Glenn Beck delivers a message of hope and optimism in the wake of the latest terror attack in London and the Supreme Court nomination of Neil Justice, and talks about a new book by Stephen Hawking called Homo Deus, which I believe means God is gay.
00:13:06.120In fact, global child mortality is at an all-time low.
00:13:10.700Less than 5% of children die before reaching adulthood.
00:13:13.900In the developed world, the rate is less than 1%.
00:13:16.880This is all due to the unprecedented achievements of 20th century medicine, which has provided vaccines, antibiotics, improved hygiene, and much more.
00:13:26.900Every few years, we're alarmed by the outbreak of some potential new plague, such as SARS in 2002-2003, bird flu in 2005, swine flu in 9 and 10, and Ebola in 2014.
00:13:40.980SARS initially raised fears of a new black plague, eventually ended with the death of less than 1,000 people worldwide.
00:13:49.600Ebola outbreak in West Africa seemed to spin out of control.
00:13:53.320In 2014, the World Health Organization said it was the most severe public health emergency seen in modern times.
00:14:01.460But by the end, it had only infected 30,000 people and only 11,000 people died worldwide.
00:14:11.180He goes on to say, despite all of this, we still think that this is only a temporary victory.
00:14:19.680He said, however, in 2015, doctors announced the discovery of a completely new type of antibiotic.
00:14:33.180Texabiactin, which bacteria has no resistance as yet.
00:14:38.860Some scholars believe texabiactin may prove to be a game changer in the fight against highly resistant germs.
00:14:45.160Scientists are also developing revolutionary new treatments that work in radically different ways to any previous medicine.
00:14:52.500For example, some research labs are already home to nanorobots, which one day may navigate through our bloodstream, identify illnesses, and kill the pathogens in cancerous cells.
00:15:02.880Microorganisms may have 4 billion years of cumulative experience of fighting organic enemies, but they have zero experience fighting bionic predators, and therefore would find it doubtly difficult to evolve effective defenses.
00:15:20.300Then he goes into war, which is just as amazing.
00:15:23.360And the whole premise of this book is, so now what?
00:15:29.580I mean, I go from this really pessimistic, and it really is up to us whether we destroy ourselves at this point.
00:15:37.620If we don't destroy ourselves at this point, the whole world is going to change.
00:20:22.220Do, do the Republicans hold the line or do they pass now Trump care?
00:20:29.100I, I mean, if you read the reports that came out last night, uh, talking about how the Freedom Caucus was all, they were all, you know, they had enough, no votes.
00:20:39.260Now they're trying to get one or two things to, just to flip.
00:20:42.500And Trump being the art of the deal guy is like, I mean, I don't think Trump cares whether X, Y, or Z is in this bill.
00:20:49.960Um, so he is saying basically there, supposedly the Freedom Caucus and the Freedom Caucus are the best, uh, we have, um, but are in there negotiating with Trump saying like, get rid of this regulation, this regulation, and this regulation, and maybe we'll come over and vote for it.
00:21:03.460Um, so, uh, that, that would mean largely that this stuff, that the bill would pass.
00:21:09.700They only, they only had to sway a few of them.
00:21:11.920The, the issue at question is whether they can sway the Freedom Caucus without losing some moderates.
00:21:19.620They said for every Democrat you get, you'll lose two, you'll get, you'll lose two Republicans, and for every Republican you get, you'll lose two Democrats.
00:21:27.900However, the things that they're talking about taking out are pretty, uh, I mean, for a Republican to oppose them, because some of it is like, uh, you know, pre-existing conditions they want.
00:21:37.760And apparently Trump administration is absolutely not, we're not taking out pre-existing conditions.
00:21:42.640Um, but the other side of it is they want to get rid of the requirement to cover maternity care.
00:21:48.700Obviously, you know, that's a weird thing for a lot of people who would have no use for that.
00:21:52.240You know, people who are, uh, are either can't give birth because they're, you know, men, or can't give birth because they may be past the age in which they would be considering giving birth.
00:22:01.840Um, and so, like, that type of thing being taken out, I don't think is the type of thing that would take a moderate and say, you know what, absolutely not.
00:22:09.960Now, that's something a Democrat would say, um, but whether a moderate Republican opposes this bill based on the fact that you no longer have to cover maternity care for people who are men, is, I don't know that that's a deal breaker.
00:22:23.760There's some things in there that they might want to keep, but again, that's, it seems to be this negotiation.
00:22:28.060What's completely bizarre about this is the complaints about the original Obamacare bill were things like, hey, you're doing this in the cover of night.
00:22:43.760And, and if you notice that the press is only focusing on the Trump supporters that wanted universal health care.
00:22:52.060So he's going to lose a lot of his, his support in the, you know, in the red States because here's Bob who voted because he wanted full universal coverage.
00:23:03.900Cause, cause you know, Trump said he was going to get everybody covered in the government was going to pay for it.
00:23:07.340Now I think most people didn't take him seriously on that.
00:23:10.000I think most people were like, you know, he's saying it because he's making a big promise and hoping people come around.
00:23:14.920I don't think most Trump supporters who, you know, are going to bail on him because he's not giving you the universal health care he promised.
00:23:23.320The question is, will most GOP supporters bail on the GOP if they do pass this water down, if they don't do what they said, repeal it.
00:23:33.420Well, it's funny because I've been seeing all these, you know, people on the left and in the media in particular, in particular saying, oh, you know, look at what they're doing.
00:23:41.720This is, yes, they're cutting some of the taxes that were in Obamacare, but they're promising less coverage.
00:26:07.380So he was going after Comey, and he was talking to Comey because there is a statute in the law that Congress was so concerned about giving the government power through these FISA courts
00:26:22.580to go ahead and listen to foreign officials on foreign soil and have, if they're calling somebody here in the United States, what happens if, you know, somebody who's involved in something nefarious, they call Pat.
00:26:39.220But they're not talking to Pat about anything nefarious.
00:26:58.400Congress made a deal with the NSA, with Department of Homeland Security, Justice Department, everybody who's involved in any of this stuff.
00:27:07.180And they came up with a deal that said, we're going to mask those names, and there's going to be maybe 100 people in the entire country that can unmask a name.
00:27:17.960And that person has to be at the collection point.
00:27:22.620So, in other words, if the NSA has this, you know, investigation going on somebody, and they give that information masked to the FBI,
00:27:35.320the FBI can't say, let me look under the cover and see who that name is.
00:27:38.960You actually have to go back to the original collection point and say, here's why I need this name, because I think it's a guy that we're looking into.
00:28:28.400But maybe it's somebody else like Clapper, and we don't really care about them either, because it's James Clapper.
00:28:34.120So there's got to be some special exceptions, I'm sure, for some of these 100 people.
00:28:40.060Trey Gowdy is saying, that person needs to go to prison, because if we can't trust that you're going to keep innocent names of Americans out, then we can't trust this system at all, because it'll become politicized.
00:28:54.860Now, that is separate, and that storyline is good for Trump, because it looks like somebody was politically after Donald Trump and was using the system the way it's not supposed to be used.
00:29:11.480That's different than wiretapping and everything else.
00:29:17.560Somebody needs to go to jail for that.
00:29:19.500Separate that now from the storyline of, was there collusion, now they're saying collusion, with the Russians and the Donald Trump camp.
00:29:34.840There's been some absolute bombshells this week that have been released that the right doesn't want to talk about, and they're conflating the two.
00:29:45.320Somebody in the Obama administration needs to go to jail for releasing names.
00:29:51.760However, there's the story about the financial ties to Russia with Manafort and Flynn.
00:30:00.480Manafort was getting $10 million a year from Russia and laundering this money.
00:30:08.340Now, we've known this before Trump was elected, but we didn't have verification.
00:30:15.040We now have verification and the documents to prove it from a Ukrainian lawmaker.
00:30:23.140And the reason why these Ukrainians want to do this is they don't like Vladimir Putin.
00:30:29.400And Manafort was working basically for Putin and his puppet in the Ukraine.
00:30:36.160And that Ukrainian Russian friendly party was the one writing these checks to Paul Manafort to get his job was to get a positive spin on Russia, to make sure Americans saw Russia as friendly allies and not a foe.
00:30:57.300Well, I would say mission accomplished there.
00:31:22.180The second story that came out yesterday was now the FBI is admitting that they are looking into collusion with the Russians going after Hillary Clinton.
00:31:44.440They're now saying that they have evidence of meetings, of documents, of recordings where the Trump administration or the Trump people were actually colluding with the Russians on releasing more information in Trump's campaign.
00:32:36.740And it's what we said from the beginning, by the way, because, yes, I think it's very plausible and actually understandable that a campaign person who is talking to a Russian ambassador would get swept up into communications that we are monitoring.
00:32:57.320The question the problem with that is it can be abused and it may be a case here where it was abused, which is something worth looking into.
00:33:03.940The other part we should point out is this seemingly happened, at least to the reporting so far, after the election.
00:33:11.960And while that does not mean that the person, whoever did it, gets out of their trouble, it's important to know that, I think, from the perspective of understanding what the motivation was here.
00:33:22.280There are a lot of stories that happened after Trump won.
00:33:24.660Remember, the Obama people did not think Trump was going to win.
00:33:28.620I mean, I mean, at least because if he did, if you're saying I knew he was going to win, well, you should have freaking gone to a sports book and made 10 times your money on Election Day.
00:33:38.320But I mean, they did not think he was going to win.
00:33:40.860So after this, there were many stories that the Obama insiders were trying to preserve evidence of these things happening, thinking in their mind that Trump was going to come in and get rid of it and make sure that no one ever knew about it.
00:33:56.920So they that is a an interesting little thing that they may have thought to themselves, well, we're, you know, and thinking to themselves, well, we're in the right here and he's going to hide that evidence.
00:34:07.640So we're going to make sure we get it.
00:34:09.200And that should end in 10 year jail terms.
00:34:11.920That activity, whether they think it was justified or not, should end in 10 year jail terms.
00:34:16.500But it was not it did not have an effect on the election in any way.
00:34:19.760The left is dismissing the first part.
00:34:22.640The right is dismissing the second part.
00:34:25.220Both are valid and any fair minded, justice minded individual will address both of them and separate them from one another.
00:34:37.680And now this we've talked about how the fastest growing crime in America is identity theft.
00:36:01.880We have to get to this later or perhaps tomorrow.
00:36:05.120Listen to how casually Ray Kurzweil talks about what's coming.
00:36:08.940Well, we're going to become increasingly non-biological to the point where the non-biological part predominates and the biological part is not that important anymore.
00:36:50.920No more feelings for anybody in humankind.
00:36:53.520One of the greatest minds alive today.
00:36:56.200And one of the guys that Stephen Hawking is like, warning, you know, just matter of factly saying, yeah, by the way, we're just not going to have biological bodies anymore.
00:43:44.340But you get out there, you get down the road, you can be miles away from where you intended.
00:43:49.540Now, if you can do that on a negative point, you can understand that a little bitty shift right now can take you different places down the road.
00:43:58.340So what are the things that we don't sweat that we should?
00:44:02.520Here is a particular thing that we should sweat.
00:44:07.680And that is the why instead of the how.
00:44:13.100You know, when we're looking at principles, there's so many people who understand how a principle works.
00:44:20.460They can harness this principle to run their business, to run their family.
00:44:35.880But you get beyond the how and you figure out why that principle works as it does, you can begin to apply that principle in different areas of your life that seem to have no relation.
00:48:58.760Here is something that may be the most helpful thing that I could lay out for people.
00:49:05.480And this is in this book and it's detailed.
00:49:07.360But very quickly, you ever worked at something in your life and you worked and you worked and you worked and you worked and you were getting results,
00:49:16.100but you weren't getting the results you thought you should have.
00:49:18.340And so, you know, you formed a committee or you hired a consultant and, you know, maybe I should just work harder.
00:49:26.620And finally, you just said, you know, this is not going.
00:49:29.840But then you found out a year later or six months later, wow, I didn't know the truth.
00:49:36.320They lied to me or I misunderstood or, you know, if we didn't know that because we could have worked till Jesus comes and nobody would have.
00:49:45.580We would have never made this happen or had something like that happen.
00:49:49.880Here's a here's a here's an odd thing.
00:49:53.740Everywhere I've gone for the past number of years, working with companies, teams, every everybody had when I say, OK, so what do you what do you want?
00:52:54.080And the second thing is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
00:52:56.840Not a mathematical proof, but the kind of proof where people hear something they hadn't heard before or hear it in a way they hadn't heard it and they go, hmm.
00:53:03.600Well, that makes total sense, doesn't it?
00:53:05.640I don't know that I'll ever think of it in any way again.
00:53:09.100When proof beyond a reasonable doubt collides with what's in it for them, they will change in a heartbeat and they will never look back over their shoulders.
00:53:23.120Well, you know, when we look at our childhood, I mean, Stu, when my daddy said to me, because I said so, well, there's a reason that didn't work long term.
00:55:33.460The clash is getting closer to happening.
00:55:35.660The markets have been looking for some progress from Trump's promises on tax reform and regulatory rollbacks.
00:55:43.180The the uncertain fate of the health care vote has thrown into question the ability to get the rest of its agenda implemented in a timely fashion.
00:55:52.700Did you see what's happened to the stock markets in the last couple of last couple of days?
00:55:57.020The stock markets baked everything in and now they're starting to lose faith that this stuff is going to happen.
00:56:04.440And now they're starting to say, wow, maybe this is overinflated where four weeks ago it was fine.
00:56:13.040The markets have shrugged off the rate increase from the Fed on March 15th.
00:56:18.020But it is not going to shrug off the next one.
00:56:23.600May I suggest that you call Goldline now.
00:58:14.240But, I mean, our drug addiction in America, we are off the charts in drug addiction.
00:58:26.400And, you know, I don't think, again, I think we are focused on all of the wrong things and missing the little things that could change our lives.
00:59:14.140It was one of the biggest hits in 1971.
00:59:17.000For thousands of years, the roles of men and women had seemed to be pretty well defined and, for the most part, accepted.
00:59:23.820Generally speaking, men were the hunter-gatherers and women were the nurturers.
00:59:28.180But society changed, and it took some time to adapt to that change.
00:59:34.240And, as transitions can get, this one was occasionally rocky.
00:59:39.600There was a time in between when popular culture made it seem that the most important task a woman had was just to make a good cup of coffee for her man.
01:00:33.100I've got 41,000 miles on my polyglass.
01:00:36.280But polyglass means more than mileage when your wife has to drive alone.
01:00:40.620When a woman's at the wheel, polyglass means more than mileage.
01:00:51.260In the midst of all the social upheaval over the roles of men and women, ads and attitudes like these just ignited the spark of social change that led to the feminist movement of the 60s and 70s.
01:01:03.840One of the most famous protests during the movement took place in Atlantic City.
01:01:09.020It happened during the Miss America pageant in 1968.
01:01:12.520To the feminists, the annual television beauty pageant seemed a gross offense.
01:03:02.760The movement was definitely still making news.
01:03:06.240In America, they'd started to burn their bras, and a women's movement had already begun.
01:03:10.600We thought, if they can do it, we have to do it in Holland.
01:03:15.400But the coverage wasn't always popular.
01:03:18.060Fifty years ago today, the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gave women the right to vote.
01:03:24.000On this anniversary, a militant minority of women's liberationists was on the streets across the country to demand equal employment.
01:03:30.720It turned out there really weren't a lot of would-be liberated women willing to stop their work for the day in New York.
01:03:36.820Early demonstrations tended to be small, and the onlookers were by no means always sympathetic.
01:03:41.280It seemed that almost no one was opposed to women having equal opportunities for employment and compensation under equal circumstances.
01:03:49.880But with abortion on demand thrown in on top of it, along with many questions of equal access to all public bathroom facilities,
01:03:58.200and the even more concerning prospect of women being drafted into the military service and placed on the front lines of battlefields,
01:04:06.600the ERA Amendment became much, much tougher to sell to the American people.
01:04:11.920William Buckley discussed some of these issues with ERA opponent Phyllis Schlafly.
01:04:16.220The state of Connecticut ratified the so-called Equal Rights Amendment.
01:04:20.900The proposed constitutional amendment, passed overwhelmingly by the Senate and the House,
01:04:24.980holds that, quote, equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of sex.
01:04:34.120That doesn't sound particularly subversive, and I would therefore like to begin by asking Mrs. Schlafly to state her principal objection to ERA.
01:04:42.060Well, it's the very innocuous wording of the amendment that is the reason why many people didn't realize in the beginning
01:04:47.980what unfortunate consequences it would have, but fortunately the amending process calls for a full-blown debate in the state legislatures around the country,
01:04:57.900and this is where we find out some of the things that were not originally realized by many people who voted for it.
01:05:04.080We find, as we look into the matter, that ERA won't give women anything which they haven't already got or have a way of getting.
01:05:12.360But on the other hand, it will take away from women some of the most important rights and benefits and exemptions we now have.
01:05:56.520There is no question that if the Equal Rights Amendment is passed, the women would become subject to the draft.
01:06:01.060However, I think that we have a situation now where the draft is going by the boards.
01:06:07.600And furthermore, I think the question is not one of the rights of women here, but it is the question of the draft.
01:06:13.560Clearly, no sane parent would want to see either child, either a son or a daughter, subject to the draft.
01:06:19.920But if women are to be citizens and citizens are to be subject to the draft, then women should take the responsibilities as well as the rights of citizenship.
01:06:28.280It is not simply a question of being subject to the draft.
01:06:30.780It is also a question of denial of opportunity.
01:06:33.680There are many situations in which women could benefit from the draft.
01:06:41.820No matter how enlightened society was or wasn't during the 1970s, the idea of America's daughters being drafted into military service and placed on the front lines of a combat situation just didn't sit well for most Americans.
01:06:58.380Despite some impressive and possibly unlikely supporter over the years, including the Republican president of the United States in 1975.
01:07:07.460Women's liberation is truly the liberation of all people.
01:07:11.460Let 1975 International Women's Year be the year that ERA is ratified.
01:07:20.960Obviously, 1975 was not that year, even with Gerald Ford's endorsement, nor was any other year.
01:07:29.600Without the passage of the constitutional amendment, did women's rights falter and die?
01:07:35.800Are women more oppressed than they ever have been?
01:07:39.400Or do they have more rights and freedoms than at any other time in the history of all mankind?
01:07:45.960We explore those questions in the next episode.
01:07:50.400Tomorrow on the Glenn Beck Program, in Chapter 4 of The War on Women, you'll learn how the left distorts facts to gain the female voting bloc.
01:07:58.720Listen live or online at glennbeck.com slash serials.
01:08:02.260Again, not an excuse to not look at the atrocities, if you will, today or the things that we can improve on today.
01:08:14.660But when you look at where women were even 100 years ago to where they are today, I mean, to think that women.
01:08:25.480Well, they've got their own cigarette now, baby.
01:08:33.380No, but to think that 200 years ago, women all over the world were treated pretty similarly to the way women were treated in Afghanistan today or in Iran today.
01:08:45.740They have come a long way, and things are pretty balanced.
01:08:54.980You know, I just watched Mad Men, an episode of Mad Men a couple of weeks ago.
01:09:26.980I think you would, I think several times a day you would be like, whoa, what, what, what?
01:09:32.940I mean, just shocking how far we have come.
01:09:35.460And it's nice once in a while just to recognize that and see, wow, we've got some room to go, but wow, we've made a lot of, and it is this country that has made the progress.
01:09:51.500For the most part, it has been this country and this system of freedom and constitutional freedom that has provided a roadmap for the rest of the world.
01:10:03.000All right, let me tell you about our sponsor this half hour.
01:29:39.640So, we'll talk about that more next year.
01:29:41.340But here, no, it's an urgent problem now.
01:29:43.880Look, my family were Orthodox Jews on my dad's side that escaped from Tsar Nicholas II when he was encouraging the killing and the raping of Jews in the 1900s.
01:29:55.260Now, I see Vladimir Putin not as a Soviet-era guy, even though he was trained by the KGB, not as a, you know, he's not Hitler, he's not a fascist, but he is a Tsar.
01:30:06.620He wants to rebuild the glory of Mother Russia, and that means imperialism.
01:30:12.420That means taking back territory that he believes is his.
01:45:44.160By the way, Massey made this argument on the air with us yesterday.
01:45:47.260Thomas Massey from Kentucky who said, look, this is supposed to be a negotiation.
01:45:52.300And if the negotiation doesn't really start until one side says no.
01:45:57.520And if conservatives say no, they're going to have to come back to the table and try to figure out how to make this acceptable to conservatives, which is a big difference from what they have now.
01:46:07.080Whether you can get that stuff by the Senate is a whole nother issue.
01:46:09.740But that's not the House's responsibility.
01:46:11.560The House's responsibility is to pass the best bill possible.