00:00:39.000His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
00:00:47.000We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
00:01:21.000Well, you have to understand that they put the one man who was using the attorneys general's office of Texas to go after the Biden administration, many other places, and they needed to put him in check and make an example out of him.
00:02:13.000Remember, we talked about in our op-ed, it's time to indict the left.
00:02:16.000Well, how can you indict the left if the good guys, the good law enforcement officers, are impeached and other attorneys generals are watching and they're taking notice.
00:02:26.000This is a massive chilling project to chill the speech and the activity of bold attorneys general.
00:02:35.000We must stand against the impeachment of Ken Paxton.
00:02:38.000We must not support the impeachment of Ken Paxton.
00:02:41.000We must rally behind the principle that Ken Paxton has done a lot of good for the people of Texas.
00:02:48.000And joining us now is John O'Shea, congressional candidate in Texas's 12th congressional district.
00:02:53.000He's also a Fort Worth area businessman, and he has all the information that our audience is really interested in regarding the impeachment of Ken Paxton.
00:03:02.000John, thank you for joining the program.
00:03:04.000Give us the update on the impeachment of Ken and what are the dynamics and forces at play here.
00:03:10.000Well, it's good to be back with you, Charlie, except unfortunately under these circumstances.
00:03:15.000So as you just rightly outlaid, the establishment is going after Ken because Ken's been one of the champions of the America First Movement and standing up for the constitutional rights of his constituents here in the state of Texas.
00:03:28.000No other attorney general, no other attorney general's office has pushed back against this unconstitutional regime that is trying to take away our civil liberties.
00:03:38.000And for that, we have a similar situation to what happened with President Trump with Alvin Bragg.
00:03:44.000There, you had Matthew Colangelo leave the Department of Justice and all of a sudden mysteriously appear at the district attorney's office right as the charges were being filed against President Trump.
00:03:54.000Here you have a woman who left the Department of Justice and somehow managed to join the House investigative committee that nobody publicly knew was even occurring within the matter of day.
00:04:06.000So I would say that this is a coordinated effort.
00:04:08.000And the thing that's most disappointing to me, but hopefully will be a wake-up call to the voters, is that it was led in large part because the Republican leadership of the House, we had 60 Republicans who voted with the Democrats for his impeachment.
00:04:24.000And now that the fate of the best attorney general in the country rests in the hands of the Senate, where we have a 19 of 12 advantage as well, although Angela Paxton, Ken's wife, is not allowed to vote.
00:04:37.000But it still needs a 21-vote level in order to impeach Ken Paxton.
00:04:44.000And unfortunately, there are a number of Republican senators who I just don't think we know until the final vote comes.
00:05:24.000Well, it's even more egregious than that because so the Texas House is largely viewed as a squish institution.
00:05:32.000They allow Democratic committee chairs, even though the Texas population, the voters, gave the House a large Republican majority and they put these people in positions of power.
00:05:44.000We were unable to get key legislative issues that were platforms for the state Republican Party through the House because they were just held up.
00:05:54.000But they used this 88th congressional session to actually on the last day hold a four-hour public hearing, which for a lot of people was the very first time that they even understood that there was an investigative committee that was going on.
00:06:07.000And on top of that, which makes it even more egregious because, like you said, it was led by Dave Phelan, who was the House Speaker, as Lieutenant Governor Patrick called him, California Dade, who clearly is not a conservative and is clearly doesn't hold to the Republican values of the electorate base here in Texas.
00:06:26.000But you had an impeachment trial that didn't even follow Texas Code.
00:06:31.000I've been watching the Senate hearing this morning.
00:06:33.000And in fact, they just got finished reading the charges against Ken.
00:06:37.000And what to me I think was just kind of most just egregious was that they kept reading Texas code in which supposedly Ken's behavior violated.
00:06:46.000Well, the whole impeachment hearing violated Texas Code.
00:06:50.000We have what's known as the prior election doctrine, Texas Code 605, which says that a elected official cannot be impeached for events that were known to the public prior to an election.
00:07:02.000Well, Ken alleged his situation was very public through both the primary and then the general election, with tens of millions of dollars being spent on media against him.
00:07:12.000And he still garnered 4.3 million votes and won by landslide.
00:07:17.000And then on top of that, there's another Texas code which governs legislative witnesses needing to be under oath.
00:07:24.000Well, the way that this whole sham impeachment was handled by this investigative committee, you had two former DOJ officials holding secret investigations, talking to witnesses who were not under oath, then going and reporting to the committee, not under oath.
00:07:38.000And then the committee went and reported to the House, not under oath.
00:07:42.000So it's hearsay upon hearsay upon hearsay.
00:08:34.000And actually, each charge is going to have a whether or not the senator thinks that Ken was, in fact, guilty of that charge.
00:08:42.000But then it's a two-part question because then the second part of that question is whether or not that is in and of itself sufficient to remove Ken from office.
00:08:51.000So, I, like you, I mean, I've been friends with Ken for 20 years.
00:08:56.000And if Ken is guilty of some of these allegations, you know, then that's disappointing, but it's also not unheard of.
00:09:04.000But that in and of itself is not sufficient to remove him from office.
00:09:08.000So, we've actually already been working on censoring the House representatives who voted for Ken's impeachment, all the Republicans, all 60 of them.
00:09:16.000In fact, I personally know three people who are primary individuals who are in the state legislature in the area, and we're seeking to solicit a couple more to go because the people are fed up.
00:09:30.000We have a gentleman in the White House who supposedly won with 81 million votes who clearly sold out his country.
00:09:37.000And we're not doing anything about that.
00:09:39.000But because Ken supposedly got granite countertops and maybe had a mistress who was hired by a campaign donor, we're going to take him off the board when the state of Texas, to your point, is suffering not only worse problems, but needs him at the wall.
00:09:52.000No, and let's be honest: Ken Paxton, the knives have been out for Ken because he has been one of the most forceful in a good way AGs in the country.
00:10:04.000This is not about a defense of Ken Paxton's personal life.
00:10:07.000This is that he was bold enough to enforce the law in a way that most Republican AGs won't, and they want to make an example.
00:10:14.000The reason we're hearing about any of this is because he's effective.
00:10:17.000And before I get lectured by anybody else, if I choose, if I picked the 50 AGs across the country, unfortunately, I bet one out of five are actively having affairs.
00:10:28.000But this is not a reason all of a sudden pander to the Democrats and pander to the Unit Party to remove A.G. Paxton, who's done a wonderful job.
00:10:40.000For 10 years, Patriot Mobile has been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
00:10:45.000When I say only, trust me, they're the only one.
00:10:47.000Glenn and the team have been great supporters of mine and Turning Point USA, which is why I'm proud to partner with them.
00:10:53.000Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability to access all three major networks, which means you get the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding the left.
00:11:04.000When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending the message that you support free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life, Second Amendment, and our military veterans and first responder heroes.
00:11:12.000Their 100% U.S.-based customer service team makes switching easy.
00:11:17.000Keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade.
00:11:19.000Their team will help you find the best plan for your needs.
00:11:22.000Just go to patriotmobile.com/slash Charlie or call 878-PATRIOIOT.
00:11:26.000Free activation when you say offer code Charlie.
00:11:29.000Join me today and make the switch today to this excellent company.
00:11:31.000Go to patriotmobile.com/slash Charlie.
00:11:34.000That is patriotmobile.com/slash Charlie or call 878-PATRIOT.
00:11:43.000I want to tell you how you could support the Michigan electors.
00:11:48.000There is a telethon that is going on right now.
00:11:51.000Gateway Pundit is streaming it amongst many others.
00:11:55.000And it's called Save the Electors Telethon.
00:11:59.000And you guys can contribute to the Michigan electors.
00:12:02.000So, for those of you that are not tracking this, we've covered it a fair amount, but it's amazing when I go to the grassroots.
00:12:09.000The Michigan Attorney General has indicted rank and file senior citizens in Michigan for signing a piece of paper that is within their constitutional authority, obviously, free speech, to become an alternate elector.
00:14:54.000But there's a controversy that has come up here with the NFRW.
00:15:00.000According to WND.com, and I verified this through a couple other sources, the National Federation of Republican Women refuse to pass a resolution saying that biological men who think they are women are not allowed to come into the NFRW.
00:15:16.000Eileen Sobjak, who is the head of the organization, oh, I'm sorry, the NFRW's national president, Eileen Sobjek, on advice from the organization's attorney, fears a lawsuit saying that if we make this, addressing this issue would end us, saying that biological men are not allowed in the organization.
00:15:37.000I will not let this issue be our demise.
00:15:42.000Laura Carlson, who is the woman leading the effort to get the NFRW to align with a very popular GOP and women's cause, how about this defending real women's spaces from being infiltrated by trans fake women, says she and her allies would be willing to raise the money necessary, obviously, for the challenges.
00:15:58.000But Eileen Sobjek is saying that this would be too costly from attorneys for us to pass a resolution for the National Federation of Republican Women to say what a woman is.
00:16:11.000The National Republican Women's Organization is afraid of lawsuits.
00:16:18.000I hope that there's more to this story.
00:16:20.000If any of you are part of the NFRW or any of the state chapters who do a great job, objectively a great job, they have their biennial conference coming up in Oklahoma City later this month.
00:16:31.000They have a bylaws proposal that is being pushed back against.
00:16:34.000They say, oh, no, it's too controversial.
00:16:46.000If you know anybody in the leadership of NFRW or aware of it, I would hope that the premier women's organization and the Republican side can define what a woman is.
00:16:58.000Do you know that the average American spends about 20 years in retirement?
00:17:01.000That's a long time to live without a steady income.
00:17:04.000And we want to make sure you enjoy every moment of it and don't outlive your money.
00:17:08.000Retirement is about more than just investments.
00:17:14.000My friends at PAX Financial, who I use for my wealth management future, develop a course for the sole purpose of helping you pivot.
00:17:22.000If you want your own free guide to pivoting into the new chapter of Life with Purpose, visit PAXFG.com/slash Charlie.
00:17:30.000That is P-A-X-F-G.com/slash Charlie, PAXFG.com/slash Charlie.
00:17:38.000Joining us now is one of my favorite guests, a courageous truth teller, Dr. Pierre Corey, author of the book, The War on Ivermectin, The Medicine That Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic.
00:17:50.000I want to discuss this Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, a ruled in favor of three doctors allowing to move forward with their lawsuit, saying the FDA abused its authority with the anti-Ivermectin messaging to Americans, saying that the FDA is not a physician.
00:18:07.000Yeah, so, you know, let's go back to the original court case, right?
00:18:10.000So when we, when Paul and Mary Tally Bowden and Robert Apter brought their lawsuit against the FDA for essentially infringing and interfering with the physicians' ability to practice medicine, you know, the FDA argued that they had sovereign immunity and they could not be sued.
00:18:27.000And that lower court judge actually, you know, dismissed the case based on that argument, which is absolutely absurd.
00:18:34.000And what happened here is the higher court said, no, no, no.
00:18:37.000This is absolutely a case of the FDA overstepping its authority.
00:18:42.000They're interfering with the practice of medicine.
00:18:44.000And, you know, in my words, I'm going to say this, this is really an example of the integrity of our government in how they practice public health.
00:18:52.000I mean, they're literally influencing the behavior of citizens, physicians, hospitals with pithy little tweets, you know, on Twitter.
00:19:21.000And, you know, it's, yeah, it's a brushback pitch because listen, we know the agencies are working in the service of the pharmaceutical industry.
00:19:27.000And we know that's why they were attacking Ivermectin.
00:20:20.000This is your federal government, everybody.
00:20:22.000This is as if a 19-year-old that is the head of some sorority Twitter account who's kind of like snark queen ends up getting the FDA's Twitter account.
00:20:40.000Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19?
00:20:44.000So the federal government comes in and is setting out these sarcastic, pithy tweets, mocking doctors' decisions.
00:20:53.000And the engagement was: well, 108,000 people liked it, 47,000 people reposted it or retweeted it.
00:21:01.000And so, Dr. Corey, this is an important issue, which I have been told by a lot of people, Charlie, what happens to a doctor and a patient is private between a doctor and a patient, that you have HIPAA, that you should never challenge that.
00:21:15.000And regardless of the audience's opinions on abortion, that is the argument they always make on the abortion thing.
00:21:26.000However, when it came to the administration of a drug where you do not know the whole patient's history, off-label use, it was this blunt forced instrument from the government to tell every doctor you can't use this, regardless of the fact that ivermectin won a Nobel Prize.
00:21:44.000They kept early treatments out of our hands.
00:22:49.000You know, even in their defense of this decision, so the FDA put out statements, you know, saying, you know, okay, you know, it's okay to prescribe, but we still haven't approved it.
00:22:57.000You know, that is such a misleading statement.
00:22:59.000We do not need the FDA to approve this drug.
00:23:45.000Have they ever treated a used ivermectin?
00:23:47.000I mean, it's absolutely unconscionable, really, what's going on here.
00:23:52.000Yeah, it's this massive contradiction.
00:23:54.000At one point, they're telling us when it comes to, you know, transgender reassignment surgeries and abortion, again, that privacy and the sacrosanct decisions of doctors cannot be questioned.
00:24:06.000And yet, when it comes to the treatment of somebody who has something where they might die, the FDA has a one-size-fits-all policy.
00:24:13.000And so, Dr. Corey, you and I have played around with this topic before, but I want to really lean into it.
00:24:35.000So, what I've said now for two, maybe three years is every time you look at any policy on any aspect of COVID, and you see that being omitted from whether it's the FDA statements, CDC policies, NIH, ask yourself one simple question: What would a pharmaceutical company want this policy to look like?
00:24:55.000Ask yourself, who is best served by this policy?
00:24:58.000You know, all of these mandates that are illegitimate, this recent FOIA request, where literally the vaccine committees at the FDA knew that there was very little efficacy of the mandates in September 21, yet they mandated across the country, corporations, universities, schools.
00:25:16.000And it's so brazen, but that regulatory capture is so clear.
00:25:20.000I mean, if people think that our agencies are working in the service of our betterment of our health, they are not, right?
00:25:27.000So, what is the primary responsibility of a pharmaceutical corporation?
00:25:38.000And if you look at the destruction wrought in COVID, it's literally these agencies working in the service of industry running rampant over our lives, our health, our liberties.
00:25:48.000And I've never could never have imagined three years ago that it would be this extreme, where literally every day of our lives, every facet of our lives is now being interfered with and really deteriorating because of the overreach of the government.
00:26:04.000Well, and this is for some people a red pill moment or just an eye-opening moment because, Dr. Corey, the way that I was taught growing up is that there was an adversarial relationship between the bureaucracies and companies, that Pfizer is fighting the FDA and the FDA is fighting Pfizer.
00:26:20.000And they're constantly going after, you can't do this, you have to do that, and you have to make this.
00:26:24.000And they're constantly suing one another.
00:26:26.000What COVID revealed is that they're in a jacuzzi together, Dr. Corey.
00:26:30.000Yeah, you know, and I'm going to speak personally here, Joey.
00:26:34.000I mean, I grew up in New York City liberal, liberal, you know, voted Democrat my whole life.
00:26:39.000And, you know, going into COVID, what we just talked about, learning that what I thought was our government is not our government.
00:26:47.000They're literally working on the behest of corporations.
00:26:49.000The government's role, I used to always be kind of pro-government because I thought they were like the referee leveling the playing field.
00:26:56.000They were there to protect us again from the rapaciousness of corporations.
00:27:01.000Now, when you see that the ref is literally being paid off by the other side, and all the calls they're making are going, like, how can you win?
00:27:10.000You're not only going to lose, but you're going to lose hugely.
00:27:32.000The War on Ivermectin by Dr. Pierre Corey.
00:27:35.000And this is a topic I want to explain.
00:27:37.000And Dr. Corey, you're so disciplined, and I don't mean to politicize this, but I think it's a fact when we go through this part.
00:27:42.000By the way, both Republicans and Democrats screwed up COVID, but here's a fact: okay, is that if we would have had early treatments, the cascade of other tyrannical things would have been stopped.
00:27:52.000School closures, mass mail-in voting, even potentially riots because of the pent-up, you know, just energy that people had.
00:28:00.000And so, if you look at the cause set in motion, this is why they had to choke point ivermectin.
00:28:07.000This is why they had to choke point the idea of early treatments.
00:28:10.000That if there were early treatments, then you wouldn't have to have the vaccine.
00:28:15.000If there were early treatments, then you wouldn't have to have mask mandates.
00:28:18.000So, it's not just it's yes, the lives are obviously the most important takeaway, but look at all the other second, third, fourth, fifth sequence tragedies that occurred because we were not able to administer ivermectin.
00:28:32.000The war on ivermectin, the medicine that helped millions and could have ended the pandemic.
00:28:37.000And you could go even as far as say that you could get a one-world government order all the way through if you don't have early treatments.
00:29:28.000That is mypillow.com, promo code Kirk, including the MyPillow 2.0 mattress topper, MyPillow Kitchen Towel Sets, and so much more.
00:29:36.000Call 800-875-0425 or go to mypillow.com, use promo code Kirk, mypillow.com, promo code Kirk.
00:29:46.000So, Dr. Corey, I know that we have reached a new level where here I am at Grand Teton National Park and people are wearing masks on the hiking trail.
00:29:55.000Not just one, but I'm talking about not a lot.
00:30:10.000They got the criminal Fauci out there.
00:30:12.000You know, he's starting to say that, oh, you know, we might need more.
00:30:15.000You got all these sorts of whisper campaigns is now getting to the shouting match.
00:30:19.000In fact, I think we have, I think we have a Fauci clip here that the team, oh, yeah, let's just go to cut one here, and then we'll let you react.
00:30:29.000The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illness, including COVID-19, was published last month.
00:30:39.000Its conclusions said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is the lead author, were unambiguous.
00:30:45.000There is just no evidence that they masks make any difference.
00:30:50.000How do we get beyond that finding of that particular review?
00:30:54.000Yeah, but there are other studies, Michael, that show at an individual level for individual, when you're talking about the effect on the epidemic or the pandemic as a whole, the data are less strong.
00:31:07.000Okay, Dr. Corey, you're going to have to explain the newspeak because I'm not as cultured to understand what the heck he's talking about.
00:31:15.000Yeah, what he says, unfortunately, doesn't make scientific sense.
00:31:19.000I mean, when you look at all the collections of studies, they did study individual protection, and there's no sustained or significant signal to show that it'll have individual protection.
00:31:30.000I mean, for sure, we know from epidemiology that mask mandates, public mask mandates don't work.
00:31:34.000But those, you know, a lot of those studies were in focus groups and they followed individual patients.
00:31:39.000And there's nothing conclusive to show that it helps.
00:31:42.000And, you know, that example you just gave me, Charlie, of people wearing masks and grantee Tom Park, the way I am.
00:33:06.000I want to ask really quick, the current risk assessment, is it fair to say the CDC is saying that the BA 2.86, whatever, may be more capable of causing infection of people who have had the vaccine.
00:33:18.000Yeah, I mean, that statement, they're basically just, you know, I think it's a tacit admission that they're saying the vaccine, those vaccinated, it's not going to protect you from this new variant.
00:33:28.000And they're also saying that about natural immunity.
00:33:30.000So basically saying this variant is more likely to evade either natural or vaccine immunity, which another way of saying that that's also a little bit of setup is go get your new vaccine.
00:33:39.000Now, the evidence that some new vaccine is going to protect, the one they're rolling out now is already, you know, a dollar late and, you know, a few steps short.
00:33:47.000You know, this, I mean, this absurdity of a global vaccination campaign for a highly mutagenic coronavirus, I mean, it was illogical before this started.
00:33:58.000And we've had nothing but three years of evidence to show vaccinating against a mutagenic coronavirus does not work.
00:34:04.000And yet they keep doing it to that point that you and I just made it sells an awful lot of vaccines.
00:34:09.000I mean, you know, this whole construct of the fear, you know, the onerous and oppressive government essentially forcing us to do this, do that, to get your vaccine.
00:34:18.000I mean, it's led to immense transfers of wealth.