00:00:29.000We also bring on Dr. Keith Rose, who actually runs one of the largest urgent care networks in all of South Texas, an MD, one of the friends of the show.
00:00:38.000We break it down and we explain what Bill Gates is saying about the vaccine all these months later.
00:01:22.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:02:01.000It was trending on Twitter as soon as that happened.
00:02:05.000You know, if you just Google Pfizer docs right now, all you will see is about 15 articles from Reuters, AP, Newsweek, fact-checking some of what they call the rumors on social media and conservative messaging boards.
00:02:22.000I think this is a really fascinating conversation.
00:02:24.000So I'm going to say like this, Dr. Rose.
00:02:28.000I don't know how to interpret all of this data.
00:02:31.000I'll be really honest, but we have pulled here on the show a lot of very interesting screen grabs.
00:02:41.000They've been analyzing it this way and that.
00:02:44.000And I think it's completely fair game to talk about the Pfizer docs.
00:02:48.000Now, for people who are uninitiated, Dr. Rose, tell us what the Pfizer docs are and how this became a news story to begin with.
00:02:55.000Well, my understanding is that Pfizer wanted the documents that are now in the public domain held for 75 years, I believe, is what they requested.
00:03:13.000I mean, that's about the equivalent of taking the national security safes and putting it in your museum and locking them up for five years.
00:03:20.000You know, it doesn't make any sense when this kind of information should have been in the public realm.
00:03:53.000And I think it's really important as American citizens.
00:03:57.000It's not only that we have the right, but we have an obligation to future generations so that this doesn't happen again.
00:04:04.000And what I mean by that is you have a lot of content pouring into the public domain.
00:04:09.000You have people going over these Pfizer docs.
00:04:12.000You have Pfizer officials on a Zoom call just a few days ago that was recorded on YouTube that talk specifically about the vaccine having a 71, 71 times higher chance of people that took the vaccine at a 71 times higher chance, the way they described it, of people getting a heart attack.
00:04:33.000And they said for every one person the vaccine helped, two were injured.
00:04:37.000Now, you can have fact checkers debunk that, but those are their words, not mine.
00:04:43.000Those are the FDA words on a Zoom call.
00:05:15.000I mean, no wonder this is causing such a reaction.
00:05:19.000I mean, you know, folks listening in the audience, remember we've played this montage before of big pharma and how they advertise on CNN, MSNBC, like all the mainstream news networks.
00:05:34.000So when you have something like this, where Pfizer is forced to share these documents ahead of schedule before they're, you know, asking to, I mean, they asked for 75 years and a judge blocked that.
00:06:38.000I'm going to get to the pregnancy issues.
00:06:40.000But when you talked about there was injuring two or killing two people for every one person it quote saved, then you had someone intimately involved with the development of the vaccine, and that's Bill Gates, who was just recorded the other day as saying, we now know that the vaccine didn't work.
00:07:00.000I'm paraphrasing, but he said it didn't prevent transmission and it didn't prevent acquisition of the disease.
00:07:18.000Well, once Omicron comes along, the vaccine is not reducing transmission hardly at all, particularly about three or four months after you take the vaccine.
00:07:33.000You know, we're seeing through a variety of the data, Israel data, UK data, that particularly if you're in your 70s, within four or five months of taking the vaccine, the protection really is going down.
00:07:55.000So my question to Bill Gates or his smart experts is that if you have a medication, an experimental vaccine that doesn't prevent the transmission of a disease or the acquisition of the disease, by their own words, it makes you have less severe symptoms.
00:08:18.000And I don't understand how physicians that when you go to medical school, and back when I went to medical school, I remember our graduation, we had someone come up and speak about how physicians he felt were truly the last group of professional people that really adhered to the maxim, you know, primum non-necessary, first do no harm.
00:08:46.000But I think we've lost that moniker because we have at least a group of physicians, unfortunately, a large number, that are doing harm either by omission or commission.
00:09:00.000And I think they need to do no K-N-O-W harm because they're not recognizing that these vaccines are not a one-off.
00:09:09.000They're not helping, but they are actually hurting.
00:09:12.000So the Pfizer documents on top of Bill Gates' revelation gives the context that the vaccines are pretty insidious.
00:09:20.000That with data from around the world, I think that's why you have the fact checkers spinning up in record numbers.
00:09:27.000And again, to put context to everything, to this content, the fact checkers are not physicians.
00:09:37.000They're, from what I understand, mostly millennials that are told what to say, what to do, and they just get out there and they say we're fact checkers.
00:09:46.000And how do they take someone who spends 20, 30, 40 years of their life studying medicine, who understands the scientific process, who understands therapeutics, who understands pharmacology, who understands biochemistry?
00:10:01.000And then you have someone saying, well, you're wrong because the science doesn't show us that.
00:10:06.000I mean, it's not the first time we've seen this.
00:10:08.000We saw this back in the 70s when the former director of the CDC after swine flu had killed 4,000 people, or excuse me, killed 50 people and they stopped the vaccine.
00:11:06.000It wasn't until early February when I was in a meeting that experts at the foundation said, there's no way, you know, there's been too much travel without diagnosis for us to contain this.
00:11:21.000And then at that point, we didn't really understand the fatality rate.
00:11:25.000You know, we didn't understand that it's a fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is.
00:11:34.000So I'm glad we didn't overreact, right, Dr. Rose?
00:11:39.000Well, I just appreciate the fact that Bill Gates and his experts, as soon as they realized that there was no way to, quote, contain this, came out and said that lockdowns weren't effective and that let's not crush the economy.
00:11:51.000Let's not cause an increase in drug use and suicides.
00:12:01.000And if you're watching talk, he's just kind of rattling off the top of the head like there were no consequences to this.
00:12:08.000No, it was his group that funded the IHME that gave us these bogus projections in the beginning that forced all the lockdowns.
00:12:16.000It said there were going to be millions and millions of deaths.
00:12:19.000So Amia Kulpa, two years later, I mean, it's not even Amia Kulpa.
00:12:24.000It's like, oh, I guess we got it wrong.
00:12:26.000Yeah, by the way, you started this whole exchange talking about how the science is changing and how they use that time and again to justify the most absurd conclusions.
00:12:34.000And yet here you go basically saying, hey, the science didn't change.
00:12:38.000As a matter of fact, back in February, we knew there was no containing this thing.
00:12:41.000So why did they even try and contain it to begin with?
00:12:44.000And you were actually the one that taught us on this show that you have never used lockdowns.
00:12:49.000You've never used quarantining to quarantine the healthy.
00:12:53.000It was always historically used to contain the sick.
00:12:56.000That's a tremendous clip from Bill Gates, basically admitting that we had a coordinated overreaction and he knew in February.
00:13:16.000But it really started when Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted about this.
00:13:20.000So in her tweet, Green shared a screenshot of a document released by the Food and Drug Administration, which she took as meaning that 1,223 people died during Pfizer's post-authorization adverse events report.
00:13:32.000A number of other conservative figures also posted why they are skeptical about the safety of the vaccine with Pfizer documents hashtag.
00:13:41.000While the report discussed adverse reaction to the vaccine in a 90-day period and the figures are genuine, the pharmaceutical company has said the documents do not link the vaccine as being responsible for the people's death.
00:13:53.000So basically, they're saying that the fatalities listed in the report are among nearly 160,000 adverse effects.
00:14:02.000The cause of each fatality is not verified and therefore may also include those who had various illnesses such as cancer or cardiovascular disease, says a Pfizer spokeswoman.
00:14:14.000So let me just make sure I'm getting this straight, Dr. Rose.
00:14:18.000Pfizer is basically saying, oh, these aren't, you know, this isn't real data.
00:14:23.000And Marjorie Taylor Greene's full of it because, you know, we can't verify all of this.
00:14:27.000Isn't this the same excuse that those on the left used to debunk the VARES data because they said they couldn't verify all the adverse events?
00:14:39.000You have to understand when you listen to the mainstream media or liberal progressives, I call it the rule of exchange.
00:14:47.000They exchange one set of data for another set of reasons and they use it back and forth.
00:14:53.000A great example is the governor of your state, Gavin Newson, who is now trying to take the medical license from any physician.
00:15:01.000They're pushing a bill right now at your state legislature to take the medical license from any physician that, quote, promotes misinformation.
00:15:11.000And at the same time, Gavin Newsom, who locked down an entire state and is trying to force vaccines, was out, I think it was 72 hours ago.
00:15:21.000And his quote was, he's upset about Roe versus Wade.
00:15:25.000And he said, remember, my body, your body, your choice.
00:15:29.000So again, liberals use the slogans that fit their narrative.
00:15:35.000And if you say anything else, like you said, it's misinformation.
00:15:38.000So they don't, they're not, we're not working on a level playing field.
00:15:41.000So you have to bring context in to show how far off these guys are, how far off the mark they are.
00:15:49.000And speaking of context, you know, you just read me a quote from Bill Gates that was so asinine that I assumed it was from February or March of 2020.
00:16:31.000It's the same mainstream media and fact checkers.
00:16:33.000Let's just keep it simple that said Hunter Biden's laptop was rushing misinformation, which we know because of Washington Post articles, New York Times articles, Hunter Biden's laptop is real.
00:16:46.000And so, you know, you would think that if I was a liberal, it might cause me some cognitive dissonance.
00:16:53.000You know, I might look at it and go, hey, this may not be correct.
00:16:57.000But unfortunately, today, we have a lot of people that are specialists in propaganda.
00:17:02.000That's why when you hear information come out and everyone's saying the exact same words and catchphrases, you can almost bet that that's misinformation.
00:17:11.000Yep, the bumper stickers, beware of the bumper stickers.
00:17:14.000And by the whole, one of the just flimsiest arguments is when they say, you know, your body, your choice, it's just plainly not their body.
00:17:24.000I mean, in the vast majority of instances, that person chose to engage in intercourse.
00:17:31.000There are potential consequences for that.
00:17:33.000And sometimes, yes, it creates another body.
00:18:07.000Have you looked at how much of Russia is inside your 401k or IRA?
00:18:11.000Did you know my friends at PAX Financial Group have zero investments in Russia through their biblical investment strategy?
00:18:17.000Those companies were screened out long ago because they didn't pass the treat people right test.
00:18:22.000One of the most important tenets of the Christian faith is to love your neighbor, and this includes to love your employees.
00:18:27.000Based on PAX's biblical responsible investment strategy, a company, domestic or international, is excluded from an investment from your portfolio if it violates our innate God-given fundamental rights.
00:18:50.000PAX Financial is rooted in biblical wisdom.
00:18:53.000So if you have $150,000 or more and would like to know more about biblical responsible investing at PAX Financial Group, text Charlie to number 74868.
00:19:10.000So you just take out your phone, text the number 74868 and type in Charlie to get to know about PAX Biblical Responsible Investing, biblical responsible investing strategy.
00:19:22.000Take out your phone, text Charlie to 74868.
00:19:27.000They're about to manage some money for me.
00:19:29.000I really think highly of PAX Financial.
00:19:59.000Some of the tactics that they're using to debunk this data is the same tactics that they use to debunk various, right?
00:20:07.000So they're basically saying, you can't trust any data, and yet, but you could trust us that this is a completely safe and effective vaccine.
00:20:16.000And as Dr. Rose said, you know, it's not a vaccine, it's a therapeutic.
00:20:20.000We even heard from Bill Gates himself saying that the vaccine stopped being able to protect people from the infection in the first place.
00:21:33.000And I'm sorry if your situation is different than that.
00:21:36.000I'm just telling you anecdotally, what I'm seeing is a lot of self-righteous progressives that brag and virtue signal about how they've been quadruple boosted, and here they are getting COVID.
00:22:12.000And I'm going to get back to blood clotting in just a second.
00:22:15.000Acute interstitial pneumonitis, a whole host of autoimmune disorders, various musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, diabetes, herpes, thyroid disorder.
00:22:27.000And by the way, there's like herpes all over the place, apparently.
00:22:30.000It's just like an outbreak of herpes from this stuff.
00:22:33.000Thyroid disorders, several neurological conditions, including multiple sclerosis, blindness, seizures, epilepsy, narcolepsy, eczema, blisters, asthma, fertility problems, which we discussed as well, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, and I guess Julian Barr syndrome, if I'm saying that right.
00:22:54.000So what's interesting about this as well is you have doctors like Dr. Keriarti, who we're going to have to get on this show.
00:23:02.000I mean, we've flirted around the edges.
00:23:04.000But I want to play his clip in quick succession with another clip.
00:23:46.000And of course, yesterday's announcement about the Johnson Johnson vaccine.
00:23:50.000I'm glad actually that the FDA is acknowledging that there is this concern about thrombosis, about blood clots with the JJ vaccine.
00:23:59.000But Tucker, I got to be honest, I'm a little surprised that they're applying that level of scrutiny to the JJ vaccine, but not to the mRNA vaccines, not to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine, because actually, if you look at overall safety issues, the JJ vaccine probably has a better overall safety profile.
00:24:35.000Dr. Cariarti is basically saying what's the key point of intrigue here is that they're not attacking the other two vaccines that are mRNA vaccines, but they are attacking Johnson Johnson, even though Johnson Johnson actually has a slightly better safety profile than the other two.
00:24:56.000Now, remember what I just played here: brought to you by Pfizer, brought to you by Pfizer.
00:25:02.000The mainstream news media is paid for, bought, by Big Pharma.
00:25:07.000So, why are they not attacking the Pfizer mRNA vaccine?
00:25:11.000Maybe they don't have as big a pockets as Pfizer.
00:25:14.000Maybe Johnson Johnson slumming it in the big pharma world.
00:25:57.000Ties the point together that a lot of people that you know and that I know that have been triple, quadruple, boosted, these people tend to keep getting COVID inexplicably.
00:26:11.000I'm not saying that I'm listening, I'm not a doctor.
00:26:14.000I'm not going to make the direct correlation.
00:26:15.000Other people like Dr. Naomi Wolf are certainly making the correlation.
00:27:18.000And here's the proof you've been waiting for.
00:27:19.000In Dinesh D'Souza's explosive new documentary, 2000 Mules, executive produced by Salem Media Group, you'll see jaw-dropping evidence of exactly how the Democrats pulled off the biggest heist in American history.
00:27:30.000Drawn on meticulous research from the election integrity group True the Vote, 2000 Mules uses both cell phone geotracking data and video evidence to uncover a massive network of illegal ballot trafficking in all five key swing states.
00:27:42.000Enough election fraud to change the outcome of the 2020 election.
00:27:46.000Thousands across the country attended the national theatrical release.
00:27:49.000Now you can watch from the comfort of your home, watch on any device with a web browser, gather friends, families, and skeptics alike, but don't miss it.
00:28:03.000That's salemnow.com, executive produced by the Salem Media Group.
00:28:09.000One of the fascinating storylines of the last, let's say, six years, since the rise of President Trump through 2020, through COVID, through all of these different periods, is the role of the fact checker.
00:28:29.000And if you've been listening to the entire show today, you will see that point after point after point, whether we were talking about the cabal in 2020, Molly Ball from Time Magazine that saved democracy, that saved the election, how there was a note in that article about how the progressives leaned on the fact checkers,
00:28:56.000leaned on big tech to rein in misinformation, as they would call it.
00:29:01.000Now we have the advent of the Ministry of Truth, Nina Jankowitz.
00:29:06.000We have the funding from the DHS to make that happen.
00:29:12.000Now we have COVID fact-checkers going after these FISA docs saying that all this information is being skewed and misinterpreted, even though they say the data is genuine.
00:29:27.000Even though there's massive red flags that are being raised, I believe rightly so from the data.
00:30:35.000They overlaid cell phone data with FOIA requested Dropbox video surveillance footage to see where ballot harvesters and mules that were trafficking data, like a cartel of drug smugglers would do.
00:30:50.000And they cross-referenced and they came up with over 2,000 of these people that were illegally harvesting votes in the five key swing states.
00:30:58.000And they determined that it was determinative, meaning that had these people not been cheating, that the outcome of the 2020 election would be different.
00:31:16.000Of course, U.S. National News five minutes ago, film claiming the 2020 election voting scheme uses faulty assumptions and improper analysis of data, fact-checkers report.
00:31:28.000So, a project that took them two years, the fact-checkers have already looked at and told you it's nothing to see here.
00:31:36.000It's all bunk and garbage and rubbish.
00:31:39.000That sorry, Twitter's letting you know that there's nothing here.
00:31:44.000So, for all of you out there, I'm glad that you went and saw the movie, and I'm glad that you thought this might be a big thing.
00:31:53.000Never mind your lying eyes with that you can actually see people delivering multiple, multiple ballots.
00:31:59.000Never mind the fact that once upon a time, now, see, one of the things that they're doing, New York Times watching you post, they're debunking this based on cell phone data.
00:32:08.000They said that you they could tell if you had an abortion based on your cell phone pings, but not now.
00:32:16.000Look, did you get hit with a big tax spill you were not expecting with rates still being very low and home equity being high?
00:32:23.000It's the perfect time to refinance and get some cash out of your home.
00:32:26.000Look, you could go to one of these woke banks, Citibank, Chase, where they hate you, they hate the country, and they hate Christianity, or you could refinance right now all of your mortgage needs with my friends.
00:34:01.000And you had a tweet that was cracking me up the other day as another self-loathing California resident.
00:34:10.000You said you were looking at properties in other states, and you said, I probably won't move ever, but there's an Eeyore vibe over this whole state.
00:34:20.000And I was like, that's pretty well said.
00:34:22.000So we all kind of feel it over here on the left coast, don't we?
00:34:33.000But we're here talking about 2,000 mules, okay?
00:34:35.000This is a tremendous effort by True the Vote out of Georgia, nonprofit Katherine Inglebrack, and now Dinesh D'Souza took their information in this investigation they've been leading for two years now, turned it into a document, well, almost two years, and turned it into a documentary that has now taken the grassroots by storm.
00:34:52.000Finally, the mainstream news media gatekeepers are waking up and they're like, oh, gosh, there's all these message boards and the telegrams and the they're all talking about this 2,000 mules.
00:35:26.000The first one is that the researchers with True the Vote and Greg Phillips in particular improperly used cell phone geotracking data.
00:35:36.000And they were saying, oh, there's no way that it could be that precise to know if these people went to multiple ballot drop boxes and certain nonprofits within this month-long-ish timeframe.
00:35:49.000You know, you could tell if they were a little bit away from it, but it's not precise in any way.
00:36:40.000When someone gets an abortion, they may decide not to share information with friends and family members, but chances are their smartphone knows.
00:36:47.000So their smartphone can know when they've had an abortion, but it can't track somebody if they go from Stash House to Stash House to Dropbox to Dropbox in the state of Georgia or Pennsylvania.
00:38:08.000They had supercomputers crunching data that they paid millions of dollars for the entire project.
00:38:15.000And what they did was they tracked all these cell phone pings and then overlaid those cell phone pings on a map of the drop boxes.
00:38:23.000Obviously, drop boxes were something new.
00:38:26.000This was not some sort of drive-by night, you know, effort to kind of appease the itching ears of Donald Trump and say what he wanted to hear.
00:38:35.000This was a very sophisticated effort to get to the bottom of whether or not they could prove their thesis, right?
00:38:42.000Which was that maybe there was some illegal ballot harvesting.
00:39:01.000Does it actually result in votes being moved?
00:39:05.000And then reference what you're seeing in these videos from the movie.
00:39:09.000So we know that it can be extremely effective in California.
00:39:12.000That's why they made it actually legal.
00:39:14.000The Democrats were doing it for years before it became legal.
00:39:18.000And so, of course, with Lorena Gonzalez, one of our favorite assembly members, who's also a union show, they made that legal here.
00:39:26.000And so, in 2018, we saw that blue wave of losing seven congressional seats in California and some pretty Republican areas.
00:39:33.000And, like I told Ed Atzinger, who is former Salem CEO, just moved to a different position, but they helped to finance this movie.
00:39:41.000And I told him, because he's another Californian, you know, we saw the dry run for this in California in 2018.
00:39:48.000And I really believe that that's true.
00:39:51.000So, how like what kind of, I mean, are we talking, and maybe you don't know it, and that's okay, but like when we're when we see ballot harvesting in a state like California, how many points can they move the vote?
00:40:01.000Like, can they, is this like, can in the most sophisticated state here when it comes to ballot harvesting, the most track record, are they moving the vote three points, four points, five points, like a half point?
00:40:11.000I mean, what's what are we actually working with here?
00:40:13.000Well, I think it depends on what they need, right?
00:40:15.000So, they do a lot of research to see exactly where they need to do things.
00:40:20.000So, with California races, it's not as neighborhood specific, but nationally with the presidential race, they knew that they just had to get certain cities to tip the electoral college vote.
00:40:31.000But within California, I think easily, you know, we saw what happened with the Katie Hill seat.
00:40:36.000She won by what, seven points, I think it was in 18.
00:40:40.000And then her, after she resigned, and then there was another election for that seat.
00:40:46.000The first election after that, the Republican won by three or four points.
00:40:49.000And then it was closer in the general.
00:40:52.000But everyone was thinking that that district had really gone purple or perhaps blue, but that was just the effect of the ballot harvesting.
00:41:00.000So, I mean, we're talking about Mike Garcia.
00:41:20.000I mean, I hate this voting month thing.
00:41:22.000I mean, it's, if anything, it's exposed, this movie's exposed that, you know, when you when you give people a month to vote, uh, you're giving them a month of opportunity to cheat, right?
00:41:32.000So when the GOP comes out in like the state of Georgia and we're saying, oh, you know, they passed this voter integrity measure, right?
00:41:39.000Which is why they moved the all-star game from Atlanta, which was, you know, which had a larger black population because, you know, they're saying it was Jim Crow 2.0 or whatever.
00:41:48.000And then they move it to Denver, which is, yeah, exactly right.
00:41:52.000So, so, but, you know, they passed this voter measure, this voter integrity measure, and their argument, the GOP in Georgia, was like, hey, we're making it easier to vote.
00:42:02.000And I'm thinking to myself, it's like, you're, I mean, not only like, I'm glad there's signature verification in the Georgia vote, but like as conservatives, we should not be pushing things in the like longer time period to vote.
00:42:25.000We know that it has a determinative impact in many cases.
00:42:28.000And now, Jen, when you see the videos that are coming out of places like Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania that you see in 2000 Mules, does that pass the smell test?
00:42:37.000I mean, when you, you are a California expert.
00:42:54.000I mean, in the AP fact check, they're saying they talked to one person.
00:42:57.000So of course they use this anecdotal evidence from one person in Michigan who says, oh, I took six ballots from my family members to the Dropbox.
00:43:06.000So they could have caught me on this film.
00:43:07.000Well, no, in Georgia, these people went to an average of 24 drop boxes to take ballots.
00:43:14.000So, unless this guy that's taking his family's ballots also goes to a bunch of other drop boxes, or he has a huge family, which that doesn't pass the spell test either.
00:43:24.000You're not going to have 20 relatives who are too old to get to the ballot box, and you're going to be the one person that takes it.
00:43:32.000So, the videos that we see, the people are in the middle of the night.
00:43:36.000They're taking pictures of the ballot drop box because that's how, according to True the Vote, they get paid.
00:43:42.000They're wearing the blue gloves, the latex gloves, after a certain date because they after people were indicted for ballot fraud and fingerprints were what took them down.
00:43:54.000So, then you start seeing the mules wearing these blue gloves.
00:43:59.000They said because it was cold in late December, because this was for the Georgia runoff.
00:44:04.000Okay, everyone wears blue latex gloves because it's cold and then turns around and puts them in the trash can when they after they're done with the ballot box.
00:44:15.000Well, and I, and I, it's a really important point what you just brought up.
00:44:18.000The point being that actually, Greg Phillips and Catherine Engelbreck, when they walked through this, how they chose the data sets that they were actually going to analyze, they set the threshold really high.
00:44:31.000So, the name of the movie is 2,000 mules, but realistically, there's way more than 2,000 because this only focused on the swing states.
00:44:40.000But, secondly, they set the criteria for who would get flagged in their searches so high because they didn't want false positives.
00:44:47.000To your point, they wanted at least like 10 ballots, they wanted 10 different visits.
00:44:54.000I forget the details, but they had to go to five of these nonprofits that were identified.
00:44:59.000Now, True the Vote's going to release that information of what these nonprofits were.
00:45:03.000We think it's things like unions or some of these Soros-funded orgs with the sunshiny names that Stacey Abrams, maybe.
00:45:57.000The point being, and someone on Twitter raised this last night to me, you know, well, you know, we don't know, blah, blah, blah.
00:46:04.000But the point is, the numbers were there.
00:46:06.000And this, like you said earlier, in this very narrow universe that True the Vote identified, there probably were a lot more of these mules taking part in the election.
00:46:16.000Just within that universe, there were more than enough ballots illegally taken to these ballot boxes to have swung the election.
00:46:25.000So, we think that that deserves some kind of investigation, especially since in these states, it was legal for people to have like their son or daughter take a ballot for them, but it was not legal to just give it to someone off the street to take in your ballot.
00:46:42.000So, this was a legal activity taking place that needs to be investigated.
00:46:48.000And, you know, actually, producer Connor's just bringing up a good point that in a movie, they describe they describe a crossover between Antifa and GMGA, the Georgia mules, right?
00:46:59.000So, they cross-referenced geolocation data that they had on Antifa in the 2020 riots with the mule data and found that a decent number of these mules were also at the riot, were also at the riot.
00:47:10.000I think it would be a stretch to suggest that Antifa was voting for President Trump.
00:47:21.000Some of them were saying, well, why would it be wrong for these people to go and peacefully protest the killing of a black person by law enforcement?
00:47:30.000Or maybe it was people who were there as first responders.
00:47:33.000So, okay, what firefighter or law enforcement officer do you know who has time to go to 24 drop boxes in addition to whatever they're doing for work?
00:47:45.000Yeah, none of this is at all reasonable, but that's, you know, so one of the things that we've been talking about, though, is just the absurd nature of the fact-checking industry, which, you know, they touch on, this touches on basically all of the main issues of our time, right?
00:48:01.000We had fact checks against the Hunter Biden laptop, proven true.
00:48:04.000We had fact checks against the Wuhan lab league.
00:48:07.000Basically, it's the predominant theory, even though Bill Gates apparently still talking about that it came from a bat, tweeting about that just last week.
00:48:15.000We have fact checks against all sorts of COVID data points, masks, whether it be Ivermect and HGQ.
00:48:24.000There's a lot of controversy around this, but the fact checkers come in and they basically tell you what the truth is.
00:48:30.000And now we have the Ministry of Truth, right?
00:48:32.000The DHS is setting up Nina Jankowitz, and they're coming now top of Twitter, even with Elon Musk.
00:48:38.000There, people don't understand Elon is not in control yet.
00:48:43.000We don't actually technically know if this is going to go through.
00:48:46.000Now, we have every indication that it will go through.
00:48:50.000But the fact checkers come in and they offer absurd rationale for so much.
00:48:56.000They make themselves the arbiters of truth and not truth.
00:48:59.000And then we come in here and we're blocked from saying these things or we get fact checks or we get strikes against our social media accounts.
00:49:24.000I wrote a piece last night about how true the vote is going to release all of their data that they have.
00:49:30.000And but the thing is, it's already had on Facebook.
00:49:33.000Someone emailed me this morning saying they couldn't share it because I forget what terminology they used, but basically that it was hateful or not good information to share.
00:49:48.000We're still bringing this out because you can't be intellectually consistent and ignore this.
00:49:53.000But also we have a VIP program that we have at Red State where people can just subscribe and pay directly for our content so we can try to get around financial reliance on Facebook and other big tech groups.
00:50:07.000Well, Jennifer, you do tremendous work at Red State.
00:50:50.000And if you do become a monthly supporter of the show, you get exclusive access to a private Zoom call with Charlie Kirk once a month, where he takes your questions.