The Charlie Kirk Show - The 4 Types of Voter Fraud Evidence the Media Willfully Ignores

00:00:00.000 Is there any evidence out there?

00:00:01.000 We dive into the different types of evidence and how it applies to you.

00:00:04.000 Also, we talk about to kill a mockingbird, so you don't want to miss that.

00:00:09.000 Please, if you guys want to win, a signed copy of the MAGA doctrine, we will give out five signed copies of the New York Times bestseller, the MAGA Doctrine, to five random people that show us you're subscribed to the Charlie Kirk Show on Apple Podcast or Spotify.

00:00:24.000 Screenshot it and email it to us at freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:00:27.000 And in the subject line, just say, to kill a mockingbird. 0.92

00:00:31.000 Buckle up, everybody. 0.95

00:00:32.000 Here we go.

00:00:34.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

00:00:36.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.

00:00:38.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

00:00:41.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

00:00:44.000 I want to thank Charlie.

00:00:45.000 He's an incredible guy.

00:00:46.000 His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.

00:00:53.000 Turning point USA.

00:00:55.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

00:01:04.000 That's why we are here.

00:01:06.000 I want to dive into what's happening right now in the fight to reelect President Trump to four more years.

00:01:18.000 President Trump is currently fighting his way through the courts.

00:01:22.000 Democrats are doing whatever they possibly can to try and stop it.

00:01:28.000 Whatever the outcome of this election, no matter what happens, the most important question is what happened on November 3rd and what can we do to make sure this never happens again?

00:01:44.000 That is actually the most important question.

00:01:47.000 Despite the absolute nonstop drumbeat of the media and all their denials of saying there's no evidence of election tampering, the truth, the rational, the reason-based truth is that there's extensive and undeniable evidence of that exact activity.

00:02:08.000 At least if by evidence, you mean that there's no evidence that would be allowed in a court proceeding.

00:02:15.000 We'll get into that in a second because I really want to dive into that.

00:02:18.000 As is so typical in today's America, terms are being tossed around by people who have no idea what they're talking about or what the terms actually mean.

00:02:30.000 You see, it sounds really kind of snobbishly smart to be able to say as you're wearing your three masks, walking your dog on the way to Starbucks next to your communist neighbor, oh yes, there's no evidence that Donald Trump was cheated. 0.76

00:02:50.000 Sounds nice to say that. 0.88

00:02:52.000 But the people who are saying that are either lying outright, which they might be, or they're so ignorant of what it actually means to have evidence.

00:03:00.000 So let's dive into it.

00:03:02.000 I don't think enough shows or programs are actually explaining what it means to have evidence.

00:03:08.000 Because it sounds obvious, right?

00:03:10.000 But there's actually a deeper point here.

00:03:12.000 So to be very clear, in a criminal court proceeding, there are actually four different types of evidence.

00:03:18.000 There's real evidence.

00:03:20.000 This is what is also called physical evidence.

00:03:22.000 Guns or knives or DNA, fingerprints.

00:03:26.000 That is what is called real evidence.

00:03:29.000 The second form of evidence is testimonial evidence.

00:03:32.000 This is the account of witnesses who directly saw or heard something relevant to the incident. 0.60

00:03:38.000 I saw XYZ come in and shoot.

00:03:42.000 That is testimonial evidence.

00:03:44.000 There's documentary evidence, the third type of evidence.

00:03:48.000 It's just like it sounds.

00:03:49.000 It's documents that can be produced, such as bank records, diaries, ballots that all support the claim of one side or the other.

00:03:59.000 The fourth type of evidence is demonstrative evidence.

00:04:02.000 It's usually charts and diagrams that demonstrate or illustrate the witness testimony.

00:04:09.000 Maps, diagrams of a crime scene, charts and graphs that illustrate physical or financial injury to a party are examples of demonstrative evidence.

00:04:18.000 So, in order for evidence from any of the above categories we just talked about, or the aforementioned categories, to be admissible in a legal proceeding, it must meet the following three very self-explanatory but very subjective criteria.

00:04:36.000 It must be relevant, it must be material, and it must be component.

00:04:44.000 It is important to note that whether or not evidence is admissible is not related to its definition of evidence.

00:04:51.000 Evidence that does not, in the mind of a judge, meet all three of those criteria can still be evidence.

00:04:57.000 But let's consider all four of those types of evidence.

00:05:00.000 Let's go through this as if it was a legal proceeding.

