Young men are leaving the left. We ve seen numerous reports over the past few years that young men are shifting toward the right. Why is this happening, and why is it happening now? Is it a good or bad thing?
01:00:43.200I'm not – I don't want to get into Trump bashing here, especially because like I really do want to avoid like doing too much domestic policy conversation as like a Canadian stuff.
01:00:50.540But like I'm not team red because I think what the conservative purpose is is to preserve and to consecrate and conserve tradition and values and constitution, which like made us in the past so great.
01:01:07.100And the point of the left is to progress us and push us forward.
01:01:15.660Like 9 million Obama voters in 2016 voted for Donald Trump and one of the big reasons was that Donald Trump went on stage at the RNC and unfurled a pride flag to thunderous applause.
01:01:28.840Donald Trump came into the Republican Party and pushed this political faction in a progressive direction.
01:02:04.100If you want to do – I'm running into this with a friend right now who tries to do war correspondence in countries that don't like trans people.
01:02:15.680Nobody would look at her and think that that person should walk into a male bathroom.
01:02:19.520But because she's trans, she has an M on her passport and she now cannot go into multiple very conservative countries because of threats to her life.
01:02:27.820Well, to be fair, you couldn't in the first place.
01:02:30.720He'd be under threat if they went anyways.
01:02:33.600No, she wouldn't because most people – first of all, she's not – she was not super out about her transness.
01:02:53.880I mean you're choosing to go to those zones.
01:02:55.980She's a war correspondent as her career.
01:02:58.100Yes, she goes to Iraq, but she's always gone to Iraq.
01:03:00.580You know, I'll concede this is a lefty position and it is – I would refer to as – I don't know what's the right way to describe this – farcical, fantastical.
01:03:34.000And they couldn't actually tell the women not to go to these zones and prepare them for what happens to women in war zones because they'd get sued if they did.
01:03:43.320And so someone asked this former MI6 guy, should women who go into conflict zones be concerned about rape?
01:03:56.480And, you know, anyway, so moving on, because he literally couldn't say if you're a woman and you go to a war zone and you're captured, you'll be mercilessly raped and sold into slavery.
01:04:05.180And if you're a man, you probably won't be.
01:04:07.320Because if he did, that would be sexual discrimination in a work environment because this is a contracted company for insurance providers and media outlets.
01:04:24.960You assume the risks of who you are and what you are.
01:04:27.840And this idea that you are entitled to some special privilege to go to a foreign country where you may be killed in any circumstance is laughably insane.
01:04:34.060What's the benefit of changing any of these passport things except for being me?
01:04:36.920In 1993, there was a law passed in the United States because forever, when medical testing was done for drugs, they did not do it on women.
01:04:46.740And so when women would go to the hospital with pain, they'd say, take this painkiller.
01:04:52.080And they go, women are such fucking babies.
01:04:54.120And then they were like, hey, maybe drugs work differently on men and women due to physiology.
01:04:58.820So they passed a law saying, from now on, medical research has to be done on both men and women because we are just kind of realizing the drugs work differently on women.
01:05:08.660So if someone, considering men and women have different organs, quite literally, there's a reason for why we designate your gender.
01:05:18.800Why on my passport does it need to say for somebody who in every single way, it's like Blair White, look at them and say, it looks like a woman.
01:05:28.300Are women allowed to walk around outside in Islamic nations without a man?
01:05:33.040I was going to say with a man and usually covered, yes.
01:06:03.220The laws that they would be breaking is that if Blair White has M on their passport, I guess Blair should be walking around without head coverings and wearing, like, keffia and not having a person, which they would kill her for.
01:06:16.980What right do you have to someone else's nation? I don't understand.
01:06:19.040This isn't about a right. This is about your own country granting you the ability to exist and perform in the way that every single person is going to treat you.
01:06:26.000We're talking specifically about your friend who wants to go to conflict zones in foreign countries and lie to their government to get privy to access.
01:06:32.720You have the right to go and do your work.
01:06:35.540You do not have a right to someone else's nation. They grant you a privilege to enter under a visa.
01:06:40.040Sure. But the issue is that you're making it seem like I would grant you that if it was the other nations getting mad at America, being like, put M on trans passports.
01:06:48.820But that's not what happened. Trump made the decision himself, unrelated to any external pressures.
01:07:40.960You think an American male should be able to get a passport that says they're a female so they can enter a country where it's illegal and do things that are otherwise illegal?
01:07:48.100I think that the idea that, like, you were basically saying that Trump is pro-trans in every way.
01:50:37.080And they have been fucked over by history.
01:50:41.120I would say, like, people cite, like, the 1970s.
01:50:44.120I don't know if you've ever seen the website, like, what the fuck happened in 1971.
01:50:47.540But essentially, there's a bunch of, like, crazy graphs that start exploding after 1971.
01:50:51.100But I think men have this history where they have an entire generation wiped out in World War II, and then all the dads that did come back had PTSD, and then the Vietnam War happened, and a whole bunch of more dads got wiped out.
01:51:04.580And so we have this history where we've basically stripped men of masculinity because they died.
01:51:10.160They died, had PTSD, and we had nothing else to offer them.
01:51:13.840And the only men that stayed back were the men that wouldn't go to war, which is not your prototypical man.
01:51:17.480This is another reason why I think a lot of guys are moving away from the left.
01:51:55.240Yeah, I think sane—I think any sane politician fundamentally recognizes that America needs to remain as, like, the hegemonic superpower.
01:52:03.360And something like Ukraine is something that has to be responded to in some degree because of such a massive breach in sovereignty that, like, I think if there isn't a response there, then we are moving towards a global hot war.
01:52:14.980I think you shouldn't be allowed to vote.
01:52:34.360Well, before it was land ownership and citizenship, but now it's just citizenship.
01:52:38.280So the issue I take with this is that I say women shouldn't be allowed to vote as a hyperbolic statement meant to cause shock so that people will go, oh.
01:52:46.400But what I'm actually saying is the idea that women in this country who largely vote Democrat have the right to vote to send me and my children and my friends to war to die for their psychotic worldview is unconstitutional and wrong and should not be permitted.
01:53:00.960Well, and that's what I was going to say to touch on what you guys were talking about is that I think some of that even, too, is unintentional, that they're the more, like, pro-war party, that they're heading towards a hot war.
01:53:11.440Because if you're continuing to—like you were saying, men are looking for a sort of empowerment and abandoning the kind of guilt that's being laid upon them.
01:53:20.100If we're—if we continue to feminize all of our males in society and make them sit down and shut up and behave and, you know, you're sort of inviting in because you tend to begin to look weaker and weaker on the stage, regardless of your technological prowess or whatever.
01:53:37.200You become kind of like a sitting duck or a target.
01:53:40.680Oh, look at these—look at this weak society.
01:53:42.420I think tying the vote to the draft is, like, super unprecedented.
01:53:44.840And I don't know almost any democracy that does that, in large part, because it's like, okay, so what, just, like, disabled men also can't vote?
01:54:48.700Conservatives will not let them be drafted.
01:54:50.640But they can vote collectively to send men off to die.
01:54:54.140Yeah, young men are going to reject that outright and be like, all these millennial women, these cat ladies are voting for us to go to war in Ukraine that I'm going to have to fight.
01:55:02.240I'm 22 years old and I got to go die because these lunatics?
01:55:05.780This is the tit for tit of citizenship is that everyone gets to vote on things that fundamentally apply exclusively to other groups regardless of whether that.
01:55:13.640Yes, because men get to vote on abortion policies, which exclusively affects women.
01:56:30.400Of course, because conservatives are probably the most staunchly positive sexist and negative sexist, right?
01:56:34.740So my point, going back to what you were saying about voting on things that affect other people, is the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act are supposed to be the remedies for that.
01:56:43.440That if you are discriminated against in this capacity, we can sue and actually stop these laws from happening.
01:56:47.520So, interestingly, we got rid of segregation.
01:57:28.880As long as they meet the minimum threshold for that job physically, they can do it.
01:57:32.400So, there's no reason they should be exempt from selective service.
01:57:34.960It's just about where a person – so, like, in this regard, going back to the disabled guy, a disabled 18-year-old man still has to sign up for selective service.
01:57:43.240And, like, it depends on the disability.
01:57:44.680I mean I just – I'm just here for you on this.
01:57:46.280Like, going to Israel and, like, watching the fact that, like, you've got both men and women in the military.
01:57:51.240They have to go and they've got this entire civilization – like, citizenry that has a knowledge of guns, that has a knowledge of violence and understands, like, how to respond to, like, high-risk situations.
01:59:06.860Well, the issue is, like, in the U.S. military – like, this is the thing about – we tried having this blank slate government of civil rights.
01:59:15.680And then people are like, yeah, everybody's actually different and creating these universal policies didn't actually work.
01:59:24.900The race thing doesn't really make sense.
01:59:26.240Racial discrimination makes literally no sense because a black guy from Somalia is going to be 5'5", and a black guy from Haiti is going to be 6'3".
01:59:31.520You can't just be, like, black people because that doesn't mean anything.
01:59:34.320But men and women largely does mean something.
01:59:36.700So what ends up happening is the military says, women get potty breaks because they have to have them for hygiene reasons.
01:59:41.800Because if women cry, best not deal with it.
02:00:13.880The United States should conscript any and all able-bodied individuals for any and all jobs they need in the event that the United States is invaded.
02:00:36.580Like this idea that, like, the left is just weak and soy and all this sort of stuff, it's like it depends on what you mean.
02:00:40.600If you mean left as far as principles, there are lots of us that are left that are principled, that are not cowardly, that understand that violence sometimes has to happen and it's a tragedy when it does.
02:00:50.340And we are pragmatic in our solutions to making a better world.
02:00:55.680It has been stomped on over and over again from both sides, by the way.
02:00:59.520The worst part about my position is that all of you are nasty to me.
02:01:03.360I get doxxed and swatted from all of you guys.
02:01:05.460And so there's this issue where it's like if you want a good left, which in a two-party system, you want a good left, just like we want a good right, then what you need to do is engage and treat the good left as though that they are doing that.
02:01:16.960The disaffected liberals aren't doxxing you and attacking you.
02:01:27.320The issue is that I'm – the issue that I'm saying is in this conversation, I've had to spend 80% of the conversation pointing at leftists and being like, yeah, I think that is crazy and not good, but that doesn't mean that I'm not left.
02:01:41.280Because those are the people that are the general audience of this.
02:01:44.400Then work with me to help make a better world.
02:01:47.720Well, I mean that's part of this is calling it out.
02:01:50.880If trans stuff is less than 1%, just let us have some trans stuff.
02:02:43.460If you want to identify as a woman, you have to have a whole number of things that include with you, and your sex has to be on some other form of ID.
02:05:15.100Like people don't tie nearly as much to age post-18, whereas people tie a lot socially and script – like socially script-wise to your gender.
02:05:23.340Well, what if you're 40 but you feel 25?
02:05:39.160If there's a whole bunch of Brian Johnsons that emerge and we identify that there seems to be a collective sequelae of behavior patterns that keep occurring all the time, that the DSM recognizes as occurring all the time, because I'm pro-criteria for trans and for gender.
02:05:58.380So, for example, if we showed that this group was suiciding at an astronomical rate, higher than schizophrenia, by the way, and it shows that if you put 25 on their ID, it might reduce their suicidality by 70%.
02:06:12.460I might even be open to that argument.
02:06:14.880I just think it doesn't exist, so we don't have to have it.
02:06:17.460Today on Fox and Friends, and it's probably just targeting me because I'm 39.
02:06:21.820It's the most annoying commercial ever.
02:06:46.300And people, like – when I first started getting white in my beard, I kept getting comments where they're like, Tim, you got something on your face.
02:06:51.300Because they didn't realize it was just, like, three white hairs.
02:08:31.420Which is why I opposed the idea of having passports doing sex changes for trans people.
02:08:36.200I always think that the conversation should have been functionally either – I don't know enough about all of the details of passports, but can gender just be removed?
02:08:43.300Because I don't know if it's actually important for passports.
02:08:45.520You've got passport number, date of birth, location.
02:08:47.600There's so much identifying information that is sex actually important.
02:08:49.680What if there's like a big fat woman with like stubble?
02:08:52.960You kind of can't tell if she's a man or a woman.
02:09:57.120I'm open to a lot of options, to be clear.
02:09:59.240What if a woman is very masculine and manly and appears like a guy –
02:10:02.960Sure, maybe that's a good argument for why we should abolish gender or sex from passports and have it exclusively on driver's license and only the sex on driver's license.
02:10:08.960I'm still in identifying paperwork, and if you don't have your license on you, you get in a car accident or something.
02:10:19.920We've got to perform an emergency hysterectomy on this man.
02:10:22.980So I've already said I'm open to a lot of strategies on the passport.
02:10:26.800This idea that it has to be my idea isn't what I'm advocating for.
02:10:30.120I'm saying caring about trans people being able to safely travel internationally actually does matter, and we should be able to have a pragmatic conversation about ways to solve this.
02:10:39.940I don't think most people going to work really care about this.
02:10:48.500If you say that you care about vulnerable populations, then the reality is that these are the niche things that you have to make policy on, and you have to be pragmatic about it.
02:10:56.600And I think the left wasn't pragmatic about it, which is bad.
02:10:59.060But the right is also not being pragmatic.
02:11:16.820And so when you're talking about the trans issue with being able to travel to other countries, there's a kind of like American exceptionalist view that you have.
02:11:24.660I believe the government should protect its citizens and do its best to find pragmatic solutions to protect those citizens in all sorts of ways.
02:13:58.200They are not pulling the trigger, and that's the point I was making.
02:14:00.320The game that they're playing is the U.S. individuals that are trained by the military and former military that are shooting at Russians are volunteers.
02:14:09.540And the special forces that work for the United States that are there are providing intelligence.
02:14:13.620But if a U.S. special forces looks at a Ukrainian guy and says, if you press that button, it'll launch a U.S. rocket and blow up a Russian vessel.
02:14:20.460You cannot claim that Russia is doing it.
02:14:24.200The issue is that, like, now we're having—now we're having, like, these loophole issues of Americans who believe in the Ukrainian war want to support it and are militarily trained.
02:14:35.420It's important to know that individual American volunteers have joined Ukrainian forces independently.
02:14:39.840For instance, U.S. and Iraq war veterans.
02:14:42.400John A. Peabli was killed in Ukraine while serving the Ukrainian.
02:14:45.000These individuals act on their own accord and are not sent by official U.S. military deployment.
02:14:49.260The U.S. has not sent troops to Ukraine to engage in combat whatsoever, and there are no current plans to do so, right?
02:14:55.040And so it's like, I understand that you're saying Americans are going there, and they're volunteers.
02:14:59.000And it's like, probably to some extent they are, and to some extent they probably have some level of blessing, but also Americans have the liberty to do that, right?
02:15:17.100It was reported earlier in several months prior by The Intercept that Western special forces were on the ground directing the combat operations for Ukraine.
02:15:26.620And what they've done is there's U.S. personnel actively pulling the trigger and shooting, but they're former military.
02:15:45.440The U.S. is involved, and we've got U.S. military in Poland training people for this conflict.
02:15:51.800If this is a hot conflict, then most of our proxy wars were hot conflicts directly between Russia and U.S., and it's just not, right?
02:15:59.560I understand that you're looking at this and being like, this is a loophole, which I might even grant.
02:16:04.840Vietnam was a proxy war with the communists, but we were actively fighting the Viet Cong.
02:16:10.300The U.S. was in Vietnam aiding—what's the name of the—
02:16:15.000When I'm saying proxy wars, I think most people—I'm at least referencing Middle East, right?
02:16:19.400That's typically the areas that we mean when we say Cold War proxy wars.
02:16:22.160The reason why this is not a proxy war is that U.S. individuals under the guidance of Ukraine, under the guidance of U.S. special forces and U.S. intel, are shooting at Russians directly.
02:16:32.960We have U.S. citizens shooting Russians.
02:16:35.860In the former proxy wars of the Cold War, like in North Korea and in Vietnam, U.S. troops were aiding the forces there to fight the other forces there.
02:16:57.200Are they being funded directly by the American military?
02:17:00.180Like, is the American military paying these people to go?
02:17:05.200You want to play—we can play a game of semantics and—
02:17:07.280It's not a game of semantics at a legal level, right?
02:17:09.620We can play a game of semantics and say they are not directly funded by the American—this is what you're going to get from, like, the defense secretary.
02:17:17.480He's going to say no U.S. dollars are being spent to send these people to Ukraine.
02:18:51.100To be fair, like I said, in the philosophy of truth, we largely believe these things based on the reports that we get from the corporate press who lie quite a bit.
02:18:59.840So this is your evidence that not only they're on the ground—
02:19:03.400Well, this is just one article I pulled up right now.
02:19:04.640Controlling the Ukrainian government—the Ukrainian military, sorry.
02:19:08.520You know what the challenge is, to be honest?
02:19:11.280I'm just saying you need extraordinary evidence for that claim.
02:19:24.060You need to show that the U.S. is actively supporting this, even if it's under tongue-in-cheek, right?
02:19:28.600You need to show evidence that Ukrainian soldiers are being controlled by these individuals and that they're high up in the Ukrainian military, like, government.
02:19:36.440If they're out in charge of a platoon, that's not really what we're talking about here, right?
02:19:40.760We're stretching the definitions of these things at this point.
02:19:43.020My point is that U.S. special forces, active duty, are in Ukraine.
02:19:48.160They are doing what's called operational coordination.
02:19:52.880Here's the simple way of describing it.
02:19:56.580The U.S. says, here's where their ships are and here are some missiles.
02:19:59.740If you press that button, it'll blow it up.
02:20:02.360Yeah, that's U.S. involvement in a war with Russia.
02:20:23.340Russia has largely won the war as of right now.
02:20:28.060And I largely just think, like, you know, Trump's getting really pissed because Putin isn't willing to stop.
02:20:35.280They had—okay, the U.S. had approximately 14 special forces personnel in Ukraine stationed at the U.S. embassy.
02:20:41.220Their roles included providing security for VIPs and assisting with oversight of U.S. equipment and supplies being sent to Ukraine.
02:20:48.440That's your evidence that they're controlling the Ukrainian military.
02:20:50.900That's one—you're going to have to find more evidence than that because that's one article you pulled up and not just here to say he should see it.
02:21:00.760The only evidence I have weakens a lot of what you're saying because they're at the embassy, which they're allowed to be at, and they're providing security for VIPs.
02:21:21.600Which my argument is the same argument you made.
02:21:23.760If you're going to make a claim that special forces are only at the embassy, you need more proof than just that article.
02:21:27.840If I'm going to be good faith to just ask your questions and read out what I find, that doesn't mean that you can go, see, that proves that they were controlling the Ukraine military.
02:21:52.560I've been covering the Ukraine war since it started.
02:21:54.460But I've—I can tell you about—I was physically in Ukraine when the conflict started.
02:22:01.580I was there twice, and I got to witness the collapse of the statue.
02:22:04.380I got to go to the Statue of London after it was toppled, and people were stealing things from it.
02:22:08.120And in covering this, I have tracked numerous stories from the beginning of the Euromaidan protest movement, which I was physically present, to the Burisma scandal, to physically being present in Kiev during the separatist conflicts in 2017.
02:22:22.700And in all of this research, we have found there are U.S. volunteers, which is part—it's called a volunteer coalition.
02:22:30.360These are paid private military contractors, former U.S. military personnel, and there is operational coordination from U.S. special forces on the ground in various capacities.
02:22:38.460In saying all of that, you asked me for proof.
02:22:41.840To be fair, what I was going to say is it's very difficult in the span of 20 minutes to pull up 10 years of research.
02:22:48.360But if I were to start digging through those articles, which I would be happy to do, we're already 20 minutes past time, and it's going to be very difficult.
02:22:54.280You then said you can't pull up one article.
02:22:57.860You said you're going to need extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence, and if you're going to pull up this article, that's a he said, she said, it's not enough, and then you literally pulled up an article of a he said, she said, to make a counterclaim.
02:23:09.600This is the sophistry of which I'm referring.
02:23:19.260I don't love meta-litigating the conversation, right?
02:23:21.640But what I said—so a really common thinking way to think, a way to purify and ensure that you're not thinking poorly about things is called extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
02:23:34.400So what I'm saying is that that article you cited, I found exactly what they were talking about, the special forces that were on the ground, and I showed you this is what they were doing.
02:23:44.840They were at the embassy, right, securing VIPs, giving them security.
02:24:12.300Which is not going to happen in half an hour with 10 years of research.
02:24:14.900I would argue that if you have 10 years of research, you could probably succinctly list out a fair bit of really strong evidence of at least dollars moving and that front line—these embassy workers, for example, ever being front line, killing Russian soldiers, anything like that.
02:24:29.560Do you want me to do a 40-minute treatise on the history of the Ukraine conflict?
02:24:38.940So in 2012, The Guardian reported that the U.S. had been working on a project to build a natural gas pipeline from Qatar through Syria, Turkey, into Europe to offset the Russian gas problem, gas monopoly.
02:24:49.840Russia controls about a quarter of natural gas into Europe through Ukraine, which leads to high gas prices in Europe.
02:24:56.560They've tried offsetting this in numerous ways, but Russia basically controls it.
02:24:59.680So the U.S. went to Syria, the Assad regime, and said, we're going to build this pipeline.
02:25:03.200It's going to provide Europe with cheaper energy.
02:25:05.200It's going to lower the costs across the board.
02:25:06.480So Syria then conferred with Russia, their ally, who has a military base in Tartus, and Syria came back to the U.S. and said, we're not going to let you do it because it would violate—it would be damaging to the economics of Russia.
02:25:16.300So the U.S. was upset, obviously, but it got really bad when Russia, Syria, and Iran plotted to then build a rival pipeline from the exact same oil field through Iraq into Syria, Turkey, into Europe to strengthen their monopoly on energy.
02:25:33.820It's around this time that they said the Bashar al-Assad regime needs to go in their terrorists, and that's when we got Operation Timber—what was that one?
02:25:44.960See, it's like, you know, Timber—Sycamore.
02:25:47.780Operation Timber—Sycamore is when the U.S. started providing weapons and CIA training to various revolutionary—let me just pull it up—factions in Syria, ultimately, which ended up joining al-Nursra and ISIS.
02:26:04.080And that's how we ended up seeing U.S. weapons and training in the hands of ISIS expanding in the region, because the U.S. wanted to topple the Assad regime so we can build a pipeline.
02:26:13.920Well, the U.S. has other means of trying to get the prices down and control natural gas in Ukraine.
02:26:18.960That is, through Burisma, an energy company in Ukraine for which the founder was a man named Michael Zlachevsky.
02:26:25.640The U.S. had a former CIA director of terrorism on the board, as well as the son of the sitting vice president, Hunter Biden, which seemed to make no sense, except when you realize it was a U.S.-aligned foreign influence operation to control the government of Ukraine, to put pressure on the land leases for which they could cause problems for Gazprom, which is Russia's ability to supply energy to Europe.
02:26:59.080He got contacted by Devin Archer and Hunter Biden over their involvement in Burisma and the fact they're being investigated by a state prosecutor.
02:27:05.760Viktor Shokin signed a sworn affidavit that the only reason he was terminated was because Biden personally flew in and threatened to illegally withhold congressionally approved loan guarantees unless he was fired.
02:27:16.040And it had to do with Hunter Biden being on the board, who was getting $83,000 a month, potentially more.
02:27:30.040At this time is around when Devin Archer, Hunter Biden are making contact with the State Department saying, we need help on this.
02:27:36.240Within a few days, Joe Biden flies out completely illegally, tells the president of Ukraine, fire your state prosecutor or you're not getting the money.
02:27:44.280To which this person replied, I believe it was Poroshenko, you don't have the authority to do that.
02:27:53.580And they put in someone good, is the quote that Joe Biden said.
02:27:56.000However, this guy they put in drops the investigation into Zlachevsky, whose funds were frozen by London under corruption investigations, who then immediately returned to Ukraine.
02:28:05.420So this whole period, they're saying none of it's happening.
02:28:09.720And in fact, once the investigations were dropped because of Joe Biden's involvement, the guy who was accused of corruption returned back to his operations in this country.
02:28:17.120Where we currently are is following the failures of Western soft power to secure this in this energy conflict, of which there's a bit more.
02:28:24.120Russia wanted to build a trade federation and they had a free trade agreement with Ukraine.
02:28:28.420Ukraine was also being offered up Schengen zone access and EU access if they chose to go with NATO in the West instead.
02:28:35.460A large portion of Ukraine split largely on the east to west, the Donbass largely towards Russia, wanted to join the EU because it would give access to Ukrainian citizens to Europe.
02:28:48.120When they entered the Schengen zone, Polish people immediately started moving to the UK and to other countries where they can get higher standards of living.
02:28:54.160Same thing happened with Greece, which caused economic instability.
02:28:56.920So the West told Ukraine, we're not going to let you into the EU unless you reach a certain standard.
02:29:02.080So you end up getting Victoria Nuland.
02:29:05.560She's heavily engaged in the politics of Ukraine, trying to convince people to be in Ukraine to support Western expansion and not the Russian trade federation.
02:29:14.120Vladimir Putin said at the time to Ukraine, if you open up a trade agreement with Europe and a free trade agreement with us, it's going to mean cheap European products are going to flood into Russia and damage our economy.
02:29:28.020The Euromaidan movement ousts Viktor Yanukovych, stripping all Russian interests, Russian-aligned interests from the country, and puts in power an administration that was more pro-West.
02:29:39.520And Vladimir Putin says, I'm not going to lose this soft power battle, even if I have to invade.
02:29:44.280The first thing they did was dispatch their troops from Sevastopol to claim Crimea got a referendum.
02:29:49.480And they had their referendum, which I think is largely fake bullshit.
02:29:53.340They just walked outside and said, hey, look, everybody's Russian now.
02:29:56.360Crimea, however, had in the past voted for independence and were blocked illegally, I would argue, by the Ukrainian government in the 90s.
02:30:02.280This ends up with a separatist movement emerging in the east, outraged the president, who was duly elected, was removed in what people who are pro-Russia would call a coup.
02:30:11.480But at the time, they were saying an illicit removal of the president of Ukraine.
02:30:15.280Russia began supplying weapons and training to the eastern separatist movements, which largely did not expand in any meaningful way.
02:30:20.800However, after Donald Trump lost in 2020 and Joe Biden came in, Western interests were reignited in Ukraine.
02:30:28.480And this pause was largely due to the fact that Donald Trump was uninterested in this direct involvement in Ukraine, much the way the Democratic administrations had been under Obama and with Hillary Clinton at the State Department.
02:30:38.480Once Joe Biden got in and started to re-up U.S. interests in the region, largely over getting cheap energy into Europe, Russia then decided to do a hard invasion.
02:30:49.040I think they were wrong to do it. I think they had lost the soft power battle.
02:30:51.900I think soft power is an appropriate means of force in winning conflict.
02:30:55.840But I admit that soft power can often lead to hard conflict, but I'm not so stupid and naive to think that wars don't happen.
02:31:02.180Russia crossed the line militaristically.
02:31:04.500However, the U.S. then immediately intervened and started supplying – I should say NATO in the west – started supplying Ukraine with weapons, which kind of shocked the Russians who thought they were going to win this relatively quickly.
02:31:14.620But they never said three days. That was actually, I think, someone on the BBC who said that.
02:31:17.800Russia has been now flooding the zone, and they've seized the entirety of the eastern region, for which their principal purpose in starting this war is not about seizing Ukraine.
02:31:29.300It is about controlling Sevastopol, where they have a $300 million or multibillion-dollar military naval infrastructure, the home of the Black Sea fleet, which is their access to the Mediterranean through the Bosphorus, and then ultimately into the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea, where what the United States derisively calls Russia a cold gas station.
02:31:51.580Russia needs access to the Black Sea to be able to sell oil and natural gas and other resources along the Mediterranean, and if they get cut off from the Black Sea, it's going to be massively damaged to their economy.
02:32:03.320Now, the important thing to understand is they didn't invade Crimea.
02:32:05.400They were already there in Sevastopol, where they have a naval base.
02:32:07.380They simply released the troops from this area to have a referendum.
02:32:11.900But the invasion of the eastern regions, which is Donetsk, Luhansk, Mariupol, Zaporizhia, etc., this is about securing a land bridge access to Crimea so they don't get cut off from their naval base.
02:32:24.040Now, some people have argued, yeah, but they could build a naval base anywhere else they have access in, you know, what do they have?
02:32:29.420They have, hold on, Sochi, I think is the name of the city.
02:32:42.840So they're going to do what they have to do to secure this region of the country.
02:32:45.840Now, we can look at a few other instances where I would argue that our involvement in Ukraine has been bad for us.
02:32:51.220That was Germany accused a Ukrainian national of bombing Nord Stream 2,
02:32:55.000and Ukraine is accused of engaging in actions like this to create public support for U.S. and Western involvement in this country.
02:33:04.780So, all in all, the U.S. should not be meddling in the foreign affairs of the Middle East and Eastern European nations for the purpose of securing cheaper gas and energy for NATO.
02:33:17.160The tangential reason, what they argue on the surface, is that there is a concern among the Western economic bloc that China is expanding too rapidly,
02:33:23.540and that in order to make sure that NATO can grow commensurately with China so they don't become the dominant unipolar force,
02:33:29.860Europe is going to need access to cheaper energy and a larger labor force,
02:33:33.060which is why they've had the mass immigration movement, largely from sub-Saharan Africa,
02:33:37.260and it's why they want to get cheaper energy into Ukraine.
02:33:40.240If the argument is, you know, as people have made,
02:33:43.940the U.S. should be involved in Ukraine because Russia is a nation who's violating the sovereignty of countries,
02:33:48.580that's fake, and that only works on people who've not done any research on the region or the conflict.
02:33:53.560And my final thought on this is, what I know about this is massively limited compared to actual people doing intelligence and working in the region,
02:34:02.080but it is over the span of 15 years of actually actively being involved to a certain degree journalistically,
02:34:08.040as I have friends who've personally gone to Syria over the Civil War,
02:34:11.280tracking this and many other stories related to the Qatar-Turkey pipeline,
02:34:13.600and have personally been to Ukraine at the start of the conflict watching it happen
02:34:17.460and interviewing people in Ukraine on the ground and even going to pro-Yanakovich rallies to learn what they were talking about.
02:34:22.760This does not mean in any way that what I am saying is absolute truth, I don't know,
02:34:25.800but I certainly have more experience in the matter than most people who are pushing bullshit platitudes about the sovereignty of Ukraine.
02:34:30.980Sure, okay. So I want to make sure I summarize you so that you tell me that I've heard you correctly.
02:34:35.560And obviously it won't be as long, so just tell me if my summary is reasonable and good faith.
02:34:39.500Basically, there was a major soft war struggle, that soft power struggle that started happening over natural gas energy, right?
02:34:47.760And Ukraine is an important nexus for this struggle, and essentially NATO wants to support Ukraine in keeping it NATO,
02:34:54.600and they want to make sure that they get pipelines through that area that goes to EU so that they have energy access.
02:35:00.180Pipelines are there. They want governmental authority to control the prices that Russia is setting when they transport this energy.
02:35:06.860Yeah, they want to compete with the Russian monopoly.
02:35:37.740Right. And then you also—and through kinetic force.
02:35:41.160Ukraine was accused by Germany, a Ukrainian national, at the behest of the government of bombing the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to shut down Russia's delivering of natural gas into Europe.
02:36:03.440So essentially you've got two big powers fighting over energy, which Russia has the monopoly on, and America is doing everything it can to weaken it and to reduce the control that Russia has over that power system.
02:36:13.980Is that correct? Does that feel like an accurate summary?
02:36:15.800I would say Russia is seeking to maintain its ability to trade in energy, as it is largely an energy exporter that's maintaining its economy.
02:36:23.720The U.S. is trying to control the prices they sell to Europe.
02:36:27.020Ukraine, in an effort to protect its sovereignty in the matter, has engaged in hostilities against NATO.
02:36:46.420But it is a soft power fight that happens, and basically Russia loses. Right?
02:36:50.660They get stripped, and Russia goes, fuck that shit, and then they turn into a hard power fight. Right?
02:36:55.400They don't just roll in, but they have lots of people in Crimea, they release the soldiers, they release the hounds, and they make a really big push for Kiev.
02:37:02.320Probably because if you control the capital, you control the country, you can have bigger say on what's going on.
02:37:06.860I'm assuming. I don't know what your reasoning is for Kiev, but essentially—
02:37:13.440This is, to be completely honest, like conflict opinion. I don't think they pushed for Kiev.
02:37:18.860I think that we saw the invasion from Belarus to the north as a pincer attack, so they could split the military forces of the Western powers and then seize the Donbass.
02:37:28.540Because the military force they applied to the eastern land bridge into Crimea was substantially greater than they applied through Belarus in the north.
02:37:34.900Sure. Okay. So essentially, soft power fight goes on, Russia loses, turns into a hard power fight, which you say Russia's wrong for doing that hard power piece.
02:37:45.000They crossed the line into the—you know, I don't think criminal is the right word because we're dealing with international conflict and crisis, but they aggressed.
02:37:51.420Right. So I would fully grant that U.S. has used lots of soft power in Ukraine based on what you're saying.
02:37:56.860What I was asking for is evidence that right now there is U.S.-sanctioned soldiers that are operating front line, fighting, killing Russian soldiers, and controlling the Ukrainian military system to fight Russia directly, that we're in basically like a pseudo-hard war.
02:38:16.520Right. What I offered up was a treatise on the history of the Ukraine conflict. I didn't say I was—I could have spent the last 20 minutes Google searching articles.
02:38:23.300Sure. It's just—that's what I asked evidence for. So, like, I'm granting you all of this history.
02:38:27.420The issue is that that doesn't necessarily prove the extraordinary claim, which is that U.S. is controlling the military of Ukraine and telling it what to do and has all this stuff.
02:38:36.920I'm sure that it's important for training. I'm sure that it's important for facilitating in ammunitions.
02:38:41.980And I'm sure that it is motivated to have Ukraine not lose to Russian control. But that isn't the same thing as what you're claiming.
02:38:51.300Well, we did go over, and we do have to wrap soon, but let me see if this is the guy.
02:38:56.700Joseph Kofor Black, was that his name?
02:39:00.740When the CIA installs—when CIA directors are installed as board members of foreign energy companies,
02:39:11.920we tend to ask ourselves, what is the CIA doing in Ukraine?
02:39:15.260And when you have the son of the vice president on the board alongside a CIA director, and, you know, going back to the history of this and U.S. involvement—
02:39:28.100Wait, don't we know why the CIA would be involved in Ukraine?
02:39:30.500There's a soft power struggle for control, right?
02:39:32.800Which, to my point is, right now, first, let me say, I'm not going to pull up every article on what's called operational coordination in Ukraine.
02:40:07.940In the wake of the Hunter Biden email controversy, the Wall Street Journal reported blacks roll at the firm, Burisma, with a group of well-connected operatives in Washington to persuade Ukrainian prosecutors to drop criminal cases against it.
02:40:19.200My point is, there is this game they're playing where Ukrainians and their international volunteer coalition, they call it, are the ones engaged in the hostilities.
02:40:31.820These are not active-duty U.S. personnel.
02:40:34.300Now, special forces are providing what's called operational coordination for the actions they take.
02:40:41.520The intelligence and the weapons that were used to sink the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet was the United States.
02:40:47.240Yeah, we're sharing intelligence with them.
02:40:48.940But having a U.S. military personnel look to a Ukrainian and say, if you press that button, my missile will be fired that will blow up a Russian vessel, it's silly to argue that's the Ukrainians who did it.
02:40:58.840The issue is that if all the Ukrainians are rallying behind it, they support the war, they don't want to, like, lose the certain lands, like the Donbass and Crimea, and they're, like, have large, tremendous support for what's going on.
02:41:51.800Let me, like, finish this argument, right?
02:41:53.260If all of your money and your energy is invested towards fighting off what you view as an invading enemy, you don't have time to coordinate very expensive elections to go to the polls.
02:42:03.320This is why martial law got instated after Lincoln because the real—
02:42:07.820No, Lincoln instated martial law, suspended habeas corpus, arrested politicians, and still had an election.
02:42:11.420So, do you think that, like, Winston Churchill was stupid for not having an election?
02:42:15.140Is it true that he didn't have an election?
02:42:16.380I'm not sure, but if he didn't, would that be stupid?
02:42:18.920It could go either way depending on the circumstances.
02:43:41.840I'm saying a component is largely, like I mentioned, 70% of millennial women voting in favor of war policies, advocating for escalating a conflict to which could result in World War III, to which Russia recently threatened to Donald Trump after Trump called Putin crazy.
02:44:01.500And you got a bunch of young guys who are in Gen Z who are on the first, who are first in line to be sent to Ukraine.
02:44:07.080I got to tell you, there's not a single exit poll where young men cite the draft anywhere near the top of the reasons why they switched them.
02:44:14.000No, I'm just saying it's a grain of sand making a heap.
02:44:17.180The issue is that I'm really interested in the heap, which is what we came to talk about, right?
02:44:20.760Right, and there's a few grains that are related to the fact that young men have to fight and die in wars and don't want to be involved in it.
02:44:25.960And they're being told they should by women who don't.
02:44:28.060It's not even by women in this case, like the—
02:44:58.840Most women probably don't have too many thoughts about Ukraine.
02:45:01.240But you get all the Democrats in Congress waving Ukraine flags and inviting their president to our country and offering them money.
02:45:08.280And then you go to, like—we're in a rather mixed area, but if you go to, like, The Gap—it's the city they call The Gap—there's, like, Trump signs and then Ukraine flags.
02:45:17.540And I'm like, what the fuck are these people flying Ukraine flags for?
02:47:45.420Philosophically, the point I'm making is there's a dude sitting back watching this right now who doesn't know much about Ukraine at all, nor cares.
02:47:51.800And he's like, why is this lady so hell-bent on, like, us being involved in this war?
02:50:00.160What I really want in the world is that we have trade negotiations and relationships with everyone so that there is economic benefit for everyone to work together.
02:50:07.560I think we should use the systems of capitalism that is good at turning human greed and power consumption to good ends, which is things like having trade negotiations with countries that we have tensions with.
02:50:18.240This is the Israel model for making peace with, like, Behran and the UAE.
02:50:41.200And so, when it comes down to, once again, a guy sitting back drinking a Coke or something or a spindrift and watching a show like this or Liquid Death, he's like, I don't know why I should care about Russia over literally any other conflict in the world.
02:51:52.560Because the entire history of Russia consuming, particularly Ukraine, who seem very, very rebellious and resistant to being consumed, is fractious.
02:52:10.200The Bolsheviks hated Ukrainians, and then the Leninites hated Ukrainians, and then the Stalinites hated Ukrainians, and then we had like four years with Gorbachev.
02:52:17.760That was like kind of base because he was like, let's just work with all of the global powers.
02:52:33.600There's things that you value more than your life.
02:52:37.160Should the U.S. be involved in someone else's ideological battle is the question, I suppose.
02:52:41.240We involve ourselves in other people's ideological battles all the time.
02:52:43.680And that's another grain of sand in the heap of why young men are moving to the right.
02:52:47.500I don't know how—I guess I would tell young men—genuinely, I would tell young men, I'm sorry, you need to look at foreign systems and how they work.
02:52:54.740If you don't want America involved in like other countries, then isolationist policy—
02:52:59.780Yeah, we're not talking about isolationist.
02:53:17.540In the Bush-era, when we said things like, why are we at war with Iraq and Afghanistan, the answer from the neocons was isolationism doesn't work.
02:53:25.940And when I was talking to Sebastian Gorka recently, he said something similar to that.
02:53:28.680But he did concede, we don't want regime change intervention in the Trump administration.
02:54:01.080And so with the Houthis striking trade vessels, the Trump administration's view on this is we have to stop them from shutting down global trade.
02:54:10.420The problem for us in America is, why should I care?
02:54:16.620And there's a lot of people who have been asking this question for 20 years, and we've repeatedly gotten responses from warmongers of both parties.
02:54:24.460We have to do it because no one else can.