The Culture War - Tim Pool - DEMOCRATS STOLE THE ELECTION

00:00:00.000 Hey Ontario, come on down to BetMGM Casino and see what our newest exclusive, The Price is Right Fortune Pick, has to offer.

00:00:07.620 Don't miss out. Play exciting casino games based on the iconic game show only at BetMGM.

00:00:13.120 Check out how we've reimagined three of the show's iconic games like Plinko, Cliffhanger, and the Big Wheel into fun casino game features.

00:00:21.320 Don't forget to download the BetMGM Casino app for exclusive access and excitement on The Price is Right Fortune Pick.

00:00:27.540 Pull up a seat and experience the Price is Right fortune pick.

00:00:31.040 Only available at BetMGM Casino.

00:00:33.540 BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly.

00:00:36.460 19 plus to wager, Ontario only.

00:00:38.820 Please play responsibly.

00:00:40.200 If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,

00:00:43.480 please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600

00:00:48.660 to speak to an advisor free of charge.

00:00:51.340 BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.

00:00:56.020 Caught on camera.

00:00:57.540 election fraud in California. But the issue with the question of election fraud always comes down

00:01:04.220 to whether or not the results of that fraud could have changed the outcome of the election.

00:01:10.280 In 2020, many people argued that the election had been stolen from Donald Trump.

00:01:14.460 They argued that there was fraud. In fact, courts did find fraud. The problem? In many of these

00:01:21.300 instances, they'd say, listen, there's 300 to 400 votes that are either wrongly dated,

00:01:26.460 should not have been counted, or for some reason are disqualified. But individually,

00:01:31.200 in this case, those ballots will not change the results. So it's moot. The question then becomes

00:01:38.340 how many instances of disqualified, unofficial, or fraudulent ballots are popping up all over the

00:01:45.340 place where each individual instance would not change the results. But together, you would get

00:01:53.100 a very different result. Right now, the question in California, how did Nithya Raman in Los Angeles

00:02:00.300 beat Karen Bass? Spencer Pratt aside, the question is, how did Nithya Raman, a third place

00:02:07.700 councilwoman in late ballots, trounce Karen Bass? Because the argument tends to be from Democrats

00:02:14.300 and from liberals that Democrats vote early and vote by mail. But in this instance, Nithya Raman

00:02:20.060 voters did and Karen Bass's voters didn't. Obviously, with these ballot dumps, Karen Bass

00:02:26.560 did get votes. But what makes this different? The question, my friends, that we have been pursuing 0.61

00:02:32.040 over the past week, past two weeks, it's a question of what constitutes cheating. And we have two hard

00:02:38.640 examples now, and there's more, but I'm going to highlight these two, of actual illegal activity.

00:02:45.500 But then, of course, the question is, is this illegal activity enough to prove the election

00:02:49.840 was stolen. Dare I say, of course it isn't. And Bert Weinstein makes a great point on the

00:02:55.700 Dark Horse podcast where he says there will never be enough proof to bring together because it is

00:03:03.060 such a massive state, a massive city. How would you possibly investigate all of these instances

00:03:07.500 to try and find the evidence anyway? It is the system itself that is cheating.

00:03:12.440 Now, I know liberals will respond with, oh, that's a cop out. You'll blame this.

00:03:16.020 Well, indeed, my friends, I've gotten more evidence for you today.

00:03:19.440 Aside from the fact that the DSA in California explicitly instructs people to collect ballots,

00:03:24.980 to go and fill out ballots with people, which should be electioneering,

00:03:30.340 because it used to be that if you went to a polling location to do that, you were committing a crime.

00:03:34.640 When they created universal mail-in voting, they did not create sister laws for electioneering

00:03:39.380 to stop you from going to someone's home and saying, fill out the ballot, I'll help you do it.

00:03:45.400 That's electioneering.

00:03:46.960 And thus, the system itself is broken.

00:03:50.720 Now, you may be saying, yeah, well, what's stopping Spencer Pratt from doing the same thing?

00:03:55.260 It's a good question.

00:03:56.760 How about this?

00:03:57.660 According to California state law, you don't even need a postmark on a ballot.

00:04:04.260 Indeed, ballots can be hand dated and they count.

00:04:09.940 So let me just make sure all of you understand the structure of California's elections.

