Coming up on the podcast, Nancy Pelosi is going down the same crazy road as every other politician in Washington, we get into her bizarre ramblings, Joe Biden, how he s being treated by the media, we spent some time with KT McFarland, you might remember her from Fox and the Trump administration. She s talking about Michael Flynn and everything that s going on with the FBI and how that affected her career and Flynn s career as well. Also, Ken Alabek, he was a former Soviet Union bioweapon program head and how it would affect the case on China and the lab and where it came from, and one of the worst claims ever from Don Lemon on Donald Trump versus Michelle Obama.
00:04:57.420The reason why a lot of people in Washington don't want a payroll tax cut is because once you see how much you are actually making and earning every single month,
00:05:08.240trying to get that baby and that genie back into the bottle is going to be really difficult.
00:05:13.940But that's not why Nancy Pelosi doesn't want it.
00:14:45.100You're probably going to do it because God only knows when the airlines are going to open up again.
00:14:48.900And God only knows when people are going to be willing to get onto a flight again.
00:14:52.900But cross the Rocky Mountains because my son and I did it last summer.
00:14:57.420And we drove and we drove and we joked the entire way.
00:15:01.600So if you were a pioneer and you didn't know how far this mountain range was going or what was on the other side, even tell me where you'd stop.
00:15:30.460Then if you decided to go up to over the mountain, you get to the first peak to where you think, oh, man, I just got to get over this peak.
00:15:40.040Then you're like, I would if that's the place, I would have killed the guy who convinced me to go over the mountain because now it's too late.
00:16:26.840In addition to their generous support of Mercury One during these troubled times, Patriot Mobile has gone above and beyond to help Americans stay in touch with their loved ones during this lockdown.
00:16:37.040And they've done it by lowering their prices even further.
00:16:39.740Right now, their U.S.-based team is standing by to design with you a customized family plan that can start at only $25.
00:16:48.320Now, Patriot Mobile shares your values and they'll never charge you for hidden fees.
00:16:52.460And unlike Big Mobile, they're not going to send your hard-earned money to places like Planned Parenthood or leftist causes.
00:16:58.420So you can get the same reliable nationwide service and support a company that shares your values, supports our constitution and puts people before profits.
00:17:09.260Right now, when you join their family of freedom-loving Americans, they will waive the activation fee, plus send you a free gift with the offer code BECK.
00:17:54.580She was one of the most prominent conservative foreign policy experts out there.
00:18:04.560She was on Fox for years and years and years.
00:18:06.840She was President Trump's first deputy national security advisor and helped Trump turn many of his campaign promises into foreign policy and actually get things done.
00:18:18.720Well, she was working with General Flynn and the FBI came in and took General Flynn out.
00:18:39.460And America needs to hear the story, especially now with General Flynn, because we now have things coming out and being released that nobody seems to be paying attention to that really calls into question whether we can trust our intelligence and national security.
00:18:58.400When it when it comes to the Justice Department, what they're what they are finding out about Russia, can we trust any of this?
00:19:22.420The last thing National Security Advisor Michael Flynn said to me when he left our West Wing office for the very last time was laced with irony.
00:19:31.740You know, I joined the military to fight the Russians.
00:19:36.840You are you were there and he he made a deal with the government, but he shouldn't have made the deal with the government, should he?
00:20:06.580But it turns out now with the stories that have come out and I write about it at great length in my book of the tactics that the FBI was doing exactly the same thing to him.
00:20:16.960In my case, they showed up at my home without warning and then said, well, you know, don't you want to help us find out what the Russians did?
00:20:26.460I want to find out what the Russians did and make sure they can't do it again.
00:20:30.220And so then I said, well, do I need a lawyer?
00:20:32.960Flynn, they did the same thing to Flynn.
00:20:35.000Well, the implication was you don't really need a lawyer.
00:20:38.120When I asked them directly, they said, we can't tell you not to get a lawyer, but we're just here to ask you some questions, to get some context of what went on, yada, yada, yada.
00:20:48.640And then it turns out that they had seized all of my government records, which by law I had turned over to the government when I left.
00:20:56.100My cell phone logs, text messages, emails, everything.
00:23:18.480And in the end of the day, I never would plead guilty to a crime I didn't commit.
00:23:24.320And I refused to implicate General Flynn or President Trump in crimes they didn't commit, which was what the FBI and the Mueller people implied I should do.
00:24:04.820It's about a group of people who are unelected, unaccountable to anybody.
00:24:09.600The deep state, they didn't like the election results in 2016.
00:24:14.480So they were going to either take the president out, take his advisors out, or make sure he couldn't govern.
00:24:19.940When they said in that memo that was just released, you know, what is our goal here?
00:24:28.320Are we trying to find the truth or are we trying to get him to lie so we can, you know, take him out, charge him with a crime or get him out of the administration?
00:24:42.000I found that a little frightening myself.
00:24:47.400And I know that they try to do perjury traps.
00:24:50.560But is this the kind of perjury trap that the FBI always uses?
00:24:57.540Because they're trying to say that they did nothing different than they normally do.
00:25:03.400Well, then that's even more terrifying.
00:25:07.400They don't like, you know, either you choose.
00:25:10.680Either they abuse their power in going after Flynn and myself and others, or they didn't abuse their power, that this is the power that they've decided to use against everybody.
00:26:03.540We looked at the foreign policy of the Obama administration, the defense policy, and the intelligence policy.
00:26:08.720And there were a lot of changes made, but not to the intelligence community because Flynn had been preemptively taken out.
00:26:16.300So I've talked to people in Washington and they've said, Glenn, at least 30 percent across the board just has to be cut because it's so infected now.
00:27:20.200I was the most powerful woman in the West Wing of the White House, one of the most powerful people in the national security community.
00:27:26.440And if they could take us down and just as you point out, nobody else has a chance.
00:27:32.120The other thing that they understand is that they can bankrupt you, whether they find you guilty of something, whether you are, whether they charge you with a crime.
00:27:41.380If they don't like you, they can bankrupt you because you have to pay for your own lawyer's fees.
00:27:46.400They have infinite resources and infinite ability to get everything, every kind of record there is.
00:27:53.220So for General Flynn's case, he lost his house, he lost his pension, he's millions of dollars in debt.
00:28:00.100My legal defense cost me high fixed figures, and I didn't even meet any Russians.
00:28:06.480And as you point out, I'm not new to this game.
00:28:10.680But the overabuse is pretty significant.
00:28:13.580I think that's why it's really important to reelect President Trump, because he's promised me personally a number of times.
00:28:19.580We're going to find out, we're going to get to the bottom of this, and we're going to get rid of these guys.
00:29:53.740This is the best of the Glenn Beck Program.
00:30:13.640So, Ken Alabak, he was born in Kazakhstan in 1950.
00:30:20.200He went to the Tomczyk Medical Institute in the former Soviet Union.
00:30:27.780He majored in infectious diseases and epidemiology.
00:30:31.720He has, and I don't know if I'd want this on my resume.
00:30:34.060This is really kind of weird and frightening.
00:30:36.340He holds a PhD in microbiology for research and development of the plague and tulmeria biological weapons.
00:30:45.700He also has a doctorate of science in biotechnology for developing the technology to manufacture anthrax on an industrial scale.
00:30:56.220He ran the Soviet Union's bioweapons labs.
00:31:00.660And when you read his book, which came out years ago, and you find out how he really became the director, I mean, it's terrifying what they were doing over there.
00:31:11.780When the Soviet Union collapsed, he immediately came over and defected to the West.
00:32:27.880You know, general principles for designing and making biological weapons in the Soviet Union and the United States were absolutely different.
00:32:37.440In the United States, there was a requirement, because the United States program continued from 1943 to 1972, 71-72.
00:32:46.280And the major principle was not to develop any biological weapon if there is no cure or vaccination.
00:32:54.400In the Soviet Union, the principle was different.
00:32:59.840There was no much interest in biological weapons if there was a cure.
00:33:04.820It doesn't mean that no weapons were developed if there was no cure.
00:33:10.840I mean, there was cure, but major focus was on something which wouldn't wouldn't be treatable.
00:33:20.700Now, Ken, the difference between the United States and the Soviet Union, especially towards the end, in safety procedures, in these real bioweapons labs,
00:33:33.260did the Soviet Union have the kind of safety procedures that we have?
00:33:40.480Was it the same, especially towards the end?
00:33:43.240I would say in the Soviet Union, there were strong requirements just to have a very strict biosefety for when we worked with some contagious agents.
00:33:58.400Specifically, the work with Ebola, hemorrhagic fever, smallpox, then Marburg hemorrhagic fever.
00:34:06.600There was a requirement not to do any work if there was no quarantine after finishing certain work.
00:34:14.560For example, we had some groups working, for example, for two weeks or three weeks.
00:34:19.980Then after finishing the work, they were not allowed just to leave the facility.
00:34:25.520They were staying at a certain facility just for quarantine for 14 days.
00:34:31.780And after this, they were allowed to come out.
00:34:38.280China, does this communist country have the same kind of philosophy of biological weapons that the Soviets had?
00:34:48.540Logically, at that time, we didn't know much about a Chinese biological weapons program.
00:34:54.440But there was some information coming, even at that time, we had some information, we called it special information, coming from some intelligence agencies of the Soviet Union, describing what was happening in China.
00:35:10.340At that time, China had a biological weapons program.
00:35:15.800We didn't know much about the actual size and a number of facilities, but it was obvious there were some efforts to design biological weapons.
00:35:24.740So now that we are facing the coronavirus, do they have the same kind of standards that you had in the Soviet Union and that we have here on these bioweapons labs?
00:35:37.380You know, a while ago, I had such a question coming from my readers.
00:35:43.120And I was explaining how these facilities should function, I mean, what levels of protection in order not to let virus coming out.
00:35:54.060And to me, it was a kind of rule in which we knew, for example, if there is no this level of protection, nobody would do any work with contagious agents.
00:36:04.020You know, if we analyze, and that's what actually I thought about, this facility in Wuhan, in China.
00:36:12.400But some information coming that the facility was not so strictly, I mean, didn't have a strict requirements on biosafety.
00:36:22.420Whether it's true or not, of course, it's still to be seen and investigated.
00:36:27.020But if there was no rule, let me say, not to stay in quarantine for at least 14 days, the probability the virus is coming from the lab actually exists.
00:36:38.580So I don't believe that this was a biological weapon or intentionally released.
00:36:45.780It looks like it might be just sloppy work followed by, you know, like the Soviet Union with Chernobyl, just doing everything they can to cover, you know, for the state.
00:36:59.320Would you say that that is a safe bet or not?
00:37:03.400Yeah, I would agree with what you say.
00:37:07.760You know, just for some while, I was trying to collect all information about how it happened, when it happened.
00:37:14.000And in just, I collected some dates in December, some in November, in December, and January, and it was clear to me that there was a pattern when we saw some people infected, for example, from a group of three, then a bigger number.
00:37:34.400And by the time, it looks like it was beginning of January, let me say, we saw already it was a much bigger number of people infected than Chinese actually reported.
00:37:47.120But at that time, they didn't report anything.
00:37:49.060But at the same time, when we talk about whether it's an intentional attack or it's an accidental release or somebody was infected from some wild source, it's obvious it was not a biological attack.
00:38:04.580Because in case of a biological attack, you would see a big number of people infected within a short period of time.
00:38:09.920In this case, we saw some very small numbers, but what Chinese reported, they said they didn't find zero patient, patient zero.
00:38:20.640Because a zero patient actually is usually a patient who was the first infected and started distributing, infecting others.
00:38:28.160They found some people who were the first, I would say, in the line to start the infection, but the actual first patient, I mean, patient zero, was not reported.
00:38:44.300And some people say, because we know when we do epidemiological investigation, we can go and we actually can find, for example, if you find three people, for example, infected,
00:38:55.400that just investigation by collecting information, they can show, for example, where they were, what they did.
00:39:02.440And finally, we can say, okay, they contacted this particular person.
00:39:07.380And if this person already dead or survived, but at least we can say, okay, in our chain of investigation, we found the one who was the first one.
00:39:17.040But if it's not known, and Chinese didn't want to release this information, there is a very high likelihood that this person was coming from a lab.
00:40:04.980I mean, we've never done this in the history of the world.
00:40:07.620Are we doing the right thing or what should we be doing?
00:40:10.480It's interesting, in many cases, sometimes it seems to me maybe I'm wrong, but if I'm wrong, for example, just would be happy if somebody corrects me.
00:40:23.600It looks like sometimes we don't get our lessons.
00:40:27.860And the first lesson we got, it was a Spanish flow, 1918.
00:40:32.660And if we analyze, for example, what was happening just 100 years ago with what we do now, and you can say exactly, we haven't developed any new measures for protection compared to what we had 100 years ago.
00:40:49.020Same situations with social distancing, masks, and that's it.