Liberals Are SOY BOYS, Reject Masculinity, DEBATE Me w⧸ John Doyle & The Soy Pill
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 25 minutes
Words per Minute
232.13469
Hate Speech Sentences
218
Summary
Amazon presents Amazon vs. The Mosquito: Liberals Reject Masculinity (feat. John Doyle and Andrew Yang) on Amazon Prime Video. This morning, we debate whether or not Liberal Men are Soy Boys.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.
00:00:04.820
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer.
00:00:09.120
From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game
00:00:12.900
and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino.
00:00:19.380
With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption,
00:00:24.440
UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun
00:00:41.320
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
00:00:44.360
please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
00:00:51.160
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:00:59.900
Surviving 100 million years, Mosquito shook off the plate tectonic breakup of Pangea,
00:01:06.280
the asteroid that eliminated the dinosaurs and the Ice Age.
00:01:10.600
But Lisa shopped on Amazon and bought a can of repellent,
00:01:14.200
a cute long-sleeved shirt, and a citronella candle.
00:01:38.140
This morning, our debate is liberalism rejecting masculinity.
00:01:42.720
We've got a couple of gentlemen joining us to have this debate.
00:01:46.340
Sir, would you like to introduce yourself first?
00:01:48.180
Before we start, one of us is going to have to change, right?
00:01:51.900
Well, we're not completely wearing the same thing, you know, but I was wearing it first.
00:01:56.880
Well, so I've been told by Alex Jones that you wear the beanie because you have the, what did he say?
00:02:01.200
He said, Tim Pool has the mark of the beast on his forehead and he hides it because he's the Antichrist.
00:02:05.800
Well, I mean, he calls it the mark of the beast.
00:02:15.260
But, you know, I try to own it, you know, and try to fight the stereotype.
00:02:22.500
I don't know if I would identify myself as such necessarily.
00:02:25.960
I'm simply a guy who talks about politics on the internet.
00:02:28.520
My name is John Doyle, and I'm glad to be back on the program.
00:02:38.520
His job and why he exists in the ecosystem is to sort of be a lightning rod and be like,
00:02:46.520
I mean, I respect a good physique, but it has to be that way because it's you.
00:02:50.200
Respecting a man's physique is pretty soy, I got to say.
00:02:54.780
I didn't say that, but no, I mean, it's indicative of discipline and things like that,
00:02:58.620
which, I mean, 99% of people on your side would reject, but it's good for you.
00:03:10.780
We were going over what is the core theme yesterday, and it's that masculinity is incompatible with
00:03:17.600
liberalism was one of the arguments or that liberalism rejects masculinity.
00:03:27.180
Yeah, I mean, that's absolutely true, whether you look at it from a fundamental perspective
00:03:30.860
where the idea behind liberalism is more or less derivative of this blank slate.
00:03:35.140
John Locke, father of liberalism, that we are all these blank slates,
00:03:38.740
and if there is to be a masculine or feminine identity, that is simply because of what's
00:03:42.980
popularly, I guess, argued to be like a social construct or something, but it's not something
00:03:48.540
There is no natural way for men and women to behave, and insofar as we see those throughout
00:03:52.580
society or history, it's because men typically have oppressed women for whichever reason.
00:03:57.200
And so I would say that it rejects the concept of masculinity, and there are ways to intellectualize
00:04:02.400
this and, you know, what is a real man or something, but I would just say that it's how men typically
00:04:09.180
Moreover, I would say it rejects it in terms of its political implementation, because when
00:04:13.780
liberalism or liberals tend to get in power, what we tend to see is not only they're being
00:04:19.380
rejected by men who are maybe more normal or masculine, as you see, whether it's you're
00:04:23.800
looking at who men are voting for, or you look at maybe the most, I guess, extreme manifestations
00:04:28.700
of left-wing men in the country, look at, like, the Antifa mugshots, they all tend to look a certain
00:04:33.480
way, and then when liberals get into power, they persecute masculinity. I mean, they make
00:04:38.040
male behavior illegal, they empower women, they demonize men throughout the culture, things of
00:04:42.240
that nature. There's even, like, a biological component, which I know we've covered on the
00:04:45.440
show before with RFK and different things they're putting into the...
00:04:48.540
What male behavior is, like, illegal from, like...
00:04:51.020
Oh, yeah. I mean, absolutely. Well, first of all, patriarchy, fatherhood, courting, all
00:04:57.200
Yes. Yeah. In many cases, like, typical male behavior, which would be used to take control
00:05:01.520
of your household, to meet a woman, things like that, are culturally enforced to either
00:05:05.920
be, you know, denigrated or demonized, or in some cases, like, yeah, you can have, you
00:05:09.360
know, police harass you if you make, you know, or maybe co-workers harass you or HR harass
00:05:13.740
you for making an inappropriate comment at the office or something like that.
00:05:20.480
there is not that on the books it says being a man is illegal. Like, obviously, beating
00:05:26.480
your wife is illegal, and it should be. However, there are circumstances where because of this
00:05:31.000
system, the balances of it, men who don't beat their wives, who actually get beaten by their
00:05:36.720
wives, will still have the police called on them, and they are more likely to get arrested.
00:05:40.620
Yeah, but that's not making masculinity illegal. That's a concept of these, you know, perceived
00:05:45.300
gender roles. You know, women are perceived as weaker, and frankly, mostly are. So if that
00:05:49.260
does happen, it's just a matter of like, hey, there's this big guy.
00:05:53.980
Yeah, well, I mean, just in general, they're on a spectrum. Like, no, I mean, people get
00:05:57.620
mad at the left for like rejecting the reality of like, you know, most women are weaker than
00:06:01.380
most men, which is true. But like, that does come back and hurt men, too, sometimes when
00:06:05.660
it's like, oh, yeah, like, how could this woman be beating this man? Like, how could that
00:06:08.600
possibly happen? But that's a factor of viewing women as less.
00:06:12.520
I'm just saying, if we're going to view the law as a rigid, it is as it is, then I would
00:06:19.800
disagree with you, John. It's not illegal to be a man. But if we're looking at the function
00:06:24.560
of what law does, because typically we don't, I bring this up all the time, there are laws
00:06:30.780
Like, my favorite, as I was reading this book, and it said it's illegal in Boston to cool
00:06:34.340
a pie on your windowsill on Tuesday or something.
00:06:36.280
Well, yeah, because it interferes with air traffic when the people float through the air.
00:06:40.380
Well, back in the day, it was bears. It's like, you live in a small village, you don't
00:06:43.320
want a bear coming by, don't put food in your windowsill, but now who cares, right?
00:06:46.380
It's the results of social incentives, cultural programming, which create the same effect,
00:06:50.580
a deterrent that would be, you know, created perhaps by a law that's enforced, but without
00:06:54.600
having the bad optics of, like, literally making it illegal to be a man or something, yeah.
00:06:58.840
Yeah, so there's an apparatus of law that is anti-male or masculine.
00:07:06.640
I don't know, I just, I don't see that. So, I hear what you're saying.
00:07:10.120
I do see, I think a problem with the left is for years being a straight white guy, it
00:07:16.220
was like the norm, right? And then finally, the left starts getting into power, and it's
00:07:19.640
like, hey, let's highlight all these marginalized voices, right? Like, women, come here, black
00:07:23.060
people, come here, trans voices, gay voices, whatever. And the problem is, now it's not
00:07:27.480
focused on men, and a lot of these pendulum-swinging people are like, yeah, you guys are the
00:07:30.920
patriarchy, you guys are the cishet white males, and there is, like, a attack or at least
00:07:34.980
a narrative against that. But, I don't know, it kind of reminds me of something
00:07:38.060
like, white privilege, like, that term, where, if you look, like, back in the 90s
00:07:42.560
and 2000s, I want to say, like, kind of everyone just accepted, like, oh yeah, black
00:07:45.520
people get treated worse by the police. Like, they have it worse off. Like, there's
00:07:49.020
the, um, what's that onion skit, where it's like, this is America, no one deserves to
00:07:53.140
be treated like a black man, right? Like, yeah, it's like, they rule that a white
00:07:57.140
woman could be treated as a black man, that's how it's interesting, right? And it's like,
00:08:00.280
that was kind of, like, culturally accepted. Yes, I know that one. But as soon as you
00:08:02.400
introduced the term, like, white privilege, now you have people like, you know, white
00:08:06.120
guys, like, even me, when I first heard this in high school, I was like, what the
00:08:08.280
fuck does that mean? You know, like, I have problems, right? Like, I, things are
00:08:10.980
happening to me that are out of my control that suck, and now you're telling me my
00:08:13.840
life's just better? Like, this is kind of this weird term that's, like, attacking
00:08:17.640
the people that really haven't done anything wrong in a way to frame the idea that
00:08:21.000
other people are less well off. And I see that kind of happening with men now, where
00:08:24.500
they're no longer centered, because it was the norm for so long, and so people feel
00:08:28.760
rejected from the left. But really, the left is this umbrella of, hey, yeah, you can be
00:08:32.940
a soy boy, you can be like, you know, a little twinkie guy, femme, coded, gay, whatever. But
00:08:37.640
you can also be masculine. But those masculine, traditionally masculine people, which is the
00:08:41.180
norm, which most people do fall into, are not, don't feel as welcome, because they're
00:08:45.120
not the only thing that's being focused on, which is what the right does, right? It's
00:08:48.180
like, hey, you can be, this is all we are, rather than this is the umbrella that
00:08:52.040
encompasses that. And people like me, like, I, I grew up in the most progressive place,
00:08:56.620
like, on the planet, in San Francisco. I went to, like, a liberal
00:08:58.580
college, UC San Diego. This is like, you know, all the SJWs, there were people like
00:09:02.560
on the middle of the campus with signs that said, like, white men bore me, you
00:09:05.600
know, or little posters are like, oh, don't say minorities, say POC, right? Like
00:09:09.440
very, very progressive SJW stuff back in 2016 era. And like, none of that made me
00:09:13.780
less masculine, or make me want to be less masculine. It just made me say, oh, okay,
00:09:18.020
that's kind of annoying, or like, that's weird. But like, the idea that it's such a
00:09:22.100
turnoff, that it's pushing you into a different party is weird to me, because like, my
00:09:25.900
ideals haven't changed. It's just like, oh, okay, like, I can
00:09:28.560
still be me, I can still be this, in this party, I'm just not the sole focus.
00:09:32.540
I don't think it's about sole focus or centering or anything. I mean, if you even
00:09:36.340
are familiar with like, the average temperament or disposition of a
00:09:39.380
conservative or a Republican, these are people who fundamentally like, just want
00:09:42.760
to be left alone. Like, you don't have to go and talk to a bunch of like, Trump
00:09:45.900
supporters and appeal to them as like, the white vote, or the straight vote, or
00:09:49.820
things of that nature. And I think it is actually pushing people who otherwise would
00:09:53.320
have preferred to identify themselves with like, the predominant party, into the arms of
00:09:57.660
Republicans or Trump, as has been the case with a lot of media personalities, for
00:10:01.360
example, because they do feel ostracized, not just because of maybe some of the
00:10:05.180
excesses that you see on the college campus with like, a sign or a t-shirt that
00:10:08.580
says like, boys are icky, or like, down with white power or something. But because the
00:10:12.680
policies which these people are pursuing, ultimately, are dispossessing normal white
00:10:17.320
Americans. And they're becoming more aware of that, which is why they're walking
00:10:20.360
away. They may agree with you on, you know, wanting to be left alone, people can have
00:10:23.780
their own identity. But at the end of the day, when that party gets into power, they
00:10:27.480
act in ways which dispossess normal Americans, takes money from them, opportunities
00:10:31.480
from them, and redistributes it to literally the entire world, and demonizes
00:10:34.880
them throughout the culture. So I would like it to be some umbrella. I think that
00:10:38.380
would be nice, but that's not what we tend to see when you guys get into power. And
00:10:42.160
The issue is that, even as you're describing it, people view politics and people of all
00:10:50.280
generations as a single group. So when you say things like, you know, it's the right,
00:10:56.460
You're a podcast listener, and this is a podcast ad heard only in Canada. Reach great
00:11:01.460
Canadian listeners like yourself with podcast advertising from Libsyn ads. Choose from
00:11:06.340
hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements or run a pre-produced ad like this
00:11:11.280
one across thousands of shows to reach your target audience with Libsyn ads. Email Bob
00:11:17.260
at Libsyn.com to learn more. That's B-O-B at L-I-B-S-Y-N.com.
00:11:24.020
Hi, I'm Chris Gethard, and I'm very excited to tell you about Beautiful Anonymous, a podcast
00:11:27.820
where I talk to random people on the phone. I tweet out a phone number, thousands of people
00:11:32.000
try to call, talk to one of them, they stay anonymous, I can't hang up, that's all the
00:11:36.180
rules. I never know what's going to happen. We get serious ones. I've talked with meth
00:11:40.400
dealers on their way to prison. I've talked to people who survived mass shootings, crazy
00:11:44.220
funny ones. I talked to a guy with a goose laugh, somebody who dresses up as a pirate
00:11:47.720
on the weekends. I never know what's going to happen. It's a great show. Subscribe today,
00:11:53.640
Masculine men or whatever on the left is trying to lift up voices that aren't actually white
00:11:57.560
men. That is saying that the younger generation of liberals have an issue with boomers and Gen
00:12:04.500
X, so they penalize Gen Z men in a way that these Gen Z men can't comprehend or they were
00:12:12.040
I think it's perceived as penalizing. I don't think it is, but I know what you mean.
00:12:19.040
A group attacking white people, insulting white people, and then they're allowed to
00:12:24.060
do it, is creating a condition by which you are allowed to be racist to a group of men
00:12:28.860
that did not experience this white privilege that was described.
00:12:33.120
First of all, again, as much as I have a problem with the term white privilege, I think you
00:12:36.800
can look at statistics of, do white people get as much shit as black people?
00:12:40.980
Great. Now let's go back to what I was saying about Gen Z.
00:12:43.120
I'm just saying, you do experience it, but the problem is like-
00:12:46.960
But an 18-year-old man did not experience the white privilege of a 55-year-old white
00:12:53.160
An 18-year-old who's entering the world and saying, man, it's really hard on me.
00:12:57.180
And then the left in these colleges say, ha, you're white, you're bad, you're stupid, you
00:13:02.340
And when they go, please stop making fun of me, they go, no, you have white privilege.
00:13:05.020
And he goes, no, the old guy might have, but I don't.
00:13:07.960
Well, that's the thing is when I say, hey, generationally, you can look at the way that
00:13:13.520
Yeah, like you're not experiencing the boomer housing market, right?
00:13:18.500
They bought a house for like, you know, 300 grand and it's now worth like a bajillion
00:13:26.520
But that's not the same thing as white privilege.
00:13:33.760
The idea that like that has something to do with like the way that different races
00:13:38.100
are treated by some sort of system, I think is irrelevant.
00:13:40.280
But the point is, this is what I'm saying is like, you don't feel white privilege.
00:13:42.980
I'm not like, oh boy, what a great day to, well, I am like, what a great day to be white
00:13:46.620
because like, let's be real, it's kind of hard to be all the other races.
00:13:53.100
The point is like, if it was framed to something like black detriment.
00:14:00.700
When I was growing up, I was told that if I wrote, if I put down that I was Mexican,
00:14:06.780
So it's like, so my parents told me not to put down that I was Asian when I was applying
00:14:10.000
for anything because I'd be discriminated against.
00:14:11.760
You're talking about like DEI policies and how like, or maybe like a front of action thing
00:14:14.860
that's like trying to correct historical records.
00:14:17.240
So like a white person might feel like, well, this guy, because this happened to me in college.
00:14:20.580
Like I saw people that were maybe not as like smart as me get advantages, maybe because
00:14:25.180
it was like a, you know, SWE is like society of women engineers, like they'd get certain
00:14:30.240
And it's like, well, shit, like I didn't get 10 grand to just go and do this, like one
00:14:34.620
It's literally just because you have a vagina that does have no privilege.
00:14:39.500
The point is like, if you're looking at a societal thing, it's like, that is something
00:14:42.220
that in this specific, you know, minutia of college.
00:14:45.200
There are people that are going to be lifted up over maybe white people, but you don't see
00:14:48.200
that as privilege insofar as like, Hey, I don't feel like I'm getting the better
00:14:52.520
In fact, these people are, but it's talking about a historical thing of, Oh, these people
00:14:56.920
had a, it worse off for so long, but that's why I would call it like a black detriment
00:15:06.360
I mean, we've been following the vector of like progressivism and civil rights for what
00:15:12.320
I mean, whether it's like familial wealth, house ownership, black generational wealth right
00:15:17.080
now is like similar levels to like reconstruction era.
00:15:21.260
So we've been following this vector of progressivism and saying that this is to make up for injustices
00:15:26.620
And this vector would suggest that those injustices have been alleviated because it's now illegal
00:15:33.040
Why would it suggest that it's been alleviated?
00:15:34.960
Because we have the civil rights movement, the great society, all of these fruits, which
00:15:38.560
has made it illegal for you to discriminate in the ways that you're alluding to in terms
00:15:42.600
So if that's been made illegal, then it would suggest that maybe these injustices were not
00:15:47.860
orchestrated from the top down, people just being mean and racist for no reason, but that
00:15:51.520
there are just cultural things that are different between people who exist in America, which
00:15:54.700
is why there really hasn't been a big change between the 60s and now in terms of performing.
00:15:59.200
I would argue that blockbusting and redlining, which still exists today illicitly, would be
00:16:06.500
Redlining, if you look at the actual counties which were affected, it didn't take into account
00:16:09.820
things like credit score income, if you actually look at the data behind redlining, it's just
00:16:13.360
a liberal talking point the same way that Jimmy, I don't know, blockbusting.
00:16:16.820
Blockbusting is when, still to this day, real estate agents will intentionally buy a house,
00:16:24.000
move a black family into a white neighborhood, then solicit the residents there to sell their
00:16:29.520
properties because, quote, there goes the neighborhood, and then try and buy the house
00:16:34.500
And then what they do is they buy the house, rent it to a black family, go to all the houses
00:16:39.480
and say property values will go down because a black family moved into your neighborhood.
00:16:47.480
Then, a year later, they move the black family out, restore the prices up to where they are
00:16:52.880
This was made illegal in the 80s, but it was a principle way by which they perpetuated
00:16:59.720
We still see this today where it is typically recognized as a racist market fact.
00:17:07.760
I'm not saying there's an individual who's racist, but it's black people.
00:17:10.400
But you go to any real estate agent and ask them, like, hey, you've got investment properties.
00:17:16.780
What would you do if a black family moved next to your investment property?
00:17:20.400
They're going to tell you they're going to sell.
00:17:22.180
And they're going to say, look, I've got no problem with a black family.
00:17:24.460
Tons of friends are black, but the market will react negatively to this.
00:17:27.240
So I probably don't want to lose money and I would sell.
00:17:35.700
You know, it's funny because even liberals do it.
00:17:37.940
Like, the story I've told is a woman that I worked with who was this progressive Hispanic
00:17:42.300
She said that she inherited a property in New York City from her, you know, grandpa or
00:17:53.040
And I said, what would you do if a black family moved next door to your property?
00:17:58.940
And she goes, I'm not trying to be racist, but like my property would lose all its value
00:18:03.060
And I'm like, OK, so long as you believe that and perpetuate it, that's going to cause
00:18:07.600
problems to the net worth and like the generational wealth of black families.
00:18:15.140
That's kind of what people describe when they talk about systemic racism.
00:18:17.420
It doesn't take a like single individual being like, oh, I hate black people, like throw
00:18:23.540
And that's the other thing is like you talk about like, yeah, it is illegal.
00:18:25.620
Well, yeah, we did pass the civil rights law, but like, you know, kicking and screaming
00:18:30.080
And those people didn't disappear and their kids probably have very similar values.
00:18:34.520
But the idea that like, oh, well, because it's illegal, it's gone now.
00:18:39.540
These people still hold these views in a lot of different places.
00:18:42.720
I mean, if there were any evidence that it were actually happening, even on the individual
00:18:45.860
level, like this is the example that comes to mind.
00:18:49.480
Papa John literally said the N word in a meeting telling employees of what not to say.
00:18:56.440
Papa John said something to the effect of how come Colonel Sanders said N word and he got
00:19:05.460
He was condemning that Colonel Sanders used a slur and no one cared.
00:19:09.940
And they used that against them to strip him of everything.
00:19:13.960
Maybe I can use this to pivot back to the topic though, actually.
00:19:15.740
Any instance of racism, you can file civil suits, you can do whatever.
00:19:21.440
You can get a book tour, whatever it is, if these instances were actually existing, even
00:19:26.100
And so I feel like it's this game of, I don't know, whack-a-mole where it's like, oh, surely
00:19:29.980
these things must be being caused by institutional racism, even at the individual level.
00:19:34.800
Whereas, I mean, maybe we've got the thing with the blockbusting, but there are also
00:19:38.160
things like education, school funding, crime rates, of course, all sorts of different things
00:19:43.700
that we could use to explain the outcomes of different cultures in this country that
00:19:47.180
we can't quite find so precisely with things like institutional racism or even anecdotally.
00:19:52.240
But all of those things you just mentioned can be products of the institutional racism
00:19:55.320
like blockbusting, where it's like, hey, this entire neighborhood of black people is just
00:20:00.020
more poor because of something that started off as a racism thing, or maybe from someone who
00:20:04.360
was well-meaning, a liberal, progressive, woke person, and yet this is now downstream effects.
00:20:09.260
That means the school is going to be underfunded.
00:20:11.640
That's why they get funding from the federal government.
00:20:13.460
You know, they don't, it's like 10%, I think, for like public schools.
00:20:16.320
On average, I think schools that are a majority minority receive like 1% greater funding from
00:20:22.000
the federal government than schools that are predominantly white, even.
00:20:24.720
I mean, you go, they even have better credentialed teachers with, you know, advanced degrees.
00:20:30.620
And I remember I went down to Cast Tech High School in Detroit because I was trying to do
00:20:35.000
And it was better than my high school, which was in Birmingham Public Schools.
00:20:37.600
It was supposed to be like one of the better districts.
00:20:40.600
I'm like walking in between like crackheads and human feces.
00:20:43.520
And I go into what looks like like a Silicon Valley startup building.
00:20:46.760
And I was like, okay, this is like pretty advanced.
00:20:48.700
Yet, I don't know how many kids in Detroit schools are literate.
00:20:52.700
Like 1% I don't think is going to make a huge difference.
00:20:58.220
And I was in like the okay kind of middle of the line mixed school.
00:21:01.640
But all the schools down in Richmond, which is like a notoriously poor neighborhood, were
00:21:07.280
I mean, there's literally, I think a movie about just how bad that was like Coach Carter
00:21:14.280
And these kids like they grew up, they don't have anything.
00:21:16.440
These like they don't have a lot of opportunities.
00:21:17.760
I don't think you can just attribute this to like, well, it's just the cultural thing.
00:21:20.900
But the culture is downstream of definitely things that happen due to them being in these
00:21:28.360
But wait, I wanted to focus back to the masculinity thing because you mentioned the Papa John
00:21:31.180
thing of this idea that like, you know, he didn't actually do anything wrong, I don't
00:21:34.220
He quoted someone, you know, who did something wrong to disparage that racist guy, right?
00:21:38.820
And then the reaction was, let's cancel Papa John, despite the fact that if you look
00:21:42.160
at this in context, this man has no ill will towards black people.
00:21:44.680
This man is specifically trying to call out racism.
00:21:46.820
And I think that's kind of what's going on with the masculinity thing where you get this
00:21:51.340
I know you covered the Gillette commercial, right?
00:21:53.800
Where like everyone freaked out because he was like calling out men.
00:22:01.860
And like this idea that like the pendulum swing back to the left is, hey, for so long
00:22:08.360
And rather than try to like integrate and like, hey, man, like let's fix men as men.
00:22:12.800
It's more of this like, hey, guys, like look at patriarchy.
00:22:15.700
Look at this like, you know, the men control everything.
00:22:18.800
And like this idea does alienate people because you hear this and like you're like, well,
00:22:22.160
even if you're not one of those people, it's like, oh, well, why are you being mean to me?
00:22:24.820
Like you said, like, why are you pushing this on me?
00:22:26.520
And the reaction of like the concept of toxic masculinity becomes this like, oh, so being
00:22:32.400
Even though it's trying to describe the worst parts of masculinity, it's unfortunate that
00:22:35.940
like people just hear that and they get turned off instantly.
00:22:37.920
And it's like this overreaction from the left that causes an even more overreaction from
00:22:43.520
How come the toxic masculinity and patriarchy and white supremacy narratives don't exist
00:22:49.900
in other countries to their dominant racial groups?
00:22:54.060
Like in China, how come there's no like left side of their, you know, political spectrum
00:22:59.680
saying Han supremacy is bad and, you know, Chinese people are oppressors.
00:23:06.040
Do they not like lock up dissidents to a degree there?
00:23:09.060
That's it's the point being like, where is their political movement calling out their
00:23:16.040
I don't know if there is one for like racial and moral.
00:23:18.000
I mean, you can look at the concept of Taiwan or Hong Kong and these people kind of rebelling
00:23:31.220
But I think they consider themselves like different peoples, right?
00:23:34.640
Well, the Taiwanese are going to say they're Taiwanese for sure.
00:23:37.220
And China is going to say the Taiwanese are Chinese.
00:23:39.740
My point is in the United States, the only the only group with racial outgroup preference
00:23:48.160
Blacks, Asians, Latinos have a racial in-group preference and white conservatives have a
00:23:54.860
White liberals have a racial outgroup preference.
00:23:56.820
You say outgroup preference like they like if you pull them, they're like more likely to
00:23:59.760
support their community than the party or something like that.
00:24:01.500
No, they're more likely to support non-white people.
00:24:04.420
And so white liberals are the only group that would support non-white liberals.
00:24:08.420
So white, the racial outgroup meaning black people are more likely to vote for and support
00:24:14.580
Latinos are more likely for Latinos, Asians for Asians, white conservatives for white
00:24:20.640
Sounds like white liberals are the least racist people.
00:24:25.380
Well, if we're willing to vote for anyone in our outgroup?
00:24:33.340
Oh, they specifically have an anti-white bias, you're saying?
00:24:37.540
What I heard from that is like, oh, they're willing to support anyone other than specifically
00:24:41.280
white people, which is kind of what my experience has been in like San Francisco.
00:24:44.620
It's not, let me be clear, there are people on like the fringe left that are like, oh,
00:24:49.080
But for the most part, it's just like, hey, like I'll support anyone regardless of their
00:24:52.300
And like, that's kind of what that sounded like to me, or at least maybe that was me projecting
00:24:56.940
Like progressive activists, one might say are nuts, but they do hold a disproportionate
00:25:01.060
amount of power among the liberal faction in this country, be it the Democrats or otherwise.
00:25:07.600
And then you see how they implement this in universities and at protests with the progressive
00:25:12.540
If you're a white man, shut up, sit down, don't speak.
00:25:14.800
See, that's the thing is I experienced that right at the SJW college UCSD, right?
00:25:24.600
So like, I thought like going in, I would watch, I would watch Tim Pool.
00:25:30.320
And I thought this was going to be like the wildest thing ever.
00:25:32.440
And going into that, it was really just kind of tame.
00:25:34.760
Like sometimes they would say some wild stuff, but it was never like, hey, you're a white
00:25:38.460
If anything, I was the guy talking in class the most, like because I was the one who was
00:25:44.200
I was really interested in like, hey, like this seems like an insane idea.
00:25:47.940
Like no one ever like marginalized me for being white.
00:25:51.220
At the worst, there was maybe some rhetoric, but that's kind of like my whole thing about
00:25:54.160
this masculinity thing is, yeah, I get some bad things coming at me, maybe some like mean
00:25:59.520
comments, but that's like really the extent of it.
00:26:03.360
And like, why let that, why let that change like who I am and my politics and make me feel
00:26:08.740
like it didn't make me feel like I couldn't be myself in the liberal party.
00:26:12.080
Yeah, I mean, I would say that I know we all have our opinions and that's our prerogative,
00:26:19.240
but we do live in a two party system, which is to say that you have to at some point align
00:26:23.620
yourself with whichever party you believe is going to be a better approximation of how
00:26:28.000
And so I have complete respect for your opinions and your experience and you aligning yourself
00:26:32.440
with progressives, maybe even voting for Democrats.
00:26:34.220
But the problem is that when Democrats are in charge, whether that be expressly in political
00:26:39.180
institutions or even culturally, you do see that demonization, which maybe is caricaturized
00:26:45.700
But even then, I mean, you can trace this back to growing up and you may not feel like,
00:26:50.060
you know, a mean comment here or there is really like stripping you of some identity,
00:26:58.380
You're supposed to behave and sit up straight and do all this.
00:27:00.520
And boys are being plugged into this learning environment, which is frankly like ailing into
00:27:04.200
them in the way that boys tend to learn versus girls.
00:27:07.980
Like I said, my middle school was the most progressive private middle school you could
00:27:17.680
To be fair, I did a little rowdy stuff and I got in trouble for that.
00:27:20.240
But it was never like, oh, you need to sit down and shut up like a girl.
00:27:24.200
But the fact is that males tend to have a more tactile learning basis.
00:27:35.420
But the entire school system is we give you seven hours of sit down and shut up and we
00:27:40.620
give you half an hour of go run and play, where boys probably need substantially more
00:27:47.220
And so what John's saying is it's not that they're going to the boys and saying, you're
00:27:51.640
They're saying behave in the way we've outlined.
00:27:55.180
Which is against their nature is kind of the argument.
00:27:59.640
It creates conditions which are going to make them less successful and it tries to elevate
00:28:03.500
women into being more successful, let alone to mention, you know, the things, all these
00:28:06.580
programs, outreach, women in STEM, everything like that.
00:28:09.500
Because like, okay, when you say they're going to be less successful, I mean, like this
00:28:12.040
has kind of been how we've done schooling for decades, right?
00:28:14.080
Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.
00:28:18.980
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer.
00:28:23.300
From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them
00:28:28.200
throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino.
00:28:33.540
With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz,
00:28:39.940
and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun.
00:28:55.720
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact
00:28:59.100
Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
00:29:05.320
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:29:14.160
Surviving 100 million years, Mosquito shook off the plate tectonic breakup of Pangea,
00:29:20.460
the asteroid that eliminated the dinosaurs and the Ice Age.
00:29:24.780
But Lisa shopped on Amazon and bought a can of repellent, a cute long-sleeved shirt, and
00:29:38.620
Like, this wasn't really borne out in the past 100 years that men were less successful
00:29:45.120
That's not, well, no, no, it's not, I guess you can say feminized, but, uh.
00:29:50.780
Like, they're saying, like, take a look at the last 100 years.
00:29:53.900
Quite literally, I think the argument would support that over the last 100 years of industrialized,
00:29:59.660
institutionalized learning facilities, it has been to the detriment of men, and we can
00:30:05.940
Men are more likely to commit suicide, they don't live as long, they're more likely to
00:30:10.940
be unemployed, they're more likely to be unemployed.
00:30:13.800
Right now, especially in this generation, millennials and Gen Z, they're more likely to
00:30:18.580
live at home with their parents, not have jobs, not go to university.
00:30:20.480
But if you're comparing this to 10 years ago or 20 years ago, maybe, yeah, sure.
00:30:22.980
But if we're looking at the past 100 years, and you talked about industrialization, where
00:30:26.100
it's like, yeah, I think just on a whole, everyone is better off post, like, 1860s,
00:30:30.100
like, invention of factories, like, as people move in cities.
00:30:32.920
Since we've implemented this institutionalized learning industrialization, you've had a
00:30:43.000
What industrialized learning are you talking about?
00:30:45.140
Industrialized learning is when, pre-industrial revolution, you had small school rooms, sort
00:30:51.380
Yeah, like the schoolhouse with the one teacher and the 20 kids or whatever.
00:30:55.380
A lot of kids would just learn from their parents, or through correspondence, or through
00:30:59.100
self-study, or through their, you know, largely homeschooling.
00:31:01.400
Yeah, but I mean, if we're comparing it to that, we wouldn't say, like, we're smarter,
00:31:06.320
I mean, I feel like most people are doing better, absolutely, than the, like, 1850s learning.
00:31:10.660
But we're not talking about technological advancement.
00:31:14.680
Yeah, I'm talking about, like, life expectancy, happiness, like...
00:31:17.720
Technological advancement, indeed, has continued to go up, largely due to oil.
00:31:24.780
No, maybe not from the 1850s, but quite recently, life expectancy has dipped, I think, in the
00:31:28.980
last five or ten years or so, particularly for white men who have been so vilified unfairly.
00:31:37.460
The general social survey, or, you know, as Tim mentioned, suicide rates.
00:31:44.140
I mean, happiness is relative, it's subjective, and humans...
00:31:48.500
But the fact that we have a large portion of the younger generation of men, their needs,
00:31:53.560
not in employment, education, and training, is indicative of a failure of our society
00:31:58.560
Women are more likely to go to university and graduate than men by, like, what?
00:32:03.660
But their suicide rates are up, as well, right?
00:32:05.780
I mean, men are better at everything, so that's why we kill ourselves more, because we're
00:32:10.040
I mean, people always bring up gun deaths, right?
00:32:11.640
Like, I think half of them, there's, like, 13,000 of them per year.
00:32:19.240
And women tend to do things like, what, like, risk stuff, pills, things that you can recover
00:32:24.160
And I think, like, it's one of those things where people are unhappier in the trends right
00:32:27.960
now because of what you're talking about, because you look at your boomer dad and your
00:32:32.360
Like, you've got all these opportunities, and I don't get any of these, and there's all
00:32:35.460
It's like, what's the big lie of, like, just go to college, you'll be successful.
00:32:41.780
A lot of people just didn't get jobs out of college.
00:32:45.140
The only people I know in my generation, I'm 29, that have a house are the two engineers
00:32:54.320
They're in, you know, some other place where the cost of living is much easier.
00:32:56.860
So, like, I think this idea that this is because of the, you know, demonization of men is not
00:33:02.880
People had this expectation of what life was supposed to be, and it's just not happening.
00:33:06.700
And so all these, like, as a whole, society in our generation is more unhappy because
00:33:13.140
So, once again, the issue is if you're an 18-year-old white man and you grew up in a
00:33:22.860
Like, when I say privilege, you don't have the Gen X privilege, right?
00:33:27.220
But it's like, hey, like, because, again, I hate the word privilege here because it's
00:33:30.280
like, you don't feel the idea of black people or your cops are less likely to attack you
00:33:35.440
Because what I would say is the challenge with what you're describing is it's based on
00:33:42.060
class for the most part with sometimes a racial component.
00:33:46.680
I was reading a study actually from, I want to say this is, it's on a book called How Fascism
00:33:51.000
Works, which is like the most liberal book I could have brought up here.
00:33:53.300
But it was talking about the hiring practices of people who report themselves as former convicts.
00:33:59.720
And it was like black versus white, not a former convict, black versus white, former
00:34:04.320
And for like the black who are not a former convict, the percentage of whether or not
00:34:08.320
you get hired is already like 10 times lower or something ridiculously low.
00:34:11.240
And then for the black convict level, even the white former convicts were getting like
00:34:16.980
It does seem like there is at least this product of, and people have that privilege.
00:34:21.560
I don't like that because if I'm a white guy not getting hired, I don't feel privileged,
00:34:26.260
So the issue is there's not just a thing as white privilege.
00:34:31.740
Because what I just described is what people mean, but I think that's a bad word.
00:34:35.360
Because when you're trying to determine any kind of like fact basis in science, we look
00:34:43.640
And when you look at any other non-white nation, these concepts don't exist.
00:34:53.280
So if I finish the point that I'm trying to make, instead of you interrupting before
00:34:56.300
the point can be completed, the Han Chinese, for instance, have an ethnic majority and
00:35:00.440
supremacy, and they experience what one would define as a privilege.
00:35:09.120
A nation's ethnic and cultural majority tends to dictate what they want and what they
00:35:25.440
And if you're a Gen Z white man, you've never experienced such a thing.
00:35:28.420
So when they say, you know, white guys would go and apply for a job, they'd get it.
00:35:32.520
And now a 17-year-old white guy applies and they go, no white people.
00:35:38.500
I'm sure this has happened before, but is there a massive influx of people like, we
00:35:42.780
I mean, first of all, it's literally legal, right?
00:35:44.580
It should be, but this is typically what the left supports.
00:35:50.220
I don't think people are not as a whole supporting the idea of, we can't hire white
00:35:54.020
94% of jobs in the post-Floyd era went to people of color, to women in the S&P 100
00:36:00.860
Boosting a marginalized group is not the same as saying, no white men.
00:36:03.500
If there are people that say, you cannot hire white men-
00:36:06.140
No, it's not, because you're assuming it's a zero-sum game.
00:36:11.320
If he started a company and all he were hiring were white men, T-minus what?
00:36:17.080
You cannot start an S&P 100 company or some serious company without hiring at least some
00:36:23.040
So it's illegal to hire based on merit, which yes, in practice makes it illegal to hire
00:36:26.920
Well, that's not illegal to be hired based on merit, first of all, because the idea
00:36:29.540
No, because you're describing it like, ah, they just found a black woman on the street and
00:36:33.380
Versus like, hey, when you look at a pool of qualified candidates, you can't select one
00:36:41.280
If it was one slot and you're like, for this one job, you can't hire a white guy.
00:36:44.500
I think the only thing that would ever make sense for that is if you're casting for a
00:36:49.960
But it is a fact that this happens, that white guys are passed over.
00:36:53.660
Right, but you're describing it as a phenomenon that is so widespread that every 18-year-old
00:36:58.120
zillennial is experiencing this, which at least in my experience is growing up in this
00:37:02.300
progressive area, in the most progressive place on the planet, this is not happening.
00:37:05.460
I'm not getting discriminated against for being white.
00:37:07.800
Like I said, I'll get some insults here or there, but it's not like-
00:37:09.900
That's called being discriminated against for being white, yes.
00:37:12.140
Okay, sure, but not on an institutional level for jobs.
00:37:16.700
I'm comparing it to every other white person that I graduated with, all the white people
00:37:22.420
Generations don't experience the same thing as the other generation.
00:37:27.740
I am in Gen Z technically, and I grow up around, I hang out with a lot of younger people because
00:37:37.040
Yes, absolutely, but I don't think it's because of white men discrimination.
00:37:41.760
The point is, when the left comes out and says, we want affirmative action in hiring and
00:37:45.740
colleges and public contracting, the 17 or 18-year-old white man is going, whatever
00:37:51.360
it is you think boomers got, I don't have, I don't get.
00:37:55.220
But, so when you create a racially discriminatory system, you have created a privilege for certain
00:38:05.060
Like, you don't, even if, like, just for a second, assume that the phenomenon that we
00:38:08.440
both agree exists is called white privilege, just because that's what people call it.
00:38:11.560
It exists insofar as, like, yeah, this person might be preference in this specific
00:38:15.060
area, or, you know, you might not just face the same problem as a black person here,
00:38:21.180
You don't feel, I don't believe that it exists.
00:38:22.740
You don't feel the absence of something, well, you agree the majority group in control is
00:38:28.440
going to have some sort of, like, in-group preference for that same.
00:38:30.880
Which for the past 15, 20 years has been liberal left, so they're, they're white critical.
00:38:36.180
I mean, our country is not, like, a liberal left majority ruled by, they're not, like,
00:38:40.300
When Jack Dorsey was in charge of X, for instance, if you post FBI crime stats, you'd
00:38:45.220
I'm sorry, your, your example of whether or not white men are, or liberals are in control
00:38:53.520
Perhaps I could describe it as Facebook, YouTube, and X, the three largest social media platforms
00:39:00.700
Banning people for, for posting fact data because it was deemed racist.
00:39:04.240
Yeah, but that's not just posting the fact data.
00:39:06.680
Almost every, if you're posting, like, 1350 stuff, it's because you're trying to paint
00:39:09.720
a greater narrative of, oh, you know, black people have a crime gene or something.
00:39:13.720
I'm saying that if you're using the example of, like, oh, look at our institutions and
00:39:18.700
If you're talking about social media, yeah, they were for a while.
00:39:20.660
I think that has since shifted, obviously, especially...
00:39:22.800
And major cities, institutions are liberal as well.
00:39:25.340
But if you're talking about, like, the country as a whole, jobs, like, all these places,
00:39:32.840
And, like, half the country, sure, is, like, liberal, progressive, not progressive, liberal
00:39:37.600
But the idea that, like, that is the same as saying, like, a white majority in-group
00:39:43.820
I guess you might say, like, certain people might discriminate against your politics in
00:39:47.640
Definitely in San Francisco, I've had people who are, you know, mag-leaning at the least.
00:39:51.000
But, like, that is not the same as, like, a white in-group preference that does exist
00:39:56.740
This is a fact statement that we had Supreme Court hearings over as to liberal institutions
00:40:09.840
I'm saying this is not the widespread concept of America is this in-group privilege for white
00:40:21.040
Liberal progressives being the majority in-group.
00:40:23.680
In the same way you might say that America was a primary white in-group preference in,
00:40:28.420
Like, there's not, like, that sort of thing going on.
00:40:30.940
Like, to the extent of, like, oh, we're, like...
00:40:32.540
The point being, the left right now is penalizing young men for something they did not do.
00:40:39.900
Like, you talked about discrimination, which is true.
00:40:42.220
Yeah, if you apply to go to Harvard, you have to score higher substantially than a Latino
00:40:50.660
That sort of, but again, this is, like, a singular institution.
00:40:52.520
They literally deduct against your score based on your race.
00:40:55.280
And they do that for, like, Asians the worst, right, too?
00:41:05.860
They changed the way they went about it, which was another controversy.
00:41:11.360
But this is also one of the things where I'm, like, I haven't gotten to finish this point,
00:41:14.060
but the idea, like, you don't experience privilege is, like, you don't.
00:41:18.920
You don't feel that because it's not happening to you.
00:41:26.020
So, like, if someone is, like, oh, like, let's just say we're talking about the 1960s,
00:41:29.600
where, like, obviously you would assume, like, white privilege exists in the 60s, right?
00:41:39.000
You couldn't marry someone who wasn't the same races.
00:41:42.200
Again, you know, I don't like the concession of, like, oh, my grandparents were the crazy ones,
00:41:46.740
It's like this has been a consistent trend in the country's history.
00:41:51.000
I'm literally just saying, was it not obvious that you had a harder life if you were black
00:41:58.160
Actually, Derrick Bell would disagree with you.
00:42:01.200
He's one of the founders of critical race theory.
00:42:04.020
He would say it was easier to be black in the 60s?
00:42:07.120
His argument is that the end of segregation was a detriment to black people.
00:42:12.380
But the point I'm saying is, obviously, in the time—
00:42:15.540
This is—he works alongside Kimberley Crenshaw.
00:42:19.200
The argument among the people who advocate the concept of white privilege is that separate
00:42:24.060
spaces for black people—they call them POC spaces—are better.
00:42:28.680
I wouldn't call it—they don't call it safe spaces.
00:42:30.520
The argument was, from Derrick Bell, that they said Plessy v. Ferguson was wrong.
00:42:45.700
Derrick Bell is a prominent thought leader on this.
00:42:51.060
But I don't think this is what's the universal university.
00:42:54.240
First of all, the fact that I am familiar with so many college people and no one has
00:42:57.820
told me this before—I'm not saying this isn't real, by the way.
00:43:01.180
No, I'm saying this is not like the universally applied theory to most of these places where
00:43:05.940
How much time did you spend in the black community?
00:43:08.620
So during the Ferguson riots, for instance, and the Baltimore riots, they were circulating
00:43:12.980
a letter, the teachings of Derrick Bell, advocating for a black-only community space.
00:43:20.220
But a black-only community space is different from 1960s segregation, though.
00:43:23.160
The argument predicated upon that before the end of segregation, black people had their
00:43:28.680
own economy, their own Wall Street, their own wealth.
00:43:34.140
And what the argument they're making is, is that white supremacists, which had always
00:43:38.380
been the Democratic Party, the party of the Klan and Jim Crow and slavery, decided if we
00:43:43.360
allow black people to establish their own economy, they will supplant us.
00:43:47.360
What we need to do, while they're still weak, force them by law to integrate with us so
00:43:55.120
That is the critical race theory view of what the end of segregation was.
00:43:57.680
It was a ploy to subvert the black excellence kind of movement.
00:44:03.820
However you want to describe it, the point was, the question asked by these critical
00:44:07.760
race theorists, these black community leaders, is why did the Democrats do a 180 in a matter
00:44:14.580
Some people try to make the argument that they were trying to win, but that doesn't
00:44:17.480
change how an entire block of racists suddenly were not racist anymore.
00:44:28.060
They didn't evaporate from the political landscape.
00:44:37.060
I'm saying that's the critical race theory argument.
00:44:39.380
It seems kind of like a weird conspiracy theory, but the whole point I'm trying to bring
00:44:43.060
up is, look, if we just talk about white privilege or privilege in general, you don't
00:44:48.540
If I was a 1960s white guy, I'm not like, oh boy, there's no problems in my fucking life
00:44:52.840
because I'm not forced to go into the left door instead of the right door, and I don't
00:45:00.320
I mean, do you agree that if we're accepting the concept of white privilege in the 60s,
00:45:04.760
that you don't feel privilege if you did have it then?
00:45:10.060
I think what I would say, just to clarify, is ethnic majority access is probably a better
00:45:17.380
And you don't feel that until it's gone, right?
00:45:19.760
And that's kind of what's happening on the left with men, where it's like we had a big
00:45:22.760
in-group preference for so long, and now because we're focusing on all these other groups,
00:45:28.300
Me, white men, big muscular guys, people discriminate against me insofar as they're
00:45:35.020
They would go to these feminist talk circles in college, and they'd be like, what are you
00:45:39.680
You know, they give me looks because they're like, you're not like us.
00:45:42.780
And that feels like, oh, well, shit, because we've focused and put the spotlight on these
00:45:47.840
people who never did have it before, now I don't have it.
00:45:51.100
It feels like something's been taken away from me.
00:45:52.420
That's just the same problem regurgitated for a new generation.
00:45:58.760
I'm saying that that feels alienating, and I understand why men are not drawn to that,
00:46:02.640
especially when the right offers them something like, hey, we're not doing that.
00:46:07.180
The left is basically going like, hey, look at that problem.
00:46:12.580
I think it happens sometimes, but I don't think it's the exact same thing.
00:46:15.140
For example, like you talked about, if you have a black-only community space, I don't
00:46:19.860
As much as I say, you don't need to have that necessarily.
00:46:22.660
Like, you can absolutely have white people working in your community towards the common
00:46:26.280
I don't think they're segregating them because they're like, oh, we hate white people.
00:46:29.580
It's because they specifically want to hyper-focus the conversation on people who understand the problem
00:46:33.860
because they're from that community, and then spread those ideas to other places, because
00:46:39.280
Do you think it would be good if, like, we took a major city, say Chicago, and then made
00:46:53.040
The level of segregation as it exists now is actually greater than it was even in the
00:46:59.200
That might be neighborhood segregation, but we're talking about, hey, you can't go in the
00:47:03.700
Right, yeah, but do you know, hold on, you're from San Francisco?
00:47:09.080
I gotta, you know, I want to make this proposal to you, but I also, I don't want to be responsible
00:47:16.260
Are you telling me to go to a gay bar and I'll get, oh, no.
00:47:30.560
People killing people because they're white is bad?
00:47:33.320
Right, the point being that racism and these privilege and these things you describe are
00:47:40.840
just like, I feel like it's largely white people standing on a hilltop looking around
00:47:51.400
And then like take a stroll through a black neighborhood in Chicago and see what happens.
00:47:54.980
You know, to be fair, like Hyde Park is super nice.
00:47:59.320
Everyone is mad at white people all the time for no reason.
00:48:02.640
Adjacent to the data you mentioned earlier about in-group versus out-group, there's data
00:48:07.840
If you look at how white people rank themselves relative to other races, it's pretty much a
00:48:12.640
If you look at how black people rank themselves, it's the first, every other race, not so much.
00:48:18.580
Same thing with Hispanics, same thing with Asians.
00:48:21.160
They all like themselves the most and dislike white people the most.
00:48:24.380
And so that creates a problem when you have these communities.
00:48:26.440
Like you're saying, if you walk through, I know you mentioned in the car you were Jewish,
00:48:29.220
but if you walk through and they identify you as a white guy, that's going to be a problem
00:48:33.340
And so why that is, I mean, do you really think that this education-
00:48:36.220
Would you think if I said, stop, I'm Jewish, they wouldn't kill me?
00:48:38.140
No, I don't think they understand sort of the problem there.
00:48:41.680
If you're in New York and you said, stop, I'm Jewish, you'd get-
00:48:46.280
Have you seen what's been going on in New York?
00:48:48.960
Oh, I saw the thing that happened at that museum.
00:48:56.460
Black men, teenagers, have been going around New York attacking Jewish people.
00:49:03.740
I remember that was an Obama-era thing as well.
00:49:05.840
But the point I was trying to make there is if we can agree that, say, minorities are
00:49:08.760
not getting the same access to education that white students are, which maybe I would
00:49:12.440
disagree with, but let's pretend that's the case.
00:49:14.060
Because then this education they're getting, which a lot of conservatives would say is
00:49:17.620
making them hate America and all this stuff, isn't quite landing with them the same way.
00:49:21.380
They're not getting A's on tests about all the evil white people who are mean to their
00:49:25.080
Yet they're still doing things like the Knockout Game.
00:49:28.820
Because I literally took a gender studies class.
00:49:30.580
They're not teaching you that white men are evil.
00:49:32.740
One of the coolest things that they taught me in that was about, you know, COINTELPRO?
00:49:35.900
Like that whole program, like the anti-civil rights, like FBI thing.
00:49:39.060
They're not teaching that, but still the races are reporting these attitudes and how they
00:49:45.540
And so what that would suggest is that, as Tim said, there is some sort of like anti-white
00:49:49.340
cultural, maybe anti-majority cultural narrative that is predominant and that young people
00:49:55.480
They are responding to other people's reaction towards their existence and they are moving
00:50:02.200
This is what I'm talking about, where it's like this narrative of, hey, these people have
00:50:05.700
been in power so long and these injustices were caused by this group in power.
00:50:09.800
That's framed as, oh, I'm bad because I'm white.
00:50:12.000
And what I'm saying is I went through that whole thing.
00:50:14.000
I went into the trenches of the gender warfare and I didn't come out thinking like, oh, I'm
00:50:19.200
I just thought, oh, yeah, like people in the past did things and I don't have guilt for
00:50:24.060
And I'm just recognizing like the historical things that might have happened that might have caused
00:50:31.260
And I'm not saying there's no reason to because some people do come out of that and they're
00:50:36.840
My, I guess, olive branch of those people is like, why let that change your policy if
00:50:41.060
these people aren't actually discriminating against you?
00:50:46.700
And it's like that didn't make me less liberal.
00:50:49.640
It's just like, oh, OK, like I don't I don't feel guilt when they're like, oh, we're talking
00:50:55.400
I just simply not sure I'll put it this way on the on the race stuff.
00:51:07.980
So where I grew up, if you crossed 47th from the south to the north, you went from a largely
00:51:13.820
white, somewhat Hispanic neighborhood into an all black neighborhood.
00:51:18.380
And if you did, you get stopped by the cops and they detain you and they usually drive
00:51:24.260
Is it because they're like, hey, this isn't safe and we're protecting you?
00:51:26.620
No, because they said the only reason white boys come up here is to buy drugs.
00:51:30.800
OK, but that's not legally enforced segregation.
00:51:34.800
I said largely enforced by the law, which I meant the cops.
00:51:37.940
I get what you're saying, but that's a pattern of behavior that they're trying to.
00:51:41.380
The inverse, however, was that there were several gangs of teenage black girls from north of
00:51:48.380
47th who would cross down to the south and then mug and rob young girls in the white neighborhood
00:51:54.400
It became a huge issue with the local government and the cops were like, look, we can't do
00:51:59.120
anything about it because if we stop these girls before they commit the crime, we're
00:52:04.740
However, the problem is after they've already committed the robberies and the muggings and
00:52:15.060
So it's like people choose to live near the races they choose, but this created pure racism.
00:52:23.100
I think those cops should have arrested the people doing crimes.
00:52:29.220
It's not racist to arrest people who's mugging someone.
00:52:31.500
How do you how do you arrest someone after they've been mugged and the gang splits up
00:52:37.880
This does get applied in poor ways where it's like, hey, a black guy robbed me.
00:52:42.940
But like, if you give a description of a suspect, you got to go stop them.
00:52:47.120
That's why I've always been a big supporter of stop and frisk.
00:52:49.380
I think cops need to go and stop as many of these black people who fit descriptions as
00:52:52.680
possible and search them in case they're the ones who committed the robbery.
00:52:55.120
If you're responding to a crime, I think that's very different from just stopping random people
00:52:59.120
that look suspicious on the street all the time like they did in New York.
00:53:02.320
But if someone fits a description, the cops should stop and frisk them, right?
00:53:05.320
For you mean if they have absolutely no other reason to other than, hey, can you really
00:53:08.740
If they fit a description for a crime, the cops should stop them and frisk them.
00:53:11.380
I don't know if the rule is that you're allowed to just immediately search them.
00:53:14.180
But if they fit the role of a crime and they want to stop them and ask them.
00:53:17.240
Cops can pat down, but they can't put their hands in your pockets or bag.
00:53:20.280
They're allowed to feel the outside, and if they feel an object that they believe is
00:53:24.300
a weapon or contraband, then they can probably cause it.
00:53:27.000
I can see ways of it being abused, but again, if the idea is the dichotomy between not being
00:53:31.960
able to stop a criminal suspect and frisking everyone on the street, I guess I don't want
00:53:37.860
The issue that arises is you get activist groups that claim it is racism, white supremacy
00:53:44.840
because too many black people are being stopped.
00:53:48.160
Stop and Frisk specifically was shown to be extra discriminatory, especially because
00:53:52.120
the majority of the people they were stopping and frisking weren't committing crimes, so
00:53:55.680
it was just harassing kind of people, versus what you just talked about, which is, hey,
00:53:59.660
five people just committed a crime, this kind of black person meets the description, and
00:54:06.640
And the political climate is such that in our neighborhood, the aldermen, the mayor, the
00:54:12.900
police, they were like, I am not going to be the person who has to run for office
00:54:17.100
and explain why we're stopping young black girls.
00:54:22.560
That might be, yeah, that is an indication of, I would say, over-progressive, you know,
00:54:29.660
If you say toxic masculinity is an overcorrection for, like, you know, the patriarchy of men
00:54:36.860
ruling for so long, or women being discriminated against, like, yeah, I can see places where
00:54:41.300
that has gone too far, where it's like, oh, men are evil, kill all men.
00:54:44.240
You see there's, like, super radical feminists.
00:54:45.600
But, like, this isn't a majority of that movement.
00:54:47.660
And I think that the concept of calling out something like a toxic masculine person shouldn't
00:54:51.880
be alienating to someone who, like, I don't know, I think I embody a lot of traditional
00:54:55.040
Catholic, not Catholic, traditional masculine traits, except for the beard, and this hasn't
00:55:00.020
forced me out of wanting these progressive policies.
00:55:04.400
Again, that's the problem here, is, like, we were talking about education and crime, and
00:55:08.380
on the one hand, it may just be an experience in a college classroom where some kid says
00:55:12.360
something silly, and everyone's like, okay, dude, whatever.
00:55:14.880
But these kinds of people are those who grow up to end up being district attorneys, who simply
00:55:18.700
refuse to prosecute crimes, and who are installed by wealthy progressives who are radical.
00:55:22.580
And that's pretty much the story in almost every major city in the country, and you can
00:55:26.620
hear these anecdotes about, like, women robbed at gunpoint on video, and the crime doesn't
00:55:34.800
They had this guy dead to rights, on camera, robbed her at gunpoint, and then got into a
00:55:39.000
luxury sedan, which was crazy, because I was always told that these people were impoverished.
00:55:42.600
And then he was identified, actually, on the television, local news, by his parole officer.
00:55:47.080
They bring the guy in, they've got him, and then some person just didn't submit some
00:55:50.840
document in enough time, and so unfortunately, they couldn't get this guy.
00:55:54.320
He ended up getting arrested two years later, because he sexually assaulted a minor with
00:55:58.980
a gun, and then now he's in prison for, like, decades.
00:56:02.040
But then my mom had lunch with some woman who lives, you know, in one of the suburbs that
00:56:05.680
these people flee to, because they're just so crazy making this stuff up about what happens
00:56:11.280
If anything happens to you in Detroit, they just won't prosecute if the victim is white.
00:56:16.140
It's like a question for this whole debate, be it race or gender or whatever.
00:56:20.040
Is it bad to discriminate against a person based on their immutable characteristics?
00:56:28.840
Well, no, because if you say, if I say it's not bad to discriminate, when people hear
00:56:32.920
discriminate, you think of the historical examples of, like, the 1960s.
00:56:36.180
But we discriminate all the time for various things.
00:56:38.180
Are there any acceptable circumstances where it is okay to discriminate on the basis of immutable
00:56:46.700
Yeah, if I say, hey, I, you know, have a gynecologist, and the gynecologist is like,
00:56:52.140
I'm an expert in looking at vaginas, and it's like, okay, I'm discriminating.
00:57:00.800
The problem is discrimination is a dirty word, which is why, like—
00:57:04.420
To say a gynecologist can only inspect vaginas?
00:57:08.880
So if a trans woman went to a gynecologist and was denied service,
00:57:16.320
Well, yeah, but it was like a plastic, like, petite one, or like—
00:57:20.280
Well, whatever it is, like, if the gynecologist is able to assess the medical needs of that,
00:57:26.440
The issue where we're going with the Civil Rights Act is that one of the arguments we've
00:57:31.420
seen from LGBTQ groups is the end of gender segregation, much like we saw the end of racial
00:57:36.700
The argument they've been making for some time now is that we used to have white and black
00:57:41.620
bathrooms, or I think it was white and colored, because colored could be not just—
00:57:45.960
It could be any kind of mixed race or anything.
00:57:48.240
And so the argument made by trans rights activists is that gender segregation, under
00:57:53.440
the exact same law that banned racial segregation, there should be no men's and women's rooms.
00:58:01.320
If you are against that, then you're for discrimination against an immutable characteristic,
00:58:06.000
which is what I was saying, is like, yeah, that's—
00:58:09.780
That's all I'm saying is, like, yeah, the phrase, I'm in favor of discrimination means
00:58:13.740
so many things, and people are going to attach the, oh, so you want to be racist and not,
00:58:18.320
hey, like, certain things are immutable and you—
00:58:20.120
Yeah, I wasn't asking about the discrimination as a gotcha or anything.
00:58:24.000
I was asking, like, we're trying to figure out how policy and law should be applied to
00:58:28.920
Where do we all stand on the issue of choosing to discriminate based on immutable characteristics?
00:58:33.560
Just the reason being, the law says you cannot.
00:58:42.980
And for years after that, we had affirmative action, which is discriminative on, like,
00:58:47.020
you know, positive or negative discrimination based on an immutable characteristic, and you
00:58:50.500
can be for or against that, but that was not illegal until the Supreme Court ruled on
00:58:55.740
But the 1964 Civil Rights Act bars the discrimination based on race, sex, national origin, religion.
00:59:02.600
Discrimination, that word means so many more things than just, I am not allowing someone
00:59:08.940
Discrimination is something that you're, like, I am distinguishing someone based on
00:59:17.000
If you want to hire a black person for a role to play a black person in a movie, that is positive
00:59:22.180
I am saying, hey, everyone who's not black, you can't be here, but that's totally legal,
00:59:26.260
Well, that's actually—I do see what you're saying.
00:59:29.340
I think legally, that is excluded from discrimination.
00:59:34.660
Maybe the word legally means something else, but discrimination just means I'm literally
00:59:40.640
For the purpose of what we're talking about in—like, if someone said, I'm going to hire
00:59:44.600
a bartender, and then a white guy came and said, you get out of here, like, we would
00:59:49.020
It's racial discrimination, yeah, based on race, right.
00:59:50.680
So I agree with you on the distinct semantics of the term.
00:59:54.080
I do not think that if a movie studio said, we have a character, he's a black man, and
00:59:59.780
then a white guy shot up and be like, you don't fit—that's not discrimination.
01:00:03.640
Maybe colloquially, people would say, well, that makes sense, but that is literally racial
01:00:10.860
You're saying you're white, so you can't do this role, which is to play a black guy.
01:00:15.640
My point being, the creation of the role was the creation of the discrimination.
01:00:21.200
That specific kind of discrimination is okay, which is why I was hesitant to say, of course
01:00:33.320
You know, so, like, here's a question for you guys.
01:00:36.480
If one racial group is committing more violent crimes than another, then is it—should police
01:00:42.780
use that as a determinant factor in whether or not they would find someone suspicious?
01:00:50.180
I don't even think that you would need to take it that far.
01:00:52.280
If police were simply allowed to do their jobs how any reasonable person would want them
01:00:55.640
to, then we would see less crime and we would see more people in jail.
01:00:59.060
The problem is, less crime might be acceptable, but more people in jail makes a lot of people
01:01:03.240
very uncomfortable—activist groups, media organizations, things of that nature.
01:01:06.840
So that's why you have, like, predictive policing is very controversial, because AI will look
01:01:10.720
at neighborhoods where crime is more likely to take place, finds out these neighborhoods
01:01:14.100
maybe have a higher representation of minorities, and they say, well, we should probably police
01:01:18.720
That has nothing to do with the fact that the AI is, you know, programmed to be wearing
01:01:24.760
Like, these neighborhoods are already policed more because of the crime that is there,
01:01:29.580
Well, the problem is, one, you've got to look at, like, all right, which crimes are actually
01:01:34.360
Like, there's plenty of white-collar crime that no one ever does.
01:01:36.660
And if you look at, like, drug usage, right, even not white-collar crime, it's pretty similar
01:01:40.260
between races, but they do go into the communities where it's more of, like, a perceived problem
01:01:44.640
there, and that might play into arrest statistics, that might play into incarcerations.
01:01:48.620
Yeah, obviously, they should go where the crime is.
01:01:50.600
I think the problem is you're assuming that all the arrest data is this, like, infallible,
01:01:55.780
like, oh, yeah, like, they're only arresting the people that are doing the crimes, and not
01:01:58.740
like, there are specific areas that are targeted, and some would say over-policed.
01:02:02.440
I think women shouldn't be allowed to be firefighters.
01:02:04.140
Even if you look at, I think it's the national crime.
01:02:08.200
I think the average, so, I mean, in terms of fighting fires, women, it's completely,
01:02:15.020
My point largely is we have these affirmative action policies that you end up with, like,
01:02:21.420
a 5'5", 120-pound woman as a firefighter, which is just the stupidest thing imaginable.
01:02:27.060
Is she the person that has to go in and carry the life?
01:02:36.980
At any moment, anyone responding to an emergency is going to have to be able to handle any one
01:02:41.900
If you've got a team of 10 firefighters, and you've got six capable people of carrying
01:02:47.460
And four of them can't, like, I don't think that means this team is somehow less effective.
01:02:51.320
Like, if these four people can do the jobs that are—
01:02:55.220
Fat men shouldn't be allowed to be firefighters, either.
01:02:56.940
No, fat men shouldn't be allowed to be saved, because it discriminates against women.
01:02:59.960
The problem is they lower the qualifications that women are able to—
01:03:02.720
I do think that's the logical conclusion of the left.
01:03:07.820
If they're choosing to hire 5'5 women to do fire rescue, and there's a morbidly obese
01:03:15.980
I have a few friends that are, like, 5'5 Asian women with no muscles, and they actually
01:03:23.480
Well, yes, but they do have to carry very fat people is what I'm saying.
01:03:26.300
And what I'm saying is, look, if you have a team of firefighters, and one of them is
01:03:29.820
not capable of lifting the 300-pound man up, if you could show me that this was less
01:03:33.620
effective overall, like, this is causing all these fat people to burn to death because,
01:03:42.120
There's enough people that can do that heavy lifting thing.
01:03:44.480
And I don't think they should lower the requirements for people if everyone is actually legally
01:03:51.060
But if it's like, hey, you're carrying the hose, or hey, like, you're getting the ladder
01:03:55.220
So the issue tends to be, and the reason I bring it up, is that what happens is the
01:03:59.660
progressives will look at the outcome and then determine the system is sexist.
01:04:06.260
How come only 7% of the fire department in this city is female?
01:04:10.420
They're clearly discriminating for some reason.
01:04:12.320
They then look through it, and they say the discrimination comes from the job requirements,
01:04:16.320
which is you've got to carry a 150-pound duffel bag over your shoulder through a simulated
01:04:20.660
burning building, and women tend not to be able to do that.
01:04:23.060
So we have to change the threshold so that it's fair for all people.
01:04:26.080
If that's what they're doing, I would disagree with that.
01:04:27.860
I mean, like, yeah, it's like the Navy SEALs example always brings up, where it's like,
01:04:33.480
Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.
01:04:38.900
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer.
01:04:43.220
From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them
01:04:48.120
throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino.
01:04:53.480
With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz,
01:04:59.660
and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals if you win.
01:05:05.720
Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out.
01:05:12.560
19 plus to wager, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly.
01:05:15.640
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
01:05:18.440
please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor for your charge.
01:05:25.240
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:05:28.380
Hi, I'm Mike Peska, host of The Gist, and I'm the kind of person, maybe you are too,
01:05:33.080
who likes to step outside the easy reinforcement of my own ideas.
01:05:38.740
Maybe you actually like to have your beliefs tested and your perspectives expanded.
01:05:46.980
There are a lot of shows, ideologically driven shows and networks, whose audiences say,
01:05:56.940
I don't need affirmation and reassurance that my side or one side of the political or social debate
01:06:05.320
I'm more worried about being misinformed by lazily going along with the untested assumption or narrative.
01:06:12.700
The gist is for people who know that being interesting starts with being interested.
01:06:25.600
You shouldn't lower the requirement for some arbitrary equality of outcome thing.
01:06:29.600
But if it's, hey, these women on this job as firefighters can do these jobs that they're
01:06:34.680
allocated to and this doesn't affect the performance, I don't think there's anything wrong with it.
01:06:37.640
I think the requirement to be a firefighter should be the first test.
01:06:42.720
You walk in and then they're like, you're applying for a job.
01:06:50.000
If like, you know, you're all there, you're a unit doing jobs.
01:06:52.300
I don't care if this woman maybe doesn't like bench what I bench, but they do lower the
01:06:56.120
requirements, whether it's for firefighters, police officers.
01:06:58.300
You have one requirement for the men, one requirement for the women taking into account
01:07:01.660
things like lower strength levels, lower endurance levels, perhaps.
01:07:05.400
And, you know, if I were really sexist, I would say, I don't know if women even have the
01:07:09.880
And maybe I would want to discriminate on that.
01:07:11.260
But like, I'm more of an open minded guy than that.
01:07:13.360
But you have to be not emotional to stop a fire.
01:07:17.080
I think in situations of high stress, there is a sort of consideration that maybe you
01:07:21.080
I mean, I've seen a lot of videos, for example, of women making arrests and they panic and
01:07:25.320
they pull a taser and shoot a guy and they go out of videos of guys doing that, too.
01:07:33.820
I think there's a lot of like women are like less temperamental is like, I don't know.
01:07:37.460
We just saw like the two most powerful men in the world have a bitch fit on like the
01:07:41.980
Again, you're comparing a situation where lives are on the line versus like two guys
01:07:45.500
who are just like having a Twitter fight or whatever.
01:07:52.300
The point being to achieve this outcome where we can have like an inclusive firefighting
01:07:55.860
department or something does, as we see, require actually lowering those standards, which
01:07:59.440
if people want fires to be fought properly, we can't have.
01:08:03.300
Like you're saying they've already lowered the standards.
01:08:05.060
Is there some phenomenon of like fires not getting put out the way they should be because
01:08:08.840
Like I I've never heard of that, if that's the case.
01:08:12.940
Actually, my buddy's that's not what I asked about your time.
01:08:15.520
Well, what he's talking about is like this instance of where people just seem to be taking
01:08:21.780
You have more accidents, things like that occurring.
01:08:24.580
And I don't expect the media to necessarily pick up this story because it would be incompatible
01:08:32.260
Like there is a trend of people putting up viral videos of female cops struggling to
01:08:41.480
If their job is if they're incapable of doing the job because of their physical strength,
01:08:49.780
There are people that are like heavily overwated.
01:08:53.180
Like, yeah, but if there was this some crazy phenomenon of fires not getting put out and
01:08:56.860
there's like, you know, there'd be a fucking there's lots of videos of fire being put out.
01:09:00.140
I would imagine you'd see one of like, you know, some woman trying to hold the hose and
01:09:03.160
she can't like sprays it out and the house burns down or something.
01:09:09.740
And like, yeah, if you can't meet the requirements of the job and you can see the detriment to that
01:09:13.220
of like, hey, like a cop, you know, interactions are getting worse because women are so
01:09:18.400
scared and they're just shooting them or something like, you know, like, yeah, I would say you need to
01:09:21.840
stop hiring people that aren't good at their job.
01:09:23.900
The problem is, I don't think this is like a female phenomenon.
01:09:26.680
Because the technology with fighting fires has probably evolved to make it more automated
01:09:32.120
So you can probably have weaker females operating these things and it's fine.
01:09:36.580
But if you've got them policing, they're an autonomous body against another autonomous
01:09:40.340
It's like, like you say, I mean, you see these videos and they just are simply incapable of
01:09:44.140
executing where even a fat cop is like a guy can use his mask sort of to his advantage.
01:09:50.380
Yeah, it depends on what, you know, look at these examples of like, okay, this woman
01:09:55.800
freaked out and shot a guy and I'd probably agree like, yeah, she's a bad cop, right?
01:09:59.520
But if you're like, first of all, I come from a nice neighborhood and it's like, okay, can
01:10:03.160
a female cop stop a skateboarder from going into a place he's not supposed to be?
01:10:07.220
Like this is very different from, what do you mean?
01:10:09.840
Oh, you mean like physically if like three teenage boys could probably overpower.
01:10:12.900
As a skateboarder who has hopped many a fence, ain't no way lady cop stopping me.
01:10:17.040
Sure, but like this is not going to turn into a physical interaction.
01:10:19.280
This is going to be like, oh shit, the cops, like, let's get out of here, right?
01:10:24.300
So I have stories from my friends where they were like on a rooftop and when the cops pulled
01:10:28.540
up because it was a company, they ran to the side of the building and jumped 10 feet to
01:10:32.400
a telephone pole and climbed down and ran away.
01:10:35.020
But that would work against a fat cop or a guy cop who couldn't catch up with you either.
01:10:38.120
My point is that if you're doing low stakes crime stuff that's not involving a bunch of
01:10:41.840
physical altercations, this isn't some reason to bar women from ever being cops.
01:10:46.200
It depends on what the job is and I 100% agree if she can't do the job, like in these videos,
01:10:53.760
There's a couple ways that people look at the political landscape.
01:10:56.900
There's revolutionaries, there's moderates, reformers, there's accelerationists.
01:11:04.900
There's got to be a word for where you just want to sit back and watch as liberals politically
01:11:10.840
immolate themselves and just like roll with it.
01:11:13.580
Conservatives don't like this because of their moral framework.
01:11:16.940
They're like, it is bad that liberals enact things and do things that are detrimental.
01:11:21.320
But as someone like me who like, I actually am more of a liberal guy, I can just look at
01:11:25.560
liberals and be like, yeah, that's going to destroy your way of life and your society.
01:11:30.160
But I quite frankly don't care because you'll cease to exist in 20 years anyway.
01:11:35.720
You know, like in the Civil War movies, like what kind of American are you?
01:11:42.420
My vibe from watching what I have, and I'll grant you this, I don't watch a lot of your
01:11:46.020
I watch pieces and I probably watch a lot of clips that are out of context.
01:11:48.620
But like, it really seems like you mostly align with like right wing stuff, even if you're
01:11:52.460
right wing, like you voted for Trump in 2020, right?
01:11:56.060
So what does the vote of a person mean for your policies, your politics, and your...
01:12:06.160
Hold on, let's talk about Tulsi Gabbard, right?
01:12:10.960
She was someone who was, what was it, in 2017, she was fossil fuels, right?
01:12:14.920
She was like a green person, like she was like more environmentalism.
01:12:17.900
Now she's with a party that's promoting fossil fuels that doesn't do these green, like, you
01:12:30.340
What I'm saying is, like, you're asking about someone advocating for a fuel source.
01:12:36.700
So right, is your argument that right and left don't define political philosophies?
01:12:42.560
A left wing person is more likely to support some sort of clean energy act.
01:12:50.320
So the question I'm asking you is you define left and right not based on...
01:13:04.540
I think he was kind of like a crackpot, slightly environmentalist person, but he's never been
01:13:11.480
And now he's supporting the anti-vax crowd, I guess.
01:13:14.580
So I guess my question is, I'm trying to ask you, like, when, when, like, how do you define
01:13:20.200
So like progressive taxes, environmentalism, like, well, that's why I'm asking you.
01:13:23.820
Like, I think you, if you vote for Trump, like, what policies of his do you support that
01:13:36.320
Bill Clinton led the charge on waste, fraud, and abuse.
01:13:38.280
Saying that we should make something better is not the same as, hey, let's cut the entirety
01:13:45.260
Bill Clinton is a liberal, but he would not do what I just described, which is what Trump
01:13:52.400
You can say vaguely, I think we should make things more efficient.
01:13:56.300
But when you see what it's borne out in the Trump administration, that's very different
01:14:03.700
You can say he made things more efficient, but this is not the same thing as, I cut the
01:14:10.800
You can't umbrella these as, oh, this is the same kind of policy.
01:14:14.360
Especially when the policy is so vague as, I'm making something more efficient.
01:14:17.340
So, traditional liberal, not classical liberal.
01:14:21.540
Classical liberal is like Locke and, you know, they're more like libertarians.
01:14:25.100
Traditional liberal as a political term tends to describe the Democrat view from the 90s,
01:14:29.020
which was abortion, pro-choice, safe, legal, rare, secure borders, no illegal immigration,
01:14:34.860
workers' rights, workers' protections, and cutting the size of government.
01:14:37.780
When you say no illegal immigration, like, what do you mean?
01:14:40.940
Like, in the 1980s, right, like, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, H.W. Bush, I think, are
01:14:48.580
I think the question at this town hall for this, or this debate was like, hey, what do
01:14:54.260
And it's like, they're kind of almost, like, out-liberaling each other.
01:14:56.560
One says, like, look, I don't like the idea of illegal aliens in my country, but these
01:15:00.300
kids are here, and I don't want to deprive them of this education.
01:15:04.020
Like, this is the Republican Party in the 80s saying, I support at least, like, you know.
01:15:08.260
The Republican Party up to, like, 2015 was for open borders.
01:15:14.020
These people are like, we need to secure our borders, and we need to do something for
01:15:16.420
these illegal people here, but I don't want to, like, you know, get rid of them.
01:15:19.960
Okay, the point being, I'm not talking about the 80s.
01:15:23.820
Right, but this is Republicans past the 90s, and you're saying you're a Democrat from the
01:15:28.000
The Democrats were more liberal than the Republicans were in the 80s, but you're not there.
01:15:32.120
You're voting for the guy who says mass deportation now.
01:15:34.500
In 2008, Hillary Clinton called for a border wall.
01:15:39.400
Having a border wall is very different from, hey, let's deport every single immigrant.
01:15:49.080
Because you're an illegal immigrant, and you're not violent.
01:15:52.580
So you don't support Democrats from 20 years ago?
01:15:55.200
No, I think it's like, the idea that you would support literally everything everyone
01:15:59.060
does all the time is a weird cultist mentality.
01:16:02.400
I'm saying your politics align with Trump today, because Trump is a right-winger.
01:16:08.700
So Trump was called a moderate when he first ran.
01:16:17.040
What is politically moderate about mass deportations?
01:16:20.220
Look at what other regimes have done to illegal aliens throughout history.
01:16:27.360
He did not advocate for mass deportations of every single illegal in the country.
01:16:31.000
And liberals right now are bragging about how Joe Biden deported more than Donald Trump
01:16:40.280
Well, first of all, in the first six months, his idea is the platform that he ran on that
01:16:48.060
He was, hey, let's get rid of every single illegal immigrant.
01:16:57.140
You're isolating a single point and saying that hereby determines-
01:17:00.260
Okay, well, let's move on to another point that calls you a liberal.
01:17:04.500
Well, I'm just asking, what makes you a liberal?
01:17:08.700
Well, then you voted for Trump, who's trying to get rid of abortion everywhere.
01:17:11.320
Like, J.D. Vance said, I want to make it illegal nationwide, right?
01:17:15.320
And Donald Trump got tremendous flack from the pro-life side, who were saying Trump is
01:17:26.160
Okay, and now the party that you voted for is attempting to-
01:17:29.000
Well, okay, John, do you want abortion to be legal, like, across the whole country?
01:17:32.400
I think it's a majority of the Republican Party is majority for illegal in all cases.
01:17:41.420
I'm saying that you're voting for the party that wants to illegal-
01:17:46.100
You're voting for the people that want to get rid of abortion.
01:17:50.520
It's who you choose to best represent your views.
01:17:52.360
If you vote for Trump and then called yourself a progressive, I'd be like, in what way?
01:17:55.920
And then you say, well, my views are all this, but I'm voting for the party, which
01:17:59.340
will materially make all these things the opposite of what I want.
01:18:03.220
Because my biggest priority is probably anti-intervention.
01:18:15.240
And I say this all the time because the left is a cult.
01:18:17.440
That means Trump does bad things, and I go, yeah, well, you know, like, I'm going to win
01:18:21.360
here, here, here, and here, and I'm a reformer, and I want those reforms more than I care about
01:18:25.740
That tends to be the average voter, largely in economics and immigration.
01:18:29.320
The left is like, but how could you possibly vote for Trump if one thing is bad?
01:18:33.700
I'm asking which liberal policy has Trump implemented that is aligned with your-
01:18:39.620
So the neocons my whole life were pro-intervention and pro-war.
01:18:42.560
And I didn't vote for Trump in 2016, but he didn't start any wars, and he's a timeline
01:18:46.680
Escalated the drone strikes from Obama and changed the reporting-
01:18:53.000
The reason why Donald Trump escalated drone strikes was because we were pulling troops
01:18:57.200
Sure, but he killed more people in that area with drones and changed the reporting-
01:19:01.920
Okay, are you anti-interventionalist because you are afraid of, like, the death and the destruction?
01:19:06.740
Or are you just like, oh, we shouldn't be located here?
01:19:09.800
Like, I can be in America and I can send missiles into another country.
01:19:12.620
Donald Trump's policies in his first term, extending even to now, have been the gradual
01:19:18.540
rescinding of U.S. military might in foreign entanglements.
01:19:25.660
And that was the liberal position for 30 years of my entire life and every protest I ever attended,
01:19:40.300
I'm not, like, a pacifist, but I never in my life hope to ever kill anyone.
01:19:44.260
However, if someone breaks into my house, I'll blow them away, right?
01:19:47.240
If someone invades the United States, I will join the military in two seconds.
01:19:50.060
So, like, it's not pro-war to say, hey, we don't want new wars to start.
01:19:53.380
However, if Russia invades Ukraine, then we should give them, like, money or weapons to
01:20:05.980
Gentlemen, a foreign nation 12,000 miles away has invaded one of their bordering neighbor
01:20:13.080
We need to send special forces, military training, attack them's missiles.
01:20:18.320
We need to sink the flagship of their Black Sea fleet and make sure they win this war.
01:20:21.920
And we're going to make sure American PMCs are on the ground aiding them.
01:20:27.840
Why is that pro-war if we want to help an ally when the war was started by-
01:20:34.760
They've never been a formal ally of NATO or the United States.
01:20:39.140
That doesn't mean we don't support their common goals.
01:20:44.560
What should we do if a nation we are not aligned with bombs our energy distribution lines?
01:20:51.280
Are you talking about the Nord Stream Pipeline stuff?
01:20:54.420
If an enemy of- or a friendly nation does that?
01:21:00.580
If a nation bombed one of our distribution systems for our allies' energy, what should
01:21:09.940
Yeah, so, like, the idea of this concept of, like, I think the theory is that Ukraine
01:21:14.240
did it to escalate our tensions with Russia so that we would support them more.
01:21:25.900
To answer the question, and then we'll carry on.
01:21:27.900
If the case is that they did that, if that's what ended up happening, it's like, oh, okay,
01:21:31.400
like, this country tried to sabotage us to make us do something.
01:21:36.060
And that's what Germany is accusing Ukraine of doing.
01:21:38.480
Germany is accusing Ukraine of the Nord Stream thing, right?
01:21:40.440
Germany has issued an arrest warrant for one Ukrainian who they said was accompanied by two other
01:21:46.460
Ukrainians to bomb the Nord Stream pipeline for the purpose of cutting off NATO access to
01:21:50.980
energy so that Russia would stop getting the resources from Europe, which benefits them.
01:21:56.960
I don't want to say the singular source funds the war, but it provides them with resources
01:22:00.460
So Ukraine attacked a NATO ally because they were trying to cause harm to Russia.
01:22:05.460
I don't know if we know this is fact, and this is-
01:22:09.860
Our ally asserted it, and we should be aligned with NATO, not Ukraine.
01:22:17.400
But if Germany said, hey, can you punish them for this, then I think that maybe we should
01:22:21.960
The idea that we should pull out of Ukraine because of this thing-
01:22:28.120
We should not be involved in some other country's war.
01:22:35.460
They literally, we helped them sign the agreement to give up their nuclear bombs-
01:22:42.280
Just because you legally didn't write the word ally down doesn't make it that, hey, we did
01:22:46.400
not promise a security guarantee for you, right?
01:22:48.700
A formal treaty alliance we do not have with Ukraine.
01:22:50.480
Are you saying that if we make a promise to a country-
01:22:53.840
Bro, you are in favor of foreign war and our involvement in it.
01:22:58.820
I am in favor of defending a country that was attacked by another country if that country
01:23:07.300
You want, do you think the US should be involved in Ukraine's war?
01:23:15.600
If Germany gets attacked by Russia tomorrow, do you think we should defend them?
01:23:20.480
If our alliance is attacked by an enemy nation-
01:23:25.600
Yeah, we're going to send American troops, they're all going to get shot by the Russian
01:23:29.660
Because that's our guarantee that we will go defend them.
01:23:42.500
And I would also add, I am skeptical a bit on whether we should answer Article 5 for NATO.
01:23:54.240
Five years ago, if Russia bombed Germany, then yes, we should answer the call of NATO.
01:24:04.320
It's a war that you support to defend our ally.
01:24:16.740
You live in an isolated, one-dimensional reality of-
01:24:21.100
Like, I don't think I'm coming in here with some crazy ideal.
01:24:27.660
But when I see a country that we signed an agreement with that said, hey, we'll protect
01:24:32.400
you so you can give up your nukes so that you don't need them for protection.
01:24:35.720
And then they get invaded and we say, hey, we'll help you out.
01:24:39.560
Now, if you can explain why that's a bad thing, I understand.
01:24:42.380
But I don't think that makes me pro-war, right?
01:24:45.560
So when I say pro-war, I'm referring to what a traditional liberal is over the past 30 years,
01:24:52.060
Traditional liberals supported aiding people that we made promises to our whole life.
01:25:01.660
You can't understand that there is interventionary conflict, which I oppose, which had been the
01:25:09.760
And we should not be intervening in Ukraine's domestic politics and their war.
01:25:18.720
We should not be intervening in foreign conflicts in foreign countries.
01:25:21.800
So we should have let the Serbians genocide the Albanians.
01:25:28.780
I care about people dying when it's in our country and within our purview.
01:25:31.840
Yeah, but if we have someone that we can have some mutual beneficial relationship with
01:25:35.280
and they say, hey, please stop them from genociding us, shouldn't we do it?
01:25:38.180
You are allowed to believe what you want to believe.
01:25:40.560
They make a movie, Team America, World Police, just making fun of exactly that.
01:25:44.680
No, brother, if we went back to 2006, you would be a neocon.
01:25:51.100
If we went back to 2006, you would be the neocon.
01:25:58.560
Bill Clinton is a, what I don't think is a neocon, intervened in Kosovo to save the Albanian
01:26:07.860
When I call you, because you guys live in a one-dimensional reality, you can't see the
01:26:21.940
I'm looking at an intervention that I may or may not agree with and say,
01:26:24.880
oh, this one makes sense because of a security guarantee that we gave them.
01:26:30.440
I'm using the word pro-war to refer to your pro-intervention stance.
01:26:37.540
You don't like the George Bush Iraq invasion, right?
01:26:42.200
Nor Serbia, Kosovo, nor Desert Storm under First Bush.
01:26:48.840
Bill Clinton stopped the genocide of the Albanian people in Kosovo using intervention, right?
01:26:52.940
That's very different from our intelligence agencies lied to us about weapons of mass
01:26:56.860
So we went in and devastated this country and killed almost a million people, right?
01:27:06.440
You, you, you, you, I, I, I know it's hard for you to understand and I don't know how
01:27:11.540
to convey the idea to you that I don't believe the U.S. military should be an apparatus of
01:27:15.180
the world's police, be it Serbia or otherwise, or Ukraine.
01:27:20.260
I think that America should be responsible to the American people.
01:27:25.540
Having a relationship with a country by saving them benefits-
01:27:28.540
You asked me a question, do I answer it or not?
01:27:30.640
If you get a beneficial relationship with a country by intervening and saving them from a genocide,
01:27:34.800
isn't that good for America that we now have influence there?
01:27:38.560
I don't think a single American troop like died in the Kosovo thing.
01:27:42.900
The American people should not be spending their labor on foreign incursions by a political
01:27:50.360
What, it's, do you think the will of the people was don't help the people getting genocided
01:28:06.520
So, so let's not argue about things we didn't exist in because if we want to go back to
01:28:09.460
the 80s, we can talk about Ronald Reagan being for gun control.
01:28:12.900
And he was a conservative and the Republicans love him.
01:28:17.740
Going back and talking about how politics change is not the point being made here.
01:28:22.220
It is because you say you're a liberal from 2002 and I'm saying none of your positions line
01:28:26.760
Traditional liberal tends to refer to where the Democrats used to be.
01:28:31.200
You're literally anti-Bill Clinton from the 90s, which was the liberals in the 90s.
01:28:35.500
I know this is hard for you to understand, but saying the same thing over and over doesn't
01:28:39.380
Because you're not acknowledging what I'm saying.
01:28:45.320
Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.
01:28:50.040
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer.
01:28:53.880
From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them
01:28:58.340
throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino.
01:29:03.320
With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz,
01:29:09.400
Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win.
01:29:25.940
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact
01:29:30.020
Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
01:29:36.600
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:29:40.540
Any of these are just like, why not just say, I like Trump's policies because Trump is on
01:29:46.360
I think the, like I said this earlier, one of the biggest divides between the left and
01:29:50.780
the right is that the left is retarded and the right is slightly less retarded.
01:29:53.640
I saw you tweet that this morning because the Brian Krasinski fell for your bait, right?
01:29:56.140
Because you can't seem to grasp that I was 13 years old when the U.S. began their interventionist
01:30:07.780
And then when you start talking about a bygone era to which I didn't exist in politically,
01:30:29.100
Do you think that I'm going to vote for Kamala Harris?
01:30:33.900
I get a withdrawal from the Middle East if I vote for Donald Trump.
01:30:36.680
I want to reform the left-wing party from what I don't like they're doing.
01:30:40.180
Are you going to vote for Trump and reform him to become pro-choice, become, you know, immigration
01:30:48.100
Are you changing the Republican Party to be more left?
01:31:01.940
He struck Soleimani, which might have caused a war with Iran, which might still happen.
01:31:10.060
That means I have a choice between the Democratic establishment pro-war.
01:31:19.040
Joe Biden started the U.S. involvement in the Ukraine conflict.
01:31:25.180
Joe Biden got the U.S. involved in a foreign entanglement in Eastern Europe.
01:31:29.600
So you're like, not just no new starting wars, no new involving ourselves with any country's
01:31:40.400
You live in a cult world where it's black or white.
01:31:43.020
But I am saying that the mathematic proposition of the last election is Donald Trump gets
01:31:53.240
Name some things that you're getting closer to.
01:31:57.700
That's a very, actually, I agree with that policy.
01:32:00.980
But like, what is he getting you closer to on other-
01:32:10.560
I was pro-Green New Deal when the policy was, we're going to build roads and bridges,
01:32:14.680
not when it was, we're going to racially discriminate against people in colleges.
01:32:18.160
Maybe I didn't see that part of the Green New Deal.
01:32:20.400
I think I might have seen there was some DEI stuff in there.
01:32:22.960
So when AOC came out and said, we want a government program that reinvests in roads, bridges,
01:32:29.880
and we want to focus on environmentally sound practices, I said, this sounds fantastic.
01:32:35.080
And I made a video saying, this is a good idea.
01:32:37.660
It's going to bring back a bunch of middle-class jobs.
01:32:39.820
It's going to strengthen construction companies, and it's going to fix our crumbling infrastructure.
01:32:45.540
And then she released a resolution that said, in hospitals, in universities, and in other
01:32:51.240
hiring practices, race should be the preference.
01:32:54.460
Because my policy is, I might disagree with some of those things, and I'm going to be in
01:32:58.660
that party telling them, hey, you got a Nix X, Y, and Z to get us closer to that
01:33:02.960
But you're voting for the complete opposite party who's nowhere close to that.
01:33:09.200
What environmental policy is Trump getting you closer to, right?
01:33:11.820
And the no new wars thing, again, Biden didn't start one.
01:33:14.260
I didn't say I'd vote for Donald Trump for the Green New Deal.
01:33:18.320
You're saying he's getting you closer to the things you want.
01:33:21.860
Helping out Ukraine is not us starting a new war.
01:33:30.900
He got us involved in Syria without congressional approval nor notifying the public.
01:33:34.480
And we only found out after we were already in Syria for like two years.
01:33:38.540
But again, how does voting for Trump get you closer to this?
01:33:45.600
If I have to choose, we can call it whatever we want.
01:33:54.160
I'm going to vote for that every day of the week.
01:33:55.440
Do you support him, like, you know, drone striking Soleimani?
01:34:00.640
But like, I don't know whether or not it's good.
01:34:03.480
I'm like, oh, maybe we needed to do this, right?
01:34:05.460
However, that absolutely could have started a new war.
01:34:07.620
And it might end up being part of the reason we go to war with Iran.
01:34:11.360
Like, there's a really great point made by Sebastian Gorka when I talked to him recently
01:34:14.780
is that the biggest concern that we have is we don't intervene with boots on the ground
01:34:24.400
We have special forces on the ground in Ukraine.
01:34:30.300
Look, I'm not going to—this is such a psychotic—listen.
01:34:34.860
Do you—if I hand John a gun and tell him to shoot you, who killed you?
01:34:44.680
Right, but are you saying, like, we fought in World War II and we gave guns to the British?
01:34:51.460
We were aiding an ally then, and then we got—no, well, we got involved when—well,
01:34:54.780
you're saying that's why the Japanese bombed us, or?
01:34:57.240
There's several reasons why the Japanese bombed us, one of which was we were supplying
01:35:02.360
Okay, so you're saying it's semantic to say we're not fighting the war because we're
01:35:06.880
We have American special forces on the ground providing logistical support, instructing.
01:35:11.960
We have trainers in Poland training their troops.
01:35:14.440
We have U.S. citizen PMCs on the ground pulling the trigger and shooting guns, and it was
01:35:20.820
Yeah, volunteers or private PMCs are not part of—
01:35:22.700
We call them—it's funny how the media calls them volunteers when they're paid to be there,
01:35:25.900
Well, I know there are volunteers in Ukraine that probably get paid by the military, but
01:35:29.440
you're also talking about something like Blackwater, right?
01:35:33.020
A private company is there fighting on behalf of U.S.
01:35:36.340
They change their name every year or something.
01:35:40.120
The volunteers that are fighting there are paid individual private military contractors
01:35:48.500
If I go and do that, right, I'm not an American veteran, I wouldn't say that America's on
01:35:54.640
If I give John $100, a gun, and say, shoot you, will I go to jail?
01:36:08.980
It's ridiculous semantics to be like, well, American citizens are there fighting, and they
01:36:12.900
are paid by the American government to be there.
01:36:16.140
The American military has not declared war on rights.
01:36:18.420
American government's not really involved, because they're only paying the guys, but
01:36:20.880
the guys chose to be there of their own volition.
01:36:22.180
Yeah, I think the way to put it would be if you were in support of us fighting, and then
01:36:29.640
you're like, dude, Tim, it'd be so funny if you gave John a gun right now, and then
01:36:36.900
Well, the analogy is like, hey, John, I'm going to protect you for the rest of your life
01:36:40.140
if you give up your gun, and then he comes at you, and I say, oh, shit, I did make a
01:36:48.120
I would simplify it completely and be like, Democrats want foreign entanglement, and I
01:36:55.420
Do you ever question, like, if Russia gave you tens of millions of dollars because they
01:37:00.300
thought, and I think you were tricked by these people, right?
01:37:09.160
They never tried to host yourself on that media?
01:37:11.560
No, you guys believe fake cult bullshit because you live in paranoia.
01:37:17.660
No evidence was ever released, and there's no case.
01:37:26.300
I can't speak out of turn if the case is dropped, right?
01:37:38.920
Beyond what I can say, I will not speak out of turn for other people.
01:37:46.420
As far as anyone can tell, it never happened, and it was dropped almost immediately the day
01:37:52.400
Almost immediately after they announced it, the case was gone.
01:38:00.520
Because I have lawyers that were working with the DOJ on it.
01:38:08.100
and it was picked up by a bunch of fucking retards.
01:38:17.560
If it's completely fake, where did it come from?
01:38:19.520
That's an interesting fucking question, isn't it?
01:38:22.240
Because my understanding was, I think you were deceived.
01:38:30.160
The DOJ PDF that they released with all the different names.
01:38:32.800
It said that Russia was trying to pay people through a media company,
01:38:46.440
Look, all I'm saying is, the story was, and if this is false, sure,
01:38:50.660
the story was the Russian government thought it behooved them to pay you money
01:38:53.840
because your talking points on Ukraine were indistinguishable from their propaganda.
01:39:00.960
When you scream Ukraine is the enemy of the people,
01:39:05.300
I don't think they're being paid for them to say that.
01:39:07.380
Did our ally, Germany, accuse Ukrainians of sabotaging our energy pipeline?
01:39:10.880
Did our ally, Germany, put money into that country to fight back against them?
01:39:13.780
Is Germany not raising money for them right now?
01:39:16.400
You gave a specific quote when I said Ukraine is an enemy of this country.
01:39:21.060
Because Germany, our ally, said that Ukrainians just bombed our energy pipeline.
01:39:30.740
Okay, so clearly the governments of these NATO countries don't agree with you insofar as they think,
01:39:34.880
hey, it still behooves us to give money to this country and help it defend itself against Russia.
01:39:39.360
Meanwhile, the Russian narrative is 100% that that did happen in that way that you're describing,
01:39:45.360
My question is, why should I take your Ukrainian facts seriously if this seems to be the case?
01:39:53.300
They said 100% this is confirmed or this is an alleged thing?
01:39:56.280
CBS reported that Germany has issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian diver named Volodymyr Z.
01:40:02.860
It means our ally has asserted that this is their stance on it.
01:40:08.980
So why isn't their conclusion Ukraine is the enemy of the people?
01:40:14.840
That doesn't get into the nuance of a political climate in Eastern Europe.
01:40:19.100
Okay, so what I'm asking you is your position on this seems to be at the least aligned
01:40:24.240
with a lot of what the Russian position is, which is, you know, fine.
01:40:26.420
Well, that Russia are scumbags and should have been hated?
01:40:29.400
And what I'm saying is, why then are all these countries still doing the exact opposite of
01:40:35.680
What does that have to do with what we were talking about?
01:40:37.760
It has to do with the fact that, like, I'm asking you, why should I take any of your
01:40:40.740
opinions on this seriously when it seems to be 100% aligned with a country that is
01:40:47.860
I mean, yes, but that's irrelevant to what we're talking about right now.
01:40:49.280
What does my opinion as an American who doesn't want to be involved in foreign wars have to
01:40:53.200
do with whether Russia agrees with that or not?
01:40:54.980
Because if the Russians thought that they should give you millions of dollars to spread
01:41:02.880
Like, do you have an email from your lawyer about it being dropped or something that you're
01:41:05.420
allowed to show with, like, a little redactions?
01:41:07.940
The proof, I, look, if you think the DOJ made it up out of thin air, maybe.
01:41:15.780
And with no evidence being issued, no case ever being brought, no individuals ever identified.
01:41:22.580
With charges, I mean, okay, with the two Russians that were-
01:41:25.900
To the two Russians indicted, are they free now?
01:41:35.500
They haven't even posted photos of these people.
01:41:38.520
Because the idea is this entire thing was crafted out of thin air.
01:41:43.060
It's directly with XYZ people, it's directly linked to this company that we know is real,
01:41:46.860
which is Tenet Media, started by Lauren Chen and her husband or whatever.
01:41:49.420
But everything in between those names is completely fabricated?
01:41:53.660
So, you believe whatever the government tells you?
01:41:57.000
I asked you if everything is completely fabricated in between those names.
01:41:59.680
Just because they issued an indictment doesn't mean that they made it up.
01:42:03.260
Okay, what is the source that is wrong then, right?
01:42:06.500
Because you just alleged these Russian people don't exist, right?
01:42:09.320
You live in a world where if the government asserts it, it must be true without charge
01:42:14.760
I said, if someone says something with a very credible report-
01:42:16.400
You're using that to strike at my opinion on a war in Ukraine, which I think we shouldn't
01:42:20.480
It's because I'm questioning the veracity of some of the facts you're bringing up on it
01:42:23.960
because they are indeed aligned with Russian state propaganda.
01:42:28.820
Let's try the second biggest live show in the country, is contacted by a conservative
01:42:33.700
personality to license a cultural debate show unrelated to the news.
01:42:40.040
The DOJ then comes out shortly before the election and claims that Russia paid for the
01:42:58.200
I read the report, I watched your response, and it's like, they deceived you to funnel
01:43:02.800
money into you because they thought that your opinions aligned with theirs and they want
01:43:10.100
Because when the US government, largely under the Biden administration, wants to be involved
01:43:15.420
in a foreign conflict, and the second biggest live stream in the country is saying we should
01:43:19.980
not be, they then issue a statement without evidence impuning my honor that you are using
01:43:26.820
Do you have evidence that the Biden government fabricated this to frame you because they hate
01:43:37.920
You just said when someone says something against the motives of the Biden administration,
01:43:42.100
they might go after that second biggest podcast because they don't like what that
01:43:47.320
The point was that you are using a claim without evidence to impugn my credibility.
01:43:53.900
You literally just said, why should I listen to your opinions on this?
01:43:56.240
I'm using, because your opinions are indistinguishable from Russian state propaganda, and it behooved
01:44:02.020
them to give you money because they're like, I want these opinions disseminated more.
01:44:06.140
The Russian position is that they shouldn't have invaded Ukraine?
01:44:15.580
You literally said Ukraine is the enemy of this country or whatever, right?
01:44:18.040
Because they bombed the Nord Stream Pipeline, according to Germany.
01:44:21.660
Bro, you know so little about the Ukrainian conflict.
01:44:25.660
Are you going to get me to name all the oblasts right now?
01:44:30.040
It was like Donetsk and Lush Hanks or whatever.
01:44:39.680
I just remember you called out Wick on that, so-
01:44:41.420
You don't know shit about what's going on, but you are adamant we'd be involved.
01:44:50.820
Well, I think you're alleging that it was because of the trade deals and they didn't want their cheap European goods flooding into Russia or something like that.
01:45:06.540
Because they don't want to lose control of Sevastopol.
01:45:09.900
That's why they control the land bridge into Crimea.
01:45:12.080
What does this have to do with anything I said?
01:45:17.200
You don't know why the U.S. is involved in Ukraine, but you want us to be there.
01:45:20.780
I think that the U.S. is opposing, one, the invasion of Ukraine because we promised that, hey, if you give up your nukes, we'll help you if you get invaded because we don't want the nuclear proliferation in this country.
01:45:34.860
Listen, I have an issue with ill-informed individuals advocating for an escalation of war.
01:45:44.580
Look, I can probably name the way that you've described of Russia's goals in this country and all the points you're going over.
01:45:50.600
My question is, why is it that when we do a security guarantee for a country, we shouldn't help that country out?
01:45:56.500
The security guarantee is that if you give up your nukes, we will protect you, right?
01:46:01.440
Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.
01:46:06.200
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer.
01:46:10.520
From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino.
01:46:20.400
With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more,
01:46:27.760
make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals if you win.
01:46:42.920
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
01:46:45.680
please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor for your charge.
01:46:52.560
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:46:55.680
Hi, I'm Mike Peska, host of The Gist, and I'm the kind of person, maybe you are too,
01:47:00.380
who likes to step outside the easy reinforcement of my own ideas.
01:47:06.040
Maybe you actually like to have your beliefs tested and your perspectives expanded.
01:47:14.460
There are a lot of shows, ideologically driven shows and networks, whose audiences say,
01:47:18.960
thank you for telling me I'm not crazy, but I don't really doubt my own sanity.
01:47:24.700
I don't need affirmation and reassurance that my side or one side of the political or social
01:47:32.620
I'm more worried about being misinformed by lazily going along with the untested assumption or
01:47:39.920
The gist is for people who know that being interesting starts with being interested.
01:47:53.780
It was the nuclear deproliferation, the beginning of the start, the start treaties.
01:47:57.520
Now, why is the United States involved in Ukraine?
01:48:00.340
Because why are we involved in any foreign country?
01:48:02.440
No, there's a specific reason we're involved in Ukraine.
01:48:04.340
Are you talking about like to combat the spread of Soviet like stuff?
01:48:08.680
I have an issue my whole life with ill-informed people propagandized by the government to
01:48:15.120
advocate for foreign intervention in other countries.
01:48:21.260
Because in good faith, I'm asking you, what do you think my position, why I support this
01:48:26.820
Like if I said, oh, it seems like we promised this country we'd defend them.
01:48:32.160
Because you're basically saying we will be greeted as liberators.
01:48:34.540
No, I'm saying it seems to me like we had a promise to this country to defend them in
01:48:44.540
But my question originally was going back to this like, okay, but like, if you're saying
01:48:47.900
the same things as Russian state TV, it makes it hard to take you seriously.
01:48:51.720
Does the treaty that we have with Ukraine that promises to defend them include any guarantees
01:49:02.980
Does it maybe, is there maybe some kind of issue pertaining to if the U.S.
01:49:09.420
I haven't read the whole thing since like three months ago or something.
01:49:17.800
When the U.S. started providing weapons to Islamic terrorist groups so that they could
01:49:23.860
topple the Assad regime, which was allied with Russia, where Russia has their naval base
01:49:28.740
That was an aggress upon an ally of Russia, which destabilized the region.
01:49:33.060
Creating a conflict, particularly around control of a Russian naval base, which put them at
01:49:39.880
We viewed him largely as a terrorist who was gassing his own people.
01:49:42.600
Russia viewed him as an ally and sought to protect him.
01:49:45.540
threatened to put a no-fly zone over Syria, to which Hillary Clinton said, let's do it.
01:49:49.140
Even though she was warned that would start war with Russia directly.
01:49:52.980
The reason we are in Ukraine largely has to do with our attempts to bring natural gas
01:49:58.580
from the Middle East into Europe to offset Russia's control of natural gas.
01:50:03.980
So the U.S. is setting up operations in Ukraine, running soft power operations to shift their
01:50:10.600
government towards a pro-EU, pro-Schengen, pro-NATO sentiment.
01:50:18.140
Firstly, the reason why they seized Crimea in 20, I think it was 2014, was because they
01:50:22.460
saw the writing on the wall with the ousting of Yanukovych.
01:50:26.480
They simply had their existing troops in Sevastopol walk outside and then-
01:50:30.060
Didn't they put a bunch of special forces and like-
01:50:40.400
There was a Lisa agreement in Sevastopol, right?
01:50:43.940
Because when Trump won in 2016, all of these tensions simmered down and halted.
01:50:48.400
The response from the left, the Democratic Party, was largely that Donald Trump was supporting
01:50:54.880
I asked what specifically about my position is completely fabricated or brainwashed, but-
01:51:00.460
Because you don't know any of this, but you want us to be involved.
01:51:04.300
But I'm also questioning everything you're telling me now, because first of all, you have been
01:51:08.920
I would always concede and cop to the fact that you probably know more about more things
01:51:13.680
Not only do I know more about it than you, I was there twice at the start of the Civil
01:51:17.660
But my question is, if the Russian state media says, hey, this person's opinions are so
01:51:21.220
aligned with ours, we want to give them millions of dollars, why should I believe you?
01:51:30.400
If you think the DOJ completely fabricated it, just say that, but I don't think-
01:51:41.900
It's like, can we call Lauren Chen on the phone and ask her right now?
01:51:45.060
The indictment contains zero evidence that anything that they've claimed happened.
01:51:48.900
Yeah, when the government releases a report on something, do they have a list of sources
01:51:52.860
Or do they say, this is what we're alleging happened?
01:51:54.580
Like, you know, Joe Biden said, hey, Russia's about to invade Ukraine in the coming weeks.
01:51:58.340
And they didn't say, and these are intelligence sources, and these are our spies.
01:52:03.600
If your only argument against the historical facts that I brought up is, but I heard from
01:52:07.900
an indictment, that you may have been paid by a foreign country.
01:52:12.040
I don't want to get into a whole Ukraine debate.
01:52:15.500
Let's just pause on the Ukraine thing, because I don't need to rehash a history lesson to somebody
01:52:23.360
You talked about it with Adam Conover, and I think you bring that up with liberals a lot.
01:52:34.400
So, people, some people, especially Chuck Schumer, he did this.
01:52:36.980
He said, Donald Trump called neo-Nazis fine people, which is not the quote, right?
01:52:42.100
Yeah, fine people on both sides, but I'm not talking about this.
01:52:44.640
But, like, I think that completely ignores the context of the white nationalists who organized
01:52:48.880
the rally, who was there on that day, and all the, like, the Identity Europa, the KKK.
01:52:52.420
Like, the idea that there were fine people in this group is kind of like what everyone
01:52:56.080
was upset about, is that he didn't condemn them on August 12th, when white nationalists
01:53:01.200
Two days later, he gave a teleprompter speech that seemed kind of like wooden and hollow.
01:53:04.360
And then on the 15th, he finally said the fine people thing, pointing to no one, because
01:53:08.360
there were not fine people on the side of the neo-Nazis, right?
01:53:10.400
I think this is why young men are leaving the Democratic Party.
01:53:14.540
Because Trump condemned neo-Nazis, and you're not trying to make the case why he actually did.
01:53:17.480
Can we talk, can you bring up the Snopes article that you brought up?
01:53:22.120
Well, here's the thing, is, like, if you look at that article, yeah, obviously, Snopes
01:53:25.960
They're like, we are here to report on the factual thing of what Trump said.
01:53:32.980
Some readers have raised the objection that this fact check appears to assume Trump was
01:53:35.720
correct in saying there were very fine people on both sides of the Charlottesville
01:53:39.120
The fact check aimed to confirm that Trump actually said, not whether what he said was true or false,
01:53:42.500
for the record, virtually every source that covered the United the Right debacle concluded that
01:53:45.320
it was conceived of, led by, and attended by white supremacists, and therefore Trump's
01:53:50.380
So, like, most of the people and the media narrative around this as a whole was that
01:53:53.760
Trump is not condemning white nationalists at this rally that killed a person.
01:53:58.040
This is why young men are leaving the Democratic Party.
01:53:59.640
Well, can you address the point I'm bringing up here?
01:54:03.940
Who did Trump describe specifically as the fine people?
01:54:07.340
Who did Trump describe as the fine people he was referring to?
01:54:09.080
He said the people that weren't the neo-Nazis and the racists who should become condemned totally.
01:54:11.440
No, he specifically said some people who just didn't want to see statues torn down in the
01:54:17.700
So, when Trump says, like, a little old lady doesn't want a statue torn down as a fine
01:54:24.160
The point is, this was a white nationalist rally organized by Jason Kessler, a white nationalist,
01:54:28.900
and with the scheduled speakers being David Duke, Mike Enoch, Richard Spencer.
01:54:33.320
And so, when you show up, you look at these promotional materials, the news...
01:54:36.920
And the news reports on, and this says, this is going to be a white nationalist rally.
01:54:39.820
And then you show up, and you're like, well, I know I'm one of the 4,000 other Nazi people
01:54:47.420
And, like, this is specifically this one or two people?
01:54:50.880
And it's also, if you look at, like, the history of how these organizations operate throughout
01:54:54.120
American politics, it's exactly like you're describing where you've got something like
01:54:58.200
a statue for Robert E. Lee, you've got Americans who are local, and they're like, you know
01:55:02.700
Maybe I don't swear by it, but I like it, and I respect it.
01:55:05.160
And they, all of a sudden, can bring in these boogeyman figures like David Duke, who famously
01:55:15.340
The boogeyman referring to this sort of, like, archetypal scary thing so that the media
01:55:18.820
can then report on it, and now, eight years later, we're pretending that Trump is maybe
01:55:22.000
The media didn't bring David Duke to the rally.
01:55:25.640
There is a relationship between the state, the media, and the boogeyman that seeks to take
01:55:32.080
normal right-wing opinions and vilify them and make them scary and alienating to normal
01:55:36.480
So you think there's, like, some subversion tactic which made the white nationalists promote
01:55:41.120
this rally to scare people away from defending the statue?
01:55:45.280
That is how this has operated since the end of World War II, this relationship between
01:55:48.640
the national security state, far-right organizations, and the media.
01:55:51.580
They all work together to vilify normal right-wing opinions such as, we don't want a statue of
01:55:58.800
Do you think that intelligence agencies in the United States coordinate with news organizations?
01:56:05.940
I mean, even worse than that, they subvert certain movements.
01:56:10.000
Do you think that news organizations, even today, take direction from intelligence agencies?
01:56:16.660
Like, if the FBI is like, you have to report on this, maybe?
01:56:20.340
If it's like, hey, we're doing a story on this, and we have insiders here, would you
01:56:28.800
So I can tell you, with first-hand experience, the State Department particularly calls on
01:56:34.400
the phone, the editor-in-chief, and tells them what to report.
01:56:38.060
They say, hey, you need to report on this, or hey, this is what happened if you're making
01:56:45.520
But that's not forcing them to report on something.
01:56:47.540
If I bombed a country, and then I'm like, hey, we're going to report that we just bombed
01:56:51.200
Cambodia or whatever, and I get on the phone with Washington Post, I'm like, hey, just
01:56:57.060
No, I'm telling you that the State Department contacts the heads of news organizations
01:57:01.400
and says, we've got a big story that we need you to cover.
01:57:05.680
But this is kind of, the way you're phrasing it makes it seem like, oh, news, you've got
01:57:12.760
This is going to be a huge benefit for you to get ahead of this story and talk about this
01:57:15.860
very big thing that's about to happen, which is a completely normal relationship.
01:57:18.680
So I think because of movies, largely, people live in this world where they think everything's
01:57:27.740
The reality is, for news organizations, it's really simple.
01:57:31.380
You just hire the people who will do what you say.
01:57:33.480
You don't hire the people who you have to bribe to do this.
01:57:35.520
Yeah, Noam Chomsky made a whole thing about this.
01:57:37.760
So what ends up happening is, you're a news organization, and you want someone who's,
01:57:42.860
you need to report that this conflict in Afghanistan has to happen, and the Taliban are the bad guys.
01:57:52.780
Oh, if you want to talk about how the media was very complicit in the Iraq war narrative,
01:57:56.600
So what you do is, you get a list of people who are writing, and one guy says, I'm a bit
01:58:08.520
Then when the State Department says, write this, they go, hey, look what we got from
01:58:16.540
Well, it's functional of the U.S. intelligence.
01:58:18.460
Okay, but if we're talking about this, and it's like, okay, if we look at the timeline,
01:58:21.560
you had a bunch of neo-Nazis on August 11th go and talk about Jews not replacing us,
01:58:24.920
blood and soil, you know, gas the K-word, right?
01:58:27.380
And it's like, the day after that, he doesn't condemn those people, versus every other
01:58:32.200
No, the day after that, he doesn't condemn those people, right?
01:58:36.040
This is why young men are leaving the Democratic Party.
01:58:38.260
You can keep deferring to that, but the point is, like, your narrative on this is painted
01:58:41.640
by what I will admit are people like Adam Conover who, like, don't understand it.
01:58:45.860
They just hear this, like, oh, he called neo-Nazis fine people, and they brush it aside.
01:58:51.380
Because the first thing he said was, the first thing he did was quoted, then claimed he didn't
01:58:55.960
Right, which is, like, pussy shit, in my opinion.
01:59:04.860
You're arguing over words and tone about things that happened eight years ago.
01:59:06.920
I'm saying, the day after neo-Nazis marched in this rally with the tiki torches, Republicans
01:59:16.120
Mitch McConnell, the Bushes, all these other people came out and said, by the way, I'm
01:59:20.400
I'm saying all the other Republican parties said, hey, these are neo-Nazis and these
01:59:33.620
Trump didn't say very fine people on both sides of the tiki torches.
01:59:39.620
That was three days later, after he didn't say anything to condemn them for two days.
01:59:44.380
Then finally condemned them after every other reasonable politician who I, you know, I fucking
01:59:50.840
And it seems like the reason people are mad are not that he said verbatim, neo-Nazis are fine
01:59:58.340
Why they're mad is because he refused to condemn one of the most egregious displays of white
02:00:02.340
nationalism in this country and violence for days.
02:00:03.420
How many times has Trump condemned white supremacy?
02:00:05.420
I don't know, but he seems really reluctant to do it compared to other people.
02:00:09.020
Have you seen the clip of him on, was it Jake Tapper, where he asks him to denounce the
02:00:14.620
Have you seen literally the 57 times Trump's been like, why do I keep getting asked to do
02:00:21.500
And it's like, hey, why are you so reluctant to do this versus every other politician who, like,
02:00:36.000
I'm in a cult because I will immediately denounce the KKK because I think the evil racist lynching
02:00:42.880
I'm asking you not because I think you support them.
02:00:45.240
I'm asking you because it's showing how easy it is to denounce them.
02:00:49.300
And it raises questions where it's like, hey, why is it?
02:00:54.440
If he says, if he lies on national television, when someone says, hey, will you denounce David
02:00:59.960
And he says, I don't know who David Duke is when he's a great answer.
02:01:02.920
No, because in 2000, he said, I'm leaving the reformist party because David Duke is part
02:01:13.060
If he knows who a character is and then pretends like he doesn't understand the concept of
02:01:23.700
I've been making online videos where I talk for hours for like 16, 17 years.
02:01:29.460
So why would you say, I don't know what that is?
02:01:32.160
If someone went back and said, Tim, you know, it's really funny.
02:01:35.820
When Andrew Tate got really big and everyone was talking about Andrew Tate, I was like, don't I know
02:01:43.060
Eight years ago, he had DM'd me about the field reporting stuff.
02:01:48.620
If someone had asked me, what do you think of Andrew Tate?
02:01:56.860
Yeah, but that's very different from citing him specifically as the reason you ended a
02:02:06.040
And then also saying, I don't know what the KKK is.
02:02:19.440
I think he said, I don't know about that group.
02:02:25.020
I don't want to say, quote it verbatim, so let's watch it together.
02:02:30.260
While you look that up, do you understand the problem with that, though, if it's 2015 and
02:02:34.940
you're having a conversation with Trump and you're like, denounce David Duke, and he's
02:02:38.860
And you're like, yeah, you do, because here's you denouncing him 15 years ago.
02:02:47.400
They just wait for him to not give a sufficient answer one time.
02:02:49.780
And now eight years later, we're discussing it like it's relevant to his policy.
02:02:52.060
Why is it that every other Republican politician can easily give the answer of, yeah, no, I
02:02:54.380
don't like these white supremacist groups, but he struggles with it.
02:02:59.840
And we know about that one instance because that's the one that they got him.
02:03:02.220
And the KKK one, which is a completely different one, and also struggling to denounce
02:03:08.220
So my question is, no, I'm not looking up, has Trump condemned white supremacists?
02:03:14.720
You're asking me to pull a single thing out of context.
02:03:21.040
Look up the CNN clip with him talking, I think it's Jake Tapper, where he asked him, like,
02:03:37.120
I just Googled search and I'm pulling up all that comes up.
02:03:40.840
But I'm saying that the National Guard would be over.
02:03:44.060
But they don't want to accept the National Guard.
02:03:46.000
You have repeatedly criticized the vice president for not specifically calling out Antifa and
02:03:54.860
But are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that
02:04:01.480
they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities, as we saw in
02:04:10.840
I would say almost everything I see is from the left wing, not from the right wing.
02:04:41.760
If you want to say he fucked up there, but then if we look at the pattern of him failing
02:04:45.260
to do this and we can please watch the KKK clip, which I think is even worse than that
02:04:48.600
one, which was bad, by the way, telling a white supremacist group to stand by and not,
02:04:52.800
hey, yeah, these people are evil and I hate them.
02:04:54.400
Like I said, you didn't want to do this because it was a smear tactic, but anyone asks any
02:05:00.580
of these Republican politicians, do you denounce the KKK?
02:05:05.380
Because obviously, versus someone who's clearly struggling to do this.
02:05:08.840
Now, by the way, I don't think this makes Trump a white supremacist.
02:05:11.540
I think this is literally just he is very hesitant to alienate his base, but that's bad if you're
02:05:55.640
The only thing that comes up, I got to be honest, when I search for it, is that Trump
02:06:04.600
He basically was like, I don't know what you're talking about.
02:06:07.440
Trump, KKK, CNN, and then it's like Trump campaign denounces Klan.
02:06:31.660
I hate to do this on stream, but I know it's in my video.
02:06:34.640
If you go to my channel, you go to my most recent video, and you scroll to that exact
02:06:45.720
I don't want to shamelessly promote myself, but if you go to my channel, it's in my most
02:06:51.160
Like, I know because I just released this on Tuesday, so I watched it like a million times.
02:06:54.540
What I'm trying to do is find the actual raw clip.
02:07:02.200
I cut out the dead air of it, if that's what you're worried about.
02:07:06.280
For the same reason, I don't want to play the CBS Evening News clip.
02:07:10.320
I'm trying to find the actual raw clip of what Trump said.
02:07:16.500
That when Trump was asked about it, he was like, I don't know anything about it.
02:07:19.200
And it was contentious, and then he came out later and said, I do condemn them.
02:07:53.160
Does that not give you pause that someone you voted for is struggling to denounce a hate
02:07:56.660
group when every other person can immediately do it?
02:08:19.640
Like, this is just a political non-story as far as I'm concerned.
02:08:22.380
So when the groups come out afterwards when this happens and say, wow, we really feel
02:08:27.520
And then you can see like a rising trend of these groups influence.
02:08:30.400
Like, I think that's a very demonstrabable material harm.
02:08:42.580
Does he not complain to himself to be a proponent of the alt-right as he has since like 2016?
02:08:47.560
You know what's really challenging in the political space is like.
02:08:50.800
What about Steve Bannon isn't alt-right when he's co-tapped?
02:08:56.960
Well, the AP has a, what do you mean when you say alt-right?
02:09:00.560
The AP guidelines have a definition of what alt-right is.
02:09:09.720
I think that he might still be, but I'd have to look into this.
02:09:12.580
Steve Bannon thinks we should tax the rich to oblivion.
02:09:15.760
He thinks there should be a wealth tax on billionaires.
02:09:17.640
Okay, but that doesn't, no, by the way, I already know this, but that doesn't make him
02:09:24.520
Well, first of all, there are Nazbols, which are Nazis who are like super, super pro like
02:09:30.440
Like you can have a economic left policy and be on the right.
02:09:33.240
We had Steve Bannon on the show and I asked him, I was like, you've been called white
02:09:39.540
And I was like, so he was playing dumb because of course he would know that, right?
02:09:43.860
We were specifically referring to alt-right as white nationalist.
02:09:48.340
And I was saying, they're claiming you're racist.
02:09:50.060
And he was like, I said, there's a viral post on Reddit right now.
02:09:54.680
And he's like, I didn't realize they were saying that about me.
02:10:01.340
So for five years of every mainstream media outlet reporting on him like that, and he's
02:10:15.820
I'm asking you about the policies of Steve Bannon.
02:10:19.460
I know that he wants to tax billionaires, right?
02:10:24.080
Off the top of my head, I'd have to go look at all the articles that have been propagandized
02:10:27.700
into my brain to force me to have this narrative.
02:10:30.580
I mean, if you watch his show, you might be like, whoa, this guy's occupied Wall Street.
02:10:41.220
Let's just say that he's like super mega leftist on this policy.
02:10:44.600
Then why is he in the Trump cabinet voting for the Trump policies that are not getting
02:10:53.740
He wants the government dismantled, broken, arrested.
02:10:56.500
But okay, look, no one is 100% aligned with one policy, one party.
02:11:01.200
I am on the left, I'm progressive, and I am pro-gun, right?
02:11:09.380
Liberals in California are stupid anti-gun, right?
02:11:11.320
They're putting taxes on ammo or background checks on ammo, all this stupid shit.
02:11:16.820
So the thing is, there are key principles that I have, like progressive tax rates, welfare
02:11:25.180
If Steve Bannon has this leftist policy of taxing billionaires, but he's completely aligned
02:11:29.740
in voting for the right policy, this is not the thing that is the deal breaker for him.
02:11:35.180
You can call him a liberal, but say he's on the right.
02:11:37.180
He's in the Trump cabinet helping Trump win, which is right.
02:11:49.120
Yeah, like who he aligns with and who he votes for is his...
02:11:53.860
If I'm a right-wing person, if I say I'm right-wing because I vote for Trump, but I
02:12:08.540
Every single one of my policies is aligned with Bernie Sanders.
02:12:11.540
However, I think abortion should be illegal in all cases, so I vote for Donald Trump because
02:12:25.040
You're voting for the material outcomes that are caused by the Republican Party.
02:12:27.880
So whether or not he wants to tax billionaires, he's voting for the party that is cutting
02:12:31.320
taxes on billionaires in this new bill that they passed in 2017.
02:12:38.340
Steve Bannon is helping out the party that is doing the opposite of this left-wing party.
02:12:44.940
My point was that he advocates for taxing the billionaires.
02:12:48.420
And if he's not doing anything to make that happen, why would that make him on the left?
02:12:55.640
Once again, this is why I say the left is a cult.
02:13:01.860
You vote for Trump because you think that these policies that you want are going to happen.
02:13:08.060
And what I'm saying is if you say, hey, I'm a liberal because X, Y, Z policy, but I vote
02:13:11.980
for the exact opposite person on all these other ones because, let's say this.
02:13:16.240
No, because your mainstream policy, you're delineating, like, this is my dividing line,
02:13:24.240
But then why pretend that you're a liberal on all these other things when you will vote
02:13:29.580
People have different weights to what they find to be more important than other things.
02:13:32.580
It's a hierarchy of what you want to happen, right?
02:13:34.760
This is why I'm also anti-death penalty and I don't go march for it.
02:13:37.320
But you are going to vote for the party that's going to try to reinstitute it, right?
02:13:41.540
Because some things are more important than others.
02:13:43.160
And if war is your delineating factor, that's fine.
02:13:46.260
Do you think woke cultism and critical ideologies are a threat to the existence of this United
02:13:52.720
And that makes sense, then, why you would vote for Trump?
02:13:55.720
But that's not a progressive or liberal position, right?
02:14:02.880
Traditional liberals were not in favor of whatever the weird shit y'all are doing now,
02:14:09.140
I mean, trans stuff is new, but the point is that the policies of, like, 20 years ago...
02:14:13.440
20 years ago, if you went to a liberal and said...
02:14:15.540
Actually, we had a big video with, like, half a million views.
02:14:18.260
We talked about how in, like, 2010 or whatever, CollegeHumor made a video with Jack Black and
02:14:22.560
a bunch of celebrities where they said, you know, it was for Prop 8.
02:14:26.320
And then the fake conservatives in it said they'll teach kids about sodomy.
02:14:38.200
I would disagree with that ad then, because, like, of course...
02:14:40.980
If you all have sex with sodomy, then why would you say, yeah, sex ed, but not for sodomy?
02:14:44.360
So liberals back then said, we are not going to teach kids about sodomy.
02:14:50.780
I think they should not teach children about sodomy.
02:14:53.940
Children should not be taught about fetish, kink, things that can destroy your body.
02:14:58.740
It's the way that primarily gay people have sex.
02:15:04.360
But if you're trying to prepare children for the outside world, and this is something that might
02:15:08.300
happen if they're gay, don't you want them to be safe and know about it?
02:15:12.100
No, you shouldn't teach kids about gay anal sex.
02:15:13.560
There's not really a safe way to engage in that.
02:15:15.800
Anal sex in any circumstance is damaging to the body and can kill you.
02:15:19.160
Do you think that gay people should never have sex?
02:15:28.220
Okay, so if we have a philosophy on gay sex can cause harm, because it can.
02:15:33.300
Yeah, they have colon cancers, they're incontinence, there's things that can happen.
02:15:35.580
Gastrointestinal infections, sepsis, and death.
02:15:38.420
So, if we're dealing with the reality of, okay, however, there exist all these gay people
02:15:41.760
that are having sex, wouldn't you rather them at least understand how to do that the
02:15:48.680
Because you can't prevent it from happening, right?
02:15:51.220
You can't Thanos snap gay sex out of the world.
02:15:58.780
You're saying, hey, if you are gay and you happen to have a gay encounter, this is the safest
02:16:05.160
They draw it out and, like, put it in the graphics and put it in the kids' book.
02:16:09.840
I don't think you should teach children to have gay sex.
02:16:12.900
You're a liberal, but you're saying the way that most, if not all, gay people engage
02:16:23.640
No, you don't agree with the way that gay people have sex.
02:16:27.480
Do you believe that if in 2004 you went to a Democrat and said we should teach children about having anal
02:16:40.060
Stop acting like you can't comprehend these things.
02:16:41.760
You're saying that gay people shouldn't have gay sex.
02:16:44.160
People of any types, male or female, should not put things in their bum bums.
02:16:46.920
That's not a liberal position from 20 years ago.
02:16:50.260
They said we shouldn't teach it in schools, apparently, from this commercial.
02:16:52.480
People should not be putting stuff up their butt.
02:16:55.200
And if they're doing it, I want them to be safe about it.
02:16:57.100
You know what else we don't talk about in school the kids shouldn't do?
02:17:04.060
Are you going to start your little dare group and go talk about how gay sex is bad?
02:17:07.140
I was going to finish my point first, which was going to be that smoking cigarettes on
02:17:10.700
average takes 11 years off your life expectancy.
02:17:13.700
Sodomy, being a practicing homosexual, removes 20 years on average from your life expectancy
02:17:18.520
because of the things he's mentioning, not to mention the proliferation of STIs within
02:17:22.380
the homosexual community and things of that nature.
02:17:26.620
Unfortunately, I wish it were true, but it's not.
02:17:29.000
So, promoting unhealthy lifestyles to children is bad.
02:17:31.460
Telling people how to have safer sex doesn't stop the spread of STIs.
02:17:38.260
Because of massive viral subsidies, not because of condom proliferation.
02:17:48.640
So join us in the song of happy days for the gays.
02:17:58.820
It's time to spread some hate and put it in the Constitution.
02:18:26.920
That wasn't right, that's a lie, but it worked, so we don't care.
02:18:29.680
Now you are sitting here telling us that's a good thing to do.
02:18:32.000
I think it is good to teach people that if they're going to engage in sex a certain way,
02:18:35.780
We are in agreement of your worldview and my position from where I used to hang out with
02:18:40.520
these people in California, and you are on the other side of that.
02:18:45.780
Tim, my liberal, super progressive middle school, when they did drug education, they
02:18:50.040
did not teach us to do molly and cocaine and all this.
02:18:52.300
However, they had a very comprehensive slideshow of, here's every drug you might encounter,
02:18:57.840
These things are out there, and especially in San Francisco, there's a good chance that you
02:19:00.880
might find someone who's trying to sell it, and they're telling, hey, these are the risks
02:19:04.880
These ones you should probably never, ever, ever do.
02:19:07.600
Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.
02:19:12.220
Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer.
02:19:16.520
From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them
02:19:21.440
throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino.
02:19:26.820
With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz,
02:19:33.180
and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals
02:19:48.940
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact
02:19:52.320
Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
02:19:58.560
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
02:20:02.500
Hi, I'm Mike Peska, host of The Gist, and I'm the kind of person, maybe you are too,
02:20:06.400
who likes to step outside the easy reinforcement of my own ideas.
02:20:12.040
Maybe you actually like to have your beliefs tested and your perspectives expanded.
02:20:20.020
There are a lot of shows, ideologically driven shows and networks whose audiences say,
02:20:25.380
thank you for telling me I'm not crazy, but I don't really doubt my own sanity.
02:20:30.700
I don't need affirmation and reassurance that my side or one side of the political or social
02:20:38.620
I'm more worried about being misinformed by lazily going along with the untested assumption
02:20:45.960
The gist is for people who know that being interesting starts with being interested.
02:20:54.460
This one won't harm you, this one's addictive, and they gave a very good comprehension of
02:20:59.120
like how to deal with these things in real life.
02:21:03.140
I don't know if you knew this, but gay guys love fucking each other in the ass.
02:21:07.240
And so if they're going to go out and do that, I'd rather them be doing it safely than
02:21:10.120
say, hey, actually just don't do it because that's how abstinence education works.
02:21:13.620
I love how we've gone from like the conservative traditional position of abstinence education
02:21:19.820
and actual intercourse to, but what about shoving stuff up your ass?
02:21:25.340
Yeah, the thing that gave people to do when they have sex.
02:21:30.600
So teaching kids about drugs actually backfired.
02:21:33.700
Maybe we should have just been like, let's not bring it up.
02:21:36.120
Dare was like this, hey, look out for this scary guy behind the fucking school.
02:21:42.640
That literally they're like, well, this one's really bad.
02:21:48.640
This is how you can avoid it, which is not what Dare did.
02:21:50.820
Dare was this very much this abstinence only type of thing to just say no.
02:21:57.200
So in Chicago, when fentanyl was starting to become like pop up on the scene, there was
02:22:03.000
a fentanyl death on the South side where I lived.
02:22:08.780
At the corner of 63rd and Sacramento, an individual was found overdosed, having taken a super potent
02:22:16.000
super heroin, they're calling it, called fentanyl.
02:22:24.200
They said, everyone watch out for this crazy super heroin.
02:22:30.080
Because if I was a heroin addict and I heard there's a super heroin, I would immediately go
02:22:35.620
We are way over, so I do apologize, but we do got to wrap things up.
02:22:40.260
It's always fun to have these conversations, as contentious as they may become.
02:22:47.020
We'll do more and hopefully we can have you come for one of our live shows.
02:22:49.520
Should I do a call out to the other leftist himbo that won't come on shows like this?
02:22:59.640
But I actually will defend Hassan because there are these personalities that I really
02:23:05.620
despise where every thumbnail they make is a random picture of Trump and then the title
02:23:10.020
is just Trump says bad thing, Trump does bad thing.
02:23:13.700
It's like Trump looks disheveled and angry and they get millions of views, but Hassan
02:23:23.300
Hopefully we can have you at our live shows in the future.
02:23:27.620
If you think I was even remotely good faith here, please go watch them.
02:23:30.420
Although my most recent video does feature Trump.
02:23:34.360
Yeah, exactly what you just described, which is Trump and the period is making his face
02:23:43.340
He's talking about the fine people thing, but the thumbnail is like Trump like this
02:23:48.740
Like, oh, Donald Trump said this egregiously big gaffe and look how disheveled he looks in
02:23:53.140
They just go, oh my God, Donald Trump was on the news today.
02:24:00.640
Perhaps he means something more like Trump had a bad day.
02:24:10.740
But again, like I have no problem with periodically you talk about Trump or criticize him.
02:24:31.020
You look at some of these channels, which I've named too often, and like every single
02:24:40.820
Hassan Piker, I challenge you for the throne of Twitch and the soul of America's young men.
02:24:46.300
You get these aspirations of anti-Semitism and being a himbo.
02:24:52.740
I'm Jewish and I'm more anti-Semitic than you because I have to live with Jews, okay?
02:24:57.220
While you were complaining about Israel and their bombing campaign in Gaza, I was there
02:25:02.000
on birthright having to listen to their stupid fucking arguments.
02:25:04.680
And you hold your swastika sword in front of Ethan Klein while I have felt the blade of
02:25:13.240
So I challenge you, Hassan, for the throne of himbo Twitch.
02:25:21.520
Yeah, you can find me at youtube.com slash John Doyle and I talk about stuff, not maybe
02:25:27.120
pertaining to the foreskin or lack thereof or anything like that, but it's a good time.
02:25:33.620
Okay, we went a little bit over, but we've got to bounce now.