The Culture War - Tim Pool - November 13, 2026


＂Today The World Ends＂ Doomsday Friday The 13th 2026, The Population Bomb & WW3

We've Been INFILTRATED Chinese Spies SINK Nvidia, Russia SURRENDERS Currency War

Episode Stats


Length

33 minutes

Words per minute

142.72

Word count

4,733

Sentence count

442

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

27

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00 Today, the world ends. This is not just a prediction. It is a date, and scientists chose
00:00:09 it 66 years ago. 1798. An English clergyman named Thomas Malthus publishes a warning.
00:00:18 Population will always outrun food. The poor will starve. He calls it a law of nature.
00:00:28 November 4th, 1960.
00:00:30 The journal Science publishes a paper by three researchers at the University of Illinois.
00:00:35 The title is just a date.
00:00:39 Doomsday.
00:00:40 Friday, 13th, November, A.D. 2026.
00:00:47 The math is simple.
00:00:48 The more people there are, the faster humanity will grow.
00:00:53 Following that curve, the human population becomes infinite on one specific day.
00:01:01 For 30 years, the curve holds.
00:01:03 The world tracks the doomsday equation almost exactly.
00:01:06 And then, it breaks.
00:01:11 1968.
00:01:13 A Stanford biologist publishes The Population Bomb.
00:01:17 Hundreds of millions, he says, will starve to death.
00:01:20 March 11th, 1969. A Planned Parenthood executive sends a memo to the head of the Population Council.
00:01:28 Attached is a table. Proposed measures to reduce fertility in the United States.
00:01:35 Postpone or avoid marriage. Alter the image of the ideal family size.
00:01:40 Encourage women to work. Encourage increased homosexuality. 1.00
00:01:44 Fertility control agents in the water supply. 0.97
00:01:47 April 24th, 1974. President Nixon orders a classified study. Population growth in the
00:01:55 developing world treated as a threat to American national security. It names 13 countries. It calls
00:02:03 for mass media and education to bring the numbers down. The public is not told.
00:02:10 1976, India. Under emergency rule, 6 million men are sterilized in a single year. Officials
00:02:19 are given quotas, villages that refuse lose access to water. Nearly 2,000 people die in
00:02:26 botched operations. The World Bank lent $66 million to the program. In Mexico, the country's
00:02:35 biggest network airs soap operas written to make small families desirable. Population growth falls
00:02:42 by a third. The formula is exported around the world. September 1980. China makes it law. One
00:02:51 child. Forced abortions. Forced sterilization. The government says it prevented 400 million births.
00:02:59 The doomsday curve called for 200 billion people by today, but there are only eight. 0.57
00:03:08 Malthus was not wrong. Someone moved the date. But the world still has other ways to end.
00:03:17 November 11th, 2026, two supertankers are disabled in the Strait of Hormuz.
00:03:22 In the Baltic Sea, a Russian warship is struck. NATO jets scramble.
00:03:27 November 12th, two more tankers hit mines.
00:03:31 The President of the United States says there will be no deal with Iran.
00:03:35 November 13th, a tanker carrying liquefied natural gas hits a mine and explodes.
00:03:41 Iran says it has destroyed an American radar in Bahrain.
00:03:45 The Pentagon denies it and says it shot two Iranian drones out of the sky.
00:03:49 Iran tells the world nuclear inspectors there will be no talks under military threat.
00:03:54 In Moscow, a car bomb, the second in Russia in two days.
00:04:01 American bases in Britain currently sit at their second highest alert.
00:04:06 The Treasury Secretary evacuated to a military base following threats of death from Iran.
00:04:13 In the next week, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin walk into the same city as Xi Jinping,
00:04:20 the man who just said Taiwan will be taken.
00:04:23 and questions linger among those deepest in the conspiracy theories. If those who feared the
00:04:31 population bomb remain in control, could war simply be a means to an end, to achieve a reduced
00:04:39 population? March 22nd, 1980, Albert County, Georgia. A man using a false name unveils a
00:04:47 Granite Monument, its first commandment, maintain humanity under 500 million. July 6th, 2022. Just
00:04:57 before dawn, someone blows it up. No one is charged. In 1960, three scientists picked the date
00:05:06 for the end of the world, and that day is today. The question is, were they wrong,
