vote margin for Nancy Pelosi.

00:44:09.000 So even if the Republican-controlled Senate were to reject a state, there's no chance that the House would, but it wouldn't certify it, which it takes both chambers to do that.

00:44:24.000 No U.S. Senator that is a Republican should vote for certification, especially Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania.

00:44:38.000 And for no other reason, they would be certifying the election of a Chinese Communist Party, spy, agent, surrogate, affiliate, whatever word you want to use.

00:44:50.000 The last part of this entire saga, state legislatures, electors, governors certify, secretary of states, frauds, board of elections, the last piece of all of it is our U.S. senators that is in Republican control, have to give a thumbs up or a thumbs down like Commodus would in Gladiator of whether or not they want a Chinese Communist Party agent to become president of the United States.

00:45:24.000 Now, some people say, well, what about Mitt Romney and Murkowski and Collins who mightn't have enough votes?

00:45:30.000 That's fine.

00:45:32.000 I want to know an entire roll call of the entire United States Senate of where they will stand on putting a corrupt, flawed, and polluted election behind their name.

00:45:48.000 This has happened before in American history.

00:45:50.000 We'll dive into it.

00:45:51.000 Let's play tape of Senator Chuck Grassley.

00:45:53.000 Do we have that tape queued up?

00:45:55.000 Talking from the floor of the United States Senate about how his report has now been vindicated.

00:46:01.000 Play tape.

00:46:03.000 For over a year, Senator Johnson and I investigated the Biden financial family dealings.

00:46:12.000 We found that they engaged in potential criminal financial deals across the globe, including China, which created counterintelligence concerns.

00:46:24.000 We showed our work and we made our findings very public.

00:46:30.000 But the liberal media and members of the other political party chose to dismiss our work.

00:46:38.000 They even falsely claimed that our work was Russian disinformation.

00:46:46.000 Russian disinformation is how they criticized it.

00:46:51.000 It's how they cross-examined the important work of the United States Senate, looking into Hunter Biden.

00:46:59.000 And so, what if the United States Senate decides to take a stand against all of this?

00:47:04.000 The big tech manipulation, the data manipulation, the corporate influence, the Center for Technology and Civic Life, the signature verification issue, the witness requirement issue, the Dominion voting systems, the ballots that are missing, the changing the polling places.

00:47:18.000 What if the U.S. Senate decided to not certify the election?

00:47:22.000 Someone would say it's unprecedented.

00:47:24.000 No, no, no, there's precedent.

00:47:28.000 In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes was running up against Samuel Tilden.

00:47:35.000 Samuel Tilden was from New York.

00:47:38.000 Rutherford B. Hayes was from Ohio.

00:47:43.000 Samuel Tilden won the popular vote with 4.2 million votes.

00:47:48.000 Rutherford B. Hayes lost the popular vote.

00:47:51.000 However, the popular vote is completely irrelevant.

00:47:55.000 Rutherford B. Hayes ended up winning the electoral vote by one vote, 185 to 184.

00:48:01.000 However, there were allegations of widespread fraud.

00:48:08.000 There were allegations of ballots gone missing, of irregularities.

00:48:16.000 One elector was replaced after being declared illegal for being, quote, elected or an appointed official.

00:48:23.000 The question of who should have been awarded the electoral votes is the source of the controversy, specifically in Oregon, which Rutherford B. Hayes won.

00:48:33.000 This is before statehood for Oklahoma, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington, Montana, and the Dakotas.

00:48:45.000 Rutherford, right?

00:48:47.000 Don't say that very often.

00:48:48.000 Not Rutherford, Rutherford.

00:48:51.000 Not exactly an expert at pronouncing corrupt Ohio politicians.

00:48:54.000 That's why I always call them Kassock, not Kasich.

00:48:56.000 Kidding.

00:48:58.000 Or I'm not going to tell you how I pronounced John Boehner.

00:49:02.000 We're not going to go there.

00:49:05.000 You guys can figure that one out yourself.

00:49:08.000 So it went to the Electoral College.

00:49:10.000 They met.

00:49:11.000 They certified Rutherford B. Hayes as the winner.

00:49:17.000 And it goes to Congress for the final step of certification.

00:49:23.000 The House of Representatives was controlled by Democrats, which, of course, favored Samuel J. Tilden, but the Senate was still very strongly Republican, which favored Hayes.

00:49:38.000 So that what ensued was what is called the Compromise of 1877.

00:49:43.000 I'm not defending what happened after.

00:49:44.000 Actually, it's pretty disgusting. 0.71

00:49:48.000 It was a bargain that ended Reconstruction and re-implemented Jim Crow, poll taxes, all the stuff that is morally reprehensible.

00:50:04.000 And it ended up being this compromise allowed the South to stay in control of their own governing strategy to kind of reassert some of their more racially despicable policies in exchange for a Republican becoming president, Rutherford B. Hayes. 0.53

00:50:30.000 This is because the two houses could not decide, or the two chambers, I should say that's the correct term, could not decide on who should become president.

00:50:44.000 If the United States Senate and these senators are serious about saving the Republic, they should do the same on January 6th.

00:50:52.000 On January 6th, this is going to come in front of Congress.

00:50:58.000 All it takes is for one House member, which is already going to happen, Mo Brooks, and for one senator, who we do not have a senator yet that has decided to do this, to challenge the legality of the results.

00:51:08.000 I would bet Rand Paul is going to do this because Rand Paul, he's awesome, which will then force a roll call vote.

00:51:19.000 And we'll see where they land of whether they're willing, the United States senators and the Republican Party are willing to put their name behind Joe Biden.

00:51:26.000 Texas has led the way.

00:51:28.000 I think there's 15 to 17 states that have now joined on to this lawsuit of Texas v. Georgia v. Pennsylvania, v. Michigan v. Wisconsin.

00:51:40.000 Now, due to original jurisdiction, what Texas has done, intentionally or unintentionally, probably intentionally, is when one state sues another, the only court that can remedy that disagreement or that suit is the United States Supreme Court.

00:51:56.000 This is called original jurisdiction.

00:52:00.000 And so it's really important to note, though, and this is where John Cornyn and Jeb Bush really deserve to be repudiated for the way they've been handling this, which is that some people are saying, I don't understand the legal standing for this case.

00:52:17.000 Well, obviously, they haven't read the lawsuit.

00:52:20.000 The lawsuit coming from Texas to the other states is actually not about fraud.

00:52:25.000 It's not.

00:52:27.000 It's not about the irregularities.

00:52:29.000 What it's about is how state law was changed without the state legislature approval.

00:52:38.000 That's what it's about.

00:52:39.000 It's a procedural complaint.

00:52:41.000 And quite honestly, a procedural complaint at this moment might actually be more successful than proving fraud.

00:52:48.000 For example, Texas is saying that they were disenfranchised because Georgia changed the way they did elections via signature verification and vote by mail in defiance to the state legislatures.

00:53:06.000 That Stacey Abrams, because she came in with $40 million and sued Rauffensberger and Kemp, and they settled out of court, and it was not ratified by the state legislatures under emergency proceedings of the Chinese coronavirus, that Texas is standing to sue.

00:53:31.000 And it's a pretty good argument, to be honest.

00:53:34.000 The argument is: why should Texas and their electors be invalidated by another state that did not follow the process?

00:53:49.000 This is getting misrepresented as a fraud complaint.

00:53:53.000 It's not.

00:53:54.000 There are other lawsuits that are.

00:53:56.000 The President Trump's campaign lawsuit pioneered by the great Cleta Mitchell in Georgia is a fraud complaint.

00:54:04.000 The great Kelly Shackelford was on our podcast.

00:54:07.000 I encourage all of you to check out the podcast in full detail and full length.

00:54:10.000 And so there are multiple legal challenges happening simultaneously across the country.

00:54:18.000 And this one of Texas is very interesting because it will ensure a potential superseding judgment.

00:54:26.000 There is no appeal after the U.S. Supreme Court.

00:54:29.000 It's called supreme for a reason.

00:54:32.000 Now, the reason why Texas probably did this is because there are over 8,000 cases that try to get in front of the United States Supreme Court.

00:54:48.000 Only about 80 of them are heard, and it's a long process.

00:54:54.000 In the rare case, though, that a state is suing another state, which does not happen very often, just because they don't want to get into conflict and the attorney generals, they usually know each other and they're part of the same associations, the Republican Association of Attorney Generals or Democrat Association of Attorney Generals.

00:55:10.000 They don't want to get in it.

00:55:12.000 It's probably the only time it's happened in recent memory is over property rights issues, probably.

00:55:18.000 Or interstate commerce or highways or reservoirs or national parks.

00:55:24.000 That's probably the most recent time that one state suing another goes to the Supreme Court.

00:55:29.000 And then they're probably happy to hear the case.

00:55:32.000 But over an election issue, this is pretty ingenious, I have to say.

00:55:38.000 If you want to get action on the U.S. Supreme Court, this is one way to do it.

00:55:43.000 And there's Amy Kony Barrett, I'm wearing an Amy Kony Barrett shirt right now.

00:55:47.000 Clarence Thomas, Ilito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.

00:55:51.000 Thank you, President Trump, for three of those five.

00:55:53.000 Then you have the Democrats, John Roberts, Sutta Mayor, Breyer, and Kagan.

00:55:59.000 And so the Democrats will all rule probably against whatever is common sense.

00:56:05.000 John Roberts has made a spectacle of ruling in a corrupt, self-interested, anti-American fashion, Bush appointee, I might add.

00:56:14.000 The Trump appointees have been amazing.

00:56:16.000 Amy Coney Barrett, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh have been terrific.

00:56:22.000 And so the question is, constitutionally speaking, can a state change the way they do elections without using the process of the state legislature?

00:56:36.000 And the answer should be no.

00:56:38.000 Now, the remedy is unknown.

00:56:40.000 What the U.S. Supreme Court will say after possibly coming to that ruling is really not clear.

00:56:48.000 It's unclear, I should say.

00:56:51.000 And here's why.

00:56:52.000 The U.S. Supreme Court should not be in the business of judicial supremacism.

00:57:01.000 The U.S. Supreme Court should not be in the business of overturning the will of the people.

00:57:10.000 The problem is that this is not the will of the people.

00:57:13.000 So the Supreme Court could do a variety of different things.

00:57:16.000 They could say that Donald Trump's the winner based on certain guidelines.

00:57:19.000 That's probably not going to happen.

00:57:21.000 What they could also do, though, is they could say that they have a court order from the U.S. Supreme Court to have a new election in January for Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.

00:57:36.000 I'd love to see Joe Biden campaign again in the month of January with all these new revelations that have come out about the federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden.

00:57:45.000 You want to see the country go into bedlam?

00:57:47.000 That will be bedlam.

00:57:49.000 So what?

00:57:51.000 The U.S. Supreme Court could say, we're going to kick this down to the states, and we are mandating you guys have a bipartisan board of elections that comes to a determination by a certain date.

00:58:02.000 They could do that.

00:58:04.000 So there's two parts to the U.S. Supreme Court.

00:58:09.000 There's the decision, and then there's the remedy.

00:58:12.000 I hope you all understand that.

00:58:14.000 So a great example of this was the gay marriage case.

00:58:18.000 Justice Anthony Kennedy is one of the last cases that he decided.

00:58:23.000 And the actual decision had very little to do about gay marriage.

00:58:28.000 The reason that we were so appalled with the decision, it was Oberfell versus Hodges, is that right?

00:58:34.000 Okay.

00:58:35.000 The reason that we found that decision to be so surprising, to quite honestly be so awful, if I could use that word, is that it overturned state law, is that it almost made new law.

00:58:51.000 The U.S. Supreme Court was kind of creeping in this direction for years.

00:58:56.000 Roe versus Wade was very similar to this.

00:58:59.000 But the Berger Court, they overturned state mandates that restricted abortion.

00:59:09.000 They nationalized the abortion debate.

00:59:13.000 So what's the consequence of all this?

00:59:15.000 Well, the Supreme Court, since they're supreme, and there really is no check or balance against the Supreme Court except potentially impeaching and removing Supreme Court justices.

00:59:26.000 The U.S. Constitution actually says there is no set number of Supreme Court justices, and there is no appellate form.

00:59:35.000 It is the only court in the country that is final.

00:59:39.000 That's why they take their rulings so seriously.

00:59:42.000 That is why they are so selective to hear only 80 out of 8,000 cases a year, because they know once they rule on something, it sets something called judicial precedent as well, which other justices might use as a reason to not overthrow a decision.

00:59:59.000 Now, judicial precedent is not everything.

01:00:02.000 The poor decision, if my memory serves me correctly, again, I'm diving deep into my Supreme Court history here of all the independent research we do.

01:00:09.000 I think it was the Dred Scott decision that was terrible, if I'm not mistaken.

01:00:13.000 And the civil rights interpretations overthrew that.

01:00:16.000 Is that right?

01:00:17.000 Roughly.

01:00:17.000 Basically, precedent has been overthrown before.

01:00:22.000 It just takes a lot of public support as well.

01:00:26.000 So the point is that the U.S. Supreme Court, with this Texas decision, should rule that the elections in Georgia and Pennsylvania and Michigan and Wisconsin were conducted unconstitutionally. 0.93

01:00:40.000 They should rule that way.

01:00:41.000 What their remedy will be, we do not know.

01:00:45.000 The remedy could be something as sort of don't do it again, is what their remedy could be.

01:00:50.000 They could decide in a 5-4 or 6-3 decision, this was bad, but we're not going to actually comment on the election itself.

01:00:58.000 We're going to leave that to the states.

01:01:00.000 Thanks so much.

01:01:00.000 See you later.

01:01:05.000 Yeah, Dred Scott was the bad decision under Article 3 or 4.

01:01:09.000 It said that slaves were not citizens of the U.S., right?

01:01:11.000 So then a later decision overturned that.

01:01:22.000 And so it really comes down to whether or not the U.S. Supreme Court is going to view themselves in their proper role as making sense of a pending collision crash course.

01:01:43.000 We are barreling towards something that none of us want to live through. 0.92

01:01:49.000 With a president that no one trusts that represents a Chinese Communist Party crime syndicate. 0.95

01:01:54.000 Now, what the U.S. Supreme Court could do, though, and this is where the U.S. Senate comes in with their final certification, what the U.S. Supreme Court could do through this Texas lawsuit is they could give the U.S. Senators the intellectual and the political permission, I could say, to then all of a sudden not certify. 0.81

01:02:16.000 What the U.S. Supreme Court could say is this, is this is actually, this was done unconstitutionally, but we are not going to overthrow it in our opinion.

01:02:25.000 We're going to leave it to your constitutional devices.

01:02:27.000 If that happens, then all of a sudden the Republicans in the U.S. Senate have a really good argument not to certify.

01:02:34.000 And what the compromise of 1877 would be, I don't know.

01:02:39.000 I don't know what that compromise or what that remedy would be.

01:02:44.000 What the U.S. Supreme Court could do is give a little bit of cover fire to House members and to senators and state legislatures.

01:02:55.000 Now, unfortunately, a lot of the state legislatures are running to the hills.

01:03:01.000 They are not doing what they said they were going to be doing.

01:03:05.000 They're hiding behind perfunctory and procedural excuses, Arizona being one of them.

01:03:12.000 The Arizona Speaker of the House is a coward who says he's not going to hold hearings on this or a vote or a special session, whatever.

01:03:23.000 Georgia is doing a good job. 0.99

01:03:26.000 Pennsylvania is a joke.

01:03:27.000 Michigan's run to the hills.

01:03:28.000 Wisconsin's nowhere to be seen.

01:03:33.000 It all comes down to public pressure.

01:03:36.000 Judges are people.

01:03:38.000 Just as Mitt Romney said, corporations are people.

01:03:40.000 He was wrong.

01:03:42.000 But judges are people.

01:03:44.000 And that's where you come in and what you can do.

01:03:47.000 A storm is coming for those people that have been selling out our country to China.

01:03:55.000 I think that the intelligence community is split.

01:04:00.000 I reel on the FBI a lot, and I probably should be more specific.

01:04:04.000 As I've mentioned before, my criticism is against the suits, not the boots.

01:04:08.000 And I think the boots are getting uneasy.

01:04:12.000 I think the federal Bureau of Investigation now realizes the sinister Chinese threat, and they want to all of a sudden start putting points on the board. 0.79

01:04:22.000 A lot of members of the FBI are patriots.

01:04:24.000 They're veterans.

01:04:24.000 They love their country.

01:04:25.000 And they don't like it when the CCP all of a sudden starts to infiltrate every single aspect of American life.

01:04:35.000 Let's play cut 48.

01:04:40.000 Gordon Chang confirming that the professor who says that he has surrogates within the U.S. government of Chinese agents, he confirms it's true.

01:04:50.000 Play cut 48. 0.99

01:04:52.000 So he's out there less than a month after our presidential election saying essentially, we admit it, we are in control.

