00:00:00.000okay so I've got five questions one and each question I will ask for the audience to respond
00:00:09.720as well no I can't see you with all the lights so and I don't want to have an unruly discussion but
00:00:15.480I will ask Keith I'll start with Keith I'll go to Bill and then I'll ask the audience to answer
00:00:20.400the question as well and that's in the interest of free speech and making sure that we are in
00:00:25.080fact ready to listen and that one of the issues we have in Canada is the US is
00:00:30.420very arrogant very big and often very influential over our thinking and are
00:00:35.580doing Canadians are really good at ready aim did I make my point that's our
00:00:44.200dilemma is we're great thinkers we're great preparers are great cogitators
00:00:48.060great brains great universities we're not particularly strong on action and I
00:00:52.180I am expecting a phone call, by the way, before we break that'll bring something to the table that I think you'll all appreciate.
00:00:58.240But I'll hold on to that and hopefully not interfere with your appetite.
00:01:02.420So my first question to you, Keith, is, is Alberta's dissatisfaction primarily about federal policies, fiscal arrangements, inadequate political influence, or a deeper incompatibility with the rest of Canada?
00:01:16.300What could independence achieve that reform cannot?
00:02:31.380our sophistication, we've outgrown the need to have Ottawa tell us how to do things.
00:02:39.720there's no reason for it anymore and because we have one house of commons that makes all the
00:02:49.160decisions in areas of federal jurisdiction and for the reasons i mentioned earlier whereby
00:02:55.500the population skew is to ontario and quebec and will always be that way they will always be the
00:03:02.280ones telling alberta what we can and can't do there was a political scientist that commented
00:03:07.280and studied this phenomena around the world where you have a concentration of people within a
00:03:13.940country in one place that can tell the periphery what to do and what not to do and there tends to
00:03:20.000be a historical pattern of exploitation where they treat that area as a colony take things from it
00:03:27.060and rule over it and that's essentially what we have here in Alberta today with our relationship
00:03:32.340with ottawa and my view is it doesn't need to be that way we can reform our constitutional
00:03:38.960relationship so that we're electing the officials our politicians here and and on the full range of
00:03:48.760topics instead of having some of the topics and the powers in ottawa so but you're taking it to
00:03:55.080the extreme of separation and saying that that power will reside within a nation yes but why
00:04:00.620not i didn't say yes or no i'm just no no that's that's fair fair enough fair enough my apologies
00:04:04.940um my wife told me i had to be nicer today than i was last night so i'm gonna try really hard
00:04:10.920because she's in the audience and i don't want to get in trouble the point that i hear you making
00:04:14.140is we will increase our sovereignty the capacity yeah well what reason you know i would turn it
00:04:19.040around it's a great point is what good reason is there you know people will often say um if
00:04:25.860Alberta were a country today and Ottawa came and said, hey, would you join Canada? We're going to
00:04:34.000take all these powers, these specific powers from you, and you're going to send additional $20 to
00:04:39.720$30 billion a year. Hey, we're not going to say, hey, where can we sign? Okay, so we're pursuing
00:04:46.340increased independence to affect the decisions that are affecting us. Yeah, and redefining our
00:04:52.140relationship with the rest of Canada I'm gonna I'm gonna pose a structural
00:04:55.440option to you in a minute but sure I'm gonna turn to Bill Bill's position I
00:04:58.920won't say sitting on the fence we talked about that he doesn't sit on the fence
00:05:02.400but he's of the view that we need to prepare whether we leave or whether we
00:05:06.340stay there are things that Alberta needs to do in order to increase its
00:05:10.080sovereignty as well so tell us a little bit of what the preparations and I know
00:05:13.620you've written a document on preparing so there may be some overlap here yeah
00:05:18.420Thank you. I just want to go to Keith's point there about the formation of this country.
00:05:24.900It's important. I use a little analogy. Earth gets together and says, you know, we need to go to the
00:05:30.040moon and take its resources and pull it back to Earth for the earthlings to use for their prosperity.
00:05:35.840And that goes on for about 100 years. And we send people up there and they mine. And 100 years later,0.99
00:05:41.120the moonlings say, why are we doing that? Why are we shipping everything back to Earth?0.94
00:05:45.500and the earthlings will say that to them that's why we sent you and that's
00:05:50.540Western Canada if you read the charges to the negotiation for the treaties with
00:05:56.140the First Nations it is explicit there go to the West get the treaty so the
00:06:02.900resources are used by Canada and remember that Canada was upper and lower Canada
00:06:07.760that's the purpose we were to be a colony the resources were to go east so
00:06:14.240when we step up today and say we really don't like the deal you talk to people
00:06:18.320in Toronto and they say we'll just move to Toronto and that's the thing here
00:06:23.300when we talk about the Canada West relationship we're those moonlings and
00:06:28.880saying why the earth is saying that was your purpose so we have to keep that in
00:06:33.800mind when we're talking to Ottawa their mindset is completely different and the
00:06:37.760other thing about the creation of the Constitution we have to remember the
00:06:41.300plains of Abraham. The British beat the French, but the French outnumbered them hugely. And so
00:06:48.540the only way they caught the way the country could be peaceful is they gave a lot of power to the
00:06:53.600French, their own laws, their own language, their own culture. And that kept the peace of Canada
00:06:59.720for 150 years instead of constant civil war. So we can't go back and say the creation of Canada
00:07:05.560as flawed no it had trade-offs and the trade-offs was peace and a lot of power
00:07:11.140to a province and that's what we're fighting here and that's where I agree
00:07:15.460with Keith absolutely needs to be changed there's no reason it can't be changed
00:07:20.060it was once implemented now it can be altered the only question is is the
00:07:26.180Eastern Bloc willing to release political power with the result that the
00:07:31.960money will go lower. Now, if you're Canada, my deal to you is, hey, I need more power so I can
00:07:38.320send you less money. Are you going to even show up at the table? You're going to be happy with
00:07:42.580the status quo and you control it. So that's the real fight here. And this is where the movement
00:07:48.280needs to move to, is to the leverage. Unless there's a leverage that it costs more to Canada
00:07:55.740for Alberta to leave, then to stay in the status quo, then they'll show up with the table with a
00:08:02.900serious deal. And that's my point there. So where you both agree, and I haven't talked to you about
00:08:08.200this, Keith, and not at great length with you, Bill, is you're frustrated to the point that you
00:08:12.960don't believe that leadership is adequate. We need structural change. Yes. Yes. Yes. Okay. So that's
00:08:19.920a very important point, because that's ultimately the frustration. There are those that are watching
00:08:24.420canada today and the handshakes and the agreements that are being signed in the mous that seem to be
00:08:29.360endless uh that somehow things are getting better and that they're going to be getting we have to
00:08:34.460discuss what that changes and here's the other problem we have you know uh oh we're getting
00:08:40.020you pipelines so you have to be happy well the problem is there is a flip of a hand says no you
00:08:45.180don't and then a flip of a hand that says yes you do okay abhorrents are figuring this out
00:08:49.980they're saying who's running the hand they're starting to look at the arm and they're saying
00:08:54.000that arm is not ours but the flip of the hand it's arbitrary and that's what Albertans are
00:08:59.620getting tired of. You want to add anything there? Well this is one of my points about
00:09:03.520where I disagree with Premier Smith and some others is they're saying well look at the pipeline
00:09:09.060deal and I there's lots of really bad things about the pipeline deal and I'll just ignore that just
00:09:14.000assume it's all in all a good deal which I don't think it is but just assume that
00:09:17.140is we had the National Energy Program under Pierre Elliott Trudeau,
00:09:24.220and then we had a period of improvement,
00:09:28.400and we sent conservatives, we had the Reform Party,
00:09:31.100and then the realignment of conservatives, and we had Harper and others.
00:09:35.360But then we got the National Energy Program 2.0 with Justin Trudeau in 2015.
00:09:41.320and you know it's it's it's like having this um spouse that's violent and you have no idea when
00:09:51.720they're going to go off right like what as i've said recently in some interviews uh at in two you
00:10:00.320know three or four months from now you could have the quebec caucus of the liberal party
00:10:05.500change its mind and say, no, the tar sands must stay in the ground. And there would be nothing
00:10:13.900we can do about it here in Alberta. And to me, that's unacceptable. How long are we going to
00:10:19.160wait until we have yet another ridiculous policy imposed on us that's harmful? And we have0.92
00:10:24.740lingering policies that continue to be harmful and affect the affordability crisis for
00:10:29.880all of us, and particularly the younger generation related to deficits and so on.
00:10:34.340So my point is that even if one were to believe that it's true that things are getting slightly better now, the overall arrangement is still bad.
00:15:16.760so we know we've been watching statistics some of us are watching the polls ipsis poll in june
00:15:24.060talked about about an 18 interested in separation are likely to vote that way 72 percent the other
00:15:29.960way somehow or another we're not getting our message across what percentage it's a hard
00:15:35.320number to grab but maybe we could talk about the referendum and that one particular vote on whether
00:15:40.240or not we should begin to negotiate separation with ottawa what do we need to make a clear
00:15:45.900statement ottawa of the level of frustration and the consequences uh bill you want to jump in with
00:15:51.100a number or or address that that issue any number greater than zero it doesn't matter if the vote
00:15:58.220goes yes or no and it will go stay in canada that's a fact but it is and i'll have to credit
00:16:05.500this man right here keith wilson and this is one of the few things i mean it looks like we're
00:16:10.620agreeing up here but there's fundamental underneath that we do disagree so we'll get there
00:16:15.420but this i have to give kudos to to keith wilson and his team is it doesn't matter what that number
00:16:21.820is is that he's building on this particular issue on on the referendum even though he's going to lose
00:16:31.180because he's with all the work he's done and i've read his papers thank you very much for that
00:16:36.460yeah the plan is as far as i can see and evaluate is solid and what he's doing with that is he's
00:16:44.220moving the spotlight off the independence movement with all its chaos and the fun that's happening
00:16:50.540and you know all the rallies and the flags and the yelling and screaming and he's turning the
00:16:54.780spotlight toward canada because now he's got something he can actually put on the pay on the
00:16:59.900table we'll still talk about that but he does have something he put on the table and it has to be
00:17:05.660something that canada's got to respond to and he's moving that spotlight and that's what i think his
00:17:11.980greatest strength and what he's capable of doing and my hat's off to you sir thank you very much
00:17:20.780thank yous today are rare so that was very nice to see and anything you want to add there i mean
00:17:25.980he's basically complimented the point that that you've been making and the contributions you're
00:17:29.740making to canada by bringing this out into the open well you know uh two things one is
00:17:36.380what bill's referring to is the incredible work of over 48 experts in alberta that volunteered
00:17:41.740their time to prepare the Alberta Transition Council plan. You go to the albertatransitioncouncil.com
00:17:49.060website and see the plans and we have the transition plan for how Alberta can move from
00:17:54.380a province to a country, dealing with all the details as well as a costed plan as to
00:18:01.740what it would cost to make that transition. And we didn't get into the payment terms as
00:18:07.620to how many years we would expect the federal government to pay back the 600 billion dollars
00:18:13.980we've sent but that's a topic for another day um and and so on so so look at that but
00:18:21.200i think what's important you know one of the heated moments last night at the debate
00:18:27.480was pretty remarkable was when um one of the speakers marie uh had said
00:18:36.620we and and premier kenny foreign premier kenny reinforced it we you know this vote vote needs
00:18:43.300to be decisive and we need to end this separatist talk we need to end the separatists we need to
00:18:49.380end them it was like whoa i even asked her i i looked to the host i said are the mics hot she
00:18:56.160said no i said are the cameras still on she said no and i turned to her and i said so ending me0.50
00:19:03.040does that involve killing me or just putting me in a camp like it was just troubling to me that
00:19:09.040that she would say these things and what i said was to bill's point is that uh i said to the
00:19:17.400audience i said if the green party only got 10 in the election does that mean we should end any
00:19:25.920discussion about environmental protection policies if the new democratic party i said to the students
00:19:31.560and the live cameras if the new democratic party only gets 20 vote in an election does that mean
00:19:38.280we should end any discussion about organized labor and protecting worker rights so uh the genie's out
00:19:45.680of the bottle so to separate to separate is a response to the ultimate of frustration we've had
00:19:53.840and we're prepared to leave but there's a consequence there's a cost it's going
00:19:58.880to take something to get from here to there you've developed a prepare plan
00:20:02.120you've certainly thought about it what can you tell the audience the state
00:20:05.720people as well as the people that want to go what can you tell about the costs
00:20:09.380are going to be to get there not just dollars jobs confidence transition our
00:20:13.940youth well I honestly believe it'd be the best money we've ever spent and it's
00:20:23.780not clear to me you know objectively the analogy I use now that I finally come up with when I like
00:20:30.620the three of us go for lunch okay and we we look at the menu and we're all going to spend $20 each
00:20:37.880on lunch and before we order I put a hundred dollar bill on the table and then the bill comes
00:20:43.900and you guys look at the bill and you say Keith where's your $20 right that's essentially when
00:20:50.260you hear people say, oh, well, Alberta's per capita share of the debt. I'm like, we already
00:20:55.460put 600 billion in. Are you kidding me? And I realize it'll be more complex. But what the
00:21:02.400transition plan found is that most of the changes are administrative. So for example, the cats of
00:21:08.860people at the airport that tell you to take your laptop out and put it in a bin, but don't put your
00:21:13.780iPad in or unless it has a keyboard, you know, those guys. And oh my God, you got water. We got
00:21:19.540a water over here everybody's like oh my god a water um so those guys uh they're actually
00:21:29.060i thought they were federal government employees they're not not unhappy about this and just
00:21:33.500describing what i found out they're actually paladin security guards with out of vancouver
00:21:38.500that the company so the alberta government would go to palatin and say hey that contract you have
00:21:43.280with the federal government to have that guy make sure i don't bring a water onto the plane
00:21:46.600we want to assign that agreement we'll step in and honor it in the same terms
00:21:51.100what's the most difficult cost what's the one we really have to be aware of
00:21:54.860um the most difficult cost well i think the heaviest lift is going to be going to
00:22:02.160through all of the different agreements and arrangements that have to be ratified
00:22:06.080because we'd have to go to the united states and and ratify and develop a new trade agreement with
00:22:10.500them it would take time but i don't think a tremendous amount of time um and uh
00:22:16.540I think that in terms of line items, it would be military, for sure.
00:22:21.080That would be one of the biggest ones.
00:22:23.340But I honestly do believe, having looked as we have in this plan, at every single thing.
00:22:31.300We'd have to ratify the Chicago Accord so we can still, WestJet can, you can still go on your Cancun vacation, all that kind of stuff.
00:22:37.880So it's one of the things, I go through periods where I get very discouraged.
00:22:43.740and what always brings me around on independence is by every objective measure my kids your kids
00:22:51.720grandkids friends and neighbors will be better off in an independent Alberta and when I was getting
00:22:58.000pessimistic about the transition plan I remember I had an epiphany one day and I went you know what
00:23:04.320every single thing we found that needs to be addressed to do the transition is absolutely
00:23:10.140doable, and most of them are super easy. It's just an administrative change, changing where the boss
00:23:17.480is from Ottawa to Edmonton. You mentioned treaties. We have treaties with the indigenous population.
00:23:23.580One of the differences between Canada and the United States is how we resolve the expansion
00:23:30.680of our country through treaties rather than through violence and reservations. Bill, can we
00:23:36.240get through this I mean I have as a question can Alberta legitimately1.00
00:23:39.360determine its future without first securing indigenous consent no those
00:23:44.520treaties predate Alberta by a long margin and I know what Keith's argument
00:23:49.640is well the government over top of those treaties has changed a couple of times
00:23:53.820and the treaties remained and that's true but this is not the same this is a
00:23:59.640an actual break with the constitutional authority over 150 years that remain consistent from the
00:24:08.560beginning carrying the treaties. And I don't see how you can do that when Alberta independence
00:24:15.080come. You're breaking from that chain constitutional change. So no. Can it be done? Absolutely.
00:24:24.400Absolutely. But you have to engage the First Nations first. Now, the First Nations do not love Canada. That's a big mistake. They don't love Canada. They deal with them. And if the independence movement wants to move forward, they have to deal with them. But they're not. We're treating them in general, and I'm not saying necessarily Keith, treating them in general, it's a piece of paper that's transferred between one government and another. They aren't.1.00
00:24:51.400that's the missing engagement here and we've seen it come up with some of these
00:24:55.900court cases that's what they're hearing we're just you're saying we're not a
00:25:00.520transaction now is it partly on their side and not again I'm not speaking for
00:25:05.800First Nations I don't pretend that this is my own sincere belief is there's a
00:25:12.580part on them too they don't want to engage within Alberta because they don't
00:25:17.720see anything and this is going to be my argument going forward. Keith has a beautiful blueprint
00:25:23.560of a nice house that Albertans can move into. I look at and I say well looks pretty good and
00:25:29.000then I look up and I just see a field of mud and dirt. I say where's the house? He says well we can
00:25:35.320build it and not he's not necessarily saying it but a large part of the movement says and we can
00:25:40.680move in tomorrow. I'm saying there's no way there's no roof there's no walls there's not even a
00:25:47.240foundation and you're asking us to make a decision on middle of october that we can start negotiating
00:25:55.240moving in and i don't see a house that's my problem is i don't see the evidence for albert
00:26:01.240independence if we got it today we'd be a failed state for generations your great great grandchildren
00:26:07.560will be still suffering it and that's the problem okay what's the first thing you would do keith
00:26:13.800in order to address this to elevate the confidence of well only 18 percent or 23 cent want to go
00:26:20.280there what would we put in place first well first of all we're not voting for independence on the
00:26:25.96019th of october it's not on the ballot no sorry i don't accept that i don't accept that you're
00:26:33.000voting for the negotiation of it absolutely that's a that's it is negotiation i think that's clear
00:26:49.840To be precise, and I mean, I would agree with you that my hope is there is a negotiation arising from it.
00:26:56.600That's where the leverage concept comes in.
00:26:58.580But the question is, status quo, stay, or the Alberta government commenced the process to schedule a referendum on independence, right?
00:27:09.640And the federal government can say, have a nice day, I don't want to talk to you, but hopefully it would lead to negotiations.
00:27:15.540If the second vote is held and it's for independence, that then is where the mandatory negotiations have to start.
00:27:24.000But I want to go back to something you said as well about the House and looking up and seeing dirt, is that critics who are trying to scare us away from voting for option two on the 19th actually use the expression that we would need to start a new country from scratch.
00:27:47.800Some of the recent economic studies that have these doom and gloom numbers
00:27:51.400assume we would need to build new courthouses in Calgary and Edmonton.
00:27:55.860Have you guys seen the courthouses in Calgary and Edmonton?
00:27:58.780I mean, Edmonton's getting a little old, but Calgary's is beautiful,
00:30:28.020that that's that's called clarity that's good but they don't believe you well so let's speak
00:30:35.080so so they're there and you can't ignore that and i know i hear some oh yeah well who cares
00:30:40.720it's the who's they because i get first nations coming up to me all the time and say i'm furious
00:30:46.060with my chief there was no community vote i say well how does your community make a decision
00:30:49.740oh we bring oh sure and they say they've never done that it's only this many chiefs and you've
00:30:54.680got to ask, they're just favor-seeking from Ottawa. It's clear as day.
00:30:58.360They're going to be a road bump. They're going to be a roadblock.
00:31:03.420Sorry, Bill, I didn't hear you over the... They're going to be a roadblock.
00:31:06.220So you don't think the indigenous population would simply roll over and fall into place? Absolutely not.1.00
00:31:10.460Nobody's talking to them on the independent side. We're speculating on the future,
00:31:14.480but we're trying to get a picture. I wouldn't disagree with that, but I have to look at this as to
00:31:18.580what the facts are and what the law is and what the truth is and
00:31:22.300And whether they're ideologically opposed to independence, they're entitled to have that.
00:31:27.700But if the suggestion is this, that it's going to, with necessity, lead to a derogation of their rights, I reject that for the reasons I've given.
00:31:35.340Okay. I'm going to shift gears to the economy.
00:31:38.480I mean, Alberta is probably one of the few provinces that really focuses on the economy instead of a whole bunch of social issues.
00:31:46.260It's one of the features of this province is we are rich, agriculture, forestry, minerals as well, and of course our oil and gas.
00:31:54.440So the economy is critical for all of this discussion that we will have a thriving economy that we've all today have a lot of confidence in.
00:32:01.900How will our economy be affected should we elect to become more independent?
00:37:37.440and their hospitals and their schools and I'm worried about them and and it caused me to think
00:37:44.640and I and so my response is this um I think in my ideal vision and I realize it's I'm trying to
00:37:53.780I'm intentionally being visionary and so you can say I'm overly optimistic and that's fine
00:37:57.800is that what would happen is I think Alberta well first of all you know Ontario buys 39 billion
00:38:06.020worth of goods and services from Albertans and Alberta companies right now. We're their third
00:38:09.660most important customer. If we can unleash our economy, we could make that $50 billion and we
00:38:16.180can give more high-paying jobs to people in Ontario. That's a good thing. That's more money
00:38:22.000for them to pay for schools and education there. Now, one more point, because I realize I'm going
00:38:27.260along here is that i also believe that alberta as a country would have and this may be controversial
00:38:36.860an idea of foreign aid where we would send money to nova scotia to say hey we're going to help you
00:38:44.860build a hospital because right now we send all that money to ottawa and then they go oh we're
00:38:51.000going to do gender sensitivity training for peasant rice farmers in Vietnam. And so it would0.83
00:38:56.720force them, it would force them, it would force Ottawa to be more realistic, make more adult
00:39:04.480decisions, just like when someone gets told, you know, maybe kicked out of the house and said,
00:39:10.640you got to get your act together. Do you want to defend the rice farmers in Vietnam in this one?
00:39:19.400No, no. Again, uncertainty depends on how Alberta leaves. It'll either be really good for Canada or really bad for Canada and really bad for Alberta. So I don't really have a comment on that. It really depends on how Alberta leaves. But in a real brief, Keith, you're preaching to your own choir. Nothing I've heard here has convinced the middle side.
00:39:46.700You've got a bunch of independence people who will sleep in the dirt under a tent.
00:39:51.660You've got the Canadians who will stay Canadian even if Alberta is burned to the ground.