00:00:40.200If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
00:00:43.480please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600
00:00:48.660to speak to an advisor free of charge.
00:00:51.400BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:00:55.360Today, Donald Trump scored two massive victories from the Supreme Court pertaining to illegal immigration, asylum, temporary protected status.
00:01:05.820Suffice it to say, liberals are furious.
00:01:09.060The first of these rulings is that if you are not in the United States, you have no right to claim asylum.
00:01:14.820This means under the previous ruling from the Ninth Circuit, what we saw in the Biden administration, individuals could come to the U.S. border, be in Mexico and tell a U.S. law enforcement, CBP or ICE agent they wanted asylum and they were legally required to take the claim and bring them into the country under this ruling from the Supreme Court.
00:01:36.980If you are not in the U.S., you have no right to claim asylum in the U.S.
00:01:42.380And this means as individuals approach the U.S. border, they can be explicitly turned away.
00:01:49.200That's pretty remarkable because you'd think that's the way it's supposed to be.
00:01:53.220Someone trying to illegally enter the country, you say, nope, you don't get to claim asylum in a country you're not in and you can't enter illegally.
00:02:06.980But for whatever reason, the Democrats never adhere to that policy.
00:02:10.560And they would actually welcome individuals who would come from Eritrea, travel across Africa, fly to Brazil, and then make their way up to the United States and say, oh, well, they're here.0.94
00:02:33.620It means all of these Syrian and Haitian migrants across this country, particularly Springfield, Ohio, can have their TPS revoked and they can be sent back home.
00:02:46.120Now, of course, Democrats are apoplectic.
00:02:49.940These poor, innocent asylees, they say, are going to be sent back to their country.
00:02:55.760Why were they granted temporary protected status to begin with?0.91
00:02:59.480Now, there actually are some conservatives who have made the argument that these people here under TPS did so legally.
00:03:06.280The Biden administration created a program by which they could come here and have protected status.
00:03:13.960Temporary protected status pertains to illegal immigration.
00:03:18.000If you want to come here legally, you apply.
00:03:20.040And then we determine whether or not we're going to let you in.
00:03:22.200So these are major victories for the American people and the Trump administration.
00:03:26.400And I think we are probably a short time away from a mass deportation of all of these Haitian migrants and Syrian migrants that are that have come here and tried to claim some temporary status, despite not having asylum claims.
00:03:43.160As for the rest of the illegal immigration, Donald Trump is fulfilling his promise as it pertains to immigration.
00:03:48.400Now, we still got big rulings that have not yet come down.
00:03:52.160Birthright citizenship has not yet come down from the Supreme Court.
00:03:55.200So we wait with bated breath, though it is widely believed left and right.
00:04:01.200Supreme Court will rule against Donald Trump and actually say yes.0.91
00:04:06.040If a pregnant Chinese woman flies to Guam to give birth and flies home, that baby can be president of the United States.0.94
00:04:13.940Seems like an insane thing to rule.1.00
00:04:16.160Now, in reality, they're probably not going to say that explicitly.
00:04:19.460They're going to say the 14th Amendment is clear that if you are born here, you are a citizen.
00:04:24.200However, what that means is, yes, it means someone from China and they do this when they're nine months pregnant, will fly to Guam, give birth and then fly home.0.69
00:04:36.020And then 35 years later, that kid, a Chinese citizen, can be president of the United States.0.88
00:04:43.640Now, I think that's absolutely insane, but we don't exactly know how they will rule.1.00
00:04:47.280And then the other big case, of course, is Watson v. R.N.C., which is mail in voting, whether or not they will allow states to count votes after Election Day.
00:04:57.140Now, the implications here are massive because they could rule in a variety of ways.
00:05:00.940We are still waiting for those, but we'll get into all of that.
00:05:03.180And we're going to break down the details we have here on the issue of asylum claims, TPS.
00:05:09.420And already the news stories are popping up.
00:05:12.280Haitian migrants are panicking, scared that they're going to be sent home.
00:05:16.820Now, before we get into all of that news, my friends,
00:07:05.460A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that migrants who present themselves at a port of entry but are physically blocked from stepping onto American soil have not, quote, arrived in the United States under federal immigration law and therefore are not entitled to inspection or the chance to apply for asylum.
00:07:22.100The 6-3 decision in Mullen v. El Otrolado reverses a ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and hands the government a significant victory in its long-running dispute over metering, a practice in which Customs and Border Protection officers stand at the borderline and turn back migrants before they can cross.
00:07:51.780Federal law requires immigration officers to inspect any non-citizen who arrives in the United States and permit such a person to apply for asylum.
00:07:59.920The justices had to decide whether a migrant standing on the Mexican side of the border blocked by a U.S. official has legally arrived.
00:08:07.840Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito, you know him, we love him, concluded the answer
00:08:13.700is no. In ordinary speech, no one would say that a person arrives in a place, for example,
00:08:19.600a house, a city, or a country, before the person enters that place, he wrote.
00:08:24.280An alien arrives in the United States only when he crosses the border.
00:08:29.000Alito leaned heavily on everyday illustrations, reasoning that a running back does not arrive
00:08:33.920in the end zone when tackled at the one yard line. And a guest does not arrive in a house by
00:08:39.580knocking on a locked door. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas,
00:08:46.300Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Wow, I got everybody except the three
00:08:51.760libs. The dispute traces back to 2016 when CBP began experiencing surges of migrants at ports
00:08:58.220of entry along the U.S.-Mexico border that the agency said exceeded its processing capacity.
00:09:02.640In response, DHS adopted a policy of metering, limiting the number of arriving migrants officers would inspect each day, with officials physically stationed at the border to prevent additional entries.
00:09:14.540The practice continued across multiple presidential administrations before being rescinded in November of 2021, shortly after a district court ruled it unlawful.
00:09:23.300Now, the fascinating thing is the 35 page dissent, I think it was from Sotomayor, that was basically like the purpose of the law.
00:09:36.600I think Alito, Thomas and everybody else are correct.
00:09:39.840How can you say someone's arrived at a place they're not in?
00:09:44.420Now, the argument that the dissent is making is how would you expect someone to arrive
00:09:49.880at a place they can't get through the door?
00:09:51.980The argument would be more like if you are waiting in your living room and someone knocks
00:09:57.400at your door, you would turn and say, they're here, and then go to your door and open it up,
00:10:02.460right? The argument, however, is that we're not talking about a house. Certainly, Alito has made
00:10:07.360those allusions, but we're talking about a country for which if you are here in this country,
00:10:12.980you can make a claim for asylum. The liberals are also arguing, how could anybody even get
00:10:17.220into the country unless they have the means to get here, and then they could claim asylum? And
00:10:20.540I think that's actually the point. You apply to come to the United States legally,
00:10:25.320and you were allowed in. Once you're here, you then say, I would like to stay beyond this visa0.95
00:10:31.260for the purpose of asylum. The idea that you walk up, knock on the door and say, I want asylum.0.98
00:10:36.920Well, you're not here. We have no responsibility to you. And I believe in the first safe nation
00:10:41.740protocol. So if you are from Mexico, we have a different question that can be asked. I think
00:10:47.360that's fair, but still not going to apply. I'm just sick of the abuse where Guatemalans go through
00:10:53.060Mexico and say, I ain't staying in Mexico. They say the advocacy organization, El Ocho Lado,
00:10:59.060along with individual asylum seekers, brought a class action in 2017, arguing that metering
00:11:03.420unlawfully withheld inspection and asylum processing from migrants seeking to enter.
00:11:07.700A district court agreed, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed, holding that a migrant arrives
00:11:11.800while standing on the Mexico side. Beyond the ordinary meaning of the words, Alito pointed
00:11:17.480to several contextual signals. Other parts of the immigration code explicitly referenced
00:11:20.820attempted entry, he noted. While the provisions at issue do not, a distinction he said Congress
00:11:26.940made intentionally and purposefully, he also invoked the presumption against extraterritoriality,
00:11:33.180reasoning that respondents' interpretation would give the statute reach over conduct
00:11:36.800occurring outside the U.S., which they can't do. The majority rejected the argument that metering
00:11:42.800creates a perverse incentive to cross illegally, noting that illegal entry carries criminal
00:11:46.900liability and other adverse consequences, and that metering merely delays entry rather than
00:11:51.940permanently barring it. In concurrence, Thomas wrote separately to question whether the lower
00:11:56.400court's relief improperly circumvented statutory limits on class-wide injunctions and infringed
00:12:00.920on the president's authority to exclude non-citizens. Sotomayor, joined by Kagan and
00:12:05.680Ketanji Brown-Jackson, dissented forcefully. Sotomayor argued that words must be read in
00:12:11.140context. And the majority's reading rendered the arrives in clause entirely superfluous.
00:12:16.820Since anyone who has stepped onto U.S. soil is already physically present.
00:12:21.120She offered her own examples. A train conductor announcing arrival in Penn Station
00:12:24.960while still half a mile away. It's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.1.00
00:12:28.540You don't say we've arrived. You say we are arriving. It's a ridiculous argument.1.00
00:12:34.100Or telling someone to call upon call upon arriving in D.C. after landing across the0.90
00:12:38.420River in Virginia. Because again, you know what? I'm from Chicago, my friends. You all know this.
00:12:44.880And I love this. Whenever I meet someone and I'll be like, where are you from? I'll go Chicago. I
00:12:49.080always go, oh, so Naperville. And it's funny how many times they'll go, yeah, I am from Naperville.
00:12:53.860How'd you know? Because for some reason, a lot of people leave Naperville. A lot of people live
00:12:59.660there. It's a wealthier suburb. It's like upper middle class. But the point is, you're not from
00:13:06.140Chicago. Naperville is a different city, some 40 minutes to an hour outside of Chicago.
00:13:11.420But nobody knows what Naperville is. So you say I'm from Chicago. Does that mean you're literally
00:13:15.900from the city of Chicago? No. And so I love this because they try to play this stupid game with me
00:13:20.600and I see these labs look like, Tim Pool's not from Chicago. I am from Garfield Ridge.0.99
00:13:25.780That's right. So we call it like Archer and Cicero, literally the city of Chicago. And they
00:13:33.740lie about it. It's so insane how these liberals lie. The reason is my dad was a firefighter and0.98
00:13:38.020we had to live in the city. So yes, I'm from the city. I'm from the Southwest side. That being said
00:13:41.820to the people who know the area, you would not say we've arrived in Chicago when you are,
00:13:48.220when you are driving up from Naperville and you're in, I don't know, like Oakbrook or something,
00:13:52.200you'd be like, no, we're not there yet. However, if you're flying into the airport,
00:13:56.280Chicago's O'Hare, that's the city. The fact that she's making the argument that IAD is outside of
00:14:03.320Washington, D.C., but they call it Washington Dulles, is it's the stupidest argument. Oh,1.00
00:14:09.720my God. We've arrived in the United States and you're standing in Tijuana? No, you didn't. You're
00:14:16.300in Mexico. Ridiculous. The Senate also detailed what it called a human toll of metering. I don't1.00
00:14:22.480care. Sotomayor warned the ruling vests limitless discretion in the executive branch to abandon its
00:14:28.300inspection duty simply by keeping migrants one winch away. Yes, they're not here. Here's how0.99
00:14:33.660it's supposed to work. Here's how it should work. You apply, right? You apply for asylum to the
00:14:40.280United States. OK, and they go, we're not we're not going to listen. This is really what it's0.54
00:14:45.060about. No one's being told they can't apply for asylum. They're simply saying that CBP has no
00:14:50.280obligation to accept a claim from someone not here in the US. Let's say you came here legally on a
00:14:55.800student visa. While here, your visa is going to expire. And they say, we're going to send you
00:15:00.560back to your country. You then make an asylum claim to stay. You say, I can't go back for these0.93
00:15:04.740reasons. Guess what? This means that the people here under TPS, they can file for asylum.
00:15:11.600The decision clears the way for the government to resume metering when it deems border conditions
00:15:15.660warranted. The government had told the court that metering remains an important tool it would
00:15:19.600likely use again. The case now returns to lower courts for further proceedings. Massive. Here's
00:15:25.320the next big one. This is the big, big one. This is the big one, because this means mass
00:15:30.400deportations. This ruling under TPS means we could see somewhat half a million to 600,000
00:15:36.920mass deportation overnight. And I'm going to bet you right now Trump goes full speed. He goes ham.
00:15:43.360You know what ham means? Hard as a MF-er. Supreme Court allows Trump admin to end protected status1.00
00:15:50.420for Syrian and Haitian migrants. A major win for the Trump administration brought to you, of course,0.98
00:15:55.320by TimGuest.com. We have, there we go. That was a weird posting here.
00:16:00.300Supreme Court allows Trump admin to end TPS. The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way
00:16:05.420for the Trump administration to terminate temporary protected status for hundreds of
00:16:09.520thousands of immigrants from Syria and Haiti, ruling that a federal law shields the government's
00:16:14.880decisions from most legal challenges and that claims of racial bias in the Haiti decision are
00:16:19.840unlikely to succeed. The consolidated cases, Mullen v. Doe and Trump v. Miotte, ended with
00:16:26.760the court reversing lower court orders that had paused the terminations while litigation continued.
00:16:32.420The decision means TPS holders from the two countries stand to lose their legal status
00:16:36.240and work authorization. So here's what's going on. Trump wants to end TPS, boot these people out.
00:16:42.740They say, no, this is racial bias and we're going to file a suit. They got a temporary injunction.
00:16:49.840The Supreme Court is not ruling on the merits of the racial bias claim, but they are saying there is no judicial oversight for this.
00:16:57.340You're likely going to lose. And because of that, no protections.
00:17:01.560You can be sent home pending adjudication. So likely not coming back.
00:17:07.260Congress created TPS in 1990 to give short term humanitarian relief to people who cannot safely return to their home countries because of armed conflict, natural disaster or other extraordinary conditions.
00:17:16.060Although meant to be temporary, designations have often lasted decades.
00:17:19.840Somalia, as the court noted, has been in place for 35 years. Syria was designated in 2012 amid
00:17:26.880the repression of the Assad regime in the civil war, Haiti in 2010 after an earthquake. Both
00:17:31.720designations were extended repeatedly. Then DHS Secretary Christine Noem moved to terminate both
00:17:36.800citing improved conditions. Yeah, Assad's gone from Syria and the earthquake was 16 years ago.
00:17:43.360The central question was whether courts can review the terminations at all. The TPS statute
00:17:48.200states there is no judicial review of any determination of the secretary with respect
00:17:52.700to the designation or termination or extension of a designation of a foreign state. Basically,
00:17:58.040TPS, the executive branch will figure that one out. It's up to them. Writing for the court,
00:18:03.080Alito held that this language sweeps broadly enough to block all the plaintiffs' non-constitutional
00:18:08.020claims, including their argument that Noam failed to properly consult other agencies before acting.
00:18:13.000The word determination he reasoned can mean either an individual decision or the whole
00:18:17.020process leading up to it. Another either reading the bar applies the phrase with respect to he said
00:18:21.300he added has a broadening effect. A separate question raised only by the Haitian plaintiffs
00:18:26.560was whether the termination of Haiti's designation was motivated by a race by race in violation of
00:18:30.940equal equal equal protection. Alito wrote the claim was unlikely to succeed. Thomas concurred
00:18:37.200because we love Thomas and we love Alito. Kagan joined by Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson
00:18:43.080dissented sharply. She argued the majority misread determination to swallow the statute's
00:18:48.300mandatory procedures. I'm not going to read this blah, blah, blah stuff, OK? They're basically
00:18:53.420just throwing procedure at each other, but I think this was ruled correctly. The cases were reversed
00:18:59.060and remanded for further proceedings. As a practical matter, the ruling lifts the interim
00:19:03.360relief that have been keeping the terminations on hold, allowing them to take effect. My friends,
00:19:08.600a slam dunk for Donald Trump. Haitian immigrants in Ohio face very sad situation as SCOTUS lets
00:19:15.600Trump end TPS. Yeah. Why are we guys? I don't even need to say it. Why did we extend natural
00:19:25.240disaster protections for 16 years? Please tell me. Why are we extending civil war protections
00:19:30.700to a country that is no longer in a civil war and Assad has fled? OK, so it's over.
00:19:36.280Why is Somalia getting temporary protected status for 35 years?0.99