The Culture War - Tim Pool - February 16, 2024


The Culture War #51 The California Secessionist Movement & National Divorce In 2024


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 28 minutes

Words per Minute

203.12

Word Count

30,251

Sentence Count

1,990

Misogynist Sentences

21

Hate Speech Sentences

70


Summary

In this episode, we discuss the secessionist movement in California and the potential for California to secede from the United States. We are joined by journalist and researcher Jeff Mayhew to discuss the possibility of California seceding from the union. We also hear from the founder of the California secession movement, Louis Marinelli, and a member of the "CalExit" movement, Jeff Manassian. We also have a special guest, an expert on the Civil War in the American Civil War, to talk about the history of California secession and the movement to split California into two new states, California and California-A.K.A., California-R.I.P. (California-Existentialism). BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly and not to get involved in anything that involves gambling. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetmGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario, a subsidiary of MGM, the king of Las Vegas-style action at MGM. Enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas Strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM Grand, Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette. - MGM & GameSense, the King of Online Casinos and other digital slot games at MGM - you play responsibly, not-to-wager Ontario, not to wager Ontario only! - please play responsibly! BetmoGMGM Casino, not playing responsibly! - Betmo GMGM, not Wager Ontario-only, not gambling, not only in Ontario, but in Canada? , not in Canada, not in Ontario? , Betmoi Casino? . BetGMGM & Gambling Ontario only, not without WagerOntario, not yet? - not without wagerable, not safe to wag Ontario, only in Canada. , and not without gambling, but not without a license to gamble in the USA? We ve got your chance to win $100,000 in a casino game, not just in Canada yet! , betmGMGM and Gambling, not a Canadian casino? ... ...and much more! and much more... of course, don t forget to check out our new app!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Get ready for Las Vegas-style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos.
00:00:05.880 Enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas Strip excitement MGM is famous for
00:00:11.120 when you play classics like MGM Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette.
00:00:17.940 With our ever-growing library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games,
00:00:22.920 and signature BetMGM service, there's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of
00:00:28.140 Las Vegas home to you than with BetMGM Casino. Download the BetMGM Casino app today.
00:00:34.980 BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. BetMGM.com for T's and C's.
00:00:39.400 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.
00:00:42.700 If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
00:00:45.800 please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
00:00:53.860 BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:00:58.140 Oh boy! It's our favorite subject. You know it. Civil war. Or maybe not even civil war, but
00:01:04.220 considering that there has been so much talk about the political conflict in this country,
00:01:08.820 considering that, for those that have been following the news just the other day,
00:01:11.880 the prosecutor, the DA, who brought charges against Trump and his associates,
00:01:16.620 is under fire for potentially lying to the courts, may get even disbarred. Things are getting a bit spicy.
00:01:21.820 And now you've got many political activists in the United States arguing that the case against
00:01:26.240 the DA, who's going after Trump as Fannie Willis, is politically motivated attacks from fascists to
00:01:31.540 try and disqualify those who are trying to bring accountability. And in the meantime,
00:01:35.580 everybody else is kind of paying attention. It's like, yo, I think this lady is corrupt and was
00:01:38.700 funneling money to her boyfriend. And they're as crooked as you'd imagine.
00:01:42.380 But there's a lot of things happening politically. New York, for instance, Donald Trump is going to be
00:01:46.020 going on trial for hush money payments. It's apparently some kind of criminal charge.
00:01:49.960 Trump says this is not criminal at all. You've got fraud charges. Things are getting pretty
00:01:54.280 wild in this country, not to mention over the past several years, we've seen an escalation in street
00:01:58.320 violence and political violence. So instead of just going into all the modern context, we want to
00:02:03.460 get into the, I suppose, the political activism element here. We've we talked a couple weeks ago with
00:02:08.660 Texit, the Texas secessionists. And now we've brought in some some activists,
00:02:16.020 advocating for a form of California exit. And we've brought in an individual journalist and
00:02:22.120 researcher to talk to us just in context about the Civil War. So I don't know, would you like to
00:02:25.740 start good, sir, and introduce yourself? Yeah, well, my name is Louis Marinelli. I'm the one of the
00:02:31.140 founders and creators of the California secession movement known as Cal Exit. And we started that back
00:02:36.760 in 2014, together with my who I consider my brother, Marcus Ruiz Evans. And, you know, it kind of
00:02:44.820 started off originally as a campaign, not for California to succeed. We wanted to kind of
00:02:49.760 make California more independent in the United States. And so we started with a campaign we
00:02:56.440 called Sovereign California. The problem with that was we ran into a lot of people who were confused
00:03:01.180 about what that campaign was about. Are you sovereign citizens, for example? Are you some kind of religious
00:03:06.160 movement? With the word sovereign, there was a lot of religious connotation with that. So we ran into
00:03:10.260 some problems with that. And then it was at the same time that the, if you recall, the Scottish
00:03:14.620 independence referendum was happening. And so that's when we kind of kind of adopted that
00:03:19.180 branding. And we said, we're going to pick up the flag for the cause of self-determination in North
00:03:25.220 America. We picked up that name, Yes, Scotland, and branded it for California. It became Yes,
00:03:30.440 California. We went on from there. Right on. So there's a lot to talk about in the development,
00:03:35.680 the current state of, and the realistic possibility of California secession. Because it doesn't just
00:03:42.500 mean California leaves the union. There's actually been, and I don't know if this is you guys, but
00:03:47.060 splitting California into two states. There's a movement for a Northern and Southern California,
00:03:52.520 as well as an Eastern and a Western. We'll get into all that context. But we also asked,
00:03:56.520 Jeff, would you like to introduce yourself? Yeah. So my name's Jeff Mayhew. I'm a father of five.
00:04:01.600 I run a small business in Manassas. I started an organization called the Madisonian Republicans.
00:04:07.000 Our focus is teaching people how our republic divide separates and balances power. That way,
00:04:12.880 they can be better voters and vote in better elected leaders. And you live in, you said Manassas?
00:04:17.920 Well, Gainesville, actually, but yeah. But close enough. Close, yeah. And that's the first
00:04:20.960 real battle of the Civil War. Oh boy, we're going to talk about this. So I thought it would be cool.
00:04:25.220 So we asked the California secessionist movement, come on board, let's talk about this. But I thought
00:04:32.480 it would be great to grab someone locally who had some expertise or knowledge in the area pertaining
00:04:37.120 to the first Civil War, hopefully the only, but we'll see. And then the idea of secession and
00:04:43.100 how this could play out in the 2024 election, because we certainly talk about it quite a bit
00:04:47.980 on our shows. Well, let's just start here first. What specifically do you want, sir,
00:04:56.200 with California? Do you want the entirety of California to just become its own country?
00:05:01.060 What is your, like, if you won the lottery of political activism, what would happen with
00:05:07.660 California? Well, that's an interesting way to phrase it, because a lot of people have the
00:05:11.380 misconception that our campaign has a set goal. And I think that's what makes our organization
00:05:17.540 unique, because a lot of organizations out there have a specific agenda that they want to achieve,
00:05:21.380 and ours is more abstract. It's let the people vote. And so we've always said, whether the people
00:05:26.760 want to secede as a whole, let that happen, if that's what the people say they want to do.
00:05:31.520 There are other movements in California to have the state, as you mentioned, separate into different
00:05:35.700 numbers. I think even Tim Draper wanted to do six Californias. There's been other campaigns for
00:05:41.480 there to be two or three. We have actually a couple different plans of our own, one of which we
00:05:45.640 call three, a galaxy 3.1, which is to divide the state into two, to create what would be a country
00:05:52.820 called Pacifica, on the most western coast of California, the San Francisco Bay Area, and leave
00:05:59.700 the remaining part of the state in the United States. The goal of that is really kind of what we call
00:06:04.960 ideological divorce, or national divorce. We started talking about the idea of divorce in 2018.
00:06:10.940 Marcus and I were in Sacramento. We were holding signs that said, it's time for a divorce. At the
00:06:16.120 time, of course, we were talking about California divorcing itself as a whole from the United States.
00:06:21.040 But since then, we've come to, or at least some of us have come to the conclusion that it's maybe not
00:06:26.860 the right thing for California as a whole to secede, because there are tens, millions of Californians
00:06:33.580 who would not want to do that. There were conservative voters. I think that I've heard that there are even
00:06:37.480 more Trump voters in California than in any other state, even though it's the one of the
00:06:42.200 bluest states in the union. And so I think that would be kind of counterproductive to the whole
00:06:46.740 idea of self-determination. If you're going to say that California and its current borders would
00:06:52.460 secede from the union and force, you know, 10, 15 million people who don't want to go with them to
00:06:57.440 go with them. So why not we, why not draw the lines in a different place? I kind of, I'm stuck on this
00:07:03.320 idea of why do we have to adhere to the existing geographical and often abstract lines that we've,
00:07:10.200 we've drawn on the map just out of nowhere. And so why not we draw those lines in a way that makes
00:07:15.020 sense economically and also ideologically?
00:07:17.940 Right. So this, the Pacifica thing, this is basically creating, it's just this small strip going along
00:07:24.260 the Pacific ocean. And then the Eastern part of California, which is more conservative, more farmland
00:07:30.140 would remain with the United States or would it become its own state or how'd that work?
00:07:33.740 Yeah. So it's actually interesting in, in this scenario, both of those would still be
00:07:37.580 dominated by the democratic party. Let's just get that right. So a lot of people say, for example,
00:07:41.760 you want to create a red state, change political dynamics in Washington. That wouldn't be the case
00:07:46.600 because the, the part of the state, the Western part, as you're referring to, is actually including
00:07:50.220 the Northern and Southern part would still be, I think, 60% Democrat. So it's still going to be a blue
00:07:55.540 state. It's just not going to be, you know, 80% Democrat like it is now. And so what happens is
00:08:02.580 then the Pacifica, we have it going along the central coast of California and the San Francisco
00:08:06.340 Bay area. That is your super ultra left wing, 80% Democrat country. And so we say, well, you know
00:08:14.020 what, let them have their progressive utopia on the West coast and see how it goes. All right. So
00:08:20.960 they would starve to death. Well, actually, I mean, they have Napa Valley, so they would
00:08:25.040 drink a lot of wine. There's a, it's fascinating. There's this viral video from the earlier in the
00:08:33.680 week of a woman who's 28 years old and she filmed herself. I'm, I'm surprised she was willing to do
00:08:39.720 this, but I respect her for doing so saying, I can't be the only one who did not know you can eat
00:08:45.420 fruit from a tree. I'm not, I'm not joking. She said a friend came to her house and saw a bag of
00:08:51.420 store-bought lemons in her fridge and said, why do you have a bag of lemons in your fridge? And she
00:08:56.040 goes, well, because you know, I use them to cook. And she goes, no, no, but like you have a bag of
00:08:59.940 store-bought lemons in your fridge. And she's like, yeah, because I cook sometimes. And she's like,
00:09:04.060 Carly, you have a lemon tree outside. And she's like, and so why do you have store-bought lemon?
00:09:08.580 She's like, cause I use them to cook. I don't understand. And she's like, just take the lemons from the
00:09:11.700 tree. But this is, this, this is not surprising to see a video like this, you know, having grown
00:09:16.840 up in a city myself, and I'm sure you guys, even to a certain degree yourselves, all of us.
00:09:22.540 I mean, I think it's fair to say someone's going to watch a show like this or anybody who's learned
00:09:27.440 to a certain degree understands you can eat fruit from a tree. There are a lot of young people who
00:09:31.220 have no idea where food comes from. And this is what I think leads to, as you called it, what a
00:09:36.540 progressive utopia they want to put together. And the reason why I said they'd starve is a lot of
00:09:41.400 these people, not all of them, but like, I mean, you look at what happened in Seattle with the,
00:09:44.900 the Chaz and they tried making the farm, whatever you want to call it. These, these people don't
00:09:50.080 know how the environment works. They don't know how farming works. They don't know how to sustain
00:09:54.520 themselves. And so, you know, back to the bigger picture of all of this, you know, when talking
00:09:59.860 about California secession or fragmentation or whatever you want to call it, I don't know that
00:10:04.520 it's so much you would create a red state and a blue state or two new blue states. It seems like
00:10:09.660 you'd create a wealthy state and a chaotic dystopian nightmare, right? The, the, the area
00:10:15.280 of, of California that produces all of the food I think would do mostly. Okay. But these tech bases
00:10:21.620 could not survive. You know, the, the, they like to Democrats like to talk about how we generate all
00:10:26.560 the wealth in our cities and subsidize, you know, the rural areas. And I'm like, yeah, but if there
00:10:32.540 were borders and tariffs and food could not enter your country without specific agreements, you would
00:10:39.780 be extremely impoverished. No one is going to trade all of their wheat for your Twitter, but that's
00:10:46.620 basically what they've done, the access and influence. So I actually see the possible, like if, if Pacifica
00:10:52.380 were to exist, I don't think they'd survive.
00:10:55.160 Well, I think you bring up a good point, but I think that what we always try to stress is that the divorce
00:10:59.920 that we're advocating for, if it does come to pass, wouldn't necessarily have to be something that
00:11:05.080 would be, uh, you know, create a negative relationship. Acrimonious. Acrimonious. That's
00:11:10.620 the right word. Yeah. I mean, I think that the two could separate and that's kind of what the purpose
00:11:14.060 is because I think that right now we have a situation in this country where, you know, the left
00:11:18.100 and the right, we're in each other's hair and let's just get out of each other's hair and we can live
00:11:22.020 our lives the way we want to live our lives. And then I think in that type of environment, there might be
00:11:26.100 a way to maintain that, um, tranquility as, as, as we, as we refer to in the Declaration of
00:11:32.420 Independence, that tranquility and peace among Americans, because we're not interfering, we're
00:11:37.300 not imposing a left or right ideology on the other. And so let's let each other live the way that we
00:11:43.140 want to live our lives, whether it be you're on the left wing in Pacifica or you're on the right
00:11:47.380 wing and somewhere in Texas. And I think that we could have a situation in North America where we
00:11:52.040 can maintain that peace and tranquility. I'm not convinced that there could be a secession of
00:11:57.680 any portion of this country from the country itself without resulting in some kind of violence.
00:12:03.840 But I'm curious, Jeff, in what do you, what do you think? I mean, I, I a hundred percent agree with
00:12:09.360 you. If, if there was a secession, we would have violence, just the nature of people, you know,
00:12:13.700 they're going to be, like you mentioned, they're going to be people in California that want to leave
00:12:17.180 and people that don't want to leave. I think like the core of what the secessionist movement is,
00:12:22.320 it says that we as people are not represented in our country. We don't have freedom. We can't do
00:12:27.900 what we want. And I think the answer to that is not necessarily secession, but a decentralized power
00:12:32.960 structure. So in, in, uh, federalist number 10, Madison talks a lot about factions and like,
00:12:38.020 what's the best way to control factions? And his answer is to have more factions. And we talk about
00:12:43.180 the civil war, what led to the civil war. Everybody always talks about slavery, but why, why was
00:12:48.780 slavery able to be kept and then advanced and preserved? And the answer is, is the three-fifths
00:12:53.740 comp. Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at Bad MGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino
00:13:00.660 games at your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement. MGM is famous for when you play
00:13:05.700 classics like MGM grand millions or popular games like blackjack, baccarat and roulette with our
00:13:12.200 ever-growing library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games and
00:13:17.040 signature Bad MGM service. There's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas
00:13:22.640 home to you than with Bad MGM Casino. Download the Bad MGM Casino app today. Bad MGM and GameSense
00:13:29.940 remind you to play responsibly. Bad MGM dot com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only.
00:13:35.360 Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to
00:13:39.380 you, please contact ConnexOntario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor. Free of charge.
00:13:47.780 Bad MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:13:52.460 When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
00:13:58.220 Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care about you.
00:14:04.000 Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't remember saying that part.
00:14:12.220 Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big on care.
00:14:17.840 Did I mention that we care?
00:14:21.520 Compromise. The three-fifths compromise gave the slaveholders
00:14:25.220 significantly more power in Congress than the non-slaveholders. So they were able to use that
00:14:31.820 power to advance their cause and advance the causes of their party. And what this did is it
00:14:37.960 created a massive divide, regardless of whether you wanted slavery or not. Maybe you disagreed with
00:14:43.340 the slaveholders on other policies, but you had no power to stop them. So it just created more of a
00:14:48.480 problem. In a modern context with California, the issue of illegal immigration is giving disproportionate
00:14:54.140 power to blue states. They're getting extra congressional districts and electoral college votes based on
00:14:58.340 people who are not even citizens of this country, who are not paying into the same, uh, in the same way as many
00:15:03.060 others. We often hear arguments that, oh, but they, they, they do pay taxes. Well, of course, everybody pays sales
00:15:08.240 tax. There's a lot of taxes you'll pay no matter what you do when you're buying gas or whatever. But in terms of
00:15:12.820 paying taxes at the same degree as your average American citizen, they're not. And so, uh, for those that aren't familiar
00:15:18.060 with this, I know a lot of people who listen to, will listen to this probably do, but I'll explain.
00:15:22.040 California sanctuary state. There's many other jurisdictions that are sanctuary jurisdictions.
00:15:27.200 What that means is they will not cooperate with the federal government on deportation or apprehension
00:15:31.600 of non-citizens who have illegally entered the country or who have remained here illegally beyond
00:15:35.980 their, their permits. The census counts those individuals as residents. Donald Trump wanted
00:15:41.780 there to be a citizenship question on the, on the census. And that was, that was, that was blocked
00:15:46.580 basically. I think even the Supreme court said no. And so what happens then is, uh, it has been
00:15:50.660 estimated by various organizations. It could be as low as one extra congressional seat in California
00:15:56.400 and as high as seven. It is estimated worst case scenario. California gets seven extra votes in the
00:16:04.280 electoral college for president because of the non-citizens who have illegally entered the country
00:16:08.420 violating our laws and don't need to vote that that that's there. So it's fun. It's fascinating.
00:16:14.140 You bring up the three fifths compromise that it disproportionately empowers these slave states in
00:16:19.420 Congress as, and we're seeing something not too dissimilar right now with, with, with the, the, the
00:16:25.020 illegal immigration crisis, the border crisis that everyone agrees on. This is giving disproportionate
00:16:29.420 power to the Democrats once again. There's, but there's a reason for that. And that the reason of
00:16:34.660 that is the permanent appropriate appropriate appropriation act of 1929. So in leading up after the
00:16:41.240 civil war and after the gilded age or during the gilded age, immigration became a major part of
00:16:46.520 American society. And it started to give more power to the Northern states, the same way that the
00:16:50.680 slaveholders were able to first import slaves and then grow slavery inside of their states and gain
00:16:55.260 power. The Northern states were able to do that through immigration. And you had this massive
00:16:59.680 disagreement because the house is fixed at 435 because of this act. But before that, it grew with the
00:17:08.380 population to, to maintain a decentralized power structure to give people a voice in their government.
00:17:14.600 But we capped it in 1929 and the, we capped it for that exact same, that reason that you just
00:17:19.620 brought up, brought up is the fact that they couldn't decide who was supposed to be counted
00:17:23.240 for purposes of apportionment. Was it supposed to be just American citizens or was it supposed to be
00:17:27.720 all persons? There was an argument on each side of it. It got stalemated in Congress for over 10 years
00:17:33.040 and eventually they just kicked the problem to the executive. They wrote this temporary act,
00:17:38.040 which became permanent because they just stopped doing it. But ultimately that's the answer right there is
00:17:44.160 it's Congress's job to apportion representatives to the people so they can actually run their government
00:17:49.000 and they've consolidated that power into themselves.
00:17:52.680 So the three for this compromise is fascinating because the average person, I would assume,
00:17:58.360 I mean, in my life growing up, they think that it was these slave owners who thought that slaves
00:18:03.700 were not a full person. The reality is the Confederacy wanted the slaves to be whole persons for the purpose
00:18:09.360 of counting individuals and voting and all that. And the North was like, no, no, no, no, no, no,
00:18:14.200 you can't claim them to be property and full persons for the purpose of voting and all that.
00:18:18.940 So the South wanted them to be counted because it would give them more power.
00:18:22.200 The North said, no way, you can't have it both ways.
00:18:24.680 Well, that's because it wouldn't be their power. It wouldn't be the slave's power.
00:18:28.880 It would be their power.
00:18:29.820 Exactly. And so, and that's the argument is like, well, you can't, you can't have it both ways.
00:18:34.380 And that's an example of the, of the history been written by the victors, because I remember,
00:18:38.100 like you just said in high school and middle school, you learn that storyline that the
00:18:42.600 Southerners were for slavery and they were the bad side. Right. And so they wanted to consider
00:18:47.460 the slaves to be less than human, therefore three fifths of a person. But reality, it was really
00:18:51.700 like you're saying about the Northern states didn't want that extra representation in the South.
00:18:55.460 Well, to be, to be fair, I think they were, they, in many ways on that core issue is vile
00:19:01.300 as bad as you can get. Like these people should be counted. So we have political power, but
00:19:07.220 we will dictate what they do. I'm surprised. Uh, I, I look, the North was very racist. You know,
00:19:14.920 this, this idea that they were like, oh, I can't believe how racist these other, no,
00:19:17.700 they were all racist. Um, but it is shockingly despicable to be like, we will own people.
00:19:23.600 They will, they will get political power and we will wield it dirty. Well, to put it lightly.
00:19:30.320 So I think it's not that the, the Northerners, um, it's, it's difficult to understand. They all
00:19:39.240 kind of, I mean, Thomas Jefferson was a Southern slave owner. Okay. And he was the proponent of
00:19:44.280 the Northwest ordinance was the first ordinance that kind of, uh, it described how to bring new
00:19:48.960 territory into the country. And it, it said that you couldn't have as, as slavery. Our founders
00:19:54.280 did not like slavery. They did not want slavery. They grew up with it. Like it was, it's hard to
00:19:59.420 change an economic system overnight, right? You have to change it over time. And they kind of set
00:20:03.980 forward a plan to do it. I mean, they get a bad rap for all this stuff, but the reality is it's not
00:20:08.960 them that mess this up. It's the, it's the next generation of American leaders. It's starting
00:20:13.320 in the antebellum period. It's starting with John C Calhoun and all the Southerners that,
00:20:18.060 that see that their power is going to slip away. And they changed the argument of, well,
00:20:22.920 slavery is a necessary evil to slavery is a positive good. And it's not a positive good.
00:20:28.480 I take a look today at, uh, the foreign wars the U S are, has been involved in. And I think history
00:20:35.980 will look back on the United States today and they'll be like, how could they have been so evil that
00:20:40.840 they, they, they let their government just bomb countries. They weren't at war with. I mean,
00:20:46.540 it's shockingly insane. You look bad. We look back at someone like Thomas Jefferson who Southern
00:20:52.360 slave owner and tried getting in the declaration of independence. This basic, basically attack on
00:20:58.520 the crown for advancing slavery in the colonies, despite being a slave owner himself. And you take
00:21:03.740 a look at, uh, today, and there are many individuals who have benefited from war directly funding it,
00:21:10.580 who oppose it. There are many people in this country every day that in some way, uh, are involved in
00:21:17.140 it like, uh, um, inadvertently or otherwise in many different things in the future, they may say,
00:21:22.600 I can't believe they were supportive of that. How could you vote for a president who would ever
00:21:28.360 advocate for these kinds of military excursions into foreign countries illegally? It's, it's shocking,
00:21:34.320 right? But you take a look at where we are with Donald Trump and with Joe Biden.
00:21:37.440 And, uh, while Trump is in my opinion, the best we've had, uh, in my lifetime in terms of foreign
00:21:43.620 war, he still fired 59 Tomahawk missiles into Syria. He still had drone strikes in the Middle
00:21:48.360 East. He inherited that. And it may come in the future. They'll say, you know, Donald Trump
00:21:53.060 opposed war and wanted our troops out. And then someone will say, yeah, but he was, he was dropping
00:21:56.860 bombs. He was doing all these things. This is nature of, of politics. You can't just snap your
00:22:01.720 fingers and end or change these things no matter how bad they may be back to the issue of,
00:22:05.820 you know, Thomas Jefferson, for instance, we get this narrative from many people in this country
00:22:09.760 that they were evil slave owners, but they actually were trying to stop it. And then, uh,
00:22:14.500 the interesting thing about what happened with civil war in this country for, uh, I was, and you
00:22:19.000 can probably speak to this better than I could, but there was talk of civil war in the 1820s.
00:22:22.400 I was reading some articles about 1812. I mean, the war of 1812, I mean, they wanted, uh, the, uh,
00:22:28.320 the northerners wanted to secede because of the war of 1812, because they didn't like war. I mean,
00:22:33.460 war is not a good thing, right? I mean, it, it, it hurts the people overall. And so there's always,
00:22:38.340 there's always going to be a group of people that feel left out. And they're the first instinct for
00:22:42.960 people in that scenario is to take their ball and leave, you know, and that's sometimes it's good
00:22:48.580 because if you have somewhere to go and you can be safer somewhere else, then by all means do it.
00:22:52.320 But if you don't have anywhere to go, you kind of have to stick around and figure out how to solve
00:22:55.580 the problem. There's that saying, any fight you can avoid is a fight you've won.
00:22:59.480 And, uh, I like to reference this video that's viral on the internet of this, like martial arts
00:23:05.340 black belt, you know, sensei teaching his students. And he's like, I'm going to teach you the one
00:23:10.200 technique, the one master technique to win any fight, no matter what. And everyone's all excited
00:23:15.500 and they're sitting down. And then he, he goes in front of the guy. And then as soon as the fight
00:23:19.780 starts, he runs from the room, waving his arms in the air and just disappears. And then everyone laughs
00:23:24.400 and claps. And he comes back in and he was like, you don't want to fight. You, you do, you do not want
00:23:28.360 to fight. You've won if you've not fought. And so that's, that's an important message that I think
00:23:32.920 a lot of people don't understand, especially as you're mentioning that the North didn't want to,
00:23:35.840 but let's bring it to a modern context. Uh, I was saying, I don't think there's any scenario where
00:23:41.160 there could be a, a, like in terms of Cal exit or secession, there's talk about like the state of
00:23:47.640 Jefferson, uh, uh, what greater Idaho perhaps, or, um, what's Jeff, uh, state of Jefferson or breaking
00:23:53.540 California into Northern and Southern or East and West. If they're within the United States,
00:23:58.480 I can see that as a potentiality, long shot billion to one. But if that happened, I'd be like,
00:24:05.740 Oh, wow. You know, that's that, that here we go. I mean, it's possible. And because of the
00:24:11.300 overarching structure of our government, law enforcement, military, if say Idaho had a vote
00:24:16.560 in Oregon and it went to Congress and they approved it. And then a portion of Oregon went to Idaho and a
00:24:20.560 portion of Northern California did. I don't see violence in that regard. I just see it being as
00:24:24.360 politically impossible for the most part. It's substantially more likely in my opinion,
00:24:29.380 that a state simply just says we out, but then you get violence. So I'm curious,
00:24:34.900 your guys' thought on, you know, whether I think you were set, you were saying earlier,
00:24:39.400 secession is not what started the civil war and it's not what causes the violence. The, the,
00:24:44.720 the initiation of violence starts the war. And so I'm curious if you guys want to
00:24:50.080 dive into this, what do you think happens? Should California or Texas or any other state say we're
00:24:54.780 leaving the United States? Where does that go? Well, I would say, first of all, we have political,
00:25:00.400 politically motivated violence right now and no states are seceding. So, I mean, this idea that
00:25:04.340 we're going to have violence because of it is just going to be a continuation of that.
00:25:07.560 Maybe it'll get worse, but if the intent of the secession is to try to alleviate the core reasons of
00:25:13.280 why that political violence is growing in this country, I think it's a noble cause. Maybe it'll work,
00:25:18.240 maybe it won't work, but I think that I would like to have the opportunity to say that
00:25:22.620 we at least tried to avert a civil war if we could. And maybe it's a, you can call me an idealist or
00:25:31.120 call me naive or something. I just think that we should try to avert that we shouldn't be trying
00:25:34.080 to drum it up. And if we can recognize that there are some core problems that are causing political
00:25:39.340 division in this country, political violence to become more common, maybe we can do something
00:25:44.660 to alleviate that. And me, the idealist says, let's try to redraw the lines at least. And so
00:25:50.080 I think that that's an important point there. But I think that what you're saying there with
00:25:55.220 dividing these different lines up with California, for example, and Oregon, I think that it's possible
00:26:01.940 to do that without there being the so-called civil war. And I think that it's important to kind of
00:26:08.060 define what the civil war is. I mean, there's a lot of people and I kind of agree with them to say
00:26:12.780 that maybe you completely disagree with me as being the historian here, but the civil war,
00:26:17.620 I don't really consider it to be a civil war, the first one, because it was a war of secession.
00:26:26.200 It was a...
00:26:27.700 Get ready for Las Vegas style action at Bad MGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
00:26:34.820 your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM
00:26:40.640 Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette. With our ever-growing
00:26:46.560 library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games, and signature Bad MGM
00:26:52.100 service, there's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to
00:26:56.760 you than with Bad MGM Casino. Download the Bad MGM Casino app today. Bad MGM and GameSense remind
00:27:03.980 you to play responsibly. Bad MGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only.
00:27:08.920 Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone
00:27:12.680 close to you, please contact ConnexOntario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free
00:27:20.640 of charge. Bad MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:27:26.160 When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
00:27:31.940 Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care
00:27:36.960 about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't remember saying
00:27:44.780 that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big on care.
00:27:51.960 Did I mention that we care?
00:27:53.000 A war for the North to keep the South in the country? It wasn't a war between, let's say,
00:28:03.260 hordes of people in streets. My vision of civil war is like unorganized hordes of people in the
00:28:09.560 streets.
00:28:09.940 We'll clarify that definition real quick. So typically, civil war historically is referred
00:28:13.840 to two or more factions fighting for control of a government.
00:28:17.680 Of one government.
00:28:18.620 Right. And the American civil war was actually just a union breaking apart with the pro-union
00:28:25.400 forces trying to stop states from leaving the union and the Confederate states wanting to not
00:28:31.020 be a part of their union.
00:28:32.180 Yeah.
00:28:32.460 So they weren't fighting for control of one government.
00:28:34.380 Yeah, that's what I mean. I guess you said it more eloquently than I. They weren't contending
00:28:37.660 for who's going to control Washington, right? They had their own capital. They had their own
00:28:40.880 president. And so they had their own confederation with their own union. So in my view, I guess,
00:28:45.720 I don't think it qualifies as a civil war. And I guess in my mind, when you think of civil war,
00:28:51.180 I see unorganized hordes of people in the streets or militias in the streets fighting each other,
00:28:56.100 but it's not necessarily the government versus another government.
00:28:58.780 This is interesting because we look at World War I and II, you have these European powers,
00:29:04.020 which then bleeds out into the second world countries that are fighting with each other.
00:29:09.020 And we call that the world war.
00:29:10.200 But World War I and II would be not too dissimilar necessarily from what the American
00:29:15.900 Civil War was. These states were sovereign. They viewed themselves as their own state,
00:29:20.900 as it were, as part of a bigger union. And the Southern states believed they wholeheartedly
00:29:24.480 had the right to leave at any point. And the union said, no, you don't.
00:29:27.660 But they didn't have the right. And this was a topic that had been talked about from the founding.
00:29:34.000 It was talked about during the Aliens and Sedition Acts. Jefferson and Madison wrote the
00:29:38.080 Kentucky and Virginia resolutions. Jefferson actually, he supported nullification.
00:29:44.060 But fast forward and Andrew Jackson and John C. Calhoun, when it came to nullification in 1828,
00:29:49.360 Andrew Jackson said, no, you cannot do that. These guys considered themselves unionists for the most
00:29:54.060 part that led the South. John C. Calhoun even included in that fact, he did not want to leave
00:29:58.240 the union. He did not believe that the South had the right to leave the union. He wanted to find a
00:30:02.820 solution to the problem. It wasn't until he died and the rest of the leaders kind of
00:30:07.940 died that we ended up in civil war. It's like, it's like a marriage, right? You're married
00:30:12.660 together. You are, you're responsible as individual states for the people of your states. Okay. Not all
00:30:20.160 the people of the South wanted to leave the union. If the slaveholders took power, they had
00:30:26.120 significantly more power in their states over the non-slaveholders. There were white people in the
00:30:30.880 South that didn't own slaves, which means they had no representation.
00:30:34.120 Well, well, real quick on that thought, I believe it was only 5% of the U S population that were
00:30:39.840 slave owners. And so the South was overwhelmingly not slave owners. Absolutely. And the, and the
00:30:46.140 thing is, is like those, those 5% held so much power and they use the power of the federal government
00:30:52.740 over and over and over again during the antebellum period to expand manifest destiny, the Mexican
00:30:58.340 American war, Texas annexation to expand slavery so they can maintain their power because they
00:31:03.800 wouldn't give it up. And so it was civil war. It was a small group of people fighting against
00:31:10.940 everyone else saying no. And then once they had lost once the, the, cause what it is is we're a
00:31:16.460 decentralized, factionalized society, right? And the democratic party had consolidated itself
00:31:22.340 with the slaveholders into this one massive party. And it took the Republican party being formed,
00:31:28.380 consolidating all the different factions that didn't necessarily agree or disagree with slavery.
00:31:33.360 They didn't really care. What they did care about is they wanted a little say in their government and
00:31:37.260 they weren't being, they weren't able to have it. Okay. But it sounds like you're describing what's
00:31:40.980 going on now. Yeah, I know. Like the, we, we were, we had a rep Massey on, uh, IRL,
00:31:48.500 Tim cast IRL last night. And I'm looking at this list of all of these members of Congress who voted
00:31:53.800 to oust George Santos, whatever your opinion is on the guy, you don't have to like the guy,
00:31:57.560 but he was not, he's not been convicted of wrongdoing. He's been accused of wrongdoing,
00:32:01.680 but a bunch of Republicans teamed up with Democrats to remove him. And with this, the example that I
00:32:07.080 give is look, Democrats would not expel, uh, Senator Menendez, despite his now second, I believe
00:32:12.980 indictment or actually more than two, but principal, uh, criminal charges. They march in lockstep.
00:32:18.500 They're a big party. They fall in line. The Republicans are basically the catch-all for
00:32:23.800 the disparate group of varying ideologies that are at war with each other. Uh, there are members
00:32:27.420 of Congress that are, as Rhett Massey described them dibs, what do you call it? Defense industrial
00:32:33.080 something. I don't know. Military industrial complex. We refer to it as there are Republicans
00:32:37.400 who, uh, they're always going to vote for military spending, war, foreign policy. And then there's
00:32:43.240 Republicans that are libertarian and say no expansion, no more spending. These people are not the
00:32:47.220 same group. They, they are not united. So what's happening now is as long as Democrats are
00:32:51.900 ideologically homogenous, they're going to exert disproportionate amounts of power. So long as
00:32:56.040 they're playing games like, uh, sanctuary States and cities, they're going to give themselves,
00:33:00.720 grant themselves disproportionate amounts of power. And I think what we're seeing now with Donald Trump
00:33:04.480 is kind of like what you're describing with the Republican party. Donald Trump has created a party
00:33:09.940 within a party essentially. And I shouldn't say he did. I believe he's the avatar of this,
00:33:14.380 this formation. And now you have a, the, the, probably the largest and strongest faction within
00:33:19.180 the Republican party is MAGA or America first, and it is expanding. It is winning and it will grow.
00:33:25.060 So maybe we won't see critical mass anytime soon, but it's certainly bubbling up. I wonder if,
00:33:31.400 you know, we're eight years away, 12 years away, maybe this elect because of the speed of internet
00:33:36.100 and information, it's much faster than we realize, but it certainly seems like, as you've described it,
00:33:41.400 we're in a similar period. Yes, we are very much in a similar period, um, for different reasons,
00:33:47.060 obviously, but I mean, and it can change very fast, but it can also change for the good very fast,
00:33:51.420 right? There are so many people out there, you know, I, I got into politics just like three or
00:33:55.620 four years ago, just a regular person watching TV, kind of a little scared, you know, I've got kids.
00:34:00.240 I'm like, what are, what are my kids' futures going to look like? So I'm going to go volunteer for,
00:34:05.420 I was, Yunkin was running for governor. I was knocking doors. They don't give you,
00:34:08.300 they don't tell you what to do. They just give you stuff. They say, knock on doors and give these
00:34:12.020 people this stuff. So I started to ask questions like, what do you not like about your government?
00:34:15.980 And the first thing I kept on hearing is Congress, Congress, Congress, Congress is crooked. Congress
00:34:20.440 is corrupt. And so it's like, well, what if, what if you actually had politicians that actually talk to
00:34:25.180 those people? Because the apps have you knock certain doors. I just knocked every door. I didn't
00:34:30.060 want to waste my time. Why not just talk to everybody instead of just talking to the people that
00:34:33.000 you're told to talk to and then ask the same questions. And you realize that the reason that you only
00:34:37.480 knock those doors is because those are the people that voted for you. And those are the people that
00:34:40.240 voted for them. And you don't want to actually have a conversation with them. And what you learn
00:34:43.980 when you do is they all don't like Congress. Why do they not like Congress? Because Congress
00:34:48.340 is unrepresentative of them because they're too small of a body. So if you had a, if you,
00:34:53.520 if you had a group of people or a politician that spoke to those people and said, Hey,
00:34:57.380 we're going to give you a real plan. We're going to say, Hey, we're going to, we're going to clean up
00:35:01.160 corruption. And this is how we're going to do it. We're going to decentralize power. We're going to
00:35:03.920 expand the house. We're going to bring more people in. We're going to make the district smaller. Maybe we're going to
00:35:07.400 break some of the big States up into smaller States. Cause it's actually a very good idea.
00:35:10.440 The power of the government is just a lot of work and the individuals doing that work are
00:35:15.440 probably just overloaded. But I think it goes beyond Congress. Uh, you're not going to alleviate the
00:35:20.880 issue of the Senate. And so I think splitting up Congress and making it more, uh, I don't know,
00:35:27.400 granular, more people, more representation. It's a good idea, but then you still, now it's just even
00:35:32.820 harder to get unity around core issues, which again, I'm on the, it sounds great. Unless you
00:35:40.620 then bump into a Senate that is the same system and the presidency and the executive branch that
00:35:46.140 is the same system. So there are arguments for expanding the Supreme court that actually think
00:35:49.900 it does make sense. The only problem is the only, the arguments only being made for political power
00:35:54.680 under administrations to give themselves more ideologically aligned Supreme court justices.
00:35:59.780 But the idea for the Supreme court was there's each appellate district has a, a justice. And right
00:36:06.580 now we have more, uh, districts than we have justices. So the argument is we should, I think
00:36:11.160 we should have 13 or whatever. There's one for each. Instead we have some that double up. I like
00:36:15.860 the idea. The problem is the only people advancing it are the ones who are currently in executive power
00:36:19.700 who would give their ideological allies seats in the Supreme court to seize control. And thus we're
00:36:25.720 at an impasse. I think we would need, uh, if we're going to expand Congress, I think the issue is not
00:36:32.320 just Congress. I think the founding fathers didn't expect, uh, the country to be at 300. No, I mean,
00:36:39.880 I don't think they forced off 300 million people. I mean, it was what 4 million people at the time of
00:36:45.480 independence, four or five. Yeah. And I think that the biggest, uh, the gap between the populations at
00:36:51.120 the time, I think it's like one to 40. Now it was like one to 13 at the time. Yeah. So even that
00:36:55.500 discrepancy you have in terms of some States getting more representation, you know, it was a
00:36:59.280 difference of 13, not 40, like it is now between California and Wyoming, for example, with, with
00:37:03.660 what you're, uh, you're saying, Jeff, it seems like the logical conclusion is perhaps a regional,
00:37:09.900 uh, uh, layer added to the United States or some kind of national divorce. Well, I mean,
00:37:16.280 there's already a regional layer and that's the state republics. Okay. We're a compounded
00:37:20.440 republic as Madison would say. And so when you said, well, yeah, if we expanded Congress,
00:37:24.860 it would be more difficult to get people aligned. Well, is that a bad thing? Do we want our federal
00:37:29.300 government to be able to do whatever they want, whenever they want? Shouldn't it be a more
00:37:34.500 comprehensive system? So the federal government is doing only what the federal government is supposed
00:37:38.480 to do and then leaving the rest of the States as the constitution declares. But so what I see
00:37:43.180 happening is, you know, how is it that the FISA court, uh, vote died the other day, right?
00:37:49.900 The, the, the foreign surveillance stuff is widespread abuses. We have seen for a very
00:37:54.700 long time, lying to Congress, all of this really awful stuff. Thomas Massey comes on saying we were
00:37:58.980 supposed to vote on it. And then they just shut Congress down. They just, we're not going to
00:38:01.780 have, it's not going to happen. Imagine where are we right now? Uh, Joe Biden, uh, certainly there
00:38:08.840 are members of Congress, the Senate, the upper or lower chambers that are trying to fund foreign
00:38:12.680 wars against the will of the American people. Cause the American people don't want war,
00:38:15.820 but it happens anyway. But I imagine a scenario where the president, uh, does something illegal.
00:38:21.200 I mean, I, I, I am of the opinion, the Biden administration is one of the most crooked
00:38:26.320 administrations we've seen. Giving you one example, the Biden DOJ just arrested a witness
00:38:31.460 and whistleblower against the Biden family. I mean, whether or not you think this guy is a liar,
00:38:36.680 this is purely inappropriate to make these moves. And that's what they're doing. So I don't,
00:38:41.160 I don't, I don't have good answers for you, but certainly if someone comes out and accuses
00:38:44.240 the Biden family of criminal wrongdoing in politics, and then Biden's DOJ goes and arrests
00:38:48.500 the guy, we have very serious problems. We can't even get the current Congress to do anything about
00:38:54.300 the abuses we have seen at the executive level for decades. But so you, you said it, it gets killed,
00:39:01.160 right? It doesn't, you can't debate it in Congress. And why is that? And I think, uh, Dean Phillips,
00:39:05.780 who's running for president actually tweeted about this recently. He said, all the power of the house
00:39:10.100 and the Senate are basically consolidated into the leaders. Well, why is that? Well,
00:39:14.740 post civil war post during the Gilded Age, you had this guy named Thomas Brackett Reed who came
00:39:19.220 into power. He found it difficult. They were fighting over representation. They were fighting
00:39:23.280 over power in Congress. And he found it difficult to get things done with, uh, with his democratic,
00:39:28.860 uh, you know, uh, competitors. And so he created something called Reed's rules where he started
00:39:34.220 consolidate power into the speakership. And that's what we have now. So like, you know,
00:39:38.200 going back to the civil war, what was one of the big ways that the, uh, the slaveholders
00:39:42.420 maintained power was with the gag rule. The gag rule was a set of procedural rules they put in
00:39:47.620 place where you couldn't talk about slavery in Congress. Well, as an individual citizen,
00:39:52.060 that's where my first amendment, right? Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at Bad MGM,
00:39:58.160 the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement
00:40:04.080 MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM grand millions or popular games like blackjack,
00:40:10.440 baccarat and roulette with our ever-growing library of digital slot games, alert selection of online
00:40:16.380 table games and signature Bad MGM service. There's no better way to bring the excitement
00:40:21.680 and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with Bad MGM casino. Download the Bad MGM casino app today.
00:40:29.260 Bad MGM and game sense remind you to play responsibly. Bad MGM.com for T's and C's,
00:40:33.560 19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns
00:40:38.160 about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600
00:40:45.640 to speak to an advisor free of charge. Bet MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with
00:40:50.520 iGaming Ontario. When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops.
00:40:57.220 So on behalf of Desjardins Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that
00:41:02.720 we really care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird,
00:41:10.400 I don't remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance
00:41:15.640 that's really big on care. Did I mention that we care?
00:41:22.040 Lays is in Congress. I have a right to speak with my representative. I have a right to have my
00:41:27.380 representative listen to me. And if he agrees with me, go into that body and speak for me and my
00:41:31.740 community. If Congress, the other people in Congress have written a rule that says you can't
00:41:36.300 talk about this thing, we're going to shut down debate, then they're not doing their job. And
00:41:40.960 they're not allowing us, the people, to have a voice.
00:41:45.160 So the one thing I want to add real quick, because I want to jump to secession again, but I believe that
00:41:51.640 any state, that any person does have a right to secede. And I view it in sort of an American
00:41:58.620 independence context. When you have grievances that will not be addressed by your leader, the
00:42:05.380 country is, should be coming from, what did Monty Python call it? A mandate from the people or from
00:42:11.500 the masses and not wet ladies distributing swords or whatever. The crown did not care for the plight
00:42:19.600 of the colonies and just smacked them around and said, you're nothing to us. We will take from you and
00:42:24.300 do as we please, shut up and accept it. And so finally they, the people said, we are being
00:42:30.060 oppressed. This is unacceptable. And so we say no. And, and we won the United States won.
00:42:38.720 I would say largely thanks to France. You had, you know, the British crown was embroiled in war in,
00:42:44.300 in, in a bunch of different ways. And so forcing them, you know, the French were basically like,
00:42:49.400 the enemy, my enemy, right? So let's assist the colonists. We base, you know, we view it like
00:42:53.480 the French expeditionary forces came and assisted us in winning this fight for independence. The
00:42:58.660 French probably viewed it as we helped them winning their war against the, against the, uh,
00:43:02.980 the, uh, uh, great Britain, but, uh, Ulysses S. Grant. Uh, so, so in that regard, we respect what we
00:43:08.960 did. The United States says it was good that we decided we were being wronged and we left,
00:43:13.660 but we didn't just leave. We fought for it. But we, but, but first, before we did that,
00:43:19.120 we sent Benjamin Franklin and others to parliament and we asked for a voice in parliament. We asked for
00:43:26.000 representation and it wasn't until we were told no, did we resort to fighting? Well, hold on.
00:43:32.020 This is, this is where it gets good. It wasn't even then we get told no. And so Thomas Jefferson,
00:43:40.080 the founding fathers are like, send more letters, send more letters. And then the crown came and
00:43:45.700 demanded the guns from people in Massachusetts who, uh, uh, said no. Then they marched their
00:43:52.360 troops onto Lexington and Concord and said, hand over your weapons. And, uh, you know, depending on
00:43:57.960 who you ask, you might get a different answer. My understanding is we don't necessarily know who
00:44:00.880 shot first, but regulars open fire on Americans to take their weapons from them. And this was a full
00:44:08.600 year before the declaration of independence. Are you talking about the Boston, Boston massacre?
00:44:13.200 No, no, no, no. This is Lexington and Concord. Oh, okay. Sorry. So these are the first battles
00:44:17.380 that we say of the American revolution a year and one month later, the founding fathers sent the
00:44:22.080 declaration of independence. So historically we were already fighting for it despite never having
00:44:27.480 declared it in the first place because the founding fathers were like no war, no violence.
00:44:32.760 We will petition and use pressure and economics to do it. But what happens with, um, it was the,
00:44:37.960 I believe it was the intolerable X. I could be wrong. Um, but basically the crown is saying
00:44:43.060 because your dicks, Boston tea party, we are going to impose penalties on you. And the colonists were
00:44:49.360 like, we are, you, you are beating us down. You will not listen to a thing we've had to say.
00:44:53.960 So we reject your, your, your policies. And so they said, okay, then we're going to occupy you.
00:44:59.140 And the founding fathers are like, this is getting out of hand. We don't want this shooting
00:45:04.020 happens at Lexington and Concord. We consider that to be the shot heard around the world. The first
00:45:07.260 battles of the revolution. Well, don't forget about the, the, uh, exaggerated propaganda of
00:45:11.800 the Boston massacre also. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That was spread across the colonies as some
00:45:16.260 massacre. A couple of people were killed. I don't know the exact details of it, but it wasn't a
00:45:20.720 massacre. So perhaps, but based on the population size back then, I think it was probably a big
00:45:24.660 deal. Well, I'm just saying that the use of the word massacre, right. And purposely made to rile
00:45:30.680 people up. Well, I mean the, the propaganda was on both sides though. Yeah. You know, like,
00:45:34.460 I mean, Sam Adams and Paul Revere, they were, they were trying to use it for their ends. It was,
00:45:38.360 you know, when you get in a situation like this, the people in power tend to use anything they can
00:45:42.980 to need nudge power in their direction. Sure. Massacre. Uh, how many people, uh, was it that
00:45:49.260 died? I think it was, it was like four Christmas addicts. I know he died. Five, five, five people,
00:45:55.340 five people, five people. And, uh, you know, historically we do mention like they were publicizing
00:45:59.680 it as a massacre. But, but my point ultimately was, um, a lot of people think that if you watch
00:46:06.480 any popular media or movies or whatever cartoons, they depict the American revolutionary war as the
00:46:12.160 founding fathers declared independence. And then the crown dispatched troops when in reality they
00:46:17.500 were already shooting and killing Americans and fighting was happening. And the founding fathers a
00:46:21.500 year later were like, I think we should declare independence. And it's like, well, you're already
00:46:25.400 fighting for it. But, uh, my point in this is we look back at that because we are the winners
00:46:31.100 and the good guys won. It's like Norm MacDonald said, Hey, I just read history and good news.
00:46:35.180 The good guys have won every time the civil war. Uh, it was, I read this letter and you may,
00:46:41.400 I don't know if you've seen this cause I don't remember exactly where it was. I was reading an
00:46:43.420 academic paper on the civil war. You, Ulysses S. Grant wrote a letter after the civil war saying,
00:46:47.860 in essence, by all means, you have the right to secede, but no, you will, you will go to war.
00:46:58.320 And if you lose, you will be ruled by your betters. And so it was, it's, it's, I believe it's the most
00:47:05.920 apt perspective. These are, these are, these are people who are the, what I mean, effectively
00:47:09.780 grandchildren or great grandchildren of revolutionaries who fought against the crown and
00:47:15.560 said, no, we'll be our own country having to reconcile. What's the difference here politically.
00:47:20.980 And his point was by all means, try, and we will fight you like they fought us. And if you lose,
00:47:26.920 you will be ruled. And that's what happened. And the Supreme court, I think actually said
00:47:30.460 something about the 1869. Uh, there's this, there's narrative out there that, you know,
00:47:35.400 you say you don't have the right to secede, but the Supreme court ruled that you do have the right
00:47:39.700 to secede under certain conditions. And they are, first of all, the consent of the States,
00:47:43.440 which is what they wrote their own words in the Texas versus white. The States have the right
00:47:48.020 to secede with the consent of the States. The problem is they didn't define what that was.
00:47:51.380 Is that a consent of Congress or is that literally consent of the States at the time,
00:47:56.120 how many States were there? So what would you need? 50% of the States, state legislators to approve
00:48:00.040 it. That's the kind of the angle that we take a galaxy and says, if California is going to secede
00:48:04.880 as a whole or any part of it thereof, that we would need the consent of the other States.
00:48:10.320 And I think that there would be 26 red States out there who would love to see a blue, the bluest
00:48:16.440 part of America secede from the union and maybe would get the legislatures in 26 States to approve
00:48:20.400 of that. The, the idea from a Ulysses S grant, which was interesting in this letter, he says,
00:48:26.120 the reason we will have a right to stop you is that we have sacrificed blood and treasure to admit
00:48:32.440 you into our union. And to paraphrase in a modern colloquial way, if I pay money to move you from
00:48:42.380 your house to mine, you owe me and we have a deal and you're like, I'll help clean up. I'll pay rent.
00:48:48.560 And then after all that, you don't pay the rent and you say, I'm leaving. I'm like, whoa, whoa,
00:48:52.640 bro, bro, come on. I helped you move out here. You said you were going to help me out with the rent.
00:48:55.360 I need to cover these costs and you're just leaving. Well, you might get into a legal dispute.
00:48:59.660 Someone's going to file a lawsuit and say, we had a contractual agreement as to what I would pay to
00:49:03.320 help them come out. Now they're leaving without paying their debt. You're going to get into a
00:49:06.220 conflict. Ulysses Grant is like, it was very hard for us to bring you in blood and treasure. You
00:49:12.700 want to leave without paying your debt. We're going to stop you. Yeah. And, and, and he's right. And
00:49:16.480 to your point about like, but the separating the States does not separate red and blue. Each state
00:49:24.260 has concentrated areas of both red and blue in it. So like, it doesn't really solve the
00:49:29.540 problem. You know, um, that's why, you know, what you really want is you, our Republic is supposed to
00:49:35.900 be of small groups governing by small groups because small groups give you the individual
00:49:41.000 more power. So if you really want to like solve that problem, it's not, it's to create more groups
00:49:46.480 inside of the group that we have not to break the group apart. And I agree. And that's, that's why
00:49:51.220 like I depart from Marjorie Taylor green, who kind of spoke about national divorce. And I think that
00:49:55.860 the message that, that at least a lot of people interpreted it was, was a blue and red state
00:49:59.500 divorce. And I don't agree with that. That's why I was talking about before about redrawing the
00:50:03.280 lines be specifically because in California alone, there's 10, 12 million Republicans that
00:50:07.960 would, who would just like, like we've been talking about might go to war to keep themselves
00:50:11.280 in the country that they love. The patriotic Californians in California who would not want
00:50:15.400 to be pulled into the leftist utopia. So, but this is, this is, man, I hear this so often
00:50:21.300 and I, I'm, I genuinely don't understand where the perspective comes from. When we talk about
00:50:25.920 a modern context and a potential second civil war, people say, yeah, but nobody wants to
00:50:29.120 fight. And I'm like, whoever did, whoever, I mean, look, I, you got John Bolton, perhaps
00:50:34.380 he's, he's itching for it, but he wants to send someone else to do it. Uh, historically,
00:50:38.480 when you look at almost all conflict, the average person does not want to fight. You die, you lose
00:50:44.600 wealth, you lose luxury, luxury and comfort. Well, so it's, it's typically smaller minority
00:50:50.700 factions who reach that point, which start the wars. Well, I mean, I think what happens
00:50:54.340 is a group decides that they want to fight and they work to make things difficult for
00:50:59.460 the people that they need to fight for them. And then they kind of pull them to fight for
00:51:04.340 them. Like what's happening today. So like, you know, no, you're right. Nobody really wants
00:51:08.900 to fight, but when you can't afford groceries and you're struggling to pay your mortgage and
00:51:13.660 all of these things are happening. And now you're like, you know what? I mean, I can't pay
00:51:18.740 my bills. I might as well fight for something, you know, I might as well do something.
00:51:21.920 It's the, uh, uh, expected value proposition. You guys familiar with gambling and what's
00:51:27.180 called the EV when you do like sports gambling, they'll show you the expected value. Meaning
00:51:32.380 that if you bet a hundred dollars, if the EV is bad, if you win, you win only $90. So it's
00:51:37.920 like, you know, so when there's a favorite, that's your expected value. And so, uh, that's
00:51:43.000 how people measure, like, is it worth it to make the bet? There are some people who make
00:51:46.880 stupid bets. Like, I think this person's going to win, you know, MVP for the season. And it's
00:51:51.780 like plus 1000, which means a $10 bet wins you, you know, substantially large amount, a lot
00:51:57.420 more money with a hundred bucks. And so, uh, there was one funny meme where it said only
00:52:02.580 0.2% of, uh, of, uh, tax returns are ever audited, giving you a 99.8% EV for, for tax fraud.
00:52:10.380 It's really funny. But, uh, the reason I bring this up is you mentioned food and mortgage.
00:52:16.160 Basically when the expected value of civil war exceeds the expected value of not you
00:52:21.760 get civil war. If the average person says to themselves, the expected value of fighting
00:52:27.700 a bloody war is higher than of just trying to pay my bills. You're going to get people
00:52:34.540 become active combatants when food, you know, uh, we've talked about this a few years ago
00:52:41.400 and over the past few years, but the cost of water, uh, in places like Detroit, Flint,
00:52:45.880 Michigan, bring you to the, to the, to the breaking point of where you could start getting potential
00:52:51.480 conflict. Not so much in this context of like Flint, but if the cost of water exceeds the
00:52:57.340 cost of labor, you're done like fighting theft. Crime will explode because now what you're
00:53:04.300 like water is the, as the most basic necessity for a human being. I may be an air, but like
00:53:08.800 in terms of what we need to pay for services, food is probably the most obvious because people
00:53:15.100 typically can find ways to get water. It's in the air, but, uh, food is a bit harder in big cities.
00:53:20.840 Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at bad MGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
00:53:27.760 your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement. MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM
00:53:33.600 grand millions or popular games like blackjack, baccarat, and roulette with our ever-growing
00:53:39.520 library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games and signature bet MGM service.
00:53:45.900 There's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with
00:53:50.440 bet MGM casino. Download the bet MGM casino app today. Bet MGM and game sense remind you to play
00:53:57.340 responsibly bet MGM.com for T's and C's 19 plus to wager Ontario. Only please play responsibly.
00:54:03.060 If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact
00:54:07.100 connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. Bet MGM operates pursuant
00:54:15.680 to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. When you really care about someone, you shout it from
00:54:22.440 the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level
00:54:27.800 to tell our clients that we really care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs.
00:54:36.140 Weird, I don't remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's
00:54:42.240 really big on care. Did I mention that we care?
00:54:45.960 But in your basic necessities, shelter, food, water, and I think general security is considered
00:54:56.560 one. Like, do you feel anxious all the time? Like you're going to die when these things are
00:54:59.880 threatened? People just say, look, I'm going to die anyway. I can't eat. Might as well fight for
00:55:05.500 what I need to survive. You know, right now you have certain politicians saying all the crime we're
00:55:09.660 seeing is because people need bread. And I'm like, bro, that, that TV is not getting them bread.
00:55:13.120 They just society is breaking down. No one cares about each other. But in terms of, uh, you know,
00:55:19.600 moving into this, uh, moving now into secession, the reason why I think no matter what happens,
00:55:26.500 if there is a state seceding, you will get violence is because of, uh, regional resources and federal
00:55:34.120 resources. States will require them. I'll put it, I'll put a pin in that real quick and say,
00:55:38.980 there is also the idea that civil war at this, in this day and age would be impossible.
00:55:43.560 And that's because of the ubiquity of cell phones, the internet, it's a lot harder to engage in
00:55:49.400 violent, murderous conflict. It's, it's hard to police. I mean, you get a video of a cop, uh,
00:55:55.460 doing something that is even, there was one cop who was almost stabbed. This was a few years ago,
00:56:00.040 a woman rushed with a knife and he shot her. And even with that video, they were calling for him to
00:56:04.280 be fired, for him to go to prison, like hard enough to do your job as a cop, let alone have an
00:56:09.040 invasion force, a national guard go into a state to suppress, you know, a, a, a voted, uh, like let's
00:56:15.800 say a state, let's say Texas and Greg Abbott, they send troops to the border to secure it.
00:56:21.400 But the idea that the federal government could dispatch armed troops to combat them and fight
00:56:27.140 bloody violence, you, you, the Biden would be, would be gone. Congress would go deep red. It
00:56:32.180 would be Republicans win overnight because people are like, are you nuts? You can't do that.
00:56:36.480 That being said, when I look at California, for instance, Southern California is extremely
00:56:41.140 reliant on the Colorado river, which means if they can't negotiate properly with Nevada, Arizona,
00:56:46.600 Utah, whatever, uh, Colorado millions upon millions of people are going to be without water.
00:56:53.240 So let's say California says, Hey, we out. And then the federal government says, we're going to
00:57:01.280 damn this waterway. We don't care about you. You're downstream from us. What can California do
00:57:06.340 about it? California might say, no, no, no, no. Just because we secede, it doesn't mean you get
00:57:09.880 to take away our water source for a large portion of our people diverting from, uh, like the, the,
00:57:15.960 the Bay area down South would desk would, would decimate a lot of the farms in, in, in the,
00:57:21.800 in the Delta and the, in the Bay area, California would have no choice, but to actually send some
00:57:26.860 kind of physical combat force to try and secure access to this water. That's just one example.
00:57:33.000 Yeah. I disagree with that. I think that the relationship between California and other
00:57:37.440 states that provide that water is mutually beneficial and mutually dependent. If they
00:57:41.560 want to continue to get grapes and everything else that California grows, California needs water for
00:57:45.400 it. And there are no other States in this union that grow much of the produce that are staple
00:57:51.240 products in American kitchens across the country. And so if Colorado wants to set off their water to,
00:57:56.900 uh, California, then they're not going to have more grapes, you know? So what are the people
00:58:00.660 going to do that? They're going to import them. They're going to have more expensive food from
00:58:03.000 other countries. So it's a mutually dependent relationship. I would say I agree with you 70%,
00:58:07.680 uh, or maybe 30%. It is certainly mutually beneficial, but who has the leverage you want
00:58:13.960 to grow grapes. Wow. That sounds like you're gonna have some delicious wine. I control the water.
00:58:18.580 Your people need to drink or they die. So here's, it's going to happen. We'll give you your water.
00:58:22.840 Your people will live and you will give us the grapes at a 10th of the cost. We currently get them at.
00:58:27.400 Yeah, but this is just grape stuff. There are so many products that are only grown exclusively in
00:58:31.100 California, like avocado, for example, I think is Mexico. I mean, in the United States with from
00:58:36.260 the American state. And so they wouldn't be people here in New York are not going to grow avocado.
00:58:40.820 And so I know, but, but California would be akin to Mexico. We, my point is right now you have
00:58:46.040 California's massive representation in Congress preventing something like this from happening,
00:58:50.520 but should California secede? I, I, I, I see the federal government outright being like,
00:58:55.380 well, now we got you a bite of balls. Look, grapes and avocados are fantastic,
00:58:59.540 but we can import those from Mexico. We have your water. I'll tell you what we're going to do.
00:59:05.920 We're going to cut your water off for six months. Then you come back to us and tell us how much
00:59:10.400 you're willing to sell your avocados for. But after the violent mobs burn down your home and
00:59:14.800 oust you from power, the next guy who comes in is going to bend the knee to us and we'll get
00:59:18.520 everything we want. So you make your choice. Yeah, I hear you. It's certainly a complicated issue.
00:59:23.260 I just don't think that they're going to, you know, cut off a huge short. I mean, there's,
00:59:28.420 I mean, I think even dairy products in California are a significant part of the national food stock.
00:59:34.120 So I think that there's so many things that are grown and produced in California that it would
00:59:38.240 be unnecessary. Why, why, why would they try to agitate the situation? I mean, if it's a peaceful
00:59:42.640 situation, like we're trying to have business, why try to agitate the situation? You can have
00:59:46.720 brotherly relations between California if it seceded in the other states.
00:59:50.000 Yeah, but I, I, I, it's not, it's not peaceful. Like it's not peaceful. When you put your put,
00:59:54.960 you're literally, if you're saying like, I'm, I don't want, look, we're married. Okay. We've
00:59:59.480 been married for a really long time. And now all of a sudden you don't want to live in my house
01:00:02.100 anymore. Okay. It, your feelings are going to be hurt. There's going to be resentment there.
01:00:08.160 And now you've got a kid together. I don't want to, I don't want you to have them on the weekends.
01:00:12.900 I want to have them all the time. I'm going to use the leverage I have.
01:00:16.000 Who gets the dog? That's right. Who gets the dog? There are many married couples whose
01:00:19.600 relationship are actually better after they get divorced and they're not living in that
01:00:22.760 same house. Yes. Yes. But how many of these people cut ties? They resolve the issue. So
01:00:29.740 the idea would be California leaves and now we got to figure out there's a divorce. Okay.
01:00:35.840 Who's getting what? Well, the only problem is in many circumstances, historically, especially
01:00:42.080 the woman leaves, she says, I want, I want to keep the house. It is, it is the trope.
01:00:46.580 The man gets kicked out. I think that's sexist and absurd. Uh, why should the guy have to go
01:00:52.280 find a different place? And so now, nowadays actually really interesting because there are
01:00:55.700 divorce lawyers telling the guys do not leave the house under any circumstances, but there
01:00:59.760 is a dependency. You, this is why we have alimony. Let's call alimony the, uh, the Colorado
01:01:05.780 river for Southern California. How many women fight tooth and nail in, in court and refuse
01:01:12.140 to give up until they get alimony. And that guy has to pay for it. So the funny thing is
01:01:16.760 you can have a woman initiated divorce and then demand the resources from, from the husband
01:01:22.860 and the courts agree in a national divorce. That makes literally no sense. It would never
01:01:26.800 happen. If California decides to leave. And for some reason it ends up happening. The federal
01:01:31.160 government says, okay, you've left. I'll put it this way. If it, I think it is fair to
01:01:37.700 say violent confrontation would be extremely difficult in a modern context in this, in,
01:01:43.020 in, in 1861, how long did it take for word to travel that a war even started? You know
01:01:48.840 what I mean? I mean, the, the fascinating thing is Fort Sumter, we say the start of civil
01:01:51.860 war, despite the fact that it wasn't actually really a fight to, you know, one guy died in
01:01:55.860 accident or whatever. The battle, first battle of Manassas, Bull Run was, was crazy. And people
01:02:01.300 didn't even think they were in a civil war when that fought, when that fight started,
01:02:03.620 you take a look at a modern context. Could Joe Biden or Donald Trump or whoever is in the
01:02:11.240 government at the time dispatch under the insurrection act troops to California to suppress
01:02:16.200 a, a secession potentially. But what this would mean is California was not wholly resigned to
01:02:22.220 secession. Let's say that all of California unanimously in their, in their state houses
01:02:27.580 and Senate and all that stuff, the governor, they all agree. We are seceding. We don't care
01:02:32.600 what the constitution says. We don't care. It's unanimous sign it. Bang. In this circumstance
01:02:39.040 to prevent this, the only way I see it being possible insurrection act is declared. U S forces
01:02:46.020 are dispatched to California who walk into government and they, and the governor and the state reps
01:02:51.780 and legislatures just put their hands up and they say, you win. And then the federal government
01:02:55.460 occupies the state and there's no conflict. However, it's a state with who they're federalizing
01:03:00.580 the California national guard to turn on their own people. Yes. The people are going to follow
01:03:04.020 those orders. This is the point. This is the point I'm making in the event that California is not
01:03:08.520 wholly resigned to secession and they do not fight. The federal government could dispatch troops
01:03:12.580 under the insurrection act and take the state over. In reality, if it came to the point where
01:03:18.060 California unanimously decided it should not be in the United States, they're going to fight.
01:03:23.180 The union would not be able to get into a bloody conflict in San Francisco. Nobody would support
01:03:27.740 that. The rest of the country would be like, are you insane? This is crazy. People would turn against
01:03:32.280 whatever the administration was. They wouldn't need to fight. The federal government would say,
01:03:36.740 okay, California, we hear you. Uh, congratulations on having your own state. We'll be securing the border
01:03:43.280 post haste. We'll be dispatching troops, not under any insurrection act or anything, just under standard
01:03:48.000 CBP border, border patrol procedures. Every highway into and out of California will be
01:03:53.460 checkpointed. You will be, you will need a passport to enter the United States. And of course, you'll need
01:03:58.440 to renegotiate your water treaties with us. I mean, California would, would, their economy would
01:04:03.020 collapse overnight. People who live there wouldn't be able to go to Vegas anymore. They'd go and they'd be
01:04:08.240 like, do you have a passport for, we don't recognize the state of Cal, we don't recognize the country of
01:04:11.900 Pacific or California. So, uh, you can't enter the United States. These people would be in revolt.
01:04:16.500 The United States government would likely then create some kind of amnesty program.
01:04:20.180 Any citizen resident of California who wishes, wishes to retain us citizenship need only leave
01:04:25.760 California and declare themselves as Americans. The California system would just, it's impossible.
01:04:32.840 I think that assumes that there's this line between California and the rest of the country,
01:04:38.000 that the rest of the country would be opposed to California leaving. There's so many people in this
01:04:41.140 country outside of California that would love to see California, as they say, fall off into the
01:04:45.400 ocean. So there would be support for California secession in Washington too. That'd be voiced
01:04:49.860 to the representatives in Congress. It wouldn't be like a united front against California.
01:04:53.780 I gotta, I gotta be honest. I would, I would assume that it's actually a large, you, you, you might find
01:04:58.460 a plurality of the people of this country who would support California secession and they don't live
01:05:04.620 in California because the California government is like, no, no, no, no, no. We have so much power
01:05:09.200 over this country disproportionately through lying, cheating, and stealing. Why would we give that
01:05:13.700 up? Yeah. And I think that even the blue states would, would come to California's defense in
01:05:17.820 Congress to prevent these kinds of draconian measures being taken against the state.
01:05:21.460 The blue states are going to argue against Cali. If, if, if the entire Democrat government
01:05:25.940 of California was like, we are seceding, not Washington, Oregon, New York, Illinois,
01:05:29.780 they would be like, no, you're not. You better not leave because then they're the minority.
01:05:34.640 They become, yeah. So, and, and that, so that you bring up an interesting point that like
01:05:38.680 all political power is broken down into three factions. It's the majority power, the minority
01:05:42.920 power, and the powerless. And for most of us, we're part of the powerless. And the moment
01:05:47.080 that you decide to leave your faction of power, you're now powerless too. And that's what California
01:05:53.320 would be doing. They would be, they would be significantly, they'd be creating their own
01:05:57.440 little power over here, but it would be significantly dwarfed by the power of the United States government.
01:06:01.640 How do, how do they do that? Because, I mean, we were talking before about how Congress is,
01:06:05.320 is locked in at 435, right? So if California were to secede from the unit, they don't just
01:06:09.860 suddenly lose 50 some votes in Congress. Those seats get reapportioned to the other 49 states
01:06:14.200 and that would benefit blue states as well. That would, the number of seats in Congress
01:06:17.520 would still be 435. You just have more seats in Washington, more seats in New York, more seats
01:06:21.480 in Maryland. I disagree. I think it's a good point. And it's a, it's a potential, but I kind of feel
01:06:26.920 like secession is such an extreme idea that we don't actually know what would happen with these
01:06:32.400 other laws as to how we, we handle congressional seats. I mean, the secession of a state that we're
01:06:39.140 to go through, it's going to, it's going to have just, let me give you an example of, of a potentiality
01:06:46.280 when it, when it came to the Supreme court hearing just recently about Trump's immunity.
01:06:51.340 And it seems like it's going to be, uh, or what was it? Was it? No, no, I'm sorry. Eligibility.
01:06:56.880 Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
01:07:04.100 your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM
01:07:09.920 Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette with our ever-growing
01:07:15.860 library of digital slot games, alert selection of online table games, and signature BetMGM service.
01:07:22.400 There's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with
01:07:26.780 BetMGM Casino. Download the BetMGM Casino app today. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play
01:07:33.660 responsibly. BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.
01:07:39.560 If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
01:07:42.520 please contact ConnexOntario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge.
01:07:50.780 BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:07:55.440 When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
01:08:01.220 Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care about you.
01:08:07.020 We care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird. I don't
01:08:13.340 remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big
01:08:19.280 on care. Did I mention that we care? The immunity hasn't happened yet. Whether Trump could be removed
01:08:27.960 under the Insurrection Act. What Trump's lawyers argued is if you rule on this language in this
01:08:34.280 clause, it's going to impact all of these other provisions in the constitution and our law,
01:08:39.800 because we use the same term numerous times. It is not just an issue of California seceded.
01:08:46.600 They're no longer part of the United States. It's what does that mean for Senate seats,
01:08:50.220 congressional seats? What does it mean for the laws? What does it mean for the clean water
01:08:53.720 restoration act? There's so many laws on the books that will be like just changed in some way we
01:09:00.620 can't foresee by secession. Yeah. And so to your point, they would be reapportioned.
01:09:05.440 And so what that would do, it would take, you're decentralizing the power. You are taking some of
01:09:11.980 that majority power and some of that minority power, and you're giving it to some of the powerless.
01:09:16.320 And you don't know what those powerless are going to do. You're not going to know what they're going
01:09:19.580 to want once they get in there. It's going to have a massive ripple effect as you describe.
01:09:24.280 I think, I think actually if, uh, the impact would be a loss of power for Democrats,
01:09:30.020 the seats would be evenly apportioned across the United States, giving some red and some blue,
01:09:35.040 they would be gerrymandered across the, uh, for sure. Yeah. But California right now,
01:09:39.200 it's overwhelmingly blue. So they would be giving up a two to one advantage for a one to one.
01:09:45.160 I mean, it would be interesting how, how math there's a, there's a complicated, uh, formula and
01:09:49.240 there's an Excel sheet that you can download actually kind of play around with it. I can get it
01:09:52.280 somewhere, but it's interesting to see where those seats would go because it would go based
01:09:56.460 on population. And, and so inevitably, like we're saying here, some of the States would,
01:10:00.580 would benefit there with blue States, but also red States. And it would be interesting to see
01:10:03.900 exactly how that laid out. But until we actually put in that formula, it'd be speculation. I don't
01:10:07.560 think it would be that bad of a deal for the Democrats. And it would, a lot of States would,
01:10:12.260 would benefit from it. They'd be cheering it.
01:10:14.820 We've had a lot of conversations about what could the catalyst of civil war be in this day and age
01:10:19.340 and slavery being this like moral inflection point, uh, clearly was a catalyst for civil war.
01:10:28.080 And we've, we've, uh, argued on Tim cast IRL, I should say I have along with some several others
01:10:32.080 that abortion could be that issue. And I'm not so sure right now, the general idea was abortion
01:10:37.020 is a constitutional personhood question. There is a disparity in the States between whether or not
01:10:44.400 a person has rights or dump or doesn't, or whether or not a baby is even a person. Uh, I, I don't know
01:10:51.120 how you argue that a human being at any stage is anything, but a human being. I think it's only
01:10:55.940 for political power that you'll get people on the left arguing otherwise, but therein lies the
01:11:00.000 problem. So actually, you know, when, when Roe v. Wade was overturned, my attitude was kind of like,
01:11:05.320 good, send to the States. It probably makes more sense. Decentralized power. Now I disagree.
01:11:09.180 You know, I've had several arguments from then. I'm like, no, actually I think I agreed
01:11:12.020 generally with Roe v. Wade, but not completely. And the issue is it should not be a state question
01:11:16.680 as to some, whether someone has personhood. I mean, think of like, think about the ramifications
01:11:21.180 of the federal government saying we will not determine who is a person or who, who isn't
01:11:26.600 giving the state, the right to say this person has, has rights and doesn't is, is insane. It should be
01:11:31.360 at the federal level. We know who is protected under the constitution and what restrictions the
01:11:35.520 government has as to how they violate those rights. I'm not so sure it's abortion anymore,
01:11:39.860 you know, but maybe what I was looking at is something like Colorado and Oklahoma,
01:11:46.700 Oklahoma's banned abortion outright. Colorado has unrestricted up to the point of birth.
01:11:50.020 And I'm like, man, that is a recipe for disaster. Someone who lives near that border.
01:11:54.780 You know, if someone, uh, we've already had some States say, if a woman plans to leave the state
01:11:58.980 for an abortion, it's a criminal conspiracy. So we may be getting to that point. Plus you've already
01:12:02.660 had violence against abortionists in the past and things like this. So there's certainly a risk
01:12:06.880 there. I wonder now if the issue is actually immigration, immigration being, uh, the catalyst
01:12:12.820 potential civil war, considering the extreme degree to which we're seeing the border crisis,
01:12:17.080 the degree to which we are seeing, uh, Democrat jurisdictions try to grant voting rights to
01:12:22.280 people who are not citizens. And what could happen if this country goes to war in itself
01:12:28.700 over the idea that non-citizens are actually full citizens. And so the question is personhood
01:12:35.220 and rights of people who are not full citizens and whether citizenship even matters.
01:12:39.380 Certainly. I think the Democrats, the military industrial complex and the powerful corporate
01:12:44.100 elites would love the idea of citizenship being erased. These corporations extend beyond borders.
01:12:49.660 They do not care for the protections of the United States. So certainly they would fund and be on
01:12:54.120 the side of California brings them all in. Texas is resisting it, but the Biden administration is all
01:13:01.060 for it. In the event, this crisis escalates to a point of conflict. You've got a lot of states that
01:13:07.680 could easily go to, uh, non-citizens and tell them fight on our behalf. And so there is a potential
01:13:13.280 catalyst of if, if they start giving, uh, overt voting rights, they've, they're doing this. Uh,
01:13:20.240 New York's stuck in the courts. Maryland has some areas where non-citizens have the right to vote
01:13:25.360 in certain elections. This is a recipe for disaster because there are people who are like, I've, you
01:13:31.200 know, I'll, I'll, I'll put it this way. The example I've used Gen Z, Gen Z asking why it is they can't
01:13:36.580 afford houses. They can't afford to rent apartments. Even they can't find jobs that pay at the same time.
01:13:42.100 Non-citizens are being brought in and given welfare cards. They're giving $3,000 debit cards. They're
01:13:46.920 being given luxury hotel rooms with their own bathroom and their own TV. Meanwhile, Gen Z is in,
01:13:51.820 is in a shoebox for 2000 bucks a month. They can barely afford, and there's no bathroom.
01:13:56.360 This comes to the point where there's going to be a lot of people being like my birthright's been
01:13:59.920 stripped from me. I won't accept that. You know, when you bring up three-fifths compromise and
01:14:04.580 disproportionate power, I think that is an issue that could lead to some type of violent escalation
01:14:11.100 because right now we are in an era where California has more power than they should over our president
01:14:17.200 and Congress, how we spend money when we go to war because they've broken the rules.
01:14:23.500 They have violated the social contract that we as people decide how our government is run.
01:14:28.940 California said, you know, we're just going to bring in a bunch of people who aren't even
01:14:32.640 citizens and then count them and get congressional seats to vote against you.
01:14:36.100 It sounds very much like what the South did with three-fifths compromise. And at a certain point,
01:14:40.380 people are going to say no.
01:14:41.500 So the immigration thing, I think, is spot on. I think that's exactly one of the issues in
01:14:47.140 clarifying what a citizen is and making sure that only citizens have American rights are
01:14:52.320 important. And we can go back and we look at the Texas Revolution, the annexation of Texas. How did
01:14:58.580 Texas come to be a state? Well, Mexico had fought in a war. It freed itself from the Spanish Empire.
01:15:04.040 It had all this new territory and it was difficult for them to manage. So they actually invited American
01:15:09.960 citizens to the Texas territory to settle the land. Well, the American citizens brought their
01:15:17.420 slaves with them and Mexico outlawed slavery. And so there was this conflict over it. And this is how
01:15:22.780 you get the Texas Revolution starting is you basically invited people into your country and they took over
01:15:29.520 your country because you couldn't manage it because there wasn't a strong government, a set of rules
01:15:36.220 for everybody to abide by and to enforce. And so, you know, that's exactly what we're looking at here.
01:15:42.840 You know, you've got the California thing is spot on. New York is the same way.
01:15:48.080 I was reading about someone, someone wrote on Twitter, California was reliably read until amnesty.
01:15:55.480 And I was like, is that true? Cause I was like in the eighties, you know, Ronald Reagan had this
01:15:59.240 amnesty thing in California and it is more complicated than that, but it's true.
01:16:04.960 What ended up happening was Ronald Reagan gives amnesty. What this does is it's not that many
01:16:10.360 people, but it created large communities of people with voting rights. However, their allegiance and
01:16:15.700 their ties were not to California or the United States. What ends up happening is maybe half
01:16:21.560 generation later in the nineties, Republicans and more conservative leaning individuals just in
01:16:26.440 general, we're like, we've got too many non-citizens and they're getting access to public
01:16:30.760 benefits. We can't do that. I can't be paying taxes for someone who doesn't, who doesn't contribute.
01:16:35.980 So they passed a bill. Non-citizens will not get access to public welfare systems.
01:16:42.340 There was a revolt, a political revolt among people who had family members who are not citizens,
01:16:47.840 but they were, and they would not tolerate this for, for a lot of, it's not just about amnesty.
01:16:54.020 That's why I say it's more complicated, but it's, it's mostly true, but you have people who come to
01:16:57.960 the country illegally are allowed to stay, have kids. Those kids are citizens. And then the government
01:17:01.920 says, we are not going to give benefits to non-citizens. Well, that kid goes, my parents
01:17:05.860 aren't citizens. Heck no. And so what happens? A political upheaval in favor of those who are not
01:17:12.920 citizens. This turned the state blue forever. What, what do you like? I, I, it's a very simple
01:17:19.900 proposition. What do you think happens when you, you, you live in a house with your buddies and you
01:17:26.820 invite people in who are completely opposed to your worldview? I always like doing these simple
01:17:33.040 analogies, but let's just, you know, you live with your roommate and you both absolutely love
01:17:36.380 spaghetti. And every Thursday it's, it's family day or whatever. And you guys order out and spaghetti
01:17:42.240 Italian is brought over. Sometimes eggplant Parmesan, sometimes it's chicken Parmesan, but
01:17:46.460 you love it. Then you invite someone who hates it and only wants to eat broccoli. Okay. Well now you've
01:17:52.420 got one vote for broccoli, two votes for spaghetti. Then that person brings their friend in. Now it's
01:17:58.340 two, now it's 50, 50. The third person who comes in, you'll never eat spaghetti again. And so with the
01:18:03.500 issue of immigration right now, Democrats don't care about the core of this country,
01:18:07.780 our values, our views, what we want to leave for our kids. They care about getting power today.
01:18:12.560 And it's certainly true of a lot of Republicans. And I'm not trying to discount Republicans like,
01:18:17.020 you know, the neocons and the industrialists of 15, 20 years ago who wanted cheap labor for their
01:18:21.620 factories. That's true too. Many of those guys were the ones who started this, but you bring in
01:18:27.300 people, you have the average American, let's say living in the city of the suburbs, they have kids.
01:18:32.280 What are they thinking about? Oh man, I used to love going down to the old, uh, the old candy shop
01:18:37.680 on third and main and whatever. And my dad brought me there and I want to bring my kids there. And
01:18:42.040 then one day they go there and it's gone. It's not there anymore. They're upset. The things that I
01:18:46.740 thought were nice that I want to give to my kids aren't there anymore. As more and more people who come
01:18:51.200 in don't know or care about the old candy shop on main street. They're not evil people. They just
01:18:57.040 don't care. So eventually what happens is you'll get an ordinance, you know, should we, uh, help
01:19:03.480 support the businesses and main street with this provision that would revitalize the area. And they
01:19:07.660 say, we don't care who cares about a candy shop. And you say, I do. I want my kids to experience
01:19:12.780 that. Sorry, you're outvoted. Then you get, then, then it's really, really simple, especially with
01:19:17.400 remittances. More and more people come who aren't from here. They're given amnesty or work permits or
01:19:22.380 whatever. And all of a sudden the money they make in your small town is being sent to a different
01:19:27.200 country. And so the money you need to come into your city, to expand, to grow and to maintain
01:19:33.220 is gone. These are, these are issues that I think are obvious and Democrats are fomenting because they
01:19:39.860 don't care. But the average person who's trying to preserve what they love, they're going to lose
01:19:45.340 out on that. And eventually someone's going to get angry, depending how serious it gets, it could lead
01:19:49.220 to fighting secession. Who knows? I mean, I think it's beyond secession. California should be kicked
01:19:54.680 out. The, the, uh, the reality is California should not have the electoral college votes or the
01:20:01.680 congressional seats. It does. The non-citizens should not have representation for the rest of us.
01:20:05.640 I should not have to have to, my, my vote as a, as an individual is countered in Congress by illegal
01:20:12.900 immigrants. Get ready for Las Vegas style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino
01:20:20.280 games at your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics
01:20:25.760 like MGM Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette. With our ever
01:20:32.100 growing library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games, and signature BetMGM
01:20:38.020 service, there's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you.
01:20:42.900 Then with BetMGM Casino, download the BetMGM Casino app today. BetMGM and GameSense remind
01:20:49.900 you to play responsibly. BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play
01:20:55.380 responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
01:20:59.360 please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates
01:21:08.240 pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:21:11.240 When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
01:21:17.820 Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care about you.
01:21:23.660 Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't remember saying that part.
01:21:31.840 Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big on care.
01:21:37.500 Did I mention that we care?
01:21:41.740 So what did my parents fight for? What did, you know, my grandfather fighting in World War II or
01:21:47.980 whatever. To give me what? So that Democrats could give away everything he fought for and
01:21:53.400 built for a better future. If we are entering a society that does not care to protect the trees
01:22:03.040 for whom shade, our ancestors knew they would never sit beneath. If they won't protect that,
01:22:09.120 then a society will grow weak. I see conflict being an inevitability based on those factors.
01:22:15.580 That's why I think immigration could be a large catalyst for the next fight and a large fighting
01:22:22.380 body and population is being brought into the country who would defend. And Democrats can easily
01:22:26.980 go to a non-citizen and say, do you want to stay here? Do you want a welfare card? Do you want a
01:22:30.400 luxury hotel? Okay, you're fighting. And they're going to say, okay. Now what? I don't know. What do
01:22:36.940 you guys think? I mean, I think that it should be addressed in the constitution. I think we need
01:22:40.500 a federal convention. We need to write several constitutional amendments to solve these
01:22:45.200 problems that go back all the way to the founding and then through the Gilded Age and the Progressive
01:22:50.860 Era, specifically addressing the citizenship question of who gets counted for purposes of
01:22:58.440 apportionment is really, really important. You're right. And I think that's a doorway to civil war.
01:23:02.920 You know why? California, congressional Democrat will never support that because what, 7% of their
01:23:10.380 district is non-citizens, illegal immigrants, and their kids are going to be like, if you vote for
01:23:16.300 that, we'll vote against you and you'll lose. So the more power they gain from non-citizens,
01:23:21.660 the more incentive and pressure they have to continually support dissolving this country.
01:23:27.040 What if you proposed a three-fifths compromise where you counted non-citizens as three-fifths for
01:23:35.240 purposes of apportionment, knowing that you have to actually create a feasible immigration system
01:23:43.560 before you do this? And because you know that those people are going to be here, you know that
01:23:47.220 they're going to have children who are going to be full citizens, and it gives them a little bit of
01:23:50.860 power in their government that they're living in, and you're able to appropriately know the amount
01:23:56.820 of people in your country for services and all those different things.
01:24:00.320 This, this, do you look at the path we're going down?
01:24:02.420 I got to disagree with that because, you know what, you give the left an inch and they take
01:24:06.160 a mile, and if you legitimize three-fifths vote for an illegal immigrant, they're going to use
01:24:11.520 that as a basis for a lawsuit in the future to go full.
01:24:14.160 He's saying take away two-fifths of their potential.
01:24:17.600 They should have zero. They should have zero representation.
01:24:20.080 Yes, but right now they have one.
01:24:21.160 So by giving them two or three-fifths or whatever the fraction is, you're legitimizing a portion
01:24:25.460 of it, which is then going to be used as groundwork for them to go to court later and say
01:24:29.380 this is a human rights issue. They're a full person. They should be granted full representation.
01:24:34.080 Give them nothing because if you give them an inch, they take a mile.
01:24:36.780 It's a civil rights issue that I, an American citizen, cannot speak with my representative
01:24:43.140 because my representative represents over 756,000 people, and they can't actually do their job.
01:24:50.920 I know. I'm saying that the illegal immigrants shouldn't have any representation.
01:24:54.740 I agree. I agree. But let's pause right there.
01:24:56.240 Shouldn't be counted.
01:24:57.220 How about this? Can we get, look, if we got 100 people to start filing lawsuits based on
01:25:03.020 that argument, that's a good argument. My ability to speak with my representative has
01:25:07.240 been diminished because my representative is spending too much time talking to people who
01:25:10.620 aren't even citizens. Make the Supreme Court answer that. And that could ultimately end up
01:25:14.960 with a ruling that congressional representatives cannot allocate time and representation to people
01:25:19.800 who are not citizens of this country.
01:25:21.080 Yeah. And then California will lose a number of seats, not just one every 10 years because
01:25:24.540 of Gavin Newsom's policies. Like they're already losing because the population lost, despite
01:25:28.260 the fact that illegal immigration to California is surging. They're still losing seats in Congress.
01:25:32.660 Okay. This is something we've got to do right now.
01:25:34.620 Yeah. They're still losing seats in Congress, even though they have all these illegal immigrants
01:25:37.860 coming to California. But if we were able to be successful with that type of lawsuit,
01:25:41.800 California's representation would be what, around 40 in the House?
01:25:44.820 Well, there's varying estimates. Some very immigration critical, I'll call it, organizations
01:25:50.040 say they only get one extra seat. And that's surprising to me because, you know, some of
01:25:54.300 these organizations are like, no more immigration moratorium. And they said one, but there's Republicans
01:25:58.680 in Congress who have said it could be as high as seven. So how about we get some people to file
01:26:05.460 a lawsuit against, I guess the lawsuit would be against your representative? That'd be interesting.
01:26:15.160 Well, you know what I could add to this is that I just went through a very long legal immigration
01:26:19.900 process for my wife, who's from Russia. And we spent 18 months going through the process.
01:26:26.000 And it was very difficult for us to get in contact with our congressional representatives because of the
01:26:30.200 backlog of all the case work that their case officers were dealing with, with regard to immigration and
01:26:37.020 illegal immigrants. And so we weren't able to get in contact. I personally wasn't able to get in contact
01:26:40.860 with my representative, like you're talking about, specifically because of this issue. And I'm assuming
01:26:46.540 I'm not the only American citizen who has sponsored a visa for his foreign wife, or vice versa, foreign
01:26:51.680 husband, who hasn't been able to reach their congressional representatives because they're so backlogged dealing
01:26:56.160 with so many cases from everybody from everywhere. And so, and what happens in a system where it's
01:27:03.080 overwhelmed and there aren't enough people to, because remember your congressional representative
01:27:07.840 is supposed to be your voice. It's supposed to be the administrator of the government, the legislator,
01:27:12.780 right? And so what happens in a country where you have this backlog and this issue where the
01:27:17.340 administrators are overworked? Well, it leans in favor with people who have connections and money,
01:27:22.700 right? So again, regular Americans. And for the most part, what I would say is American families
01:27:28.920 are left out because, you know, that's the one thing that I've learned since getting into politics
01:27:33.780 is it is not designed for people with children to be involved. You just kind of have to show up all
01:27:38.960 the time to have any sort of a right or a voice in the conversation. And if you have to pick your kids
01:27:44.440 up to school or drop them off at school or have to do homework with them, you don't have the time to
01:27:48.140 show up at all these random events that they put together. This is the fascinating thing.
01:27:51.420 Uh, yesterday before the show on Tim Kessler-L, Ian, he likes to advocate for this thing. He calls
01:27:57.160 the fourth branch of government, an idea that was, uh, I don't know if it was originally from,
01:28:02.220 um, uh, Mike Gravel, but Mike Gravel was a proponent of it. This idea that you have a democratic
01:28:09.340 system. So you have your representatives in Congress, but then the people themselves could
01:28:13.780 also, uh, like draft bills to be presented and vote on whether they make it forward. I said, uh,
01:28:18.980 the idea of a fourth branch of government comprised of the people who go out and vote on all these
01:28:23.200 things is a tremendously bad idea because it favors the unemployed. And so that means government
01:28:27.300 will skew towards benefits for the unemployed, which is currently already true. As you're
01:28:32.120 mentioning with kids, it is easier for someone with no kids to participate in politics than someone
01:28:37.040 with kids. Therefore, throughout the past, uh, therefore over the past several generations,
01:28:41.100 laws have skewed skewed to benefit mostly people who don't have kids.
01:28:44.520 Same thing is true for the unemployed. That's why we see the expansion of welfare benefits.
01:28:49.740 That's a problem for a system that will eventually lead to its collapse. So, you know,
01:28:53.720 what's the answer to that?
01:28:54.940 I mean, the answer is decentralizing the power, uncapping the house. It's absolutely uncapping
01:28:59.080 the house. No, everybody, everybody that's alive today doesn't understand how the system's
01:29:04.100 supposed to work because they've never actually lived in it. It's always been this concentrated power
01:29:08.400 and, you know, all of the different, you know, events that have taken place. It's kind of worked
01:29:15.100 in our favor a little bit. I mean, we were at an advantage to have a concentrated power system during
01:29:19.240 World War II to be able to fight against, uh, other sovereign powers. But, you know, at the end of the
01:29:23.960 day, it hurts American families. It hurts people that really just want to live their lives and build
01:29:31.340 their communities. Um, and it gives advantage to people that, you know, want power.
01:29:37.180 I find that an interesting point about this American families thing. Do you remember
01:29:40.640 the representative or politician, whoever it was, he recently, uh, said the quiet part out loud when
01:29:47.080 he said that the reason that they want to bring the illegal immigrants into the country is because
01:29:49.940 of population decline or the threat of population decline. Well, if we wanted to address population
01:29:54.300 decline, then why not adjust our laws and regulations to support American families who,
01:29:59.160 as you're saying, are not able to participate in the system?
01:30:01.640 I 100% agree. I mean, we want to have more kids, but I can't afford to have more kids.
01:30:05.600 Like it's, it's a big deal in my marriage with my wife. The fact that she would love to have
01:30:10.500 another child and I have to be the guy that goes, well, we can't feed, we can't feed another
01:30:14.580 child.
01:30:15.120 So instead of having more American children, natural born citizens in this country, they're
01:30:18.660 going to bring in illegal immigrants.
01:30:19.720 And they're going to give them a $3,000 and they're going to pay for their healthcare and
01:30:23.040 they're going to do all those things that I have to pay for.
01:30:24.800 And your taxes have paid for and subsidized. Exactly.
01:30:27.140 This is why.
01:30:27.880 And you lose your national identity that way too. And you lose your culture and your traditions.
01:30:30.960 And if the, is it really interesting because, uh, the American nationalist types or whatever
01:30:39.360 you want to call it are being opposed by internationalist open borders advocates, which
01:30:44.640 have basically opened our borders. It's going to be really interesting. If this does devolve
01:30:49.480 into a civil conflict, who wins? I can certainly see a historical record a hundred years from now
01:30:55.280 that says there were people in this country, politicians who believed that you didn't have
01:31:02.720 rights because you weren't granted a piece of paper. How insane is that? No, if you're a human
01:31:07.920 being and you were here on the soil, you are entitled to full rights and benefits of anyone else
01:31:12.320 who's on the soil. Wow. How insane citizenship. What an evil thing. I certainly think there are
01:31:18.320 powerful elements within corporations. And as I mentioned, who would love to see the idea of
01:31:22.980 citizenship abolished worldwide. And it's not necessarily about one world governance because
01:31:27.820 each, each region could have its own governance, but it would be freedom of movement for anyone
01:31:32.860 on the planet to any place they wanted to go without restriction. You would just be subject
01:31:36.660 to the rules within when you were there. This would mean that your home will cease to exist.
01:31:43.760 The, uh, the place you grew up and the things that you liked won't be there anymore.
01:31:47.700 And the argument from the left is so what, who cares? And the argument from the right is
01:31:51.000 typically like, but I like the things that I grew up with, you know? And I think this,
01:31:54.920 this is that you can look at Jonathan Knight's moral foundations and actually see, uh, let me,
01:31:59.160 let me pull up the moral foundations actually. Cause I want to know which one, uh, this would fall
01:32:05.180 under. Moral foundations theory. Uh, okay. You have care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity.
01:32:13.040 There are a few others that have been, um, proposed equality, proportionality, liberty, honor,
01:32:17.240 ownership, but I believe the, the originals care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity.
01:32:22.780 I wonder, you know, they ended up adding Liberty as a sixth moral foundation because they found
01:32:28.080 there were some people who had no moral foundations at all. The only thing they cared about was,
01:32:30.920 am I free to do what I want? You'd be free to do what you want. But, uh, purity, I think has to do
01:32:36.040 with disgust and contamination. I think purity is the moral foundation that, uh, the right has the
01:32:42.440 left certainly does not. The left only has care and fairness. Typically they don't care about purity.
01:32:47.240 So in the, in the, if you take the moral foundations test, which I recommend everybody does,
01:32:50.660 it's really fun. Some of these questions are horrifying. One of them is actually, let me,
01:32:55.800 let me see if I can find the actual, uh, the actual test itself to give you an example.
01:33:00.000 Cause, uh, we can show it. Mole foundations test. I'm typoing. Here we go. IDR labs. Uh,
01:33:06.660 here's an example of one of the moral foundations questions. Oh, it's, it's, it's actually the
01:33:10.360 question that I was looking for. This is fantastic. Hannah inherited an old flag of her country
01:33:14.740 from her father, but has never used it. One day when Hannah is cleaning the house,
01:33:18.800 she discovers that she is out of rags. So she uses the flag as a rag to clean the house.
01:33:23.760 And there's varying degrees of, is it not okay? Kind of okay. No, not really. Okay.
01:33:29.160 To it's totally fine. I gotta be honest. I am filled with a violent rage at the thought of someone
01:33:34.100 taking a flag of their country and using it as a rag. That fills me with a deep, violent passion.
01:33:42.700 You know, to put it simply, if I saw somebody grab an American flag, like I'll put it this way.
01:33:47.960 If you bought your own American flag from a grocery store and get ready for a Las Vegas style action
01:33:52.880 of bet. MGM, the king of online casinos, enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same
01:33:58.920 Vegas strip excitement. MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM grand millions or popular
01:34:04.960 games like blackjack, baccarat and roulette with our ever-growing library of digital slot games,
01:34:11.180 a large selection of online table games and signature bet. MGM service.
01:34:15.280 There's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with
01:34:20.100 bet. MGM casino. Download the bet. MGM casino app today.
01:34:25.240 Bet. MGM and game sense remind you to play responsibly bet. MGM.com for T's and C's 19 plus
01:34:30.140 to wager Ontario only please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your
01:34:34.500 gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1 8 6 6 5 3 1 2 6 0 0 to speak
01:34:42.200 to an advisor free of charge. Bet. MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming
01:34:46.860 Ontario. When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf
01:34:53.920 of Desjardins Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really
01:34:59.280 care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird. I don't remember saying that
01:35:07.640 part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance. That's really big on care. Did I
01:35:14.880 mention that we care?
01:35:15.640 Desecrated or whatever. I don't like it, but it's yours. I guess if someone took a like actual
01:35:25.880 aged American flag that was literally used in any context, any context flown at a school or
01:35:30.600 whatever, and they tried to use as a rag, I would physically stop them. I would, I would, I would,
01:35:35.300 I would not, I'm not saying I would harm them. I would be like, you are not going to do that.
01:35:39.140 That's like, I don't know. I don't like the idea and I can go into great details to why,
01:35:43.880 but this is something the right has. The left typically does not not always, but typically
01:35:47.460 doesn't think about what that means for a country. I see the American flag. I see the blood, sweat,
01:35:54.580 and tears, the sacrifice of blood and treasure for all that came before us. We tried to preserve this
01:35:58.500 to give a, to create a better life for their children to simply to, to, to, to keep it simple.
01:36:04.100 So the American flag to me represents the tree that was planted that our ancestors knew they
01:36:10.640 would never get to sit beneath. And as the saying goes, society grows great. When people plant trees
01:36:15.860 whose shade, they know they were not, they will never sit beneath for the left. They don't care
01:36:19.340 at all. They will chop that tree down so they can make tables and chairs. And then we have no shade.
01:36:24.980 And I think that leads to a detriment of, it leads to suffering. That's why I'm simply put like,
01:36:29.980 do not desecrate the flag. It is a reminder. It is the idea that must be preserved.
01:36:34.100 So we understand where we come from for those that don't remember the past,
01:36:37.420 they're doomed to repeat it. If the left doesn't care about this, that means you will have city
01:36:45.740 center. Uh, Hey, how about a community center? You grew up there, you played basketball,
01:36:53.560 you played hockey, your friends were there, you had bake sales, you had, um, prom or whatever.
01:37:00.000 And you're like, this was a wholesome, fun moment. That was, it was, um, it was for, for me,
01:37:08.400 a major part of my development. And I want my kids to share that. I want them to experience these good,
01:37:13.760 positive things that led me to be a good moral person, to have memories that I would never,
01:37:17.840 never want to forget. And then one day you show up and the police have taken over the building and
01:37:22.740 they've put a bunch of illegal immigrants in it, which is what they're doing now. I think it's in
01:37:25.820 Massachusetts. This is what the left will do to you. They don't care about the good memories you
01:37:31.200 have and the things that helped you become a good person. Literally don't care. That's a
01:37:35.300 terrifying prospect for what's going to happen to this country.
01:37:37.820 Well, they have an agenda of radical social transformation that they understand Americans
01:37:42.580 who are born in this country will never accept. And so that's why they need to import these
01:37:46.780 foreigners to come to the country to eventually gain citizenship and then the right to vote so they
01:37:51.740 can bring about this radical social transformation. And so you're going to lose your identity. You're
01:37:56.980 going to lose your country. I know Donald Trump says, if you don't have a border, you don't have
01:38:01.240 a country. If you don't have an identity, you don't preserve and protect your identity and your
01:38:04.980 culture. You also don't have the same country that you were born into. And so I think it's really
01:38:09.020 important to not only protect our borders from the invasion of illegal immigrants coming into the
01:38:13.460 country, but also to preserve our culture and our traditions and our history.
01:38:17.440 Yeah. I mean, I agree with a lot of that. I think what it's important to understand in the context
01:38:24.720 of what you just described is that, yes, there are a portion of that power structure that feels
01:38:30.460 and acts the way that you do. But a lot of them, they look at their idealist. They want everybody
01:38:36.420 to have the same things that they have. And they see this as a way to do that. They don't necessarily
01:38:41.860 see the repercussions of their actions. They're part of the powerless that empowers the majority
01:38:47.380 power in this circumstance. And they're kind of just misled because this isn't the way to solve
01:38:53.200 those problems. This is the way to consolidate power. If you actually wanted to solve those
01:38:57.720 problems, it's to debate these issues in Congress, to write actual immigration policy, to create a real
01:39:04.160 border with real security that you can actually stop bad people from getting in and also allow good
01:39:10.100 people to come in and work in your country. Because we do have a population issue. And if you want to be
01:39:15.400 a strong sovereign nation, you need to have a strong population. It helps the economy. It helps
01:39:20.480 the communities. It helps everything. And so there is a balance to be had here. And our leaders just
01:39:26.820 don't want to talk about it. They just want to manipulate things to their side of the aisle so
01:39:31.500 they can be either in the majority or the minority.
01:39:33.740 Yeah. And it goes with what you were saying before about, I think Tim was talking about how the
01:39:39.400 Democrats act in lockstep with one another because they're on a war footing against this country in
01:39:45.520 my view. And so they're going to vote together as a single block. They don't ever have, we never see
01:39:50.220 in the news how, like you were saying, a couple of Democrats voted with the Republicans, right? You
01:39:54.240 always see the other way around. The Republicans are giving way to the Democrats to do something.
01:39:57.180 And that's because they have this agenda of radical social transformation that they are
01:40:02.080 behind. And they don't like the history and the culture and the traditional values of this country
01:40:08.440 and its founding. It's why these symbols don't matter to them. That's why they're willing to
01:40:11.820 burn them or step on them, use them as a rag. For example, it doesn't matter to them. They don't
01:40:16.660 want that. They remove these statues from our parks because they want to erase history, not to
01:40:20.460 restore and to protect our history. And so we're talking about losing your country, not just because
01:40:25.180 you're being invaded by illegal immigrants, but because the people within our own government
01:40:29.220 want to erase our history and don't respect our culture and our traditions.
01:40:33.600 I think what that is, is insecurity. Like, I think it's just a bunch of insecure leaders that are,
01:40:38.540 they look back at mistakes that we've made in the past. They don't understand them and they're ashamed.
01:40:43.540 And there's really no reason to be ashamed at the decisions that people have made in the past.
01:40:48.100 Our job of living in the president is to learn from them and to grow from them and teach our
01:40:53.100 children how to do better. We shouldn't look back and feel that way about ourselves.
01:40:57.680 Yeah. And like Vivek says, you know, these people, they need some kind of cause to coalesce around and
01:41:04.440 they don't know what that is. And so they want to take down statues because it makes them feel good
01:41:08.240 that the person that's represented in that statue, for example, Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner.
01:41:12.980 So it makes them feel good about themselves that they did something against slavery, because that
01:41:16.640 would be a noble thing to do, to stand up against slavery and do something about slavery. But
01:41:19.580 slavery is abolished in this country. So we don't need to have a campaign against slavery anymore.
01:41:24.160 So they are coalescing around these kind of fake pseudo campaigns because it makes them feel good
01:41:29.420 inside, but it really is detrimental to the country because we're losing our culture and we're losing
01:41:33.260 our traditions and our history because of it. I can't remember who said it, but they said this
01:41:37.120 country is a supply and demand problem when it comes to racism. And that largely in the 90s and early
01:41:42.920 2000s, you saw whether it was comedians or just the average person on the street, right? Things were pretty good.
01:41:48.960 And now that we've gotten so far and up until like, I'd say 2016, that racism has become such a big
01:41:57.600 thing now, right? People aren't being racist to each other when they walk on the street now, but that
01:42:01.480 statue that's been in the park for a hundred years, oh, I'm oppressed. It's hurting who I am as a
01:42:08.040 person. And I can't remember who said it, but it's true that they have nothing to rally behind. So
01:42:13.540 they're kind of fabricating things.
01:42:15.180 And sometimes it's not even them that are offended. They're offended on behalf of other
01:42:19.180 people who themselves are not offended by it. I mean, look at the situation with the
01:42:23.560 Washington football team, the commanders now, right?
01:42:27.600 That's a terrible name.
01:42:28.540 Isn't there, I think I heard that there are Native American groups that want to return the name of
01:42:33.660 the Redskins to that team. They're not the ones offended, but the people who got the NFL or the
01:42:38.660 football team to change their names are the ones who were offended on behalf of people who
01:42:41.600 themselves are not offended. So they're just looking for a campaign, looking for a cause to
01:42:46.320 throwing things at the wall to see what, what sticks in it. And it's, it's hurting the country
01:42:50.180 because everyone gets divided because of it.
01:42:52.700 So while you guys are talking, I took the moral foundations test. I am a Liberty conservative.
01:42:57.280 A Liberty conservative.
01:42:58.640 It's probably, probably a bit too strong to say it says my strongest moral foundation is Liberty,
01:43:03.040 but I'm closest to that of conservative. And it's actually really simple to break down.
01:43:06.880 First, I would say it doesn't mean I'm a conservative. I think it actually probably
01:43:10.960 means I'm more libertarian than anything. But, uh, if you take a look at the moral foundations
01:43:15.460 test, we pull this up, give you a general understanding. So the blue graph from the,
01:43:20.420 uh, test is left liberal. The red bar is conservative and the yellow is libertarian.
01:43:26.720 Green is me. So if you look at care and fairness, you can see that, uh, left liberals on average have
01:43:31.840 very high care and fairness, loyalty, authority, purity, extremely low. And Liberty is, is a bit
01:43:37.960 balanced. Conservatives have care and fairness at about 60% loyalty, about the same authority,
01:43:43.560 about the same purity, about the same and Liberty, a little bit high. So, uh, when you look at my
01:43:48.240 moral foundations, they're actually very close to your average conservative, except I'm a little
01:43:53.060 bit more libertarian, which I think makes sense. Cause I, I, I talk about that quite a bit. And if you
01:43:57.040 take a look at the guests that we tend to have, that's the case, this is actually worrying to me.
01:44:02.540 The idea that liberals don't care much for loyalty, authority, or purity. And it's not
01:44:07.580 surprising when you take a look at their politics. This, I think really does explain the divide
01:44:13.460 politically in this country very, very much so. And it doesn't, doesn't a way that's outside the
01:44:18.000 context of policy. You could care about authority or not authority and be pro or anti-police.
01:44:24.020 You could, you could have, you know, conservatives tend to be back the blue, right? But you could be
01:44:28.420 totally in support of police while condemning certain police actions and being an advocate
01:44:32.360 for police reform. That being said, what scares me the most is purity. The left liberals have almost
01:44:40.120 none and purity is rooted in avoiding disease and like disgusting food and refuse. So take a look at
01:44:50.500 our cities and the crime and the look at San Francisco. San Francisco is exactly, exactly what
01:44:56.200 you get. You get poop all over the streets, just, just littered everywhere. So I think I'm a, I love
01:45:03.640 this moral foundations test. It's usually the, every time I do it, it's about the exact same, but
01:45:09.560 sometimes it'll say I'm more, uh, it'll say I'm a liberal or left leaning liberal or whatever, even
01:45:14.320 though it's like, I'm still always way more for purity. And, uh, I'm surprised the authority
01:45:20.200 was as high as it was to be completely honest, that of an average conservative that could be due
01:45:24.360 to, uh, changes in my views over the past few, uh, years due to what we're witnessing happening
01:45:29.520 to this country. And perhaps the realization that if we don't have some kind of order, you get nothing
01:45:36.520 in this country just falls apart. I don't know. What do you guys think you'd land? Like in terms of,
01:45:42.240 I feel I'd probably land pretty similar to you. I consider myself like a conservative progressive.
01:45:47.680 Um, I want to preserve the things that deserve to be preserved, but I want to progress society
01:45:52.620 forward to share, share the, you know, that with everyone else. What's interesting is, uh, how similar
01:45:59.240 libertarians and liberals are to each other, but, uh, they just strongly believe in Liberty. Some of the
01:46:04.200 questions on this thing, holy crap, I don't want to read, but I'll read them anyway. Um, one of the
01:46:10.820 questions is a man orders a lifelike sex doll designed to be his niece. Right. And I'm like,
01:46:17.660 as not okay as not okay can be, but how are you supposed to perceive these questions? Are you
01:46:23.760 supposed to put yourself in those shoes and say, this is not okay. Are you supposed to be like, okay,
01:46:27.880 well that's somebody else. I don't have to think about it. Well, the interesting thing about it is,
01:46:32.060 um, it's actually difficult to interpret what it means to be okay or not. Okay. I'm trying to see
01:46:38.660 if I can trigger it again. Cause it's just, is there a way to like retake the test? I don't know.
01:46:43.720 Uh, some of the questions it's like, it asks you if it's okay or not, but what does that mean? Is it
01:46:49.200 okay? Like it's not a yes or no, yes or no question. One of them, you know, it's like, uh, a woman asks a
01:46:55.740 guy in a date and he says, why would I date someone who looks like an overweight bulldog?
01:46:58.880 Is that okay or not? Okay. Well, what does it mean by okay or not? Okay. Are you saying should
01:47:03.320 this be allowed? Or are you saying that guy's a dare? Get ready for a Las Vegas style action of
01:47:08.240 bad MGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas strip
01:47:14.680 excitement. MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM grand millions or popular games like
01:47:20.620 blackjack, baccarat and roulette with our ever growing library of digital slot games,
01:47:26.100 alert selection of online table games and signature bet MGM service. There's no better
01:47:31.740 way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with bet MGM casino.
01:47:37.300 Download the bet MGM casino app today. Bet MGM and game sense remind you to play responsibly
01:47:42.740 betmgm.com for T's and C's 19 plus to wager Ontario only please play responsibly. If you have questions
01:47:48.740 or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at
01:47:53.360 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. Bet MGM operates pursuant to an operating
01:48:01.020 agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:48:03.960 When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops.
01:48:08.080 So on behalf of Desjardins Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell
01:48:13.000 our clients that we really care about you.
01:48:17.500 Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs.
01:48:20.600 Weird. I don't remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance
01:48:26.700 that's really big on care. Did I mention that we care?
01:48:33.700 Because for me, I'm like, that's not okay. Yeah, but I think it should be totally legal.
01:48:37.220 And I would laugh if I heard someone say it. You know what I mean? I'm saying like,
01:48:41.160 I would not advocate someone do that. You probably shouldn't. But if someone did, I would laugh.
01:48:44.340 So what does that mean? Is it okay or is it not okay? I don't know. How do you answer that question?
01:48:49.300 Some of them are good. Anyway, building off of this in terms of like these moral foundations,
01:48:56.500 what's interesting to me is the geographical polarization we've been seeing. And you mentioned
01:49:02.360 with Gavin Newsom, you've got this, you know, decrease in population. I'm just wondering like,
01:49:07.820 what happens? I was saying Pacifica or whatever would starve to death. You know, maybe that's
01:49:13.320 unfair. They would eat each other to death first. So they'd be well fed, but, you know, consuming
01:49:18.240 human flesh or something because, you know, people wouldn't want to die. But I'm curious, like,
01:49:22.580 what happens when you take this, this polarization we're seeing in the United States is clearly,
01:49:29.420 you know, you look at this moral foundations test, you can see some people care about like the
01:49:32.920 sanctity and purity of what this nation is and represents and what it can be. Some people don't care
01:49:36.920 at all. What will these two distinct bodies look like? You know what I mean? Like, what will they
01:49:42.820 be fighting for? And why would they be fighting? And what would that result in? Like, imagine you
01:49:47.780 took every conservative and put them in one place. We're going to have American flags everywhere.
01:49:52.120 Is it going to look like World War II Italy or something? Or is it going to look like 1950s America
01:49:58.300 is the left? What's that? What's that going to look like? Like, what does this become?
01:50:03.120 Well, I think that the left really thinks that they can achieve like this. I use this
01:50:06.820 word utopia multiple times. And I think that their, their vision is, is based on a future where
01:50:12.400 they think they can achieve this utopia. And many societies in the past have always, or not always,
01:50:17.860 but many societies in the past have pursued this idea of utopian and always fails because utopia
01:50:21.800 is itself unachievable. Well, I don't know if I agree. I think the default left liberal probably wants
01:50:30.720 a utopia, but is in no way politically engaged or informed in any, in any way, or even trying to
01:50:36.260 bring it about. Then you have powerful elites on the Democrat side or the progressive side who know
01:50:43.500 you'll never have a utopia, but no, they can exploit stupid people for personal gain. And then on the
01:50:50.520 right, you have everyone arguing with each other over the right way to do things.
01:50:53.440 Yeah. I mean, I agree. I don't think that there's something they can achieve and that
01:50:56.420 they're not going to be motivated to do it, but that's, I think it's in their mind. And a lot of
01:51:01.180 people on the left, we call them a keyboard warriors. They're, they're activists online,
01:51:06.240 but they don't actually want to go out and do something. That's one of the, by the way,
01:51:08.780 one of the problems we had with Cal exit was a lot of support for it online, a lot of support for it,
01:51:12.980 even in the polls. But when you're getting people to go out and do something for it,
01:51:15.740 they don't want to. Well, it's, it's, it's, it's the right. That is the keyboard warriors.
01:51:18.900 I've seen it. Oh, I'm well from California. I've seen it on the left too, with how the far left
01:51:23.640 goes outside and burns things down. Is that activism? Well, I mean, it's active. It is
01:51:29.740 active. I'm talking about within the parameters of, of legal activism. I mean, the left, yeah,
01:51:35.880 they go out and burn things down, but just, just, we don't need to talk about legal activism. I mean,
01:51:40.420 it's just fervor, passion or whatever, but they're just, they're more organized. I mean,
01:51:45.280 at the end of the day, like when I, when I, I've knocked doors for Republican candidates and
01:51:49.760 Democratic candidates, when you show up to knock doors for a Republican candidate, you it's show
01:51:54.560 up at nine, the person with the literature is there at nine 15. Um, there's supposed to be coffee
01:51:58.640 and donuts. There's no coffee and donuts. All the literature are scattered in the back of a trunk.
01:52:02.360 They say, here's your pile. Here's, you have to set you up on the app and you're out the door at 10.
01:52:06.880 When you show up to knock at doors for the, for the Democrats, your literature is pre-packaged,
01:52:12.480 counted out for each door that you're going to knock. Your app is already set up and you get
01:52:16.560 there at nine and you're out the door at nine Oh five. Okay. Oh yeah. It's just a more efficient
01:52:20.240 way of getting things done. Well, I used to work for, uh, when I did nonprofit fundraising,
01:52:24.240 various organizations that were for Democrat or progressive causes, environmentalism,
01:52:27.920 things like that. And I ultimately stopped because they're liars, but, uh, yeah, you walk in,
01:52:32.400 they hand you a binder. It's got everything you need, signup forms, postcards, and it's fascinating.
01:52:38.560 You know, you'll, you'll get some 20 year old kid who has no idea about anything, but they're told,
01:52:45.680 don't worry. This is how you do good. And they go, okay, I guess. And then you get a postcard
01:52:48.800 and the postcard says, dear Senator, you know, what's his face. Here's what we think. Here's
01:52:54.080 how we think it. Here's what we want you to do. They say, go out and fill out 10 of these. Every
01:52:57.920 time you go out, they're not mandatory, but we try to get these done. And then what happens,
01:53:02.000 they get 50,000 of these postcards and mail them all at once and massive garbage bags full of,
01:53:10.720 you know, these postcards land in a Senator's office. And he's like, what is this? And they're
01:53:14.800 like, take a look. And it's all of these people saying, we do not want fracking. And he's like,
01:53:20.160 okay, no fracking. It is. Guess what? The people who asked other people to fill those cards have no
01:53:27.440 idea what the card said. And the people who filled it out don't care either. But the Senator,
01:53:31.760 the Congressman, they believe it. They buy it because they can't actually talk to their community
01:53:35.440 because there's too many people in their community. And this allows corruption to happen. That's what
01:53:40.640 our founders were afraid of, of a small body would become corrupt. And that's exactly what happens.
01:53:45.920 They're manipulating the process. They're manipulating the communication between the people
01:53:51.840 and the representative. And now the representative thinks they're acting in a virtuous way when in reality,
01:53:56.880 it's completely BS. Well, what would you, I mean, if we were to, like, didn't the Constitution
01:54:02.800 originally put the number at 30,000? It's one in every 30,000 originally. And they actually,
01:54:08.560 the first proposed amendment to the Constitution was to make it continuous, like to always be that.
01:54:15.840 But what would be the number of congressmen we'd have today if it was at one of 30,000?
01:54:19.120 A lot. I don't know off the top of my head. It's like 27.
01:54:22.240 So I think it's 6,800 something.
01:54:26.000 Oh, 6,000. Yeah.
01:54:26.720 So here's, here's the first. So, uh, this is really amazing because the original first
01:54:31.520 amendment is still pending ratification status. So the first one said after the first enumeration
01:54:36.880 required by the first article of the Constitution, there shall be one representative for every 30,000
01:54:41.280 until the number shall amount to 100, after which portion shall be so regulated by Congress
01:54:46.560 that there shall not be less than 100 representatives, nor less than one representative for every 40,000
01:54:51.840 persons. It actually capped at 50,000. The idea was once they got to 200 members of Congress,
01:54:57.920 each rep would have 50,000 people. It's now 775,000. You ain't never going to talk to your
01:55:03.120 member of Congress. They don't care what you think. They care what they care about their donors think.
01:55:07.200 And so what ends up happening?
01:55:08.560 And it's not even, by the way, real quick, it's not even, uh, equal 575. There's some
01:55:12.800 district that have six, 700,000 in California. Some have 400,000 in Wyoming. So there's a
01:55:18.240 discrepancy there as well.
01:55:19.520 What ends up happening though is, hey, you're a member of Congress. You want to get reelected.
01:55:24.160 How do you get reelected? Okay. Well, it used to be, you would go to community gatherings in your
01:55:28.240 district. That's 50,000 people. So you could reasonably, you actually could talk to them.
01:55:32.240 You would say, put out the word, send a letter to the local town. They'll put up notice. I'm
01:55:37.680 going to be there on this day. And you know, three, 400 people show up and you do that 15,
01:55:42.480 20 times. And eventually you start getting to large portions of the actual voting base.
01:55:46.240 You've talked to now. It's actually much simpler. You say, I don't know or care who any of these people
01:55:53.120 are, but there's this rich guy who lives in my district. Who's going to give my pack $2 million.
01:55:57.360 And I can buy a lot of TV ads with that. So guess who gets whatever they want.
01:56:01.600 It ain't you.
01:56:06.080 The silence is happening.
01:56:07.040 I just, I just waited. I wanted everyone like, you will, you will never have a large,
01:56:12.560 louder voice than the guy who can fund a super PAC.
01:56:14.400 Yeah. And it, and again, because the, the concentration of power, because the body is small,
01:56:21.520 it encourages that thing. Because when I walked into politics and I said, Hey, look, I, I started
01:56:28.320 studying history and I realized that our legislative body is too small and Citizens United gave control
01:56:34.080 to corporations. And they said, well, you can't change that. That's just the way it is. You have
01:56:38.240 to learn how to work inside the new system. And I said, no, change the system, decentralized power,
01:56:43.760 give me power back, give my neighbors power back, give my community power back. Because otherwise,
01:56:48.800 how are you going to know how to govern us? Eventually you're going to lead us off a cliff
01:56:52.560 because back to the, the leaders are insecure. They're insecure because they don't actually
01:56:57.600 know what to do because it's just a lot of work. Like at the end of the day, I kind of sympathize
01:57:01.200 for the people in office because it's got to be really hard to do their job because there are
01:57:06.160 200 million more people now than there were in 1910 when they originally capped the house.
01:57:12.080 Yeah. And in the house representatives, they spend most of their time just campaigning for
01:57:15.360 the next election and raising money for the respective parties. So when it comes to actually
01:57:20.000 doing their work, they probably defer to their analysts. And then what happens is party leadership
01:57:26.320 in the house are the ones who get you elected. So what we've seen over the, in 2022, for instance,
01:57:31.760 there were many great Republican candidates who were crushed by party leadership because they were
01:57:37.760 like, no, no, we don't support you. We support the other guy. And so then the people we actually
01:57:40.960 wanted lose because they don't get the financial support from the machine. I want to give a shout
01:57:45.040 out to, uh, the fifth article, which became the second amendment, a well-regulated militia composed
01:57:51.200 of the body of the people being the best security of a free state. The right of the people to keep
01:57:56.160 and bear arms shall not be infringed, but no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled
01:58:00.800 to render military service in person. If only that's what they actually ratified.
01:58:05.200 They didn't want to include the last bit because they, uh, uh, they feared that it would,
01:58:10.960 it would, it would make it so they couldn't have conscription. And we needed that. How else you
01:58:15.440 conscript the militia, the, the, the armed men and women of the people to fight. If you say no one
01:58:21.120 should have to do it. The issue though is legally had they included that it created a clear distinction
01:58:26.800 between regulated being a military force and the body of the people. In its initial writing,
01:58:34.240 there would be no argument right now. The liberals are like a well-regulated militia means you are in
01:58:38.480 the government. The government regulates you. And so it's only about having a militia controlled by
01:58:42.160 the government. When the original was like, actually like, no, no, no, you will not be compelled to
01:58:46.640 render military service and you can keep and bear arms. It meant anyone could have it. So it's like,
01:58:52.000 can we just go back to look at what they really meant when they wrote that? Well, they got,
01:58:54.960 they got rid of that part because they're like, no, we want conscription though.
01:58:57.440 I mean, I think the most important part about the second amendment is if you think about it,
01:59:01.440 as far as your safety on us, you know, as a sovereign nation, if another nation invades you
01:59:07.840 and you go to war, both militaries are going to expend their already, you know, trained officers.
01:59:15.760 And once that happens, who does the advantage go to the country that doesn't have weapons that
01:59:21.440 needs to be trained, how to use a gun first, or the country where everybody has a weapon in their
01:59:27.680 house at some place and has gone to a firing range and understands how to use it for fun for
01:59:32.800 fun. Right. But it makes you safer as an American citizen to know this and other nations know this
01:59:38.560 too. You know, like we talk about Sparta and how they have like, everyone's a warrior. The only way
01:59:44.720 a Spartan, there's only one way a male Spartan and a female Spartan could get a gravestone.
01:59:50.960 The male Spartan had to die in battle and the female had to die in childbirth. Otherwise you
01:59:55.520 were not worthy of being remembered. And so we look back on that, like, man, it was so barbaric.
02:00:00.240 Like I read that they would take a baby and leave it in the woods overnight or whatever. And if it
02:00:04.320 didn't survive, it didn't deserve to, or I don't know if that's true or not, but like these wild
02:00:07.920 stories, imagine how wild it's going to be in a hundred years. What are they going to say about us?
02:00:11.120 They're going to be like, America was comprised of people who engaged in combat play for fun
02:00:18.640 cultures of war as a game, going out and shooting guns, hitting targets and destroying things.
02:00:26.320 It's, it's, it's kind of Spartan in that regard. And so you look at these other countries and they're
02:00:30.060 like, no, we shouldn't do any of that stuff. And I'm like, well, you know, we're going to win if we
02:00:32.880 ever go to war. So a body of people who enjoy the practice of combat as a sport where they're not
02:00:39.240 actually hurting it, but you know, it's, you know, maybe paintball or airsoft or whatever.
02:00:44.420 We, we, we play with guns. Like you don't want to, you don't want to go to war with us.
02:00:48.420 It has nothing to do with our aircraft carriers and our nuclear missiles and our satellite tech.
02:00:51.420 It has to do with, you ain't never going to come here. The moment you land a boat,
02:00:55.420 everybody just points their gun out the window and they're like, now you can leave.
02:00:58.860 Well, even when the British were like, we talked about in the beginning, uh, occupying America,
02:01:03.520 the 13 colonies, they had to stay near the shore. Uh, they couldn't get food in inland. The, you
02:01:08.940 know, 90, 90% of the population were living on farms at the time yet. They had to stay near the
02:01:13.500 shore near their supply lines. So could you imagine if they tried to like, so I'll, I'll tell you this
02:01:18.140 sure, California, much less guns, but the gangs have much more guns. We just don't, don't know for
02:01:25.520 sure. Could you imagine like, you know, I don't know, China tries to invade the West coast.
02:01:30.260 Sure. A bunch of uppity white liberals would be like, help, help. We're under attack.
02:01:33.520 And all of the gangs would be like, we got this. Like, yeah, what we're trying to do there?
02:01:38.760 Like there's a whole bunch of just dudes running around with guns everywhere. Good luck. It was,
02:01:43.380 it was, it's bad enough for the United States trying to combat like a bunch of guys living
02:01:46.740 in the mountains with, with AK 47s in Afghanistan. What do you think it would be like for an invading
02:01:51.220 force encountering New York or, or Los Angeles gangs, let alone Chicago. I'm sorry. Ain't nobody
02:01:56.280 ever going to be able to occupy Chicago. It's just never going to happen. The government could
02:02:01.020 surrender and the gangs would be like, nah, just no. Yeah. I do want to give a shout out to while
02:02:06.340 we're at the third amendment, which was the six article. No soldier shall in a time of peace be
02:02:11.480 courted in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in a time of war, but in a manner to
02:02:15.680 be prescribed by law. What's fascinating about this is nobody cares about the third amendment.
02:02:18.440 It's never really come up, but it might actually come up now more because what I think the Supreme
02:02:25.860 court ruling on it, it's not about soldiers in your house. It's about the government using your
02:02:31.680 house period. So the third amendment says no soldier shall be quartered, but when it came to
02:02:37.420 the actual argument, the actual interpretation is the government shall not be able to use the private
02:02:41.640 property of an individual unless in a manner prescribed by law, only in a time of war, I guess,
02:02:48.840 which has huge implications on eminent domain and things like that.
02:02:52.720 Yeah. And I've seen some of the case law about that was even used to, with, with respect to
02:02:56.300 surveillance teams from civil police. Right. And so it's not just about the troops. And I think
02:03:01.460 when it comes to modern interpretations of it, we may need to have an expanded understanding to say
02:03:07.100 that they can't force us to house illegal immigrants in our houses. Uh, that could be a
02:03:11.460 government use. They're already using some of the community centers, the schools, other, uh, public
02:03:17.100 facilities are being used to house illegal immigrants. Uh, what if they started telling you that you have
02:03:21.620 to put them in your house? They're already asking people to do it voluntarily. And I think I saw a
02:03:25.940 story about a couple in, I think it was Massachusetts or somewhere over in new England where they have
02:03:30.420 agreed to do that, setting the example, but, uh, that's, that's great for them. If they want to house
02:03:35.880 illegal immigrants, that's more power to them, but I don't think that Americans should be forced
02:03:39.640 to do that. But what happens if we get to the point where there's so many of them here
02:03:42.500 and there's nowhere else to put them, there are no more schools to commandeer, no more community
02:03:48.180 centers. And all of a sudden, well, we can't have them out on the street.
02:03:51.880 Well, you, you see what, uh, is going on now with, I think it's Massachusetts. Was that where it was,
02:03:56.140 where they said people should take the illegal immigrants into their homes, the refugees, I'm sorry.
02:04:01.080 And, uh, it's fascinating because there's this video of this white woman and she's like,
02:04:04.480 it's great. It's like, I have my own personal chef. Well, the narrator says that the journal,
02:04:08.280 the reporter says she feels like she has her own chef and it shows the migrant cooking food or
02:04:13.160 whatever. And it's like, what did, what do we call it when somebody would be provided room and
02:04:18.920 board in exchange for labor? There's a variety of terms for it. I think, uh, I think the one you're
02:04:23.880 looking for is slavery. Yeah. You know, it's a lot of people are saying to be fair that the Haitians
02:04:28.160 could leave whenever they want, you know, there's a perfectly fine dumpster outside to sleep in.
02:04:32.600 So it's kind of funny because it's like slavery with just, uh, a coercive barrier where it's,
02:04:38.200 we're not forcing you to stay here and cook for us. You can leave anytime you want. You know,
02:04:43.040 it's 20 degrees outside and there's no food and nowhere to go. So why don't you just cook the
02:04:48.460 paella and shut up? I think that, I mean, what is force is force physically holding somebody down
02:04:54.140 or creating a circumstance where they have no other choices? Well, I think slavery is apt because,
02:04:58.620 um, the, the, the, the famous quote that I've said a million times the past month, Harriet
02:05:03.420 Tumman, I freed many slaves. I would have freed many more if only they knew they were slaves.
02:05:07.900 What people don't understand about slavery typically is because they get their, their view
02:05:12.280 of it from movies where all slaves were being beaten in fields, which certainly happened and
02:05:17.000 it's horrifying, but there were a lot of slaves who were like cobblers. They worked in a shop in a
02:05:21.480 city and they made shoes and they actually got paid money, but they had no freedom, no rights.
02:05:26.360 They couldn't go where they wanted to go. And the only reason they were able to hold and trade
02:05:29.480 money was because it was easier for the slave owner than having to buy the clothes for them
02:05:32.740 instead. However, there were slaves who bought their freedom because they were able to earn
02:05:37.960 enough money and then eventually paid. And it was fascinating when I was reading about all this
02:05:42.760 stuff, the idea that you could be a slave and buy your own freedom or buy the freedom of others.
02:05:46.860 It was like, yeah, but you know, you were sort of just exchanging value. And most people don't
02:05:52.660 understand what the actual slave economies were like in the South.
02:05:55.720 So slave, so freedom is not the ability to maybe have a job and make money. Freedom is the ability
02:06:03.000 to have a say in writing the rules. Freedom is having representation. And when you have a country
02:06:08.500 that's consolidated the power into 435, you've stripped the freedom out from a lot of people.
02:06:15.200 So you're basically saying we're slaves.
02:06:16.920 I'm not saying we're slaves. I'm saying that we're just in a really difficult moment in our time.
02:06:20.940 And we just have to think critically about how to solve the problems.
02:06:23.780 There was a viral meme where it said something like the slaves of Egypt were only grant,
02:06:27.460 had to give 20% of all of their labor to the Pharaoh or whatever. And that was slavery.
02:06:34.720 And the idea of it back then was it is not feasible for a monarch to control the economic
02:06:43.380 pursuits of every single individual they own who has no say. And so it's easier just to say,
02:06:48.460 you give me X percent of all the labor you produce and then spend the rest as you see fit.
02:06:53.940 The big difference was the general idea is they have no say. They can't leave. They can be,
02:06:58.780 they have no rights. They have no free speech. They just get to spend money as they see fit.
02:07:03.300 Today, do we really have free speech? Kind of, you know, it is better to a certain degree.
02:07:08.980 You can get arrested for obscenity. Gun rights are, are, are, are certainly getting better and
02:07:13.500 better, but the ability to write the rules and have a say in government, I don't believe
02:07:17.360 exists so much anymore. So large portions, around 40 to 50% of all of our wealth generated
02:07:23.440 is taken from us for things we don't want, like war being the obvious one. And if you want to change
02:07:30.840 the rules, you can't, you can't because the deep state will slide a picture of JFK, JFK across the
02:07:37.320 table. So you, you don't act up and, um, your opinions don't matter to members of Congress.
02:07:42.440 Yeah. And if you, I mean, I agree that you do have generally free speech in this country and
02:07:46.460 certainly a lot more free speech in this country than other countries, especially in some that I've
02:07:49.940 lived in. But on the same token, if you say something that is not accepted or, uh, the, the government
02:07:59.620 or the establishment approves of, and you make enough noise, they'll come after you. And, uh,
02:08:05.060 you don't have to be a politician for that. You can be any activist. If you ruffle enough feathers,
02:08:10.600 rock the boat, and your unapproved, unacceptable opinion makes enough noise, you can find yourself
02:08:16.920 under investigation. I don't, I don't see a simple solution, anything like decentralization. I get,
02:08:21.720 um, but man, the ideological homogenization, uh, polarization, not homogenization, the ideological
02:08:30.300 homogenization, uh, polarization that we're seeing in this country, how do you decentralize ideology?
02:08:36.660 You have conversations. Well, you have conversations, but come on. And I mean, it's,
02:08:43.020 it, there is, you're right. There is no simple solution to the problems that we have,
02:08:46.840 but you can't have conversations with a cult. I mean, if you call them a cult, no, you can't
02:08:52.180 have a conversation. It doesn't matter what you call them. If you, but if, but if you stand there
02:08:55.900 and you, you know, if you walk into their neighborhood and you say, Hey, I'm here
02:08:59.840 knocking doors for the guy that normally doesn't knock the doors. What do you consider to be the
02:09:04.400 problem? And then they, they surprise you with saying Congress, Congress is the problem. And then
02:09:09.600 you start talking about the issues and you find out that you have a lot more in common
02:09:13.400 than you otherwise would have known. There are certainly instances where the right and the
02:09:18.440 left have been like, if we can agree on this thing, can we at least do that? And I still don't
02:09:22.900 happen. So, uh, there's one viral video from a couple of years ago where a woman was going
02:09:27.540 knocking on doors and she got attacked because she was pro-life. She was going to knock on doors
02:09:32.360 and asking people and having conversations and she got physically attacked. Uh, yeah, I call them a
02:09:36.900 cult cause they're a cult. Right. And I'll give you an explanation. I'll give you a good story.
02:09:39.900 Um, it is, uh, why am I forgetting the guy's name? The famous blues musician. Uh, man, I
02:09:48.800 can't believe I'm forgetting his name. He's awesome. He, uh, de-radicalized the clan. You
02:09:51.920 guys know what I'm talking about? I'm confusing him with someone else and I don't want to get
02:09:55.140 the name wrong. So let me, everybody in the chat knows the only person I can think of
02:10:00.680 is Coltrane, but it's, uh, Daryl Davis. I want to say David. I'm like, it's not David,
02:10:06.660 it's Daryl Davis. So we invited Daryl Davis to speak at an event we were having. He is
02:10:12.100 famous for being this, uh, he's this old black blues musician who one day said to himself,
02:10:16.520 I don't understand how someone could hate me if they never met me. So he went to clan
02:10:19.240 rallies and, uh, they were all racist. They didn't attack him or anything. He talked to
02:10:24.460 him and he said, and they had a lot of views and they were backwards. And, uh, eventually
02:10:29.800 by getting to know him, a lot of these guys were like, you know, everything they told me
02:10:32.460 was not true. None of these things describe you, Daryl. You're a good dude. And that did
02:10:36.140 radicalize him. One of my favorite stories was that he met this like prominent Klansman
02:10:41.120 who was very racist. And he, he heard that, uh, the guy was a big fan of this, uh, you
02:10:46.540 know, rock and roll legend. I can't remember the exact name. This guy owned his famous car
02:10:50.500 and he was talking to him one day and he asked him like, you know, kind of music is he
02:10:54.180 into? And the guy mentioned he's a huge fan of this rock and roll guy. And Daryl being
02:10:57.380 a well-known industry musician said, yeah, I can get you in the museum. You want to sit
02:11:01.400 in the car? And the guy was like, what? And he's like, you come with me. I will get you
02:11:05.200 in that car. The legendary car of this rock and roll superstar. And he's like, you're
02:11:09.200 kidding me. And the guy cried. It's like his dream came true. And he was like, I can't
02:11:13.860 believe everything they told me about this is just a lie. Daryl, you're you've, you've
02:11:16.640 made my dreams come true. I can't believe it. He de-radicalized all these people. So
02:11:20.400 invite him to speak. We say, come to our event headline speak. He got a standing
02:11:24.520 ovation. Everybody was so inspired by the guy. And all the story was, was let's talk
02:11:28.840 to each other. He told these great stories about how he shut up the Klan meetings and
02:11:33.060 people thought he was crazy. They're going to kill you. And it's like, no, they're not.
02:11:36.220 They just said nasty things. They were insulting, but they talked to him. So outside of our event.
02:11:42.460 So first, what happens is Antifa threatened to burn down the theater where the event was
02:11:45.340 taking place. The event was called fighting ending violence, authoritarianism, and racism.
02:11:50.720 And it was a very libertarian, uh, uh, event. We had progressives there. And so they threatened
02:11:56.500 to burn the theater down. They didn't want it to happen. That's a cult. The theater owner
02:12:00.180 two weeks out said they're threatening to burn the theater down. I can't do this. Let's go
02:12:03.260 somewhere else. So we lost our venue of a thousand seats. And the best we could do is
02:12:06.900 go to a casino that 500 seats. We ended up having to refund tickets. We lost a lot of money
02:12:10.660 from it, but the event happened anyway. The venue that was across the street from the theater
02:12:15.140 that was going to host the after party for those who bought VIP tickets refused to back
02:12:19.240 down. They were moderate liberal types. They started getting inundated with phone calls
02:12:24.100 from people saying you're racists, you're fascists. And it was really awesome because
02:12:28.720 I was there and we were like paying a deposit and someone called and the woman who owned
02:12:33.820 it, she was like, look at this San Francisco phone number. And so she answers it and she's
02:12:38.180 like, hi, what can I do for you? And the guy was like, I'm wondering why it is you're
02:12:41.360 hosting a bunch of fascists and I'm upset. And I think that, you know, if you do this,
02:12:46.180 that I will never be a customer at your establishment. And she's like, where do you
02:12:49.880 live? And he was like, well, California. And she was like, you've never been to my
02:12:54.960 establishment. You never will be. So why are you calling me? And that was fascinating to
02:12:59.140 see some guy on the other side of the country who had no idea what was going on, saw on the
02:13:04.340 internet and decided he would join the cult. Here's what ends up happening. We have the
02:13:08.760 event. It's fantastic. Everybody's hanging out. We got this thousand dollar bottle of scotch
02:13:12.840 and everybody took a little bit and across the street were far leftists, Antifa, Black
02:13:17.840 Lives Matter. And so Daryl Davis, he's like, I'm gonna go talk to him. And we were like,
02:13:22.860 Daryl, look, be careful. You know? And he's like, nah, come on. He's like, I know what I'm
02:13:27.620 doing. What do you think happened when he went across the street? They probably attacked
02:13:31.660 him. They screamed at him. They called him a Nazi and a fascist. And every time he tried
02:13:35.260 to speak, they would start chanting. So he couldn't, he came back and it was like, what the
02:13:39.580 just happened. He ended up writing this viral post on Facebook about how never in his life
02:13:44.500 has he experienced anything like that, that his whole mission has been de-radicalization,
02:13:49.400 speaking with each other, community, communication, that he's been able to go to the most vile of
02:13:54.320 white supremacists and talk to them even when they hate him and never agree with him. Some
02:13:58.980 of them agreed and de-radical and got de-radicalized and handed their ropes to him. Others told him
02:14:03.180 he was wrong and they would never agree with him, but they would debate and they would argue
02:14:05.840 with each other. But when he tried approaching anti-fund far leftists, they screamed at him
02:14:10.380 and refused to even speak in any way. That's what we're dealing with.
02:14:14.740 So you, if you, if you want to be able to have a conversation with him, you have to break
02:14:19.200 their large group, which you, you, you mentioned people from all across the country join this
02:14:24.000 group and it makes it look like they have more power than they do.
02:14:27.800 Well, in this physical instance, the people across the street were just from, I think,
02:14:31.780 New Brunswick, New Jersey or whatever, or Brunswick or whatever the city is. And it
02:14:35.720 was like 17 people. I'm not saying that there's not a group dynamic there. I'm saying it wasn't
02:14:40.420 like people from all over the country descended on New Jersey. No, it was quite literally just
02:14:44.800 like a small handful of BLM people from just North of where the venue was.
02:14:48.520 And then, but again, and looking at it from the other perspective, it's 17 people and now
02:14:53.100 you're. And one guy, one black man walks up saying, how do you do?
02:14:56.960 Yeah. How many people were at these, uh, what was it? The KKK meetings or what was the group?
02:15:02.360 I would imagine. I would imagine the Klan meetings.
02:15:04.320 I'd imagine dozens. That was, that's what I mean. There was probably the same dynamic there.
02:15:07.260 At least that was Daryl's point. He's like, he could, he was shocked. He couldn't talk to these
02:15:10.980 people. And he was like, he's a black man walking up by himself to a group of some black, some white
02:15:17.720 asking them what's going on. And they screamed at him instead.
02:15:20.060 So don't talk to them. Go talk to the other people that are in their homes, raising their
02:15:24.940 families who nobody ever talks to. Right.
02:15:26.960 Bring them out on the street and outnumber the 17 people that are radicalized. That's how you
02:15:31.580 change the system. And they're taking care of their kids. They're not going to come
02:15:33.800 on the street. Like we were talking about, they're busy getting involved in the political
02:15:36.560 process, but they're also brainwashed. Right. So it's fascinating to look at the modern state
02:15:43.320 of politics and it's almost impossible to get through to how, how, how radicalized so
02:15:48.600 many people are. Of course they will claim we're the radicalized one. And I'm like, we
02:15:52.220 have disparate political opinions. We argue with each other all the time. Y'all are the
02:15:55.100 cult. And I got no problem saying that look when we have some, we had someone come on
02:15:59.860 the show and I'm like, we're talking. And I go, you know, when Joe Biden said, you're
02:16:04.100 not getting a billion dollars unless you find the prosecutor. I mean, a lot of people see
02:16:06.840 that as a quid pro quo. He goes, that never happened. And I was like, what? And I pulled
02:16:10.400 up the video and I played it for him. He had never seen the video. So it's good. Those
02:16:13.840 conversations have been, but it certainly didn't de-radicalize him. This guy's got a
02:16:16.160 monetary incentive to keep going down the path he's going. There are people who make videos
02:16:20.440 every day, intentionally misrepresenting the arguments we make on our shows for the purpose
02:16:25.940 of generating money while claiming it's that what we're doing. And then the problem is every
02:16:31.760 time, you know, our faction engages in conversation, we try to respect the position of our opponent
02:16:37.520 while they lie about our position for political and financial gain while claiming we're the
02:16:42.480 ones doing it. So if we, if we're playing this game where we are opening up to conversation
02:16:47.940 and desperately trying to convince people and they use that against us to hurt us, I'm not
02:16:54.180 advocating for anything else. I'm just saying, you know, you'll lose. I don't, I don't have an
02:16:57.980 answer for you. I'm just saying, that's why with the, with the, with the hyper-polarization,
02:17:02.620 that's why I'm kind of like, I don't, I don't, I don't see a path forward. Adam Schiff lied on TV
02:17:08.380 about having evidence that Donald Trump colluded with Russia. Just outright lied. Adam Schiff
02:17:13.300 published the private phone records of an American journalist for political gain.
02:17:18.820 And, and he wins landslide victories in his district. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter
02:17:22.560 what, what he does. Joe Biden, his DOJ just arrested a whistleblower, accusing the Biden
02:17:28.820 family of corruption and wrongdoing. And the, and the, and CNN runs, the claims are now discredited
02:17:34.700 with no conviction, with no trial. The Biden DOJ said, what did he accuse us of? Bribery and
02:17:39.760 corruption? Arrest him. CNN goes, well, that proves it. He was lying the whole time. Like, uh, or Biden is
02:17:45.140 arresting those who are trying to blow the whistle and bring up evidence against them.
02:17:48.280 Yeah. And what we were talking about before with purity, I think that this is where some of the
02:17:51.620 purity comes in because within the left-wing, uh, cult, as you call it, and I guess I agree,
02:17:58.420 you know, there is a purity test. If you disagree with them on any one point at all, you're out.
02:18:04.340 Like you have to toe the line on every single issue from abortion to zebras.
02:18:09.700 Even when the issue changes.
02:18:10.600 Yeah. Even with any, if you don't, you're out. You could agree with them on 99% of the
02:18:13.880 issues and be out there screaming and yelling at everybody in Antifa. You agree on one issue.
02:18:17.480 You're out. I'll tell you this is why I look, you know, I'm never going to walk up to somebody
02:18:21.800 and tell them they're a cultist unless they are extreme. The average default liberal I'll talk to,
02:18:28.000 I will approach them as best I can on their grounds. But two weeks ago, we were hanging out
02:18:32.420 at MGM national Harbor playing poker. And I'm hanging out with people of different political
02:18:37.160 backgrounds. A handful of which know me. A couple of them were libertarian Mises caucus guys. So they
02:18:41.760 were probably closer to the being fans camp. No, they don't agree with me, but they like listening to the
02:18:45.880 show. They think the show is productive. There was one guy who totally disagreed, not a big fan of
02:18:51.320 the show, but was familiar and was polite. And there's another guy who had what I would describe
02:18:54.880 as Trump derangement syndrome. There's no communication with this guy. He's not politically
02:18:59.620 active. He's not some guy marching in the streets. But if you went to his door and knocked,
02:19:03.800 he'd scream in your face. This guy was muttering to himself like a psychopath when he found out that
02:19:09.920 I was going to vote for Donald Trump. Someone at the table says, have you figured out who you're
02:19:13.420 voting for yet? And I was like, oh, Trump, no question. His brain snapped in an instant.
02:19:18.080 And he started just sputtering and muttering. I can't believe these people are so stupid.
02:19:21.300 We can't believe these stupid people. You'd be so dumb. You can't even argue with them because
02:19:24.400 they're so morons. And I'm like, my guy, what is wrong with you? And he just kept muttering and
02:19:31.320 sputtering. He said, name one thing. Name one thing Donald Trump did that you liked. And I went
02:19:34.800 Abraham Accords. And he was like, you can't even name one thing. Can you believe these people?
02:19:38.300 They're so insane. They can't even think of one thing. And I'm like,
02:19:40.540 this 55, 58 year old man, you will never, never convince him to break from that cult.
02:19:48.620 And that's the kind of mentality you have. There are two big distinctions that I would see.
02:19:54.520 Somebody who behaves that way, that's a cult. His brain is locked in this position. He won't
02:20:00.620 listen to what you have to say. He doesn't know what you're saying. He doesn't care what you're
02:20:03.420 saying. The other is, I was at a Trump rally. This is probably 2016 in, where was this?
02:20:11.540 Oh, it was in California somewhere, um, just East of Los Angeles. I think it was. And there
02:20:18.800 were Trump supporters and there were anti-Trump leftists. I walk up to the Trump supporters and
02:20:23.820 they got American flags. And I say, anybody want to tell me what's going on? But, uh, I'll talk,
02:20:27.540 I'll talk. Uh, so we're here. We're supporting Trump. We have our flags. Here's what we want.
02:20:30.800 I'm like, what do you, what do you like about Trump? Like, well, you know, insert a bunch of issues.
02:20:34.320 I'm a union guy, man. He's the only guy who's talking about bringing the factories back.
02:20:37.520 Another person says, I can't stand the political correctness. I like that. He's brash. And then
02:20:41.860 he says these things. Okay. I get a varying opinions. I walk across the street. They're
02:20:46.520 the far leftists. And I go, I was like, how's it going? Anybody want to talk? And Mike check,
02:20:50.860 Mike check, Mike check. What do not do not talk to talk to anyone, anyone about politics. And I was
02:21:02.260 like, okay, did anybody want to tell me why they're here? Mike check, Mike check. That's what
02:21:08.060 they do since occupy wall street. This is what they do. Anybody outside the group who tries to talk,
02:21:14.280 they will start doing this thing called Mike check over and over again so that no one can say a word.
02:21:18.380 And this is a group of like, I don't know, nine people. There's one organizer commanding the group.
02:21:24.560 And by doing something as simple as Mike check, the premise of which is I'm just trying to amplify
02:21:29.800 my voice. In reality, it shuts down anybody who even asks a question. Why none of these people
02:21:34.680 could answer the question. I'm in Berkeley and I'm filming police arresting somebody, something's going
02:21:39.660 on. And a woman starts muttering to herself about the far right or whatever. And I'm holding a camera up
02:21:45.520 on a gimbal and she starts talking. And then I turned to her holding the camera and I say, oh,
02:21:51.060 tell me more. She talks more. I say, well, what do you think about this? She answers. So what do you
02:21:55.200 think about that? She answers. I said, a woman was just attacked. She was standing in the crowd
02:22:00.840 and a far left protester knocked her over because they thought she was a Trump supporter. And she's
02:22:05.840 like, well, I mean, she shouldn't be here with Trump supporters. And I said, you think that it was
02:22:12.440 okay. She was attacked because of the way she looked. And she goes, yeah, if she looked like
02:22:16.120 she was a Trump supporter. And I was like, what if a woman was raped because of the way she was
02:22:19.420 dressed and the way she looked? And she went, no. And I was like, okay. And I was like, but if it's
02:22:26.060 political, it's okay. And she's like, yeah. And I was like, okay. All right. Well, thank you.
02:22:29.560 But she did think about it. She, she leaves 30 seconds later. She walks back, goes, delete that,
02:22:33.860 delete that footage. And I was like, no. And she's like, but you, you don't have permission to
02:22:37.380 record me. And I was like, you walked up to me talking while I was filming. She's like,
02:22:42.200 but you need to delete that. And I was like, I'm not going to. She realized, oh, if people find out
02:22:47.700 I gave opinions, I'm going to be in trouble. So among these people, it's very much, I better say
02:22:52.940 nothing because you'll get canceled. You get fired from your job. You'll get coerced. It's better to
02:22:57.540 fall in line and say, yes, sir. Thank you, sir. Whatever. On the right, Ben Shapiro and Tucker Carlson
02:23:02.700 are fighting right now. And Ben's like, Tucker, you've misrepresented me. And Tucker's like, well,
02:23:06.980 you want war. And Ben's like, I am not an advocate for this is the right. They don't even agree with each
02:23:11.700 other. But anyway, I think that that about gets to the point. And we've gone a little bit over. So
02:23:15.640 maybe we'll just wind down if you guys want to give any final thoughts. Otherwise, let's keep
02:23:18.580 ranting. Yeah, I don't, I, you know, we got that campaign in California. I don't know that we're
02:23:24.380 going to be able to divide the state into one or two parts or keep it together or what's going to
02:23:29.780 happen. I just think something needs to happen. I think that the, as we've been talking about,
02:23:34.880 we have a country and a society that has a two diverging sets of values that are no longer
02:23:40.860 compatible. That's why we call for this national divorce. And we say it's due to irreconcilable
02:23:46.100 differences. And I don't think that we can reconcile them as you're saying, for example,
02:23:50.340 by coming to the table. I think we've gone beyond that. I think that it would be better to allow for
02:23:56.860 the lines to be redrawn. And maybe we can even stay together as a single country, but just redraw the
02:24:01.100 lines. If we had states that were with new borders and that those states, we could return to a form of
02:24:06.960 federalism. I think like you're talking about decentralization, and then we can get out of
02:24:10.780 each other's hairs where the Republicans aren't imposing Republican values on Democrats and vice
02:24:15.960 versa. We might be able to restore some peace and tranquility in this country without actually
02:24:20.860 having any state secede from the union. If we just redraw those lines. And one thing I like to point
02:24:25.740 out is, for example, I guess I'll become unpopular in the, in the Northeast. Why do we have to have
02:24:31.940 seven or eight small, tiny little states up there? When California is a huge state, geographically
02:24:37.680 speaking, uh, they have a combination of about 14 senators up there for this small piece of
02:24:43.840 territory. I know that the Senate was specifically designed to represent states, but really does
02:24:48.420 Delaware need to exist as its own state anymore? Uh, Rhode Island, for example, do they need to exist
02:24:53.560 as states? Why can't we combine and condense them into an area called new England or something? I mean,
02:24:57.840 Delaware isn't in new England, but the idea is why not redraw the lines in such a way where it makes
02:25:03.120 sense economically, where we can keep, uh, economic areas together and connected. So we're not, uh,
02:25:10.120 dividing them. And one thing I would point to is when I was living down in Uruguay, I found that
02:25:14.800 between Uruguay and Brazil, there are a couple of cities that are straddling the border and
02:25:21.860 the, the border between the two countries literally goes through the city and the residents of the
02:25:29.200 city on both sides of that border are free to pass it and live their lives as if there's no border
02:25:33.900 there. It's really interesting. And you're, you're in one country and you cross street in the next
02:25:38.520 country. So a lot of people say, for example, national divorce, how are you going to divide the
02:25:42.160 country when you're going to draw the line between red and blue and you're going to be breaking up
02:25:46.100 communities? And I don't think that needs to be the case because what they have in Uruguay and Brazil
02:25:50.620 is an example. I think there's elsewhere as, as well, are these places called, uh, peace cities.
02:25:55.960 And what happens is if you're in the, if you're on the Brazilian side of the city and you cross into
02:26:00.140 the Uruguayan side, you're good to go. But if you want to pass in further into Uruguay, then you're
02:26:04.620 going to pass this border checkpoint. But the people in that city are living their lives without any kind
02:26:09.900 of borders, no checkpoints, no walls, no, no barbed wire or anything like that. So I think there's a way
02:26:14.420 to do it where if we were to pursue a national divorce in such a way where we're drawing lines
02:26:19.540 between ideological areas to not disconnect economic zones. I know Marcus Reese Evans, who helped me
02:26:26.460 create this campaign, uh, a lot of effort was put into demonstrating that there are economic zones
02:26:33.980 in California that are interconnected. And so why would we want to break them up? We wouldn't want
02:26:37.500 to break them up. We can keep them together. If we draw the lines, make sense economically,
02:26:42.600 make sense culturally, make sense, uh, ideologically, but not breaking up the communities.
02:26:49.520 So, um, obviously I'm, I'm a unionist. I believe that we should hold together, but I'm a, I'm a,
02:26:54.860 I'm a unionist and a small group guy. I think that we should decentralize the power. And if you're out
02:27:01.060 there and you feel frustrated and you feel scared and you feel like you're part of the powerless and
02:27:06.020 you feel unrepresented, the answer to that is to become active, right? Families don't have the ability
02:27:12.000 to do that, but you can sacrifice a little bit. Your kid doesn't have to play baseball every single
02:27:16.220 season. Okay. Take a season off and invest in your primary congressional races. There are good people
02:27:22.460 running all across the country that you don't ever hear about because they don't have the money to
02:27:27.360 reach you. Go to them. In my district where the primary was run, there was six, almost 16,
02:27:33.300 only 16,000 people that decided the, who actually ran for Congress. That's a small fraction of people
02:27:39.060 making the decisions for the rest of us. If you want to be represented, if you want to have some
02:27:43.880 power, you have to get out in your community. You have to go find the people running for office,
02:27:47.920 and then you need to support them, support them with your volunteerships, support them with your
02:27:52.400 donations so they can have a voice and speak for you in your Congress. And then when they get there,
02:27:57.640 tell them to uncap the house.
02:27:59.620 Right on. Gentlemen, thanks for hanging out. It's been a blast.
02:28:02.260 Thanks for having us.
02:28:02.940 Thank you so much.
02:28:03.480 Everybody listening, subscribe to Tenet Media. We've got the next show coming up
02:28:07.320 at youtube.com slash timcast IRL at 8 p.m. tonight. Thanks so much, and we will see you all then.
02:28:12.660 Hey moms, looking for some lighthearted guidance on this crazy journey we call parenting?
02:28:29.120 Join me, Sabrina Kohlberg, and me, Andy Mitchell, for Pop Culture Moms, where each week we talk
02:28:34.900 about what we're watching and examine our favorite pop culture moms up close to try to pick up some
02:28:40.220 parenting hacks along the way. Come laugh, learn, and grow with us as we look for the best tips.
02:28:45.800 And maybe a few what not to do's from our favorite fictional moms.
02:28:49.980 From Good Morning America and ABC Audio.
02:28:52.960 Pop Culture Moms. Find it wherever you get your podcasts.