The Culture War #67 Anti-White Racism On The Rise In The West, DEI & The Cult
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 14 minutes
Words per Minute
196.32649
Summary
Jeremy Carl and Jeremy Tedesco discuss the rise of anti-white racism in America, and the hypocrisy of wokeness in the face of growing anti-racistism. Jeremy Carl is a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute and author of The Unprotected Class, a new book about the growing problem of anti white racism and its rise in America. Jeremy Todesco is a 20-year First Amendment litigator at Alliance Defending Freedom, and has won 15 Supreme Court cases at the Supreme Court over the course of his 30-year career, arguing for freedom of speech and religious freedom. They discuss the role of race and identity in the culture war, and why anti-whiteness has become an epidemic in America and why we should be worried about it. Get ready for Las Vegas-style action at BetmGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas Strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM Grand, Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly! Please play responsibly, and if you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. to speak with an advisor FREE of charge, please call ConnectsOntario at (1-800-532-262600) or visit Connects Ontrementor at (833-1919-1915. If you have any concerns about gambling or you or someone you care about you or want to help with your gambling? - call Connectes Ontario, call 1-888-1913-1933-1914-192300 to talk to an adviser free of ChargeFree to Wager Ontario only, call Connecteds Ontario, or call Connections Ontario at (888-835-2621-527-2619 to speak free to you. or visit the ConnectsON-2622-907-541-1924 . and the best kept secret: to wager Ontario at Connects ON-521-1926-1922-1917-192100-2982-2981-2882-828-513-876-976-0583-8787-5385 , &
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Get ready for Las Vegas-style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos.
00:00:05.880
Enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas Strip excitement MGM is famous for
00:00:11.140
when you play classics like MGM Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette.
00:00:17.940
With our ever-growing library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games,
00:00:22.900
and signature BetMGM service, there's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you
00:00:29.320
than with BetMGM Casino. Download the BetMGM Casino app today.
00:00:34.960
BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly.
00:00:37.480
BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.
00:00:42.680
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
00:00:45.600
please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
00:00:53.880
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:00:57.060
You know, it's kind of shocking how long this has been going on. It's probably 15, 16 years since
00:01:03.700
the wokeness, intersectional feminism, culture war battles have been expanding rapidly into the
00:01:09.980
mainstream. Gamergate, many say, was the beginning of the culture war. But a huge component of this
00:01:16.520
has been an attack on white people. The idea that white history or things related to white
00:01:23.800
cultures and white indigenous nations are wrong, racist. Otherwise, a really great example of the
00:01:30.520
hypocrisy in wokeness as it pertains to white people is that if you were to go to, if you were to hold up
00:01:38.720
a big sign saying that I support indigenous people, they'd all clap and cheer. And then if the bottom
00:01:43.280
folded out and it said of Europe, they would all lose their minds. The idea that the people who
00:01:48.400
are indigenous to Europe are not the same as indigenous to Native America, clearly the component
00:01:52.200
here is not whether or not someone's indigenous, it's whether or not they're white. So we're going
00:01:56.160
to talk about that today. We've got a couple of Jeremy's hanging out. First, Jeremy, would you like
00:02:00.280
to introduce yourself? Yeah, I'm Jeremy Carl, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute. And I
00:02:04.880
have just written a book called The Unprotected Class about anti-white racism and its rise in America.
00:02:09.040
And Jeremy, other Jeremy. I'm Jeremy Tedesco. I'm a 20 year First Amendment litigator at Alliance
00:02:14.540
Defending Freedom. We're probably the best kept secret. If you're a fan of free speech and religious
00:02:19.180
freedom, we've won 15 cases at the Supreme Court since 2011, 74 over the course of our 30 year history.
00:02:26.120
And we're advocating for First Amendment freedoms all day long and trying to stop the Biden
00:02:29.340
administration from weaponizing the federal government and private corporations against
00:02:33.360
our First Amendment rights. Oh, right on. I do also feel that it's not just about white people,
00:02:38.280
but also it's like, if you're a white Christian, it's fair game. They can say whatever they want,
00:02:42.900
they can discriminate. And if you're a white Christian man, I mean, then it's just good luck,
00:02:47.300
right? But who wants to do? How about, do you want to, you wrote a book, do you want to introduce us to
00:02:52.240
what exactly is going on with this in the United States?
00:02:56.040
Yeah, well, it's really become an epidemic. And I didn't really want to write the book,
00:02:59.880
quite honestly, for many years, because I'm not an idiot, right? And when you write a book like this,
00:03:04.760
you get a lot of people very angry with you, because as you noted at your introductory remarks,
00:03:09.640
you're not really allowed to say anything about white people that might be construed as nice. But
00:03:14.160
it just got to the point where, particularly, you saw this, what's been called the Great Awokening
00:03:19.040
in 2013, Obama's inaugurated, and you see the kind of real radicalization of the left on these issues.
00:03:27.640
And I just felt that it was really important to kind of document that. So I try to do that in the book.
00:03:31.300
I sort of talk about everything from immigration to healthcare to entertainment, and I kind of just
00:03:38.560
show how anti-whiteness has become epidemic throughout, you know, all of America in 2024.
00:03:45.620
So it's really getting crazy out there. And then, you know, you other Jeremy, I don't know if it's
00:03:52.860
Yeah. You guys are dealing with lawsuits pertaining to this stuff now. What's going on on that front?
00:03:58.400
Sure. I mean, we're worried about the weaponization of the federal government and even of private
00:04:03.320
corporations against people's First Amendment rights. The DEI is a part of this. And, you know,
00:04:07.780
all the demands of diversity, equity, inclusion related to race, related to, you know,
00:04:13.400
labeling people oppressors and oppressed based on their race, their sex, their religious convictions.
00:04:20.580
I mean, we have lawsuits that where we've challenged that. We're starting to be adopted and
00:04:24.260
pushed in schools. But we're also concerned about the broader weaponization of, you know,
00:04:29.600
the legal system and even these private corporations take away people's First Amendment rights. It's
00:04:34.260
a huge problem. And I think it's kind of all part of the same package of problems. There's an
00:04:40.040
aggressive push by kind of the political left, especially the extreme elements of it,
00:04:45.720
to weaponize our legal system, to try to take private corporations and regulate us through them
00:04:51.040
and censor us through them. And so we're pushing back hard against those.
00:04:54.880
How is this? How is it happening? I mean, the 1964 Civil Rights Act makes it illegal to
00:04:59.760
discriminate on the basis of race. Yet we now have institutions that are putting in tests,
00:05:05.500
you know, like the Harvard lawsuits restricting white people. And oftentimes they're explicit in
00:05:11.680
why they're doing it. They're outright saying too many white people, too many Asians. So we're going
00:05:16.540
to change the structure so that we get rid of them. And then you've got corporations that flat
00:05:21.200
out tell people, oh, you're white. Sorry, we're not interested. I'll tell you a quick story. We had
00:05:26.220
a pro skateboarder on this show a few months ago. He was a gay man. And he's like, it's not really
00:05:33.200
a big deal. It's like, I don't go around telling everybody. But he got approached by a friend who
00:05:36.860
said, hey, they're doing a commercial for, I think it was a shoe company. And it's like Pride
00:05:41.320
Month or whatever. Would you want to be in it skateboarding? And he was like, oh, wow, that'd
00:05:45.320
be cool. And when they submitted his reel, the people on the commercial said, why did you send
00:05:50.780
us a white guy? So here here is a gay man for their diversity commercial. And they said white
00:05:56.000
person. And then we played the commercial. No white people in it. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I think
00:06:00.780
actually you've actually hit on a really important insight that a lot of people miss. And in fact,
00:06:06.600
even people who've written on this issue miss. And an area where I differ a little bit
00:06:10.620
from other folks who've written very good books in slightly similar areas, guys like Christopher
00:06:15.380
Caldwell and Richard Denania have kind of written books about this, is that I am not as, I don't
00:06:23.740
think the Civil Rights Act in and of itself is the totalizing thing that gets us to where
00:06:28.980
we are now. And that, as you point out, these laws are on the books and they're just getting
00:06:33.020
ignored. It's in the culture, this type of discrimination. And it really helps me have folks
00:06:38.220
like Alliance who will actually call this out on lawsuits. But right now, a lot of this
00:06:43.640
discrimination is illegal and it's been happening in plain sight. Yeah. Right. Yeah. I know. I think
00:06:48.500
that's totally right. How did this happen? I'm not sure. It all happened kind of under the radar.
00:06:53.300
There was a lot of push for years. And then DEI, I think, put it on steroids as far as this kind
00:06:59.500
of racialized view of the world and a zero sum game where, you know, my racial group has to win and
00:07:03.820
yours has to lose. But a lot of big businesses, institutions in college and university setting as
00:07:09.600
well, adopted these things and nobody challenged them legally. But that's, it is starting to change.
00:07:15.780
Some of the, the Harvard decision from the Supreme Court was kind of the first real shot across the
00:07:20.140
bow. But that's not a limited decision. I think it's going to result in a lot of these programs,
00:07:25.040
which really are patently illegal and ultimately undermine the core promise of the U.S.
00:07:31.560
experiment, which is we're all equal before the law, regardless of our race, regardless of our sex,
00:07:36.580
regardless of our religious convictions. And so I think in the end, we're going to be,
00:07:40.860
the arc is going to be long, but we're going to prevail against this because it's absolutely
00:07:45.140
contrary to our founding principles, constitution protections, and some existing laws and statutes
00:07:51.600
as well. Well, I see, I see two paths on this road we're on and I'm hoping we win. I think a strong
00:07:59.260
component of it would require a Donald Trump victory and a Republican victory in November,
00:08:04.280
considering the stakes of this election. But I, I, I feel that if I would predict,
00:08:11.000
if we were to see a Democrat victory, you're likely going to see the expansion of this as
00:08:16.680
what is written down in law is completely meaningless. You know, people point out,
00:08:20.880
oh, Donald Trump, he just got convicted in a court of law.
00:08:23.560
Well, yeah, it's a jury. They agreed. And it's like, well, yes, in the Soviet Union,
00:08:26.880
they trials as well. No one takes them seriously. When we're looking at corporations that are outright
00:08:32.160
telling people, we won't hire you based on race. This happened to me actually, uh, sort of. So I was,
00:08:38.160
I worked for a company called fusion. They were hosting a big event with presidential candidates.
00:08:42.240
I was one of their top paid correspondents. I am also a mixed race person and news, news went out
00:08:49.820
about the event they were doing and the hosts they had brought on to do it. And it was their top
00:08:53.380
correspondence plus one, one outside contractor who was black. And so I'm like, Hey man, look,
00:08:58.540
you don't got to come and ask me to do anything. Let me do my thing, pay me my money. But I did ask
00:09:02.720
the president of the company. I was like, couldn't help but notice you brought in all of the top paid
00:09:07.380
correspondents and then a contractor. And then I'm not invited. And he said, you look too white.
00:09:13.100
Just straight up. He said, you look too white. And I was like, well, I'm, I'm a mixed race person.
00:09:17.060
And he was like, yeah, but you know, that doesn't matter. And I was like, all right,
00:09:19.880
well, he was straight up with me and they paid me a lot of money. So I was like, honestly, like I,
00:09:24.400
if it was something I was pursuing, like I had applied for it, right. I probably would have lost my
00:09:28.500
mind. Well, it's interesting, Tim. And I think your experience is, is really similar. And I was,
00:09:33.920
I was one of the first interviews I did about this book with Miss Charlie Kirk and Charlie,
00:09:38.020
I thought had something really interesting to say anecdotally, because he talks to such a
00:09:41.380
broad swath of people in the conservative movement. He says, when I talk with my older donors and folks
00:09:46.220
like that, and they say, you know, I start talking about anti-white racism, they kind of freak out.
00:09:50.420
They're like, oh, you know, can we even say that? Is that bad? Does that make us racist? Whereas when I
00:09:54.520
go on college campuses and I talk to young people about this, like young white people, they're like, yeah,
00:10:00.440
this is the biggest issue we're facing. You know, thank you so much for, for raising it. So I think there's
00:10:05.300
also a generation gap here where a lot of old people or older people, you know, even people
00:10:12.960
like me or middle age, my generation don't understand how bad it's gotten for younger
00:10:17.720
people trying to make their way in the world right now on some of this stuff.
00:10:20.240
Yeah. I mean, are you guys seeing more and more lawsuits or more and more requests for lawsuits?
00:10:27.060
There are more lawsuits being filed on the overreach of DEI now than there ever has been.
00:10:33.240
I think the floodgates really opened with the Harvard decision from the Supreme Court a couple
00:10:37.100
sessions ago. And so, you know, I was just looking at an opinion the other day, coming out of the 11th
00:10:42.240
Circuit Court of Appeals, where a program that has race preferences built into financial awards,
00:10:51.760
you know, the, the, the, the court said this, this violates federal law against race based contracting
00:10:58.580
decisions. Another decision came out recently that struck down a federal program and the racial
00:11:05.640
preferences they have for minority owned businesses. And so basically, if you, if you fell into certain
00:11:10.980
racial categories or ethnic categories, you, you got favored preferential treatment under the
00:11:15.560
program. And they said that just violates the fundamental principle of equal protection for
00:11:19.720
the law. So I do think that a lot of this stuff exists. It's pervasive, but I also think the legal
00:11:25.780
decisions are going to go the right way. They're going to stack pretty quickly. You were saying before
00:11:29.520
Tim about, you know, the things that are written are ignored in many ways, but what we're worried
00:11:34.800
about is what's, what's happening behind the scenes, what's shrouded. You know, and we're, one of the
00:11:40.180
things that we're working on is the way in which the federal government is taking kind of the secrecy
00:11:45.500
that's allowed within the banking system and using it in weaponizing that against people, you know,
00:11:51.240
totally legal businesses, weaponizing it against people for their constitutional,
00:11:55.520
constitutionally protected activities like speech and religion. There's a lot coming out on this.
00:12:00.300
I testified at a Congress on this a few months ago where we were actually caught up in it as well,
00:12:04.560
ADF, where I work, Alliance Defending Freedom, because the, the, the, the FinCEN, uh, part of
00:12:10.100
the counter-terrorism kind of ecosystem at the federal level shared a document with big banks
00:12:15.620
saying, look, uh, around the January 6, uh, you know, uh, uh, activities, we want you to look for
00:12:21.520
people who could be domestic, domestic violent terrorists. And they said, here's a list of hate
00:12:26.160
groups, so-called hate groups, which is put out by all these far left activists. We're on it.
00:12:30.180
Lots of other Christian organizations are as well. Um, and they're like, you know, these organizations
00:12:34.640
are, you know, domestic violent extremists, or at least could be, and people who donate to them
00:12:39.920
could be. And they're asking big banks to scour their records for people who give donations to
00:12:44.620
groups like us who, you know, use terms like MAGA or Trump or shopped at Dick's Sporting Goods or
00:12:49.660
Cabela's. Like these are, this, this is really alarming stuff. So there's, there, it's a whole
00:12:55.160
government problem. And there's a lot of manipulation of the kind of legal apparatus,
00:13:01.620
especially the counter-terrorism and criminal. Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at BetMGM,
00:13:08.500
the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas strip
00:13:13.980
excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM Grand Millions or popular games like
00:13:19.920
blackjack, baccarat, and roulette with our ever-growing library of digital slot games,
00:13:25.380
a large selection of online table games, and signature BetMGM service. There's no better
00:13:31.040
way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with BetMGM Casino.
00:13:36.600
Download the BetMGM Casino app today. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly.
00:13:42.160
BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.
00:13:47.140
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
00:13:50.500
please contact ConnexOntario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
00:13:58.560
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:14:03.200
When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
00:14:08.980
Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care about you.
00:14:14.780
We care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't
00:14:21.100
remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big
00:14:27.060
on care. Did I mention that we care? Divisions in the federal government to harm people's First
00:14:36.160
Amendment rights. And so that's a real concern. And I think it's all part of the same package.
00:14:40.260
Yeah. And I think maybe part of the reason I'm a little less optimistic, and I mean, if I were
00:14:44.220
totally pessimistic, I wouldn't have written the book because I think there are things we can do.
00:14:48.040
But I'm a little less optimistic because I think a lot of these things that we're doing to challenge
00:14:52.940
the law are only as good as the people we have who are enforcing them. And so by that, what do I mean?
00:14:59.200
You just touched on the Harvard Supreme Court decision, which says affirmative action is illegal in
00:15:02.460
universities. So Missouri has a really excellent forward-looking attorney general. As soon as that
00:15:08.080
happens, he cancels $16 million worth of race-based scholarships in the state. But I don't think any
00:15:13.580
other state AG did it, right? Because nobody actually stepped forward and said, aha, I'm going to go use
00:15:18.440
this. And then the kind of real black pill, if you will, is to look at California. So California has now
00:15:24.120
twice at the ballot box outlawed affirmative action by race in its universities. If you look at the
00:15:29.800
statistics for admission, if you really squint, you can maybe see a little bit of effect that that
00:15:38.740
That was funny. So you're referring to, I think this was, what, four or five years ago,
00:15:44.340
they had an attempt to amend the Constitution of California to allow them to discriminate on the
00:15:49.480
basis of race in public contracting and education. I remember I had a conversation with a friend of
00:15:55.020
mine who was like, excuse me, like a woke LA actress. And I saw that she had posted in favor of
00:16:01.380
it. And so I immediately texted her and then ended up with a phone call. And I was like,
00:16:06.240
so why do you think people should be allowed to discriminate against people based on their race?
00:16:11.720
And she was like, well, no, this is to help minorities. And I said, what's the population
00:16:19.200
breakdown of California? Like what are the racial demographics? Let's actually, let's pull this one
00:16:23.440
up. I think whites are like 38% or something. So they're a minority. So 40% are Latino, 35% are
00:16:31.800
white, 15% are Asian, Pacific Islander, 5% are black. And I was like, you know, what's the breakdown?
00:16:37.880
And then actually let's, let's do this. Los Angeles. I was like, so the racial makeup of LA is 48.7%
00:16:48.680
white. But that includes Hispanics there. Like the white non-Hispanic numbers. Well, it says 44.6
00:16:55.180
are Hispanic or Latino. Right. Because if you look at it, it's adding up to way more than a hundred,
00:16:59.800
right? Because this is a number of Hispanics who self-identify as white. So if I had to guess
00:17:04.720
the white non-Hispanic number. Oh, right. That doesn't make sense. Does it? I asked her, I was like,
00:17:09.000
do you think that in like these towns that in California that are predominantly white,
00:17:14.620
do you think they're going to choose to be more or less racist? And she was like,
00:17:22.280
well, I would assume more racist. And I was like, why would you want to give them the legal right to
00:17:26.020
do so? Right. And she didn't have an answer. I feel like a lot of these activists just want to be
00:17:31.160
racist for real. I mean, that's it. I mean, like the outcome of, of, of amending the constitution in
00:17:37.560
the way they did certainly at the state level could have some impact, but there are counties that are
00:17:42.240
predominantly white in California. There's the East, uh, certain farming areas. And I'm like,
00:17:47.640
the reality is, I think if California changed the amendment, these overwhelmingly white areas would
00:17:52.120
not implement racial laws to protect white people. Right. The other counties that aren't
00:17:56.560
predominantly white would absolutely pass laws to harm white people. Right. Well, the interesting
00:18:01.320
thing on that, that, uh, ballot initiative in California was every politician in the state
00:18:07.400
endorsed at least all the, the Democrats did, which is everybody who has office. Um, they outspent
00:18:12.720
the proponents about 30 to one or something preposterous and everybody thought that they
00:18:17.680
were going to win. Um, and they lost 56, 44 while Biden was carrying the state with 63%. So I think the
00:18:24.400
good news is that actually racially discriminating is sort of unpopular in America. Um, at least when you
00:18:31.440
sort of expose it to light, but the bad news is there's a lot of this stuff. And as you point out,
00:18:35.740
a lot of this is coming out behind the scenes. And so, um, you know, I think part of my, part of
00:18:41.960
what I'm trying to do in the unprotected class is just to, to shine a light on it, to say, Hey,
00:18:46.000
this is going on. We should, we should talk about it. We should do something.
00:18:48.560
So where does it all, where does this all begin? Like the, the, the, uh, origin, I suppose of DEI
00:18:55.600
and anti-white racism. Yeah. I mean, I think you can't tell the story without telling the story
00:19:00.560
of the civil rights act. And again, where I get a little bit less, uh, autistic than some people
00:19:05.000
is I think some of them like to be super intellectually curious and say, ah, you know,
00:19:09.380
it was just the civil rights act. It was really horrible. Um, my view is civil rights act of 1964
00:19:14.200
was a response to real problems that were existing. I mean, there was, there was segregation. There was
00:19:19.200
racism, uh, things had been improving, but it was not an unreasonable. It was a blunt instrument to
00:19:25.380
solve a very real problem. And I think it turned out to be too blunt. It took away too many freedoms
00:19:30.020
over the longterm. And even more importantly, the deep state slash administrative state and future
00:19:35.420
really dubious Supreme court rulings and other things built on this and, and took it way away
00:19:40.600
from what I think everybody would have wanted it to be in 1964. But having said that, I don't think
00:19:45.280
you can tell this story without discussing the act. I don't think a lot of this happens without the
00:19:52.160
civil rights act of 1964. And I think without seriously amending our civil rights laws, I don't think we
00:19:57.840
can fix fully some of these problems. But I also think that the, the, the left has, has made a
00:20:03.900
calculated decision that they can, at least for right now, the best way to drive their agenda is
00:20:08.780
through a lens of a discrimination. So they have, they have co-opted a lot of good laws like the,
00:20:14.000
the civil rights act of 1964 and other state and local laws, um, that are really meant to be shields
00:20:20.500
to protect people from discrimination based on immutable characteristics that they have no control over
00:20:25.560
and they shouldn't be deprived of jobs or other things, uh, because of, and they've decided to
00:20:30.040
drive, you know, an agenda through that and essentially say, there's a point of view or
00:20:35.300
perspective that you need to bend the knee to. And if you don't, we're going to use this as a, as a
00:20:39.340
sword instead to, you know, harm you, to run you out of business, uh, to litigate and make,
00:20:45.780
you know, vexatiously and make your life miserable. Our, our clients deal with this all the time.
00:20:49.620
You know, we, we represented, um, um, Jack Phillips, uh, from Masterpiece Cake Shop at the U.S. Supreme
00:20:54.760
Court. We won that decision seven to two back in 2017. He's still been sued today, um, because
00:21:02.080
other folks in Colorado didn't like the outcome of that decision and just took the non-discrimination
00:21:07.760
there law and decided to attack him rather than through sexual orientation, discrimination through
00:21:13.040
gender identity discrimination and say, well, you have to bake a cake that celebrates my gender
00:21:17.820
transition. So like, this is, this is part of the problem is it's a calculated political strategy.
00:21:22.740
Where's the inverse? Where's the white Christian going to a gay bakery and asking for, uh, a cake
00:21:30.580
with Leviticus saying, if you shall lay with a man as a man lays with a woman.
00:21:34.300
That actually happened in Jack Phillips' case. I mean, that was actually one of the most interesting
00:21:37.480
parts of that case. Um, that some guy did exactly what you said, showed up at a, uh, a bake shop
00:21:43.720
in Colorado, um, that, you know, was clearly gay affirming and asked him for a cake that celebrated,
00:21:50.840
you know, uh, marriage between a man and a woman and had a few verses from scripture that, you know,
00:21:56.140
made it clear that marriage between a man and a woman. And this, and the, and the cake shop owner
00:21:59.420
said, no, I'm not going to do that. Well, then he filed a civil rights complaint. Same one that was
00:22:03.500
filed against our client, uh, alleging discrimination and Colorado kicked that and said, no, there's no
00:22:09.080
discrimination here while they continue to prosecute Jack Phillips. And I think part of
00:22:13.900
the reason we won is the selective enforcement. Oh, that actually helped you win. It did help us
00:22:18.580
win. Yeah. I mean, it wasn't, it wasn't what, what ultimately sealed the deal, but it was definitely
00:22:21.920
as part of the case, the whole way up was the selective enforcement by the officials. Uh, I think
00:22:25.960
it was Steven Crowder went to a bunch of, uh, Muslim bakeries and tried to get gay cakes made and they
00:22:32.240
refused and no one cared. Right. And I think this is the real issue. And, and with, I mean, what these guys do
00:22:38.180
is awesome. Okay. It's, it's great. And I, you know, they have got a lot of attorneys and I wish
00:22:41.820
they had 10 times as many, but I think what he's also showing is, is the problem of scale, right?
00:22:47.200
Which is, so they stepped in, right? But not everybody who does this can get media attention
00:22:52.720
or can have things put in. And so it's, it's not really the law that ends up deciding most of this,
00:22:57.140
unfortunately, it's these woke bureaucracies and these woke politicians.
00:23:01.180
So, so would you say in your, I don't know if you're allowed to give legal advice in this context
00:23:07.000
though, but just in your expert opinion, that's it. If a person were to go to a bakery and requested
00:23:11.720
scripture on a cake and they refuse, is that religious discrimination?
00:23:16.780
So is it religious discrimination? Well, a jurisdiction might find that it is, but my view
00:23:21.640
is that person should be, should be able to object. I mean, I will, I will order 10,000 cakes tomorrow
00:23:26.300
with Leviticus written on it to prove a point. If, if, if that is the, the actual, if maybe we should
00:23:32.660
just do it. If the big shop owner in that situation says, I have a, an objection to that message.
00:23:37.580
I disagree with him. I don't want to write on a cake. Then they should be afforded the same
00:23:41.160
treatment that our clients are to not be forced to coerce, to promote messages they disagree with.
00:23:45.360
I mean, this is the, the, the problem with the law is they're being used as a tool to force
00:23:50.520
speech that people don't want to engage. So imagine the rule needs to apply equally to everybody.
00:23:56.440
Well, even more provocatively, imagine a racially provocative thing. I'm not even going to,
00:24:00.300
you can kind of, your, your listeners can use their imagination here, right?
00:24:03.480
You're right. This is better. I should start. I, I, I will hire someone right now to start
00:24:10.200
calling as many bakers as possible saying, we want cakes that say white people are great.
00:24:16.780
That's it. Yeah. Or, or how about it's okay to be white? Right. And then that's like the,
00:24:22.400
that, that you guys remember that campaign when they put up the flyers, the point of that,
00:24:27.040
for those who are not familiar, I assume most people are, but there was this, um, um, I guess,
00:24:31.820
what do you call it? A campaign or something? It was, it was a grassroots meme campaign where
00:24:37.200
someone made a bland white image with black tech saying it's okay to be white. The point being
00:24:44.320
was that it doesn't assert that white people are better. It's not a white supremacist message.
00:24:50.460
It's just okay. Cause they knew that the, the narrative and the ideology of the woke would be
00:24:57.740
that it is not okay to be white and they would attack the message and they did.
00:25:01.020
Right. And, and Tim, this is such, I mean, I, I, I did not pay Tim to do this, but this was
00:25:05.560
originally the title of my book was it's okay to be white. And I got that for, for the exact reasons
00:25:11.440
you just said, um, I got that by the editorial staff. And finally, like two months later, we were
00:25:16.160
going to go to press soon. The sales staff came back and said, we can't sell that book to Walmart
00:25:21.020
and Costco with that title. And I said, you know, but if it was okay to be Hispanic, okay to be black,
00:25:25.720
okay to be Asian American, you wouldn't blink for a second and say that. But if it's okay, if I say
00:25:30.960
it's okay to be white, I might as well put on my clan hood. Right. And that I think just illustrates
00:25:35.620
the pervasiveness of anti-whiteness within our current context.
00:25:40.380
So is there a reason why we haven't seen a larger campaign of someone just calling 5,000
00:25:45.700
bakeries in a week and asking for these cakes? I don't, no, no reason. Usually these things
00:25:53.020
are organic. So I just, well, I would just order a cake and be like, yeah, I'd like to
00:25:57.240
have a cake made. Yeah. And we can do a variety of, so I think the, the, you know, I'm curious
00:26:03.480
if you went to a bakery and said you wanted a, uh, I want a black fist and I want to say
00:26:09.960
black power. Right. They'd probably all agree to do it. Yeah. Yeah. But if somebody objected
00:26:15.580
and they, and they had a, they had a, you know, like a, a, a, a speech based objection
00:26:20.280
to that and they were being forced to create something through their own.
00:26:23.060
Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games
00:26:30.260
at your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement. MGM is famous for when you play
00:26:34.980
classics like MGM grand millions or popular games like blackjack, baccarat and roulette
00:26:40.760
with our ever growing library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games
00:26:45.960
and signature BetMGM service. There's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las
00:26:51.640
Vegas home to you than with BetMGM Casino. Download the BetMGM Casino app today.
00:26:58.220
BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager.
00:27:03.760
Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling
00:27:07.760
or someone close to you, please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor
00:27:15.840
free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:27:21.640
When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of
00:27:27.060
Desjardins Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that
00:27:31.620
we really care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't
00:27:39.620
remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big
00:27:50.980
You know, skills, you know, writing that message on a cake, designing it, then they can't be coerced
00:27:57.640
to do it. I mean, this is the problem with the non-discrimination laws is that activists are
00:28:01.220
using them to force people to say messages they disagree with. So that's the line. And, you know,
00:28:05.700
the First Amendment protects written speech, you know, graphic art and a much more capacious,
00:28:11.280
you know, form of expression than that. People shouldn't be forced to do that.
00:28:14.760
Do you think if someone asked a bakery to make a white power cake and they refuse to do it,
00:28:19.620
would that be considered discriminatory based on race?
00:28:24.020
I mean, I imagine the jurisdictions would find that. And then you'd have to decide whether there was,
00:28:28.080
you know, a First Amendment right involved. But I mean, these things all play out, right?
00:28:30.880
In the broader cultural context, and the power equation, I think, is very imbalanced. That's why
00:28:38.640
it's really important for us to be able to come in on behalf of people like Jack Phillips, who have
00:28:41.540
religious objections to same-sex marriage, and say, you can't coerce people to create art that
00:28:47.920
violates their core religious convictions related to marriage or a host of other issues.
00:28:51.960
Well, apparently you can, because they won't leave this guy in Colorado alone.
00:28:56.500
Well, I mean, they are. And lots of times these things, you know, sadly, as a litigator,
00:29:01.220
I can say, you know, these things aren't resolved once and for all, even when you win a great
00:29:04.320
Supreme Court case. And we won Masterpiece Cake Shop 7-2. That was on religious freedom grounds,
00:29:08.920
not free speech grounds. Then just last term, we won 303 Creative, which was another Colorado
00:29:14.320
business owner who created websites, designed websites, all the content, all the imagery,
00:29:19.980
all the graphics. She did wedding websites as well. And she didn't want to be treated the same
00:29:24.300
way Jack Phillips was. So she preemptively sued Colorado and said, I need an order telling
00:29:28.520
Colorado, Colorado, I can never be forced to promote same-sex weddings through my design work.
00:29:34.520
We had to go all the way up to the Supreme Court. It took eight years to get a win in that case. Now,
00:29:38.900
you know, that didn't, it should once and for all solve the issue. But the problem is you've got,
00:29:43.940
you know, all these different actors in the private sector and in the governmental sector who don't
00:29:49.660
like the ruling and are doing everything they can to get around it. So, you know, this is part of the
00:29:53.460
lesson of Reagan's quote, you know, we, we, we are all, all are part of the process of passing
00:29:58.660
along our freedoms to the next generation. And that requires vigilance.
00:30:02.100
What if you asked a bakery in Colorado to make a cake that said white people suck?
00:30:08.460
Is that discrimination though, if they, if they, if they were to make that message as a business?
00:30:14.900
So I'm curious because it's, it's one thing to deny someone a public accommodation,
00:30:19.360
a service based on like their, their belief or whatever. I'm wondering if there is also
00:30:25.160
a claim or is it actually just evidence of bias if a bakery is willing to make a racist statement
00:30:33.620
Yeah. Well, I mean, obviously I agree with Jeremy that, that we should just be able to,
00:30:37.260
that these bakeries should not be compelled to have any message that they don't want to have.
00:30:41.180
But I think the reality is, and I would love for you to test it. If you did a white power cake
00:30:44.940
and get a black power cake and call it around to a hundred bakeries, we'd get a very, very different
00:30:49.020
answer. And that's just the reality. And so that's the way the law is playing out in practice.
00:30:54.160
I think it's fairly obvious. You call an area that's predominantly conservative. They're going
00:30:58.260
to say, we're not going to make a black power or a white power cake. You call an urban liberal
00:31:02.780
center and they're going to say, how many black power cakes did you want? How about you do a BOGO?
00:31:06.440
You know, if we love the message, can we give you another one for free?
00:31:09.180
It's Steven Crowder going to Dearborn bakeries and saying, will you do this? And I'm saying no,
00:31:16.820
It was like, I mean, Lauren Southern, I think was banned from England for, you know,
00:31:20.160
Allah is a gay God, right? She did the, you know, sign years ago, right? It's the same thing,
00:31:25.800
which of course you could see leftists basically making that same point with those, almost those
00:31:31.400
same words, but it's perceived differently, right?
00:31:34.020
Well, I think the issue is, man, it really comes down to, I suppose, white Christian men are weak.
00:31:42.320
They're weak. There's a lot of strong ones, but, you know, the United States is a nation that
00:31:49.000
was a predominantly white Christian country and through their tolerance and acceptance have
00:31:55.200
allowed evil and degeneracy to expand rapidly to the point where we are now. I'm not saying this
00:32:00.080
country should have stayed the way it was. I have no problem whatsoever. My family come from different
00:32:05.320
racial backgrounds. So the issue, however, is a lack of, I suppose, discipline and strength in
00:32:11.740
protecting the institutions while actually allowing and being, like, if you're going to be tolerant,
00:32:18.560
you still have to say, hey, there's a line. And so my greater point is the only reason we are seeing
00:32:25.680
what we're seeing is because white people are actually split on the issue and no other racial
00:32:30.240
Tim, I'm so glad you mentioned this because this is actually something I try, I both try to stress it
00:32:34.460
in the book and I try to stress it when it comes up in interviews, which is, I am not writing this to say,
00:32:40.440
oh, like, white people should be victims. And, you know, we need to, it's not about whining the
00:32:44.160
rest. It's about saying, like, we need to have more self-respect than to be treated as second
00:32:49.260
class citizens, period. And it's like, white people are not some 1%, 2% minority in this country.
00:32:54.540
If we simply stand up and say, we're not going to allow ourselves to be treated in this way,
00:32:59.260
it will stop. But as you point out, there's a split. And not only that, we have a split within
00:33:03.260
white community. Some of them are some of the actively worst people on that. I think there's a variety
00:33:08.020
of interesting reasons why that's going on. But really, this is not about kind of creating
00:33:13.620
a new victim class. It's just to say, white people shouldn't be putting up with this. And
00:33:17.440
obviously, everybody else should be helping us not put up with it, too. But we're kind of our
00:33:25.960
Well, I mean, I just think our message should be, we shouldn't put up with race discrimination at all.
00:33:29.900
I mean, you know, race, organizing a society around, you know, like racializing everything
00:33:35.700
becomes a zero-sum game where your people must win and others must lose. And so if you look back
00:33:45.740
in American history, the most, you know, the advances for equality and justice have always been
00:33:54.320
ultimately about people like Frederick Douglass or Martin Luther King Jr. calling on for accountability
00:34:01.720
to America's founding principles, to its promise of equal protection before the law, the idea
00:34:07.020
expressed in the declaration that we're all created in the image of God, that we all have
00:34:12.080
inalienable rights given to us by God. And that equality before the law is the most important thing.
00:34:16.840
I think we're in a battle of ideas. And I think people in the kind of conservative
00:34:21.800
ecosystem feel like they're on the losing side of it. And I think that's to some extent true,
00:34:27.060
but are the ideas that formed this country and that we believe in are the ideas that can save us
00:34:34.100
from this trajectory of DEI, racializing society in this way.
00:34:38.620
I think the problem though, that you're both going to have to accept if you want to figure things out
00:34:43.660
is that white people are the most racist racial demographic in the country. They are the most,
00:34:49.560
and I can prove it. I can prove it right now. I've got proof right here. I pulled up. You can
00:34:53.200
already see it. Now, here's what I want to explain. This proves that white people are the most racist
00:34:57.400
against white people. So if you take a look, what we have pulled up is mean in-group bias by race and
00:35:04.160
ethnicity. Black people have a mean 15.58% in-group racial preference. Hispanics is 12.83, which is weird
00:35:14.100
because Hispanic means Spanish speaking person. Asian is 13.94. Perhaps they mean Latino. White
00:35:19.760
liberal is negative 13.17 and non-white liberal is 11.62. If you were to break this down, what do you
00:35:27.580
see? Of the racial groups with an in-group preference, non-white liberals are still lower than all of the
00:35:36.580
other groups. There is a lower preference for white people among non-liberal white people.
00:35:42.580
And among liberal white people, there is an out-group preference. Add these numbers up.
00:35:48.240
Liberals are the most racist. Now it's predominantly against, I should say, white people, if you were to
00:35:54.240
add it all together, will be the most racist, but it's against white people.
00:35:59.920
Tim, I'm so thrilled. I talk about this graph a lot. I've never had anybody actually show it. I'm
00:36:05.940
thrilled that you know about it because it's so important. And I should add, this graph that Tim
00:36:09.660
is showing is not from some, you know, right-wing push-pull that was trying to get a particular
00:36:14.480
result. This is standard social science survey data. It's taken from a very large data set. And
00:36:21.260
it's really fascinating, right? Because everybody, I mean, you know, yes, even it is interesting that
00:36:27.240
even non-liberal whites have less in-group preference than these other groups, but at least
00:36:32.420
those other bars are like a little bit similar. And you can kind of wave your hands and say,
00:36:36.100
ah, it's kind of the same thing going on. You sort of expect, like, people are going to have
00:36:39.600
an in-group preference. As long as that's not out of control, it's not really something I would call
00:36:44.300
a big problem, right? Like you prefer your mother to some random woman on the street.
00:36:48.280
But what's really pathological here is the white liberal, right? Which is this massive thing where
00:36:54.440
they think white people are dumber, more criminal. You go out and I really, my next book is going to
00:36:58.940
really probably be to put these guys on the couch.
00:37:00.660
They don't think that white people are stupider. White liberals believe that white people are the
00:37:05.780
supreme race. And they're guilty about it. We call them whites. We call them white supremacists
00:37:11.000
with guilty conscience. But it's true. I've encountered this quite a bit. For those that
00:37:16.140
have listened to any one of my shows, I have a story that some of you may have heard. But for the
00:37:19.940
sake of the gentleman before me, I will tell you guys, I was in North Dakota at the North Dakota
00:37:24.180
Access Pipeline protest. No, Dakota Pipeline protest, whatever it was called. And ice cold,
00:37:31.580
Native American saying, don't build this pipeline. I was only able to be there for a few days because
00:37:37.000
I had a business meeting in California, which meant I had to drive from New York to North Dakota
00:37:41.240
to California. It was a heck of a trip. Wide out conditions, driving to Montana, a whole lot of fun.
00:37:45.360
Wyoming roads were pure ice. And so we're sitting down to dinner or a lunch or whatever. And someone
00:37:52.600
asked me how long I was sticking around for. These are all leftists. And I said, I got to leave in
00:37:56.980
the morning because I got a business meeting in California in three days. And this guy smarks and
00:38:02.200
says, business meeting? And I was like, yeah. And he was like, that's colonial thinking. And I was
00:38:08.860
like, what does that mean? Colonial thinking? He's like, it's scheduling your meetings is colonial
00:38:14.480
thinking. He's like, Native Americans don't do that. They wake up when they need to wake up when
00:38:18.340
it makes sense. They do the work when the work needs to be done. It's white Europeans who brought
00:38:22.040
this idea of scheduling and meetings to, to the world and to America. And I was like, what? I was
00:38:29.980
like, Asians have time too, bro. Like we, we, like we, we have clocks. He goes, no. He's like, no,
00:38:37.240
these, these are ideas that were spread by white Europeans. And I was like, my guy, China invented the
00:38:41.580
compass. He's a white guy too. I'm like, China invented the compass 1,000 years before you,
00:38:46.260
1,000 years before you did. And he's like, but don't you think that really it's just white people
00:38:51.180
brought all that stuff to Asia? And I was like, I actually snapped on the guy and I was like,
00:38:55.300
I'm not going to sit here and have some white supremacist telling me that my culture is derivative
00:38:59.180
of his. When we did this stuff thousands of years before you, you white supremacist piece of trash.
00:39:03.800
And they were all like, it's remarkable that they genuinely believe this stuff.
00:39:08.260
You actually, you could see this in some other interesting studies they've done.
00:39:12.000
For example, when, when white conservatives talk to African-Americans in particular,
00:39:17.720
the language that they use is effectively the same as when they talk to white people. They're not sort
00:39:22.760
of talking down to them and have ways of measuring this scientist. Ah, there you go. Right there.
00:39:27.820
You're, you're, you're, you're like, you're teeing it up, right? That they, they, um, white,
00:39:32.840
white conservatives treat minorities as the same, but when white liberals get in front of
00:39:37.060
African-Americans, they, they talk down to them. Yes. Right. A Yale insights. This is Yale.
00:39:41.380
Right. White liberals present themselves as less competent in interactions with African-Americans.
00:39:47.620
That's wild. It's so weird. Yeah. For, for me, I suppose growing up in a, in an area,
00:39:56.800
Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at Bad MGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
00:40:03.720
your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement. MGM is famous for when you play classics like
00:40:09.080
MGM grand millions or popular games like blackjack, baccarat and roulette with our ever-growing library
00:40:15.960
of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games and signature Bad MGM service.
00:40:21.800
There's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with
00:40:26.400
Bad MGM casino. Download the Bad MGM casino app today. Bad MGM and game sense remind you to play
00:40:33.300
responsibly. Bad MGM.com for T's and C's 19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please play responsibly.
00:40:39.000
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
00:40:42.360
please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
00:40:50.420
Bad MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:40:55.040
When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
00:41:00.820
Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care
00:41:05.860
about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't remember saying that
00:41:13.940
part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big on care.
00:41:24.680
Mixed? You don't do this. The fastest way to get punched in the mouth is to treat someone like
00:41:31.220
they're dumb. But I feel like a lot of these white liberals, they're probably wealthier,
00:41:37.900
higher income, and they come from white enclaves. So you know what's interesting is being from Chicago,
00:41:45.500
and now everyone can say, oh, Tim said he's from Chicago again. It's Democrat controlled for 100
00:41:49.520
years. No Republicans. I have no feeling whatsoever most of my life on the Republican
00:41:54.660
party because they don't exist. Where I grew up, everything I experienced was just Democrats.
00:42:00.160
I hate Democrats. And I wonder if this is the same thing for those white liberals. They grew up
00:42:04.720
surrounded by white people. It's not that white people are bad. It's that they only ever experience
00:42:09.400
good or bad coming from white people. And so then you get a media that romanticizes these other
00:42:16.380
races, or what do they call it? The myth of the noble savage is this racist idea that they all
00:42:22.100
must be pure and good. These liberals grow up hearing these things, and then this is the worldview
00:42:27.440
they build. Yeah. I mean, I grew up in North Carolina in a highly integrated public school system,
00:42:32.480
grew up around a lot of African Americans, got to Yale, and I dealt with a lot of these white guys from
00:42:38.780
New England who'd gone to prep schools and maybe hadn't had very much exposure outside of that.
00:42:43.280
And it was really clear to me how uncomfortable they were, regardless of their professed opinions
00:42:49.380
on anything, with actually dealing with a normal African American person, right? And so, I mean,
00:42:56.380
it was really striking to me at that time, and I'm sure it's the same type of thing that you're
00:42:59.220
talking about, same type of dynamic. You know, I think that you're talking about enclaves and things
00:43:03.920
like that. I think the problem, though, is that this politicization of everything,
00:43:09.100
this racialization of everything, even whether you keep a schedule, it's colonial or whatever. I mean,
00:43:13.500
it's bizarre, but I think the problem is it's pervasive in the sense that DEI is at the root
00:43:19.360
of the education system right now. And I think as a society, we're going to be reaping the whirlwind
00:43:25.140
of that for some period of time until it gets rooted out, because that idea around, you know,
00:43:32.440
everything has to be seen through the lens of this power relationship and the oppressed-oppressor
00:43:36.580
classes. And then everything, even like whether you keep a schedule and set, you know, whatever,
00:43:41.160
a clock to get up in the morning, becomes some kind of, you know, indicator of whether you're from
00:43:46.780
a privileged class. I mean, this is really toxic, but they're teaching it to all of our kids in all
00:43:53.500
the public schools and in a lot of private schools too. So, you know, I think the problem is how
00:43:58.520
pervasive is we're challenging this in a couple of school districts. We, in Albemarle School District
00:44:02.300
in Virginia, we represent parents and also some school officials because the school adopted this
00:44:08.920
anti-racist program and started pushing it as curriculum in the schools. And parents of kids
00:44:15.720
that were multiracial would come, the kids would come home and they'd be talking in ways about their
00:44:20.340
own racial makeup that they'd had never done before, you know, all the years they've been
00:44:25.080
raising their kids in this kind of multiracial family. So, you know, it is very toxic and,
00:44:31.480
you know, it just, it kind of creeps in where people aren't, they don't fully, I don't think,
00:44:36.960
are aware yet just how pervasive it is and how it creeps into the, you know, the most innocent
00:44:41.420
settings at your school. So, you know, I think it's imperative that we root it out. And even,
00:44:46.000
I think you mentioned this, Jeremy, I saw you in an interview, talk about how down in Florida,
00:44:50.340
they, they just eliminated their DEI departments. Yeah. And I mean, that's the kind of actions we
00:44:55.460
need. We need, we need just the pure, the complete elimination of DEI departments, positions at
00:45:00.180
colleges and universities. And that needs to trickle all the way down to the, you know,
00:45:03.840
K through 12 schools too. You know, the, the reality is, you know, when you mention people
00:45:08.620
should have their free speech, we shouldn't discriminate on the basis of race. These are the
00:45:12.600
traditional liberal positions. And that's literally was social liberalism as it was referred to that
00:45:18.440
led to the 1964 civil rights act. There are a lot of post liberals that say, this is what has,
00:45:24.960
you know, uh, brought us to the point of communism, Marxism, race, communism, whatever you're going to
00:45:30.900
call it. I just, I agree and disagree. I think the issue is when we create something like the 1964
00:45:36.780
civil rights act and all the titles within it, we're basically saying, guys, we're not going to do this
00:45:41.740
thing anymore. But just because bad people are using it to do bad things doesn't mean it,
00:45:46.800
it was bad. It means we are not safeguarding it. You build a bank to hold your money and then you
00:45:54.220
walk away and someone robs it. The idea is someone goes, well, that was dumb. Why we put our money in
00:45:58.880
the same place? It's like, well, no, the problem was you weren't protecting it. You weren't saying,
00:46:03.240
stop, you can't take the money. So what we, what we need is we need to reaffirm. You can't
00:46:09.140
discriminate the basis of race that includes white people or otherwise. The problem now is the left
00:46:13.640
is quite literally discriminating the basis of race and the courts and the systems are all
00:46:19.900
agreeing with them because it's not about, it's not, it's, it's, it's never about what's written
00:46:23.880
down on law. Um, I'll give, I'll give a shout out to Wade Stotz again. He's the, he made a video about
00:46:28.340
the constitution is dead. His argument, you saw this video. I literally was in an interview in Idaho
00:46:33.620
yesterday with Wade. Oh, okay. He had a great point where he said, when a society gets to the point
00:46:39.200
where they begin writing things down, it's usually not going well. If a society is acting in a certain
00:46:44.580
way, no one writes it down because everyone is just doing the thing, right? We don't, we don't
00:46:49.400
need to write down that people should eat food to live because everyone eats food to live. And so
00:46:54.560
when we decide to write down these laws, it's because people are not agreeing on what constitutes,
00:47:01.980
you know, our, our moral framework. So we then put up a notice to everybody, this is what we've
00:47:06.420
decided. But at that point, you know, things are starting to break down. Yeah. So no, go ahead.
00:47:11.980
Well, I mean, just one thing about DEI that I want to make sure I bring out is that it's not just about
00:47:16.700
all the race issues. It certainly isn't. That's, I think a very pivotal piece of what's going on
00:47:20.060
with DEI, but it's also critical gender theory. There's a host of, of, of bad cultural things that
00:47:26.200
are happening, um, that are being driven through essentially critical gender theory. It demands for
00:47:33.000
pronoun usage demands for, you know, um, uh, puberty blockers for, for, for youth, even medical, uh,
00:47:39.960
surgical interventions for youth, um, for kids who are struggling with, you know, gender dysphoria
00:47:44.020
and things like that. Um, in the corporate world where I do a lot of work, trying to push back on
00:47:48.500
corporations being weaponized to push these agendas on the American people by bypassing democratic
00:47:53.840
accountability. DEI is really the tool that's used to push these things on corporations too.
00:47:58.720
And so like organizations like the human rights campaign scores corporations on their corporate
00:48:03.360
equality index this year to get a hundred percent, which all the corporations want on the corporate
00:48:08.720
quality index, the corporations have to provide, um, insurance coverage for puberty blockers and
00:48:15.460
surgeries for youth. And so like 70% of the American public. Why do they care about the HRC? Plus 25
00:48:23.320
states have outlawed various aspects. Why do they care what the HRC says? They all care.
00:48:27.800
But the question is why, why? Because ESG and DEI is a tool that the left has successfully used to
00:48:34.960
drive all the corporations left time to do the time. Where's the inverse? We're doing it right
00:48:38.780
now at ADF. We have shareholders creating scores. We have a score. Well, our score is the viewpoint
00:48:43.460
diversity score business index. So we, we rate all these corporations on their respect for free
00:48:47.340
speech and religious freedom. Um, and then we have a, a, a shareholder coalition that essentially uses
00:48:52.420
the same tools that the left uses to drive all these corporations down this very toxic path of ESG,
00:48:58.700
DEI, all the critical gender stuff and everything else to, as a counterweight to it. And we're actually
00:49:03.700
seeing successes. We had, we had chase dropped a, drop a policy, a hate, uh, like a hate group policy
00:49:08.660
that allowed them to, um, debank people for, um, political or religious reasons. Um, just this year,
00:49:15.980
they dropped the policy that we had made up kind of a, a key part of our advocacy with chase.
00:49:20.040
Shouldn't have policies on the books that allow you to debank people for their political or religious
00:49:24.280
beliefs or because they're involved in ESG, you know, disfavored industries and they dropped that
00:49:28.960
policy. So, you know, we are trying very hard to push back on this stuff. I feel like you're taking
00:49:34.520
the approach of the ship is sinking. Everyone needs to bail the water out to try and save the ship.
00:49:40.560
I I'm, I'm kind of partial to the make the ship sink faster idea and, uh, destroy DEI through its own
00:49:48.660
error. So, you know, what I've told people is, uh, in New York city, for instance,
00:49:54.820
gender identity, have you, you're a lawyer, have you looked at New York city's human rights law?
00:49:58.220
Sure. Absolutely amazing. Gender identity is described as self-expression.
00:50:02.680
They, you, you are, it is not, it is illegal. It's a violation of human rights in New York city,
00:50:06.560
the city specifically to discriminate on the, uh, uh, against a person based on the clothing they wear,
00:50:11.500
the names they choose to use. And so when, when this was, uh, I don't remember when it was passed,
00:50:17.780
but I do remember when it became an issue. This is probably around 2017 or 18. So I actually called
00:50:22.400
around to a few different human rights lawyers and I was like, I'm trying to understand this law.
00:50:26.620
Help me out. You can't discriminate against a person based on the clothing they wear,
00:50:30.740
the name they use, gender identity, identity is protected as self-expression. They all say,
00:50:35.400
yes, absolutely. These are New York city based human rights. And I said, okay, so that means like,
00:50:39.460
obviously if you're biologically male, but you want to be called Janet and wear a dress,
00:50:44.020
they can't fire you. And they're like, right. And I said, okay. And then there's a little bit
00:50:48.620
more nuance. Like if there's a standard uniform, then you're expected to wear the uniform. You
00:50:52.740
can't just wear whatever you want that that's interpreted by the judge. We all understand what
00:50:56.300
this means. If there is a male and female version of the uniform, you can choose whichever one you
00:50:59.940
want to wear. And I said, okay, how about for a business with no dress code? If I showed up,
00:51:06.560
if I showed up for an interview wearing normal clothes and they said, we're hiring you. And
00:51:11.320
let's say it's like a barista position. And then the next day I showed up in a full fursuit
00:51:15.520
with like a wolf cartoon wolf head. And I told them from now on, my name is Volsiferon,
00:51:20.640
Herald of the Winter Mists. And I expect to be addressed that way. It's my, as it's my full name.
00:51:25.540
Can they discriminate? All the lawyers said, yes. And I said, why? They said, because that's
00:51:31.660
ridiculous. And I said, says who? And they were like, any judge will laugh you out of the courtroom.
00:51:38.160
And I said, does that then mean a judge could laugh at a man dressed like a woman? And they were like,
00:51:42.680
well, that's different. And I said, I don't understand the legal pretext for why a judge
00:51:49.340
can laugh at a man's clothing when the law says you can't, but not another man's clothing.
00:51:54.520
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I think it's beautiful logic, I think, but I think they're probably right that
00:51:59.140
it's not going to matter. I mean, this, this is what comes down to the fact that the Civil Rights
00:52:02.780
Act gives us certain protections right now, but they're not actually being enforced.
00:52:05.560
Well, so, so what do you think would happen if someone went to Starbucks with a, let's not say
00:52:12.800
a fursuit, but they had cat ears, a tail, whiskers stuck to their fake, fake teeth, and they kept
00:52:19.340
talking like this. And they said their name was Muford and they expect to be called Muford by everybody.
00:52:24.320
Right. Do you think they would win a discrimination lawsuit if they were told they couldn't do that
00:52:28.000
anymore? I don't think so. I don't think it's a protected class under the New York law. So
00:52:31.380
probably not. It says the clothing you wear in your identity though, self-expression.
00:52:35.840
Probably based in some limited sense of gender identity where they're still limiting it in some
00:52:40.600
way to male, female. What if they went in, what if they went in blackface and said, I identify
00:52:45.480
as an African-American, Rachel Doolittle? The law does not have that distinction. It literally,
00:52:50.860
so going, I went through the law and the definitions. I don't know how you can draw a distinction
00:52:56.780
between, so they have 31 legally recognized genders. I don't know, obviously the judges
00:53:04.760
exist to interpret and bring the human element into the law to find that limit. But wouldn't
00:53:09.520
this in essence create a fracture in the legal framework itself that a man who wears a dress,
00:53:17.760
what, okay, so what if you really test limits? A guy wears a dress, but he also wears fruit
00:53:20.880
on his head, like those dancers, you know, the women who had the fruit on their heads and
00:53:23.920
they would dance. I'm Miranda, yeah. Yeah, and what if they said, no, you can't do that?
00:53:26.960
Get ready for Las Vegas-style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
00:53:34.100
your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like
00:53:39.440
MGM Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette. With our ever-growing
00:53:45.860
library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games, and signature BetMGM
00:53:51.380
service. There's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to
00:53:56.040
you than with BetMGM Casino. Download the BetMGM Casino app today. BetMGM and GameSense remind you
00:54:03.400
to play responsibly. BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.
00:54:09.620
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact
00:54:13.420
ConnexOntario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant
00:54:22.000
to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
00:54:25.440
When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
00:54:31.200
Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care about you.
00:54:37.040
We care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't
00:54:43.340
remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big
00:54:49.280
on care. Did I mention that we care? But that's something women have done. That's clothing women
00:54:57.460
wear. Is that not protected? I mean, the problem with this is what you're kind of pointing out here
00:55:01.540
is that public accommodation laws are being abused, I think, by adding a whole host of protected
00:55:07.660
characteristics that shouldn't be included. And therefore, it's limiting even more and more
00:55:13.300
people's freedom. And the other thing that they do is they result in coercion of speech and coercion
00:55:19.760
of people's, you know, punishing of people for exercising their religious beliefs. I mean,
00:55:24.920
that's where we intersect with the great increase in protected classes and in the kind of aggressiveness
00:55:34.280
of enforcement. So in New York City, one of the lawsuits we filed was on behalf of a Jewish counselor
00:55:40.560
who didn't want to have to provide gender affirming care and was actually prohibited from providing care
00:55:48.800
to people who were struggling with gender dysphoria if the care was designed to help them embrace their
00:55:59.160
And that this is all over the country. There are laws, these kind of public accommodations laws or
00:56:03.680
laws that are essentially born of the same, you know, kind of prescriptions where they're saying,
00:56:11.540
you know, the only kind of care you can provide to people who are struggling with gender dysphoria
00:56:15.640
dysphoria is, is, is gender affirming care, which essentially, you know, they have to be,
00:56:20.240
you have to provide them care that results in them embracing something other than their natural
00:56:24.020
sex. So this is a huge problem for Christians and other people of faith who are counselors who
00:56:29.960
want to be able to help people embrace their biological sex. And, you know, it's, it's, it's coercive
00:56:41.840
Yeah. See, I don't respect that because that was around kids.
00:56:44.880
But the, the general belief is that this teacher was, so all we know based on the news reports
00:56:51.640
is that one day this teacher had massive, like.
00:56:56.300
Yeah. Just like massive, ridiculous, over the top cartoonish breasts. And, uh, that was,
00:57:02.720
it was like, story goes viral. Students film teacher who is dressed this way. Everyone got
00:57:07.520
mad. They said, how could this be happening? And I, I, I agree with many conservatives on this
00:57:11.960
one that regardless of the reason doing this around children is inappropriate.
00:57:14.880
But the rumor was this teacher was actually a moderate dude. Didn't like all this weird DEI
00:57:22.640
stuff. Got threatened by the school to protect himself. Said, okay, let's play baby. And then
00:57:29.640
straddled the line between wearing a fur costume and, and just being transgender. Yeah.
00:57:36.260
That is, he was doing trans clothing, but it was cartoonishly absurd. And they, they defended
00:57:45.380
him. They did. Now he's relocated, got rid of the whole thing. It was funny when he was
00:57:50.440
saying to the press that they were real boobs and he suffered from a gigantomastia, which
00:57:54.120
is, you know, enlarged breasts, like they grow too big. But the, the idea was that he was
00:57:58.580
basically trying to attack the system. Yeah. I don't know that it worked. Yeah. I don't
00:58:03.320
know that it forced them to reconcile anything. Yeah. I just think that this is the problem
00:58:08.360
of, I mean, you're making these very principled arguments in line with the law and I agree
00:58:12.660
with them. And I think they're obviously correct, but that the left is just post law. And we see
00:58:17.540
this in so many ways. Right. And it's just, they're going to do what they want and they're
00:58:20.700
not going to be held back by principles of consistency. And we see this with respect to
00:58:26.500
race all the time. I mean, that's what my book's about basically.
00:58:29.540
But, but I would say like, if it were me and I wasn't doing a show like this or any of the
00:58:33.340
other work and I was just, if I worked at a company and they started doing this stuff,
00:58:37.520
I would just go nuts with it. Like I, instead of bailing the water out, I'd be dumping the water
00:58:43.380
in. I'd, I'd be the one at fire hose. Right. And I'd show up dressed like Godzilla. And
00:58:49.080
then I'd be like, I'm, I got nothing but time. If you want to figure this one out and
00:58:53.320
have the courts litigate, these, these companies don't want to go through lawsuits. No company
00:58:57.320
does. Yeah. Every lawyer is going to go to your company and say the cost of the lawsuit
00:59:00.880
will outweigh, will outweigh the cost of the settlement. Yeah. So I, I'd imagine for anybody,
00:59:05.300
if you shut up to work dressed like big boobs teacher, and this is not legal advice, uh, the
00:59:10.180
company would try and stop you. Right. And then you'd be like, I, you know, if it were me,
00:59:14.640
I just think it were me and I, and, and a boss came up to me and they're like, you can't dress
00:59:18.300
this way in front of customers. I'd say, do you want to pay me the settlement now? Do you want to
00:59:22.960
settle? I'll, I'll quit. You give me five grand. We'll call it a settlement. Otherwise I will sue
00:59:27.220
you. I will win. And even if I don't, it's going to cost you a hundred grand. Right. They're going to
00:59:31.440
be like, here's your check the F out. Well, and this is what's happened with so-called disparate impact,
00:59:35.660
which I talk about a lot in the book that comes out of 1971 Supreme court case that basically what
00:59:41.280
it effectively does is if you have any sort of hiring process and it can be shown or, or promotion
00:59:47.300
process or whatever, that there's a substantially different outcome by race than kind of the
00:59:52.560
population coming in. You can say it has a disparate impact on this group, uh, and you can sue. Now the
00:59:59.000
reality is, and you're laughing appropriately, and it's a horrible, horrible, uh, ruling. And in fact,
01:00:03.380
the Supreme court tried to, to fix it in 1989. And then the Bush, uh, civil rights division
01:00:09.860
stupidly got, got rid of it and put it back. Um, but what happens often is it's not that there are
01:00:14.960
10 million actual lawsuits that go, um, because of this, because what happens is it all starts before
01:00:22.420
then, you know, they get threatened or they just set their policy so they can't be sued. And so to do
01:00:27.800
that, you've got to end up discriminating a lot against white people. Right. So you don't see it a lot
01:00:31.620
because somebody come like you comes up and says, Hey, I'm going to sue you. And they're like, Oh,
01:00:35.180
let's just, you know, I'll give you some money and we'll just pay, pay it off. Right.
01:00:38.900
You're like, what, what if somebody, and this may be a little crass, but honest question in your
01:00:43.720
legal experience, what if somebody shut up to work with like just a massive prosthetic male part
01:00:49.900
in their pants, clearly visible going on the side of their leg? Could they take legal action against
01:00:55.280
that person? Like, could, could they do anything to that person based on the existing law?
01:00:58.800
Well, I think they absolutely could. Yeah. They'd fire them and say, you can't do that.
01:01:02.880
I would think they would fire them, whatever. They would start some kind of disciplinary process.
01:01:07.080
I don't think you have any right to do that. Well, whether or not you think you have a right,
01:01:10.560
do you think like, so in New York, if a trans man stuffed their pants, I, I don't think the
01:01:18.840
business would do anything about it. I think it'd be scared. I think it would, I would think it would
01:01:22.160
depend on how big it got. Right. Like, I mean, to be class about it.
01:01:25.040
Big boops teacher. I mean, this is Canada, but they defended big boops teacher. Yeah.
01:01:28.840
I mean, this is the problem with these laws and the way in which that they, you know,
01:01:32.740
they're being enforced and the kind of demands that people believe are associated with them
01:01:38.600
because of the way government officials talk about them and enforce them in courts is that
01:01:42.540
they chill expression. They chill people's willingness to object to them. They also chill people's,
01:01:48.860
you know, willingness to exercise their, their actual constitutional rights in response to them.
01:01:54.260
So, you know, this is the, this is the problem with the way in which the non-discrimination
01:01:58.240
laws have been wielded by the left to drive their political agenda. It's about bending the knee.
01:02:03.440
And if you don't bend the knee, you're going to be silenced. You're going to be chased out of
01:02:06.300
business. You're going to be punished in different ways. And, you know, I think that's why it's so
01:02:10.060
important for us to continue to push back against these things and try to get the laws, as you said,
01:02:15.260
Tim earlier, which are actually good laws, important laws that express basic principles, like everyone's equal
01:02:20.700
before the law, race doesn't matter, you know, and access to school or anything else, um, and restore
01:02:25.860
them to those, to, to, to those, those, those hallowed grounds rather than allowing them to be
01:02:34.400
I want to show you guys this, uh, you know what this is.
01:02:37.860
You're, you're, you're, I've got my pulse on the thing up. You're like, Oh yeah, here we go.
01:02:40.320
This is the Smithsonian's whiteness, uh, flyer. Uh, Jeremy, have you seen this one?
01:02:48.320
So this is everything they claim that is whiteness, rugged individualism. This is a white
01:02:55.060
people thing. Self-reliance. Wow. Individuals assumed to be in control of their environment.
01:03:01.520
You get what you deserve. That's amazing. Independence and autonomy, highly valued and
01:03:06.940
rewarded. The individual is the primary unit. Family structure, father, mother, 2.3 children
01:03:12.500
is the ideal social unit. Husband is breadwinner and head of household. Wife is homemaker and
01:03:16.640
subordinate to the husband. Children should have own rooms and be independent. What is this is
01:03:24.520
Objective, rational, linear thinking, cause and effect relationships, quantitative emphasis. Here we go.
01:03:32.280
History based on Northern European immigrants experience in the U S heavy focus on the British
01:03:36.660
empire, the primacy of Western Greek and Roman and Judeo-Christian tradition. Protestant work
01:03:42.360
ethic. Hard work is the key to success. I'm sorry. That's a scientific fact. But anyway,
01:03:48.180
work before play. If you didn't meet your goals, you didn't work hard enough. Christianity is the
01:03:53.500
norm. Anything other than Judeo-Christian tradition is foreign, no tolerance for deviation from single
01:03:58.860
God concept. Wealth equals worth. Your job is who you are, respect and authority, blah, blah,
01:04:04.240
blah, blah. Uh, justice based on English common law, protect property entitlements intent. What
01:04:10.660
else is it? Communication. The King's English rules, written tradition, avoid conflict and
01:04:14.980
intimacy. Don't show emotion. Don't discuss personal life. Be polite. You know, it's really
01:04:20.320
like, this is what, one of the most shockingly racist and offensive things, but also the stupidest
01:04:26.880
because you could apply almost all of these things, except for the obvious, like Northern European
01:04:32.200
history. You could apply a lot of these things to Asians outside of religion and history. A lot of the
01:04:40.340
same ethics, work, worth job, all of these things apply. In fact, even more so to many Asian cultures.
01:04:46.880
Yeah. I mean, this is from the Smithsonian National Museum of African-American history and it's,
01:04:52.460
it's a white supremacist document, right? Planning for the future. Right. Planning for the future is
01:04:57.880
like, I'm, I'm offended because no one plans for the future better than Asians. I'm allowed to say
01:05:03.980
that. I think, uh, it is, it is actually known that China implements what they call like their
01:05:08.600
thousand year plans. Other cultures don't have that degree of long-term planning in their, in their
01:05:14.100
history and in their culture. Uh, delayed gratification, progress is always best. Tomorrow will be
01:05:18.800
better following rigid time schedules. It is absolutely remarkable. The people who make this
01:05:26.040
have no concept of the Eastern hemisphere. Amazing. Yeah. Yeah. Definitely. And one of my
01:05:33.520
favorites. It's unbelievable how derogatory this is to people who are not white. I know. This is
01:05:39.100
unbelievable. And that's the, one of the things that always cracks me up, I guess, but also disgusts me
01:05:44.740
about DEI and his proponents is they are the worst stereotypers of all. Of course. It's like the
01:05:49.900
Supreme court said in the, in the Harvard decision, you know, one of the things that our law simply
01:05:53.540
doesn't accept as a first principle is the way you, the color of your skin determines what you've,
01:05:59.180
how you think it is yet. That's, that's like the, the primary kind of philosophy, I think of
01:06:05.200
proponents of DEI. But again, we're looking in, and right now we have a good Supreme court. And so
01:06:08.940
at least much better than it has been. Um, and so that's great, but I look at Biden's judges and
01:06:14.360
this is something I wrote about and Tucker picked it up and other people ran with it of the first
01:06:18.880
97 federal judges he appointed in his first two years, there were 22 African-American women and five
01:06:25.460
white men. Now, if you look by any objective measures of qualifications, which maybe I'm just
01:06:31.240
showing my white supremacy by, by putting that up there, um, you will not get anything like that
01:06:36.440
ratio. I mean, absurd, like, and so we're having now judges put in the system who basically are
01:06:43.640
going to buy into that logic. You're showing up there in some, but Biden, Biden called Kamala
01:06:47.060
diversity hire. Yeah. You see that he's like, you know, we, we champion diversity, equity,
01:06:51.900
inclusion, and it starts with the vice president. It's like, Oh wow. I mean, she didn't earn any
01:06:56.420
delegates in the primary and Biden said he was going to choose a woman of color. Right. So this is
01:07:03.340
quite amazing. Right. You know, uh, who, who was it? Um, I'm forgetting the guy's name. Uh,
01:07:12.540
who was it who said this? There's a guy who said that, uh, he shorts companies
01:07:17.560
that prioritize ideology over merit. Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at bed. MGM,
01:07:24.540
the King of online casinos, enjoy casino games at your fingertips with the same Vegas strip
01:07:30.000
excitement. MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM grand millions or popular
01:07:35.400
games like blackjack, baccarat and roulette with our ever-growing library of digital slot games,
01:07:41.620
alert selection of online table games and signature bet MGM service. There's no better way to bring the
01:07:47.680
excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with bet MGM casino. Download the bet MGM casino
01:07:54.340
app today. Bet MGM and game sense remind you to play responsibly bet MGM.com for T's and C's
01:07:59.960
19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns
01:08:04.540
about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600
01:08:12.020
to speak to an advisor free of charge. Bet MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with
01:08:16.920
iGaming Ontario. When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops.
01:08:23.380
So on behalf of Desjardins Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients
01:08:28.900
that we really care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird,
01:08:36.800
I don't remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big
01:08:43.060
on care. Did I mention that we care? Autocracy because any company that decides the person for
01:08:52.220
the job is appropriate based on their skin color instead of the capability to do the job,
01:08:56.660
then they're going to sink. Yeah. Their, their, their numbers are going to go down. It's going to be,
01:09:02.880
you know, and you're going to make money off shorting them. Yeah. Yeah. It's really,
01:09:06.400
really interesting on that point is that one of the studies that has driven a lot of the kind of
01:09:12.620
racial quotas and even just kind of like sexual minority quotas and things at the board level of
01:09:19.040
these big corporations are McKinsey studies that basically came out in 2015. And then they repeated
01:09:24.860
several times and said that firm performance is better. You're going to have a better, more valuable
01:09:31.380
company. You're going to have better performance across the board. If you have diversity as defined
01:09:36.460
by the left, you know, the box checking experience based on intersectionality
01:09:39.940
representing your boardroom. Well, a study just came out looking at all of McKinsey's studies and
01:09:45.540
McKinsey is, you know, basically gospel for these, these, these boards of major corporations
01:09:50.940
and said they couldn't replicate any of their conclusions. It's not true. Basically McKinsey
01:09:57.260
foisted that on corporate America, but so many companies followed suit and now are essentially
01:10:03.460
imposing racial quotas, sexual minority quotas, um, you know, sex-based quotas. And that's just not
01:10:11.000
the right. You got to have people with a diversity of thought experience background who benefit your
01:10:16.220
business and fill experience or know-how or knowledge gaps on your board. So you have the
01:10:22.360
best possible picture of how to run your business successfully. I'm, I'm, I'm somewhat in a sense,
01:10:27.920
okay with it just somewhat. Um, the problem I see is I'll, I'll give you a more real world example
01:10:34.960
of, of this. There was a transgender anarchist Satanist in New Hampshire who ran for the Republican
01:10:40.980
sheriff primary and won. And then once the Republicans found out who they voted for,
01:10:45.860
they lost their minds. Now this was the primary, the Democrat ended up winning,
01:10:48.900
but my attitude is shame on you to the people who voted and then were shocked to realize they voted
01:10:56.720
for a transgender anarchist Satanist. And we're upset about it. You didn't actually look into who
01:11:01.920
you were voting for. You just checked a box next to an R and assumed you'd be good. So the issue is
01:11:08.240
with these big corporations, they have become lifeless, bland entities with no leadership anymore.
01:11:17.240
Rife for manipulation. It's bad what's happening in the big picture, but part of it makes me laugh that
01:11:24.060
these corporations are now comprised of individuals who don't care about the system they work for.
01:11:28.980
They don't care about the company, the betterment of the American people. You've got someone in the
01:11:32.900
HR department and they're hearing, Hey, look, diversity because of the law. And they go,
01:11:37.340
then they go to the boss and the boss says, I don't want to get sued. Just do whatever we're
01:11:40.740
legally required to do. So instead of actually caring about this country and caring about their
01:11:45.760
company, they say, just we'll do whatever they tell us. We don't care. And then it all ends up
01:11:51.380
burning down around them. Vice is a really great example of this. So there was a viral tweet. I
01:11:57.760
think it was Wesley Yang pointing out, Washington Post is bleeding viewers. It's apocalyptic for
01:12:04.480
the Washington Post. Half their viewership is gone, their audience. And so the editor comes in and he's
01:12:09.300
like, look, this has got to change. We've got to bring in new people. No one is reading what you
01:12:13.720
write. No joke. The response from the staff was, have you considered hiring more black women?
01:12:19.080
And the editor was just like, are you insane? So he brought in some guys, some white guys,
01:12:27.040
and they complained saying like, we couldn't help, but notice you just brought in some white guys.
01:12:31.520
And he said, no, I brought in the people with experience in the industry that know how to turn
01:12:34.860
this around. This is a wake up call. Vice and Buzzfeed and these other companies, but Vice is a great
01:12:42.060
example. They're really great examples of the, there are no great men anymore. There are no captains
01:12:51.040
who will go down with the ship. What happened at Vice? Multi-billion dollar evaluation. Young people,
01:12:59.400
overly woke, made demands of the company, and the leadership of the company dropped to their knees
01:13:03.920
and said, we will do anything you say. Because they were more concerned about what would be
01:13:09.660
reflected on them as individuals than what would make the company work and people, and now what
01:13:14.180
happened? Everybody loses their jobs. Company's valuation is zero. They're bankrupt on the verge
01:13:19.680
of collapse. Owners don't care. They got paid. They left. They stripped the copper out of the walls and
01:13:25.060
then jumped ship. Yeah. The irony of course is Gavin McInnes was the founder of Vice who became kind of
01:13:31.340
this figure who was getting banned from X and YouTube and everything else for his right-wing-ness,
01:13:37.180
and then as often these institutions do, they just get taken over by the woke left, and they go crazy
01:13:43.120
on race issues, and you get the sort of results you're talking about. It's a really great, you know,
01:13:48.260
you could have predicted this for Vice, I'd imagine. You get Saru Shalvi, Shane Smith, Gavin McInnes,
01:13:53.540
the original founders of Vice magazine. It was called Voice of Montreal. They moved to the United States,
01:13:57.440
becomes Vice, skyrockets in popularity as they expand rapidly, and then I don't know the full
01:14:03.220
history or whatever, but I know around, I think like 2007, 2008, conflict emerged between Shane and
01:14:09.260
Gavin. Gavin originally, Gavin McInnes was originally, and you could, Gavin, I would love to talk to him
01:14:15.520
about this because he can probably break it down better. If he wants to, I don't know, it might be
01:14:18.240
Water Under the Bridge, it's an old story, but he was the content guy. He's like, I do the content, and it was edgy.
01:14:23.440
He was sex, drugs, and rock and roll. That's what Gavin is. Shane did marketing to promote and push
01:14:28.580
the brand, and Saru Shalvi, I believe, was the one who originally started it. Saru Shalvi said, look,
01:14:33.100
whatever, I'm with Shane. Shane says, we want to make money, so we can't do things like this anymore.
01:14:37.440
Gavin says, screw you, you don't have the right to tell me I can't make this content. They bought him
01:14:41.240
out. Gavin leaves, says, fine, whatever. That right there shows you the bigger concern for the
01:14:47.340
remaining founders' advice was, maximizing profit based on what the machine has asked us to do.
01:14:53.980
What happens? Ten years after that, the company has blown up. It shot straight to the sky. The
01:15:01.300
founders probably extracted whatever they could, and now it's just, I don't know, gum stuck to the
01:15:06.860
bottom of a table. Yeah, remarkable. I want to go back to something you said, too, about the
01:15:11.220
corporations. I don't think it's that the leadership is saying, go tell us what the law says,
01:15:17.080
and we'll do what the law says. Because if they were doing that, the attorneys would come back to
01:15:21.300
them and say, Title VII doesn't allow you to do most of this stuff. It's illegal for you to do a
01:15:25.460
lot of the things that the DEI program department is telling you to do. I think part of it is what
01:15:30.680
you mentioned, which is there's a lot of, well, we've trained young people in DEI. These activists
01:15:37.120
show up at the companies, and they demand these kinds of programs and things from corporate leaders,
01:15:42.560
and corporate leaders are caving. But the other part of the story that I think people need to
01:15:45.540
understand is the role the big asset managers and the proxy advisors play in the ecosystem of big
01:15:53.520
corporate America. BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, they demand things that the law doesn't
01:15:59.840
demand, in fact, that are contrary to law, of these corporations related to DEI, related to ESG.
01:16:07.520
And so do the proxy advisory services, ISS and Glass-Lewis, who recommend how millions and
01:16:13.020
millions of Americans' proxies are voted every year on shareholder proposals at these corporations.
01:16:18.060
And what happens is these five big companies basically tell the corporations, we want you to
01:16:23.720
go further and further down the path of ESG, whether it's the climate stuff or the S of ESG, which is DEI.
01:16:30.720
And they go further and further down the path every year because there's no real counterweight to that.
01:16:36.080
So that's a huge part of the story that why these corporations are captured and do so many bad things like
01:16:42.240
debanking, like deplatforming and censorship. I mean, these things are all rooted in this worldview that's
01:16:51.640
But taking advice from their lawyers and doing what they have to do, it's more nuanced, I suppose.
01:16:58.120
I would say to the letter of the law, I'd agree with you.
01:17:00.000
But in my experience dealing with lawyers is they don't, you know, the lawyers I've dealt with on numerous
01:17:06.480
occasions, and you are a lawyer, so you can tell me what it's like in your experience actually having done the
01:17:09.820
work. I don't get lawyers who come to me and say, here's the law, here's how it should be applied.
01:17:14.560
They say, here's the law, here's what will happen in court.
01:17:18.280
So when they come and they say, you know, I'm in a lawsuit and they go, okay, based on everything you
01:17:26.460
presented, you are 100% correct, in the right, and you'll win. Based on how the courts actually
01:17:31.320
work, you've lost, pay them their money. And I'm like, well, how does that make sense? And they're
01:17:35.380
like, because they're going to use manipulative tactics, they're going to draw, they're going to
01:17:42.000
request continuances, they're going to make weird demands of you that strain you, you're not going
01:17:47.900
to win the actual legal fight. You can cite the law all you want, you're not going to win.
01:17:51.380
And what? We had one lawsuit we were approaching. And the first question we get from the lawyer was
01:17:58.380
not, is the law on your side? He goes, I see the laws on your side. Which jurisdiction do you want
01:18:03.760
to file this in? Because that'll determine whether you win or not. So these corporations are probably
01:18:09.380
looking at it like, okay, do we operate in California and New York? We do? Okay, then we have to base
01:18:16.540
everything off of the standard of the court and the judges of California and New York and not
01:18:21.360
what the law says. So their lawyers, I would imagine, are going to them and saying, if you
01:18:26.680
engage in DEI, which is blatantly illegal, you're good. California, New York, despite the law, will
01:18:34.780
still protect you. And that's where your biggest pain vectors are going to be. Anybody who files any
01:18:39.700
claim will, if we can, move it to those venues so that we win and we'll take that path.
01:18:44.860
Yeah, I think this is actually really important because the left is expert at this. I mean, I saw,
01:18:49.120
I ran for a little while, a pretty large bureaucracy in the Trump administration. And I saw
01:18:53.920
from that how terrible conservatives are at running large bureaucracies and manipulating them
01:18:59.140
from my own painful experience. And the left is expert at doing these procedural rules. And just what
01:19:06.320
you said, you know, they'll get a big outlying state or even be a small outlying state. And they
01:19:11.640
will take those advantageous rules and make sure to apply maximum pain and pressure to you to make you
01:19:17.940
run with them so that you will be taking the most left-wing view. And it could be race,
01:19:21.700
it could be the environment, it could be any number of things.
01:19:24.520
Yeah. But is that something that you deal with in law, that you've got different venues,
01:19:32.620
Yeah, you're always looking at where, you know, where you're more likely to win or lose,
01:19:36.400
you know, especially when you're looking at the circuit courts and kind of litigation we do
01:19:39.020
with First Amendment litigation. You know, you know that there's some circuits that are going to
01:19:43.540
probably be more favorable to your claims. You've got a better chance at getting three judges at a
01:19:48.620
circuit court, you know, that'll rule for you. I mean, it used to be for years that the Ninth
01:19:53.180
Circuit Court of Appeals, it's not like this anymore. I think Trump has put a lot of really
01:19:56.720
good judges on the Ninth Circuit and tipped the balance. But it used to be for years, if we wanted
01:20:01.640
to get a case to the Supreme Court, we probably needed to file something, you know, one of those
01:20:06.520
kinds of cases in the Ninth Circuit, because we knew we might win at the lower courts. When we got
01:20:10.540
the Ninth Circuit, we'd lose, and then we could appeal to the Supreme Court. You knew you'd lose.
01:20:13.800
Well, I mean, it was, I mean, it wasn't guaranteed. Right, but you wanted to lose.
01:20:17.180
But it was almost certain. Yeah, and sometimes, you know, well, sometimes you have to lose.
01:20:22.160
Get ready for Las Vegas-style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
01:20:28.900
your fingertips with the same Vegas Strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM Grand
01:20:35.120
Millions, or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette. With our ever-growing
01:20:40.660
library of digital slot games, alert selection of online table games, and signature BetMGM
01:20:46.160
service, there's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to
01:20:50.860
you than with BetMGM Casino. Download the BetMGM Casino app today. BetMGM and GameSense remind
01:20:58.080
you to play responsibly. BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play
01:21:03.560
responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
01:21:07.320
please contact ConnexOntario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. BetMGM
01:21:16.000
operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:21:20.200
When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
01:21:26.020
Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care about you.
01:21:33.560
Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't remember saying that part.
01:21:40.040
Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big on care.
01:21:49.180
Just to win. Like if you lose at the court of appeals, then you can file a cert petition,
01:21:53.640
ask the Supreme Court to hear it. And lots of times, two thirds of the time, they're going to
01:21:57.180
reverse on appeal. So if you're in a losing position on appeal at the court of appeals, then,
01:22:03.180
you know, you've, at least you're going into it, you're thinking, well, I've got a 66% chance of
01:22:07.120
winning. I've been in lawsuits. This one was a couple of years ago. This was a bigger, you know,
01:22:12.400
free speech one. And the judges, the lawyers are like, this is, this is what we're doing. This is
01:22:17.480
what we've got. The evidence is on our side, the law is on our side. And then a month later,
01:22:21.100
they were like, guys, sorry, we were assigned judge so-and-so. So we're going to, we're going to
01:22:25.180
drop it. That's it. We've lost. And I was like, well, really? Like this judge will,
01:22:29.720
doesn't matter what the law says. Right. And they were like, wow. And they're like,
01:22:32.740
our best opportunity is to try and drop it, refile something different and try and get a
01:22:37.500
different venue. And that's, and that's, what's terrifying. And I know I'm not going to out any
01:22:41.920
particular people, but let me just say, I know from earlier times in my life, some of these new
01:22:46.180
judges, Obama is putting on the court actually. And I know what are two of them actually. Okay.
01:22:51.700
But I also know some folks that I'm like, it wouldn't matter what the merits of my case were on race.
01:22:55.620
If I, if I put them before that judge, they're going to rule against me. They will find a way
01:22:59.520
to rule against me. I mean, look at Mershon in the, in the, in the, in the Trump case just now.
01:23:03.420
Yeah. That judge blatantly, I mean, you had Alan Dershowitz saying, I have never seen anything like
01:23:08.320
this. The judge screaming at a witness. Yeah. So, I mean, I, so something I think is really
01:23:13.680
important to understand though, is that like, from my perspective, you can do all the, you can run all
01:23:17.840
the traps. You can look at the composition of the courts. You can try to figure out where I'm going to
01:23:20.440
and when I'm going to, where am I going to lose. In the end, the way I look at it is you got to,
01:23:23.780
you got to file what was right. What's good. You got to stand for truth and trust for my
01:23:28.340
perspective, trust God with the outcome. So I'll give you an example. We, we we've, I filed a case
01:23:33.500
in Arizona. I don't know when it was a long time ago on behalf of the small little church, 14 people
01:23:38.580
met in a little school. All they want to do was put up temporary signs, tell people where the church
01:23:42.060
was. And the town of Gilbert said, no, we're not gonna let you do that. Even though they let all
01:23:46.280
these other signs proliferate, proliferate political signs and signs of all different shades and colors
01:23:50.840
and views, church signs. No, I lost that case. My team lost that case four times, twice the district
01:23:56.980
court, twice to the court of appeals. And 10 years later, you know, we're at the Supreme court. We
01:24:02.380
didn't know. We thought we would win, but we didn't know. We ended up getting a just fantastic
01:24:07.120
unanimous decision from the Supreme court saying that that violated the first amendment free speech
01:24:11.000
rights of the church. And now it's essentially a seminal first amendment case. So it's, I think
01:24:17.320
it's risky to sit or to spend too much time trying to figure out where should I file this? Where can
01:24:22.840
I win? Where am I going to win or lose? I mean, if you're, if your cause is just, you have to trust
01:24:27.880
the process. And I think the process still can deliver the right result. I would like to see
01:24:32.980
10,000 people request of their bakeries, um, it's okay to be white cakes and some Leviticus cakes.
01:24:39.340
Because, you know, I think the issue is the challenge, I suppose people on the right,
01:24:46.460
whatever the right means these days, people believe in free speech don't want to compel,
01:24:50.840
compel bakeries to do these things. It is the left that does that. Yep. I just wonder what the media
01:24:56.740
would report on when you go from one story of a guy with a bakery who won't make a cake to
01:25:03.420
all of a sudden there are 10,000 discrimination instances, not necessarily lawsuits where
01:25:10.820
national level media is going to be like a wave of right-wing activists are demanding that gay
01:25:15.400
bakeries make Leviticus cakes and they're all refusing completely undermining the position the
01:25:21.000
left has on non-discrimination. Yeah. I would love to see us do it. Right. Um, I think it would be
01:25:26.700
great. It's one of those things that frustrates me. And your worst case scenario is you get a cake.
01:25:30.600
Look at that. Yeah. You bring, you bring home a Leviticus cake to your family. You bring it to
01:25:34.620
church. Everybody gets a piece. They all laugh together. And that's the end of it. And it's
01:25:38.080
like you spent 30 bucks. Yeah. Everybody's laughing or the bakery refuses. Right. You go to local media
01:25:45.160
or you pursue a suit or whatever. And then there's 10,000 lawsuits for religious discrimination.
01:25:50.460
Um, yeah, I wonder about this. I mean, if Christians, if white people really want to stop being
01:25:56.780
discriminated against in the areas where they are, they're going to have to assert their right to,
01:26:02.440
or, or that, that demand that you don't do this. Yeah. So it is, it is a rock and a hard place.
01:26:08.080
We don't want to compel people to speech. That's the issue, but they're actively discriminating
01:26:13.940
in the process while attacking you for not wanting to speak. Yeah. I completely agree. I mean, I,
01:26:20.900
it, it, it frustrates me to no end that we are not more aggressive in these areas. I would love us
01:26:25.360
to, to see us do everything that you're just describing. I think we should do the campaign.
01:26:30.560
That's great. How hard is it for someone to order a cake? You know what I mean? Yeah. And like the
01:26:35.420
thing I was asking about like a white power cake is obviously that's evocative. Right. I mean,
01:26:40.740
you want to be more careful, right? In terms of you want to pick as, you know, from being a lawyer,
01:26:44.340
right? You want to pick a really good case. So it's probably not white power, but maybe it's,
01:26:48.600
maybe it's, it's, it might not even be, it's okay to be white. It might need to be something
01:26:51.900
more edgy, but, but, but something, yeah, Leviticus, whatever it is, you know, you, and
01:26:55.760
you find the bakery that is going to be unhappy with you and you find an atheist cake maker and
01:27:00.100
tell them, put a cake that says God is real on the cake. I would love to do it. I got to be honest.
01:27:05.540
I feel like a lot of atheists would have no problem writing God is real on a cake. It's the,
01:27:10.640
it's the woke, overly woke one. So if you went to an overtly LGBTQ bakery is where you're going to
01:27:16.420
start encountering more ideological, you know, rigidity, you go to a bakery and it's like some
01:27:22.440
default lib atheist and they're like, sure. All right. God is real. I don't know. You can do
01:27:27.000
whatever you want. You know what I mean? They're not really paying attention. They vote Democrat,
01:27:29.680
but they don't care all that much. Yeah. However, they would definitely say no to a, a white is,
01:27:34.500
white is good or something cake. Right. Yeah. I mean, and it's not just cakes, right? We, we could be
01:27:39.480
doing this in a million different ways and we should. Um, and we don't have the appetite for this.
01:27:44.400
I mean, it's just like I, in my book, I talk a little bit about civil disobedience, I think as
01:27:49.280
something that we should get a little bit involved with, but I also talk about a, it doesn't work
01:27:53.280
for us in the way that it often works for the left and B it's just not constitutionally part of the
01:27:58.500
way the right thinks about things. Well, look what happened to the truckers in Canada. You know,
01:28:02.780
they did civil disobedience and what the, what the government do, they debanked them and their donors,
01:28:07.800
you know? So this is, you know, the, I, I do think there's, you know, the power imbalance is still real.
01:28:14.000
Yeah. Um, and we do need to try to fight on, on, on turf that we can win. Right. And, you know,
01:28:20.680
I think the civil disobedience, they're going to, they're going to come back and clap back on us in
01:28:25.340
ways that we probably don't, um, when the shoe is on the other foot. So it's. I wonder what would
01:28:30.740
happen if someone requested a bakery and make a cake, someone called a woke bakery and told them to
01:28:37.020
make a cake that says black, black people are the superior race. Would the bakery want to do that?
01:28:42.400
Hmm. Cause now you're really just pushing them as hard as possible in their own direction. Yeah.
01:28:48.680
Cause they might be like, well, that goes a little too far. Yeah. You know, but then they might be on
01:28:52.920
the wrong side of history in their minds if they're not willing to. Right. Well, and then the first
01:28:56.520
thing you should also make it clear is like, as soon as they bake that cake, you're going to be taking a
01:29:00.240
picture of it and putting it on X and like, I'm going to go on Tim cast and, you know, blast that out to
01:29:05.200
the whole world to make sure people know, you know, this would actually, this is a really great
01:29:08.960
campaign idea for science. And it's to, uh, I would imagine you'd want to go to a polling,
01:29:16.240
a company that is polling because they have the map of demographics and the, you know, they,
01:29:21.460
they basically have their, their, uh, regional national makeup that representative makeup.
01:29:27.480
And then you would use that and order a cake in each area that represents certain swing,
01:29:32.180
certain, certain voter blocks. And then you could actually map out which voter blocks were willing
01:29:36.760
to make which message, you know, that'd be pretty interesting. It would be fast. Yeah.
01:29:42.560
But I suppose the, the, I suppose the bigger question though, is outside of any kind of silly
01:29:47.780
prank campaign or something where we try and test the limits and see what they're willing to do.
01:29:51.120
Yeah. I suppose the question is if we pursue the route of let's just play it straight, let's say,
01:29:56.680
Hey, stop discriminating. You know, what do you guys think the outcome becomes? Are we winning this
01:30:02.360
pushback to this more standard non-discrimination or does it just escalate and people become more and
01:30:08.960
more divided? Well, I'll, I'll give you a political answer and then maybe you can give a legal answer
01:30:12.600
is, is to me, this is just like what has happened over the last 60 plus years is the left has organized
01:30:19.520
and made various racial demands. The white has made what the white, the, the right has made the white,
01:30:24.940
the white, for any sleep there, the right has made, uh, you know, various broad,
01:30:30.680
Gazi appeals to principle and we've gotten steamrolled politically. The way that this happens
01:30:36.180
is the left has to understand that when they engage in anti-white racism or other discrimination,
01:30:41.480
there is a painful political price that they pay immediately because we say enough. And then at
01:30:48.180
that point, maybe like when they've really gotten hit, you can begin to, the moderates come out on
01:30:55.000
both sides and say, yeah, you know, let's, let's, we don't want to interject race into politics.
01:30:59.500
This is a bad idea, right? It doesn't work for anybody. Um, let's try to restore constitutional
01:31:05.340
principles, content of character, not color of skin, et cetera, to this discourse and, and how we
01:31:11.520
behave. But I think just asking nicely, pretty please has been shown not to work just empirically.
01:31:16.620
Right. And so I think there has to be a pain point for the left or they're not going to stop.
01:31:21.880
Yeah. And I think, you know, it kind of comes down to the whole fight fire with fire. I mean, I,
01:31:26.180
so I'm, I'm, I resist the, the idea I think that's expressed in, in, in that phrase from the
01:31:32.560
standpoint, if it just means whatever they do to us, we do to them. I think we have to be principled
01:31:36.660
about it, but I always try to tell folks within the conservative circles that I, I, I kind of operate
01:31:42.220
in is we have so many tools already on the books that we just don't use. Um, and they're principled
01:31:50.080
tools, they're tools related to non-discrimination, um, you know, equal protection under the law
01:31:54.840
and all these things. And we're seeing some of those lawsuits being filed. I mean, there are
01:31:58.100
organizations out there, uh, including us, but others that are, that are especially, I think
01:32:02.500
there's some that are really leading on the race discrimination side of these DEI programs
01:32:06.120
who are scoring wins. And I think in the end that you read these decisions, it's absolutely clear
01:32:12.580
that you can't award contracts on the basis of race. You can't make government, uh, you know,
01:32:17.680
grants dependent on the race of the applicant. I mean, these are basic baseline principles
01:32:23.740
of the constitution and of a lot of relevant federal statutes. Um, and so I think for whatever
01:32:32.080
reason, there was a period of time where this stuff crept up and nobody knew, um, or there was
01:32:37.460
an unwillingness to use the available tools to push back. But those things are happening now.
01:32:41.960
I think in the end, legally, there are going to be consequences. There's probably going to be
01:32:46.400
painful ones from a monetary award and otherwise consequences. Um, but I think there's a, the real
01:32:52.900
thing we have to win is the battle of ideas. We have to win people's hearts and minds. We have
01:32:57.360
to reconvince them. Yeah. That you have to win the culture. That's why they're going after kids in
01:33:01.200
schools. There's no question. Yeah. There's this tweet that Christopher Rufo posted. I think it's
01:33:05.860
hilarious. It's from Ibram Kendi. Yeah. He says, and I guess the guy's name is Henry. Yeah. Henry
01:33:11.380
Rogers, I believe. Henry Rogers. And he calls himself Ibram X. Kendi because it's like a brand or
01:33:15.680
something. Right. He wrote more than a third of white students lied about their race on college
01:33:19.920
applications. And about half of these people lied about being native American. More than three
01:33:24.380
fourths of these students who lied about their race were accepted. Rufo says, behold, the tweet
01:33:28.600
that ended it all. There has never been a, a, a self debunking this spectacular, this glorious,
01:33:33.920
right? All that's happened when they create these things that people lie. Yeah. When I was a kid,
01:33:39.740
my parents, uh, my dad said, never put down Asian on an application.
01:33:44.480
Get ready for a Las Vegas style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
01:33:52.580
your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like MGM
01:33:58.420
Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat and Roulette with our ever-growing library
01:34:04.820
of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games and signature BetMGM service. There's no
01:34:11.440
better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with BetMGM Casino.
01:34:17.320
Download the BetMGM Casino app today. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly.
01:34:22.920
BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have
01:34:28.380
questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connects Ontario at
01:34:33.380
1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating
01:34:41.040
agreement with iGaming Ontario. When you really care about someone, you shout it from the
01:34:47.420
mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell
01:34:53.020
our clients that we really care about you. Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs.
01:35:00.960
Weird, I don't remember saying that part. Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance
01:35:06.740
that's really big on care. Did I mention that we care?
01:35:13.120
And I was like, why not? He's like, they're allowed to legally discriminate against Asians.
01:35:16.620
Put Mexican or Hispanic or something. Yeah. Because then they'll give you some benefits.
01:35:20.800
And I said, why? And he goes, because Asians aren't a strong voting bloc. That's it.
01:35:24.200
Yeah. Well, there's a lot of truth to that. I mean, Chris was a kind endorser of the book
01:35:29.600
that I wrote. And I mean, he's an incredibly effective operator. So it's always, I think,
01:35:34.020
good to follow his lead on a lot of this stuff. And I think it'll be interesting to see whether at
01:35:38.820
some point we hit up against an end of the maximum return to that strategy. But I think everything he's
01:35:45.780
done so far has been great. I just wonder how much of what we're seeing is people lying.
01:35:51.080
Like when we see the in-group, out-group preference among white people,
01:35:54.660
is it literally just scared white college kids being like, oh yeah, whatever you say,
01:35:59.440
I'm not racist? Well, it's fascinating. I mean, and I, again, I write about this in the book as
01:36:03.860
just kind of one example of this that you could point to. So Eric Kaufman, who is a race and ethnicity
01:36:09.700
scholar himself of multi-ethnic background, did a really, really elegant kind of real world study
01:36:16.900
where he basically looked at where Trump voters moved, white Trump voters versus where white
01:36:24.020
Biden voters moved, or maybe it was Hillary Clinton voters. I can't remember what year he did it.
01:36:28.240
And he had a pretty large end on the study. And it turned out that even though white,
01:36:33.480
the liberal white Biden voters were trashing white people left and right, they moved to just as white
01:36:41.260
So that suggests there is a certain amount of preference falsification, as scholars would say,
01:36:46.660
going on here. I mean, this is a guy who says that the only cure to past discrimination is present
01:36:52.200
discrimination. So, I mean, he's completely, you know, in the can and, you know, a leader.
01:36:59.960
He needs there to be racism so that he can make money. So he's telling everyone to be racist.
01:37:03.360
But we're not always going to be so lucky to get this guy as our opponent. I mean,
01:37:08.300
it's going to be insidious. There's going to be stuff that goes on behind the scenes.
01:37:12.660
Yeah. I mean, right? Like, he's easy. And this is my concern is that we will
01:37:16.940
chalk up some wins, just like you're saying. I mean, there's blatant discrimination going on
01:37:21.260
now that we seem to have finally woken up a little bit about that. We're going to get some wins and
01:37:25.080
people are going to feel like, yeah, the system is working really well. And I think history shows,
01:37:31.340
at least recent U.S. history, that this is kind of a little bit of a ratchet. So
01:37:34.780
then they come back in a different guise, in a different way, and they're doing a lot of the
01:37:39.440
same stuff, which isn't to say we should absolutely be doing these things. And it's great that we
01:37:43.660
went on any of them. But I don't think that this is just going to be a long, happy march back to
01:37:48.700
centrism or something sensible. I think the bifurcation in American culture is leading us to
01:37:56.640
a potential civil conflict. Yeah. With the, I mean, Steve Bannon ordered a prison the other day,
01:38:01.860
Donald Trump being found guilty in a New York heavily Democrat court, and all the civil cases
01:38:09.880
against him, Georgia, which has been frozen. And so for all the people who may watch this and are
01:38:14.780
actually cheering for these convictions, my point is not on the surface, whether you agree or disagree
01:38:19.980
with Trump. The point is, there is a conflict brewing. Democrats and Democrat jurisdictions
01:38:25.500
are trying, I shouldn't say trying, but are literally imprisoning their political rivals.
01:38:33.880
Look, I'm very concerned about it. I live in Montana for a reason. I want to be far away,
01:38:38.520
I mean, A, just far away from the Borg, and B, I certainly want to be far away from Democratic
01:38:43.720
jurisdiction power. And I am concerned that the left is sleepwalking into these incredibly
01:38:50.780
provocative stuff. It's just like Biden saying, ah, we're going to go have our missiles go hit
01:38:55.620
Ukraine, Russia now from Ukraine. That's not a big deal. And...
01:38:59.740
Yeah, there are rockets. We trained people to use them. We told them where to fire them. And then
01:39:03.760
we asked them to press the button, but it wasn't us.
01:39:05.460
Right. I mean, it's like, actually, that sounds like an escalation. Maybe we should have a debate about
01:39:09.300
whether that's the thing we want to do. So I am very concerned. I read about it in the book,
01:39:13.800
my concern that I think that nobody should be wishing for any type of civil conflict. Because
01:39:19.640
even if you think, bro, we're going to crush them, like, no, you know, anybody who's actually been
01:39:24.500
through a civil war will tell you that, or anything like that, that it is nothing that we should be
01:39:30.140
wanting to touch in the US. And I'm really concerned that the left is leading us in that direction with
01:39:35.300
some of the things they're doing, not just limited to race, but as you point out, the things with going on
01:39:39.180
with Bannon and Trump and the whole bit. Yeah, I think the whole red state, blue state thing that
01:39:43.460
you hear people talk about, and this idea that we're going to have kind of two Americas, the more
01:39:48.460
we embed those things into the fabric of our country, the bigger problem we're going to have.
01:39:53.240
I mean, it's not healthy long-term for the country to do that. And it's happening in the, you know,
01:39:57.740
there's talk of that in business as well. We need red companies, blue companies. I mean,
01:40:03.180
I don't think that's going to serve us well across the board. I think there's a need for
01:40:07.380
alternative technologies and startups and disruption in the marketplace for actors who are
01:40:11.660
doing the wrong thing, like banks and social media companies that are de-platforming and
01:40:15.460
debanking people. But if the end result that people want is, well, we need our own set of services for
01:40:20.840
people who are red state and then the blue folks, the blue get their own other set of services, I think
01:40:27.200
that that is going to create kind of fault lines that we're going to have to reckon with.
01:40:33.340
Well, there's no choice. There's no choice. You've got banks that will ban you for your speech.
01:40:40.580
Yeah. There is a choice though. I mean, we passed legislation in Tennessee that bans debanking
01:40:45.060
based on, through the help of the legislature there and other allies, that bans discrimination
01:40:50.980
based on religion, based on politics, based on involvement in ESG, you know, disfavored industries.
01:40:57.300
I mean, we're trying to reestablish through law, the principle of non-discrimination in financial
01:41:02.120
services. You can't stop a yogurt shop from putting up a bunch of pride flags. And so you
01:41:08.220
bring your child into the yogurt shop and there is a drag queen thrusting their genitals in the face
01:41:13.040
of children. And then you say, time to pass another law, I guess, but it doesn't stop. Or you say,
01:41:19.900
we only want to go get frozen yogurt from a place that actually upholds our values. So, you know,
01:41:26.420
I look at what public square is doing and I think it's tremendous and extremely important
01:41:29.280
because right now what you have is, I mean, big team like Disney, like the, the, the big cultural
01:41:37.620
forces, though they may be dying because they're insane. Right. You're not going to mandate by law
01:41:42.960
Disney stop creating content that indoctrinates children towards a crackpot communist ideology
01:41:49.580
because it's free speech. But then all of the major institutions are pushing this message through
01:41:54.340
their free speech, which we agree with. The only alternative is to create a separate industry
01:41:59.280
that pushes back on that. There's, I think it's an important strategy. I think that's, you know,
01:42:04.560
to, to, but I do think we can redeem some of the existing institutions. I don't know if that's true
01:42:08.360
of Disney. It seemed pretty far gone. Well, actually, but JPMorgan Chase, like we, you know, we've been
01:42:12.740
pushing on JPMorgan Chase for the last three years. They're starting to crack. They're starting to do the
01:42:16.820
right thing. They're eliminating bad policies. They'll lead to debanking. They're affirmatively putting out in
01:42:20.740
their policy statements that they, well, not their policy statements yet. That's our ask now,
01:42:23.980
but in some of their reports and different things, this commitment that they don't debank people for
01:42:28.160
political, social, or religious views. Like, I, I don't think we, as I don't think it's right for us
01:42:35.120
or good for us to just say those institutions are dead to us and we're going to abandon them.
01:42:40.480
And so, you know, I think there is a redemptive work that can happen and some are going to opt into it
01:42:45.960
and say, yeah, we see it. And I think the public square efforts help that because they see,
01:42:50.160
well, there's this vibrant community of people who want something different. And it's in our best
01:42:54.360
interest, JPMorgan Chase or otherwise, to serve everybody and get rid of a lot of these things
01:42:59.460
that are telling people and sending signals that they're not going to serve everybody.
01:43:02.560
Yeah. I think there's an interesting cleavage here a little bit between maybe how you and I
01:43:06.440
are, uh, feel about kind of the institutions in the system. And I think you're maybe a little more
01:43:11.020
feeling like they can be redeemed. And I actually think it's, it's, even though I'm more skeptical,
01:43:14.660
I think it's super important, the sort of work that you guys are doing,
01:43:17.380
because you will push some of them and some of them who didn't really want to be doing the bad
01:43:21.320
thing, we will get back to the center. And that's really, really valuable. But I think a lot of
01:43:26.260
them are beyond redemption and the sort of yogurt thing that you like site. It's like, yeah, I mean,
01:43:31.020
I want to go to my own yogurt company. I want to go to my own coffee company because I don't
01:43:34.940
necessarily think I'm going to convince, you know, X or Y to be non-woke.
01:43:38.680
Yeah. A Bud Light's a great example. When the Bud Light fiasco happened, I, I, I predicted it. I
01:43:44.340
said, you get the Dylan Mulvaney promotional thing where Dylan's got all the beer. The media lied and
01:43:50.060
they were like, it was one promotional can for Dylan Mulvaney. Why are they mad? No, it was Dylan
01:43:53.800
Mulvaney did a promo for March Madness or something like that, selling Bud Light to children. And so I
01:43:59.640
said, I bet this is a millennial woman who recently got promoted. She's, you know, in her thirties
01:44:05.660
and she said, we're going to shake things up and we're going to do, and that's exactly what
01:44:09.040
happened. It then came out like a month later, millennial woman took over the marketing department
01:44:14.420
and said, we adopt our ideology for marketing and it tanked the company and they've not recovered.
01:44:21.640
Yeah. And, and, and this is an interesting thing by the way, and you probably appreciate this
01:44:25.120
because of the world that you're in, but I have talked to people who are very sophisticated people
01:44:30.380
who have worked at the very, very top end of media companies, both on the right end and in the
01:44:35.040
center. And they have said, actually the biggest villains who we're not going after are the kind
01:44:41.200
of like woke millennial woman in the ad buying department. Who's like, Oh, you know, Tim cast
01:44:46.560
they're like doing stuff that's a little too edgy and there's no actual basis to say empirically
01:44:53.120
like that there's not a good audience for that, that they wouldn't buy products, that it's actually
01:44:57.380
freaking out so many people that it will alienate them from their brand. There's no actual empirical
01:45:01.720
basis they have for making these decisions, but they personally find it icky. These are
01:45:05.660
the random like millennial woman. And so they shut down our ability to bring in ad dollars.
01:45:14.720
Yes. But I think that the concern that I have is the changes that we're seeing are not because
01:45:21.300
one day a corporation said, look at the law. The changes are not happening because the marketing
01:45:27.120
departments, the legal departments, the HR departments all had some revelation and they went,
01:45:32.320
heavens me, wokeness is the right choice. It's what's happening is that millennials are already
01:45:38.100
living in the worldview of wokeness and that world will not be changed to people who are now entering
01:45:43.620
middle age. That worldview is solidified. That is the world to them. They are now taking over the
01:45:49.120
corporations and gaining more corporate political and legal power. Yeah. So my view of this is
01:45:55.160
fighting to, uh, referencing Wade Stotts' video again about writing things down,
01:45:59.420
fighting to win court battles on this doesn't change the fact that the law is immaterial to
01:46:05.180
the culture. Sure. If it's on the books often is enforced, but there are so many laws that never
01:46:11.700
get enforced. It'll never happen. Uh, like, uh, for instance, in West Virginia, drag shows featuring
01:46:17.060
children are felonies explicitly look up, look up the law. It doesn't literally say if you do
01:46:22.820
dragon, it says public looting, lascivious behavior, behavior of a sexual nature is a crime in the
01:46:28.540
presence of children. It is upgraded. There's no enforcement of it, none whatsoever. You might
01:46:33.520
win all these legal battles, but when millennials are in their fifties, Gen Xers are retired. Gen Z is,
01:46:40.640
is, is relatively comparable to millennial bifurcated for sure. You are just going to see
01:46:47.040
all of these things tenfold. It's, it's, it's because it is the, it is the, it is the cultural
01:46:53.280
body of the people, not what is written down that dictates what people will tolerate and accept.
01:46:58.460
I just don't think it's that monolithic. I mean, I, I, I agree. We have a huge problem because
01:47:02.900
the education system is instilling this in a lot of people who are coming into the corporations and
01:47:08.260
the, and the, and, and, you know, and the, and the colleges are, you know,
01:47:11.660
get ready for a Las Vegas style action at BetMGM, the king of online casinos. Enjoy casino games at
01:47:18.880
your fingertips with the same Vegas strip excitement MGM is famous for when you play classics like
01:47:24.240
MGM Grand Millions or popular games like Blackjack, Baccarat, and Roulette. With our ever-growing
01:47:30.640
library of digital slot games, a large selection of online table games, and signature BetMGM service,
01:47:37.180
there's no better way to bring the excitement and ambience of Las Vegas home to you than with
01:47:41.540
BetMGM Casino. Download the BetMGM Casino app today. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play
01:47:48.600
responsibly. BetMGM.com for T's and C's. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.
01:47:54.420
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
01:47:57.520
please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
01:48:05.580
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
01:48:08.780
When you really care about someone, you shout it from the mountaintops. So on behalf of Desjardins
01:48:16.000
Insurance, I'm standing 20,000 feet above sea level to tell our clients that we really care about you.
01:48:24.040
Home and auto insurance personalized to your needs. Weird, I don't remember saying that part.
01:48:29.440
Visit Desjardins.com slash care and get insurance that's really big on care.
01:48:37.080
Creating a bunch of activists who are now becoming marketing directors and things like that.
01:48:44.340
But it's so contrary to common sense. And there are a lot of people we know from polling that there's
01:48:49.180
still tons of people who reject most of the propositions.
01:48:53.340
I don't know. But I still think, well, I'll just say, I think that what's going on in corporations
01:49:01.320
is the Bud Light example. What happened with Target? What happened to Disney? They're losing
01:49:07.200
billions of dollars in value. Those aren't one-off things that aren't leaving a mark. The corporations
01:49:12.120
that we talk to and we meet with C-suite members, when we do our shareholder proposals, they show up
01:49:18.400
and talk to our shareholders and talk to us. I sometimes lead those negotiations. Some of those
01:49:22.780
corporations are saying, we agree with what you're saying. We want to figure out how to work
01:49:28.440
collaboratively, move back to political neutrality.
01:49:37.160
So what happens when a 30-year-old millennial who is either overly woke or anti-woke comes in?
01:49:42.740
Now, it's entirely possible those who are anti-woke and believe more in meritocracy are the
01:49:46.880
ones who start to inherit these positions. But that's not actually what's happening right now.
01:49:51.100
So we'll pull up this tweet here. This is End Wokeness. Let me play this clip for you.
01:49:55.860
When people watch The Hate U Give, what do you want them to walk away with? Because I know
01:50:01.260
Well, I mean, white people crying actually was the goal.
01:50:10.980
So this is, you know, causing a bunch of issues. This was a different show. This was The Hate U Give.
01:50:15.900
And she says, making white people cry was the goal. They also say that the actress and the show
01:50:23.220
writer for Star Wars say it's the gayest ever. Millennial woke people are taking over.
01:50:29.160
Jen, so when you look, this is fascinating. When polled, there is a, it's about 50,
01:50:35.340
slightly more than 50% of the United States believe a civil war is coming.
01:50:37.860
But that doesn't matter. That poll doesn't matter. What matters is people over the age of 65,
01:50:44.040
it's like 9% think a civil war is coming. People between the ages of, you know, 50 to 69,
01:50:50.120
20%. These aren't the exact numbers. As you get younger and younger, the belief that a civil war
01:50:55.660
is coming grows exponentially to where you get to millennials and it's like 46% of millennials think
01:51:00.580
a civil war is coming. And it's because you go back to the nineties and you look at political
01:51:05.880
affiliation and policy, Democrats and Republicans overlapped almost completely according to Pew
01:51:11.520
research. They believed almost the exact same things, but there were a few minor issues that
01:51:16.800
were wedge issues that would be used. Tax should be a little higher or lower or abortion should be
01:51:21.140
easier or harder. Now it's total abortion at any point, even after birth, in some circumstances,
01:51:27.820
the baby can be terminated. This has literally happened with Northam in Virginia. And then you
01:51:32.420
have on the right total bans of abortion. There's no overlapping ideologies anymore.
01:51:37.500
I believe that when, so the silent generation and the baby boomers are retiring. They're all starting
01:51:45.000
to leave industry. Gen Xers are now inheriting the crowns and the thrones of the biggest companies.
01:51:52.480
Millennials are now taking the mid-management positions that actually run the day-to-day operations.
01:51:56.160
When millennials take over the top of these corporations and government, the bifurcation will
01:52:02.380
be tremendous. And in court, it's going to be absolutely balls to the walls, nuts. Imagine that
01:52:11.320
woman. Uh, what was, what was the woman's name from Bud Light? I can't remember her name.
01:52:16.240
What do you remember? It was, I'll look at it in a second. Imagine she's on a judge. She's a judge.
01:52:19.940
She's going to sit there and say, I mean, a better example is Ketanji Brown Jackson. She doesn't know
01:52:25.540
what the word woman means. You cannot function as a society if you cannot define woman. Now we say,
01:52:34.060
oh, but most people can. Yeah, but you're talking about the older generation. And I don't necessarily
01:52:38.960
agree that colleges are, I think colleges are both a cause of, it's, it's, it's, it's correlation and
01:52:46.460
causation at the same time. Colleges are not making activists, making woke activists necessarily.
01:52:52.780
They are bolstering it. Social media likely was the driving component of this psychotic ideology.
01:53:00.040
We saw this in the end of the two thousands when every country in the world saw a massive uptick
01:53:05.700
in the same use of terminology in the same words. And it was likely because Facebook, Twitter,
01:53:11.680
and YouTube prioritized algorithmically, accidentally certain words to generate more
01:53:16.440
traffic to keep people on their platform. So a kid who was born in 1998 is, you know, 10 in 2008,
01:53:24.180
they get their first Facebook profile. What do they see? Nothing but police brutality. Why? Police
01:53:29.540
brutality made money. So there, there was a website that was the top in the top 400 websites in the
01:53:35.560
world that only showed videos of cops beating black people. And the people running the website
01:53:40.540
were making millions of dollars. Facebook didn't do this on purpose. Facebook just told the algorithm
01:53:47.240
promote what people click on. Well, racial justice generated a lot of attention. Simultaneously,
01:53:53.780
something else happened. The rise of the alt-right. When you have this endless attack on white people
01:53:59.320
because of these videos that are going viral, you got an equal and opposite reaction. The rise of
01:54:03.680
white identitarianism also started to explode, go viral and a bunch of white nationalists and white
01:54:09.700
identitarians, not necessarily nationalists, started making a bunch of money. Well, that was offensive
01:54:13.900
to the sensibilities of most Americans, be it silent boomer, Gen X, millennial or otherwise. So they all
01:54:19.720
got banned instantly. What was left was leftist anti-white identitarianism still to make all of its
01:54:27.280
money. And this is the culture war. These kids grow up being slammed by nothing but wokeness on social
01:54:35.500
media because these companies were making money, enter college, and you see professors try to push
01:54:40.420
back. Famously, Nick Christakis, I think this was, I don't know, where's it, but Princeton, Yale, and
01:54:46.180
right. Yeah. And they did that. He said, Hey, wear whatever costume you want. The students yelled
01:54:51.460
at him and said, this is not about education. It's about a safe family community or something like
01:54:56.300
this. Those kids didn't learn that at college. They learned it before college. They're, they're
01:55:01.560
transforming the colleges because they're the customers for the college and the colleges just
01:55:05.180
want to keep their customer base happy. Once millennials are the CEOs, their worldview is not
01:55:11.340
going to change. So all of these, all this precedent, all this law is in my opinion, mostly
01:55:15.780
meaningless. It is a culture that you have to win and we have to absolutely crush and shut out woke
01:55:22.260
culture. This means either we infiltrate, destroy, and rebuild the likes of Disney and the Washington
01:55:29.040
Post and Bud Light, or we build alternatives that grow faster and become stronger and more resilient.
01:55:36.000
If Bud Light wants to blow itself up and go out of business, then we need say conservative dads,
01:55:41.200
ultra right. And they're expanding rapidly. They're launching new stuff. Maybe that's the
01:55:45.880
answer. Either way, it can be, it can be a two front battle where we try and get people to go into
01:55:50.600
Bud Light, take it over your lawsuits, forcing these corporate corporations to realign. And then the woke
01:55:55.300
millennials that are in these companies have no choice but to bend the knee. But if, if we just sit
01:56:03.360
back and say, the only thing we're going to do is try and win the lawsuits because it's illegal, we can
01:56:07.900
already see they're abusing the law and doing whatever they want. I imagine in 30 years,
01:56:12.680
it's not, it's not cut and dry. It's not 100%. But that's why I think civil conflict, because you
01:56:18.640
are not going to have a country where one state says we can kidnap your children and castrate them,
01:56:24.420
which is literally what they've done already. I believe it's Washington has stated, if a child is
01:56:29.560
taken by force without the parent's permission from any other state and brought to Washington
01:56:33.100
for a sex change, the state will not intervene in law enforcement operations to reunite the child
01:56:38.680
with the parents. Sooner or later, someone's kid gets kidnapped by a pedophile off TikTok,
01:56:44.600
ends up in Washington for a castration, and some dad's going to get a posse. And then you've got a
01:56:49.500
nightmare scenario on your hand. Yeah. So I don't know how law can rectify these, this extreme
01:56:54.900
cultural difference. Yeah. And it is generational. And again, it's like when I, when I talk to older
01:56:59.540
people about my book, they're like, Oh my God, you know, like, how could you even be so brave as,
01:57:03.480
as to write this? And then it's kind of like, my generation is like, wow, this is really needed.
01:57:07.320
I'm glad you did it as, as kind of brave. And then, you know, I finally get down to some of
01:57:10.940
these Gen Z guys who I'm mentoring and they're like, you know, cool book, bro. Next time go even
01:57:15.720
a little bit harder. Right. It's like, it's just, um, it's a huge generation gap. And I think we are
01:57:22.820
just beginning to see the leading edge of what that's going to look like when those groups are running
01:57:27.760
our institutions, because obviously the, the folks who I'm talking to are, are the minority who are
01:57:33.200
in, you know, our camp on these, but they are reacting to the crazy wokesters who have, and the
01:57:38.600
anti-white racists who've completely taken over, um, in, in their generation. I do think, I do think
01:57:44.100
we're on the winning side. Like, well, I mean, I mean, probabilistically, I do think we are trending
01:57:48.580
towards winning and shutting this stuff down. And hopefully we go back to a more classically liberal,
01:57:53.580
just don't discriminate against people, leave everybody alone. But I don't know.
01:57:58.820
I mean, I don't think there's any single solution to it all. I think you're right about that.
01:58:01.860
You're not going to win this solely through the law. I think the law is an essential tool in the
01:58:05.860
toolkit, one that we use all the time to change the behavior of governments and even, you know,
01:58:11.760
companies that, um, you know, get crosswise with the law. Um, but I do think it's, it's kind of a
01:58:16.840
multi-vector, multiple discipline approach to trying to solve these problems. But I, I do think that,
01:58:22.920
you know, we should have hope. I do think we're on the winning side. If you even look at pride
01:58:27.220
month, like pull it back down to what's going on right now with pride month, the Texas Rangers
01:58:31.520
aren't even celebrating it. 11, you know, uh, NFL teams didn't even put out statements celebrating
01:58:36.880
pride month. So I view these things, not as kind of like on some, you know, arc of inevitability.
01:58:42.720
Um, I view them, this is the societal issues is largely on a pendulum swing and what's going on in
01:58:48.660
corporate America from kind of like my, it's not an insider seat, but we're dealing with a lot of
01:58:53.080
the big corporations. We're scoring them on an index that the rates them on their respect for
01:58:57.960
free speech and religious freedom on their political neutrality, other services they offer.
01:59:02.380
I'm seeing them pay attention in, in, in, in, in struggling with how do we deal with these
01:59:08.680
cultural moments that are going on? It's no longer, well, the Bud Light thing was just a one-off or,
01:59:12.940
you know, the, the, the grassroots, um, customer, you know, response to that backlash that it was
01:59:20.020
survivable and just a blip. No, it led to over a billion dollars in the loss of the value of their
01:59:24.840
company. And Bud Light's not the only one that's seeing that and recognizing and understanding that's
01:59:29.260
a problem. So a lot of these things kind of come together and there's, there's a lawsuit against
01:59:33.280
Target, uh, a shareholder derivative lawsuit that's saying, you know, you knew that if you sold
01:59:38.220
these ridiculous, you know, uh, um, you know, swimsuit gear in your store, that it would actually
01:59:43.560
alienate and undermine your value to us as shareholders. Um, so the law plays a role in
01:59:49.460
all that. I think, you know, in the end, a lot of these things come together to kind of push things
01:59:53.440
back to what I think, you know, I hope you're right, Tim is more of a classical liberal approach
01:59:57.720
to organizing society. You're right with respect to things like gender ideology, but I'm concerned
02:00:01.140
it's not going to work anywhere near like that for race. And because it's a different America.
02:00:04.760
So the silence, you know, there are 85% white, I'm making that up, but it's roughly correct.
02:00:09.140
Um, the under 18s are minority white and going down. And so you're, you're pitching to a different
02:00:17.600
America at that point. And the sorts of things that are going to be acceptable as regards race,
02:00:22.680
um, among the younger generation will in most cases, in my view, correctly appall older generations,
02:00:29.900
um, of, of what that's going to look like. So yeah, I'm seeing Tim, you're, you know,
02:00:35.520
yeah, you know what I think, I think there's a very, very strong possibility that in,
02:00:40.500
I don't know, say 35 years, there's a whole lot of elderly, single women with a lot of cats
02:00:51.940
If we go in the direction of meritocracy, family, traditional values, and morality,
02:00:59.560
I think they'll probably just starve to death. The, the idea that you, you go back in time,
02:01:09.760
how does, how does, how does, how does survival work, right? But pre-social security and all these
02:01:13.720
things. People have kids, their kids have kids, those people are older and their families help
02:01:21.460
take care of them into their old age and they die. Then we moved into this modern industrialized era
02:01:26.700
and we, we ended up with social security. Now in general, young people pay taxes to pay a small
02:01:35.040
amount of money to old people to support them. If we move away from these, these ideas, social security
02:01:41.380
is going to be insolvent by 2037, they're predicting. They always move the timeline back because they're
02:01:45.640
always printing money or engaging in some kind of weird Ponzi scheme to keep it afloat. But they're
02:01:50.520
saying that within, we're looking at nine years, is when we start to see the instability in social
02:01:57.940
security. Older people are going to be unable to start receiving their benefits. Bad things are going to
02:02:03.100
start happening. Four, four years after that, they expect it based on the current timeline, there will be
02:02:08.160
none. If we move in the direction of, for a variety of reasons, uh, conservatives are more likely to
02:02:14.020
have kids. So conservatives are going to be less dependent upon this system. They're also going to
02:02:18.340
be more likely to have a controlling voting block moving forward, especially now, because it was,
02:02:23.420
it was bad in the, in the two thousands liberal for every, uh, every four kids. Uh, I think every four
02:02:29.680
kids born, uh, three of them were, were conservative. And now we're starting to see in the research on young,
02:02:36.280
the next generation, Gen Z. Gen Z is comparable to millennials in politics, but they tick slightly
02:02:42.360
rightward on some issues. The first time in a hundred years, we've seen a generational shift
02:02:46.220
toward the right in any way. It's likely going to be because of just child rearing fertility,
02:02:52.060
even though conservatives are down below replacement, liberals are way worse. You give it
02:02:58.180
20 to 40 years, you are going to have more likely the cultural makeup of this country is going to be
02:03:02.780
leaning conservative traditionalist and probably Christian. Yeah. You're going to see a lack of
02:03:08.640
support for things like social security and the welfare state. And this will result in a small
02:03:15.380
pocket of millennial women who are childless, single, owning lots of cats like Chelsea Handler.
02:03:20.380
And they're going, she's well, she's a millionaire. So she'll be fine for the rest of her life.
02:03:24.560
Uh, I'm assuming she's a millionaire. She's probably well off. She's a wealthy personality,
02:03:28.000
but it's gonna be a lot of women like her who bragged about in their thirties, how they wake up,
02:03:32.940
do drugs, you know, diddle themselves as she described it, and then go to bed and then wake
02:03:38.540
up again later to do drugs again. Yeah. When they're 70, they're going to say, I'm not making
02:03:43.320
any money anymore and I can't work because I'm too old. I need money from the state, but they will be
02:03:48.840
such a weak voting block that everyone's going to say no. And then what ends up happening?
02:03:53.840
They're going to be institutionalized. They get, we bring back mental institutions or whatever.
02:03:59.300
And we say, sure, we can't have you living and crapping in the street. So you're going to go
02:04:04.080
live in a box in a building that we pay the bare minimum for. It's sobering. Certainly you see
02:04:10.140
dramatic in the last 15 years, differential fertility between secular white women and religious
02:04:16.940
Christian women. And that wasn't actually always the case, um, particularly by politics. Like it's,
02:04:22.540
it's a more recent development. Um, you know, I'm a white Christian with five kids. So I got
02:04:26.640
done with that, but, uh, yeah, you're, you're, you're fine. I'm good. Yeah. I think, I think
02:04:31.220
about that. I like, I mean, I, you do look and you're like, eh, is all the social security
02:04:34.700
I pay going to be here for me? And I'm like, eh, you know, like all dear kids, my oldest
02:04:38.800
is 17. My youngest is eight. So you're my gap too. I have five as well. 17 to seven.
02:04:43.820
And, and, and, and, oh, okay. So, so you guys are only a few years away from being
02:04:46.780
grandparents. Yeah. And then when you're old and struggling with a cane, there's gonna
02:04:52.180
be a bunch of grad kids running around asking grandpa to tell stories. And then, uh, there
02:04:56.340
will come a time in your life when you are lying on a medical bed and you're going to
02:05:00.600
have a hard time breathing and you're going to be surrounded by your children and your
02:05:03.600
grandchildren crying, holding your hand, saying they love you and they appreciate everything
02:05:07.160
you've done for them. And no one will ever forget you. And their grandkids will, will hear
02:05:12.340
the stories and then you'll die. And that will be the way to go, I suppose. And there
02:05:18.000
will be many of these women like Chelsea Handler who will be in a sterile hospital bed surrounded
02:05:22.120
by no one. The doctor will walk in, sign the chart, stick it on the bed, walk out, and they'll
02:05:27.000
be sitting there staring at a cold dead wall. That is something I hope they're prepared for.
02:05:32.360
But this is the world they choose to live in. Maybe, maybe at that point they'll plug their
02:05:36.300
brains into Neuralink to, and to, to overstimulate the dopamine so that they, they, or at that
02:05:42.320
point, you know, cause I got, I'll be as dark as I can with it. Of course, they're pushing
02:05:48.320
medical assistance and death. You had, I think it was like a 19 year old healthy girl, healthy
02:05:53.740
woman was put to death recently because she was sad. However, I don't see medical assistance
02:06:00.740
and dying being allowed to expand. If trends in the culture war and fertility continue within
02:06:09.480
20 to 40 years, this simple math predicts a more conservative worldview that will not
02:06:14.900
allow medical assistance and dying. Should it, a lot of these women like Chelsea Handler
02:06:20.940
will just choose to go to the doctor and say, I'm done with life and me. But assuming the
02:06:26.800
current trends we're seeing, conservatives won't allow that. And so they will just sit
02:06:31.480
in a chair, staring at the wall, crying lonely and said, well, that's sort of a, that is pretty
02:06:37.540
dark. Let's, uh, it's not that, uh, that bad, but yeah, I mean, certainly, I mean, I just
02:06:42.560
think hope doesn't really matter in the, in the, in the, as a, as a factor of what is going
02:06:47.220
to happen. And I think it is going to happen. Whatever the governmental system may be, the
02:06:52.360
reality is there are many single childless women that have emerged due to the expansion
02:06:56.520
of woke ideology. Yeah. There's the, um, famous magazine cover of the woman who said, I froze my
02:07:01.520
eggs and it's like, freeze your eggs, be a boss. Right. And then several years later, her eggs all
02:07:06.180
shattered and were unviable. And she said, she screamed like a wild animal realizing she could
02:07:09.780
ever be a mother. Yeah. Well, and it's interesting because on these issues for particularly for race,
02:07:15.900
you really see a dramatic difference both formally and informally between folks who have kids and
02:07:22.920
folks who don't. I mean, I dedicated my book to my kids for a reason because it's sort of like,
02:07:26.300
okay, I've navigated my way through this. It hasn't always been perfect, but, but at least
02:07:30.420
when I was young, it wasn't as bad. Um, but I'm looking, you know, it's very easy for particularly
02:07:35.660
white liberals who are older, if they don't have kids to just kind of pose with whatever
02:07:39.540
is fashionable, uh, view on race, whatever they think is good. Cause there's no real stakes
02:07:43.200
for them anymore or nothing they can't navigate. I'm looking at like, well, what are the opportunities
02:07:47.200
my kids are going to have? Um, that's like what motivated me to write this book at the end of
02:07:52.380
the day is like, what, you know, it's not an abstract intellectual question for me.
02:07:56.500
I think the fact that you wrote the book is indicative of, uh, a trend towards victory.
02:08:03.760
It's just, you know, the night is always the darkest before the dawn and, uh, every generation
02:08:08.260
has their, you know, their great conflict of some sort or some cultural battle.
02:08:11.680
So, and, uh, hopefully it's not world war three.
02:08:15.480
Hopefully it's just us complaining about what's on TV, you know, debanking is bad, but I gotta
02:08:22.180
be honest in terms, if I had to choose between two fights and one was I'm being sued over
02:08:27.780
a cake or I'm being shot at by Germans, I'd choose the cake. So shout out to all the D-Day
02:08:32.820
veterans and all the heroes and the, and the, and the veterans in general. But, uh, I gotta
02:08:37.920
say our, our, our battle certainly isn't the most difficult ever fought by any generation,
02:08:44.860
Yeah. Do you guys see any, any, any, any, uh, uh, is there anything on the horizon positively
02:08:50.520
any cases you're working on or anything you've seen that is indicative of a, uh, a good way
02:08:56.780
Well, well for me, actually, it's just what you said is that, um, even two years ago when
02:09:02.520
I started to write this book, I sort of sometimes felt like, wow, you know, I'm on this narrow
02:09:06.760
tightrope and there's alligators stamping at me. And now, you know, I'm going on Tucker,
02:09:12.080
I'm going on Charlie Kirk, I'm here on Tim Cass. Like I'm talking about this book, major
02:09:15.920
folks like you with really big audiences have said, Hey, this isn't a legitimate issue.
02:09:20.420
We can talk about it. It's really important that we talk about it. And so I think even
02:09:24.080
just in the last couple of years, let alone in the decade plus, I've been writing seriously
02:09:27.700
about this, the environment for speech around this has gotten much freer. And the reception
02:09:33.400
of my book has been way better in the sales way better than I would have possibly imagined.
02:09:37.400
And I think that is all a great sign, uh, for, for optimism on this issue that maybe people
02:09:45.740
I'll say one thing that's kind of funny is when Chet GPT first came out, it was a big
02:09:51.500
controversy because people would ask it to rank race based, uh, based IQ and race, and it
02:09:56.220
would refuse outright. And it wouldn't even want to, it wouldn't even tell you what the bell
02:10:01.660
curve was and these stories. Not that I think they're good or I'm just pointing out that
02:10:05.380
Chet GPT was outright. Like, no, you go on Chet GPT now and it has no problem just saying
02:10:10.000
all of these things. Now the issue I took with it, if there is a fact based on data that we
02:10:14.200
have in science, I don't care if you're offended by it, let's analyze it. And Chet GPT would
02:10:19.240
say no for moral reasons. It doesn't do that anymore. It still does lie. It still has problems,
02:10:24.300
but Chet GPT is much more willing now to actually present existing data to you, regardless
02:10:28.740
of whether it offends somebody like crime statistics and things like that.
02:10:31.840
That's good. I'll stay in my legal lane to answer your question and just say,
02:10:34.180
there's two cases. One just came down from the Supreme court last week at National Rifle
02:10:38.120
Association versus Vulo. That is a debanking case and a case involving insurance companies too.
02:10:44.560
And essentially that the, the, uh, New York department of finance had put pressure on banks
02:10:50.000
and insurance companies to deprive an array of services because of their second amendment
02:10:55.620
advocacy, um, and of other gun groups too. And so, um, the, the, the NRA had one at the
02:11:01.040
lowest core loss at the second court of court of appeals and ultimately won at least the right
02:11:06.120
to continue their case. But it was a really great case, unanimous decision from the Supreme
02:11:09.760
court saying, I mean, in essence, the key holding in the case is government officials can't censor
02:11:15.580
by proxy through private corporations and through the kind of reputational risk, uh, coercive power
02:11:21.160
they have when, when it comes to regulating industries like banks, um, and insurance
02:11:25.580
companies, that's a big win. It's a, it's a flag. I think, um, you know, that we can plant to try to
02:11:31.720
protect people's first amendment rights from government regulators who try to abuse their
02:11:36.380
power and use banking regulations to shut people out of the marketplace because of their
02:11:40.620
constitutionally protected activity. And then in just a couple of weeks, I think we need to all
02:11:44.520
be watching what happens in Murphy versus Biden. That's the social media censorship case.
02:11:48.760
Which one is that? Where's that based out of that's came out of Texas. Okay.
02:11:53.440
Decided by the fifth circuit, the right way is ultimately coming up to, um, to, to, for a decision
02:11:59.020
by the Supreme court by the end of this term. So by the end of June, we'll have a decision in the
02:12:03.740
Murphy case. And that case is about the Biden administration using their coercive power to
02:12:08.380
shut down speech on COVID, on COVID vaccines, on masks, on the Hunter Biden laptop story and a host
02:12:13.560
of other issues too. And it's not just the feds who are doing that. States have, have popped up
02:12:18.340
their own kind of like election interference boards and they, they put pressure on Twitter
02:12:23.160
and these other companies to take down misinformation. So this is from our perspective,
02:12:27.480
kind of the free speech, um, problem of our age is the way that government is using these
02:12:33.160
concentrations of power in the private and the private sectors, especially related to the digital
02:12:38.180
public square and trying to censor speech they don't like. So really important to see how that
02:12:42.640
case comes out. I hope that Vulo came down in a way that is an indication that we might get a win
02:12:48.760
in the Murphy case too. Gentlemen, it's been absolutely fun and fantastic having this
02:12:52.760
conversation. Uh, do you want to just shout anything out before we wrap up? Yeah, go to
02:12:56.600
adflegal.org. That's our website. I love people to go there. We're a donor-based ministry.
02:13:01.460
So all the legal representation we provide to our clients is totally paid for by the people that
02:13:06.040
support us. Right on. Yeah. We've, we've, we've, uh, covered a couple of the suits that you guys
02:13:10.060
have been involved in. We're big fans of what you do. Uh, and Jeremy, would you like to show
02:13:13.040
anything out? Yeah. The Unprotected Class, How Anti-Weight Racism is Tearing America Apart.
02:13:16.960
Get it at your local bookstore, get it on Amazon. Um, again, just, uh, any support. By the way,
02:13:22.300
when you, when you buy it, it's not like anybody who knows anything about the book business,
02:13:25.420
you're not making me rich sadly, but what you are doing is you're sending a message to publishers
02:13:31.700
that, Hey, there's interest in this. This is a legitimate subject for a book to be about,
02:13:36.300
and we need to see more stuff like this. And so I think it, it kind of helps the entire
02:13:40.900
ecosystem. And then you can check me out on Twitter at Real Jeremy Carl, if you're interested
02:13:45.060
in following me there. If you sold a million of them, would you be rich? Yes. All right. There
02:13:49.900
we go. I'm doing well, but I'm not yet on that million trajectory. So I got to work on that.
02:13:54.280
Well, thank you both for hanging out. This has been a, it's been a blast. And for everybody who's
02:13:57.380
watching, subscribe to Tenet Media on YouTube. We've got, uh, every, every Friday at 10 a.m.
02:14:04.080
new episodes, more conversations and debates. We've got some interesting ones coming up. So
02:14:07.460
we appreciate it. If you would give us a subscribe, hit the like button. We're back tonight over at
02:14:11.620
youtube.com slash Timcast IRL for some topical news. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all then.
02:14:19.960
Jackpot city is the home of all things casino. We've built a world-class lineup of classic casino
02:14:25.080
games, such as roulette and blackjack, and crafted a virtual range of the best slots,
02:14:29.420
including Atlantean treasures. Everything's online. Everything's ready. Everything's for you.
02:14:34.080
So whenever you're feeling playful, head to Jackpot City and you'll be endlessly entertained.
02:14:38.740
Jackpot City, casino games perfectly made for you. Proud partner of the Toronto Maple Leafs.
02:14:43.980
Must be 19 plus. Ontario residents only. Please play responsibly. Gambling problem? Visit