00:05:04.000 Real evidence.

00:05:06.000 Well, we already have that.

00:05:07.000 This is the type of evidence that can be found in Georgia, where physical ballots have been found to be uncounted, or in Pennsylvania, where signatures cannot be matched against those on the file.

00:05:17.000 There are other similar problems that we talked about in Arizona and Michigan and Wisconsin.

00:05:22.000 We have mountains of real evidence.

00:05:25.000 How about testimonial evidence?

00:05:28.000 As of this moment, there are hundreds of sworn affidavits of people that say they saw wrongdoing.

00:05:34.000 We have testimonial evidence up to the sky of people that have said they saw multiple ballots being inputted into machines.

00:05:42.000 We saw people that were coming in with ballots that were not being checked.

00:05:47.000 We saw military ballots being filled out for Joe Biden.

00:05:50.000 There's also testimonial evidence regarding all aspects of the Dominion voting machines.

00:05:57.000 How about documentary evidence?

00:06:00.000 In this case, the documentary evidence overlaps with the real evidence because of the nature of ballots.

00:06:06.000 Video evidence, for example, of these suitcases filled with ballots could also fall under this category as it gives support to testimonial evidence of Georgia election workers.

00:06:16.000 The video evidence also walks a fine line between being documentary and real evidence, which I should say is in the four categories of evidence that could be in one bucket and also another.

00:06:25.000 We have so much documentary evidence.

00:06:27.000 We have video evidence of people ripping up ballots.

00:06:29.000 We have video evidence of people filling in ballots.

00:06:32.000 We have video evidence of people tearing ballots they don't like.

00:06:35.000 We have video evidence of people finding suitcases full of ballots.

00:06:40.000 How about demonstrative evidence?

00:06:42.000 Now, in this case, we would be considering the development of diagrams that laid out the problems of vote chain of custody issues, physical layouts of vote counting centers, and where vote observers were not allowed to be standing, and the reenactment of the evidence to limit moderning of vote counts.

00:06:59.000 When viewed in all of its totality, which of as now is really impossible to do because of the widespread dispersion of evidence, it is easy to say that anyone who looks at the four categories of evidence,

00:07:15.000 if they're looking at this objectively and rationally and empirically, can say that all four categories of evidence are more than satisfied and fulfilled under the thesis that this election was tampered with.

00:07:34.000 So the real question is: if all four categories of evidence are fulfilled, why haven't the courts reversed this election?

00:07:44.000 Look, the legal system doesn't work like your parents' kitchen table.

00:07:49.000 The legal system doesn't work like a fraternity where you try to find out who stole the six pack of beer.

00:07:58.000 The legal system doesn't work the way that it might with a group of friends that are investigating who might have broken the other person's car.

00:08:09.000 You see, the first is the subjective criteria mentioned above or previously of materiality, competency, and relevance to be met in a court.

00:08:19.000 And the long and short of it is this: the judges are not impartial here, and we kind of don't want them to be.

00:08:26.000 We don't want Democrats in the future to be able to go in front of a judge and overturn an election that might have actually been fair or in Florida or Texas.

00:08:34.000 It is a higher threshold to overturn an election.

00:08:37.000 It is.

00:08:38.000 We can try to convince ourselves that judges wear black robes to be impartial and they're always going to be ruling with sobriety.

00:08:45.000 That is not the case.

00:08:46.000 These judges do not want to be known as a judge that overturned an election, despite the mountains of evidence in the real evidence, testimonial, documentary, and demonstrative categories.

00:08:59.000 But the biggest problem is this: time.

00:09:02.000 Typically, when you put together a criminal case or a civil case, you are afforded anywhere between a year to 18 months to get all of your evidence in a row.

00:09:12.000 Find holes that they might poke in them.

00:09:14.000 Be able to get witnesses exactly where you want them.

00:09:18.000 Answer cross-examination.

00:09:19.000 Be able to get in a courtroom and anticipate the arguments and the counter-arguments.

00:09:25.000 These legal cases are being rushed through the system, are super complex, and there's very little time.

00:09:31.000 There is a deadline that matters.

00:09:32.000 That deadline is January 20th.

00:09:34.000 That is a constitutional deadline.

00:09:36.000 On January 20th, a new president must get inaugurated, either to another term or a new president altogether.

00:09:43.000 I should say another term must be instituted or instated.

00:09:49.000 Look, it's not often you get a gift for yourself, but I need to tell you about something that you got to buy.

00:09:55.000 It's called a hedge against all the craziness in the market.

00:09:58.000 It's a free 22-carat American gold eagle coin.

00:10:02.000 Not bad, right?

00:10:03.000 A free 22-carat American gold eagle coin in a special presentation box.

00:10:08.000 To qualify, you have to take out a precious metals, IRA, or 401k rollover with Noble Gold.

00:10:14.000 Makes a lot of sense right now to keep your savings and investment safe.

00:10:17.000 Who knows what the next administration will do or what's going to happen?

00:10:20.000 So look, we don't know what's coming next.

00:10:22.000 And you have to have a hedge.

00:10:24.000 They're creating money.

00:10:26.000 Austrian School of Economics is completely under attack.

00:10:29.000 So if you guys want to hedge against all the market volatility, and we know what's coming, inflation is coming.

00:10:34.000 Call 877-646-5347 and get this special coin offer, but don't hang around.

00:10:39.000 That's 877-646-5347.

00:10:42.000 Tell them that Charlie Kirk sent you.

00:10:44.000 Again, that's Noble Gold, 877-646-5347.

00:10:51.000 The problem with going through the courts is that prejudice has now become the standard of our justice system in America.

00:11:07.000 Increasingly, our courts have strayed away from this idea of blind justice now to blind partisanship.

00:11:15.000 The courts are not what they were intended to be.

00:11:17.000 The courts were always supposed to be above any sort of partisan bickering.

00:11:26.000 Our legal system has become so unbelievably corrupt that it cannot be trusted in any way whatsoever to admit evidence rationally or view it objectively.

00:11:37.000 But here's who can.

00:11:39.000 The American people can.

00:11:42.000 Now, if you go back to the Federalist Papers and back to our founding fathers, The founding fathers always viewed the state legislatures as being the voice of the people, the closest to the citizenry.

00:11:57.000 Now, are we subjects or are we citizens?

00:11:59.000 That's the question that we have to wrestle with.

00:12:01.000 Being a citizen, according to its original Greek, where we get the word citizen from, actually means being a co-ruler.

00:12:10.000 This is exactly why we used to elect U.S. senators via the state legislatures.

00:12:18.000 We got rid of that with, I think, the 17th Amendment, we got rid of that with the 17th Amendment, which implemented the direct election of senators.

00:12:27.000 One of the worst mistakes I think ever made that turned U.S. senators into pseudo-celebrities engaging in a popularity contest, no longer actually under the threat of a recall or a check in balance from the state legislature.

00:12:44.000 Now, that's not to say we might not get some favorable court rulings, but Sidney Powell's election and Lynn Wood's election, I'm sorry, election, lawsuit on the election in Georgia just got thrown out recently.

00:12:57.000 And Samuel Alito did not grant emergency relief.

00:13:00.000 Is that the right way to word it?

00:13:02.000 Emergency relief in Pennsylvania yesterday.

00:13:06.000 So what measures do we have left?

00:13:08.000 What is the last reset that we can go to?

00:13:13.000 The state legislatures.

00:13:17.000 Now, I want to go to Kelly Shackelford here, who is from First Liberty.

00:13:22.000 We had him exclusively on the Charlie Kirk Show podcast last evening.

00:13:26.000 I really encourage you to listen to this interview in full if you're interested in getting an idea of exactly what's happening here and what kind of lawsuits might end up being successful.

00:13:41.000 Let's go to Cut 65, where Kelly Shackelford explains that the states did not follow what the legislature set in law, which the Constitution says they have to follow.

00:13:50.000 Cut 65.

00:13:52.000 Whatever the state legislature said is what you have to do.

00:13:56.000 And of course, in a number of these states, they violated what the state legislature said.

00:14:01.000 I mean, let's take Pennsylvania, right?

00:14:05.000 Pennsylvania said, and the law says, if you're going to do these mail-in ballots, they have to be in by the time of the election.

00:14:14.000 Well, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which is Democrat, said, no, no, we're going to extend that through the end of the week.

00:14:22.000 Well, you can't do that.

00:14:24.000 The legislature determines.

00:14:27.000 The legislature actually determines it.

00:14:29.000 So what Kelly Shackelford was talking about in Georgia, which is exactly what the Georgia state legislature should come in, is they should correct what Stacey Abrams and Rothensperger did.

00:14:44.000 And Kelly Shackelford really built this out beautifully, I thought, on our podcast yesterday, better than any other pundit or commentator where he said this. 0.98

00:14:54.000 Stacey Abrams sues Rafensperger.

00:14:57.000 Raffensperger surrenders, who's the Republican Secretary of State of Georgia, and settles.

00:15:02.000 He settled the civil suit with Stacey Abrams and changed state law.

00:15:08.000 Now, Raffensperger might thought he had to do this because he was under an order from a judge or whatever it might be, that cannot usurp, overthrow, or defy a state legislature.

00:15:22.000 If the state legislatures meet in Georgia, they could say that we need to recount all the ballots under 2018 standards, that any sort of civil suit that was settled by Raufensperger can be thrown out.

00:15:36.000 The same can be done in Arizona, where the state legislature's wishes and demands were overthrown by A secretary of state, I think it's Katie Hobbs, right, in Arizona, and Adrian Fontas.

00:15:54.000 Small business banking, there's only one name you need to know: it's Aslo.

00:15:59.000 Aslo offers a free business checking account with invoicing, bill pay, no minimum balance requirements, and no maintenance or overdraft fees.

00:16:07.000 Instead of the days it takes at a traditional bank where you're still required to go in person, with Aslo, you go to azlo.com and apply in minutes.

00:16:16.000 There is no waiting to use your account.

00:16:18.000 With Aslo's free instant funding feature, you can deposit up to $1,000 and access it instantly.

00:16:24.000 And now they've launched the all-new Aslo Pro bundle for only $10 a month with tools like unlimited envelopes to organize your money, discounted instant transfers, and the ability to set up recurring invoices.

00:16:36.000 Because you listen to this podcast, you could try Aslo Pro Free for 14 days at aslo.com/slash Charlie.

00:16:44.000 Aslo.com does an amazing job.

00:16:46.000 I know a lot of people that have done, they've really been able to figure out their banking needs through Aslo.

00:16:54.000 It's terrific work.

00:16:55.000 So go to aslo.com/slash Charlie, A-Z-L-O.com/slash Charlie, A-Z-L-O.com/slash Charlie.

00:17:06.000 We have been walking through the current state of affairs state by state.

00:17:14.000 We had the amazing Kelly Shackelford explain this, I think, with better clarity than any guest I have heard recently, because a lot of you guys are emailing us, freedom at charliekirk.com, and you say, What on earth is going on?

00:17:28.000 How can I help?

00:17:29.000 What is happening?

00:17:30.000 And we just went through the four different types of evidence, which, of course, is real testimonial, documentary, and demonstrative.

00:17:37.000 But what this all comes down to is the state legislatures.

00:17:42.000 That's it.

00:17:43.000 Your pressure on the state legislatures is everything. 0.98

00:17:48.000 Let's go to cut.

00:17:50.000 Did we play cut 65?

00:17:52.000 I don't think we did.

00:17:53.000 Cut 65?

00:17:54.000 Play tape of Kelly Shackelford, who has argued cases in front of the Supreme Court.

00:17:59.000 He does this for a living.

00:18:00.000 He's a great friend.

00:18:01.000 Play tape.

00:18:03.000 Whatever the state legislature said is what you have to do.

00:18:07.000 And of course, in a number of these states, they violated what the state legislature says.

00:18:12.000 I mean, let's take Pennsylvania, right?

00:18:16.000 Pennsylvania says, and the law says, if you're going to do these mail-in ballots, they have to be in by the time of the election.

00:18:24.000 Well, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which is Democrat, said, no, no, we're going to extend that through the end of the week.

00:18:33.000 Well, you can't do that.

00:18:35.000 The legislature determines.

00:18:37.000 So, what Kelly Shackelford is talking about here is that the legislature is the authority.

00:18:42.000 If you don't like it, then go change the United States Constitution.

00:18:45.000 This is an originalist, textualist position.

00:18:49.000 Let's play Cut 66.

00:18:51.000 Kelly Shackelford talks about how there is time, and the December 14th date can be changed, but there has to be some really good evidence presented.

00:18:59.000 We talked about evidence.

00:19:00.000 Remember, this is why the courts all of a sudden can get a little bit messy.

00:19:04.000 Play Cut 66.

00:19:07.000 There is time, but everybody's kind of looking at December 14th where the electoral votes are cast.

00:19:12.000 But that could be moved.

00:19:13.000 It could.

00:19:13.000 It could be.

00:19:15.000 And they could overturn that.

00:19:16.000 Just because the electoral votes are cast, it still would go to the House and the Senate.

00:19:22.000 But I don't think any of that's going to happen unless something is shown in court that the American people get to see and then realize, okay, this is a problem.

00:19:33.000 And so Kelly Shackelford then goes to talk about how the best example of this, though, is the Georgia lawsuit.

00:19:41.000 Probably the best chance we have is the recently filed Georgia lawsuit by Cleta Mitchell and the campaign PlayCut 67.

00:19:49.000 The things that Cleta did in the lawsuit are things that were really undeniable.

00:19:54.000 I mean, you have records of how old people are.

00:19:56.000 It says so-and-so voted, and you have a record of how old they were, and they weren't eligible to vote.

00:20:03.000 You know what the law says about comparing the signatures, and they know exactly how many of those wasn't done.

00:20:09.000 And so, literally, what you should do is throw all those votes out.

00:20:12.000 And what you would probably have to do in Georgia is have another election.

00:20:18.000 And that shouldn't be out of the realm of possibility of the realm of conversation.

00:20:21.000 So, now we have going up to the Supreme Court.

00:20:24.000 Texas started a movement yesterday, and now Louisiana, Missouri, I think Florida has joined as well, to sue Georgia.

00:20:32.000 A little bit of an SEC rivalry going on here.

00:20:34.000 They're also suing Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.

00:20:37.000 And the Attorney General Jeff Landry, who's terrific, who I texted actually during our program yesterday, said, quote, Louisiana citizens are damaged if elections in other states were conducted outside the confines of the Constitution while we obeyed the rules.

00:20:56.000 And so the state legislatures have an opportunity to do something about this.

00:21:04.000 But it's Republicans that are actually refusing to fight.

00:21:07.000 A special session is not necessarily needed.

00:21:12.000 You see, the wants and the needs, the desires, the demands, and the laws of the state legislatures were intentionally defied in these elections, intentionally defied.

00:21:24.000 The state legislatures had very specific orders.

00:21:32.000 And these Secretary of States and these outside groups and these liberal Democrats decided not to follow the rules.

00:21:43.000 The recourse should be ballots not counting and completely and totally new elections.

00:21:51.000 That's what the recourse should be.

00:21:54.000 So the time is running out.

00:21:56.000 That is the one thing.

00:21:58.000 There is some time constraints here.

00:22:01.000 It's not the same time constraints that they're telling you.

00:22:04.000 What did Google say today that we passed the safe harbor deadline?

00:22:08.000 Is that what they said?

00:22:09.000 That all of a sudden they're putting in a no-fly zone.

00:22:11.000 You can't even talk about election fraud anymore on YouTube, which is why we are not currently streaming this conversation on YouTube.

00:22:17.000 I'm not in the martyr business, so we're going to try to navigate that in some form or fashion.

00:22:21.000 Thank God for terrestrial radio and for podcasting.

00:22:28.000 The only deadline that really does matter here is January 20th.

00:22:33.000 That one is constitutional.

00:22:34.000 The two deadlines that were constitutional or are the election, first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, and January 20th.

00:22:44.000 That's it.

00:22:44.000 Those are constitutional for good reason.

00:22:46.000 You want to have firm deadlines to be able to have a peaceful transition of power.

00:22:52.000 And by the way, a peaceful transition of power is a uniquely American practice.

00:22:58.000 President Trump never had a peaceful transition of power.

00:23:01.000 They spied on him, entrapped Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, launched a coup against him, lied about it.

00:23:05.000 Biden mentioned the Logan Act in the Oval Office meeting.

00:23:08.000 The coup in the con was launched.

00:23:11.000 They planted metaphorical mines all throughout the White House.

00:23:15.000 And before you knew it, the Trump administration by June had a special prosecutor, whispers about Russia, despite China being our greatest threat.

00:23:24.000 And I want to talk about that.

00:23:27.000 There is now growing chatter around China.

00:23:31.000 It's really interesting how a lot of this China conversation is happening after the election.

00:23:38.000 Wouldn't it have been nice to have a China conversation?

00:23:40.000 I don't know, around October 25th, when we asked which candidate was more purchased by China.

00:23:46.000 How about the candidate where we have a laptop that goes to show international business deals being done by China?

00:23:52.000 How about the candidate where you have Tony Bobulinsky, the former CEO of the Biden business, come out and testify and say that Joe Biden was in direct contact with the Chinese Communist Party and doing business with the Chinese Communist Party to enrich his family?

00:24:07.000 I guarantee a lot of those criminal investigations are going to disappear very soon.

00:24:12.000 The new attorney general, whether they appointed an attorney general yet?

00:24:16.000 No.

00:24:16.000 Might be Doug Jones, is what they're saying.

00:24:18.000 Might come in and all of a sudden all those investigations will go away.

00:24:21.000 But they will continue to investigate Donald Trump.

00:24:23.000 In fact, there was an Atlantic piece that came out today and said, here's how we continue to investigate Donald Trump.

00:24:30.000 So Eric Swawell, who is the Russia hoaxer, who created a cable television career out of pushing lies against Donald Trump on Russian collusion, Cut 37, let's go to that.

00:24:46.000 Just to refresh our memory of this petulant child who got elected to Congress, was trying to start a war against Russia based on lies.

00:24:56.000 Cut 37.

00:24:58.000 Russia attacked our democracy this past election.

00:25:02.000 And then they showed up to his Trump Tower, offered the evidence to his family.

00:25:06.000 They received it.

00:25:08.000 They didn't turn it down.

00:25:09.000 Donald Trump, for years, had been working with the Russians.

00:25:12.000 He brought people on his campaign who had ties to the Russians.

00:25:15.000 We have seen a candidate and a president who has spoken in very flattering ways about Vladimir Putin.

00:25:21.000 All of the arrows continue to point to a personal, political, and financial relationship that Donald Trump had with the Russians.

00:25:28.000 That he was the one that was advancing and pushing this incredibly divisive and pernicious Russian lie.

00:25:37.000 I am not a person who thinks that Russia is a good country. 0.99

00:25:40.000 I think Vladimir Putin is a thug.

00:25:43.000 I also don't think we have to be saber-rattling against a country that has a declining population. 0.52

00:25:49.000 Their only source of wealth is the petrodollar.

00:25:53.000 We're energy independent.

00:25:55.000 Their military is something to be somewhat concerned about, but they just want regional hegemony.

00:26:00.000 And Russia is not our greatest enemy.

00:26:02.000 They are one-third of our population. 0.99

00:26:05.000 We could have a stasis with Russia. 1.00

00:26:08.000 They're more of an annoyance than a threat. 1.00

00:26:11.000 Russia is a mosquito. 0.99

00:26:14.000 China is an empire. 0.99

00:26:17.000 At least they're trying to be an empire. 0.97

00:26:19.000 And the Federal B of Investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, I shouldn't say that so quickly, the FBI, says they have 1,000 investigations into Chinese technology theft, Confucius Institutes, islands in the South China Sea, technology transfers, dumping of steel, a million Muslims in concentration camps. 0.97

00:26:40.000 I have called China our greatest enemy. 0.96

00:26:42.000 I think we should suspend all trade with China absolutely, totally, and categorically.

00:26:46.000 I say this because I am not purchased by the Chamber of Commerce.

00:26:49.000 Anyone who is afraid to call for the suspension of all trade with China probably has a capital flow from some Chinese auxiliary company or power source.

00:27:01.000 Many of you listening to this remember the Soviet Union. 0.68

00:27:05.000 You remember how the Soviet Union tried to take over the world?

00:27:11.000 The Chinese Communist Party is implementing a blueprint that is completely different than that of the Soviet playbook.

00:27:21.000 The Soviet playbook was one of internationalist expansion.

00:27:25.000 One of the biggest lies taught to young people in schools is that the communist Soviet experiment was confined to the Soviet Union.

00:27:35.000 In fact, some lunatic once tried to say that to me at the University of Minnesota, and I nicely countered him.

00:27:41.000 It's actually one of our best performing videos out there.

00:27:44.000 The Soviets supported Robert Mugabe, which turned Rhodesia into Zimbabwe.

00:27:50.000 The Soviets had sleeper cells in Nicaragua, El Salvador.

00:27:54.000 They helped with the Venezuelan experiment, the Argentinian experiment.

00:27:58.000 They tried to implement communism in India and Afghanistan, Southeast Asia and Vietnam, the Korean Peninsula.

00:28:04.000 The communists tried everywhere.

00:28:07.000 Cuba, of course, is an easy example.

00:28:09.000 So, this idea that the Soviet Union didn't try to take over the world is nonsense.

00:28:13.000 But the Chinese Communist Party has similar global ambitions, but the CCP, I think they actually read the art of war.

00:28:23.000 Because the CCP, instead of trying to actually do what the Soviet Union did and close themselves off, they've immersed themselves.

00:28:35.000 Instead of trying to say that we're going to build up our own self-contained empire, we're going to influence and infiltrate everything.

00:28:47.000 This is different than the Soviet Union because instead of trying to have coups and revolutions like the Soviet Union did, the CCP has just purchased the leadership of the entire globe in finance, sports, culture, music, film, cinema.

00:29:08.000 They own everything.

00:29:10.000 Because as Sun Tzu said, the greatest victory is that which requires no battle.

00:29:21.000 The Chinese Communist Party takes that very seriously.

00:29:24.000 They say, how do we actually avoid conflict?

00:29:27.000 They say, well, why don't we use our singular advantage?

00:29:30.000 China has only one advantage.

00:29:31.000 They have a lot of people. 0.97

00:29:32.000 That's it. 1.00

00:29:33.000 Let's make stuff cheaper because we have so many people that are in the third world and they'll make it for five cents an hour or five cents a day and we'll deindustrialize the West. 1.00

00:29:43.000 We'll use that money to go purchase their elites and their political system. 1.00

00:29:47.000 They'll buy all the plastic from us.

00:29:49.000 We'll conquer the world without ever starting a battle.

00:29:55.000 When running a business, HR issues can kill you.

00:29:58.000 I can tell you from Turning Point USA that wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations, they can really add up.

00:30:05.000 HR manager salaries are never cheap.

00:30:07.000 They're an average of $70,000 a year.

00:30:09.000 Look, you've heard me talk about Bambi before.

00:30:11.000 They're terrific.

00:30:12.000 It's Bambi spelled B-A-M-B-E-E.

00:30:15.000 They were created specifically for you, the small businessman. 0.96

00:30:19.000 You can get a dedicated HR manager, craft HR policy, and maintain your compliance all for just $99 a month.

00:30:26.000 With Bambi, you can change HR from your biggest liability to your biggest strength.

00:30:29.000 Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email, or real-time chat.

00:30:33.000 From onboarding to terminations, they customize your policies to fit your business, and they help you manage your employees day to day, all for just $99 a month.

00:30:41.000 Month to month, there are no hidden fees, cancel anytime.

00:30:44.000 You didn't start your business because you wanted to spend time on HR compliance.

00:30:47.000 Let Bambi help get your free HR audit today.

00:30:49.000 Go to Bambi.com/slash Kirk right now to schedule your free HR audit.

00:30:53.000 That's Bambi.com/slash Kirk.

00:30:55.000 Spell BAM to theBEE.com/slash Kirk.

00:31:01.000 California School District considers ban on classic books.

00:31:05.000 To kill a Mockingbird, Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry.

00:31:08.000 Of Mice and Men, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and The K by Theodore Taylor.

00:31:14.000 That's the one I don't know.

00:31:15.000 Now, I don't support any of these censorship.

00:31:19.000 It's so amazing to me how the left wants to almost normalize pornography for 11 and 12 year olds, yet they want to take out to kill a mockingbird.

00:31:26.000 They allow sexual education that is so graphic that if you saw it, you would take all your kids out of high school immediately, yet they don't want to kill a mockingbird in our schools.

00:31:35.000 They have the most graphic video games that they want 11 and 12 year olds to play, yet they don't want to kill a mockingbird in our schools.

00:31:43.000 It's the same people that say, go wear your mask, by the way, go do heroin.

00:31:47.000 It's not exactly a congruent line of thinking.

00:31:50.000 It's all about chaos, disruption, disorder, disunity, and power.

00:31:57.000 The To Kill a Mockingbird one, I think, is the most stunning to me.

00:32:00.000 It is the piece of literature I'm most familiar with.

00:32:02.000 I remember when I first read To Kill a Mockingbird back in seventh grade.

00:32:08.000 It's a very powerful book.

00:32:10.000 That's a tough read for a seventh grader.

00:32:11.000 It just is.

00:32:12.000 There's a lot of difficult themes.

00:32:14.000 And I'll never forget in my high school, in my middle school, despite it being very liberal, if I'm not mistaken, To Kill a Mockingbird has the N-word in it, I believe, several times.

00:32:25.000 But this is the way that we handled it when I was in seventh grade.

00:32:28.000 Seventh grade, we read To Kill a Mockingbird.

00:32:31.000 Do you know how we handled it?

00:32:32.000 Our teacher got us together and they said, in this book is a test of whether or not you can handle things that shouldn't be said.

00:32:42.000 There are words in this book that I don't want to hear anyone say, but we're still going to read it.

00:32:49.000 And they send out waivers, by the way, for our parents to sign, because that's probably the right way to do it.

00:32:54.000 And they said, this is how people used to talk in our country.

00:32:58.000 But this story is a heroic story.

00:33:00.000 It's a story about the presumption of innocence, wrongful accusation.

00:33:04.000 It's about the court process.

00:33:06.000 And it's just a great narrative of the antebellum South.

00:33:08.000 It just is.

00:33:10.000 Atticus Finch is the hero of it.

00:33:14.000 Boo Radley, I believe, is the individual that is wrongly accused.

00:33:18.000 No, I got my characters all screwed up.

00:33:19.000 Anyway, point is that, if I remember correctly, it's a black man that's accused of something he didn't do, and he gets let off in trial thanks to Atticus Fitch. 0.93

00:33:30.000 Boo Radley's the recluse. 0.77

00:33:31.000 I'm sorry.

00:33:32.000 He's the guy that just comes out.

00:33:33.000 Anyway, the point is that I remember learning the book.

00:33:36.000 I remember the themes behind it.

00:33:39.000 But without any censorship whatsoever, we were given the book.

00:33:43.000 We read it.

00:33:46.000 And everyone in our classroom, everyone in, Tom Robinson was the black man's name. 0.99

00:33:54.000 Everyone in our class in our grade was better because of it. 0.98

00:33:57.000 We read To Kill a Mockingbird again on a deeper level when I was a sophomore in high school.

00:34:02.000 Same thing.

00:34:04.000 We read Adventures of Huckleberry Finn with all of the bad words in them.

00:34:08.000 But do you know what it actually made us do?

00:34:10.000 It made us not say those words.

00:34:12.000 Yeah, there were some smart Alex and some lunatics that said it, but guess what?

00:34:16.000 We understood the seriousness and we understood the weight of what happened if you said those words.

00:34:23.000 They're like, cut it out.

00:34:24.000 That's not funny.

00:34:25.000 Because in that book, they actually viewed people as subhuman.

00:34:28.000 You see, that's actually the maturation process.

00:34:31.000 Those are people getting older.

00:34:33.000 You see, you understand that people are more likely to be racist if you remove these books, right?

00:34:38.000 That people are more likely to go join the KKK.

00:34:41.000 People are more likely to believe in nonsense like critical race theory and BLM Incorporated when you remove these literatures.

00:34:47.000 It's the literature that actually makes you a more mature and more worldly person.

00:34:51.000 I saw it work.

00:34:55.000 Instead, the removal of these books and putting in books like Angela Davis, 1619 Project, Nicole Hannah-Jones, Critical Race Theory, Herbert Marcuse, it creates hyper-racist people against white people, against white men.

00:35:14.000 The National Coalition Against Censorship is doing this to fight against it for good reason.

00:35:21.000 I'm afraid the censors are going to win.

00:35:24.000 Because under this idea of racial reckoning, they are creating the most racist generation of young people since the KKK.

00:35:30.000 That is the agenda of the Democrat Party.

00:35:33.000 Divide people on race, sex, and class. 1.00

00:35:36.000 That's all they care about.

00:35:37.000 They don't care about individuals. 0.93

00:35:39.000 They don't care about human beings.

00:35:40.000 They don't care about character.

00:35:41.000 They don't care about your spirituality.

00:35:43.000 Instead, they view you as a specific piece of a broader power struggle.

00:35:50.000 They say, how can we overthrow the West?

00:35:55.000 Well, not by continually reading the books that actually made the West decent. 0.51

00:35:58.000 Cut out that to kill a mockingbird thing.

00:36:00.000 That makes people like each other.

00:36:01.000 Instead, let's go make things that make people angry, that creates little activists, that creates seventh graders that want to burn down the country, not want to improve their character.

00:36:12.000 And that's why they want to destroy the central canon that I grew up reading.

00:36:16.000 And I'm only 27 years old.

00:36:20.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.

00:36:21.000 If you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, go to tpusa.com, tpusa.com.

00:36:26.000 Please consider supporting us at charliekirk.com/slash support.

00:36:29.000 Thanks so much for listening, everybody.

00:36:31.000 God bless.

00:36:31.000 Speak to you soon.

The Charlie Kirk Show - December 10, 2020

The 4 Types of Voter Fraud Evidence the Media Willfully Ignores

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript