The Charlie Kirk Show - December 02, 2021


One Thing Could Have Prevented Nearly ALL COVID Deaths and No One's Talking About It


Episode Stats


Length

37 minutes

Words per minute

170.52213

Word count

6,423

Sentence count

416

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the Charlie Kirk Show, host Charlie talks about a new study that could change the way we think about vitamin D and why public health officials aren t talking about it. We also have a conversation with Carter Sneed about Roe v. Wade and the Supreme Court.

Transcript

Transcripts from "The Charlie Kirk Show" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, today on the Charlie Kirk Show, a very compelling and shocking new study.
00:00:05.000 It's not anything that we haven't been mentioning here before, but I encourage you to send this episode to every single friend, every person you know that has exhibited fear of the virus and asked them, did you know this?
00:00:18.000 Did you know that there's over a hundred studies that now show that vitamin D very well might be the most important component to whether or not you will be able to successfully navigate getting the Fauci Chinese coronavirus?
00:00:34.000 It's a very important study and an important episode of the show of a shocking new article from Daniel Horowitz.
00:00:40.000 Send this episode to your friends and just ask them, like, hey, we might not agree on anything, but this is science, isn't it?
00:00:47.000 Why aren't our public health officials talking about it?
00:00:49.000 We also have a conversation in the middle of the episode with Carter Sneed, and all of your questions will be answered about the Supreme Court and Roe versus Wade for all of our pro-lifers out there.
00:01:00.000 I'm one of them.
00:01:01.000 I think you'll really enjoy his update.
00:01:03.000 Email us your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:01:06.000 I get all the emails.
00:01:08.000 I read them all.
00:01:08.000 I do not respond to them all, but I do read them all.
00:01:10.000 Freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:01:12.000 If you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, where we play offense with a sense of urgency to win the American Culture War, go to tpusa.com.
00:01:20.000 That's tpusa.com.
00:01:22.000 If you want to come to AmericaFest, go to tpusa.com/slash AMFEST.
00:01:27.000 We have some of the biggest speakers in the entire country coming.
00:01:31.000 We have Tucker Carlson coming, Candace Owens, Kaylee McInaney.
00:01:35.000 We have Greg Gutfeld, Ted Cruz, Jesse Waters, Jim Jordan, Donald Trump Jr., Pete Hegseth, Madison Cawthorne, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Rand Paul, Jack Pesobic, Benny Johnson, Kat Kamack, Lauren Boebert, Matt Gates, Louis Gomert, Burgess Owens, Sean Foyt, Sarah Palin, Brandon Tatum, Michael Chandler, Steve Weatherford, Cameron Haynes, Jimmy John Leotold, Congressman Annie Biggs, Congressman Byron Donalds, Devin Nunez, Chad Wright, John Lovell, Ryan Klechner, James O'Keefe, and Pastor Jack Hibbs.
00:02:00.000 Full musical concerts by Brantley Gilbert, Dustin Lynch, Russell Dickerson, Adam Doliak, Ray Lynn, Lee Greenwood, and DJ Silver.
00:02:08.000 tpusa.com slash amf December 18, 19, 2021.
00:02:13.000 It's only a couple weeks away, everybody.
00:02:15.000 Get your tickets right now.
00:02:16.000 We'll see you in Phoenix, Arizona.
00:02:18.000 If you want to support our show, go to charliekirk.com/slash support.
00:02:21.000 If you want to support our doing two podcasts today, one on Saturday, one on Sunday, the hardest working podcast team out there.
00:02:27.000 It's charliekirk.com slash support.
00:02:29.000 That's charliekirk.com slash support.
00:02:31.000 I want to thank Janet from California for your support.
00:02:33.000 Thank you.
00:02:34.000 Angela from Alabama.
00:02:35.000 Thank you.
00:02:36.000 Tammy from California.
00:02:37.000 Thank you.
00:02:38.000 Anthony from North Carolina.
00:02:39.000 Thank you.
00:02:40.000 Rebecca from California.
00:02:41.000 Tanya from California.
00:02:43.000 Tripp from Florida.
00:02:43.000 Thank you.
00:02:45.000 Lori from Arizona.
00:02:46.000 Thomas from Florida.
00:02:48.000 Jennifer from California.
00:02:50.000 I also want to thank Michaela from Illinois and Juliana from Montana.
00:02:54.000 CharlieKirk.com slash support.
00:02:57.000 Thank you.
00:02:58.000 Thank you.
00:02:59.000 The episode that will make you think completely differently about the virus.
00:03:06.000 If you haven't yet been aware of this, send this episode to your friends.
00:03:09.000 And at the very least, share the article that we have posted at CharlieKirk.com all about it.
00:03:14.000 Buckle up. 0.96
00:03:14.000 Here we go. 0.96
00:03:16.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
00:03:17.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
00:03:20.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
00:03:23.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
00:03:26.000 I want to thank Charlie.
00:03:27.000 He's an incredible guy.
00:03:28.000 His spirit, his love of this country.
00:03:30.000 He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
00:03:35.000 Turning point USA. 0.65
00:03:37.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:03:45.000 That's why we are here.
00:03:48.000 Hey, everybody.
00:03:49.000 This episode is brought to you by my friends at ExpressVPN, expressvpn.com/slash Charlie.
00:03:55.000 Secure your device, anonymize your online activity, protect your action online.
00:04:02.000 Expressvpn.com slash Charlie.
00:04:05.000 Help our show out by also helping yourself protect yourself.
00:04:09.000 Expressvpn.com slash Charlie.
00:04:15.000 So if I were to ask you, what are the most important numbers in your life?
00:04:19.000 Things that you can measure objectively.
00:04:22.000 You might say your credit score.
00:04:25.000 You might say your net worth.
00:04:27.000 You might say how much money you have in your bank account.
00:04:29.000 You might say your stock portfolio.
00:04:32.000 If I were to ask you what numbers are ones that you track and that you try to improve, there would be a whole variety of numbers that you would offer.
00:04:42.000 What if I told you that a new study has come out that is getting no coverage from the activist press of a number that very well might be able to predict your ability to handle and survive a case of the Fauci virus?
00:05:00.000 No, I'm not talking about your credit score.
00:05:02.000 I'm not even talking about your vaccination status.
00:05:05.000 I'm talking about your vitamin D levels.
00:05:10.000 A new shocking article by my friend and just a brilliant, brilliant thinker, Daniel Horowitz.
00:05:18.000 Studies show an aggressive vitamin D campaign could have prevented nearly all COVID deaths.
00:05:25.000 Now, I was a little skeptical before I read this.
00:05:28.000 I was skeptical because I said, boy, you're trying to tell me that an aggressive vitamin D campaign could have prevented all COVID deaths?
00:05:34.000 I'm going to read this article almost verbatim and go through it.
00:05:38.000 But before I do, I have heard this anecdotally from ER doctors, from nurses in the emergency room.
00:05:45.000 I say, what is the one thing that every single person who dies from the Fauci virus have in common?
00:05:52.000 They say, oh, they're vitamin D deficient.
00:05:54.000 They say it without even any hesitation.
00:05:57.000 I was recently getting a vitamin C infusion.
00:06:00.000 I try to do that every so often and just to try to keep with good health.
00:06:04.000 And I'm a big believer in IV treatment.
00:06:07.000 And I think that you guys should check it out as well.
00:06:10.000 And the people who administer the IVs for this particular clinic, they also work in the emergency room.
00:06:18.000 And I asked them, I say, is it standard protocol in the emergency room in Arizona to administer a vitamin D booster shot as soon as someone who is COVID positive comes in?
00:06:31.000 They say, no, we don't even have vitamin D at the hospital.
00:06:33.000 Now, I've heard at some hospitals they are doing this, but at least in Banner and some of these other places in Phoenix, Arizona, they are not doing this, which is stunning.
00:06:43.000 You look at the numbers and you go through these studies.
00:06:47.000 The most important number that you should be tracking is what is your vitamin D level.
00:06:54.000 Not what is your credit score, not your vaccination status.
00:06:57.000 Daniel Horowitz writes, what if we could have simply advised everyone last March when the pandemic began to supplement your treatment with vitamin D?
00:07:08.000 An endless stream of academic research demonstrates that not only would such an approach have worked better than most vaccines, but rather than coming with the sundry known and unknown side effects that would have induced immeasurable positive side effects in the population for awry for an array of other health concerns.
00:07:28.000 Most doctors will not even tell you that your vitamin D levels are low.
00:07:31.000 Do you know you can even, you know, you can get that tested?
00:07:33.000 In fact, there is a spectrum on whether you have a high vitamin D level and a low vitamin D level.
00:07:40.000 We'll tell you about that in a second.
00:07:42.000 According to a breaking new German study, the difference between a level of 18 and one over 50, so that's the spectrum of how you measure vitamin D levels, is one between life and death.
00:07:56.000 Here's a question that you should ask your COVID, let's just say, obsessed friends.
00:08:03.000 This is a question you should ask your doctor: why is it that you've never mentioned vitamin D?
00:08:07.000 Maybe they have.
00:08:08.000 Maybe you're taking vitamin D supplements.
00:08:10.000 Maybe you are getting injections of vitamin D.
00:08:12.000 And by the way, you cannot get IV treatment for vitamin D.
00:08:14.000 It's fat-soluble, so you have to have it, I guess, injected is the right word.
00:08:19.000 You have to have it put in as a shot.
00:08:22.000 Why has this education been totally suppressed to the entire public, especially now that we're in the midst of winter season when there's essentially no natural vitamin D from sunlight for anyone above the 37th parallel, Daniel Horowitz writes?
00:08:39.000 Studies are showing that there's 142 studies, it's 142 academic studies vouching for the near-perfect correlation between higher vitamin D levels and better outcomes in COVID patients.
00:08:57.000 It is likely that the area of COVID-19 treatment research that has the most data behind it.
00:09:04.000 And I'm going to explain later in this article, Daniel Horowitz, and I'll build it out, why this is logical.
00:09:10.000 Because when people actually die from COVID, the body is basically pleading for vitamin D assistance.
00:09:22.000 Not only did German researchers find a linear relationship between vitamin D levels and mortality rates from COVID, they found an essentially zero morbidity from those with a D level above 50 NG per milliliter.
00:09:36.000 And so, for those of you that are worried about COVID, or for those of you that might have family members that are worried about COVID, they might be vaccinated and they're seeing double vaccinated people like Dana White and LeBron James get infected.
00:09:47.000 The thing that you should be telling them is: what's your vitamin D level?
00:09:51.000 Get it tested.
00:09:53.000 Vitamin D is abundant in two ways.
00:09:56.000 You can go outside if you live in Arizona, New Mexico, parts of the Sun Belt or Florida, or obviously you can get vitamin D at your local Walgreens or CBS.
00:10:03.000 It's cheap.
00:10:04.000 Maybe that's why we're not hearing about it.
00:10:07.000 The reason this study is so important is that relative to dozens of other tracking D levels with COVID outcomes is because it's measured the levels before the patients got COVID as well after the infection onset.
00:10:20.000 Quote, in most studies, the vitamin D level was determined several days after the onset of infection.
00:10:26.000 Therefore, a low vitamin D level may be the result and not the trigger of the course of infection.
00:10:32.000 This study followed 1,601 hospitalized patients, 784 who had their vitamin D levels measured within a day after admission, and 817 whose vitamin D levels were known before infection.
00:10:48.000 They observed the median vitamin D level over all the studied cohorts was 23.2 Ng per milliliters, which is considered to be vitamin D insufficient.
00:10:59.000 The results were remarkable, Daniel Horowitz writes.
00:11:02.000 At a threshold of 30 Ng per milliliter, mortality decreased considerably, found the authors.
00:11:09.000 Quote, the scientific researchers, by the way, the CDC, Fauci, Francis, Collins, NIH, with Omicron here, why aren't they mentioning this study?
00:11:18.000 100 plus studies, 142 studies that show this.
00:11:23.000 Quote, at a threshold of 30 Ng per milliliter, the mortality decreased considerably.
00:11:32.000 It's amazing.
00:11:33.000 Continues by saying, based on these findings, they conclude that people should test their blood levels and supplement to get their levels over 50.
00:11:43.000 Studies have already shown that one is, this is an amazing number.
00:11:47.000 You could put this number, and if you get fact-checked by social media, it's verifiable.
00:11:52.000 Do you know someone is 14 times more likely to die from COVID with a vitamin D deficiency?
00:12:00.000 The reality is this, is that most people's levels are below 30.
00:12:04.000 In fact, many are closer to zero, especially amongst the elderly population.
00:12:09.000 Instead of a mass vaccination campaign, why didn't we have a mass vitamin D supplement campaign?
00:12:15.000 If you have not heard about this vitamin D story, you need to take a pause and say, why haven't you heard this?
00:12:20.000 It's a near direct correlation between low vitamin D levels and not being able to survive COVID.
00:12:27.000 Why are public health officials not telling you the truth?
00:12:30.000 You type in vitamin D to Google, almost no stories at all telling people to boost their vitamin D levels.
00:12:41.000 Incredible.
00:12:43.000 But everyone, go get vaccinated, even though the vaccinated are getting infected and the vaccine is waning in efficacy, not to mention all the other associated risks with it.
00:12:54.000 What's so interesting is the very same people that want to power the entire world through solar energy and they look to the sun to be able to power everything, they very well could have said, yeah, the sun could actually help us fight COVID.
00:13:05.000 Now, in order to get the necessary vitamin D levels from the sun, you need 20 or 30 good minutes, 20 to 30 good minutes of sunbathing a day.
00:13:12.000 It's not just going for a stroll, but it helps.
00:13:14.000 And by the way, that's why you have to measure your vitamin D levels.
00:13:18.000 Most people do not know their vitamin D levels.
00:13:20.000 I bet less than half of 1% of the American population could say their vitamin D levels.
00:13:25.000 But I guarantee you that most Americans could tell you how many Instagram followers they have, their credit score, I hope so.
00:13:32.000 They could tell you the recent score of the Tampa Bay game.
00:13:37.000 But a vitamin D level, the thing that actually could determine their life, most people don't even know about it.
00:13:44.000 Isn't that an amazing disservice by our public health officials?
00:13:47.000 Of course it is.
00:13:48.000 This right here is the most simple and I think effective issue of cross-examination against our public health officials.
00:13:56.000 Why have you not been doing a massive public awareness campaign to raise vitamin D levels?
00:14:03.000 By the way, it's not just COVID that higher vitamin D levels can work against.
00:14:10.000 I guess that wasn't worded perfectly, meaning that higher vitamin D levels help with a variety of health issues.
00:14:15.000 Now, someone just emailed us, Charlie, can you take pills for vitamin D?
00:14:18.000 Of course you can.
00:14:18.000 You could take them as supplements.
00:14:19.000 The problem with supplements, though, is that when it goes through your digestive tract, is that you're not going to get 100% of the actual vitamin to absorb.
00:14:27.000 And so this is why IV treatment is so effective, but you cannot take vitamin D via IV treatment because it's fat-soluble.
00:14:34.000 You could take vitamin C via IV treatment.
00:14:36.000 You could take magnesium.
00:14:37.000 You could take glutathione.
00:14:39.000 You could take amino acids, but vitamin D has to be administered via a shot.
00:14:44.000 And so maybe if you have such low vitamin D levels, if you're in the elderly population or if you have underlying health conditions and you were promised a lot of things with a vaccine and you're worried, I'm not one to give you health advice, but a higher vitamin D level certainly won't hurt.
00:15:00.000 100 plus studies show that the main cause of death, and this is important, so I want to just reiterate this for those of you guys tuning in.
00:15:07.000 142 studies have now come out vouching for the near perfect correlation between high vitamin D levels and better outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
00:15:16.000 I've heard this anecdotally.
00:15:17.000 Now there's 142 studies reinforcing this, and yet the CDC and the NIH says nothing about this.
00:15:26.000 But here's why it actually works.
00:15:29.000 The main cause of death from COVID stems from, you've probably heard this on television, it's called a cytokine storm, where the body's immune system releases too many toxics, toxic cytokines, as part of the inflammatory response to the virus.
00:15:48.000 Vitamin D happens to be the key regulator of those cells.
00:15:53.000 So the cause of death from COVID is the body actually attacking itself as part of an inflammatory response.
00:16:00.000 That is why aspirin has been showing to be effective against hospitalization.
00:16:04.000 That's why Regeneron helps.
00:16:06.000 This is why steroid treatment can be helpful.
00:16:09.000 And by the way, the treatment that they do want to push is one that actually can be catastrophic to you in your liver, such as remdesivir.
00:16:16.000 We'll get to that later.
00:16:18.000 Which I've heard horror stories about remdesivir.
00:16:23.000 And so, but if the body has higher levels of vitamin D, then that kind of storm actually is able to be thwarted.
00:16:35.000 Daniel Horowitz writes, quote, we've had 20 months to get our levels over 50 and certainly over at least 30.
00:16:42.000 He personally says, quote, I have had my levels increased by approximately 50 NGS per milliliter in about half a year.
00:16:50.000 Had the public been doing this at the same time, most deaths could have been avoided.
00:16:55.000 Those with absorption problems could have been given the active form of D through a shot to raise their levels, bypassing the liver's metabolic process very carefully.
00:17:09.000 Studies have shown that almost anyone hospitalized with low levels, but given the active form of D, did not progress to the ICU afterwards.
00:17:17.000 Do you know in Arizona they do not give vitamin D booster shots, at least from the ER doctors I've talked to.
00:17:23.000 Yet the studies show, quote, studies have shown almost anyone hospitalized with low levels, but given the active form of D, did not progress to the ICU after.
00:17:34.000 Why isn't that part of the regimen for every COVID patient in the country?
00:17:40.000 Did you know that if you shop at Nike, they turn around and give your hard-earned dollars to pro-abortion groups like Planned Parenthood and the Population Council?
00:17:48.000 Did you know that Airbnb gave $500,000 to the Marxist Black Lives Matter organization?
00:17:54.000 Your first vote is at the ballot box, but that isn't enough to defend our traditional Judeo-Christian values.
00:18:00.000 Left-wing corporations are subverting our democracy by taking money from conservative customers and giving it to radical organizations that support abortion, gun control, and critical race theory.
00:18:11.000 You have another vote, a second vote at the checkout line.
00:18:14.000 And that is where massively important organizations called Second Vote come in.
00:18:19.000 The courageous people at Second Vote are exposing corporations for how they spend your money.
00:18:23.000 Check out secondvote.com today.
00:18:26.000 Second Vote is developing incredible tools and engaging the smartest minds in the country to help inform Americans' purchasing decisions.
00:18:32.000 What if I told you Chick-fil-A is not all that you might think it is?
00:18:35.000 Well, their work is arduous, complex, and exhaustive.
00:18:39.000 It doesn't happen for free.
00:18:40.000 Please support their work so we can defend our future from the woke Marxist mob.
00:18:45.000 So here's what I want you to do.
00:18:46.000 Go right now to secondvote.com and subscribe.
00:18:48.000 It's just $50 a year.
00:18:50.000 But if you use promo code Charlie, you get 50% off.
00:18:53.000 It's literally $2 a month, everybody.
00:18:55.000 And you get 50% off the information you need to have before you make your next purchase.
00:18:59.000 Do not buy products from people that hate you.
00:19:02.000 Don't buy products from people that are funding the downfall of America.
00:19:06.000 Join me, go to secondvote.com and subscribe with promo code Charlie today.
00:19:13.000 I am going to finish on the vitamin D story because it's just so important.
00:19:16.000 And I just want to say the obvious that yes, you can take too much vitamin D and you can have an adverse reaction to that.
00:19:24.000 So, do your research and hopefully find a medical professional that actually believes in science, not one that just believes in what they're told.
00:19:31.000 And the proper dosage of vitamin D and as a supplement can be very, very helpful.
00:19:37.000 Someone just asked, hey, Charlie, what study are you reading from about the low vitamin D levels?
00:19:42.000 It is Daniel Horowitz from theblaze.com, and we'll also repost it at charliekirk.com.
00:19:48.000 That's right.
00:19:48.000 We'll repost his article at charliekirk.com.
00:19:52.000 But generally, people's vitamin D levels are far too low, and you should have it tested.
00:19:57.000 You should manage it.
00:19:57.000 You should try to get those levels up.
00:19:59.000 You could do it in a variety of different ways.
00:20:00.000 And definitely, if you have someone that has contracted COVID, it will not hurt to get a vitamin D shot if managed correctly and balanced.
00:20:10.000 Yes, you can have an excess of vitamin D and you can have an adverse reaction to that.
00:20:13.000 I do want to make sure I mention that because, unlike our health officials, I don't want to lie to you.
00:20:19.000 Okay, we've been getting a ton of emails, freedom at charliekirk.com, about the Supreme Court and what happened there.
00:20:27.000 And there's a lot of confusion.
00:20:28.000 There's a lot of people thinking that Roe versus Wade is going to be completely wiped out.
00:20:33.000 The other side is totally freaking out about this.
00:20:35.000 A lot of it is still speculation, but I wanted to bring on an expert that could help us navigate this, very smart person who has a great video that just came out about this issue.
00:20:45.000 And he'll be able to kind of walk us through what happened yesterday and the legal implications alongside of it.
00:20:52.000 It's Professor Carter Sneed from University of Notre Dame.
00:20:55.000 And I think they're going to have a new football coach soon.
00:20:57.000 But Professor Sneed, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
00:21:00.000 Thank you so much for joining us.
00:21:02.000 Thanks for inviting me on.
00:21:03.000 I appreciate it.
00:21:04.000 So, Professor Sneed, walk us through what happened yesterday.
00:21:08.000 What were the oral arguments?
00:21:09.000 What did we learn?
00:21:11.000 And what are the implications surrounding this case that came from Mississippi?
00:21:16.000 So, Mississippi, as your listeners probably know, passed a law a while ago that bans abortion after 15 weeks gestation.
00:21:24.000 They had different reasons for doing that, some of which related to concerns about fetal pain.
00:21:29.000 But a 15-week ban is a ban prior to fetal viability, which is defined as the capacity of the baby to live outside her mother's body.
00:21:38.000 It's a respiratory status, basically.
00:21:41.000 Are your lungs sufficiently developed to live outside your mom's body?
00:21:45.000 And that's around 22 weeks, 22, 24 weeks.
00:21:48.000 And so, the reason I mentioned that is because the dominating appellate decision of the Supreme Court, which fixes abortion law in America, is a case called Plan Parent versus Casey.
00:21:59.000 It purports to be interpreting Roe v. Wade.
00:22:02.000 And in that opinion, the Supreme Court said no bans prior to viability are constitutional.
00:22:08.000 What they said is prior to viability, the state may not unduly burden a woman's right to abortion.
00:22:15.000 And after viability, states can regulate abortion.
00:22:17.000 But for various reasons, the way the court has interpreted health of the mother and a health exception that has to attach to any restriction on abortion, we basically have abortion on request, both pre- and post-viability, making us one of the most extreme countries in the world in terms of our abortion law, in terms of its permissiveness.
00:22:36.000 And as actually yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts observed, it puts us in the company of China and North Korea in terms of how permissive we are in allowing abortion.
00:22:44.000 And then, if that weren't problematic enough, that policy was imposed on the United States by the Supreme Court in 1973 and then again in 1992 under a very specious reading of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.
00:22:58.000 They say the 14th Amendment, which guarantees, among other things, that the state must provide you with due process prior to its depriving you of life, liberty, or property, that that procedural safeguard means that there's a right to abortion.
00:23:14.000 And that's a very aggressive and I think reading of the Constitution.
00:23:19.000 It's not connected to the text, history, or tradition of the Constitution.
00:23:23.000 In 1868, when the 14th Amendment was ratified, abortion was banned everywhere.
00:23:28.000 No one thought that the due process clause precluded states from protecting unborn children, really up until 1973, when the court announced that very novel and surprising decision in Roe v. Wade.
00:23:40.000 So, because the Mississippi law directly conflicts with the Supreme Court's sort of invented law of abortion, it set up a conflict.
00:23:48.000 It set up a conflict that the justices agreed to resolve.
00:23:52.000 And then when you apply for a Supreme Court review, it's called a petition for sorcery or I.
00:23:58.000 And you, you, your part as a party, file for in the court to take your case.
00:24:02.000 That's what Mississippi did. 1.00
00:24:03.000 There were many, many delays before the court finally acted on that petition.
00:24:07.000 But when they did, they granted certain they agreed to answer one question.
00:24:10.000 And the one question they agreed to answer is whether all pre-viability bans on abortion are unconstitutional.
00:24:18.000 And if you read Casey and Roe, the answer is yes, they are unconstitutional.
00:24:22.000 So simply by virtue of granting cert in this case, it gave a great deal, I think, of optimism to people who care about the lives of unborn children and their mothers and caring for all of them rightly short of abortion, who believe that abortion is the unjust killing of innocent human beings.
00:24:38.000 It gave a lot of us optimism that the court was, for the first time since 1992, considering whether or not the law of abortion in America should be undone, reversed, or sustained.
00:24:50.000 And it's a kind of a binary choice here.
00:24:53.000 And we saw that very dramatically in yesterday's oral arguments.
00:24:57.000 Both sides, Mississippi, ably represented by their Solicitor General, Scott Stewart, and Jackson's Women's Health Center, which is an abortion clinic.
00:25:05.000 I think it's the only abortion clinic in Mississippi, represented by a lawyer from the Center for Reproductive Rights in New York City.
00:25:11.000 And then our Solicitor General, Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the U.S., the Biden administration and the Justice Department, argued in favor of the abortion clinic's position.
00:25:23.000 But all of the parties, even though they disagreed on the constitutionality of Mississippi's law, they all agreed that the court had two choices here and only two choices.
00:25:31.000 One was to affirm Roe and Casey and the unjust and unconstitutional apparatus of abortion that the Supreme Court created in 1973, or dismantle that in its entirety and affirm the 15-week ban.
00:25:45.000 There's no middle position.
00:25:47.000 You can't affirm the 15-week ban without dismantling the entire apparatus of abortion if you want to do so in an intellectually coherent way, in a way that is actually consistent with what the opinions in Roe and Casey actually said.
00:26:01.000 So that's very helpful.
00:26:03.000 Thank you.
00:26:04.000 I think where some people are confused, and you did a great job in navigating that, and I think Kavanaugh clarified it yesterday by saying that the Constitution is silent on the issue of abortion, which I don't agree with, but that's a separate issue.
00:26:18.000 I think that the Constitution as a social contract defends the natural rights of all beings, both unborn and born, but that's a separate issue for a different time.
00:26:27.000 But at the very least, Kavanaugh was beginning to make an argument that the states should be able to determine their own abortion laws.
00:26:36.000 And if I remember correctly, Planned Parent v. Casey, that was Justice Kennedy's very bizarre, like open interpretation of existence opinion, if I'm remembering correctly.
00:26:49.000 It says, existence is what you want it to be.
00:26:51.000 It was like this really strange, meandering opinion.
00:26:54.000 Can you talk about how you think the court is actually going to rule?
00:26:59.000 Yeah.
00:26:59.000 So as you say, Justice Kennedy said, again, the whole question is: does the 14th Amendment provide a right to abortion?
00:27:05.000 That's the first question.
00:27:06.000 Then the second question is, even if it doesn't and Roe and Casey are wrong, should they be overturned in light of what we call, we lawyers call the doctrine of stare decisis, which is a kind of prudential doctrine that invites but doesn't require judges and justices to think about the practical consequences of undoing prior wrongly decided precedent.
00:27:27.000 And that's mostly what the justices talked about yesterday.
00:27:31.000 They didn't really talk about whether or not Roe was decided rightly as a matter of first impression.
00:27:36.000 There was some discussion of that on the abortion rights advocate side.
00:27:40.000 But mostly they focused on stare decisis because it's a very rare and I don't think there are, I think the six justices who were appointed by Republican presidents, I think every single one of them, based on their publicly available statements and their jurisprudence, I think they all understand that Roe v. Wade and Plan Parent versus Casey are untethered to the Constitution.
00:27:59.000 They're not fair interpretations of the 14th Amendment.
00:28:02.000 And if the case came as a matter of first impression, you would be sure that they would all say, no, that's crazy.
00:28:06.000 The Constitution doesn't, the 14th Amendment, 1868, ratified when abortion was banned everywhere, doesn't create a right to abortion, which is also illegal at common law, by the way, stretching back even before the American founding.
00:28:22.000 They would say, no, but what they focused on is, okay, let's assume for the sake of argument, these were wrongly decided.
00:28:27.000 Should we disturb those cases and overturn them because it would be because they've proven to be unworkable, because they would be too unduly disruptive to people's settled interests to do that.
00:28:39.000 And that's mostly what the conversation circled on and focused on yesterday.
00:28:44.000 And yesterday was important because we saw for the very first time in the voices of the justices kind of where their heads are on this, what they're thinking about it.
00:28:52.000 And a lot of people were wondering, will they try to craft some kind of middle pathway where they say the 15-week ban is okay, but we're still going to say there's a right to abortion.
00:29:00.000 And we'll tell you later exactly how that works.
00:29:03.000 I think there were no takers for that position yesterday, except for perhaps Chief Justice Roberts, who, again, didn't commit himself to that.
00:29:10.000 He was just sort of musing about what might be possible.
00:29:14.000 And he said, well, is it possible to disentangle viability from the undue burden standard?
00:29:19.000 And what would that look like?
00:29:20.000 Everybody, the lawyers and it seemed to the other justices said that's not, that doesn't work.
00:29:24.000 So I don't think there's any, there certainly won't be, my prediction for whatever it's worth is, you know, you get what you pay for.
00:29:31.000 You're not paying for this prediction.
00:29:32.000 You get what you pay for.
00:29:34.000 But my prediction is that Roe v. Wade and Casey will be overturned in their entirety and the matter will be returned to the elected branches of government to settle through the democratic process.
00:29:46.000 And Justice Kavanaugh, his comments, I think, are the most important comments of the day yesterday because they were a window into his thinking.
00:29:54.000 And he said to both sides, as he frequently does, he likes to be diplomatic and likes to be conciliatory.
00:30:03.000 And he said, well, there are important issues on both sides here, but it's an unsolvable problem.
00:30:09.000 And the Constitution is scrupulously silent.
00:30:12.000 He was characterizing the views of Mississippi, but it seemed like it was consistent with his own views and things that he's written in the past.
00:30:20.000 The Constitution is silent on the question of abortion.
00:30:22.000 It's scrupulously neutral.
00:30:24.000 And shouldn't the court also be scrupulously neutral and allow this very difficult conflict of incommensurable goods, the goods of women's freedom on the one hand, and the goods of the lives of unborn children on the other?
00:30:36.000 Shouldn't that be something to be resolved through the political process?
00:30:41.000 And that was really, I think, the most insightful things he said vis-a-vis his own thinking.
00:30:47.000 I think I would be shocked.
00:30:50.000 Who knows?
00:30:50.000 Anything's possible, right?
00:30:51.000 But I would be shocked if Justice Kavanaugh were not leaning very heavily in the direction of overturning Roe and Casey in their entirety.
00:30:59.000 And if you want a straight up prediction, I think that's what's going to happen.
00:31:03.000 I think it's going to be 6-3.
00:31:04.000 I think Chief Justice Roberts will join the five in overturning Roe and Casey in its entirety.
00:31:12.000 Well, Professor, I want to have you back on and explain this further.
00:31:15.000 I wish we had more time.
00:31:16.000 That was so thoughtful.
00:31:18.000 And it's not always we get to have college professors on this show.
00:31:21.000 So that always gets me excited.
00:31:23.000 They have a tendency not to like me.
00:31:25.000 But really respect your views on this.
00:31:29.000 And I just want to say you're the director of the Danikola Center for Ethics and Culture at the wonderful Notre Dame University law professor, Dr. Sneed.
00:31:37.000 Thank you so much for joining us.
00:31:38.000 We'll have you back again soon to kind of unpack this.
00:31:41.000 Thank you so much.
00:31:42.000 Deeply appreciate it.
00:31:43.000 Thanks for having me on.
00:31:44.000 Take care.
00:31:47.000 Look, everyone out there has been asking me, Charlie, how do I get more pillows?
00:31:51.000 Well, that's mypillow.com.
00:31:54.000 And MyPillow doesn't have their box stores anymore, so we got to help them out.
00:31:57.000 And part of them being canceled, they want to give you the lowest price yet.
00:32:01.000 So you can get the lowest price in the history of MyPillow for their classic standard MyPillow regularly, $69.98, now only $19.98 with the promo code.
00:32:11.000 They also have queen size, regularly $79.98 and $24.98 with a promo code, or king size, usually $89.98, only $29.98 with your promo code.
00:32:21.000 MyPillow is not just pillows.
00:32:22.000 They have over 150 products, everything from sleepwear to new beds.
00:32:25.000 Go to mypillow.com or call 800-875-0425 and use promo code Kirk because they give Andrew Mike's special offer on his standard MyPillow.
00:32:33.000 That's mypillow.com, promo code Kirk, or call 800-875-0425, mypillow.com, promo code Kirk, mypillow.com, promo code Kirk.
00:32:46.000 I want to close out by finishing this story by Daniel Horowitz again on the vitamin D thing.
00:32:51.000 For those of you that missed the earlier portion of the program or you've been skimming through and doing more important things, 142 studies are vouching for the near-perfect correlation between higher vitamin D levels and better outcomes in COVID patients.
00:33:06.000 To finish the argument, a new study from Turkish researchers have found that a rapid regimen of regular vitamin D3 with the aim of getting people's levels well over 30 was wildly successful compared to people without supplementation.
00:33:20.000 They found that those who used treatment protocol to get their levels over 30, even if they had comorbidities, were much better off of those without comorbidities who didn't supplement, Daniel Horowitz writes.
00:33:30.000 23 published studies, in addition to the 142, contain 11,901 participants who found that one who is vitamin D deficient was 3.3 times more likely to get infected than one who isn't.
00:33:44.000 So if you don't want to get infected, why aren't you hearing a nonstop propaganda campaign around vitamin D?
00:33:51.000 Daniel Horowitz finishes by saying, why would we not try an approach that comes with a positive rather than negative side effects for our society as a whole?
00:34:02.000 And I've already told you that yes, you can take too much vitamin D, you can have an adverse event.
00:34:05.000 It takes a lot of vitamin D to get to that level.
00:34:08.000 But that's a necessary warning for those of you that might be sprinting to the store.
00:34:15.000 For those of you WABC on the dial in New York City that might be hearing this, and you just take an exit off the Brooklyn bridge, like, that's it, I'm going to Walgreens.
00:34:23.000 I'm going to go raid the vitamin D aisle.
00:34:24.000 Okay, just do your research.
00:34:26.000 I'm telling you something you need to be aware of.
00:34:28.000 The studies show that higher vitamin D levels equip you against infection and serious adverse events when it comes to getting COVID.
00:34:40.000 But it all comes down to the very same thing that is dominating our entire society.
00:34:45.000 If we would have had robust vitamin D regimens, we might have not had vote by mail.
00:34:52.000 If we had vitamin D that was generously distributed or a campaign of educating people about vitamin D instead of vaccine commercials every single time you turned on television, we might not have had the Georgia Senate seats flip, which were obviously a byproduct of mass mail and voting.
00:35:13.000 We wouldn't have had Zuckerberg and Bezos be worth over $100 billion.
00:35:17.000 What I'm saying is potentially, if we would have had a aggressive vitamin D campaign, if America would have just started to take vitamin D and do it so responsibly and would have done with prudence and would have done in the best benefit of their health, all the other profits from BioNTech, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson Johnson, and power, Raphael Warnock, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden, might never have happened.
00:35:47.000 If you have loved ones that have come down with COVID, I urge you to please look at this research study from Daniel Horowitz.
00:35:55.000 Why aren't our hospitals requiring vitamin D boosters for COVID-positive patients that come into the hospital?
00:36:02.000 Why isn't the CDC talking about that?
00:36:05.000 Why don't I hear any elected officials grandstanding about low vitamin D levels?
00:36:11.000 I already did a whole podcast before on the obesity problem in our country.
00:36:14.000 I'm not going to do that again.
00:36:15.000 I got plenty of angry emails about that, but it's just true that the clinically obese are having a more difficult time surviving COVID.
00:36:24.000 It's not intended to offend anyone.
00:36:26.000 It's just the truth.
00:36:29.000 Some people say that taking vitamin K alongside vitamin D can help with the absorption of it.
00:36:37.000 Again, do your research on this.
00:36:38.000 The point is this, that this would have been a cheap and possibly effective, widespread way to empower you and not keep you masked, locked down, your children controlled.
00:36:50.000 And also, if vitamin D would have all of a sudden worked, then the vaccine manufacturers might not have made a lot of money.
00:36:57.000 Pfizer, BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Moderna, they wouldn't have hit their profit margins.
00:37:03.000 It really comes down to the question is, does our government want us to be sick?
00:37:09.000 Why wouldn't they tell us about this?
00:37:11.000 Well, now you know.
00:37:12.000 We're going to post that at charliekirk.com.
00:37:14.000 Daniel Horowitz, studies show an aggressive vitamin D campaign could have prevented nearly all COVID deaths.
00:37:19.000 Thank you so much for listening, everybody.
00:37:21.000 Email us your thoughts, freedom at charliekirk.com.
00:37:23.000 And if you want to get involved with TurningPointUSA, go to tpusa.com, get involved with AmericaFest.
00:37:28.000 It's tpusa.com/slash amf to come to AmericaFest.
00:37:32.000 God bless you guys.
00:37:33.000 Speak to you soon.
00:37:36.000 For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.