00:04:14.080 If a ballot is received four days after the election, and it could be up to seven, let's just say four days, there is no postmark on it, but there is a handwritten date.

00:04:26.380 So long as that date is election day, that baby counts.

00:04:31.300 Now, as for the signature, you could put a smiley face, a star or any other kind of symbol without verification.

00:04:37.900 Indeed.

00:04:38.420 In this instance of evidence from James O'Keefe, we can see individuals collecting petitions, registering people to vote is the allegation, I believe, in exchange for money.

00:04:51.400 And that's just normal.

00:04:53.500 You can't do that.

00:04:54.740 That's a crime.

00:04:56.220 We have another big story to tackle as well from The New York Post.

00:04:59.900 California election worker caught an alleged cheating scandal as their secret illegal activities are exposed.

00:05:06.960 Interesting.

00:05:07.340 These aren't the only examples, but I'm starting off today's show by highlighting actual illegal activity to make the point.

00:05:14.540 How do you track down every single individual out of thousands who have cheated or who have committed these crimes?

00:05:23.380 The problem we are facing, particularly with California, starts with the structure of their elections.

00:05:28.460 But after that, we do have a problem nationwide.

00:05:30.660 if one individual cheats by securing 500 illicit ballots, each instance is not enough to change

00:05:40.300 the outcome of an election. Thus, the courts consider it moot. They would say, even if we

00:05:45.900 remedy this, what would change? You would have to actually track down every single granular instance

00:05:52.640 of someone pulling in illicit ballots and prove it, which is just not possible.

00:06:00.160 And therein lies the problem we are facing today.

00:06:02.720 I tell you this.

00:06:04.000 Democrats and liberals aren't even asking these questions, and they are claiming that

00:06:08.000 these stories don't exist.

00:06:10.400 Rolling Stone, for instance, put out a story saying all they have left is to claim fraud.

00:06:15.400 Well, I'm not here to claim fraud.

00:06:17.160 I'm here to show how the structure of California's elections are legalized fraud.

00:06:24.340 It's not fraud.

00:06:25.360 It's not a crime, right?

00:06:26.720 You're allowed to fill out a ballot, backdate it by hand, and submit it with a smiley face

00:06:33.400 on it, and that counts as a vote.

00:06:36.060 I'm sorry, but that's cheating.

00:06:37.840 That's not a real election.

00:06:40.020 Well, let's jump into these first two stories before we get into the nitty gritty.

00:06:42.840 Before we get started, of course, guys, you got to go to TimCast.com and click join us

00:06:46.420 to get in the Discord community.

00:06:48.660 We got tens of thousands of people in our Discord server hanging out.

00:06:53.000 They make their own shows in the morning, afternoon.

00:06:55.400 they got pre-shows, they got after shows. We have the members only green room, 630 Monday through

00:07:02.420 Thursday. Plus, we're now doing Josie's members only interviews Friday nights. You don't want to

00:07:08.040 miss it. Community is everything. We live for the human experience. This is what gives us

00:07:13.040 fulfillment. If you are looking for purpose, if you have talents or you seek to improve yourself,

00:07:18.860 you need to find that network of individuals that you can live for, help and be helped by.

00:07:25.020 Now, I'm not going to say that we're perfect or that we're the best, but we are building

00:07:29.000 this because we know it can help and it will help and we must build a strong community.

00:07:35.240 Otherwise, if not for each other, what are we really here for?

00:07:38.900 I don't think we have very many members based on the ideology of you guys in the show that

00:07:44.480 are hedonistic loners that want to lock themselves away in virtual reality.

00:07:48.360 I think we are here for that human experience.

00:07:49.960 So join us.

00:07:51.160 Don't just sit idly by.

00:07:53.300 Let's jump into this first story.

00:07:55.100 Of course, hit that like button, subscribe to this channel right now, and share this

00:07:58.640 video on every platform if you do want to help out.

00:08:00.840 If every single person who watched this posted this video to Insta, Facebook, or even made

00:08:05.660 clips and posted them on other social media, we'd be the biggest news show ever, and that

00:08:10.620 would be appreciated.

00:08:11.740 Here's a story from the New York Post.

00:08:12.960 California election worker caught an alleged cheating scandal as their secret illegal

00:08:17.540 activities are exposed.

00:08:18.580 I do appreciate the New York Post saying alleged cheating scandal, but then as a statement of fact, call it secret illegal activities like I don't know if you guys get that one cleared by legal or a California election worker has allegedly been caught breaking into a locked ballot cabinet making copies.

00:08:35.260 His questions continue over the legitimacy of the state's elections.

00:08:38.000 The staffer was not been named as under investigation over the count in over the count in Shasta County, north of Sacramento.

00:08:43.420 after the incident was exposed on Tuesday.

00:08:46.500 Officials said the case involved a small number of extra ballots

00:08:49.320 that may have been sent out before Election Day

00:08:51.460 and that it had been reported to the Secretary of State's office.

00:08:54.600 Quote,

00:08:55.640 During a reconciliation of the early vote,

00:08:57.920 which is a standard process following an election,

00:09:00.260 discrepancies were found,

00:09:01.740 suggesting that a small number of additional ballots

00:09:03.820 may have been handed out to voters prior to Election Day by one employee.

00:09:07.700 Interesting.

00:09:08.720 The disclosure stems from an incident that occurred June 4th

00:09:10.880 at Shasta County Elections Department in Reading.

00:09:13.300 Election workers uncovered irregularities while conducting a routine reconciliation

00:09:17.140 of early voting records following the election, according to the county.

00:09:21.300 Now, the New York Post also had another story.

00:09:23.680 They said that there was a homeless shelter which had received a $600,000 grant from Nithya

00:09:27.460 Raman.

00:09:28.360 This homeless shelter had 185 homeless individuals who did not live there registered to that

00:09:34.180 address so they could vote.

00:09:35.960 One of the leading theories as to how the Democrats muster up extra votes and statistically

00:09:41.760 improbable outcomes, is that they just go to homeless people and say, I'll vote for you.

00:09:47.420 Now, here's the real question. With universal mail-in voting, is it possible? I'm kind of

00:09:54.860 looking at the camera, making a look. Is it possible if 185 mail-in votes are mailed out

00:10:02.680 to one homeless shelter and you don't need a signature, a smiley face would suffice.

00:10:08.000 Is it possible people are just filling out these ballots and sending them in because they get paid to do it or because they're ideologically motivated?

00:10:15.760 Guys, I think the answer is, how are you going to prove it?

00:10:19.460 If a vote comes in with no signature, it's a smiley face that originates from a homeless shelter.

00:10:24.960 And you say, where's this person in question so I can confirm if they voted or not?

00:10:29.280 The response is, they're homeless.

00:10:31.180 Good luck.

00:10:32.320 There's no way to actually track the person down.

00:10:35.160 Ain't that something?

00:10:36.900 Now, James O'Keefe has a smashing mini documentary I recommend you guys check out.

00:10:41.640 This is just the trailer.

00:10:43.080 40 seconds that I'll play for you shortly.

00:10:45.020 You get the gist of it.

00:10:46.080 Fraudulent petitioners on Skid Row are now paying the homeless to forge names,

00:10:51.000 forge addresses, and forge signatures of registered voters.

00:10:56.160 So do you want to sign the first name?

00:11:00.480 I'm Joseph Albright.

00:11:01.740 Okay.

00:11:02.060 First name?

00:11:03.340 Joseph Albright.

00:11:06.160 What are you using?

00:11:11.440 That's a man.

00:11:12.500 No, I'm going to give you the address to the right.

00:11:14.100 Oh, okay.

00:11:14.820 Okay, yeah, yeah.

00:11:17.520 Quickly becoming a widespread scheme that can be found on almost every street corner in downtown Los Angeles.

00:11:25.260 Cash for ballots.

00:11:26.440 Now, I believe what James O'Keefe uncovered is paid petitioning.

00:11:30.560 Petitions are used for a variety of issues pertaining to referendums and ballot initiatives, things like this.

00:11:36.160 you need signatures for candidates to get on the ballot. So if you want to get somebody to be

00:11:40.500 on a ballot, you need signatures. They are forging all of this. Now, I believe James O'Keefe

00:11:45.320 in the in the larger show, actually, it gets into overt voter fraud, as he's described it.

00:11:50.480 He calls it California election fraud for cash. I give you this from The Washington Times.

00:11:56.280 Let's break down the statistics of the California election just as some context.

00:12:00.960 But then I'm going to show you the mechanism by which, yeah, they're cheating.

00:12:03.520 the statistical impossibility of L.A.'s mayor race. It's an opinion piece that writes,

00:12:10.320 JGPT could not find one example in American history of a third place candidate surging

00:12:14.580 days after an election to overtake second place. Yet that is what we are seeing in the L.A.

00:12:18.920 mayoral race with Democratic socialist Nithya Rahman besting reality TV star Spencer Pratt

00:12:23.360 over the weekend, possibly edging out of the runoff. I want to pause real quick and just say

00:12:27.780 fact check false. I asked, I don't know if I have it pulled up, actually. I think I do.

00:12:34.320 Let me let me let me let me just pull this in, because I was able to get to show several

00:12:38.840 instances, in fact, in California's top two in twenty eighteen. Gil Cisneros was not projected.

00:12:45.320 He was behind. But afterwards, he advanced. I mean, it's actually fairly common that things

00:12:48.840 like this happen. Now, that being said, even outside of outside of California, it has happened

00:12:54.740 in New York, for instance. They tend to be in Democrat districts. I think this is a silly thing

00:13:00.200 to lead with because you can find examples. This has happened in recent history. The question,

00:13:04.300 however, that is interesting that I think may be a challenge, maybe this is what he failed to

00:13:08.520 explain properly, is that when you take a look at the proportion of votes, something doesn't make

00:13:13.200 sense. Now, we've covered this for the past few weeks, but for context, here it is. For mail-in

00:13:16.820 ballots arriving before the election. Karen Bass received 38 percent, Pratt 28 and Rahman 20 percent

00:13:24.780 voter turnout for Mr. Rahman on June 2nd, the day of election was so tepid she gave a concession

00:13:30.120 speech. Well, she did not give a concession speech. She cried and implied we lost like

00:13:37.020 she didn't say, right, I concede, I resign, we've lost. But she cried about how hard they worked.

00:13:42.220 The general idea was we didn't make it. Then something miraculous happened. A surge in Mr.

00:13:49.420 Mount's popularity that was not observable before or on June 2nd. She collected 37% of the mail-in

00:13:58.160 ballots that arrived afterwards, a 17% surge, besting Mrs. Bass's 35, a 3% drop. Just to be

00:14:06.700 clear, mail-in ballots that arrived after June 2nd dropped for everyone except for the person

00:14:12.140 Democrats needed to defeat Mr. Pratt. Interesting question that I would ask all of you. How?

00:14:20.200 How did Karen Bass not perform as well? I mean, this is the anomaly. I will tell you my theory

00:14:26.260 first ballot harvesting before based on the DSA's operations. They got the youth. They don't like

00:14:31.520 Karen Bass. That could make sense. It could be as simple as that. We can argue illicit activity

00:14:37.000 in that if they backdated ballots and they would be counted, they knew on election night how many

00:14:44.920 votes they needed. They then could have potentially gone out, collected loose ballots,

00:14:50.580 filled them out with fake signatures and turned them in. And as I argued last week,

00:14:55.960 when you were in a rush to knock out the sole Republican, you don't have time to balance

00:15:01.320 ballot percentages to make it look plausible. Thus, Nithya Rahman sees a surge for seemingly

00:15:08.920 no reason, despite the fact, get this, she lost her own council district. So where her name ID

00:15:15.920 is biggest, she lost. Yet somehow after the election, you know, when everyone knows how

00:15:22.780 many votes you'd need to pull ahead, she wins. Well, let's take a look at the structures of

00:15:28.280 the elections. I give you this. This is Secretary of State California dot gov to one nine nine one

00:15:35.240 standards for valid and invalid votes votes by ballot. A vote by mail ballot shall be subject

00:15:41.400 to the standards provided in the approved use procedures for the system on which it is processed

00:15:45.000 and the provisions election code, et cetera, et cetera. A voters ballot shall be considered

00:15:48.520 a valid ballot if the one voters signature on the return vote by mail identification envelope

00:15:54.260 compares with the signature in the voter registration card to damage, torn or otherwise

00:15:59.320 non-processable ballot can be duplicated to exactly reflect the voters choices and thereby

00:16:04.520 enable the ballot to be processed on the system provided for that purpose. I'm going to pause

00:16:09.120 there. We're going to scroll down to where it matters, and that is Section 8. Vote by mail

00:16:15.240 ballot identification envelope has no dated postmark. The postmark is illegible and there

00:16:21.620 is no date stamp for receipt from a bona fide private mail delivery service. But the voter

00:16:28.120 has dated the vote by mail ballot identification envelope or the envelope otherwise indicates

00:16:33.640 that the ballot was executed on or before Election Day and the ballot was received by

00:16:38.600 the elections official in accordance with elections code section 3020. And I have that

00:16:43.520 pulled up for you as well. I would like to stress this to you, my friends. California state law says

00:16:50.300 that if the voter themself writes a date on or before election day, it is an eligible ballot.

