The Glenn Beck Program - November 14, 2022


Best of the Program | Guest: Vivek Ramaswamy | 11⧸14⧸22


Episode Stats


Length

49 minutes

Words per minute

175.8056

Word count

8,631

Sentence count

15

Harmful content

Misogyny

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

5

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

On this episode of the Glenn Beck Program, Glenn and Jake discuss the results of the mid-term elections, the crypto-exchange scandal, the boycott of Elon Musk, and much, much more. Glenn is joined by his good friend, Pat Gray, to discuss it all.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 you weren't exactly a ray of sunshine still i just want you to really yeah i want you to
00:00:06.200 reevaluate what you brought to the show today and uh maybe come in with something a little happier
00:00:12.340 i'm a balance for you when you're too happy i have to be sad i have to make people angry sad
00:00:17.640 it was not good not good today uh we just uh you know we took the red pill uh which turning out to
00:00:26.160 be the blue pill but just politically speaking uh and uh and told you what was what was going on
00:00:33.000 also we went into the um the crypto exchange that looks like it's probably never going to get
00:00:41.200 prosecuted because i don't know i think he might be he has every connection known to man and donated
00:00:47.580 40 million dollars to uh to democrats i don't so i think there's a chance he might escape from this
00:00:52.960 because of those connections but man there's a if this is not criminal activity i will be stunned
00:00:57.080 it absolutely is criminal activity however uh you really think he's going to pay the price that
00:01:03.100 that even elon musk is paying now i mean look at what they're doing to elon musk and and look at how
00:01:10.740 many people are are uh it was chip what is it chipotle uh general mills one of the two uh lending tree
00:01:19.360 general motors uh united airlines holdings they all said we're joining the boycott of twitter this
00:01:28.000 is esg in action right here it's it is against a guy who started the world's largest you know
00:01:32.820 electric car company it's really it is really fascinating to watch all right want to uh get
00:01:38.300 you right into the podcast first let me tell you about built bar if you uh like protein bars
00:01:43.860 oh you have no taste i mean you probably had your tongue removed if you want all the benefits of a
00:01:51.240 really healthy protein bar but you want the taste as well then you need to try built bar built bar
00:01:58.860 right now built bar has all these different flavors you can try them out i'll tell you about it in a
00:02:03.140 second but they're really good for you most of them have 17 grams of protein but only 130 calories
00:02:09.640 four grams of sugar and four net carbs really delicious and you can find um your favorite
00:02:16.080 by getting the new blaze favorites box go to built.com slash beck that's built.com slash beck
00:02:24.320 you're going to get 15 built bars the favorite flavors of steven crowder steve dace and yours truly
00:02:30.900 so grab them now get the blaze favorites box at built.com slash beck that's built.com slash beck
00:02:39.580 and here's the podcast
00:02:41.440 you're listening to the best of the glenn beck program
00:02:52.980 welcome to the glenn beck program we say hello to mr pat gray from hello gray unleashed
00:03:02.140 so welcome how are you feeling today uh miserable would be a good word despondent would be another
00:03:12.080 word huh uh defeated would be a third okay we could use so not spirited no not spirited in any way
00:03:22.400 except about the national divorce movement i'm kind of you're into that i'm kind of into that
00:03:27.360 yeah do you think that in if we got a national divorce in the new let's say constitutional republic
00:03:35.640 that we would like to live in do you think the gop would win the elections 0.99
00:03:40.100 somehow they'd still blow it they'd still they'd still blow it still find a way to lose there'd be a
00:03:47.120 communist one communist and he'd be like the green party takes over i think i should fill all of the
00:03:53.280 senate seats and they'd win yeah that's probably true yeah probably true so isn't it bizarre though
00:04:01.460 that every time you go to sleep with a lead you wake up with not the lead it's kind of strange to me
00:04:09.880 i i wasn't expecting this over the weekend have you adam laxalt would drop the what almost three
00:04:16.240 point lead he had going into the weekend two and a half points something like that yeah and all of a
00:04:20.680 he said nope he lost adam laxalt preparing him for a loss i'm like wait what how did that happen
00:04:27.560 well all the precincts that came in were heavy democrat we just thought they might be slightly
00:04:32.920 democrat okay wow that happens a lot didn't happen i didn't didn't happen in the gubernatorial race
00:04:39.700 though that's good they did that is true the republican if you're going to do it you know if you're
00:04:45.340 gonna cheat you you think you would do exactly exactly that's why or or that's what they want
00:04:54.140 you to think you know what we'll give them the governorship we'll give them that they won't be
00:04:59.360 able to as long as we have the senate then they won't be able to say anything uh it hurts though it
00:05:05.100 hurts it does and to see the victory lap that biden is taking i mean after the g message he's he meets
00:05:11.800 with xi for three hours comes out talking about you know how great it is that democrats won that uh
00:05:18.580 well how how did he put it that oh election denialism was strongly rejected because you know there's such
00:05:27.560 wide and open and honest elections in china that's i'm glad he uh he was able to shine light on that
00:05:35.080 yeah because they've been doing such a good job uh president xi very very popular very very very
00:05:40.980 popular in fact i think he might win 98 99 of the vote well if they let that's because they call him
00:05:47.220 mr freedom mr freedom mr freedom mr freedom mr freedom wow i didn't see that one coming yeah no but
00:05:56.660 then again i didn't see laxalt lose no i didn't either no did not either so at least it takes the edge off
00:06:02.420 the georgia race now doesn't it yeah it's like uh whatever it might be good for uh for walker's
00:06:09.520 chances i think there's an argument made that like now that control isn't a hundred percent
00:06:14.540 it's teetering on that maybe maybe uh maybe they win maybe republicans will be more active than some
00:06:22.240 sideline voters that don't typically go out to the polls maybe yeah maybe i still think my reaction
00:06:29.220 is a little like pats huh well well i mean it's it i i am it's a six-year term i'm getting out of
00:06:38.900 two i'm getting out of the car before they drive it over the cliff but they are driving it over the
00:06:44.600 cliff so assuming we still have a nation in the next couple of elections it will be nice to have
00:06:48.660 a one-seat cushion as we see how close these things are the next couple of elections yes i was
00:06:54.740 expecting six next couple of months it is important though and and next time the map
00:07:01.100 tilts towards republicans as we've discussed many times this yeah we have a better shot yeah
00:07:05.800 2024 should be a good year now he said it's mcconnell's gonna see to that i'll tell you i thought you
00:07:11.880 were just talking about maybe replacing him with somebody i am talking more excited about now there
00:07:16.020 are some people that are talking about it as well uh you know there's um
00:07:21.540 there's josh holly okay eric schmidt yes rick scott good ron johnson all right uh lindsey graham
00:07:31.800 lindsey graham yeah that's a surprise yeah yeah mike lee huh jd vance okay ted cruz like that rubio
00:07:39.460 rubio was in that mm-hmm there's a there's a few murkowski strangely not huh what a surprise
00:07:45.200 not stunning surprise did they call that race yet i don't know i haven't checked that one in a while
00:07:50.160 for the love of p just call it alaska i know i don't know if they have yet actually i do because
00:07:55.120 no they haven't because they have to do the rank choice thing and they have to wait for all the
00:07:57.880 votes to come in but she's gonna i think murkowski's the favorite there by uh of course she is of course 1.00
00:08:03.260 she is you're gonna go for so the more of the two evils not the lesser it's never but the more
00:08:11.100 yeah so chewbacca is currently up by two points this is
00:08:16.220 it went ask for a comment it has for a comment that's what she said 1.00
00:08:21.940 we've been talking about that race for like two weeks like why have we not talked about this race
00:08:28.360 without with pat in here we need pat in here when we're talking about the chewbacca race right 1.00
00:08:33.980 because it's important to have somebody that can do
00:08:35.940 murkowski's at 42.8 but the way this breaks out of course when you do the rank choice voting
00:08:46.260 you're going to lose the last candidate first and her her vote which i think the last one is a
00:08:51.000 republican but it's only a couple percent and that let's just say that even goes to chewbacca which it
00:08:56.560 could go either way the next one's a democrat and that's not i think nine percent of the vote
00:09:01.080 and that that percentage will be distributed between it will almost exclusively go to murkowski
00:09:06.840 which should really over the 50 point uh barrier that that's the way i'm looking at that race now
00:09:11.900 of course there's still a bunch of votes to come in alaska is one of these from labor unions i
00:09:16.500 possibly uh i think you have 14 days after the election to have your they wait 14 days something
00:09:22.940 like that and to get all the votes in what yeah i look do they have to be at least like marked the
00:09:30.040 day i think they have to be postmarked postmarked by and you might say like it's three towns away
00:09:34.460 and it still takes 14 days in alaska that could be the truth i don't know i think you know alaska
00:09:39.360 is a little bit of a different place but i mean if there's one you can't there's no reason to do
00:09:43.900 this in like california like there alaska maybe you have a there's some island out that no one's
00:09:48.680 ever visited and i don't know it takes a while for the mail to get there maybe but like you know
00:09:54.760 it's like new york city we need six months sorry i think nevada did that either nevada or arizona i
00:10:00.340 was reading about one of the two i can't remember over the weekend and they said that saturday was the
00:10:06.360 deadline for mail-in votes yeah to arrive and be counted and it didn't even specify whether or not
00:10:13.240 they had to be postmarked yeah they do have november 8th so that's good at least well the other ones
00:10:18.420 they do is they're like what you don't care about our military members serving overseas that want to
00:10:24.140 get their votes what happens about a person who is in a cave in afghanistan and decides on election day
00:10:31.500 he's going he needs to he gives it to a sherpa who postmarks it on november 8th who then has to
00:10:37.620 walk it and he hasn't heard yet that we withdrew from afghanistan a year ago he's in a cave how would
00:10:44.080 he know okay you're right he just knows he wanted catherine cortez masto to be the next senator
00:10:49.140 i think that's a very good point a very good point and you know while you're at it i mean sure he's
00:10:57.300 over in a cave but you might be in the kitchen of some some union kitchen where there's knives and
00:11:04.280 you've got to you've got to get around all the knives as you're passing out the ballots and then
00:11:08.700 collecting all the ballots and making sure that it gets there you might need a couple of months
00:11:13.300 that's very likely that happens it takes some time how many times have we seen that be the case
00:11:18.080 for some of these voters many many times many times or you might be dead and it takes you a little
00:11:25.840 longer to get it out of your casket above ground into the hand of a mailman and all the way to the
00:11:32.200 voting place right you know it takes some time for the dead to get their vote counted they move
00:11:37.300 slowly if you've ever seen very slowly or a zombie i don't know if you've seen this i i've seen this
00:11:43.240 happen you have to convince the worms to take that letter up above the soil and a lot of them don't want
00:11:51.680 to no and they have they have to they have to grab that ballot with their teeth with their worm teeth
00:11:59.440 the worm teeth okay worm teeth and get that up there yeah and worm teeth uh you know they might
00:12:05.360 bite through the they might start eating the ballot you have to get it up there before they finish
00:12:09.000 dissolving it that was the problem with the with the chads oh really yeah the worm teeth the worm
00:12:15.140 it was worm dang it man so many of our problems come back so many teeth so many you know yeah good
00:12:21.300 chunk of them hey so can i uh can i just give you a story about walgreens uh walgreens has decided to
00:12:28.440 close three locations in boston oh what racists hey man thank you for saying you're welcome
00:12:34.880 so clear and obvious that that's all about racism it is now they might have been you know robbed
00:12:42.820 every day yeah but who isn't uh that's just sheer unadulterated racism thank you pat i was glad somebody
00:12:52.200 said and i was i was hoping you i was hoping you would see that like the city of boston does
00:12:57.480 everything is racism now everything is racist it's true it's true i was uh my wife and i went away
00:13:04.540 i was in nashville nashville i love nashville it's a great town of great people around uh went into a
00:13:10.060 walgreens there and that was an interesting experience really yeah it was different than
00:13:14.460 the most of the walgreens that i go to in what way um well uh she was inside the store accosted by 1.00
00:13:21.960 multiple homeless people while she was in her aisle and i was in my other aisle and she had to kind of
00:13:26.720 come over and and uh and uh let me know now this is like you have she has a problem with homeless 0.88
00:13:34.000 people uh right in this sort of in this circumstance yes first of all wow on the walk over there
00:13:39.580 obviously there was 1400 homeless people that came up and asked us for money or looked at us in a in
00:13:45.300 in a threatening manner of some sort but that's just nashville that's just what what's going on down
00:13:51.760 there downtown uh yeah after you could crawl over the giant bags of trash that are on every single
00:13:57.360 corner but once you get past that whole circumstance you think once you're inside the walgreens
00:14:03.780 you're gonna have a moment a respite of some sort listen to this elitism glenn i know i need the
00:14:10.740 elitism of this guy my gosh oh wow i mean like it's sad it's a real problem when they shop at walgreens
00:14:18.120 all the time you know what i mean they're just like the upscale the upscale walgreens you do kind of
00:14:24.720 expect though inside a store to not be harassed by people okay and uh apparently not okay apparently
00:14:32.040 you expect to be harassed by sales people trying to sell you stuff that's what i expect going
00:14:36.780 is that the way it happens at tiffany's i don't know glenn do you want to get into an elitism battle
00:14:42.460 on the air oh we're all out of time okay i just want to make sure
00:14:46.000 this is the best of the glenn beck program
00:14:52.180 vivek ramashwamy is with us uh now vivek glenn how are you i'm good kind of a disappointing week
00:15:03.300 uh last week but uh recovering from it and uh and moving on yeah well you know that's the only way
00:15:11.220 forward right i know it is so so vivek i wanted to get you on to explain the ftx thing to somebody like
00:15:19.260 me that's not really up on ftx and i haven't been following this 30 year old guy tell me what's
00:15:26.480 what's happening and what it means it's a really interesting story glenn and not all of the details
00:15:32.500 are crystal clear yet i can give you the the super detailed version if you're interested but the
00:15:37.740 slightly less summary version is that there's a guy who operated an exchange called ftx right that
00:15:45.560 was the exchange where people trade cryptocurrencies it's like coin guys own yeah exactly except this
00:15:51.600 is offshore coinbase is onshore so think about that as an exchange but it's a centralized exchange it
00:15:56.980 just happens to trade cryptocurrency so it's like an old school think about as an equivalent of like a
00:16:01.740 stock exchange except people can trade cryptocurrencies on it now that's owned and founder founded by and
00:16:07.580 lead owner is sam bankman freed who goes by sbs but he also had a separate hedge fund called alameda so
00:16:16.660 that's a trading firm so that's not an exchange that's just trading to try to make money like people
00:16:21.580 always have on wall street this has existed for a very long time hedge funds that just traded their
00:16:26.900 own capital to make more money so he's operating both the exchange and his own hedge fund and it appears
00:16:33.080 what happened was when that hedge fund encountered a bunch of losses and they have leverage right that means
00:16:38.960 they're borrowing that means they have to post collateral to cover for those losses so it appears what he did
00:16:45.860 was he took customer funds from the exchange but used that to borrow it and post it as collateral and when that
00:16:55.000 came to light the other participants in that exchange particularly one big market participant this guy
00:17:03.000 cheng pang zao said that he was going to dump a bunch of the and this is where it gets a little
00:17:08.340 bit complicated but a bunch of the token issued by the exchange that basically caused the value of that
00:17:14.660 token the instrument that people hold on the exchange to collapse and that sent a free fall spiral that
00:17:20.720 caused the whole house of cards to come crashing down so you know putting complexities and the details to
00:17:26.920 one side as we can get into if you want the bottom line is there's a guy who is self-dealing
00:17:31.540 using customer money on an exchange to cover his own personal trading losses tried to cover it up
00:17:38.480 when that came to light there was a house of cards that came crashing and unfortunately many of those
00:17:43.700 customers are likely going to lose a lot of their money and even the portion they get back they're not
00:17:48.600 going to see for a very long time so that's just descriptively what happened but boy is there a lot more
00:17:53.540 that's interesting to this story when you look at this guy who was a major donor to the democratic party
00:17:58.440 one of the major faces of advocating for regulation of the cryptocurrency industry in washington dc
00:18:04.280 that created the smoke screen that prevented people from being able to see through this fundamental fraud
00:18:10.660 okay so let's i want to go there but first let's start he's like 30 years old uh and his and the the
00:18:17.580 woman running the hedge fund she girlfriend right his girlfriend looks like she's 14
00:18:23.220 yeah i'm not i'm not gonna i i don't have the facts but i will tell you it did not look uh good
00:18:31.380 it surprised me a little bit right so how is it that these two people pulled the wool over so many
00:18:38.560 people's eyes so it's a great question i think it has to do with cultivating this do-good image this
00:18:47.040 futurist image on the promise of cryptocurrency and the importance of what that would mean for
00:18:52.620 humanity i mean at the end of the day these are nothing this guy is nothing more than a high
00:18:57.520 frequency trader and there's nothing wrong with being a high frequency trader but it's just you're
00:19:01.760 in the business ordinarily to just make an extra buck to make an extra buck by beating somebody else
00:19:07.160 at the sport of trading effectively but what he managed to do was to disguise that in the veneer
00:19:12.640 of this moral superiority this morality and the funniest part about this glenn is that a lot of
00:19:18.700 people miss this this is going to have a backlash that i think is going to be over inclusive where
00:19:25.700 this guy was operating a centralized exchange that's no different than an old school exchange it just
00:19:31.340 happened to offer trading in cryptocurrencies so there's really nothing that fancy or even futuristic
00:19:36.320 let alone morally humanistic about it it's just an old school exchange where people trade stuff and
00:19:41.800 the stuff they trade it as a cryptocurrency but the actual promise of the future of cryptocurrency of
00:19:46.960 decentralization is actually decentralized exchanges where there's no single centralized owner of the
00:19:53.200 exchange and the irony here glenn is i think this is going to provoke a backlash from regulators to the
00:20:00.280 entire cryptocurrency of course it will including to decentralized exchanges and the irony here's the
00:20:05.760 ultimate irony that a lot of people miss he couldn't have done what he did if it were actually a truly
00:20:11.980 decentralized exchange the only way he was able to borrow those customer funds as one actor and lend
00:20:18.180 it over to his hedge fund to post his collateral is the fact that the exchange was centralized in the first
00:20:23.200 place and so the irony here is you have this guy who was the face of pro-regulation he was a pro-regulatory
00:20:30.040 advocate in washington dc which is why everyone viewed him as the good bot that's the good guy the golden
00:20:35.900 boy and yet the irony is he happened to be the fraudster and then the reaction to that is likely
00:20:41.280 going to include over-regulating decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges which would have been
00:20:47.440 probably the best way of actually preventing this fraud so that's the irony in the whole story that
00:20:52.360 that i think people haven't yet caught up to see isn't he also uh big in uh esg
00:20:59.160 and the world economic forum part of the smoke screen exactly it's all just part of the smoke
00:21:04.740 screen glenn is that is part of it now there was there was a story that was uh floating around on
00:21:09.880 social media yesterday that actually found that a subsidiary of fact set which is one of these rating
00:21:14.860 companies yeah uh assigned an esg score on a leadership and governance metric including as it related to
00:21:22.120 sustainability standards that was higher for this company than exxon mobil okay which is
00:21:28.120 a company that most americans will know and has been around for a long time okay so that's the bit
00:21:34.120 of the farce in this but that's just one example of the farce he's pro-regulation so the democrats in
00:21:39.920 washington dc see him as a good guy he is the second largest donor to democrats this cycle donating over
00:21:45.940 30 million dollars another point on the strike in the tally of being the good guy wait wait hang on
00:21:51.260 didn't he also didn't he also say that for 2024 he will donate up to a billion dollars to the
00:21:58.420 democrats yes so the funny thing is what he said is he was going to donate a billion dollars over the
00:22:04.720 2022 and 2024 cycle now the sad part for a lot of democrats is they were kind of upset at it because
00:22:10.620 you might think that meant like a few hundred million now and and more hundred million then
00:22:15.340 actually he only ended up donating 30 plus million so the side note to the story kind of the comic part of
00:22:20.140 this is a lot of democrats are actually upset at him for only ponying up a little over 30 million
00:22:24.520 because he had committed to a billion but you see this guy there's a common pattern over promising
00:22:29.020 and under delivering turns out that applies to political donations as well but but the broader
00:22:33.780 point though glenn is it's just all checking all the boxes speaking with clinton on stage and tony blair
00:22:39.700 boldly wearing shorts being the cool guy of the future world economic forum all that that that entire
00:22:45.700 crowd esg rating donations to the democratic party being vocally pro-regulation in an industry where
00:22:52.700 the other entrepreneurs have in my opinion for good reason resisted regulation that that created the
00:22:58.880 cultivated aura of this being one of the good guys one of the guys you could trust and it reminds
00:23:04.120 me a lot of actually that ceo of volkswagen you know you remember this guy winter corn he was the ceo
00:23:10.020 volkswagen which was the number one esg award-winning company yes until they found by the he would wax
00:23:16.500 eloquent about climate change and the energy transition until they found that he had actually
00:23:21.000 rigged the emissions measurements in their own cars right this reminded me a lot of that story
00:23:27.140 where the person who protests the case for the futurism of the esg-laden world the one of the good 0.93
00:23:34.420 guys about the pro-regulation crowd ended up being the most fraudulent of them all and it's not an
00:23:40.420 accident that that pattern just repeats itself time and again because it's all about creating a smoke
00:23:47.140 screen to allow you to get away with a kind of fraud you would have never gotten away with if people
00:23:52.620 hadn't been thrown off the scent with the smoke screen that you put up so that's the story it happens
00:23:58.460 again and again and i wish people would learn the lesson glenn but there's something about us as a
00:24:03.140 people that make us suckers for the smoke screen of wanting to be the pro-esg pro-democrat pro-regulation
00:24:09.460 good guys that every time that ends up being actually a pretty good way to throw the regulators
00:24:14.740 and to throw customers off the scent and to be able to get away with something like this and and
00:24:19.280 there's a real big uh media angle here to this too because this is yet another example elizabeth holmes
00:24:26.160 style where they made this guy into a hero all the like he he doesn't brush his hair he there are
00:24:32.120 stories about how he wears shorts to every meeting one story talked about how he would fall asleep on
00:24:38.900 beanbag chairs outside of offices and they bring in all these multi-billion dollar donors past him
00:24:45.460 while he was sleeping and then he would wake up and waddle into the the uh the meeting like 10 minutes
00:24:51.020 later and this was like he's just a genius he's a he doesn't even care he's asleep on a beanbag outside
00:24:56.980 of the meeting uh one story talked about these are all praising him where he was playing video games
00:25:02.940 during an entire presentation while he was in there and they gave him a billion dollars after
00:25:08.580 this meeting where he was playing league of legends throughout an entire meeting and like there's no
00:25:14.360 mea culpa from the media after all of this who built this guy into this celebrity to get all of
00:25:19.620 these dollars and there will never be a time all they'll get is a bunch of podcasts later on hosted
00:25:26.300 by the same reporters who initially interviewed him and made him into this superstar i mean it's a
00:25:32.140 ridiculous cycle you make such a good point and this is less a story about this random guy sbf whatever
00:25:39.060 he came two years ago he'll be gone you know two months from now but it's an indictment of our culture
00:25:45.800 i mean what is it about our state of our psyche our cultural psyche in the u.s even internationally
00:25:53.260 that causes us to bear this self-inflicting pain every time to line up behind a guy who who not only
00:26:01.160 poses to be the boy genius i mean that was elizabeth holmes version of this but to take that to the next
00:26:06.240 level to think that he is actually better than the rest of us just because he checked the boxes that
00:26:12.460 we had created in our artificial evidence edifice of esg and of of humanitarianism and of political
00:26:19.840 philanthropy it's almost as though we did this to ourselves and he was just the guy who happened to
00:26:25.400 ride the wave that the rest of our culture had created that's the more interesting part of this
00:26:30.120 story because it's the volkswagen thing all over again you know it's unilever in kenya i mean it's all
00:26:35.420 the stuff i've been writing and talking about for two years we just see the same story repeat itself
00:26:40.340 in different clothing it just happened to be in the clothing of cryptocurrency this time around
00:26:44.300 uh so i i heard um on the uh the podcast uh all in i heard brian armstrong who's the ceo of coinbase
00:26:53.000 saying he didn't he didn't see this one coming at all he said i i just thought he was a really good
00:26:59.000 really good guy he said now in retrospect i i guess i did see things but i ignored them
00:27:04.700 was there anybody who saw this i not that i know of i mean i guess what makes it such a big story
00:27:12.340 right and i'm not even you know i follow the cryptocurrency space but that's not an area
00:27:17.100 where i spend an immense inordinate amount of my time i'm focused more on you know equity markets
00:27:21.640 etc but but there is something about seeing a guy who is calling for greater regulation in his own
00:27:30.120 industry while also making greater donations to the very people who are responsible for uh crafting
00:27:37.540 those regulations gosh that sounds a bad taste in my mouth that alone just struck me as as
00:27:43.680 potentially false and inauthentic now was that going to underlie a 30 billion dollar 40 billion
00:27:48.640 dollar fraud i did not necessarily go to the extent of predicting that there's something that was
00:27:52.720 amiss about this in terms of calling for self-hating regulation while donating to very people
00:27:57.200 were going to write those regulations and that's strange that sounds a little like zuckerberg
00:28:01.860 it actually does doesn't it it does yeah it does it does um hey it's pattern repeats itself glenn
00:28:09.460 you know well so it's not going to be we could probably count if we took 10 minutes we could
00:28:12.800 probably find 10 to 20 other examples that smell just like it so i'm sketchy on all of this stuff
00:28:18.220 of ache but i there's a missing 1.7 billion billion dollars is that accurate
00:28:25.840 i i can't say if it's accurate but that is what that is that is what the latest uh reporting is
00:28:32.600 absolutely yeah how do you misplace 1.7 billion dollars well the funny thing is now they're talking
00:28:40.560 about this uh about the potential hack into the system too after the fraud story came to light so i'm
00:28:48.640 i have no basis for this other than intuition but to say that that hack seems uh mysteriously
00:28:54.500 well-timed so guys guys being uh being you know investigated now for fraud being scrutinized for
00:29:05.460 fraud for himself misappropriating those funds to his affiliated hedge fund from an exchange that he
00:29:11.820 was operating for customers and then suddenly there's a hack and and i think that it strikes
00:29:16.060 me as a little convenient to sort of say that okay the hack is something that we can blame because
00:29:21.240 that's something that's outside of all of our control when in fact at the very moment it for
00:29:26.440 two years there wasn't any report of a hack but now there's a report of a hack right when you are
00:29:31.600 being investigated so that did that did smell a little bit uh a myth to me but you know the facts
00:29:37.960 on this are changing by the day changing by the hour but the lesson i think is actually less
00:29:44.520 complicated than each of those detailed facts might you know might you know invite okay and i think that
00:29:52.040 it's it's pretty simple whether it was cryptocurrency or anything else there's just a guy who's operating
00:29:57.000 in exchange for customers and you cannot use customer money to add without their correct permission
00:30:03.320 to advance your own financial trading goals period that is a hard line and whether you're regulated or not
00:30:11.480 that is an illegal act of misappropriation of theft and then fraud and lying to the people who you're
00:30:17.600 stealing from so it actually in a certain sense has nothing to do with cryptocurrency has nothing to do
00:30:22.360 with crypto regulation the only double irony of this is that if it had actually been operated as a truly
00:30:29.200 decentralized exchange this guy couldn't have even done the thing that he did and so in a certain sense
00:30:34.980 the crypto-ness of this let alone the the morality of this is all just a deflection the smokescreen from
00:30:42.520 the essence of what was really nothing different than just an old school madoff-esque fraud and is there
00:30:48.420 any anything more than just trading into fiat currency um uh becoming in bed with ukraine and the uh the main
00:30:59.620 bank of ukraine to to trade cryptocurrency and get it into uh fiat currency so people could use it do you
00:31:07.500 think there's a money-making scam in there as well well i think there's no doubt that there is you know
00:31:13.960 in in all of crypto exchanges sort of a money laundering element to it yeah in the sense that you know
00:31:21.040 you're using the and the supposed anonymity of these exchanges to be able to you know launder money
00:31:29.160 that you otherwise would have not been able to launder but that's not unique to cryptocurrency
00:31:33.560 right you have to do that in the current fiat no so that's a bit of a deflection i know thank you so
00:31:38.560 much vivek i appreciate it uh vivek ramaswamy he is the author of nation of victims and co-founder
00:31:46.100 and executive chairman of strive asset management
00:31:49.200 the best of the glenn beck program
00:31:55.660 so glenn so stew nothing ever good starts with so glenn yeah um can i walk you through
00:32:12.880 the house do you mean my house the unfinished house it'll be finished in six
00:32:19.180 weeks you know six weeks now oh gosh that's terrible i thought it was only two two weeks
00:32:22.760 okay but i'm i know your house is never going to be finished never going to be finished go ahead
00:32:28.420 not that house now glenn yes we have a situation where let me give you the good news okay for
00:32:33.520 example prediction markets prediction say the house should go republican 95 chance 95 chance
00:32:39.640 that's pretty good that's really good although i do remember those prediction markets being very very
00:32:46.120 confident in things like carrie lake they were pretty confident now they are not confident in
00:32:50.980 carrie lake they're not now they're not no changed in fact now there's a 94 chance that carrie lake
00:32:56.200 will lose according to the markets huh wonder what happened that's different than it was probably she 0.93
00:33:01.680 probably had a 60 or 70 chance in mid to late last week i trust the prediction markets right they could
00:33:08.180 change right this could be but but but that's what they think they're confident yeah almost everybody
00:33:12.620 will tell you and you've heard this non-stop even in the mainstream media the republicans will likely
00:33:17.320 win the house yeah but can i be a little pessimistic here and walk you through what we have
00:33:21.580 is it pessimism or is it reality i think it's real i think it's reality but but but it's not all bad
00:33:31.360 news but just how confident do you feel in this scenario that i'm about to walk you through okay i'm
00:33:37.660 guessing zero okay but uh let me hear it i went through all the outstanding races okay looked at them
00:33:45.580 and i have uh i don't know what i tend to find is a somewhat disturbing situation okay so i ranked all
00:33:54.220 of the races in the best chance for republicans to win yeah yeah okay so 212 are pretty much in the bag
00:34:02.340 212 212 got to get to 218 though wow 218 that's a long way from that's easy oh there's a lot of races
00:34:09.120 there's a couple dozen races still out there i mean uh you know gosh really have to be over 220
00:34:14.540 uh to even uh because you know there's a lot of weasels in there yes yeah for sure but 218 is
00:34:21.260 control and at this point i'll take i will take 218 yes i will too all right so i've ranked them in
00:34:28.920 the old school grading system from from you know your old high school days a b c d f oh okay wow that's
00:34:35.680 harsh now none of these i would say are completely decided but i i came up with three a's three a's three
00:34:42.960 three so and they're and that that means really high according to the grading scale
00:34:49.100 these are the best of the best not sure things let me give you an example of a race that i put
00:34:54.160 as an a okay lauren bobert's race in colorado oh that's an a that's an a now as of right now she
00:35:00.360 leads by 0.4 percent with 99 of the vote in how many votes is she away actually not percentage
00:35:08.020 not percentage uh yeah that's a good question i can yeah if you give me one moment glenn of course
00:35:12.700 i can pull that up for you and i'm completely prepared to give you any detail that's additional
00:35:17.060 why are you stalling i'm giving you at any time and that's what's important about this particular
00:35:21.540 coverage i can always tell you in a moment's notice and people need to understand this wow
00:35:27.400 uh it's very very clear we just looking for the number of votes that number of votes in in that
00:35:33.800 race yeah in that race yeah i've got it at uh 1 122 thank you okay 1 000 votes away now but
00:35:42.620 they're 99 in 99 in and you'd think so basically what we're talking about there would the outstanding
00:35:50.720 vote couldn't overturn it only if there was like a recount or something else that's all right i feel
00:35:55.580 good i feel good about that feel good about that that's the type of a race i'm talking about
00:36:00.180 we have three of those that gets republicans at 215 wait we have three of those three a races that
00:36:06.720 are that good i think so there's another race in new york uh a 0.4 in new york yeah okay 0.4
00:36:14.840 that's not colorado that's new york okay yeah i mean i now when you say it that way yeah you know it
00:36:22.200 doesn't sound as good you know but right where's the third one third one uh uh oh that one's in
00:36:30.320 california california that one is not even new york that's california all you have to do is depend
00:36:39.220 on the fine people in new york and california again these are close races okay uh but i'm going to go
00:36:46.520 ahead and just give us those three just for the for the optimistic take here on the house and that
00:36:51.380 gives us gets gets us to 215 215 now seeming even more cavernous in between 215 and 218 than it did
00:37:02.420 just a few minutes ago it seemed really easy seemed pretty easy with a couple dozen races out there
00:37:07.520 right why can't we get all we need is six right right but now of the a's i only have three three so
00:37:14.080 now we're at 215 okay now you'd say what number is still passing right still a good grade still a
00:37:18.460 good grade how many races would you like to see in the b column to make yourself comfortable that
00:37:24.760 the republicans 27 27 that's a good seven yeah that's how i would feel right i always feel these
00:37:29.860 are going to go against us how many do we have two two two races that are just two that would take us
00:37:37.920 to uh two two 17 yes and you're going to be excited that here in our b's we have another
00:37:45.280 california oh good and you're going to be super confident because it's arizona is the other one oh i
00:37:52.280 hope it's maricopa county because that one's done so that's done so well yes yeah now if we assume
00:38:01.740 we have both of the a's and the b's that gets us to not 218 no which is what you need yeah but 217
00:38:12.720 217 which is one less than what you need so we don't have control there have control at 217 now may
00:38:20.260 i ask how much worse is a b from an a is it like 1100 votes okay or it should be 900 votes one race in
00:38:34.040 arizona it's a 0.2 lead with 94 of the vote in that's a b a b boys and girls i'm not being unfair
00:38:45.560 with these rankings that's a b and the only reason i say it's a b is because it was expected to be
00:38:51.080 a pretty easy not an easy win but it's a it's a purplish district but it is it was projected to be
00:38:58.600 a republican leaning district this time now of course we've seen that before in in what in in what
00:39:05.040 state in arizona in arizona good good okay and then we have a uh a race in california where there is
00:39:11.940 a six point lead currently for the republican however only 52 percent of the vote in that's
00:39:17.040 going to shrink okay as we get closer that's a b that's b but that one was leaning republican anyway
00:39:23.080 they've got the lead i'm gonna get that a b all right that gets you to 217 now you go into the c's
00:39:28.980 uh-huh now we just need one of these just need one of them and you'd like how many to be there
00:39:34.380 to just get one out of them i'd like this is a c is a c so again you're in like toss up area i would
00:39:43.560 like maybe i'm gonna shoot low five five that's a nice guess unfortunately you lose
00:39:52.700 i lose because i only have three you only have three c's now you if you're optimistic and you
00:39:58.960 take those a's and b's and you're like okay we can pick these off that's 217 you got one of these
00:40:03.740 three we still don't have the house this kids is going well going well i think mitch mcconnell
00:40:11.360 and kevin mccarthy i think they've done their job i think they've done their job they should be
00:40:16.980 rewarded with leadership they should be rewarded with new positions now here we have two california
00:40:24.700 races and an arizona in the seas okay we have what two california races and uh please tell me
00:40:33.080 it's like in the farming area of california some of them are there's some again you know i know
00:40:39.280 california we make fun of there are races that a lot of republicans do win in california yeah some
00:40:43.980 of them they're even favored in but like uh but like for example this one which is a a toss-up
00:40:50.400 uh-huh toss-up race i would say right now if you look at the projections okay was a biden plus six
00:40:58.100 district okay okay so one that biden won all right now in this environment which is not necessarily
00:41:04.600 i mean it's only slightly better for republicans maybe right we need the republican to win and of
00:41:10.780 course we still have 30 of the vote to count so we don't know at this point
00:41:13.820 oh 30 then you get into the d's wait there that was hot that was it there's three c's
00:41:21.740 uh-huh you've got some i mean you've got i i think there's there's one that's errors in arizona where
00:41:28.080 the republican leads by 0.6 percent with 89 of the vote in which i my a's i put if you're over 95
00:41:37.160 percent in and you're winning you know i put that as an a this one's at 89 in winning so a chance
00:41:43.620 certainly a chance um and it was a likely republican district going in so you'd think maybe there's a
00:41:51.280 chance that some of the some of the votes will be again you see me i'm reaching for some of these but
00:41:56.200 that's again it's close 0.6 percent lead but if we won all of the c's c's right that would give you
00:42:04.720 two to 20 which again isn't great in fact a lot of these uh these mainstream people looking at this
00:42:12.960 are like oh well we reproject 221 for republicans plus or minus four well that's a big that's a big
00:42:21.720 plus or minus yes yeah because 225 at this point would be like wow that's fantastic right 217 bad
00:42:28.580 bad bad bad yeah okay then you got three d's and then i have all the rest of them are f's
00:42:36.320 they're not gonna win they're not gonna win no well again they're all in california mostly at least
00:42:41.780 all in california and they're all districts that lean democrat and you know the democrat even have
00:42:48.120 the lead in a bunch of them i mean i just ask a quick question yes why is it that it just seems
00:42:57.100 to be in the sketchy states where they can't really count everything that might be why we
00:43:04.800 picture them as sketchy right it might be why it might be yeah it might be it might be something that
00:43:10.280 in theory you'd if as a lawmaker in one of these states you'd be incentivized to correct your terrible
00:43:16.220 practices because no one believes you're voting anymore you might not be incentivized right you
00:43:22.300 know if you're on the winning side yeah exactly so again you can see why right you would say hey
00:43:30.800 republicans are favored in this race and i would say you're probably maybe right but like 95 confidence
00:43:40.880 do you have 95 confidence in that scenario i just mapped out for you i mean i think wait wait wait
00:43:46.540 wait are republicans involved they are no i don't have any confidence in it then you know you may
00:43:52.540 remember glenn us uh saying over and over again republicans should win this election unless they
00:43:58.800 screw it up which which they always do i believe was the rest of that prediction they're very good at
00:44:07.400 that you know you got a couple rank choice voting now who would you say i'm going to give you time
00:44:12.220 i'm going to give you time okay who would you say is most responsible for that loss now don't answer
00:44:20.920 right away i want you to think is there anyone that might be responsible that maybe we should
00:44:29.240 reassign and i don't mean reassign their sex i mean reassign them to i don't know
00:44:37.300 basement duty instead of running the show who do you think is responsible for this
00:44:46.060 based on your lead in yes i believe no no don't base it on my lead i'm trying to analyze this a
00:44:53.000 little bit i believe i'm talking it through like i'm on a game show okay okay based on your question
00:44:57.540 based on my question yes do we have the do we have the game show music based on your
00:45:01.140 based on your question uh-huh i i think what you want me to say no i this is not no this is not
00:45:09.740 high school this is not high school i'm not a progressive teacher no but i think you have an opinion
00:45:14.840 on this yes i do and you would say uh i guess i'll generalize this republican leadership mitch
00:45:20.900 mcconnell but mitch mcconnell doesn't have anything to do with the house that's why i'm
00:45:24.780 no mitch mitch mcconnell and kevin mccarthy both of them both of them should go yeah both of them
00:45:31.380 should go these guys are the same guys that were in those positions under donald trump you know when
00:45:39.080 they got rid of obama they didn't it's gone that didn't get rid of oh they didn't get rid of that 0.70
00:45:43.860 did they wow well these guys they've done an awful lot and mitch mcconnell and kevin mccarthy
00:45:51.240 have got to go even if they're a minority maybe especially since they're the minority leaders 0.97
00:45:59.460 i mean after a poor showing usually what you see are repercussions for the people who led
00:46:05.800 the charge to the poor showing yes that's usually how things work in the world yes right not here
00:46:11.480 you're a you're a a football coach your team is three and nine and you're not going to make the
00:46:17.600 playoffs and you have a big a big payroll usually you get fired right usually what happens right
00:46:25.060 but that doesn't seem to be the way that these things go in washington okay here are the people
00:46:31.340 that can make mitch mitch mcconnell a thing of the past mitt romney call his office no mitt romney
00:46:39.020 is mitt romney really going to do a thing about me he loves but he should know but he should know
00:46:43.840 no this is this is i know but this is what he should know he should know that uh i'm gonna
00:46:50.720 remember what you said about uh about uh mitch mcconnell being responsible and uh since you
00:46:58.500 were wrong about that i'm sure i'm sure you're going to uh evict him and if not don't worry about
00:47:05.140 it because we have a very long memory and next election you are out remember it's only two years
00:47:11.700 um deb fisher from um nebraska roger wicker from mississippi rick scott florida ted cruz texas
00:47:23.300 mike braun from indianapolis uh from indiana uh josh holly from missouri john barrasso from wyoming
00:47:31.720 marcia blackburn um all of these people need to be reminded
00:47:39.540 that when you lose and you have put your money into an alaska race that was going to go to the
00:47:50.740 republican no matter what and you double down there really egregious it's really egregious
00:47:56.960 he cut money from arizona could have won new hampshire could have won took the money from there put it
00:48:05.300 into a race where two republicans were going against each other because he didn't why like
00:48:09.180 because he wanted to rescue lisa murkowski and why did he want to do that because the candidate running
00:48:14.400 against lisa uh lisa mcconnell said she uh will not vote for mitch mcconnell's leadership all of
00:48:23.660 these senators all of these senators know what their constituents are saying about mitch mcconnell
00:48:29.300 but mitch mcconnell has a very heavy hammer and he is trying to rush this thing through you've got to
00:48:37.660 call them today the government switchboard at the capitol is 202-224-3121 get on the phone
00:48:47.040 mitch mcconnell and kevin mccarthy let's start first with the senate because they're going to be meeting
00:48:54.340 tomorrow and then i guess voting on wednesday we have a very short time period mitch mcconnell must
00:49:01.320 not be the majority leader
00:49:03.640 you