The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program ｜ Guest： Steve Deace ｜ 2⧸12⧸20

00:00:00.000 Hello America and welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. It's our podcast. Got a great one for

00:00:03.820 you today. All the coverage that you need on what happened in New Hampshire yesterday. Also,

00:00:11.160 there's a new name for the coronavirus because we found out now that WHO is very concerned

00:00:16.900 that coronavirus just sounds too scary and people are going to start demonizing the Chinese. So

00:00:24.820 we're going to give, we're not working on a cure yet, but they do have a new name for us. And

00:00:30.040 we're going to give that to you today on the podcast. Also, I realized that, you know, that

00:00:34.000 grumpy old man that used to live and used to yell at you all the time, you know, as a kid that never

00:00:38.960 seemed to ever die or get older. He was just always old. It's Bernie Sanders. And I'll explain my theory

00:00:47.460 on today's podcast. And don't forget to sign up and subscribe to Stew Does America. It's available

00:00:53.960 now in podcasts everywhere. If you're in the podcast app, click over and subscribe to it right

00:00:59.560 now. And of course, don't forget, tonight is the big debut of the new format of the TV show,

00:01:06.120 Hour Long. Hour Long, and it is a deep dive on the issues of the day. Today, we look in China 0.87

00:01:12.480 and the too close for comfort relationship between China and the Bidens.

00:01:23.960 It came out very much like Iowa did. Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg slugging it out for number

00:01:46.300 one and number two. I thought these numbers spoke volumes. America, the Democrats don't want a 0.78

00:01:56.840 socialist. You'll notice that Elizabeth Warren, her numbers went down. Bernie Sanders didn't pick any

00:02:05.540 of those numbers up. Amy Klobuchar clobbered Joe Biden. And Pete Buttigieg is being viewed as a moderate,

00:02:15.520 even though he's not. You start to get rid of Joe Biden and Michael Bloomberg or, you know,

00:02:26.260 Amy Klobuchar. You get rid of the so-called moderates. And Pete Buttigieg would have clubbed Bernie. 0.99

00:02:34.920 Just clubbed him to death. And to me, that's something that we need to talk about. Also,

00:02:42.420 there's something else the media is missing. Donald Trump more than doubled Obama's 2012 New

00:02:48.700 Hampshire vote total. There was not a lot of passion for Barack Obama in 2012.

00:02:55.760 He still won, but there wasn't a lot of passion. Donald Trump has doubled those numbers in New

00:03:07.040 Hampshire. That says the people who are for Donald Trump are on fire for Donald Trump. The turnout for

00:03:16.160 the youth, what was it, 18 to 30-year-olds, was actually down by two or three points from the 2016

00:03:28.320 election. They expected it to be 20 points higher. There is no revolution going on here.

00:03:36.940 This is not a big socialist revolution. It's happening in the Twittersphere. It's happening

00:03:45.980 online. It's happening on MSNBC. But it is not happening in our communities when New Hampshire

00:03:53.320 isn't even putting 10 or 15 points in front of Pete Buttigieg. We go to Steve Dace from the Steve

00:04:03.280 Dace program here on Blaze. He follows this program live every day. Wanted to see and get his feel on

00:04:11.160 what happened in New Hampshire last night. Hi, Steve. Morning, Glenn. And, you know, the big takeaway

00:04:17.340 I see is the winning vote total Bernie Sanders had compared to what we've seen in recent cycles when

00:04:25.400 there's been multi-candidate fields. Like what Sanders did four years ago is irrelevant because it

00:04:30.320 was just him and Hillary head to head. Correct. But if you if you go back to 1996, you'll see a

00:04:35.520 pattern. And that is whenever the winning vote total is depressed in its overall amount, that party

00:04:42.900 loses. Buchanan in 96 won New Hampshire with less than 57,000 votes, for example. And then if you go

00:04:50.360 back and it doesn't really matter who wins, like McCain won New Hampshire in 2000, but his vote total was

00:04:55.480 over 115,000. And then you saw George W. Bush ultimately win that election. So whichever party

00:05:02.000 has a surge in the vote total of its winner, Donald Trump was well over 100,000 back in 2016, for

00:05:08.820 example, whichever party sees a surge in the vote total of its winner in New Hampshire tends to go on

00:05:14.940 and win in November. And what you're looking at with with Bernie Sanders is what I was telling you back

00:05:20.560 in Iowa. This is 2012, but there's no Mitt Romney. They thought that was going to be Joe Biden and

00:05:27.020 they don't have that candidate right now. And so Bernie Sanders is winning, pardon the Soviet pun,

00:05:33.180 a bunch of Stalin grads here. He's winning wars of attrition because his base shows up no matter what 0.95

00:05:38.980 while everybody else is sort of figuring out, hey, who else are we going to go with? Is it Rick

00:05:43.080 Santorum? Is it Michelle Bachman? Is it Rick Perry? Well, now the names are Pete Buttigieg and

00:05:48.020 Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar, who nobody knew what a Klobuchar was a month ago.

00:05:54.220 So big picture takeaway for your audience. They've got the left media and the Democratic Party

00:05:59.740 has between now and Super Tuesday on March 3rd to take him out. If you go to the calendar on Super

00:06:05.280 Tuesday, there's a lot of Southern states there that Pete Buttigieg has no chance to win. All right.

00:06:10.040 And so if Bernie Sanders wins just as New England states and California, he's going to be the nominee

00:06:15.760 and you're going to see them begin to start making peace with it and retconning him

00:06:20.140 from March 4th thereafter. But between him now and March 3rd, it is open season on Bernie Sanders

00:06:26.920 and they've got to come up with a candidate that they can rally behind. That's not him.

00:06:31.160 Do you think that's Pete Buttigieg?

00:06:32.920 No. I think Pete Buttigieg is largely a fascinate, the same people that voted, the same white suburbanites

00:06:41.000 and exurbanites who voted for Barack Obama without knowing what a Jeremiah Wright was or vetting his

00:06:45.840 record because they wanted to break the racial barrier is who's voting for him now because they

00:06:50.760 want to, he's the virtue signaling candidate of this cycle. They just want to say, hey, I'm not homophobic.

00:06:56.340 But if you look at the college campus communities in those places, the urban areas, he doesn't have a lot

00:07:02.020 of support there. And now we're going to go to South Carolina. He has no chance to win there.

00:07:06.800 And then from there, we go, other than the Nevada caucuses, there's going to be a lot of

00:07:10.880 southern states here, a lot of black voters who are socially conservative. He's a no-go, 1.00

00:07:16.740 no-fly zone right away. And I think you're going to see him remain relevant because of what he's

00:07:22.140 already done. But there's not too many states between now and Super Tuesday that when you look

00:07:27.960 at the calendar, you think, yeah, I think Pete Buttigieg could win there.

00:07:32.580 So who is there? Because I just, I'm watching Amy Klobuchar. She is just not somebody who's going

00:07:41.960 to win. I mean, I watched her last night give her speech and it's just that I just don't see a

00:07:49.280 president Klobuchar. So who is it?

00:07:53.580 I think that's the problem. I don't think there is a logical one. I think Michael Bloomberg,

00:07:58.300 you know, I mentioned to you this a few weeks ago. I think his play was for Super Tuesday to

00:08:03.180 see if I can buy primary wins in places like Oklahoma, et cetera, with huge, massive television

00:08:09.920 buys. But the problem is he was a terrible Republican. He's an even worse Democrat. He's not

00:08:17.800 an inspirational figure at all. He's even more socially awkward than Elizabeth Warren.

00:08:23.560 This is why I think he is. This is why I've been I've been tweeting out for the last couple of

00:08:29.080 weeks, Glenn. This this is Thanos. I am inevitable. I believe Bernie Sanders is inevitable

00:08:36.380 because everything you just said about the Democratic Party is true. But that's why he's

00:08:40.560 inevitable. Glenn, they have played footsie with the likes of Bernie Sanders and these folks to club

00:08:46.180 people like you and me for 30 damn years. And now and now the camel's nose is not under the tent,

00:08:51.780 the whole torso, the tail, the backside. But it's all in the tent now. And they have and they can't

00:08:58.000 figure out how to consolidate a true ideological moderate would crush him. But they're not capable

00:09:04.680 as a party of permitting one. I mean, Andrew Yang put out one moderate position on abortion 24 hours

00:09:11.340 ago and was excommunicated by the by the white woke brigade. And so everybody we call a moderate. I mean,

00:09:17.760 Pete Buttigieg wrote in college, his political idol was Bernie Sanders. All right. So everybody we call

00:09:23.160 a moderate is actually a leftist, too. They just don't Nikita Khrushchev shake their fist at you

00:09:28.340 like Bernie Sanders does. So but isn't that why isn't that a reason why Pete Buttigieg could do well,

00:09:35.920 because he is that he is that leftist and but he just is in much softer, nicer, younger packaging?

00:09:46.920 Yes, if he were if he were Governor Buttigieg or Senator Buttigieg. But the problem we have right

00:09:52.520 now is if we're going to be blunt, the only reason the mayor of the town is big as Cedar Rapids, Iowa

00:09:58.020 is in this race is because he's gay. And that right now is the number one intersectionality victim group

00:10:03.560 in the Democratic Party. And so that's gotten him where he's at now. But now we reach where we go

00:10:09.520 where the map pivots south and we go to that's the biggest argument against him. And so what got him

00:10:15.240 in the door in Iowa and New Hampshire, it made a whole bunch of people say, yes, I finally get to

00:10:19.960 convince MSNBC I'm not a homophobe is now what is too expensive of a cover charge for him to pay to go

00:10:27.760 into the bar from South Carolina, Alabama, and all those states down south between now and Super

00:10:33.560 Tuesday, his biggest strength becomes his biggest impediment. So I have a different view on Pete

00:10:38.720 Buttigieg and people and you know, hey, I'm not a homophobe. I think that's already been decided. 0.97

00:10:44.100 I think that's over, you know, for the most part, except with the real diehard extremists.

00:10:48.880 Um, and, and it's kind of like had its day and we, you know, we've all accepted everybody

00:10:56.780 and yada, yada, yada. It's not, that's that, that is not the noose it used to be. Um, you say

00:11:04.940 one thing wrong and it used to be an absolute noose. Now it's kind of divided, I think on the left

00:11:11.700 to where, uh, there are others that are saying, you know, why are you getting all the special

00:11:17.220 details and the special laws and the special everything. So I think there's, I think there's

00:11:22.240 the, um, there's the, it's a double aired store sword inside of his own quiver of yes, he's gay, 0.68

00:11:31.240 but yes, is he, is he an extremist? Uh, like, you know, like we have seen in the past. Um, and so I

00:11:39.160 think there's, it works both ways on that. I really think Pete Buttigieg is, uh, the,

00:11:47.220 the Jimmy Carter of this generation. He is, he could go a long way just being the anti-Trump.

00:11:58.080 Look, can't we all get along? Can't we? Nobody cared about Jimmy Carter except he's just a simple

00:12:04.360 peanut farmer. And he, you know, he was a preacher and he just loves the Lord and he'll carry his own

00:12:10.900 luggage. He's not like that evil Nixon and Ford. I think there's a swing and the swing that I think

00:12:19.440 people are, uh, hungry for is a don't be Donald Trump and they've beaten people and beaten people

00:12:28.720 and beaten people. And I think there's a chance that even they are seeing, I don't want that

00:12:33.940 divisiveness. I don't want the Nancy Pelosi and the, and the just beating people over the head. 1.00

00:12:40.280 I want to win, but I would like a uniter, not a divider. And I think that if Pete plays it right,

00:12:47.800 and I think he did last night in many ways, if he plays it right on, Hey, I'm just, I'm just,

00:12:54.360 I just want us all to come together. I think that could be effective for him. Disagree?

00:12:59.560 Uh, somewhat, I think you're correct about the rivalry within the democratic party. Uh, and you

00:13:06.840 know, the same week that we had the first gay marriage really from the Supreme court, they struck

00:13:10.320 down the voting rights act of 1964. And what a lot of people on the right don't know is the

00:13:16.200 intra party dynamic on the left. There's a massive problem between, uh, between, uh, the, the homosexual 0.96

00:13:23.120 activists and, and the black community, because it is seen as if this group has put them, pardon the

00:13:29.080 pun again, to the back of the bus here on the intersectionality chart. If Pete Buttigieg is

00:13:33.740 the democratic nominee, mark my words, Donald Trump is going to get the best voting total

00:13:38.480 of blacks by a Republican presidential nominee since before the civil rights act of 1964.

00:13:44.680 Okay. Mark my words.

00:13:45.720 All right. So hang on just a second. I want to come back in, in one minute, because I want

00:13:49.960 to ask you the road to not having Bernie Sanders, uh, is a dicey one, especially if the democratic

00:14:00.680 party doesn't, it knows what you just said, which I believe, uh, then what, then how do

00:14:07.560 they manage this? And what is the, what's the aftermath? We'll go to, uh, so Steve, let me start

00:14:13.220 with the question, uh, of how does the democratic party, which I completely agree with you. I found

00:14:21.760 some old audio. We should play that today. Uh, found some old audio of me in 2004, warning

00:14:27.540 the democratic party. Once they put Michael Moore in the presidential box with, uh, Jimmy Carter

00:14:34.500 in 2004, I said, you people are out of your mind. He's a socialist. You think you're using

00:14:41.260 him, he's using you, he's going to come back and the socialist will eat you for breakfast

00:14:47.960 and you watch. And here we are. How do they untangle themselves from these very dedicated

00:14:57.240 radicals, revolutionaries, uh, and hold things together? I don't think that they can. I think, 1.00

00:15:05.740 I think, you know, to, to quote, uh, the former president's, uh, uh, leftist, uh, pastor, their

00:15:12.360 chickens are coming home. Yeah. I think eventually, you know, do not be deceived. God will not be

00:15:20.260 mocked. You will always reap what you sow. Right. And I think that you're watching this now and I

00:15:25.300 don't think there's a way out of this because they're only real inspiring alternative is a guy

00:15:31.400 that actually exposes the wedges of their constituencies all the more. If you look at all

00:15:37.120 of the black and brown polling in this race, even down to the college age kids where they've been

00:15:41.880 totally worked over by the sexual revolution, the lowest polling candidate of all black and brown 1.00

00:15:48.040 peoples of any age group is Pete Buttigieg. And so when you put him as the alternative, you're

00:15:55.060 actually exposing this schism and fracture all the more. That's why I don't think they have a way out

00:16:00.860 of this. So you think they're going to run Bernie Sanders? I think they're going to run. I think

00:16:09.580 either, I think they're either going to run Bernie Sanders. And if we look at the primary calendar

00:16:13.640 between now and March and the end of super Tuesday, tell me what States, maybe Colorado,

00:16:19.600 maybe Virginia. And that's about it of those 14 States that are going to be going between now and

00:16:25.220 March 3rd, that Pete Buttigieg can win. If Bernie wins new England, those, the rest of those new

00:16:30.100 England states, California, you know, I, if he wins California and they don't give him the

00:16:35.020 nomination, that's their headquarters. So I think, I think they've got a couple of weeks to try to

00:16:41.440 figure out some kind of Harry, Hail Mary pass. And then I think you're going to see them just begin

00:16:46.360 to make peace with it because they recognize that go back to the first interview you and I did on this

00:16:51.820 cycle back in January of a year ago. And I said, the biggest challenge Democrats have

00:16:55.740 is they want to run the election of 2028 and 2032, but we're not there yet demographically.

00:17:01.400 And so they may just decide, you know what, we'll eat it like we did with McGovern. We'll eat it,

00:17:05.540 you know, like we have in other cycles, because ultimately we know that we're controlling the arc

00:17:10.520 and trajectory of the Overton window in history here. And once Donald Trump is gone, there is not

00:17:15.660 another Republican who dares to stand against us on this cultural level because they're all afraid of

00:17:21.300 our media. My guess is that's the play they make beginning on March 4th if they can't take Bernie

00:17:25.840 out. So you think they're still confident in the long run? Because I, I will tell you it with

00:17:30.540 exception of the demographic, the demographic shift here. And that also will play against them soon

00:17:37.080 because you see the, the ones coming behind the millennials are very conservative, very active,

00:17:44.560 conservative, uh, and are, are learning what they should be learning. I think we have a new generation

00:17:50.520 of conservatives coming up, um, that are unlike anything else. You think that the Democrats are

00:17:56.840 still, uh, confident in this, in this socialist future? I think the ones that are coming in the next

00:18:05.540 generation are, and it's their religion and they're going to play out, um, this self-actualization

00:18:10.720 into its ultimate outcome. That's what I think. Thank you so much, Steve Dace. You can, uh, get all

00:18:15.560 of his analysis, uh, following this program every day on blaze TV and blaze radio. And don't forget

00:18:22.580 tonight, 9 PM, a brand new series starring yes, little old me tonight, China and Joe Biden.

00:18:34.460 The best of the Glenn Beck program.

00:18:40.720 Hey, it's Glenn. And you're listening to the Glenn Beck program. If you like what you're hearing on

00:18:47.060 this show, make sure you check out Pat Gray unleashed. It's available wherever you download

00:18:52.400 your favorite podcasts. All right, let me give you some, um, let me give you some good news. First

00:18:57.900 of all, in the coronavirus, I'm gonna, I'm going to give you all of the details on the coronavirus,

00:19:01.880 uh, here in just a second, uh, at the bottom of the hour. But I want to start with this because

00:19:07.880 this is, I mean, when you think of coronavirus, what is it that you have been most concerned

00:19:12.340 about on the coronavirus? I mean, just the massive spread and dying. I would say that'd be number

00:19:19.240 one on the list. What was number two? I, uh, I, it was pretty much just the one.

00:19:28.000 Now this shows how out of steps do is the number one concern on the coronavirus is that it is

00:19:34.960 something that is targeting the Asian community. It's name apparently, according to the WHO is

00:19:44.480 making people look at that and saying, Oh, this is an Asian problem. And they're afraid that racism

00:19:50.060 will, uh, uh, pop up and there'll be all kinds of problems because of how Asian it sounds to me. 1.00

00:19:57.300 I think anybody who's not paying attention to it would think that it's a Mexican beer virus. Yeah.

00:20:02.940 Uh, and that's been shown in search results. Well, well, uh, overshadowing the human toll,

00:20:11.220 you know, an actual death is the human toll of racism. So yesterday the, uh, the, uh, coronavirus

00:20:18.700 has officially had its name changed to a now politically correct name that has taken the word

00:20:28.320 Corona and disease and put them together. So it's now COVID-19. You will not be hearing on this

00:20:40.900 program. We are not haters. You will not be hearing about the coronavirus. You will be now hearing about

00:20:46.540 COVID-19. That is the official name. And it has nothing to do with China. Pay no attention to

00:20:54.240 China. You haters. That's a serious story. Serious story. I mean, how, how on earth did we get

00:21:06.200 through these things? We don't, we don't, we deserve to die of little Chinaman disease. 1.00

00:21:13.440 You can call it whatever you want. COVID-19 coronavirus, bat soup is bad for you disease, 1.00

00:21:24.140 whatever we deserve it. If we are more concerned about what we're naming it. That's, I mean,

00:21:30.420 that's real political correctness, right? That's, that's, that's, you know, that's our special next,

00:21:35.200 next Wednesday. Next Wednesday, we're doing COVID-19. And the, the real theme of the show is

00:21:43.260 big governments kill. That's what they do. And sometimes they do it with compassion, but they kill

00:21:48.160 because big governments only care about the mass and look at what's happening in China. And this is

00:21:53.300 an example of it. COVID-19, you are spending, can you work on a cure? Who is like, you know what?

00:22:00.080 Put the scalpel down, put the test tubes down for a minute. Can we talk about the name? The name is

00:22:05.960 scaring me. Who is saying that? Okay. Let me give you some good news.

00:22:13.100 How does it feel to you, this fight against socialism in America, this fight against racism

00:22:24.040 in America? Does it feel like we're winning? We're making progress? It seems like the party's going

00:22:33.100 further and further left to a degree that almost unthinkable. I mean, we've used this example before,

00:22:40.000 but Bernie Sanders in 2013 proposed Medicare for all and could not get a single co-sponsor on the

00:22:46.640 bill. Now, everyone in the race, the 50,000 people who ran are pretty much on, on, on board.

00:22:53.940 All right. And it seems like Bernie Sanders and all of the Democrats, they're all socialists. All of

00:23:00.060 them are socialists, right? Socialists. Seems like it. Seems like it. They're, they're at least,

00:23:05.400 they're at least holding onto the socialist truck on a skateboard. They're, they're just,

00:23:10.460 you know, they're skating behind that truck, right? Uh, let me give you from 1958, and these numbers

00:23:18.720 are 1958, 1983, 2007, 2015, 2020. Gallup poll. The percentage that would vote for a person who is

00:23:31.360 black. I'm going to give you this, the, the raw American numbers. In 1958, it was 38%. That's

00:23:40.320 remarkable. In 1983, it was 77%. Today it's, uh, then I'm sorry, 2007, 94. Then in 2015, 92. Then in 2020,

00:23:52.680 96. And to be clear, the 92 is just because there was a black president that half the country didn't

00:23:58.400 like. Yes. Right. So it degrades a little bit just on, on that. Catholic. I'm just going 0.98

00:24:03.980 to give you the, the 1958 number to the 2020 number. Catholic, 67% would vote for a Catholic

00:24:10.520 in 1958. Uh, 95% would vote for a Catholic now. That's crazy. Hispanic. We didn't even pull it in 1.00

00:24:18.560 1968. Uh, but it is now 94%. Mm-hmm. Jewish, 63% to 93. Women, uh, 54% to 93. Evangelical Christian,

00:24:32.400 they didn't pull it until 2015, 73 to now 80. So now, let me, let me help you out here. Black, Catholic,

00:24:40.740 Hispanic, Hispanic, Jewish, women, all in the nineties. Evangelical Christian is 13 points behind

00:24:48.120 any of those others. That's fascinating. That's not the right doing that. No, no. Uh, gay and 1.00

00:24:55.320 tolerance though, Glenn, gay and lesbian started taking that in 1983, 29%. Then in 2007, 55, then 2015,

00:25:05.080 74. Now 78. Under 40. We've never pulled it until now. Under 40 is 70. Over 70. It's a short,

00:25:16.200 I mean, cause it's got, you gotta be 35 in the constitution. So that's a short little window

00:25:20.800 there. It's right in the middle of it. Over 70, only 69% of Americans want to vote for somebody

00:25:27.400 over 70. Muslim, 66. Atheist, 60. The last one is socialist, 45. Now, let me get still really

00:25:42.960 high, but I think you're giving me that as good news, right? Yeah. I'm giving this to you as good

00:25:47.260 news. Okay. Still really high, but willingness to vote for candidates with diverse characteristics

00:25:53.400 by party ID. Okay. The views of political independence, I'm reading directly from the

00:26:00.800 research. Now, wait until you hear this. The views of political independence fall midway

00:26:05.680 between those Republicans and Democrats for several candidate types, including socialist with

00:26:10.700 less than half of independent saying that they would vote for such a person. Independents are closer

00:26:15.560 to Democrats than Republicans and their greater reluctance to support an evangelical Christian

00:26:21.080 candidate in the greater willingness to support a candidate who is a woman, gay, lesbian, somebody

00:26:26.400 under 40, a Muslim, or an atheist. As the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries get underway,

00:26:34.100 listen to this, it may be instructive to know that little prejudice stands in the way of Democrats,

00:26:40.540 as well as national support for candidates who happen to be Catholic, Hispanic, Jewish, or female,

00:26:46.780 especially young or advanced in age could pose minor appeal problems. Being gay or lesbian, Muslim,

00:26:54.980 atheist, or a socialist wouldn't cause much stir among Democrats, but these candidates could have

00:27:02.720 difficulty attracting support from Republicans and to a lesser extent from political independence.

00:27:08.440 Republicans. So who has the problem here? Republicans, clearly. Republicans, Republicans. Let me give

00:27:15.660 this to you. You're going to have little prejudice. You're going to be facing little prejudice if you

00:27:22.600 are running for the Democrats. Republicans aren't going to stand in your way, but there is some prejudice

00:27:28.320 there. If you happen to be Catholic, 95 is the number for Republicans saying that they would vote for

00:27:34.620 a Catholic out of 100, 95. Hispanic, 90. Jewish, 92. Or female, 86. Especially if you're young or advanced 0.94

00:27:45.920 in age. 73 is for advanced age. Okay? Republicans, 73. That number for Democrats is 66.

00:27:58.080 76. So you're going to pose some opposition from attracting a Republican. Uh, they're at 73% acceptance.

00:28:09.640 You're at 66. Then you're going to have real problems if you're gay or lesbian, because this is 0.98

00:28:16.560 real. It won't cause a stir among the Democrats, but, uh, these candidates are going to have a really

00:28:22.360 hard time attracting anybody because they're so diverse. Uh, but anybody else, you're a Republican, 0.98

00:28:30.200 you're a bigot. Being gay or lesbian, that's at 89%. Let's see. Uh, if you were Catholic, it was 95

00:28:39.620 for the Republicans, Hispanic, 90, Jewish, 92, female, 86. Being gay or lesbian, uh, is, uh, 89. Muslim, 88. 0.57

00:28:52.360 Atheist, 69. Socialist, 76. All of their numbers are lower than the ones that they were saying

00:29:00.660 earlier are going to really cause a problem. It's very divisive, and these people won't do it.

00:29:04.680 Their number, they're more bigoted than, than the Republicans are on the things that they say

00:29:12.900 they're all for. Gay, lesbian, Muslim, atheist, socialist, 76%. The, the point that I get out of this 1.00

00:29:23.500 is there is not a big movement for socialism. There is not a, there is not this grand divide,

00:29:33.620 except beginning with evangelical Christians, both sides with gay and lesbian, both sides under the age

00:29:44.300 of 40, both sides over 70. Uh, one side really, I mean, it's 42 to 88 for Muslim, atheist 41 to 69, 0.78

00:29:54.820 and socialist 17 for the Republicans and 76, uh, for the Democrats, but only 45 for independents.

00:30:03.460 Even that though is remarkable. Almost a one out of every five Republicans is fine with a socialist

00:30:08.740 president. I know that's crazy. That's an incredible number. It really is. It's interesting to that divide

00:30:14.500 where you have characteristics, religion, or lack thereof, sort of grouped together because there

00:30:21.160 is a difference there, right? Like saying you won't vote for someone because of black skin

00:30:25.820 is a really, I mean, psychotic old timey view. Uh, the idea that you wouldn't vote for someone

00:30:34.720 because of their religion. Well, religion is, is largely a collection of beliefs that informs the

00:30:39.300 way you act, right? That's a much more, now I don't, I don't, you know, there's always someone,

00:30:44.900 right? Like, but if you, if you were to say like atheist, a lot of people would not, that was one of the

00:30:48.300 least popular ones on there to take that as an example. And you might say to yourself, well, atheism

00:30:52.560 is, is a system of beliefs, uh, that might not lend itself to, uh, support my view of religious

00:31:01.480 liberty, right? Now we all know we met, I mean, Penn Jillette is a, would be a big defender of

00:31:06.640 religious liberty and he's an atheist, but we've all met atheists that would do that, but that's not

00:31:10.960 necessarily inherent in the ideology. In a way, what is a religion, but an ideology, right? Right. So, uh,

00:31:17.560 when it, at least as it applies to public policy. So it's, it's a big difference there and they lump

00:31:23.240 all that stuff together. And it's, it's an interesting thing that is always included in

00:31:27.820 these polls because it really does. I think for a lot of people, it's going to indicate

00:31:32.260 how someone would act because you know, that's how you would act, right? Like if you have a religious 0.95

00:31:37.900 foundation, it sets the foundation for the way that you deal with whatever issue you're talking

00:31:42.640 about, um, where skin color should not be that way. And yet the left treats skin color

00:31:48.740 that way. You know, they talk about how important, uh, every cultural differences and how that

00:31:54.340 is inherent, like skin color. It's not inherent in that at all. No, that's not the way that's

00:31:59.160 supposed to be. No, no. But the good news is, I think if you saw last night, Bernie's numbers

00:32:06.620 are not turning out. No, they're not turning out. There is a revolution going on, but it is a very

00:32:14.420 small group of people. It's not what you are led to believe by the press. It is still small,

00:32:21.380 uh, but it is, it's uncommonly large for America to be seeing this, but it's still a small number.

00:32:29.880 And it's being foisted upon us by a very small group of quite honestly, very powerful because

00:32:39.280 they are connected, uh, very powerful forces in our universities and in, uh, television and broadcast.

00:32:47.040 But it's only feeling like we're overwhelmed by socialists because the Democrats are being

00:32:52.320 overwhelmed by socialists. They have let this small group of, of rebels, uh, uh, Americans,

00:32:59.880 haters, constitutional, um, imbeciles take over. And that's why you feel it's choking because it's

00:33:08.480 choking them to death. If you're a Democrat, you really need to wake up, uh, because it's choking

00:33:15.820 your party to death and it's a small number of people doing it. This is the best of the Glenn Beck

00:33:24.060 program.

00:33:34.660 Hey, it's Glenn. And if you like what you hear on the program, you should check out Pat Gray

00:33:39.640 unleashed. His podcast is available wherever you download your favorite podcast.

00:33:44.780 Hi, it's Glenn. If you're a subscriber to the podcast, can you do us a favor and rate us on

00:33:49.300 iTunes. If you're not a subscriber, become one today and listen on your own time. You can subscribe

00:33:54.920 on iTunes. Thanks. So do you remember that old man that lived down the street that all of us kids

00:34:00.500 were afraid of? And you would, sometimes you would add maybe five or six minutes to your walk home just

00:34:06.420 to take, just to take the route that didn't pass his house. You know, you would opt for the house

00:34:12.900 with a Rottweiler that was on a chain and the chain looked a little rickety and there was a big hole in

00:34:19.300 the fence and the shape of a former classmate. You remember that house? You'd walk by that house

00:34:24.360 because that old man was sitting in that house and it was like he was waiting for you. He was just

00:34:31.060 waiting. His door seemed to always be just a little open, just a little bit of a crack. He was like ready

00:34:37.820 to pounce when you walked by. And he was, he was old when our parents were our age. He was the guy

00:34:45.460 that our parents were like, Oh, I remember, I remember cranky old Mr. Wilson. You'd be like,

00:34:51.100 he was old then. Yo, yeah. He'd come out and yell at you and he's still doing it. I don't know. Maybe,

00:34:59.480 maybe there's another guy that's a vampire or a Highlander or I don't know what it is, but

00:35:08.200 that guy won in New Hampshire last night, New Hampshire.

00:35:15.580 Cause you know, Bernie Sanders, after he gave his speech, he wanted to get into the car and he was,

00:35:19.740 you know, firing up the old Buick. And he was like, Oh, why aren't there any dials on the,

00:35:28.960 on the radio anymore? Why are there dials? And he couldn't hear, he couldn't figure out how to get

00:35:35.220 the radio reports on how he won. And everybody in the car was like radio. What is that?

00:35:41.120 It's the same guy, that same guy that would yell at you all the time. And you would see him and he

00:35:49.100 would be in shorts and black socks and he'd have black shoes on, but they were like the really high

00:35:54.600 knee socks that, you know, only old guys in suits would wear. And you can't imagine him in a suit 0.79

00:36:02.180 because I mean, did they have suits back when he was a kid? When he was working, that had to be

00:36:09.840 what a hundred years ago. And now he's like, these shoes are comfortable. These are the shoes

00:36:17.040 everybody should have. It's Bernie. He was trying to get everybody to wear those comfortable shoes

00:36:22.520 because they never wear out. I bought these shoes back in 1954. They never have worn out. Everybody

00:36:30.460 should only wear these shoes and you can borrow my socks. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. You ruffians, 1.00

00:36:39.840 in your tennis sneakers. You'd come to his house if you were brave or if you were the new kid that

00:36:51.040 moved into the block or you were just stupid. You would go to his house on Halloween and he'd open

00:36:58.360 the door. What do you want? It's Halloween. We're all dressed as... And then you'd see him in the happy

00:37:04.460 mode. He'd look at the kids and he'd be like happy. I mean, you wouldn't know it because his face didn't

00:37:10.060 change and he would still say, I got nothing and slam the door. And you know, you know that that guy

00:37:18.220 is the guy who wants the big government because if you were ever playing baseball, if you were playing

00:37:23.280 kickball, any of that stuff, that was the guy who was like, you kids, I'm calling your parents.

00:37:30.980 I know your parents and they're not going to like it. Yeah. Cause they're scared of you too.

00:37:38.540 So, you know, he was the guy that wanted rules on everything. He is the guy. He was a progressive.

00:37:44.880 He had to be. He wanted everything. I'm calling the cops on you. I'm walking down the street.

00:37:51.220 I'm whistling, no whistling around my house. And when you were there on Halloween and he closed it,

00:37:57.800 I got nothing. Door closed. You know, he was walking back to his one chair with a lone TV in

00:38:04.880 the room and he's eating a TV dinner and he's like, everybody, these kids, they all want free stuff.

00:38:11.700 That's Bernie Sanders, man. That is who won last night in New Hampshire. The guy who's going back to

00:38:20.160 his TV dinner alone, watching that TV and that old ratty chair that is comfortable in my comfortable

00:38:27.000 shoes and everybody should wear these black comfortable shoes and stop knocking at my door

00:38:32.120 for free stuff. And yet he's promising everyone, somebody else's stuff for free.

00:38:40.340 Thus ended the lesson. I thought I would just pop that in today because I realized it last night

00:38:48.580 when he was happy and yet he looked angry and I thought I've seen him before. That's Mr. Wilson.

00:38:58.960 Yeah, there's only one guy. He was in your childhood, our parents' childhood, and now he wants to be

00:39:06.140 president of the United States. That's all there is to it. Uh, by the way, uh, Klobuchar, uh, is now

00:39:14.140 going to expand her campaign after a strong New Hampshire primary. Uh, she sucked. Uh, no, did you 0.88

00:39:22.880 see her, her speech? I think she's really bad. Yeah. You know, she has a great resume. She has a 0.98

00:39:31.280 great electoral history. She pretty much blows everybody out everywhere she's ever been. Okay. 1.00

00:39:36.120 Well, but she also says, I mean, if I have to hear one more time that she announced her campaign

00:39:42.460 in a snowstorm, I'm going to jump off of a building. I thought it was just me. She says it every time.

00:39:49.600 Why do we care what the weather was when you started talking about your campaign? Why would it,

00:39:55.060 why on earth would we care about that? You live in Minnesota. Of course it was snowing. There's no

00:39:59.420 other options. Get off my lawn in the snow. Get off my lawn. It's really annoying. And she has, 1.00

00:40:08.660 she's very bad at the, she does a Kamala Harris did this too, where they come up with these lines, 1.00

00:40:15.220 you know, on the bus or in their focus groups or whatever that they think are really,

00:40:19.500 really effective. And they continually repeat them over and over again in every media appearance.

00:40:24.840 Every time you see them, every time she walks out, she says something like, I may be Klobuchar

00:40:29.320 and I'm going to be Donald Trump. Right? Just like, oh, you're like, oh, can she, I mean,

00:40:36.300 can you even attempt to say it like a human being would say it? Can you even try? Or, you know,

00:40:41.880 I'm sorry. I, I have no problem. I have no problem voting for a woman. I would have voted for,

00:40:47.040 oh, what's her? Hillary Clinton. Heels and the. Oh, for you. Kamala Harris. I know you. No, 1.00

00:40:57.000 you know the woman. Imelda Marcos. No. Carly Fiorina. I would have voted for Carly Fiorina in a 1.00

00:41:03.280 heartbeat. Okay. I really liked Carly. Okay. I think she was a real constitutional conservative. 0.97

00:41:09.280 Didn't sound like it at the beginning, but I think she really was. And she had the guts to do it. I

00:41:14.100 loved her. I loved her. Um, but you know, there, there, there is, there is something about some

00:41:21.480 women, just like some guys, you know, you, you listen to some guys and you're like, their voice 1.00

00:41:26.320 just grates on me. You know, there's some people that have radio shows that didn't last long in

00:41:32.720 radio show because their voice just grates on you. Uh, Klobuchar is one of those people. Hillary

00:41:39.580 Clinton was one of those people where it's just like, I'm gonna tell you right now. That's all

00:41:45.240 you hear. That's all you hear. That's not necessarily the way they sound. What you hear is

00:41:50.000 I'm gonna tell you to pick up your socks. This is the sexism we've been talking about. Yes. No, 0.99

00:41:56.900 but I mean, Elizabeth Warren, I think, and again, we're naming every female candidate here. No,

00:42:01.000 Kamala Harris didn't have that. No. Kamala Harris doesn't have that. No. Uh, and I don't think,

00:42:06.620 I think Elizabeth Warren has something else different. I think she has, she has almost

00:42:10.640 like a, it's almost like a, uh, uh, a teenaged puberty male voice. It's always cracking. It's

00:42:16.560 got that. Hi, Elizabeth Warren. She almost has that thing going on, which is a very strange 0.99

00:42:21.500 character. So is it like a Catherine Hepburn thing? Is it like, is it kind of like that?

00:42:28.680 Possibly. That's what I would like Elizabeth Warren to say. If she got into a debate, she should 0.99

00:42:32.340 just use all the old Catherine Hepburn lines from like on golden pond where, Hey, you're

00:42:36.820 the old poop. Stop it now. It's working better than what she's doing now. Anything would, anything 1.00

00:42:43.380 would, anything would, but there is that. And look, this happens, uh, for a lot of people.

00:42:48.620 It's, it is, it's a, I mean, women will say that it's sexist, but I, you know, I, I, you look at it

00:42:56.260 and I bet no Barack Obama had the same kind of thing, except he had it with catchphrases that

00:43:02.100 would drive you out of your mind after a while. You can, he was better at least at pulling them

00:43:08.100 off. Every, every candidate says similar lines at different speeches and they, everybody has

00:43:14.320 their go-to phrasing. There's something about Klobuchar though. It's very stilted. She, she

00:43:19.480 knows like she's memorized the way she thinks it's supposed to sound, which is not the right

00:43:23.240 way. And she repeats it the same way every single time. And that is really irritating.

00:43:27.780 Stilted. How can you tell next to Elizabeth Warren?

00:43:31.060 And Warren is the same way. I mean, Warren is, she's bad. Like Warren is like a grandmother

00:43:35.860 that wants all of the teenagers to love her. And she's not like that cool grandma or that 0.98

00:43:43.800 cool grandpa that is just like, everybody does love you. You know, uh, she's really trying.

00:43:48.860 She's tries too hard. And so you're like, okay, okay. Creepy lady. Uh, that's enough.

00:43:52.920 You know, I'm just hip with you kids too. Hello, fellow kids. Yeah. I mean, wow. Those

00:43:59.880 are snazzy sneaks. Whoa. And she thinks she's being cool. That's the problem with Elizabeth 1.00

00:44:07.600 Warren for me is she's trying so hard, so hard, so hard. Uh, and I don't understand. I mean,

00:44:16.780 it does feel like the Klobuchar, the Clomentum that we're seeing now. The Clomentum. I like 0.84

00:44:23.200 that. Yeah. That is just. Because now we don't have Jomentum. No. Jomentum is, uh. Jomentum

00:44:28.420 is done. Crashed and burned. Yeah. The Jomentum ran out over the ocean, unfortunately. It crashed

00:44:33.600 into the sea. I have a feeling the Joe Biden, uh, and it's appropriate, uh, but the Joe Biden

00:44:40.560 career is going to be remembered a little like the Hindenburg in the end. Yeah. Sure. It might've

00:44:45.360 been great floating around for a while, but once it got over its target, it just burst

00:44:50.620 into flames. It's true though. And I think Klobuchar almost benefits from being so bad

00:44:58.080 for so long. Like Beto, for example, comes out and he has this big run and then falls

00:45:03.920 apart. Kamala Harris has a big run and then falls apart. Elizabeth Warren has a big run

00:45:07.720 and falls apart. All these people had these rises and then falls. Well, Klobuchar was smart.

00:45:13.160 She never had the rise. Yeah. She just didn't do anything. I'm just, I'm not better. I'm not

00:45:19.220 worse. I'm just exactly the way I was in the snowstorm. Everyone. I'm only looking good

00:45:25.060 because everyone else is burned to the ground. Yeah. I mean, that's the, that is the problem

00:45:30.580 because they're nobody's really taking it. Everybody's like, okay, well try her. Maybe

00:45:37.560 right. We're like, well, we got, we don't want to, he's got a socialist. You got Buttigieg

00:45:41.820 who's like 12 years old. I think he's rode his bike to the rally. Jing, jing. I got a new

00:45:46.860 bike bell boys. Who else are we going to have? Well, Klobuchar, we haven't heard anything bad

00:45:51.120 about her yet because we haven't heard anything about her yet. So let's try that one. I'm telling

00:45:55.440 you it is shoe shopping. They are like women shoe shopping. They're going to try them all 1.00

00:46:00.740 on. And in the end they're going to go, you know, I don't think I need new shoes. That sexism

00:46:06.120 is there again. Look at that. That's right. That's right. And I'm going to say it. Coronavirus.

00:46:11.620 I don't care. I don't care how anti-Asian that is. You're supposed to call it COVID-19 now.

00:46:19.620 The Blaze Radio Network. On demand.

The Glenn Beck Program - February 12, 2020

Best of The Program ｜ Guest： Steve Deace ｜ 2⧸12⧸20

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript