The Culture War - Tim Pool - May 13, 2026


2026 CHANGES EVERYTHING FOREVER

Topics
redistricting war redistricting wars and black representation oil prices
Hosted by
Tim Pool Phil Labonte Hannah Claire Brimelow
Mentioned
Donald Trump Thomas Massey Mark Kelly Henry McMaster Rubio George W. Bush Barack Obama JD Vance Ryan Gerdusky Harmeet Dillon Pete Buttigieg Yvette Clark Gavin Newsom Adam Morgan Nick Sorter Tate Reeves Andy Gibbs Sean White Ed Galrain Ro Khanna and 4 more
Inside The Leftist PSYOP To Divide Christianity CHUD CHARGE WITH ATTEMPTED MURDER

Episode Stats


Length

31 minutes

Words per minute

162.32

Word count

5,135

Sentence count

471

Harmful content

Misogyny

11

sentences flagged

Toxicity

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

34

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Why is there a Congressional Black Caucus? What role does race play in our political system? And why is it so important that we have a race-based voting block based on the color of your skin? In this episode, I break down why I think there should be no more political parties based on race.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00 What is generosity?
00:00:02 Is it smiling at a stranger?
00:00:04 Is it helping a neighbor move?
00:00:06 Is generosity sharing your good fortunes?
00:00:08 There is power in generosity,
00:00:10 not just for those who give,
00:00:12 but for those who receive it and witness it too.
00:00:14 Every act of generosity, big or small,
00:00:17 creates a ripple effect.
00:00:18 And as Canadians, generosity is in our DNA.
00:00:22 It's in the people we love and the places we call home.
00:00:25 Visit CanadaHelps.org for more ways to be generous.
00:00:30 The redistricting war rages on and Democrats are warning that one third of the congressional
00:00:36 black caucus could be wiped out in this conflict, this procedural battle between the Democrats and
00:00:42 Republicans. Since the VRA was fundamentally shifted, there is a potential for a major
00:00:48 upheaval nationwide. Well, most people are focusing on Southern states saying obviously
00:00:53 in Louisiana, they're going to redistrict and eliminate one of these majority minority districts.
00:00:58 The truth is Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Illinois, many states have majority minority districts drawn up for the purpose of equity or for race based reasons.
00:01:12 And the question is, why is there a congressional black caucus?
00:01:16 Why are we creating political bodies in our government solely based on race?
00:01:21 We are supposed to transcend this.
00:01:23 And thus, my friends, this year, this battle, everything changes.
00:01:30 This is where it all begins.
00:01:33 It's not just the Congressional Black Caucus.
00:01:35 It's going to be everything.
00:01:37 If Harmeet Dillon, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ, goes after these states, it'll be massive.
00:01:43 If Donald Trump gets his way on universal mail-in voting with the post office, his executive order,
00:01:48 saying you can't send them out unless you can prove that they are citizens eligible to vote.
00:01:52 So if the SAVE Act happens, if we get the citizenship question on the census for 2030, we are looking at a fundamental shift in this country, the likes of which we have not seen in generations.
00:02:08 2030 is the next major move.
00:02:10 And oh, boy, do I got some data for you.
00:02:12 Now, you've already heard I've talked about it.
00:02:14 The internal migration from people from state to state is going to fundamentally shift the balance of power in Congress.
00:02:21 But on the issue of illegal immigration, it could be additionally massive.
00:02:26 If we do not count illegal immigrants, wait till I show you state by state based on district level data, which they tend not to give you.
00:02:35 The argument we see from all these experts is that, well, you know, California will lose a seat, but Texas will lose a seat. 1.00
00:02:41 So it's even right. A Democrat state or Republican state?
00:02:45 No. When you break it down to the district level, eliminating illegal immigrants from the census count would result in Democrat congressional districts in red states being eliminated. 0.81
00:03:00 Now, that may mean Texas loses a seat, but it was a Democrat seat to begin with. 0.62
00:03:06 This is where it all changes, my friends.
00:03:09 Louisiana has announced they are moving forward with a new map.
00:03:13 We got the new map for you. They've eliminated one. I believe Alabama is also moving to eliminate
00:03:19 one seat. Now, South Carolina is getting a little weird. Republicans defied Trump in the state and
00:03:25 voted against it. But now we're hearing the governor may actually still call a special
00:03:28 session in Mississippi. We're hearing that the special session has been ended and maybe they'll
00:03:35 revisit redistricting later on, despite the fact that some reports are saying they're still going
00:03:39 to do it. Well, I can tell you this, my friends right now, don't matter what they do because the
00:03:44 GOP is up nine seats already. At the bare minimum, they have turned what was supposed to be a clean
00:03:51 sweep for the Democrats into a competitive race. For some reason, people think Democrats can win
00:03:57 the Senate. That's insane. But we'll talk about that as we do with all the news, starting with
00:04:03 the end of the Congressional Black Caucus. And the argument I present to you right now, I ask
00:04:08 you all this, why do we have race-based voting blocs in this country? Now, by all means, get 0.66
00:04:15 factual and say, well, you see, Tim Beck during the civil rights era, agreed. I'm talking about
00:04:19 today. For what purpose do we allow this? I would actually argue we should have a restriction
00:04:28 on the formation of political bodies on the basis of race. I don't think they should be allowed.
00:04:34 Of course, they'll just lie and say, no, no, we're the the, you know, historical American lovers of freedom caucus where everyone's black.
00:04:45 But I don't think there should be an Asian caucus or a Latino caucus or a black caucus or a white caucus.
00:04:51 I think there should just be American politicians.
00:04:54 But you know what this shows? 0.85
00:04:56 This exemplifies, in my opinion, that racism ain't going nowhere because all of these people are racist.
00:05:04 They want to have a voting block based on race.
00:05:07 They want it. 0.68
00:05:08 They want everything to be about the race and the color of skin. 1.00
00:05:12 That's why they kicked little Asian kids out of schools. 1.00
00:05:15 Sorry, you can't come here. 1.00
00:05:17 Too many people look like you.
00:05:19 I say enough with the racism.
00:05:20 Enough with race-based policies.
00:05:22 But you tell me, am I crazy?
00:05:24 Comment below.
00:05:26 Let's jump into this.
00:05:26 Before we get started, go to TimCast.com.
00:05:29 Sign up.
00:05:30 Join the Discord community right now.
00:05:33 Tens of thousands of people hanging out every day.
00:05:35 If you're trying to start a new project, start a company, make a band, write a comic, maybe write a book, you got to meet people to help you do it.
00:05:44 Now, maybe you know how to do these things and you want to help others.
00:05:47 Join our community on Discord.
00:05:50 Tens of thousands of people hanging out every single day.
00:05:53 We also have a great newsletter that you can get daily updates.
00:05:56 I think it's daily.
00:05:58 Don't just sit idly by.
00:06:00 Don't just be a passive observer, because eventually, if people do not stand up for what is true and right and honorable, then darkness prevails.
00:06:12 And I'm asking you to stick your neck out and jump into a burning pit or to press the blue button.
00:06:18 I'm saying do it for yourself.
00:06:21 Join this community so that your voice is a part of the conversation and you're not watching the world pass you by.
00:06:28 From NBC News, Democrats warn a third of the Congressional Black Caucus could be wiped out by the redistricting wars.
00:06:37 And I'm here for it. 1.00
00:06:39 The Congressional Black Caucus, a power center in the Democratic Party for decades, saw its membership rise in Congress to an all-time high of 58 House members.
00:06:48 And this infuriates me.
00:06:50 It infuriates me.
00:06:52 The idea that we have 435 members of Congress.
00:06:57 To be fair, I don't think it's fair, I should put it this way, that a substantial chunk, a substantial chunk is based on race. 0.75
00:07:09 The implication being everyone else is the white caucus. 0.99
00:07:13 It's ridiculous.
00:07:15 They say, CBC chair Yvette Clark said as many as 19 of the caucus's members could be affected by the redistricting wars in a worst case scenario.
00:07:25 though she noted it's still fluid given that states are still drawing new maps in the wake
00:07:30 of the supreme court ruling it's devastating people have sacrificed so much to make this
00:07:35 a more perfect union and here we are in 2026 seeing this massive regression and all the gains 0.86
00:07:40 that have been made it's painful yeah all the gains made just for black people and that's it 0.99
00:07:45 and you know i'm gonna tell you why i'm mid you see uh look at my family going back to the 60s
00:07:51 pre-loving v. Virginia. You know, it was illegal for people of different races to cohabitate,
00:07:59 to have children. It was a crime. They call these miscegenation laws. And my mom was born at a time 1.00
00:08:07 when it was actually a crime to cohabitate. My grandmother had to pretend to be the help, 1.00
00:08:13 and her kids were just the help. And when people would find out that this was actually an
00:08:21 interracial couple, my family had to flee. Now, I have a question for these people. 1.00
00:08:29 Do they claim to be fighting for civil rights? Well, I'd make the argument as such. The Civil
00:08:34 Rights Act and Loving v. Virginia specifically created a world where people like me could exist.
00:08:40 And with that, there is a question. Which caucus do I get? Which brings me to my argument against
00:08:47 this so substantially, and that was Occupy Wall Street. Despite being massively corrupt with
00:08:56 people stealing money and stuff like that, something interesting happened where it started
00:09:00 with what they called the General Assembly. Everybody in the park would come together and
00:09:03 they'd all wiggle their hands and vote on things. The only problem is stagnation. Nobody agreed.
00:09:07 So they never got anything solved. Facilitators, they called themselves the bureaucracy of Occupy
00:09:13 Wall Street, decided to change the structure of the voting body to a spokes council, they called it.
00:09:17 then you would have different bodies based on the work they do send a representative so that
00:09:24 things could move more quickly and negotiations could be made. It's kind of like why we have
00:09:28 Congress. Instead of having a million people all scream at each other, one guy comes in, cuts a
00:09:33 deal. Well, the funny thing was it made sense to me that like the computer working group and the
00:09:39 sanitation working group would have interests related to functions of the protest and send a
00:09:45 representative to have discussion. The only problem was they they believed in the progressive
00:09:51 stack and they said, well, it's not just about the job you do, but what about your race or your
00:09:56 gender? This created the Women's Caucus, which went to civil war because they were like half of 0.99
00:10:03 them were like trans women aren't women, which created like two women's caucuses. And one was 0.80
00:10:08 like the Women's Caucus and the Women's with Trans Caucus, which was weird. And then you had,
00:10:14 of course, the black caucus. And you actually had people like my Wall Street voting for how
00:10:19 to spend donations because of their skin color. And I said to these people, where do I go?
00:10:26 Like, what would I do? And they were like, well, there's no caucus for white people. I said,
00:10:30 no, I'm mixed race. I'm Asian. And they go, oh, Asian caucus. The white people told me to go to
00:10:34 the Asian caucus. And I said, OK, because I already know what's going to happen. And I go to 0.73
00:10:39 these progressive woke far left Asians and they said, you're white. And I'm like, oh, no, I'm
00:10:43 mixed. And they go, nope, you're white. Get out. And I'm like, oh, OK, so I get nothing right.
00:10:48 This is why I can't stand these people. This is why I think this should be banned. And I don't
00:10:52 care. There should be we should have some kind of provision rule or whatever. You cannot have
00:10:57 voting blocks in Congress based on race. How are we going to put a stop to racism
00:11:03 with things like this? So I say good riddance. Well, the war is on, my friends. Let me brush
00:11:09 the chip off my shoulder and start reading about actual news for you guys. Louisiana GOP lawmakers
00:11:14 advance map, eliminating one Democrat House district. And I am here for it. I despise these 0.95
00:11:22 people who claim to be fighting for progress while trying to drop a world that excludes people like me 1.00
00:11:29 because you are liars and you are hypocrites. Let me tell you, every time I go to a conservative 1.00
00:11:36 event. Not a one person makes the issue my race. Not a one person at turning point events of
00:11:43 yesteryear or at the White House ever ever asked me about race or whatever. I've had people come
00:11:51 up to me and be like, you Mexican? Yeah. And I tell you this, with progressives and Democrats,
00:11:57 that's all that ever is. At Occupy Wall Street, if you wanted to speak at an event,
00:12:02 if you are white or male, they dropped you to the bottom of the list and you were only allowed to
00:12:07 speak after everyone else, which makes literally no sense. None. So a homeless guy who grew up in
00:12:14 the mountains and struggling wants to speak, but the wealthy trust fund black guy, yeah, 0.98
00:12:19 because they're racist. So Louisiana says we're going to get rid of this majority black district, 0.98
00:12:25 which is just an insane spattering. And why they keep this one, I don't understand. 1.00
00:12:30 Missouri Supreme Court has upheld its new congressional map, adding a likely GOP seat.
00:12:36 All of it's fantastic. And then, of course, we have this forecast. The 2030 apportionment.
00:12:42 Y'all ready for this? The world's changing, my friends, changing for the better.
00:12:47 California's expected to lose four seats. Oregon's going to lose one seat. Then you've got Idaho,
00:12:53 you've got Utah, and you've got Arizona expected to each gain a seat. You've got Minnesota,
00:12:58 to Wisconsin and Illinois, going to lose a seat. Pennsylvania, New York will lose a seat.
00:13:03 North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, they're going to gain seats. Florida gaining two and Texas
00:13:08 gaining four. It's going to be a tremendous shift, which strips a massive amount of power
00:13:15 from Democrats because they have mismanaged their states. They only have one answer,
00:13:21 Illegal immigration.
00:13:23 But 2026 changes everything.
00:13:26 You know, I'm looking at what's happening in Virginia, covering it this morning.
00:13:30 They went to the Supreme Court asking them to overrule the state Supreme Court, which
00:13:35 I doubt is going to happen.
00:13:36 They misspelled Virginia, calling it Virginia, and they misspelled Senator saying sentator.
00:13:43 We'll see how that goes for them.
00:13:45 But they're desperate.
00:13:47 The Democrats are desperate.
00:13:48 it. I believe that Donald Trump, the GOP have gained such a tremendous board advantage that
00:13:55 popularity does not matter at this point. Procedurally, the Republicans have gained
00:13:59 too much power. The destruction of USAID stripped them. And now I wonder, I'm going to throw in a
00:14:06 little conspiracy aside here. Trump keeps coming out every other week. We're going to have a deal
00:14:11 in Iran. It's going to be great. And then a week, like three days later, no, the deal is bad. We're
00:14:15 not doing it. And what's happening is oil prices are bouncing up and down like a yo-yo.
00:14:20 If you knew what Trump was doing, you would be seizing control of everything.
00:14:26 Trump announces there's a deal. Prices go up. So you buy right before Trump announces the deal.
00:14:32 He does. Prices spike. Then you sell right before Trump announces the deal is off and the prices,
00:14:38 I'm sorry, it's the other way around. Trump says there's going to be a deal and the prices go down.
00:14:43 So you've sold.
00:14:44 There's going to be a deal.
00:14:45 The prices start dropping.
00:14:46 I think that's right.
00:14:47 And then when he says there's no deal, the prices spike back up.
00:14:50 Because with no deal, the strait is closed.
00:14:52 You do that five times and you have created a new elite, a new power structure in this country.
00:14:59 So I have to wonder.
00:15:00 Democrats, of course, are apoplectic.
00:15:02 They're saying people are getting rich off of Trump yo-yoing like this.
00:15:05 And I'm like, yeah, why not?
00:15:08 I mean, like, probably.
00:15:10 No, I'm not saying it's good.
00:15:11 But I look at it like, is Donald Trump playing a game to amass as much power in the United States
00:15:18 as possible within the GOP and his sphere of influence? The Democrats can never gain power
00:15:24 again. And we are seeing this in every function and every facet. Virginia seems to be the last
00:15:30 vestige, the last bastion of the deep state, and they're struggling. Meanwhile, Republicans are
00:15:36 ascendant. I mean, this this culture war is seemingly going to end with a tremendous GOP
00:15:41 victory. Now, we do have some challenges that the Republicans are facing. South Carolina
00:15:48 Republicans defy Trump tanking redistricting for now. However, in this post from Nick's order,
00:15:54 breaking South Carolina Governor McMaster is set to call a special session to redraw their map per
00:15:58 Rep. Adam Morgan. The new map would likely eliminate the Democrat U.S. House seat,
00:16:03 and it could pass with a simple majority.
00:16:07 If Henry McMaster does this,
00:16:09 it won't matter that these Republicans said no.
00:16:11 He'll just bang the hammer and it's on.
00:16:16 Now, we got this from Greenville News.
00:16:17 McMaster will wait to decide on whether to call a special session
00:16:20 so we don't exactly know what's happening.
00:16:24 Let's update this again to make sure we're getting the latest up-to-date
00:16:26 because I know Nick Sorter had the news.
00:16:30 Let's just hard reset.
00:16:31 There we go.
00:16:33 They say South Carolina's governor is waiting to see what the legislature can accomplish by May 14th
00:16:37 before determining whether to call a special session.
00:16:40 South Carolina Senate failed to adopt an amended signed resolution on May 12th,
00:16:46 which would allow lawmakers to keep working beyond the May 14th deadline.
00:16:50 President Donald Trump specifically called in the state Senate to redraw the maps, and they said no.
00:16:54 But if a special session is called, it's on.
00:16:58 Now, interestingly, when we move over to Mississippi, Governor Tate Reeves cancels the special session on redistricting.
00:17:05 Yeah, but this is where it gets weird.
00:17:06 This is a special session on redistricting the Supreme Court seats, their jurisdiction.
00:17:12 They say the May 20th special session was initially called to fulfill the court ordered redistricting of Mississippi Supreme Court voting districts.
00:17:20 But in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to gut the Voting Rights Act, the ruling was overturned and the state no longer has to redraw those districts.
00:17:29 Calls for Reeves to include Mississippi's U.S. House voting map in this special session echoed on social media bolstered by state auditor Shad White and later agricultural commissioner and gubernatorial candidate Andy Gibson.
00:17:41 The Republican politicians urged legislature to eliminate the majority black district that has elected Thompson a Democrat for 33 years.
00:17:50 Well, Ryan James Gerduski comes in and says, Alabama and Louisiana redistricting two seats
00:17:57 instead of four. Yep. South Carolina blocking the redistrict. Mississippi's waiting till 2027.
00:18:03 The South really dropping the ball. Yeah, no, I don't think they're dropping the ball. I think
00:18:09 they're doing exactly what they've always been expected to be. They are what we expect them to
00:18:16 be. So dropping the ball means we, the outsider populists who want to see real change, are upset
00:18:23 that the establishment crony shills will not do what needs to be done to preserve and protect this
00:18:30 union. Indeed. Now, there is an aside, which I want to throw into the mix a little bit before
00:18:36 we get into the bigger macro scales of these things. Thomas Massey and this crazy scandal
00:18:42 that's emerged. Thomas Massey may actually lose. It's really, really close. The polls,
00:18:48 I think we got the poll data here. Echelon Insights. Ed Galrain is winning in the polls
00:18:54 against Thomas Massey for the primary. And it's, you know, it's across the board. With those
00:19:00 leaning, you get Galrain at 52.8%. The key takeaways, Massey may actually lose his seat
00:19:08 as the GOP has dumped massive amounts of money into this fight.
00:19:12 What I can only say is Thomas Massey is a maverick.
00:19:15 He defies, he bucks the trends.
00:19:18 Sometimes he works with Democrats, particularly with Ro Khanna,
00:19:22 but he defies Trump because he stands on principle.
00:19:24 But the power is coalescing around the GOP,
00:19:27 and this could be bad news for some Republicans as well.
00:19:30 Now, the question, my friends, is where do we go from here?
00:19:33 What happens in 2030?
00:19:35 Beyond 2026, what changes shall be wrought?
00:19:38 The first thing I'll say is this.
00:19:40 Democrat Party favorability is actually worse right now than the Republicans.
00:19:45 Not by much, but that is significant.
00:19:48 Democrats are supposed to be way up.
00:19:50 They're supposed to be doing way better. 0.55
00:19:52 Why aren't they?
00:19:53 Well, I guess people just plumb don't like Democrats.
00:19:56 The weird woke stuff. 0.96
00:19:57 They're fake. 1.00
00:19:58 Their politicians suck. 1.00
00:20:00 We got rumors about who's going to be running in 2028. 0.99
00:20:03 Pete Buttigieg apparently is going to be running.
00:20:05 There's rumors that Pritzker is making a move.
00:20:07 that's why he's been doing press so much. And Mark Kelly, Mike, Mark Kelly, which I forgot the
00:20:14 guy's name, but I'm pretty sure it's it's the astronaut guy. You know, I'm talking about.
00:20:19 It's it's Mark Kelly, Mark Kelly. There's a handful of other people, of course, Gavin Newsom,
00:20:25 but he's the obvious one. We know that none of these people got any riz. They got no riz.
00:20:31 On the right, you've got some. Rubio, he's got procedure behind them. Rubio has decorum.
00:20:40 J.D. Vance has a little bit, but not like Trump. I look at the current field of candidates and I'm
00:20:45 like, ain't none of them got it going on. Seriously. It's kind of crazy if you think about it.
00:20:50 We had Barack Obama. I mean, George W. Bush had Riz, okay? This means charisma. George W. Bush,
00:20:55 call him dumb, but he could rally people. And he talked in a way that people like to hear, 0.99
00:21:00 Obama the same way. Donald Trump, 100%. Right now, ain't nobody got it. Don't get me wrong.
00:21:07 Obviously, J.D. Vance has some, a good amount of charisma. But I don't know. There's rumors
00:21:12 that he might not even run. Then you got Rubio. Rubio is impressive for a lot of reasons. I'm
00:21:21 very impressed with him as of lately. But he doesn't have that, I don't know, that X factor.
00:21:27 not say this democrats have none at all you know in the generic congressional vote for 26
00:21:36 the polling heavily favors democrats here's the thing though anybody who's paid attention knows
00:21:42 it always favors the democrats it always is there's a natural bias in the polls nationally
00:21:49 the question is in the swing districts what will we see that's the real question this doesn't matter
00:21:56 at the highest level. I will say it may actually be balanced. We actually may see a six point
00:22:03 advantage for Democrats because it's usually favoring, usually favors them this time around.
00:22:09 So it should have been lower, but some around Democrats actually do have,
00:22:13 let's just say the historical trend, I guess. They're the opposition. They're the underdog.
00:22:19 6.6 may actually make a lot of sense. Trump's job approval right now in aggregate is minus 16. So
00:22:26 not all that great. These things will, in fact, play a role. But let me show you this map I've
00:22:32 got. I got a couple of maps for you. This is the U.S. map showing states that can that have
00:22:40 majority minority districts. If Harmeet Dillon decides she's going to go in and say majority 1.00
00:22:49 minority districts are unconstitutional and you must redraw your maps. Take a look at this hammer
00:22:54 drop. Pennsylvania has two. New Jersey has has two, three coalition. New York has seven
00:23:04 majority minority. Illinois has five. All in all, there are, I believe, what is this? Holy crap,
00:23:14 55 districts that are considered majority minority. Well, the point is they're unconstitutional 0.99
00:23:24 if they're drawn up explicitly for the purpose of racial issues.
00:23:29 In Illinois, you've got an area where it's not drawn up based on race,
00:23:34 but it's going to be majority black. 0.94
00:23:36 So that likely would still stand. 0.77
00:23:38 The point is half, let's just say 27.
00:23:43 27 seats could be eliminated under the new VRA ruling.
00:23:47 And here's my ultimate favorite.
00:23:49 All right. 2024 projection. Democrat seats, net change, Republican seats based on illegal
00:23:57 immigration. If we were right now to eliminate illegal immigrants from the census, Democrats 0.58
00:24:05 will lose two seats. Republicans will gain two seats, a four seat swing. Now, here's what no one 0.74
00:24:13 tells you. We see these. I've talked about it before. They come out and they say in these in
00:24:18 these maps, they're like, actually, as I showed you here for the net migration change, they say
00:24:23 in these maps, well, if California loses a seat, but Texas loses a seat too, then it's balanced
00:24:28 because Texas is Republican and California is Democrat. Wrong. I asked my friend Claude to
00:24:34 break down all of the congressional districts where they are likely formed due to a population
00:24:39 of illegal immigrants. It did. I then said, based on that information, if we removed those illegal 0.96
00:24:48 immigrants from the census, what would the per party seat change look like? Texas loses two
00:24:53 Democrat seats. And there it is. Arizona loses one Democrat seat. California loses one Democrat
00:25:00 seat. Interestingly, Oregon would gain one Democrat seat. Minnesota would gain one Democrat
00:25:08 seat. But Ohio and Tennessee would each gain a Republican seat. Overall, with that loss,
00:25:14 It results in Republicans gaining two and Democrats losing four for a net change of plus two Republican.
00:25:25 That's tremendous.
00:25:27 That's absolutely massive.
00:25:30 It's going to reshape everything in 2030.
00:25:33 Now take a look at this. 1.00
00:25:35 I asked it to project in 2030 if they do not count illegal immigrants. 0.92
00:25:41 Take a look at this. 0.65
00:25:43 Massachusetts will lose a seat. 0.51
00:25:45 New Jersey will lose a seat.
00:25:47 California would lose two.
00:25:48 Democrat, these are Democrat seats lost.
00:25:50 All of it is Democrat seat lost, by the way.
00:25:53 Wisconsin will gain a seat, but we don't know how it would go.
00:25:56 And Pennsylvania would as well. 0.66
00:25:58 Virginia would gain a seat.
00:25:59 South Carolina would gain a seat.
00:26:01 This is what the map's supposed to look like. 0.97
00:26:03 Let's just eliminate party and just talk about the seat swings,
00:26:08 where the minuses are and where the pluses are.
00:26:12 There should not be any—none of these states should be lit up. 0.99
00:26:15 We should not be counting illegal immigrants in our census and then apportioning representation 1.00
00:26:21 to Congress, to our federal government, because there are people who live here who are not 1.00
00:26:25 citizens.
00:26:26 That is insane to me. 1.00
00:26:28 With Wisconsin, you don't exactly know how it's going to go.
00:26:30 And the important thing to understand with PA as well, they might gain a seat, but it
00:26:34 depends on who controls the state.
00:26:36 With New Jersey losing a seat and Massachusetts losing a seat, it's because that's it.
00:26:40 you'll lose a seat, figure it out. And they already gerrymander. Now, as for Wisconsin,
00:26:48 if control is Democrat, they'll gerrymander a Democrat seat. If it's Republican,
00:26:51 they'll make a Republican seat. Same with PA. Washington would actually gain a seat. 0.81
00:26:57 Now, my question is, why should any of these states tolerate this stuff?
00:27:01 Why should any of these states that are owed congressional representation and an electoral
00:27:05 college vote. Tolerate California. Look at Florida loses a Democrat seat, too. Absolutely insane. 0.88
00:27:13 You know, the secret is the secret is that illegal immigrants tend to be in urban centers, sanctuary 0.99
00:27:19 cities on purpose. This forces the creation of another Democrat district. So if you've got let's 0.69
00:27:27 say you got a million people in a big Democrat in a big city. They say, OK, if we're going to
00:27:35 a portion of congressional seat there, you circle most of the district, most of the city,
00:27:39 and that gives you 775,000 individuals that vote Democrat. Now, the truth is, it's probably going
00:27:46 to be 600,000 Democrat and 175K that vote Republican. So you can split the city basically
00:27:53 by three quarters. Then the rest of those Democrats will be absorbed into a red area,
00:27:58 creating a lean red, but that's the way you have to do it. Now, let's say there's a million people
00:28:05 there, but, but, but, but, you add in 100,000 illegal immigrants. Now you've got 1.1 million
00:28:15 people and the calculus starts to change. The Democrats then say, wait, wait, wait, wait, hold
00:28:20 on. When we gerrymander here, we are going to have 1.1 million. If we split this in half,
00:28:27 550,000 each. We can create two Democrat districts with 550, 550, 125, 125. The issue with just the
00:28:38 million is that you could make a district of 550 and have 450 left over, and you still could
00:28:45 crank one out. But crank out a Democrat district. It makes it substantially easier, and that's why
00:28:53 they are sanctuary cities that will not deport illegal immigrants. It gives them voting power
00:28:57 at the federal government illicitly, illegally, unconstitutionally. And I would call that evil.
00:29:04 Now, to be fair, again, you can still draw up with 1.1. Let's actually get serious.
00:29:11 With 1.1 million people in an area, that additional 100,000, you could make three
00:29:17 Democrat districts that are D plus seven or something. 300,000 each split up. Theoretically,
00:29:24 you could do 250 each. You could do 275 each. And that's going to overpower. That's basically what
00:29:30 AOC's district is. It's lean. It's majority Democrat. But if every single Republican
00:29:36 in AOC's district voted, she would lose. And the problem is that they don't.
00:29:40 so this is all going to change my friends everything is transforming before our very eyes
00:29:48 this war the supreme court ruling it may not be exactly what you want you may be upset
00:29:56 saith ryan james gurdusky that they're dropping the ball but what about moving forward to 28
00:30:03 and a 2030. This is just beginning. This is the year that changes everything.
00:30:11 If Republicans keep doing the bare minimum, they still win. Right now, they've gained nine seats.
00:30:20 And we can see in the prediction markets, it's dipping up 28% likelihood of a Republican sweep.
00:30:26 Full disclosure.
00:30:28 I put money down, 100 bucks on Republican sweep.
00:30:32 Because I think one of two things will occur.
00:30:35 They will sweep or enough will change from now to then
00:30:39 that people believe the possibility of Republican sweep will skyrocket.
00:30:43 Which means the value of those contracts goes up.
00:30:45 I'm not telling you what to do.
00:30:46 I'm giving you full disclosure on what I'm saying.
00:30:49 100 bucks.
00:30:50 100 bucks.
00:30:52 You know?
00:30:54 Nothing crazy.
00:30:54 But I think we are going to see something substantial.
00:30:59 I wonder then, after these midterms, what Trump is willing and capable of doing.
00:31:05 And not just him.
00:31:06 There's a report that Trump has given instructions to J.D. Vance should he be killed. 0.79
00:31:11 Yeah. 1.00
00:31:13 Because what?
00:31:13 Four assassination attempts.
00:31:15 But things like this. 0.95
00:31:18 That's why so many of these lefties are losing their minds.
00:31:21 This is their last chance and they're losing.
00:31:25 I'll leave it there.
00:31:26 Smash the like button.
00:31:27 Share the show with everyone you know.
00:31:28 You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
00:31:30 If you've made it this far, you're a superstar.
00:31:32 Join us at TimCast.com.
00:31:34 We'll see you all tonight for TimCast IRL at 8 p.m.
00:31:37 Thanks for hanging out.