The Charlie Kirk Show - September 25, 2024


Kamala's Filibuster Threat and Pro-Life Voters


Episode Stats

Length

34 minutes

Words per Minute

179.9419

Word Count

6,193

Sentence Count

463

Misogynist Sentences

26

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

Kamala Harris says she will get rid of the filibuster. What does this mean for pro-life states like Tennessee, Oklahoma, Kansas, and the other pro-choice states in the country? What does it mean for the future of abortion rights in the United States? Today's episode is brought to you by The Weekly Standard and Noble Gold Investments. Weekly Standard is a leading financial news and opinion publication. Since its founding in 1859, it has consistently been one of the most influential publications in the world. Its mission is to inform, inform, and empower readers to make informed decisions about economic, political, and social issues affecting their day-to-day lives. At the bottom of the pyramid, it is the ultimate arbiter of what s good, what s bad, and what s just fine. Noble Gold is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show. Become a Member, a Founding Member of Memberscharliekirk.org, a Patron of the show, and a Friend of the Movement. You'll get access to all the latest and greatest gold and precious metals, including the rare Rare Gold! and much more! Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investing Investments. That's where I buy all of my gold. I don't have to pay taxes, I get to keep my gold at home! -Noble Gold Investments, I buy it in the vault, I own it, I give it to my clients, I tell them so they can keep their gold and I give them my gold and they get it for free, I receive it back in the rest of the world, I'm sure they'll love it, they'll get a good deal, I know it's safe and I'll tell them it'll make me better than that's good for me, they can tell me so much of it's going to make me that, they're going to get it back, and I'm going to tell them that, and they're gonna get it in return, it's gonna be great, they won't have it in a nice place, and it's good enough, I'll get it that way, I can tell them how it's great, right they'll have it, it'll be good, they know that they'll hear it, etc., etc. etc. - That's right, right? - Thank you, Charlie Kirk, you're a friend of the movement, right?!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, enjoy this episode.
00:00:01.000 Become a member, members.charliekirk.com.
00:00:04.000 That is members.charliekirk.com.
00:00:07.000 Email us as always, freedom at charliekirk.com, and become a member to support this program.
00:00:12.000 Buckle up everybody, here we go.
00:00:13.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
00:00:15.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
00:00:17.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
00:00:21.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
00:00:24.000 I want to thank Charlie.
00:00:25.000 He's an incredible guy.
00:00:26.000 His spirit, his love of this country.
00:00:28.000 He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:00:34.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:00:43.000 That's why we are here.
00:00:47.000 Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals.
00:00:57.000 Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
00:01:03.000 That is noblegoldinvestments.com.
00:01:05.000 It's where I buy all of my gold.
00:01:07.000 Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
00:01:12.000 Hello everyone, honored to be with you as always.
00:01:13.000 Blake is co-piloting today.
00:01:15.000 I want to remind you guys to do something about this election.
00:01:19.000 Go to tpaction.com slash commit 100 and do something.
00:01:23.000 Chase ballots, register voters.
00:01:25.000 I want to begin today, Blake and the audience, about something Kamala Harris said yesterday.
00:01:32.000 Now there's been a fair amount of apprehension amongst those of us that are pro-life that Donald Trump is insufficiently pro-life, therefore I'm going to stay at home and I'm going to protest vote him.
00:01:42.000 Meaning I'm not going to vote and just so you know there are, at least in my circle, I know of a lot of pro-life people that refuse to vote for Trump.
00:01:51.000 Now they're getting there because they say that Trump is not as pro-life as they would like to be.
00:01:55.000 I think this is silly and foolish and I say this as somebody who's very very pro-life.
00:01:59.000 But recent developments by Kamala Harris shows that he is far more pro-life.
00:02:05.000 Vastly more pro-life, and more to the point, pro-life in the ways that politically matter right now.
00:02:13.000 And I think that is the most important framing to put on it.
00:02:16.000 Yeah, and so so what Kamala Harris announced yesterday for the first time is that she is willing to nuke the filibuster, which is a tactic that is used in the Senate.
00:02:27.000 It's not constitutional that slows down pieces of legislation effectively saying that we're going to gut the filibuster.
00:02:38.000 Now, this might sound like something you've seen on a television commercial from Kamala Harris, but it's something completely different.
00:02:46.000 What she is saying is that she will overturn any state that might have pro-life legislation.
00:02:53.000 In Oklahoma, in Kansas, in Tennessee.
00:02:55.000 So what is so remarkable about this tape that we're about to play, this is Kamala Harris in a phone interview, I imagine a radio interview of some sort, and she does this unprompted.
00:03:07.000 Nobody asked a question of Kamala Harris about the filibuster, at least to my knowledge.
00:03:13.000 I don't know what the question was asked.
00:03:14.000 It seemed as if Kamala Harris just meandered right into it and said it, and her team had it prepared for her to make this announcement.
00:03:21.000 Kamala Harris wants to tell states like Tennessee what they can do with their pro-life legislation.
00:03:31.000 The brilliance and the moderate ground that President Trump has been saying is this is a state's rights issue.
00:03:37.000 It has been for quite some time.
00:03:39.000 There'll be ballot referendums and state laws.
00:03:41.000 Kamala Harris wants to overturn the state-directed, citizen-led component of the pro-life abortion debate.
00:03:51.000 Listen to Kamala Harris saying that she will get rid of the filibuster to accomplish such radical and unprecedented policy objectives.
00:04:00.000 Play cut 55.
00:04:02.000 And so I would also emphasize that while the presidential election is extremely important and dispositive of where we go moving forward, it also is about what we need to do to hold on to the Senate and win seats in the House.
00:04:16.000 That being said, I've been very clear.
00:04:18.000 I think we should eliminate the filibuster for real.
00:04:21.000 And get us to the point where 51 votes would be what we need to actually put back in law the protections for reproductive freedom and for the ability of every person and every woman to make decisions about their own body and not have their government tell them what to do.
00:04:40.000 So Blake, what does this mean for a state like Tennessee?
00:04:43.000 So what she's saying is that she will nuke the filibuster, have the Senate get rid of the filibuster, you don't need 60 votes to close debate anymore, to basically, she says, bring back Roe.
00:04:55.000 So what that would literally mean is they would pass a federal law that says The original Roe v. Wade ruling is now the National Abortion Law, which basically means you can have no restrictions whatsoever on abortion in the first trimester.
00:05:09.000 You can't really have that many restrictions in the second trimester.
00:05:14.000 And then, like, in the third, you're kind of allowed to ban it, maybe.
00:05:18.000 But that might even just—they just say Roe because they know it's popular.
00:05:20.000 So they could easily say, we're passing Roe, and it'll just be nationwide, you know, New York legal throughout pregnancy for basically any reason.
00:05:29.000 And if you pass that...
00:05:32.000 Here's what's going to happen.
00:05:33.000 Now, we've often had some, like, dooming stuff on the right, because pro-life stuff hasn't always done great when it's an up or down vote at the ballot box.
00:05:41.000 So you actually mentioned Kansas, but Kansas is an example where their Supreme Court said it's a constitutional right, and so they actually have very liberal abortion laws because they didn't amend it successfully, get rid of it.
00:05:51.000 Montana, we didn't do great there.
00:05:53.000 But, if you set those aside, here are states that have very strict laws right now.
00:05:58.000 Texas, second biggest state in the Union.
00:06:00.000 Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee, Missouri, Kentucky, Indiana,
00:06:07.000 West Virginia, South Dakota, Idaho, all of those have essentially, at least according
00:06:14.000 to the abortion supporters, they have basically outright bans.
00:06:17.000 Georgia has a heartbeat bill, six weeks.
00:06:19.000 Florida has a heartbeat bill, six weeks.
00:06:21.000 And we might lose that one, but it's a 60% threshold to amend, so that very easily could survive in Florida.
00:06:27.000 We'll see.
00:06:28.000 You have a heartbeat bill in South Carolina.
00:06:29.000 You have a heartbeat bill in Iowa.
00:06:31.000 So, I didn't keep exact track, but that's about 20 states.
00:06:34.000 Oh, North Dakota had a ban, and then a judge threw it out, but it's like a low-level judge.
00:06:38.000 They'll probably reverse it.
00:06:39.000 So, you basically have about 20 states here that have vastly more restrictive abortion laws, thanks to the Dobbs decision, that have so far not been overturned in any vote.
00:06:51.000 And, you know, it's actually been over two years at this point.
00:06:56.000 They've stuck around a little bit.
00:06:57.000 They've gotten through an election cycle.
00:06:59.000 And if you have pro-lifers deciding to stay home because Trump doesn't want a national abortion ban like what you are effectively doing is you are you're mad at Trump over something that won't happen because I'm just going to tell you they're not going to pass the national abortion ban and if they do we will lose the following election.
00:07:17.000 I don't like that that is true.
00:07:19.000 Yeah, Blake is super pro-life.
00:07:20.000 That is what would happen.
00:07:22.000 It's like saying, like, we should nuke China to stop abortion.
00:07:26.000 Like, okay, that's just a dumb thing to do, because it would have massively destructive follow-up consequences.
00:07:33.000 So we won't do it.
00:07:35.000 And that is the same thing here.
00:07:36.000 You're going to not vote for Trump because he's not pro-life enough, but you'd rather have national row.
00:07:42.000 And really, once Congress passes that, I strongly suspect it will be very difficult to ever get it repealed.
00:07:50.000 So let's not have them pass it!
00:07:52.000 And the key part of this is not just that she supports it, she's willing to remove the filibuster to get it done.
00:07:58.000 Yes!
00:07:59.000 And that means everything else that they've talked about doing to get rid of the filibuster.
00:08:03.000 They want to make Puerto Rico and D.C.
00:08:05.000 states, which would, among other things, mean the U.S.
00:08:08.000 flag gets uglier.
00:08:09.000 You don't want that to happen.
00:08:11.000 And, you know, four Democrat senators, more safe electoral votes, and so on.
00:08:15.000 stacking the supreme court back to supreme court pack the supreme court all
00:08:18.000 those gun rights decisions you like they can get rid of religious liberty religious liberty
00:08:22.000 done choice choice got yet they speech gone they just rewrite
00:08:25.000 everything they want and their they have a long list of packages that they want
00:08:30.000 to do like you know how we got in trouble for like project 2025 there
00:08:35.000 are 50 different liberal nonprofits with 50 million
00:08:38.000 more on assets and they all right their own project 2025 and almost all of them have a massive list of things they
00:08:44.000 can do if they get rid of the filibuster.
00:08:46.000 And if you're pro-life out there, if you're a Christian or a Catholic, and you say, I'm not voting for Trump because he's insufficiently pro-life.
00:08:53.000 Let me be as clear as I can.
00:08:54.000 Not voting for Trump is a ticket to one party rule and would have nationalized abortion.
00:09:00.000 It would overturn every single state where we made progress.
00:09:03.000 And then you'd be giving the keys to the Democrat party to add DC and Puerto Rico estates because they'll use the filibuster for that.
00:09:10.000 They'll get rid of filibuster for that.
00:09:12.000 Pack the Supreme Court, and then also pass H.R.
00:09:15.000 1, which is universal mail-in balloting, and just no, no... Amnesty.
00:09:19.000 They'll pass amnesty.
00:09:20.000 And look, I'll be honest, I was talking to some pro-life leaders last night, and they said, yeah, we're organizing people to protest against Donald Trump, and I said, you're being immature children, throwing the country out.
00:09:30.000 Not only is your protest point stupid, but if Donald Trump wins, the pro-life movement stays alive.
00:09:37.000 If Kamala wins, it could be obliterated for a generation.
00:09:41.000 A generation.
00:09:42.000 Not to mention Kamala Harris will use the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the IRS to go after any pro-life leader in the country.
00:09:50.000 And so I hope you guys are listening carefully here.
00:09:52.000 She'll attack pregnancy crisis centers.
00:09:54.000 Every state that has passed pro-life legislation will just be overturned and reversed.
00:09:59.000 But I guess it's worth it to not vote?
00:10:02.000 It is, would you call it Blake, moral virtue signaling?
00:10:06.000 Yeah, you'd rather go back to the era where things were worse because I guess you had more moral clarity then or something?
00:10:14.000 No, that's what some people say.
00:10:16.000 Makes you wonder, you know, what team they're actually on.
00:10:20.000 How would you define your relationship with sleep?
00:10:23.000 Are there challenges, trouble falling asleep, or staying asleep?
00:10:25.000 Here's the thing about sleep.
00:10:26.000 It's the foundation of whole body health.
00:10:28.000 Good sleep is both mental and physical, and our daily performance depends on it.
00:10:32.000 So how do you get to your dream state?
00:10:34.000 Three words.
00:10:35.000 Beams Dream Powder.
00:10:37.000 Science-backed, healthy hot cocoa for sleep.
00:10:39.000 This product will single-handedly change the way you sleep for the better.
00:10:43.000 Other sleep aids can cause next-day grogginess, but Dream contains a powerful all-natural blend of reishi, magnesium, l-theanine, Apigenin and melatonin help you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed.
00:10:54.000 My listeners get a special discount on Beam Dreams Powder, their science-based healthy hot cocoa for sleep with no added sugar.
00:11:01.000 Text BEAM to 717767.
00:11:02.000 That's BEAM to 717767 for up to 40% off.
00:11:03.000 Better sleep has never tasted better.
00:11:05.000 Don't let sleep evade you like it has me.
00:11:06.000 Text BEAM to 717767.
00:11:06.000 I'm going to play more tape here of the push to get rid of the filibuster.
00:11:25.000 Blake, explain to our audience again the significance of the filibuster, because this is being met with massive opposition from Joe Manchin, Kyrsten Sinema... Both leaving, though.
00:11:35.000 Yeah, so what is the... Tell us, what are the components of the filibuster?
00:11:41.000 So, what the filibuster is, is...
00:11:44.000 In the Senate, you need a majority of votes to pass something.
00:11:48.000 51 votes or 50 plus the Vice President, Kamala, right now.
00:11:54.000 But they have rules that govern how the Senate works, and some of those rules govern debate.
00:12:00.000 And what a filibuster is, is when someone refuses to allow debate to end.
00:12:06.000 And what they've done with the rules is they say, you need 60 votes to force an end to debate.
00:12:11.000 They call this cloture.
00:12:13.000 And if you are not able to end debate, there's no time limit on it, so they can just perpetuate it indefinitely.
00:12:20.000 And so, this used to be a pretty rare thing, and it used to be, like, to filibuster, you'd have to physically keep talking, so you occasionally had— Like Strom Thurman?
00:12:29.000 Yeah, Strom Thurman did it for, I think, 24 hours to impose— I think it was 27.
00:12:32.000 I'm gonna look it up.
00:12:33.000 Something like that, yeah.
00:12:34.000 So it used to be that way, but over time there's been this move towards making it more sclerotic, not able to do stuff.
00:12:42.000 So now you can just filibuster forever and you don't need to be physically talking.
00:12:47.000 So it's essentially become, you need 60 votes to pass anything.
00:12:51.000 Now this is something of a legal fiction because you can get rid of the filibuster by majority vote.
00:12:59.000 It is not in this.
00:13:00.000 It's not in that.
00:13:00.000 I want to be very clear.
00:13:01.000 It is not in the U.S.
00:13:02.000 Constitution that I'm holding up right now.
00:13:04.000 It is purely a norm that the Senate maintains, and you can get rid of it.
00:13:08.000 So, for example, you used to be able to filibuster Supreme Court nominees.
00:13:12.000 The GOP got rid of that so they could get Gorsuch on the court.
00:13:15.000 You could filibuster lower court nominees, I believe.
00:13:18.000 I think Obama got rid of that one.
00:13:20.000 Well, that's right.
00:13:21.000 So Obama got rid of it first for circuit court.
00:13:23.000 For circuit court.
00:13:24.000 And then McConnell took the precedent.
00:13:26.000 Because, remember, McConnell said, you're going to regret doing this.
00:13:28.000 Yes.
00:13:29.000 And then McConnell went, you know, we win, and we get Amy Coney Barrett, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.
00:13:34.000 It almost works like, it's kind of like, it's like nuclear war, like military escalation, like you can escalate back and forth.
00:13:42.000 And so in theory you could get rid of the filibuster for anything.
00:13:46.000 They used it for the Inflation Reduction Act.
00:13:47.000 Yes.
00:13:48.000 So that was, did they get rid of the filibuster, or was it that technically the filibuster doesn't apply to reconciliation?
00:13:55.000 Not sure.
00:13:56.000 That was a part of Obamacare.
00:13:58.000 No, that's correct.
00:13:59.000 Yeah, because of Scott Brown winning in Massachusetts.
00:14:02.000 And so there's all these complexities to it.
00:14:04.000 And what is ultimately the case is you can just get rid of the filibuster by majority vote.
00:14:09.000 So what's funny about the filibuster is it actually It doesn't quite protect the minority the way people say it does.
00:14:16.000 What it actually does is it protects the majority from votes they, like, don't really want to take, and they need a political excuse for not doing.
00:14:26.000 That's why Republicans loved it so much.
00:14:27.000 Oh!
00:14:28.000 Can't pass!
00:14:29.000 Can't secure the border!
00:14:30.000 We don't have 60 votes!
00:14:32.000 Sorry, guys!
00:14:33.000 Whereas, if there was no filibuster, they would have to be much more overt that we actually kind of support open borders.
00:14:39.000 So that's a really good summary.
00:14:40.000 Thank you, Blake.
00:14:41.000 And on that, this is Joe Manchin saying he will not endorse Kamala Harris because of this.
00:14:47.000 Play cut 63.
00:14:48.000 I think I've been very clear my whole career is that the 60 vote threshold that we basically operate under in the Senate is essential.
00:14:58.000 Would you endorse her for president then?
00:14:59.000 I'm not endorsing her.
00:15:01.000 I'm not endorsing her.
00:15:03.000 Secondly, this is Let's Go Hear Cut 56 on CNN about the filibuster.
00:15:09.000 Now that she has said that she would gut the Senate filibuster rules in her past measure, Manchin tells us this morning he will not endorse Harris for president.
00:15:16.000 He's one of the staunchest supporters of the filibuster.
00:15:18.000 Play Cut 56.
00:15:19.000 Now that she has said that she would gut the Senate's filibuster rules in order to pass a measure to preserve abortion rights, Manchin tells us this morning that he will not endorse Harris for president.
00:15:34.000 He is one of the staunchest supporters of the filibuster in the Senate.
00:15:39.000 He argues that it is essential to forcing bipartisan consensus and compromise in the
00:15:45.000 Senate.
00:15:46.000 Isn't the minority of Democrats in particular are pushing to gut this altogether because
00:15:50.000 it would lower the threshold for advancing legislation from 60 votes to 51 if Kamala
00:15:57.000 Harris had her way.
00:15:59.000 They're basically trying to set the precedent here that the filibuster is not going to mean
00:16:03.000 anything and we're going to use whatever is at our disposal to do what.
00:16:08.000 So, this time they're using Roe, because that's like, that's, you know, their winning issue.
00:16:12.000 They never shut up about abortion.
00:16:14.000 But, you have to understand, Democrats don't see, this is not, get rid of the filibuster for this and it's totally around for everything.
00:16:21.000 Democrat activists want to get rid of it for the whole shebang.
00:16:24.000 They're thinking, this is why we can't get the Green New Deal, climate stuff, this is why we can't- Amnesty.
00:16:28.000 This is why we can't get amnesty, this is why we can't get statehood for all these- Gun confiscation.
00:16:33.000 This is why we can't pack the courts.
00:16:35.000 And that's what, the key thing, the real key thing is, This is vital in a modern era for checks and balances.
00:16:45.000 Kamala wants to get rid of it to bring in a radically communist agenda to the country.
00:16:50.000 Pay attention!
00:16:52.000 If she wins, watch out.
00:16:56.000 Are you worried about the future of the U.S.
00:16:58.000 economy?
00:16:58.000 With so much uncertainty in the air, it's natural to fret about the security of your retirement savings.
00:17:03.000 But there's one asset that stands the test of time, and that is gold.
00:17:06.000 For centuries, gold has been a hedge against market volatility and economic instability.
00:17:11.000 With a gold IRA from Noble Gold Investments, you can harness the power of precious metals to help protect your financial future.
00:17:17.000 By rolling over your existing IRA or 401k into a self-directed gold IRA, you can enjoy the potential for long-term growth and stability.
00:17:26.000 Diversify your portfolio with a tangible asset that has real value.
00:17:30.000 Setting up your gold IRA has never been easier with Noble Gold Investments.
00:17:33.000 Streamline process and expert guidance.
00:17:36.000 This election year, don't let election volatility and uncertainty keep you up at night.
00:17:40.000 Vote for the timeless safety of gold and silver in 2024.
00:17:43.000 Noble Gold Investments will help you with up to 10 1-ounce silver Trump coins or 10-ounce silver American flag bar if you open a qualified account.
00:17:50.000 Go to noblegoldinvestments.com now.
00:17:52.000 That is noblegoldinvestments.com, noblegoldinvestments.com.
00:17:58.000 Okay, joining us now is Jeff Clark, great American here.
00:18:02.000 Talk about Kamala Harris.
00:18:04.000 Has she ever done anything?
00:18:05.000 Senior Fellow at the Center for Renewing America and former Assistant Attorney General of the United States.
00:18:09.000 Jeff, welcome back to the program.
00:18:11.000 Thanks for having me, Charlie.
00:18:12.000 Glad to be here and talk about this important topic.
00:18:14.000 Yeah, so Kamala Harris is running ad after ad here in my home state of Arizona, saying, I put cartel members in prison.
00:18:21.000 I prosecute cases.
00:18:23.000 Is there any evidence that she's ever prosecuted a case from start to finish?
00:18:28.000 So I have been looking and the only thing I can identify as a political argument, article, I'm sorry, let me put that off to the side for a second.
00:18:37.000 So I ran searches on Westlaw, which I'm particularly expert at using.
00:18:41.000 It's a very large, the largest and most comprehensive computerized legal research database.
00:18:48.000 And I can't find any evidence of any cases that she prosecuted.
00:18:53.000 And I searched for habeas cases where the transcripts might have wound up there.
00:18:57.000 I also looked for whether she'd argued appeals.
00:19:00.000 Can't find anything.
00:19:02.000 Those tweets have gone viral.
00:19:03.000 Elon Musk has spotted them.
00:19:05.000 And I challenged her and her campaign weeks ago to please post up on some kind of, you know, logging website Her past trial transcripts so that other lawyers like me can look at them and see if they show any signs of an impressive lawyer or if she's, you know, being puffed up and overblown like an empty pantsuit.
00:19:26.000 And, you know, I'm sad to say I really don't find any evidence like that.
00:19:30.000 She hasn't met the challenge.
00:19:31.000 But now back to this Politico article.
00:19:34.000 So there's an author, Eric, spelled H-E.
00:19:37.000 I don't know how he pronounces it, whether it's hey or he.
00:19:39.000 And he was kind enough actually to respond to me.
00:19:42.000 He did a story and that story says that she prosecuted a 300-day sex crimes prosecution against two different defendants.
00:19:52.000 Their trials might have been split up.
00:19:55.000 And then they referred to trial transcripts, plural.
00:19:59.000 But when I contacted Eric, he did respond, but he said he doesn't have the trial transcripts.
00:20:04.000 The only way to get them is to physically go to the courthouse and look at them.
00:20:08.000 So I'm working on that next step.
00:20:11.000 But many of us think that this may not have been cases that she prosecuted.
00:20:15.000 It may have been that she made some kind of an appearance at the trial.
00:20:19.000 And I'm looking to see whether she actually first chaired a trial ever.
00:20:23.000 Otherwise, it's really misleading to call yourself Some kind of ace prosecutor.
00:20:27.000 And she was accused of that by one of her past political foes, a man named Bill Fazio.
00:20:33.000 And I'm going to get in contact with him, too, because he exposed her.
00:20:36.000 She was making claims she'd prosecuted hundreds of cases, and then in a debate she dialed it back to, say, 50.
00:20:42.000 So she's already been caught lying about this, Charlie.
00:20:45.000 Yeah, so just help me understand, how common is this for people that ascend as a D.A.
00:20:52.000 and then an attorney general?
00:20:54.000 Is it frequent that people rarely have any courtroom experience as a prosecutor?
00:20:59.000 In my experience, someone who becomes a local D.A.
00:21:03.000 usually has significant trial practice behind them.
00:21:07.000 You know, it is a politically elected job, so it is possible to come in from the outside.
00:21:12.000 But usually if someone runs for a D.A.
00:21:13.000 from the outside, It's someone putting aside these Soros prosecutors who, you know, was in private practice.
00:21:20.000 They might've been in the criminal defense bar, for instance, or they might've, you know, held other government posts.
00:21:25.000 But, you know, for her to become the DA and to win and to, you know, beat people like Mr. Fazio, who was really a veteran prosecutor, you know, she's an empty suit, as I've said.
00:21:36.000 And I think it's because they just propped her up.
00:21:38.000 They portray her as attractive and dynamic and younger.
00:21:43.000 And that's kind of been the press clippings that she's been running on ever since.
00:21:48.000 And once she got the DA job, then she got some special patronage jobs that Willie Brown gave her.
00:21:54.000 on state boards in California. And then, you know, she became attorney general of California. And
00:21:59.000 then she parlayed that into a Senate seat. But so far, we're not finding that she actually has much
00:22:04.000 of a record as an actual real lawyer, Charlie. It seems as if this is a pattern, right, Jeffrey,
00:22:10.000 that it seems as if she says one thing and then does another. And this is significant because
00:22:15.000 in an attempt to win over center right, moderate Midwestern swing voters, she's making herself seem
00:22:24.000 as if she is this, you know, amazing prosecutor that she's able to come in and lock up the cartels
00:22:30.000 and she knows how to try these cases.
00:22:33.000 Blake, do you have a thought on this?
00:22:34.000 I'm just kind of wondering, like, you know, she never gives interviews, of course, and if she does, a lot of them will be softballs, but it'd be really fun to just... if the press would actually put her on the spot and ask her, like, relatively basic legal questions, because, I mean, she failed the bar the first time, like, I do wonder how... What is a motion to dismiss?
00:22:53.000 Yeah, like, you know, how does it work?
00:22:54.000 How does law stuff work?
00:22:56.000 You know, Ms.
00:22:57.000 Harris, we just want to know, like, you could easily, you know, swage our concerns, and just... just tell us.
00:23:02.000 Just tell us, Kamal.
00:23:04.000 So Blake and Charlie, look, the master at this is Senator John Kennedy, and I have posted on X.
00:23:10.000 I'd love to see him question her, right?
00:23:14.000 He goes through the forms of federal abstention and stumps people.
00:23:18.000 He would definitely stump her.
00:23:19.000 She would be totally exposed.
00:23:21.000 And so of course, she's never going to do that.
00:23:23.000 And of course, the press is never, the mainstream press is never going to put her through that.
00:23:27.000 And she's not going to agree to do something like come on your show, Charlie, and have you quiz her about any legal topics or put, you know, have you pair up with a lawyer guest to ask her questions?
00:23:38.000 She's going to dodge all that and the mainstream media is going to cover for her.
00:23:44.000 On that point, her campaign is largely centered on trying to be tough on crime.
00:23:51.000 I'm going after the cartels.
00:23:53.000 I'm going after people on the border.
00:23:55.000 The evidence actually shows any work she did as AG and DA was to be soft on crime, was to allow violent criminals and to be released.
00:24:03.000 Not actually trying cases, but her work seemed to be more about relaxing standards for violent criminals.
00:24:09.000 Is that correct?
00:24:10.000 I think that's fair.
00:24:12.000 And I also think, right, that the whole framing of her versus Trump, you know, the geniuses on the Democratic Party, their political consultants, they decided the framing would be excellent for her if Trump is a criminal defendant and she's the tough on crime prosecutor.
00:24:27.000 She, as she said, knows his type.
00:24:30.000 You know, she's gone after a whole array of different criminals, etc.
00:24:33.000 Like, I don't buy that.
00:24:35.000 I don't buy this, the idea that she prosecuted transnational criminals.
00:24:38.000 I want to see the evidence of that.
00:24:40.000 I've seen no evidence of that.
00:24:42.000 You know, she was focused in the sex crimes unit.
00:24:45.000 And, you know, there are many people who know the California legal system well, and they're skeptical that given how many years she spent as a line prosecutor that she possibly could have you know done much in terms of really being a first chair
00:24:59.000 in a sex crimes case because those could be complicated and You know very fraught. So, you know, I just think her
00:25:06.000 record is exploding. Her record is You know phony and you know, I I don't I think she's gonna
00:25:12.000 run from this That's why she hasn't answered my challenge online. So so
00:25:16.000 yeah Jeff. I also want to talk about lawfare here and And there was another segment last evening on CNN where they said Donald Trump threatens to use the legal system against his political opponents.
00:25:26.000 I mean, it's so Orwellian, it's hard to even grasp here.
00:25:30.000 You have been a victim and a target of lawfare.
00:25:33.000 I don't think we're talking about this enough.
00:25:36.000 Bring us up to speed on how your situation is and what Kamala Harris would do if she's president.
00:25:41.000 She would turn the Department of Justice into her own private secret police.
00:25:46.000 Look, I think, you know, it's a laugh out loud moment when you hear the left try to say that Trump's going to be an autocratic dictator who's going to turn the Department of Justice into a weaponized system going after Democrats that he doesn't like.
00:26:00.000 What have we been experiencing for the last three plus years under Joe Biden and Merrick Garland?
00:26:05.000 We've been experiencing a weaponized justice system.
00:26:08.000 And, you know, that's why they use special counsel Jack Smith.
00:26:12.000 Because they think that that's an accountability-defeating mechanism.
00:26:15.000 It fuzzes up who's really responsible.
00:26:17.000 We know that Joe Biden and Merrick Garland are responsible for that.
00:26:22.000 We know from FOIA information that America First Legal got that Joe Biden actually authorized The idea that there's some independent guy who's not a Democrat, he's just an independent Jack Smith, and he's responsible for all of this, and it doesn't fall on the Justice Department's political head, or on Joe Biden and Kamala Harris's head, is ludicrous.
00:26:53.000 They've weaponized the justice system, And, you know, there needs to be accountability for that, Charlie.
00:27:00.000 And I think President Trump is going to bring that.
00:27:03.000 And for them to try to call that, you know, accountability, weaponization is ludicrous.
00:27:08.000 They're the ones who launched these political attacks.
00:27:11.000 They're the ones who are bringing Marxism into the justice system and violating equal protection up and down the various states and in the federal system.
00:27:21.000 They should actually be put on the spot about that.
00:27:24.000 I'd like to see Congress put them on the spot more about that too.
00:27:27.000 They haven't done enough of that.
00:27:29.000 No, they certainly haven't.
00:27:30.000 Jeffrey, please plug your information.
00:27:32.000 And finally, just really quickly, can you talk about Judge Chutkan has allowed Jack Smith to file a 180-page legal brief that the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity doesn't preclude his prosecution of President Trump.
00:27:45.000 Comment on that, and how can people support you?
00:27:47.000 Sure.
00:27:48.000 So tomorrow, that's going to drop.
00:27:51.000 Jack Smith's going to drop a 180-page brief, which is, you know, 135 pages in excess of the normal 45-page limit.
00:27:58.000 And it violates normal procedures, the federal rules of criminal procedure, because President Trump should get to file a motion to dismiss against his superseding indictment.
00:28:07.000 Instead, that's going to wait, and you're going to get Jack Smith Using anticipation to defend what Trump might say and defend his indictment.
00:28:15.000 So he gets to move twice in the chess game, which is totally wrong and I think violates due process.
00:28:21.000 And then that's not going to be public immediately.
00:28:24.000 Eventually, there'll be a redacted version that's issued.
00:28:27.000 And that's going to inherently be in October.
00:28:30.000 And that's their October surprise against President Trump to try to convince the center of the electorate not to vote for him.
00:28:36.000 And Charlie, thanks for mentioning me and my fight, which continues against the D.C.
00:28:41.000 Bar especially and against Fonny Willis.
00:28:44.000 I can be found at Jeff Clark U.S.
00:28:46.000 on X and Getter and at Real Jeff Clark on Truth Social.
00:28:49.000 And also the movie about my challenges is at thejeffclarkstory.com, Charlie.
00:28:56.000 Very good.
00:28:56.000 Jeff Clark, thank you so much.
00:28:58.000 Thank you.
00:29:01.000 We are all truly blessed to have a leader like President Trump.
00:29:04.000 Those are the words of Goya President and CEO Bob Unawe.
00:29:08.000 Bob is a true American whose grandfather came here as an immigrant and now has the largest Hispanic-owned food company in the United States.
00:29:16.000 In his new book, Blessed, Donald J. Trump and the Spiritual War, Bob reveals how the word blessed stirred up hatred, division, and the cancel culture, and the boycott of Goya Foods igniting a spiritual war for the soul of America.
00:29:31.000 Others reveal in the book that God, quote, has placed his hand on President Trump, allowing him to courageously bring America back to strength, prosperity, and to God.
00:29:41.000 Bob writes that the United States is engaged in a civil war for its soul.
00:29:45.000 Good versus evil, freedom versus tyranny, and he predicts America's spiritual resurgence.
00:29:50.000 Order your copy of Blessed on Amazon right now.
00:29:56.000 Really quickly, Virginia early voting numbers are coming in.
00:29:59.000 Some of this is speculative.
00:30:01.000 Some of it is still rooted in data.
00:30:04.000 Republicans are doing well with lower propensity voters in Virginia.
00:30:07.000 So if you are in Virginia, drag a friend to the polls.
00:30:10.000 Get yourself to the polls.
00:30:12.000 Get out and vote early.
00:30:13.000 Make it easier on campaigns to know who to target.
00:30:17.000 Vote early, everybody.
00:30:19.000 Vote early.
00:30:20.000 all of a sudden say, oh yeah I'm going to vote on election day and then guess what? You get sick,
00:30:24.000 you have the flu, you have COVID, your daughter has to go to soccer practice or in Arizona our
00:30:30.000 machines fail and you have to wait two and a half lines and people end up not voting.
00:30:34.000 So in Virginia, Virginia early voting summary to date.
00:30:40.000 Compared to 2020.
00:30:41.000 Strong Trump counties are up 63%.
00:30:45.000 Weak Trump counties are up 58%.
00:30:46.000 Competitive counties are up 36%.
00:30:49.000 Weak Harris counties are up 23%.
00:30:52.000 Strong Harris counties are up 26%.
00:30:55.000 This trend should seriously worry Democrats.
00:30:58.000 Virginia is coming out strong, which might mean this turnout election, Blake, might be higher than what people were modeling.
00:31:04.000 Maybe.
00:31:04.000 Very possible.
00:31:05.000 And if that's the case, advantage Trump.
00:31:07.000 So it seems, according to what the polls say.
00:31:10.000 Again, for the record, when I say stuff like that, I'm not predicting Trump's going to win.
00:31:14.000 For sure.
00:31:15.000 I've been very clear on that.
00:31:16.000 I have no idea what's going to happen.
00:31:17.000 I do know what I'm going to do.
00:31:18.000 Blake, this is the closest election that people like Nate Silver have seen ever.
00:31:24.000 Yeah.
00:31:25.000 And everyone in the audience has an opportunity to do so.
00:31:28.000 Yes, exactly.
00:31:29.000 So I know some people dump on Nate Silver.
00:31:31.000 I'm going to defend Nate Silver.
00:31:33.000 He was definitely the analyst who gave Trump the best shot in 2016.
00:31:40.000 He thought it was unlikely Trump would win, but he was like one-third shot.
00:31:44.000 When you had professional analysts, people at universities, who said zero percent shot, one said, I'll eat a bug if Trump wins, and I think he actually did in fact eat the bug, which liberals like doing anyway, so it probably wasn't a big deal.
00:31:57.000 But anyway, so this is what Nate Silver said just the other day.
00:32:01.000 Quote, in 16 years of running election forecasts, I have never seen such a close election.
00:32:08.000 Our polling averages in seven swing states, as of when he wrote this, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
00:32:16.000 Seven states were within two percentage points when he wrote that.
00:32:20.000 So that could mean if you have a very tiny shift one direction, Trump blowout.
00:32:24.000 Tiny shift the other direction, Kamala blowout.
00:32:27.000 That's how close it is.
00:32:28.000 And that's what's really so crazy is you have a lot of swing states every election, but what really stands out is how there's seven or eight states that could be the state that decides the election this time.
00:32:42.000 Whereas, you know, last time it turned out, oh, there was a pretty big range in the outcomes of, so only one or two states were really like the tipping point.
00:32:50.000 But this time it's just, it's all over.
00:32:53.000 Let's play cut 73.
00:32:54.000 How close this thing is.
00:32:57.000 Play cut 73.
00:32:59.000 They liked the job that he did as president.
00:33:02.000 So we talk about popularity, we're often talking about favorability ratings, but how about approval ratings?
00:33:07.000 How about approval ratings, thinking that he did a good job in his presidency?
00:33:10.000 I think people confuse that often.
00:33:11.000 I think people confuse it very often.
00:33:13.000 Look at this, think his presidency was a success.
00:33:16.000 Donald Trump, 51%, the majority think his presidency was a success, despite his personal popularity being meh.
00:33:24.000 Look at this for Joe Biden, way down at 37%.
00:33:27.000 I think that this is a real drag on Kamala Harris, despite her own personal popularity, while Donald Trump, with thinking his presidency is a success, I think the net favorability ratings don't actually get into the fact that there are a lot of folks who like the job he did as president, but don't necessarily like him personally.
00:33:44.000 That right there means that Donald Trump should be successful.
00:33:47.000 We'll see.
00:33:48.000 And every one of you out there, you have your marching orders.
00:33:51.000 How many voters have you registered?
00:33:53.000 If you haven't registered a hundred new voters, then you're not doing your job.
00:33:57.000 It's that simple.
00:33:58.000 You're just kind of hoping it gets better.
00:33:59.000 So I don't want to hear your complaint.
00:34:01.000 You've got to go to tpaction.com slash 100.
00:34:03.000 How many ballots are you chasing?
00:34:04.000 How many conversations are you having?
00:34:06.000 We are running out of time, everybody.
00:34:07.000 And many of you did work over the summer.
00:34:09.000 But honestly, a lot of you send us emails, angry emails, and I ask how many voters you've registered.
00:34:13.000 You say, I don't believe in that.
00:34:14.000 Well, Democrats do.
00:34:15.000 This will be the closest election in American history, potentially.
00:34:19.000 Do something about it.
00:34:20.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
00:34:21.000 Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:34:23.000 Thanks so much for listening, and God bless.