The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program ｜ Guests： Sen. JD Vance & Charles Buhler ｜ 6⧸14⧸24

00:00:00.000 Today is a fun Friday broadcast. We have Bridget Phetasy joining us to talk about

00:00:04.900 the old man. We all know he's an old man and he's doing old man things. Should he be the 0.97

00:00:12.220 president of the United States as an old man like this? He's completely checked out. We also have 1.00

00:00:19.100 J.D. Vance on to talk about meetings that he had with Trump yesterday in Washington, D.C.

00:00:24.240 that went very, very well. Looks like the Republicans are starting to come together.

00:00:28.360 Then we have a scientist on, Charles Bueller. He has been searching for a way to put objects

00:00:40.620 into space without propellant. He has come up with something now. He works with NASA. He's

00:00:48.460 got his own company that has been researching this now. He's been working on this with others

00:00:54.660 around the world for about 10 years now. And they have actually can move things without any

00:01:04.500 propellant. Like your airplane, you'd be sitting in the engine, but there is no engine. They don't

00:01:10.940 even know exactly how it works. It seems to be defying all physics. I have never found myself

00:01:19.280 in an interview where I didn't even know where to begin. I thought I understood some of the

00:01:27.040 ramifications of it. Um, but as we got into it, no, I, no, I don't. Uh, we could go to the moon

00:01:35.620 in two hours. Uh, we could go to Mars in five days. It's remarkable technology and a remarkable

00:01:45.840 discovery. Uh, and that's all on today's podcast. First, let me tell you about pre-born. It is hard

00:01:52.360 to believe, but this month marks two years since Roe versus Wade was overturned. We still celebrate that 1.00

00:01:59.640 decision, but at the same time with a good comes a lot of bad. The number of abortions actually has 0.52

00:02:05.060 increased after Roe increase last year. They were at the highest since 2012. There's a lot of work to

00:02:12.360 do. The problem is, is this, um, this abortion drug. Now they can mail it to you. You don't really need a

00:02:19.620 doctor. I mean, it's, it's crazy. This, this summer, we are going to find out if, uh, the abortion cult 0.97

00:02:27.620 will win on that front. There's a chance that that changes in the Supreme court as well.

00:02:34.740 But pre-born is the largest pro-life organization in the country, and they're leading the charge to

00:02:39.740 put an end to the atrocity of abortion. Every day they sponsor free ultrasounds for women, as well as

00:02:46.480 providing them help for up to two years after the baby is born. And you are the key. When a mom sees

00:02:52.620 her unborn child on that monitor, when she hears the heartbeat, she is twice as likely to consider

00:02:57.140 choosing life for her baby. If you have the means, would you contribute $28 a month? That is

00:03:04.660 the price of one ultrasound. You could be saving 12 babies every year. Or if you have the means and

00:03:11.100 you'd like to make a real leadership, uh, uh, donation, please do. You can help them. A donation

00:03:18.320 of 5,000 will sponsor ultrasounds entire nation national network for 24 hours. This is the largest

00:03:24.720 network in the country right now. You can donate dial pound two 50, say the keyword, baby pound two 50

00:03:32.160 keyword, baby. It's pre-born.com slash Beck.

00:03:44.640 You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

00:03:48.840 JD Vance is on the phone with us. JD Vance, Senator from Ohio, also on a short list, uh, for Donald Trump.

00:03:58.020 Uh, I'm sure he's going to, he's just dying to talk about that because they always are. Everybody

00:04:03.180 who's on the short list. They're like, Oh, please ask me about that. So go ahead. Spill it. Spill the

00:04:08.980 beans. My favorite topic. I said this, I have not talked to Trump about it. Uh, yes. You know,

00:04:20.340 we, we, I'm aware that they're, they're looking at me and I think that they're probably looking at 20

00:04:24.820 other people and I'm sure he'll make his decision. Um, and if it's me, then, uh, like I said,

00:04:30.560 repeatedly, I'd be interested in it. Cause I think it's important to help him because if he doesn't

00:04:34.080 win this election, this country's in a tough spot. So now that's pretty much it. You, you were in the

00:04:39.980 meeting with him yesterday, right? I was. Yeah. Yeah. Cause he said the guy I'm going to pick

00:04:46.240 is most likely in this room with us right now. So I didn't see that, but, um, unfortunately for the

00:04:53.400 odds makers, there were like 49 other people in the room. So it doesn't help. Yeah. Um, but

00:04:57.920 let me just sort of set the stage. I mean, one, it was a very positive meeting and you, you obviously

00:05:05.680 have people who are more allied with the president and his agenda, you know, like me and Bill Haggerty,

00:05:11.700 Marco Rubio and so forth. And then you, you also have people in the room who are very, you know,

00:05:16.240 even in the last couple of months have been very critical of the president. And I think what you saw

00:05:21.440 is just a recognition that we have to unify as a Republican party and win this election. And look,

00:05:26.180 there are guys that are, there are guys that are running that I wish their primary opponents had

00:05:30.800 won. And I wish we had a different candidate representing the Republican party, but there

00:05:35.420 isn't a single person running, at least in the Senate, who I would rather have a Democrat take 0.85

00:05:39.640 their spot. The other thing that's really interesting, Glenn, is, is just you to realize that the internal

00:05:44.560 psychology of Republican senators right now is they're looking at every single one of these

00:05:50.860 Senate ballots and the polls suggest that whether it's by five points or 15 points,

00:05:56.920 our Senate candidates are running behind Donald Trump in the core battleground state. So if we

00:06:01.300 actually want to take back the Senate with a solid majority, we need the president to help us close

00:06:06.640 the margin between our guys and his margin. And I think he will help us do that as we get down the

00:06:12.520 stretch here. But there's just a recognition here that he's tapped into something, especially in this

00:06:17.580 cycle. And if we can get that, that thing to reverberate to the benefit of our Senate candidates,

00:06:23.140 you know, we can win a major, major victory in the United States Senate.

00:06:27.580 And he was really kind of conciliatory yesterday. He seemed to be in good spirits and,

00:06:36.140 you know, recognizing that we, you know, we don't all agree on everything. At least that was the

00:06:41.800 impression I got from his conversation. Would you, would you agree with that?

00:06:47.420 I agree with that, Glenn. I mean, look, he was, he was extremely friendly. He was obviously in a good

00:06:51.860 mood. I think, you know, he, he made us, he was very friendly to Mitch McConnell, of course, who's not

00:06:59.000 always been the best ally of Donald Trump. He was friendly to everybody in the room. And, you know,

00:07:04.820 he said like, look, even when we disagree, our disagreements pale in comparison to the Democrats.

00:07:10.920 And we're at this stage, you know, and I've done this now twice, Glenn, I've been in politics for

00:07:16.660 two cycles where right now we're sort of in the hurt feeling stage where a lot of people who didn't

00:07:22.660 win primaries, grassroots activists, donors, state chairman, and so forth, they're kind of frustrated

00:07:29.000 and they're exhausted from the primary season. And they're not thinking about the future.

00:07:33.580 And I just think, you know, Trump is maybe the only guy in the party who can sort of stand before

00:07:38.420 everybody and say, look, yeah, maybe your guy didn't win. Maybe things haven't always,

00:07:42.780 we haven't always agreed on everything, but, but now it's time to save the country. And to do that,

00:07:46.780 we have to win. He said yesterday that he was, and I'm going to get to something that you want to

00:07:52.200 talk about the DEI programs going away, which is so important. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

00:07:57.420 We'll get to that in a second, but one more question on this meeting yesterday with Trump.

00:08:00.340 Um, he said that he, uh, wanted to abolish the income tax and replace it with tariffs.

00:08:12.440 So that was not in our meeting. I think that may have been in another meeting at that day. I saw the

00:08:17.760 headlines, uh, but that was not an, in our meeting. I mean, look, this is a fascinating proposal and we

00:08:25.220 could talk, uh, for a while about it, but you know what we have to sort of think about when we tax

00:08:30.840 something, we get less of it and we should ask ourselves, what do we, you know, we have to raise

00:08:35.960 revenues for the military and social security and so forth. Like what do we actually want to raise

00:08:40.840 revenues from? And, and my, my view would be, we want to tax production less. We want to tax making

00:08:48.040 stuff in China more. Well, that's what a tariff fundamentally does. So whether you get rid of

00:08:52.500 the whole income tax, I think it's a really smart idea to say, we want to reward people for making

00:08:58.500 things. We want to reward productive work. We don't want to reward making stuff in the home country of

00:09:05.700 our chief rival. And that's, I think fundamentally where Trump's head is on this matter.

00:09:10.240 Well, I tell you, there is, I mean, if I think if we don't take control of the Senate and the house

00:09:16.480 and, and, and the white house, uh, we're just going to be treading water at best. If they win

00:09:23.660 those, uh, we are, we're done. Uh, they have, they have put so many, uh, uh, deadly fruit trees in all

00:09:34.700 of our agencies and all of our government that I just don't see us being able to survive it. The

00:09:41.020 fundamental transformation will be finished in the next term. And you have introduced legislation

00:09:46.860 to dismantle all of the federal DEI programs from the federal government. Uh, thank you.

00:09:56.000 Yeah, we, we have, and to your point about the Senate, Glenn, this, you know, the Senate's in

00:09:59.820 the personnel business. We approve all of the political appointees. And if you want to root out

00:10:04.260 the deep state and the bureaucracy, you need political appointees who are aligned with the agenda.

00:10:08.920 And what this legislation does, and I'm not an idiot, Joe Biden, I can sign it. Uh, but Donald

00:10:14.240 Trump would, and what it would do is, is really destroy the diversity, equity and inclusion

00:10:22.000 bureaucracy that exists in our country. And people say, well, you know, who, who doesn't like

00:10:25.960 diversity, right? Doesn't diversity just mean, um, you know, you have a Mexican restaurant down

00:10:30.700 the street. No, no, no, no. The way that our federal government has interpreted this is to

00:10:35.700 explicitly allow racist decision-making, primarily targeting white and Asian Americans now in the

00:10:42.440 21st century, but explicitly racist decision-making and contracting and hiring in the provision of

00:10:48.980 grants. Uh, some of these programs, by the way, have been held flatly illegal by the federal courts.

00:10:53.680 For example, uh, there was a farm program that explicitly excluded white Americans from the

00:10:59.660 provision of farm assistance for our farmers. And that's ridiculous. You can't discriminate whether

00:11:04.780 black or white against people on the basis of skin color. This would proactively root this stuff 0.99

00:11:09.600 out of our government. And it's a very important first step to getting basic merit back in our

00:11:14.700 federal system, Glenn. Yeah. And I, you know, I don't think that even black farmers, uh, would, 1.00

00:11:20.200 would have wanted that. I mean, you know, maybe some would, but, you know, farmers rely on each other

00:11:26.360 and they need to help each other. Cause you know, if Bill's crop is down this year, it might be

00:11:31.980 my crop down next year. So we're all in this together. The last thing you want are now new

00:11:38.740 racial barriers between neighbors where he gets the help from the government and we don't,

00:11:45.540 it's not a good idea. It's not a good idea at all. And to your point about how black farmers feel 1.00

00:11:51.880 about this stuff, if you look at public polling on this, what you consistently find is that black 1.00

00:11:58.440 Americans and most white Americans don't like racial quotas. They don't like racial discrimination,

00:12:05.000 whether it benefits them, their, their group or harms their group. The one group of Americans

00:12:11.060 that seems to really like racial quotas are very high education, white Americans. That is the one 0.75

00:12:18.660 group. That is the one group that seems, by the way, they're not going to lose out, uh, when the quota

00:12:24.340 system comes because they pull all the strings, but they're not doing it for the good of the country.

00:12:30.540 I think they're fundamentally doing it because they look down on, um, they look down on, on white

00:12:37.380 Americans who don't have their same educational status. And a lot of, you know, one of my theories, 0.97

00:12:42.700 Glenn, is that a lot of what is broken about America is high education whites who really 0.99

00:12:48.960 hate lower education whites. And I think you, you see that as a main driver of a lot of very stupid 0.97

00:12:55.800 public policy and frankly, a lot of very evil public policy in this country. So we got to root

00:12:59.800 it out. We got to be proactive about it. That's what I'm trying to do. I mean, it's, it's really,

00:13:04.540 I mean, this, it wasn't like this before because our education system was, was much more local,

00:13:11.400 you know, um, and in, and not as, uh, you know, you, you didn't have all of the smart people going

00:13:19.640 to this one college. And so they were only surrounded by really, really smart people and

00:13:24.720 then get married to the same kind of thinking some, you know, you, you would have, um, a great 0.76

00:13:30.740 disparity in, in education and experience in families all the time. But now the elites, they wouldn't

00:13:40.280 marry into a farming family. They, they don't understand it. They don't like it. Generally

00:13:44.700 speaking. No, that, that, that's right. Uh, Glenn. So there is this, this real classism,

00:13:51.500 right? I think that's a much bigger problem than racism in modern America, but it's actually made

00:13:55.980 our education system much stupider because to your point, you know, you used to have, of course,

00:13:59.880 you'd have, you know, the smart kids would become doctors and lawyers and engineers and the kids who

00:14:05.140 didn't like school as much would do something else, but sort of everybody lived together and work

00:14:09.520 together. And it was, it was a good community kind of work together. When you silo people by

00:14:15.140 education, what we find is that we send people to colleges and they don't get good training and

00:14:21.040 useful skills. They increasingly get indoctrinated into how to be crazy people. So even the educational

00:14:27.360 institutions stop serving their function when you stratify this thing in such a ridiculous way.

00:14:33.280 And I think you're certainly seeing evidence of that in our country right now.

00:14:36.140 So what are the chances that this even passes this legislation? I know Biden won't sign it,

00:14:42.020 but do you think it'll even get passed?

00:14:45.920 Um, I, I look, I don't think it's going to get out of the Senate. I think the house would support

00:14:49.140 this. Uh, but what we're trying to do is plant seeds, Glenn. One of the things that happened in

00:14:53.140 the, in the 2016, uh, campaign is Republicans really expected Trump to lose. And so when he actually

00:14:59.880 won, there wasn't the foundational work that had been done to make the, the, you know,

00:15:05.720 to just pass a bunch of really good legislation, we're trying to do that. We're trying to set up

00:15:10.260 the next administration for success. And at the very least have a debate about what kind of country

00:15:15.020 we want. Do we want a country that discriminates based on race? I think the answer is no. And I

00:15:19.500 think 90% of people agree with me. Do you believe that the, the next administration can, uh, fire

00:15:28.040 enough people to make a difference in the deep state? I do, Glenn, but it will be one of the most

00:15:34.320 important fights. I mean, I think the two things that hopefully president Trump does in his second

00:15:39.340 term, and I know he wants to do, but will cause massive backlash from the media is we need to deport

00:15:45.700 a large number of the illegal immigrants who have come here over the last few years. Uh, and we also

00:15:50.760 need to really root out the federal bureaucracy to make it more responsive, to make it more,

00:15:56.700 to make it smaller, uh, but to really make it democratically accountable to the people's elected

00:16:01.500 president, the media is how about the stuff. They'll call it fascism. They'll call it every name

00:16:06.360 in the book. It's the opposite. It's the opposite. Exactly. It's, it's accountability, right? That is

00:16:13.040 the opposite of fascism. And it, frankly, we have fascism at the bureaucratic level where people's

00:16:20.280 lives are controlled by people they never elected, right? That that's democracy. That's Republican

00:16:25.000 form of government. So look, this is the most important thing structurally that we have to fix

00:16:29.720 at the government. I think Trump is committed to it. And I think the question is, do you have enough

00:16:34.420 Republicans in there who have the willpower and the courage to fight alongside of them? And I think

00:16:40.580 that's the big question. Yeah. Well, we've, we've got a lot of people like you where, when we did the

00:16:46.100 tea party thing years ago, we didn't, we didn't have, we just didn't have the people in there who

00:16:51.680 really, truly had the foundation that they'd been thinking about for a long time. Um, and I think we

00:16:57.520 do now, we have a lot of really good people. We need more, but this is the best chance, uh, of success

00:17:04.100 that I've seen in, in a very long time. Um, the tea party turned out to be, you know, we were really

00:17:11.580 fighting the, the deep state in the Republican party. And I think that one is on its last legs.

00:17:20.840 Look, we, we, we need to win that. We need to win the fight one. And if we don't, I really do think

00:17:25.220 we could lose our country. Yes, I agree. Uh, JD, thank you very much. I appreciate it. Senator JD Vance,

00:17:31.180 uh, from Ohio. Uh, this is a, um, a good seed planting because DEI does need to go from all

00:17:39.880 of our federal agencies and federal programs. Thank you so much, JD. Appreciate it.

00:17:46.640 This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. And don't forget, rate us on iTunes.

00:17:53.580 Well, I am, uh, I'm so excited and, and just, we're about to geek out, um, uh, with Charles,

00:18:00.040 uh, Charles Bueller. He is, uh, the founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, uh, NASA X, uh,

00:18:08.920 electrostatics and surface physics laboratory as well. He's an engineer. He believes he's found a

00:18:15.200 way to overcome earth's gravity. This is crazy. Welcome. Welcome, sir. Hey, thank you. Thank you

00:18:23.640 for having me. So can you explain this as much as you can in layman's terms, uh, on what you,

00:18:30.840 what you've discovered? Uh, sure. I do have to caveat first that this is, uh, not sanctioned

00:18:39.140 by NASA. This is work that we've done outside of NASA as a team. Oh, they were made up of a lot

00:18:45.200 of scientists and engineers throughout the aerospace industry, but, uh, this is not NASA work and

00:18:50.640 there's several reasons for that. Okay, good. I'm actually, I'm actually happier about that. I like

00:18:56.060 private industry coming up with things. Okay. So Charles, tell me what you've done.

00:19:02.380 Well, we've been, uh, exploring, um, propellantless propulsion for several members of our team for

00:19:08.480 several years. Gosh, I've been doing it for 25 years. My colleagues been doing it for about 15 years

00:19:14.080 or so. But when we joined forces in 2016, we were able to see some magic happen. And then we didn't

00:19:21.940 really understand it until about 2018. Um, and that's when we kind of hit the ground running once

00:19:28.180 we understood it. And then, uh, we didn't come public with it until earlier, earlier this year.

00:19:33.820 So when you say you really didn't understand it, the articles that I've read say you still

00:19:40.060 don't fully understand what's going on because it seems to break the laws of, of physics and gravity.

00:19:47.840 That's correct. So when I say, we understand it from a classical point of view, but we know that

00:19:53.260 can't be the full picture. There's got to be some kind of mechanics involved, but we at least know

00:19:58.840 enough to do some engineering around it based on the conservation of energy laws. And we've tested

00:20:05.660 that. And we've made about 1500 test articles in the last eight years. So we're learning. We learn

00:20:14.380 every, you know, we learn every day because we tested about every day. So what this would allow

00:20:19.960 at scale, um, and if you could do it, not in a vacuum, but space is a vacuum. So we could,

00:20:26.940 we know it would work in space. Is that right?

00:20:29.500 Well, that's this, you know, we need that theory verification, you know, to prove that it is

00:20:35.900 actually a separate course that we have not yet seen in nature. So to do that, no one will believe

00:20:42.260 you until you actually do it in space and see it move.

00:20:44.460 Sure. So, so you, but you have found a way, I mean, when we think of sending things into space,

00:20:51.440 we think rockets and that is probably one of the more, more dangerous moments, uh, when you're going

00:20:58.000 into space is all of that thrust behind you coming from, uh, propellants. Um, and, uh, and you found a

00:21:08.140 way now to possibly put rockets into space without it really being a rocket. What, what is it that

00:21:18.000 is the propellant?

00:21:19.240 Well, that's the nice thing about it. It doesn't, uh, use propellant and, you know, propellant with

00:21:27.380 propulsion. So you can imagine the skin of your aircraft being the thruster, if you will. It's a

00:21:33.680 paradigm shift in the way we think about transportation. It does seem to violate a lot of old classical laws

00:21:39.400 like the rocket equation and other classical mechanics. So those equations are, gosh, almost 400

00:21:44.600 years old. We have a lot of new physics since then. And I think this is taking advantage of

00:21:49.420 some of the, not the 20th century quantum mechanics as much, but more of the 19th century

00:21:53.780 E and M physics, electricity and magnetism. So you're right. It will replace rockets because

00:21:59.420 about 90% of the rockets by mass and volume is just fuel. Right.

00:22:04.200 If you get rid of all that, if you get rid of all that, then you could theoretically start

00:22:08.900 from Earth and go straight into space and then back and forth all over.

00:22:13.500 That is crazy. That will change everything. So, so when you say the skin of the plane or

00:22:22.180 the rocket or whatever you're talking about, is it kind of like static electricity? Is that

00:22:27.720 what you're, I mean, I just don't even understand at all.

00:22:33.180 Well, well, it turned out initially we thought, I thought for 20 years that it had to do with

00:22:40.660 electromagnetism. So that's electricity and magnetism together. But we found out in 2018,

00:22:46.260 it was really just a static electricity effect, which meant no current and the charges are static.

00:22:52.040 That's a big distinction. It just happened to be the area of expertise that I am at NASA

00:22:56.220 is being electrostatic expert for the agency. So once I knew that that's what it was,

00:23:00.880 it was able to hit the ground running and to get thrusters that in theory should be able

00:23:05.920 to lift under their own weight on Earth, provided they didn't have to carry anything yet.

00:23:11.440 We're still working on getting it stronger, but that's essentially the gist of it.

00:23:15.760 Static electricity itself has energy because there's energy between charged particles.

00:23:21.380 We're all familiar with the Coulomb energy, you know, like particles, like positive particles

00:23:26.160 repel, you know, negative particles repel, but plus and minus attract.

00:23:30.880 We're all familiar with that aspect of static electricity. What this has shown is that there

00:23:37.700 is what we call electrostatic pressure in the presence of the field. It's basically

00:23:42.260 the pressure itself, which is not something I invented that's been around for 100 years or so,

00:23:49.400 but the pressure itself can act in such a way that if it's unbalanced, it can give you a net momentum

00:23:56.640 transfer to your system. That's what's new. And how exactly this does this, I don't know.

00:24:03.460 I'm not sure if I'll ever know, but it seems to work. So this is easy to manufacture. It's easy to test.

00:24:10.380 Now, we've done all the tests we've done in vacuum or the lab. Now it's time to take the next step,

00:24:16.020 you know, put it lower a little bit and see what it does.

00:24:18.920 Dr. Buehler, can I ask, I'm looking at a chart of your success and it looks like in 2021,

00:24:25.680 you just had phenomenal success. It just skyrockets up to just over a G of thrust.

00:24:32.720 What happened at that time where you just exponentially started getting, having more and more success?

00:24:38.960 Well, we know that static electricity, this force, is based on asymmetrical capacitance.

00:24:49.000 Now, asymmetrical capacitors have been around for 100 years. People have seen thrust in them,

00:24:53.980 but they've been kind of ignored from the scientific community because of an ion wind effect.

00:24:58.240 You do it in air. But if you ignore that and if you actually test it in vacuum and test it correctly,

00:25:04.080 you'll see that you'll get the thrust actually in the opposite direction of the ion wind.

00:25:07.980 But that's a geometry effect. So, you know, parallel plate capacitors are parallel. If you

00:25:14.840 change the dimension of one of them, you'll get a thrust. So that's a geometry effect. But there

00:25:20.980 are many ways to make an asymmetrical capacitor other than geometry. So that's what we've explored

00:25:26.900 and that's what we've uncovered. And that helps. It makes things smaller, miniature,

00:25:31.580 makes things two-dimensional, if you will, and lighter. So that's the big advancement that

00:25:37.800 we've made. Are there any videos that you guys have made showing this at all yet?

00:25:46.540 We have a couple on our website. We're going to put a few more on in the next couple of weeks.

00:25:51.600 But yes, so what we're doing now is we're trying to make videos to show people how to build these.

00:25:57.720 That's really the only way to get it out there, to kind of show people how this is done.

00:26:01.160 So we have a couple of videos that we made, I don't know, five years ago, six years ago,

00:26:05.080 that show the thrusters moving in air. So we have to encapsulate them in styrofoam. So it doesn't

00:26:12.300 look very pretty, but styrofoam is a great diagnostic. It's light. You know, it stops corona, what we call

00:26:18.960 corona from happening, which is a gas breakdown. We don't want any sparks or discharges or current.

00:26:23.460 So we encapsulate everything. Styrofoam is light. It's a good source for that. So those videos are

00:26:29.960 online. You can take a look at those. Okay, so that's at exoduspropulsion.space. Easy for me to say.

00:26:39.160 Easier for you to type. Yeah. So tell me the ramifications. If this is found to be

00:26:49.600 what you think it might be, tell me how our life and the things that it could do and would change.

00:27:02.400 Well, clearly, it would revolutionize transportation as we know it. All forms of

00:27:08.480 transportation. Cars, boats, trains, planes, everything would change. You wouldn't need an

00:27:14.660 engine. You wouldn't need a combustion engine or to burn fossil fuels. You wouldn't need

00:27:21.480 propellers or wheels or tires. It would just revolutionize everything.

00:27:25.920 What?

00:27:27.680 Yes, it would revolutionize everything if we can get this above, much above unity. Right now,

00:27:32.220 we're sort of hovering around unity, but you need a little bit more to carry something.

00:27:36.920 Okay, so wait a minute. What's unity?

00:27:38.680 Unity. Well, we define unity as the thrust needed to lift up the weight of the thruster.

00:27:46.340 Okay. So you need to add more so you can put a body or stuff or whatever in that thruster. Okay.

00:27:57.420 Okay. Okay. So that's what we need. So we need at least a double or triple the factor just so we can

00:28:03.700 lift up the power supplies for and carry load, payload, whatever that is. So that's what we're

00:28:10.520 working toward. But right now- I have to tell you, go ahead.

00:28:15.320 Well, I'm just saying right now, we are above lunar unity. So for the moon, and NASA is very

00:28:20.740 interesting to go back to the moon as others are, we actually have way over lunar unity. So in theory,

00:28:27.040 we can send objects to the moon using conventional rockets today and actually make spacecraft also be

00:28:34.260 the hovercraft for the lunar surface. Never actually have to touch the surface unless they

00:28:39.680 want to. That's very exciting. You don't want to touch the dust. You don't have to. You can just

00:28:45.500 hover above it and you can travel with the sun. There's a lot of cool things you could do with

00:28:50.640 this technology, but a great demonstration of it would be on the moon.

00:28:53.400 So this would help, like, because as I understand it, one of the reasons we want to go to the moon

00:29:01.040 again is we need a staging station if we wanted to go to any of the outer planets. This could make

00:29:10.040 that- we wouldn't have to have that step if you didn't need the propulsion, if you didn't need,

00:29:18.700 you know, some propellant that you would have to get off the moon. Correct?

00:29:23.380 No, you're absolutely right. Right now, NASA's aim is to go to the South Pole to extract water.

00:29:30.080 Part of that water could be used for propulsion. It could split up the hydrogen and oxygen. But you

00:29:35.980 wouldn't need to do that with this technology. You would just go to the moon, and then when you get

00:29:39.880 tired of going to the moon, you can go to Mars. Right now, we can go to the moon, theoretically,

00:29:43.520 in about two and a half hours. It's a very slow acceleration. Wait, wait, wait. Wait, wait,

00:29:49.500 wait. What did you say? Well, since it's a constant thrust, theoretically, we should be able to put our

00:29:58.760 thrusters in space and get to the moon in under three hours with the accelerations that we have.

00:30:03.840 That's huge. We can get to Mars in about five to six days. That's very rare. Oh, my gosh.

00:30:16.520 You're streaming the best of the Glenn Beck podcast. To hear more of this interview,

00:30:22.000 find the full episode wherever you get podcasts. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. Hello, America.

00:30:28.200 It's Friday. Good thing the G7 summit, where all of the big leaders get together and, you know,

00:30:37.640 have a powwow and talk about what we're going to do to cause some more war and higher inflation.

00:30:43.900 They got together and they were watching just a fantastic skydiving event that was done for them.

00:30:52.800 Now, remember, just remember, these are the ones that are always saying global warming, global warming.

00:31:01.320 So not only did they fly over in their own planes to get together, but then they sent an airplane up

00:31:10.060 with people in it to jump out for their entertainment. So I'm taking them seriously. But they're all standing

00:31:17.420 there in an open field watching these guys come down except for except for Joe Biden. He watches for a

00:31:25.180 while and then he decides squirrel and he starts to meander and walk away from and it's it's incredible

00:31:36.500 footage to watch because you can see none of the prime ministers or presidents know what to do as he

00:31:45.260 just wanders off. He's facing the wrong direction. And you see Prime Minister Maloney from Italy.

00:31:55.180 She's the only one that gracefully knows how to get him out. She kind of backs up and then grabs him 1.00

00:32:01.820 and like over here, Mr. Brown, we got cookies. Who wants a cookie? Look at cookies. Say cookie.

00:32:06.980 It is. It is. It is horrifying how bad he is. And then he puts his glasses on at twice the speed

00:32:16.900 that it takes to for him to sit down at ceremonies. I don't know if you remember that footage from

00:32:24.560 earlier this week, last weekend, where he was trying to sit down and look like he crapped his pants.

00:32:29.280 He didn't crap his pants. He was just deciding, should I sit down or not? Maybe I should stand.

00:32:55.920 OK, that's that's what was going through his head. He didn't know whether he was starting to sit down

00:33:03.040 and then he's like, oh, nobody else's. You just stand up, man. You just stand right back up. It's

00:33:07.680 no big deal. We've all done it. Whoops. But he just froze like I'm thinking when he's putting his

00:33:13.880 sunglasses on. He's like, I've got to lift my arm. The pressure on my sunglasses enough to keep him

00:33:21.660 held up so I can put him now on my face over my ears. Done.

00:33:33.180 What do they honestly, what do they jack him up with? Because they've got to jack him up with

00:33:39.420 something. Because there's no way that's not the guy who speaks to us in like major interviews or,

00:33:45.660 you know, when he comes in to address Congress for the State of the Union, he's like, hey, man,

00:33:51.420 I got to tell you, everything's going great. I mean, the state of our economy is great.

00:33:55.260 I don't know what they're putting him on, but that ain't Joe Biden.

00:34:00.020 The difference is shocking.

00:34:01.140 What we're seeing now. Yeah, shocking. Shocking. I mean, you look at, I mean, in the interviews,

00:34:06.860 he's with it. But when he gets on a stage, maybe it's maybe he's just allergic to stages.

00:34:11.300 I don't really know what it is. But he'll just have that reboot. Or in this case, it was a field.

00:34:15.220 In this case, it was a field. But yeah, it's like, it's that, remember that when he was just,

00:34:20.260 when he got stuck in that one facial expression, when he was at that, what was that event at the

00:34:25.060 White House or whatever for, was it Juneteenth? He just, it was stuck. It was like everything just

00:34:30.200 stopped. And can you, can you play that? Do we have that video from earlier this week? I'm not sure

00:34:34.940 we still have it. But that video of him and the Juneteenth celebration, that happened actually last

00:34:39.860 weekend. The weekend before was, I'm going to sit. So it's once a week, we're getting these major

00:34:52.560 things. And he was standing at Juneteenth, and everybody was moving with the music and everything

00:34:57.100 else. He had that Joker smile on him. Go ahead and roll that, will you? He had this Joker smile on

00:35:04.480 his face. No, that's not it. But that's another great one too. He has this Joker smile on him

00:35:12.880 that doesn't move. He's like, I'm happy, I'm happy to be here and everybody's happy. Jill told me to

00:35:19.840 keep smiling. So I'm smiling, smiling. That's all I'm doing now is smile, smile, smile. She didn't tell

00:35:25.140 me to move and smile. I'm just smiling and not moving. That's just creepy. It is creepy.

00:35:34.740 He is, you know who looks more lifelike? The audio animatronic Joe Biden. It'll be the only one in

00:35:43.460 Disney that's like, man, they nailed him. They didn't get better. He just always looks like he's

00:35:49.540 auto animatronic. I'm a robot. I don't want to like presume. I don't want to try to guess on what

00:35:57.240 might be wrong with him, but my father had lupus and he would have like little like micro strokes

00:36:02.800 and he would just, it was just all of a sudden he would just like check out. He would just kind of

00:36:06.540 stop and like kind of gaze. And what he was doing, he was having like little micro strokes. And that is

00:36:11.580 eerily similar to what I saw from him. Well, this is, I mean, um, one of my daughters,

00:36:19.500 you know, Mary, she has significant strokes and are significant seizures. Um, and this,

00:36:27.140 this really cutting edge, um, procedure that I wouldn't have done. She chose, she chose to do it

00:36:35.920 because I would have been too afraid because they said to her, you may, may wake up and you may not

00:36:40.560 recognize anybody. You may not be able to speak or know people's names. I mean, we don't know what

00:36:47.260 we're doing here and, but we think we know what we're doing, but we don't. And brave girl, she was

00:36:55.820 like, do it. I don't want to live like this anymore. Just do it. And so they did. And she was seizure

00:37:02.240 free for about two years. And, uh, and now they've, they've come back, um, pretty hard and hers are

00:37:09.180 really getting grand malish. Um, my other daughter has seizure where she is like Joe Biden, but just

00:37:17.960 very short period of time where she just like, and you're like, hello, hello, what? And we didn't,

00:37:27.940 for a long time, didn't know there were seizures kind of probably like your dad. We didn't know,

00:37:31.740 just thought he just kind of drifted, you know, for a minute and yeah, but that's not, I think he's

00:37:37.380 just gone. I think he's just gone. Uh, here's Biden yesterday, promising Ukraine a lot more money.

00:37:46.160 Great.

00:37:46.360 By the way, the idea that we had to wait till we pass the legislation overall, even held up by a

00:37:52.800 small majority of our Republican colleagues was just terrible. And, uh, there's a lot more money

00:37:59.020 coming beyond.

00:37:59.800 Can you stop? Can you stop? Can you, can you stop play that again? I want you to listen to what

00:38:04.420 the president of the United States just said. Listen again, by the way, the idea that we had

00:38:10.600 to wait till we pass the legislation overall, even held up by a small majority of our Republican

00:38:16.760 colleagues. Stop.

00:38:17.680 The idea that we had to wait for Congress to pass this before we could do it is just horrible.

00:38:30.260 That's the constitutional process, dude. He's complaining that you have to wait before you

00:38:39.260 spend money on something that's controversial. That, what is that? That's the cry of a dictator.

00:38:45.640 Now you can say, because of our system, we had to wait. And, you know, it's just the way,

00:38:53.440 you know, a Republican, a democracy, it's not pretty all the time, but it's, as Churchill said,

00:38:59.460 it's the worst until you compare it to everything else. And then you realize it's the best.

00:39:05.200 It's the best of the worst. You know, sorry, we had to delay on that, but we have certain things

00:39:10.080 we have to do, but the money's there now. No, he's saying the very idea that we had to wait.

00:39:19.240 Do you know that famous speech from FDR, you know, a date which will live in infamy.

00:39:23.640 Do you know what that speech was? That speech was for the president to make his case in front of

00:39:31.740 Congress to go to war. There was never a clearer, at least, you know, in the last hundred years,

00:39:40.080 there's no clearer declaration of war than bombing Pearl Harbor, right? Bombing all of our ships.

00:39:48.440 Today, we would have just launched. The president back then, this is how far we've drifted. The

00:39:55.280 president back then, even after Pearl Harbor, went the very next day to Congress and gave that speech.

00:40:02.460 And then they voted. The very idea that we have to vote on things in Congress. I've done everything

00:40:11.120 I can to make Congress and the Constitution just, you know, a rubber stamp, but I'm not there yet.

00:40:17.940 So let me promise you that there's a lot more money coming. Oh my gosh.

00:40:23.080 He does these, you know, that's an interesting point you made, Glenn, because I've caught him

00:40:26.620 doing that in the past. These very fundamental beliefs of our country, the United States,

00:40:31.120 they clearly just do not believe in. Like every time he threatens us with the F-15 remark that

00:40:36.900 he's said about 16,000 times, I never really got annoyed that it was a threat. I never really

00:40:41.960 took it that way. What really annoyed me was he is making fun of the fundamental, you know,

00:40:47.880 right of self-defense that we have in this country. The fundamental right that if there ever

00:40:52.260 becomes a tyrant, you have the tools to stand up and push back and say, no, you have that

00:40:57.080 right to put, you not only have the right as this, as it says in the Declaration of Independence,

00:41:02.980 you have the duty to overthrow the shackles of a tyrant. And you're right. But, you know,

00:41:12.680 Jason, as somebody who is in Afghanistan right after 9-11, I don't know. On those F-15s,

00:41:22.840 everything that we, you know, everything that we threw at them, they're still in charge of

00:41:27.540 Afghanistan, aren't they? Yeah, I don't think F-15s help them out too much. Neither did the

00:41:32.800 Northern Vietnamese. I mean, history is full of insurgencies that have been successful. You know,

00:41:38.580 on this Ukraine funding thing, we've done multiple different shows on some of this stuff. And what

00:41:45.440 will shock you, if you just kind of look and try to trace some of these funds, whether they're

00:41:50.440 coming from Congress or some other agency within this government, it is everywhere. Like, just look

00:41:56.500 at the news. You'll look, it's like, oh, Secretary Blinken was in Ukraine yesterday and he just promised

00:42:00.860 $200 million. Yeah, like, where'd that come from? I don't, Congress didn't approve that. And then

00:42:06.000 you'll hear at the exact same time the Pentagon did. That's the Chevron case. Yes. That's the

00:42:11.000 Chevron case. They can't do that. Only Congress has the purse strings. Only Congress can issue more 0.61

00:42:19.800 spending. It must start in Congress. We've completely disregarded the Constitution. It's not

00:42:27.600 only hanging from a thread. I think the thread is so frayed that it is broken and we're not even using

00:42:36.040 it at all. Or we are the closest that we've ever been to absolutely destroying everything that

00:42:43.300 everybody worked and died, died for. Anyway, so he's promising more money, but don't worry,

00:42:50.580 the experts get it. Here is Janet Yellen telling us that, you know, you just don't get it. You don't

00:42:58.380 understand. We're smarter than you. Cut nine. All Americans, both those who are well off and those 1.00

00:43:05.800 who are near near at the bottom of the income distribution are better off now. Their wages

00:43:11.500 have risen more than prices. Okay. All right. Good is bad. Bad is good. Up is down. Down is up. And

00:43:24.140 prices are down and your wages are up. So everybody knows this. America, can you afford to be led by

00:43:33.840 these people another four years?

The Glenn Beck Program - June 14, 2024

Best of The Program ｜ Guests： Sen. JD Vance & Charles Buhler ｜ 6⧸14⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript