The Charlie Kirk Show - Trump in Court: Go Fast or Take it Slow? with Kash Patel and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, it's on the Charlie Kirk Show.

00:00:01.000 Kash Patel joins the program and then Marjorie Taylor Greene.

00:00:04.000 We talk Trump indictment, debt ceiling vote, and more.

00:00:08.000 Email me your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:00:11.000 I encourage you to get your tickets right now to our Turning Point Action Conference.

00:00:16.000 We have President Donald Trump.

00:00:17.000 We have Tucker Carlson, Dan Bongino, Steve Bannon, Josh Hawley, JD Vance, Matt Gates, and more.

00:00:24.000 Check out tpaction.com.

00:00:27.000 That is tpaction.com, tpaction.com.

00:00:34.000 Buckle up, everybody.

00:00:35.000 Here we go.

00:00:36.000 Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

00:00:38.000 Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.

00:00:40.000 I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

00:00:43.000 Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

00:00:46.000 I want to thank Charlie.

00:00:47.000 He's an incredible guy.

00:00:48.000 His spirit, his love of this country.

00:00:50.000 He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.

00:00:55.000 Turning point USA.

00:00:57.000 We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

00:01:06.000 That's why we are here.

00:01:08.000 Brought to you by the Loan Experts I Trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandTodd.com.

00:01:17.000 Reminder to get your tickets to actcon tpaction.com, President Trump, Tucker Carlson, Dan Bongino, Steve Bannon, coming up in just about a month.

00:01:26.000 We're going to be promoting it every day.

00:01:27.000 Get your tickets.

00:01:28.000 If you live in the Southeast, in particular, if you are listening in the great state of Florida, you need to get your tickets.

00:01:34.000 Come on by.

00:01:35.000 Palm Beach Convention Center.

00:01:36.000 It's going to be amazing.

00:01:38.000 tpaction.com, tpaction.com.

00:01:40.000 Joining us now is Kash Patel.

00:01:42.000 Cash, welcome to the program.

00:01:44.000 Hey, thanks so much for having me back.

00:01:46.000 Lots to discuss, Cash.

00:01:47.000 I have the indictment here.

00:01:48.000 Cash, top line thoughts.

00:01:50.000 What are we looking at here?

00:01:51.000 Donald Trump will be arraigned tomorrow in Miami, Florida.

00:01:55.000 And then I'm going to go through some of the details of the indictment.

00:01:57.000 Kash Patel.

00:01:58.000 Yeah, look, from the standpoint of a former national security prosecutor and public defender, I think what his team needs to do is after the arraignment, move quickly to pretrial motions, because I think this case needs to be adjudicated before it hits a jury.

00:02:11.000 And this is why.

00:02:12.000 The legal inconsistencies in the indictment itself by the DOJ show you their sham prosecution.

00:02:17.000 For two years, they told you how Donald Trump ran around and stole and hid and burned classified information.

00:02:25.000 And then when push came to shove and they went to a grand jury and they said, we are going to show the world that Donald Trump illegally possessed classified information.

00:02:33.000 You know what they did?

00:02:34.000 They didn't charge him with it.

00:02:36.000 They reached back to a statute under the Espionage Act, the National Defense Information Park, which is 105 years old, which we use to charge sailors and things like that, and said Donald Trump somehow possessed information he shouldn't have.

00:02:51.000 And we think he was grossly negligent.

00:02:54.000 And we'll get to Hillary later.

00:02:56.000 And we want you to prosecute him.

00:02:58.000 But in the entire indictment, they talk about how he's waving around classified information.

00:03:02.000 They banned both can't be true.

00:03:04.000 Either he had classified information or he didn't.

00:03:06.000 And in the indictment, the prosecutors admit he doesn't.

00:03:09.000 So several questions here.

00:03:10.000 First, I want to congratulate you on winning your lawsuit at the Department of Justice and your book is going to print.

00:03:14.000 People can go to governmentgangsters.com.

00:03:17.000 How does that tie in with this news, Cash?

00:03:19.000 Connect that news with what Donald Trump's going through.

00:03:22.000 It's unfortunately the same people at DOJ and FBI that ran Russia Gate and Jan 6 and are running the Hunter Biden laptop investigation.

00:03:31.000 All the people in leadership positions, DOJ, Garland, Ray.

00:03:35.000 And you want to know something about Chris Ray?

00:03:37.000 Ray is the one who signed off on Sammy Berger, who actually stole classified information and shoved it in his pants.

00:03:44.000 Ray is the one who signed off on charging that guy with a misdemeanor at the time Chris Ray was head of the criminal division at DOJ.

00:03:50.000 That's what the book is all about.

00:03:52.000 These people are institutionalists like Bill Barr and company, and they destroy our system of justice.

00:03:57.000 And we need to get them out of there forever.

00:04:01.000 Is it fair to say, Cash, that this is so the President Truckers Act does not have a criminal component? 0.81

00:04:08.000 So they introduced this Espionage Act of 1917 that was passed shortly after the United States entered World War I by Woodrow Wilson, one of America's worst presidents by far.

00:04:20.000 And in some ways, Woodrow Wilson also birthed the administrative state that is pushing forward the statute.

00:04:26.000 It's all very interesting and fitting.

00:04:28.000 We, in a lot of ways, are living in the country that Woodrow Wilson built, former head of Princeton University, historicist, German historicist who hated the country, hated the founding, and became president because Teddy Roosevelt ran as a third party in the election of 1912.

00:04:43.000 Looking through this indictment, though, Cash, something's missing for me.

00:04:49.000 I don't see anything about destroying documents.

00:04:52.000 The government got everything back.

00:04:55.000 So what the heck, man? 0.88

00:04:58.000 Did the Iranians pay Donald Trump $5 million for a document?

00:05:05.000 Did the Russian Federation get Ukrainian troop movements?

00:05:09.000 Yeah.

00:05:09.000 What's the damage here?

00:05:11.000 And you pick up on a very fine point of the indictment that I think wrecks its entire precipice.

00:05:16.000 They are saying they have a sensitive recording, putting aside the problems they have with attorney client privilege, breaking that, of Donald Trump talking about some document to some media reporter, some book.

00:05:28.000 But here's the kicker, Charlie.

00:05:30.000 I looked through the indictment.

00:05:31.000 The document they're talking about that Donald Trump was supposedly waving around unlawfully, that was super classified, isn't one of the documents identified in the indictment itself.

00:05:42.000 That means to me, the government doesn't have it.

00:05:45.000 And what are they going to do?

00:05:46.000 They're going to go in there and ask the judge for a spoliation of evidence reading to the jury.

00:05:51.000 What that means is they're going to say Donald Trump was so reckless and we, the government, tried so hard to find this document, but we think he destroyed it.

00:05:59.000 And that should prove his guilt.

00:06:00.000 Now, that is a charge or reading that instruction that can be given to the jury, but I don't think the government has this document.

00:06:06.000 It goes to your point.

00:06:08.000 He didn't destroy anything.

00:06:09.000 He didn't do anything unlawful.

00:06:11.000 They're just using.

00:06:12.000 Well, but then where do you think that document is then, Cash?

00:06:14.000 I don't know.

00:06:16.000 I don't even know if the government knows what document they're talking about.

00:06:19.000 And here's the thing, Charlie.

00:06:20.000 I can relate to that.

00:06:21.000 As a guy who was first subpoenaed by the January 6th committee and these same Cretans were running this thing, they asked me for an hour about a document they couldn't produce that Millie had supposedly written.

00:06:32.000 And I said, can you just show me the document so I can see it? 0.97

00:06:36.000 And they said, we don't have it.

00:06:38.000 And I said, so how do you want me, the guy you're targeting, to answer this question if you can't produce the document in question?

00:06:45.000 And I think they're using the same play here.

00:06:47.000 So the indictment continues.

00:06:51.000 And let's just go through the very top.

00:06:52.000 It's very obvious here, but it's worth repeating.

00:06:55.000 Donald Trump and Walt Teen Nada.

00:06:58.000 So, Cash, if you were to try to take down the mob, which you did some very heavy prosecutorial work, take down people that are up to no good, you would also indict the bagman, the bodyman, to try to work your way up.

00:07:11.000 Is that what's happening here?

00:07:12.000 Is the federal government going to try to turn this Navy veteran against Donald Trump?

00:07:16.000 That's exactly what they're trying to do to a great American and Walt Nada.

00:07:20.000 And what they want him to do is flip.

00:07:22.000 And I don't know that that will ever happen.

00:07:24.000 I don't believe it will.

00:07:26.000 But you can't have a conspiracy without someone else.

00:07:29.000 And what they wanted to do in this indictment, this speaking indictment, as we call them, is dirty up President Trump so much in the media and so much in the minds of the jury that they're just going to be like, oh my God, he did something wrong.

00:07:41.000 Plus, he's got a co-conspirator, this guy who was always around him and they were talking about stuff.

00:07:46.000 Well, that guy, Walt Nada, that was his job to be the president's personal valet and to be around and do what the president says.

00:07:54.000 Every president has them and every former president has them.

00:07:58.000 And so now they're just building up a conspiracy.

00:08:00.000 But legally, if the president, which I believe is not guilty of the charged offenses in the top of the indictment, there can be no conspiracy.

00:08:08.000 There can be no obstruction.

00:08:10.000 There can be no lying to federal officers if there's no illegality in the first place.

00:08:14.000 And that's why I go back to the Espionage Act and the NDI stuff we were talking about.

00:08:18.000 So is there this could borderline on just complaining, but it's not complaining.

00:08:25.000 Is there an equal protection claim here, Cash, that secretaries of state, they weren't charged under these similar statutes for actually consciously committing these crimes?

00:08:36.000 Or is that just going to fall on deaf ears with this judge?

00:08:38.000 I mean, it depends on the judge, right?

00:08:40.000 Look, they drew the judge on forum shopping that they didn't want to draw, which is kind of ironic since they lied to the federal court in the charging document saying there were no related cases when they brought this charge in the first instance.

00:08:52.000 So I think the judge is going to catch on to prosecutional misconduct.

00:08:55.000 I've outlined in other places Karen Gilbert's misconduct, Jay Bratt's alleged misconduct.

00:08:59.000 I think that's all going to come forward.

00:09:01.000 And then the smart defense attorneys will be able to couple that with other legal instances, Petraeus, Clinton, Berger, the sock drawer case, and everything, and combine that to show that this was a politicized prosecution.

00:09:15.000 So if we have a judge who's going to hold her ground, I think it's going to come to an end before a jury ever sees it, or it should.

00:09:21.000 Yeah, but realistically, you think that a judge is going to dismiss these charges on, I mean, look, the Trump legal team is going to do motions to dismiss.

00:09:30.000 Mark Levin made a great point, though, is that the amount of pressure for top-level lawyers not to take this case is significant.

00:09:39.000 So a boutique law firm is probably going to end up taking this.

00:09:42.000 They have thousands of documents to go through, hundreds of witnesses.

00:09:47.000 Just the manpower, Cash, to figure out this maze, this thicket, this thorny labyrinth is going to be thousands of billable hours, right?

00:10:00.000 And of motions that dismiss.

00:10:02.000 Do you agree with that?

00:10:03.000 No.

00:10:04.000 You need three solid lawyers.

00:10:05.000 You need a national security guy.

00:10:06.000 You need a classified information procedures act guy.

00:10:09.000 And you need a litigator.

00:10:10.000 I handle these cases with much less.

00:10:12.000 You can do it.

00:10:13.000 They don't need a big giant law firm.

00:10:18.000 Nefarious, the number one movie on Salem Now is available to rent today.

00:10:22.000 Nefarious is like a modern day screw tape letters ripping back the curtain on evil.

00:10:27.000 Pastor Jack Hibbs says the movie, quote, captures what is going on today in America.

00:10:31.000 Jim Caviesel, who played Jesus in the Passion of the Christ, loves this movie so much, he watched it three times in just five days and says it's one of the most important films of the last decade.

00:10:41.000 Matt Walsh, the filmmaker behind What Is a Woman, calls it excellent.

00:10:44.000 Dinesh D'Souza calls it captivating, suspenseful, and profound.

00:10:48.000 Jack Pasobic says it will knock your socks off and you will not stop thinking about it.

00:10:51.000 Father Martins from The Exorcist Films calls it excellent.

00:10:54.000 You've probably heard friends talk about Nefarious because it is that good.

00:10:57.000 Sean Patrick Flannery and Jordan Belfie give Oscar-level performances in this movie based on the book by Steve Dace.

00:11:04.000 You do not want to miss Nefarious.

00:11:05.000 Visit Salem Now or your favorite video platform to rent it today, even though it's still in theaters.

00:11:10.000 If you want to rent for your church or a large group, visit movienight.com to rent it today.

00:11:17.000 All right.

00:11:17.000 So, Cash, tomorrow, Donald Trump will be arraigned.

00:11:20.000 What is the timeline here?

00:11:22.000 What are you thinking?