01:05:00.000 Our friends in the business community in the United States, Wall Street specifically, are on our side over and against the U.S. government itself, the current presidential administration, and we pull the strings.

01:05:14.000 Do you think that's bragging?

01:05:15.000 To what extent is that true?

01:05:18.000 Well, that part of the video is true.

01:05:20.000 That's absolutely true.

01:05:21.000 That China does have that relationship into what he calls the core circle of America's real power.

01:05:29.000 That part is definitely true. 0.97

01:05:30.000 And then I want to play Rick Grinnell here, Cut 74.

01:05:34.000 I'm making a prediction right now.

01:05:36.000 The reason this is starting to leak out and the FBI is sending warning shots.

01:05:40.000 Remember, it was Bill Barr who warned over the summer that even CEOs who are doing business with China might be subject to foreign registration laws and requirements.

01:05:49.000 Play Cut 74.

01:05:50.000 This is the beginning of what could be one of the great revelations of our time of how the CCP has infiltrated every aspect of America.

01:05:57.000 Play Cut 74.

01:05:58.000 And I can tell you without giving away too much intelligence, this is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the leverage that China is putting on our politicians.

01:06:07.000 There's many, many more.

01:06:10.000 Wouldn't the Bidens be up there in that category?

01:06:14.000 There's a variety of mayors, governors, senior people.

01:06:18.000 Look, the other thing that we've got to point to is that Eric Swatton.

01:06:21.000 I can't let you gloss over that.

01:06:23.000 Mayors, governors, senior officials, what?

01:06:28.000 There's a whole bunch, Sean, and more should be coming out.

01:06:31.000 They've all received defensive briefings, and there's a lot more to it.

01:06:34.000 This is the tip of the iceberg.

01:06:36.000 They've all received defensive briefings, which means that they...

01:06:40.000 Now, if only Donald Trump received the defensive briefing from our own government before they spied on him.

01:06:47.000 Our own government was acting like the CCP, and Trump never got a defensive briefing like, oh, hey, by the way, James Coney and Peter Strzzok are spying on you. 0.54

01:06:55.000 I'm glad that people that are in bed, literally, with the Chinese Communist Party get defensive briefings.

01:07:05.000 Our government has been purchased by the CCP.

01:07:09.000 And we did this under the Chamber of Commerce lie of free trade, of open borders, pro-pharmaceutical, and pro-plastic.

01:07:16.000 That's what I call it.

01:07:18.000 It's all the plastic nonsense that we import from China that we don't need. 1.00

01:07:23.000 I'm making a prediction here. 1.00

01:07:26.000 And these usually tend to come true. 0.94

01:07:30.000 There's going to be some very shocking revelations when it comes to the Chinese Communist Party's infiltration of America coming out very soon. 0.97

01:07:38.000 Maybe a report, maybe declassifications.

01:07:42.000 But something tells me that the intelligence agencies have been confined to a box and they're not going to take it anymore.

01:07:51.000 They've been told don't interfere with the election.

01:07:53.000 And the patriots that are still within the FBI, that are still within the DOJ, and there's plenty of them, and many have been shackled by the deep state influences.

01:08:02.000 They're ripping off the handcuffs and they say, fine, we can't look into voter fraud.

01:08:06.000 Then we're going to punish somebody here.

01:08:09.000 And that's what's happening.

01:08:12.000 Is that the last gasp of patriotism within our government is making their offensive.

01:08:22.000 And God bless them if that's what's happening.

01:08:25.000 Investigate them all. 0.96

01:08:27.000 Diane Feinstein, Eric Swawell, Kamala Harris, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, all of them who sold out our country to the Chinese Communist Party. 0.81

01:08:38.000 Email us, freedom at charliekirk.com. 0.91

01:08:40.000 God bless America.

01:08:44.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.

01:08:46.000 Make sure you're subscribed to the Charlie Kirk Show.

01:08:48.000 Type in Charlie Kirk Show to your podcast provider.

01:08:51.000 Hit subscribe.

01:08:52.000 Email us, freedom at charliekirk.com anytime you have questions.

01:08:56.000 And if you want to support us, go to charliekirk.com slash support.

01:09:00.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.

01:09:02.000 God bless.

01:09:02.000 Speak to you soon.

The Charlie Kirk Show - December 11, 2020

Hunter Biden and the Media's Criminal Coverup

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript