The Charlie Kirk Show - Is the CDC the Regime’s Trojan Horse?

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, today on the Charlie Kirk Show, we examine Earth Day first and then we talk about Fauci and some comments he's made about the Constitution and courts.

00:00:09.000 A little more of a philosophical episode.

00:00:11.000 So if you're interested in kind of diving deep into how we got here and what's been motivating decisions, I think this episode will be for you, but we tie it into the news of the day.

00:00:21.000 Email me your thoughts as always freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:00:24.000 And if you want to support our program, go to charliekirk.com slash support.

00:00:28.000 That's charliekirk.com slash support.

00:00:30.000 I want to encourage you to go back into the archives of the Charlie Kirk show.

00:00:35.000 It doesn't take a lot to go back.

00:00:37.000 It's just a couple episodes prior, but I'm afraid that it got kind of just lost in the flurry of episodes we've been posting, which is our conversation with Dr. Malone.

00:00:46.000 It was posted on Wednesday.

00:00:47.000 The only three things I can save America from mass psychosis.

00:00:50.000 Listen to it.

00:00:50.000 It's an important episode.

00:00:51.000 It really is.

00:00:52.000 And I think it will bless you.

00:00:53.000 If you want to get involved with Turning PointUSA, go to tpusa.com.

00:00:56.000 Come to our young women's leadership summit at tpusa.com slash ywls.

00:01:01.000 That's tpusa.com slash yws.

00:01:04.000 There's a young women's leadership summit, and you will love it.

00:01:07.000 June 2nd, 3rd, and 4th in Dallas, Texas.

00:01:09.000 I will be there.

00:01:09.000 So Alex Clark, Kaylee McInnie, Candace Owens, and more.

00:01:12.000 tpusa.com slash ywls.

00:01:16.000 If you want to support the Charlie Kirk show, go to charliekirk.com slash support.

00:01:20.000 Buckle up everybody here.

00:01:21.000 We go.

00:01:22.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

00:01:23.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses.

00:01:26.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

00:01:29.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

00:01:32.000 I want to thank Charlie.

00:01:33.000 He's an incredible guy.

00:01:34.000 His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.

00:01:43.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

00:01:52.000 That's why we are here.

00:01:54.000 Brought to you by Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.

00:01:57.000 For personalized loan services, you can count on.

00:01:59.000 Go to andrewandtodd.com, the wonderfulandrewandodd.com.

00:02:05.000 There's something happening worldwide, and we've been talking about this theme, and I really want to focus on this theme as we kind of get kicked off today, which is the theme of the big trying to crush the small, or the few trying to crush the many.

00:02:18.000 We're seeing this play out on a global stage.

00:02:21.000 In one month, the World Economic Forum will be meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

00:02:26.000 The World Economic Forum, of course, they are the authors and they are the attempted implementers of the Great Reset.

00:02:34.000 We've talked at great length about the Great Reset.

00:02:37.000 And it's interesting, as I was having dinner last evening with Pastor Frank and Shawnee, the wonderful pastors here at Calvary Chapel, Chattanooga.

00:02:46.000 We got to talking and they asked me, what percentage of Republican office holders could tell you what the Great Reset is?

00:02:53.000 And I'd say probably less than 10%.

00:02:56.000 I want you to think about that.

00:02:58.000 Less than 10% of people that we send to Congress could tell you in any detail what the Great Reset is.

00:03:04.000 However, a vast majority of grassroots activists and the base of the party could tell you what the Great Reset is.

00:03:11.000 They could tell you at least some of the goals of the World Economic Forum, that they want you to own nothing and be happy, that they want to keep borders completely wide open, that they want to bring Western values to a breaking point, that meat will be a delicacy that will no longer be enjoyed daily, that it will be basically will be a meatless society.

00:03:32.000 All these are different types of promises.

00:03:35.000 Some would say they are predictions.

00:03:37.000 I would say it's a little bit more of a goal of the World Economic Forum.

00:03:42.000 But I was thinking about this late last night, which is if the base of the party knows more than the leaders, what does that tell you?

00:03:52.000 Now, on its surface, that's a very troubling development or a very troubling fact that the base of the party knows more than the people they actually send to Washington, D.C.

00:04:03.000 But I actually look at it differently.

00:04:04.000 I actually think there's something very positive.

00:04:06.000 I think it's very promising.

00:04:08.000 It might not be promising immediately, but it means eventually we are going to get people into leadership that understand the global implications of what is happening all around us.

00:04:19.000 Now, one of the agenda items that kind of transcends all the other is the agenda item of energy.

00:04:27.000 Now, today is Earth Day.

00:04:28.000 That's what they tell me.

00:04:29.000 Earth Day.

00:04:30.000 I love the environment, and you should love the environment.

00:04:33.000 I love people, however, more than I love the environment, and you should too.

00:04:38.000 The environment is there so people can flourish.

00:04:41.000 Now, we want the environment to be sustained.

00:04:43.000 We want it to be protected.

00:04:45.000 We want it to be passed down to future generations.

00:04:47.000 But if you had to choose the survival of humanity and the flourishing of people, or the survival, not even the survival, or the unnecessary protection of a tree, it should be a no-brainer.

00:05:02.000 Now, Earth Day is fine.

00:05:03.000 I mean, the founder of Earth Day was kind of a very creepy, weird guy.

00:05:07.000 The founder of Earth Day, Ira Einhorn, the Earth Day co-founder, killed and composted his girlfriend.

00:05:14.000 Nice guy.

00:05:15.000 But at least he composted his girlfriend, right?

00:05:17.000 It's not like he just killed her.

00:05:18.000 At least he composted it, right?

00:05:20.000 Sustainable murder.

00:05:23.000 I don't think that's what they mean by sustainability, but we'll leave that as it is.

00:05:29.000 Earth Day, though, can go wrong very quickly.

00:05:32.000 I'm all for having a day to honor the environment.

00:05:35.000 Okay, sure.

00:05:36.000 Not a huge problem with that, philosophically.

00:05:38.000 However, the forces that are trying to push the great reset pervert people's appreciation of nature and the natural world immediately into an anti-fossil fuel, green energy takeover.

00:05:53.000 Now, the problem with the tyrannical green energy types is they use energy as a means to the end.

00:06:01.000 They use the energy topic as a way to try to control your life.

00:06:07.000 It's all about control.

00:06:08.000 And so when you start to hear the people in charge be insistent about an acceleration towards a green economy, we should take a step back and say, why is it that you want a green economy?

00:06:23.000 What does that actually even mean?

00:06:25.000 Now, of course, some of the more sustainable options for energy in our country, nuclear power, natural gas, which is very abundant, geothermal energy, where a lot of oil wells can be converted to geothermal energy because of how deep they go to the Earth's surface, which is abundant, near unlimited source of energy.

00:06:46.000 You don't hear that from the environmentalist types.

00:06:48.000 It's that it's always wind or solar, and that's it.

00:06:51.000 In fact, it's less about energy, and it's more about the eradication of private property, the stunting of entrepreneurship, or the remaking of the West as we know it.

00:07:03.000 So the Biden spokeswoman, Corine Jean-Pierre, says that Biden is committed to do everything he possibly can to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and speed up and not slow down our transition to clean energy.

00:07:15.000 However, but Corine Jean-Pierre should be asked, what is clean energy?

00:07:19.000 What do you mean by that?

00:07:20.000 Because natural gas has actually played a major role in lowering greenhouse carbon emissions over the last couple decades.

00:07:27.000 We are closer to the aims and the ambitions of the people that want to make the air cleaner, allegedly, and our environment safer, yet they don't want us to focus on natural gas.

00:07:38.000 In fact, they're trying to stop the exploration of oil and natural gas.

00:07:42.000 Why is it they're trying to prevent nuclear power?

00:07:46.000 Why is it that they're trying to prevent other sort of sustainable, long-term, cheap energy sources?

00:07:52.000 Is it all just about solar and wind?

00:07:55.000 Play cut 100.

00:07:57.000 But look, the president is committed to doing everything he can to address, you know, to reach his climate goals, taking executive actions that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

00:08:09.000 But at the very same time, we must speed up, not slow down, our transition to clean energy.

00:08:14.000 So we are.

00:08:15.000 It's central planning, of course, but we must understand that the energy push plays directly into the great reset aims and ambitions.

00:08:24.000 And if you have Republican lawmakers and leaders that do not know what the great reset is and talk about it regularly, then you need to challenge them on that.

00:08:31.000 If they are virtue signaling today on Earth Day and trying to say it's time for us to pass the Green New Deal, you need to ask, is it really about energy or is it about remaking the society as a whole as we know it?

00:08:44.000 An unpopular opinion, but a necessary opinion, is the ability to have access to cheap and abundant energy has allowed human beings to progress technologically, medically, and otherwise, civilizationally, quicker than anything we've ever seen.

00:09:02.000 The ability to have energy, which literally is what fuels your society, is a moral imperative for human beings to flourish.

00:09:10.000 And every single time you will confront a green energy type, an activist or environmentalist, around this idea of being able to have access to abundant and cheap energy, they'll scoff at it.

00:09:22.000 They'll say, oh, no, natural gas is not what I want, even though we have more natural gas than we'll probably ever know what to do with.

00:09:28.000 We are the world's leader in natural gas.

00:09:32.000 Remember, the great reset depends on scarcity.

00:09:37.000 In order to execute the great reset, they need emergencies.

00:09:41.000 They need crises.

00:09:43.000 So the great reset needs to try to create scarcity of food and energy, which will then allow the consolidation of control and power.

00:09:51.000 It will make you have to obey because you'll have no choice to then be able to control society.

00:09:57.000 The great reset hinges on you not being able to travel, not be able to have autonomy, and energy decisions are a major factor in that.

00:10:06.000 And unfortunately, a very small percentage of Republicans can even tell you what the great reset actually is.

00:10:15.000 Look, inflation is out of control.

00:10:17.000 One area we see it more than ever is the grocery store.

00:10:20.000 Even though grocery prices feel like they've doubled, Good Ranchers' prices have stayed low and affordable.

00:10:24.000 Once you subscribe, it's locked in.

00:10:26.000 The price never goes up.

00:10:27.000 Your best price is locked in for life.

00:10:29.000 They sell 100% American meat and deliver it to your door for a great price.

00:10:33.000 Good Ranchers help solve your meat problem.

00:10:35.000 And the problem is 85% of the grass-fed beef in stores and online is imported.

00:10:40.000 Shop Good Ranchers for all your beef, chicken, and seafood needs.

00:10:43.000 Their pre-trimmed and pre-marinated chicken breasts are absolutely delicious.

00:10:47.000 I love Good Ranchers, and you guys should too.

00:10:49.000 Their animals are ethically raised and they're beautifully sourced.

00:10:52.000 They do the things the right way and it shows in every box.

00:10:55.000 Good Ranchers takes the guesswork out of the meat aisle and grocery shopping.

00:10:59.000 Get a steakhouse quality at home with Good Ranchers.

00:11:02.000 Right now, go to goodranchers.com slash Charlie and do it right now.

00:11:06.000 It's Good Ranchers, American meat delivered.

00:11:09.000 I love Good Ranchers.

00:11:10.000 When Good Ranchers gets delivered to our home or to our office, it's something incredible.

00:11:16.000 If you don't buy the meat in your house, tell the person who does to check out Good Ranchers.

00:11:20.000 Support the Charlie Kirk Show.

00:11:22.000 Support America.

00:11:23.000 GoodRanchers.com slash Charlie.

00:11:28.000 If you spend some time and read the literature of the progressives in the early 1800s and early 1900s, you will see a constant peppering of a reference of science.

00:11:40.000 Now, in the late 1800s and early 1900s, that must have been a very exciting time to be a progressive because there were, at the time, incredible scientific breakthroughs occurring, industrial breakthroughs.

00:11:53.000 We saw in a very short period of time the airplane, the assembly line.

00:11:58.000 You started to see what they figured to be phenomenal vaccine technology start to be introduced in the early 1900s.

00:12:06.000 Science was spreading with massive momentum throughout the industrialized world.

00:12:12.000 The Germans in particular were people that put this forward.

00:12:16.000 Not put this forward, but the Germans were, they blended scientific breakthroughs with progressive philosophy.

00:12:23.000 And I'll unpack that because it's really important, the significance of it, and applies to what we're living through today.

00:12:28.000 Science, we've gone through the different types of how people describe science and what science actually is, the scientific method and the conjecture of it, but in the late 1800s, early 1900s, kind of piggybacking off of Hegel and a lot of German thinkers, there was this movement that ended up taking over the entire German government in the 1930s, the National Socialist Workers' Party,

00:12:55.000 otherwise known as the Nazis, that believed that science was a pinnacle, was a zenith, was an irrefutable principle, if you will, of industrialized society.

00:13:09.000 Now, it wasn't just trying to make pharmaceutical breakthroughs or military technological breakthroughs, but the Germans were unable to resist the temptation of trying to actually engineer the man.

00:13:22.000 Now, Woodrow Wilson believed this as well.

00:13:25.000 Woodrow Wilson was a progressive.

00:13:27.000 He was a college professor at Princeton University and then a college president, the governor of New Jersey, and then president of the United States.

00:13:34.000 Woodrow Wilson won the presidency without winning a majority of the votes.

00:13:38.000 He won the 1912 election in a three-way election against Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and then, of course, Woodrow Wilson.

00:13:45.000 And Howard Taft and Teddy Roosevelt split the vote, which then allowed Woodrow Wilson, the most radical president to hit to date, to take office and to declare war on the founding fathers.

00:13:57.000 Not total war, that's not totally fair, but he certainly rejected and repudiated a simple principle.

00:14:06.000 And the principle was that we now, since we have planes and we have trains and we have automobiles and technology is progressing, then we are now able to change the framework of the system of government.

00:14:18.000 And this very same debate is unfolding today, which is do you believe human nature changes over time, or do you believe human nature generally stays the same?

00:14:28.000 Do you believe it's a constant?

00:14:30.000 The founding fathers and the framers, because they studied history and they believed in the laws of nature and nature's God, as Thomas Jefferson beautifully put in the Declaration of Independence, believed human nature does not change, that the constant you're dealing with is human nature, and technology might change along the way, which might make it easier to do what human beings automatically want to do.

00:14:51.000 But the human spirit, the raw material of human beings, it doesn't change.

00:14:57.000 Now, understanding this is very significant because we're starting to see the very same debate unfold now in the political and the public health arena.

00:15:08.000 The founding fathers, when they designed the structure of government, specifically Madison, Hamilton, and John Jay, which they articulated beautifully in Federalist 51, Madison wrote, he said, if all men were angels, a government would not be necessary.

00:15:24.000 He knew that human beings were broken by nature, a belief in original sin, which is a biblical concept, and that therefore power should not be consolidated in one person, and you need a system of checks and balances.

00:15:37.000 Checks and balance is something we take for granted.

00:15:40.000 And thankfully, this last week, we've seen checks and balances play out, that the CDC is not supreme.

00:15:48.000 Now, the CDC is just an American example of the very same sort of German historicist, progressive, scientific philosophy that science and scientists must be supreme.

00:16:03.000 They must be elevated.

00:16:04.000 They must have power over others.

00:16:07.000 Thankfully, we still have a system of government, albeit in shambles at times, where the courts have an independent judiciary to check and balance the scientific community's push to restrict freedom and liberty.

00:16:28.000 Hey, everybody, towels just don't seem to dry you anymore.

00:16:31.000 They feel soft and lotiony in stores, but you get them home and they don't absorb.

00:16:34.000 Well, Mike Lundell at MyPillow found out that around 2006, towels changed forever.

00:16:39.000 They started importing them and adding softeners and other things to the cotton that made them feel good, but they didn't work.

00:16:45.000 He found the best towel company right here in America.

00:16:47.000 They have proprietary technology to create towels that feel soft but actually work.

00:16:51.000 They are all made with USA cotton and they come with a MyPillow 60-day money-back guarantee.

00:16:56.000 It's a six-piece set, two baths, two hand towels, two washcloths made with USA cotton.

00:17:00.000 They're soft yet absorbent.

00:17:01.000 Regularly, $100,999, not $39.99.

00:17:04.000 Just go to mypillow.com and click on the new Radio Listener Specials and get deep discounts on all MyPillow products, including the towels.

00:17:11.000 Enter promo code Kirk.

00:17:13.000 Call 1-800-875-0425 for these great radio specials.

00:17:16.000 That's mypillow.com and click on the new Radio Listener Square, mypillow.com.

00:17:23.000 The Founding Fathers created a system where, in order to do something dramatic or personal to the citizenry, it would require congressional consent.

00:17:34.000 You see, the progressives, though, the tricksters that they are, in the late 1800s and early 1900s, they designed a loophole, a workaround.

00:17:43.000 You see, the progressives said, you know, we've got to start to do things faster because we have all these great ideas.

00:17:48.000 We have science on our side.

00:17:50.000 And this little annoying Constitution keeps on getting in our way.

00:17:54.000 Like, the Constitution slows things down.

00:17:55.000 By the way, that's not a negative of the Constitution.

00:17:58.000 That's a positive characteristic.

00:18:01.000 It was an intentional design.

00:18:03.000 You see, Woodrow Wilson thought it was a design flaw.

00:18:06.000 Those of us that actually love liberty think it's a good thing that it's difficult to get stuff done in the United States Congress, especially the forsaking of freedom and liberty and things that are personal.

00:18:17.000 So when it comes down to mandates or when it comes down to getting into the personal business of a human being, it's not to say that Congress can't do that.

00:18:26.000 It's that it should be difficult to do it.

00:18:29.000 It has to be done intentionally.

00:18:30.000 You've got to win over the representatives themselves.

00:18:34.000 But in the early 1900s, we saw a diversion from this.

00:18:38.000 Teddy Roosevelt, I think, gets wrongly blamed.

00:18:40.000 I'm a big Teddy Roosevelt fan, and I'm happy to explain that in a future episode.

00:18:45.000 Teddy Roosevelt was one of the main reasons why a legitimate communist, Marxist-style revolution did not actually take root in America.

00:18:56.000 Teddy Roosevelt was a bridge, a good bridge, during the most unprecedented economic change.

00:19:06.000 Not just unprecedented, the most dramatic.

00:19:08.000 That's the word I'm looking for.

00:19:09.000 Economic change in history.

00:19:11.000 Now, we're living through another one of those. 0.52

00:19:13.000 But the farms to the factories transition was mismanaged by Russia.

00:19:19.000 The farms to the factories transition was mismanaged by Germany.

00:19:23.000 But it was actually managed very well by Teddy Roosevelt.

00:19:26.000 Now, I don't support everything that he did, but he understood that if you are not able to have some sort of a framework to all of a sudden go from an agrarian to an industrial economy, people like Vladimir Lenin are going to start to become really popular.

00:19:41.000 It's one of the main reasons why a Marxist revolution never took root here.

00:19:45.000 But Teddy Rosa gets blamed for part of this, and I think that's fair to blame him for a little bit of it.

00:19:49.000 But the main guy, the villain, is Woodrow Wilson.

00:19:52.000 And Woodrow Wilson was annoyed by the structure of the U.S. Constitution.

00:19:57.000 So all of that is now a lead up to what we're living through right now.

00:20:00.000 What we're living through right now is the very same debate 106 years later or 105 years later.

00:20:07.000 So Anthony Fauci in Cut 95, he insists that the CDC should be above U.S. federal courts.

00:20:14.000 What he's saying is that science should be unquestioned.

00:20:17.000 Who is a judge to tell me what I should be able to do and not do?

00:20:22.000 Play Cut 95.

00:20:24.000 Both surprised and disappointed because those types of things really are the purview of the CDC.

00:20:29.000 This is a public health issue.

00:20:31.000 And for a court to come in, and if you look at the rationale for that, it really is not particularly firm.

00:20:38.000 And we are concerned about that, about courts getting involved in things that are unequivocally public health decisions.

00:20:45.000 I mean, this is a CDC issue.

00:20:47.000 It should not have been a court issue.

00:20:49.000 Anthony Fauci would have been a perfect German historicist doctor.

00:20:55.000 Perfect.

00:20:56.000 Who's to say that a check and balance on me?

00:20:59.000 I'm a scientist.

00:21:02.000 You see, post-Darwin, there was this very dangerous philosophical movement that was implemented in the National Socialist Workers' Party of Germany, which was that if the science says it, don't question it, just do it.

00:21:22.000 Post-Darwin, the application of scientific supremacy led to eugenics movements, eugenicist movements. 0.89

00:21:34.000 Scientific supremacy led us to the forced sterilization of women post-Jacobson v. Massachusetts, where idiot women in the 1920s, well over 50,000 of them, were forcibly sterilized. 0.99

00:21:51.000 Now, that's their term, not my term, idiot women, because their IQs were too low, and they were forcibly sterilized because public health demanded it. 1.00

00:21:59.000 You see, what Fauci is saying there is that this is a public health issue. 0.98

00:22:03.000 However, somebody should say, you know, Mr. Fauci, under the guise of public health, more people have been intentionally destroyed over the last 100 years than under any other excuse. 0.82

00:22:15.000 It was a public health concern to try to set up concentration camps.

00:22:20.000 It was a public health concern to sterilize women. 1.00

00:22:25.000 That's why we have the structure of government that we have.

00:22:29.000 And Fauci doesn't have any sort of appreciation for the U.S. Constitution.

00:22:34.000 In fact, he has disdain for it.

00:22:37.000 He doesn't want to live under a structure where he could be checked and balanced.

00:22:42.000 He wants the unquestionable authority of science.

00:22:46.000 He is a despot bureaucrat.

00:22:49.000 And thankfully, the founders, all the way back to 1787, we are now living still through the blessing, the intergenerational blessing, where they knew someone like Anthony Fauci would come up at some point.

00:23:03.000 Now, mind you, the loophole they didn't anticipate as much, and who am I to criticize the founders?

00:23:08.000 That would be a huge mistake.

00:23:09.000 But it's well kind of, I think, agreed upon in constitutional circles.

00:23:13.000 Larry Arn and many others would say that the one thing the founders would have been a little bit surprised is like, you're creating this entire new fourth branch of government, this unelected branch where Congress doesn't even do their job, where you have the rulemakers actually be the agencies themselves, where the CDC doesn't have to go to Congress.

00:23:34.000 The CDC can just do it unilaterally. 0.58

00:23:37.000 That's been unconstitutional for well over a century.

00:23:40.000 It's definitely immoral, and it leads to these sort of measures.

00:23:44.000 But this judge, praise God, rose up and said, this is not constitutional.

00:23:48.000 This is not going to work.

00:23:49.000 So the Biden regime doesn't like this.

00:23:51.000 The Biden regime hinges on the ability to be able to micromanage your breathing, your decisions, your livelihood outside of Congress and through regulatory rulemaking.

00:24:05.000 An example of this is Cut 98.

00:24:10.000 Biden's COVID advisor, Ashish Ja, says a major goal of the Biden administration is to, quote, make sure the CDC has the authority to unilaterally implement mask mandates.

00:24:21.000 Play cut 98.

00:24:22.000 First is that public health decisions like this should be made by public health scientists.

00:24:27.000 And CDC had made a decision that masks were useful.

00:24:30.000 And it was deeply disappointing to see a federal judge step in and take that decision away from public health scientists.

00:24:37.000 The appeal, no question, a major goal of the appeal is to make sure that the CDC has the authority and the ability to protect Americans during health crises like this.

00:24:49.000 You are experiencing, you are witnessing, you are living through a multi-century debate of who's actually in charge.

00:24:57.000 Are the people sovereign?

00:24:58.000 Or is some sort of weird, creepy scientist like Fauci, who's been wrong about everything, is he in charge?

00:25:06.000 You see, laced into that remark from Ashish Jha, who is not my favorite person, is this comment, look, it must be done by public health.

00:25:19.000 The way he says it, right?

00:25:20.000 So the way he says it is he acts as if public health must be elevated above constitutional liberty.

00:25:27.000 The way he says it, he expects kind of to win people over, like, well, if it's public health, then just so be it.

00:25:33.000 I mean, if it's public health, then why would I even question it?

00:25:38.000 Well, of course, we now have seen over the last two years how public health has been against public health, the saddest, most oppressed, alcohol-addicted suicidal generation in history, thanks to public health decisions.

00:25:50.000 But even beyond that, even if all the public health decisions were being made beautifully and wonderfully, let's pretend masks are the greatest thing ever and they're epidemiologically sound, the rulemaking itself must actually go through a constitutional process.

00:26:04.000 Now, of course, we know these rules are anti-science.

00:26:08.000 They're anti-what is best for the human spirit, the soul, and the individual.

00:26:12.000 The Biden regime doesn't even mention how you could still wear masks if you want to.

00:26:16.000 No one's preventing you from doing that.

00:26:18.000 But instead, it is about the centralization of power.

00:26:21.000 It's the precedent to be able to make rules without that simple and necessary check and balance.

00:26:28.000 We see here in this clip, Ashish Jha says masks should be on.

00:26:33.000 Play cut 97.

00:26:35.000 You know, I think in terms of legal strategy, that's really being sorted out by the Department of Justice.

00:26:40.000 But from a health perspective, do you want the masks back on?

00:26:43.000 Yeah, look, the CDC scientists were very clear that masks should be on right now while they're doing an evaluation.

00:26:49.000 And I think that assessment is right.

00:26:51.000 And so I think that that is what should be happening right now.

00:26:54.000 This Hashish Jah guy is the White House coronavirus response coordinator on short-term leave from Brown University School of Public Health.

00:27:05.000 The very same type of person that would be in this entire German historicist progressive team, where I have a bunch of degrees.

00:27:14.000 I went to Brown.

00:27:15.000 Therefore, I should have more power than anybody else.

00:27:19.000 And not a judge, not a voter, not a member of Congress should be able to check and balance me.

00:27:27.000 No one should be able to interfere with what I want to do.

00:27:30.000 And so what you are seeing play out is a stress test of the structure, we use that word a lot on this program, of the Constitution.

00:27:39.000 And I'll say this time and time again.

00:27:41.000 The Founding Fathers were brilliant.

00:27:44.000 They knew exactly what they were doing.

00:27:46.000 So how is it a bunch of people in 1787 designed a system that is so incredibly applicable in 2022?

00:27:56.000 I thought that we're supposed to believe that things are old, are bad, and outdated.

00:27:59.000 It's because they didn't design the system based on the technology around them.

00:28:05.000 They designed the system on people.

00:28:08.000 When you study the Roman Empire, the Greek Empire, when you study the British Empire and the Chinese Empire, you realize the people themselves never change.

00:28:16.000 They act in a pattern because we all want the same things regardless of the technology around us.

00:28:22.000 Just because we have planes and faster cars and Twitter doesn't mean all of a sudden that you're dealing with somebody different.

00:28:30.000 Fauci doesn't believe that.

00:28:31.000 Ajish Jah does not believe that.

00:28:33.000 They think as medical technology advances, you've got to give them more power to try to accelerate the changing of the human being itself.

00:28:41.000 I want to get into this here.

00:28:42.000 It kind of connects to what we're talking about, which is the WHO, the World Health Organization, wants to be like a global CDC and call all the shots in the future.

00:28:55.000 So essentially, they want to try to have a global regime over American sovereignty because there is this annoyance that the CDC can be checked by federal courts.

00:29:10.000 So we must understand that global health emergency declarations are necessary for the great reset.

00:29:18.000 We have a clip on this to kind of explain it further.

00:29:21.000 Play cut 108.

00:29:23.000 To name it, to give the new disease or whatever a name, to decide what quarantine measures are needed.

00:29:32.000 And it's a one-health approach for every country around the world, a global approach to every disease.

00:29:41.000 It gives the WHO the control over who gets to develop the new treatments and what they are and how long they take and whether they're safe and so on.

00:29:53.000 So absolutely centralized control.

00:29:58.000 It's Dr. Tess Laurie from the World Council.

00:30:01.000 The WHO would reserve the right to decide what constitutes a pandemic and what have already changed the definition of the term.

00:30:08.000 It could be the flu.

00:30:09.000 The treaty could give the World Health Organization the power to name new diseases and decide what quarantine measures are needed on a global scale.

00:30:17.000 The World Health Organization controls over who gets to develop new treatments and decide whether they're safe.

00:30:22.000 The World Health Organization would then be given authority to determine who gets quarantined or locked down, usurping American law.

00:30:31.000 There'd be no more Sweden or Florida examples.

00:30:34.000 All the decisions would be centralized in the World Health Organization, the same World Health Organization controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. 0.69

00:30:42.000 The World Health Organization would decide over vaccine mandates for each country. 0.84

00:30:46.000 So how do they crush states' rights?

00:30:49.000 How do they crush this idea that judges can come in and check and balance?

00:30:53.000 You go above it.

00:30:54.000 You see, domestically, thankfully, the founding fathers gave us an ability to check and balance power here.

00:31:01.000 But what we must be vigilant is to make sure America is immune, to make sure America is not able to be interfered with an imperialist world health organization that wants to determine public health for our country.

00:31:15.000 And I will finish with how I started.

00:31:17.000 Very few Republicans know or have any idea what is going on with the Great Reset.

00:31:26.000 They better wake up and they better get the memo soon because there is a concerted effort to squeeze and suffocate America as we know it via public health declarations and yes, energy policy as well.

00:31:42.000 And we see that with this new WHO effort to be able to dictate all the health decisions for a country.

00:31:49.000 There'll be no more open Florida, no more open South Dakota.

00:31:54.000 Instead, some would call it a progressive Trojan horse for their quote-unquote totalitarian utopia or dystopia.

00:32:02.000 Republicans better wake up and we as voters better start to demand from them: if you can't tell me without looking at your notes what the great reset is or who Klaus Schwab is, you shouldn't be running as a Republican.

00:32:16.000 It's not just a issue, it is the issue.

00:32:20.000 Thank you so much for listening, everybody.

00:32:22.000 Email us your thoughts as always freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:32:24.000 Thank you so much for listening.

00:32:25.000 God bless.

00:32:29.000 For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk. com.

The Charlie Kirk Show - April 22, 2022

Is the CDC the Regime’s Trojan Horse?

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript