The Glenn Beck Program - April 25, 2022


Best of the Program | 4⧸25⧸22


Episode Stats

Length

43 minutes

Words per Minute

184.5612

Word Count

8,070

Sentence Count

8

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

Glenn Beck is out of commission for a few days, but we have plenty to talk about in his absence, including CNN Plus and their catastrophic failure, new details on Joe Biden shaking hands with air once again, and Elon Musk's rumored takeover of the internet.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 welcome to the podcast uh today we uh well it's pat and i in for glenn glenn is you may have heard
00:00:06.240 on friday his voice was leaving him uh due to what he claims are allergies we believe is some
00:00:12.120 something he picked up on a on a bender with hunter biden we're not 100 sure but uh he's out
00:00:18.860 his voice is toast right now so he's going to be out today i don't know about tomorrow we'll see
00:00:22.360 how it goes uh but we had a lot to talk about today there's plenty to talk about in glenn's
00:00:25.900 absence including cnn plus and their catastrophic failure new details on that joe biden shaking
00:00:31.660 hands with air once again uh this is a continuing thing with him right now and i don't understand
00:00:37.980 what's going on and elon musk will he take over twitter looking more and more like they may accept
00:00:42.840 his offer to buy twitter which i think would be good for everybody including honestly the people
00:00:47.840 who currently own twitter they should get out of it right now because they do not do a good job
00:00:51.480 running the thing uh so check it out um it is available here on podcast don't forget to also
00:00:56.900 subscribe to pat gray unleashed uh which is also available five days a week on this very platform
00:01:02.560 and studios america uh you can rate and review both of them we'd appreciate that if you do here's the podcast
00:01:08.320 you're listening to the best of the glenn back program
00:01:19.080 it's pat and stew in for glenn beck he will be back at some point he's uh having some issues with
00:01:26.880 his uh voice everybody's sick around texas right now the allergies are absolutely ridiculous right
00:01:32.560 now uh which of course people love sneezing it's a new thing in our society they do like it it was
00:01:38.540 never a welcome activity from others uh but especially welcome now though people people look at you like
00:01:45.080 you've just killed everyone around you when you sneeze now it's so true i mean did you just murder
00:01:51.420 me right yeah coughing sneezing everything like that is just uh you know kind of frowned upon kind
00:01:57.320 of frowned upon uh pat gray joins us uh pat gray unleashed just finishing up the brand new pat gray
00:02:02.020 unleashed overtime available if you're a subscriber at blaze tv.com slash glenn every single day after the
00:02:07.760 show so make sure to check that out as well pat i've been talking about the absolute and utter
00:02:12.860 catastrophe that is cnn plus i think and we were trying to come up with a comparison
00:02:19.920 what is the greatest consumer catastrophe of all time you know media catastrophe quibi was an example
00:02:28.800 we talked about last that lasted seven times as long as cnn yeah many months and actually had some
00:02:35.060 good shows there were some good like the the reno 9-1-1 reboot they did on that was really funny
00:02:40.220 i gotta say it was actually really good they had some good shows on quibi it just was way too much
00:02:44.580 money on a project that didn't make much sense when everyone was locked down to their homes
00:02:48.240 yeah you know you couldn't watch when quibi launched you were not able to watch it on television
00:02:53.120 it was so specific for people who were out and about at the grocery store you know watching their
00:02:58.380 phones did they fix that during they eventually did try to do it but you know after it was already
00:03:03.660 a failure so did you have quibi i did actually did have it sounds like you had it yeah it was good
00:03:07.560 i mean well it wasn't good but there were a couple shows that were good okay and a couple funny shows
00:03:13.320 a couple good ideas it would have been an interesting thing to see played out to the end to see what they
00:03:18.780 could have done with it yeah um but you know that but again there's that there's uh pets.com back in
00:03:24.780 2000 that was a spectacular failure but that lasted i think it was 262 days much longer much longer
00:03:32.540 than uh cnn plus uh and i can't we talked about new coke oh new coke again new coke lasted 17 years
00:03:40.720 kind of a success in comparison oh totally a success in comparison i mean really the only thing that
00:03:45.900 they the only mistake they made with new coke was taking coke classic which was actually just coke back
00:03:50.600 then but taking coke classic off the market and people got annoyed that they took away the thing they
00:03:55.220 liked people didn't get annoyed for example diet coke was out and it was been out forever and they
00:04:01.020 introduced coke zero people weren't like damn you why did you introduce the new option for me
00:04:06.840 like people people don't mind that like they just don't like you taking away the old thing yeah it
00:04:11.100 didn't make any sense to take it away this is unless it was really a marketing ploy right i kind of
00:04:15.540 suspect all along yeah that that's what it was there is that theory out there that this was actually
00:04:19.940 because it works so well i mean the the sales of classic coke actually increased a lot when they brought
00:04:27.160 it back so you think that might happen with cnn plus like people would be like so upset cnn plus
00:04:31.400 went away that they might that vibe they might go back to regular cnn i'm not getting that i don't
00:04:37.220 think so either so i'm fascinated by this now there is some new analysis about this that maybe you have
00:04:43.400 not heard from brian stelter who works at cnn and was one of the centerpieces of cnn plus right just to
00:04:50.880 make to be clear one of the centerpieces of cnn plus was brian stelter now look brian i don't think
00:04:57.820 you're gonna make him a centerpiece no because he sucks it's just not a thing you're gonna do he's
00:05:01.920 terrible now chris wallace was another person they brought over which again i'm not very excited about
00:05:06.720 that either no i mean chris wallace i didn't watch him at fox why would i watch him at cnn plus but like
00:05:11.520 the people at cnn probably did like chris wallace because he was the one guy over at fox in their
00:05:17.500 perception who would occasionally say critical things about republicans right so maybe you could
00:05:23.500 understand him being a part but again as the centerpiece and he was i mean it seemed like
00:05:28.680 their strategy with chris wallace was like let's have him interview william shatner like all right
00:05:34.100 okay yeah and didn't he make a statement kind of like yeah i don't want to do politics anymore
00:05:38.620 right which is like well wait that's what you're you're known for so it was again a catastrophe from the
00:05:44.560 start but brian stelter had some perspective on this and i hadn't really thought of it this way
00:05:51.360 i have to admit that i mean because i thought this is a complete failure and uh everything we know about
00:05:57.000 it is a failure it's one of the greatest it's just a question is is it number one or number two on the
00:06:00.980 list are we forgetting something from like the 1700s or something that could compare to this i don't know
00:06:06.400 what it could be but brian stelter wants you to make sure you're taking your time in in in how you
00:06:12.620 think about cnn plus and whether it was a positive or a negative have you seen anything like this
00:06:18.660 happen before in the media business no i mean no and first of all i think i'm making history right
00:06:25.240 now i've never been on a program talking about the demise of that program well we probably have more
00:06:32.500 viewers now than ever before because there's so much curiosity and uh let me try out a theory on
00:06:39.960 well let me try out a theory on which is it's too early to know if this product or this service was
00:06:45.920 a success or a failure right you know you got all the haters today saying this thing was a failure
00:06:50.120 i don't know if you can even ever assess that because it just simply didn't have enough time
00:06:54.360 because of the management change in direction and at the end of the day if you buy something if you
00:06:59.580 buy a giant media company you get to do whatever you want with it but it does mean there's a lot
00:07:04.140 of suffering uh because for employees and frankly disappointment among subscribers as a result just
00:07:09.560 too early to tell that's all could know well you can't know you know i don't know i mean it lasted
00:07:14.820 less than 30 days or about 30 days uh who can know if that's a success or a failure yeah and i i said
00:07:21.540 maybe unfairly that it didn't even last a month technically it did last one month and one day
00:07:26.300 yeah uh or will it's not even completely done yet they canceled it long before a month i mean it
00:07:32.300 wasn't even close to a month when they canceled it but they did they're playing out the string until i
00:07:36.540 think april 30th so it isn't i guess it technically lasted a month and a day but i don't know i feel like
00:07:44.280 when you when your service has already after three weeks been disintegrated it's possible that is a
00:07:51.960 failure you don't need more time to assess it like it's not in like 20 in the year 2387 people
00:07:57.460 are gonna be looking back and be like you know that's cnn plus you guys just take a look at what
00:08:00.360 happened there i think that was a success huge they had 10 000 people watch it 10 000 and i i will
00:08:08.720 say this i don't believe that number i don't even i don't believe 150 000 people no way subscribe to
00:08:15.180 it i don't believe they even had 150 000 total let alone paid the wall street journal has already
00:08:21.720 come out and said they have insider information uh that it was less than 100 000 and i agree with
00:08:27.240 that i believe it was less i believe i think it's less than 50 000 here's my my theory they said 150
00:08:34.060 000 people subscribe to this thing i think it's closer to 150 okay like i mean 150 not 150 000
00:08:41.960 yeah 100 not 1500 150 now it might be higher than employees of cnn right it was brian stelter and
00:08:51.060 chris wallace and their families yes i don't believe that number for a freaking second now that
00:08:56.280 number would still be a catastrophe if you spent 300 million dollars on the product and had a billion
00:09:00.920 dollars to spend over four years you'd still be disappointed in 150 000 or 150 000 subscribers but
00:09:06.760 like i don't buy that for a second and 10 000 subscribers or 10 000 people watching video maybe
00:09:14.660 over the course of an entire day maybe maybe and i think that's what they were talking about
00:09:18.900 wasn't it 10 000 people a day a couple different ways streamed it is what i read that's so that's
00:09:25.080 bad bad really bad again they don't have people watching their main product you know if you have
00:09:33.100 a main product with a massive amount of viewers and you want to you want to have like you know fox
00:09:39.580 fox and fox nation for example i don't know i don't know how how well fox nation does but it's been in
00:09:44.540 business for multiple years i mean we could say that but you know they have fox fox news channel
00:09:50.620 which is a big channel with lots of viewers and they kind of have this big idea and then they
00:09:54.700 advertise fox nation all the time they say hey come listen to additional commentary from you know
00:09:58.840 whatever tucker carlson or whoever and you know i'm sure if people and people do i'm sure they do at
00:10:03.960 some level certainly much more than cnn plus yeah oh yeah and probably cnn regular and this thing has
00:10:15.460 just i look there are people you know look there's people who do you know they they are electricians
00:10:23.020 who work on the show and then people who run i don't know the cameras on the show and like you know
00:10:27.140 these there are people who are going to get hurt by this and it sucks and for them you know i mean it
00:10:30.740 they lured people out of really good jobs to come to cnn plus with the promise they were going to run
00:10:36.740 this thing and that's completely irresponsible by the people who did it what do you do if you're
00:10:41.740 chris wallace and you left a really good job to go over there and be their featured person at cnn plus
00:10:48.220 and now it's gone now wallace they'll probably stick somewhere on cnn right they will i thought
00:10:52.780 the rumors are going to put him at nine with uh brian williams i've heard that and that's a that's kind of
00:10:59.440 an amazing that is admission in some ways but then he can't do his own thing he's not even strong
00:11:06.620 enough they don't even trust him to do to do a newscast for an hour on the primetime cnn which has
00:11:13.880 85 viewers as opposed to 10 which is just it's an amazing thing but i mean okay worst case for chris
00:11:20.640 wallace he probably goes and it's just like a contributor and comments on years of the day or
00:11:25.120 whatever yeah you know a lot of these people left stable jobs and remember cnn knew this merger
00:11:32.500 was coming and they knew discovery didn't want it discovery was saying it publicly on in the media
00:11:38.780 that they didn't want this thing and they questioned whether it had utility it didn't and so these people
00:11:44.760 you know should have probably seen that coming but if they didn't they left good jobs to come over
00:11:49.060 to this you know disastrous cnn plus and they're going to be out on the street which is a completely
00:11:56.340 irresponsible thing for cnn to do is it a disaster though i think it's too soon to tell you think
00:12:01.100 yeah i do yeah i probably jumped the gun on that one okay i loved the twitter responses to brian
00:12:06.880 stelter over the weekend where they where they had uh a flaming hindenburg and said it's it's really
00:12:13.360 too soon to tell if dirigibles are a good form of transportation
00:12:18.760 should hydrogen be what makes it float who knows uh who knows who knows i mean is it a little bit
00:12:27.340 combustible yes but it's too soon too soon to tell really whether it's too dangerous we don't know yet
00:12:32.760 it's on the ground in flames it's a oh it's already there everybody aboard was killed yeah i i think it's
00:12:43.060 i just feel like it's time safe to say let's make the call
00:12:46.240 i mean we have a phrase oh the humanity already people know the phrase and it's specifically
00:12:54.980 around this i gotta say which one is worse the hindenburg or cnn plus you have to say the
00:13:01.700 hindenburg i don't think that was its first flight i think it had a bunch of successful flights before
00:13:06.440 that it did if i remember the history correctly yeah yeah i mean it had a run there was plenty of
00:13:11.300 hydrogen ships that got up there and were fine i mean they they adjusted the plan later and blimps
00:13:17.700 to this day still exist very true you know we see them over every football game in the nfl yeah
00:13:23.340 so they they switch the formula up a little bit
00:13:26.460 but i do you think cnn is going to switch up their formula when they learn that no one cares about what
00:13:32.600 they're doing no no they're going to continue to i don't know maybe discovery is done with brian
00:13:39.200 stelter at least and maybe the rest of the lineup too the rumor is that the the opinion people are
00:13:45.960 going to go by the end of spring they say the the opinion people are gone that would be really a
00:13:51.200 welcome change wouldn't it you know oh man it's just it really would be i thought of this when the
00:13:56.840 ukraine russia thing broke out it would be really nice to have a network where we could go to trust
00:14:02.960 some of the information yeah you know i mean look i is there are a lot of places i like and look and
00:14:07.620 trust but like you know we don't the blaze doesn't have reporters on the ground in ukraine like but
00:14:11.900 that's not the type of organization we are uh you know it would be nice if somebody if there was
00:14:16.360 someone out there who did that and did it responsibly yeah maybe cnn can recapture that
00:14:21.240 somehow or capture it for the first time well there was a time when they were that yeah you know in
00:14:27.120 the 80s it was always left early 90s you know they they were always left leaning but like when
00:14:30.940 when the first iraq war broke out like they had pretty good coverage all you had to do was everyone
00:14:36.760 was watching cnn yeah that's it was your only option yeah people were glued to it even though
00:14:42.880 you knew yeah sometimes they would go they would take a left-wing position on things and it was still
00:14:47.940 mainstream media i mean you still had that but at least nothing like today yeah at least you believe
00:14:53.300 that the video they were showing was real yeah at this point i don't even know if you could do that
00:14:56.780 on cnn i'm gonna say no okay you can't do that yeah but it's again it's too early to judge too early
00:15:02.860 yeah way too that's the that's the summary of this hour it's too early to judge cnn plus could be
00:15:07.300 successful it may in in time be viewed as a massive success that's possible it's very you know very
00:15:14.060 possible if 150 uh subscribers can be viewed as a success yeah what is that like it's like 1500
00:15:20.760 a month that they know it's like five bucks a month oh it's only oh that's right yeah in fact they cut
00:15:26.280 it to three they cut it to three so so it's uh 4500 a month which is you know not bad not bad not bad
00:15:35.040 i mean you could pay you could pay you get a one bedroom in new york for that you know it's so great
00:15:41.800 this is the best of the glenbeck program
00:15:49.400 we're talking about this uh california abortion law which allows abortion anytime during the
00:16:06.160 pregnancy as most abortion laws do now uh at least in blue states uh red states are starting to
00:16:14.240 fight back against that um but in the blue states you can't you can't be a democrat anymore and say
00:16:23.840 yeah abortion should be safe rare and legal safe and rare because they they don't care about rare
00:16:31.660 anymore and they don't they don't care when it happens anymore it could happen as the baby is
00:16:37.040 being born that's the partial birth part rare has gone the way of cnn plus it is it is no longer a
00:16:43.560 thing yeah and they're kind of proud of it or say well if it should be if it's safe and legal why
00:16:48.420 should we worry about rare yeah they want to be more common yeah safe legal and common is their new
00:16:54.060 and i don't even know safe they don't seem to care about much of that either honestly certainly not
00:16:58.360 for the baby yeah they don't care about the safety of the baby at all the only thing they care about
00:17:02.480 is legal just let it happen anytime anywhere you know we should we should have abortion clinics inside
00:17:08.960 7-elevens um because it should be that convenient it should really be just whenever they please but
00:17:16.960 in california they're passing this law of about uh um perinatal abortions which
00:17:26.740 allow the baby to die seven days after birth very strange so savannah hernandez went out on the street
00:17:35.740 asking people about this new law and what their thoughts were so basically like if they have their
00:17:41.480 baby they can neglect them for seven days and if the baby dies then they can't be held criminally
00:17:46.720 liable what do you think yeah i think whatever like helps women and yeah helps them achieve their
00:17:53.400 like dreams and what that needs to like happen it's definitely like acts to help that is helping
00:17:59.440 all of us amen so i prefer that most women make their decisions at eight weeks okay but if uh-huh but
00:18:05.660 i'm also in support of 10 months out of the womb so you think babies should be aborted 10 months after
00:18:11.200 they're born if if the mother wants to yes i think them kids so if like you want to get a late term abortion
00:18:20.340 like that's up to you you know i've had an abortion too and it's it's it was my choice and i'm happy i had that
00:18:26.200 choice i've had an abortion myself would you guys get an abortion again yes 100 times i do it multiple times
00:18:33.240 me too until i feel that i'm ready to parent um that's a choice i'll continue to make huh wow that's
00:18:38.760 great i had 22 abortions last week pat did you really yeah 21 week yeah and now i'm really happy
00:18:44.780 about 21 of them you should maybe be a little more careful is that too much is that too much for me to
00:18:50.280 ask uh pardon me is that is that too much to ask it is wow i yeah i'm sorry wow i can't believe you
00:18:57.060 even said that publicly don't be careful i've just changed my mind thank you don't be careful
00:19:02.100 get pregnant as many times as you want yeah not careful care less right care less about your
00:19:09.780 that's what we need to encourage in this society more carelessness that's the that's the uh i love
00:19:17.020 that because that when they say the don't say gay bill and you know there are they people oppose this
00:19:21.660 bill and in the bill specifically it says age appropriate conversations so to oppose the bill
00:19:27.320 you are outwardly asking for age inappropriate conversations the the conversations must be
00:19:34.680 inappropriate for the age for your view of that bill uh if you're on the left the same thing here
00:19:41.160 like if you if you say to someone what if you're more careful maybe don't do the activity yeah or
00:19:48.300 protect yourself before you do activity take some precaution i don't know there's pills for that
00:19:52.900 there's pills there's condoms there's all sorts of things yes prophylactics all sorts of things
00:19:57.260 there's all sorts of ways to make sure this this does not occur if you would not like it to occur
00:20:01.220 uh that that no that don't involve tearing the baby apart in the womb yeah i it just seems like a
00:20:08.000 basic step and you know i understand uh sometimes the world can be a complicated place however encouraging
00:20:15.380 the opposite of being careful which would be to encourage someone to be careless is an odd choice
00:20:22.340 for what we are supposed to believe is the responsible side of an argument yeah well could
00:20:28.760 this have been precipitated by a guy who once said i'm gonna teach my children i got a two daughters
00:20:35.900 nine years old and six years old i'm gonna teach them principles but if they make a mistake i don't want
00:20:42.620 them punished with a baby i don't want them punished with an std at 16 well didn't you kind of set
00:20:51.340 things up there for people to feel that way about being punished with a baby now they they consider
00:20:57.120 it a punishment that they just don't want to deal with and so they just eliminated from their life
00:21:04.020 it's incredible it really is incredible and this law goes even much much farther much than this you
00:21:10.700 know talking about you know and savannah who you know was was was here with us at the place
00:21:15.260 very nice and thoughtful person who's trying to actually get answers on these questions
00:21:21.020 and just asking questions you know i you know if you've never seen savannah she's young
00:21:27.420 she is she's not an old white man right uh and that is of course old white men have no no knowledge
00:21:34.160 and we should obviously get rid of all of them from society she's not one of them so we should
00:21:38.040 never comment no of course not abortion no pregnancy at all obviously not at all she uh comes you know
00:21:44.960 it's a different package the people talking her don't think she might be on the conservative side
00:21:50.740 of the aisle they don't really consider that so they right they're not their guard isn't up they're
00:21:55.040 just answering the questions as they feel yeah i had an abortion it was great i freaking loved it
00:21:59.540 i would recommend everybody have about 10 to 12 abortions per month
00:22:03.420 if you can do it i highly recommend it that's the attitude from some of these people and you know
00:22:11.340 is there no limit what is the limiting principle pat to the argument of women's choice what is the
00:22:19.240 limiting principle of that argument to me there isn't one there isn't one now that's a problem i mean
00:22:25.260 like like the guy said uh he prefers that you only get abort an abortion within the first eight weeks
00:22:32.660 but he also supports 10 months after birth right 10 if if the mother wants that right he is not
00:22:44.720 advocating that the dad should have any no but if the mother wants to kill the child she may yeah
00:22:51.820 after 10 months now i don't know why the 10 months barrier why not a year two years why not why not now
00:22:59.880 why not with why not his parent right now right this is the problem with this argument if his mother
00:23:06.820 wants right if his mother to abort him like if his mother decided you know you know who sucks is my
00:23:12.780 stupid kid who i just saw on television 28 years old and he's the dumbest person alive if you this is
00:23:19.400 radio but if you saw his haircut you could understand an abortion request from mommy at this point even at
00:23:25.280 28 years old he he's got the dumbest haircut i've ever seen in my life and that guy that guy maybe you
00:23:34.820 know there's an argument to be made if mommy has a choice yeah that maybe he should be aborted at 28
00:23:41.900 years old and honestly when you when you adopt the left wing view of this particular issue why why not you
00:23:51.300 why not it's the mommy's choice the kid doesn't get rights till when whenever you're saying it is
00:23:57.940 it's arbitrary yeah right at least we had a line of the birth canal before where we could say okay
00:24:05.460 you know kermit gosnell we're gonna put him in prison because he kept killing people after they
00:24:11.340 were born right that used to be there was a time way back in like 2016 where we agreed with this
00:24:17.840 at least we could acknowledge okay there's peter singer out there he's a an ethicist at princeton
00:24:23.100 there was a few people out there who would argue for abortion years after birth but it was pretty
00:24:28.260 rare now it's not it's not it's becoming more and more common because of course when you say the
00:24:34.200 fundamental foundational truth of this argument when it comes to abortion is mother's choice
00:24:39.520 there's no limit to that as long as mommy's alive how do you how do you draw this line
00:24:47.180 how do you draw the line of it's mommy's choice so mommy gets to abort the fetus it's mommy's choice
00:24:55.860 and we have no respect for life anymore just none and we people these obviously these kids
00:25:04.500 are so desensitized to human life that they don't care anymore and they don't care you can put this you
00:25:12.000 could see too they've put no thought into it even the people who have had abortions have put no thought
00:25:16.440 of this and it's because they know the standard comeback to any given argument about abortion is
00:25:22.920 well if the mom wants it and that gets you off the hook for no matter what you say yeah you'd be
00:25:27.060 like well you know wait a minute but uh that that woman was a dictator she committed genocide
00:25:31.280 well yeah but she was the mother of the country the mom wanted it mother's choice they'll justify
00:25:36.120 anything through that lens because of course when it's arbitrary choice by a person you can justify
00:25:42.460 anything right you could justify anything through that lens you know what was the case back in
00:25:47.600 houston you'll remember this pat where the mom drowned five other kids in the bathtub yeah andrea yates oh
00:25:53.080 my god it was one of the worst stories i've ever heard horrific and but like why would a leftist
00:25:59.200 oppose it why would the people in that video oppose that her treatment in that story it was
00:26:06.020 today i don't know that they would i don't know they would you just say you know well look you
00:26:11.200 know she made a choice there you know she was the oldest was seven if i remember right so i i don't
00:26:19.020 know if they would oppose that do you think we could get an on like an on record statement from
00:26:26.920 like an aoc that to oppose that case right now do you think she would do you think do you think she
00:26:33.460 would say something to the effect of look it might not be my choice right but i'm not going to affect
00:26:38.300 her choice i'm not going to affect her choice she's the mom yeah she gets to tell her uh what choice to
00:26:43.520 make there i don't know she was stark raving mad if uh you might want to right affect that choice if
00:26:50.520 we are not at that point we are close to it yeah yeah we are but we are close to it they are they're
00:26:56.200 passing just when you think it can't get any worse it does it gets worse i never would have thought
00:27:02.940 we'd get to a point where people would be saying 10 months after a birth of a of a human being
00:27:10.780 that you can end their life if the mother wants it would you have ever thought that that was possible
00:27:18.160 i never just a few years ago i mean other than like you said peter singer who has been saying this
00:27:24.440 nonsense for a while but nobody took him seriously at first apparently they are now yeah it's similar
00:27:29.640 to the crt thing you know crt bubbled up in people like you know people the equivalent of peter singer
00:27:34.900 you know at institutions for a long time it sat there for a long time growing and manifesting itself
00:27:41.220 as they taught generation after generation this nonsensical ideology and now here we are
00:27:49.680 right like now we're at the point where something uh pretty drastic has changed where now that
00:27:56.640 philosophy that was just in colleges is now being taught to your elementary school kids
00:28:01.340 because their teachers went to college and learned it back 20 30 40 years ago and we're seeing this
00:28:09.840 beginnings of that i think now with with this extreme abortion and abortion argument and the only
00:28:15.980 positive thing out of it is that it does highlight the craziness of the left in a way that maybe you
00:28:21.340 couldn't you know people when when the argument was okay well but free viability maybe it's okay
00:28:28.800 but we frown upon it we want to make it as rare as possible that argument i think makes sense to
00:28:33.600 some people it doesn't make sense to me i will say but it makes sense to some people uh i don't think
00:28:39.200 the argument of we can kill babies after they're born makes a sense to a lot of people only the extreme
00:28:43.320 left and i hope that's true because if it's not we are we're lost pat we're lost it's over
00:28:49.040 no question the civilization is is over if people can't recognize that
00:28:52.840 you're listening to the best of the glenn beck program
00:28:58.800 on friday joe biden said something interesting about the future of the u.s military
00:29:14.460 i'm not convinced this is something we should focus on but here's what he had to say
00:29:21.620 in the united states military every vehicle is going to be climate friendly every vehicle
00:29:29.100 no i mean it yeah yeah billions of dollars to do it but every vehicle is going to be climate friendly
00:29:40.200 i don't care about that what i care about is that the u.s military and i bet they do too
00:29:46.180 uh has the best equipment available to them better than anybody else's equipment at any
00:29:52.180 any cost to the climate yeah whatever it's not something whatever even considering when thinking
00:29:57.060 about the military now hopefully we don't have to use them asinine but yeah that's not like that's
00:30:01.660 not a by the way watching the video was he aware he was facing away from the podium
00:30:05.700 probably not probably not as it just seemed like he was just now i know there was people standing
00:30:11.640 back there but yeah i was i'm hoping that he heard a question from back there and he turned around
00:30:16.800 because if not we're even deeper down this uh this this problem area watch him again and and pay
00:30:23.160 attention to that because i'm pretty sure nobody says anything to him but in the united states
00:30:29.580 military yeah every vehicle is going to be why are you telling them no i mean no he means it he's
00:30:38.040 not joking billions of dollars to do it he spent billions of dollars literally not a concern not a
00:30:44.740 concern you know the one thing that when you think about the constitutional limitations of government
00:30:49.540 the one thing that they actually should be doing is a military they should have a military to protect
00:30:55.400 the country okay and in addition to uh to that minor detail uh the when you want the government to do
00:31:04.500 something you have to ask yourself a fundamental question do i care about inefficiency and i mean
00:31:11.680 that sincerely like there are things we want the government to do but if you can clear that basic
00:31:18.460 hurdle in that you don't care about inefficiency the government might have a role like for example
00:31:25.400 uh it would be inefficient to store let's say tens of thousands of ventilators right for no use
00:31:37.080 right however when a pandemic occurs it would be great to have them so you might be okay with the
00:31:44.340 inefficiency uh-huh no one can make money no business can be like you know what i'm gonna make
00:31:49.380 some money i'm gonna just store some ventilators for about 15 years until pandemic might happen right
00:31:53.520 there's no way to it's there's no way to make that into a business model so maybe the government
00:31:57.860 steps in and has some of these around now of course they tried to do that and failed so even even when
00:32:03.880 you are okay with inefficiency they'll probably screw it up but if you can embrace inefficiency
00:32:10.040 it might be okay for the government to be involved if there are no other constitutional concerns the
00:32:17.280 military is a great example of this i am completely fine with the government blowing through a billion
00:32:24.820 dollars trying to come up with a new weapon system oh yeah totally fine with it i i actually
00:32:31.100 encourage them to try take billions of dollars and try a bunch of different crazy stuff that you
00:32:38.100 think might turn into an incredible weapon system to defend us that is an okay use of taxpayer dollars
00:32:43.780 in my my opinion it is okay to spend money training soldiers for wars they may never fight
00:32:51.940 right i am fine with that make them really strong give them the best weapons make them the best
00:32:58.140 military on earth and hopefully that leads to a complete waste of money because they never fight a war
00:33:04.400 totally fine with that
00:33:06.400 this idea is incredibly stupid the last thing you should worry about when talking about defending
00:33:16.360 your country is an impossibly small percentage of global emissions right impossibly small to the
00:33:24.800 electric tanks let's not worry about electric tanks never think about it never think of it
00:33:30.060 never think of it especially when an electric car will only go 275 miles on a charge right my tank
00:33:39.180 i want that to go as far as it needs to yeah and without stopping overnight and charging it for 12 hours
00:33:51.020 exactly you know you if you know what if it's efficient and let's say the electric because they usually do
00:33:58.440 the electric vehicle costs much more however you found that it was a better way for a tank to operate
00:34:04.720 and it'll last longer all of the money on that yeah i mean yeah like if right now we don't have that
00:34:10.200 that's not possible for example one of the things we've done is come up with nuclear submarines
00:34:14.820 right because we now that is not that's not an efficient nuclear submarine how could that possibly be
00:34:22.440 because we don't care about efficiency when you're defending the country you take efficiency
00:34:27.800 and you throw it in the in the in the garbage you don't recycle it you throw it directly into the
00:34:32.600 trash you don't think about it now look we that doesn't mean waste money on nothing no when you're
00:34:37.860 spending six hundred dollars for a toilet seat that's that's the dumb but it should be at some
00:34:43.960 level expected this is why you don't turn over large portions of your economy to the government
00:34:49.000 because they're going to do things like that the military is going to buy six hundred dollar toilet
00:34:53.460 seats they are get used to it and you know i will of course if i'm in the military if i'm advising
00:34:59.720 military policy which shockingly enough at this point i am not but if i were i would advise against six
00:35:04.900 hundred dollar toilet seats however you have to go across that line item i might say you might say
00:35:09.460 not this one can we find like something a little cheaper than that right like i don't know 20 bucks
00:35:13.640 right is that possible but when they're like you know we are thinking we can't have like a hundred
00:35:18.000 million dollars try to bounce lasers off of stars yes yes you can have it yes a hundred yes here you
00:35:22.960 go here's your money bounce some lasers off of stars see if they'll come down in moscow i don't know
00:35:26.960 try it you know i mean like i when you're talking about the defense of the country you don't care
00:35:31.640 about these things and and when you talk about this is a it's remarkable people just don't think about
00:35:37.040 it when you're talking about cutting emissions the decisions they ask you to make won't make a
00:35:44.580 difference even if they're totally right on the science often conservatives will say wait a minute
00:35:50.420 well we quibble with you on this part of the science we quibble you with you on that part of
00:35:53.660 the science and that's important of course getting the science right is really important if you have a
00:35:57.500 you know a disagreement it's important to have that debate but like it's also important to realize
00:36:03.240 that if we lost like for example if our entire transportation sector not just cars not just your car but
00:36:11.480 cars trucks planes every our entire transportation sector went from what it is today to zero emissions
00:36:18.880 tomorrow we would cut something like four percent of global emissions and that percentage would be made
00:36:25.660 up by china within about two or three years so think of what a ridiculous standard that is turning
00:36:32.800 the transportation sector off not cutting its emissions not making it just our military use green
00:36:42.560 vehicles but turning our entire transportation sector off tomorrow would make basically no difference
00:36:50.520 that is how that's how grand a scale this this issue is it's not the type of issue you could say you
00:36:57.560 your personal sacrifice is a giant zilch it means nothing it is just a signal it is just a way to play
00:37:07.380 along to tell everyone who you are what you care about they are trying to influence not the climate but
00:37:15.220 your votes with this nonsense that is all it is it will not do anything you buying hybrids even you know
00:37:22.320 you know there's a lot of affinity for our our friend elon musk who who has done more to affect
00:37:28.360 uh this issue when it comes to the transportation sector than any individual human being and now the
00:37:33.340 left hates him we should point out that they obviously don't believe that global warming is the
00:37:39.540 singer single most dire existential threat to our country because obviously elon musk i mean the guys
00:37:47.660 tweeted a couple things we don't like so let's abandon him he's not he's not getting these aren't
00:37:52.240 union jobs pat so we don't care about his cutting of emissions but he's built an electric car company
00:37:57.360 and actually made it something that people want and he's built rockets that can eventually get us to
00:38:04.220 mars right because he thinks we're going to need to live there someday yes that's how seriously
00:38:08.780 believes in global warming right but honestly taking even all these cars and going to electric will make
00:38:15.780 no difference and this is not remember of course electric cars are not emission free they're built
00:38:20.200 on a on electricity that is that is largely coming from fossil fuels mostly natural gas but also some
00:38:26.760 coal and and oil and other items in addition to that there's a lot of emissions in the the process to
00:38:34.140 put these cars together that are almost never included but in addition to that there's the battery that
00:38:39.360 once it's done with its life cycle uh it's incredibly toxic to the earth and the number one supplier for
00:38:47.480 the nickel for these batteries comes from ukraine and russia so there's a lot of issues associated with
00:38:52.820 this that being said even if it was perfect and it really did cut all of these cars to zero it still
00:38:58.480 wouldn't do anything it wouldn't do anything to solve this problem even if their science is completely
00:39:03.620 right so it shows how ridiculous this conversation can be and to take what i just described described
00:39:10.000 the entire transportation sector going to zero emissions and think it should be a priority for
00:39:15.800 our military to worry about electric tanks it's got to be it is the most joe biden thing i've ever
00:39:22.380 heard in my life yeah just plain dumb dumb it's it's as if he is completely senile when it comes to
00:39:29.480 thinking of these things he i mean that's a good point because he kind of is he's it's kind of
00:39:35.800 completely senile i mean look at him on friday when he did another phantom handshake this is kind of
00:39:42.560 another another one yeah he offers his hand to the wall here in a second that help hello what do you
00:39:48.540 what are you doing what and now we watch he goes the wrong way because you're gonna see the secret
00:39:56.900 service agent which you never see follow him in there because he went the wrong way that's why
00:40:02.280 you see the secret service agent because he's going the wrong way so he turns around can we see
00:40:06.740 that one more time he turns around and offers his hand to the wall or something what what are you
00:40:13.280 doing hello and then he realizes and turns around and then goes and then goes the wrong way
00:40:20.600 and almost tripped i think it fell on his face and then the secret service and there's a secret
00:40:25.480 service oh my gosh you know i i i've been working on something pat a scientific project of sorts
00:40:30.840 uh-huh over the past few weeks for studios america my show by the way available uh on podcast
00:40:35.780 make sure to subscribe to it or on youtube.com slash studios america um it is uh a the uh joe biden gaffe
00:40:45.720 emotional triangle and i've decided to come up with this to understand the three types of feelings
00:40:53.600 and emotions you have after watching a joe biden gaffe there is funny there is uh fear
00:41:01.160 and there is sadness yes and and each gaffe has a different profile on this triangle and it's plotted
00:41:08.480 on this triangle to try to understand where it goes because sometimes i watch this and i'm like oh my gosh
00:41:12.980 what an idiot like that one that's kind of how i felt yeah it was just funny maybe a little sad not
00:41:17.680 necessarily scary when he says something about like hey we might just nuke moscow tomorrow that's
00:41:24.900 in the scary section and probably also sad not quite as funny you know these three distinct feelings you
00:41:32.120 feel when watching joe biden screw up on one of his 20 to 30 times a day you really need to under
00:41:38.500 to categorize them and i feel like we've had a a movement if we were to plot these these gaffes over
00:41:46.420 time we would see a movement towards scary i feel like we you know it was funny at first
00:41:51.680 then it got kind of sad and now it really is like especially with this war stuff i'm getting to the
00:41:57.680 point where i'm legitimately scared he's going to gaff us into world war three i am legitimately scared
00:42:03.380 of that absolutely could he almost has done it multiple times saying we had troops in in ukraine
00:42:09.080 right saying uh that it's okay a minor incursion probably won't do much of anything we probably
00:42:14.120 won't react to that and nato might not stick together there's gonna be a lot of disagreement
00:42:18.160 if they do anything um what was the other one there was another big one in there that i'm missing
00:42:22.500 it was right around the troop it was in that speech that he made in poland uh where he oh he uh regime
00:42:28.640 change in russia yeah where he basically seemed to change the u.s policy on the fly for regime change
00:42:34.680 he had another one where he was talking about gas prices and just blurted out another major change in
00:42:41.220 u.s policy this is like it's becoming an issue where vladimir putin's already not the most sane
00:42:48.680 person okay he's already doing things that are pretty erratic and we're giving him excuses to
00:42:54.420 justify that stuff to his own people he can play videos like when like what's his dumb justification
00:43:01.620 with the ukraine thing he's like oh well you know basically this is uh the united states and the west
00:43:07.800 aiding ukraine they want to come after us in russia let me show you the evidence of this here's joe
00:43:13.260 biden announcing 800 million dollars of arms coming to kill your children right russian citizens and
00:43:19.200 uh here's another video of that one's actually not a gap that's just for some reason our policy to just
00:43:23.760 announce all this stuff but then and then here he is talking about how he wants to make sure i can't be
00:43:28.780 in power anymore he wants to change your leadership i'm of course the person you voted in so
00:43:32.460 so overwhelmingly so many times and now he wants to change that does he have an argument to the
00:43:38.140 russian people about that are they going to support that probably yeah probably
00:43:41.420 you