Joe Lieberman says for the first time he would vote for the impeachment of Donald Trump, we discuss the difference between the Bill Clinton impeachment and the Trump impeachment, we have Bill O'Reilly on, we talk about the coronavirus, which you don't get from beer, believe it or not, but I think it might be a cure this weekend, and also, Daniel Hannon from London, just a few hours away from the official Brexit as they leave the EU, his thoughts on that, on freedom and what America is doing right now and the choices in front of us.
00:00:00.000Hey, welcome to the program. Big day for the impeachment. Witness? No witness? We actually have Joe Lieberman on. He says for the first time how he would vote. We talked about the difference between this impeachment and the impeachment of Bill Clinton. Also, we addressed Trump's peace talk plan. He was fascinating. We have Bill O'Reilly on. We talk a little bit about the coronavirus, which you don't get from beer, believe it or not, but I think it might be a cure. You should try it this weekend.
00:00:28.900And also, Daniel Hannon from London, just a few hours away from the official Brexit as they leave the European Union. His thoughts on that, on freedom, and what America is doing right now and the choices in front of us. Great. Don't miss podcast begins now.
00:00:58.900You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.
00:01:40.960You know, which non-service member of us doesn't just break down around Memorial Day and have to do blow or something, you know, off the belly of hookers?
00:01:52.400Because that's the way, I think, as Stu says, that's the way Jesus would want it.
00:01:58.520Now, I disagree with that, but it's Stu.
00:02:02.320So anyway, Pat, one word in context of today.
00:05:39.500No attorney would say, okay, let's do that.
00:05:44.020You'd say, no, but if it's Pat, my best friend, and he goes off and he's going to release this book, let's at least get him on the stand so I can cross-examine him.
00:05:55.380Because the media will run all of the book release stuff from him.
00:06:01.580They will do fawning interviews because they want to destroy me.
00:06:41.400It destroys the book tour because there's nothing new to go over.
00:06:46.320But if you don't do it, when that book is released, it's a huge event and you have a fawning media that wants John Bolton to be saying bad things about the president.
00:06:59.940So the Democrats can then say, you know what?
00:09:25.980The corruption, everything we said that was going on, it all has gone on.
00:09:30.360But there is a deeper story to it that is, how can I put this without, it is, it is a story that has driven the news on a couple of presidents.
00:09:55.060And, and I can't, I just can't say, it is a huge, huge story.
00:10:53.440It's not going to be behind the paywall.
00:10:54.880You'll be able to see it on YouTube and Facebook and, and all of our platforms for free, but watch it because it is, you can end this trial.
00:11:08.520And begin a new trial that must be done.
00:11:14.160And you're not talking about trying Obama.
00:11:17.140You're talking about exposing Obama and then exposing all of the people that were involved in it.
00:11:51.660Um, but it is, it is, it is the worst that we have seen in the past from presidents, uh, two of which I know, um, uh, went through massive trials in history for this.
00:12:10.040Um, um, and it is an affront to Congress, the constitution, all of it.
00:35:07.820Remember, Ted Cruz won the Iowa caucus last time around.
00:35:11.900What's really interesting is it's not all like that.
00:35:15.600I went to a couple of high schools for the caucus, and they would have the, you know, for instance, next Monday, they'll have the Bernie people here.
00:35:26.080They'll have the Elizabeth Warren people in this room, and you can go listen to them.
00:38:17.980They think Biden is going to not make it to the finish line.
00:38:22.640Where Podesta and the wise guys in the Democratic Party, they don't want Bernie Sanders at all.
00:38:29.240But the media favors Sanders over Biden.
00:38:32.440And if Sanders wins Iowa and New Hampshire, which he almost certainly is going to, and then he wins in Nevada where he's performing pretty well,
00:38:44.120he's got pretty serious momentum by the time you get to South Carolina.
00:38:48.140Can anybody stop him if he wins those first three?
00:40:53.880As long as you're making money and you're, you're towing the line and telling everybody that, you know, there has to be somebody to oversee against all the corruption of all the other people.
00:41:37.980They were not fired by the Sanders campaign, and they occupy the same position that the guy who went to Virginia to shoot all of the Republicans on the baseball diamond held.
00:42:33.180Why is Pennsylvania why is Pennsylvania a problem for him?
00:42:36.720Because if it's Biden, as I think it will be, the African-American vote that stayed home last time around, they didn't like Hillary, will come out for Biden because Barack Obama will campaign for Biden.
00:44:29.100This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.
00:44:34.180I have to tell you, I looked down and I knew that we had scheduled Joe Lieberman, but I'm looking down and I'm thinking, OK, I'm writing down the things I have to say to Joe Lieberman and get his opinion on.
00:45:02.700And then I realize, wow, Joe and I have been friends for a very long time and I treated him and I and I've never said this before because this is pretty new.
00:45:27.560I was very, very hard on you during the impeachment of Clinton.
00:45:32.420And you know that I was I was really very hard on you.
00:45:35.960And I have to apologize to you because I think you were right in watching Dershowitz and I don't buy all of his stuff.
00:45:46.020But in watching Dershowitz, if it's not a political crime, if it's a crime, especially the one he committed, which was perjury about his marriage, I was so dead set on you can't have somebody committing perjury who's the president.
00:46:02.380But if we cross these lines, as I understand now from Dershowitz, we become a parliamentary system where it can really easily become a vote of no confidence.
00:46:14.240And then the president doesn't mean anything.
00:46:17.060Was was that the way you looked at it at all?
00:46:42.000But you're you're you're making a good point.
00:46:44.200I tell you, I spent a lot of time during the Clinton impeachment trial, going back and looking at what the intention of the was of the great men who wrote our Constitution about impeachment.
00:46:58.160And it seemed to me that they were setting a very high bar for taking a president out of office.
00:47:05.400And the reason is what has been discussed by Dershowitz and others, which is the centerpiece of the system.
00:47:12.720The new country they were creating was elections.
00:47:15.120You have to have consent of the governed for those who govern.
00:47:18.780And you would only let Congress intervene in that when it was an extreme situation, really, that the country I had the feeling that the country would be in danger if a particular president was kept in office.
00:47:33.960And, of course, this was before the 25th Amendment, which came along a lot later, that that set up a procedure for removing a president from office for physical or mental and capability.
00:47:45.580So that's why they required two thirds vote in the Senate.
00:47:49.940And, you know, I felt and I said it then that President Clinton's behavior was morally reprehensible.
00:47:57.740And it wasn't just morally reprehensible, but it had an effect on the country because a leader I learned growing up and I learned it a lot from, you know, from the Bible that a leader is actually held to a higher standard than average people because the impact of immorality or wrongdoing is greater.
00:48:18.860So long story short, I felt he had done something terribly wrong, but it but it hadn't reached the threshold for impeachment.
00:48:36.820And I think it's probably going to come now to a to a what I would call a reasonable and just conclusion or let's put it this way, a conclusion that if Madison and Hamilton were here alive today, they would say this is what we intended.
00:48:54.640How would you vote today if you were sitting there?
00:48:57.760I probably vote for witnesses just because and of course, I'm being a little naive about what I'm about to say.
00:49:06.460Yeah, I know there was some fear that if you had witnesses, it would be 15, 17 witnesses.
00:49:11.640The impeachment trial would go on for weeks and months.
00:49:14.700But in the good old days, we wouldn't have negotiated a compromise across party lines, as we did, incidentally, on the on the rules for the Clinton impeachment trial, where they were adopted 100 to nothing.
00:49:30.760And then, you know, I've hesitated to say this because I'm not on the field anymore, so I haven't said how I would vote.
00:49:38.380But let me we're getting because I wanted to hear all the evidence.
00:49:42.400But let me just say that I thought Lamar Alexander's statement last night, although he disagreed with what I just said about hearing witnesses, was was right,
00:49:52.700which is what the call from all that I know now, the call that President Trump made with President Zelensky of Ukraine was inappropriate, was wrong.
00:50:02.700But did it reach the point where we can say nine months before an election, I want to come back to that point, that he represents, if he keeps him in office, he represents a danger to the country?
00:50:16.600I think it's up to leave it to the people in November.
00:50:18.920In other words, the impeachment, as our framers intended, I believe, was not meant to be punitive, to punish you either criminally or by taking you out of office.
00:50:29.640It was meant to protect the country until the next election.
00:50:33.920And the closer it is to an election, the higher the threshold for convicting somebody president and removing him from office.
00:50:42.540So I think it's coming to a fair conclusion.
00:50:45.580Hopefully we can get back to governing.
00:50:47.260If not, we can go on to the election, and the people will decide.
00:51:07.560So I know that this is, you know, a lot of this is political.
00:51:11.780However, the peace plan that was given, and honestly, the words of President Trump to the Palestinians at that press conference was, I thought, astounding.
00:51:26.580And everything, a reasonable group of people should at least sit down and consider.
00:51:33.540But it was rejected right out of hand.
00:51:36.640And no one in the press is, they're barely even reporting this.
00:51:59.960I thought this was the result of real effort and persistence directed by President Trump, but really carried out by Jared Kushner and the others who worked in the administration for it.
00:52:16.900And Kushner is being – Kushner is being mocked by the press.
00:52:50.360And really, this peace plan offers – in other words, the – well, everybody was trying for the last – well, since the Oslo Agreement in 19 – I think it was 93.
00:53:03.100Everybody was trying to fit within that format totally, and nothing was happening.
00:53:09.740And here again, all the efforts that President Trump, Kushner were making with the Palestinians were going nowhere.
00:53:16.360So they simply decided, we're going to begin a new conversation.
00:53:21.820It gives Israel security and a lot of what it wanted.
00:53:26.200But it honestly, as you've said, think about it, it gives the Palestinians a state that's about twice as large as the territory they now govern, and a capital in East Jerusalem, which they wanted, and a promise of $50 billion.
00:54:01.300No interest by the current Palestinian leadership, which has proven – I went during my time in the Senate over and over again.
00:54:09.120Just about every time I visited Israel, I went to Ramallah to see President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority.
00:54:15.820Nice man, pleasant to be with, good to talk to.
00:54:18.540But he has proven himself incapable of being a leader who will take the risks for peace and prosperity for his own people.
00:54:28.260But, Glenn, you pointed a few moments ago to the really significant difference in response to the really significant differences in this Trump Middle East peace plan, which is the response of the Arab world.
00:54:49.620They're all – they are – and correct me if I'm wrong, Joe – they are more pro-Israel, at least sounding, today, than the Democratic candidates that are running for president.
00:55:02.800Well, I can't say every candidate, but some candidates, a Democratic candidate, you're absolutely right.
00:55:09.680And, you know, there you had in that room – I was there in the East Room at the White House on Tuesday – you had the ambassadors from the United Arab Emirates, big, important country ally of ours from Oman and Bahrain.
00:55:22.060And then the two giants, really, in the Arab world, Saudi Arabia, host of the two holy mosques of Islam, and Egypt, which has been the historic center of the Arab world and the largest population in the Arab world,
00:55:39.060both saying – not endorsing every element of the plan, but supporting it and directly calling on the Palestinians to come to the table and begin to negotiate.
00:55:50.320Right now, based on what's preceded in recent years, don't expect it from this Palestinian leadership, but maybe we'll be surprised.
00:55:59.540Anyway, I think, you know, President Trump is, to put it mildly, unconventional as a leader.
00:56:06.660And sometimes this upsets me, but other times, because he is willing to be unconventional in what the folks in the high-tech world call a disruptor.
00:56:19.640He does things that enables things to happen that you look at and you say, you know what, this is something we ought to try.
00:56:28.720And believe me, this is a step toward peace in the Middle East, when and if there's a Palestinian leadership.
00:56:37.560And when, there will be when, if now, a Palestinian leadership that is willing to get engaged with Israel.
00:56:43.800And you're right, this is a first offer, if you will.
00:56:49.240There's some things that Israel weren't allowed to be changed, but some things can be negotiated and the Palestinians ought to, the people of Palestine, the Palestinian people ought to rise up and push their leaders to go to the table with Israel in a process, as the Saudis and Egyptians said, under the auspices of the United States.
00:57:10.860We can mediate and they can get something done.