00:00:54.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:06.000Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandTodd.com.
00:01:15.000Joining us now is former acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker to talk about the Department of Justice and a lot of different stories, including the one that was breaking over the weekend.
00:01:57.000You know, I would say what's happening right now is the discipline of the Department of Justice is fraying because every line assistant United States Attorney knows that this deal that Hunter Biden's getting is extraordinary.
00:02:14.000As I've talked about many times, it is outside of the mainstream of what these typical deals would get.
00:02:21.000The fact that they blew the statute of limitations on the most serious charges and were unwilling to bring those in other districts like D.C. and Los Angeles, I think tells us everything we need to know.
00:02:33.000And I think Merrick Garland is certainly hearing that from the rank and file.
00:02:39.000And, you know, they're better off to kick the can down the road than to kind of take what's about to happen at Maine Justice and across the U.S. Attorney's offices around the United States.
00:02:50.000So I think they may want to delay it, but knowing Merrick Garland and the way he's been running the Department of Justice, I would be surprised if ultimately they don't just go forward with it.
00:03:02.000And because it's just kind of, I would compare it the way Hunter Biden's been going on these trips to Ireland and these vacations with his dad and hanging out at the White House on July 4th.
00:03:13.000I think they're just thumbing the nose, thumbing their nose at the American people.
00:03:35.000So if it was just a plea of guilty to certain charges, then the judge would set a plea hearing and then set a sentencing.
00:03:44.000This is what's known as an 11C1C plea agreement, from what I can tell, which is that the government and the defendant have agreed not only to what charges that the defendant's going to plead to, in this case, Hunter Biden, but also what the sentence should be.
00:04:00.000And so the judge can either accept or reject that plea agreement.
00:04:04.000I don't, you know, there's usually no discussions beforehand.
00:04:07.000It's a filing with the court and a hearing is set to consider it.
00:04:12.000But, you know, this judge certainly will know what cases have been before her previously and will know how those cases have been dispatched and what the sentence was.
00:04:24.000And in this case, you know, this, I think the most extraordinary piece, Charlie, is the deferred prosecution agreement that they're entering into on the gun charge.
00:04:36.000This is something that's not typically done in these types of cases.
00:04:39.000I mean, depending on who you listen to, they might suggest this happens all the time.
00:04:43.000Usually, if you're going to bring a gun charge, you're going to make them plead to a felony and they're not going to get a deferred prosecution agreement.
00:04:51.000So do you think it's possible that Merrick Garland is getting a little bit anxious or worried with looming congressional oversight?
00:04:59.000Or, I mean, there's so many other issues involved in here, also including Weiss, the Weiss issue.
00:05:10.000Explain to our audience how you think Weiss plays into all of this.
00:05:14.000Yeah, so I think the way I analyze it is quite simply that you're right.
00:05:18.000They don't want congressional oversight of this investigation and this plea deal.
00:05:24.000And if you still have an ongoing investigation, that limits the amount of questions Congress can ask and that you're really compelled ultimately to answer.
00:05:34.000So I think obviously delaying this, trying to push it past some later date is certainly going to be in DOJ's interest.
00:05:46.000The U.S. Attorney Weiss up in Delaware, everyone said, you know, he was a Trump appointee, and there's no doubt that he was appointed by Donald Trump.
00:05:55.000He had been the first assistant in that office.
00:05:58.000He was a career, longtime, you know, person that was well known in Delaware.
00:06:04.000Certainly not what we would think of as a Trump supporter by any means.
00:06:11.000You know, I worked with him just when I was at the Department of Justice, and he seemed like a fairly straightforward prosecutor.
00:06:19.000But obviously, if you're, Delaware is a small state, and if you've been in Delaware long enough, you're going to have interacted with and know of the Biden family.
00:06:27.000And certainly, you know, that this is no exception.
00:06:30.000You know, nobody gets to political power in Delaware without Joe Biden and his 40-plus years in Delaware politics having some influence on their career.
00:06:43.000So that being said, I think, you know, the U.S. Attorney Weiss certainly needs to say what happened.
00:06:50.000You know, he's been a little inconsistent in his two letters to Congress as to how this prosecution went and whether or not Maine Justice interfered with his ability to bring these cases.
00:07:02.000But we've been told, just to remind your viewers, we've been told that this U.S. Attorney went to the District of Columbia and that U.S. Attorney blocked him from bringing certain tax charges, that he went to Los Angeles and the U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles and the Central District of California blocked his desire to bring those charges.
00:07:21.000To get around that, it sounds like U.S. Attorney Weiss asked for special counsel status, which should give him access to all the districts, all 94 districts in the United States of America to bring these charges.
00:07:34.000Now, Merrick Garland suggests that he never asked Merrick Garland for that special prosecutor status.
00:07:40.000That's uh, a little bit too nuanced um really, for the purposes here.
00:07:45.000You know, the bottom line is he was blocked from bringing charges, the most serious charges, against Hunter Biden.
00:07:51.000So the the other question here, you know you, you being acting U.s attorney what is your opinion of Garland's conduct in front of Congress?
00:07:59.000Do you believe that he lied to congress?
00:08:01.000Do you believe it's time to hold him in contempt of congress?
00:08:05.000Yeah, so I I don't think there's any doubt that he has not been uh truthful with congress.
00:08:11.000Uh, you know, the question is, did he intentionally do that or was he not well briefed and did he not know the actual facts and circumstances of these investigations?
00:08:20.000You know he promised that he would not interfere um uh, with the investigation.
00:08:26.000I took that to mean not only will Merit Garland not interfere, but people under his power and control the assistant attorney generals for tax and for the criminal division, the U.s attorneys that are under his control.
00:08:40.000I mean, depending on what U.s attorney Weiss would say in front of Congress and I hope that he testifies sooner rather than later I think we'll finally know.
00:08:48.000Uh, and if Merrill Garland did lie to congress, I mean he needs to be held, not only in contempt of congress, but I think this this would be an impeachable offense now, but just from the criminal side, this is kind of the clown show.
00:09:00.000If they were to hold Garland in contempt of congress, would that referral then go to his desk?
00:09:06.000Uh yeah, that's the interesting thing about this works, uh.
00:09:08.000You know, I don't think our founding fathers ever intended Charlie, for Congress to rely on the executive branch to bring and enforce their contempt charges, but that's where we are, and you know they passed a law so so that they could offload that.
00:09:25.000You know some Trump supporters uh, in the past have been held in contempt and been prosecuted.
00:09:30.000Yeah, you know Peter Navarro and and uh, and so you know I.
00:09:36.000I think, if we look at those cases, you're right though, that the prosecution decision would be uh, at the feet of Merrick Garland.
00:09:44.000Now he could appoint a special counsel, obviously because of that conflict but, as we've learned, in the special counsels uh, like Jack Smith, and in the Rob Her that's looking allegedly into Joe Biden's uh uh, keeping classified information, those special counsels still report directly to the attorney general.
00:10:01.000There's really no way for the attorney general to offload that responsibility unless he recused which I have not seen Merit Garland recuse from a single thing yet that that that's what Jeff Sessions would do, but not uh, not Merit Garland.
00:10:17.000Every day the parallel economy grows bigger and bigger.
00:10:20.000It's powered by everyday Americans who are sick and tired of all the woke nonsense being jammed into every product they consume.
00:10:26.000Big mobile companies are no different.
00:10:28.000For years they've been dumping millions into left-wing causes and we had to take it because you need a cell phone and probably thought that there was no alternative.
00:10:37.000Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
00:10:41.000They proudly offer dependable nationwide coverage on all three major networks.
00:10:45.000Stop using WOKE Wireless as they fund Pride Month and all this stuff.
00:10:49.000When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending a message that you You support free speech, religious liberty, the sanctity of life, Second Amendment, and our military veterans and first responder heroes.
00:10:57.000They're 100% U.S.-based customer service team, make switching easy.
00:11:01.000Just go to patriotmobile.com slash Charlie or call 878-PATRIOT, get free activation today with the offer code Charlie.
00:11:07.000Ask about their coverage guarantee while you're there.
00:11:09.000Get the same dependable service and take a stand for your values and make the switch today.
00:11:13.000Patriotmobile.com slash Charlie or call them at 878-PATRIOT.
00:11:19.000So, Matthew, if you were to look at public reporting based on your experience as U.S. acting U.S. attorney, where do you believe Jack Smith is going with these charges?
00:11:30.000Do you think he's going to try a seditious conspiracy charge?
00:11:33.000How do you think this thing is going to conclude?
00:11:35.000Yeah, I think unfortunately, you know, based on the reporting, I would believe that, you know, there's going to be a lot more.
00:11:42.000We're led to believe that he's going to bring more document charges, maybe in a different district.
00:11:47.000They're not happy with Florida nor the judge.
00:11:50.000And so, you know, you could see them try to bring a case in D.C. or maybe even New Jersey for additional document charges, which I, you know, I think that case is completely outrageous.
00:12:02.000I had a really good chat the other day with former Secretary Willkie on the Espionage Act and the history of it and how just, you know, it was been used as a weapon previously in our nation's history by Woodrow Wilson against his enemies.
00:12:16.000But anyway, and then, you know, this on the January 6th charges, you know, again, all of President Trump's conduct that I can tell, you know, it's been reported is all protected First Amendment speech.
00:12:30.000And in fact, you know, those of us that watched that speech on that day heard him say, you know, peacefully and patriotically.
00:12:37.000And, you know, I think that to some extent is a huge hurdle to overcome for any alleged prosecution.
00:12:43.000But, you know, this, you know, Jack Smith's been a very aggressive prosecutor in his past.
00:12:47.000He's been slapped down, you know, for previous prosecutions he's involved in, including Governor McDonnell in Virginia and others.
00:12:58.000So, you know, I think this is going to be a very, there's going to be a lot of new law made, to be honest with you, Charlie.
00:13:05.000There's going to be a lot of new case law made based on these cases that Jack Smith is bringing.
00:13:10.000And, you know, I compare and contrast that to the speed with which Rob Hurr, who's doing the Biden case, isn't investigating.
00:13:18.000You know, we're hearing nothing about that case.
00:13:22.000Yeah, so Bob Hurr is the special counsel that is looking into the documents with Joe Biden.
00:13:31.000He was a former principal deputy, principal assistant deputy attorney general for Rod Rosenstein, and then he was the U.S. Attorney in Maryland and Trump.
00:13:40.000Yeah, no, so is there, is it, if the Department of Justice sets a precedent with how they've indicted Donald Trump with document retention, is it up to Robert Hurt to look at that precedent?
00:13:51.000Is the way the DOJ works where they just kind of do their own thing?
00:13:55.000Or is it that, hey, now that we indict a president based on, you know, document retention in this capacity, they would have to indict Joe Biden under the same thing.
00:14:04.000They keep him unguarded next to a Corvette in a garage.
00:14:09.000Yeah, the federal prosecution demands that you use the same prosecutorial standard for different investigations.
00:14:17.000I think that's the whole purpose of having a federal criminal justice system.
00:14:22.000But that being said, we're going to see if Rob ever does anything with that investigation, what standard he used.
00:14:28.000Now, remember, there is a memo that says you can't indict a sitting president.
00:14:33.000Well, but there's also a memo saying you don't go after candidates.
00:14:40.000And there's, you know, the policy is also, yeah, there's a window of time where you're not supposed to investigate or go after candidates.
00:14:46.000But, you know, we've obviously crossed that Rubicon.
00:14:49.000You know, the President Trump case, I think, as a historical precedent is incredibly concerning.
00:14:55.000I think just as a matter of American jurisprudence, we're in a brave new world and we're going to regret.
00:15:03.000I think our founding fathers would have certainly suggested that we're going to regret this position we find ourselves in as this administration prosecutes Donald Trump.
00:15:25.000And I mean, Donald Trump is going to have multiple criminal cases that he's fighting in New York, probably in Georgia, and then one in Florida and then in D.C.
00:15:36.000They are trying to weigh him down politically in 2024, not just from a reputation standpoint, from a logistics standpoint, going from courtroom to courtroom to courtroom.
00:15:46.000And yes, there was a long-standing memo that if you're running for the presidency of the United States, we're not going to indict you.
00:16:14.000Back-check me, look at NAD and see what it could do for you.
00:16:16.000But look, I take NAD every single day.
00:16:18.000Strong Cell is a scientific breakthrough in cellular health replenishment that combines NADH, CoQ10, and marine collagen to boost your body's cellular function.
00:16:27.000I personally take Strong Cell every day, and so do a ton of Kirk listeners.
00:17:29.000It's all the autopsies done across all the different case reports in the world, commissioned by the University of Michigan School of Public Health.
00:18:22.000I mean, Doctor, if my team tells me you're one of the most published cardiologists in American history, you have a lot of experience publishing data that people might not like to hear, but you have to go where the data leads you.
00:18:34.000Doctor, why is the powerful Lancet censoring wrongthink that might go against the narrative?
00:19:07.000So right now there are 120 colleges, by the way, that still require full vaccination, full boosting for kids to go there.
00:19:14.000And so, doctor, I'm starting to see the Overton window move a little bit, though.
00:19:18.000Even in just upper polite society, people that were otherwise shills and peddlers of the mRNA vaccine, people that I kind of talk to here or there, they've really turned on this.
00:19:29.000And there's, I think, a consensus agreement, 60 to 70% of the country that now either regrets getting the mRNA shot, believes it was a mistake.
00:20:16.000Now we have these data showing that, you know, the autopsies when they're done, and we had a standard search methodology, standard adjudication, people expert in cardiac pathology, including myself, we know what we're looking at.
00:20:29.000And, you know, Lancet, Lancet said, you know, the methodology didn't support the conclusions, but they didn't say what about the methodology.
00:20:36.000And they certainly didn't have problems when we are putting it up on the preprint server.
00:20:40.000I think this is censorship after the fact.
00:20:43.000And I think it's probably influenced by what we term in my book, a biopharmaceutical complex, a syndicate that's formed out there that does have an agenda for worldwide mass vaccination.
00:21:09.000You know, this is indicating the results of what's called going natural.
00:21:14.000That is, in today's modern day world, where we don't have the old threats of diphtheria, pertussis, measles, German measles, polio, improvement in environmental water supply, living conditions, et cetera.
00:21:29.000Now the Amish are a real living experiment that going natural has very good outcomes and it raises the issue.
00:21:36.000Mass vaccination of these legacy problems in children, could it be causing autoimmune conditions like asthma, atopic dermatitis, tympanostomy tubes, diabetes, ADD, autism spectrum disorder?
00:21:50.000Three studies support the Amish, one by Miller, Thomas, and Hooker.
00:21:57.000All show going natural with no childhood vaccines in the modern day certainly is safe and the kids are healthier than their vaccinated cohort.
00:22:07.000So, doctor, we've seen autism used to be one in a thousand or one in 2,000.
00:22:13.000Now it's for young boys, one in 27 to 35.
00:22:16.000I can't remember the number, somewhere in that.
00:22:18.000Do you believe, based on the data that you have available, that mass vaccination could potentially be one of the reasons as to why the autism rates have skyrocketed in the last decade or two?
00:22:34.000We've got about 800 papers in the pre-reviewed literature, about 200 showing that autism and ADD are actually a neurologic consequence of the immune system, something the immune system in childhood.
00:22:47.000The obvious perturbation of the immune system is hyper-vaccination.
00:22:51.000The kids are receiving multiple vaccines in single shots now, having dramatic immune system activation.
00:22:59.000Some children clearly have fever, some tonic clonic jerking, eye movements, and then actually febrile seizures.
00:23:07.000Then after that, they clinically have autism.
00:23:09.000So, I mean, those cases, I think, are clear.
00:23:12.000But the preponderance of literature now is pointing to a connection.
00:23:18.000And I mean, there are a lot of parents out there that want to delay vaccines.
00:23:22.000And the problem is, Doctor, can you help me understand this?
00:23:25.000Why is it that 99% of pediatricians are pathological when it comes to the full CDC schedule?
00:23:33.000In fact, they won't allow kids to go to some summer camps or some schools.
00:23:36.000What is it in the medical training that creates almost a religious commitment to mass childhood vaccination with no delays, no questions?
00:23:46.000On the three-month mark, you must go through these six vaccines, hepatitis B, hepatitis A, you know, Prevnar, polio.
00:23:55.000Some of those things might have some interesting, you know, counterpoints, but then, you know, chickenpox, DTAP, is there a money incentive?
00:24:08.000And, you know, there's been about 150-year vaccine ideology that the ideology is that the human system is inherently weak, that man can make it better, that vaccines are good.
00:24:20.000By the way, Charlie, the same ideology is in veterinary medicine.
00:24:23.000Every year, there's more and more vaccines for pets and for livestock.
00:24:57.000I mean, so there's some of the vaccines might be necessary.
00:25:00.000I'm not an expert on this, but if you even ask a question like, hey, maybe we couldn't go back to like the 1984 schedule, they say you're anti-vax.
00:25:21.000And, you know, it's not just autism, ADD, but it's also allergic asthma, knee for tympanostomy tubes, ectopic dermatitis.
00:25:30.000There's a clear risk of febrile seizure and death.
00:25:33.000That's been reported with multiple vaccines given at one time.
00:25:37.000You know, so one proposal would be to make it much more risk stratified, space them out.
00:25:43.000For instance, little boys don't have any consequences from rubella or German measles.
00:25:47.000It's always girls approaching childbearing years.
00:25:49.000So we could take the boys out of the rubella program, for instance.
00:25:53.000Hepatitis B, it's only needed in babies at birth, active drug using mothers or those with active hepatitis B. All the other children can actually skip it.
00:26:03.000And then if they become a healthcare worker later on, like me, they can take it.
00:26:50.000We probably are going to need to go to risk stratification for what's really needed, what's really appropriate, and not just pummel these kids with salvos of vaccines.
00:27:01.000And so, but doctor, can you also mention that as modern medicine progresses on the treatment side, is it always necessary to then, is there a question of do you need to then inoculate against the potential disease or bacterial infection if your treatments have improved?
00:28:39.000And again, this is considered to be the third rail of third rail.
00:28:42.000People are afraid to even ask this, but I could tell you what.
00:28:44.000We get thousands of emails from young mothers and parents that are guilt-tripped by their pediatricians, held hostage by not allowing to send their kids to school because they're not perfectly on schedule, that they might want 80% of the vaccines that they say, wait a second, why don't I need hepatitis B?
00:28:58.000And they will threaten these children, never asking about adverse events or effects, can't even have dialogue or discussion.
00:29:05.000The current vaccine environment in America is one of the most totalitarian landscapes of discussion.
00:29:46.000Give you a little bit of an update of how things are progressing.
00:29:50.000You know, we go into these events and we host them at Turning Point, and the team does such a great job working so hard.
00:29:56.000And I have to tell you, we've done a lot of events.
00:29:58.000I think this is probably the best speaker lineup we've ever had in turning point history.
00:30:02.000And we've had some, boy, we've had some beauties, I'll tell you.
00:30:06.000You got President Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, Dan Bongino, Steve Bannon, Don Jr., Josh Hawley, JD Vance, Eric Schmidt, Roger Stone, Matt Gates.
00:30:19.000And so when we go into this, I was expecting a fair amount of presidential candidates.
00:30:26.000So we have six presidential candidates that are showing up.
00:30:30.000Vivek Ramaswamy, Donald Trump, Eric Suarez, Governor Asa Hutchinson from Arkansas, Ryan Binkley, and others.
00:30:41.000So we've received a no from Nikki Haley.
00:30:43.000She has another commitment that must be more important than speaking to 6,000 super activists in the millions online.
00:31:30.000We got hundreds of our biggest donors.
00:31:32.000But there must be something more important that is going on somewhere else.
00:31:36.000But it's a testament to Governor Hutchinson, to who wants to attend, Mayor Suarez, Donald Trump, and Vivek Ramaswamy, and then Ryan Binkley and possibly others running for the presidency.