The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program ｜ Guests： Sen. Rand Paul, Justin Haskins, & Josh Rogin

00:00:00.000 Wow. Today was, I mean, whirlwind. Such big news happening with General Milley. We have Josh

00:00:08.220 Rogan talking about that, along with, let's see, who else was on? Senator Rand Paul. Senator Rand

00:00:14.180 Paul talking about General Milley and the other things that were going on, including the State

00:00:20.480 Department, what was happening in Afghanistan. Also, some really important information from Rand

00:00:26.220 Paul on COVID-19 that you need to hear. Jason Chaffetz. About Hunter Biden and the laptop.

00:00:35.840 And also, we played a song that you're not allowed to know about. They don't want anyone

00:00:42.300 promoting it on Facebook. From the guy who is five for fighting, if you will. Blood on your hands.

00:00:51.500 We have a lot to discuss on today's podcast. And don't forget to head over to blazetv.com

00:00:58.260 slash Glenn. Sign up. Get a subscription. You might notice that conservative media is being

00:01:04.660 cracked down upon. And this is a great way to fight back about it. Glenn, I know, has a big

00:01:09.180 special coming up at 9 p.m. Eastern. Right after some crappy show with Stu.

00:01:15.320 And a crappy guest, Glenn Beck. Wait.

00:01:19.640 Stu Does America, followed by Glenn Beck on Blaze TV. Make sure you check it out.

00:01:31.860 You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program.

00:01:35.860 Senator Rand Paul, where would you like to begin, sir?

00:01:43.320 I think General Milley is the most pressing problem of the moment.

00:01:47.880 We can't have generals talking to foreign countries and saying,

00:01:51.920 hey, we think our president might bomb you, so be prepared. I'm going to try to stop him.

00:01:57.020 That actually might cause an accidental war. Think about it. We have different things that are

00:02:02.060 launched into space all the time. Satellites, this and that. And they can be misinterpreted

00:02:06.640 as a missile. If they were, we call each other and say, no, that's a satellite, not a missile.

00:02:12.400 But what if a general has just called the Chinese dictator and said,

00:02:15.820 our president is going to probably launch. I'll try to stop him, but we think he might launch an

00:02:20.160 attack. They might interpret a satellite and actually some kind of launch into space as a missile.

00:02:26.260 And all of a sudden you have a nuclear war going on. It's incredibly dangerous.

00:02:29.920 Not to mention that there are a host of reasons. We have a chain of command.

00:02:33.920 Not to mention that we have elections. Presidents are elected. Milley wasn't elected to be president.

00:02:38.640 I can't, you can't, I can't even tell you how, how incredibly dangerous this is.

00:02:44.320 He needs to be called in today and asked under polygraph what he said to the Chinese president

00:02:49.920 or to his counterpart in China. And what did he have permission to do so?

00:02:54.080 Now they just, they just, they just released, um, some information. The Pentagon did that said

00:02:59.640 these happen all the time. And there were lots of people on the call and it happened with the

00:03:04.180 state department, but did it happen with the president's permission? The state department

00:03:09.560 does a lot of things where they don't, they don't care who the president is. That's not our system.

00:03:16.740 So is there any circumstance where this would be, as far as you understand it today, where this would

00:03:22.960 be acceptable? I think it depends on what is said. I mean, if he was insinuating that he would go

00:03:29.300 outside the chain of command and that the president was capable of launching an attack on China, um,

00:03:34.640 that to me is something he should be cashiered. He should be court-martialed, but he, you know,

00:03:39.820 everybody gets their day in court. So we need to know what's true and what's not true. And so we need to,

00:03:43.880 to hear from him, but this accusation, you talk about a bombshell, this is a bombshell accusation,

00:03:50.400 but it kind of fits with the guy that seems to be a chameleon. You know, he sort of tried to

00:03:57.240 act as if he was supportive of president Trump's policy. He immediately becomes some sort of

00:04:02.060 politically correct culture warrior. When, when Biden is elected, um, you know, many people who

00:04:08.120 are rank and file, and I talk to people in the military all the time, will tell me that these people

00:04:13.620 who rise up to the top end up becoming more politicians and military leaders. But, you know,

00:04:18.700 you want another excuse for, for getting rid of Milley? Look at the disastrous withdrawal. I mean,

00:04:24.300 you can't imagine a more disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan and, uh, the decision to give up

00:04:29.980 Bagram Air Force Base before the Americans were, were, were exited from the country is probably one

00:04:36.300 of the worst military decisions. And that alone ought to get Milley fired.

00:04:39.800 May I, may I just, uh, bring up an idea? You know, the, uh, yesterday the Senate received

00:04:45.220 a lot of, uh, promotion nominations, uh, in the armed services. And usually it just kind

00:04:52.000 of, it just happens with the Senate and the armed forces committee. Is there, um, I mean,

00:04:56.900 is there anything to the idea of just saying we're not promoting anyone until this man, um,

00:05:03.180 resigns? No promotions. We're not considering it until this man resigns.

00:05:06.800 It's a thought. I would have to think through it and I don't have the power. The chairman of

00:05:12.140 the armed service committee does that's a Democrat, but I think the ranking member also may be able

00:05:17.800 to hold up promotions. You're right. It's rarely done, but I'm not so sure, uh, punishing the

00:05:23.640 people being promoted actually causes him to fire Milley. If you actually think it will,

00:05:28.460 that they would back down or if there's any precedent for it, but I have to think through it,

00:05:32.600 you know, cause it's also, you know, do you punish somebody that's been in the military for 20,

00:05:36.740 25, 30 years, it's getting their promotion. So I don't know if that's the right thing to do or not.

00:05:41.240 I do think that all of those who have a position to voice their opinion should be saying that Milley

00:05:48.160 needs to be asked directly in an interview. Um, I think with polygraph included, you know,

00:05:53.940 whether or not he insinuated that the president of the United States, uh, might attack them,

00:05:59.160 that he was going to stop it. If he said that in a conversation, boy, we need him out of government

00:06:03.780 and the sooner the better. And we need him out of the Pentagon. If he didn't vigorously disagree

00:06:08.960 with the president, I mean, I, I support, um, you know, we have a system of, of checks and balances

00:06:15.240 and we have a constitution and we have a civilian run military. And if the president, uh, disagrees with

00:06:21.800 the advice, then they either have to put their stars on the table and then go talk to the press,

00:06:27.520 uh, or they have to execute it. And if it is a legal order like Afghanistan was, but a crazy one,

00:06:34.420 um, you either fight against it. And if you, if, if this was your best effort to make it good,

00:06:43.460 you need to resign. We just, we just need to say this guy is incapable of making a good decision

00:06:50.860 here. There's a great, there's a great deal of irony in the fact that the left clamors on a daily

00:06:57.620 basis about how Trump was an authoritarian and wanting to, uh, subvert democracy. And yet here

00:07:04.700 we have a president, I mean, a general wanting to subvert the chain of command, the idea of civilian

00:07:10.300 run military, et cetera. Um, everything that the left says was wrong about Trump. They were actually

00:07:16.880 plotting to do this morning on CNN, uh, apologist. They even got, they trotted out Vindman, who even

00:07:22.880 Vindman said this was a terrible thing to do, but then they trot out a former general West Clark to

00:07:28.340 say, Oh, this is all just a normal discussions between countries. I guess it's normal for them

00:07:34.200 to say, Oh, we think the president's going to attack you. So it really depends on what was said.

00:07:38.800 And I kind of doubt that kind of language would have been on a group phone call.

00:07:42.780 Yeah. You're going to say something like that. I would think it'd be more one-on-one,

00:07:47.220 but the only way to get to the bottom of it is to ask him and have, have him take a polygraph

00:07:51.600 test on what was said. So I can't imagine this was in a big conference call. I would think that

00:07:56.380 this had to have been in a one-on-one call if it happened. You have Blinken yesterday. Um, you would

00:08:01.600 not let him go over the target of the U S drone strike. We knew there was something wrong from the

00:08:06.840 beginning because they wouldn't even say who the target was or who they killed. Now they're saying,

00:08:10.940 Oh, we're looking into it. How are we looking into it with no one on the ground? How are we

00:08:16.100 looking into that? Well, and here's the thing is they hide behind the classification. Initially

00:08:20.920 they weren't hiding. They were saying they killed a top level ISIS K operative. That's what they said

00:08:26.560 they announced. And yet yesterday in the hearing, he says either doesn't know if it was an operative

00:08:31.760 or an aid worker. And then it says it's not the right forum. So this is the way they hide.

00:08:36.180 Initially they were bragging in an unclassified way that they got this guy. And now they're saying,

00:08:41.560 well, we can't tell you there's going to be investigation. And we frankly, but he did admit

00:08:46.100 they don't know. That's why they're investigating. And I would think that they might make some decisions

00:08:53.100 and, and, and think about the consequences of killing an aid worker and 12 to 14 young people

00:08:59.040 or kids in that area that creates, you know, hundreds and hundreds of potential terrorists that will hate

00:09:05.320 America for generations. And really there was something we could have done in practical fashion

00:09:10.100 is let's say that we take them at taste value and they didn't think that the government and the

00:09:15.100 Bagram air force base would have been overrun so quickly. One thing you could have done is as soon

00:09:19.760 as the Taliban took possession of a Bagram air force base, they should have said, you have three minutes

00:09:24.620 to leave. The vehicles were blowing up everything. And, or if you don't exit the base, we're blowing up

00:09:29.840 the whole base. And look, I've been against most wars. I've been against the war in Afghanistan.

00:09:35.560 I've been for coming home for a long time, but I would have given that order in a heartbeat to blow

00:09:40.380 up Bagram air force base on the way out though. No plane was useful. No plane was left standing,

00:09:45.400 no Humvee. Um, there are cases of arms. They would have been blown up as well, but, uh, just what a

00:09:51.700 disaster. I just hope people get the right lesson of this. It's, you know, some on the other side are

00:09:57.140 saying the lesson is we should have stayed forever. I think the lesson is we stayed 20 years and they

00:10:02.320 didn't fight one day. You know, the president left one day, nobody fought, not one shot was fired to

00:10:08.500 defend Bagram air force base and not one shot was fired to defend Kabul. That's an indictment of,

00:10:13.800 of, uh, nation building and shows that 20 years and trillions of dollars didn't form a country out

00:10:20.120 of these people. They were unwilling to fight for their own. I have to tell you, I think, uh, I think

00:10:23.960 there's something else. And I think this will ring true to you. Um, we, there were, there were those

00:10:30.300 who, uh, listened to the people in Afghanistan. That's a tribal nation. They never wanted to be

00:10:36.880 Afghanistan. One nation. It's a tribal nation. And the tribes all went to the Trump administration.

00:10:42.700 And then early on the Biden administration saying, please let us have local control to be able to

00:10:49.040 vote in our own governor, our own mayor and our own, uh, police chief, but they were all appointed by

00:10:56.560 the national government. So there was no loyalty there. Nobody wanted to fight for any of these

00:11:01.400 people. And those guys were just getting fat and rich. We need to stay out of people's business and

00:11:07.700 let people decide their own fate. There was a great article by Rod Dreyer a while back, uh, from the

00:11:14.720 American conservative magazine. And he wrote about, uh, when Afghan was lost and he showed a video

00:11:20.760 of some woman giving a discussion of Dadaist art and Marcel Duchamp, the guy who did the urinal

00:11:29.420 ago, the urinal is art. And they showed this woman, this professor explaining to the Afghans why this is

00:11:36.820 art. And it's like, if there's ever been an indictment of Western decadence and why they don't want to

00:11:42.520 accept our ways, putting a urinal as art, out as art, these people rolling their eyes, there was no way

00:11:48.360 they could even conceive of how stupid it is that a urinal is art. But that's the kind of crap we were

00:11:54.080 spending our money trying to teach people who were like, are you kidding me? We're trying to grow enough

00:11:58.800 crops to eat this year. We need to have fresh water. We don't need to be looking at a urinal that you

00:12:04.380 idiots in the West believe is art.

00:12:06.160 And by the way, that was against the Dadaist movement. Their point was, you're all, you're

00:12:12.460 crazy. Art is becoming crazy. We can say whatever we put a urinal on the wall and call it art and

00:12:20.120 you'll buy it. And they did. And they're defending it. All right. Let me ask you quickly. I mean,

00:12:27.420 we have so many people blinking, absolutely lying under oath yesterday. And we can make that case as

00:12:36.420 we finish our operations. But he was lying yesterday. We have Fauci lying. I'd like to

00:12:44.560 share some information with you offline at some point on a special that we're going to be doing

00:12:49.700 about Fauci is we have our constitution hanging by a thread. And I fear that we have some sort of DHS

00:13:02.200 led. It feels like, um, protest, uh, March in Washington, DC, about 700 people. We've done

00:13:10.460 all kinds of research. We can't find anything that there's no excitement behind this. And yet

00:13:15.480 they're putting razor wire up. What are we, where are we? Well, haven't you heard Nancy? Have you

00:13:21.280 heard Nancy Pelosi? We're going to prevent another armed insurrection. And, uh, my question is, well,

00:13:27.240 you know, the people and some people did misbehave and should be punished from January 6th, but none

00:13:31.520 of them were armed. And so it's like, we're, we're doing this ridiculous thing of putting razor wire up

00:13:36.220 in the fence again, because they're creating a mirage. But, you know, George W. Bush bought right

00:13:41.360 into this and his speech was really should terrify all of us. He said that people who are protesting on

00:13:47.740 January 6th were essentially Al Qaeda. But this is another Rod Dreyer article from yesterday. It was just

00:13:54.700 amazing where he says the apparatus that we established, this massive invasive surveillance

00:14:00.880 system that can surveil anybody in the world will now be turned against Americans with the

00:14:06.820 imprimatur of George W. Bush saying, yes, these people are as dangerous Al Qaeda. So we need to have

00:14:12.980 observing of their activities. We need to have them in jail. We don't need to have trials because

00:14:17.840 trials take too long. We don't need to have juries. Juries will be too judicious. We need to put these

00:14:23.640 people in jail. And that's what's happened. That's the response to January 6th. And look,

00:14:28.100 I voted to seat the electors on January 6th. I thought what President Trump was arguing was not

00:14:33.460 the correct argument. And yet the people showed up on January 6th do not deserve to be rotting in jail

00:14:40.160 and treated as if they were murderers. I would like to invite you publicly to come on the podcast.

00:14:47.360 No commercials, just an hour, because honestly, Rand, I think we're at a place now where people

00:14:53.160 don't know what to do and they need good, sound, constitutional reasoning on these issues and

00:15:03.540 advice on how to make a difference. Will you join me on a podcast? Can we reach out?

00:15:09.680 Sure. Sure. And I think the thing is, is you'll give me one second. One thing that I try to do in

00:15:14.420 every interview, people don't know what to believe on COVID. If you get it, whether you're vaccinated or

00:15:20.180 unvaccinated, there is a treatment, but there's a window of time when you get it. It's called IV

00:15:25.100 monoclonal antibodies. It can save your life, but there's been no announcement from the government.

00:15:30.360 I've helped three people get this treatment in the last week. And yet nobody knows about it because

00:15:35.520 Fauci is talking about masks, which largely don't work, but you're going to get it. And if you do get

00:15:41.560 it and you're getting sick, you need to ask your doctor about monoclonal antibodies. They also won't

00:15:46.660 give it to you if you're admitted. So if you go to the emergency room and they say they're going to

00:15:51.020 admit you, you have to ask, can you give me the monoclonal antibodies in the emergency room?

00:15:56.320 Because if you cross the doorway, Fauci and the government won't let you have it once you cross

00:16:00.840 the doorway from the emergency room to the hospital. Everybody needs to know this because you have to

00:16:05.440 take into your own hands your healthcare and people are still getting sick and dying from COVID,

00:16:10.640 but you need to take this into your own hands because the government is still completely screwing this up.

00:16:15.300 I don't understand. I just don't understand. I can't find good reasons for any of this stuff

00:16:21.260 happening. Rand Paul, thank you so much. Thanks for standing up for the constitution. Thank you for

00:16:26.320 everything that you're doing on COVID-19 as well. Keep up the fight. Senator Rand, you bet. Senator

00:16:32.460 Rand Paul. So I am trying to eat healthier and I am, but the thing is I don't like healthy food. I don't

00:16:39.800 like any of it. You've heard of a fat suit, right? I mean, there's got to be, when are we getting a

00:16:44.500 skinny suit? Something that will make me look skinny because I just want treats all the time. I grew

00:16:49.980 up in a bakery for the love of Pete. The bad news is no skinny suit is coming. You actually have to do

00:16:55.100 the work, blah, blah, blah. That's why I am eating Bilt Bars. It satisfies my sweet tooth, but it's a protein

00:17:01.580 bar, but not like, you know, that's like eating stuff at the bottom of my chalkboard. Usually this is a hundred

00:17:07.340 percent real chocolate. It's low carb, low sugar. If I'm eating a protein bar as a treat, come on, you gotta

00:17:14.000 know it's good. And I am mint brownie cookies and cream. The new flavors that are coming out all the

00:17:18.700 time. They're fantastic. Go to BiltBar.com and use the promo code BEC15 for 15% off your order. Your mouth

00:17:27.480 is going to water. Just looking at them. Trust me, BiltBar.com. Promo code BEC15.

00:17:37.400 This is the best of the Glenn Beck program.

00:17:48.560 I've known Justin Haskins for quite some time. Uh, I think we first met when I read about him, uh,

00:17:55.020 putting together stopping socialism.com. Is that when we first met? Uh, we didn't meet.

00:18:00.280 Yeah. We called you. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And, uh, I just thought, and you were young at the time,

00:18:05.420 weren't you? I'm always young. I'm still young. Come on. What are you talking about? No, but I mean,

00:18:10.420 I think you were like in your twenties or just out of college or something like that. Uh, yeah. Like

00:18:14.500 mid twenties. Yeah. Okay. Um, and now he's the editorial director at the Heartland Institute, uh,

00:18:20.660 and also the coauthor of the new book that we have coming out in January, uh, all about the great

00:18:27.940 reset. And this has been a very difficult book to write because it's very complex. It can easily be

00:18:35.920 dismissed as conspiracy theory if you don't have the facts. And quite honestly, when we started talking

00:18:43.480 about it a year ago, year and a half ago, I don't think we had a handle on it. Nope. Uh, and I'm not

00:18:50.260 sure we still have a handle on it, but the more we learn and the more facts we gather,

00:18:55.960 the more frightened, uh, we become that, that the world is behind the eight ball.

00:19:03.560 Yeah. Without a doubt. I think when we, when it first started, you and I looked at this as this

00:19:09.440 is some sort of a plan to institute socialism or Marxism or something like that. It is not much worse.

00:19:15.600 It is so much worse. I would, I started all of this out. Um, you know, I spend a lot of time

00:19:21.020 working on socialism. That's my background. Yeah. And I'm so I'm terrified of socialists.

00:19:25.480 Right. Right. And I thought that that, that was the worst thing that could ever happen

00:19:29.520 would be AOC, Bernie Sanders, they get power. Now I don't think that that's true.

00:19:34.300 You know, it's crazy because you and I worked on the book arguing with socialists. Um, and

00:19:38.680 I was convinced you were convinced that's what was really going on. Once you understand the great

00:19:46.320 reset, you understand those are, those are useful idiots. They're rubes. That's right. Um, it is,

00:19:52.240 it is everything the left used to put into movies about the corporation. America is becoming a giant

00:20:01.400 corporation. It is public private partnerships with the great reset. It is why you've been shut down,

00:20:08.360 but home Depot is okay. That's right. You've been shut down and your doctor can't give you a shot,

00:20:15.220 but CVS can you're, you can't have a medicine that does isn't, isn't the recommended medicine,

00:20:23.680 uh, by some government group that is helping pharmaceuticals get rich. It's crazy what's

00:20:30.840 going on. At some point, the left realized the elitists in the left, we're not talking about

00:20:36.460 grassroots democratic socials. They realized at some point that corporations and big money and

00:20:44.580 the establishment, it would be so much easier if we could just find a way to buy those people off

00:20:49.900 and get them on board. Yeah. Why are we fighting with them? They have so much power, so much political

00:20:54.520 clout. They're in bed with establishment Republicans. How can we get them on board? So they created this

00:20:59.520 system and it's been rolled out over the past decade or more, uh, ESG scores. We've talked about

00:21:05.880 that a bunch of times before using central banks and the banking system to buy off corporations,

00:21:11.780 to take the corporations over who they, they won't go along with, with their plans to kick out leaders

00:21:18.060 who won't go along with their plans and to put in place a system that guarantees that we're going to

00:21:24.620 move towards a progressive, uh, uh, well, authoritarian, authoritarian, fascist, globalist state.

00:21:33.780 Yeah. It's crazy. There's really no easy way to define it. No. Um, now I'm going to give you some

00:21:39.460 information about a meeting that happened on September 1st at the world economic forum.

00:21:44.520 Uh, and I want you to really understand what's being said here. Tell me about the two people that

00:21:51.200 are involved, right? So this is an interview, believe it or not, between the head of the world

00:21:55.140 economic forum. Yeah. And by the way, anyone who says it's a conspiracy, we're telling you go to the

00:22:00.740 world economic forum, listen to them. They're openly discussing it. Absolutely. They published

00:22:05.440 this interview on their own, on the world economic forum website. It's between the head of the world

00:22:09.700 economic forum, Klaus Schwab, one of the most outspoken supporters of the great reset of resetting the

00:22:14.940 global system of forcing America to come along with it as well as other countries around the world.

00:22:19.440 And Christine Lagarde, who is the head of the European central bank, that's the bank essentially

00:22:25.180 for the European union in the Euro. It's sort of like the fed, our fed. Exactly. So he asks the head

00:22:31.520 of the European fed about the role central central banks should have in society. Now, what is our feds

00:22:39.420 charter? Our feds charter is very simple. What is it? Our feds charter is to ensure that the monetary system

00:22:47.780 is, you know, stable. Yes. Stable and to watch for inflation. Right. That's it. So she said,

00:22:55.420 now listen to this. What role can central blank banks play in the fight against climate change?

00:23:01.840 Well, that's a highly controversial issue. There are some traditional thinkers who believe central

00:23:08.660 banks should altogether stay out of that business and exclusively concentrate on inflation and price

00:23:16.840 stability. That's the charter of the Fed bank. I strongly disagree with that. At the ECB,

00:23:25.480 the Fed of Europe, we now have wrapped up and concluded our strategy review, which was the first

00:23:33.040 one in 17 years. And I was blessed to have an entire governing council unanimously agree that the fight

00:23:41.620 against climate change should be one of the considerations that we take when we determine

00:23:46.660 monetary policy. So at least the European central bank is of the view that climate change is an

00:23:52.320 important component in order to decide on monetary policy. OK, you can say, well, that's good because

00:23:59.020 climate change is really important. That's not the scary part. Listen to what she says.

00:24:04.880 After acknowledging central banks should get involved in this, Lagarde said people are going to have to

00:24:11.780 suffer and sacrifice. Listen to this. And that takes me to your second question, Lagarde said.

00:24:20.040 Can we arrive at the tradeoff between fighting climate change, preserving biodiversity and yet securing

00:24:28.720 enough growth to respond to legitimate demands of the population? Listen to that again. Can we fight

00:24:37.060 climate change and secure enough growth to respond to legitimate demands of the population?

00:24:44.860 Legitimate whatever they define as legitimate demands. And my first answer, Klaus, to be firm

00:24:52.600 is that to have a way of life, we need life. And in the medium term, we have major threats on the horizon

00:25:02.540 that could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of people. So we must think life first. We have to

00:25:11.120 think of way of life second. Do you understand, America, what that means? You have elites that you

00:25:22.220 never elected that are having these meetings. They are out in the you have Davos. Davos is the World Economic

00:25:31.460 Forum. So you have all of those elites that go to Davos every year deciding what is a legitimate need

00:25:41.880 for you and telling you that your needs are going to go away in your lifetime.

00:25:49.380 You may not see a time where you get wants again. Just your needs are going to be addressed. Am I reading

00:25:58.280 this wrong? No, this is absolutely what this is. What is being said here? She's very clear that we need

00:26:05.180 to make sure that way of life is second to life. We have to save all of these people. Hundreds of thousands

00:26:12.120 of people are going to die from the supposedly existential threat of climate change and put

00:26:17.500 their their their wants and their desires and their high quality of living. All of that has to come

00:26:23.260 second. And she later went on to say that this and make sure that the cost of it, she's talking about

00:26:29.900 the cost of of these climate change policies. Make sure that the cost of it is not so high for some

00:26:35.480 people. For some people. That's right. For some people that they just cannot tolerate it. I think

00:26:43.320 that the tradeoff that we reach will probably require some redistribution because it is clear

00:26:49.640 that the most exposed people, the less privileged people are those that are going to need some help.

00:26:55.600 So this is a central bank saying this. This is not an elected official who's accountable directly to

00:27:01.080 the people. There's a central bank saying we're going to print money. We're going to use monetary

00:27:05.500 policy to impose these ideas to rework society in order to accomplish our goals. Now, you can say,

00:27:12.680 well, that's just the Davos crowd and that's just the European Central Bank. Where's the Fed on this?

00:27:20.040 Where's our Federal Reserve? Where are they on this? They are moving in the exactly the same direction,

00:27:26.820 exactly the same direction. And there's been people who have been openly talking about this. In fact,

00:27:32.860 there was this article in Bloomberg that was published, I think it was in late August. And

00:27:38.080 the article, it was incredible, was designed to defend people who were criticizing the Fed for not

00:27:43.940 doing as much as the European Central Bank. That was the point of the article. And in the article,

00:27:48.620 they report on what's been going on here in America. And they said, Powell, that's the head of the

00:27:53.280 Federal Reserve here. And the Fed's board of governors created two new entities, the Financial

00:27:57.820 Stability Climate Committee to focus on the broader financial system and the Supervision Climate

00:28:03.740 Committee to focus on individual institutions. This matters because it means top officials are

00:28:10.320 committed to regularly evaluating and responding to the threat, the threat of climate change.

00:28:14.640 They're already working to ensure that banks embed climate change in their business decisions,

00:28:21.220 analyzing exposures, identifying concentrations of risk and considering how to manage them over time.

00:28:27.980 This is not just about climate change. This goes into ESGs. Now, let me tell you about the Great

00:28:38.080 Reset's creepy youth movement that is going on. And I want you to understand, this is not just the

00:28:47.300 United States of America. This is almost every country on planet Earth, either coming to it

00:28:55.100 on their own free will or being strong armed into it. We are talking about a global government not led by

00:29:05.380 the United States of America. Why do you think we're being systematically dismantled? You cannot bring

00:29:12.340 the world up to America's standards. You must bring America down low to the world's standards.

00:29:21.640 That is what's happening. And it's really important for you to understand, as I've been saying a lot

00:29:28.380 lately, this is going to come like a thief in the night. It is so far well underway.

00:29:37.100 But you must be informed. You must be informed. People think that you are our children are being

00:29:47.020 indoctrinated into Marxism, but that's not really the goal. And a few honest teachers and teachers unions

00:29:55.500 have been very clear. It is to make your kid into an activist. Okay. It's not about reading,

00:30:04.720 writing and arithmetic is about indoctrinating them to get them to become an activist. Why is that so

00:30:13.580 important? Because as and you've seen this with with Greta Thumbert, she's sort of the the epitome

00:30:19.600 of this whole idea. They believe that they can use. There's two goals to this. The first, I think,

00:30:26.300 is that they believe that they can use kids as a prop to try to get things done because kids are

00:30:30.340 sympathetic. Politicians are not sympathetic, but children are sympathetic and they can go out

00:30:34.820 there and they and they don't understand. They haven't been involved in these things for decades.

00:30:38.500 They don't know who the players are. And so they're happy to go out there and protest in the streets

00:30:43.360 and become activists and all too willing to do it. BLM is a very good example. There's lots of people

00:30:48.480 that went out and because they said black lives do matter. I agree with that. But they didn't know that

00:30:53.620 it's black lives matter ink run by a bunch of white people, many of them over in Europe that are just

00:31:00.440 sowing the seeds of discontent and taking all of that money. So they have they're not looking beyond

00:31:09.180 the message now. They are the World Economic Forum in conjunction with its global shapers, their youth

00:31:19.200 activation program, which has ties to Al Gore and his climate work, has just published a millennial

00:31:27.160 manifesto that has six principles for activism. It's I mean, when did the Davos people say, you know

00:31:36.660 what? We need a manifesto for our children. But this is what they're pumping to our children. I just want

00:31:43.880 to go through them quickly and stop me if if there's something you think needs to be put in one. We will

00:31:48.980 create space for intergenerational dialogue. That seems great. We'll ask big questions to advance

00:31:56.500 bold solutions. We will pursue systems of change and collective action. We will build bridges within

00:32:05.400 across communities to strengthen the structures that work and dismantle those that don't really

00:32:11.480 important language. We will set ambitious goals and move from talk to action. We will focus on local

00:32:18.860 changes that can lead to global transformations and celebrate our progress. We'll make space for

00:32:25.420 diverse lived experiences. We'll embrace uncomfortable conversations. We'll surrender our privilege and give

00:32:33.720 everyone a seat at the table. We'll engage to listen, understand and co-create solutions. We'll create

00:32:41.220 brave spaces for ideas to be heard, questioned and challenged. Yeah, right. We'll recognize the complex

00:32:48.120 intersectionality of social change. We'll call it will care for ourselves, others and our ecosystem. Right. What what people need to

00:32:58.580 understand is that there are literally hundreds of these groups all over the world with thousands of members, youth

00:33:05.180 members who are being given this material and being trained by the World Economic Forum to become youth activists in the

00:33:13.240 streets. And in other documents that the World Economic Forum has put out, they've said that the reason for this is so that these

00:33:19.400 groups can put pressure locally on their political leaders to go along with the sort of great reset agenda. That's the goal of all of

00:33:27.800 this. An international network of youth activists like Greta Thunberg, who can go to their local governments and demand these changes in the

00:33:36.140 streets and force these politicians to shout down children. It is why it is so important for you to act locally because they are

00:33:45.420 acting locally. This is what really is happening. And I got to tell you, anybody who thought they were freedom fighters, you know, the 60s, 70s, 80s,

00:33:54.140 whatever. You have the Davos people training your children in groups to help the the biggest globalist George Soros types of the

00:34:09.020 world who are flying out to Davos every year. You have them training them on what they have to do for fairness. It is insidious and it is

00:34:22.000 everywhere. We will have more on this in the coming days and weeks and the new book on the Great Reset by myself and

00:34:30.500 Justin Haskins will be coming out, I believe, in January. You need the facts on this. Thank you, Justin. Appreciate it. Thanks, Glenn.

00:34:40.280 The best of the Glenn Beck program.

00:34:42.260 I was going over the script for tonight's Wednesday night special with the writers and this was last night and

00:34:55.060 they have they put some facts in there that shocked me. Absolutely shocked me. Tonight, you're going to see

00:35:05.060 what the federal government. They're they're they're grabbing on to three crises that are going to change

00:35:13.400 the world and going to change America permanently. Climate change, COVID and January 6th.

00:35:24.060 Uh, January 6th has been, uh, just the facts on January 6th. I do about 10 minutes on that tonight.

00:35:31.560 Those will melt your brain. It's stuff that nobody knows. Nobody has asked questions on, uh, and you

00:35:40.140 don't have a right to know it's if you think it's if you think things are bad, you need to understand

00:35:47.680 what's really being arrayed against you. And that is, uh, tonight. And there are things that we can do

00:35:55.260 about it and they're important that we do. And we'll give you that information tonight on blaze

00:36:01.360 TV blaze tv.com slash Glenn. If you join us now, please support us. Uh, we are, uh, I, we are entering a

00:36:13.440 very difficult, uh, time period in our country and for broadcast and people like me, uh, please support us.

00:36:20.400 If you find anything of value, if you don't, that's fine. But if you do find something of value that we do,

00:36:25.300 please join us, uh, so we can help continue to get the word out at blaze tv.com slash Glenn. Use the promo code

00:36:34.960 Glenn and you'll save, uh, on your subscription. Uh, do we have Seth Rogen on? Cause I'm excited for some comedy.

00:36:43.920 Wrong Rogen there. Glenn. It's Josh. Yeah. Oh man. He's got bad news. Much better connected. I think to the Trump, uh,

00:36:51.300 to the Trump white house and what's actually going on here. Yeah. Uh, so, um, uh, Josh Rogan is a great

00:36:58.620 writer, not, he's not political. He'll call them where they land. Sure. Um, and he had unprecedented

00:37:05.720 access to the, uh, white house under Donald Trump. And he said it was chaos under heaven. Uh, he said it

00:37:12.820 was, you know, um, a, an administration that was divided and split against itself and at war with itself.

00:37:21.000 But he has an interesting, uh, take on what general Milley is reported to do and his sources are,

00:37:29.580 uh, meticulous. I mean, he really makes sure that what he has to say has been sourced, uh, and can

00:37:38.740 be backed up. You know, I wanted to get his opinion when I, I heard the news about Milley. The first

00:37:43.600 person I wanted to hear from was Josh and I'm glad he's on the program with us today. Hi, Josh. How are

00:37:48.420 you? Great to be with you. So, uh, this is a really weird thing because we don't know exactly

00:37:56.180 what happened and I don't want to accuse, I don't want to accuse anybody because this is so serious.

00:38:02.980 I'm kind of like strangely Donald Trump today who said, I'll believe it when I see it. But if it's true,

00:38:09.120 it's real trouble. Explain what happened and what your sources are telling you.

00:38:17.280 Right. So I have the same reaction. It's shocking if true. So I decided to do what I do,

00:38:21.900 which is to call up people who were in the room to figure, try to figure it out. And so over the

00:38:26.540 past 12 hours, I've actually gathered up a ton of information. I'm happy to share that all with

00:38:29.840 you and your listeners right now. And basically it's more complicated than the way it's been covered.

00:38:34.900 Surprise, surprise, right? It's always, you know, and your intro is exactly right. If you remember

00:38:40.480 at the end of the Trump, it was pretty chaotic. There was a lot of stuff going on and all the

00:38:46.100 different parts of the government weren't talking to each other. So, you know, what I discovered is

00:38:50.380 that yes, there is some truth to the fact that, uh, at that time, both in October and then in January

00:38:55.880 after the Capitol, uh, uh, incident, there was Mark Milley was making calls, not just to the Chinese,

00:39:02.100 but to lots of other countries. And he was basically saying to them, Hey, listen,

00:39:06.540 I know you've seen some crazy stuff on the TV. Don't worry. Nothing's going to happen. We're

00:39:10.220 going to be fine. Now, the details of what he said in those Chinese calls, that's what Woodward and

00:39:15.880 Bob Costner trying to say is new, right? Oh, he warned about, we're going to warn you if you don't

00:39:22.300 attack, right? Those details are in dispute. Okay. And what's weird about that, of course,

00:39:27.480 is that the only person who probably could have given that information to the, to Woodward is Mark

00:39:33.640 Milley, right? So why would he say those things if they weren't true? So it makes people believe

00:39:39.720 that there's, those are true, but the larger context, and this is really important is that

00:39:43.920 he wasn't doing this all by himself is that he was actually working with at the time, defense

00:39:48.220 secretary, Mark Esper and others, but he wasn't telling everybody. So the white house didn't know

00:39:53.760 what the Pentagon was doing. The Pentagon didn't know what the state department was doing. So NSC

00:39:58.380 didn't know what parts of the white house was doing. And now that this all comes out in a book

00:40:02.140 a year later, it seems shocking. And it was like, Oh my God, how could that have happened? But if you

00:40:07.560 pick, pick through it all, you'll realize that some of it's true. Some of it's disputed. Some of it

00:40:12.380 seems like it's not true. And in the end, what you've got is a very complicated story that can only be

00:40:17.280 really resolved by one man. That's Mark Milley. The only way we can really figure out what Mark Milley said,

00:40:21.740 you know, is talking to Mark Milley or that Chinese general, but I don't think he's going to return.

00:40:25.940 I don't think so. So you have a general Mark Milley, allegedly calling what the book describes

00:40:34.820 a friend for many, many years, who is in the joint chief's role over in China, an enemy country saying

00:40:44.940 that we want you to know, uh, you know, we're not going to launch missiles and, uh, you know,

00:40:51.300 we're not going to go to war. And if we do, if that's what's happening, I will call you and give

00:40:56.960 you the heads up. That is so unbelievably, that's the allegation. So unbelievable that that could have

00:41:05.600 happened. And what's crazier is how many people on MSNBC and others are saying that's okay.

00:41:11.880 I wouldn't condone that with Joe Biden, uh, and Afghanistan. Sorry, that's not the way things

00:41:18.860 work in the United States of America. How much of that do we think is true?

00:41:26.640 Right, right. So it's really, it's really, uh, important question because, you know,

00:41:31.840 right. So we can say that the fact that he's calling people in China is not necessarily a scandal.

00:41:36.820 That's kind of what people in his position do. The fact that he didn't tell people in the White House

00:41:41.300 about it, well, that's kind of messed up, but again, it's not a, uh, uh, some sort of illegal

00:41:46.200 act. It's just, it's just him being him. You know, he thought he was in charge.

00:41:51.640 We dropped you. He thought he was in charge. Okay. He thought he was running U.S. foreign policy,

00:41:57.200 and that wasn't his job at the time, and he's not supposed to be doing that. And that's the real

00:42:01.180 question is like, how much is he freelancing? And how much is he conspiring with Nancy Pelosi

00:42:05.280 to guide our foreign policy in a way that the president of the United States wasn't aware of?

00:42:09.740 And why is he doing that? No, wait, wait, wait. I think it's important that you stop and explain

00:42:14.360 the Nancy Pelosi thing, because there was a story that came out about Nancy Pelosi, uh, that looks

00:42:20.460 like she was read in on this. Well, this is also in the Woodward book, according to the book,

00:42:26.640 according to the reports about the book, Pelosi called Millie and said,

00:42:29.920 Donald Trump is crazy. He could do anything crazy. He might launch a, uh, a military coup. Are you going to

00:42:35.160 stop it or not? And according to the book, Mark Millie said, okay, don't worry. I got this. You

00:42:39.700 know, basically I agree with you. I'm not going to let Donald Trump launch a military coup or launch

00:42:45.420 a nuke against, uh, China. And I'm going to tell everybody in the Pentagon that they shouldn't let that

00:42:51.340 happen without talking to me first. And again, that sort of gets to the core question, which is

00:42:55.760 like, do we really think that was happening? Right. This is the real breakdown in our discourse,

00:43:00.040 in our society. And a lot of the, all the mainstream media takes it as sort of a, uh, uh,

00:43:04.640 just a, uh, a truism that, that Donald Trump was capable of launching a nuke against China for some

00:43:09.840 reason. But I was there and I'm in the mainstream media and I never saw any evidence that he was

00:43:13.440 going to do that. In other words, we could, you can easily over, over analyze and overblow the,

00:43:20.000 the, the, the level of, of, of what happened on January 6th and what happened on in that,

00:43:25.200 inside that white house. There were some bad, there was some crazy stuff that happened,

00:43:28.620 but no, we weren't about to nuke China. So why is Nancy Pelosi telling the joint chiefs of

00:43:34.120 chairman to, that we have to prevent Trump from nuking China? Maybe she wasn't, you know,

00:43:39.740 being objective either. Maybe even Mark Milley wasn't being objective either. Maybe in those

00:43:44.700 last days, you know, they lost their minds a little bit too, like a lot of people. So it's a

00:43:50.520 judgment call. And, you know, and that's why we have civilian leadership over the military.

00:43:54.860 So if we were at a situation where the speaker of the house and the joint chiefs chairman were

00:43:59.920 trying to prevent the president from having control over the military, yeah, that's crazy. But

00:44:04.840 that doesn't mean that's entirely Trump's fault because I never saw any evidence that he was

00:44:09.540 about to nuke China. So where did they get that from? And why are they talking about that? Why are

00:44:12.980 they warning the Chinese about it? And, and, and, and, but by the way, that is not, even if they really

00:44:20.040 did think that that was going to happen, that's not their role. If they believe that, then the general

00:44:28.560 should put his stars on the desk of the president and say, I cannot work with you. I think you're a

00:44:34.800 very dangerous man. Leave the white house, alert the press and stand there next to the speaker of the

00:44:41.180 house who also believes that and present the evidence to the American people. The American

00:44:46.460 people would not have stood behind a coup. Some would have, but the United States of America,

00:44:52.620 we, we are law abiding. We respect our system as long as we believe it's fair. But even when we

00:45:00.620 think it's not fair, we want investigations. Um, this is not the way you run a constitutional

00:45:09.360 republic. This is the way you run a banana republic. Exactly. And remember that after January 6th,

00:45:16.720 Mark Esper wasn't there. So now at this point, General Milley, the, the big, the head uniformed

00:45:21.920 official in our military, the, we're supposed to have civilian control over the military. He's doing,

00:45:26.860 now he's doing this on his own and that's not his job again, if the reporting is true. And so,

00:45:32.420 so that's also say, we got to hear from General Milley. He's got to tell us what he did and what he

00:45:36.180 didn't do. And we have to realize too, that like, you know, he's become a politicized figure for

00:45:41.000 sure. But a lot of that is his own doing, you know, how, how do we have 17 books with inside

00:45:46.980 background quotes about General Milley's personal conversations about how General Milley saved the

00:45:51.340 republic from the crazy president, Donald Trump, right? That doesn't, that's not an accident. You

00:45:55.340 don't have 16 books come out in the space of three months with all these General Milley, you know,

00:46:01.120 stories about how he's the hero and how he was the guardrails. And we wouldn't even have a

00:46:05.360 democracy if it wasn't for General Milley. And then everyone's, oh, why is General Milley politicized?

00:46:10.600 Well, yeah, that's because, you know, he's been put up on this pedestal and the Democrats built this

00:46:15.780 pedestal, right? They built it for a reason. It's because the, they, they, their January 6th

00:46:20.720 hearings are coming up and they want Milley, they want him on that stand, right? This is what this is

00:46:24.620 about for them. They're, they want to prevent Trump from running for reelection. And whether you're not,

00:46:29.080 whether you're for Trump or against Trump, again, this is a manipulation of the system. And that's

00:46:33.540 what I object to. I'm not saying Donald Trump did everything right. I'm not saying General

00:46:37.660 Milley did anything, everything wrong. I'm saying that we, the reason that we have institutions is

00:46:41.920 so that the Speaker of the House and the Chief Chairman don't have to have a phone call about

00:46:46.140 telling China we're not going to nuke them because that's not how democracy works. That's not how our

00:46:50.060 system was designed. You know, what the Democrats will of course say is like, oh, well, this was an

00:46:54.140 unprecedented situation because the president was like, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.

00:47:00.120 I don't even think he was clinically insane. Like, I don't agree with him on a lot of stuff.

00:47:04.520 I think he did a lot of crazy stuff, but there's no evidence that he was about to nuke China. So

00:47:08.560 you can make the same case about Joe Biden right now. His behavior, everything he's done

00:47:18.040 has been a detriment to the Republic. In my opinion, he looks as though he's just looking for

00:47:25.500 pudding 90% of the time. Now that doesn't make that, that doesn't, that doesn't give you the

00:47:32.560 right to go around him and you evoke the 25th amendment and you speak out and you present a

00:47:40.720 case. You don't go around the elected president of the United States, period. I don't care who it is.

00:47:47.840 And just on that point, but if you think about it, how much, how much, how much president Biden

00:47:54.020 be thinking about general Milley, who's still the joint chief chairman who now he knows is willing

00:47:59.200 to do all of this stuff without telling the white house or telling everybody in the white house at

00:48:03.360 least. And he's still, he's still in position. He's a highly politicized figure who went through

00:48:09.120 all these controversial, you know, incidents. Did he handle them all perfectly? Of course not. I guess

00:48:14.120 nobody would, but that's a problem for the Democrats. If they, if they think about it for

00:48:17.980 two seconds, they realize that now he's a huge, they've built him up to be this hero. They're

00:48:22.780 venerating him as he's the guy's like one miracle away from full canonization in Washington. And

00:48:28.100 after that, he'll be able to tell president Biden to go screw himself if he wants to. And the Democrats

00:48:32.980 will have a lot of trouble, you know, taking a sledgehammer to the pedestal that they just built for

00:48:36.900 him. Josh Rogan. Thank you so much. Um, it's, I appreciate your clear thinking and your even handedness

00:48:43.320 on everything. Thank you so much. I know, I know. And I appreciate it. Not a lot of people do that.

00:48:48.820 Uh, columnist for the Washington post. I don't know how, but he is author of chaos under heaven.

00:48:54.560 Must read Josh Rogan. Thanks.

The Glenn Beck Program - September 15, 2021

Best of The Program ｜ Guests： Sen. Rand Paul, Justin Haskins, & Josh Rogin ｜ 9⧸15⧸21

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript