The Culture War - Tim Pool - January 13, 2026


Left PANICS Over RFK's MAHA Reform, Testosterone To SKYROCKET ft. Raw Egg Nationalist


Episode Stats

Length

29 minutes

Words per Minute

176.58783

Word Count

5,139

Sentence Count

6

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

In this episode, I'm joined by food writer, journalist, author, and all-around expert on the topic of Big Meat and its impact on the world. We discuss how R.J.K. junior is shoving Big Meat down everyone s throats, why it's a bad idea, and why we should be worried about it.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 all right well before we get started here i just want to read this headline this is hilarious this
00:00:04.680 is from the new york times they put this guest essay out this would have been on the 10th no the
00:00:09.920 new food pyramid brought to you by big no way now i saw this i said look everyone's talking about a
00:00:16.960 big me everyone's you know thinking about big meat big meat's been like just in my brain i'm having a
00:00:23.100 tough time grasping big meat obviously it's on the tip of everyone's tongues so i wanted to bring an
00:00:27.600 expert in what are your thoughts on big meat um do you think big meat is maybe it's like kind of an
00:00:32.900 imposing force do you think rfk is shoving big meat down everyone's throats what do you think is going
00:00:36.880 on yeah i i you know i think about big meat a lot um it occupies a lot of my thinking a lot of my
00:00:45.420 writing is about big meat about what big meat means right um how you would define big meat you know
00:00:52.580 what constitutes big meat one small meat right or uh average meat even you know right um uh but um
00:01:00.760 but yeah but to be to be serious though you know this this notion of big meat actually is absurd i mean
00:01:08.460 what they want you to believe i think really is that basically there's big like there's big ag
00:01:14.820 and you've got big corn and you've got big soy and you've got big beef and big chicken and big pork
00:01:21.120 and they're all kind of competing forces within the market right and so you know what's good for
00:01:27.080 big meat for big beef or big corn uh or big chicken or big pork isn't good for big soy or big corn
00:01:33.640 well that simply isn't the case i mean it month it might once upon a once upon a time have been the
00:01:39.480 case that you had conglomerates that were just in chicken or beef or pork and conglomerates that were
00:01:46.380 that were in grains but agriculture is so deeply deeply integrated in the us now so if you look at
00:01:54.600 a mega corporation like cargill for example cargill is one of the largest grain companies in the world
00:02:02.320 and has been for and has been for the better part of a century or more they're also the biggest or one
00:02:08.480 of the biggest beef producers in the us so this notion that somehow all rfk junior has done is he's kind
00:02:15.560 of like you know flipped a switch and now instead of favoring big grain he's favoring big meat
00:02:21.500 is just nonsense because you can't actually you can't separate them there's no i mean so it is a
00:02:27.600 nonsense it really is a nonsense to suggest that this is just about um pleasing or pandering to
00:02:33.840 a new set of corporate interests you know the big big meter big meter slipping rfk junior you know
00:02:40.620 stakes stakes in the background or something like it just doesn't work just doesn't work like that
00:02:45.200 agriculture is not like that anymore so actually you know you find that these big um companies that
00:02:52.440 were traditionally in meat so cargill i think uh you know another tyson for example tyson's a better
00:02:58.600 example you know tyson was traditionally a meat and dairy company well they're they're hugely into grain
00:03:06.000 now and they're also hugely actually into alternative proteins and this is something that i talk about
00:03:11.500 in my previous book um the eggs benedict option that i wrote in 2022 um you know all of these these
00:03:18.700 companies that were traditionally just producing meat and dairy they're now producing um uh like
00:03:25.000 they're things like plant-based meats and pea protein and all sorts of alternative foods as well
00:03:30.700 so like there's just this this notion of of big meat of of meat production being separate from
00:03:37.900 other forms of food production separate from processed food in particular because processed
00:03:43.200 food is the is the principal constituent of the the vast majority of americans diets now it's just it's
00:03:51.380 just nonsense so i mean it's it's fabricated as funny as it might sound you know to be talking about
00:03:57.220 rfk junior you know riding big meat it's yeah it's nonsense it's nonsense absolutely well i mean that's
00:04:04.880 why i wanted to bring you on because obviously this story has been in the zeitgeist but there's
00:04:08.420 not a lot of people that can speak with authority on it let alone speak with the depth of knowledge
00:04:12.960 that you have on the topic um you know before we really get into the meat and potatoes so to speak
00:04:17.720 of the story could you give an overview on on the work you've done thus far and then what aspects
00:04:23.100 of that work you have seen implemented in rfk's sort of overhaul of hhs yeah well you know it's it's
00:04:29.720 very interesting i actually met um uh someone who is now very senior in hhs just before um the
00:04:38.420 election like days before the election when i was in the us and this person said to me i read your book
00:04:44.360 the eggs benedict option it's amazing it's a blueprint for make america healthy again like
00:04:50.040 everything you talk about here uh corporate control of the food supply in particular the elimination
00:04:56.100 of animal foods uh from you know from from diets of ordinary americans and the corresponding decline
00:05:05.240 in health this is all the stuff that we want to get into this is all the kind of stuff that we want
00:05:09.580 to focus on so i mean my book the eggs benedict option is about the plan for a global plant-based diet
00:05:17.240 and why that's a bad thing uh and so you know i mean that was that was a that was a big thing in
00:05:23.100 like 2020 2021 2022 during the during the coronavirus crisis you know when people were talking about the
00:05:30.740 great reset whatever that was supposed to mean uh an integral part of that was this idea that actually
00:05:36.700 we need to change our diet we need not only to have a great reset you know of the way that we
00:05:41.820 of the way that what the world of work um uh and the way that we live and all this kind of stuff but
00:05:48.300 also the way that we eat in particular um and so they were pushing plant-based diets and so i thought
00:05:54.280 well you know what would that actually mean for our health and so i wrote a book about it and then i
00:05:59.280 wrote an alternative proposal so my great reset was a vision of actually returning to um returning to
00:06:07.220 the way our ancestors used to eat um to to animal-based diets basically and i drew very heavily
00:06:13.700 on the work of uh a dentist come anthropologist called western a price who uh wrote this amazing
00:06:20.320 amazing book in the 1930s called nutrition and physical degeneration which um is basically the
00:06:26.680 best book on nutrition you've never heard of so he uh he basically went around the world to small
00:06:34.380 scale traditional societies he visited the inuit he went to the uh highlands and islands of scotland
00:06:41.700 he went up into the swiss alps he went to uh africa to polynesia to fiji and new zealand and all these
00:06:49.240 different places and he looked at what people in traditional societies at and he looked in he looked
00:06:54.360 in particular for traditional societies where people were basically in perfect health and he discovered
00:06:59.480 that everybody everybody all of these societies every single one of them uh prioritize nutrient-dense
00:07:06.460 animal foods in particular so you know like an inuit isn't eating exactly the same food as a
00:07:12.860 pastoralist uh in kenya sure right but the type of food is the same so yes an inuit might be eating
00:07:20.960 salmon and caribou and yes uh you know a maasai herdsman will be eating uh beef and milk and blood
00:07:29.840 in particular but actually they're both prioritizing the same kinds of animal foods which are nutrient-dense
00:07:36.300 animal foods so it's things like organ meat fatty cuts of meat dairy foods eggs uh seafood shellfish
00:07:44.280 crustaceans uh fatty fish that kind of stuff you know and that's basically how our ancestors
00:07:51.060 ate since the dawn of time uh but then there was this profound change in the 20th century in particular
00:07:57.380 continuing into into the 21st where we we started to eat these new types of food produced in factories
00:08:04.400 the first processed foods and then ultra processed foods which are kind of like the more a more recent
00:08:09.520 development from the 70s 80s uh into today but um but yeah i mean the the hhs agenda i mean i'm i'm
00:08:18.620 amazed i'm really amazed so far actually you know that they they really have turned the food pyramid on its
00:08:25.340 head and it and it's basically i mean it's everything i've asked for it's everything i've said
00:08:30.700 we should do you know we need to return to um to diets that are based on nutrient-dense animal foods
00:08:39.100 we we need to stop being afraid of animal proteins and especially animal fats you know animal fats
00:08:46.860 and cholesterol in particular which is constituent of animal fat uh they've been demonized in the
00:08:54.920 20th century cholesterol in particular i mean cholesterol is one of the is one of the re is the
00:08:59.680 real boogeyman apart from say something like tobacco uh of 20th century medicine you know in the late
00:09:07.260 1960s in the u.s then um there was actually a specific health warning attached to eggs in
00:09:15.200 particular in the u.s so they are the only food stuff in american history that has ever had a
00:09:20.580 specific warning attached to its consumption because of the because of the amount of cholesterol
00:09:25.140 in eggs so um uh we we need to reverse all that you know we were promised americans were promised
00:09:32.940 and the rest of the world were promised renewed health we were told look if we stop eating cholesterol
00:09:37.520 we'll stop getting heart disease uh all of these other chronic diseases will go away you know we'll
00:09:42.740 have renewed health and that just hasn't happened and you know you you look it's it's obvious you look
00:09:48.060 around today people are unhealthier than they've ever been they're more dependent than they've ever
00:09:53.660 been on pharmaceuticals in fact you know people are dependent on pharmaceuticals in a way that
00:09:58.260 once upon a time 100 years ago would actually only have been conceivable in the pages of science
00:10:03.440 fiction novel right i mean in somewhere like scotland for example and i mean i know scotland is
00:10:09.200 a kind of is a kind of grim place and so it's kind of a bad example but 20 25 percent of all adults in
00:10:16.220 scotland are on antidepressants yeah that's one one million people out of four million and then i think
00:10:22.260 a further uh a further million are also on other forms of drugs like uh zed drugs anti-anxiety meds
00:10:29.660 benzodiazepines all these kind of psychotropic drugs i mean we are medicated yeah to an insane extent i
00:10:35.600 mean virtually everybody is taking pills everybody is um is medicated so um you know the the orthodoxies
00:10:44.420 of of 20th century uh medicine need to be thrown out they need certainly need to be re-examined but um i
00:10:51.060 mean fundamentally i think they need to be thrown out and it's good to see that actually uh hhs under
00:10:57.280 rfk junior is prepared to do that i mean he knows he knows i mean i i i i would doubt that our my
00:11:04.520 thinking and his thinking on diet and health differ at all really you know he's just he's in a more
00:11:10.820 difficult position obviously because he has to oppose competing interests and you know he's he's the
00:11:16.520 one who has to push against the medical community and and all these entrenched interests but i think
00:11:22.680 fundamentally we we really do align in our thinking and our approaches well i guess that would be the
00:11:28.180 question is obviously you outline the history uh obviously when in process which introduced the diet
00:11:33.000 you know the the pharmaceutical industry really taking off i guess the question and i think a lot of
00:11:37.940 people in the audience would sort of wonder the same thing or debate back and forth how much of that
00:11:42.200 was brought into our lives uh out of it for ideological reasons like these people genuinely
00:11:48.860 believing a this is better for us or b potentially they wanted to neuter us versus how much of it is
00:11:54.700 just business interests like hey i just want to move more grain i don't care what you have to say
00:11:58.460 to move the product just say it i mean those to me seem like the two sort of camps i would explain it
00:12:03.340 how much is attributed to each would you say it's a complicated thing i mean i i don't think that you
00:12:09.760 can just say there was some kind of conspiracy to make us all sick and and dependent and i mean that
00:12:16.860 has been the practical effect of everything that's happened in the 20th century without a doubt i mean
00:12:21.140 like i say you know we are we are unwell and dependent on pharmaceuticals and and and the medical
00:12:28.020 industry to an extent that would have been impossible to imagine i mean if you just look at the
00:12:33.220 demonization of cholesterol for example then you can see the involvement the deep involvement of
00:12:39.080 corporate interests even from the very beginning so the theory that cholesterol causes heart disease
00:12:44.960 which has been the principal justification for abandoning animal foods in our diets is something
00:12:51.600 called the lipid heart hypothesis and it was formulated by a man called ansell keys in the 1940s
00:12:58.240 now ansell keys presented himself as an expert nutritionist but he really wasn't he worked on the
00:13:04.340 k ration he helped make the k ration the famous army ration or military ration that was used by
00:13:10.140 american service personnel during world war ii he helped come up with that and then he kind of
00:13:14.560 branded himself as a nutritionist anyway heart disease rates were exploding in the u.s in the 1940s and it was
00:13:21.420 really the beginning of the kind of uh big upsurge in heart disease and it was becoming a national issue and so
00:13:27.920 people were looking for explanations his explanation that he came up with was that it was saturated fat
00:13:34.280 consumption and saturated fat and cholesterol consumption are linked and he produced um uh this
00:13:41.300 study called the seven country study where he presented results correlations between saturated fat
00:13:48.100 consumption and uh heart disease in seven different countries from around the world
00:13:52.440 showed a very close correlation very close correlation but why was that because he cherry
00:13:59.620 picked the countries so he just picked seven seven countries that had a very close correlation
00:14:05.560 he ignored for example a country like france uh they talk about the french paradox because the french
00:14:13.360 consume so much butter they consume four times the butter i think it might even be more than four times the
00:14:19.920 butter americans consume and yet they have significantly lower rates of heart disease
00:14:24.680 um now this was all pointed out at the time actually by his colleagues so he was kind of laughed out of the
00:14:31.480 room by his contemporaries they were like look you're you've gerrymandered this data you're just presenting
00:14:37.920 a totally selective picture of of um the relationship between saturated fat consumption and heart disease
00:14:43.600 this is rubbish and it was rubbish and it was rubbish and it is rubbish but um ancel keys managed to get
00:14:51.160 the backing of uh margarine makers and i think in particular proctor and i think it was proctor and
00:14:57.560 proctor and gamble i think um uh there were these you know these companies that were trying to market
00:15:04.680 new forms of fat that were made basically from industrial waste products and this is one of the things that you
00:15:10.340 hear about seed and vegetable oils margarine right is that once upon a time these were industrial waste
00:15:16.740 products and then corporations found a way to turn them into edible products and so they started making
00:15:22.580 money i mean that is actually true yeah that is actually true so crisco which was the first margarine
00:15:28.680 is crystallized cottonseed oil that's where the name comes from right and so cottonseed oil was a byproduct
00:15:36.100 of the production of the production of cotton industrially right so they would just have loads
00:15:40.120 and loads of cottonseed oil laying around the place and they're like well what can we do with it we can
00:15:44.480 use it to um lubricate machinery we can use it as paint thinners and then somebody comes up with this
00:15:50.740 industrial process of hydrogenating cottonseed oil to turn it into a semi-solid fat like butter well
00:15:58.200 what ansel keys did was he provided the science to justify the consumption of these new um alternative
00:16:07.440 fats right and so the margarine producers and i think particularly procter and gamble poured millions
00:16:13.100 of dollars into promoting this stuff through organizations like the american heart association
00:16:19.380 so i think procter and gamble gave the american heart association a million dollars in in 1940 whatever
00:16:25.760 which was a lot of money there right and so you can see from the beginning that actually you know it
00:16:32.900 was industrial interests pushing this science and they won they won and the science was accepted over
00:16:41.300 the uh objections of large parts of the scientific community i mean this is this is something that you
00:16:47.840 don't hear when when you you know people talk about the transition from you know consumption of animal
00:16:53.320 facts to these novel industrial facts is that actually loads and loads of scientists at the time said that
00:16:59.440 the science was rubbish um it wasn't it wasn't that everybody accepted it it was that that actually
00:17:05.560 no lots of scientists didn't accept it but the money won out as is often the case so it's it's a
00:17:13.080 complicated thing but of course then once you once you erect a system once you entrench these interests
00:17:20.020 it becomes very very difficult to um to to dislodge them and to replace them and so you know this has
00:17:27.840 been the orthodoxy for 70 years uh 70 plus years you know um that we need to stop eating animal animal
00:17:35.800 foods and we need to uh adopt you know a different kind of diet that's built around healthy plant proteins
00:17:42.400 and healthy plant fats in particular um and actually along the way along the way as is often the case
00:17:50.560 then when you have this this kind of dominant paradigm conflicting evidence is ignored so there's a very
00:17:58.000 very famous example of this called the minnesota coronary study where um basically a large-scale uh double
00:18:07.700 blind gold uh double blind uh gold standard um intervention study was done where i think it was
00:18:15.240 seven or or maybe 10 um institutions uh health institutions hospitals uh in minnesota substituted
00:18:25.300 um vegetable and seed oils uh like sunflower oil that kind of thing for animal fats in the diet of the
00:18:32.800 patients now according to the lipid heart hypothesis what would happen is well everyone would live longer
00:18:38.740 their health would improve right the complete opposite happened the complete opposite happened
00:18:44.480 and actually the scientists behind the study showed that for every i think it was something like
00:18:50.500 for every 30 point reduction in cholesterol in blood cholesterol uh the mortality rate doubled or
00:18:57.660 something i mean it was something it was crazy like it was the absolutely flew in the face of the of the
00:19:03.000 lipid heart hypothesis and the orthodoxy that had been accepted so what happened they did this expensive
00:19:08.740 study over a period i don't know maybe of a year might even have been longer than a year cost a lot of money
00:19:14.460 took a lot of time they just binned it they binned it because because the results didn't fit and then 30 40
00:19:21.800 years later they rediscovered them in this study and were like actually you know what maybe maybe
00:19:27.340 they were right and maybe this shouldn't have been um uh hidden from the public but it was simply
00:19:33.940 because it didn't fit with the the established narrative and that that's what that's really what
00:19:39.320 happens you know you get these entrenched interests uh huge amounts of money now are behind
00:19:45.660 i mean however much money there was in making margarine in in the 1930s or 1940s you know we'd
00:19:52.780 we're talking you know uh orders of magnitude more now many orders of magnitude you know i mean
00:20:00.420 consumption of soybean oil for example has increased the thousand fold over the last century i mean this
00:20:06.420 is we're talking about huge amounts of money um so it's uh it's a complicated thing and i think you
00:20:12.360 have to look at it historically and understand you know not only like um what led to the initial um
00:20:19.580 uh the initial kind of take up of these products but also then you have to understand the kind of
00:20:25.100 dynamics that exist within the scientific community within the corporate community within government you
00:20:30.520 know i mean these they're all kind of hand in hand they're all hand in glove um uh and so it becomes a
00:20:37.160 very very complicated thing actually to really to to do anything and to make any change so
00:20:42.340 uh it's a mixture of things it's a mixture of things certainly but uh there's corporate
00:20:47.600 interests there's you know i think a lot i think a lot of people in the scientific community also
00:20:52.880 genuinely believe in the science um i think they do i don't think that people just push it because
00:20:58.720 they think it's because it's convenient or because it serves some ulterior motive i do think there are a
00:21:04.980 lot of there are a lot of true believers um and they're very hard to convince and the reaction
00:21:10.740 to rfk jr turning the the food pyramid on its head has been well i mean people are talking about about
00:21:17.800 big meat you know i mean people are conjuring conjuring up these these phantoms that don't
00:21:22.900 even exist to um to try and explain how somebody could ever come to the conclusion that actually you
00:21:28.700 know eating animal fat is healthier than eating a byproduct of um cotton manufacture yeah they're
00:21:34.900 shadow boxing against like these boogeyman that literally have been completely disarmed over the
00:21:40.080 last time it's like totally ridiculous i guess i have one more question for you um obviously people
00:21:45.800 have seen the headlines or perhaps even the data sort of indicating that you know when people
00:21:49.960 participate in activities like weight lifting or clean eating um they become more right wing
00:21:55.080 obviously it's almost a cliche at this point people say that over and over again but you know for my
00:21:59.360 analysis it's true because it does produce more testosterone and that's obviously going to make you
00:22:03.600 more disagreeable in a good way so then you're going to be able to reject sort of the consensus
00:22:07.240 at large uh my question is do you really do you think that uh rfk's sort of decision making here
00:22:14.020 with hhs is actually sort of a viable political strategy in which as he sort of unchains the vitality
00:22:19.720 of american men we will see more and more men stepping up and saying yet this consensus that we've
00:22:25.580 been you know that's been hoisted upon us is absolutely ridiculous they're going to be more
00:22:29.100 uh sort of poised to buck the system so to speak oh yeah i mean look uh this is this is one of the
00:22:36.180 central one of the central contentions of my new book or certainly one of the one of the things that
00:22:40.900 i really talk about in the new book is about uh which is called the last men liberalism and the death
00:22:46.000 of masculinity it's out now amazon hardcover kindle and audiobook um uh but you know what one of my
00:22:53.060 central theses in that book is that actually testosterone decline is a serious political
00:22:59.540 problem uh and we're seeing a civilizational decline in testosterone levels that is in part
00:23:06.760 what there are many factors causing it it's partly diet it's partly it's broader lifestyles it's exposure
00:23:12.300 to toxic chemicals etc but you know we have we have very good reason to believe that actually
00:23:17.800 decline in testosterone is tied to changing political behavior and there's a lot of experimental
00:23:24.340 data from uh disciplines like social and personality psychology that shows that if you give a man
00:23:30.980 uh a dose of testosterone so there are all these experiments you know where you'll have groups of
00:23:36.760 people and one of them will be groups of men and one of them will be given uh testosterone gel and the
00:23:41.960 other will be given a placebo and then they'll do some kind of activity that's supposed to show
00:23:47.740 uh to demonstrate particular kinds of behavior and what you'll find is that actually if you give
00:23:53.040 men a dose of testosterone they do basically become more right-wing you know they display particular
00:24:01.420 behaviors that are associated with being right-wing like for example um being okay with hierarchy now
00:24:09.320 that's something that social and personality psychologists look at a lot is hierarchy attitudes to hierarchy
00:24:14.880 and inequality and it turns out that if you give men a dose of testosterone they're happier with
00:24:21.340 hierarchy than they were before um and hierarchy obviously you know is is a fundamental organizing
00:24:28.620 principle uh for the right-wing and for conservatives and it's you know a central it's the central target
00:24:35.660 of leftist politics is hierarchy the leveling of hierarchy is the leftist project wherever it's found
00:24:42.400 uh and there are loads of other studies that i that i talk about actually you know at great length in the
00:24:47.620 in the book um i mean yes i i do think that improving the health of the nation and particularly improving
00:24:55.840 male health is a winning long-term strategy for the right and should be one that the right should focus
00:25:02.180 on i mean it's funny because you know once upon a time health was more or less the province of the left
00:25:09.860 actually you know you had hippies and all these kind of crunchy beatnik types you know uh all you know
00:25:16.320 eating their organic foods and and um uh their smoothies and talking about raw milk and all that
00:25:22.720 kind of stuff well those days are gone now i mean the left the left is explicitly kind of anti this stuff
00:25:28.740 actually and it was and it was very interesting during the election campaign to see that there was
00:25:34.080 no alternative to rfk jr and the mahar agenda from the democrats they just simply didn't acknowledge it
00:25:41.380 um uh they weren't interested in they didn't think it was a winning issue and maybe it maybe it isn't a
00:25:47.860 win i in fact i don't think it is a winning issue for the left now because what the left wants to do
00:25:52.480 is to foster dependency wants to foster dependency on the state in particular you know i mean you know you
00:25:59.520 want a big state you want you want big daddy to or big mommy to to give you everything um then yeah
00:26:06.340 it's great to have everybody everybody fat and useless um uh it's great to reduce people's capacity
00:26:13.540 to rely on themselves to be to be physically fit and courageous and uh especially for men to have
00:26:21.860 testosterone so i do think that this is a yeah that this is a winning i don't think that this is a
00:26:26.720 distraction i mean i think that this actually should be a should be and is at the moment at
00:26:31.080 least a fundamental part of the right-wing platform and it should remain so going forward
00:26:35.900 you know indefinitely i think actually absolutely i totally agree that's great i mean that's it's so
00:26:42.460 true i love the the denial of the testosterone studies from the left too the ways they can conjure up
00:26:47.260 because they know how much of an indictment really is of their politics but with that we are running out
00:26:52.760 of time but this is so fantastic i really appreciate you hopping on where can people
00:26:56.640 find you where can people find your book they're going to want more so where where can people find
00:27:00.100 you yeah so i'm on i'm on twitter uh baby gravy nine is my unfortunate handle i am the raw egg
00:27:06.480 nationalist baby gravy nine i have a sub stack raw egg stack dot com and my new book the last men
00:27:13.480 liberalism and the death of masculinity is out now from sky horse it's available on amazon as i said in
00:27:20.140 hardcover uh kindle and audiobook format and i will be uh doing a little bit of a book tour
00:27:26.920 over the next couple of weeks in the u.s i'll be appearing on info wars uh doing some live events in
00:27:32.800 new york and washington and maybe la as well so uh pay attention to my twitter if you want to find out
00:27:41.300 details and maybe maybe turn up at one of those events i love it dude thank you so much well i'll catch
00:27:46.180 you next time it's been a pleasure thank you all right well that was the raw egg national just the
00:27:51.740 perfect perfect person to come on and talk about these sorts of things uh yeah it's so true like
00:27:56.900 uh maha as a political vehicle is very real like we're not just doing this for fun like legitimately
00:28:02.420 sorting out uh the people's health is going to be very politically expedient uh testosterone huge
00:28:09.440 crisis uh people are getting fatter and gayer and uh i gotta lock in the book's great i'm just picked
00:28:15.400 up the copy but i gotta lock in and uh just really health max chud max chud maxing takes more than just
00:28:21.600 a mental change it takes a physical change as well so with that you can find me on x and instagram
00:28:27.020 at real tate brown we back tonight for timcast irl at 8 p.m be there or be square and thank you very
00:28:34.740 much for watching we will see you all next time
00:28:36.240 you
00:28:37.440 um
00:28:39.140 yeah
00:28:40.540 like we will see you starting like this in this first one
00:28:42.140 here's this episode I mentioned
00:28:43.140 you
00:28:44.160 absolutely
00:28:45.220 two
00:28:46.300 14
00:28:46.880 14
00:28:47.540 15
00:28:48.000 15
00:28:49.100 15
00:28:50.300 15
00:28:51.720 16
00:28:52.500 15
00:28:53.560 17
00:28:54.180 16
00:28:55.340 18
00:28:56.180 17
00:28:57.340 18
00:28:58.100 18
00:28:59.100 18
00:29:00.140 17
00:29:01.100 18
00:29:01.680 18
00:29:02.600 18
00:29:03.480 18
00:29:04.100 18
00:29:04.160 18
00:29:05.140 18