Adverse Event Statistical Manipulation in AstraZeneca Phase III Trial ｜ A Critical Compass Clip
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
145.80003
Summary
In this episode, we talk about the latest in the anti-depressant jab trial, the controversy surrounding it, and why we should be worried about it. We also talk about what we should do about the lack of transparency in the study, and if it was really as bad as it appears, we should all be fired.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
i i find that really upsetting um but this is where i also say like the thing about it is is
00:00:09.800
they in those uh what was it 66 or 62 deaths um and even the you know the 33 inside of the placebo
00:00:17.800
as because these were aborted fetuses as they weren't considered into the death counts
00:00:24.980
they weren't a part of that a spontaneous abortion and when it comes to a clinical trial
00:00:32.100
where we're trying to figure out if this is going to harm women that are having babies
00:00:37.160
that are under the age of 50 then there should be a lot more information that kind of comes around
00:00:44.220
this instead of this is a bullshit summary the the 21,587 is offensive because that that is not an
00:00:54.120
accident yeah not all 21,587 people got the jabs two jabs anyways and yeah not not all the people
00:01:04.640
that were inside of the women's group could have had babies yeah reading through this i i look at this
00:01:10.560
and that 21,587 shows up when it's convenient to show up as the largest number to divide by
00:01:18.700
and that this is just outright just diluting the statistics yeah yeah well it's so obvious i mean
00:01:26.120
like no no no legitimate study would be presented like that where it's 90 of it is is column a versus
00:01:33.040
column b and then you invert it when the when the statistics start to look inconvenient right
00:01:36.860
that's it this this whole thing was to stop covid right like that's that's the reason that they came
00:01:46.880
out with the jabs that's the reason that they were doing these studies does it stop covid well if
00:01:53.080
people still got covid after it and people still died of covid pneumonia then the answer is no what
00:01:58.160
the fuck is the rest of the study for right it doesn't work you know it doesn't work yeah so they
00:02:05.560
talked about reducing in you know in certain severities and mortalities sorry go ahead sorry
00:02:12.000
sheldon did you know the the second and third uh rows of these of these statistics do you know
00:02:19.620
how they define uh what is causally related or not
00:02:23.840
do they say that anywhere how how they define what is causally related to the treatment or otherwise
00:02:33.200
no they don't they don't describe it but if you look at um all of the all of the the breakdown of
00:02:42.480
these things they they said that there's nothing causally related to uh to the jab so it always shows
00:02:49.000
up as a zero over all right yeah another another convenient statistical manipulation hey and yeah and
00:02:55.740
deaths causally related you know so occurrences and deaths causally related it always shows up as
00:03:01.060
no the chaps didn't cause this yeah sure it sure the statistics don't look that good coronary artery
00:03:08.600
disease and again this is one that's that's a big one so 25 people got cad um you know which was
00:03:18.120
0.12 and only 0.05 so again i think the 0.05 is probably pretty close to baseline keeping in mind
00:03:26.300
that not all of our subjects were all together that healthy to begin with uh cad again a consumption
00:03:31.820
related disease right um so it seems high it to me it just seems really high also there's zeros across
00:03:44.600
the board like i'm noticing we've gone through more of these cases they're not willing to admit
00:03:51.540
a single a scene like they're all zeros of how many occurrences are causally related they're not
00:03:59.260
willing to even admit a single relationship yeah yeah that in any that's exactly what they're saying
00:04:06.040
sure these people got it but it 100 wasn't caused by the thing that's causing all the other things
00:04:10.860
but again you know what i what i wanted to point out and you know after i come through you know the the
00:04:15.780
things that seemed a little bit more alarming to me is that um the number of people uh that that
00:04:22.260
completed dose two was only 20,770 not 21,587 the number of people that actually completed the trial
00:04:29.500
was 16,099 so like the as far as i'm concerned this i'd fire every one of these motherfuckers i would
00:04:39.380
because this is terrible like it's sloppy work um you know track how hard is it to track like it's
00:04:46.860
i'm sure that they're all using a database something that has a spreadsheet it's pretty easy to sort that
00:04:52.440
shit out sort that shit out you've got patient numbers you know some sort of identifiers on these
00:04:58.620
people that they could have whittled it down into the actual full study of being only 16,099 people
00:05:05.860
which you know that that might be it might be generous of you as well to to believe that
00:05:11.580
the uh the people who actually published this report had any interest whatsoever in actually