The Edstream, the edgiest live show I know, hosted by myself and my co-host, co-anchor, and long time friend, Rachael Rake. We discuss censorship, conspiracy theories, and more!
00:06:21.520Hey buddy, thanks for having me on, I feel like you and I have been sort of lurking each other's content for so long that we're bound to have this eventually happen, so I'm glad it is today.
00:37:47.280The sort of, like, prevailing feature that I saw in my investigation, because for me, the investigation was, it was like, it was this great fact-finding opportunity for me, because I got to see
00:37:59.200what it was that they were going to be upset with me about, and I figured that that would say more about them, right?
00:38:08.560So, you know, for instance, like, if I disagree with BLM, they then accuse me of being racist, because they say that BLM and Black people are the same thing, right?
00:38:21.940Or, for instance, if I reference people who have trans regret, they say that that's me engaging in transphobia, right?
00:38:31.100So, it's like, it revealed a whole bunch of things about them, and that's what I was really interested about.
00:38:35.700And, but then what they do is, instead of having a conversation about these things, instead of actually figuring them out, all they do is they just reference these different military codes, where it's like, you can't be a hateful person.
00:38:51.400You can't, you know, you can't discriminate against anyone.
00:38:56.140And it's like, okay, but I didn't do that.
00:38:58.660And you're not showing me how, by me referencing people having trans regret, you're not explaining how that's in any way transphobic.
00:39:06.700You're just saying that that's me being a transphobic, persecutory person, right?
00:39:11.640It almost sounds like it's like an anti-human, bureaucratic machine that is spitting out bad takes about how you're not conforming to the rules.
00:39:23.540And they've set it up so that everything is so subjective that all it's about is it's about getting certain people in positions of authority who can utilize those sort of subjective mechanisms to just get rid of anyone who's going to rock the boat.
00:39:38.940So, that's why they want to purge people from those positions of power.
00:39:42.800And I know, I know a friend of ours, Jeremy McKenzie, Raging Dissident, has talked about how they have done a purging of a lot of the top officials within the military on supposed grounds of, like, maybe they made a comment about a female, like.
00:40:01.560Yeah, it's like 10 years ago, someone says they mooned someone when they were, you know, whatever.
00:40:06.280And there's no tangible me too, like you would have with somebody like the Cuomos or with like a Weinstein type character or that guy that had the button on his desk where the door would lock behind them.
00:40:21.400And like all this disgusting shit that happens with mainstream media and all these governors and these sick people who are protected from this.
00:40:34.820And yes, they will eventually make a me too out of it.
00:40:37.760But it's just like, where's the me too for these guys?
00:40:40.060If you really had something, you would take it to like the nth degree.
00:40:47.700I really do think that they are purging top people in the military because they see them as being somebody who would call out this corruption.
00:41:00.500And, you know, I think of how, you know, how Sam Hyde answered his interview with iDubbs where iDubbs was trying to figure out Sam's like his political leanings.
00:41:12.040And Sam basically just said that I think that this philosophical or this psychological rift between two groups is irreconcilable.
00:41:21.500And there's no point in even trying to like really sort of engage with it.
00:41:25.840So you're saying that there's no military solution?
00:41:30.060Well, I think what I think the situation that we're in is that it's not even like it's as strategic as, okay, we need to take out the top generals and we need to make sure that the pharmaceuticals, it's not even that well thought out.
00:41:45.260It's just like these people are trained to behave from a place where it's it's literally just re it's just like it's just re in in in what do you call it in bureaucratic form?
00:41:59.260Yes, it's like they're trained bureaucratically, they're trained to just react in a way where it's like they have this brain worm, and their mind just breaks and they snap if something comes across, that creates an error message.
00:42:13.600And it doesn't matter how well informed you are, it doesn't matter how well intentioned you are, doesn't matter how, like, how noble any of these things, if you say something that goes against their orthodoxy, they're just going to find every excuse to to kick you out.
00:42:29.400And there's only so many places that we can run now, you know, the military, you're going to get kicked off the internet, you're going to lose like you're going to lose your bank, all these things, and all they want to do is just push us out.
00:42:42.060Okay, so that is one specific paradigm in which you can get censored the military, I want to go over academic next.
00:42:52.640But overall, I'm trying to make a living here with the edge stream, and I can't find any sponsors because we'll just they'll just get t platform too.
00:43:04.160So I've had to go all the way back to the 1990s to find some sponsors for this program.
00:43:10.500So we'll be right back after, after the our esteemed sponsors here.
00:45:29.080I am officially, have been paid to say that, so I have to at least inform you guys about that.
00:45:37.240But anyways, yes, we will get on to talk about academic censorship.
00:45:41.840So, you know how we can justify our thoughts through philosophy, through political philosophy, too, in specific.
00:45:54.420Now, throughout the last 20th century, we have tons of political and philosophical people who are able to explain these things, right?
00:46:07.460But now, our universities are literally being purged of these kinds of people.
00:46:12.680So, if you want to have a speaker who is going to cause some controversy to come to your university, that's just not going to happen anymore.
00:46:22.460Like, when you think about it, who is the last person who's come to speak at a university that was controversial in Canada?
00:46:36.440So, first, like, one of the things that kind of politically activated me, I guess you could say, because I was a pretty apolitical person for most of my life.
00:46:48.780As we all are in this situation, right?
00:46:53.400Yeah, no one cares about any of this stuff until someone, like, starts to knock on your door and says, hey, you don't get to like or do the thing that you're doing, right?
00:47:01.360But I did, when I was 18 years old, I did a bunch of traveling around, and I traveled through Nepal when they were in the middle of their civil war.
00:47:10.540And back then, it was like there were, you know, different groups, and they would force infrastructure strikes, and they would say, you know, there can be no public transit.
00:47:19.880It was like the Maoist versus the king, right?
00:47:22.340And so, I knew that that's like, you know, that was a country in the middle of all this political turmoil.
00:47:28.500And then I came home, I come to Canada, and then somewhere around, I want to say it was maybe like 2016 or something, back when there was, it was like Milo Unanopolis or something, went to go speak at Berkeley.
00:47:40.520And then all of a sudden, Antifa were showing up and pepper spraying people and fighting people.
00:47:44.680And then we started to get these little, like, medieval battles over, like, if Ben Shapiro can speak at a university.
00:47:50.840And it was like, yeah, that to me, it was like, oh, my goodness, this was like, we're heading back to the same grounds that I saw in Nepal during their civil war.
00:48:00.900And for me, it was like, we're going to, we're going to reach a civil war if we're not capable here, if we're not careful here.
00:48:05.860Like, that's what our institutions are in for if they don't address this.
00:48:10.320And all that our institutions have done is behaved in a way where, no, that's actually what they're trying to foster.
00:48:18.620And, but the last, like, the last person that I remember who was, like, controversial, I actually went and saw, my wife and I, we saw Ben Shapiro speak in Vancouver.
00:48:27.700And this was when I was, like, a little bit more normie about some of these things.
00:48:32.140I didn't really understand how subversive Ben was.
00:48:35.540But he, he's like, so, okay, when you go in there, they say that no one, no one can record anything.
00:48:43.340Like, don't record off your cell phone or whatever, because they're going to be recording it for you.
00:49:52.040And it's, like, in, within Canadian law, it's one thing for us to speak broadly, sort of ideologically, and to say that, you know, biological men who socially or medically transition into women aren't actually women.
00:50:06.060And their pronouns should be he, all that stuff, like, that is one thing, but to specifically direct your language at someone and to, you know, purposefully misgender them, all that kind of stuff, that can bring a person to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.
00:50:21.260So Ben had done that, and he had put himself in that territory where that could have happened.
00:50:27.880And, you know, like, well, it's, it's unfortunate that it's, like, that's based, is that we, you know, we are, you know, it's, like, we're honest.
00:50:37.420And to be honest is to be, like, right.
00:51:06.180So Ben was going to be this, like, he was going to pat himself on the back for being this revolutionary person who was going to, like, break Canadian laws.
00:51:13.160But only if he could do it in this clandestine way where there was no evidence.
00:51:17.380And when that happened, that's when I first started to get suspicious about him, too.
00:51:20.780I, I, I'm very, uh, uh, kind of surprised by that.
00:51:26.760Because I thought that he would love to flaunt that.
00:51:29.680But it seems like he's kind of a, even a fucking pussy by his own fucking terms.
00:51:43.880Because if you're going to look at to see who, who we're talking about here, what a real free speech patriot looks like in Canada, a professor with some real scholarship on, you got to understand that Ben Shapiro goes from university to university.
00:52:08.040I mean, I mean, I think he's, I mean, I think he is a lawyer, but he definitely just goes around dunking on people who are, like, first year in university.
00:52:15.340Yeah, dunking on first year university feminists.
00:52:46.620Ben just needs, Ben just needs to go debate Ben, um, Nick Fuentes and stop relying on just slandering a person and doing the whole SJW thing where he's, like, they're a really bad person.
00:52:57.360So I don't have to entertain their ideas.
00:53:27.060I live stream on YouTube, and then I take stuff off of YouTube, and I put it on Odyssey, because otherwise I'll just lose my YouTube channel.
00:54:25.520So, a controversial professor at the University of New Brunswick is set to retire after he was accused of being a white nationalist and was condemned by more than a hundred of his fellow faculty at the university.
00:54:35.740Ricardo Duchesne, professor in the Department of Social Science, has provided his notice of early retirement to focus on his own pursuits as an independent scholar.
00:54:48.040So, he had his own blog called The Council of European Canadians.
00:55:05.340But, when you know more about this guy, uh, Professor Ricardo Duchesne, so, it kind of really brought it up in my head, because last Thursday, my buddy Tyler Russell did an interview with Dr. Ricardo Duchesne, and he asked him some good questions, and it really highlighted what a good guy this Dr. Ricardo Duchesne guy is.
00:55:32.000So, he's been a scholar, an academic, and a professor, working for decades now.
00:56:19.060So, apparently, over the course of his career, throughout the 90s and the 2000s, into the 2010s, he made, like, he started off as kind of like a multiculturalist in the history and sociology department of academia.
00:56:37.280And then, he slowly converted to understanding that he could tell that European civilization had these specific things about it that made it what he thought was, I don't know, greater or more worth, like, investigation and looking into.
00:56:59.480So, he wrote several books, and I actually have the latest book that he's written.
00:57:12.680I don't know if this is flipped backwards for you guys to see, but it says Canada and Decay, Mass Immigration, Diversity, and the Ethnocide of Euro-Canadians.
00:57:22.400And, this is one of the most well-researched books I've ever read in my life, and he's actually also a good writer, in that he could present all this information to, in layman's terms, almost.
00:57:41.100So, this is not something that you need to be super smart to read and understand.
00:57:45.060Like, and I have highlighted all the best parts of this book, I'm about two-thirds of the way through, and what he does, is he goes through all the different past Canadian historians and sociologists,
00:58:00.020and what their opinion on multiculturalism in Canada is, and how they understand the history of how different races developed Canada in general.
00:58:15.200And he shows each individual, like, ethnicities contribution for what they were actually worth, and then he contrasts that with what our current historical analysis of the past is.
00:58:35.320Because our current history that we're being taught is very specific in that it downplays the European history of it, and it tries to make it seem like it's bad.
00:58:52.640That's why they're tearing down all the statutes of Sir John A. Macdonald, because they say that he was down for, like, racism of some sort, or residential schools.
00:59:03.160And all these different things, and then they just completely try to denigrate the history that we have.
00:59:12.260And they try to add minorities into it.
00:59:15.560If you look at how they've treated the history of the last two years as well, and how disingenuous that has been.
00:59:25.040Like, the way that they're treating the rest of our history, I'm sure, is way worth whatever it is that they can get away with.
00:59:33.160And I started to see this thing, like, for me, as soon as I was concerned that the government wasn't respecting the Charter, I was like, okay, what we're going to see here is we're going to see the founding of a new country.
00:59:45.260They're, they're still going to call it Canada, Canada is going to be the same geographic area, but it'll be a new country.
00:59:51.800And I was describing it as it's like, it's as though a sort of soft coup is occurring within the institutions.
00:59:59.740Because if we're not recognizing the Charter, we're not recognizing Canada as a country.
01:00:04.660The Charter, the Charter is a good way to start in order to say, hey, we have some, some solid morals, or some solid principles here.
01:00:27.860So it's like, if you're going to, if you're going to have some sort of revolution, that's the thing that you got to get people to lie about.
01:03:04.660And on top of that, um, so, they got him because he's saying that things are anti-white, right?
01:03:16.960So, in 2014, he wrote a letter to, I think it was a city councilor and also a professor in British Columbia.
01:03:25.340And the city councilor was trying to push through legislation that said that we need to reinvestigate how Asians were discriminated against in Canada before 1946 or something retarded like that.
01:03:45.500So, then Ricardo Duchesne wrote an open letter that he put on his website and also wrote an open letter and tried to publicize it saying,
01:03:53.840Hey, you're trying to mobilize white guilt in order to, like, put through legislation and demonize white people.
01:04:01.900And also, you might be working for the Chinese government in facilitating white guilt in order to push through Chinese, Asian, uh, nationalist interests as opposed to ours over here.
01:04:19.400And his response was that you should not be teaching at your university because you're a racist and I'm in hate crime, right?
01:05:06.400So, this Ricardo Duchesne guy, he, when he finally got canceled from his university, it was in May 2019.
01:05:16.560So, what happened is the Huffington Post wrote an article saying there's a white nationalist, white supremacist professor teaching at University of New Brunswick.
01:05:54.300That's what's so frustrating about all these things, because I was reading some of the articles that you sent me about this, about this professor.
01:06:02.080And I was like, okay, well, what exactly?
01:06:04.860I'm hearing a lot of what people are accusing him of, but I'm not seeing a lot of what it is that he said that's so transgressive.
01:06:12.080And it's tough because I did not send you who he was.
01:06:15.380And I have a long history of understanding who he is.
01:06:19.360Right. Well, there is this funny thing I noticed.
01:06:21.620I forget what article it was that you sent me, but it's like, he's accused of, you know, racist and white supremacist perspectives.
01:06:29.360And there are, like, links that you can click.
01:06:32.100So, I'm like, okay, I'm going to see some citations here.
01:06:34.380I'm going to get to see what it is that he said that they are calling racist.
01:06:38.640You know, I click on the link, and it just takes me to articles about racism.
01:06:58.200So, that's what's really funny about it.
01:07:01.380So, Huffington Post was one of the mainstream media news outlets that were really trying to promote the deplatforming of this professor.
01:07:10.900So, in about mid-May, like, May 20th or something, they got the first – they got the Huffington Post article, and then they just compounded – they pressured other University of New Brunswick professors.
01:07:26.920So, they got about 100 University of New Brunswick professors to all sign a thing saying that he was being racist without academic merit.
01:07:36.620Now, how many of these professors actually had any academic merit in the same fields that Ricardo Duchesne had academic merit in?
01:07:47.580I think there was, like, two or three in the sociology and history department out of the 100.
01:07:54.140And even then, that's a conflicting political opinion about it.
01:07:59.360Yeah, that's not even how, like, science or anything works either.
01:09:12.460And he has written five books simply on the topic of academic mobbing, which is perfect for our situation because Ricardo Duchesne has been academically mobbed.
01:09:46.140But he talks about how the academic mobbing happens, where you have a professor who has a specific opinion, and it's the institution, or the people who run the institution, or other teachers or students mob a professor or an intellect in order to silence them.
01:10:14.060And academic mobbing is different from criticism, because criticism allows open debate.
01:10:23.380And they don't allow open debate anymore.
01:10:26.040And you can simply see that by the fact that if Ricardo Duchesne tries to speak at any university, which he tried to do with the help of Lindsay Shepard, a free speech activist, who originally got reprimanded by her professors at, I think it was the U of T, or no, I think it was the University of Waterloo, where she was trying to add Jordan Peterson, evolutionary psychologist, like, principles within her lesson plan.
01:10:55.060And she got reprimanded, saying that she can't use Jordan Peterson in her lesson plan.
01:11:23.140So, everybody give 07s to Lindsay Shepard.
01:11:26.300But, yeah, she's been trying to bring these people to campus.
01:11:31.660But the problem is that when you try to bring Ricardo Duchesne to campus, the security detail costs, like, $30,000 because Antifa threats so much violence against what is happening.
01:11:48.080And that the university does not take that into a camp.
01:11:54.020They don't care that leftists are implying violence.
01:11:57.120Why can't we just have a speaker without having to pay $30,000 of security to defend against violence?
01:12:03.780And then what ultimately happens is in, like, the 2019 situation where Bernier and Dave Rubin were trying to have, like, a speaking event together.
01:12:14.080Then they had Proud Boys standing there because Bernier needed to get his own security.
01:12:21.320So, then they make multiple media hit pieces about how they had Proud Boys there.
01:13:02.180And then when members of the public start to form together to cover up that gap, then the government goes in and persecutes that group and calls them terrorists.
01:13:11.120When it's like, those people were the ones who were doing the job that the government was supposed to be doing in the first place.
01:13:16.640But the government doesn't want competition because what they do is that they're deliberately, are you familiar with the term stochastic terrorism?
01:13:31.860It's where, it's like, this is basically what the media does, is they speak about things in a way that is going to incite violence against those people.
01:13:41.480Um, and it's like deliberate and you basically get enough, you get enough crazies and you create the conditions for there to be enough crazies and you sort of feed their ideology a certain way.
01:13:54.600And then you speak about their opposition a certain way and then, you know, someone snaps and they go, they go attack a person.
01:14:01.600And, um, that is a way that the government will, they'll, they'll attack certain people, but they'll also hide behind plausible deniability.
01:14:32.600But I don't think that's a totalizing, uh, theory that you could use for society, especially when white people are being dissuaded from having any group interest.
01:14:46.600So how could you have white privilege in those scenarios?
01:14:50.600And I would be much more sympathetic to their arguments if they differentiated between what they call white privilege and like some kind of majority privilege or whatever the group is that has a more well established.
01:15:04.600So, so this goes perfectly with what Ricardo Duchesne's actual thesis overall.
01:15:10.600So Ricardo Duchesne, his principle theory is that white European Canadians should have multicultural rights under the banner of multiculturalism.
01:15:36.600So, uh, a lot of conservatives, mainstream conservatives in Canada, like you, like, even like Bernie or the PPC would say that we don't like identity politics, but at the same time, identity politics is being played by every other group, but white Europeans.
01:15:58.600So what Ricardo Duchesne is supposing is that, Hey, people's group rights and people's like group affiliations, culturally, ethnically, whatever they do matter.
01:16:12.600And they do matter because you can't, you can't just assimilate everybody into Canadian culture too, especially when there's no Canadian culture.
01:16:21.600But at the end of the day, uh, uh, Ricardo Duchesne is saying that under the guise of multiculturalism, which many conservatives are trying to reject, they're trying to reject multiculturalism and say, you have to assimilate.
01:16:35.600No, uh, we can have people here who have different cultures and they want to stay their culture.
01:16:41.600You can't brainwash people into being so-called Canadian, even when there's no like consensus of what is a Canadian.
01:16:48.600But at the same time, white Europeans should be able to congregate under this banner of multiculturalism, whether they're a majority or minority doesn't matter.
01:16:59.600They should be able to have a fair shake in this game.
01:17:02.600And that is what is going to be something that's happening in the future.
01:17:41.600And I couldn't even imagine that that would have been a thing before, but it has come to fruition that I need to defend myself for being white.
01:17:54.600But again, their perspective isn't that you're being denigrated for being white.
01:17:59.600Their perspective is that, so what they would say is that there are certain attitudes, beliefs and behaviors that when you see them through that eventually created white people.
01:18:12.600You know, it would be, it's the kind of behaviors that cause a person to move away from the equator.
01:18:17.600That's ultimately what it boils down to. Right.
01:18:19.600Now they're, what they're trying to do is they're trying to say that those attitudes and behaviors, those are what they're criticizing.
01:18:49.600So that, that is, you know, group guilt or, or what, how they'll try and get around it is they'll try and say that we're not guilting you for what your ancestors did, but we are calling you out for the traits that you share among them that you're presenting today or whatever.
01:19:03.600Right. But how it falls apart is that, okay, you take that same line of logic and apply it to the opposite.
01:19:09.600And, you know, heaven, heaven forbid you criticize black people for being near the equator.
01:19:17.600It's easy enough to criticize white people for having left the equator.
01:19:21.600But, you know, you, it, it only goes in one direction and it's set up to only go in one direction.
01:19:27.600And like part of, you know, one of my arguments that the military had issue with was.
01:19:32.600To even, to even explain the idea of white grievance to say that white people are in any way being slighted at all.
01:19:41.600That shouldn't be controversial because it's like every group experiences.
01:19:46.600You know, like some form of racism or persecution to some degree, but they're trying to say that, well, that's not the case when it comes to white people.
01:19:59.600So I think you're getting spammed in the chat.
01:20:06.600But that's also why I think that, you know, the difference between majority privilege, if they could just differentiate between majority privilege and not just conflate it with white privilege.
01:20:18.600Majority privilege and white privilege.
01:20:20.600And I think that Duchesne is hitting the nail on the head where he is saying majority privilege and white privilege.
01:20:28.600And he's making a distinction, but he's also making a good case for why you should maybe have white privilege in a country where that was founded by European stock.
01:20:41.600Well, either grant it to every country or take it away from every country, but you don't get to only pursue you.
01:20:48.600You don't get to only apply those rules to only white countries.
01:20:53.600So, so, so Indians in India or China, China has like a 97 or something close to that percent Chinese majority.
01:21:06.600And then they're coming here expecting to displace European majorities.
01:22:24.600And that's usually, that's usually what happens.
01:22:27.600But in this article by this, a professor at University of Waterloo who specializes in academic momming, he's saying, I've not studied this case in enough detail to identify all the factors, but there's one major factor that is involved here.
01:22:45.600And it's because he did not accept the postmodern mentality.
01:22:52.600And it goes on to say that they, they also probably had an envy of excellence because if you go and look at Dr. Ricardo Duchesne's political history, when it, academic history, it's just like a constant stream of him writing articles and writing books where he's expanding his knowledge of being a multicultural.
01:23:22.580Into being like an ethno-nationalist for Euro-Canadians.
01:23:28.580And he battles everybody fairly with his point of view using other references throughout history.
01:23:37.580Like he is the exemplar of somebody who is using previous historical precedents and using facts in order to present his own opinion against other people's opinions.
01:23:53.580Right. And I can appreciate if, if he's conflating excellence with like being white and saying that they're jealous because white people are excellent.
01:24:03.580And, you know, then I can see people, I can see why people would be like, maybe he's a white supremacist because it's not that, it's not that many degrees away from being like, you know, if you're treating white as the same thing as excellence, then there's an issue there.
01:24:20.580Then there's an issue there, but the, you know, I don't know whether or not that's what his position is, but it's, it's.
01:24:27.580Well, when you look at all the European inventions and you look at all the European contributions to philosophy, whether it's like Greek philosophers from back in prehistoric times, or you're looking at what's happening today.
01:24:42.580So what are you going to say there's no doubting that there's like, you know, white people have definitely made this huge impact on the like technological and historical or whatever.
01:25:09.580Well, you're talking about a, like an uncle Ted kind of thing where it's like,
01:25:13.580kind of like it is all this technology that we've developed going to be leading to a future where we still have freedom.
01:25:23.580And I don't necessarily think so, but at the same time, somebody like Dr. Ricardo Duchesne is implying that freedom is an essential part of what it means to be European.
01:25:35.580So that is kind of the anti bureaucratic, uh, you know, leftist, we need to get everybody reined in, in order to make some kind of fucking evil future, which uncle Ted, Ted Kaczynski, we're not condoning any of the, uh, the terroristic things he did.
01:25:55.580But, uh, when it, when he talks about how leftism and, uh, technology demands that we have leftism.
01:26:06.580Well, I don't think that that necessarily has to be the case.
01:26:11.580It is definitely something that is, it's pushed in that direction for sure.
01:26:18.580But maybe if we have truth and we could fight against this, then we, at least we could push them off for a while.
01:26:26.580Yeah. I think this isn't the result of a person being black or white or whatever.
01:26:30.580It's more like, these are just human traits playing themselves out.
01:26:33.580And I think that, you know, maybe Europeans have made more of an impact in terms of like inventions or certain things to do with like the material world.
01:26:43.580Um, there are other, there are other groups that have made other contributions that aren't as easy to measure, but they have also turned into this weird.
01:26:56.580It's like the, the sort of uncle Ted thing that we're warning about happening through technology.
01:27:02.580That's also happened in this immaterial philosophical, whatever, that a lot of these other traditions have pursued as well.
01:27:09.580So we're all going to eventually end up at the same place, whether it's through Europeans having done it or some sort of multicultural thing or other groups or whatever.
01:27:24.580So with Ricardo Duchenne being, uh, targeted, I want to show an early example of academic mobbing or targeting.
01:27:35.580Um, this is probably the first example ever.
01:27:38.580So in Stanford university, when it was first started, they had all these prestigious professors.
01:27:44.580And there's one specific professor named professor EA Ross, Edward Alsworth Ross Ross.
01:27:53.580And this is what he said that got him canceled.
01:27:58.580So this is around the set time when they had Chinese is coming in to immigrate to work on the railroad.
01:28:07.580So what he said was, and should the worst come to the worst, it would be better for us if we turn our guns upon every vessel, bringing Japanese to our shores, rather than to permit them to land.
01:28:26.580So they're saying that instead of having more Chinese, Japanese, Asian immigrants come that we should shoot down their boats before that happens.
01:36:37.580So, so we've outlined academic censorship.
01:36:40.580I do feel like we need to really show people what we need about these other methods of censorship, right?
01:36:51.580So we have covered academic censorship with professors like Ricardo Duchesne and legal censorship, too.
01:37:03.580So I don't think we need to really show any more resources for this.
01:37:06.580But in Canada for legal censorship, I have a pretty good knowledge of what is going on.
01:37:12.580So you could say most things in Canada without inciting violence or, you know, specifically harassing a person like those are not covered under a free speech, right?
01:37:26.580I call fire in a crowded stadium, right?
01:38:19.580But also, with free speech, from what I've seen, when they talk about hate speech, hate speech is actually a law that you can't break without getting charged.
01:38:35.580But the precedent for hate speech is so strong that only about one person per year in Canada gets charged for hate speech.
01:38:51.580That's why these people like anti hate these non governmental organizations are trying to open it up so that more people get charged for these kind of, you know, infractions.