00:00:54.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:49.000The what's really what we need and what we're missing is the Republicans have been coasting on laurels for decades.
00:02:03.000And our technology and the ground game behind the technology is almost 20 years behind the Democrats.
00:02:11.000And we, by and large, are totally unaware of it, particularly the RNC, obviously, but the apparatus itself of the Republican Party is unaware just how far behind we truly are.
00:02:28.000It's like we're trying to use Napoleonic tactics for modern mechanized warfare.
00:02:34.000And what we really need to do is we need to educate ourselves just exactly how far behind we really are and how we got there.
00:02:45.000The GOP used to have a really good ground game and a good data game.
00:02:49.000Like everything from the 94 Revolution all the way through the bush years, you know, we had the best technology, the best data, the best, you know, for the time.
00:02:58.000The RNC data warehouse was second to none, and it simply doesn't have that anymore.
00:03:03.000And what happened was big tech happened.
00:03:07.000A trillion-dollar industry sprung up and they turned around and gave a trillion-dollar gift to the Democrats starting from 2008 and ever since then.
00:03:17.000They got the data, they got the technology, and they got a lot of the developers behind it.
00:03:25.000A good example right now is the Reach app, the famous app developed by AOC's campaign in 2018.
00:03:35.000Some developers from Google and other big tech outfits took a leave of absence, put that in quotes, and built this app for her campaign.
00:03:50.000Another part of the big problem is with this campaign, those coders who took that leave of absence, supposedly absence, they received stipends from left-wing nonprofits.
00:04:52.000And they may actually believe that they're okay.
00:04:57.000A part of the part of the really big problem here is if you look at the GOP ecosystem and technology and across GOP-oriented companies in general, you see a lot of people who are politicos first.
00:05:10.000You get lots of history degrees and poli sci degrees, but not a lot of comp sci degrees or science degrees or math degrees.
00:05:19.000So what you have there is an inversion of skill where you have, you know, otherwise good people who know the politics and attempt to automate their systems to automate themselves with technology.
00:05:37.000But what you're not getting is you're not getting innovations from technology being brought into politics on the Republican side.
00:05:47.000Yeah, that's an interesting point where you say that they're not telling the truth, but they might not be lying because they might actually think it's true.
00:05:54.000They're saying something that is objectively being able that can be disproven, but they actually might have convinced themselves that they have this wonderful tech apparatus when you're saying, no, you don't.
00:06:05.000So just really, just maybe you can answer it, maybe not.
00:06:09.000When they say they spend tens of millions of dollars on data, what are they spending that money on?
00:06:16.000Well, taking a step back from that, in the Republican side, all of our data is still stuck in the direct mail paradigm from the 1970s.
00:06:31.000And you just keep mailing, you just keep mailing, you just keep mailing.
00:06:34.000And the only data that you get back that validates itself is whether someone responds or whether someone donates.
00:06:45.000So you get this perverse situation where the incentive is to simply keep mailing, to simply keep communicating and to do so with greater frequency and with more obtuse messages.
00:06:59.000The giant MAGA 3X donate now emails that are brutal, they simply just don't know any better.
00:07:09.000And they're spending between three and 10 times as much for names.
00:07:14.000And this is just for donors, let alone voters, three to 10 times as much as value would dictate.
00:07:26.000So you spend a lot of money using this old paradigm, this 1970s era paradigm, to attempt to build the list.
00:07:35.000And you've overspent, one, you've overspent, but two, you don't have a lot of quality to the data, even if you get response.
00:07:45.000And we're in a modern age now where if you respond, it's not sufficient validation.
00:07:57.000You have to be able to model the probability that you'll get the response you want based on what you learn about someone from their profile.
00:08:07.000This is how big tech got their power is that they learn everything about you.
00:08:12.000They don't even have to know your name, but they learned everything about you and they can predict your, they predict your reaction to things.
00:08:21.000But I just, I'm fired up about this because I have been on conference calls and in meetings, and the RNC says they do all of this.
00:08:31.000They say that they have all these wonderful Silicon Valley people and they got platoons of data modelers and that they have people that used to work at Salesforce.
00:08:41.000You just look at the people in these companies.
00:08:52.000And you do some digging on the employees.
00:08:54.000They're all politicos first who might do some data work, might do some data work via the old paradigm.
00:09:04.000But what's missing and what Democrats have successfully done is entice the best minds from technology, math, and science, and bring them into, bring them into politics.
00:09:19.000So one of the things we have to do critically is to find, is to dig through all the closets where there are people in tech who, like me,
00:09:35.000are technologists who've been doing it a long time, know the math, know the algebra, and can actually build things effectively and entice them into the GOP ecosystem.
00:09:51.000And we have to do so by enticing them with resources and protecting them from retaliation.
00:10:01.000Because there's a lot of, I mean, we're 90% Democrat, and so many of us are in the closet in many, in many ways.
00:11:31.000If we were to build the tech infrastructure, does the personnel exist for us to be able to hire them to be able to work on a conservative cause?
00:11:41.000However, one thing that we know in the tech industry, especially as coders, and something that Elon Musk proved publicly is that the vast majority of hired coders are superfluous.
00:13:39.000What I suggest is a two-pronged approach.
00:13:43.000One is to assemble a core team of top developers to build the tools necessary for local groups to be able to engage in data integration for their own local needs in comparison to the national needs.
00:14:00.000And then the other wing of that is a pool from the donor class to engage in this type of impact investing, to invest in companies to give out grants to coders or to even support open source projects that are germane and relevant.
00:14:58.000But there's also a lot of nonprofit money going into these developments as well, where they stipend some coders to build something and they may or may not commercialize it.
00:15:09.000But either way, I mean, it's that much.
00:15:12.000That is really playing Russian roulette with the IRS code.
00:15:15.000Obviously, they don't think they're ever going to be investigated.
00:15:17.000But let me ask you, though, how much money do you think?
00:15:18.000Let's say if you had a venture fund of 10 million, 20 million, 50 million, what would it take to move the dial?
00:15:26.000The number that continually pops in my head, and I can't fully explain it because that's how my techie brain works is somewhere around 30 million.
00:16:15.000They should expect that the political mission has to take forefront.
00:16:22.000So yes, in that way, but the Democrats have been fairly successful at putting out this seed money in large measure and then reaping the handful of successful projects.
00:16:56.000If all home air purifiers are the same, why did the U.S. Department of Defense select EnviroCleanse to protect and purify the air on board our Navy ships?
00:17:06.000Because EnviroCleanse, advanced mineral technology, goes beyond ordinary HEPA filters to destroy airborne illness causing cold and flu viruses, including COVID.
00:17:15.000EnviroCleanse is the new science in air purification.
00:17:18.000Now you could order one for your home.
00:17:20.000This is how to help stop colds and flu from taking your whole family down.
00:17:24.000This is how you destroy allergy inflaming toxins and mold from the air your family breathes.
00:17:28.000In fact, the hospital-grade technology is so powerful that it promises far fewer colds and allergies and better sleep.
00:17:34.000Visit ekpure.com and use promo code Charlie for 10% off.
00:17:39.000Your EnviroCleanse home air purification unit.
00:17:41.000You'll also receive a free air quality monitor plus fast-free shipping.
00:18:13.000Charlie, this weekend, I decided to look into this hip piece that came out about Project Veritas and its major, I think, personally, I think, from a news perspective, bombshell revelations about what's going on inside Pfizer.
00:18:30.000I said so on one of the couple of Twitter spaces that Project Veritas hosted in the last week.
00:18:38.000This story, this hidden camera footage is nothing short of a smoking gun.
00:18:44.000And I'll explain in due course for the haters and the losers specifically why I believe so.
00:18:51.000But I couldn't help in digging around this issue, but find this article written on Forbes.com, a website with a not insignificant poll and amount of traffic.
00:19:02.000The title was headlined, no, Project Veritas video doesn't prove Pfizer is mutating COVID-19.
00:19:10.000Now, you will know as well as I do that that attempt to squeeze that many search terms into the headline is actually a search engine optimization play from this author and from Forbes.
00:19:24.000What they want to do is be the first result that comes up when you go to a search engine and search for, is the Project Veritas video real?
00:19:32.000Does Jordan Tristan Walker work at Pfizer?
00:19:35.000And they have made a clear assertion in their headline that there is no proof that Pfizer is mutating the virus.
00:19:45.000So I thought to myself, okay, well, who's written this article?
