Questionable Methodology & Reporting in AstraZeneca Trial ｜ A Critical Compass Clip
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
160.36234
Summary
In this episode, Dr. Kelly interviews Dr. James Mccullough, a cardiologist and cardiology professor at the University of Toronto, about his research on the link between childhood vaccines and heart disease. Dr. McCullough is a pediatric cardiologist who has treated thousands of patients with heart disease, heart problems, and heart conditions. He is a professor of cardiology at the Department of Cardiology at Toronto's Rush University Medical Center.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
what you need to kind of see in this thing is that we didn't study it for the full two years
00:00:06.940
you know we studied adverse events and it's and it's called onset latency so if it happened
00:00:15.400
outside of the onset latency it couldn't possibly be considered from the vaccines
00:00:20.140
so your chest is moderately sore one day more sore more sore more sore you go to your doctor
00:00:27.060
he says take a couple of aspirins or you know whatever maybe it's just a little influx
00:00:31.760
acid influx you don't go through the testing but because it's already been reported you find out
00:00:37.120
that you have a damaged heart they can't report that so a large underreporting factor onset latency
00:00:43.640
was a big thing and it was a big thing inside of the um what do they call it the post-marketing
00:00:49.740
experience for the the pfizer data that came out a couple years ago it was big in that as well you
00:00:54.620
also you also have subclinical effects that will accumulate over time because um somebody will
00:01:02.080
say well it's only a little bit of scarring on the heart tissue that does not regenerate well like well
00:01:08.120
a little bit of scarring from one one jab and then what about a little bit more and you may not notice
00:01:14.100
it it may not be at a point that is noticed to be reported but the damage is still there therefore
00:01:20.000
again the underreporting is much higher than what we even know yeah well and that's that's one of the
00:01:28.960
things that mccullough said too or very early on was that uh there there is no such thing as mild
00:01:35.580
myocarditis there there is no such thing as mild heart inflammation any heart inflammation is dangerous
00:01:41.500
needs to be taken very seriously and there's anyone anyone who would describe heart inflammation
00:01:47.380
as mild or like you know make it come off as like it's just a you know it's a little inconvenience
00:01:53.060
they're not being honest with you well and then there's um uh an even larger factor that that goes
00:01:59.480
into this because if you looked at it how well do people with dementia communicate can they can they
00:02:04.480
tell you when something's uh really troubling them and and if you get away from the people that with
00:02:09.460
dementia uh when they started giving this to children how many kids can communicate that they have a sore
00:02:14.880
chest or uh you know some of the other symptoms of myocarditis from the ages of six months to let's
00:02:21.700
call it three years old children aren't very good communicators and and and especially with new parents
00:02:26.520
parents aren't that good now i'm not saying that parents are bad and they wouldn't recognize the
00:02:30.700
symptoms but even if the parent took a colicky child into the doctor the doctor would give them
00:02:35.600
something for that but not attribute it to the vaccines and may not attribute it to
00:02:41.740
the the actual condition that's going on and and that's what i find the most troubling is you're
00:02:46.460
you're now giving this stuff to people that can't communicate if they're having a bad reaction
00:02:51.220
while there's absolutely no benefit for them and only a hundred percent risk that part was
00:02:57.500
unforgivable for me that i can't uh you know i i try to give people the benefit of the doubt and
00:03:04.260
understand that you know you know people uh people behave poorly when they're they're fearful for
00:03:11.320
their you know for their life or their for their health or their family's health but no for the for
00:03:16.060
the people who should have known better the the how actively the government and medical uh governing
00:03:24.840
bodies pushed these vaccines on children that's yeah that's that makes me i try not to get upset about
00:03:32.000
this kind of stuff but it makes me very upset makes me very upset closing them out of parks letting
00:03:37.500
them go through two years of pandemic before you give them a vaccine where they've their risk was so
00:03:43.240
small it couldn't even be calculated and again this came from israel and as related to pfizer and and the
00:03:51.720
study literally said no healthy person under the age of 50 has died from covid no healthy person under
00:03:59.520
the age of 50 inside of canada we could show that basically no healthy child especially no healthy
00:04:05.120
child under the age of 18 um has died from covid there's absolutely zero reason that they these these
00:04:14.560
vaccines should have been pushed into children astrazeneca was actually late in coming out so while canada
00:04:22.400
considers uh moderna and pfizer as having come out on uh i believe it was december 14th 2020
00:04:31.920
only eight people got the jab that day so they weren't really out in full swing so but they were out and available in
00:04:38.320
in december so call it january when when they started rolling out the the pfizer and the moderna
00:04:43.520
it wasn't until february um the end of february that the astrazeneca's got approved in south of canada
00:04:53.120
um by may so you know they're approved in february let's call it mid-march before they're starting to
00:05:00.720
make um make it into people's muscles right uh by may so march april may two and a half months later
00:05:08.960
um two canadian provinces had already pulled astrazeneca while while not reporting any serious
00:05:16.000
they just said well yeah maybe we just don't want to use these anymore uh by july 5th canada
00:05:23.360
was tossing out half of the doses that remained right and i think it was by yeah by june or july we
00:05:32.400
basically just stopped using the jabs now what's what's kind of troubling about that is i don't know if i
00:05:38.640
have this on here is um the the who recommendations on this were to give a booster may be considered
00:05:47.280
uh every four to six months inside of canada they never started talking about booster jabs until
00:05:53.440
september even if the who says it there's zero clinical data that states that this has been tested
00:05:59.760
in more than than two jabs in in 20 000 people the benefits of booster vaccination are recognized
00:06:08.400
following increasing evidence of waning vaccine effectiveness against mild and asymptomatic
00:06:13.840
sars cov2 infection over time that sentence is ridiculous on so many levels like where do you