00:01:10.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:36.000We've been hitting it, and I don't even have an exhaustive list here of Democrats that are refusing to debate their Republican counterparts.
00:01:45.000Kerry Lake with Katie Hobbs, Shapiro with Mastriano, Fetterman with Oz.
00:01:54.000The new model of quote-unquote democracy is so oligarchic.
00:02:01.000And Madison warned about this in the Federalist papers because every time democracy is actually mentioned in the Federalist, it's actually mentioned negatively.
00:02:09.000The word democracy does not show up in the Declaration of Independence, doesn't show up in the Constitution.
00:02:16.000It does a couple mentions in the Federalist papers, but only negatively, not positively.
00:02:22.000And this kind of new model of democracy, if you will, or this kind of new blueprint, is answer zero adversarial questions.
00:02:31.000Do a bunch of fundraisers from a bunch of very wealthy, woke, white, miserable people with more money than anything, but very little joy and happiness.
00:02:40.000A lot of them live in Silicon Valley, live in Seattle, they live in Portland, they live in D.C., they live in Boston, they live in New York.
00:03:10.000In a moment, here we will have Pastor John Amanchuku, who has a great new book called Erased, all about critical race theory and abortion.
00:03:19.000I've spent a lot of time kind of thinking about this particular issue of critical race theory, kind of the structures that the left is trying to destroy here.
00:03:30.000And on John Amanchuku's website, it says by defunding Planned Parenthood and similar groups, we could save 900 black babies a day.
00:03:39.000You guys can check that out at johnamanchuku.com.
00:03:42.000And when you talk about critical race theory, it's important that we understand the philosophers and the venomous and the insidious ideas behind CRT.
00:03:51.000You see, CRT and critical race theory is just an outgrowth of critical theory itself, which of course was pioneered by Herbert Marcuse from the Frankfurt School, a committed communist revolutionary who came to America with the sole intent to try and change the framework, change the approach of how human beings in the West viewed their existence.
00:04:14.000Herbert Marcuse wrote a book called One Dimensional Man.
00:04:18.000One Dimensional Man was widely accepted in the American Academy as being profound and clairvoyant.
00:04:25.000And it really kind of started this school of thinking called postmodernism.
00:04:31.000And in postmodernism, they believe in something called frame theory, which is that there's an infinite interpretation of events that you're living through, an infinite interpretation of truths, if you will, that there is not one truth, that there is your truth.
00:04:47.000And so as you have the kind of many interpretations of quote-unquote what is true, well, then all of a sudden you get into power dynamics.
00:04:57.000Postmodernism believes more about power than they do truth.
00:05:01.000They believe in the collision of the oppressor versus the oppressed.
00:05:06.000They do not believe in objective beauty or goodness or virtue or truth.
00:05:11.000Critical race theory, critical theory believes that power dynamics, especially power dynamics via the tribe, is the only way that we will be able to mitigate conflicts or differences.
00:05:23.000Now, critical theory manifests itself in a variety of different ways in our country.
00:05:26.000It manifests itself in black-only dormitories, in hiring quotas, in affirmative action, in blatant forms of racism that exist against, unfortunately, white people and Asian people in our country.
00:05:40.000But even more than that, critical theory exists to change the terms and the language of the very basis of our society, of humanity as we know it.
00:05:52.000If all of a sudden the words of the Constitution can mean whatever they want to mean, well, then the Constitution can mean whatever you want them to mean.
00:06:00.000And so the kind of assault on language, of course, it's very corollary to the trans movement, I can be whomever I want to be, is an outgrowth, is a sister, is a cousin of the postmodern movement.
00:06:14.000And we see that in so many different ways now in our government.
00:06:17.000We see that in our culture, in our society.
00:06:22.000And so, for example, when you study Jacques Derrida, who's another one of these guys that was part of the postmodern movement, you start to realize the darkness and the hopelessness that is embedded in deconstructionist philosophy.
00:06:40.000And, you know, look, for example, Jacques Derrida, one of the quotes that Derrida had about this, he always said this, one thing.
00:06:51.000One of the most famous quotes of Jacques Derrida, he said, I believe in the value of the book, which keeps something irreplaceable, and the necessity of fighting to secure its respect.
00:07:02.000No one gets angry at a mathematician or a physicist whom he or she doesn't understand, or it's someone who speaks a foreign language, but rather it's someone who tampers with your own language.
00:07:12.000You look at the very basis of postmodern or deconstructionist philosophy.
00:07:17.000It's making you question the terms, the language, and the truth of your very own existence.
00:07:27.000That's one of the most fundamental things that keeps us all together, that binds our entire civilization together.
00:07:34.000Jacques Derrida, alongside another one of those tricksters, Michelle Foucault.
00:07:39.000Michelle Foucault was a very sick person from France, another kind of one of the kind of flat, the banner carriers, if you will.
00:07:49.000In fact, when I was at UC Berkeley and I did the kind of ask me anything back and forth on campus, it was a woman came up with the book One Dimensional Man, I think it was either One Dimensional Man or Foucault, and asked me to sign it.
00:08:05.000And I wrote there, I said, There is, you're smarter than this, don't believe this garbage.
00:08:12.000Michelle Foucault said, I don't believe that it is necessary to know exactly what I am.
00:08:16.000The main interest in life and work is to become something else that you were not in the beginning.
00:08:24.000I don't believe it is necessary to know exactly what I am, not to discover who you are as a human species, what is a human being.
00:08:31.000The main interest in life and the work is to become someone else that you were not in a beginning, to transform.
00:08:38.000But you think about the kind of philosophical disturbance of Michelle Foucault, what he's writing about here.
00:08:45.000The main interest in life and work is to become someone else that you were not in the beginning, to transform oneselves.
00:08:55.000That is fundamental to the trans movement.
00:08:57.000The German historicist model, the progressive, the Darwinian belief is that it's not how you were made by your creator, it's what you are becoming.
00:09:10.000We've talked about here on this program the difference between being and becoming.
00:09:16.000You could become a man, you could become a Christian, but becoming the wrong thing, it's very, very dangerous.
00:09:23.000Friedrich Nietzsche talked openly about this, about becoming an Ãœbermensch, becoming a superman, elevating and lifting yourself up to a higher plane of existence.
00:09:34.000Nietzsche wrote, and he did not mean this, he was not proclaiming it.
00:09:39.000He was not celebrating it, that God is dead, and therefore we must build our own values, must build ourselves up to become das Ãœbermensch.
00:11:42.000So during the summer of 2020, while city after city was being burned down after the death of George Floyd, while being at one of the busiest abortion clinics in the Southeast, a black father walked up to me while I was out there just trying to save babies.
00:11:59.000Wearing a BLM shirt, he walked up to me and accosted me and he said, why are you out here fighting a white man's issue?
00:12:07.000And on that Saturday morning, 70% of the people outside of the abortion clinic trying to save the babies were white.
00:12:14.000But nearly 80 to 85% of the mothers prepared to abort their babies on that Saturday were black.
00:12:21.000But this black father, while sending his girlfriend to the doorsteps of the abortion clinic to abort their baby, he's going to get mad at me because I'm fighting a white man's issue.
00:12:32.000Now, if I were to ask him what the definition of critical race theory was, he would probably tell me that he didn't know.
00:12:38.000But in critical race theory, they see racism at all times and in all places, even when a 6'4, 260-pound black man is at an abortion clinic trying to save babies.
00:12:50.000From that, the Lord gave me a plan on how to fight this woke agenda and movement.
00:15:12.000So blacks are experiencing what I call Stockholm syndrome.
00:15:16.000During a heist that took place in Sweden in 1973, the same year that Roe v. Wade was enacted in America, a man by the name of Jan Eric Olson walked into a Swedish bank.
00:15:34.000He stayed in the bank with the hostages for nearly six days.
00:15:36.000And somewhere along the way, the hostages started to fall in love with the person that was there to capture them.
00:15:42.000And that's where black America is today.
00:15:44.000We have falling in love with our captor.
00:15:47.000And it's time for us to remove ourselves from the liberal plantation because as a community and as a people, we are going down because we are trusting in a God called government, and government can't be God.
00:17:00.000Are you like every one of us that thinks our country has gone nuts, whether it's Russia Gate market crashes or selling oil to China or this insane inflation?
00:17:08.000Well, right now, you need a financial mind who understands your concerns, but the same time as a Christian worldview of money.
00:17:15.000That's why you should talk to my friends at PAX Financial Group.
00:17:18.000Look, I've given my money to PAX Financial to manage.
00:17:20.000If it's good enough for me, I think it's good for you.
00:17:23.000Like all of us, they have concerns, but they also have hope.
00:17:26.000In this market, you must have a financial person who shares your hope and at the same time can help you with biblical responsible investing, B-R-I, biblical, responsible investing.
00:17:36.000That's why I want you to text the word Charlie to 74868.
00:17:41.000That is Charlie to 74868 to connect with my friends at the PAX Financial Group.
00:18:27.000You know, there was an article, a bunch of articles that appeared in the Epoch Times about the CDC and their safety monitoring of the VERIS system, which is the vaccine adverse event reporting system, which is the official system used by the U.S. government for tracking adverse events in the vaccines.
00:18:47.000And at first, the CDC says they were looking for safety events, and then they said they weren't, and then they said they were, and then they said they weren't.
00:18:55.000It's almost so confusing to anyone, even myself, reading it.
00:19:01.000And so I decided to do a little digging because back in August of 2021, I officially notified them via their official channels that they had a mistake in their safety monitoring signal generation algorithm.
00:19:20.000And basically, they're looking at PRR, they're looking at chi-squared, they're looking at a raw number of events.
00:19:30.000And it's an and clause, which means that if you're looking at something like PRR, which is a measure of proportional reporting rates, so it's a little bit technical, but it means that if you're, say, reporting 1% heart attacks in this vaccine, but other vaccines report 2% heart attacks,
00:19:57.000then your vaccine must be safe because you're reporting proportionally less than the total number of events.
00:20:03.000But the problem, of course, with this formula is that if you have a very, very dangerous vaccine and which is generating tons of events, then it's very difficult for that PRR number to be more than one and the CDC formula requires two.
00:20:32.000But what I noticed when I read the Epoch Times article is that even with the flawed formula that they have, which will not detect any of the safety signals except for the most prominent safety signals, those will still be detected.
00:20:51.000And so I decided to just do a calculation for the death safety signal since that's the most important.
00:21:00.000And I couldn't figure out why they weren't generating a safety signal for death.
00:21:06.000And it turns out that the safety signal for death is so huge that it satisfies all three criteria that the CDC says for generating a safety signal.
00:21:20.000So it should have generated a safety signal.
00:21:23.000And the CDC should have notified us that the VARIS system has generated a safety signal for death.
00:21:35.000There was nothing in the Freedom of Information Act requests that came back showing that they even detected this critical safety signal.
00:21:45.000I mean, if there's one safety signal you want to look for, it's death.
00:21:48.000And there was nothing, not a zip zero in those Freedom of Information Act responses from the CDC showing that they even realized that the death signal was generated.
00:22:04.000This is very troubling because it shows a complete lack of accountability and a complete lack of competency in terms of monitoring the VARS systems for safety signals.
00:22:17.000Everybody in the world should be on edge knowing that the CDC is unable to even apply their own formula to their own data.
00:22:33.000This is the clip from the EPOC Times Want to Play Play Cut 63.
00:22:37.000And last week, Dr. Walensky issued this letter right here, which was made public on September the 12th, in which she admitted that the CDC gave false information to us here at the EPOC Times in regards to their vaccine safety monitoring process.
00:22:50.000Specifically, in this letter, Dr. Wilenski admitted that despite telling us otherwise, the CDC was not actually analyzing certain types of adverse events reported within their own database throughout all of 2021.
00:23:01.000And instead, they only began their analyses of these adverse events in March of this year.
00:23:06.000That is, again, despite the CDC telling us previously that they started their analyses all the way back in February of 2021.
00:23:14.000So if we lie to the government, we go to jail.
00:24:50.000You came on our program once and mentioned you were a big Democrat donor.
00:24:53.000I don't want to politicize this, but do you find it curious that, I mean, Rand Paul's been pretty good, that why is it the Republican Party is interested in this and no one in the Democrat Party is?
00:25:03.000I mean, I grew up in an America where one of the kind of villains of the Democrat base was pharma, was Pfizer, AstraZeneca, price gouging.
00:25:14.000I mean, it's silence from Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.
00:25:17.000It is, we must trust the science and all this, where I could see 20 years ago an Elizabeth Warren type kind of leading a workers' crusade against this.
00:25:28.000I mean, what happened to the American Democrat Party?
00:25:31.000Well, I think that it's the, you know, when you have a narrative that is promoted by the president of the United States, who's your own party, and you have, you know, I think that as liberals, we tend to trust the mainstream medical community.
00:25:48.000We tend to trust the institutions, right?
00:25:53.000So, you know, this is where I was more than a year ago as a big Democratic supporter and believer in these institutions.
00:25:59.000You know, I think that liberals just, you know, for whatever reason, have much higher trust in these institutions of government than they should.
00:26:11.000And so I think that is the cause of this, because it's not like payoffs to government officials, because my liberal friends, you know, who are not being paid off by the drug companies for sure, are all believers in the vaccine and we should get shot, get the latest booster.
00:26:29.000I got, you know, I have one friend, one liberal friend who's got, you know, six boosters.
00:26:34.000But conservatives, I think, are more 50-50 on the vaccine.
00:26:38.000But liberals are like, you know, 95% versus 5%.
00:26:44.000So I think it's more of the, you know, the character of the party.
00:26:54.000I know that if Republicans take back the House or the Senate, I could at least think of a couple senators that will definitely take this as an issue.
00:27:27.000And again, you're right, not every conservative Republican has been open-minded here, right?
00:27:32.000I mean, President Trump has been a big pusher of the vaccine.
00:27:35.000There's been a lot of Republicans, but there is an audience in the American right right now, at least around this topic, which I just think it's very interesting.
00:27:45.000So let me ask you kind of another question here.
00:27:48.000Actually, let's play some tape here of kind of a one-two combo.
00:27:52.000It's a very depressing one-two combo, might I add?
00:27:54.000Let's play Cut 57 of Pfizer celebrating children that are going to be in the vaccine child trials.
00:28:52.000Well, they're trying to normalize the damage from the vaccine.
00:28:57.000They're trying to cover up the damage in the vaccine and make it appear like, oh, the myocarditis is just something normal.
00:29:05.000And isn't it great that this hospital is treating it?
00:29:08.000What they're not telling you in the ads is that we don't know what's going to happen five years down the road for that young girl who was in that TV commercial because myocarditis, I think the stats are like in five years, like 20% of the people are dead.
00:30:10.000Harvard is mandating this, the COVID-19, the latest booster, the Omicron booster and the bivalent booster.
00:30:24.000I mean, that is insane when you have a paper coming out from Harvard that says it's unethical.
00:30:32.000So, Steve, I want to ask you: you know, do you think that people are generally waking up?
00:30:37.000I mean, you know, you say that you have a lot of liberal friends and stuff that, you know, you have the nine boosters or whatever the number is.
00:31:19.000It's if one doctor said, said something.
00:31:23.000And one of my friends said, hey, if a TV doctor came out who was formerly promoting the vaccines and came out against the vaccines, then she would listen to that.
00:31:34.000And of course, there is now a TV doctor in Great Britain who has now, who went from basically promoting the vaccines to everyone on TV.
00:31:46.000And now he's saying, whoa, the vaccine should be stopped immediately.
00:32:38.000And the average timeframe is about five months from the time that you get the shot to the time that there's enough growth in your arteries to block off your arteries and kill you.
00:32:50.000This is why the peak of death is at five months after you get vaccinated.
00:33:05.000He started looking into it and he looked at the evidence and he said, oh, this vaccine's a disaster.
00:33:12.000And so instead of shutting up, which is what most doctors do, he decided to write a couple of papers that were then published in the peer-reviewed medical journal that he sits on the board of.
00:33:29.000He wasn't involved in the review process.
00:33:31.000But now it's in the medical literature that these vaccines are dangerous and should be stopped.
00:33:39.000And so we're starting to see shifts in people who have these personal events.
00:33:44.000When it happens to them personally, they realize and they wake up.
00:33:48.000It all revolves around whether they're willing to look directly at the scientific evidence as opposed to trusting authority.
00:33:55.000Because once they do that, it's all over.
00:33:58.000Once you start to look directly at the scientific evidence, at the data itself, rather than trusting authority, there's no way that you can say that these vaccines are safe and effective.
00:34:09.000Same thing happened to Paul Merrick, one of the top intensive care physicians in the entire world.
00:34:16.000He's the most published and the most respected in his field, which is basically ICU medicine.
00:34:22.000He basically thought the vaccines were safe too.