The Critical Compass Podcast - Questionable Methodology & Reporting in AstraZeneca Trial ｜ A Critical Compass Clip

In this episode, Dr. Kelly interviews Dr. James Mccullough, a cardiologist and cardiology professor at the University of Toronto, about his research on the link between childhood vaccines and heart disease. Dr. McCullough is a pediatric cardiologist who has treated thousands of patients with heart disease, heart problems, and heart conditions. He is a professor of cardiology at the Department of Cardiology at Toronto's Rush University Medical Center.

00:00:00.000 what you need to kind of see in this thing is that we didn't study it for the full two years

00:00:06.940 you know we studied adverse events and it's and it's called onset latency so if it happened

00:00:15.400 outside of the onset latency it couldn't possibly be considered from the vaccines

00:00:20.140 so your chest is moderately sore one day more sore more sore more sore you go to your doctor

00:00:27.060 he says take a couple of aspirins or you know whatever maybe it's just a little influx

00:00:31.760 acid influx you don't go through the testing but because it's already been reported you find out

00:00:37.120 that you have a damaged heart they can't report that so a large underreporting factor onset latency

00:00:43.640 was a big thing and it was a big thing inside of the um what do they call it the post-marketing

00:00:49.740 experience for the the pfizer data that came out a couple years ago it was big in that as well you

00:00:54.620 also you also have subclinical effects that will accumulate over time because um somebody will

00:01:02.080 say well it's only a little bit of scarring on the heart tissue that does not regenerate well like well

00:01:08.120 a little bit of scarring from one one jab and then what about a little bit more and you may not notice

00:01:14.100 it it may not be at a point that is noticed to be reported but the damage is still there therefore

00:01:20.000 again the underreporting is much higher than what we even know yeah well and that's that's one of the

00:01:28.960 things that mccullough said too or very early on was that uh there there is no such thing as mild

00:01:35.580 myocarditis there there is no such thing as mild heart inflammation any heart inflammation is dangerous

00:01:41.500 needs to be taken very seriously and there's anyone anyone who would describe heart inflammation

00:01:47.380 as mild or like you know make it come off as like it's just a you know it's a little inconvenience

00:01:53.060 they're not being honest with you well and then there's um uh an even larger factor that that goes

00:01:59.480 into this because if you looked at it how well do people with dementia communicate can they can they

00:02:04.480 tell you when something's uh really troubling them and and if you get away from the people that with

00:02:09.460 dementia uh when they started giving this to children how many kids can communicate that they have a sore

00:02:14.880 chest or uh you know some of the other symptoms of myocarditis from the ages of six months to let's

00:02:21.700 call it three years old children aren't very good communicators and and and especially with new parents

00:02:26.520 parents aren't that good now i'm not saying that parents are bad and they wouldn't recognize the

00:02:30.700 symptoms but even if the parent took a colicky child into the doctor the doctor would give them

00:02:35.600 something for that but not attribute it to the vaccines and may not attribute it to

00:02:41.740 the the actual condition that's going on and and that's what i find the most troubling is you're

00:02:46.460 you're now giving this stuff to people that can't communicate if they're having a bad reaction

00:02:51.220 while there's absolutely no benefit for them and only a hundred percent risk that part was

00:02:57.500 unforgivable for me that i can't uh you know i i try to give people the benefit of the doubt and

00:03:04.260 understand that you know you know people uh people behave poorly when they're they're fearful for

00:03:11.320 their you know for their life or their for their health or their family's health but no for the for

00:03:16.060 the people who should have known better the the how actively the government and medical uh governing

00:03:24.840 bodies pushed these vaccines on children that's yeah that's that makes me i try not to get upset about 0.73

00:03:32.000 this kind of stuff but it makes me very upset makes me very upset closing them out of parks letting

00:03:37.500 them go through two years of pandemic before you give them a vaccine where they've their risk was so

00:03:43.240 small it couldn't even be calculated and again this came from israel and as related to pfizer and and the

00:03:51.720 study literally said no healthy person under the age of 50 has died from covid no healthy person under

00:03:59.520 the age of 50 inside of canada we could show that basically no healthy child especially no healthy

00:04:05.120 child under the age of 18 um has died from covid there's absolutely zero reason that they these these

00:04:14.560 vaccines should have been pushed into children astrazeneca was actually late in coming out so while canada

00:04:22.400 considers uh moderna and pfizer as having come out on uh i believe it was december 14th 2020

00:04:31.920 only eight people got the jab that day so they weren't really out in full swing so but they were out and available in

00:04:38.320 in december so call it january when when they started rolling out the the pfizer and the moderna

00:04:43.520 it wasn't until february um the end of february that the astrazeneca's got approved in south of canada

00:04:53.120 um by may so you know they're approved in february let's call it mid-march before they're starting to

00:05:00.720 make um make it into people's muscles right uh by may so march april may two and a half months later

00:05:08.960 um two canadian provinces had already pulled astrazeneca while while not reporting any serious

00:05:16.000 they just said well yeah maybe we just don't want to use these anymore uh by july 5th canada

00:05:23.360 was tossing out half of the doses that remained right and i think it was by yeah by june or july we

00:05:32.400 basically just stopped using the jabs now what's what's kind of troubling about that is i don't know if i

00:05:38.640 have this on here is um the the who recommendations on this were to give a booster may be considered

00:05:47.280 uh every four to six months inside of canada they never started talking about booster jabs until

00:05:53.440 september even if the who says it there's zero clinical data that states that this has been tested

00:05:59.760 in more than than two jabs in in 20 000 people the benefits of booster vaccination are recognized

00:06:08.400 following increasing evidence of waning vaccine effectiveness against mild and asymptomatic

00:06:13.840 sars cov2 infection over time that sentence is ridiculous on so many levels like where do you 1.00

00:06:22.320 even begin with how stupid that sentence is 1.00

00:06:41.760 you 1.00

The Critical Compass Podcast - May 31, 2024

Questionable Methodology & Reporting in AstraZeneca Trial ｜ A Critical Compass Clip

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript