The Charlie Kirk Show - September 12, 2024


Ignore the Spin, What Do the Polls Say?


Episode Stats

Length

41 minutes

Words per Minute

179.63518

Word Count

7,386

Sentence Count

550

Misogynist Sentences

34

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

In this episode, Andrew Colvin is joined by Rich Beres of the Public Polling Project and Mark Mitchell of Rasmussen to discuss the impact of the Democratic Debates, and what we can expect to see from a bounce in the polls, including a potential bounce in support from Independents. They also discuss what they are seeing from independent voters, and why they think Joe Biden is a better choice than Donald Trump in the 2020 election. Finally, the guys discuss the new Pfizer drug, and the impact it could have on the economy and the economy in general, and whether it will have a negative impact on inflation and the possibility of higher interest rates, as well as what it could mean for the economy, and how it could impact the economy. This episode is a must listen to, and a must-listen to. Please consider joining Memberscharliekirk.co/joinnow. You keep us bold, proud, loud, and unafraid of boycotts, censorship, and all the other benefits that we pack into memberships. Thank you, members. - Charlie and his staff. Subscribe to the show today! You get access to the latest episodes of The Charlie Kirk Show, every Monday morning, wherever you get your favorite shows, every Wednesday morning. If you like what you listen, you get a new episode of the show, every Tuesday morning at 7am Eastern Standard Time. Thanks for listening to The Charlie Kirker Show! - Your host, Charlie Kirk and much more! - Thank you for listening and supporting The Charlie and Good Morning America? - Cheers, Charlie & Good Morning Charlie! - Cheers! - Your continued support is much appreciated! - Eternally grateful! - Teddy and Good Luck! - Charlie, Kristy, Andrew, Timestamps: - Chuck Colvin - The Best of the Best Political Podcasts - Thank You, Charlie, - Kristy & Mark Mitchell - Good Luck, Timestories: Thank You for listening? - Please consider becoming a Member of the Charlie Kirk Podcast? - Thank Me, Thank You For Listening, Charlie and Thank You & Good Luck Me Out? - Best Regards, Cheers - Teddy, Timed? - Timestaffing Me, Chuck, Best Effed Me, Best of Your Support, Brett, and Best Effort, Sarah, Rory,


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
00:00:02.000 Andrew Colvin in for Charlie Kirk.
00:00:04.000 This is a phenomenal, phenomenal analysis episode.
00:00:07.000 We have two pollsters, Rich Beres, Big Data Poll, and Mark Mitchell from Rasmussen.
00:00:12.000 We talk about what we can expect to see, a bounce, any bounce, what's happening with independents, All of the polling analysis you could possibly want is crammed into this episode.
00:00:22.000 It's a must listen to.
00:00:24.000 Please consider joining members.charliekirk.com.
00:00:27.000 Members.charliekirk.com.
00:00:29.000 You keep us bold, proud, loud, and unafraid of boycotts, censorship, all of the rest.
00:00:35.000 There's so many benefits that we pack into members.charliekirk.com.
00:00:38.000 Please consider becoming a member today.
00:00:40.000 Members.charliekirk.com.
00:00:42.000 Buckle up, here we go.
00:00:45.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
00:00:46.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
00:00:48.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
00:00:52.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks!
00:00:55.000 I want to thank Charlie.
00:00:56.000 He's an incredible guy.
00:00:57.000 His spirit, his love of this country.
00:00:59.000 He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:01:05.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:14.000 That's why we are here.
00:01:18.000 Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals.
00:01:28.000 Learn how you can protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
00:01:34.000 That is noblegoldinvestments.com.
00:01:37.000 It's where I buy all of my gold.
00:01:38.000 Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
00:01:43.000 We are honored to be joined by Rich Beres, Big Data Poll, the People's Pundit, and I want to make sure I give Rich an opportunity to talk about the Public Polling Project.
00:01:52.000 Rich Beres, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show, brother.
00:01:55.000 Hey, thanks for having me as always, Andrew.
00:01:57.000 How are you doing today?
00:01:59.000 You know, I'm doing better than I thought I was going to be doing, Rich.
00:02:02.000 I'll be honest.
00:02:03.000 Last night, I was like, you know, Trump, I give it like a B, B minus maybe.
00:02:09.000 I've seen Trump way sharper, way more on the details, way more articulate defending his platform, his policies.
00:02:16.000 But I think somehow, Rich, the message got through.
00:02:19.000 You are an expert on this.
00:02:21.000 You're the one who's asking voters the questions across the country.
00:02:24.000 So you have a very keen insight.
00:02:26.000 What is your takeaway from what we saw last night?
00:02:29.000 All right, so first and foremost, I just want to say that he didn't need to do this at all.
00:02:34.000 He could have won the debate simply by saying, I already debated the legitimate nominee of the Democratic Party.
00:02:39.000 I'm not going to lend credibility to an illegitimate process.
00:02:43.000 She's a usurper.
00:02:44.000 And I will be standing up for the voters of nearly 15 million, nearly 15 million voters who cast their vote for Joe Biden, not her.
00:02:51.000 And he could have done that and walked away a champion.
00:02:53.000 He already had the momentum.
00:02:55.000 That being said, going into this, I mean, obviously it was going to be a three-on-one.
00:03:00.000 The head of ABC News is a friend of Kamala Harris, introduced her to her husband.
00:03:05.000 I mean, for people who don't know how incestuous this relationship is, So I just don't know why he's not taking the opportunities and a unique position, if you're going to debate, to reform this process because it badly needs reformation.
00:03:17.000 Badly.
00:03:18.000 It doesn't serve the voters.
00:03:19.000 It serves big pharma.
00:03:20.000 We heard more about the side effects of the latest Pfizer drug during the commercial break than we did about Kamala Harris's plan.
00:03:28.000 To tackle inflation.
00:03:29.000 And that ultimately is a big problem, Andrew.
00:03:32.000 That's a big problem.
00:03:34.000 Her major problem is really twofold.
00:03:36.000 Number one, the gang up that really occurred.
00:03:39.000 3v1 on Trump.
00:03:40.000 It's the same media who just did that, who just was lying, just got exposed, lying to the public about Joe Biden being senile.
00:03:48.000 So they really didn't anticipate that there could be a backfire there.
00:03:53.000 And then secondly, we're talking to voters now.
00:03:57.000 Reuters had a poll, not a poll, a focus group.
00:04:01.000 You're seeing all these focus groups on CNN.
00:04:04.000 I want to give it a little bit more time, but these undecided voters that were in our poll that we sent you, out of the 200 plus that we had asked whether they would watch the debate, nearly 88% said that they would, which I don't believe, but they said they would.
00:04:19.000 Uh, we asked them if we could contact them again and ask them about their thoughts on the debate.
00:04:23.000 That is looking very good for Donald Trump.
00:04:26.000 So far, you know, only about 50, uh, the, you know, 200 or so, um, have responded, but the margin on whether like, forget about who you think won.
00:04:36.000 That is not even important to me.
00:04:37.000 Did the debate after the debate, are you vote?
00:04:40.000 Are you, have you decided who you're going to vote for?
00:04:43.000 Yes.
00:04:43.000 Okay.
00:04:44.000 Who is it?
00:04:45.000 And honestly, the undecided number is very small now.
00:04:50.000 I mean, it was already not huge, but of those who said they were undecided, now it's even smaller and it's going like two to one for Donald Trump.
00:04:59.000 This is very bad if this turns out to be the actual data.
00:05:03.000 This is a very weird phenomenon that we have somebody that people basically say won the In the traditional sense, like how pundits and Washington talking heads gauge these things.
00:05:26.000 I would say she won the debate, you know, but what, what matters more than what people tell you who won, who lost is how it really moved the needle.
00:05:34.000 And there are two things that we're hearing from these people.
00:05:37.000 And I knew one of them immediately.
00:05:40.000 I kind of suspected that the other one may be a problem for her, but I was kind of waiting for confirmation from voters.
00:05:46.000 One is she came across, she got the same problem Hillary Clinton has.
00:05:50.000 Everyone said, Oh yeah, Hillary won the debate.
00:05:52.000 That woman is, you know, remember when Trump said, Hillary is such a nasty woman.
00:05:52.000 But you know what?
00:05:59.000 That was his nice way of saying what all the people at home were thinking is that this woman's a You know, look at her face.
00:06:06.000 It's not a very nice word.
00:06:09.000 Yeah, it's not a nice word.
00:06:10.000 But it's the only word you can say and people use your imagination.
00:06:13.000 It's the only word you could say that really captures what you know, really captures it fully.
00:06:18.000 And she had a look, we talk a lot with our with our expression and our body.
00:06:23.000 We talk more nonverbal communication than we do verbal.
00:06:28.000 And the nonverbal communication was atrocious.
00:06:30.000 I think I'm telling you, Andrew, they told her no cackling because the cackling is, it is very unpopular.
00:06:37.000 People don't like it when Kamala does that.
00:06:40.000 They think it's awful.
00:06:41.000 So I think they told her no cackling and that normally Kamala, when she disagrees with somebody,
00:06:47.000 she'll want to insult somebody or when she just outright thinks,
00:06:52.000 She'll laugh and she outright thinks like you're saying something wrong or incorrect.
00:06:56.000 She laughs and tries to like, uh, degrade you.
00:06:59.000 And anyone who works for her knows what I'm talking about.
00:07:01.000 All right.
00:07:02.000 This is what she does publicly.
00:07:03.000 If a, if a journalist asked a question that she doesn't like, or she doesn't want to have to answer, She just does that cackle and then kind of comes back with a smart-ass comment.
00:07:12.000 Pardon my French, you know, but that's what she does.
00:07:14.000 That's who she is.
00:07:15.000 And I think during debate prep, they told her, Kamala, no cackling.
00:07:20.000 And when she was holding the cackle back, we were getting these faces.
00:07:24.000 You know these, I mean, go back and re-watch the debate, folks.
00:07:27.000 I played a couple clips of it on my show today.
00:07:30.000 That is not what you do when you're trying to win people over, you know, and I think she came across like, you know, for instance, black men under the age of 45 were concerned that she was this, and I think she showed them that that is what she is, and or at least affirmed it.
00:07:47.000 And then the second problem is very simple, and we're hearing this a lot from people where We're thinking are like really, truly persuadable.
00:07:53.000 Most undecideds now are actually men or were, and the women that were left, Kamala needs to win.
00:08:00.000 It is because women were more undecided when Biden was still in the race.
00:08:03.000 That's why Biden gained with undecideds and it's been completely turned on its head now.
00:08:09.000 The undecideds are more male and they're breaking for Trump and he gains against Kamala.
00:08:14.000 So it's total reverse from what it was, you know, the dynamic of the race before with Biden.
00:08:19.000 And I think those men are going to go out the window, but those women that she needed to win over were really like kind of looking for an excuse not to vote for Donald Trump, but acknowledge that life was better under Donald Trump than it is now in the United States of America.
00:08:35.000 And it was less war, and it was more prosperity.
00:08:37.000 And they were like, you know, hoping beyond hope.
00:08:41.000 Like, give me a reason to vote for you.
00:08:43.000 But you need to tell us this.
00:08:45.000 You need to tell us that.
00:08:47.000 I need to know more about you.
00:08:48.000 New York Times poll even showcased this.
00:08:50.000 And they found the same thing we did.
00:08:52.000 There's a group that wants to vote for Kamala, but they don't know enough about her.
00:08:55.000 And they're wondering, why won't you do it now?
00:08:58.000 And you're promising us all this stuff.
00:09:00.000 You're in office.
00:09:01.000 He's senile.
00:09:02.000 You can do whatever you want.
00:09:03.000 I mean, this is what people are thinking.
00:09:04.000 And she did not deliver that.
00:09:07.000 Like last night, she put on a mediocre performance that won a debate.
00:09:11.000 She did not score some knockout.
00:09:13.000 Yes, she won, I guess on style, she was ineffective ultimately, because what she needed to do
00:09:19.000 is she needed to somehow put some distance between her and Joe Biden.
00:09:25.000 If she would have said something kind of shocking, being like, listen, I was the vice president.
00:09:29.000 You think I got everything done that I wanted to?
00:09:31.000 No, I didn't get everything I wanted.
00:09:34.000 This is my opportunity to get everything I want to get done.
00:09:36.000 If she would have said something that sort of out there, maybe it would have had an effect.
00:09:41.000 But ultimately, Rich, what we saw was independents tracking right along with Republicans.
00:09:46.000 I'm going to play this clip and get your reaction.
00:09:48.000 Play cut 120.
00:09:50.000 This will be one of the greatest mistakes in history for them to allow, and I think they probably did it because they think they're going to get votes, but it's not worth it because they're destroying the fabric of our country by what they've done.
00:10:03.000 There's never been anything done like this at all.
00:10:06.000 They've destroyed the fabric of our country.
00:10:09.000 Millions of people let in, and all over the world.
00:10:12.000 Crime is down all over the world except here.
00:10:15.000 Crime here is up and through the roof, despite their fraudulent statements that they made.
00:10:20.000 Crime in this country is through the roof, and we have a new form of crime.
00:10:24.000 It's called migrant crime, and it's happening at levels that nobody thought possible.
00:10:29.000 Rich, if you saw that, you know, for those listening, there's an independent bar and a Republican bar.
00:10:34.000 A couple of instances, the independents were more enthusiastic about what Trump was saying than the Republicans.
00:10:41.000 And, you know, later on in that commentary, the same analyst says, we haven't seen this phenomenon since 2016.
00:10:47.000 In 2020, it was all over the place like spaghetti lines.
00:10:50.000 And in 2016, we saw the same phenomenon.
00:10:53.000 We're going back to an old playbook.
00:10:56.000 It's history repeating itself.
00:11:00.000 Are you ready to lose weight but not sure where to start?
00:11:01.000 I understand.
00:11:02.000 I was right where you are two years ago.
00:11:03.000 Let me tell you why I chose the PhD Weight Loss and Nutrition program.
00:11:07.000 First, Dr. Ashley Lucas has her PhD in Chronic Disease and Sports Nutrition.
00:11:11.000 Her program is based on years of research and is science-based.
00:11:14.000 Second, the PhD program starts in nutrition.
00:11:16.000 There is so much more.
00:11:17.000 They know that 90% of permanent change comes from the mind, and they work on eliminating
00:11:21.000 the reason you gained this weight in the first place.
00:11:23.000 There's no shortcuts, pills, or injections, just solid science-based nutrition and behavior
00:11:26.000 change.
00:11:27.000 And finally, and probably most importantly, I lost 30 pounds.
00:11:29.000 Look, they're amazing.
00:11:30.000 If you want to lose weight, you've got to go to myphdweightloss.com.
00:11:33.000 I was just texting with Dr. Ash Lucas today.
00:11:35.000 If you're ready to lose weight for the last time, call 864-644-1900.
00:11:40.000 Go online at myphdweightloss.com.
00:11:42.000 Do what I did and what hundreds of my listeners have done and call today, 864-644-1900.
00:11:48.000 I recommend their program.
00:11:49.000 Dr. Ashley Lucas has her PhD in chronic disease and sports nutrition.
00:11:53.000 Her program is based on years of research and is science based.
00:11:56.000 Second, the PhD program starts in nutrition, but it's so much more.
00:11:59.000 Go to MyPhDWeightLoss.com.
00:12:01.000 MyPhDWeightLoss.com.
00:12:03.000 Call 864-644-1900.
00:12:06.000 I lost over 30 pounds.
00:12:07.000 Dr. Asher Lucas, great American.
00:12:08.000 Check it out.
00:12:09.000 MyPhDWeightLoss.com.
00:12:14.000 This phenomenon of independence tracking with Republicans, it's happening all over again, just like in 2016 when Trump won.
00:12:22.000 What is your polling saying when you're talking to these voters?
00:12:26.000 Is that the same sort of thing you were expecting to see?
00:12:29.000 I mean, I guess so.
00:12:31.000 I mean, hindsight's always 20-20.
00:12:32.000 But, you know, last month, not the poll we just did, but the one before that, we kind of saw like an inflate because there was a bad response bias in the data.
00:12:40.000 So we saw an inflation of independents or Democratic-leaning independents.
00:12:45.000 So independents are really when you ask them and push them, they lean more to the Democratic Party.
00:12:49.000 Now it's ironed out again back to closer to what we had seen for like the entire year plus.
00:12:55.000 Uh, so that we wouldn't expect Kamala Harris's entry into the race to change those fundamentals.
00:13:00.000 And I will say this, this is what she didn't do with those voters last night.
00:13:04.000 In response to that, she did not give an answer, Andrew, about like what she intended to do to stop that.
00:13:11.000 All right.
00:13:11.000 Because they basically are tracking, I mean, not basically, they are tracking right along with the Republicans, but instead she gave them a reason why not to vote for Trump over it.
00:13:20.000 Right?
00:13:20.000 So that's what she did all night long, and that's not what voters wanted to hear.
00:13:24.000 Listen to this from the Reuters panel, then I'm going to give you something from ours, okay?
00:13:28.000 This guy, Robert Wheeler, 48, security firm executive in Nevada, he was leaning to Harris.
00:13:33.000 He's a voter, like the woman I'm about to read you from ours, who when you pushed her would say, yeah, okay, I'm undecided, but I think I'm leaning to Harris.
00:13:42.000 Same thing with this guy.
00:13:43.000 Really?
00:13:44.000 But now he's voting for Trump.
00:13:46.000 And he said because there was no clarity.
00:13:48.000 It was just, this is his quote.
00:13:50.000 I felt like the whole debate was Kamala Harris telling me why not to vote for Donald Trump
00:13:55.000 instead of why she's the right candidate.
00:13:59.000 Same thing, 53 year old woman in California.
00:14:02.000 This is a woman who leans to the left.
00:14:04.000 She has voted for squishy rhino Republicans in the past, but mostly votes Democratic.
00:14:10.000 She's never voted for Trump, doesn't like Trump or MAGA and said that now she's leaning
00:14:15.000 This was the best she's ever seen Trump.
00:14:18.000 I'm like.
00:14:19.000 A little bit confused, I think.
00:14:23.000 But this is real.
00:14:25.000 We're all finding this.
00:14:26.000 And I want a couple of days to see the data and how it impacts overall surveys.
00:14:30.000 But very clearly, ma'am, when it comes to these undecideds who are watching this debate, this did not go well for her.
00:14:38.000 And I really think those two things are it.
00:14:40.000 Her mannerisms.
00:14:41.000 We've talked about this on your show before.
00:14:45.000 You've got to meet a presidential bar and you've got to have a presidential justification.
00:14:48.000 justification. Why you now for this moment, like why you?
00:14:53.000 Obama had one, Trump has one, and had one in 16. What the hell is her justification? It was her
00:14:58.000 job to lay that out and she didn't.
00:15:00.000 Well, it feels like, you know, again, we were all confused because on style points,
00:15:06.000 we could all see Trump can actually do a lot better than this. He can't.
00:15:10.000 And I actually think if he did a second debate, he can do a lot better.
00:15:13.000 Because the knockout punches are there.
00:15:15.000 She tipped her hand.
00:15:16.000 We know she's afraid of the fracking argument.
00:15:18.000 We know she's afraid of the fact that she's been in power for three and a half years.
00:15:21.000 She doesn't have an answer for that.
00:15:22.000 She doesn't know how she's different.
00:15:23.000 She doesn't have a why.
00:15:25.000 All of this stuff, she tipped her hand.
00:15:26.000 Trump could dunk on her in the next debate.
00:15:28.000 But what's fascinating is, and we've said this, and the campaign knows this, they have been hiding Kamala Harris for 50 plus days now.
00:15:38.000 Hiding her.
00:15:39.000 They knew they had to do at least one debate because they would look like cowards if they didn't.
00:15:43.000 But they won't let her do interviews.
00:15:45.000 They let her do one with CNN and Tim Waltz, which didn't go well for her.
00:15:49.000 They're keeping her out of press gaggles.
00:15:51.000 No unscripted moments.
00:15:53.000 She's an actress.
00:15:54.000 That is all she is, essentially.
00:15:56.000 She's a performance artist.
00:15:57.000 And the more the American people see of her, The less they like her.
00:16:02.000 And it kind of doesn't matter about the debates, about the finer points of the debate.
00:16:06.000 It doesn't matter about how she comes off, or the one-liners, or the zingers.
00:16:10.000 We just don't like what we see.
00:16:11.000 It's kind of almost that simple, Rich.
00:16:13.000 And the campaign, I think, knew this because they've been hiding her from us.
00:16:18.000 She's not a likable person.
00:16:20.000 Have we all forgotten that she was the most unpopular vice president in history?
00:16:24.000 She beat Dan Quayle with unpopularity, folks.
00:16:27.000 I mean, now this new resurgence of popularity isn't real.
00:16:32.000 It's being pushed by a bogus media narrative.
00:16:34.000 They did it once before with her, and then she collapsed in the Democratic primary.
00:16:38.000 They're hiding her because they're afraid of this repeating history, history repeating itself with her.
00:16:43.000 The more they see her, the more they don't like her.
00:16:45.000 I agree, man.
00:16:46.000 I think she reminded people last night why They didn't like her to begin with.
00:16:50.000 I really do.
00:16:50.000 Hillary did the same thing.
00:16:53.000 Remember, she bailed on the Democratic primary because the more she was out there talking, the worse her numbers got.
00:17:01.000 And eventually Democrat voters cast her aside, as Trump would say, like a dog.
00:17:07.000 Maybe this is just how she is.
00:17:10.000 She comes out with a big bang, she gets a big She looks the part, she checks the boxes, and then she opens her mouth and people start realizing there's nothing there.
00:17:22.000 Yeah, so what we're basically trying to do, Andrew, is change how this stuff is done.
00:17:29.000 Gone are the days of the Trump plus ones, Biden plus ones.
00:17:33.000 In order to keep them honest, we have to be transparent like anything else in government, business, and in life.
00:17:40.000 Sunlight is the best disinfectant from this garbage disease in the polling industry we've been Dealing with.
00:17:46.000 So what it is, is it's basically funded by viewers, listeners, people who, you know, see it shared by their friends and whatnot.
00:17:53.000 And they can go and fund the Rust Belt poll, which is the big three.
00:17:56.000 Now it was the big six, but might as well be the big three.
00:18:00.000 And the national poll that we do.
00:18:02.000 And this way, I mean, my incentive is just to be right.
00:18:05.000 Because then people won't fund it if I'm wrong.
00:18:07.000 Right?
00:18:08.000 And it was very successful in 2020.
00:18:10.000 I was a little concerned.
00:18:11.000 People have less money now than they did in 2020 that it wouldn't fund, but so far we're doing really well and I'd like to very much keep up that momentum.
00:18:20.000 If they go to bigdatapoll.com or on my locals page where it says support our polls, a little hand waving, they can learn more about it and they can definitely just go to bigdatapoll.com and they'll see it in the menu.
00:18:31.000 They can click on it and check it out.
00:18:33.000 Support it, share it far and wide, help it stay successful, and we'll try to keep them honest.
00:18:40.000 I love that, Rich.
00:18:42.000 It's more important now to support the good guys than ever, especially when you see the media bias like we did in that debate last night where it was three on one.
00:18:51.000 Rich, I want to play a clip here from one of these focus groups that we saw last night.
00:18:58.000 There's one clip in particular that I'm looking for.
00:19:02.000 Where it was, I think, so emblematic of what we saw last night where it was like, you know, yeah, he was basically exaggerating some things, but then this other lady says, you know, it really didn't matter.
00:19:16.000 Let's go ahead and play Cut 100.
00:19:19.000 Trump's say about abortion rights.
00:19:21.000 Absolutely, because he was intentionally sensationalizing and giving false information, essentially disinformation.
00:19:32.000 Is that an issue that motivates the two of you?
00:19:34.000 Is that going to make you want to vote for perhaps Kamala Harris, Vice President Harris?
00:19:39.000 It's an important factor.
00:19:42.000 There's just so many other things that concern me more.
00:19:48.000 I can't say that that's my top.
00:19:49.000 That's not my top.
00:19:52.000 How perfectly emblematic of what happened last night in the minds of voters.
00:19:57.000 Rich Beres.
00:19:58.000 Yeah, I think that, you know, the late, great Rush Limbaugh used to have this phenomenon of like MAGA and Trump's appeal attitudinally and policy-wise.
00:20:08.000 He used to have it down pretty well.
00:20:09.000 You know, Andrew, he did.
00:20:11.000 And he would say, you know, that voters don't take Trump literal like that, but they take what he's talking about seriously.
00:20:17.000 Right?
00:20:18.000 And it doesn't matter if he gets the number of immigrants wrong, right?
00:20:22.000 It doesn't matter if he gets a specific detail about whether or not Haitians fried up a cat or a dog wrong, right?
00:20:29.000 It's like the policy he's talking about is real and they take it seriously.
00:20:34.000 And since he's the only one addressing it and the only one who seems concerned about it, all of those little things that the media gets hung up on don't matter.
00:20:43.000 They just don't matter.
00:20:45.000 When they start taking this stuff seriously and they start addressing and acknowledging even the grievances that people have, you know, like Springfield, Ohio, nobody voted for that.
00:20:55.000 Andrew, nobody voted for that.
00:20:56.000 It's a town of 50,000 residents.
00:20:59.000 Nobody voted for 20,000 imported Asians.
00:21:02.000 Nobody asked their permission.
00:21:04.000 And he's the only one who seems to care.
00:21:06.000 And until they start addressing those grievances and acknowledging that those are legitimate grievances, then they're going to lose to guys like Trump.
00:21:13.000 It's that simple.
00:21:14.000 You know, I mean, and they get so hung up on.
00:21:17.000 It's so well said, Rich.
00:21:19.000 Rich, I didn't get nearly enough time with you today.
00:21:22.000 I could have done the whole hour with you, Rich.
00:21:24.000 Tell people where they can watch your show.
00:21:25.000 It's Monday, Wednesday, Friday, correct?
00:21:28.000 Tell people where they can follow you.
00:21:31.000 Yeah, the best place again is on Locals, peoplespundit.locals.com.
00:21:35.000 And we're on YouTube, we're on Rumble, we're basically a getter, we are on getter too, but if you go to Locals, sign up, become a member, you'll see it all.
00:21:44.000 What we're doing with the polling, actually we're going to run a nationwide voter file analysis, which we have not done this election cycle yet.
00:21:52.000 Machine learning, AI, it's cool.
00:21:54.000 If you're on Locals, you'll check it out, you'll get it, you'll see it.
00:21:58.000 So definitely peoplespundit.locals.com.
00:22:02.000 Well done, Rich.
00:22:03.000 Excellent as always, my friend.
00:22:04.000 Thank you for making the time and we'll talk to you soon because we're going to want to know how the numbers settle out in the days that come.
00:22:10.000 So be well, Rich.
00:22:11.000 We'll talk to you soon.
00:22:13.000 Anytime, my friend.
00:22:17.000 Hey everybody, Charlie Kirk here.
00:22:18.000 Did you know that 80% of adults take supplements to feel our best, right?
00:22:23.000 Well, one thing your dog can't do without you is improve their diet or health to feel their best.
00:22:29.000 That is why I believe Rough Greens could dramatically help your best friend by adding what is missing to their diet like you do.
00:22:36.000 Rough Greens is helping thousands and thousands of dogs feel better and live longer, including my dog, Mr. Briggs, who loves it.
00:22:45.000 Naturopathic Dr. Dennis Black, who created Rough Greens, is also an Airborne Ranger and Green Beret.
00:22:50.000 An amazing background, he loves dogs and is on a mission to help as many as he can.
00:22:55.000 Dog food is dead and Rough Greens supplements your dog's food with existing vitamins and minerals, omega oils, digestive enzymes, Probiotics and antioxidants.
00:23:06.000 Dr. Black is offering you a free jumpstart trial bag.
00:23:09.000 So fetch your free jumpstart trial bag.
00:23:11.000 Just cover shipping.
00:23:12.000 Don't change your dog's food.
00:23:14.000 Just go to ruffgreens.com slash kirk r-u-f-f greens dot com slash kirk.
00:23:20.000 We have Mark Mitchell, chief pollster of Rasmussen, on with us.
00:23:24.000 Mark, give us the big picture takeaway.
00:23:27.000 I feel like there's a little bit of, you know, how would you say it?
00:23:31.000 We were expecting maybe a little bit more of a 50-50, but the morning after, it looks like Trump really took this thing, and I think that's surprising a ton of people, even in conservative circles.
00:23:42.000 Mark, your take.
00:23:43.000 Really hard to predict what's going to happen with these kind of events.
00:23:45.000 To be honest, you know, Biden and Trump have changed electoral politics in a way that I don't think everybody's fully grasped yet.
00:23:54.000 I mean, the fact that, like, the people voting for Trump have seen him on Everything's more at him than any other candidate.
00:24:05.000 And then also with the amount of mass formation psychosis going on in the left, how rapidly
00:24:11.000 that Kamala Harris went from the worst VP in history to literally the ascendant coming
00:24:19.000 of Barack Obama in female form.
00:24:22.000 It's really crazy.
00:24:23.000 And even just the expansion of the electorate in 2020 gets us to a point where I think there's less undecided voters than really anybody's willing or able to come to terms with.
00:24:34.000 I think going into this debate, though, the way that we kind of looked at it is people gave Trump and Kamala Harris about even odds, which was better for her than Biden.
00:24:42.000 Only 37% of people expected Biden to win.
00:24:46.000 But in our opinion, the momentum and narrative has been slipping through their fingers like sand after this DNC that didn't give them the historic bounce.
00:24:57.000 That's back when you had undecided voters, when you get like these massive upper single digit bounces for like Clinton and Biden.
00:25:04.000 She got like maybe two points in our polling.
00:25:07.000 And then all of a sudden over the weekend, the New York Times and Nate Silver independently came out and like stuck a shiv In the Kamala Harris campaign, they destroyed her momentum in the press by saying the New York Times came out and agreed with us.
00:25:24.000 That Donald Trump is winning the popular vote by one point.
00:25:27.000 We have the exact same results, us and the New York Times.
00:25:30.000 And so it's awfully hard to ignore Rasmussen reports and all of the polls we put out, like four times more polls than the New York Times, when we say the same thing.
00:25:40.000 So everything we've been saying going into this debate is that in our polling, Trump has always been winning the national popular vote.
00:25:47.000 Now, a major mainstream media outlet came out and validated our data And if it's true and he's winning the national popular vote, I think even the swing states start to matter less.
00:25:58.000 And so what you have is between now and where we're at, and November, what are all the things that could move their numbers aside from like another assassination attempt, or they're not even going to be able to jail Trump anymore.
00:26:15.000 And so we said going into it, such a huge pressure for her to perform in a way that she never has yet.
00:26:23.000 She really needs an unequivocal win to show that she'll be a better president than Donald Trump.
00:26:30.000 And I think looking at last night, she, you know, people have said she'd win.
00:26:33.000 I think the mainstream media doesn't have their hearts in it.
00:26:36.000 It doesn't look like a win.
00:26:37.000 And if anybody wins, I think it's independent media.
00:26:41.000 Well, and you bring up a really good point.
00:26:43.000 I mean, the calculus has changed in our modern era because of social media, because of X and because of clipping.
00:26:51.000 There's almost like a post-debate debate, right?
00:26:54.000 And everything that I'm seeing from the punditry class at CNN and others is that Kamala Harris had this dazzling performance.
00:27:03.000 And I'm even willing to concede that she won on style points.
00:27:06.000 Fine.
00:27:06.000 She was more rehearsed, more polished, but it was You've got this Reuters article that says 6 out of 10 undecideds are now either voting for Trump or leaning Trump, and then you've got panelists after panelists after panelists that somehow still says, yeah, but I think I'm going to go with Trump.
00:27:25.000 What is that about?
00:27:27.000 Why are we so able to see that maybe Kamala won the style points but lost on substance?
00:27:34.000 What is happening with these focus groups?
00:27:37.000 I would caution people to avoid the information coming out of And this is like, I think Michael Crichton coined the concept, but basically like when you read the newspaper and you see an article you know something about and you are like, Oh, they're lying.
00:27:53.000 And then you go to a topic you don't know anything about.
00:27:55.000 And you're like, Oh, they're telling me the truth.
00:27:57.000 Uh, mainstream media pollsters and the mainstream media have proven themselves time and time again, again, to be liars all the time.
00:28:04.000 No, but many times.
00:28:06.000 And all of those panelists, We're ostensibly selected by somebody adjacent to those organizations.
00:28:13.000 It is not a scientific sample size.
00:28:15.000 It's like 12 schmoes they found.
00:28:17.000 And again, like I'm saying, I don't even know like how many undecided voters there are out there, but somehow they were able to come up with a completely random sample of those people that reflect the cross section of the undecided in America.
00:28:34.000 It's impossible, and it's great for, like you said, the post-debate debate, right?
00:28:39.000 They're trying to form a narrative about who won, but I think in reality, the Trump people will find something that they like.
00:28:46.000 The Harris people, you know, the Trump people were looking for zingers to clip and put on Twitter, like you were talking about, right?
00:28:51.000 Right.
00:28:52.000 And when they look at Kamala Harris, I think very few of them will objectively say, oh, she answered that well because they were probably put off by all the contrived faces she was making.
00:29:02.000 And on the left, they're getting exactly what they want to, which is the mainstream media telling them that she is a brilliant statesman and policy genius.
00:29:11.000 And that's what's happening.
00:29:12.000 And every time they look at Trump talk, they just Yeah.
00:29:17.000 So if this is the kind of debate we're at, quite frankly, I think it's a wash.
00:29:22.000 And again, people look at the betting markets.
00:29:25.000 I don't think the betting markets are accurate, but I think they're responsive.
00:29:28.000 And unfortunately for us, we haven't even put specific post-debate questions into the field yet.
00:29:35.000 They're not even going to go into the field until Sunday night.
00:29:37.000 We're not going to get those back until middle, late next week.
00:29:41.000 I also think people should be suspicious about mainstream media-operated snap polls as well.
00:29:47.000 And also in the matchup numbers, we're not going to get even our first night of post-debate matchup numbers till tomorrow.
00:29:53.000 It'll only be one night of data.
00:29:56.000 So these things take time to figure out.
00:29:58.000 And in the grand scheme of things, I suspect we're going to see basically no movement, right?
00:30:03.000 is almost baked in, right?
00:30:03.000 Yeah.
00:30:06.000 Like people expected the press to be hostile.
00:30:08.000 People expected Trump to do what Trump does in debates.
00:30:12.000 And people expected her to have underhanded tactics and lie a lot and not get fact-checked.
00:30:18.000 One of the main storylines from last night was certainly that David Murr,
00:30:28.000 or however you say his name, and ABC as a whole were completely
00:30:35.000 in the tank for Kamala Harris.
00:30:38.000 I mean, we went through it as a team this morning, and it was like Kamala lied about the fact that she supports gun compensation.
00:30:45.000 She said she didn't.
00:30:45.000 Well, in 2019, there's a clip of her saying, yeah, I support mandatory buybacks.
00:30:50.000 Yeah.
00:30:50.000 She said that nowhere in America can you do late-term abortions.
00:30:54.000 ABC actually interjected and fact-checked Trump on that.
00:30:56.000 Well, it turns out in at least eight states and District of Columbia, you can do late-term abortions.
00:31:02.000 Kamala said that Trump's policy is to ban IVF. He's been a leader on IVF.
00:31:07.000 Kamala said that Trump referred to neo-Nazis as very fine people. Debunked as a hoax many times over.
00:31:13.000 Bloodbath hoax. Trump was talking about the economy.
00:31:17.000 You know, so she says she didn't wanna ban fracking.
00:31:21.000 Well, she is on the record of saying she very much wants to ban fracking.
00:31:25.000 She tried to pin 2020, Project 2025 to him.
00:31:28.000 He's come out and distanced himself from that.
00:31:30.000 It was done by Heritage, not by Trump.
00:31:33.000 She said that officers were murdered on January 6th, Capitol Police officers.
00:31:37.000 There was approximately zero officers that were killed on January 6th, only Ashley Babbitt.
00:31:43.000 CNN came out saying that Kamala Harris only lied once and Trump lied 33 times, according to CNN.
00:31:51.000 And I just think to your point, nobody's buying it anymore.
00:31:55.000 I don't know what changed in the national consciousness, but people do not buy it.
00:32:02.000 It doesn't move the needle.
00:32:04.000 Mark.
00:32:05.000 Yeah, I talked about this on Alex Jones last night.
00:32:07.000 I think it's a very important thing.
00:32:09.000 And Americans are absolutely insane right now in a way that is just immeasurable.
00:32:13.000 We have the highest number of voters right now who think a civil war is likely in the next five years.
00:32:19.000 And if you ask Republicans who the country's biggest enemy are, number one, they say China, number two, Democrats.
00:32:25.000 And with the Democrats, it's Russia and Republicans.
00:32:28.000 But basically to keep Biden in power, The Democrat regime burned trust in almost every institutional asset we have in America.
00:32:38.000 Nobody trusts the health industry anymore.
00:32:40.000 People don't trust the media.
00:32:42.000 60% of them think the media is the enemy of the people.
00:32:45.000 You know, the Fed's direction, like literally everything nobody trusts anymore.
00:32:50.000 And I think what you're seeing in a deeper way is almost this like, spiritual political battle.
00:32:55.000 Because when you're talking about all those lies that Kamala Harris spewed, and I think objective thinkers and rational people could look at them and call them lies.
00:33:03.000 If you think about them, like religious quasi religious catechisms, I think it makes A lot more sense.
00:33:10.000 And we've definitely gone into the religious aspect.
00:33:13.000 Trump is winning by 30 points with evangelical Christians, but Kamala Harris is winning by even more than among Democrats with atheists.
00:33:21.000 But it isn't just religion, it's this aspect of reality.
00:33:25.000 And I think that's one of the reasons that our information, again, when people follow us, and I feel the pull for our content, It's because they seem like they're hungry for information and want to figure out how to consume it rationally and engage with it in discussion and dialogue.
00:33:42.000 Like an actual debate.
00:33:43.000 Like what Charlie Kirk is doing on college campuses right now.
00:33:46.000 It's almost like our country has lost its ability to debate.
00:33:50.000 And that's how you get cancel culture.
00:33:52.000 That's how you get Biden strong approvers wanting to put the unvaccinated in camps and that's how you get this just absolute disagreement and it's like you have the regime mentality who wants to maintain some kind of psychological conformity as like in some kind of like cultist behavior to be frank and honest
00:34:14.000 And I see it even on my Twitter feed, like the people that like our polling will ask me questions, they'll point out flaws that we'll have an engaging discussion.
00:34:24.000 The trolls that come here, the blue anons that come to my Twitter feed, it's literally just two logical fallacies over and over again, right?
00:34:32.000 It's ad hominem attacks.
00:34:34.000 And it's like answer criticism with criticism.
00:34:36.000 That's all they got.
00:34:37.000 That's all they if they can't Put their head in the sand to ignore our data.
00:34:44.000 But the problem for them is we agree with the New York Times.
00:34:47.000 Trump is winning the national popular vote.
00:34:52.000 You don't need to tell me that life is precious, that it could get all taken away in an instant.
00:34:56.000 That's why I keep a four-week emergency kit from My Patriot Supply in my home.
00:35:01.000 It's got everything my family could need during a crisis.
00:35:03.000 With over 2,000 calories a day, there's enough to go around during times of social unrest, government crackdowns, or God forbid, an attack on the homeland.
00:35:12.000 The food lasts up to 25 years, ready whenever disaster strikes.
00:35:16.000 We've seen mass panic in our lifetimes before.
00:35:17.000 Some were not that long ago.
00:35:19.000 I'm not gonna take my family's safety for granted anymore.
00:35:22.000 Right now, you can get $50 off the same 4-week emergency food kit that I keep in my home.
00:35:22.000 Are you?
00:35:28.000 Go to mypatriotsupply.com and save $50 on a 4-week emergency food kit from My Patriot Supply and we'll send it over as fast as humanly possible.
00:35:36.000 Trust me, I know my order showed up in one day and it shipped for free.
00:35:39.000 Get your 4-week emergency food kit at mypatriotsupply.com.
00:35:43.000 That is mypatriotsupply.com.
00:35:48.000 Mark, one of the phenomenons that we've seen in the post-debate analysis is that independents are tracking very closely with Republicans, especially on immigration and inflation, the economy.
00:36:00.000 Is this what you're seeing in your numbers?
00:36:02.000 Do you expect to see whatever's left of that undecided independent vote break for Trump, or is it not going to matter?
00:36:10.000 In my opinion, independent doesn't always necessarily mean undecided, to be honest with you.
00:36:17.000 Listen, the Democrats have a brand advantage.
00:36:19.000 Often it's cool to call yourself Democrats, and you'll have people that are Democrat and vote, you know, Trump.
00:36:24.000 And then you also have this trend over the last three or four years of people fleeing the Republican Party and calling themselves independents because they just don't think, you know, it's a party that's serving their interests.
00:36:36.000 So really hard to say.
00:36:36.000 But what I would say is that the independents They're the ones that are going to decide this election because in our numbers, the biggest move in all of them from 2020 has been the independence went for Biden, like upper double digits in our polls in 2020.
00:36:52.000 And now it's a Trump, solid Trump win every single poll we've had in the last, like really Afghanistan woke him up and turned him super, super conservative.
00:37:01.000 It got to the point where the swing in independence was so big that we had to reevaluate and put additional methodology in.
00:37:10.000 To make our numbers less pro-Trump.
00:37:13.000 Right now, I mean, we are getting like a 10, 15 point Trump lead among independents.
00:37:19.000 So we're waiting to the 2020 recall vote, which a lot of people aren't.
00:37:22.000 We don't need to get into all the details.
00:37:25.000 But I get a lot of Trump supporters and I have to weight them down in order to get to what I think is an accurate representation of where the race is now.
00:37:33.000 And even despite that, again, we have Trump plus one.
00:37:37.000 If we're wrong, Kamala Harris has a blowout and for some reason for the first time in a national presidential cycle we're off more than like a point and a half.
00:37:48.000 It will be because something changed in my methodology that made my independents look too conservative.
00:37:54.000 But they have their eyes open about all of this.
00:37:57.000 The independents only gave Trump about a 15 point favorability advantage going into the first debate with Biden.
00:38:04.000 After Biden's failure, they said like 63% to 10 that Trump won that debate.
00:38:11.000 So I'm expecting to see something similar about them and we'll see how they break.
00:38:16.000 But they've been more and more conservative on every issue that matters.
00:38:20.000 They trust Republicans and Trump 15 to 20 points more on like the economy and the border.
00:38:26.000 And quite frankly, they like don't seem to care about abortion that much and all of the other Like, key Democrat issues.
00:38:34.000 Now, there are a huge mix of people in there.
00:38:36.000 There's definitely TDS folks.
00:38:39.000 There's definitely single-issue abortion voters.
00:38:42.000 But in our latest matchup, we had independents going six points to Donald Trump, and I think the number without waiting to the recall vote was like 10 or 11 points.
00:38:54.000 That's one of the things that separates us from the people like ABC News, which are sampling massive Trump deranged populations and getting independents going harassed by upper single digits.
00:39:04.000 So break that down for what that means, and I think that's really good news if you're a Trump supporter.
00:39:09.000 Arizona has more registered independents than Republicans or Democrats.
00:39:13.000 So I love hearing that for Arizona.
00:39:15.000 What does that mean in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, especially the blue wall states?
00:39:21.000 Yeah, a lot of them are trending more and more independent as well.
00:39:24.000 And quite frankly, it makes the polling harder if your target's moving every four years, which it is.
00:39:31.000 But those people tend to be Kitchen table issue voters that have less loyalty to party, which again, is why in every single swing state, we show Trump doing much better than the Republican party and even the Republican senatorial candidates.
00:39:48.000 But that's the things like fracking, the things like jobs and inflation matter to those people.
00:39:55.000 And that's how you get over the last four years, a 20 point shift towards Trump In the independents.
00:40:01.000 So they definitely shifted towards Trump, again, unlike, you know, whatever's going on in the ABC News polling.
00:40:08.000 It's just a question of how much.
00:40:09.000 And you gotta wait and see.
00:40:11.000 And not only is it impossible to predict exactly what the political makeup of the independents is, but even how big they'll turn out, right?
00:40:20.000 Because we've been frequently surprised by the sudden and drastic increases in mysterious turnout, really going back all the way to 2018.
00:40:31.000 But again, at this point in time, like, look, Pennsylvania is the must-win state.
00:40:35.000 We had it as a statistical tie in numbers collected in the middle of the DNC, which is six points better than Trump was doing just four years ago in our polling.
00:40:47.000 And we only shifted the weighting like three points more Republican.
00:40:50.000 Yeah.
00:40:51.000 We got to wrap it up here, but excellent analysis as always.
00:40:51.000 Yeah.
00:40:55.000 Everybody check out Rasmussen, the polling and also Mark, follow him on Twitter, a must follow.
00:41:01.000 Thank you for your analysis and we'll talk to you again soon.
00:41:04.000 Yeah, happy to be here.
00:41:05.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
00:41:06.000 We'll talk to you soon.