What happens when the wealthy and the elite are funding the active destruction of our country? Will we actually get the truth out or will the media continue to play partisanship games? That s the first thing we tackle on today s podcast. Also, Alan Dershowitz on freedom of speech and something frightening he thinks is coming through the Supreme Court in the coming weeks, months, and years. And Chip Roy gives us the straight skinny on the Big Beautiful Bill.
00:14:02.860why does the community movement builders call murder of diplomats morally righteous
00:14:10.640and how does that square with broader liberal or humanitarian values
00:14:16.420if your goals are liberation and justice why do you glorify terrorist leaders and groups that have committed atrocities
00:14:27.080what does it mean for a u.s based non-profit to call for liberated zones under separate racial
00:14:35.460governance is this inclusion or is it segregation under just a different name
00:14:40.740if an ideology calls for collective racial control of resources and defines police as killer pigs
00:14:49.200is that promoting civic unity or justice and again why are the silicon valley people
00:14:57.140pouring millions of dollars in to promote that
00:15:00.320why are groups this extreme receiving significant democratic donor support especially when their rhetoric
00:15:12.940goes beyond protest into open support for political violence and separatism
00:15:17.160how far from the traditional democratic platform are these ideas i mean the party you're not don't seem to be
00:15:24.460distancing yourself from in fact you seem to quietly embrace this and it's getting louder your quiet is
00:15:31.500starting to get a little loud what what are the dark money networks like arabella play in shaping the
00:15:38.760grassroots movement with potentially extreme ideologies is anybody looking into that are politicians like
00:15:45.820kamala harris or uh raphael warnock aware of the full nature of the groups being funded through packs and networks aligned with them
00:15:54.460why is there so little media scrutiny of these connections compared to the other political funding controversies
00:16:04.300why is anti-semitism tolerated or overlooked when it comes from far left or minority focused groups i i just don't know
00:16:10.980why does mainstream media the the outlets including those owned by donors like the atlantic
00:16:16.320fail to report critically on any of these stories
00:16:20.040is is the public being misled by selective coverage or the avoidance of topics that might expose contradictions in elite or party narratives i just
00:17:26.240or are we just going to play politics again yeah let's just play politics today again media
00:17:33.300you're you're so good at it let's just do that
00:17:35.580let me tell you about patriot mobile when the world feels upside down you start to notice the little things
00:17:41.960the cashier who still says god bless you the school that starts with a pledge the neighbor who flies the flag without shame
00:17:47.920the last normal things in a country that is trying so hard to forget what normal even means and that's why patriot mobile matters more than you even think because it's easy to miss
00:17:58.220just it's a cell phone company right i mean same coverage is the big guy same service what do i care
00:18:03.760well here's why you care you'll find out that the that patriot mobile is the only christian conservative mobile company in america
00:18:12.260they support pro-life ministries first responders veterans faith-based non-profits and suddenly it's not just a cell phone company
00:18:19.280and you might say well that's nice but i don't want to get involved you're already involved but you're involved in the opposite things
00:18:25.420every time you pay your bill especially with verizon you're helping more abortions happen because they they help fund planned parenthood
00:18:32.600you know christian conservative phone company like that's like one of the last normal things
00:18:38.840in a world that's spinning uh off its axis sometimes you need to grab onto something that still makes sense
00:18:44.320and that thing is patriot mobile make the switch today call 972 patriot use the promo code beck you'll get a free month of service
00:18:51.540keep your phone change your phone keep your number change your number doesn't matter they'll make it super easy
00:18:55.880now back to the podcast this is the best of the glenbeck program
00:19:08.020welcome alan dershowitz how are you sir i'm doing great how are you i'm good so did i get this right
00:19:19.840you're you're talking about now that the supreme court might start leaning towards security over free
00:19:25.780speech in the in the coming years yeah look i pride myself on never uh it does i pride myself on
00:19:33.840never making predictions based on what i want to happen that's what lawrence tribe does that's what
00:19:40.120others on the left do and that's why they're always wrong i make predictions based on my analysis of
00:19:45.980trends this is not a trend i approve of but it's a trend i see coming i see coming it in the area of
00:19:53.300defamation i see it coming in the area of incitement i think that the brandenburg decision was written
00:20:00.520during a time of relative calm and we weren't seeing the kinds of incitements to violence that we
00:20:07.020saw that probably led to the burning of jews in uh in boulder colorado and the shooting of these two
00:20:14.380innocent people in washington dc and uh other kinds of things uh look i i have a lot of
00:20:21.500you just said and i find this amazing that you said you just said it happened in a you know in a
00:20:28.720time of relative calm it was 1969 um that this case came down to the supreme court if i'm not mistaken
00:20:34.820which is not really a calm year but um can you explain what the brandenburg case is
00:20:40.380sure what it was denberg was a nazi who was uh making horrible horrible speeches um but he wasn't
00:20:48.760inciting anybody directly and uh the nazis in those days had no influence no power they weren't getting
00:20:55.320people to do things um the people who were creating problems then were during the vietnam war people from
00:21:01.320the left i represented a lot of them and i represented people who uh disrupted the democratic convention
00:21:08.020in uh 1968 uh the chicago seven and other people like that and i saw with my own eyes that some of
00:21:15.780these people who started as disruptors and violent uh confrontationists and people pushing and shoving
00:21:22.700and and and and uh you know breaking property and stuff like that ultimately became murderers like
00:21:29.340kathy budine who ended up uh being responsible for the killing of two policemen uh or the weathermen who
00:21:35.500planted bombs um and and killed people um and um and then their leaders became you know prominent spokesmen
00:21:43.640of the left uh professors in various places so i saw that and what i'm seeing now is a different a
00:21:52.940different uh kind of quantity and what we're seeing it is when with the you know globalize the intifada
00:21:59.240uh and palestine will be free from the river to the sea those are calls for violence and uh under the
00:22:05.340current brandenburg case they're protected speech i think they should still be protected speech but my
00:22:11.120view my prediction is that when the next case comes up to the supreme court this supreme court um i think
00:22:19.460they may take a more security oriented point of view and say wait a minute the incitement doesn't have to be
00:22:25.600so direct it could be a little bit more indirect and let the jury decide that issue so i'm i'm concerned
00:22:33.020about that you know in my book the preventive state i have a whole chapter on free speech and
00:22:38.280how free speech can sometimes cause violence and but that it's not proper to deny free speech in order
00:22:47.080to prevent violence we have to think of better ways of preventing violence and in the preventive state i come
00:22:53.140up i think with better ways than constraining free speech because i i i really i'm with you on this
00:22:59.840this really disturbs me when i read this article uh from you yesterday the story from you yesterday i i
00:23:05.060i needed to talk to you because i'm like this is this is horrible this is this goes beyond um uh cancel
00:23:13.060culture this is now the government being able to come in and say nope yeah right that's really bad
00:23:21.100yeah look there are so many preventive mechanisms we use that have effects on free speech even
00:23:26.360deportation um deportation obviously denies the deported person the right to speak freely
00:23:33.320in this country now of course under the constitution a citizen has the most free speech rights a green
00:23:39.880card holder second most visa holders almost no free speech rights they can be deported if they say
00:23:46.020things that are contrary to the interests of the united states they're just guests in the country
00:23:49.980and so um you know i think we're going to see a lot lots of movement in this area because we're
00:23:59.120going to see a lot more violence let me tell you what happened to me uh the the day before uh the
00:24:05.540killings in the district of columbia this one christian boy and jewish woman who were killed
00:24:10.120working for the embassy the day after that i was getting an honorary degree at a college in florida
00:24:17.100and the security people from the college came up to me and said we're terrified that there might be
00:24:21.820a copycat uh attempt to kill you because you're a prominent uh spokesman um for pro-israel points of
00:24:29.740view and so they created a whole security thing around me where uh they created an escape plan they had
00:24:36.980policemen with machine guns and with uh bulletproof uh glass to protect me and uh i i i have redoubled my
00:24:45.760security uh and i think we're going to see more copycat crimes i think that hamas wants to see
00:24:51.460violence in the united states that's their goal to get more people to kill jews christians uh and
00:24:59.620others in the united states and i think they're probably going to succeed unless there are some
00:25:03.660preventive steps that are taking taken now the preventive steps should not include uh diminutions
00:25:08.860of of legitimate free speech onto the constitution i i i tell you i you know i see what the government
00:25:17.000is doing and how ai is you know in silicon valley is playing a big role with the pentagon and cia and
00:25:23.620and everything else and i am really really concerned if there is another big event like a 9-11 yeah i fear
00:25:31.380americans are just going to run to that kind of stuff and then we're in a trap that i don't think we get
00:25:36.760out of yeah but that's what history shows and in my book to prevent a state i show that there's a
00:25:42.920common phenomenon we underreact and we don't prevent we didn't prevent pearl harbor we didn't
00:25:48.880prevent 9-11 uh israel didn't prevent october 7th then what happened after we failed to prevent
00:25:54.960pearl harbor we put 110 000 innocent japanese americans in camps in order to prevent them from
00:26:02.200doing it again they never would have done it again we overreacted after 9-11 we created the
00:26:08.000patriot act which gave the government too much power uh to prevent a recurrence of that and you know
00:26:14.260reasonably disagree about israel but a lot of people think that israel uh for failure to prevent october
00:26:20.0407th which they could have done they had the intelligence may have overreacted uh in in gaza i'm not
00:26:25.840agreeing with that i'm just telling you historically there's a phenomenon it starts with under prediction
00:26:31.580and ends up with overreaction to the event that was not predicted and prevented that's the one of
00:26:38.220the theses of my book so what what should we expect and how do we prepare ourselves so we don't go down
00:26:48.220that road well first of all we do a lot more uh preparation and prevention uh we tried desperately
00:26:56.920to use what the resources are available i'll give you an example um the um young man who burned those
00:27:05.100people in boulder colorado he was here illegally uh he had over overstayed his visa there's there's
00:27:12.220nothing wrong with using artificial intelligence and computer technology to keep track of people who
00:27:17.860are here illegally and once he overstayed his visa action could have been taken and maybe this crime
00:27:24.400could have been prevented um so i think there are preventive steps that are consistent with the
00:27:29.600constitution with free speech that can be taken to avoid the cataclysmic events i'm going to give you
00:27:36.060another horrible example that's we're working on right now uh should the united states and israel uh bomb
00:27:43.300iran's nuclear um facilities we know they're planning to create an atomic bomb and we know that in the
00:27:50.7801930s if france and england had prevented germany from building up its army that would have saved 50
00:27:57.480million lives but we didn't know it then and so these are the kinds of preventive decisions but
00:28:04.000there's no free lunch every preventive decision entails some diminution of liberty and you know
00:28:09.600benjamin franklin was correct when he said uh those who would deny essential liberties to secure a little
00:28:15.540bit more security deserve neither but the question is can we deny a little bit of non-essential liberty
00:28:21.600um to prevent major cataclysmic events give you an example if before 9-11 we had arrested 10 people
00:28:29.320and prevented 9-11 and four of the people arrested were improperly arrested and spent two months in jail
00:28:35.000improperly that's probably a trade-off that's worth it