The Debrief With MyronGainesX - Former Fed Reacts To 9⧸11 Conspiracy Theories (PART 2)

00:00:00.000 and we are live what's up guys welcome to fed it today we're going to go over part two

00:00:04.900 of the 9-11 conspiracy man we've got a lot to cover guys let's get right into it my friends

00:00:09.520 i was a special agent with homelands investigations okay guys hsi the cases that i did mostly were

00:00:16.940 human smuggling and drug trafficking no one else has these documents by the way here's what fed

00:00:23.620 it covers doctor lofredo confirmed lacerations due to stepping on glass murder investigations

00:00:31.860 reaching in his jacket you don't know and he's positioning been on february 13 2019 you're

00:00:36.700 facing two counts of two meditative murder racketeering and rico conspiracies young slime

00:00:41.940 life here and after referred to as ysl the defendant's uh six nine and then this is billy seco right

00:00:47.000 here now when they first started guys six nine ran with i'm upset i'm watching this music video

00:00:51.600 you know i'm bobbing my highlight hey this shit lit but at the same time i'm pausing 0.78

00:00:55.660 oh wait who this right who's that in the back firearms and violent crime aka bush i see violated

00:01:02.720 in order to stay away from the victim rapper bush i see arrested after shooting at king diamond

00:01:06.820 this is the one that that's gonna fuck him up because this gun is not tracing well it happened 0.82

00:01:12.780 at the gun range here's your boy 42 dug right here on the left okay sex trafficking and sex crimes

00:01:17.400 they can effectively link him to paying an underage girl and the first bomb went off right here

00:01:25.020 the second explosion inspired by al-qaeda two terrorists brothers the zokar sarnab and tamar

00:01:33.780 land sarnab when the cartel shipped drugs into the country as this guy got arrested for um espionage

00:01:39.180 okay trading secrets with the russians for monetary compensation the largest corrupt police bust in new

00:01:46.640 on the street the days of the police are gone so he was in this bad boy we're gonna go over his

00:01:52.100 past the gang guy so that this all makes sense

00:01:55.180 all right we're back guys today we're going to be covering the 9-11 conspiracy part two of the

00:02:07.920 five-hour documentary the new pearl harbor okay guys and we covered part one of it uh last week

00:02:12.780 and we're going to go ahead and cover part two i think this is going to be probably more than

00:02:15.820 likely a three-part series guys we're tight on time because i got to obviously do fresh and fit

00:02:19.840 uh very soon here but uh real quick uh quick announcements on this one guys um party january

00:02:27.040 14th get your tickets while you can um they're selling out quick uh we have a venue that we're

00:02:32.300 going to have probably a rooftop spot here in miami so it's going to be late guys uh second we're now

00:02:37.300 on rumble rumble.com slash fresh and fit again that's rumble.com slash fresh and fit and we're

00:02:41.960 migrating patreon over to locals okay it's fresh and fit dot locals dot com i think is what it is

00:02:47.960 uh i'll put the link in the description uh if you guys want to support but yeah guys um we're still

00:02:52.760 gonna be on youtube i've been getting a lot of questions from y'all about yo are you guys gonna

00:02:56.580 stay on youtube blah blah don't worry we ain't going nowhere we're still gonna stream on youtube

00:02:59.680 all the channels are gonna stay on youtube um just for after hours some of the shows uh well when we do

00:03:04.800 after our show starting next week what's gonna happen is um in the middle of the stream we're gonna go over

00:03:08.980 to rumble so if you guys want to watch the flips you're gonna go have to go over to rumble but

00:03:12.080 yeah man we're on rumble finally i can

00:03:13.920 all right so um let me go ahead and show y'all uh i'm gonna share a screen with you guys real quick

00:03:22.980 just so you guys can kind of see where we are here um okay so my bad let me move this out the way

00:03:30.140 you guys look at this all these tabs you guys are seeing right now okay so uh yes last week guys we

00:03:35.600 covered um a couple of different sections with the 9-11 conspiracy okay as you guys know i've been

00:03:40.360 doing a multi-part series here on 9-11 the first episode was the 9-11 attacks and how uh well

00:03:46.560 actually you know what let me just show y'all instead of describing it here's a channel as y'all

00:03:49.640 know fed at 1811 we're almost at 105 000 subscribers so thank you guys so much for that donna marco

00:03:53.840 so the first episode right of the 9-11 series guys was right here we talk about 9-11 how the fbi

00:04:02.060 investigated and linked al-qaeda to everything okay all the time stamps here it was you know

00:04:07.780 very um methodical you know the fbi basically did their entire investigation out of a garage uh

00:04:14.980 underneath their uh older building i think at 26 federal plaza then in manhattan new york and then

00:04:21.720 we had part two which is osama laden how the cia found him okay some of the hardcore um and how they

00:04:26.900 were able to track him down and about about pakistan then part three right was um how seal

00:04:33.480 team six uh did the raid right how they killed him they actually interviewed a guy here who was a

00:04:38.600 member of the team this dude right here we go into detail on that with all the time stamps and then

00:04:42.740 most importantly what they found in his compound man the the bin lana papers right they found a bunch

00:04:48.840 of you know as always you know propaganda with being a terrorist a bunch of you know

00:04:53.020 that type of stuff and uh you know

00:04:56.900 that's what they found at the compound right but and also future attacks really interesting

00:05:00.580 stuff to kind of see what bin laden had planned had we not stopped him and then you know for all

00:05:04.960 you guys out there that like conspiracy theories like it was i went ahead and covered part one

00:05:11.100 uh which we're going to go ahead and cover part two but just so that we can go ahead and bring you

00:05:15.700 guys up to speed and i put time stamps on all my videos guys and the reason why is because i want

00:05:19.720 y'all to really be able to skip around and watch what you guys want but here right we cover and i have

00:05:25.500 it nice and delineated for you guys let me enlarge this a little bit you guys so you guys can actually

00:05:28.780 see here um debate begins main issues of 9 11 official story air defense hijackers and airplane

00:05:34.500 okay so part one was the air defense why didn't the you know um air force shoot down these planes that

00:05:39.620 were attacking you know the united states part two was the hijackers right the the lack of surveillance

00:05:45.060 footage of them in the airports when they were doing the attack and then part three uh the airplanes

00:05:49.900 right which we're going to go ahead and cover that in this episode but this stuff right here

00:05:55.140 between the hijackers and air defense was pretty extensive and then obviously the first part of it

00:05:58.900 was the intro and what they did was they went ahead and drew parallels between 9 11 and pearl harbor okay

00:06:05.260 guys so now that we're caught up and you kind of you guys kind of know what we're about to do

00:06:09.180 we're going to go into part two which covers the airplanes okay guys so without further ado let's get

00:06:15.760 right into it and break this bad boy down drones and not regular airliners what happened to the

00:06:22.260 passengers with certainty no one can answer this question one thing we do know however the cia has

00:06:29.920 been developing plans for covert operations that involve the in-flight swapping of commercial airliners

00:06:35.380 with military drones since the 1960s one such plan was called operation northwoods and it detailed how to

00:06:42.780 replace a civil airliner with a military drone in midair unbeknownst to the air traffic controllers

00:06:48.320 now you guys got to understand a lot of time with these intelligence agencies you know typically

00:06:52.080 somewhere between 10 to all the way up to like 50 years what they'll do is they'll declassify documents

00:06:58.140 which is why um these guys were able to get this stuff about the cia replacing commercial airlines

00:07:04.180 with drones right that's how they are able to get this information so information always gets declassified

00:07:08.700 later on typically does all of it get declassified no but uh a good portion of it does so that's how

00:07:13.620 they're able to draw these um these inferences after the swap the airliner would be landed in a military

00:07:20.140 base the drone would continue to fly appearing on radar as the original plane and would be remotely

00:07:26.400 guided all the way into the target we don't know whether this is the actual end the passengers met

00:07:33.960 but one thing we can say for sure those who called their relatives from their cell phones

00:07:38.940 could not have placed those calls from the airplanes in flight

00:07:42.600 minutes after the fourth plane crashed in pennsylvania news was already circulating that several

00:07:49.640 passengers had made calls with their cell phones from the hijacked airplanes

00:07:53.200 we are being hijacked we are being hijacked and remember guys this is 2001 all right for the phone

00:08:00.260 technology was not that good back then i'll tell you that right now okay i'm old enough to remember

00:08:05.380 that piece of crap cell phones that flip or the nokias that were indestructible right so phones were not

00:08:12.740 good at all back then let alone being able to make a phone call on a plane how you can't make a phone call

00:08:17.000 on a plane now so um so now this is a part three of the planes you guys can see they're you know they're

00:08:22.140 speculating yo were those actual real real airliners that hit the towers okay were they or were they

00:08:28.520 military drones again guys you know they're bringing up uh the question so let's continue on with the

00:08:34.480 conspiracy theories

00:08:37.420 those frightening words were uttered by a passenger aboard united flight 93 who was able to call

00:08:46.140 emergency personnel on his cell phone before the plane crashed in western pennsylvania and tonight we're

00:08:51.160 getting reports of cell phone calls from at least three of those four flights on the second flight

00:08:56.960 that came out of boston that was the second flight of the day and also went into one of the twin towers

00:09:01.320 of the world trade center there was a businessman who got off two cell phone calls to his father

00:09:06.620 the cnn commentator barbara olson wife of u.s solicitor general ted olson she reportedly called her

00:09:13.320 husband twice on a mobile phone to tell him her plane was being hijacked the problem is that in 2001

00:09:19.660 it was practically impossible to make a call with a cell phone from an airplane at cruising altitudes

00:09:24.880 the whole idea behind cellular phones is that they use low power transmitters both to keep the cost of

00:09:31.060 the units down and to preserve battery life it is up to the receiving towers on the ground to pick up and

00:09:36.900 boost their signal before they route it through the system it is commonly thought that beyond 10 000 feet

00:09:42.460 in altitude most cell phones become useless passenger planes normally cruise at 30 000 feet and beyond

00:09:48.680 the editors of popular mechanics however maintain that cell phones do work from cruising airplanes

00:09:54.740 even at maximum altitudes david dunbar with regard to the cell phones we did well and you guys gotta

00:10:00.660 remember that you know so this documentary goes ahead and outlines a bunch of evidence and it goes against

00:10:05.640 what the 9 11 conspiracy debunkers also say which we covered that in the first episode for this episode

00:10:11.180 to make sense guys you need to watch the first episode of the conspiracy theory pod that i did

00:10:17.760 okay because now we're into the we're about an hour and a half in now on this 9 11 new pearl harbor

00:10:24.020 documentary so for this to all make sense make sure you watch the first part because they prop up all

00:10:29.780 their arguments from the beginning and they outline everything so that this all makes sense now

00:10:33.520 what any reporter would do we talk to experts in the field and in fact cell phones do work

00:10:39.980 at that altitude up to 35 000 feet and higher and um in 2001 in 2001 and it might be instructive for you

00:10:48.720 to talk to some of the cell phone experts instead of talking to experts japanese television decided to

00:10:54.520 take matters into their own hands in 2003 they conducted an on-camera experiment near ontario canada

00:11:00.680 to verify the actual reach of cell phones from different altitudes the cellular phone system used

00:11:06.140 in the experiment in canada is the one used in the united states three cell phones each from

00:11:12.140 different telephone companies were used

00:11:14.140 the experiment begins at a thousand feet

00:11:19.600 hello that indestructible nokia guys

00:11:24.600 them things are unbreakable you know all you young boys you guys don't know about them nokias but them

00:11:30.380 things man that thing's a weapon a phone a rock a placeholder them things japanese did not play

00:11:37.180 around with those nokias man they made them indestructible 1.00

00:11:39.640 the results were the same with the other two next we went up to four thousand feet

00:11:50.380 then

00:11:51.640 company b's phone stopped working at four thousand feet

00:11:58.580 and when the aircraft rose to six thousand feet company a's phone also became useless

00:12:04.040 at eight thousand feet none of the three cell phones worked anymore

00:12:07.680 no service on a no service on b no service on c

00:12:11.720 in other words at an altitude of 35 000 feet cell phones would have been totally useless

00:12:18.380 there is another problem besides altitude that makes calling from a cell phone unthinkable from a cruising airplane

00:12:24.740 and that is speed calling from an aircraft with a cell phone would be like calling from a car traveling at 500 miles per hour

00:12:32.840 the connection would continuously need to be transferred from one receiving station to the next and then to the next and again to the next

00:12:40.740 the transfer procedure between two receiving stations is called handoff and it relies on continuous triangulations between the receiving towers in order to establish the exact position of the caller

00:12:52.200 as the mobile unit approaches the handoff zone the first tower senses the weakening

00:12:56.600 of the signal and prepares to transfer the call to the second

00:13:00.120 when the second tower senses the signal is strong enough to take over the handoff

00:13:04.200 procedure is initiated if everything goes well the call is rerouted into the

00:13:08.760 system by the new receiving station but the speed by which an airplane

00:13:13.560 approaches and crosses over the handoff zone is so high that the towers

00:13:17.560 wouldn't have the time to complete the handoff procedure

00:13:20.360 the call would be dropped and the person would need to dial the number from scratch

00:13:24.680 if one considers the altitude and the speed problems combined

00:13:28.520 it should be clear that the chances of having an actual conversation with a

00:13:32.040 cell phone from a cruising airplane are practically nil

00:13:35.560 even after 2001 both altitude and speed problems remain

00:13:39.800 in 2005 the washington post wrote most cell phones can't reach a station from

00:13:44.840 beyond 10 000 feet another technical hurdle is to find a way that cell phone calls would be

00:13:50.200 handed off from one cell tower to another on the ground when an aircraft is traveling at 500 miles an

00:13:56.040 hour and even 10 years after 9 11 people who try to use their cell phone from cruising altitudes

00:14:02.120 are bound to get the same results and i mean this is pretty much indisputable you guys have all been on

00:14:06.520 a plane trying to make a phone call like i mean as you're taking off you know it well if this flight

00:14:11.160 attendant doesn't get mad at you and be like hey get off your phone you know if you are actually

00:14:15.400 able to make a phone call you already know as soon as you take off and like you know two three not

00:14:18.920 even like a minute and two minutes in you're pretty much service is gone so um and that's even now in

00:14:25.000 2022 so even sophisticated cell phones with advanced technology can't get a reception at that high

00:14:30.760 once it became clear that the passengers could not have placed their calls from the cell phones on

00:14:39.640 the airplanes the official narrative on this issue became more and more ambiguous and non-committal

00:14:45.640 theodore olson who had initially told the press he had received two cell phone calls from his wife

00:14:50.600 barbara changed his story to calls made from an air phone and by the time the 9 11 commission published

00:14:56.200 their final report only one mention on the cell phone calls remained shortly thereafter wrote the

00:15:01.800 commission passengers and flight crew began a series of calls from gta air phones and cellular phones

00:15:07.960 no indication on which calls were made from cell phones and which ones with air phones was given

00:15:13.560 the authorities from the massawi trial also avoided being too specific on the origin of the calls within

00:15:19.320 the official documentation they released this flash animation which contains all the basic information on

00:15:25.160 the four hijacked airplanes by clicking on any of the flights one can view the passengers list

00:15:31.720 by clicking on the telephone icon at the bottom the passengers who have made phone calls are highlighted

00:15:37.400 and by clicking on any of the passengers names the list of the calls they have made is displayed

00:15:42.920 each of the calls lists the exact time it was placed the duration the initial part of the number dialed

00:15:48.680 and the name of the person receipt in the call 203 s connecticut right there southern connecticut

00:15:53.560 but the number from which the phone call was placed is missing the only information available is the

00:15:59.320 location on the plane the calls were presumably made from row 30 in this case it's as if the authorities

00:16:05.960 were trying to suggest that the calls were made from air phones without having to put it down on paper

00:16:11.560 only in two cases did the authorities openly state that a cell phone was used one is the call allegedly

00:16:17.880 placed to 911 by a passenger who had locked himself in a lavatory where air phones are not available the

00:16:23.880 second is a call placed by flight attendant cc lyles to her husband who later described his surprise

00:16:29.560 in receiving a call from her cell phone in a television interview once the phone got disconnected

00:16:34.360 then i sat up in the bit like it was like i just woke up i'm like did was that a real call

00:16:40.280 so i looked at the caller id and noticed that it was a call and it was from her cell phone

00:16:45.240 and i'm like okay wait a minute how how can she call me from on the plane from a cell phone because

00:16:50.600 cell phones don't work on the plane that's what i'm thinking as only these two phone calls were

00:16:54.280 admitted by the authorities the debunkers have universally adopted the only two cell phone calls made position

00:17:00.360 this is one of the debunkers here i think this guy's out of uh italy if i'm not mistaken somewhere

00:17:09.480 in europe um he's one of the main uh debunkers for 9 11 for the 9 11 conspiracy theories

00:17:16.680 but one thing is the number of cell phone calls admitted to another is the number of calls that

00:17:34.520 were actually made in the days following 9 11 the fbi interviewed the various people who had received a

00:17:40.520 phone call from their relatives on the planes and their reports tell a different story one of the

00:17:46.520 reports reads starting at approximately 6 30 pacific standard time which is 9 30 new york time dina

00:17:53.080 burnett received a series from three to five cellular phone calls from her husband thomas burnett

00:17:58.760 burnett was able to determine her husband was using his own cellular phone because the caller id

00:18:03.800 showed his number only one of the calls did not show the caller id as she was on the line with another call

00:18:10.600 according to the official documentation thomas burnett made a total of three calls

00:18:14.840 one at 9 30 one at 9 37 and one at 9 44 this means that at least two of these calls if not all three

00:18:22.840 were made from burnett's cellular phone at 9 30 the plane was flying at 32 000 feet and climbing at 9 37 it

00:18:31.080 had reached 36 000 feet and was still climbing at 9 44 it had descended to 22 000 feet while it accelerated

00:18:38.920 until reaching a ground speed of almost 400 miles per hour none of these calls seems to have been

00:18:44.440 possible with a cell phone from that airplane according to another report united 93 passenger jeremy glick

00:18:51.720 saw hijackers on the plane used a cell phone and called makely his stepmother to report the hijacking

00:18:57.880 he then asked to talk to his wife liz beth and uh and he was on the phone and he had told me um

00:19:03.240 that his plane had been hijacked according to the fbi click's wife liz beth could not hear any

00:19:08.600 and this is a fbi uh 302 guys 302 is their um that's the the number for their reports so elizabeth

00:19:16.760 could not hear any unusual sounds in the background of the call and the connection was extremely clear as

00:19:21.160 if he was calling from the next room which is strange because as we know guys you know you can't even

00:19:25.880 get reception let alone being able to actually get a clear call back in 2001 on a cell phone back then

00:19:33.800 the unusual sounds in the background of the call and the connection was extremely clear as if he

00:19:38.920 was calling from the next room cell phone communication was lost at 9 55 click place the call

00:19:45.160 at 9 37 which means the communication lasted uninterrupted for 18 minutes while the plane was

00:19:50.920 flying between 39 000 and 10 000 feet at an average speed of almost 400 miles per hour only a miracle

00:19:58.280 could have kept that connection open for all that time had the call truly been placed from the airplane

00:20:03.560 in flight lauren grancolas possessed a cellular phone and is believed to have allowed another passenger 0.98

00:20:10.520 honor weño to use the cellular phone weño placed one call to her parents at 9 53 when the plane was at about

00:20:18.200 10 000 feet traveling close to 400 miles per hour elsa strong received a cell phone call from her sister 1.00

00:20:26.040 lisa granlund a passenger on united 93 granlund made the call to her sister at 9 46 when the plane was at

00:20:33.000 17 000 feet and traveling at almost 400 miles per hour mary and britain was also a passenger on united 93

00:20:42.120 britain's live-in boyfriend received a cellular phone call from britain during the hijacking britain

00:20:47.400 told fiamano her boyfriend that she had borrowed a cell phone from another passenger britain's call

00:20:53.080 to fiamano took place at 9 49 when united 93 was flying beyond 13 000 feet at a speed of 420 miles per hour

00:21:02.440 peter hansen a passenger on united 175 contacted his mother on cell phone and said the flight had been

00:21:09.000 hijacked peter's father lee said that he resisted the temptation to call his son back because he

00:21:14.200 didn't want to place him in more danger by having his cell phone ring on the plane peter hansen called

00:21:19.400 his parents twice at 8 52 and at 9 a.m at 8 52 the plane was at 30 000 feet and it was climbing

00:21:27.640 at nine o'clock it was flying at over 18 000 feet in altitude while it accelerated towards the record

00:21:33.960 braking speed of almost 600 miles per hour near sea level brian sweeney was also a passenger on united

00:21:41.880 175 after learning of the attacks wrote the fbi his wife julie sweeney returned home to find that her

00:21:48.200 husband had left a message made from his cell phone aboard the plane on their answering machine

00:21:53.400 sweeney made the call at 8 58 in between the two hansen calls when the plane was still at 25 000 feet in altitude

00:22:01.320 while any one of these phone calls could have momentarily been connected by a set of fortunate

00:22:05.800 coincidences it should be obvious that all these cell phone calls as a whole could not have been

00:22:10.600 made from the cruising airplanes not only that but to be made with like good quality like they're saying

00:22:15.720 where it sounds like he's in the other room in 2001 yeah that's definitely a big uh nope question given

00:22:23.400 the known limitations of the cellular phone system in 2001 can you provide any evidence that the cell

00:22:29.560 phone calls made by the passengers reported by the fbi could have been made from the altitudes

00:22:35.160 at the speeds and for the durations indicated for each of them we do know however that the calls were

00:22:42.760 made as no one has ever doubted that the relatives actually received them this opens the way to a

00:22:48.280 disturbing possibility which seems to support the in-flight swap hypothesis that the passengers were forced

00:22:54.680 to call their relatives under duress pretending to be on the airplane while in fact they had already

00:22:59.800 been landed in some unknown location in support of this hypothesis we have different elements one is

00:23:06.040 the conversation passenger todd beamer had with the gta airphone operator lisa jefferson during the hijack

00:23:12.600 of flight 93. it is through lisa jefferson that the whole world learned about the famous call to action

00:23:18.680 let's roll when he told the guys are you ready i assume that they were waiting on his cue then they

00:23:25.960 responded to him and he said okay let's roll the 9 11 commission has established that the hijack took

00:23:34.040 place that's interesting very very interesting let's roll

00:23:38.440 at 9 28 todd beamer was connected to lisa jefferson at 9 43 some 15 minutes into the hijacking the fbi

00:23:50.920 report confirms that jefferson received the call from beamer at approximately 8 45 central time which

00:23:57.000 is 9 45 eastern but the contents of the conversation are strikingly at odds with the official narrative

00:24:03.400 according to jefferson beamer called to state that the plane was about to be hijacked he stated

00:24:08.360 that three individuals two wielding knives the third with a bomb strapped to his waist with a

00:24:12.760 red belt were preparing to take control of the flight jefferson estimated that she spoke to beamer

00:24:18.280 for seven minutes before the two hijackers armed with knives entered the cockpit this places the

00:24:23.480 hijacking at around 9 52 while officially it took place at 9 28 this is no small discrepancy

00:24:31.240 how could beamer be describing events that are supposed to be happening in front of his eyes

00:24:35.320 when in fact they had already happened half an hour before how could the terrorists be preparing

00:24:40.440 to take control of the flight at 9 45 when they had already been in the cockpit for more than 15 minutes

00:24:47.000 the fbi also wrote that jefferson noted that the call had an unusually low amount of background noise

00:24:52.920 the same thing liz glick had noticed furthermore the records show that beamer's call lasted roughly

00:24:58.600 one hour and that the line was left open after the crash we didn't lose a connection stated jefferson

00:25:04.600 because there's a different sound that you use i never lost connection it just went silent oh

00:25:10.600 shit what the hell's going on here jefferson stayed on the phone stated the fbi until she learned flight 0.98

00:25:17.480 93 had crashed question since air phones are powered by the same airplane's electrical system

00:25:23.880 how could the line have remained open for another 45 minutes after the plane had literally disintegrated

00:25:29.240 to the ground in a thousand pieces all these discrepancies seem to suggest that beamer was not on the

00:25:35.160 plane observing real events unfolding but was describing an imaginary pre-scripted situation from

00:25:41.000 a different location in support of this hypothesis we also have the dramatic message left by flight

00:25:48.200 attendant cc lyles in her husband's answering machine before briefly talking to him on her cell phone

00:25:53.640 as she herself is suggesting we should listen very carefully tuesday 9 47 a.m hi baby i'm baby you have

00:26:03.720 to listen to me carefully i'm on a plane that's been hijacked i'm on the plane i'm calling from the plane

00:26:09.240 i want to tell you i love you please tell my children we too can notice the absence of the typical

00:26:14.120 background noise heard inside a plane i don't know what to say there's three guys they've had that

00:26:19.480 complaint i'm trying to be calm after saying goodbye she seems to fumble with the headset while she 0.85

00:26:25.080 whispers a few more words into the mouthpiece i hope to be able to see your face again baby i love you

00:26:33.560 it's pretty damn clear especially for being high up in the air

00:26:37.880 it's pretty damn clear even by playing the segment several times it remains difficult to hear anything

00:26:51.640 different from the words it's a frame

00:26:57.160 in any case the problem with the phone calls does not change the cell phone calls confirmed

00:27:02.280 by the fbi and their reports cannot have been made from the cruising airplanes

00:27:06.760 someone has to explain where they came from

00:27:14.920 all right very interesting and don't worry guys this isn't the end of it this is because this

00:27:18.200 this documentary came out on dvd so this is like you know i'm saying yo uh put in the next dvd now for

00:27:25.880 all you young boys out there you guys are not aware of this so now we're on to dvd two of three all

00:27:31.320 right so let's see here let's see if we could fast well i think we're gonna it's gonna just play

00:27:35.320 through but yeah interesting stuff guys very very interesting stuff here um let's see here let me

00:27:41.400 see if i can fast forward just a little bit or is it gonna just oh okay of course so now we're

00:27:46.360 gonna cover the pentagon okay guys now we're on to part four here so we covered the planes right

00:27:50.120 we covered uh that potentially being drones issues with cell phones how the hell are you able to make

00:27:55.560 a phone call at cruising altitudes they've done tests on this especially back then with limited 2001

00:27:59.800 cell phone technology so they definitely bring up some good questions and some uh good topics and

00:28:05.720 then also you know they had the information from before that the cia had been testing you know

00:28:09.800 replacing drones with commercial airlines so yeah i mean like i said before put on those tinfoil hats

00:28:16.760 right all right now we're going to get into the pentagon portion of this which uh this is actually a

00:28:23.080 very interesting portion as well according to the 911 commission the airplane that appeared over

00:28:28.520 washington and went on to strike the pentagon was flight american 77 the same plane that had

00:28:33.640 disappeared from radar screens over west virginia almost one hour before but they never provided any

00:28:39.560 evidence of that as we have seen the flight data recorder's serial number that could have identified

00:28:46.120 the airplane was never released all the debunkers have to show for flight 77 is a small piece of

00:28:52.280 wreckage carrying an american airline serial number but this piece could have been placed by anyone onto

00:28:58.360 the grass after the impact in fact unidentified men in suits were seen meddling with the debris right

00:29:05.240 after the impact in direct violation of the rules of a crime scene a contractor who was only 100 yards

00:29:11.560 oh what the hell dude's messing around with the crime scene before the police get there okay it's 0.52

00:29:17.640 two yards away from the point of impact stated it was dps the guys in the black coats they were here

00:29:22.920 right then and there that's what i don't understand where did they come from maybe they knew something i

00:29:28.440 don't know the debunkers claim that the witnesses accounts are more than sufficient to identify the

00:29:34.360 airplanes hundreds of people saw an american airlines jet fly into that building but it's presumable

00:29:39.960 that if anyone wanted a different airplane to look like an american airlines aircraft they would

00:29:44.600 have at least thought of painting the fuselage with the same colors the majority of witnesses recall seeing

00:29:50.040 a large airliner but there are also witnesses who describe a much smaller executive like airplane

00:29:55.720 i was just casually looking out the corner out of the window in the corner of my eye i saw what looked

00:29:59.720 to be um maybe a 20 passenger corporate jet no markings on the side uh from my office i was able to see

00:30:06.120 um a white jet like a gulfstream type commuter jet i i guess oh my you say this was a smaller plane

00:30:14.200 uh 10 to 15 passengers maybe no it's muy grande no it's muy grande is it not like too big it's just

00:30:19.000 uh they say like it like uh business uh like a business jet it looked like a commuter plane two

00:30:27.240 engines come down from the south real low uh proceed right on and crash right into the pentagon and are you

00:30:33.880 fairly sure that it was what we sometimes describe and recognize as a small commuter plane yes it was

00:30:39.080 by the witnesses accounts alone it's impossible to establish what kind of airplane it was

00:30:44.920 as the plane clipped five light poles before striking the pentagon the debunkers maintained

00:30:49.720 that the distance between and we went over this in detail guys on the last episode as far as like

00:30:54.040 the skill it took to be able to come in right and do that sharp turn and then be able to hit the

00:30:59.240 pentagon from the side versus hitting it from up top that was another part in part one where they were

00:31:02.840 saying well if you're an actual terrorist and you hated the united states you want to cause the most

00:31:05.960 damage you would have hit it from the top and it would have been easier for you to hit it from

00:31:09.480 the top as well versus like taking an extremely difficult maneuver and you know going ahead and

00:31:14.840 like steering the plane like directly to the right essentially and we covered this in more detail in

00:31:19.320 the last episode um and they actually had like airline pilots try the maneuver in simulation and

00:31:25.080 everyone failed even experienced pilots so um definitely go check that out but yeah this was

00:31:29.640 an extremely skillful attack where he was able to fly so close to the ground and hit it and and

00:31:35.800 allegedly also they were saying that these hijackers can barely fly cessna planes let alone a whole

00:31:41.080 commercial airline plane so a lot of uh holes in the situation the light poles indicates a corridor

00:31:50.440 wide enough that only a large airliner could have created it so what we can see is that the avion

00:31:56.360 in arrivant had fallen five pylons that were on his trajectory and these pylons were spaced 25 meters

00:32:03.880 in between them already that appeared just respectfully numa

00:32:22.600 five feet but the wingspan of a 757 is 124 feet which means any airplane with an 85 foot wingspan

00:32:30.360 could have downed those light poles it didn't need to be a 757. in fact with a 100 ton airliner

00:32:38.440 hitting a reinforced concrete building like the pentagon one would expect to find a situation

00:32:43.560 similar to this what immediately stood out instead was the absence of large identifiable pieces of

00:32:51.400 debris which are usually found after the crash of an airliner bob pew was the first professional

00:32:57.560 cinematographer to arrive on site no one was in control of the area i have free reign and there's

00:33:04.120 a lot of debris in the foreground of those videos again it's very small pieces i mean i'm standing

00:33:10.200 on pieces a dinner plate or smaller in size all the while i'm looking for wreckage um and i can't

00:33:16.360 find a piece of anything that i recognize i can't see the tail i can't see the wheels i can't see the

00:33:21.400 engines there's no chairs there's no luggage according to the debunkers there are no large

00:33:26.040 pieces of debris on the lawn because most of the airplane ended up inside the building

00:33:36.840 purdue university has produced a detailed computer animation illustrating the official version of the

00:33:42.360 event we had the plans for the pentagon all the details right down to the last reinforcing bar the

00:33:51.400 speed of the airplane and the direction from which came was given to us by the transport safety institute

00:33:59.240 according to the official version the plane approached in a low trajectory clipping five

00:34:03.640 light poles from the nearby intersection slightly tilted to the left it hit a trailer parked outside

00:34:09.000 the building with the bottom of the right wing and then impacted the facade at an angle of 42 degrees

00:34:14.200 most of the plane penetrated the facade and proceeded inside the building on a diagonal course causing

00:34:20.120 destruction as it was being destroyed the fuselage pierced through the outer wall of the c ring producing

00:34:26.200 this round-shaped exit hole 10 to 12 feet wide there are however many problems with this version of the

00:34:34.520 events the first one is the actual wingspan of a boeing 757 and this is the official version that came from i

00:34:40.680 i think it was either 2004 2005 uh 9-11 official commission report guys where they you know conducted

00:34:46.120 their own investigation etc so this documentary takes you know a good amount of time debunking

00:34:51.640 a lot of the claims from the official version okay and in this one the pentagon situation is no different

00:34:58.600 most of us remember the facade of the pentagon after it had collapsed but before it collapsed

00:35:04.760 right after the impact this is what the building looked like this series of pictures was taken by

00:35:12.280 a navy photographer shortly after the impact there doesn't seem to be enough damage for a boeing 757 to

00:35:20.600 have penetrated the building almost in full using the best part from each image a digital expert has

00:35:27.480 created this composite picture which has become the universal tool of reference for anyone involved in the

00:35:32.840 debate the composite picture shows an almost continuous opening at ground level about 90 feet wide the damage

00:35:40.040 extends to the second floor with an entry hole about 15 feet wide this is enough maintain the

00:35:45.960 debunkers to have accommodated most of the plane inside the building effectivement on

00:35:50.440 se demander où est-il passé et puis si on prend des photos qui ont été prises à des instants différents

00:35:55.160 et qui justement à part un assemblage ont permis de montrer les dégâts qui étaient réellement visibles sur la

00:36:00.120 façade et là on voit clairement que tout le rez-de-chaussée a été anéanti sur une longueur de 30 mètres

00:36:06.840 et puis au milieu bien sûr vous avez l'autre coup de la carlingue

00:36:09.880 «The gash in the e-ring was about 90 feet across the um the wingspan of the plane was about 124 and

00:36:17.640 change that punched the hole into the building it is true the wingspan of the 757 is 124 feet but the

00:36:25.480 debunkers forget that the plane came in at a 42 degree angle which makes the projected wingspan on

00:36:30.920 the facade 160 feet wide that's almost twice the 90 foot existing gash

00:36:37.640 as shown in this animation the left wing should have also destroyed these two windows to the

00:36:42.680 left of the opening but the whole segment to the left of the opening doesn't seem to have been hit by

00:36:47.640 a wing traveling at 500 miles per hour windows wooden frames are still in place and the glass

00:36:53.080 seems to have been broken from the ensuing explosion as you can see they're being meticulous

00:36:56.920 in very detail about this so i mean hey they're bringing up good arguments here you know what

00:37:00.200 i mean uh but i'm gonna let this play through and uh we'll talk about it after not from the impact

00:37:05.560 itself the limestone covering the facade has fallen off but the bricks underneath appear practically

00:37:10.920 untouched by the same projected angle the right wing should have impacted the facade all the way to

00:37:16.600 this column on the second floor in fact there is a diagonal cut on the second floor wall that could

00:37:21.800 have resulted from the wings impact but this puts most of the wing above the second floor

00:37:26.840 slab which means it never penetrated the facade to begin with so where did it go this is the

00:37:33.640 explanation by popular mechanics for what happened to the wings the wings did not fully penetrate the

00:37:39.160 facade in fact the wings had already been partially stirred off by the time the plane even hit the

00:37:43.240 building the fuselage mainly made the hole that existed conspiracy theorists want to know why it

00:37:48.280 wasn't the width of the full wingspan of the plane and actually just the simple reason was that the wings

00:37:53.080 came off but where did they go popular mechanics doesn't say a similar problem is posed by the

00:38:00.120 horizontal stabilizers which extends some 50 feet in width as they are mounted three feet higher than

00:38:05.720 the wings they should have impacted the facade approximately here and here but there are no

00:38:11.960 visible marks from their impact on the facade nor is any recognizable piece of the stabilizers visible on

00:38:17.720 the lawn same story for the tail which raises 24 feet above the fuselage at the time of impact the

00:38:26.120 tail should have hit as high as the windows on the fourth floor the purdue animation shows the tail

00:38:31.480 entering the building in full as if it were cutting through butter but the facade above the entry hole

00:38:38.600 doesn't show any significant damage and the glass from the windows around the hole isn't even broken

00:38:43.640 for the missing tail and stabilizers popular mechanics offers this generic explanation a plane flying 500 miles

00:38:51.800 an hour hitting a concrete wall that is extremely reinforced there's not going to be much left of it

00:38:57.800 you're not going to see it sitting on the lawn of pentagon in one or two or three pieces but here is the problem

00:39:03.080 if part of the wings the stabilizers and the tail disintegrated against the facade how could the fuselage

00:39:08.680 penetrated almost entirely the fuselage is by far the weakest part of the plane as it basically

00:39:14.840 consists of an empty cylinder meant to carry the passengers and their belongings how fragile the

00:39:20.040 fuselage is compared to the wings is explained by aviation expert jacques roland jacques roland ancien

00:39:26.200 general de l'armée de l'air est aujourd'hui le meilleur expert en crash aérien auprès des tribunaux

00:39:30.920 il n'est pas du tout évident de comprendre qu'effectivement dès que vous avez un choc à l'avant l'ensemble

00:39:36.600 s'enfonce à la vitesse de pénétration en fait et le premier point dur se trouve ici tant que vous

00:39:41.800 n'arrivez pas là l'avion c'est c'est du papier question how could the fuselage which is the weakest

00:39:48.120 part of the plane penetrate the facade almost entirely while part of the wings the stabilizers

00:39:53.400 and the tail which are relatively stronger were unable to do so and were shattered in a thousand

00:39:58.120 pieces instead even more mysterious is that this and it's a good question i ain't gonna lie and then

00:40:03.800 yeah this is a big one here with the engines let's get into this one appearance of the engines

00:40:07.720 the 757 that allegedly hit the pentagon was equipped with two rb211 engines built by rolls-royce

00:40:14.760 almost eight feet in height weighing over 7 000 pounds each the internal core of the engine is made

00:40:20.440 with components so sturdy and resistant that they are considered practically indestructible

00:40:25.000 it has to rotate about 10 000 revolution per minute the blade speed of about 800 miles per hour to operate it

00:40:32.600 around seventeen hundred degrees the design not to melt quali sono le parti che non vengono distrutte

00:40:39.000 che non si squagliano per il calore pezzi del carrello è il è il cuore dei due motori è molto più compatto

00:40:46.360 dalla parte esterna dei motori ovviamente è fatto in materiali che devono resistere la temperatura

00:40:52.440 2000-2500 gradi per cui la parte centrale dei due motori è sicuramente sopravvissuta l'impatto

00:40:58.520 but where are they in their animation purdue university has chosen to ignore the issue

00:41:04.600 as one can see moments before the impact the two engines simply vanish into thin air

00:41:09.800 debunker paolo attivissimo has made what he calls a cautious suggestion

00:41:33.160 but this rotor could have come from any engine there is also another picture of a similar disc

00:41:38.200 possibly the same disc from a different angle and then there is this part of an engine found inside

00:41:43.560 the pentagon but we are not looking for scraps we are looking for two three ton pieces of machinery

00:41:50.280 made with steel and titanium that after an accident should look something like this

00:41:55.960 or like this or like this in fact had the pentagon been hit by a 757 the two engines would have

00:42:05.000 impacted the facade around these two points just below the wings this means they would have

00:42:09.960 proceeded inside the building on a path somewhat parallel to the fuselage carving a trail of

00:42:15.080 destruction much more devastating than any other part of the plane

00:42:18.360 but there are no engines visible outside the exit hole nor are there any other holes in the wall

00:42:34.280 that could have been caused by an engine question can you explain what happened to the core of the two

00:42:41.320 engines which is built with components so strong and resistant to be considered practically indestructible

00:42:46.840 i mean that is a good question where the hell are those goddamn engine parts man

00:42:52.520 now for the biggest mystery of all the exit hole according to the official version it was the fuselage

00:42:58.120 of the plane that created this hole in the wall of the c-ring on september 15 2001 the pentagon

00:43:04.040 renovation manager stated the plane penetrated through the e-ring d-ring c-ring the nose of the plane

00:43:10.120 just barely broke through the inside of the c-ring so it was extending into ae drive a little bit

00:43:16.280 the ae drive is the internal alley separating the c-ring from the b-ring but how could the fuselage

00:43:21.960 have made it all the way through the wall of the c-ring

00:43:24.520 the fuselage have made it all the way through the wall of the c-ring

00:43:28.520 if the fuselage is only a cylinder and it gets cut and ground by the columns in a thousand pieces how can it

00:43:52.200 retain the circular shape needed to punch this almost perfectly round hole in the wall this is

00:43:57.560 where the explanations by the debunkers become absolutely fascinating the mass of the plane

00:44:02.760 penetrated the building with enormous energy and continued into the building in a state almost more

00:44:08.120 like a liquid than a solid then encountered reinforced concrete columns two feet thick

00:44:14.440 so the aircraft was flying through a forest of columns the plane became almost like an artillery

00:44:21.000 shell or a tank ground what actually came out it was a circular ball of fire which is how fire goes

00:44:26.680 that's why it has a perfectly round shape by this time there was an avalanche of debris that was

00:44:32.760 moving as a single mass much as in an avalanche of snow whether it was a liquid mass a ball of fire

00:44:40.040 or an avalanche of snow all these hypotheses are flatly contradicted by the pentagon building

00:44:45.240 performance report a document published in 2003 by the american society of civil engineers

00:44:51.640 in a set oh here we go oh seeing the condition of the columns on the first floor the report reads

00:44:58.360 columns 3g 3h 3j and 5j were damaged but still standing although in the direct path of the fuselage

00:45:06.440 it is highly unlikely that any significant portion of the fuselage could have retained structural

00:45:11.240 integrity at this point in its travel the aircraft frame most certainly was destroyed before it had

00:45:16.440 traveled the distance that approximately equaled the length of the aircraft the length of the aircraft

00:45:21.320 is 155 feet which is roughly half the distance between the entry and the exit holes that no substantial

00:45:27.720 part of the fuselage reached the wall of the c ring was also confirmed by the first eyewitnesses

00:45:32.600 who described the damage inside the pentagon the plane went in up to the e d and to the c ring

00:45:40.840 not all the way through the c ring question given that according to the pentagon building performance

00:45:46.200 report the aircraft frame most certainly was destroyed before it had traveled the distance that

00:45:51.160 approximately equal the length of the aircraft and that it is highly unlikely that any significant

00:45:56.600 portion of the fuselage could have retained structural integrity from that point on can you explain what

00:46:01.960 caused the almost perfectly round exit hole in the outer wall of the c ring in conclusion we have an

00:46:09.400 opening on the first floor that's a bit more than half the projected wingspan of a 757 the tip of the

00:46:15.640 left wing and most of the right wing missing without a valid explanation the horizontal stabilizers and the

00:46:21.800 tail also missing without a valid explanation a fuselage that behaved more like a warhead than an empty

00:46:27.880 cylinder made with aluminum no trace whatsoever of the core of the two engines and an exit hole on

00:46:33.960 the c ring that no one can rationally explain given all these facts we must conclude that the damage

00:46:39.960 observed at the pentagon is not compatible with and must have been created by something other than a

00:46:44.840 boeing 757. the mystery of what hit the pentagon could have been easily solved if the fbi had released

00:46:53.240 the videos from dozens of surveillance cameras that are placed all around the impact zone yeah there were

00:46:59.000 a lot of cameras around the pentagon if you look at the pentagon you can see that there's cameras on each

00:47:04.760 corner there's cameras at some of the businesses around the pentagon and we know in those cases the tapes

00:47:10.760 were confiscated immediately by the fbi within hours of the event when a freedom of information act

00:47:16.200 requesting all the videos covering the impact zone was filed the fbi agent in charge of the tapes

00:47:21.640 responded the fbi possessed 85 videotapes that might be potentially responsive to plaintiffs foia request

00:47:30.040 but concluded the agent i determined that only one videotape showed the impact of flight 77 into the

00:47:36.040 pentagon on september 11 2001. this is the tape we have all seen many many times the fbi could have

00:47:44.040 released all the videos anyway just to allow the public to see by themselves what was actually shown

00:47:49.560 in each of them but for some reason they preferred to keep them under wraps i've filmed before down at

00:47:55.400 the pentagon before 9 11 there's got to be at least 100 video cameras bringing that building in the trees

00:48:02.280 everywhere they've got that plane coming in with 100 angles i want to see the video i want to see 100

00:48:10.040 videos that exist of this why don't they want us to see that plane coming into the building

00:48:18.840 not only has this question never been answered but an in-depth analysis of the only footage of the impact

00:48:24.120 ever released contains a dramatic surprise initially the dod released these five frames taken from a

00:48:30.600 pentagon parking security camera later on this gets very interesting as well guys pay attention

00:48:37.000 because you might miss it but there is uh they're going to do some pretty serious uh work in this one

00:48:42.120 this park on in 2006 the dod released the entire sequence from which the five frames had been extracted

00:48:49.400 the time-lapse sequence runs at approximately one frame per second and it shows the moments leading up to

00:48:54.360 the impact the large explosion and a billowing fire that ensued unfortunately the video does not show

00:49:01.640 the airplane in transit all we can see in the frame preceding the explosion is what appears to be the

00:49:07.560 tail of an airplane followed by a trail of white smoke but the body of the plane remains covered by this

00:49:13.800 concrete column standing in the foreground the department of defense also released a second video

00:49:19.640 taken by a different camera from the same parking lot the second camera was actually located in the

00:49:25.480 very column that obscured the view of the plane in the first video this aerial shot of the pentagon

00:49:30.920 shows the actual location of the two cameras the second camera faces in the same direction as the first

00:49:36.840 and it offers a clear unobstructed view of the same field of action by using the moment of the explosion

00:49:43.160 we can synchronize the two cameras with absolute frame by frame accuracy

00:49:50.680 by synchronizing the two cameras we notice that the second video begins earlier than the first

00:49:55.480 while the first lasts longer than the second this leaves us with a middle comment section of about 100

00:50:01.880 frames which are perfectly synchronized with each other from the moment the police car moves on the

00:50:07.080 action proceeds in an identical manner both in the frames preceding the explosion

00:50:12.040 and in those following the explosion especially in the second part of the videos after the explosion

00:50:17.560 we can verify how each couple of frames depicts exactly the same action by looking at the shape

00:50:22.840 of the billowing smoke

00:50:27.400 this confirms that the two cameras were operating in perfect synchronization

00:50:33.480 this is only to be expected after all the two cameras were controlled by a centralized recording

00:50:38.600 system called multiplexer or tlr there is however one pair of frames from the two videos that shows

00:50:45.960 a completely different action from one another they happen to be the two frames in which the plane travels

00:50:51.640 across the lawn it's frame 23 in the relative count as the first video showed the tail and the trail of

00:50:59.560 smoke we would expect the second camera placed in this concrete column to show the entire body of the plane

00:51:05.400 in the same position it does not in the corresponding frame camera two shows only the tip of the plane

00:51:13.080 entering frame from the right hand corner but how can the nose of the plane be behind the tail at the

00:51:19.800 same moment in time the synchronization system allows for a maximum fluctuation between the two cameras

00:51:25.960 or margin of error of 1 30th of a second given that the plane is traveling at 750 feet per second the

00:51:33.480 maximum possible fluctuation between the two cameras would translate into a difference of a mere 25 feet

00:51:39.320 in the position of the plane a 757 is 155 feet long even calculating the perspective due to the diagonal

00:51:47.240 path this is far from sufficient to explain the large discrepancy between the two images

00:51:52.360 furthermore after this moment the two videos resume their perfect synchronization

00:51:56.440 which is maintained all the way to the end

00:52:01.560 why these two crucial frames and only these two are so different from one another has puzzled

00:52:07.160 researchers and digital experts alike the same digital expert who had prepared the universal image

00:52:12.440 from the pentagon has also conducted an in-depth technical analysis of the two videos released by the

00:52:17.640 department of defense after confirming that the two cameras were synchronized by the same multiplexer

00:52:23.000 system this expert has compiled a table comparing the contents of each pair of frames as one can see

00:52:29.240 frame 23 is the only one showing a strong inconsistency between the two images the expert has then proceeded

00:52:36.200 to analyze the two frames with the most sophisticated digital tools and has obtained some astonishing results

00:52:43.160 a series of boolean subtractions reveals that a small part of the image is actually present in both

00:52:48.840 frames what is said to be the nose of the airplane in camera 2 is also present as part of the smoke trail

00:52:55.240 in camera 1 it seems in fact as if someone has retouched this area of the frame by means of cut and paste

00:53:03.080 in order to cover the plane while he has kept the end of the smoke trail to make it look like the nose of the plane

00:53:09.160 entering frame question given that the maximum fluctuation between the two cameras would

00:53:15.400 translate in a difference of 25 feet in the position of the plane can you provide a valid

00:53:20.200 explanation for the large discrepancy between the two corresponding frames oh lee oh oh absent a valid

00:53:28.440 explanation for this discrepancy we must conclude that at least one of the two frames is the result of

00:53:33.720 intentional manipulation or photoshopping if we now summarize the situation at the pentagon we have

00:53:42.360 the total lack of evidence that the unknown incoming was in fact flight 77 a mysterious phantom plane that

00:53:48.680 attracted the attention in the opposite direction the failure from the white house to shoot down the

00:53:53.320 incoming even though it posed a serious and imminent threat a totally illogical approach maneuver from a

00:53:58.920 terrorist's point of view an alleged hijacker incapable of performing that maneuver the absence of any

00:54:04.920 significant part of the plane from the wreckage a damage to the building clearly incompatible with a

00:54:10.120 757 a doctored tape of the impact and the obvious reluctance by the fbi to release any other tape that

00:54:17.160 could allow the identification of the plane all right now we're going to get into uh flight 93 um you

00:54:29.000 guys can see man they're making some compelling arguments here um you know i'm just sitting back

00:54:32.840 watching and i'm sure you guys are probably like mind blown like what the hell is going on here but uh

00:54:37.880 let's keep going the whole issue of flight 93 basically boils down to one question if you just happened to

00:54:46.040 drive by and someone told you that a boeing 757 has just crashed into this hole and most of the 100 ton

00:54:52.360 airliner is now buried under the ground would you believe it or not this is the kind of

00:54:57.640 puzzlement the people from shanksville experienced when they arrived on the crash site of flight 93

00:55:02.280 we drove back that road and where the road ended that's where the plane was and i mean you know

00:55:06.600 the only thing i could tell you know i get out you know like i said i heard this thing you know i felt the explosion

00:55:11.240 and saw the fireball and i'm and i get up there and i'm thinking where is it you know just debris

00:55:16.120 pieces small pieces of debris and the trees were singed and burning it's just moldering nothing it was

00:55:22.600 just little pieces there was nothing to actually like a door or a window or anything you can't really

00:55:27.880 it was just little pieces of shrapnel everywhere what's that right there over in here tv reporters

00:55:34.760 were also at a loss when faced with the idea that an actual plane had just crashed on that site

00:55:39.880 you know at first i wasn't even sure that this was uh that these were pieces of the plane they're so

00:55:45.160 small um and it's indistinguishable you can't tell whether it's a piece of the fuselage or

00:55:52.920 a piece of the seats you don't know what it is chris knicky he's a photographer he was back there

00:55:57.880 just a couple of minutes ago and chris i've seen the pictures it looks like there's nothing there

00:56:02.760 except for a hole in the ground uh basically that's right from where we could see there wasn't

00:56:06.680 much left any large pieces of debris at all no there was nothing nothing that you could distinguish

00:56:11.720 that a plane had crashed there it's really all you see is a large crater in the ground and and just tiny

00:56:17.080 tiny bits of debris alert also went out to somerset county coroner wallace miller he hurried to the

00:56:22.920 scene an abandoned strip mine when he arrived he couldn't believe his eyes it looked like someone

00:56:29.000 gouged about a 10 foot wide 10 foot deep trot through the strip mine but when you looked in

00:56:36.920 it was just covered with dirt there was nothing there that you could really say it was an airplane

00:56:40.440 dennis roddy was the editor-in-chief of the pittsburgh gazette airplane debris

00:56:45.640 nothing i could identify possibly the most disconcerted of all was the mayor of shanksville

00:56:50.520 early stool yes my husband and a good friend of mine were the first here this one and in shanksville

00:56:59.400 in the square next hexbourg one Lucas�� 191 in shank landings star crashing down there and they were the first

00:57:03.720 yeah their wagon stand right there they were the first and so they were the PRI opiné here then came

00:57:07.240 erst the fire bziękuję but everybody stared for the mouth out there was a boredom tourists

00:57:15.240 And there's no airplane.

00:57:22.240 No airplane.

00:57:27.240 They were sent to the police station and there was no plane?

00:57:31.240 No, there was nothing.

00:57:33.240 Just this hole.

00:57:37.240 This is it.

00:57:39.240 I always thought that was the right side of it.

00:57:42.240 Yes.

00:57:43.240 But there's nothing to see.

00:57:45.240 It's in that hole, says the FBI, that most of the airplane lays literally buried in the ground.

00:57:51.240 Much of the plane and its contents were found beneath the soft dirt, states the FBI's website.

00:57:56.240 Evidence technicians found the flight data recorder about 12 feet below the surface

00:58:01.240 and the cockpit voice recorder about 25 feet deep.

00:58:04.240 Since the two black boxes are located in the tail of the plane,

00:58:08.240 one must conclude that also the cockpit, most of the fuselage, the passengers' seats and bodies and their belongings somehow managed to get buried deep underground.

00:58:18.240 The only ones who don't seem to have a problem with this explanation are the debunkers.

00:58:22.240 We had this idea that when planes crash, they crack in half and there's this dramatic burn wreckage.

00:58:28.240 That's what happens when planes crash at very low speeds, usually on approach or takeoff from an airport.

00:58:34.240 This plane was flying straight down.

00:58:36.240 It was approaching the speed of sound.

00:58:38.240 It would have if it had gone much farther.

00:58:40.240 And it penetrated into soft ground with incredible velocity.

00:58:45.240 But here, the crash was different.

00:58:47.240 The plane was almost vertical when it crashed at a very high speed.

00:58:51.240 The plane breaks almost in the ground, produces a small crater.

00:58:55.240 And what remains remains is almost all in the ground.

00:59:00.240 First of all, it isn't true that the plane hit the ground almost vertically.

00:59:04.240 According to the NTSB flight path, the 757 hit the ground at an angle of about 45 degrees.

00:59:11.240 This fact alone removes much of the exceptionality the debunkers would like to attach to this crash.

00:59:18.240 But even if it were true that the plane fell almost vertically,

00:59:21.240 how could the hole have closed itself up even before the first responders arrived?

00:59:26.240 This is not mud.

00:59:27.240 This is your typical hard country soil.

00:59:30.240 When a plane crashes and makes a hole in the ground, the hole remains open and quite visible from above.

00:59:36.240 This, for example, is the crater caused by flight Pan Am 103 when it crashed in Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988.

00:59:43.240 It's true that the 747, the plane that crashed in Lockerbie, is larger than a 757.

00:59:48.240 But it's also true that the Pan Am flight broke up in mid-air due to an explosion

00:59:52.240 and that only part of the plane caused the crater seen in the photographs.

00:59:56.240 Let's compare the size of the Lockerbie crater several blocks wide with the one in Shanksville several feet wide.

01:00:03.240 This is the size of a human being next to the Lockerbie crater.

01:00:07.240 This is the size of a human being next to the Shanksville crater.

01:00:11.240 These are people looking down into the Lockerbie crater.

01:00:14.240 These are people standing by the Shanksville crater after the accident.

01:00:18.240 Compare the size of a car with the Lockerbie crater and the size of a small truck with the crater in Shanksville.

01:00:25.240 This is the largest chunk of the Pan Am flight that was found near Lockerbie.

01:00:29.240 It's almost half the front part of the fuselage and includes part of the cockpit.

01:00:33.240 This is the largest piece of debris we have ever seen from Shanksville.

01:00:37.240 It's a piece of fuselage a bit wider than two passenger windows in a picture released five years after the event.

01:00:44.240 This is an engine from Pan Am flight 103 which plunged to the ground at a location near Lockerbie.

01:00:50.240 This we are told is an engine from flight 93 which was supposedly excavated from the hole in Shanksville.

01:00:56.240 These are images from different crashes showing that the tail of the plane almost always survives.

01:01:01.240 It does so because it's normally the last part of the plane impacting the terrain

01:01:05.240 when most of the kinetic energy has already been dissipated to the ground.

01:01:09.240 This is the mark on the ground that was supposedly left by the tail of flight 93 before it vanished into thin air.

01:01:16.240 These are the chunks of the wings that are normally found after a plane crash.

01:01:20.240 These are the marks that the wings of the plane allegedly left on the ground in Shanksville

01:01:25.240 before vanishing with everything else into thin air.

01:01:28.240 And this is the center of the hole which is supposed to have swallowed practically the whole fuselage.

01:01:34.240 But this is where the official story of the crash becomes truly fascinating.

01:01:38.240 According to the FBI after two weeks of excavation in Shanksville 95% of the plane had been recovered.

01:01:45.240 A Boeing 756

01:01:47.240 Oh shit.

01:01:48.240 Oh shit.

01:01:49.240 They got 95% of the plane.

01:01:50.240 Let's see what they found.

01:01:51.240 Seven weighs roughly 100 tons.

01:01:54.240 A mid-sized car weighs about 2,500 pounds, a ton and a half.

01:01:58.240 This means that, according to the FBI, the equivalent of at least 50 to 60 cars was actually excavated from the ground.

01:02:07.240 Question.

01:02:08.240 Can you explain how most of an airplane weighing 100 tons could end up buried deep underground

01:02:13.240 in a hole that closed itself up before the first responders arrived?

01:02:17.240 But even if it were true that 95% of the plane has been recovered, where is it?

01:02:23.240 Why have we never been shown it?

01:02:25.240 When a controversial accident happens, all efforts are made to recover as many pieces of the plane as possible.

01:02:32.240 These, for example, are the remains of the flight from Lockerbie, which have been pieced together in a hangar.

01:02:38.240 These are the remains of TWA 800, the flight that crashed in the ocean near Long Island in July 1996.

01:02:45.240 These are the remains of flight Itavia 870, which crashed in unclear circumstances near Ustica, Italy in 1980.

01:02:53.240 Why wasn't the same thing done with United 93?

01:02:57.240 Given the controversy on the absence of debris coupled with the rumors of a possible shoot-down,

01:03:02.240 it would have been the perfect way to put all the conspiracy theories to rest.

01:03:06.240 Instead, we are told, all the recovered parts of the plane have been sequestered by the FBI,

01:03:11.240 and no one has ever been able to see them.

01:03:14.240 As far as we know, Flight 93 might have never crashed in Shanksville to begin with.

01:03:21.240 There is another problem for those who support the official version.

01:03:24.240 When an airplane crashes to the ground, normally a plume of thick black smoke rises to the sky

01:03:30.240 and continues to burn until all the fuel is consumed.

01:03:34.240 But instead of being faced by something like that, this is what the people in Shanksville saw.

01:03:39.240 It looked like a mushroom cloud, he said. But under the cloud there is no plume of black smoke rising to the sky.

01:03:52.240 And the mushroom shape is the classic result of a bomb explosion.

01:03:56.240 The same local reporter also noticed the absence of smell from burnt jet fuel and the odor of scorched earth instead.

01:04:03.240 The grass next to the hole also indicates there was no fire after the explosion, as it appears perfectly dry and untouched all around.

01:04:16.240 Some have suggested that this is only the initial explosion and that the plume of black smoke hasn't started to rise yet.

01:04:32.240 But this hypothesis is disproven by this video, taken by a local amateur shortly after the explosion took place.

01:04:39.240 Crash over on Lammersville Road.

01:04:42.240 As one can see, the initial cloud floats in the air, but the typical plume of black smoke rising from below is not there.

01:04:48.240 I don't know anything more.

01:04:50.240 If we fast forward the video, we can see that the situation doesn't change much.

01:04:54.240 After more than one minute, the initial cloud is still there, but there is no black smoke whatsoever rising from below.

01:05:00.240 Question. Since the plane was carrying eight to ten thousand gallons of fuel at the time of impact,

01:05:06.240 can you explain why there is no plume of black smoke rising from the ground after the initial explosion?

01:05:12.240 But the toughest problem for the supporters of the official version is to explain how different parts of debris

01:05:18.240 could end up several miles away from the crash site, even though the plane is supposed to have hit the ground in one piece.

01:05:24.240 William Bunch was a reporter for the Pittsburgh Gazette.

01:05:27.240 I gathered all the information I could and, you know, quickly learned that there were a lot of things about the crash of Flight 93.

01:05:35.240 That didn't really add up right away. The fact that debris fell on this lake a couple miles away at the same time that the plane was crashing.

01:05:43.240 The lake Bunch is talking about is Indian Lake, which is located a couple of miles southeast of the crash site.

01:05:49.240 According to the debunkers, there is a valid explanation for the debris found in the lake.

01:05:53.240 First of all, it's not true that there was wind on that day. As the images show, there was only a light breeze gently moving the air all around.

01:06:13.240 The very cloud from the explosion, as we have seen before, practically didn't move for over one minute.

01:06:19.240 Secondly, it wasn't just small pieces of paper that were found.

01:06:23.240 From the Pittsburgh Tribune, we read,

01:06:25.240 By Wednesday morning, crash debris began washing ashore at the marina.

01:06:29.240 Witness John Flegel said there was something that looked like a rib bone amid pieces of seats, small chunks of melted plastic and checks.

01:06:37.240 In any case, the problem is not limited to Indian Lake, which is two miles away from the crash site.

01:06:43.240 Debris from the plane was found as far as eight miles away near New Baltimore.

01:06:47.240 Wow. Holy.

01:06:49.240 This is the map of the debris field published by the Pittsburgh Tribune.

01:06:54.240 CNN also reported the secondary field, confirming that the debris belonged to Flight 93.

01:07:00.240 Well, Darren, in the last hour or so, the FBI and the state police here have confirmed that they have cordoned off a second area

01:07:06.240 about six to eight miles away from the crater here where this plane went down.

01:07:10.240 This is apparently another debris site, which raises a number of questions.

01:07:15.240 Why would debris from the plane, and they identified it specifically as being from this plane,

01:07:19.240 why would debris be located six miles away?

01:07:21.240 Could it have blown that far away? Seems highly unlikely.

01:07:24.240 And as to whether it broke up on the way, we don't know that.

01:07:27.240 FBI is being very tight-lipped about that.

01:07:29.240 But again, it leads to that possibility.

01:07:31.240 It certainly leads to a number of questions.

01:07:33.240 Since the plane is supposed to have hit the ground in one piece,

01:07:36.240 can you explain how it was possible for debris to be found six to eight miles from the crash site

01:07:42.240 on a day when only a light breeze was blowing?

01:07:46.240 The extension of the debris field is not the only fact suggesting a shoot-down.

01:07:50.240 There are other elements that seem to confirm it.

01:07:53.240 I'm standing there watching on TV, and the lights flickered in the building.

01:07:56.240 About that time, we heard the engines roar, and we took off out of the building.

01:08:01.240 As we were coming up from the office out through the building, the ground shook, and we heard a big boom.

01:08:08.240 Looked over and saw the big ball of fire.

01:08:10.240 Fleagle later told other people about the lights flickering.

01:08:13.240 I was in Atlanta, and I was sitting there talking to another guy, and I was explaining to him

01:08:19.240 about whenever we were standing in the office and the lights flickered and everything.

01:08:22.240 And as soon as he heard me say that, he immediately stopped me and he said,

01:08:26.240 I'm retired from the Air Force.

01:08:28.240 He said, that plane was shot down.

01:08:30.240 And I said, why?

01:08:32.240 And he said, because whenever the lights flickered, they zapped the radar frequency on everything before they shoot.

01:08:40.240 The mayor of Indian Lake also remembers the power going off just before the crash.

01:08:44.240 Our power had gone off, and then we felt a tremor.

01:08:48.240 It sounded like a missile came across our house.

01:08:51.240 I mean, they were going that fast.

01:08:53.240 The mayor of Shanksville had something interesting to say.

01:08:56.240 I know of two people, I will not mention names, that heard a missile, Stuhl said.

01:09:01.240 They both live very close, within a couple of hundred yards.

01:09:04.240 This one fellow served in Vietnam, and he says he's heard them.

01:09:07.240 And he heard one that day.

01:09:09.240 But who could have possibly shot the plane down?

01:09:13.240 As far as we know, there are no witnesses who saw fighter jets near Flight 93 at the time of the crash.

01:09:19.240 And if you guys want more details on fighter jets, you guys got to watch the first episode where we discussed that in more detail as far as like there were only four jets covering the whole eastern seaboard on that day.

01:09:30.240 And a bunch of other planes were doing exercises, you know, which was strange.

01:09:35.240 And on top of that, the threat level had been reduced the day prior.

01:09:38.240 So there's a bunch of strange coincidences on that day, and it goes into more detail on the first part of the 9-11 conspiracy pod.

01:09:46.240 So go ahead and check that one out, guys.

01:09:49.240 There are, however, some witnesses who saw a small unmarked white plane which flew over the area just before the crash.

01:09:56.240 I was just driving along here.

01:09:57.240 It was a beautiful day.

01:09:58.240 I had my window open.

01:10:00.240 I had this stereo on.

01:10:03.240 And when I got up here almost to the stop sign, this small white plane at the time, that's what I thought it was, went over top of me.

01:10:13.240 It was so smooth, and it just glided right over me just like that.

01:10:18.240 And then I ducked, and when I looked up again, then it just banked to the right and went over and went down behind those trees.

01:10:25.240 Something caught my eye, and here was a white plane, and it was coming from the crash site area.

01:10:33.240 The debunkers maintain that there is no mystery behind the white plane.

01:10:37.240 It was a corporate jet, they say, which air traffic controllers had asked to take a look on the ground after they realized they had lost Flight 93.

01:10:45.240 There was, in fact, a little white jet that was seen in the area after Flight 93 crashed.

01:10:49.240 A number of witnesses saw it.

01:10:50.240 It was a little Dassault Falcon corporate jet that was flying to a nearby airport.

01:10:54.240 And what happened is, once air traffic control knew they had lost Flight 93, they asked the nearest aircraft to go over the area and actually radio back exact coordinates for the crash site.

01:11:03.240 Susan McElwain, however, remembers seeing the white plane before the crash, not after.

01:11:08.240 About 11.30 that night, the FBI came, wanted to talk to me.

01:11:13.240 They kept asking me how big the plane was.

01:11:15.240 I said the plane, you know, it was small, wasn't much bigger than my van that I saw, and that it went over top of me.

01:11:22.240 I said, you want to make sure that maybe it was ours and not somebody else's.

01:11:25.240 And then that's when he did seem to get a little nicer, told me that it was a white Learjet.

01:11:31.240 Someone was taking pictures.

01:11:33.240 I said, before the crash.

01:11:35.240 And he says, well, we got to go.

01:11:37.240 John Flegel also saw the mysterious plane.

01:11:40.240 Since Flegel arrived on the spot within a minute from the crash, the corporate jet sent by the air traffic controllers would not have had time to descend over the area yet, while the mystery plane was already getting away from the spot into the blue sky.

01:11:52.240 We got there, like I said, probably within 45 seconds or a minute of impact.

01:11:59.240 We were there.

01:12:00.240 We were there before any firemen, any paramedics or anybody.

01:12:03.240 We were on site.

01:12:04.240 When we got there, there was a plane flying up above.

01:12:08.240 And he was smart.

01:12:10.240 He flew straight for the sun.

01:12:12.240 So you couldn't look at it and see exactly what type of plane or if it was a fighter or what it was.

01:12:18.240 But, you know, we caught a glimpse of it.

01:12:20.240 And as he was swinging, he was basically traveling in the same direction as the plane.

01:12:26.240 If the plane was actually shot down, one big question arises.

01:12:31.240 What are we to make of the heroic gesture by the passengers who chose to force the plane to the ground, we are told, in order to save the lives of other fellow countrymen?

01:12:39.240 In truth, this heroic gesture by the passengers has been refuted by the 9-11 Commission itself.

01:12:45.240 It was the hijackers wrote the commission and not the passengers who chose to intentionally crash the plane in Shanksville.

01:12:51.240 The passengers never even made it into the cockpit.

01:12:54.240 From the final report, we read,

01:12:56.240 At 9-57, the passenger assault began.

01:12:59.240 But for more than five minutes, writes the commission, the passengers were unable to break into the cockpit.

01:13:05.240 After a while, as the outside attack continued, Jara asked,

01:13:09.240 Is that it? Shall we finish it off?

01:13:11.240 A hijacker responded, No, not yet.

01:13:14.240 When they all come, we finish it off.

01:13:16.240 It should be noted that this dialogue was allegedly extracted from the cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93.

01:13:22.240 But the actual recording, as we have said before, was never played in public.

01:13:27.240 Yeah, basically they had the black box, but they didn't want to release it, which is also strange.

01:13:33.240 Again, we covered that at the end of the last episode, guys, if you want more details on that.

01:13:36.240 And they weren't able to recover the black box on any of the other planes either.

01:13:40.240 To a hijacker said, Pull it down, pull it down.

01:13:43.240 The hijackers remained at the controls, but must have judged that the passengers were only seconds from overcoming them.

01:13:49.240 The airplane headed down. The control wheel was turned hard to the right.

01:13:53.240 The airplane rolled onto its back, and one of the hijackers began shouting, Allah is the greatest. Allah is the greatest.

01:14:00.240 With the sound of the passenger counterattack continuing, the aircraft...

01:14:03.240 They're saying this.

01:14:04.240 Allahu Akbar!

01:14:06.240 ...plowed into an empty field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania at 580 miles per hour, about 20 minutes flight time from Washington, D.C.

01:14:14.240 Jarrah's objective, concludes the commission, was to crash the airliner into symbols of the American Republic, the Capitol, or the White House.

01:14:22.240 Given that they were only 20 minutes away from Washington, and for almost six minutes the passengers had been unable to enter the cockpit,

01:14:29.240 why didn't the hijackers continue flying towards the Capitol?

01:14:32.240 And even if they thought they couldn't make it to Washington, why didn't they try to crash the plane onto a small town nearby?

01:14:38.240 Why crash the plane in an empty field where they knew they could not kill any more victims than those that were already on the plane with them?

01:14:47.240 Maybe a less fictional explanation for Flight 93 is the one offered by Vernon Gross, author and former NTSB investigator.

01:14:54.240 The role the government plays in times of stress, how they view the public.

01:15:00.240 Can the public stand the truth? Or shouldn't we... We need a legend at this point.

01:15:06.240 We need a really neat story of reacting against such a dastardly act as was happening.

01:15:12.240 So it's really nice and convenient to think of the Beamer story, let's roll.

01:15:17.240 And that becomes just like the Alamo.

01:15:21.240 And it's just one of those legends.

01:15:23.240 And I think there'll be a lot of pressure to let the legend stay where it is.

01:15:31.240 If we now summarize Flight 93, we have no proof whatsoever that the terrorists...

01:15:36.240 All right, guys. So they're summarizing now this portion. Pay attention.

01:15:39.240 They made some really good arguments here. Let's go through it.

01:15:42.240 Terrorists boarded the plane, nor that they were ever in the cockpit.

01:15:46.240 An alleged hijacker who could not have flown an airliner in the way that Flight 93 was flown.

01:15:51.240 A false, concurrent hijacking that called the attention away from the real one.

01:15:56.240 No proof whatsoever that Flight 93 crashed in the field near Shanksville.

01:16:00.240 An extended debris field which flatly disproves the official version of the crash and suggests that the plane broke up in midair instead.

01:16:07.240 An unexplained small white jet leaving the area right after the impact.

01:16:12.240 And the fact that the passengers who called from their cell phones could not have been on that plane to begin with,

01:16:17.240 which strongly suggests their revolt was a scripted fictional event intended to fuel a prefabricated legend.

01:16:24.240 All right. So now we get into the Twin Towers. This is some pretty crazy stuff here, guys.

01:16:37.240 With insurance policies and who purchased it and the best this. So, yeah, let's do it.

01:16:43.240 Lore Los L This is tiny.

01:16:56.240 There's a bigger picture of the redgrade has. 0.73

01:17:00.240 Now we're looking at the pattern towards the human is designed to deliver nothing.

01:17:09.240 I don't have time.

01:17:21.080 I'm on the 83th floor.

01:17:22.240 What?

01:17:23.240 I'm on the 83th floor.

01:17:24.240 I'm on the 83th floor.

01:17:25.240 I'm on the 86th floor.

01:17:26.240 I'm on the 86th floor.

01:17:27.240 I'm on the 86th floor.

01:17:28.240 I'm on the 86th floor.

01:17:29.240 I'm on the 86th floor.

01:17:30.240 I'm on the 86th floor.

01:17:31.240 Are they going to be able to get somebody up here?

01:17:32.240 Of course, man.

01:17:33.240 We're coming up to you.

01:17:34.240 Do this in this office.

01:17:35.240 We're not ready to die, but it's getting bad.

01:17:37.240 There's no one here yet, and the floor is completely engulfed.

01:17:39.240 We're on the floor, and we can't breathe.

01:17:41.240 No fire for now, and no smoke, right?

01:17:44.240 Of course, there's smoke.

01:17:46.240 Where are you?

01:17:47.240 That's where you guys up to.

01:17:48.240 We're getting there.

01:17:49.240 We're getting there.

01:17:50.240 There's a few out there, and I just wanted to.

01:17:51.240 It's very hot.

01:17:52.240 I don't see any air anymore.

01:17:54.240 Okay.

01:17:55.240 All I see is smoke.

01:17:56.240 Smoke rises.

01:17:57.240 We're on the floor.

01:17:58.240 We're in the window.

01:18:00.240 Can you stay on the line with you, please?

01:18:02.240 Yes, ma'am.

01:18:03.240 I'm going to die, aren't I?

01:18:04.240 No, no, no, no, no, no.

01:18:05.240 I'm going to die.

01:18:06.240 All right, ma'am, ma'am, ma'am, say your prayers.

01:18:08.240 Give God to blow your hands on the left.

01:18:10.240 Help! 0.98

01:18:11.240 Help! 0.98

01:18:12.240 Okay.

01:18:13.240 Help! 0.98

01:18:14.240 What the hell happened?

01:18:16.240 Oh, my God.

01:18:17.240 Oh, God!

01:18:36.240 For most Americans, the destruction of the Twin Towers will remain embedded in their memories

01:18:49.240 and their hearts as the epitome of horror, astonishment, and unjustified human suffering.

01:18:55.240 But for some, it may have represented the moment where large corporate interests of global reach

01:19:08.240 and cynical economic greed found the perfect place for a secret encounter.

01:19:13.240 Common wisdom has it that the September 11 attacks destroyed two of the best jewels America has ever had.

01:19:23.240 But exactly jewels, the Twin Towers, were not.

01:19:26.240 While they sat on some of the most valuable real estate in the world, after 30 years, the Twin Towers had become obsolete.

01:19:32.240 With each of the floors built as an open space of almost one acre in size, the rising cost of energy had made it extremely expensive to keep the buildings warm in winter and cool in summer.

01:19:43.240 General maintenance was also very expensive compared to buildings from more recent years.

01:19:48.240 In his 1999 book on the Twin Towers, Divided We Stand, author Eric Darden wrote,

01:19:54.240 When the World Trade Center was bombed in February 1993, it was already passing its prime as office space, overtaken by a generation of more recent... 0.98

01:20:02.240 Which recovered the 93 World Trade Center bombings, guys, on another episode.

01:20:06.240 Make sure to check that one out.

01:20:08.240 Honestly, I'm probably going to make a whole 9-11 playlist for y'all on the FEDA channel, just so that you guys understand everything and how it made sense.

01:20:14.240 Because the people that planned the 9-11 attacks, Ramzi Youssef, his uncle, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he was the one that actually planned the 9-11 attacks, 0.69

01:20:23.240 but he was the uncle of the guy that had tried back in 93 and failed, who's in prison now.

01:20:29.240 So, yeah, man, if you guys want more info, make sure to go check out that pod where we go into detail about the 93 World Trade Center bombings,

01:20:35.240 where they did that one with a rental truck with explosives in the parking garage.

01:20:40.240 ...cybernetically smart buildings with higher ceilings and greater built-in electrical capacity.

01:20:45.240 To maintain the Trade Center as Class A office space commanding top rents,

01:20:49.240 the Port Authority would have had to spend $800 million rebuilding its electrical, electronic communications, and cooling systems.

01:20:56.240 Furthermore, after the 1993 bombing, the tendency had dropped dramatically, and it had been very hard to bring it back to normal levels.

01:21:05.240 But the biggest problem with the Twin Towers was the large amount of asbestos they contained.

01:21:10.240 Built in a time when the use of asbestos was still allowed in civil construction,

01:21:14.240 at least 400 tons of this extremely dangerous material had been used to fireproof the steel structure of the buildings

01:21:20.240 and to insulate hundreds of miles of pipings for water, heating, and air conditioning.

01:21:26.240 Asbestos was also present in the ceiling panels, the elevator shafts, and the vinyl tiles from office floors.

01:21:33.240 From a property condition assessment of the Twin Towers dated December 2000, we read,

01:21:38.240 According to Port Authority records, a total of 7 million square feet of vinyl asbestos floor tiles were installed in the World Trade Center.

01:21:46.240 By the time asbestos was banned from civil construction, the Twin Towers were nearing their completion.

01:21:51.240 Initially, the asbestos was encapsulated wherever possible to prevent the particles from being inhaled.

01:21:57.240 But in the 1990s, the regulations grew tighter, and every time a simple renovation was needed,

01:22:02.240 the complete removal and replacement of the asbestos was also required.

01:22:07.240 At the same time, because of the health risk it posed, the cost of asbestos removal and abatement had been skyrocketing.

01:22:14.240 Safety procedures required the areas to be treated, to be vacated in advance,

01:22:19.240 hermetically sealed, and kept under negative pressure at all times to prevent particles from escaping outside.

01:22:25.240 Only specialized workers could access the area, wearing airtight suits and respirators.

01:22:30.240 A full decontamination process was required every time they left the area.

01:22:35.240 In the mid-90s, the Port Authority put out different bids for the removal and replacement of the asbestos in a case-by-case scenario.

01:22:42.240 For example, this is a 1995 contract for the installation of two low-voltage substations in Towers 1 and 2.

01:22:50.240 One section in the contract listed the replacement of asbestos at floors 41, 42, 75, and 76 in Tower 1 and floors 75 and 76 in Tower 2.

01:23:01.240 Total cost for the asbestos removal and replacement? $868,000.

01:23:06.240 Holy man!

01:23:08.240 And what I'll do is I'll go ahead and check and see real fast for you guys what that was back then,

01:23:17.240 because obviously inflation is a thing now.

01:23:20.240 So hold on, let me go ahead and open this up over here.

01:23:24.240 All right, let's get back to it while I pull this up for y'all.

01:23:27.240 Tower 2, 40th floor. Contract for asbestos removal and abatement. Total cost $650,000.

01:23:36.240 Towers 1 and 2. Removal of asbestos and new ceilings at floors 7, 41, and 75.

01:23:42.240 Total cost $882,000.

01:23:46.240 All right, so guys, that would have cost $868,000 or $860,000 back in 1995 to 2022 is worth approximately $1,681,695.01 today.

01:24:02.240 So damn near double, pretty much, guys, is what it is.

01:24:05.240 So with these numbers that they're throwing, pretty much doubling, that's what it would be in today's dollars.

01:24:10.240 So it's quite a bit of money, right?

01:24:13.240 Because let me go back here a little bit.

01:24:18.240 Make sure I had the...

01:24:21.240 This is 95.

01:24:23.240 Yeah, $650,000.

01:24:24.240 Yep.

01:24:25.240 And then $650,000 back then.

01:24:32.240 $1,271,000.

01:24:37.240 So pretty expensive, man, to be able to do this stuff.

01:24:40.240 $650,000.

01:24:42.240 Towers 1 and 2.

01:24:44.240 Removal of asbestos and new ceilings at floors 7, 41, and 75.

01:24:49.240 Total cost $882,000.

01:24:52.240 It soon became clear that the Twin Towers were quickly turning from a prestigious asset into a serious liability.

01:24:59.240 From the December...

01:25:01.240 $882,000, guys, back then was worth today $1,724,000.

01:25:06.240 It's basically $1.7 million.

01:25:09.240 $1,724,000.

01:25:11.240 In the December 2000 condition assessment, we read,

01:25:14.240 From 1986 to 1999, a total 31 contracts were bid, and a total of $58.2 million was spent in abatement projects.

01:25:24.240 By then, 3.5 million square feet of vinyl asbestos floor tile was removed.

01:25:30.240 Only half of the initial 7 million square feet installed.

01:25:34.240 At the estimated cost of $5 to $6 per square foot, that accounted for an additional $20 million in cost for the Port Authority.

01:25:42.240 And that was for the floor tiles only.

01:25:44.240 There were also hundreds of thousands of square feet of spray-on fireproofing to be removed throughout both buildings.

01:25:51.240 And then there were the elevators.

01:25:53.240 This is the list of elevator shafts with asbestos-containing material as of December 2000.

01:26:00.240 This is Tower 1.

01:26:03.240 And this is Tower 2.

01:26:06.240 Reportedly, by the year 2000, the Port Authority was looking at an asbestos abatement bill of as much as $1 billion.

01:26:13.240 The same money it would have cost to build a brand new tower.

01:26:18.240 Back in the 90s, the Port Authority had sued the insurance companies, trying to get them to cover the cost of the asbestos removal.

01:26:25.240 But in May 2001, four months before the terrorist attack, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey lost their 10-year-old court battle.

01:26:33.240 At that point, the Port Authority was between a rock and a hard place.

01:26:37.240 The Twin Towers could no longer be maintained without incurring the cost of asbestos removal,

01:26:42.240 yet they could not be demolished because of the large amounts of asbestos they contained.

01:26:46.240 The only remaining option was to dismantle and remove the two poison-filled giants one piece at a time.

01:26:52.240 But the cost of such an operation would have been so astronomical that no one has ever tried to put a number on it.

01:27:01.240 Luckily for all, the stalemate was broken when a real estate tycoon named Larry Silverstein,

01:27:06.240 who already owned Building 7, offered to purchase a 99-year lease for the Twin Towers.

01:27:11.240 76 years old, and look at him go. He walks fast, talks fast, and is always, always selling.

01:27:18.240 Silverstein seemed in a big hurry to close the deal.

01:27:21.240 Even though he had been hospitalized for a car accident during the bidding operations,

01:27:25.240 he asked his doctors to take him off.

01:27:27.240 Which, by the way, guys, just so you know, $1 billion back in 2000 is the equivalent to,

01:27:31.240 holy, $1,730,615,000 today.

01:27:38.240 So, yeah, that is wild.

01:27:41.240 So, it would be almost damn near $2 billion.

01:27:45.240 So, it would be $1 billion back then is $1.7 billion today.

01:27:49.240 The morphine, so the deal could be finalized.

01:27:52.240 So, I told the doctor, I said, kill the morphine, and I got to get my people in here,

01:27:56.240 because you can't think with morphine.

01:27:58.240 So, they let the morphine run down. The pain was terrible.

01:28:01.240 But I brought everybody together, and that's when we famed our best and final bid.

01:28:06.240 On July 24th, 2001, Larry Silverstein celebrated the acquisition of the Twin Towers with a public ceremony.

01:28:13.240 Silverstein signed the lease on the World Trade Center just six weeks before 9-11.

01:28:18.240 He then took out an insurance policy covering the Twin Towers for $3.2 billion in case of total destruction.

01:28:25.240 Silverstein then began spending every morning of the week in his new office in the North Tower.

01:28:30.240 And so, my mornings were spent at the Trade Center, and then by noon I was back uptown.

01:28:35.240 But on September 11, luckily for him, Silverstein didn't go to work.

01:28:39.240 Even though he had already scheduled a business meeting in the North Tower, he found out that his wife had made $3.2 billion back then, guys,

01:28:46.240 is the equivalent to $5,384,745,000 today.

01:28:53.240 So, my man went ahead and picked up the towers, right, and got a $1 billion insurance policy on it, or a $3.2 billion insurance policy on it, which is the equivalent to $5.3 billion today.

01:29:06.240 Wild man.

01:29:08.240 An appointment for him at the dermatologist.

01:29:10.240 The morning of September 11, Silverstein was scheduled to have breakfast at the restaurant at the top of the North Tower.

01:29:17.240 He canceled at the last minute at the insistence of his wife, Clara, who wanted him to go see his dermatologist.

01:29:23.240 That particular morning, my wife, God bless her, had made an appointment for me at the doctor.

01:29:30.240 And I said, okay, yes, dear, I'll go.

01:29:33.240 I'll go.

01:29:34.240 Everyone who was in that restaurant that morning perished.

01:29:37.240 And then, just minutes later, feed the telephone call to the television set and witnessed this horrendous circumstance.

01:29:47.240 This is how, on the evening of September 11, Larry Silverstein found himself in control of some 12 million square feet of new office space to be built on some of the most valuable real estate in the world.

01:29:58.240 And since the terrorist attacks had been two separate events, contended Silverstein, the insurance companies would have to pay him $7 billion to rebuild what he has always been calling My Three Towers.

01:30:09.240 I will spend $7 billion on My Three Towers.

01:30:13.240 Eventually, a settlement was reached for $4.5 billion, which was still one third more than the amount initially insured by Silverstein.

01:30:22.240 And since on September 11, due to the terrorist attacks, Building 7 had also been destroyed.

01:30:27.240 Silverstein received another $800 million to rebuild the skyscraper that had originally cost $400 million.

01:30:33.240 It's a much more beautiful building. It's a glass facade, allows the light to come in to the space.

01:30:38.240 The views on four sides are phenomenal, and the space looks magnificent.

01:30:42.240 In the meantime, all the asbestos from the Twin Towers has been inhaled by the citizens of downtown Manhattan.

01:30:48.240 And this is Larry Silverstein right here, by the way, guys. Just so you all know, a quick little Google search on the guy.

01:30:53.240 Larry Silverstein is an American businessman among his real estate projects.

01:30:57.240 He is the developer of the rebuilt World Trade Center complex in Lower Manhattan, New York City, as well as one of New York's tallest residential towers at 30 Park Place, where he owns a home.

01:31:07.240 He's 91 years old, born in 1931.

01:31:11.240 Yeah, this is this is the real estate tycoon here that bought the towers.

01:31:16.240 In July 2001, just two months before the terrorist attacks on 9-11, the Port Authority agreed to lease the Twin Towers to Larry Silverstein.

01:31:22.240 A New York City developer Silverstein agreed to pay the equivalent of $3.2 billion over the next 99 years.

01:31:29.240 Crazy man.

01:31:31.240 AKA that insurance policy that covers terrorist attacks.

01:31:35.240 Especially by the first responders and volunteers who worked at Ground Zero, who are now being decimated by mesothelioma and other pulmonary diseases.

01:31:43.240 In the debate over the destruction of the World Trade Center, two important organizations have played a major role.

01:31:51.240 One is NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which was officially tasked by the U.S. government.

01:31:57.240 All right, guys, NIST is going to have a very large part in this documentary from this point forward.

01:32:03.240 So pay attention to who these guys are, because a lot of the arguments that are going to come now are going to debunk findings from NIST based on how the towers collapsed.

01:32:13.240 To investigate the collapse of the three skyscrapers.

01:32:16.240 In 2005, NIST presented their final report on the collapse of the Twin Towers, and in 2008, the one on Building 7.

01:32:24.240 For the Twin Towers, NIST concluded that they were brought down by the consequences of the impacts and the ensuing fires,

01:32:30.240 while Building 7, according to NIST, was brought down primarily by fire alone.

01:32:35.240 In other words, they fully confirmed the official version by the U.S. government.

01:32:40.240 The other organization to bear weight on the debate has been Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth,

01:32:46.240 an association of professionals in civil construction founded in 2006 by San Francisco architect Richard Gage.

01:32:53.240 Architects and Engineers lists over 2,000 experts in structural engineering, science of materials, architectural design,

01:33:00.240 fire protection, science of construction, metallurgy, and even experts in controlled demolitions.

01:33:06.240 Since they've entered the fray, Architects and Engineers has brought to the table

01:33:10.240 a solid amount of scientific information refuting the official explanation by NIST on the collapses,

01:33:15.240 and confirming the theory of controlled demolitions instead.

01:33:20.240 At the same time, Architects and Engineers has acted as an unrelenting watchdog for every action taken by NIST,

01:33:26.240 pointing out every single error in their work, and even forcing them, in some cases, to make corrections to their reports.

01:33:32.240 I think it's something that we need to clarify and correct in the final version of the report.

01:33:37.240 Okay.

01:33:38.240 The first issue that needs to be clarified is the actual strength and solidity of the Twin Towers,

01:33:43.240 since both the 9-11 Commission and the debunkers have made extensive efforts to depict them as extremely light and fragile buildings.

01:33:50.240 The outside of each tower was covered by a frame of 14 inch wide steel columns.

01:33:55.240 The centers of the steel columns were 40 inches apart.

01:33:58.240 These exterior walls were the majority of the weight of the building.

01:34:02.240 The interior core of the buildings was a hollow steel shaft in which elevators and stairwells were grouped.

01:34:07.240 The torres of New York, instead, were supported by an external ceiling,

01:34:12.240 by subtle steel walls, and, in short, they were like the parallelepiped walls.

01:34:18.240 The World Trade Center was a very light structure,

01:34:20.240 with the highest expression of a light glass ceiling, as the technicians call it.

01:34:24.240 There is only another building that I know,

01:34:26.240 which was called the Sears Tower in Chicago, which used the same type of structure.

01:34:32.240 After the World Trade Center, no one of the most used it.

01:34:35.240 As we shall see, all these statements are false.

01:34:38.240 Contrary to traditional skyscrapers, where all the support columns are equally spaced,

01:34:43.240 in the Twin Towers, part of the supporting columns had been moved towards the exterior wall,

01:34:48.240 creating a large, column-free space available for rental.

01:34:51.240 For this reason, the external structure had literally become a grid of steel columns

01:34:56.240 made with prefabricated blocks that were mounted on site.

01:35:00.240 These are the thin steel nerves mentioned by debunker Alberto Angela.

01:35:05.240 244 steel columns, placed approximately two feet apart,

01:35:09.240 which supported 40% of the weight of the towers.

01:35:12.240 Far from being two empty parallelepipeds,

01:35:15.240 the internal structure was comprised of 47 steel columns,

01:35:19.240 so long and sturdy that a special factory in Japan had to be built in order to assemble them.

01:35:24.240 It was the core structure to support the majority of the weight of the building, 60% of it, and not the external structure.

01:35:31.240 The core structure seen on the left is what the 9-11 Commission has called a hollow steel shaft.

01:35:37.240 This is the same core structure near the base of the tower.

01:35:42.240 The core structure was an actual, extremely robust steel skyscraper built within another skyscraper.

01:35:49.240 The core structure housed the stairs, the elevators, and all other services needed for the functioning of the tower.

01:35:56.240 The inner walls of the core structure were made of simple layers of sheetrock.

01:36:00.240 A long series of steel trusses connected the core structure to the external one and supported the floors.

01:36:07.240 The floors were also prefabricated rectangular pieces covered by a thin layer of concrete.

01:36:12.240 The internal and external structure connected through an umbrella-like structure called a hat truss,

01:36:18.240 which kept together the towers and bound them from above.

01:36:21.240 The idea that this kind of structure is fragile and therefore no longer used after 9-11

01:36:26.240 is disproven by the new Building 7 built by Larry Silverstein.

01:36:31.240 A strong central structure supports the majority of the weight of the building.

01:36:35.240 Long steel beams support the floors and connect the core structure to the external one,

01:36:39.240 allowing for large, column-free space in between.

01:36:42.240 A very similar concept to the one used in the Twin Towers.

01:36:46.240 Most importantly, the debunkers forget to mention that the Twin Towers were built

01:36:50.240 with a structural redundancy of three to five times the weight they were meant to support.

01:36:55.240 This structure was capable of holding three to five times the weight.

01:36:59.240 These buildings are built to handle several times the load above them.

01:37:03.240 Those perimeter columns could handle five times the load above them,

01:37:06.240 and the core columns could handle three times the load above them.

01:37:09.240 In addressing the solidity of the Twin Towers,

01:37:11.240 the Massachusetts Institute of Technology stated that its 244 perimeter columns

01:37:16.240 made it one of the most redundant and one of the most resilient skyscrapers.

01:37:20.240 On the same subject, the architectural firm of Roth & Sons wrote,

01:37:24.240 The building, as designed, is 16 times stiffer than a conventional structure.

01:37:29.240 The virundial trusses would be so effective, according to the engineer's calculations,

01:37:33.240 that all the columns on one side of a tower could be cut,

01:37:36.240 as well as the two corners and several columns on the adjacent sides,

01:37:40.240 and the tower would still be strong enough to withstand 100-mile-per-hour wind.

01:37:44.240 So that goes to speak as to the, you know, strength of the Twin Towers.

01:37:49.240 You know, these things were pretty damn resilient for, you know, modern buildings.

01:37:54.240 Well, in this case, they were built a while ago, but very resilient, very well built.

01:37:59.240 John Skilling, the structural engineer who designed the Twin Towers stated,

01:38:04.240 Live loads on these perimeter columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs.

01:38:11.240 In particular, the Twin Towers were designed to sustain the impact of a large airliner

01:38:16.240 traveling at 600 miles per hour and still remains standing.

01:38:20.240 I like how they have the sources there, too. You can see it right there.

01:38:22.240 That's from the NIST report in itself.

01:38:24.240 Viewed in 1993 by the Seattle Times, John Skilling stated,

01:38:28.240 We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings,

01:38:32.240 even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side.

01:38:35.240 Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel from the airplane

01:38:39.240 would dump into the building.

01:38:41.240 There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed.

01:38:44.240 The building structure would still be there.

01:38:47.240 And it was. After the impacts, both towers remained standing,

01:38:51.240 showing no major effect on their stability.

01:38:53.240 Furthermore, NIST has confirmed that the initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes.

01:39:00.240 This means that from that moment on, the only available source of fuel for the fires was common office furnishings.

01:39:06.240 And as we know, regular office fires are not hot enough to affect the stability of a steel structure.

01:39:12.240 No steel frame high rise building has ever collapsed due to fire.

01:39:16.240 In over 20 years, I have not seen until recently a protected steel structure that has collapsed in a fire.

01:39:24.240 These kinds of designs have performed extraordinarily well over history.

01:39:28.240 In fact, until this occurrence, no building had fallen down because of fire.

01:39:33.240 Furthermore, NIST estimated the combustible fuel loading was somewhat lower than found in prior surveys of office spaces.

01:39:39.240 The number of interior walls and thus the minimal amount of combustible interior finish and limited bookshelf space account for much of the differences.

01:39:48.240 There was no reason for the towers to collapse at that point.

01:39:51.240 With a structure that had clearly withstood the impacts and with less than average office content to feed the fires,

01:39:57.240 both buildings should have remained standing, allowing for the evacuation and rescue of everyone who had survived the initial impacts and the fires.

01:40:05.240 Instead, both buildings suddenly collapsed from top to bottom, one 56 minutes after the impact, the other as much as one hour and 42 minutes after the impact of the plane.

01:40:16.240 Why?

01:40:18.240 The debate on the collapse of the Twin Towers centers around two major questions.

01:40:23.240 One is what caused the initial collapse of the top section of the building onto the lower part of each tower?

01:40:29.240 The second is what caused the complete destruction of the remaining healthy structure below once the top section had collapsed on it.

01:40:37.240 As far as what initiated the collapse, at first we were told that the heat of the fires had softened and melted the structure of the building.

01:40:44.240 In 2002, NOVA depicted a scenario envisioned by many experts at the time,

01:40:50.240 that the truss connections failed in the extreme heat, causing the floors to fall onto one another, precipitating the collapse.

01:41:00.240 As the steel began to soften and melt, the interior core columns began to give.

01:41:06.240 Then you had this sequential failure that took place where it all pancaked, one after the other.

01:41:11.240 In fact, it became known as the pancake theory.

01:41:14.240 So, that took place to the theory that we call the pancake theory.

01:41:17.240 That means that, as this part is falling on a ladder, this ladder has fallen,

01:41:23.240 and in the cascade, all the ladder have fallen on each other.

01:41:27.240 That's what we call the pancake theory.

01:41:29.240 But the pancake theory had a major flaw.

01:41:31.240 It forgot to explain why the core structure of the towers collapsed.

01:41:35.240 Furthermore, experts pointed out that jet fuel produces barely half the heat needed to melt steel.

01:41:41.240 It would not have been enough to disconnect the trusses from the external structure.

01:41:45.240 At that point, the official explanation backtracked and settled for a more generic weakening of the steel due to the fires.

01:41:52.240 You don't need to melt the steel columns. You just need to start weakening them.

01:41:57.240 What we found is, it doesn't take temperatures high enough to melt steel.

01:42:00.240 It just has to heat up the steel so it expands and then softens and weakens the structure until it collapses.

01:42:06.240 In the new explanation, the initial failure was no longer blamed on the rupture of the steel trusses,

01:42:11.240 but on their sagging due to the heat.

01:42:13.240 The trusses stayed connected to the columns, even as they sag from the heat.

01:42:18.240 They pulled on the columns, pulling them inward nearly five feet in some areas, until the columns reached the breaking point.

01:42:25.240 They decided to continue to melt.

01:42:27.240 It is burning the air and burning the steel of the solar system.

01:42:32.240 At this point, it begins to flare.

01:42:34.240 It loses its resistance to the load.

01:42:37.240 It turns into the columns.

01:42:40.240 At a certain point, the columns of the fabric, which are carrying about 40% of the weight of the structure,

01:42:47.240 which is the steel.

01:42:48.240 Suddenly, the columns snapped.

01:42:50.240 And as a result, the entire top of the building came down pretty much in free fall

01:42:57.240 because the kinetic energy that was unleashed was just huge.

01:43:00.240 NIST also maintained that the impact of the airplanes widely dislodged the fireproofing from the trusses,

01:43:07.240 hastening the process that eventually caused them to sag.

01:43:10.240 It should be noted that NIST made the dislodgement of the fireproofing a necessary condition for the towers to collapse.

01:43:16.240 The buildings would not have collapsed under the effects of the airplane impact and the fuel, jet fuel ignited multi-floor fires.

01:43:24.240 And it only, the reason it collapsed is because the fireproofing was dislodged.

01:43:29.240 But the theory of the sagging trusses created even more problems than the one before.

01:43:34.240 First of all, there is no proof whatsoever that the fireproofing from the steel had been widely dislodged by the impacts, as NIST has maintained.

01:43:42.240 The steel structure of a skyscraper is elastic, not rigid.

01:43:46.240 And it absorbs the impacts by slowly swaying back and forth, not by vibrating.

01:43:51.240 The building swayed slowly one way toward the Hudson River to the west.

01:43:55.240 And by the time it came back, I just jumped up and just had to get out of the elevator.

01:44:01.240 In fact, there are good reasons to believe that the fireproofing from the steel was not dislodged at all, as in the following example.

01:44:07.240 This is James Glanz for the New York Times.

01:44:10.240 When the plane hit the North Tower between the 94th and the 98th floors,

01:44:15.240 Steve McIntyre, an engineer for the American Bureau of Shipping, was reading his email on the 91st floor.

01:44:22.240 The plane hit, and I think he described it as the biggest wham he'd ever heard.

01:44:26.240 But there wasn't much shaking. His email was still there after the impact.

01:44:31.240 He was still staring at a glowing screen.

01:44:34.240 He had a little knick-knack, a piece of slate in the shape of a sailboat, hadn't fallen off his desk.

01:44:40.240 Pictures of his wife and kids just propped up on a bookcase were still upright.

01:44:45.240 Nothing had fallen over.

01:44:46.240 McIntyre was just below the point of impact.

01:44:49.240 If his pictures didn't even fall, why should the spray-on fireproofing have been detached from the steel trusses?

01:44:56.240 Secondly, there's no proof that the temperatures were high enough to seriously weaken the steel in any case, with or without fireproofing.

01:45:03.240 The majority of the jet fuel was burnt up instantly in the big fireball, and it was gone.

01:45:10.240 The fires that were left were office furnishings and carpet and things like that.

01:45:17.240 A lot of things in these kind of buildings have to be fire-resistant by nature. It's required by code.

01:45:23.240 In their computer simulation, NIST claims to have observed temperatures beyond 1800 degrees during the fires.

01:45:30.240 But NIST has used their own computational model, and they've never published the data from their simulation.

01:45:36.240 When architects and engineers asked to verify the computer model used by NIST, their request was denied.

01:45:42.240 The truth is that NIST itself admitted, in their own report, to have no proof for temperatures high enough to seriously weaken the steel.

01:45:50.240 From the NIST report, we read,

01:45:53.240 Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels,

01:45:57.240 only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250 degrees centigrade, or 480 degrees Fahrenheit.

01:46:05.240 Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis,

01:46:10.240 and the temperatures did not reach 250 degrees centigrade.

01:46:14.240 No conclusive evidence was found to indicate that pre-collapse fires were severe enough to have a significant effect on the microstructure that would have resulted in weakening of the steel structure.

01:46:26.240 In other words, NIST openly admits to have no proof to support their own theory.

01:46:31.240 In conclusion, the known facts are, steel melts at about 2800 degrees Fahrenheit.

01:46:37.240 Softening can begin at about 1100 degrees Fahrenheit.

01:46:40.240 Except for three isolated spots, NIST admits to have found no proof of temperatures beyond 480 degrees Fahrenheit,

01:46:47.240 which is less than half the temperatures needed to seriously weaken steel.

01:46:52.240 On the other hand, there is multiple evidence that the temperatures needed to seriously weaken steel were not reached for a sustained time in the Twin Towers.

01:47:01.240 The first one is that a group of 16 people managed to descend through the area devastated by the impact without obviously being burned alive.

01:47:09.240 One of them is Brian Clark.

01:47:11.240 And when we came to the 78th floor, the last layer was standing, but it was cracked.

01:47:17.240 And there were flames licking up the other side of the wall like this.

01:47:21.240 It wasn't a roaring inferno.

01:47:23.240 I sensed that the flames were maybe starved for oxygen right there, you know, in the interior.

01:47:28.240 We kept going and we got onto the 74th floor when we got down that far.

01:47:33.240 Normal conditions.

01:47:34.240 The lights were on, fresh air coming up from below.

01:47:37.240 Attevisimo has maintained that these people managed to survive because in that part of the building, the stairwell runs on the side of the tower and not through the center.

01:47:46.240 When they went there, they went through a area that was on the opposite side of the incendio.

01:47:52.240 So it's logical that they were not being burned.

01:47:56.240 This scale does this round and goes down.

01:47:59.240 In truth, stairwell A traverses to the side of the tower on the 82nd floor.

01:48:04.240 But Clark and his colleagues were on the 84th.

01:48:07.240 This means they descended two floors in the center of the tower before crossing over.

01:48:11.240 Furthermore, one of Clark's colleagues went back from the 81st to the 91st floor before descending all the way to the ground.

01:48:19.240 Ron DeFrancesco, who went in the 81st floor with me, he went up to 91, caught up to the people laying down on the floor to thinking that there was fresher air at floor level.

01:48:30.240 He made his way back to the stairs.

01:48:32.240 And so I started to run downstairs and so I ended up on ground level and I went to walk out.

01:48:40.240 Had there been a temperature of 1100 degrees around the stairwell, nobody would have been able to go through it alive.

01:48:47.240 Secondly, there is a series of thermographic images shot with an infrared camera showing temperatures much lower than those needed to soften steel.

01:48:55.240 This is the North Tower, seen from below.

01:48:58.240 It's 918, about a half an hour after the impact of the first plane, and the indicated temperatures do not reach the color yellow, which means they don't exceed 100 degrees centigrade or 212 degrees Fahrenheit.

01:49:10.240 And this is the South Tower, some 15 minutes after the impact of the second plane.

01:49:14.240 Here too, the indicated temperatures do not exceed 212 degrees Fahrenheit.

01:49:20.240 But the major problem with the sagging trusses theory is that it doesn't make any sense from a mechanical point of view.

01:49:27.240 Even assuming the temperatures were high enough to make them sag to such an extent,

01:49:31.240 where did these relatively thin trusses find the strength to pull and then break apart a supporting structure much larger and stronger than they were?

01:49:39.240 The phenomenon suggested by NIST is called thermal expansion.

01:49:43.240 If one assumes that the trusses were forced to expand downwards by the vertical structures resisting the push,

01:49:49.240 it means they were weaker than the structure and they would have never found the strength to pull it inwards.

01:49:54.240 If instead the trusses sagged on their own, so weakened by fire to become unable to support their own weight,

01:50:00.240 where would they find the strength to pull and break apart the same structure that had easily supported them when they were strong and healthy?

01:50:07.240 In either case, the idea that the trusses alone would have been able to pull and break apart the external structure makes no sense.

01:50:14.240 As we shall see, the external structure did bow inwards before the towers collapsed.

01:50:19.240 But a much greater force than their own must have been applied to those trusses for them to be able to pull and break apart the structure they were attached to.

01:50:28.240 Question. Can you provide any evidence that the fireproofing from the steel trusses was widely dislodged by the impact of the planes,

01:50:38.240 which NIST has made a necessary condition for the collapses to be caused by fire?

01:50:43.240 Can you provide any evidence that the temperatures in the twin towers were high enough and lasted long enough to seriously weaken the steel in the areas where the initial collapses occurred?

01:50:53.240 Can you explain how a sagging truss weakened by heat could pull and eventually break apart the structure it is attached to, with no external force being applied to it?

01:51:02.240 If the explanation by NIST on what caused the initial collapse seems seriously flawed, their explanation on what caused the complete destruction of the towers does not exist.

01:51:15.240 Within more than 10,000 pages filled with technical data of relative importance, in a footnote on page 82 of the NIST report we read.

01:51:23.240 The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower.

01:51:30.240 For brevity of this report, the sequence is referred to as the probable collapse sequence, although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable.

01:51:45.240 With the simple word inevitable, NIST purports to have explained the total destruction of 80,000 tons of a perfectly healthy steel structure upon itself.

01:51:55.240 The area below the damage zone where the planes flew in and where the fire was, that area below that, 80 or 90 stories, 80,000 tons of structural steel was not damaged in any way.

01:52:09.240 Yet you stood there and watched it destroy itself, wiping out floor by floor, all 287 structural columns as if they didn't exist underneath the damage zone.

01:52:22.240 When a well-known debunking website wrote to NIST asking for a clarification on the sequence of the collapses, it received a similar answer.

01:52:29.240 NIST did not describe the specific sequence of events after global collapse initiated.

01:52:35.240 This astonishing statement has been repeated by NIST over and over again under the most surprising of justifications.

01:52:42.240 Once the collapse initiated, the video evidence is rather clear. It was not stopped by the floor's wall, so there was no calculation that we did to demonstrate that to what is clear from the good videos.

01:52:54.240 This is tantamount to saying, once the Pearl Harbor attack initiated, the video evidence shows that the US fleet was quickly overwhelmed by the Japanese, so we didn't feel the need to find out why it happened.

01:53:06.240 To make up for this embarrassing void, the debunkers often point at some independent studies which purport to explain the collapses by gravity alone.

01:53:14.240 There are techniques like those that you have mentioned here that analyze in extremely detail the dynamics of the Pearl and the Pearl Gemell and do not find anything strange.

01:53:24.240 The study most quoted by debunkers is called, What did and did not cause the collapse of the WTC Twin Towers in New York, by Czech engineer Zenik Bazant.

01:53:34.240 But in his own study, Mr. Bazant admits to have worked on a one-dimensional model, while he states,

01:53:40.240 The high tilt seen on the south tower top would call for a three-dimensional model of progressive collapse.

01:53:46.240 In any case, it is not up to private studies to explain the collapse of the Twin Towers.

01:53:51.240 NIST received $20 million of taxpayers' money to determine why and how World Trade Center One and World Trade Center Two collapsed

01:53:59.240 following the initial impacts of the aircraft, and to this day, they have not done so.

01:54:04.240 This is why architects and engineers have kept pressing NIST, asking them to publish their data in regards to the potential energy released

01:54:12.240 during the downwards movement of the upper stories and the absorptive capacity of the intact structure below the collapsed zone.

01:54:20.240 Structural engineers do this every day. This is not rocket science. You have the known weight of this building mass.

01:54:28.240 You have what are known columns below it in order to resist it. You let it go in your models, and you calculate what the resistance is.

01:54:38.240 Why didn't they do it? Could it be because they knew darn well that it would not have collapsed at all?

01:54:46.240 In fact, it could be suggested...

01:54:48.240 And just so y'all know, Richard Gage, he actually was on the PBD podcast, and it's funny, too, because they took this episode down.

01:54:56.240 But this is it right here. Shout out to Valuetainment.

01:54:59.240 Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth answers whether jet fuel can melt steel beams.

01:55:04.240 And this was very interesting stuff if you guys want to watch it.

01:55:08.240 But the full interview was taken down. I can't find it anymore, man.

01:55:11.240 So that also makes me say, hmm, you know, so I think they took it down for misinformation more than likely.

01:55:17.240 But, you know, YouTube gonna YouTube, right?

01:55:22.240 ...vested that NIST never explained the collapses by gravity alone because it would be impossible to do so without violating at least two of the most fundamental laws of physics.

01:55:31.240 One is Newton's third law of motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

01:55:38.240 This means that two opposing forces will neutralize each other.

01:55:42.240 Which, when you click, right? So let me show you guys something very interesting here.

01:55:45.240 Jet fuel, 1,500 degree Fahrenheit. Steel melts at 2,500.

01:55:49.240 But then they show that steel does lose...

01:55:52.240 So there's PBD himself, right? You click here, right? Watch the full podcast.

01:55:58.240 This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on hate speech.

01:56:02.240 Learn more about combating hate speech in your country.

01:56:04.240 Which is strange to me because it's like, how is it hate speech when...

01:56:07.240 You say jet fuel, 1,500 degree Fahrenheit. Steel melts at 2,500.

01:56:12.240 But then they show that steel does lose strength at around 600, is what they say.

01:56:16.240 Yeah.

01:56:17.240 What's your argument to that?

01:56:19.240 Let's get into this because the official narrative says, in both the Twin Towers and Building 7, that the steel, in the case of Building 7...

01:56:27.240 A shout out to Valuetainment Short Clips guys and Valuetainment in general.

01:56:31.240 Don't forget to subscribe and like the video for them as well. Shout out to them.

01:56:34.240 7 expanded in the case of the Twin Towers.

01:56:36.240 We did episode on PBD as well.

01:56:38.240 Towers weakened. And they build a whole narrative based on that.

01:56:45.240 And certainly steel weakens at 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit, loses half of its strength.

01:56:49.240 It could begin to sag.

01:56:51.240 We don't challenge that.

01:56:54.240 But what we have in both cases is the evidence of molten iron.

01:57:02.240 And that is incredible.

01:57:04.240 It is found by the U.S. Geological Survey in all of their dust samples, previously molten iron microspheres about the diameter of a human hair.

01:57:15.240 Four tons of them by extrapolation.

01:57:18.240 Well, they don't tell us where those came from.

01:57:20.240 Where did they come from?

01:57:21.240 This is incredible.

01:57:23.240 Iron doesn't melt until 2,800 degrees.

01:57:26.240 So, yes, steel weakens earlier.

01:57:29.240 But NIST denies the evidence of extreme temperatures which are available where?

01:57:35.240 Published in a metallurgical examination in the Appendix C by FEMA in 2002 before NIST took over the investigation and threw out that metallurgical examination.

01:57:47.240 Why?

01:57:48.240 Well, what did it say?

01:57:49.240 It said that there's a hot temperature corrosion attack on the steel.

01:57:55.240 Liquid molten iron invading the grain boundaries of the steel.

01:58:01.240 Well, wait.

01:58:02.240 What's liquid molten iron?

01:58:03.240 We haven't used iron in our skyscrapers for 100 years.

01:58:06.240 Where does it come from?

01:58:08.240 Well, molten iron is the byproduct of thermite.

01:58:11.240 Thermite is an incendiary used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter.

01:58:18.240 So, maybe we're getting-

01:58:19.240 Oh, hold on.

01:58:20.240 And we're going to get into that here in a documentary.

01:58:23.240 So, but that's just a little bit from there.

01:58:25.240 But that's the guy that was featured.

01:58:28.240 Let's keep going here with the doc.

01:58:30.240 In a head-on collision, the two cars absorb each other's kinetic energy and transform it into physical deformation or damage.

01:58:37.240 After that, the system comes to a rest as there is no more energy to be dissipated.

01:58:42.240 The top section pushing on the bottom section, it's going to meet equal forces as it goes.

01:58:49.240 Both sections are going to be demolished at the same rate.

01:58:54.240 So, by the time you've crushed up 15 stories below it, the top 15 stories are also going to be crushed.

01:59:02.240 And so there's nothing left now to crush the rest of the building.

01:59:05.240 Something of this kind is what we should have seen when the top section of the towers collapsed onto the lower one.

01:59:11.240 The upper and lower sections should have mutually destroyed each other until all the energy is dissipated and the system comes to a rest.

01:59:18.240 Alternatively, as shown in this experiment with two towers made of snow, the top section could have fallen off to the side after the initial collapse.

01:59:30.240 What could not have happened is this.

01:59:32.240 A little tiny chunk of the building can't possibly fall and crush the entire structure below it.

01:59:39.240 This is such a simple fundamental concept that architects and engineers were astonished in seeing it totally ignored by NIST.

01:59:45.240 This is high school physics.

01:59:47.240 And our whole society is being led to believe that these fundamental laws of physics, hard science, don't apply anymore.

01:59:56.240 But even if we assume that the top section of the tower had enough potential energy to destroy the rest of the structure below,

02:00:02.240 it could not have done so at the speed it did, which was near freefall speed.

02:00:07.240 That would have violated an even more important principle in physics known as the law of momentum conservation.

02:00:14.240 This law states that the total energy within an isolated system must always remain the same.

02:00:20.240 As we have seen, the energy can be transformed within the system from motion to physical deformation.

02:00:26.240 But for the deformation to begin, the velocity must decrease in order for one kind of energy to be transformed into the other.

02:00:34.240 No new energy can be added to the system.

02:00:37.240 One particular example of momentum conservation is freefall.

02:00:41.240 Freefall happens when the only force applied on an object is gravity.

02:00:45.240 This means that all the potential energy contained by the object is converted into vertical motion.

02:00:51.240 As soon as the falling object hits an obstacle and breakage occurs, the speed must decrease because some of its energy needs now to be converted into physical breakage.

02:01:00.240 It takes energy to break things apart and that energy must come from within the system.

02:01:06.240 Thus the falling rock cannot keep falling at freefall speed and break apart at the same time because it doesn't have enough energy to do both.

02:01:15.240 Let's go now to the twin towers and ask a simple question.

02:01:18.240 Assuming that the top section on the left contains enough potential energy to destroy the rest of the tower,

02:01:24.240 and assuming we dropped both upper sections at the same time, which one would hit the ground first?

02:01:29.240 It would be the second, of course.

02:01:31.240 As it finds no obstacles in its path, the section on the right would quickly accelerate to freefall speed and maintain it all the way to the ground.

02:01:39.240 The section on the left instead needs to use some of its energy to destroy the structure below so it could never achieve freefall speed.

02:01:47.240 In the case of the twin towers, however, both upper sections fell with an acceleration close to freefall speed,

02:01:54.240 as if their path had been practically free from obstacles.

02:01:58.240 It took each tower between 10 and 12 seconds to collapse to the ground, while an absolute freefall time would have been 9.2 seconds.

02:02:06.240 In other words, both upper sections of the towers found enough energy to destroy 80,000 tons of healthy structure below while accelerating to near freefall speed.

02:02:17.240 This is, as we have said, absolutely impossible by gravity alone.

02:02:22.240 The law of momentum conservation won't allow it.

02:02:25.240 A building cannot do freefall with a huge structural steel structural system in place to support it.

02:02:31.240 The twin towers could not have come straight down through the resistance of 80,000 tons of structural steel at the speed of a practically freefall.

02:02:42.240 That just would not happen.

02:02:44.240 If in fact it actually hit and made an impact, it was effectively crushing anything, pushing hard on this core structure below it, the core structure is going to push back equally hard.

02:02:57.240 And that's what's going to cause the top section of the building to slow down.

02:03:02.240 As energy is drained away from the system to deform those members, it would slow down the descending mass and cause a descent at less than freefall speed.

02:03:13.240 There is only one way for those buildings to have collapsed at the speed they did.

02:03:17.240 The buildings fall at a speed which can only occur if their structure has been removed, the vertical structure.

02:03:24.240 The same Shyam Sunder from NIST has acknowledged that freefall can only be achieved with the absence of a structure below.

02:03:31.240 Freefall time would be an object that has no structural components below it.

02:03:36.240 But what could have removed the supporting structure below since the falling section didn't have any extra energy to do so?

02:03:43.240 The fact that it's coming down at freefall says all of the energy is being used to just make it go straight down, which means it's coming down through itself and not breaking up the building as it goes.

02:03:56.240 Something else has to be clearing the way.

02:03:59.240 There is only one known way to allow that kind of acceleration while removing the supporting structure.

02:04:05.240 A building cannot do freefall without it being blown up. That's the only way it could come down at freefall.

02:04:11.240 The only way that a building can accelerate as it collapses is by having pre-engineered, precisely timed and precisely placed explosives.

02:04:22.240 In other words, controlled demolition.

02:04:25.240 Oh shit.

02:04:28.240 And this is where we start to get into, was this a controlled demolition?

02:04:37.240 Since a near freefall speed automatically means a controlled demolition, the debunkers have tried to deny that the Twin Towers fell in about 10 seconds each.

02:04:46.240 Tempi di crollo?

02:04:47.240 Tempi di crollo?

02:04:48.240 Si parla di 10 secondi.

02:04:49.240 Tempi di caduta libera?

02:04:50.240 Esatto.

02:04:51.240 Ma i tempi di crollo delle 12 semelle non sono quelli di una caduta libera.

02:04:54.240 Sono, sulla base dei video disponibili, di almeno 16 secondi.

02:04:58.240 Basta ascoltare la durata del boato.

02:05:01.240 Basta ascoltare la durata di una caduta libera di una caduta libera di una caduta libera di una caduta libera.

02:05:19.240 Quindi, se avete contato con me, sono un po' più di 10 secondi.

02:05:22.240 We couldn't count with him, as it's very difficult to establish the exact duration of a collapse by listening to the sounds only.

02:05:29.240 Furthermore, a couple of seconds more or less would not make a big difference, as the time for the transfer of momentum between each collapsing floor must be considered anyway.

02:05:39.240 So, a floor impacting on a floor below would transfer momentum, and that floor, those floors would transfer momentum, such that in the Twin Towers, if you didn't have any columns whatsoever,

02:05:52.240 it would still take a minimum of 30 seconds for these towers to collapse, just by transferring the momentum of the floors.

02:06:01.240 In any case, the near-freefall speed of about 10 seconds has been confirmed by different official sources.

02:06:07.240 The 9-11 Commission wrote that the South Tower collapsed in 10 seconds.

02:06:12.240 Mr. Sunder from NIST has confirmed similar timings.

02:06:15.240 The measurements have indicated that Tower 1 collapsed in about 11 seconds and Tower 2 collapsed in about 9 seconds.

02:06:24.240 Mr. Sunder has also acknowledged that the towers came down practically at freefall speed.

02:06:29.240 As a result, the entire top of the building came down pretty much in freefall.

02:06:34.240 The same admission is present in the official report.

02:06:37.240 Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance, the building section above came down essentially in freefall.

02:06:45.240 At this point, we can pose the following question.

02:06:48.240 Given that the building section above came down essentially in freefall, given that for freefall to occur, no supporting structure must be present, and given that the falling sections didn't have any extra energy to destroy the structure below, can you suggest anything different from some kind of controlled demolition for the removal of the supporting structure, which was necessary for near-freefall speed to be achieved?

02:07:13.240 At this point, one may wonder what the response by the debunkers has been to all the scientific arguments presented by architects and engineers.

02:07:21.240 There has been no response. All the debunkers have done is to either belittle this association of professionals or to ignore it altogether.

02:07:28.240 And for engineers, when you look at the engineers who signed, it's amazing.

02:07:35.240 You have engineers in electricity, in hydraulics, in nuclear safety.

02:07:41.240 Well, it's really the Babel tour of engineering. 0.89

02:07:45.240 The people who are competent in calculo-structure,

02:07:48.240 I've looked at them,

02:07:50.240 a few of them,

02:07:51.240 a few of them,

02:07:52.240 a few of them.

02:07:53.240 I'm genius.

02:07:54.240 Whether the experts in structural engineering are 30 or 300,

02:07:57.240 it should not make any difference.

02:07:59.240 It's their arguments that must be refuted,

02:08:01.240 and Kirant has never done so.

02:08:03.240 Ativissimo instead has chosen to belittle architects and engineers as a whole,

02:08:08.240 by terming all its members as gymnasium builders.

02:08:11.240 But Ativissimo has never responded to their arguments either.

02:08:22.240 But the most shocking statement comes from popular mechanics.

02:08:26.240 In their book, Debunking 9-11 Myths, they wrote,

02:08:29.240 Not one of the leading conspiracy theorists has a background in engineering, construction, or related fields.

02:08:36.240 This statement appears both in the original publication, dated 2006,

02:08:40.240 and in the revised edition published in 2011.

02:08:43.240 By then, architects and engineers had been active for almost five years.

02:08:47.240 Listed more than 1,300 experts in civil engineering,

02:08:50.240 had made presentations in 20 different countries in the world,

02:08:53.240 and had been invited on national television several times.

02:08:57.240 And what caught my eye is their claim that more than 1,300 architects and engineers examined the evidence about building 7's collapse,

02:09:06.240 and disagree with the official report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

02:09:12.240 I certainly am much more open-minded about it than I was,

02:09:15.240 and it is because of the involvement of the 9-11 families,

02:09:18.240 and all these engineers and architects.

02:09:20.240 Clearly, they know more than I do.

02:09:21.240 The truth is that from the moment architects and engineers has entered the fray,

02:09:25.240 not one of their scientific arguments disproving the official version

02:09:29.240 and confirming the theory of controlled demolitions has been refuted in any way by the debunkers or by anyone else.

02:09:40.240 So as y'all know, usual, it's basically DVDs.

02:09:44.240 So we'll go ahead and fast-forward here to the next portion.

02:09:48.240 And I think, guys, this is where we're going to go ahead and end part two of this breakdown.

02:09:55.240 As you guys know, this is a five-hour long documentary, The New Pearl Harbor.

02:10:01.240 And yeah, as you guys can see, very thorough, very systematic.

02:10:05.240 I mean, we're going over science, we're going over engineering,

02:10:07.240 we're looking over the temperatures of what it takes for steel to melt.

02:10:12.240 Let's now return to the previous question.

02:10:14.240 So now we're on part six, guys.

02:10:16.240 So what we're going to go ahead and do is we're going to stop it here, okay?

02:10:21.240 We're pretty much almost done with the documentary.

02:10:23.240 We have about an hour and a half left, and that will be covered on part three.

02:10:26.240 But yeah, guys, timestamps will be up.

02:10:28.240 Hope you guys enjoyed this breakdown.

02:10:30.240 I did a little less talking on this one, wanted you guys to kind of take it in.

02:10:33.240 And yeah, man, I hope you guys enjoyed that breakdown.

02:10:37.240 So I'll catch you guys on the next episode of Fed It.

02:10:40.240 Don't forget to like the video, subscribe to the channel, and I'll catch you guys on the next one.

02:10:45.240 Part three.

02:10:46.240 Stay tuned.

02:10:47.240 Some friends in the back.

02:10:48.240 Peace.

02:10:49.240 Peace.

02:10:50.240 I was a special agent with Homeland Security Investigations, okay, guys?

02:10:55.240 HSI.

02:10:56.240 The cases that I did mostly were human smuggling and drug trafficking.

02:11:01.240 No one else has these documents, by the way.

02:11:03.240 Here's what Fed it covered.

02:11:05.240 Dr. Lafredo confirmed lacerations due to stepping on glass.

02:11:11.240 Murder investigations.

02:11:12.240 You see him reaching in his jacket.

02:11:13.240 You don't know.

02:11:14.240 And he's positioning.

02:11:15.240 He's positioning.

02:11:16.240 Been on February 13th, 2019.

02:11:17.240 You're facing two counts of two meditative murders.

02:11:20.240 Bracketeering.

The Debrief With MyronGainesX - November 21, 2022

Former Fed Reacts To 9⧸11 Conspiracy Theories (PART 2)

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript