Time Magazine has a blockbuster interview with one of the principals and he says all those people that were testifying got it wrong. And I have no problem with my memory. This is absolutely stunning. Also, the Man of the Year is not just a person of the year, it s a kid. And we talk about that as well. And the IG report, how devastating it is for the Obama administration, the DOJ, and how President Trump is the smartest guy around.
00:00:00.000Hello and welcome to the podcast for today. It's Wednesday. We got a good one for you.
00:00:05.800I mean, we go from pigeons wearing cowboy hats out in the wild.
00:00:13.440Not making that up. Nobody knows how the hats are getting on them, but they're wearing little teeny miniature cowboy hats.
00:00:19.800Uh, we go from, we go from that today to Time Magazine pretty much debunking half of the testimony that happened in the house.
00:00:30.880When they all said, no, I told, I told them. Really?
00:00:34.640Because Time Magazine has a blockbuster interview with one of the principals and he says all those people that were testifying got it wrong.
00:00:45.380And I have no problem with my memory. I don't know what happened.
00:01:01.880And the IG report, how devastating it is for the Obama administration, the DOJ, and how President Trump, because he's so good looking, so handsome,
00:01:11.980has the best words, is the smartest guy around, knows how to do it.
00:01:16.640If that man shows up and really does this trial in the Senate right, I mean, who knows?
00:02:28.820In fact, his name is mentioned in the impeachment inquiry dozens of times.
00:02:33.900He was at many of the events that were quoting at the center of the impeachment inquiry.
00:02:42.720And a 300-page report last week by the inquiry mentions Yermak by name dozens of times.
00:02:51.460But in his first interview about those public hearings, Yermak has questioned the recollections of,
00:02:59.260this is Time Magazine, of crucial witnesses into the impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump's alleged abuse of his office for political gain.
00:03:10.120So the guy who is at the center of the events that make the impeachment inquiry,
00:03:20.480the guy who is quoted, the guy who is, they say, all of them said, oh, no, he was there.
00:03:30.140He's now saying, I don't think the witnesses remember this correctly.
00:03:36.940Yermak told Time Magazine in an interview on December 4th,
00:04:10.840The most crucial point at which Yermak's recollection contradicts the testimony of the inquiry's witnesses relates to a meeting in Warsaw on September 1st,
00:04:21.060when Ukrainian President Zelensky met with Vice President Mike Pence.
00:09:01.360We talked about how well the meeting went, and that's all we talked about, end quote.
00:09:07.960In a statement, Sondland's lawyer said Ambassador Sondland stands by his prior testimony.
00:09:12.760I'm not sure which one that was and will not comment further.
00:09:16.240In his initial testimony to the impeachment inquiry in October, Sondland said he never knew the U.S. aid in Ukraine was conditional on the investigations that Trump wanted.
00:09:26.140But the following month, Sondland amended his testimony with a sworn statement in which he described the conversation with Yermak in Warsaw.
00:09:34.720Oh, now I recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said the resumption of aid would likely not occur, and we had been discussing that for many weeks.
00:09:43.220So was he lying the first time, or was he lying the second time?
00:09:49.440And this is not a rhetorical question now.
00:10:05.620I mean, it could also be the guy from Ukraine, undoubtedly.
00:10:08.880And, you know, there's an argument, and they make it in this story, that it makes sense.
00:10:15.320You know, they're still dependent on the U.S. for funding.
00:10:19.120I mean, the same thing that would have made them do this in the first place, which was to please Trump and to get the funding, could make them do this this time.
00:10:26.280However, we don't have evidence of that, and it certainly brings up a massive question.
00:10:29.980And, you know, if, let's just say, you came up with this idea to impeach a president and actually did an investigation and did a legitimate inquiry instead of the crap that they did the last couple of weeks,
00:10:41.180maybe they'd be able to sort this out.
00:10:43.540Instead, they're just jumping to it and assuming the worst in every single circumstance to get their political ends.
00:12:13.160This is a guy in the center of the story.
00:12:15.580The one, as they point out in time, the one point of contact that would actually illustrate that there was a quid pro quo for financial aid.
00:12:24.340And they have, they even talked to the guy?
00:12:31.440When Time asked him whether he ever felt there was a connection between U.S. military aid and the request for investigations, Yermak was adamant.
00:12:55.100We were told they were going to figure it out.
00:12:57.020And after a certain amount of time, the aid was unfrozen.
00:13:00.380We did not have the feeling that this aid was connected at all to any one specific issue.
00:13:06.720I think that's totally reasonable and goes completely with everything except what Sondland said as he changed his testimony.
00:13:21.720It goes completely with everything that we hear from everyone, including Sondland, until he updated a month later his own testimony to say, oh, I, oh, yeah, I did do that.
00:13:33.660Now, they're saying that it's absolutely reasonable that Sondland, I mean, that Yermak would say this because of, you know, politics.
00:13:46.660But you don't do that unless you think they're not going to impeach this president, remove him from office, and he's not going to lose the next election.
00:13:56.160So if you take the Democratic point of view on this, it makes no sense unless the president's going to steamroll the Democrats.
00:14:14.420So if President Trump is removed from office or the next president comes in and it's a Democrat, you can say, we didn't pick sides on this.
00:15:40.400We're going to have an intellectual discussion about who the person of the year is and all of the glory that this individual brings now, person of the year.
00:17:09.400We know what a problem climate change is.
00:17:13.240It's the massive, the biggest moral challenge and scientific challenge of our time.
00:17:18.960And if you don't think so, how dare you?
00:17:22.640Greta Thunberg is our time person of the year.
00:17:26.180And as we were all discussing climate change and how we're all going to die miserable, horrible deaths from either drowning or fiery death of some sort, starvation or too much food.
00:18:36.680She's alerted people that there's a problem with the climate and she's 16 years old.
00:18:40.860She screamed at all of us and said how bad we are because we've taken this world, which, by the way, I don't know if she noticed this.
00:18:47.500If she grew up in previous generations, her life's a hell of a lot better at 16 years old than it was for every previous generation before her.
00:18:55.000She could have grown up in just beautiful, beautiful peace and comfort in the World War II generation.
00:19:03.700Before she was there, maybe she could have been rounded up, you know, by a government official because she was saying controversial things against the government.
00:19:12.580Here she is, a 16-year-old who reads the world the riot act, blames us for stealing her future.
00:19:21.780This is a person who we have, whose parents and who the media has made her into a person who, I mean, listen to this statement.
00:19:33.780You have stolen my dreams and my childhood.
00:27:25.220If, if he does the impeachment trial in the Senate right, and if he does what he does best and gets people to watch, he will disrupt the Justice Department, the DOJ, intelligence community.
00:27:43.980He will destroy the credibility of the DNC.
00:27:48.180It's, it is all happening in January if they do it right.
00:27:52.980And he will be the ultimate disruptor of the year, possibly the disruptor of the last 100 years.
00:27:59.120And there's been a lot of disruption, but this one could give your country back to you.
00:32:36.100I remember when I was 19 years old and I couldn't afford it, but I remember reading about Disney being on the outs and Michael Eisner was rumored to be coming in.
00:34:06.700Then it was Avengers Endgame, Game of Thrones, the new iPhone 11, and then Jussie Smollett was number 10 of the big things that we Googled.
00:36:57.820I don't think they're freezing people to get to Mars, by the way.
00:37:00.100By the way, we never talked about the Mars thing that came out earlier this week where you can't have, if you decide, you know, hey, Elon, I'm going to go.
00:37:08.980I know you've been begging, but I'm going to go.
00:37:13.520If you live on Mars, and we don't know how much time this will take, but at least the next generation, so if you have children on Mars, those kids will be Martians, and they will not be humanoids.
00:37:32.160They will not be, I should say it this way, they will not be Earthlings.
00:37:36.360And so you will be having relations with another species, something, an alien, an alien.
00:37:47.800And they say now that the people that will be coming back and forth from Mars, if you find a hot Martian, and you're like, hey, I mean, it's just, hey, what happens on Mars stays on Mars.
00:38:02.240They say you can't do it because it might kill you.
00:49:50.740Well, it was a moral gesture for one, Misery Loves Company.
00:50:01.100But the biggest thing was that we were able to communicate what was going on, what they were trying to do to each of us.
00:50:10.680And we could find ways to try to counter what they were attempting to learn from us.
00:50:19.180And we all, being military, with any communication group, no matter how small or how large that group might be, we would find out who was the senior ranking POW in that group.
00:52:49.340She found out in August, I was shot down in April, that I actually was alive as a POW there.
00:52:58.080But she believed from the very beginning, even though my squatter mates had seen my airplane go down and blow a fire and did not see me eject.