In this episode, FedReacts covers the Y&W. Mellie murder trial and what happened after the mistrial was declared. We discuss the case, the evidence, and the facts of the case. We also discuss the investigation and the outcome of the trial.
00:01:36.760Before I go ahead and talk about what a mistrial is and where we go from here, let's talk about the facts of the case, what went down, okay?
00:03:10.960He is best known for his songs, Murder on My Mind.
00:03:12.880Obviously, you guys, they did not use this song against him in the trial.
00:03:17.880Mixed Personalities featuring Kanye West, Suicidal featuring Juice WRLD, and 223s featuring Glock 9, excuse me.
00:03:26.120The first is considered his breakout, which garnered him further attention after being charged with double murder of his two fellow rappers in the Y&W Collective.
00:03:33.060In November 2019, he released the debut of Mellie vs. Melvin, peaking number eight on the Billboard 200.
00:03:38.500In February 2019, he was arrested and charged with two counts of premeditated murder and faced a life imprisonment without the possibility of parole or the death penalty if convicted.
00:03:47.700He is also a suspect in the 2017 murder of a sheriff's deputy in Gifford.
00:03:53.660In March 2019, Demens pleaded not guilty to double murder charges and is currently on trial.
00:03:58.340And as you guys know, he, you know, we just recently got the mistrial.
00:04:02.140So here's the arrest documents, right, right, guys, that he had.
00:04:05.520And if you guys watched the first episode, I actually went through this extensively, but give you guys a quick little refresher here.
00:04:47.940And then this basically, all right, is all the stuff.
00:04:55.020Now, this is where stuff gets, and here you can see him already, Mark A.
00:04:59.520This is the lead investigator here, right?
00:05:02.180So, Andy Williams, contrary to section 78 and 775 of the Florida Statute, honored about the 26th day of October in the year of 2018 in the county of Broward State, Florida,
00:05:13.780Jamel Demens and Courtland Henry did, then and there unlawfully and feloniously, while acting as principles, kill and murder Christopher Thomas Jr., a human being,
00:05:22.660by shooting him with a firearm with a premeditated intent to cause the death of said Christopher Thomas Jr.
00:05:27.680And during the course thereof, Jamel Demens did actually possess and discharge a firearm.
00:05:32.520And as a result, death was inflicted on Christopher Thomas Jr., contrary to sections such and such, right, of the Florida Statutes, right?
00:05:39.700So, now we're going to get into the complaint affidavit, which lists out the, and then this was the arrest warrant that he got, right?
00:05:49.600It said, you're arrested to, you're commanded to take Jamel Demens if that person be found in your country,
00:05:55.400arrest and safely keep so that you may have the person's body before the judge.
00:05:59.560So, this is what you get a lot of times once you file a complaint to go ahead and arrest somebody, right?
00:06:03.780And then here is the actual affidavit, okay?
00:07:49.660So you can see Melly here getting, he was the last one to come out, by the way, because at this point all the other parties were in the car.
00:10:48.900The defense, right, is defending, cross-examining witnesses, et cetera, right?
00:10:54.000And at the end, you have something called closing arguments.
00:10:56.980And closing arguments, guys, is basically where each party gives a summarization of their case, the facts, and arguing for why the defendant is either guilty or innocent.
00:11:12.080Or in this case, why the state might have not proved their case for the defense, right?
00:11:17.600So we're going to go ahead and watch this video right here from Law and Crime Network, because I think it's very important that you guys understand what went down to the closing arguments.
00:11:24.560And then we'll go into the mistrial part here.
00:11:55.900With a potential verdict on the horizon, we look at some of the highlights from the prosecution and defense battling it out in closing arguments in the YNW Mellie murder trial.
00:12:06.580Welcome to Sidebar, presented by Law and Crime.
00:12:12.720Well, folks, we have come to the end of YNW Mellie's double murder trial out of Broward County, Florida.
00:12:19.360The murder on my mind rapper, whose real name is Jamel Demmons, is charged with the murders of his two friends and fellow YNW group rappers, Christopher Thomas Jr., or YNW Juvie, and Anthony Williams, or YNW Sack Chaser.
00:12:33.760The men were found shot to death on October 26, 2018, after Mellie's co-defendant, Cortland Henry, also known as YNW Bortland, pulled up to the hospital with the bodies of Thomas and Williams in the car, claiming that they were all victims of a drive-by shooting.
00:12:48.600However, the evidence has suggested, or at least as the prosecution has suggested, this was a staged drive-by shooting, and the shots actually came from inside the vehicle.
00:12:59.380Prosecution even highlighted how the defendant was a member of a gang called the G-Shine Bloods.
00:13:03.420And I'm going to talk about that because they spent a lot of time talking about Mellie being a blood gang member.
00:13:07.700You guys can hear them throwing gangsters, et cetera.
00:13:09.500But I want to talk about that here as well.
00:13:12.440We can't forget that there is a lot at stake here because the death penalty is on the table if Mellie is convicted.
00:16:38.740You learned from Sergeant Williams, as well as from the medical examiners, that the firearm that inflicted that wound was approximately three inches to no more than three feet.
00:16:46.580We know from the backseat passenger it could have been because there is stippling.
00:16:50.500Strike K comes in and hits the front of the rear door.
00:16:54.560So what she's showing is that, right, because remember guys, the wound patterns, right, you got one victim sitting here and you got another victim sitting here.
00:17:05.380The wounds came from the left to right.
00:17:07.680But the drive-by shooting bullets go left to, sorry, right to left.
00:17:12.580So you got the wound patterns showing they were indefinitely shot from inside the vehicle, right, with the stippling.
00:17:17.740The stippling is the burning marks that when a gun is shot at close range, right, and you got the wounds all on the left side of the victims.
00:17:24.660But the bullets come in from right to left, so it doesn't make sense.
00:17:39.540So the door was open when one of the shots came in, which tells you that somebody got out from around here, walked around here, and started shooting.
00:18:31.320This is going to go through and you can track the defendant wearing that lyrical lemonade sweater all the way out to the Jeep where he gets in the spot.
00:33:28.040I think that's something that gets kind of glazed over.
00:33:35.160And isn't, people say, oh, the defense didn't do anything or the defense did a silly job.
00:33:38.580The defense doesn't have to do anything.
00:33:39.580They just have to make sure, they have to make the prosecution look terrible, or make them look, excuse me, incompetent, which you guys are going to see here.
00:33:46.300So, let's go ahead into the summary of the defense.
00:33:48.640October 26th, that day of the shooting.
00:33:51.280I'm glad that you guys, it's making sense.
00:37:46.960And all police did was have tunnel vision and focus on YNW Melly.
00:37:50.000You might recall that in the opening statements delivered by the defense, they said that law enforcement went after Melly because he was a high-profile person.
00:37:54.940And the defense actually goes on to put more emphasis not on Melly, but someone else, Cortland Henry, and his role in all of this.
00:38:01.960We know that Cortland Henry's in balance.
00:38:04.060We all know that, according to the statement, Cortland Henry lied to the police.
00:38:20.980Now, Melly in his documentary made a, you know, there was a, they said it as well, but he didn't overtly actually say it himself like, oh yeah, we got attacked in a drive-by.
00:38:31.260Melly never gave a statement to the police.
00:38:32.680It was Henry that said this ridiculous story when he brought the two bodies to the hospital.
00:38:37.960So the defense is trying to put the blame on Henry, right?
00:38:54.740And a lot of times, guys, when you end up in cases like this where you have multiple conspirators, et cetera, the first thing the defense does for each of those clients is they're going to attack other conspirators in the case to show that, hey, this guy is the most culpable.
00:39:10.500My guy was just taking orders, blah, blah, blah.
00:39:12.040They tried to minimize the role of their client while simultaneously increasing the role of the other, of the other defendants to make their defendant not look as bad.
00:39:54.600And I broke this down on another episode where we covered this live.
00:40:00.460This guy basically, Melly Bezos thing, he needs to get this guy a fucking record deal or something.
00:40:06.580He basically gives a story saying that Melly got in the Mitsubishi with them and he was there when the news broke that the friends were killed.
00:40:15.820So he's not putting Melly in the vehicle, which is huge because the prosecution's case relies upon them putting Melly in the vehicle.
00:43:22.520Phones don't send messages and walk 1,300 steps by themselves.
00:43:26.020There's no evidence whatsoever that anybody else got in that jeep.
00:43:29.440But the evidence says show, the defendant was consistently in that jeep, and that jeep never stopped during that whole course of travel until it got to the edge of the Everglades.
00:43:36.960The edge of the Everglades, where there's no witnesses, where there's no cameras, where they can stage a crime scene to try and get away with her.
00:44:08.540And it means the defendant is not acquitted of the crime, but is not yet convicted either and will likely return to jail unless they have bonded out until the new trial begins.
00:44:15.920Mistrials do not happen very often, but they clearly do.
00:56:02.780Well, guys, when you go to trial, okay, the lead attorney, right, is the attorney that basically is the main prosecutor in the investigation, right?
00:56:11.760Then you have a second and, in some cases, a third or even fourth chair if the case is big enough.
00:56:16.260And that means you have other attorneys or prosecutors helping you out running the case.
00:56:22.700As you guys can see, Mellie had three different lawyers at the table with him, and each of them took turns basically objecting, giving summaries, giving statements, cross-examining witnesses, et cetera, okay?
00:56:35.080Kind of like if you look at O.J. Simpson's team, right?
00:56:39.020He had like four to five different attorneys, you know, all having different specializations and working together.
00:57:01.520The reason why he got away is because the state couldn't prove it, okay?
00:57:06.620And they couldn't prove it in court, and they had issues with witnesses being, you know, racist and all the other stuff, you know, Mark Furman or whatever.
00:57:12.900And I did a whole breakdown on that case, guys.
00:57:14.440It's age-restricted, which is why it's suppressed to the shadow realm in YouTube.
00:57:17.920But if you guys want to go ahead and still watch it, it's there, all right?
00:57:24.120But, again, that's another perfect example of you know he did it.
00:57:59.800The prosecutor was by herself doing this goddamn case.
00:58:02.700In the O.J. Simpson case, it was two prosecutors against, like, five really good defense attorneys, okay?
00:58:10.620So that's number one issue I noticed is that that prosecutor, the girl that you guys saw with the black hair, she was by herself the whole time, okay?
00:58:18.440She didn't have a second or third chair helping her out.
00:58:20.640Or maybe she had an assistant, it looked like, but it doesn't look like she had another actual attorney that knew the case.
00:58:25.280Number two, they spent way too much time on the blood and gang angle, okay?
00:58:33.240Like, they spent, like, two weeks plus just on trying to establish that Millie was a gang member with the G-Shine bloods, talking about the gang culture, showing text messages.
00:58:47.000You know, they brought in that detective that didn't show his face that worked undercover as a subject matter expert.
00:58:53.560Like, they spent way too much time on that.
00:58:56.020Now, why do I say that they spent too much time on it?
00:58:59.920The reason why, well, let's talk first about why they brought that, they did this, right?
00:59:04.940They did it because in order for them to get the death penalty in Florida, guys, they need to establish that the crime was committed in the furtherance of some type of gang activity.
00:59:13.280So they needed that gang angle to push for the death penalty, okay?
01:00:21.120So when you're going into a complex investigation, talking about gangs and all this other stuff, blah, blah, blah, right?
01:00:28.260It's going to take away from the overall case.
01:00:30.540So by the time they started bringing in the phone stuff, the other witnesses, the medical examiners, we're like two, three weeks into the goddamn trial.
01:01:09.480And the fact that they had so much stuff, right, might have hurt them a bit.
01:01:14.340And I think we were spending so much time on the gang stuff because it took away from the validity of the phone evidence, the testimony from the police officers, the testimony from the medical examiners, et cetera.
01:01:24.280So, and on top of that, the defense, right, what did they do?
01:01:55.980So we are kind of just summarizing things here.
01:01:58.080But I want to make sure I get all the questions answered.
01:02:01.360But, yeah, I think that's what – I think those were some big blunders is spending way too much time on the gang stuff, sensationalizing that part,
01:02:09.780not focusing on the hardcore evidence that actually paints a very good picture, right, like they had done in their criminal complaint.
01:03:01.340The past five years, he's been in jail, right?
01:03:04.100And a big reason for that is because the strength of evidence from this state, the violence, all this stuff, they were able to articulate, no, he needs to stay behind bars.
01:04:36.680If Portland took the stand and said, yes, Mellie shot him, I was in the front seat, okay, that would have definitely made Mellie guilty, even though Portland is not credible.
01:04:49.140Because all the forensic evidence shows it.
01:04:51.900The bullet in the back seat, the phone evidence, the blood on the back of Portland's shirt that shows that he couldn't have been the shooter, right?
01:04:57.580So even though he's a liar in the eyes of the police, he can go ahead and, I guess, clear his credibility to a degree because there's a bunch of physical evidence, right, that would substantiate what he's saying.
01:05:11.600And then, more than likely, he would say, they would ask him, right, if the prosecution put him on, why'd you lie to the police?
01:05:17.460Well, I lied to protect Mellie, right?
01:05:20.740Mellie would have hurt me, some other bullshit like that, right?
01:05:22.900So he would have probably got a pass if he had testified against Mellie, even though he's not a credible witness, because the physical evidence against Mellie is so strong.
01:05:30.920But, well, excuse me, the physical evidence against, the circumstantial evidence against Mellie is very strong.
01:05:36.680It paints a picture when you put it together.
01:05:38.280But you don't have like that one, one smoking gun, right, which is why they were able to go ahead and create that reasonable doubt, especially with that witness.
01:05:48.060Even though we know that witness is lying, because when the prosecution put him on and cross-examined him, he didn't have any answers for her, right?
01:05:55.820But what that one witness did, though, was create the reasonable doubt that Mellie wasn't in that Jeep.
01:06:46.820And it gives you a little bit more time.
01:06:48.980It gives you the ability to kind of sharpen your craft and know what the prosecution is going to use, right, or how they're going to argue things.
01:06:57.840The prosecutor in this case, I think her name is Christine Hadley or something like that.
01:07:06.720She was very bland in presenting her case.
01:07:10.680A lot of the times, man, being an animated attorney helps.
01:07:13.300I hate to say it, but like being boring and monotone and, yeah, well, as a matter of fact, this is what happened and the evidence will show, blah, blah, blah.
01:07:21.520No, you want to be charismatic and artistic in the way that you deliver your arguments a lot of times because you want to be memorable to the journey, to the journey, to the jury.
01:08:05.420Sometimes they'll take you out of a jury pool depending on your profession or your background or if you're biased towards the type of case that they have.
01:08:24.460And then how I prosecuted differently, I would not focus so much on the gang stuff, not push so hard for the death penalty, focus on the good evidence that you have.
01:08:31.820Don't make it a fucking clown show with bringing on detectives that can't show their face like it takes away from all the other evidence that they had that was really good in this investigation.
01:08:41.100And yeah, I'll say the prosecution dropped the ball.
01:08:44.160They didn't prove even though the evidence they have is strong and we all know he did it.
01:08:48.620They couldn't prove it during the discourse of a trial through litigation.
01:08:53.720OK, say that again for y'all, because that's very important.
01:08:57.200Even though, you know, anyone with common sense would look at the evidence and be like, yeah, Mellie's guilty.
01:09:02.440The prosecution did not do a good job of proving that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt through the course of litigation in a trial setting.
01:10:02.940So the defense attorney made a good argument about that, about how one of the defendants was shot first, which conflicts with another expert witness.
01:10:13.940So I think one of the cops, one of the sergeants gave some testimony that conflicted with the medical examiner.
01:10:18.980So they were saying, yo, since this cop gave this evidence that doesn't conflict with the medical examiner, everything that he says gots to be thrown out.
01:10:25.120So that that actually hurt quite a bit because that cop that they brought in, the sergeant, was someone that was important to the investigation.
01:10:54.160No, it's not because they did a phone.
01:10:58.140They did a phone analysis of one of the people that they interviewed and that showed that they went completely different, different directions.
01:11:05.900So one of the people, because one of the guys lied and said that Mellie got in a car with him.
01:11:09.520And that, that, that did not, um, that didn't line up with the phone evidence, but no, good, good question.
01:11:19.700So, um, when you're wiretapping something, you're getting that information real time through something called a title three intercept.
01:11:26.940And, um, at the time you, you, you can't, you need an active investigation where you know that they're doing criminal activity, maybe a drug investigation, a gang investigation, whatever you're actively investigating them.
01:11:39.660You need to be developed the probable cause while investigating them to be able to get the probable cause, to get the affidavit, to file it, to get the title three in the first place.
01:11:47.560So in this case, this is what I call a reactionary case, a murder cases, 99% of the time are reactionary cases, right?
01:11:53.400You're not going to, cause if you know that a murder is about to happen, you're supposed to stop it before it happens.
01:11:57.100You're not, even if you hear on a wiretap, you hear, oh, we're going to go whack this fucking guy, right?
01:12:38.000Uh, yeah, more than likely a lot of, a lot of times defense attorneys will sit there with their client and they'll be like, all right, man, tell me what the hell happened for real.
01:12:45.100And, you know, a lot of times they'll be like, yeah, this is what really went down, et cetera.
01:12:48.080And then that will allow the defense to kind of formulate, um, a defense strategy.
01:12:54.060And that's why, um, lawyer and client, uh, information is considered privileged, right?
01:13:01.680Because, uh, you can say whatever to your lawyer and it's privileged and he can't, he can't, you know, do anything like he can't disclose that to other people.