00:16:59.800 That's legal. Now, I would say that's cheating because you just write anything you want down.

00:17:08.760 Imagine that standard of evidence in like a criminal case. You know, the cops go,

00:17:13.980 hey, we didn't find a murder weapon at the scene, but here's a knife. And you're like,

00:17:18.920 Where'd that knife come from? I found it. Where? A week later, outside the scene. Uh-huh. And it's

00:17:26.340 got a tag on it that says Walmart. Yeah, must have bought it from Walmart. And you're going

00:17:30.580 to be like, what? Or how about, he just literally writes on it, found at scene. Well, it says right

00:17:35.820 on it. What I love about this is that after the ICE shooting, there were bullet casings found that

00:17:42.000 had engravings on them or riding with pen, like F ICE or whatever. And liberals said, there's no

00:17:47.400 way that's real. So they understand the concept of anybody writing down whatever they want. That's

00:17:52.740 right. Cash Patel found, I don't know if cashed it, but the FBI, they found casings and it said

00:17:57.540 like F ice on it. And the liberals in the left mocked the idea saying you could just write that

00:18:04.000 and then claim the left did it. I agree with that. I just think it's more likely that the guy who

00:18:09.160 literally shot at an ice facility was motivated by anti-ice rhetoric. And I would also agree that

00:18:14.660 with the idea of you can write whatever you want. So it strains the credibility.

00:18:19.120 If you can just put any date you want. Now, I do. I do want to make sure we have section 3020 up.

00:18:25.640 It actually says that the ballot has no postmark, a postmark with no date or an

00:18:29.320 or an illegible postmark and no other information is available from the U.S. Postal Service or the

00:18:34.860 Bonafide Private Mail Delivery Company to indicate the date in the ballot was mailed.

00:18:38.500 The vote by mail ballot identification envelope is date stamped by the elections officials upon

00:18:43.020 receipt of the vote by mail from the U.S.

00:18:45.440 Post Service or bona fide blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and is signed and dated pursuant

00:18:49.100 to Section 3011 on or before Election Day.

00:18:52.000 So to clarify, let me read Section A.

00:18:56.460 All vote by mail ballots cast into this division shall be received by election officials from

00:19:00.160 whom they were obtained or by the precinct board no later than the close of polls on

00:19:04.100 Election Day, notwithstanding Subdivision A.

00:19:07.480 Any vote by mail ballot cast into this division shall be timely cast if it is received by

00:19:11.520 the voters election official via the United States Post Service or bona fide private mail delivery

00:19:14.760 company no later than seven days after the election day. And either of the following is

00:19:21.320 satisfied. To clarify, these are commas indicating it says if there's no stamp on it, the vote by

00:19:30.600 mail ballot identification envelope is date stamped. It could be. So they make this so verbose

00:19:38.260 intentionally. If the ballot is no postmark, no date, or is illegible, and no other information

00:19:43.560 is available from the United States Post Service or the mail delivery company to indicate the date,

00:19:47.880 the vote-by-mail ballot identification envelope is date-stamped by the elections official upon

00:19:50.840 receipt of the vote-by-mail ballot from the United States Post Service and is signed,

00:19:54.720 dated, pursued to Section 3011 before Election Day. That's largely a meaningless statement.

00:19:58.460 It's basically saying they just get it. It says the ballot is postmarked honor before Election

00:20:01.980 Day or is time-stamped or date-stamped by a bona fide private mail delivery company,

00:20:05.440 or it is otherwise indicated by the U.S. Post Service or bona fide private mail delivery company

00:20:08.800 that the ballot was mailed on or before election day. For the purpose of the section,

00:20:12.940 bona fide private mail delivery means blah, blah, blah. This section largely just pertains to if it

00:20:17.500 were to be received in accordance with Section 230. Again, the clarification that the envelope

00:20:24.560 must indicate it was the voter has dated the ballot identification themselves or otherwise

00:20:31.300 indicated under section 3020. Okay, to try and wrap up the legalese, understanding the commas

00:20:38.040 and clauses. Section 3020 that I pulled up intentionally shows you how it outlines being

00:20:45.160 received and date and stamped. I believe it's intentionally confusing as if to imply they must

00:20:50.800 be received and stamped that way. This is important clarification because it is not correct.

00:20:54.600 They say the voter has dated the vote by mail ballot identification envelope or the envelope otherwise indicates.

00:21:03.280 The important point is right here. If the voter dated the mail in ballot envelope themselves, it counts.

00:21:14.020 You ready for this one? This one's my favorite.

00:21:16.120 This is from sbcounty.gov.

00:21:20.240 Identifiable similarities. Pictures or symbols can be used as valid signatures.

00:21:24.600 indeed. Can we just, you know, what's funny is, um, these liberals just, it's remarkable and they

00:21:31.040 lie guys. I am not saying we have proof of widespread fraud. In fact, I said the same

00:21:36.780 thing in 2020. I don't think there's widespread fraud. It's codified. Is it, is it, let me,

00:21:42.880 let me, let me put it this way. Let's do a man in the street. You know what I really want to do

00:21:46.920 when I want to do a man in the street interview with people. Should you be allowed to draw a

00:21:51.220 picture of Kirby Star from Nintendo as your signature on an election on a ballot? What do

00:21:57.720 you think people are going to say? They're like, what? Kirby Star? Yeah, a little puffball guy.

00:22:02.880 And he sucks the air and he eats people, eats people. Listen, can I draw Mickey Mouse? Does 0.96

00:22:08.620 that count as a signature? Some people might say yes, because they're going to be like, well,

00:22:12.180 some people are illiterate. Yeah. Most people are going to say no, you can't draw a picture.

00:22:16.980 Now, here's the best part. Because Kirby Star is like this is the funniest thing.

00:22:24.880 I would also put it this way, like we know it's Kirby Star because literally in this document,

00:22:29.000 they actually write out Kirby Star. That's just nuts. OK, in the doodle of Kirby,

00:22:36.600 they actually say this counts. If the voter signature on file is a doodle of Kirby

00:22:41.480 and the signature they later use is a different doodle of Kirby so long as it's identifiable as

00:22:48.280 a doodle of Kirby. And this is insane, isn't it? It counts. That is to say, let's make it a little

00:22:53.000 bit more understandable. If for my registration, I draw a picture of Mickey Mouse spinning plates

00:22:59.260 on his fingertips with one foot in the air. And then for my signature on my ballot, I draw Mickey

00:23:05.020 Mouse riding a bike, flipping the bird. They'd say, well, it's Mickey Mouse. Welcome to California

00:23:10.960 elections. I want to throw it to our good friend, Brett Weinstein here, who lays this out

00:23:15.900 in a very academic way. We're going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see

00:23:23.060 what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with

00:23:31.560 indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say,

00:23:39.660 where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with

00:23:45.580 this election? And we are going to be caught in the following predicament.

00:23:50.380 No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the

00:23:57.620 evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is,

00:24:04.800 can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can, easily.

00:24:10.720 Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will

00:24:18.220 be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on

00:24:25.800 the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went

00:24:31.080 through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means or it was

00:24:37.280 the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not

00:24:44.640 an accident. And the point that I want to make primarily is the primary evidence against

00:24:52.300 elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we

00:25:00.400 are actually able to see, you know, the, you know, moment by moment vote count that does something

00:25:05.800 strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like

00:25:11.340 that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections

00:25:19.040 are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's

00:25:26.720 really the thing that we must focus on. I agree with Brett and would add a here's how I'd frame

00:25:34.480 it. He's 100 percent correct. I'd shave off about 10 percent in framing and then add a little bit

00:25:39.840 of my own and say this. The the conundrum we face that I've been highlighting is that let's say it's

00:25:46.480 the day after the election took place and they can see Nithyrman's crying her eyes out. They can see

00:25:51.860 Spencer Pratt is won by 40,000 votes. They then say there's an estimated million votes still to

00:25:56.300 be counted. At this point, they can say, guys, we need 40,000 votes for Nithya Raman. What they

00:26:02.500 can actually do is more interesting than that. Likely what I think happens is they say, here's

00:26:07.900 the proportion of votes as they came in. We will likely see the same proportion in mail-in votes.

00:26:14.020 So we need to skew the proportions that Nithya overtakes Spencer, which means we need to produce

00:26:19.660 100,000 ballots in which. 10,000 are Spencer Pratt, 60,000 are for Nithya and 30,000 are for 0.68

00:26:28.980 Karen Bass. So it looks like Democrats just win. Now, that may be the case, but I actually think

00:26:36.100 the greater mechanism is just about harvesting before the election in the first place.

00:26:39.920 This may all change with Watson v. RNC. I've been harping about this nonstop,

00:26:44.200 and I think it is going to change. I believe the Democrats are done.

00:26:47.660 You know, I saw Bill Maher said they got it in the bag.

00:26:50.720 They're going to win the midterms.

00:26:52.280 I would say this to Bill.

00:26:53.940 Maybe, you know, I'm not a big fan of doing the real time thing because you don't get

00:26:57.320 a real conversation.

00:26:58.160 And the problem with Club Random is they don't like talking politics like it's supposed to

00:27:00.980 be like just hanging out.

00:27:02.060 But I'd love to get an end of the conversation on this one.

00:27:04.880 If the Supreme Court strikes down mail in voting. 0.90

00:27:10.580 Democrats are cooked.

00:27:11.940 If the argument is Democrats tend to vote by mail just flatly, that's all it is.

00:27:15.980 well, then they'll be curtailed by this. But let me put it this way.

00:27:20.440 Supreme Court can rule narrowly or broadly. A narrow ruling on Watson v. RNC is that

00:27:25.500 midnight election day, you can't count any more votes. That's it. If you didn't count,

00:27:30.800 it's over. Theoretically, what this means is that Spencer Pratt would have taken second place

00:27:34.980 and they would then argue, but we got a million votes. We didn't count the Supreme Court. Oh,

00:27:38.480 it's not fair. Yeah, well, too bad. That's a narrow interpretation. The argument is that

00:27:43.140 Congress prescribes a single day for voting. So you cannot have counting after the fact,

00:27:49.320 but they may rule more broadly and say the mechanism of universal mail-in voting itself

00:27:56.040 creates an extended voting period beyond election day void. All votes must be cast.

00:28:02.580 All belts must be received on election day with limited exception for like military.

00:28:08.560 This would mean Democrats would be hard pressed.

00:28:11.640 This would mean that in order to vote, you got to go to a polling location.

00:28:15.440 They'd have said at more polling locations.

00:28:18.040 Very interesting.

00:28:19.400 This could fundamentally change everything.

00:28:21.940 Now, the Supreme Court could go even further than this.

00:28:25.280 And this is what I'm hoping for.

00:28:27.760 They could actually rule.

00:28:30.140 The 1945 law states there is a single day for the election.

00:28:33.820 And that is, I think, second Tuesday in November or second Thursday or whatever.

00:28:37.920 However, the purpose of this law is that our elections be held on single days for federal

00:28:44.520 elections that is defined in November for primary elections.

00:28:49.100 They must be held in the same accordance as federal elections if they are to have an impact

00:28:56.400 or result in a federal candidate to be elected.

00:29:00.020 That is to say.

00:29:02.080 If the Supreme Court only rules in the broad sense that you can't do universal mail in

00:29:06.080 voting and you can't count after election day. The Democrats then go, OK, but we can do all of

00:29:13.260 that in a jungle primary. That is ain't no Republican is ever going to get to a general

00:29:18.400 in the first place. And if this is only about the 1945 law, we can have mail in voting for

00:29:24.660 primaries because those are state elections and some of them are private, like the Democratic

00:29:28.200 Party. And then when we remove any Republican from the general, your rules on federal elections

00:29:34.960 do not matter. Hence, the reason why they did the jungle primary in the first place.

00:29:40.440 California does not allow Republicans to run for election in November. They don't.

00:29:45.760 They say we had a prime. We had to hold the primary of every possible party and the top

00:29:50.940 to advance to the general. That way, moving into November, the general election will be

00:29:56.660 two Democrats. Supreme Court says all elections must be held in standard accordance with how

00:30:03.200 federal elections were prescribed. State elections and local elections can be held on any day

00:30:07.940 that the jurisdiction warrants, but they must be held in accordance with the federal law

00:30:14.040 pertaining to elections. That is the way we do a federal election single day. You can do your

00:30:19.600 elections whenever you want, but it must be the same single day. You choose when you choose why,

00:30:24.340 but not the how. And that would be a nuclear bomb. Then, my friends, Democrats truly never

00:30:32.440 win again. So let me wrap it up by saying to Brett, I don't know that we need the argument

00:30:40.080 on proven fraud. I certainly don't bother making it. My argument, you know, this is like, guys,

00:30:45.780 I'm gonna say something to you. Republicans frame everything poorly. Conservatives frame

00:30:50.100 everything poorly. I saw this debate where they were like, you know, who's more responsible for

00:30:54.960 violence left or the right? And the left is citing they're like, look at the ADL. They said

00:30:59.040 this and I'm like, I don't care. The ADL says black ethno-nationalism is left-wing. Well,

00:31:04.560 what's left-wing about identitarianism? It's neither left nor right as far as anything

00:31:09.160 meaningful. And therein lies the problem. I see these conservatives arguing that the right is

00:31:14.600 more violent and say, well, yeah, but not anymore. And I'm like, listen, the framing is wrong.

00:31:21.080 liberal. The left has falsified the framing. Let me put it this way. I don't argue fraud in

00:31:29.520 elections because it is meaningless. It is meaningless. I argue the structure. The question

00:31:35.060 is this. Is it an election if people can turn it ballots after election day with a smiley face

00:31:41.900 instead of a signature? No, it's not. You can call that fair and legal. And either way,

00:31:47.200 a reasonable person that says that's not a real election. So why bother arguing the fraud question

00:31:51.760 because they're going to say prove fraud and you're going to say it's impossible to prove

00:31:54.580 fraud. They're going to say you're a sore loser. In fact, that's literally what they're doing. 0.99

00:31:58.780 Johnson says California election fraud is so bad it can't be proven because conservatives suck at 0.98

00:32:03.840 making arguments. If I was in a press gaggle and they said, do you think the election was stolen?

00:32:08.200 I'd respond with this is important public service announcement. California allows ballots to be

00:32:14.040 dated by hand, not by a postal service, to be delivered seven days, up to seven days after

00:32:19.080 the election took place. And the signature requirement could be a picture of a cartoon

00:32:22.880 character. This is not a joke. This is actually true. Now, do you believe the American people,

00:32:30.940 do you believe it's a real election if people are turning in hand dated ballots up to a week

00:32:38.440 after the election with Mickey Mouse on it? I don't think that's real. Is it fraud? No,

00:32:44.120 because it's codified it's legal in Virginia. I would also argue, however, that is not an election

00:32:49.740 or at the very least, it's some kind of election, but it ain't democracy.

00:32:54.680 Conservatives need to learn how to frame these things. The ADL and Cato Institute saying the

00:32:59.400 right's more violent. Bro, Cato Institute claimed a white supremacist who punched his wife is right

00:33:03.360 wing political violence. It's not meaningful to how I vote. So when we talk about it,

00:33:08.440 it's actually simple. Of the manifestos of either party, which party contributes the most to

00:33:15.000 violence? And it is clearly the Democratic Party. When far leftists go out and fight with cops or

00:33:20.420 riot, Democrat politicians don't come out and cheer on the violence for the most part, sometimes,

00:33:25.720 but they do put out statements or file lawsuits towards the goals of these extremists, notably

00:33:31.140 in Newark. Rioters came out, fought with cops, obstructed ICE. And then Raj Baraka came out,

00:33:37.280 Raj Baraka, came out and said, shut down the ICE facility, using the legal structure to agree with

00:33:43.880 those that are engaged in violence. My favorite, Mayor Tom Wheeler in Portland, who joined the

00:33:47.980 extremists' firebombing a federal building. So come on, is it meaningful to say the right is

00:33:53.440 more violent because a white supremacist punched his wife? The Republican Party denounces white 0.95

00:33:57.720 supremacy. So who are you really voting for? Or I guess in this story, are you voting? I'm going

00:34:04.740 to leave it there, my friend. Smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you've ever

00:34:07.980 met in your life. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all in the next segment.

The Culture War - Tim Pool - June 10, 2026

DEMOCRATS STOLE THE ELECTION

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript