The Glenn Beck Program - April 18, 2019


Best of the Program | Guest: Jason Buttrill | 4⧸18⧸19


Episode Stats

Length

56 minutes

Words per Minute

198.29773

Word Count

11,152

Sentence Count

13

Misogynist Sentences

25

Hate Speech Sentences

14


Summary

On today's show, we go over the Borr Borrana Press Conference and discuss what we learned from it. Plus, we dive into why the media is so desperate to dig into the report and see what's in it, and what it means for the investigation.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 welcome to the podcast uh today it's it's muller day another muller day i i i hope these never end
00:00:06.900 i hope every two or three days you have yet another muller report day uh that is happening
00:00:11.860 uh today and we're going through the report we get the bar press conference that happens during
00:00:16.100 the show we go over what he said break it down for you and if you if you have not followed this
00:00:20.980 that closely we try to get you up to speed and if you have followed it there are things you will
00:00:25.700 notice in bars press conference that are really amazing including the fact that there i mean it's
00:00:31.460 it's a more it's a more convincing case i think they were more convinced than they even let on
00:00:35.860 the initial letter that there was nothing going on with pollution i mean they could find no evidence
00:00:39.260 of that there's this list of 10 things that they describe in the obstruction of justice part of it
00:00:44.440 that are going to be the focus of the media we go into what they're going to try to do why that
00:00:49.420 matters and the report kind of gets released in the middle of the show so we go through as much as
00:00:54.560 we can and uh i mean it's it's one of those days a breaking news day we dive into all of that on
00:01:00.560 today's podcast make sure you listen to for further uh breakout at 5 p.m eastern on blaze tv
00:01:05.520 dot com slash glenn of course you can get it at any time when it comes to uh on demand uh use the
00:01:11.020 promo code glenn and save ten dollars on your membership but you get a free trial check it out
00:01:15.340 we're going to break down the entire muller report at 5 p.m eastern on blaze tv now the podcast
00:01:20.360 you're listening to the best of the glenn beck program
00:01:31.640 so here we are it's muller day part two and it seems as if that we are going to get some
00:01:43.520 expanded picture as to what's in the muller report now if you're like me i think
00:01:48.740 you don't salivate over these things like the media does the media loves to talk about this
00:01:54.720 because there's this great time that they have in this window of open speculation where they can say
00:02:01.160 whatever they want because they there's no evidence as to what's going to be in the report yet right
00:02:08.180 like we know that bar came out and said there's no collusion and you know he's not exonerated from
00:02:13.000 from the obstruction of justice but there's nothing there to actually make it rise to criminal
00:02:19.800 level and you know you have to think about what what do we expect here the the press has had a
00:02:25.460 field day since this letter came out because what they've been able to do is say why did we get this
00:02:30.980 summary from bar we don't care about some summary from some guy who works for donald trump we want to
00:02:36.620 see the whole thing we want to see every little bit of it because when we see every little bit of it we
00:02:40.460 know we're going to catch him in something we know that he was protected somehow this guy muller who
00:02:45.940 we all said was the gold standard was going to be able to go into this and and find every little
00:02:51.620 detail because he's he's so well respected by both sides well when he didn't come up with a conclusion
00:02:57.020 that we wanted now we have to there's they're still holding on to the just that little string like
00:03:04.120 that little kitty hanging from the strain he's a hang in there they're still kind of just hanging in
00:03:08.220 there hoping that they can now dig through 400 pages instead of four and find something really
00:03:13.420 damaging which i i understand what they're doing right these are democrats trying to control the
00:03:19.660 narrative and they went into uh ridiculous mode last night because of the announcement of this
00:03:26.540 press conference which is again coming up in about 20 minutes we'll have it here for you as it goes
00:03:31.060 the idea that they're trying to make the american people believe is that bar is protecting donald trump
00:03:43.520 by having a press conference before they actually release the report so in theory you'd have the report
00:03:50.620 released and then people would be able to go through it and then you'd have a press conference about it
00:03:54.340 what they're trying to say is all right well no they're doing this in advance so we don't have the
00:03:59.320 report to ask sensible questions about yet and they're doing this to essentially ease whatever
00:04:06.420 is going to come out and we know it's going to be something bad they're trying to ease the the
00:04:10.460 the horrible effects on the president's administration now is this true i don't know i mean look
00:04:18.080 every presidential uh cabinet every presidential administration when they think that something
00:04:26.980 could be damaging to them if they don't take steps to protect themselves from that thing
00:04:33.200 they're morons everybody does it everybody tries to control the narrative in washington what do you
00:04:39.860 think the nonsense of the last 24 hours has been about what are democrats doing democrats are stepping
00:04:46.140 up and democrats are saying well there's if he's having this press conference that means he must be
00:04:50.120 hiding something they're trying to control the narrative and what's interesting here and you see
00:04:55.020 this all the time is when republicans are trying to control the narrative you see extensive coverage
00:05:01.860 as to what they're trying to do in that process this is how they're trying to protect the president
00:05:06.480 this is what they're trying to do well you know what allies of the president are trying to protect
00:05:10.640 the president of course they are i mean that does not mean that there's anything bad in here
00:05:15.080 we will find out relatively soon what is in there but the democrats are doing the same thing and
00:05:21.100 they're just treated as the experts on the topic no one says hey democrats are also trying to control
00:05:28.040 the narrative the democrats don't care what's in this report the democrats care about what they can
00:05:33.420 use against donald trump and and and whoever else in the administration is their next big target and
00:05:39.580 that's what i think you have to look back at as we're going through this process we know one thing
00:05:45.500 we know is that there was nothing a criminal level of collusion in this case we know that that's already
00:05:51.740 kind of done um as far as obstruction of justice there was nothing that rose to an obvious level of
00:05:58.660 criminal uh issue and that does not mean however that the democrats won't a be able to find things
00:06:07.800 that they will try to convince america of criminality they may they may find something
00:06:13.600 that's uh juicy enough that they can go in there and say well here's this part of it is is is criminal
00:06:18.580 and we need to go after it why aren't they investigating this they can use their investigative
00:06:22.780 powers to go in and look for additional documents they can use these things as sort of like lead paths
00:06:29.060 into a new investigation and then they can drag this out over the next couple years and believe me
00:06:33.080 this is too much of an asset to them for them to let it go they are going to find something in this report
00:06:38.700 that they are going to claim and they won't believe it but they will they were going to claim
00:06:43.700 is serious enough for them to be able to go through this and uh justify additional
00:06:52.340 show in court they're going to be able to find something that they can put a show on
00:06:57.700 that's going to happen and then additionally beyond that they're going to get to a level where
00:07:03.980 um there's a strong possibility they're going to be able to find something embarrassing at the very
00:07:11.460 least so that's kind of where i think this is realistically going to land is there going to be
00:07:16.960 a text exchange related to this investigation where a prominent trump official says something negative
00:07:23.160 about trump it where they say something negative about the way something was handled where they say
00:07:28.840 something that's critical of their own administration all these things are legitimately possible and
00:07:35.220 you know that's the type of thing that is going to control a news cycle for a week or two it doesn't
00:07:40.700 make it has nothing to do with the actual real problem we have of a foreign power russia trying to
00:07:48.820 influence our elections that was the point of this and i think at the end of the day you may look back
00:07:54.860 at the muller investigation and say wow like because you know the investigations would have gone on
00:08:00.100 anyway uh they would have they would have been throwing these things out at yet anyway if the
00:08:04.600 democrats couldn't control the house they would have launched investigations anyway now you have
00:08:08.120 someone who every democrat on the record has said is incredibly credible who said well there's nothing
00:08:12.160 there so it might wind up being a huge positive overall for trump but if you remember when the
00:08:16.960 hacking went on with the dnc uh and a lot of this was obviously tied to the russia investigation when
00:08:23.100 that happened what came out of it what came out of it anything of value not really what came out of
00:08:30.840 it was embarrassing things for some of the key clinton players right it was oh well you know we think
00:08:37.280 bernie basically we think bernie sucks and we don't want him to get the nomination because he's going to
00:08:41.520 lose he's a freaking socialist so what can we do to help clinton win is there any evidence that
00:08:46.540 they moved four million votes to hillary clinton remember she won by 12 points in the primary 12
00:08:51.680 points this was not that close um but she won the primary election and bernie has held on to that as
00:08:57.740 essentially he was wronged in the primary campaign there was a lot of infighting there were certain
00:09:03.840 officials and people who had high level democratic ties that were mocked by people like podesta
00:09:10.000 and those things were embarrassing to the democrats will that type of thing come out here it's possible
00:09:16.960 it's legitimately possible and that's all you're going to be hearing about for a few weeks if that's
00:09:21.040 what happens but these things are not of fundamental importance to the united states of america which is
00:09:26.700 supposed to be what we actually care about that is supposed to be the end game here it's just very
00:09:35.060 rare that you actually see that occur so as we go through this report it's you're going to have
00:09:43.140 something in there that's going to lead the news for at least some time the idea that this is coming
00:09:48.460 out i mean you see this it comes out on a thursday tomorrow is good friday then you've got easter
00:09:53.220 weekend how long of the legs is something in here going to have the democrats and the media are going to
00:09:59.360 do as much work as they can to make sure the legs are long they want nba level legs they want legs
00:10:06.140 they want they want uh plastic man stretch armstrong legs that's what they want and they're going to
00:10:11.640 stretch this out as long as they can because this is what they have right now they certainly can't talk
00:10:15.180 about the economy uh you know there are they're going to make their case and they're going to come
00:10:20.280 out and they're going to say that that what went on here is obstruction of justice literally
00:10:27.060 no matter what is in this report that is what they're going to say is there something so serious
00:10:34.500 that it's going to convince the american people people who are in the middle who are looking back
00:10:39.300 and forth and saying i you know i don't know who to believe here are they going to be able to pull
00:10:43.320 those people over they're going to be able to pull someone over to the democratic side from the
00:10:48.300 republican side because of this report i mean i'm incredibly skeptical of that idea and and the reason is
00:10:55.220 that if they had something they there would have been more here remember there wasn't even an attempt
00:11:02.660 by muller to uh subpoena donald trump to testify in front in front of him he could have he could have
00:11:08.760 done that now whether it would have worked or not there would have been all sorts of court fights over
00:11:11.960 that instead he asked email questions essentially had him answer with the help of his attorneys and and
00:11:18.500 had donald trump answer questions in written form if he was sure that there was a borderline claim here
00:11:25.740 he would have subpoenaed him and pushed this down the road a lot further than he did
00:11:30.720 again this is someone that both republicans and democrats said was very credible and he didn't even take
00:11:37.620 that additional step to try to subpoena him and we've seen before obviously bill clinton was subpoenaed
00:11:43.000 successfully um this could have happened so without taking that step you just it's hard to imagine
00:11:50.720 they're going to be able to find something here is there stuff on roger stone we're not going to know
00:11:55.100 is there stuff on one of his kids did what did did it kushner or uh his you know obviously his son-in-law
00:12:01.900 or did did donald trump jr say something bad in a text that could be problematic it's not impossible
00:12:08.540 and we're gonna we're gonna see some of that uh here but you have to remember you have to set
00:12:12.800 the scene here and the scene is the democrats no matter what are going to say that donald trump
00:12:17.380 is guilty of obstruction of justice the media is going to echo those sentiments and it's going to
00:12:22.700 be up to the real people in america people like you who actually care about russia's influence in
00:12:31.240 the election who actually care if uh donald trump did something wrong because if he did you'd be all
00:12:36.980 over him i hope i know i would be um but we're going to look at this with with an open mind and say
00:12:42.200 all right well here's what he did wrong and here's what he did right if if any of those things are
00:12:46.380 there and i think there's a great a great lesson for all of us here to learn about how uh how
00:12:54.120 inaccurate we are with the direction we go in these in these stories because once again taking precedence
00:13:00.440 over russian influence over our elections this is a foreign power we all realize the threat of russia
00:13:06.460 and instead of talking about that everyone's going to be talking about some salacious text
00:13:09.980 so that's the scene that we have today uh and we're going to get into that a little bit more
00:13:15.340 jason buttrell is going to be joining me here in a second to go over the the schedule of events today
00:13:19.020 we have the press conference coming up in about 10 minutes it's stew on the glenbeck program we're
00:13:24.000 going to take a quick one minute break uh and we'll be back if you're catching the show live we're
00:13:28.420 about 10 minutes away from the press conference supposedly starting here on the glenbeck program
00:13:34.720 uh glen's out here for a little bit we he's not feeling well he may be joining us here uh at any
00:13:39.900 point uh jason buttrell is also with us uh jason uh is let's i mean yeah he's got military experience
00:13:46.280 he's glen's the lead researcher blah blah blah the main thing that that jason does on these days is
00:13:51.300 we force him to read all the annoying reports all these dang reports yes and i'm happy to do it it's
00:13:56.580 been two years 24 months i've been dreading today i mean how many of these have we had to read and
00:14:02.580 talk about over the last what year and a half yes it feels like a ton i know there's always a
00:14:06.820 new 5 000 page government report poor jason is stuck reading and it's not like you and glen are like
00:14:12.420 yeah can you read all of these like 5 000 pages and have them done by the show today in like two or
00:14:17.020 three hours that's all we ask i mean it's not a big it's not a big one so uh jason can you kind of
00:14:21.760 walk us through the schedule today because i mean the press conference leads the day here in a few
00:14:25.520 moments yeah we're going to find out something about this hopefully maybe a little bit about the
00:14:29.840 process is that what we're expecting here oh that's what i'm hoping and i you you were talking
00:14:34.080 about how you know i didn't ever i actually think about that that was an interesting way to look at
00:14:37.100 that i'm just controlling the narrative because what i was hoping is that the narrative will be
00:14:41.280 squashed but i guess that's a way in a way that's kind of controlling the narrative as well sure but
00:14:46.000 like it's it's been so kind of it's been so frustrating after the initial you know four page
00:14:51.120 summary was sent out because it's been spun in like a gazillion different ways but i was like please
00:14:55.860 like when i heard about the conference it's like awesome like at least just tell us look this is
00:15:00.420 why there was a four page summary because the rules were changed after ken star and the new special
00:15:04.620 counsel you know rules because i think much of the mainstream media just doesn't even talk about that
00:15:10.020 no they they they want to like create some kind of click-baity thing you know what i mean so like
00:15:14.560 yeah tell us all about that lay it all out because we're not getting it on cnn let's just get it
00:15:19.100 straight from attorney general bar's like mouth um then this is why we have to redact things we can't
00:15:24.520 talk about certain things unless they you know uh pertain to a crime um or if they have stuff about
00:15:30.460 you know uh um non-public officials yeah and this is an important part i think there's four different
00:15:35.300 ways they're redacting this information they're going to color code it so you know the reason they
00:15:38.920 redacted it part of it is grand jury um so the grand jury uh testimony cannot be put in a public
00:15:44.780 report like this unless there's a special clearance from a judge judge which they do not have so that some
00:15:48.900 of this will be because of its grand jury information that's so going to happen right it's absolutely
00:15:52.600 going to happen they're going to go for that um that's number one you also have uh and this is an
00:15:56.680 interesting one basically they don't want to throw information that could be personally damaging on
00:16:01.520 someone who's sort of a periphery character character in this and ruin their life just because
00:16:06.860 if it's a public report so you know if some guy at starbucks had some interaction uh with donald trump
00:16:12.800 or mcdonald's is probably a better example he likes he likes the mcd's if someone mcdonald's had an
00:16:17.920 interaction with donald trump and it was embarrassing for the mcdonald's employee they're
00:16:22.360 not going to include that information they're going to redact it because they don't want to
00:16:25.840 there's no reason to embarrass the mcdonald's employee over this yeah now what's interesting
00:16:29.720 is people are were saying hey well donald trump if he wasn't charged with anything is he a character
00:16:35.860 they're going to black out all the information on bar was very clear no we're not going to redact
00:16:41.460 information about donald trump he's a public uh official um and he i think he the wording he used
00:16:46.640 was a public elected official official but there's still a way they can get around that though
00:16:50.620 actually when this is why i think there's some of the gray area because they also cannot talk about
00:16:55.120 uh the current case of roger stone because of the gag order yeah that's another one of them so there
00:16:59.180 could be text messages emails whatever specifically between the two of them the president and roger
00:17:04.360 stone in theory in theory but that would be completely blacked out and correctly backed up by blacked
00:17:09.680 out they're in the middle of ongoing proceedings so they don't want to tip their hand on it as to
00:17:13.440 necessarily what they have they don't want to necessarily close down another string of the
00:17:17.260 investigation that might go from roger stone to someone else these are and if you listen to actual
00:17:23.420 legal experts and on the left and in the right they will tell you these four uh categories of redaction
00:17:29.620 are incredibly standard they're the boring standard everybody uses in this type of situation
00:17:36.580 now the left is going to say that bar is applying them incorrectly right like they can say well we
00:17:45.460 think he redacted too much what you will definitely get is a word count essentially as to what
00:17:51.980 percentage of the documents were redacted no matter what number that is they will say it's too high
00:17:58.940 they will say they redacted too much information and you know what
00:18:02.660 because this is just like it's like a it's like a series jason it's like when you want to extend
00:18:08.040 people to watch the next episode of game of thrones you give it a little cliffhanger and what
00:18:11.960 they'll do here is well we saw what they gave us but you know what's behind those black uh markers
00:18:17.000 uh that's the real stuff and they won't give us that release the whole thing and they will
00:18:21.580 they will stretch this out for another six months um so so that comes out at 11 eastern
00:18:27.340 apparently only on cds uh just for congress this is our we're still using cd-roms
00:18:32.660 i mean and we don't know when the uh the other less redacted version is going to come out yeah and
00:18:37.940 it will be i will say it will be um available for uh download on dial-up modem uh so that's going
00:18:43.140 to be coming up i can't wait for that release that's going to be exciting uh we'll be back with
00:18:47.240 more here in just a second on the muller report and the press conference right around the corner
00:18:51.100 the best of the glenn beck program
00:18:55.320 okay uh so glenn is uh he was in this morning we're prepping the show and he uh just kind of
00:19:07.840 walked out about 30 seconds before the show not feeling well and so he has gone home uh so we are
00:19:13.460 here to give you the breakdown of the muller report i it's i'm sure he was uh it wasn't that he was
00:19:19.420 feeling completely fine and just didn't want to deal with the muller report all day i'm sure
00:19:22.560 that was not the real situation he was like how many pages yeah how many am i assigned not feeling
00:19:28.260 too well at the moment all of a sudden so i'm here with jason buttrell who joins me he's a head
00:19:32.840 researcher he's the guy we're going to task with uh i mean we're all going to read it but jason's the
00:19:37.000 one who's going to have to really get nerdy with it and uh that's why you're here jason i'm sliding
00:19:41.420 into my x chair here we go gotta have the x chair today okay so i'm going to walk through here
00:19:45.860 for a couple minutes what we just learned from the muller report and i will say um bar's press
00:19:52.980 conference did reveal things that we did not know before and did give a significant
00:20:00.020 uh idea as to what direction the coverage is going to go on this and so let me go through this a little
00:20:08.180 bit uh first of all kind of walk through the process what is happening now is um we have uh in
00:20:14.700 congress there are a bunch of cd burners they've bought the last six cd roms from the shelves of
00:20:20.320 staples and they are now burning the cd roms with the report and they're going to drag it over to
00:20:27.200 congress i mean it's embarrassing i do think that if you have a dial-up modem you may be able to get
00:20:32.580 access to this now whether you can post it on myspace i'm not sure but you can check that and maybe you
00:20:40.620 can even post it on friendster we'll have to check with that i'm not 100 sure i mean it's just
00:20:44.760 embarrassing we spent how many millions of dollars on this report and then in the end of the day what
00:20:50.080 we're going to have is a bunch of cd roms being physically brought across and you know you can make
00:20:55.140 the argument okay well you know security reasons or whatever you might not want to put them on the
00:20:59.800 internet we're posting it on the internet later today like this thing it's 400 pages email the thing
00:21:04.700 you know what post it on amazon let people buy it if they have to but there should be a nice fancy
00:21:10.620 point we should we should pull this uh up and make sure we're checking for this as we go and i'm
00:21:14.300 blabbing here uh when that button comes up we should be able to download the entire 400 page report
00:21:18.980 and we will start going through it for quotes we'll start going through it for uh understanding an
00:21:24.200 additional perspective on what's actually going on here and bar came out and did you could argue
00:21:33.000 what the democrats were saying he was going to do and also you could argue exactly what any
00:21:38.400 administration would do he's trying to give you perspective so you understand what you're about
00:21:42.760 to read so let me give you this uh breakdown of what he went through that the muller report comes
00:21:50.320 in two different pieces two different chunks part one and part two part one is about collusion
00:21:56.480 now we have heard in the initial letter from bar that there was not enough evidence there was i believe
00:22:04.720 it did not rise to the level of criminality um they trump was saying completely exonerated
00:22:11.400 and i thought that was a pretty fair uh summary of of the tone of this letter when it comes to
00:22:18.520 collusion they went through and they said look there's no collusion here um and that is a that's an
00:22:25.100 interesting thing like when you say that there's no collusion what does that mean it's a summary of all
00:22:29.240 the evidence right you're saying okay there may have been things here and there but we it didn't
00:22:34.400 rise to any criminal level that was i think overthrown in the bar press conference because
00:22:43.100 what william barr said was not that there was you know some things here and there but it didn't amount
00:22:49.600 to collusion what they said was there was absolutely nothing they went so i mean he look if he's wrong on
00:22:57.760 this if he's lying on this i mean i don't see how he can he was quoting muller but they said over and
00:23:02.520 over again that there was absolutely nothing not only from donald trump not only from trump's family
00:23:10.960 not only from trump's campaign and all the people surrounding him all the way down to you know the
00:23:15.860 carter pages of the world who i think maybe like gave donald trump a high five once in his life
00:23:21.140 not any of those people not only them but no american they were able to find any evidence of
00:23:27.620 can you yeah sure go ahead put that in context of what that means for the other people that have
00:23:32.900 been charged that surrounded his campaign uh talk about papadopoulos yep um that was a huge thing if
00:23:39.480 true so what the heck was that was that all just a made-up story i mean between that ambassador and
00:23:45.620 that weird it's like or was he just braggadocious and but remember he did not get charged with it he got
00:23:50.360 charged with lying right so is it just that he was lying about it but in reality they didn't find
00:23:55.080 anything to that incident right that's a big deal and that and again like there was this idea that
00:24:01.200 trump colluded with russia the the letter from barr came out and everyone kind of realized okay doesn't
00:24:06.900 look like he colluded with russia we are now at the point that i mean there's nothing to that claim
00:24:13.260 whatsoever now we're going to look at this document obviously there's going to be more in there you never
00:24:19.220 know and you know what you're going to find in there that could be something that is you know you
00:24:23.520 don't you think is distasteful or whatever but the way it was worded and this is worded not by bar
00:24:28.340 but by muller that there was they were unable to identify any evidence this is a quote any evidence
00:24:36.560 of collusion with russia by any american let me give you the three ways they broke this down first of all
00:24:42.100 there was the internet research agency if you remember this is a social the social media sort of
00:24:45.820 attacks um they of course did come up with charges against the russians and this is another thing
00:24:51.040 that's going to be left by the wayside here but is incredibly important one of the things that this
00:24:57.060 the muller report establishes very clearly is that russia did try to manipulate our elections
00:25:06.040 to me and i've said this many times before it is not a witch hunt the only way this is a witch hunt
00:25:16.600 is if the witch you're going for is donald trump and of course the media and the left that is the
00:25:23.760 witch they're going for they want to take donald trump down so him calling it a witch hunt uh oh i
00:25:29.660 can't believe they're doing that he's really bad it's not a witch hunt not because of the trump stuff
00:25:34.360 but because of the russia stuff the idea that they found and identified not only i was at 12 russians or
00:25:39.820 13 russians who were specifically in on this campaign but also identified the the methods
00:25:44.980 uh and the process of which they of how they tried to manipulate uh american elections is incredibly
00:25:52.340 valuable i mean it's very if we could have just erased all the nonsensical politics around this
00:25:59.020 and step back and said hey you know it'd be great if we actually focused on a hostile nation to us and
00:26:05.160 what they're trying to do the muller report would have been fantastic and i hope that's what muller
00:26:11.980 was trying to do you know i really hope he was i'll say this he did he may have had other motives too
00:26:17.500 but he did do that we do know that they did try russians and there was uh we did uh indict russians
00:26:24.440 and we know they're not going to go to jail because they're just going to stay in russia obviously you
00:26:28.380 know or they've been killed already by vladimir putin uh so i don't know how much how jail would be
00:26:33.920 really i don't think it'd be that effective they may be begging for american jails for where they
00:26:37.820 actually are the point though is that that is real and that did happen and we should note that we
00:26:42.980 shouldn't that's by far the most important thing that could come out of this is what is russia doing
00:26:48.240 how do we stop it in the future so that's that's that part internet research agency again they said
00:26:53.660 they could not identify evidence could not identify any evidence that any american colluded with russia
00:27:02.560 with the internet research agency part two was the gru they hacked the democrats now this is the
00:27:08.800 thing you remember with john podesta's emails coming out you know a lot of people like to
00:27:12.740 the clintons love to blame this as the reason they lost really what came out i mean step back for a
00:27:18.120 second can you remember anything that came out of the hacks of the democratic national committee
00:27:22.600 or podesta's emails the i mean honestly the probably the most memorable thing was it started the
00:27:28.140 pizzagate conspiracies right like i mean there's there's really nothing that came out of that uh the
00:27:34.240 only thing was some infighting among democrats that embarrassed them a little bit i mean it did not turn
00:27:40.240 the election it's absurd to think that it had turned that it turned the election however uh they also
00:27:46.300 did not find any evidence that's a quote could not find any evidence that anyone in the campaign
00:27:54.200 in the administration in the trump family anyone did anything to work with russia when it comes to
00:28:01.820 hacking the democratic emails that's a pretty big deal they also talked about uh the publishing the
00:28:07.720 emails of wikileaks all this comes down to uh the end game which is they could not find anything on this
00:28:15.660 and that and that report was amazing by the way that's another one that i had to read um but talking
00:28:20.260 about the what was it 25 ish russians that were indicted in that was it that high it was something
00:28:25.400 like that it was i think it was 25 but like if you want to know how this worked read that it is so
00:28:30.760 in depth yeah i mean it's amazing investigative work they tracked bitcoin payments they tracked server
00:28:35.960 ip number uh you know numbers they found out exactly where these people were in the world i mean
00:28:40.460 it's just amazing it's so in depth but there's no question at all that russia was behind this after
00:28:44.580 you've read that and and we as uh thinking members of society have to step back and not let the media
00:28:50.820 control where these things go if all we find out of this is the exact process and identify inner workings
00:29:00.560 of russian spy activity it was worth it right like that's a huge thing that's the sort of thing that
00:29:07.280 the that we should have been doing anyway and may have done anyway in a in a private sense but it's it's
00:29:13.600 not it's not the investigation it's not the people working and tracking ip addresses and bitcoin
00:29:18.460 payments it's the media and left that have derailed this into basically the only thing that matters
00:29:24.480 about it is how much can we screw trump over on this thing yeah so what i just given you is part one
00:29:30.820 of the report part one of the report all about collusion they could not find again quote any evidence
00:29:35.940 they could not identify any evidence that supported that theory and that's why this word right here
00:29:43.120 is going to be the last word you hear about that in the report no one's going to care about
00:29:48.400 collusion anymore is all going to be dead from this moment forward because it was so clear and so
00:29:54.900 exonerating for the president on and not only just the president everyone in his campaign and everyone
00:29:59.960 in the country they could not find any evidence that anyone in the country colluded with russians on
00:30:04.480 this number one it's going to be erased and no one's going to care about it anymore collusion that word
00:30:09.580 goes away number two uh it's encouraging in a lot of ways i mean you know i i don't put anything past
00:30:17.400 any american and i i we walk into a into a you know a walmart or a starbucks you never know who the next
00:30:23.840 person over i have no idea what they're going to do they're probably super super duper creepy
00:30:27.260 joe biden's like got his hands on everybody's shoulders i have the very low expectations of people
00:30:32.520 they could come up and sniff your hair at any time but at least we're not colluding with russians
00:30:36.860 so we have that we're going to take a one minute break we're going to come back on the other side
00:30:40.480 with the obstruction stuff this is going to be the focus of the media this is what they're going to
00:30:44.620 care about this is the best of the glenbeck program
00:30:50.160 we have the new democratic uh candidate power rate ratings out they're on glenbeck.com you can read
00:31:06.460 the entire list right now and the way this works is we you know we've been working for a few months
00:31:11.300 i'm putting together an actual sort of model statistical model that kind of measures a bunch
00:31:15.820 of different things about campaigns i have 30 different categories we go over i won't bore you
00:31:20.320 with all the details but it's stuff like you know it's polling in all different areas it's you know
00:31:24.220 it's everything from social media reach to fundamentals in the campaign there's fundraising in there
00:31:29.920 uh you know there's all sorts of stuff about 30 categories measured and we're looking to see if
00:31:36.440 we can kind of identify these it makes sense of this because half the freaking country is running
00:31:40.520 for president for the democrats right now so how do you make sense of that that's what the democratic
00:31:44.780 candidate power rankings are doing if you're a sports fan you see this on all the sites you know
00:31:49.000 you have the nba power rankings you know they rank the teams one to 30 and you kind of get a sense of
00:31:53.040 where people think they are well it's a little bit more scientific than that and that we're not just
00:31:57.260 just you know it's not just my opinion uh it is a lot of data going into this as well and so we'll
00:32:03.500 kind of go through this you know from worst to first here and we'll start at number 18 wayne messam if
00:32:08.500 you don't know he's running for president you're not alone he's the mayor of miramar florida and he i
00:32:14.220 think he was a wide receiver for florida state in the mid 90s that's about about his uh his chance of
00:32:20.220 winning another we kind of have a score that this model spits out between zero and 100 uh wayne messam
00:32:26.420 in 18th place has a 13 out of 100 so i don't think there's any way a guy can go from a small town
00:32:34.120 and small city mayor to president of the united states but forget that i said that as we get later
00:32:40.800 on in this list because there's some conflicting information marianne williamson she's like a
00:32:45.540 spiritual advisor for oprah winfrey and kim kardashian perhaps if kim kardashian like uh paints her body
00:32:54.260 with a marianne williamson for president sticker and releases a new sex tape maybe she'd have a
00:32:58.880 chance i think that's about it it's about her only chance she's in 17th place her score 17 out of 100
00:33:04.940 in 16th place is eric swalwell you know the eric swalwells of the world because there's a certain
00:33:10.700 brand of presidential candidate that's not actually running for president and that's eric swalwell eric
00:33:17.340 swalwell has is under no impression that he can actually win the presidency but where's the downside
00:33:21.580 of running for president people will start knowing your name you'll be able to raise a bunch of money
00:33:25.960 that you can even pull over to your uh your house campaign later on or if you want to run for senate
00:33:31.040 or something in california later on you're raising your profile and you know eric swalwell continues
00:33:36.400 to be able to raise his profile a little bit over the hundreds of uh nameless faceless representatives
00:33:42.480 that we have and you don't know who they are because he'll go on msnbc and to say really outlandish
00:33:47.380 things for attention and that's what this is about it's an attention campaign eric swalwell 16th place
00:33:53.080 a score of 20 john delaney is next up he's a 20.3 is his score 0 to 100 uh he's been a candidate for
00:34:01.400 the 2020 race since you were a small child when you when you got out of kindergarten that's when john
00:34:08.040 delaney announced he's very rich guy uh he so he's been funding his own campaign basically he's lent
00:34:14.220 himself 16 million dollars to run his campaign um but the fact that you don't know he was running
00:34:19.100 and he's been legitimately running since july of 2017 this has been going on he's been everywhere in
00:34:25.360 iowa he's trying to make this a thing it doesn't seem like it's turning into a thing however uh he
00:34:30.940 is i will say one of the few candidates on the democratic side that will stand up against something
00:34:34.300 like medicare for all he's kind of running as a moderate he says you know capitalism's done some
00:34:38.720 good things but we need to change it there's this moderate wing of the party that's trying to make
00:34:43.500 some noise and they're almost all at the bottom of this list uh john delaney in 15th place in 14th
00:34:48.620 place did you know he was running tim ryan did you know who tim ryan was you know paul ryan you know
00:34:54.500 ryan gosling do you know tim ryan no you don't okay unless you're in ohio you probably don't who tim
00:34:59.860 ryan is he's a representative there there's probably some very unlikely path to tim ryan being a vice
00:35:07.680 presidential candidate i mean he's from ohio uh he's again running sort of as a moderate in the
00:35:12.540 campaign uh he is but just doesn't that make it impossible to win in the democratic party right
00:35:17.840 now if you're running as a moderate in the democratic party unless your name is joe biden
00:35:22.360 and honestly i there's no real evidence that joe biden is going to run as a moderate everyone keeps
00:35:26.980 saying that but i mean every time joe's asked about he's like i'm the most progressive guy in this in
00:35:31.820 this campaign i mean he's not running as a moderate even if you think 30 years ago he may have been
00:35:36.660 moderate he was one of the most progressive candidates running for president in 2008 as a
00:35:41.820 senator he i mean this idea that he's a moderate is is perplexing to me but uh tim ryan comes in
00:35:47.760 and 14th place with a score of 21 out of 100 on the candidate rankings by the way you can get all
00:35:54.100 these again at glennbeck.com it's interesting to read through them and see where everyone stands
00:35:58.260 in 13th place tulsi gabbard she's got a score of 26 now tulsi is a weird that's a weird bird
00:36:04.860 that tulsi gabbard she's from hawaii uh she is very very left she's in the bernie socialist side
00:36:12.640 of the of the party which you may have noticed is kind of the only side of the party but i digress
00:36:19.260 she has a very strange history though she kind of came up as a right winger she took positions her
00:36:26.560 dad was a big anti-gay rights activist type of person um we know was on the gay conversion
00:36:33.100 therapy thing she did like appearances and and uh and and such for that cause so she has like a
00:36:40.020 very anti if you think about this in a democratic primary the idea that you took a stand a few years
00:36:46.260 ago uh for gay conversion therapy probably not going to help you in the primary race uh she loves
00:36:53.480 the bashir al-assad she's like number one in the fan club it's her and david duke they're the only
00:36:58.200 two people in the in the assad fan club she loves him she doesn't think he did anything wrong and
00:37:03.880 she's just a strange candid she's kind of she was actually sort of endorsed by david duke in the
00:37:08.420 past again this is a democrat we're talking about it's i mean and if you know anything about history
00:37:12.500 it might not surprise you that david duke duke would would endorse a democrat uh but that's something
00:37:18.120 that which at least shocked the media whatever strain of the flu that allows alex jones and
00:37:25.800 former socialist presidential candidate and democratic congresswoman cynthia mckinney
00:37:30.420 uh to to be best friends whatever strain of the flu that is that's kind of what tulsi gabbard has
00:37:37.940 it's a weird combination uh of characteristics and a candidate i don't see how she wins the nomination
00:37:43.640 but she's in 13th place in 12th place the yang gang makes their appearance andrew yang
00:37:49.640 a score of 27 out of 100 yang is uh is interesting in that he's you know pretty smart guy like if you
00:37:58.100 heard his interview with ben shapiro i would highly recommend it every democratic candidate should do
00:38:01.720 these types of interviews we've invited a lot of them on of course they won't show up and talk to glenn
00:38:05.180 or any of us uh they you know yang went on with shapiro and it was smart of him to do so because i
00:38:10.100 think he convinced a lot of people that at least he's not insane um however he has i i think he makes
00:38:16.380 occasional sense which is not not something you can do in the democratic party right now you can't
00:38:23.380 you can't have a sensible take on something he does occasionally do that he also makes a lot of
00:38:28.120 statements that don't make any sense he's big on uh the universal basic basic income but if you hear
00:38:32.440 his description about why it kind of comes flows from almost the uh you know uh conservative libertarian
00:38:41.120 argument for it which there is one and it's a little convoluted i i absolutely encourage you
00:38:47.040 to listen to that shapiro yang interview it was pretty interesting he is the only candidate to
00:38:51.160 outline an anti-circumcision position which makes him uh he's now leading the field in commentary about
00:38:57.980 the private parts of male babies and that is that's something he can just take on his own he's the only
00:39:02.700 guy doing that uh we're going through the top 18 candidates here this is where they stand at this
00:39:07.740 at this moment in 11th place is jay inslee he has a score of 30 out of 100 and inslee if you think
00:39:13.760 of inslee as a candidate you think of like lindsey graham 2016 if you remember lindsey graham in his
00:39:19.740 candidacy it was essentially a one issue candidacy he wanted to get on stage in the debates and take
00:39:25.620 foreign affairs um you know the war on terror a hawkish foreign policy into the debate people weren't
00:39:34.640 really talking about it it was more of a domestic issues election and he ran for president largely to
00:39:39.320 try to make people talk about foreign policy uh he ran a single issue campaign in 2016 on hawkish
00:39:47.080 foreign policy and now jay inslee is essentially running one on hawkishly fighting the weather like
00:39:52.400 he's a big climate guy he's the governor of washington but he's been talking about the climate
00:39:56.660 incessantly forever maybe he's the type of person who could be in the picture for a vice presidential
00:40:01.640 nod but he's really in the race to you know kind of force front runners left on the climate i don't
00:40:07.460 know if he can stop that burning orb in the sky we'll see i mean maybe if we elect him he will he'll
00:40:13.000 turn the whole thing off and everything will be dark just like we wanted uh john hickenlooper yeah
00:40:18.120 he's running too by the way how many so far have you heard that you knew were running for president
00:40:21.920 i mean two maybe john hickenlooper has a score of 32 out of 100
00:40:27.860 uh when it comes to quality of democratic uh primary chances to win we're looking at you know
00:40:33.680 not whether they're good candidates or whether we would vote for them certainly they're all awful on
00:40:37.200 that front but would do they have the chance to win the democratic nomination hickenlooper another
00:40:41.480 former governor uh you know he has some moderate tendencies i guess you know he at least is trying
00:40:47.280 to play those up maybe you'd see him as like a a you know the type of person who would get a vp
00:40:52.180 candidacy behind a cory booker or kamala harris somebody like that you have to wonder though if
00:40:57.680 the democrats want another you know kind of you know white bread vanilla unknown zilch of a candidate
00:41:06.280 again i mean this is what they tried with tim kane i mean and does anyone even remember that tim kane
00:41:11.020 ran for president i mean at least people remember dan quayle does anybody even remember tim kane's name
00:41:16.480 i bet 90 of america doesn't remember who ran with hillary clinton right now that's how much of
00:41:20.660 that's how little an impact he made and i don't know that you go with a guy like hickenlooper
00:41:25.100 um after that experience i will say i find it very hard to believe that president hickenlooper could
00:41:31.220 be a thing i just i just doesn't feel like the type of name that would be president of the united states
00:41:37.040 and that's not an actual reason to not be president but it just doesn't feel like you could
00:41:42.240 see hickenlooper on a bumper sticker like that though i guess it happened in colorado when he became
00:41:46.120 governor uh julian castro comes in ninth place with a 36 score out of 100 and you know there was a time
00:41:54.560 where it looked like castro could be kind of big i mean he was kind of picked out of the democratic
00:41:59.560 field a young up-and-coming democrat he's kind of like a uh you know four-star high school football
00:42:04.280 recruit gets the big sec you know scholarship and then he's pretty mediocre and he's going very late
00:42:10.100 in mock drafts that's kind of where he is if you remember a willy wonka there was that one girl who
00:42:15.720 was really rich and she had like the entire staff of people going through the willy wonka bars to find
00:42:20.500 the golden ticket that's what we're doing right now with the muller report we have thousands and
00:42:24.620 thousands of people reading it simultaneously and we're going to get the highlights of that i should
00:42:28.300 tell you that tonight if you go to blaze tv.com slash glenn use the promo code glenn if you're not a
00:42:33.180 subscriber already you can watch tonight we have an hour-long uh sort of special right up to 5 p.m eastern
00:42:38.360 going through everything we know about the muller report where it stands where we're going and we'll
00:42:44.280 get into that uh in more detail as we get it we're kind of in the middle of going through it right now
00:42:48.500 we're gonna have some nuggets here for you in just a couple of minutes and we'll kind of find out
00:42:53.080 what we know where this is going we you know we know the media is going to find a way to make this
00:42:57.040 into the story for the next few weeks and we want to know where it's going we want to know if any of
00:43:00.920 it's true we want to know how much of it is you know a bunch of lie and spin and that's how we're
00:43:05.700 going to approach this thing let's see what we can find and when we have it we will uh let you uh
00:43:10.620 let you in on all of it as well you can get the report now online you can also get the democratic
00:43:14.960 primary power rankings here we have those right now online at glennbeck.com we're up to number eight
00:43:21.300 on the list there's 18 candidates running number eight kirsten gillibrand um now she was initially
00:43:27.080 a moderate and supposedly and then kind of went transformed into someone to the far left and now
00:43:32.620 she kind of seems to dabble in whatever news story is sort of popular at the moment she became
00:43:37.160 sort of the prominent voice of the me too movement when she asked for al franken to resign
00:43:43.300 kind of a problem that she didn't really realize at that moment though is that the left has no
00:43:49.480 interest in consistently enforcing these new standards they've come up with they don't care
00:43:54.520 about me too when it means getting rid of a crappy comedian who votes the way they like
00:43:59.200 so the al franken thing is actually turning out to be a bad thing for gillibrand in the primary
00:44:04.840 because democrats didn't care about how what al franken did to some woman they don't care about that
00:44:09.340 what they care about is al franken uh voted for a lot of left-wing socialist things that's what they
00:44:16.220 care about so now gillibrand's support of a woman who told her truth about an alleged series of
00:44:23.100 assaults with photographic evidence by the way it's now her achilles heel in the democratic primary
00:44:29.020 because you know what the old hashtag believe all women has its limits and she's learning that one
00:44:37.120 it kind of was supposed to be kirsten gillibrand's time you know now it's kind of hashtag times up
00:44:43.060 and that's kind of how it looks for her right now she's in eighth place a score of 38 out of 100
00:44:48.540 if you're just joining us we have a zero to 100 scale and it's kind of a statistical model to see
00:44:53.660 where these candidates actually stand in seventh place amy klobuchar now klobuchar has a decent case
00:45:00.200 for a candidacy here uh she's a woman she's from the midwest uh she's outperformed electoral
00:45:05.500 expectations many times you know they made a big deal about beto o'rourke when o'rourke's run against
00:45:11.400 cruz o'rourke outperformed generic house democrats by about four points klobuchar did that and outperformed
00:45:19.760 house democrats by 13 points she's been much more impressive electorally than beto o'rourke has
00:45:26.540 she's got she's probably a top tier candidate for vice president um and you know i say these nice
00:45:32.600 things about her so she doesn't throw something at me uh because apparently she does that a lot as
00:45:37.420 well in sixth place elizabeth warren a score of 46 out of 100 you'll notice these we haven't had one
00:45:44.440 over 50 50 on the score here and we're all all the way up to number six elizabeth warren as we know
00:45:50.980 is not a good candidate she is a socialist on policy she's basically bernie she gaffs constantly
00:45:58.200 like a joe biden she is not likable at all when she tries to act natural uh she fails miserably
00:46:06.800 she is uh you know i mean if you want to say something positive about her she's at least
00:46:11.640 one of the only people who are releasing policy plans but they're things like i want a wealth tax
00:46:16.260 i am native american you should believe me i also want to you know nationalize a good chunk of the
00:46:23.900 prescription drug production in america these are not things that most people would find appealing
00:46:29.520 but i guess in the in the primary maybe they will i just don't think that right now the democratic
00:46:34.000 party is about policy you'll see this again with a muller report reaction today the democratic party
00:46:38.800 right now exists to do one thing and that is to beat donald trump get them out of office by any
00:46:44.320 means necessary after that they'll figure out who the next person is they want to get out of office or
00:46:48.520 you know their next goal but they don't care about these policies right now um bottom line is uh you
00:46:55.360 just can't run hillary clinton part two against donald trump that's a terrible idea and that's what
00:47:01.320 elizabeth warren is in fifth place cory booker he's got a score of 55.5 uh you know cory's just an actor
00:47:10.620 you know he is he's one of these guys he's just constantly overacting he's trying to figure out
00:47:15.020 in this constant real-time assessment of every audience to figure out what they think he should be
00:47:22.460 and you know he overdoes it he's his eyes are bulging all the time his arms are flailing it's
00:47:29.560 part of his act and you can kind of feel him doing it when you're a guy who's calling yourself
00:47:34.960 spartacus in the middle of a hearing you just know the overacting is there and you know cory booker is
00:47:40.860 not convincing you can feel him trying too hard all the time trying too hard and i think the fact that
00:47:47.000 people will see through that eventually will be his downfall um and he's not a great guy for vice
00:47:51.780 president i don't think either because he's so attention hungry he really wants people to talk
00:47:55.920 about him look at him think about him i don't spend much time doing that but cory booker in fifth place
00:48:01.400 on our top 18 candidates as it stands right now for president of the united states on the democratic
00:48:07.060 nomination side number four i mean this is a surprise to me never thought this would be the thing
00:48:12.580 but pete buddige a guy who's a mayor from from south bend indiana and remember like we're looking at
00:48:19.700 this as a snapshot of where we are in this campaign right now not necessarily where this is going to
00:48:23.860 turn up i mean it's hard for me to believe that the mayor of south bend indiana is going to be or is it
00:48:28.500 pawnee it's one of those towns in indiana how is that person going to really go from there to president
00:48:33.820 the united states i mean maybe uh it seems that that's the thing these days uh i don't know uh he is
00:48:41.880 openly gay and you should know that he's openly gay because you should not be prejudiced against people
00:48:47.040 who are openly gay remember the phrase openly gay we all know you're evil you're already listening
00:48:52.000 to the glenbeck program so we know you're an evil person uh you need to understand that being openly
00:48:56.480 gay doesn't mean that you aren't capable of governing an effective manner and i know because
00:49:01.200 you're listening to the glenbeck program you're on some talk radio station with evil conservatives you
00:49:05.480 already think you know what if he's gay he can't govern but no that's not true by the way also don't
00:49:13.780 just treat him as some boring white guy because that's not true either he's historic every you
00:49:17.960 know what we should do is constantly focus on the fact that he's gay but also forget that he's gay
00:49:23.140 all the time you should just be thinking is this person openly gay yes he is but on the other hand
00:49:30.040 you should not factor it into your decision whatsoever however you should factor it into
00:49:33.200 your decision because it's historic remember all of these things at the same time uh that is
00:49:38.720 pete buddige you know look i will say this and i mentioned this long before he's had this
00:49:43.700 little bump the one thing about buddige that is actually notable is he has internal
00:49:49.220 obama machine support obama mentioned him before anybody knew who he was they like him because he's
00:49:56.660 a military veteran he's you know he's a road scholar went to harvard all that so he kind of fits that
00:50:01.700 obama profile he's not the military veteran part but the other parts the military veteran part they
00:50:06.660 think will appeal to people in the middle of the country he's calm he's an effective speaker he's not
00:50:11.800 going to lose lose it and as glenn kind of pointed out the other day running cory booker is trying to
00:50:17.600 fight fire with fire with trump buddige is trying to fight fire with water he's the exact opposite of
00:50:23.960 trump he's going to sit back and he's not going to he's not going to give his arms aren't going to
00:50:27.100 flail he's not going to start he's not going to make accusations not going to supposedly call people
00:50:30.240 names he's trying to do the opposite i will also point this out no one has said a bad word about him
00:50:38.200 yet this is not this campaign is not going to end with pete buddige winning the nomination without
00:50:43.140 anyone criticizing him and there has been zero counted zero criticism of pete buddige they're not
00:50:50.780 going to allow the other democrats are not going to just give this nomination to him they're going to
00:50:55.040 fight against him they're going to come up with things uh that don't make him look so good they're
00:50:58.680 going to try to put him in positions where he doesn't look so good and eventually that's going to
00:51:02.320 take its toll whether he can survive that is is really the question of whether he's going to be the
00:51:06.860 democratic nominee in third place bob frank o'rourke you may know him as robert francis o'rourke
00:51:13.600 but if you know him as beto o'rourke you're falling for something because you know what he's not actually
00:51:18.200 hispanic you can make the argument he's more hispanic than the average white irishman i suppose but
00:51:23.600 he is not a hispanic and he's zero percent hispanic uh you know he is part of this sort of thing the
00:51:30.960 democrats are doing now which is like hey what if we run someone who's really famous for losing an
00:51:35.900 election this is like a new thing among democrats oh stacy abrams she'll be gillam in florida he'll
00:51:42.880 be wonderful taking these candidates that they say impressively lost and running them for higher
00:51:48.740 office is now apparently a democratic thing uh now look the fundraising is good for beto
00:51:54.460 um he's got a lot of people on like now this is youtube channel that apparently like him
00:52:00.540 he loves praising below average quarterbacks that have no business being in the nfl whether they
00:52:06.560 kneel or not uh his hands though flail around like crazy i mean his hands go in places i don't
00:52:13.140 understand the hand gesture thing they go in odd places places that even joe biden's hands don't go
00:52:17.480 and that could be an issue he's not a convincing speaker i'll say that i'm watching him in the debates
00:52:23.160 here in texas you know he's always jumping up on on countertops like he's a cat i just i i don't
00:52:30.120 know that beto is going to be able to do it but again this field is a crappy field he's in third
00:52:34.040 place 62.9 second place bernie sanders sanders is uh i mean he's he's the he's the sign of of the
00:52:42.940 democratic uh campaign right now i mean this is a guy who got zero co-sponsors on his medicare for all
00:52:48.380 bill in 2013 here we are six years later and every candidate in the field except for some of
00:52:54.300 the people in like 17th and 18th place are supporting medicare for all he he basically
00:53:00.060 outlawed your right to get a doctor outside of medicare for all outlawing private insurance it
00:53:05.800 would be illegal and every senator that is running for president signed onto that bill that is where
00:53:11.380 we are this is a guy you're not going to out socialist a guy who who went to the soviet union
00:53:15.720 on his honeymoon like you're never going to find a place to his left and as he goes as the rest of
00:53:20.520 the party moves left bernie goes even further left i just don't understand i mean do democrats really
00:53:26.800 want to try this with bernie sanders do you really want to take you're a party that lost with hillary
00:53:31.800 clinton in 2016 and you want to try running a guy who's six years older who's also most famous for
00:53:39.200 losing to hillary clinton in 2016 that does not seem like the path to a victory but the democrats
00:53:46.420 may very well attempt that here with bernie sanders number two again the scores are one to 100 he's at
00:53:52.140 68.3 edging him out at 69.1 for first place right now is kamala harris now harris has a lot going for
00:54:01.300 her i think in the campaign she's not ahead in polling as of now bernie's well ahead of her but you know
00:54:06.540 polling takes more of a precedent in these models as we get closer to the elections she's got a big
00:54:12.100 big money factory she doesn't hide that she wants to take big dollar donations you know bernie's like
00:54:17.060 oh you send me two dollars she's like send me two million dollars she's got a lot of money she's got
00:54:22.320 a lot of big wealthy power base you know she has a history of of some strict law and order policies
00:54:29.240 which is are not going to help her in the democratic campaign but the things your opponent leaks against
00:54:33.940 you in a primary are the things you put in your own commercials in the general she's not going to
00:54:38.880 be a pushover if she makes it i don't she's not a hillary clinton she's used to dealing with you know
00:54:43.680 she's a prosecutor she's used to dealing with high pressure situations which is what trump brings to
00:54:48.080 the table um that being said she's way too far left to think that she could be nominated as in the
00:54:54.640 president united states and win an election in america i don't know how that happens um but who knows
00:55:01.280 maybe it can she also did have an affair um and what's interesting about that affair is here we are
00:55:08.460 in the me too generation kamala harris benefited in her career by having an affair at work with a
00:55:17.820 powerful male this is like the other side of the me too movement it's the side where it kind of worked
00:55:23.500 out okay i don't know if that's a new hashtag can we do me too part two sometimes it works out great
00:55:29.800 i don't know by the way uh she had an affair with willie brown who was voted 1984's one of the top
00:55:35.280 10 sexiest men in the world by playgirl magazine who could possibly give up such an attractive job
00:55:41.640 opportunity the blaze radio network
00:55:44.360 on demand
00:55:48.120 on demand
00:55:53.400 on demand
00:55:55.320 on demand
00:55:57.720 on demand
00:56:02.100 on demand