00:05:13 or is there some force seeking to prevent it by any means necessary? Let's break it down.
00:05:23 Today is the day that the world was supposed to end. The population bomb, they called it.
00:05:31 And the math makes sense. The idea is that everybody was having a lot of kids, at least
00:05:37 three, four, five, or more. If you go back 100 years, 200 years, families were much larger.
00:05:43 but something shifted dramatically in the mid-1960s. Interestingly, shortly after the
00:05:50 prediction of the end of the world came out, attitudes began to change as to how families
00:05:56 were run. Society began to change. Arguments over whether women should be in the workforce or out of
00:06:02 it ended with more women in the workforce and less mothers raising families. The rise of planned 0.92
00:06:08 parenthood. And generally what we see with much of liberal ideology resulted in population
00:06:15 collapsing. And now where we are today, we perhaps have gone overboard. The United States does not
00:06:22 have the population size to maintain its economy. Gen alpha is around 45 million people, which is
00:06:31 60 or so percent the size of Gen Z millennials. It's much smaller. And we've seen an equal panic 0.96
00:06:41 over underpopulation with an attempt to bring in illegal immigrants to the southern border. 0.98
00:06:47 Now, we'll save that for another issue, because my friends, this may be one of the most important
00:06:52 and shocking videos that I have ever made that you will watch. So I recommend this as you watch
00:06:59 and learn things that you believe were not possible, all confirmed through official sources,
00:07:07 I consider, I ask you to consider sharing this video, letting people know to watch it,
00:07:14 because the thesis is actually quite simple. It begins in 1960, a fear that as families had two,
00:07:21 three, or four children, population would grow exponentially. Ultimately, we would reach an apex.
00:07:28 There would not be enough food, there would be too many people, and we would starve.
00:07:33 This is highlighted by many researchers as it pertains to any ecosystem.
00:07:37 In fact, out here in West Virginia, we've had this problem quite a bit.
00:07:41 The deer population grows too large.
00:07:43 They consume all of the food that is available to them, and eventually, they fight over it.
00:07:49 They become sickly, gaunt, and diseased.
00:07:52 They suffer.
00:07:53 The argument is that if the human population ever got that large, we would all suffer for it.
00:08:00 And there must be efforts made to reduce population growth.
00:08:04 Famously, Bill Gates gave a speech where he said.
00:08:23 voice. With vaccines, we can reduce population growth. He meant he was suggesting that through
00:08:32 health care, vaccines and technology, more and more people around the world would choose not
00:08:37 to have so many children. I believe that's genuinely what he was saying, that one of the
00:08:43 plans put in place since the rise of what's called Malthusianism, one of the plans has been to go to
00:08:50 the third world and provide them resources, technology and cultural means by which they 0.69
00:08:55 will not have children. Other means have been attempted. This may be surprising to many people, 1.00
00:09:01 but yes, a massive sterilization effort took place in India. Let me break it all down for
00:09:07 you, my friends, because some of these things I assure, I assure you, many will find hard to
00:09:12 believe. But everything I have is backed up, fact checked and provided by official sources
00:09:17 as to the true nature of what we are experiencing.
00:09:20 And I give you this, the scariest element of all of it.
00:09:25 The Georgia Guidestones that said humanity must not exceed 500 million.
00:09:31 Unfortunately for the people who built those, we're at 8.3 billion.
00:09:38 Is there going to be an effort to further reduce population by over 7 billion people?
00:09:45 A lot more than that, actually. Perhaps 7.8. From theweek.com. Why scientists in the 1960s
00:09:55 predicted the world would end on Friday. Interesting. Did you hear the world is ending
00:10:01 on Friday? That's according to three scientists in the 1960s. Our great-great-grandchildren will
00:10:06 not starve. They said in an article in the journal Science published on November 4th,
00:10:10 1960, they will be squeezed to death. The Austrian-American physicist Heinz von Forster
00:10:16 and two colleagues wrote the paper that had the sobering title, Doomsday, Friday the 13th,
00:10:22 November AD, 2026. My friends, as of the recording of this video, that is today.
00:10:29 The work was based on a simple observation, said Science in October. The time it took for
00:10:34 the human population to double in size kept getting shorter. So drawing on population estimates
00:10:39 from about 400 B.C. until 1958, the authors came up with an explanation that best described the
00:10:46 trend. By 2020, they predicted the human population would exceed 25 billion. The researchers didn't
00:10:52 calculate when humanity would run out of food, land, or energy. They merely concluded that at
00:10:57 some point in 2026, their equation ceased to give meaningful results because the predicted population
00:11:03 shot towards infinity, 25 billion. So first, what you want to do is cut that number in half,
00:11:11 12.5. Two people make more people. So if you have 25 billion, you have 12.5 billion couples.
00:11:19 If they produce those couples, if they, so we're not going to assume that one person produces one
00:11:27 person. If they produce two, you are at equilibrium. If they produce three or four,
00:11:33 the population is exponentially increasing. So 25 billion people, 12.5 times four. And you can
00:11:42 see where we're heading. Soon there would be 75 billion because these 25 billion that have
00:11:47 children at the age of 25 or so still exist. Human lifespan overlaps with generations and
00:11:57 the population was estimated to hit upwards of 200 billion by 2026. Now, of course, there aren't
00:12:04 enough resources for such a feat, but it doesn't matter because the idea is simple. We will reach
00:12:10 the maximum amount of humans and we will fight and we will starve. The claims caused an immediate
00:12:17 stir. And Alan McIrchon, McIrchon, probably pronouncing that wrong, McIrchon, history
00:12:26 professor from Western University of Ontario, Canada, on the conversation, that's what he said,
00:12:32 there were stories in time, the New York Times, about the findings. They became the subject of a
00:12:37 series of pogo comic strips. Many commentators thought the article was strictly a tongue-in-cheek
00:12:41 comment on population fears. Lobbyists leapt on it. In 1963, a witness from the chemical industry
00:12:47 told a Canadian parliamentary committee that the report was an argument for chemical pesticides,
00:12:52 which would, they argued, be needed to feed the approaching population explosion. In a 1971 U.S.
00:12:58 Supreme Court abortion case leading up to Roe v. Wade, it was cited as proof there was no
00:13:02 compelling reason for the government to favor increased population. I hope you guys are ready
00:13:08 for this roller coaster. As I'm going to lay out for you a story that appears to have come true.
00:13:15 I believe that there has been a tremendous Malthusian cultural effort to convince people
00:13:19 not to have children or make them unable culturally or otherwise to do so. I think when you look
00:13:25 around us right now at population collapse, it becomes quite apparent. Thomas Robert Malthus,
00:13:31 a British economist and demographer born to a prosperous family. He studied the University
00:13:38 of Cambridge. They say he argued population will always tend to outrun the food supply,
00:13:44 but the increase of population will take place if unchecked in a geometrical progression.
00:13:50 Well, the means of subsistence will increase only in an arithmetical, arithmetical progression,
00:13:57 arithmetical, arithmetical, medical. He believed population would expand the limit of subsistence
00:14:03 and would be held there by famine, war, and ill health. He is correct. That is known for all
00:14:08 ecosystems. This is the article, Doomsday, Friday, 13, November, AD, 2026. It exists,
00:14:17 science.org. It's here right now. You can read it. I want to make sure I show these things to
00:14:22 back up everything I'm saying, because I think many people would be terrified to realize what
00:14:27 is happening around them. I also want to stress my friends, this of all of the things that I've
00:14:32 produced probably is the most shocking and offensive to the powers that be. And let's roll,
00:14:39 baby. The population bomb. While you were reading these words, four people will have died from
00:14:46 starvation, most of them children. The population bomb keeps ticking. As 1968 began, Paul Ehrlich
00:14:55 was an entomologist at Stanford University known to his peers for his groundbreaking studies
00:15:01 of the co-evolution of flowering plants and butterflies. But almost unknown to the average
00:15:05 person, that was about to change. In May, Ehrlich released a quickly written, cheaply bound paperback
00:15:10 the population bomb, initially ignored. But over time, Ehrlich's tract would sell millions of copies
00:15:16 and turn its author into a celebrity. It would become one of the most influential books of the
00:15:21 20th century and one of the most heatedly attacked. The first sentence sets the tone.
00:15:26 The battle to feed all humanity is over. And humanity had lost. In 1970, the book promised,
00:15:32 excuse me, hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death. No matter what people
00:15:38 do, nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate. Ehrlich, now 85, told me
00:15:46 recently, says the writer, that the book's main contribution was to make population control
00:15:50 acceptable and a topic of debate. But the book did far more than that. It gave a huge jolt to
00:15:56 the nascent environmental movement and fueled an anti-population growth crusade that led to human
00:16:02 rights abuses around the world. Are you ready, my friends? I give you Frederick S. Jaff.
00:16:11 Or is it Hafei? Vice President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America and founder
00:16:17 of what is now the Guttmacher Institute. He was an advocate for increasing the availability of
00:16:22 family planning services in the United States. Through his publications and consultations,
00:16:27 Jaff argued for birth control as a matter of health and human rights. He was instrumental
00:16:31 in developing public support for federal financing of family planning programs, among them the
00:16:36 landmark Title X, Title 10, of the Public Health Service Act passed by Congress in 1970. For his
00:16:42 contributions to public health, Jeff was elected to the Institute of Medicine at the National
00:16:47 Academy of Sciences in September of 1977. I ask you now, my friends, what if Malthus was right?
00:16:54 I think he was. But I don't know the rate at which population would become overbearing and
00:17:00 then break down in such ways. What if the scientists in 1960 were correct? What if Jeff
00:17:05 was correct? What if we face an existential crisis? And due to the actions taken by these men,
00:17:14 we prevented catastrophe. Right now, we are facing population collapse. Our economy can't
00:17:20 sustain it. Something needs to change. Efforts are underway to roll out artificial intelligence
00:17:25 that will provide the means for cheap labor to try and sustain our economy. Perhaps that is the
00:17:31 course of action. Perhaps it is true, my friends, as much as we may recoil, those right now
00:17:38 approaching this from first ordered thinking simply see men who did horrible things.
00:17:45 But what if they were right? I'm not suggesting they were. I'm asking you to consider what if
00:17:51 today the population would be at 15, 20 billion, it would be a catastrophe, pollution, destabilization,
00:17:58 conflicts, riots. What if it wouldn't? What if with 20 billion people, we'd have gone to the
00:18:04 stars. Science would have exploded. And these people are dangerous cultists. They believe 0.86
00:18:09 insane things for insane reasons and sought to destroy human reproduction out of an ideological
00:18:15 fear that was unfounded? I guess we don't know. Perhaps hindsight is 2020. I give you now one of
00:18:22 the most shocking documents of all, the Jaffe Memo, a March 11th, 1969 memorandum written by
00:18:28 Frederick S. Jaffe, then vice president of Planned Parenthood, and the founder of the
00:18:33 Guttmacher Institute, to Bernard Berelson, president of the Population Council. The memo
00:18:38 was not a formal policy statement or directive by Planned Parenthood. Rather, it was a working
00:18:43 paper that cataloged and classified a wide array of population control proposals being
00:18:48 discussed by various researchers, demographers, and policymakers at the time.
00:18:54 It famously included a chart categorizing various means of reducing U.S. fertility,
00:18:59 ranging from voluntary measures to more controversial or coercive suggestions.
00:19:06 Do you want to see how terrifying this is? I gave you the memorandum.
00:19:09 Proposed measures to reduce fertility by universality or selectivity of impact in the U.S.
00:19:18 Social constraints.
00:19:19 Restructure family, postpone or avoid marriage. 0.61
00:19:22 B, alter image of ideal family size. 0.67
00:19:26 Compulsory education of children. 1.00
00:19:28 Encourage increased homosexuality. 1.00
00:19:30 Educate for family limitation. 1.00
00:19:33 Fertility control agents in the water supply. 1.00
00:19:35 Encourage women to work. 1.00
00:19:37 Now, do you believe any of that has or is happening? Comment below. Let me know what you
00:19:45 think. Economic deterrence and incentives. Modify tax policies. Substantial marriage tax. We've not
00:19:53 seen this. Child tax. We've not seen this. In fact, the inverse. Tax married more than single
00:19:59 has not happened. Remove parents' tax exemption. Additional taxes on parents with more than one or
00:20:05 two children. Reduce and eliminate paid maternity leave or benefits. Reduce and eliminate children 0.87
00:20:10 or families' allowances. Bonuses for delayed marriage and greater child spacing. Pensions 0.55
00:20:15 for women of 45 with less than N children. Eliminate welfare payments after first two
00:20:21 children. Chronic depression. They wanted to impose that? Require women to work and provide
00:20:27 few child care facilities. Limit, eliminate publicly financed medical care, scholarships, 1.00
00:20:32 housing, loans, and subsidies to families with more than N children. These things did not happen.
00:20:38 Social controls, compulsory abortion of out of wedlock pregnancies. I want you to see that 0.82
00:20:44 recommendation again. Compulsory abortion of out of wedlock pregnancies. Thankfully, 0.96
00:20:49 that did not happen. Compulsory sterilization of all who have two children, except for a few
00:20:55 who would be allowed three. Confine childbearing to only a limited number of adults. Stock 0.84
00:21:01 certificate type permits for children. Discourage private home ownership. Stop awarding public
00:21:08 housing based on family size. One of these things absolutely is happening. Measures predicated on
00:21:14 existing motivation to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Payments to encourage sterilization. Payments,
00:21:21 payments to encourage contraception. Payments to encourage abortion. Abortion and sterilization
00:21:26 on demand. Allow harmless contraceptives to be distributed non-medically. Improve contraceptive
00:21:31 technology. Make contraception truly available and accessible. Improve maternal health care
00:21:37 with family planning a core element. Of these recommendations, my friends, we have seen
00:21:42 quite a bit. Not all of the most extreme ones, my friends. Mostly none of the extreme ones.
00:21:48 When you take a look at the social constraints, it's effectively all of them.
00:21:51 PolitiFact says Bill Gates talked about using vaccines to control population growth in an
00:21:59 unedited 2010 talk, Ted talk video. False. It's actually true. He did strange. They would call
00:22:08 it false. Now what is false is that Bill Gates was saying he wanted to kill people. Bill Gates 0.59
00:22:13 was speaking as to slowing population growth. Here's the article. Bill and Melinda Gates
00:22:20 have repeatedly said that increased access to vaccines and health care on the world would
00:22:23 reduce child mortality and allow families to decide to have fewer children. That would slow
00:22:27 the population growth rate. Indeed, then Bill Gates talked about using vaccines to control
00:22:32 population growth is true. Strange how they do this. They claim it's false, but then below claim
00:22:39 it's true. Bill Gates, again, was not saying to kill people. He was saying we want people not to
00:22:45 have children. I give you the memorandum NSCU DM 134 from the chairman of the National Security
00:22:53 Council Undersecretary's Committee Ingersoll to President Ford, Washington, December 14th, 1974.
00:23:01 The study looks to the year 2000 and beyond on the basis of alternative projections for population
00:23:06 growth. Simplified. A conference held August 19th to the 30th in 1974 in Bucharest, Romania.
00:23:14 The conference was attended by 135 nations.
00:23:17 The United States was one of a dozen of nations who contributed to the final report.
00:23:22 A summary of recommendations from NSSM 200 was provided to President Ford on December 14th, 1974.
00:23:29 The basic thesis of the report was that population growth in the least developed countries
00:23:34 is a concern to U.S. national security because excess population growth,
00:23:39 growth that exceeded local food, water, housing, waste handling,
00:23:41 and other humanitarian concerns would first cause local suffering, would tend to risk civil unrest
00:23:47 and political instability. The policy gives paramount importance to population growth
00:23:51 planning measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries
00:23:56 to stem rapid overpopulation growth. From Al Jazeera, India forcibly sterilized 8 million men.
00:24:04 One village remembers 50 years later, the imposition of a state of national emergency
00:24:11 on June 25th, 1975 was India's closest brush with dictatorship. In Uthawar village, the scars
00:24:19 remain. That is shortly after the United States was warned that third world population growth was
00:24:26 a threat. In India, they began sterilizing millions of men. The stories exist and persist. 0.94
00:24:36 More than 8 million men were forced to undergo a vasectomy during the period,
00:24:40 which lasted until March 1977, when the state of emergency was lifted. This included 6 million men
00:24:46 in just 1976. Nearly 2,000 people died in botched surgeries. I give you Miguel Sabido.
00:24:54 Really? He's currently alive today. The United Nations awarded Mexico with their population
00:25:03 award. The United States Agency for International Development, or USAID, wrote, the Televisa family
00:25:11 planning soap operas have made the single most powerful contribution to the Mexican population
00:25:16 success story. Albert Bandura became an instrumental ally to Sabido, or I believe it's
00:25:23 explaining some of the enormous impact
00:25:25 through his social learning theory
00:25:27 and later going on to publish many papers
00:25:29 on the effects of serial dramas.
00:25:32 Indeed.
00:25:34 Indeed.
00:25:36 Producing shows
00:25:37 that told people to have smaller families.
00:25:41 He went on to produce
00:25:42 the family planning themed telenovelas
00:25:44 in the 70s,
00:25:45 which collectively resulted in a 34% decline
00:25:48 in the population growth rate of Mexico.
00:25:53 from brookings.edu. Population policy and politics. How will history judge China's one
00:26:01 child policy? Indeed, we all know about it. From 1979 to 2015, you were only allowed to have one
00:26:09 child. The problem? People wanted an heir. So they mass murdered baby girls. They dumped them
00:26:18 in dumpsters. Horrifying reality because people decided to have their one child. And when they
00:26:22 found out it would be a girl, they thought we will have no heir to the family. So they killed
00:26:28 them. These are the policies that we see. And then I give you the Georgia Guidestones. 0.93
00:26:36 The slabs called satanic by some, they were blown up. On the Guidestones was a warning.
00:26:42 You must maintain the population of earth below 500 million. The question then becomes,
00:26:48 are those that seek to reduce population growth satisfied with 8.3 billion? The population is
00:26:56 still slowly growing. Are they satisfied with where we currently are? USAID is gone.
00:27:05 Could it be that the great culture war, what we are seeing between Donald Trump
00:27:08 and the deep state, whatever you want to call it, is more built upon those that would seek
00:27:14 to dramatically reduce population to 500 million? And those who would seek to allow life to flourish
00:27:21 as it does? Or is it possible it's all one big happy family tree, son? And that is the machine
00:27:29 that we see in play is all marching in lockstep. The powers that be have a plan. And that plan
00:27:36 will not be stopped. Consider this. Elon Musk, no friend of the Democrats, producing Optimus bots,
00:27:44 auto cabs, cyber cab, self-driving. Doesn't seem to matter which side you're on. Both seem to be
00:27:51 focused on a similar goal. On the Trump side of things, you will have your self-driving cars and
00:27:57 you will have AI rapidly produced. On the Democrat side of things, you'll have no kids and you'll be
00:28:02 homosexual, whichever way you step. And now with Donald Trump in office, we are facing a serious 0.95
00:28:09 escalation of war with Iran. Some fear that this is leading us to World War Three. I don't know
00:28:14 that it will. I don't know that it will. Terror plots, sabotage, threats to US military in Europe
00:28:22 are mounting. If you truly wanted to reduce the population from 8.3 billion to 500 million,
00:28:28 certainly. A world war is one way to do it. Besant confirms he's moved to a military base, 0.99
00:28:35 blames the Wall Street Journal for printing the location of his house.
00:28:40 10 things, global news. Europe moves closer to Ukraine peace talks. It's good news. Ukrainian
00:28:47 drone strikes a Russian warship in the Baltic. Bad news. Trump withdraws Vance from Iran negotiations.
00:28:54 Trump and Netanyahu are clashing over Iran strikes.
00:28:59 I would say I don't believe that it's as simple to say that they really would wipe out billions of people in a war.
00:29:06 What I can say is when you take a look at the totality of the things that have happened socially and economically, 0.99
00:29:13 I'd argue that Malthusians have been in power the whole time. 1.00
00:29:17 But I also wonder, were they wrong? 0.98
00:29:20 And I don't mean morally.
00:29:22 I think everyone would agree most of these things, if they were implemented by choice,
00:29:26 would be morally wrong.
00:29:27 But there comes the more difficult question for all of you.
00:29:31 If you were the king and you were given undeniable evidence that you were facing a catastrophe,
00:29:38 would you make difficult decisions, sacrificing even some of your own people or your future?
00:29:44 They meant preserving your people in the long run.
00:29:47 The challenge with these ideas is that we just don't know.
00:29:52 That's reality. We just don't know. Could this just be zealots, ideologically driven,
00:30:00 believing math that did not add up? I would argue this. As population expands,
00:30:08 more specialties emerge and science expands along with it. Our technology is a component of the
00:30:14 scale of our population size. Elon Musk agrees. The more people you have, the more people can
00:30:21 specialized. No single individual will ever build a computer monitor or a computer for that matter.
00:30:27 A rudimentary computer, sure, analog, but not by today's standards. It requires probably
00:30:34 thousands of people, each with different specialties. Would we have just found a way
00:30:40 to colonize other planets and expand? Could it be that these zealots who have actively tried to
00:30:46 stop humans from growing and multiplying have hindered a great future? At the same time,
00:30:55 what if we didn't develop fast enough? What if we could not develop the technology fast enough,
00:31:00 even with population expansion? I mean, even today, there are people who don't do any meaningful work
00:31:05 and they're suckling the teat of the system. So what do you do? Which brings us to the next point.
00:31:13 Perhaps the Malthusianism is not just about the reduction of population size. 0.95
00:31:17 It's about the reduction of people who are useless eaters and undesirable.
00:31:22 Like the Jeff Memorandum said, some people would be permitted to have a third child.
00:31:26 Who those people are, that makes me wonder.
00:31:31 The people they don't want to have kids are those that can't contribute and are not smart enough to.
00:31:36 This is all real.
00:31:37 It's all laid out before you in facts, sourced, cited, government records.
00:31:43 This is history.
00:31:44 The painting is clear.
00:31:46 I end with this.
00:31:48 UN Agenda 2030 proposes an end of the family unit and government raised children.
00:31:54 It does not exist.
00:31:56 But there is an Agenda 2030, and it does and continues to recommend a change in our social
00:32:03 structures of which you may see hindrance or an end of the family unit. Take a look right now.
00:32:10 The average home buyer is 40. Perhaps that was the intended condition. 0.63
00:32:16 I can only imagine that there are a lot of people saying, Tim, don't make this video.
00:32:20 These people should not know this. Or perhaps they don't really care. Why? Because fight as
00:32:26 you might. You can't change the system. A skyscraper has been built and you are but a
00:32:32 man with a ball peen hammer. You ain't knocking it down. You can adapt. You can survive. I spoke
00:32:38 with Alex Jones years ago, and he said, they've laid the bear traps in front of you, and they've
00:32:43 told you where they are. And if you're not smart enough to avoid them, that's your fault.
00:32:50 Smash the like button, my friends. Share the show with everyone you know. If you are as shocked by
00:32:55 this as I am, let people know. You can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. We've got more
00:33:03 segments coming up for you today, this beautiful Friday. Thank you all so much for hanging out,
00:33:07 and we'll see you all in the next segment.