Best of the Program ｜ Guests： Megan Basham & Steve Baker ｜ 8⧸19⧸24
Episode Stats
Summary
On today's show, Glenn and Stu talk about the upcoming Democratic National Convention and what Joe Biden should do when he takes the stage tonight. They also discuss the growing number of pro-Israel and anti-abortion protests that are taking place in Chicago.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Well, on today's podcast, we get ready for the, you know, the DNC tonight and all of the mostly peaceful demonstrations that are going to be happening tonight.
00:00:13.680
And we actually give advice to Joe Biden on what he should do when he takes the stage.
00:00:25.060
Well, the day has finally come to a close as you ease yourself down into bed, stare up at the ceiling.
00:00:29.800
Thinking about what tomorrow's going to bring is the answer pain.
00:00:33.360
If you're living with pain, I may have an answer for you.
00:00:39.460
It's not something that you take like, ow, I got a headache.
00:00:42.480
This is a daily supplement that helps your body fight pain by fighting inflammation.
00:00:49.280
Over a million people have tried Relief Factors Quick Start Kit.
00:00:52.240
70% of them have gone on to order it again and again.
00:00:54.880
And it helps reduce or eliminate the everyday aches and pains that you're experiencing.
00:01:02.160
See how Relief Factor can help you with their three-week quick start.
00:01:17.840
When you feel the difference, you know it works.
00:01:29.540
You're listening to The Best of the Glenn Beck Program.
00:01:42.140
Maybe I'll see if I can find an abortion on the bus or a vasectomy.
00:02:03.200
I think it's interesting that this cult that we have said is worshipping Moloch would come together at their big annual celebration and their DNC convention full of joy, just like they used to in the Bohemian Forest, and kill and sacrifice their young.
00:02:24.980
This is their sacrament, and they're doing it in Chicago.
00:02:35.300
And I'd like you to see the choice of the people that, you know, are attending the DNC.
00:02:42.560
You know, you're going to have every star, but you're also going to have about 150,000 to 200,000 protesters there.
00:02:48.060
All of them protesting, you know, to, ah, from the river to the sea, let's keep Israel free?
00:02:59.480
I can't remember, Stu, but I don't think it's pro-Israel, something tells me.
00:03:07.820
Just in case you were wondering, as Rashida Tlaib reminded us, it's nothing to do with genocide.
00:03:16.940
It's really nice because you have the outer ring.
00:03:23.500
And then the inner ring, you have to be against babies.
00:03:28.040
And then the inner ring is, you get to be for globalism, which I think is great.
00:03:48.120
Yeah, there wouldn't be such a people problem if it wasn't for all of these people, Glenn.
00:03:52.340
So if we could find different ways to kill all of them.
00:04:05.740
If we could just liquidate all of these people, we wouldn't have such a people problem.
00:04:18.960
Well, I know the difference, but apparently YouTube doesn't.
00:04:23.340
YouTube has taken away some of our freedoms on YouTube.
00:04:40.860
Now, he's the guy that the English are saying is responsible for it.
00:04:55.600
And there wasn't one thing in this eight-minute interview.
00:04:58.760
There's not one single thing that he said about violence, except to say he's not for it.
00:05:05.960
In fact, could we please play the Tommy Robinson clip here?
00:05:11.740
You are not calling for the rioting and burning of buildings and bricks through windows, correct?
00:05:20.720
Glenn, if you will, I've just put a video together.
00:05:22.820
The insanity of this is the media, the politicians and the police are currently building a narrative
00:05:28.400
and they're pumping it everywhere that I've instigated these calls for violence.
00:05:31.960
So what I've done is I've gone through, and if you look, it's my latest tweet on my Twitter.
00:05:36.180
I made a video, and I've cut together all the things I've said.
00:05:44.360
I have appealed for calm, peace, and love from the start of this.
00:05:54.700
So they can tell the public whatever they want.
00:05:56.680
And they're currently telling them that I am the instigator of all this violence.
00:05:59.940
So when you're looking at the riots right now on British TV, on every chat show, everywhere,
00:06:05.740
Whereas the truth, if you watch my video, is the total opposite.
00:06:12.920
So that's the only time we talked about anything violent, and he was against it.
00:06:19.060
But YouTube is taking now their marching orders from the European Union.
00:06:29.640
We now all have to comply by Europe's standards.
00:06:34.040
So if Europe puts this woke bullcrap in, these public-private partnerships will say,
00:06:53.740
This is not an American-first attitude because we're better than everybody else.
00:07:04.040
You don't go against the things that set America and the rest of the world free for the first time in human history.
00:07:18.640
And I can't figure out the standards at all of YouTube because this is the note we got.
00:07:34.040
Or content that provides or promotes or incites violence.
00:07:46.280
And in some cases, content that is potentially controversial or offensive.
00:07:52.940
It may remain up, but with some features disabled.
00:08:14.620
Your videos are still live on YouTube, but some features have been disabled, meaning the watch page will no longer have comments, suggested videos, or likes.
00:08:30.900
And I know I got a lot of heat from social media when I first talked about a digital ghetto.
00:08:48.000
Oh, but nobody will see us because there's a wall between us?
00:08:57.500
YouTube, telling the truth is not inciting violence.
00:09:11.440
Since when in this country can we not talk to a newsmaker?
00:09:32.520
This is going around the Constitution because public-private partnerships are in bed with our governments.
00:09:42.920
We are very careful on what we put on YouTube because we know that X and the Blaze are the only true free platforms that we don't have to worry about.
00:09:55.240
Two platforms that we don't have to worry about.
00:10:03.220
I got this on Friday right after the show and I was livid.
00:10:38.220
May I just show you some other things that have not had any problems on YouTube and are still live and are still there?
00:10:46.920
You know, the Home Secretary of the UK is now saying that they have to look at ideological trends and what they need to do is hold people's views about women.
00:11:03.520
It's not okay anymore to ignore the massive growing threat caused by online hatred towards women.
00:11:21.300
Well, if you're talking about the UK, I would say it's about 60% of London now.
00:11:42.400
Or are you talking about the extreme right wing?
00:11:50.820
It's not the Islamist that you're worried about.
00:11:53.660
It's all of those people that say these men can beat up women in a boxing ring.
00:12:00.620
The one that says your daughter has to compete against men in sports.
00:12:05.720
Or the one that says, hey, you, as a guy, you can become a woman and become anything.
00:12:21.080
The ones that are taking all of the rights that women have worked so hard for and flushing them down the toilet.
00:12:27.180
That's got to be the ripped women's rights you're talking about.
00:12:35.720
Now, when you listen, I think you can spot, I mean, it kind of, inciting violence, you kind of know what it is when you hear it.
00:12:45.620
Tommy Robinson saying, no, you are destroying everything we're trying to do by pricking up a brick or having violence.
00:12:54.680
Because if it wasn't the FBI or the CIA or whoever that orchestrated Jan 6, if it was really just a bunch of right wing people, which I highly doubt.
00:13:19.280
But let's listen to some other things that are not inciting violence or controversial that are still on YouTube with all of their privileges.
00:13:30.820
Some of the success that we've been able to achieve around criminal justice reform would not have happened in recent years were it not for Black Lives Matter.
00:13:38.140
And the intensity and the brilliance of that movement that forced, at least, that there would be some counterforce to the status quo, which is so reluctant for change, if not hostile to change.
00:14:01.800
And everyone beware, because they're not going to stop.
00:14:05.280
They're not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they're not going to stop after Election Day.
00:14:10.500
And that should be, everyone should take note of that on both levels, that they're not going to let up, and they should not.
00:14:25.280
That's in the midst of the rioting in the streets.
00:14:34.200
All right, I want to talk to you a little bit about Patriot Mobile.
00:14:36.440
I had a friend write to me a couple of weeks ago, and he said, Glenn, I don't know why I didn't listen to you before.
00:14:41.100
He said, but one of the big three just raised their rates on me.
00:14:46.120
And he said, it was, I mean, just unbelievable how high my rate went.
00:14:51.060
He said he was paying over, he has four phone lines, and he said he was paying over $420 or $450 every single month.
00:14:58.920
So he said, I immediately thought of your commercials, and I went and I called Patriot Mobile.
00:15:08.720
He's now paying for those same four phone lines just over $100 a month instead of $400 a month.
00:15:20.080
They're the only Christian conservative phone company out there.
00:15:23.700
They really are working at the grassroots level to help defend and protect our Constitution.
00:15:29.500
You get the same great coverage because you have access to the same three major networks that everybody is on,
00:15:35.860
and they have a 100% U.S.-based customer service team that will show you how much money you can save every single month.
00:15:48.660
You're standing on the right side, and you're saving money.
00:15:53.000
Call today, 972-PATRIOT, 972-PATRIOT, use the promo code BECK.
00:15:58.620
You'll get a free smartphone with promo code BECK.
00:16:01.980
Make the switch today, 972-PATRIOT, or patriotmobile.com slash BECK.
00:16:09.860
So, Stu, do you ever see the movie Pale Rider with Clint Eastwood?
00:16:17.600
It's one of every, like, four or five years, I break it out and watch it.
00:16:24.680
And at one scene, he plays a preacher, and he is called into the town by the corrupt capitalist that's trying to buy all of the land because it has gold on it.
00:16:42.120
Well, anyway, he said, you know, preacher, you come to work here.
00:16:47.640
I'll tell you, you come to work here, and here's what's going to happen.
00:16:50.320
And you might find yourself in need of a church.
00:16:59.660
And Clint Eastwood says, well, I mean, if a man had a church, he would need fine clothes to be able to stand up in front of all those people.
00:17:13.400
I mean, you know, hand-tailored preacher outfits for you.
00:17:18.780
And Clint Eastwood said, that's why it wouldn't work.
00:17:21.060
Because anybody who serves mammon cannot serve God.
00:17:28.020
How many of our churches are worried about money?
00:17:43.200
And she's written a new book called Shepherds for Sale.
00:17:47.320
How George Soros is trying to infiltrate your church.
00:17:57.800
Yeah, it was quite a bit of research and getting quite a bit of blowback.
00:18:02.540
But the reality is this, is that evangelicals are roughly 30 percent of the American electorate.
00:18:08.620
They've rightly been called by even left-leaning outlets like the Atlantic, America's most powerful voting bloc.
00:18:14.640
They are the firewall against the most immoral policies that the left wants to enact.
00:18:20.940
They are what has been holding back the left's agenda.
00:18:24.280
And so actors like George Soros and other left-wing billionaires have started funneling money into evangelical institutions and ministries
00:18:33.360
to try to harness the power of high-profile evangelical leaders.
00:18:44.640
Like, if I'm sitting in a church, how do I know if that's my church?
00:18:52.720
Well, I can give you an example that's happening right now in this election cycle.
00:18:57.180
So if you're familiar with Christianity Today, which is known as Evangelicalism's flagship magazine,
00:19:03.760
founded by Billy Graham back in 1956, it's well-known, it's a trusted brand,
00:19:09.160
and it's been promoting a Bible study, a political Bible study, into churches and Christian colleges and campuses.
00:19:18.560
The Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, starting last year, last August,
00:19:23.740
started promoting it to all of their 185-member schools.
00:19:29.840
And essentially what it teaches is that voting is very complex.
00:19:34.940
And if someone tells you how you should vote when it comes to an issue like abortion,
00:19:41.560
But Christians have an obligation to vote to oppose alleged systemic racism.
00:19:47.020
So it's subtle, but it's pretty obvious who they're trying to get you to vote for.
00:19:50.240
Well, that program called the After Party, that curriculum, is exclusively funded by hard-left secular foundations,
00:19:59.240
the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Foundation and the Hewlett Foundation,
00:20:03.660
which is the largest funder of Planned Parenthood in the country.
00:20:07.500
And then you have the Rockefeller Foundation, which promotes, quote-unquote,
00:20:11.900
gender-affirming care for youth, meaning cross-sex hormones, puberty blockers,
00:20:16.240
all of those things for kids, and, of course, abortion.
00:20:20.660
So these are the people who are funding this curriculum,
00:20:23.500
which they said, we want to see this roll out in the battleground state of Ohio to begin,
00:20:29.080
And it's being brought into conservative churches.
00:20:32.060
So this is just one example of what I cover in my book.
00:20:35.840
If you look at what George Soros has been involved in,
00:20:39.220
so he started funding an organization, secular left open borders organization,
00:20:47.340
They wanted to convince evangelicals to buy into these open border amnesty policies.
00:20:53.720
So they created a front group called the Evangelical Immigration Table.
00:20:59.620
And there is no legal separation between the National Immigration Forum and this evangelical front group,
00:21:05.700
but they brought in all of these well-known leaders,
00:21:08.740
quite a number of leaders from the largest Protestant denomination,
00:21:11.740
the Southern Baptist Convention, the National Association of Evangelicals,
00:21:17.040
which represents some 45,000 churches in dozens of denominations.
00:21:24.700
Once again, the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities.
00:21:27.820
So all of these entities that are viewed as trusted and conservative,
00:21:32.120
but they're partnering with George Soros-funded organizations
00:21:35.220
and have taken George Soros' money themselves in order to participate in these programs
00:21:41.140
that are designed to convince conservative lawmakers that their most important constituency,
00:21:47.320
the evangelicals, want them to vote for these amnesty policies.
00:21:52.400
So this is how this sort of money, funneling of dark money is coming in,
00:21:57.640
and it's how this network of associations is working.
00:22:00.420
How many of the churches are actively aware of this?
00:22:11.980
and part of the reason is because, one, obviously, you know,
00:22:20.960
and I think it's because so many people were shocked to find out this information,
00:22:24.300
and also because the pushback has been so unbelievably fierce.
00:22:28.700
I mean, I expected some pushback, but there has been a lot of weeping and gnashing of teeth
00:22:32.840
that this information has now been publicized on such a high level,
00:22:36.420
and I think it's because they knew that for so long,
00:22:39.420
most rank-and-file people in the pews, most average pastors,
00:22:43.140
were not aware that these things were going on.
00:22:45.880
And so you see a lot of scrambling to try to deny the information,
00:22:49.740
but you can't deny it, Glenn, because the reality is you can say that,
00:22:53.340
oh, hey, there's nothing wrong with the fact that we're hiring pastors
00:22:56.400
to be, quote-unquote, regional mobilizers to connect with lawmakers over,
00:23:02.900
for example, these immigration policies or these climate change policies.
00:23:07.760
When you drill down on the—yeah, that's happening, too.
00:23:10.520
But when you drill down on the money, you cannot deny the IRS 990s.
00:23:15.560
You cannot deny what's right there in cold black and white in all of these financial filings,
00:23:20.980
that money is going from these secular left billionaires and organizations,
00:23:24.740
and not just George Soros, also people like Bill Gates, the Clinton Foundation.
00:23:36.100
Pierre Omidyar, yeah, the left-wing Buddhist founder of eBay.
00:23:41.320
Today, he's funneling money into groups like the policy arm of the Southern Baptist Convention.
00:23:48.440
So all of these secular left billionaires, Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook,
00:23:52.080
all of this money is flowing from them into these evangelical ministries,
00:23:56.440
and it's gone unnoticed for a really long time.
00:24:13.540
Well, you know, I think the first thing is I have encouraged people,
00:24:16.520
look, don't blow your pastor up the minute you see maybe something from the evangelical immigration table
00:24:23.300
or the after party, which is that political Bible study from David French of the New York Times
00:24:29.060
and Christianity Today editor-in-chief Russell Moore.
00:24:32.040
When you see that come in, first have a conversation with him.
00:24:36.640
Because there's a really good chance he doesn't really understand where it's coming from,
00:24:40.540
and some friend, some pastor friend of his brought it to him and said,
00:24:47.060
And then two, if you sense that they are not willing to really look at the information there,
00:24:52.280
I think you need to have a tougher conversation.
00:24:54.780
And if it seems like, no, they are deliberately bringing this in,
00:24:58.060
then I am sorry, but you've got to find another church.
00:25:07.120
And, you know, largely what we're seeing when we look at the Christian nationalism discourse
00:25:11.760
is that I think it's a smear that's largely being used by the left
00:25:16.240
in order to dissuade Christians from participating in the civic process.
00:25:22.040
So essentially what you see is, for example, the Rob Reiner documentary,
00:25:28.680
They take something like the overturning of Roe, the Dobbs decision,
00:25:33.460
and they label that Christian nationalism as a smear,
00:25:37.140
when really what it is is just average Christians availing themselves
00:25:40.500
of the same constitutional process of free association, free speech,
00:25:46.060
electing candidates who are going to enact their policy preferences
00:25:53.620
but it's simply Christians doing exactly what their secular neighbors do.
00:25:56.900
Now, I know there are a small, fringy group of people
00:26:04.280
But as far as actual money coming from the right or something like that,
00:26:09.860
And not only that, where you do see Christian organizations
00:26:13.100
getting involved in politics on the right, it's very transparent.
00:26:16.700
There's no question about what people like Ralph Reed
00:26:21.340
They're not trying to hide it because they're not taking money
00:26:24.540
from people who everyone knows are not Christian
00:26:27.400
and do not have any interest in building up God's kingdom.
00:26:32.440
It is something I thank you deeply for doing the homework on.
00:26:39.180
This is something that we exposed a couple of three years ago.
00:26:43.040
And I know that many churches are in the midst of an internal fight,
00:26:49.800
There is a big fight going on for the soul of these organizations.
00:27:18.260
Stu, you remember last week when the Blaze had the report out
00:27:22.540
about the pipe bomb that it might have been planted by the police?
00:27:30.360
We didn't spend a lot of time on it because I thought,
00:27:37.840
You know, I'll wait for Steve Baker to pin this down.
00:27:40.380
Then this weekend, I saw Darren Beattie of Revolver News came out,
00:27:59.520
Steve, is this new information or it's the same information that you had?
00:28:05.340
Hey, this is exactly the information that we had and we released early last week.
00:28:13.340
But I think that whether it's Darren or any other journalists stepping out
00:28:20.160
and saying that this is conclusively proof that the police planted that bomb
00:28:30.040
We have the video of what we believe to be a Secret Service agent exiting a Metropolitan
00:28:42.860
Now, he's carrying a bag in his hand, but he steps out of frame.
00:28:46.620
And then two minutes later, he steps back into the camera frame once again.
00:28:51.840
And that is not proof that he set a bomb down, but it does make us ask questions.
00:28:59.600
And it makes us question the FBI directly once again, as we did in our article,
00:29:05.280
which was our lead in that article, was the FBI can solve this for us today
00:29:10.720
if they will release the DNC's own security cameras.
00:29:15.680
Their own security cameras are aimed and focused on exactly that spot where the bomb was placed,
00:29:22.440
but they have never released that to the public.
00:29:27.460
So it is, I mean, I have to tell you, I mean, if you have to take a leap of faith,
00:29:32.120
if you're forced to take a leap of faith, and you look at all of the evidence,
00:29:37.380
it is circumstantial, but it is pretty good, especially when the DNC has that video and won't
00:29:46.880
release it, why wouldn't you release the video?
00:29:51.000
That's the great question about this bomb, and that is what makes, as you're saying there,
00:29:58.060
this so, such a, it's such an easy thing to come to a conclusion on when you have a bomb
00:30:05.280
that was allegedly placed 17 hours earlier, around, you know, 7.30, 8 o'clock the night before,
00:30:12.460
and then it allegedly sat there undetected during all that time with so much foot traffic that morning,
00:30:20.760
so many officers all over that building from various agencies,
00:30:24.420
two different bomb sweep teams swept the facility.
00:30:30.060
We know that from the OIG report that came out a couple of weeks ago.
00:30:33.900
There is this mounting evidence that there just couldn't have been a bomb there for 17 hours,
00:30:42.760
but somehow, some way, 15 minutes before it was discovered, we see a guy getting out of a car,
00:30:50.600
bag in his hand, he walks over that direction, into that, you know, it's a blind spot in the camera
00:30:59.440
coverage from the CCTV, because they moved it, well, this particular camera, we went back,
00:31:07.540
when we were in the, in the Capitol, uh, viewing room, we went back eight days,
00:31:11.560
that camera had been fixed for eight full days prior to this event, and then that camera begins
00:31:20.240
moving five minutes after the alleged discovery of the bomb by a plain-clothes Capitol police officer.
00:31:28.560
So, when, then suddenly, suddenly that, that camera starts moving by remote control,
00:31:33.100
it focuses in, it zooms into that location in between the benches,
00:31:36.840
you can kind of pick up a little bit of a, um, uh, visual of the bomb when that camera moves,
00:31:43.440
and then it sweeps away, and then within 30 minutes, whoever the operator was turned that
00:31:49.500
camera off of the investigative scene, uh, full 90 degrees away from it, and it never returned
00:31:56.060
for the rest of the day. So, this takes us into a whole new territory, if it is true, and this is
00:32:03.240
why I, uh, as much as I believe this probably is what happened, um, you don't want to go there,
00:32:11.500
you know, uh, unless it's absolutely true, and I don't know how we would ever prove that,
00:32:17.040
um, but this, you say, why, why do you say this was a Secret Service agent?
00:32:22.980
Uh, mainly because of the way he was dressed. It was a Secret Service detail, and Secret Service
00:32:29.040
were mingling with Metropolitan Police officers that day in that detail, which is not uncommon.
00:32:34.760
Uh, they do assist, uh, uh, the local police do assist the Secret Service, and there was, of course,
00:32:40.300
uh, the fact that we learned, uh, sometime, uh, well, a year later, after January 6th,
00:32:46.480
that Kamala Harris was actually inside the building at that time.
00:32:56.720
There's no doubt, no, I, I, I have no problem going out, uh, and declaring the reason for it
00:33:01.840
being planted. The reason for that bomb and the one over at the RNC, uh, the Capitol Hill Club,
00:33:06.660
was diversionary. They were specifically planted to divert resources from the Capitol. Bear in mind
00:33:16.060
that only five minutes before the first breach on the West, uh, front there at the Capitol on January
00:33:22.240
6th, was, that's when the first bomb was found at the RNC, and then only, um, two, three minutes
00:33:31.660
before the breach, this particular, who we think is a Secret Service agent, uh, wearing a trench coat,
00:33:37.840
carrying a bag, just two to three minutes before that barrier, uh, barricade breach at the Capitol,
00:33:44.880
this guy disappeared towards those benches, and then he's back, and then five minutes later,
00:33:49.960
or 15 minutes later, um, some minutes after the barricade breach, the Capitol Police plainclothes
00:33:56.480
officer found the bomb. And that diverted resources from the Capitol that were needed.
00:34:03.660
So do you think it was ever supposed to go off?
00:34:07.460
No, these, these, these bombs were not viable. They were, they were absolutely, um, uh, props.
00:34:14.020
And we know that beyond any shadow of a doubt. We have, we have direct testimony from one of the
00:34:18.740
agents that worked on that bomb scene, worked on the, um, investigation of the bomb. And he was told
00:34:26.080
by his superiors that these devices were not viable. What's your gut tell you on this?
00:34:38.220
My, my gut tells me that we're going to learn who this man is. That's the first thing. And that's
00:34:47.000
one of the reasons why it would be reckless for us to declare him, the guy that plucked planted the
00:34:52.340
bomb. Uh, that would be, you know, there's, there's probably some legal jeopardy for us to do that,
00:34:58.220
but it's suspicious. We are going to learn who he is. We're also eventually going to learn after
00:35:03.940
three and a half years, I hope why Kamala Harris was in that building, why she was not at the Capitol
00:35:10.540
where she was being basically coronated as then, uh, vice president. She was a voting senator at the
00:35:17.660
time. She was, uh, the BP elect at the time and the debate for her ascendancy to vice president,
00:35:28.100
the certification of electoral college vote was taking place at the Capitol at the time,
00:35:33.220
but she had been scheduled according to this same OIG report. She had been scheduled according to the
00:35:38.840
secret service logs two days in advance that she was going to be at the DNC from 1130 to 330 during
00:35:47.360
the scheduled debate. And during the scheduled vote, she was not going to be there. And this is,
00:35:54.280
I'm telling you, Glenn, that's a bigger mystery to me than even the bombs. But if we do discover
00:35:59.480
that these bombs were in fact planted by one of the agencies, secret service, FBI, MPD, Capitol
00:36:07.140
police doesn't matter. We just, if we've discovered that it literally, no, no pun intended blows this
00:36:14.840
thing up. Tell me about what you know about the secret service, uh, and the, the body of the, uh,
00:36:23.420
would be assassin of Donald Trump being cremated before Congress had a chance to examine and
00:36:29.940
investigate, uh, and also that they, they cleaned up biological evidence and, uh, that apparently
00:36:38.660
doesn't happen. Is that true? Uh, it shouldn't have happened as soon as it did. That's the first
00:36:46.020
answer. It is not 100% uncommon that if a case is clearly solved, that they don't clean up and they
00:36:54.900
don't take the body away or that they don't go ahead and turn the body back over to the family for
00:36:59.460
however they wish to, um, uh, take care of the body at that point, it's not uncommon, but this is not
00:37:05.300
a common case. And that's why this should not have been, uh, done so soon. And I think that
00:37:10.260
representative Clay Higgins from Louisiana is absolutely correct in that. Now, as a law enforcement
00:37:15.380
officer himself, a sheriff in Louisiana, he would have seen the disposal of bodies of all types of
00:37:20.560
all types of homicides. Um, and, and he would know based on the significance of this, that it
00:37:26.720
should have been preserved to the body of Thomas Crook should have been preserved to have other
00:37:31.680
investigators, backup autopsies, other examinations from different agencies to confirm, validate
00:37:38.320
findings. Because if you don't do that, all you do is open up the conspiracy theories and you let it
00:37:44.640
ride that there must be a coverup. Now we were pretty sure they're a coverup. We just don't
00:37:50.480
know if they're covering up their, uh, incompetence or if they're covering up something much more
00:37:55.520
sinister. What's your gut tell you? I, uh, in this case, I'm, I'm, I'm in the camp solidly
00:38:05.040
that this young man was groomed, that he had help. Um, I do not believe for a second that there was a
00:38:12.400
second shooter on the scene and those conspiracy theories are easily disproven, but, uh, we have
00:38:20.480
one of our absolute most trusted sources is an individual who for 30 years did this very thing
00:38:28.400
for our government overseas in Africa, Middle East, Asia, Central America. He told me, and I'm quoting,
00:38:38.720
he said, what disturbs him the most about this particular case and Thomas Crooks is he says,
00:38:45.120
I recognize my own handiwork. Are we going to find out who it is?
00:38:52.720
I'll tell you what, you know, that I'm looking, you know, the Joe Hanneman, uh, who we wrote this
00:38:57.360
article, uh, who I wrote this article with, uh, we're going to be looking at this thing for a long
00:39:01.040
time. I, uh, wish you luck. And I hope that, uh, thanks for being responsible on this. I'm not saying
00:39:06.720
that the other reporters are not, they may know something that I don't know, or we don't know.
00:39:10.480
Um, but, uh, I don't want to rush to anything and get it wrong. This is way too important. If that's
00:39:17.120
true, then your deep state is exposed and nobody is safe. Nobody is safe. Thank you so much. I appreciate it.