00:00:42.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:04.000We're going to talk a lot about Tucker Carlson and the release of the January 6th tapes and what this means for us and what it means for our country.
00:01:12.000We've got Kash Patel coming up later in the hour to discuss with that in great detail.
00:01:19.000But first up, I want to bring here on producer Andrew Colvet.
00:01:24.000And now, producer Andrew, we don't always, you know, have the, I think this may be one of the first times that you and I have done the show like this together.
00:05:18.000You may not like Russia, but that is going to have economic impacts on their families, on their society, on their jobs, on their manufacturing base that they're trying to cling on to.
00:05:29.000This is going to have huge ripple effects through Germany.
00:05:32.000And now you've got this huge piece coming out by from, and by the way, yes, an actually respected journalist like Cy Hirsch coming out and saying, no, it was the U.S. that did your trade partner, another NATO member that did this to you.
00:06:57.000Now, why would pro-Ukrainian forces, why would that be something that was allowed to be published in this geopolitical landscape?
00:07:04.000Well, I venture to guess, and admittedly, this is speculation, but that there was a phone call made, probably a perfectly perfect phone call between the Biden administration and Zelensky and said, hey, listen.
00:07:18.000Which, by the way, and I'm just going to throw this out there for everybody, like, Andrew, you've done some stuff on high levels and you've had some kind of phone calls like this.
00:07:29.000Like, you're not just some schlub out there.
00:07:32.000Not about blowing up pipelines, but yes.
00:07:34.000It's not about blowing up pipelines, but you've done some high-level stuff.
00:08:02.000If you want another $150 billion, you know, if you want that billion-dollar deal, you better fire that process because they're already at war with Russia, right?
00:08:29.000That was obviously Grimbraz that did that.
00:08:31.000It's very similar to something like that.
00:08:33.000It's not the first time special forces have used a convenient third-party force to sort of get the quote-unquote get the credit for the kill.
00:08:41.000In this case, the kill being a pipeline.
00:08:43.000But also, I think the audience was the German people.
00:08:45.000It also, by the way, gives them a convenient out if they ever need to throw Zelensky under the bus, if they ever need to cut off funding to Ukraine.
00:08:53.000You look at things going on now in the East.
00:08:55.000It's not looking good in Bakhmut and some of these other areas.
00:08:58.000It gives them an absolute out if they need one for all of this.
00:09:02.000But I do wonder, Andrew, you know, going with this phone call theory, do you think that they tried to get Schultz to come out and toe the line with them?
00:09:08.000Do you think that may have been the initial plan to say, all right, we're going to come out and we're going to announce the results of this investigation and make it some big thing?
00:09:16.000And Schultz was like, no, I'm not doing that.
00:12:53.000That's like, that's what John Oliver tries to do, by the way.
00:12:56.000But the fact that Russell Brand has the truth on his side, he doesn't need these like 10-minute segments and laugh tracks because you're laughing because he's so funny.
00:13:11.000I've talked about that on Human Events Daily, how this is, you know, we always say, you know, it's like the old French line, Sherche Lefemme, you know, look for the woman in international relations.
00:13:20.000I always say, Sherche Le Petrol, follow the gas, follow the gas.
00:13:26.000Once you understand that, you'll understand what's going on.
00:13:28.000But, but, Brad, he just puts it in such a funny way.
00:13:33.000Incredible appearance, by the way, just destroying John Heilman, someone who really had truly deserved it, on Bill Maher this last weekend.
00:13:41.000And the way he's able to do it in just one minute, whereas John Oliver would have taken a 10-minute segment with piped-in laugh tracks and all the rest, it's absolutely ridiculous.
00:13:51.000So, I think, I think, Andrew, correct me if I'm wrong, but did is this narrative dead for them?
00:13:59.000But again, when you put something in the pages of the New York Times, you have to understand that all the mockingbird media are just going to run with it anyways.
00:14:09.000So, my question is: so, this is the, so if the official story is that Ukraine blew up the Nord Stream pipeline, so are we going to continue financing Ukraine and financing the war because they're just blowing up pipelines all over the world now?
00:14:58.000Maybe Alexander Vimman could leak us the transcript.
00:15:01.000The way he's leaking, and we'll talk some more about the way we've got the leaked documents on Andrew Vinman.
00:15:06.000But it's truly amazing to me that even if you follow through the official narrative of this, even that doesn't make any sense because you then have to say, so wait, we fund this, we support this, we're just going to go along with this.
00:15:21.000No, I mean, I think what you're seeing is a lie compounding on a lie, compounding on another lie, and eventually the lie will collapse on its own logic, right?
00:15:31.000But the question is, will the media report the truth?
00:15:53.000When Mike Lindell, great American patriot, invented My Pillow, had everything you could ever want in a pillow.
00:15:59.000But now, 20 years later, he discovered a new technology that makes it even better.
00:16:02.000The MyPillow 2.0 has a patented, adjustable fill on the original MyPillow.
00:16:08.000And now, with a brand new fabric that is made with a temperature-regulating thread.
00:16:12.000For exclusive listeners, the MyPillow 2.0 is buy one, get one free offer with promo code Kirk and get your best sleep ever.
00:16:20.000MyPillow 2.0 temperature regulating technology is 100% made in America and comes with a 10-year warranty and a 60-day money-back guarantee.
00:16:28.000Go to mypillow.com and click on the Radio Listener Square to buy one and get one free offer.
00:16:33.000Enter promo code Kirk or call 800-875-0425 to get your MyPillow 2.0 now.
00:17:31.000But all the stuff I wear is just for my foundation.
00:17:34.000And like I said, we're raising money to give away to whistleblowers, to Jan 6 families in need.
00:17:39.000Actually, ABC just today did a massive hit piece on my foundation for giving away money to whistleblowers and Jan 6 families.
00:17:48.000They're like, Cash is in legal jeopardy because he didn't do X, Y, or Z.
00:17:51.000This is exactly what, this is exactly what I was talking about on that stage.
00:17:55.000And Michael Knowles came up after us and, you know, he understood the assignment where I said, you need to stop looking at hit pieces as something to be scared of.
00:18:05.000Conservatives need to understand these are badges of honor.
00:18:09.000If you aren't getting written up, are you even doing anything?
00:18:12.000And I'll mention that to Media Matters, who are fantastic fans of this show.
00:18:51.000This is the most silly thing I've ever heard it.
00:18:53.000Are we going to stop helping Jan 6 families or active duty service members who are sidelined because of their beliefs in not taking the jab and things like that?
00:19:02.000Well, I'm just going to go more harder.
00:19:04.000Well, let me ask you about that because we had that incredible moment with Ashley Babbitt's mother and we were able to give her standing ovation at CPAC.
00:19:11.000I think that was just one of those special moments that just kind of happens.
00:19:14.000But, you know, switching it back to the tapes.
00:19:17.000So the Tucker Carlson access to the tapes, the tapes have come out.
00:19:22.000It hasn't been a ton of footage yet, but what's come out, I think, has been phenomenal at what we've got.
00:19:27.000But I want to ask you from your perspective, because you've got the legal mind on this because you've been in these cases, you've been on both sides of it.
00:19:35.000What would you have done with access to these tapes?
00:19:39.000So as, you know, putting on like my former federal public defender hat where I defended lots of these types of cases, where you score big usually is when you can show a Brady violation.
00:19:50.000Is the government had a piece of evidence that showed somehow your client may have been innocent?
00:19:55.000Not that it exonerates him, but just maybe.
00:19:58.000And that's that word is exculpatory evidence, right?
00:20:02.000And so, video footage of like you know, the whole scene that's pretty powerful stuff.
00:20:06.000It's the best type of evidence, like maybe, I don't know, a police officer opening the doors, beckoning you in, and then escorting you down the hallway, right?
00:20:13.000And then being charged with trespassing.
00:20:15.000That's pretty, that's pretty good stuff.
00:20:17.000So, I, you know, I'm glad some of the material is getting out there.
00:20:20.000I think I would have taken a different approach rather than release, you know, QAnon Shannon or whatever that guy's name is.
00:20:28.000It's too many, too many vowels in one short little area there.
00:20:31.000But he's kind of a divisive character.
00:20:34.000And, you know, he got charged with a couple of crimes and he got sentenced and pled out to like, I think, 42 months or something.
00:20:40.000I probably would have gone with, you know, there's like 500 or so individuals charged with very low-level misdemeanors or very low-level felonies, basically just trespassing, like being somewhere they shouldn't.
00:20:52.000And if you could have a defense attorney find video footage that says my guy was charged with this bogus trespass and incarcerated for it, and we actually have video footage, like you said, Jack, of the police officer saying, come on in.
00:21:04.000That's the one I kind of would have led with because it would have literally shown the Department of Justice withholding evidence, lying to a federal court, overcharging a defendant, even though they knew he was innocent, just because they could ram him through the system.
00:21:20.000That's the ultimate way to piecemeal through that.
00:21:34.000But if you could prove that in one of these cases, I think that would have been a better route because more people who are less agitated on either side of Jan 6 could have said, oh, wait, look at that.
00:21:48.000And by the way, I appreciate the fact that we've had so far, I've only seen two people actually in positions of power speak out on the fact that we still have these detainees that are behind bars, some of them without trial, some of them who are sitting there for, as you say, just being in the wrong place at the wrong time, taking pictures, taking selfies.
00:22:09.000Norm McDonald had that great tweet up.
00:22:11.000The great Norm McDonald had that tweet up about how the violent terrorists were abiding by the velvet ropes as they walked through Statuary Hall.
00:22:18.000And the only people that I've seen speak out about this, President Trump, of course, has come out and said they should all be released.
00:22:23.000And then President Bukele, El Presidente, down in El Salvador, they've actually said more about the Jan 6 detainees than any sitting elected Republican.
00:22:32.000Gosh, what is going on with this party?
00:22:35.000You know, wow, I don't know if I know the whole answer to that, but as a former federal prosecutor who did, you know, who requested detention of actual terrorists, I know people, you know, my concern is due process.
00:22:47.000Did some of these people by the way, like people who are trying to blow up a police facility down in Atlanta?
00:22:52.000For just, you know, just as an example, a total hypothetical that I bring off the top of my head.
00:23:42.000And why do people eventually sign it sometimes?
00:23:44.000Look, as a public defender who did probably thousands of cases and tried 60 jury trials to verdict, it's because it's the fastest resolution of the case.
00:23:54.000And also for the defendant who you're representing, you're like, hey, we'll get to your trial in like a year.
00:23:59.000Sorry, I'm going to work my tail off to get to your trial.
00:24:01.000Or the government comes in and says, okay, six months jail time, you got to plead guilty and then you're out.
00:24:07.000It's just the nature of the justice system, unfortunately.
00:24:11.000especially when your client is incarcerated.
00:24:12.000If they're out on bond, totally separate story.
00:24:15.000They can ride it out, do their thing, live their life.
00:24:18.000But most of these individuals on Jan 6 have been denied bond.
00:24:21.000And I think that's where the crux of the problem is.
00:24:23.000A lot of these judges said, there's two things you have to evaluate when you're looking at bond.
00:24:27.000Which is totally unconstitutional because as you say, we have video of them not committing.
00:24:36.000Again, not talking about like the 50 to 75 people that actually committed violence.
00:24:40.000By the way, many of whom who are still not even been arrested, the people who took down the barricades, for example, people like Ray Epps that were actively urging people to go into the Capitol, people cutting down fences.
00:24:50.000Those have never been identified, even though we have them on video.
00:25:04.000But that's my problem is this two-tier system of justice, whether it's Jan 6 or Hunter Biden or what have you, insert whatever, Mar-a-Lago, RussiaGate.
00:25:14.000They've just created this multi-tier system of justice in America, and the judges have allowed them to do it.
00:25:22.000And we've got a judicial branch, not entirely, but in some part, especially the concentration in D.C., that for some reason has said, you could be a federal prosecutor, you could be a federal lawyer, a Democrat, and literally bomb a New York Police Department police vehicle car with Molotov cocktails, set the thing ablaze and destroy it.
00:25:45.000And the DOJ will throw out all the minimum mandatory requirements, all of the rules, and the judge will essentially give you probation and thank you on the way out at the sentencing hearing.
00:25:57.000You're a good person for setting a law enforcement vehicle on fire.
00:26:00.000Who of the January 6th people that are detained in prison right now set a cop car on fire?
00:26:07.000And Charlie and I are going to get into this very subject next segment when we come in, well, in the next hour, when he comes back and we're going to talk about Atlanta, we're going to talk about the exact same situation and the fact that they were using these tactics, these firebomb tactics.
00:26:19.000But cash, there is another point here that I think people understand is that, and I'd love to see if there could be perhaps a congressional remedy for this or a federal remedy.
00:26:29.000If you're a Republican or a Trump supporter, there's no way you get a fair trial in D.C. There's just no way.
00:26:35.000That's, I mean, look, we saw what happened to Sussman during Durham.
00:26:39.000We saw what happened to Denchenko, anything related to Trump world, you're not getting a fair trial by this.
00:26:44.000And then Bannon, Stone, Flynn, et cetera.
00:26:47.000And the only thing, so look, this DOJ has masterminded jurisdiction in the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. Jurisdiction does not have to reside in Washington, D.C. They've chosen that on purpose.
00:27:01.000The only way to fix it is you got to take back DOJ and have an attorney general saying, you know what?
00:27:06.000I found venue jurisdiction in Kansas, and that's where these guys are going or Texas or Idaho.
00:27:11.000There's a lot of different ways to get jurisdiction established.
00:27:14.000They just rest on the easy, easy button that says, we're going to do it in Washington, D.C. because it's Washington, D.C. Right, because I've sat through, I've sat through jury selection in these trials.
00:27:23.000I was, I was in, in every single one of the cases that I just mentioned, with the exception of Flynn, because I didn't go to a jury.
00:27:29.000I sat through the jury selection and it's just like lib after lib.
00:27:33.000It just comes up on the jury, every single one.
00:27:35.000So if you've got Donald Trump associated with you in any way, you're done.
00:27:44.000The flip side is the opposite, obviously.
00:27:46.000It's the destruction of the jury system and the judicial process in the United States of America in 2022 and 2023, which I literally never thought we would actually be talking about.
00:27:56.000But you have to have a DOJ that's willing to see that for what it is, like you called it out.
00:28:05.000They're just like, here's our safety net.
00:28:07.000We can build as crappy of a case as humanly possible.
00:28:09.000And as long as we take it to a DC judge and a DC jury and we say Trump, they're just going to be like, you're dead.
00:28:15.000Which ultimately, of course, that's what Merrick Garland is weighing right now with this grand jury on President Trump, which, of course, he knows that if he convicts, if he's willing to convict Trump in the jurisdiction of Washington, D.C., that he will be convicted by a DC jury.
00:30:28.000Rupert Murdoch, who has admitted they were lies and said he regretted it, has a special obligation to stop Tucker Carlson from going on tonight now that he's seen how he has perverted and slimed the truth and from letting him go on again and again and again.
00:30:50.000Not because their views deserve such opprobrium, but because our democracy depends on it.
00:30:57.000Ah, so Cash, because democracy, you've got to take Tucker Carlson off the chessboard.
00:31:18.000Simply, the characters involved don't want anything about January 6th out there to alter the narrative that the fake news media and the unselect committee have established, which is everybody there was an insurrectionist, guilty of treason and sedition.
00:31:34.000And there's no possible way anyone was overcharged or is in detention that shouldn't be.
00:31:39.000They don't want that narrative touched.
00:31:42.000And what Tucker is doing by, or anybody is doing by putting out the videotape, is threatening, like we talked about in the prior segment, threatening the structure of that reality or fiction that they've created, in my opinion.
00:31:54.000And then when you combine the legal efforts, even Rupert Murdoch's not, you know, impervious to $1.6 billion lawsuit.
00:32:02.000And Schumer specifically knows the heads of Fox News, the board, the ownership, the new management team, they don't like Trump.
00:32:10.000So they have an out to cast their fishing rod line there and say, hey, pull this down.
00:32:19.000The reason, by the way, though, for the importance of the Jan 6 narrative and that why they freak so much out and that you can see the Uniparty really just spreading their arms out to protect this thing so much is because that's how they get away with essentially explaining away the color revolution that we saw domestically here in the United States in 2020.
00:32:41.000They can get away with the George Floyd riots.
00:33:01.000January 6th is the only thing that happened.
00:33:03.000And all of the things that we did, including the military occupation and militarization of Washington, D.C., under which Joe Biden took his oath of office on January 20th, 2021, just 14 days after January 6th, it was all justified because of January 6th.
00:33:22.000Even though obviously one happened before the other, everything that we did with the ballots, everything that we did with drop boxes, it was all done because of January 6th.
00:33:32.000And the political optics and the hypocrisy of it, you know, when I was chief of staff at DOD, when and now it's been proven unequivocally that Donald Trump acted preemptively to authorize the security posture of 20,000 National Guards, men and women there.
00:33:44.000And Pelosi and Schumer and company refused it, but then flipped to the Biden inauguration and they wanted downtown D.C. to look like downtown Kandahar.
00:33:53.000They cared more about optics than actual security.
00:33:56.000And the only person that did care about security was Donald Trump.
00:34:05.000At Cash on Truth Social, at KASH on Truth Social, and the Cash Foundation, where you can get these one-of-a-kind hoodie and help us fund whistleblowers.