00:19:47.000How could they possibly have this level of insight if the theme of the article, as it is, is that, oh, we haven't had enough time to look into this.
00:19:56.000So it turns out the senior contributor to Forbes and author of this article was a chap called Bruce Y. Lee, different Bruce Lee from the one that we're used to.
00:20:05.000But this person is also doing far less heroic.
00:20:11.000Far less heroic, but also doing a serious amount of acrobatics in this article to get to his conclusion here.
00:20:20.000But nowhere near as impressive, believe me.
00:20:22.000So he starts with all these ad hominem attacks about Project Veritas and about Tucker Carlson and all of this stuff.
00:20:27.000But when you get to the meat of his argument, it struck me as really interesting.
00:20:30.000He says, quote, a Google search didn't really reveal any legitimate source that could verify the person's name and title.
00:20:37.000Similarly, a search on LinkedIn doesn't reveal such verifiable profiles either, just some accounts trying to spread his name.
00:20:44.000And then it goes on to say, of note, a search for Tristan without the H did return an urban dictionary entry described Tristan as a very hot and cute boy who always wants to disagree, who has the softest hair in the entire world.
00:20:59.000And then the conclusion to that paragraph is: so if you're looking for someone hot, disagreeable, and really soft-haired, there is that.
00:21:06.000Now, I understand that this author's trying to be humorous and stress on the word trying here.
00:21:13.000But you start an article by trashing a news outlet, an investigative news outlet, its conclusions, and in defense of a major pharmaceutical company and indeed lobby, quite frankly, and its things.
00:21:28.000And I just didn't think that that stacked up, frankly, to a hill of beans.
00:21:33.000So I started to look into Mr. Lee himself.
00:21:38.000And of course, most people in the audience will probably be quick enough, quicker than me, even to get to the rub of this.
00:21:46.000Mr. Lee's work has, throughout his scientific career, been in fact funded, as they say, by Pfizer.
00:21:54.000And it wasn't just once, it wasn't just twice, but over the course I went through, because we don't just Google and go on LinkedIn in my work.
00:22:03.000I went through a lot of his academic papers.
00:22:07.000I went through a lot of his grant proposals and indeed the ones that were accepted and funded by Pfizer.
00:22:15.000And I ended up putting all of that up on the sub stack in full, all of its glory for people to see.
00:22:22.000Because Charlie, guess what Forbes didn't do?
00:22:25.000They didn't put anything on the article that said Bruce Wiley is funded by Pfizer.
00:22:31.000This person has a conflict of interest in writing off Project Veritas and its findings.
00:22:37.000So Forbes is owned by a Hong Kong investment company, if I'm not mistaken, called Integrated Whale Media Investments, which I think is owned by Palico, which is a private equity company, which I'm going to go through some of their holdings in a second.
00:22:54.000I'm sure there's something pharmaceutical there, but this is very basic, right?
00:22:58.000So Forbes launches a salvo against James O'Keefe and Project Veritas without disclosing to the audience that the author is a paid shill for the pharmaceutical companies.
00:23:11.000I mean, if you or I were to do that and it was found that we were taking money from the people that we were defending, from a big corporate lobby that we were defending, without disclosing that publicly in some way, you know, we'd be absolutely eviscerated in the mainstream press.
00:23:29.000CNN would be running entire segments about how dishonest and not real journalism all of this was.
00:23:36.000And yet Forbes, under the guise of having this in its op-ed section, can get away with a headline that disputes what everybody can see with their lion eyes and their lion ears in that video that Veritas released.
00:23:51.000Now, let's go one further than that, because it is important to note Pfizer's response for all of this.
00:23:58.000And I just want to make it clear to the audience what Pfizer said in their response to all of this.
00:24:02.000They said, quote, with a naturally evolving virus, it is important to routinely assess the activity of an antiviral.
00:24:09.000Most of this work is conducted using computer simulations or mutations of the main protease, a non-infectious part of the virus.
00:24:15.000In a limited number of cases, when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells.
00:24:27.000Now, I don't know about you, but it seems pretty clear-cut to me that in this statement, Pfizer is not distancing itself from what Jordan Tristan Walker alleged on his grinder date that they were doing.
00:24:39.000And it seems as if there's new documents that show on the internal Microsoft team's profile, he's still an active employee at Pfizer.
00:24:49.000So, this Forbes article writer tries to comically and sarcastically say, Well, we can't tell based on LinkedIn.
00:25:10.000And you could get, I mean, he, Bruce Lee, could have could have got to that easier than I could have by calling his buddies who have funded his work at Pfizer up and asking the question.
00:25:22.000But he, you know, he probably did ask the question.
00:25:24.000He just didn't like the answer that he got.
00:25:26.000And Forbes itself, quite frankly, I mean, what I love about this, Charlie, is that this is one of their now most highly commented pieces on their website.
00:25:35.000It's got something like 400 comments under this article, and they're all negative.
00:25:39.000All of the responses to Bruce Lee's assertions, whether it's on his Twitter, on the Forbes Twitter account, or on their website, is now just calling them liars.
00:25:51.000The media in this country, in the Western world, has an approval rating amongst the public of about 9%.
00:25:59.000And it's things like this that have ended it up in that position.
00:26:04.000I mean, I remember when Forbes was a very respectable outlet.
00:26:09.000And it really does go to show, I mean, Project Veritas deserves so much credit for what they're doing here, that there's hierarchies to where the media really deploys the attack dogs.
00:26:22.000And what I have learned in the last two years is that defending the pharmaceutical machine is actually more important than even defending the racial machine, the race machine.
00:27:06.000The pharmaceutical industry is promising these people immortality, you know, not just cussing them fat checks and having them, you know, another example, you know, Mr. Lee works for CUNY in New York, and they received $17 million for their Cold Spring Harbor laboratory in New York.
00:27:42.000It's about the entire fate of human civilization.
00:27:48.000What is scientism and how does it connect to the Pfizer-AstraZeneca story?
00:27:54.000Well, don't worry, because if they have their way, we'll have eternity to talk about these things.
00:28:01.000The idea is very simple, is that man and machine come together in some way, whether it is on this planet or in the virtual world.
00:28:12.000And this is effectively what these people are aiming for.
00:28:15.000And companies like Pfizer, companies like the big tech giants who are developing all of their AI stuff right now, you hear about so much of it going on.
00:28:24.000And hilarious to me, by the way, that ChatGPT and these guys are actually supplanting journalists who just five years ago were telling Americans who are being put out of their manual labor jobs to learn to code.
00:28:36.000Well, the code is now supplanting these journalists.
00:29:37.000All the racial politics, it points towards that because there is this, for the secular world, the non-religious world, there is a promise of, you want to say eternity or, you know, immortality, but I think it's more sinister than that.
00:29:52.000I think that is that the merging into something that is close to a godlike figure over man.
00:30:00.000What do you need to go to real heaven for?
00:30:04.000And by the way, your heaven looks nothing like the heaven in the Bible.
00:30:08.000It looks everything like Dr. Fauci's idea of heaven, which, you know, I think we can probably or should all probably be able to agree upon right now.
00:30:17.000Seems like hell on earth, quite frankly.
00:30:46.000But I think there was something in it that spoke to some cynics, let's say, or critics of this mantra in Hollywood itself.
00:30:56.000And you see how the media deploys every force.
00:31:00.000I mean, no coverage of this Pfizer story.
00:31:04.000And thankfully, Elon Musk allowed this video to go wild.
00:31:08.000It's 28 million views on Twitter right now.
00:31:10.000It's one of the most successful, it's the most successful video in Produ Veritas history and one of the most successful in Twitter history.
00:31:16.000So minute and half remaining, how do we go about actually making a serious dent in the scientism regime?
00:31:23.000Well, Dr. Bruce Lee in his Forbes article says, quote, real journalists are obviously quite busy because a lot of bleak is happening in the world.
00:31:31.000They tend to report on something only after there are enough facts to verify the story.
00:31:36.000Plus, just because you don't see the articles yet doesn't mean that journalists aren't researching it and looking further into what's going on before deciding whether it deserves coverage.
00:32:26.000And thanks to the audience's support, I like to publish my work on my sub stack at RaheemKassam.com.
00:32:32.000I think we are getting closer and closer to rumbling these people.
00:32:37.000Comes from a German historicist view of the world that puts a preference on an unelected scientific elite.
00:32:46.000Interestingly, that's exactly what Dwight D. Eisenhower warned right after the military-industrial complex said: be very wary of an unelected, technocratic scientific elite.