The Culture War - Tim Pool - SCOTUS DEFIES Trump, May UPHOLD Illegal Alien Birthright Citizenship

00:00:00.000 Marketing is hard, but I'll tell you a little secret.

00:00:03.580 It doesn't have to be.

00:00:04.400 Let me point something out.

00:00:05.700 You're listening to a podcast right now, and it's great.

00:00:08.040 You love the host.

00:00:08.780 You seek it out and download it.

00:00:10.020 You listen to it while driving, working out, cooking, even going to the bathroom.

00:00:14.300 Podcasts are a pretty close companion, and this is a podcast ad.

00:00:18.400 Did I get your attention?

00:00:19.700 You can reach great listeners like yourself with podcast advertising from Libsyn ads.

00:00:24.580 Choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements or run a pre-produced ad

00:00:28.860 like this one across thousands of shows to reach your target audience in their favorite podcasts

00:00:33.280 with Libsyn ads. Go to Libsyn ads dot com. That's L.I.B.S.Y.N. ads dot com today.

00:00:41.440 For the first time, a president has joined oral arguments at the Supreme Court. Donald Trump

00:00:48.420 listened in as attorneys argued before our highest court as to whether or not we should allow

00:00:54.660 illegal immigrants to have children in this country and grant them citizenship. And oh boy,

00:01:01.280 was it contentious. Many people are saying it may fall six to three. It was really bad for Trump's

00:01:07.960 side, for our side. The argument coming from Roberts is the country may have changed. The

00:01:14.400 world may have changed, but the Constitution remains the same, which presents many moral

00:01:21.160 philosophical challenges for our nation. The argument, I suppose, from John Roberts is that

00:01:28.260 though a country may face an existential crisis, if the structure of such a country

00:01:34.200 permits its own destruction, it must be destroyed. I didn't say that explicitly,

00:01:41.300 but that is the philosophy behind the arguments from a conservative judge who says,

00:01:47.440 let the country be damned. Now, of course, everyone's favorite Supreme Court justices,

00:01:54.760 Thomas and Alito, seemed very much to agree or may lean more towards birthright citizen was

00:02:01.880 never supposed to extend to birth tourism companies or illegal immigrants. The principal

00:02:07.380 argument from the government is this. Even in Wong Kim Ark, which set the precedent that if

00:02:13.600 you're born, you're a citizen, they said you must be domiciled here. What does that mean?

00:02:17.440 It means you live here. You have legal permanent residence and the intention to stay.

00:02:23.960 Ergo, if you are here illegally, you are not domiciled here. You are not going to be granted

00:02:30.040 citizenship. Liberals, of course, we know exactly which direction they're going. They're basically

00:02:36.120 sitting there going, destroy America. I'm kidding, guys. It's a joke. And as much as

00:02:42.160 Ketanji Brown Jackson gets ragged on and people insult her arguments, I'm actually going to give

00:02:47.920 her some defense. She made a comment about being in Japan and owing temporary allegiance to the

00:02:54.700 Japanese. And thus, if allegiance is a requirement for birthright citizenship, then you're going to

00:03:02.220 get it. You will, your children will be citizens because you are temporarily allegiant to this

00:03:08.020 country. But the big issue with her argument that I'll push back on, of course, is that the times

00:03:13.460 they are a changing. And allegiance, as viewed back then, is substantively different to what

00:03:20.500 allegiance is today. If we are going purely on the shape of the world today, Ketanji Brown-Jackson's

00:03:26.800 and Robert's arguments clash and don't quite make sense. Robert's argument is the Constitution

00:03:33.040 remains the same, even if the times change. Ketanji Brown Jackson's arguments are no,

00:03:39.660 because the times changed, we will apply the Constitution differently. Oh, boy. The end result

00:03:46.360 is this, my friends. The Supreme Court seems largely skeptical of ending birthright citizenship,

00:03:52.480 but it's still possible to get a five to four ruling under the assumption that Roberts actually

00:03:59.780 sides with the liberals. And thus, if that is the case, I will reiterate, it would appear the

00:04:05.300 moral philosophy of John Roberts is as such a nation that structurally allows its own destruction

00:04:13.600 must be destroyed. It would it would appear to me based on listening to these arguments

00:04:18.720 that Chief Justice Roberts is basically saying this country must be ended because think about

00:04:25.160 it logically. If your nation allows Chinese birth tourism, and this is the principal crux of the

00:04:31.320 argument, they allow people to fly to Guam, give birth and fly back. And there's an estimated over

00:04:37.700 1 million Chinese nationals in China that are eligible to be president of the United States.

00:04:45.520 And Robert's argument is, so what? The constitution allows it. Well, there's a simple logic there. I

00:04:54.760 mean, they're an adversary. Are we really going to let them come in? So be it. Let's jump right

00:05:00.540 in and I'll present to you the latest updates on where this is all going. It's not a done deal,

00:05:05.260 my friends, but interesting nonetheless. Before we get started, of course, head over to

00:05:11.080 timcast.com and join now. Get in our Discord community. Tens of thousands of people hanging

00:05:18.400 out every day. It is not what you know. It's who you know. And if you're trying to build a new

00:05:24.660 system, maybe start a business, make a comic, write a song, fix a car. This is a network of

00:05:29.960 people that will help you move in the right direction. The sad thing to me is that I hear

00:05:34.620 many Gen Z say that they can't figure out where to meet people or how to build community or get

00:05:39.120 involved. Hey, it's not perfect, but there are like-minded individuals who maybe some people

00:05:44.820 might argue with you. They're all in this discord and it's a great place to start, but most

00:05:49.500 importantly, you're supporting the work we do. Without you as members, we would not be able to

00:05:54.240 do this, and that's a fact. So all that matters is if you think this video is important and you

00:05:59.140 like the work that I do, join us at TimCast.com. Here's the updates from CNN. Supreme Court

00:06:06.460 skeptical of Trump's birthright citizenship order. Several justices, including those Trump

00:06:12.160 appointed, aggressively questioned the president's effort to reimagine birthright citizenship. Now,

00:06:18.940 CNN, I love what you're doing. You're not news. This is not a reimagining. It's an

00:06:23.840 argument. That's it. An argument made that we are not actually upholding the Constitution

00:06:30.360 and an argument made by the ACLU, the others that we are. That's it. It's not a reimagining.

00:06:36.940 It's a, hey, guys, you're doing it wrong. Well, CNN reports. Supreme Court justices expressed

00:06:43.420 skepticism during oral arguments over President Donald Trump's executive order that attempts to

00:06:47.720 end automatic birthright citizenship. The case puts the admins aggressive approach to immigration

00:06:52.180 front and center before the court. The president attended the arguments for about 90 minutes,

00:06:57.020 the first sitting president to do so. Arguments have focused on the history and meaning of the

00:07:02.640 14th Amendment, which states that all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. and subject to

00:07:07.580 the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the U.S. Now, what does that really mean? It's simple.

00:07:13.040 The intention at the time, and I think this is the reasonable approach, is that we had a bunch

00:07:17.520 of slaves. The war ended. Slavery was was done. There were even people who were brought here

00:07:22.880 illegally, didn't want to be here, but did live here now. And so he said, guys, all of the people

00:07:27.540 that were born here or naturalized, they're citizens. OK. All right. It was descriptive,

00:07:33.200 not prescriptive. They said, actually, the senator who wrote the amendment, this will not,

00:07:38.800 of course, apply to foreigners, aliens, the children of diplomats or foreign ministers.

00:07:45.520 Yet here we are.

00:07:47.080 Here we are.

00:07:48.260 You get 50 some odd years or 40 or so years later,

00:07:51.220 Wong Kim Ark, Chinese immigrants who are here legally domiciled in the U.S.

00:07:57.740 had a kid.

00:07:58.100 And they said, is that kid a citizen?

00:07:59.240 They went, yeah, OK.

00:08:00.900 But how does that mean that someone can run across the border illegally,

00:08:05.340 give birth, and then that kid gets to be president in 35 years?

00:08:09.600 Like they're eligible to be president.

00:08:11.200 But we have naturalized citizens who came here, studied and believe in the American dream, who can't even be president.

00:08:17.060 But that Chinese kid whose parents flew to Guam, gave birth and flew back to China.

00:08:22.180 That's that's legal.

00:08:24.540 Does any sane person think the founding fathers wanted this to be the case?

00:08:29.860 Well, apparently, John Roberts, as I already stated, has outright looked into the eyes of the solicitor general saying your country shall burn.

00:08:37.840 I know I'm a little heated on this one, but when you hear this, it is shockingly offensive,

00:08:42.480 in my opinion. They're going to say Trump has continued slamming this. He says we are the

00:08:48.200 only country in the world stupid enough to allow birthright citizenship. About 30 other countries

00:08:54.780 also allow birthright citizenship. That is a lie. You see what CNN does? We call this

00:09:01.980 factual but not truthful. The United States is the only country where you can enter illegally

00:09:10.320 and give birth. Sure, 30 other countries have birthright citizenship, but there are requirements

00:09:16.420 that must be upheld. And this is actually what the Solicitor General is asking for, meaning

00:09:21.100 if you're on a tourism visa and you give birth, that kid would be a citizen in some circumstances,

00:09:27.860 I would argue there. So there are countries that allow birthright citizenship, but it's basically

00:09:32.200 because your parents are citizens and you're born here, you're a citizen.

00:09:36.780 That's not how it works in the United States. Here's where it gets downright crazy. Listen

00:09:44.180 to this insanity that based on Chinese media reports, there are 500, 500 birth tourism

00:09:52.460 of companies in the People's Republic of China whose business is to bring people here to give

00:09:58.080 birth and return to that nation. Having said all that, you do agree that that has no impact on the

00:10:05.200 legal analysis before us? I think it's, I'd quote what Justice Scalia said in his Hamdan dissent

00:10:10.520 where they have, like their interpretation has these implications that could not possibly have

00:10:16.080 been approved by the 19th century framers of this amendment. I think that shows that they've met

00:10:22.360 a mess. Their interpretation has made a mess of the provision. Well, it certainly wasn't a problem

00:10:26.320 in the 19th century. No, but of course, we're in a new world now, as Justice Alito pointed out to,

00:10:31.480 where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who's a U.S. citizen. Well,

00:10:36.520 it's a new world. It's the same constitution. It is. You're a podcast listener, and this is a

00:10:42.960 podcast ad heard only in Canada. Reach great Canadian listeners like yourself with podcast

00:10:48.440 advertising from libsyn ads choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements or run

00:10:54.520 a pre-produced ad like this one across thousands of shows to reach your target audience with libsyn

00:10:59.760 ads email bob at libsyn.com to learn more that's b-o-b at l-i-b-s-y-n.com as justice calia said

00:11:09.900 i think in the case that uh justice leader was referring to uh you've got a constitutional

00:11:14.380 provision that addresses certain evils and it should be extended to reasonably comparable

00:11:17.860 evils. He said that about statutory interpretation. I think the same principle applies here,

00:11:21.500 and I think we quote that in our brief. Thank you. Absolutely incredible. Let me read through

00:11:25.740 the quotes again. The Solicitor General for the United States says, China has 500 birth tourism

00:11:31.080 companies to bring people here to give birth and return. Most famously, they fly to Guam.

00:11:37.240 It's cheap. They land, give birth, head back. Then 30 years later, that Chinese individual

00:11:42.680 serving the Chinese Communist Party, allegiant only to communism, can come to the United States

00:11:47.280 and be like, I'm an American. Yep. That's psychotic. And what is Robert's response?

00:11:54.040 That has no impact on the legal analysis. It actually does. And I think Sauer is correct.

00:12:01.440 When you go back to the 19th century, this was not a component of the discussion they had.

00:12:08.100 Certainly, they could not address that issue. Therefore, it must be addressed now.

00:12:13.700 I'd make a similar argument for the Second Amendment. The only difference first as liberals

00:12:19.180 come on, say, oh, yeah, then make that argument for the Second Amendment.

00:12:23.860 The issue of the Second Amendment is on an issue of the conquering of a nation and the collapse of

00:12:28.220 the system therein. The whether or not an individual can own a machine gun has no bearing

00:12:34.620 on whether or not our government functions. If our enemies can bring their children here and take

00:12:42.340 over our system of governance, we don't exist. Now you may say, but Tim, if regular old people

00:12:49.820 can get machine guns, they can take over government too. Well, the issue there is the

00:12:55.140 government always has bigger machine guns, isn't it? And I actually don't think that that argument

00:13:00.380 is applicable. Whether or not citizens allegiant to a country can be armed has no bearing on

00:13:07.160 whether or not there is a capability to defend that nation from an armed population. Sounds like

00:13:11.380 that's a legislative issue. The issue where our country constitutionally allows our enemies to

00:13:17.320 bring their children here, give birth, and then in 30 years, those people will be lording over

00:13:23.920 the people of this country. That is psychotic, and it will be the end of the United States.

00:13:30.740 Now, I don't know for sure that John Roberts actually, actually will ultimately side against

00:13:36.560 against this argument. We will see. But it certainly does seem that to be the case.

00:13:43.480 Now, Kazanji Brown-Jackson made some interesting points. Actually, I respect this a little bit,

00:13:47.420 and I'm going to break this down for you. One of the more interesting points made in the

00:13:51.140 structure of the argument from the government, it's actually quite simple. Wong Kim Ark,

00:13:55.080 the famous 1800s ruling by the Supreme Court, it was like 1898, I think, stated that a child born

00:14:02.060 to Chinese immigrants who were legally here, who are domiciled here, I should say, I believe they

00:14:05.380 may have overstayed their visa, but they were here and domiciled under a legitimate process

00:14:10.040 that this individual who was born would be an American citizen because they were here

00:14:14.740 under our, they were allegiant to this country, domiciled.

00:14:18.180 And it specifically states several times in Wong Kim Ark, domiciled, which the government

00:14:22.860 is arguing means you must be here legally, living here with the intention to stay here.

00:14:29.380 I think that makes sense.

00:14:30.080 That means if there is a Chinese couple, they get American visas, they come here, and they are here living legally, maybe it's a two-year visa, and have a kid, that kid's a citizen.

00:14:40.500 Now, that does still mean people can come and exploit the law, but it dramatically reduces people coming here as tourists for birth.

00:14:51.040 Now, that being said, as I already said, some instances, tourism would still be allowed to have kids become citizens.

00:14:55.620 It would just eliminate birth tourism.

00:14:57.140 It would give leeway to the government to say no to certain things.

00:14:59.080 But there are some people who come here on a tourism visa and they may they may come here and then begin a process where they seek to be permanently domiciled and make an argument that they are going to stay.

00:15:11.440 They're going to apply for advances, something like that. Rare and not necessarily the point, but possible.

00:15:17.220 Now, Ketanji Brown Jackson brings the issue of allegiance, what it means to be domiciled.

00:15:21.180 And she's getting mocked for this. But guys, let me let me play.

00:15:25.580 I was thinking about this, and I think there are various sources that say this, that you can have, you obviously have permanent allegiance based on being born in whatever country you're from.

00:15:39.600 So the argument here is, if you are not allegiant to a country, can you be granted citizenship?

00:15:44.780 This is the question in the Fourth Amendment pertaining to jurisdiction of, meaning if you are born or naturalized and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

00:15:53.940 Subject to the jurisdiction means you have allegiance to that nation and no one else.

00:15:57.920 Well, here's an interesting argument.

00:15:59.540 That's what everybody recognizes.

00:16:01.840 But you also have local allegiance when you are on the soil of this other sovereign.

00:16:09.300 And I was thinking, you know, I'm a U.S. citizen and visiting Japan.

00:16:13.420 And what it means is that, you know, if I steal someone's wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me.

00:16:26.020 It's allegiance meaning can they control you as a matter of law.

00:16:31.080 I can also rely on them if my wallet is stolen to, you know, under Japanese law, go and prosecute the person who has stolen it.

00:16:39.940 So there's this relationship based on even though I'm a temporary traveler, I'm just on vacation in Japan.

00:16:46.580 I'm still locally owing allegiance in that sense.

00:16:52.320 She's not wrong. She's not wrong.

00:16:55.420 The issue is that times have changed.

00:16:58.400 And if you go back to the 1800s, Native Americans, Mexicans, Canadians would move through the United States and they would not be allegiant.

00:17:08.540 They could be coming through as banditos.

00:17:11.460 Imagine a guy on horseback from Mexico storming into Texas, firing a gun, bang, bang, and

00:17:15.640 then he shoots a guy.

00:17:17.320 But he's subject to our laws.

00:17:19.300 Yeah, we're going to stop him.

00:17:20.940 Well, that means he's allegiant and now his kids are citizens.

00:17:24.140 What?

00:17:25.500 Okay, here's the ultimate point.

00:17:27.900 Ketanji Brown-Jackson isn't wrong with the definition of allegiance in the law dictionary.

00:17:31.700 allegiance is meant is meant the obligation of fidelity and obedience which the individual owes

00:17:38.460 to the government under which he lives or to his sovereign in return for the protection he receives

00:17:42.320 it may be an absolute and permanent obligation or it may be qualified and temporary the citizen or

00:17:47.960 subject owes an absolute and permanent allegiance to his government or sovereign or at least until

00:17:51.960 by some open and distinct act he renounces it they're going to mention this is from carlisle

00:17:56.140 the U.S. and aliens while domiciled in the country owe temporary allegiance. Now, I want to defend

00:18:03.300 Ketanji Brown-Jackson because I'm a nice guy. And she does make an apt point about temporary

00:18:08.700 allegiance and how we recognize that in law. The only problem is that's literally the argument of

00:18:13.800 the government and the Solicitor General, that people who come here legally and are domiciled

00:18:18.860 here legally are allegiant because we have an agreement, a relationship. But if you come here

00:18:24.760 illegally. You are clearly stating your intent of no allegiance to our laws and government.

00:18:31.380 You have entered the country violating our laws. We are now going to remove you. There's a great

00:18:37.400 point made by Alito when he said, if an illegal immigrant is subject to removal at any time,

00:18:44.840 they are certainly not domiciled here. Therefore, their children would not be citizens. Indeed,

00:18:52.920 Ketanji Brown Jackson masterfully making the point for the Solicitor General and the United States.

00:18:58.760 We all agree.

00:19:00.140 If you have a functional legal relationship where my country and your country say we'll provide protection to certain degrees for our citizens and uphold those laws,

00:19:11.360 you are allegiant based on the agreement you made when you applied for your visa or through a visa waiver program.

00:19:18.280 The problem is she's still only arguing for birth tourism and her argument would still eliminate illegal immigrants having kids in this country, getting citizenship, I should say.

00:19:33.080 My friends, we are truly living in some of the dumbest times.

00:19:37.660 I'm going to tell you about the darkness now.

00:19:40.400 The darkness, the reason why the Democrats want this.

00:19:42.800 It is impossible for this nation to survive should we continue to allow birthright citizenship.

00:19:48.720 And we have already seen the ill effects of this for some time.

00:19:51.900 When Roberts stands up on a pedestal and say, the rules of this country, though they may permit

00:19:58.340 its own destruction, shall be upheld to the destruction of this country.

00:20:01.800 That's fascinating.

00:20:03.240 Yeah.

00:20:04.120 Well, sooner or later, a generation will say no.

00:20:06.980 And I think you will find Gen Z saying no more and more.

00:20:10.860 then they will say, I don't care what you've written down. I don't. And that's true for

00:20:16.300 anything. Leftists might say the same thing for the ninth and 10th amendments. The federal

00:20:21.760 government will take over and control the states. It will be one nation ruled by us.

00:20:27.420 Because sooner or later, the system breaks. It is a fact the founding fathers did not intend for a

00:20:32.240 system where our adversaries and foreigners would come to this country, have kids, and those kids

00:20:35.900 would be able to hold government positions of government that our adversaries could infiltrate

00:20:40.520 and having no allegiance, resisting arrest, resisting the law.

00:20:46.880 I think the fact remains this, to Kataji Brown-Jackson's argument.

00:20:50.900 Individuals who come here and evade law enforcement

00:20:53.840 certainly have expressed no allegiance to our system or country.

00:20:58.980 Simple as that.

00:21:00.860 Now, you might argue that people come here on legitimate visas to have kids.

00:21:05.460 Well, at least they've completely abided by the rules of the system.

00:21:09.560 She's at a halfway point.

00:21:10.520 Well, our country will not exist if this persists. That's the truth. The United States will not

00:21:16.760 exist. Foreign-born, first-generation immigrants who naturalize tend to vote Democrat.

00:21:23.420 Pre-2024 polling often showed them favoring Democrats. Children of immigrants tend to meet

00:21:27.340 Democrat. Third generation often moderating towards the center or right. This is the point.

00:21:33.900 It's not about illegal immigrants voting. It's about bringing in illegal immigrants who have

00:21:37.560 kids. Those kids then entertain the policies set before them. Those of the noble American tradition

00:21:44.800 tend to be Republican, where they say, my grandfather built this town with his bare

00:21:50.460 hands so that we could all live better. And I will not give that away. And the Democrats look

00:21:56.900 to the child of immigrants and say, hey, what about your parents? They want free stuff too,

00:22:01.980 right? Vote for me. It's exactly what happened in California after amnesty. Fascinating thing

00:22:07.400 happened that turned California from a reliable Republican state into a Democrat state.

00:22:11.980 And that is, my friends, Reagan's all like, we've got to give amnesty. And then he does.

00:22:19.760 Then you get a bunch of young people whose parents and grandparents are illegal immigrants.

00:22:24.900 And so then in the early 90s, a vote is held. Shall we remove access to public resources from

00:22:32.300 illegal immigrants. And these children who receive naturalization go, no, because my mom wants free

00:22:39.280 stuff. Plain and simple. And so these children voted Democrat because Democrats promised to give

00:22:47.840 away the American dream. And that's what's happened for Gen Z. Now, unfortunately, the

00:22:53.040 lefty wackaloons think the American dream is being curtailed by wealthy individuals who own

00:22:57.940 businesses, which don't get me wrong, they have their faults indeed, but that's not the real

00:23:02.440 reason. We are looking at in New York hotels being propped up for illegal immigrants. We are looking

00:23:09.440 at housing programs and free medical care for illegal immigrants in California. In Illinois,

00:23:14.900 they've set up camps for illegal immigrants. Meanwhile, young people are left homeless

00:23:19.780 without jobs or opportunities, and they are struggling. Indeed, my friends, the American

00:23:25.180 dream is being given away to noncitizens because it guarantees Democrats win power. So they will

00:23:31.120 burn the whole thing down if they can but extract a little bit of wealth while they do it. And

00:23:38.400 people like John Roberts will sit there and say, so what? Those are the rules. Okay. By all means,

00:23:45.840 you do you. But be warned, if the rules are as such, sooner or later, the people come with

00:23:52.620 torches and pitchforks. And that's something we desperately do not want. Unfortunately,

00:23:58.900 what do we see? Feeding our future defendant sentenced to over one year in prison.

00:24:05.140 CBS says the case that started it all, the COVID era $250 million scheme. The group claimed to

00:24:11.680 work with restaurants and caterers to distribute meals to schools and other groups, but instead

00:24:15.280 submitted fake meal counts. My, oh my. Early on, Minnesota officials questioned some of the group's

00:24:20.640 filings and slowed approvals for reimburse of reimbursements, prompting feeding our future to

00:24:26.080 file a lawsuit. The state's auditor office found that the threat of legal consequence and negative

00:24:30.520 media attention affected the state's decision making process. What federal prosecutors called

00:24:34.480 the largest pandemic era fraud in the United States is just the tip of the very iceberg of a

00:24:38.560 very large iceberg. Here's the fraud in the housing program, autism program fraud, fraud claims against

00:24:44.460 daycares. YouTuber Nick Shirley drew tens of millions of views in late December when he posted

00:24:48.980 video that showed him visiting federally supported child care centers around Minneapolis and finding

00:24:53.740 no children present. He alleged nearly a dozen daycare centers were not actually providing any

00:24:57.780 service and suggested owners were pocketing taxpayer funds. CBS conducted its own analysis

00:25:03.360 and visited several daycare centers. All but two have active licenses, according to state records.

00:25:09.220 One was subjected to an unannounced inspection. Our review found dozens of citations related to

00:25:14.140 safety, cleanliness, equipment, staff training. Another daycare shared security footage of people

00:25:18.480 dropping off young children the same day that Shirley arrived and claimed the daycare was empty.

00:25:22.880 Minnesota's Office of Inspector General carried out on-site compliance checks at the time.

00:25:26.980 Eight of the centers had children present, and one had not opened yet when it was inspected.

00:25:32.420 Shirley's viral video prompted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to freeze funding

00:25:37.640 to these daycares. Trump has largely blamed the Somali community. Tim Walz has drawn widespread

00:25:44.780 scrutiny for his handling of the fraud in the state. What we know is this. I have no problem

00:25:49.240 saying that not everything Shirley showed was was was proven to be fraud. That's fine. But he found

00:25:55.240 empty medical facilities, buildings where it's like here we provide medical care and the buildings

00:26:00.280 are all empty, no clients, nothing. He's repeated this in California. The issue. We know that

00:26:06.180 Somalis are funneling huge amounts of cash out of the state and back to Somalia. They have no

00:26:11.240 allegiance to this country. Many of them are here through fraud, not all of them. Ilhan Omar has been

00:26:16.980 accused of using immigration fraud to get her brother access to the United States, which would

00:26:20.700 subject her to denaturalization, according to the INA. When you bring in people who are not

00:26:26.140 allegiant to this country in the true sense of the word, meaning they don't care, they will extract

00:26:30.380 from you and they will burn your country down. There are people who came here from Nigeria.

00:26:36.380 They worked really hard. They filed their paperwork. They bought plane tickets. They flew in.

00:26:41.240 were greeted with a smile. They shook hands with the people when they arrived with the

00:26:45.400 administrators. And they said, welcome to America. Did you know that these people make over $100,000

00:26:50.020 a year? Nigerians. There's a really funny video that went viral. It's a black man. And he's

00:26:56.100 sitting with a white kid and then like a Pakistani dude, like a pale, like a lighter skinned South

00:27:01.780 Asian. And they're doing a chat roulette with a young black guy. And the young black guy says,

00:27:09.280 you got to give me your black card because you're sitting here with two white boys.

00:27:12.560 And then the Middle Eastern, like South Asian guy goes, there's only one white dude here.

00:27:17.720 And then the black dude says, I'm not one of you street kids. I'm Congolese. None of this.

00:27:24.860 And then he speaks Congolese or whatever the language is to the black kid. And he calls

00:27:30.380 him a racial slur. The point is this. Not to get into like the racial drama, whatever.

00:27:36.380 There are people around the world who come here legally as immigrants, and they love this country, and they learn English, and they look for work, and they are proud to have made it, to taste the American dream, and I love it.

00:27:50.580 This young man saying, I'm not a street punk like you, man, not to rag on that young kid or anything, but I respect the guy who says, I will be a respectable man, and I will uphold the values of this country.

00:28:04.480 I, the immigrants who come here legally, I have such tremendous respect for them.

00:28:09.560 That's fantastic.

00:28:11.040 They come here legally, they get permanent residency, maybe citizenship.

00:28:15.040 If you're a permanent resident and you have a kid here, your kid's a citizen, congratulations.

00:28:18.740 Thank you for coming legally and fighting for our values.

00:28:23.060 Now, it's not always that way.

00:28:24.340 Some come here legally and they're bad people.

00:28:25.740 I get that.

00:28:26.180 But I say, legally, what we end up with, damning breakdown of California's alleged fraud and where your cash is being burned.

00:28:38.240 People who come to this country because they want to extract from it.

00:28:43.340 They want to steal from us, from our goodwill.

00:28:46.760 Never again, my friends.

00:28:48.100 We can't allow this.

00:28:49.740 But I'll only say this.

00:28:50.980 If it is true the Supreme Court is leaning against the government of this one.

00:28:56.180 I'll tell you what's going to happen.

00:28:58.800 Now, it can manifest a couple different ways.

00:29:00.900 But the first thing is that young Gen Z Americans, they will not tolerate this and you will probably get insurgency.

00:29:08.700 It may turn into a revolution where Americans finally just say no more.

00:29:16.460 We don't care what the law says.

00:29:18.020 We will not be destroyed.

00:29:19.640 I will not watch my home be given away.

00:29:23.000 It may become that the government is just filled with foreigners, the children of foreigners, immigrants to this country.

00:29:33.220 They send remittances back to their home country.

00:29:35.960 Resources get extracted.

00:29:37.900 Quality of life, life breaks down.

00:29:40.620 Crime escalates.

00:29:42.000 And then everyone's just generally pissed off all the time until the system breaks because there's nothing left to extract.

00:29:47.360 And China becomes a dominant unipolar power.

00:29:49.700 It's possible.

00:29:50.440 In that system, you may have insurgency from American restoration groups that ultimately fail.

00:29:58.480 But this seems to be the direction that we're going.

00:30:01.000 I think it's, you know, one thing that may be possible is that America just becomes this

00:30:04.780 de facto global citizen lump, where you'll have small pockets all over the country that

00:30:11.520 represent different communities like Dearborn, Michigan, or the Somali community in Minnesota.

00:30:16.460 You'll have Latinos from other countries in Miami.

00:30:19.380 And the United States will just be a fractured, balkanized land.

00:30:24.100 There will not be an American people.

00:30:26.660 But the Communist Party of China will take over with the Belt and Road Initiative.

00:30:29.620 And there you go.

00:30:31.900 Should that happen?

00:30:32.880 I say no.

00:30:33.440 I think Sauer is correct when he said to John Roberts that there are evils that we must stop.

00:30:43.260 that the point is, if the founders and the framers did not or were not able to address this,

00:30:50.980 the court must address it now. I didn't ask a question about nuclear weapons. I said that I

00:30:58.120 said the Second Amendment allows for it. It shouldn't, but it does. So how about we change

00:31:03.580 that? Maybe the Supreme Court could weigh in on whether nuclear arms are allowed because keeping

00:31:09.300 and bearing arms is allowed. Hey, look, people had privateers back then. If the people are unable,

00:31:16.340 if the government is unwilling, your system's going to break down. The only thing that'll

00:31:21.900 happen is that someone with power will come and make it happen. Maybe that's Trump. I'm going to

00:31:26.420 wrap it there, my friend. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. More

00:31:31.500 segments coming up throughout the day. Thank you so much for hanging out, and we will see you all

00:31:34.180 next time.

00:31:39.300 You

The Culture War - Tim Pool - April 01, 2026

SCOTUS DEFIES Trump, May UPHOLD Illegal Alien Birthright Citizenship

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript