Edmonton City Council's "Show & Tell" Public Engagement w⧸Jason Bale
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
189.5589
Summary
In this episode, I sit down with City Councilman Mike Bloomberg to discuss the city's lack of engagement with the public, the apathy that plagues the community, and what the city can do about it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
well first of all how do you address the apathy side of things is that like is there an engagement
00:00:09.640
piece and like what do we do to kind of get that turned around so i think you kind of nailed it
00:00:15.580
there with that engagement piece and over the years the city's approach to public engagement
00:00:21.300
has become more show and tell rather than a two-way conversation and this was one of the
00:00:26.480
things that i noticed actually during covid with michael's park there was some first place housing
00:00:30.940
going in now first place housing the program intent is not bad i actually don't disagree with it
00:00:37.000
it didn't achieve the outcomes it was looking for uh and it's it was taking away green space from
00:00:43.740
the community so why are we taking away this this desired green space to put in something that does
00:00:49.260
that we know doesn't work and right during covid they were trying to to hold or to use covid as a
00:00:58.080
reason to not do public engagement and so i drafted them a nasty letter and i signed mike's name to it
00:01:05.440
and i made him read it and made him ink it and um but it was like look when it came to the lrt uh
00:01:12.820
construction you didn't listen to the to the residents of michael park michael's park when it
00:01:17.180
came to the christopher's pub development when they wanted four eight now 12 stories you didn't
00:01:22.600
listen to them when you asked them about first place housing you said do you want one or two units
00:01:26.560
and they said well we don't want any nice and then you came back and said well you get three complexes
00:01:31.180
then when it was the uh the public engagement for the the epcor drainage in the area and the dry ponds
00:01:37.800
you were asking them you know what's important to them they prioritize green space and then you still put
00:01:42.820
in these um these programs when you asked them about transit service they said yes transit's
00:01:47.480
important to us then you took off all the transit off of the uh 76th street there so they're not
00:01:53.940
engaging because it doesn't matter what they say you're not listening to them and you're demonstrating
00:02:00.000
that day-to-day and that needs to change uh so uh and in the letter i said absolutely absolutely not
00:02:08.160
are you skipping this uh um public engagement you will find a way to do it virtually you will
00:02:13.520
postpone it you will do something or we will make a motion to make you do it so do you think that uh
00:02:20.520
like what are the what are the barriers there like is it something where um the city has a plan and they
00:02:26.940
kind of already know what they're going to do and they're just doing this as lip service or is there
00:02:30.360
are there competing interests that come in like if they you know they'll they'll they'll do the the
00:02:35.480
engagement in earnest but when the answer comes back and something that might go against what
00:02:39.620
you know a a contractor might envision the contractor's you know desire overrides the
00:02:45.620
community like what what is the barrier there so i think it's a little bit of both uh for example the
00:02:51.060
the speed limit reductions that's a one that everyone knows about that they went down to 40
00:02:55.160
so when that result came the survey question went out do you want residential roadway speed limits to
00:03:01.020
be 50 40 or 30 and most people the it was pretty evenly split three ways but the winner was 50
00:03:10.020
kilometers an hour and they interpreted that as most people don't want 50 kilometers an hour so let's
00:03:15.700
compromise at 40 uh you know they knew what they wanted and then they just found a way to to
00:03:20.520
interpret the results so right it's it's a matter of uh of uh just wording the questions in such a way
00:03:27.920
that you shockingly you always get to the answer that you want