00:11:24.000 Should Donald Trump really push for a quicker trial?

00:11:27.000 Should he try to stretch this out?

00:11:30.000 What are your thoughts?

00:11:31.000 I mean, politically, I think he may want to get this thing wrapped up and shown that it's a fraud as early as possible.

00:11:38.000 But in order to do that, he's going to have to file some extensive pretrial motions, not just to dismiss.

00:11:43.000 You can't go to the dismissal right away.

00:11:46.000 You have to build a case for the causes of corruption that are built in.

00:11:49.000 And I did an exclusive about Karen Gilbert, the deputy special counsel, who I actually tried cases against in the Southern District of Florida, who's the Weissman of this case, who was caught by a judge unlawfully wiretapping a defense attorney's recorded conversations during a prosecution and was throttled by the district court.

00:12:07.000 Go to the Ollie Shagan case.

00:12:09.000 She's running this disaster. 1.00

00:12:11.000 She's the reason the case went to Miami. 1.00

00:12:13.000 I think they need to challenge that.

00:12:15.000 I need to challenge the Jay Bratt allegation that he dangled a judgeship in front of a lawyer for a codefendant.

00:12:20.000 And I think they need to look at all of Jack Smith's underlying activities.

00:12:25.000 And they need to challenge the breaking of attorney-client privilege under the crime fraud exception where Donald Trump is shown to have been discussing options with his attorney.

00:12:36.000 And if that's the case and that's allowed to stand, then no more counsel can ever consult with their clients and tell them what their options are, yes or no.

00:12:45.000 And so I think there's a multitude of people.

00:12:48.000 Again, I'm a layman in this stuff and I think I share the confusion with our audience.

00:12:54.000 Piercing the attorney-client privilege is something that is so, from my understanding, rare and dangerous.

00:13:02.000 Cash, have you ever, as a prosecutor, were you ever able to pierce that veil?

00:13:07.000 No.

00:13:08.000 And I was glad as a public defender when prosecutors tried to pierce it against me that it never happened. 0.92

00:13:13.000 And the judge that did it in this case is the chief judge, or I think the former chief judge in the District of Columbia, who basically has this case rigged against Donald Trump from junk.

00:13:23.000 But the judge that was assigned the case in Miami can review those decisions and the evidence.

00:13:28.000 And I think they need to bring a pretty powerful motion on that right away.

00:13:33.000 Yeah.

00:13:33.000 I mean, so, but what does the law say about that?

00:13:36.000 I mean, the United States Constitution guarantees attorney-client privilege.

00:13:42.000 Yeah, you're absolutely right.

00:13:43.000 And it's almost resolute.

00:13:45.000 And the only instance where it can't is say, Charlie, I'm your lawyer and you come to me or I go to you and I'm like, hey, we should go kill this guy down the street.

00:13:52.000 And you're like, yeah, I'll give you 20 grand for that.

00:13:54.000 The crime fraud exception comes in to say, these guys architected a crime together.

00:13:59.000 The attorney-client privilege can no longer stand.

00:14:01.000 So that makes sense.

00:14:02.000 But if you were my client and you were like, what are my options?

00:14:07.000 Where I'm like, well, you could pay someone off.

00:14:08.000 Don't do that.

00:14:09.000 That's illegal.

00:14:10.000 You really want to stay clear of that kind of stuff.

00:14:12.000 And then you could ask, you could even ask me, what are your options as the attorney on this case?

00:14:17.000 Discussing those things are what is sacrimonious about the attorney client privilege.

00:14:23.000 So it's one of those things that I think was done for political reasons.

00:14:28.000 I appeared before this judge in D.C. You could clearly see what her leanings were on this case.

00:14:34.000 Yeah, this is something that's really bothering me and troubling me.

00:14:40.000 And so, but let me understand this.

00:14:42.000 Hillary Clinton's lawyer is actually the one that destroyed the emails and destroyed the classified information.

00:14:48.000 Why were we not able to pierce the attorney-client privilege in that case?

00:14:52.000 You're exactly right.

00:14:53.000 I mean, that's just it.

00:14:55.000 These double standards are starting to come out.

00:14:57.000 And why was Hillary Clinton not charged under the National Defense Information Act for actually being grossly negligent with her attorney by destroying evidence and having classified information on an unlawful server that she communicated with people to include the current and the government never got their stuff back? 0.99

00:15:16.000 This is important.

00:15:17.000 Hillary Clinton made things permanently disappear. 0.51

00:15:21.000 Based on everything that we have available, the government was able to get stuff back.

00:15:25.000 In fact, there is other, you know, harder to prove evidence, but let's just say circumstantial, that Hillary Clinton might have used all this classified stuff in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

00:15:35.000 Yeah.

00:15:36.000 I mean, it's very possible because we have massive capital inflows from foreign countries that are otherwise inexplicable.

00:15:42.000 Final thoughts, Cash.

00:15:43.000 You're absolutely right.

00:15:44.000 I think the two-tier system of justice is what I've told President Trump to highlight, which I think is starting to come out heavily, whether it's January 6th, Russia Gay, the documents case, Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton, Clinton Sock drawer, Sandy Berger, General Petreus, what have you.

00:15:57.000 Americans are starting to realize I don't want to be prosecuted by this weaponized DOJ and FBI because I believe in conservative values.

00:16:06.000 And the middle of America is starting to realize that that could creep over to them too.

00:16:10.000 And I'm going to win.

00:16:13.000 Kash Patel, check out his book, GovernmentGangsters.com.

00:16:16.000 Cash, thank you so much.

00:16:17.000 Thanks a lot.

00:16:20.000 Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here.

00:16:21.000 Every day, the parallel economy grows bigger and bigger.

00:16:24.000 It's powered by everyday Americans who are sick and tired of all the woke nonsense being jammed into every product they consume.

00:16:30.000 Big mobile companies are no different.

00:16:33.000 For years, they've been dumping millions into left-wing causes, and we had to take it because you need a cell phone and probably thought that there was no alternative, but there is.

00:16:41.000 Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.

00:16:45.000 They proudly offer dependable nationwide coverage on all three major networks. 1.00

00:16:49.000 Stop using woke wireless as they fund Pride Month and all this stuff.

00:16:53.000 When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending a message that you support free speech, religious liberty, the sanctity of life, Second Amendment, and our military veterans and first responder heroes.

00:17:02.000 Their 100% U.S.-based customer service team makes switching easy.

00:17:05.000 Just go to patriotmobile.com/slash Charlie or call 878-PATRIOT, get free activation today with the offer code Charlie.

00:17:11.000 Ask about their coverage guarantee while you're there.

00:17:14.000 Get the same dependable service and take a stand for your values and make the switch today.

00:17:17.000 PatriotMobile.com/slash Charlie or call them at 878-PATRIOT.

00:17:23.000 Joining us now, Marjorie Taylor Green, who gave a great speech at our Young Women's Leadership Summit.

00:17:30.000 Congresswoman, welcome back to the program.

00:17:32.000 Thanks so much, Charlie.

00:17:33.000 And I have to tell you, that was the best conference.

00:17:36.000 There were so many young women, and I was so impressed with many of them. 0.69

00:17:41.000 And it was very good to see.

00:17:43.000 I really enjoyed it.

00:17:45.000 Well, thank you.

00:17:46.000 So I want to dive into some of your remarks there, but first I want to clear up just some of the confusion from our audience.

00:17:51.000 Tell us about your vote on the debt ceiling, why you voted on it, and because our audience is asking about it, and we'll go from there.

00:17:56.000 Yeah, thank you for asking about that.

00:17:58.000 I don't know if many people saw the news articles, but when I came to Washington that week for the debt ceiling, I had called it a basically a crap sandwich, but I used another word.

00:18:10.000 It was something I never wanted to vote on.

00:18:12.000 And I was having a really hard time with it and understanding the bill.

00:18:16.000 But I spent a lot of time talking with Thomas Massey, who has the most fiscally conservative voting record in Congress.

00:18:24.000 And I vote just like Thomas Massey most of the time.

00:18:28.000 And talking with Thomas Massey, there's a plan in the debt ceiling bill that allows us to use appropriations the way they're meant to be used.

00:18:36.000 It separates the appropriations into 12 separate bills, which is extremely important.

00:18:42.000 That stops an omnibus bill.

00:18:44.000 And if Congress cannot approve 12 separate appropriation bills, it automatically goes into a CR, a continuing resolution that continues funding, except it cuts 1% of the government.

00:18:57.000 So that's a 1% cut in spending after already an agreed-upon $1.5 trillion cut in spending.

00:19:04.000 Those are the only things in the bill that I thought were important.

00:19:08.000 And I agreed with Thomas Massey on voting for that for a plan because we need to use appropriations.

00:19:14.000 That's the only tool we have to fight against the weaponized government. 0.96

00:19:19.000 And I want to go ahead and announce on your show, I just tweeted it out a little while ago, that I'm writing an appropriations rider to defund special counsel Jack Smith's office and investigation.

00:19:31.000 And I refuse to vote for any appropriation bills that fund the weaponized government or things like the FBI's new headquarters in Virginia.

00:19:40.000 This is the way that Republicans can fight, and I'm committed to using appropriations for that battle.

00:19:45.000 Which will be a bigger headquarters than the Pentagon, just to be clear.

00:19:51.000 We now have a domestic police headquarters that would be nicer and better furnished than the Pentagon really makes you think about the priorities of our government.

00:20:02.000 Okay, I want to play a piece of tape here, Congresswoman, of your remarks at our turning point USA Young Women's Leadership Summit, Play Cut 12.

00:20:09.000 You're told you can't say things like this, and I'm going to say it. 0.60

00:20:12.000 I just drove up to here at the Gay Lord, and I saw three flags.

00:20:16.000 And one of the flags, which was just as big as the other ones, our United States flag, the Texas flag, was the rainbow flag. 1.00

00:20:24.000 Shame on them. 0.97

00:20:26.000 Shame on them for hanging that flag out there. 0.99

00:20:30.000 Because it shouldn't be about what people do sexually that causes us to hang a flag somewhere.

00:20:37.000 The only flags, the only flags that should ever be hung should be our United States flag, and it's big and beautiful in the back of this room and a state flag. 1.00

00:20:49.000 So shame on the gay Lord. 1.00

00:20:51.000 Yep. 0.99

00:20:52.000 Now that's, of course, pushed by Marriott Corporate.

00:20:55.000 We did our best to try to get it removed and we failed.

00:20:58.000 So any thought, and you want to elaborate?

00:21:00.000 By the way, this is not an isolated incident, Congresswoman.

00:21:03.000 The Biden White House had the gay flag prominently displayed this weekend.

00:21:09.000 We could pull that up, where it wasn't just the gay flag, it was the trans flag, new one, with the American flag playing second and third fiddle.

00:21:18.000 So we could put this up on screen. 0.56

00:21:20.000 The gay flag had prominence to the American flag flanking it.

00:21:25.000 Your thoughts, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene?

00:21:28.000 Absolutely.

00:21:29.000 I called them out because the pride movement is not about rights for gay people anymore.

00:21:36.000 That has been totally determined for a very long time.

00:21:39.000 Every single American has equal rights.

00:21:42.000 They have the equal right to vote, equal right to be able to buy a home, to have a job if they qualify for job qualifications, get an education, and so much more in America.

00:21:52.000 But that flag that you're showing there that the White House and Joe Biden prominently displays is more important than the United States American flag has become a symbol of aggression.

00:22:03.000 And it's an aggression in a type of form that should be concerning to all Americans.

00:22:08.000 And it is to most Americans.

00:22:10.000 This is a sexual agenda.

00:22:12.000 And it's the sexualizing of children, grooming children to believe a complete lie, that they can change their gender. 0.98

00:22:19.000 And the sexualization and grooming of children to train children to believe that the way they have sex when they get old enough to have sex is how that should identify them as a person is the most perverted. 0.99

00:22:33.000 It's abhorrent. 0.99

00:22:34.000 It's evil.

00:22:35.000 And it's an attack on our children who are the most innocent among us.

00:22:39.000 And I'm completely disgusted with this. 1.00

00:22:41.000 And, you know, I call on many people in the gay community.

00:22:45.000 I call on them to stand against this because their movement has been hijacked.

00:22:52.000 And last night, Charlie, I'll finish up one more thing.

00:22:55.000 In the night last night where I live in Washington, D.C., late into the night, all I heard was the crowd all around, all over the streets, having the Pride Festival continuing on.

00:23:08.000 And when I had to drive back to my condo yesterday, I witnessed so much of it as we drove through it all.

00:23:16.000 I mean, I even saw one woman that had no pants on. 1.00

00:23:20.000 And this is where families were.

00:23:22.000 There were children present.

00:23:23.000 And I mean, you've seen the videos.

00:23:25.000 They're all over Twitter and how disgusting this is.

00:23:28.000 This has nothing to do with equal rights.

00:23:31.000 This is a movement that has been hijacked and It is being used to push the worst sexual perversion that we have ever seen in modern day history.

00:23:42.000 And I'm calling it modern day Sodom Gomorrah.

00:23:45.000 Modern day Sodom and Gomorrah, Media Matters, make sure you quote that one.

00:23:49.000 You know, it's interesting you say that there is no such thing as a secular society.

00:23:52.000 I use that sometimes.

00:23:54.000 There will be something that replaces whatever religion used to exist.

00:23:58.000 If it was Judeo-Christian values or Christianity, people are not going to believe in nothing.

00:24:02.000 They need symbols.

00:24:03.000 They need traditions.

00:24:05.000 They need rituals.

00:24:06.000 It's part of who we are as a species. 0.99

00:24:09.000 And so you remove Christianity, you remove the country. 0.86

00:24:12.000 Yeah, you're going to replace it with pagan pleasure, which is what Pride Month is all about. 0.56

00:24:17.000 And they say it's all just about celebrating love.

00:24:19.000 And I mean, we have some grotesque images we could throw up there, but the Biden regime, again, this is not some sort of fringe thing.

00:24:26.000 This is not just some sort of thing that happens in some sort of strange gay bar at 2 a.m. in San Francisco.

00:24:34.000 This is your government, right?

00:24:36.000 There's some images right there.

00:24:38.000 This is your government, not just our government.

00:24:40.000 It looks like the German government and 10 Downing Street is also with the trappings there.

00:24:47.000 I know we have you only for one segment because you have to go vote, Congresswoman.

00:24:50.000 I want your reaction on Donald Trump.

00:24:53.000 Do you believe Donald Trump is gaining popularity in the Republican primary?

00:24:57.000 What are you hearing from the grassroots?

00:24:59.000 Well, I tell you what, I think that President Trump has had their support all along.

00:25:04.000 The base never left him, ever.

00:25:07.000 But the weaponization of government and what we're seeing coming out of the Department of Justice with communist tactics that we've witnessed for several years now is appalling to so many people that not only has it solidified his support among the base, but he is pulling support among independents, even Democrats, and those Republicans that were supporting other candidates like Ron DeSantis and others.

00:25:30.000 And so this is so unreal to me.

00:25:33.000 You know, like I said, I've announced today that I'm writing an appropriations writer to defund Jack Smith's special counsel, but we need to go further.

00:25:43.000 What I read on the 1023 form on Friday of last week that has clear evidence that Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe in order to get Victor Shokin fired, the prosecutor in Ukraine that was investigating Burisma.

00:26:00.000 This is to a point where I think it's all hands on deck.

00:26:04.000 We must impeach Joe Biden.

00:26:06.000 We have enough evidence.

00:26:08.000 It's unbelievable.

00:26:09.000 The people support it and everyone sees it clear as day.

00:26:13.000 But President Trump is innocent.

00:26:15.000 The people know it.

00:26:16.000 And I firmly believe that he will win the presidential election, not just the primary, but the general in 2024.

00:26:23.000 Marjorie Taylor Greene, I know you have to go vote.

00:26:26.000 Thank you so much for your leadership and we'll talk to you soon.

00:26:28.000 Thank you.

00:26:29.000 Thanks so much, Charlie.

00:26:33.000 All right.

00:26:33.000 Apparently, I'm trending on Twitter.com, which so it's very funny.

00:26:41.000 Oh, how many tweets do I have?

00:26:43.000 That's not even that much.

00:26:44.000 So, you know, Andrew sends me this thing a couple hours ago.

00:26:47.000 He says, Charlie, you're trending on Twitter.

00:26:49.000 And you know, you live a busy, full life, a deep life when you say, for what?

00:26:55.000 Because you can't quite pinpoint it.

00:26:57.000 Was it the rant I did on Friday?

00:27:00.000 Was it the tweet?

00:27:01.000 Was it the Unibomber tweet, which was really good, where we said that the Unibomber flirted with becoming a trans person?

00:27:08.000 You see that, Ryan?

00:27:09.000 I didn't use the word a trans person.

00:27:13.000 No, no. 0.59

00:27:14.000 Apparently, I'm trending on Twitter for not for basically telling young women that they should prayfully consider getting married and having children. 0.88

00:27:24.000 This is what the regime chattering class on Twitter is so fired up about.

00:27:31.000 Can't say that.

00:27:31.000 So let's play the clip that is now going viral.

00:27:35.000 Can't say that. 0.99

00:27:36.000 You must tell young girls to freeze their eggs, have cats, drink as much wine as possible, have a bunch of gay friends, and do not have boyfriends. 0.98

00:27:46.000 Cannot say anything else but that. 0.98

00:27:48.000 Okay, what tape is this?

00:27:49.000 Play cut one of the wildly controversial clip that is going viral.

00:27:54.000 Play cut one.

00:27:55.000 In my personal opinion, you should enter the serious dating pool earlier than not, right?

00:28:01.000 I'm talking 22, 23, 24.

00:28:04.000 This whole idea of putting your career first, I think is a very, very dangerous proposition.

00:28:08.000 It could work out for you, but I hear stories every day.

00:28:11.000 Charlie, I decided to go become a partner at a law firm, and now I'm 32 years old, and I can't find anyone because all the good ones are gone.

00:28:18.000 There is some truth to quote unquote, the good ones being gone.

00:28:22.000 The window does narrow.

00:28:24.000 And so I think you should prioritize what do I want most in my life.

00:28:28.000 And if that thing is the best thing that I think a human being can do, which is to get married and have kids, then you should do that with clear intentionality.

00:28:36.000 That's it.

00:28:37.000 By the way, I was pretty non-judgmental.

00:28:39.000 I said, if this, if you want to do the greatest thing human beings can do, by the way, outside of worship of the Lord, it is the commandment to be fruitful and multiply.

00:28:48.000 Yeah, I mean, if you want to just put your career first and all that, there's a cost to everything in life.

00:28:53.000 And the cost is you could become a partner at a law firm and be a cat person.

00:28:57.000 We have an obligation in our public commentary to tell the truth.

00:29:05.000 Real life has trade-offs and choices.

00:29:07.000 People who say it doesn't are lying to you.

00:29:10.000 You have the agency to make the decision.

00:29:14.000 But how often are young women on these campuses told about the beauty of getting married and having kids? 0.98

00:29:22.000 No, they're taught about abortion culture, free sex on demand, and how men are awful and evil.

00:29:28.000 We try to help women with the truth.

00:29:30.000 And the truth is this, that getting married and having children is a beautiful thing.

00:29:35.000 It is the greatest thing a human being can do. 0.79

00:29:41.000 Liars are evil.

00:29:42.000 And the secular society that is attacking us and just the kind of pleasure-seeking society, how dare Charlie Kirk tell people not to pursue their career? 0.87

00:29:52.000 Well, it comes at a cost.

00:29:54.000 It comes at a price.

00:29:55.000 Maybe it's a price that you're willing to take.

00:29:59.000 But what do you want to live?

00:30:01.000 What do you want to leave behind?

00:30:05.000 By the way, deep down, people want to be married.

00:30:11.000 They want to have kids.

00:30:14.000 And let me be very clear.

00:30:15.000 I was very supportive of people and their dreams.

00:30:18.000 I was really kind of neutral, also honest, though.

00:30:22.000 I didn't play into like the boss babe thing.

00:30:26.000 I was just being strategic about how you might have to time it out and you might have to also date with intentionality.

00:30:34.000 I suppose that is wildly controversial.

00:30:38.000 So there's this tape that is now going viral of this young lady who is complaining that she can't find any liberal men.

00:30:48.000 She says, all the men that are masculine, I want to date are conservative.

00:30:54.000 Well, yeah, obviously.

00:30:57.000 To have a masculine liberal man is a walking contradiction.

00:31:01.000 It just not really something I find much of.

00:31:05.000 I'm sure they exist somewhere and then eventually they'll become more conservative.

00:31:08.000 Ideas matter.

00:31:11.000 And their ideas are so bad, you eventually become a beta, which is the furthest extra.

00:31:16.000 It is the end result of Postmodern liberalism, which is have to take, you know, eat a bunch of soy, get my testosterone levels down, can't be too disagreeable, toxic masculinity. 0.91

00:31:32.000 When deep down, women want to be led. 1.00

00:31:35.000 And this young lady, it's too bad we don't have the tape, but there, she's fired up. 1.00

00:31:38.000 She can't find masculine liberals.

00:31:44.000 Thanks so much for listening.

00:31:46.000 Everybody, email us your thoughts as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.

00:31:49.000 Thanks so much for listening, and God bless.

00:31:54.000 For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.

The Charlie Kirk Show - June 12, 2023

Trump in Court: Go Fast or Take it Slow? with Kash Patel and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript