The Glenn Beck Program - September 29, 2020


Best of The Program | Guests: Sen. Ted Cruz & Salena Zito | 9⧸28⧸20


Episode Stats


Length

39 minutes

Words per minute

171.17224

Word count

6,773

Sentence count

11

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Join us tonight as we get ready for tonight's debate between Sen. Joe Biden (D-Delaware) and Donald Trump (R-Illinois) in the Democratic primary debate. We discuss the demographics of the vote and how they affect the outcome of the election.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 hello america and uh welcome it is the uh tuesday podcast as we get ready for the debate that's
00:00:07.920 really what this podcast is all about today debate debate and the senate don't miss a second
00:00:14.640 yep uh make sure you don't miss tonight's coverage as well on uh on my youtube channel it says
00:00:19.440 stewdoesamerica.com we'll get you the link to the youtube channel just go there and subscribe
00:00:22.860 tonight uh we're gonna start at 8 p.m eastern with the stew does america debate pre-show then
00:00:28.960 at 9 p.m the debate starts you can watch it on the stew does america youtube channel uh watch it
00:00:34.240 with friends watch it with us uh we're gonna not gonna be talking over you're gonna still be able
00:00:37.480 to get the debate but we'll throw in our comments and quick fact checks here and there when we can
00:00:41.460 um that is gonna be myself pat maybe steve days will stop in it's gonna be a great crew
00:00:45.520 then at 10 30 uh the debate post show you can get that uh on youtube or at blaze tv.com um the promo
00:00:53.540 code is glenn debates you can save 20 bucks off your subscription you're gonna go through all the
00:00:57.740 debate stuff that's going on great crew is going to be there all of us will be there as well as
00:01:02.180 ali stuckey and um uh dave rubin i believe these are the people that you want to hear from not the
00:01:08.420 talking heads on the network that you know exactly what they're going to say blah blah blah don't miss
00:01:14.700 it tonight blaze tv.com the code is glenn debates uh or uh youtube.com search for stew i'll be the
00:01:21.880 first show there join us tonight grab some popcorn as we watch joe biden grab a kid and sniff their hair
00:01:25.980 you're listening to the best of the glenn beck program
00:01:37.100 i've been writing the numbers on this and and uh you can play with the percentages of vote and see
00:01:46.380 who's you know if trump has to do better than he did last time to win with the changes in demographics
00:01:53.000 if everything plays out the same same turnout for each uh group and each group has the same vote
00:01:59.880 share trump will lose the election so he has to do better than he did so let's let's let's roll some
00:02:06.040 numbers can we roll numbers and okay so let's roll some numbers let's say trump what did trump have
00:02:10.820 with uh african-americans last time yeah so here's yeah well african-americans he had nine uh eight
00:02:15.980 percent of the vote of african-americans let's bring that up to 15 of the vote okay i think that's
00:02:21.320 reasonable maybe not yeah i mean that's not candace owens says he's gonna get 30 i don't know about
00:02:27.700 that no but if he goes eight if he goes eight percent to 15 of the african-american vote he would
00:02:32.560 then win the election however as you point out still lose the popular vote by about three million
00:02:37.520 okay let's go hispanics up four percent think that's possible including the uh are we changing
00:02:45.100 african-americans back to their no no leave that okay uh okay so four percent so yeah do i think 0.76
00:02:50.760 it's possible yes i mean he's okay 28 in 2016 give him 30 so 30 okay uh white uh male or white uh
00:03:03.620 voters that are on or have no college education so it's broken up into white non-college graduates
00:03:09.220 and white college graduates so go very differently yeah go give uh give uh white no college what did
00:03:15.660 he have he had 69 of the vote last time 70 okay take him up to 70 here and uh the graduates what is
00:03:23.060 that one uh he won 46 of white college graduates 42 so he's going down yes okay there's more college
00:03:34.140 graduates that are a little older now okay and then anything else you want to change uh asian
00:03:39.120 others the other category we haven't moved at all no i don't i don't know okay so that would give
00:03:43.960 uh a result of joe biden 308 electoral votes donald trump 230 wow and leave his leave his numbers
00:03:53.460 alone trump's numbers alone on white college educated okay so we'll move him back to 62 there
00:03:59.300 whatever he had 46 excuse me yeah whatever he had last time just the same number okay that would be
00:04:05.280 donald trump 306 joe biden 232 that's how tight this is these things move by one and two percent and
00:04:12.240 they move the entire election um again in that scenario however donald trump loses the popular vote
00:04:18.260 again now they've already been coming after the electoral college for the past few years they will
00:04:23.220 of course ramp that up even higher if this happens to get him it's interesting to try to find a way
00:04:27.820 let's say we give 15 of the african-american vote that's up from eight we go uh from 68 to seven or
00:04:35.560 excuse me 28 to 30 percent of the hispanic vote um we'll keep all that the same and we go from let's
00:04:42.860 say 72 percent of white non-college graduates then we start getting into basically a tie in the popular
00:04:48.480 vote so is it possible for donald trump to go from 68 to 72 percent of white non-college graduates
00:04:53.840 very possible um and now that has him losing no uh white college graduates though and that's the
00:05:01.660 part where i think he's struggling the most you know it's you're talking it's you know you look at
00:05:06.420 this again it's suburban moms it's it's that type of uh group that seems to be uh the issue here for trump 0.94
00:05:14.020 um now you can also play with the turnout so if even if he stays around um let's say 70 percent a
00:05:22.840 little bit less but you start cranking that turn up up he you know instead of 50 i think the turnout
00:05:27.380 for white non-college graduates was 55 percent the the turnout for white college graduates was 72
00:05:34.220 so white college graduates turn out much much higher numbers than whites that do not did not
00:05:40.760 and i think that number is going to go higher uh turnout for white non-college graduates uh college
00:05:46.540 graduates higher than 72 yeah and i think it could go higher could go higher uh for non-college
00:05:54.840 so let's say let's let's crank those up a little a couple of points each how about uh black turnout
00:05:59.780 up or down up what do you think i think up yeah um hispanic uh turnout maybe down or flat because
00:06:13.140 because it was the wall last time yeah right um yeah okay that is uh so playing with that a little
00:06:20.540 bit we now have donald trump at 310 electoral votes joe biden 228 however once again biden still wins
00:06:29.420 the popular vote i mean it you know as long as he has a couple of states ahead in the electoral college
00:06:38.480 as long as he wins yeah you know two states or three if it's one we're screwed uh because they
00:06:45.300 will just dismantle it they'll find a way but if he can lose at least one state to their meddling
00:06:51.620 you know what i mean then i think you're okay you know look if you win 310 electoral votes there
00:06:58.700 might be an argument to change the electoral college that the left will make right we can expect that
00:07:03.040 there's not an argument that the election was fraudulent now the democrats as i pointed out
00:07:09.260 before in every election of my adult life that they have lost they have said it was a fraud and
00:07:14.360 it was stolen every single one of them so they will say that again in almost any circumstance right
00:07:20.980 i mean they're almost no matter what happens they're going to say it was stolen from them
00:07:24.500 but is it going to be credible with the american people now like there was you could argue that for
00:07:29.620 a good chunk of the american people the bush gore thing was credibly stolen now it's not true all the
00:07:35.920 media recounts show the opposite the george w bush won the election fair and square but remember the
00:07:42.160 days when you could trust the media at least that much where you could say after the recap they were
00:07:47.540 in the bag for uh al gore yep but eventually they came out and said no we've done all the recounts no
00:07:53.840 matter how we recount it george bush wins yeah unless you came up with some fraudulent standard some crazy
00:07:58.560 standard that anytime we you know any any it was a ridiculous thing they had to do to get to any
00:08:03.300 other conclusion the the the ones that were counted by the media that came back with the standards that
00:08:08.740 were accepted were all in the favor of bush and look bush won the election but there's probably 35 40
00:08:15.320 percent of america that sits back and says that was actually al gore's right um for that to happen i think
00:08:21.660 you have to have your right coming down to one state that's very close maybe two states that are very
00:08:27.060 close i mean if you look back at the clinton election with trump you know we they were in
00:08:32.300 if about 40 000 people changed their mind and switched their votes appropriately spaced over
00:08:37.660 four states uh the the election swings to clinton so that was a very close election when it comes down
00:08:45.040 to the number of votes that would have needed to be switched i mean that can give you maybe some
00:08:48.840 confidence uh that that uh it's very difficult to steal an election that was a stealable election it was
00:08:56.120 and i think they learned that i think that might if they could suppress i think their their goal is
00:09:01.740 they learned from remember they were meeting to figure out how to win this election or take this
00:09:07.240 election or shut him down um on inauguration day they all met on inauguration day and laid these things
00:09:15.380 out so they've been looking for ways to make sure that that never happens again and if it was stealable
00:09:22.960 then it will be stealable this time i think too part of the situation last time is they were very
00:09:27.580 confident right they thought they were going to win without the need to pull any shenanigans this time
00:09:33.180 is look this is the craziest election we're ever probably going to see uh so you say they're not
00:09:38.480 confident you say they're not confident i don't think i think they're terrified about what happened
00:09:43.680 last time right and i think they are i think that they are terrified but really really confident uh
00:09:53.340 in some regards because of how many tools they have on the table you know what i mean they have so many
00:09:59.920 ways to rig this switch this it just takes a little it takes just a few of those things to go a little
00:10:08.640 right none of them have to go entirely right just a few things going a little right and they can turn
00:10:14.860 the tables and i think they are i think they're arrogant i mean why would the democrats suddenly side
00:10:23.620 with violence in the streets uh with you know repealing your guns they're they're not they're they're not
00:10:31.680 moderating at all no they're going the opposite they're going the opposite joe biden is outwardly
00:10:36.420 running a more leftist campaign than he ran in the primary and there's only two reasons for that
00:10:40.940 you know something that we don't know and so you don't care anymore or you're so misguided that that's
00:10:47.380 who you think america is and yeah there's no indication of that's who america is i think that's
00:10:54.560 who the democrats are they are a far left you know group of crazy people and i think they believe
00:11:01.320 things like the the coronavirus plus the george floyd stuff plus all the stuff that's been
00:11:08.840 happening is allowing them to go further than they normally would in an election i think they see this
00:11:13.940 as an opportunity to push farther than they ever would i mean this is progressivism 101 right you take
00:11:19.160 what you can get and they think they can get more and look there's nothing signaling to them that
00:11:25.000 they're losing this race we can all sit here oh no i keep hearing so many people on the right
00:11:30.240 so confident that trump is going to win because he quote unquote won last time and the polls had
00:11:35.160 clinton favored well again set your set your expectations here a little bit the polls are
00:11:41.220 better for joe biden now than they were for hillary clinton and it is and in joe biden is not hated and
00:11:49.080 joke right and that was the secret weapon of hated that was the secret weapon of donald trump in 2016
00:11:54.320 yes everyone including the people voting for her hated hillary clinton they don't feel that way
00:11:59.680 against biden correct they think he's they're worried about him being um losing it a little bit
00:12:04.600 that's all true but they don't despise him right they also i've heard this from several people who
00:12:10.420 vote for or were going to vote for joe biden i just he's not a radical right he's not a radical
00:12:16.360 so he can surround himself with radicals but he'll he'll overpower they will think that they will think
00:12:22.940 that well he's going to be in charge and then you follow it up with does he seem in charge well i
00:12:28.920 don't know i mean he's not going to run if he's you know if he's if he's in dementia that's why
00:12:35.920 tonight is so important he has to be seen as placating the radicals he has to be seen as a
00:12:43.240 you know doddering old guy you know like you know like our all of our grandfathers get eventually
00:12:49.320 you know he's got to seem like that if he can pull off that he's not that he's strong he's alert
00:12:55.300 he's got it you know he makes the typical joe biden gaffes but he just holds it together this is
00:13:02.120 going to be a very good night for joe biden i will tell you if i were joe biden i would i would try
00:13:07.800 to approach this with the eye of having a moment you know the sister soldier moment everyone always
00:13:13.520 talks about from the bill clinton campaign a moment where you say i'm not gonna pack the court
00:13:19.140 yeah i'm not gonna i'm not we're not defunding the police none of this is on the table for me
00:13:23.820 i don't want any of it all this crazy i don't want to add states and and and all that stuff that that
00:13:30.460 you keep hearing suggested that donald trump keeps saying i'm doing i'm not doing any of that i don't
00:13:34.420 want any of that i love this country the way it is yeah if he has that sort of moment which i don't
00:13:39.180 know that he's capable of i think his whole party would would revolt all right make sure you're
00:13:43.520 watching the debates we're gonna have the pre-coverage with stew then we're gonna have
00:13:46.720 the actual coverage and then afterwards we're all getting together and talk about the debates make
00:13:50.920 sure you join us for all of it or at least some of it uh special promo code glenn debate at uh blaze tv.com
00:13:58.960 slash glenn
00:14:00.280 this is the best of the glennbeck program and don't forget rate us on itunes
00:14:08.440 ted cruz senator from the great state of texas and author of a new book that comes out i think
00:14:17.780 today one vote away how a single supreme court seat can change history a great book where he explains
00:14:25.560 how it already has and uh and let you noodle on what it means for the future ted cruz how are you sir
00:14:33.140 glenn i'm doing terrific how are you doing today i'm good i'm good uh i want to
00:14:38.420 get to your book here in a second first any thoughts about the debate
00:14:42.280 well i i think the debate uh it ought to be interesting i think there'll be some fireworks
00:14:50.140 my assumption is biden will take a couple of shots at trump and i think trump will take several shots
00:14:56.700 at biden uh what i hope happens is that we see a real contrast of ideas and a contrast of visions
00:15:03.900 i i think we win if we contrast free enterprise with socialism i think we win if we contrast
00:15:11.080 the rule of law and the constitution and bill of rights with chaos and anarchy and riots in the street
00:15:18.360 i i think joe biden wants to make it just a personality contest on whether or not you happen
00:15:25.020 to like donald j trump they think they win that i don't know if they do or not but i know and i'm
00:15:30.440 confident we win if we focus on the competing visions and what's better for america so um
00:15:36.420 in a related question i'm worried about losing the presidency but i am terrified of losing the
00:15:42.660 presidency and the senate and there's a real chance of that
00:15:47.080 the the two are closely correlated uh if you look at the senate seats that republicans are defending
00:15:54.480 they're they're in purple states they're in states that are tough and most of the outcomes the
00:16:00.400 presidency and the senate go together we either win both uh or we lose both so there there's a couple
00:16:08.120 of very narrow slices where you win one or the other but in all likelihood it's it's it's all good
00:16:14.520 or all bad and and glenn if we wake up in in january of 2021 with joe biden chuck schumer and nancy
00:16:22.680 pelosi in charge god help us god help us they will do more damage in two years than obama did nate
00:16:30.000 uh i don't think we i i don't think we i think the fundamental transformation of america is done
00:16:36.020 at that point unless we have the supreme court holding to not the republican point of view i don't
00:16:43.600 want that i want somebody who's holding to the constitution will the if if uh amy coney barrett is 1.00
00:16:52.100 is uh pass through and and and wins her nomination uh is that enough on the supreme court
00:17:01.340 to be able to hold this country together well i think she is a strong nominee i think the decision
00:17:09.160 to nominate judge barrett may well be the single most important decision president trump has done in
00:17:14.880 office uh as you know i've got a brand new book came out today uh called one vote away uh how a
00:17:23.080 single supreme court seat can change history and and and the book uh before i was in the senate i was
00:17:29.280 a supreme court litigator uh what i did for a living is argued cases in front of the u.s supreme court
00:17:34.720 and and what the book does is each chapter talks about a different constitutional liberty
00:17:40.040 so there's a chapter on free speech there's a chapter on religious liberty there's a chapter
00:17:45.400 on the second amendment there's a chapter on u.s sovereignty there's a chapter on democracy and
00:17:50.660 elections and it talks about bush versus gore i was part of the legal team that represented george
00:17:55.920 w bush and and the case went all the way to the supreme court in a contested election we could easily
00:18:01.420 see that this november and and what the book does is it really tells inside war stories of of what's
00:18:08.780 going on at the court it takes you behind the curtain who the justices are what they're doing
00:18:13.860 and and many of the landmark cases in each of these areas uh i litigated and and and so i tell the the
00:18:21.140 behind the scenes who the parties were what was going on and and and i'll tell you it really is
00:18:26.900 striking on on issue after issue after issue so many of the landmark cases are five to four meaning
00:18:34.200 we're just one vote away one more leftist judge is the difference between losing our rights to free
00:18:40.720 speech religious liberty the second amendment versus preserving and keeping those rights well we have
00:18:46.240 john roberts who i think has been wrong on all of the big constitutional uh questions i don't even know
00:18:53.320 who he is anymore i mean he just seems like he's worried about pr or i i don't know what um but
00:19:00.100 do you go ahead it's painful and unfortunate and i've known john roberts 25 years uh john was a
00:19:08.080 former clerk to chief justice rehnquist uh as was i um and and i gotta say what has happened to john
00:19:15.160 in the last couple of years and particularly this term uh has been horrific he has become
00:19:21.180 sander day o'connor and and personally i think it's driven by antipathy for donald trump
00:19:28.180 uh it is difficult to imagine two people more antithetical more opposite than john roberts and
00:19:36.220 donald trump and and and there are a whole series of decisions this term where john roberts sided with
00:19:42.740 the left on the court in a way that was really inconsistent with the constitution inconsistent
00:19:47.380 with the laws and one of the things i try to do in this book one vote away that the last chapter
00:19:52.680 is all on supreme court nominees and how to get it right yeah and it traces the history of supreme
00:19:58.700 court nominations going back to dwight d eisenhower and if you look at it and you know this glenn
00:20:03.940 democrats are nearly a hundred percent virtually every democratic nominee votes exactly as the
00:20:11.800 democrats would want in almost every case republicans terrible at this what we don't even bat 500
00:20:18.400 and and and there's a clear pattern there's a difference between when we get it right when we
00:20:23.400 get it wrong if you look at those justices who stayed faithful to their oaths who stayed faithful
00:20:28.740 to the constitution antonin scalia clarence thomas sam alito uh chief justice william rehnquist my former
00:20:37.080 boss every one of them had a long proven record as a conservative they had stood up for the constitution
00:20:44.880 they were constitutionalists and this is the critical piece they had been excoriated by the press they had
00:20:50.860 been pounded by the press and they hadn't wavered that's what produces results that was what produces
00:20:57.200 consistency on the other hand when republicans have a stealth nominee someone that doesn't have a record
00:21:03.400 someone that hasn't been criticized a hundred percent of the time they turn out to be a disaster
00:21:08.460 all right so do does barrett have that long record
00:21:11.380 ted sorry does yeah does does does uh barrett have that record record the audio we lost the audio
00:21:20.500 with ted are you can you hear me ted uh okay you're you're coming back sorry sorry glenn the audio is
00:21:25.320 fading in and out okay i'm sorry i'm asking if amy coney barrett has that record that long record
00:21:30.400 you know i hope so uh her credentials are very very strong she was she was first in the class at
00:21:35.940 notre dame law school she clerked for justice scalia she's been a law professor at notre dame for
00:21:41.860 20 years she has been one of the most respected appellate judges in the country for the past three
00:21:47.740 years um she's also a mom of seven kids which which is amazing i can't even imagine doing that
00:21:54.520 much less doing that along with everything else she's done um and and so i i i hope she proves
00:22:01.600 a strong and consistent constitutionalist my preference is always for a longer proven record
00:22:07.880 but i think everything we know know about her uh is is strong and encouraging okay um you're in your
00:22:16.640 book you do break down uh gun rights chapter three of religious liberty school choice uh abortion free
00:22:25.380 speech crime law and order uh and then democracy and the electoral uh process all of those are about
00:22:34.320 to be lost all of those are about to be lost how go ahead go ahead every every one of them is hanging
00:22:44.040 in the balance let's let's start with with free speech uh one of the things i talk about in in the book
00:22:50.300 is is the case citizens united now a lot of people have heard of citizens united the democrats hate
00:22:56.160 that decision they attack it constantly most people don't actually know what citizens united concerned
00:23:01.360 citizens united was a a non-profit organization that made a movie critical of hillary clinton and the 0.90
00:23:09.600 obama administration wanted to find them for criticizing hillary clinton and the question there was can we
00:23:16.360 as as citizens criticize our politicians at the oral argument the obama justice department justice
00:23:24.280 sam alito asked the obama doj under your argument could the federal government ban books if it disagreed
00:23:32.020 with the book if it didn't want the book to criticize a politician could it ban books and the obama doj said
00:23:38.380 yes we could ban books now fortunately the supreme court rejected that radical proposition but the vote was
00:23:46.240 five to four there were four justices willing to take away our free speech rights to make it give the
00:23:53.360 government the power to make it illegal to make movies to make books to criticize our politicians
00:23:58.660 that is i think a profound threat uh to our liberties in the book that ted's just put out
00:24:06.020 one vote away he talks about the electoral process which ted if the president and there's a good shot he
00:24:13.240 wins again without the popular vote the the democrats are prepared with states just to say
00:24:21.360 we're delivering all of our votes for the um uh for the electoral college to the popular vote winner which is
00:24:28.980 not that's not the way it works can they do that and how do we hold on to the electoral college which i think
00:24:38.200 is the most important thing for the balance of our country well i'm deeply concerned that we're headed
00:24:45.980 for a period of chaos in in the weeks after election day um i think by any measure this could be a close
00:24:52.620 election and if it's close joe biden has already made explicit that if he doesn't win he intends to
00:24:58.540 challenge the legitimacy of the election uh bush versus gore as you mentioned there's an entire chapter
00:25:04.020 talking about bush versus gore the last time we had a significant contested presidential election
00:25:09.460 uh in the courts uh i was a young lawyer i was on the george w bush campaign at the time in fact
00:25:15.380 heidi and i met on that campaign we were at cubicles about 20 feet apart from each other on the campaign
00:25:21.560 um i was down in tallahassee the entire time of the recount recount it was chaos on election night
00:25:28.740 george w bush had won the votes were counted he won he was declared president and then the votes
00:25:34.480 were close enough that al gore challenged it and he filed a whole series of lawsuits all throughout
00:25:39.800 florida seeking to to reverse the outcome of the election and what he was seeking to do
00:25:44.720 was throw out votes that were for george w bush and try to find new votes that were for him and then
00:25:50.460 that's what anyone in a recount if you've lost your incentive is keep counting and counting and counting
00:25:55.460 till you can change the outcome well it was utter chaos i remember we had a war room with a white 0.78
00:26:02.340 board we had seven different cases all on the white board any one of which could could flip the
00:26:09.080 presidency of the united states that case went to the u.s supreme court twice the first time we won
00:26:16.200 unanimously nine zero the supreme court vacated the decision of the florida supreme court sent it back
00:26:22.060 said they got it wrong the second time it went up to the court we won seven two on the violation so
00:26:28.760 seven two the supreme court agreed what was happening in florida violated the equal protection clause of the
00:26:34.420 constitution but critically we it was five four on the remedy on the outcome where five four the court ruled
00:26:42.540 enough is enough we've counted the votes the votes have been counted four times george w bush has won
00:26:48.540 all four times under the law the election is over it's time to move on that decision we had 36 days
00:26:57.840 of uncertainty of chaos the country in the world didn't know who the next president was going to be
00:27:03.000 i think we could see it much much worse this year instead of just one state florida i think biden if he
00:27:10.380 loses could challenge in three four five states simultaneously uh we could see chaos you know there's this
00:27:17.300 group i'm sure you know about called the the transition integrity project oh yeah and it's a
00:27:22.120 group of biden supporters hard uh democrats and leftists but graybeards in the democratic party
00:27:29.240 and then also a bunch of republicans who are never trumpers who hate the president also so they're almost
00:27:33.740 all biden supporters and they ran through what they called war games about the election and they had
00:27:40.620 john podesta play joe biden now john podesta as you know was bill clinton's chief of staff
00:27:46.240 he was hillary clinton's campaign chairman so but that's podesta is a respected figure in the
00:27:51.620 democratic party he played joe biden in the scenario that they labeled clear trump victory so clear win
00:27:59.420 what podesta playing biden did was challenge the outcome of the election get democratic states to send
00:28:07.160 electors who who voted for biden even though the people in the states didn't vote for biden and and
00:28:14.260 actually in this scenario they had three states california oregon and washington try to secede
00:28:19.740 from the country it is we could be facing real chaos i and it's why we need a non-justice supreme court
00:28:26.960 i agree with you uh we in fact i have a special tonight going through those actual transcripts to
00:28:32.860 uh show the american people uh these are radicals that will not accept uh no for an answer ted cruz thank
00:28:40.320 you very much ted cruz uh his new book is out today uh it is one vote away how a single supreme court
00:28:48.340 seat can change history a lot of behind the scenes the best of the glenbeck program
00:28:55.200 you are of course a columnist for the new york post a national political reporter for
00:29:04.400 washington examiner co-author of the great revolt which uh talked about the first race in 2016 and
00:29:12.260 what the media missed uh what are you feeling today because i'm about to throw up i'm so nervous
00:29:18.620 well you know i totally get that i i also feel you know sort of you know like racy heart kind of
00:29:27.540 anxiety feeling right i think that's pretty normal especially if you are a political junkie like you
00:29:33.900 and i are but where the majority of americans are not as obsessed you would think they were based on
00:29:41.780 the constant coverage on on uh cable news and or uh on on social media that you know most people
00:29:51.180 though not live and die by american politics i i think that going into this evening uh the onus
00:30:00.100 is on joe biden to do a number of things to uh either win voters over earn someone's vote
00:30:09.600 or he's possibly going to lose votes uh not necessarily that will go to trump but people
00:30:19.760 will take a look at him and saying depends on what lane you're in they could look at him and say a
00:30:25.480 number of things first of all he's too far left or he's too moderate uh but the third problem and
00:30:31.860 i think this is the one people are sort of anticipating is that he's not on his game anymore
00:30:38.580 and that he uh has lost a step i don't think that gaps are his problem right i think that his problem
00:30:49.480 is saying things like he went to an historic black college which he did not those are not gaps those
00:30:56.180 are problems but also don't you think i think there's a lot of people that that i've talked to
00:31:02.520 at least that are voting for donald trump i mean uh for joe biden and they they say well he's not part
00:31:08.980 of the hard left so if he right if he looks like he's part of the hard left that's a problem but
00:31:13.700 but the other thing is they always say he's not part of the hard left and i mean he's just going
00:31:19.600 to get the job done and he'll keep those people at bay but if he doesn't look like if he has a moment
00:31:25.480 where he's confused or or any of us senior moments i think people are also tuning in to see
00:31:33.720 if he is going to be if he's if he's actually there do you hear that concern at all right yeah
00:31:41.780 absolutely i do hear that concern and i also hear the concern from uh people uh in to your point about
00:31:49.520 being either part of the far left he's going to lose moderate voters who don't particularly care
00:31:57.540 for donald trump's comportment but think that they have a safe choice with biden if he goes too far left
00:32:04.220 he's going to lose them that does not mean they go to trump that does mean they sit at home
00:32:09.500 he also could lose people on the far left i have a really like illustrated story about this in my
00:32:18.000 latest column at the examiner where there was this house that i passed almost every day just filled
00:32:25.300 with like bernie sanders paraphernalia there was a full you know a life-size sign of him there had to
00:32:33.220 be at least 30 signs in the uh in this yard now the only there's one tiny little sign in this yard
00:32:41.180 that says meteor 2020 so if biden you know those are the undetected voters right those are the ones
00:32:50.560 that you have to if you're a democrat and if their needs are not met that they're going to just sit it
00:32:59.220 out and essentially say hey you know what we told you guys we wanted someone left you gave us biden
00:33:06.340 he doesn't have our back he's not with us on our issues we're not showing up and y'all can just have
00:33:12.800 donald trump wow so if if he's asked tonight about the police which he should be asked about um he he has
00:33:23.240 not rail uh reigned in the violence until very recently and then he's even he's even come out
00:33:30.620 and said the only one that's talking about defunding the police is donald trump is that going to be
00:33:36.120 effective no you know there's this assumption that by the by the um political strategist and uh in in
00:33:47.480 in large part by my profession that they still think it's 20 years ago where people don't have
00:33:53.500 the access to look things up and find out if it's true um because we have such a large distrust in my
00:34:01.780 profession and quite frankly we have earned it uh people are not going to take what someone says
00:34:08.220 at face value as being the god's truth and so they're going to look up and say is he consistent
00:34:15.360 on this well no actually he's not and he's not he is but when he falls into that trap of being
00:34:23.160 considered a typical politician which by the way the base on both sides are vehemently against yeah
00:34:33.080 okay and if you start speaking like a traditional politician and he is one he spent 40 years in
00:34:40.160 washington if he starts throwing out big words and concepts and trying to sort of talk down not just
00:34:48.400 to trump but to voters he really has a problem in earning their uh support the um the article you
00:34:57.640 wrote forgotten counties will make their voices heard is i mean everybody should read this um you talk
00:35:03.280 about a county that was democrat forever notoriously democrat and these small counties little by little
00:35:12.020 have been moving towards uh the republicans and you talk about one where it was lopsided for the
00:35:18.360 democrats forever and now it's a republican the the um registration has gone off the charts for the
00:35:26.220 republicans there and you mentioned several counties in pennsylvania are like that is is that enough
00:35:32.600 i mean donald trump needs every single vote he can get uh in some of these states um just to just to
00:35:42.860 battle the the possibility of a rigged election are the numbers for trump do you think solid and bigger than
00:35:52.700 they were in 16 so what i think was in in 2016 i wrote in august of 2016 there's 10 counties to watch
00:36:02.140 that if just 2 000 or more voters showed up in these counties uh for trump over romney that trump would
00:36:08.040 win didn't matter what happened in philadelphia didn't matter if hillary clinton was able to replicate 1.00
00:36:14.200 obama numbers and or exceed them he would still win and i said by 40 000 votes it was actually 44 000 votes
00:36:23.720 those numbers those numbers need to increase uh i'm not increased they need to remain steady
00:36:31.320 plus they need to draw out one percent more voters to be able to offset the philadelphia numbers again
00:36:40.240 doesn't matter what the turnout is what matters is is if you get this one percent more also i'm really
00:36:47.940 keeping my eye on the top tier counties in pennsylvania that go from warren all the way over to
00:36:56.800 wackawana these are the counties that i call the energy counties and these are in in agriculture
00:37:03.640 counties these are counties where a lot of voters did not show up for trump even though they would
00:37:10.160 uh were republican but because they thought the way he talked was more like a liberal democrat from
00:37:17.760 the outer Bronx of new york right now he has a record and the record is something that they're very
00:37:24.000 very supportive of uh energy workers because of loosening of regulations but also uh agriculture
00:37:31.780 voters because of the trade deal they love that trade deal now you you draw out about 2 000 more
00:37:39.580 voters in those eight counties and again the same scenario exists also you have to continue to draw out
00:37:47.340 voters in those original 10 counties and almost all of them have switched their registration from
00:37:52.260 democrats to republicans in the past four years i will tell you that i know a lot of people like
00:37:57.300 me that there's a first election in 2016 first election i didn't vote for a republican or a democrat
00:38:03.780 uh i voted for an independent that's the first time i've ever done that and i know a lot of people
00:38:09.260 that did that or just didn't vote uh because they couldn't vote for hillary clinton and just
00:38:14.340 couldn't vote for donald trump he didn't have a record they didn't believe in him
00:38:18.180 now now they do and those people come out yes absolutely i had a story just about a week and
00:38:25.860 a half ago from cambernet county pennsylvania and i walked into the county republican office
00:38:30.980 these are one of those counties that that has changed their registration there was a gentleman
00:38:35.780 there who was in his 50s who'd been a democrat all of his life did not vote for donald trump in 2016
00:38:41.700 and switch was changing his party affiliation along with several dozen other people there was a line
00:38:48.740 outside the building uh and then he was voting for trump this time these are the people if y'all
00:38:55.380 read uh the great revolt in the back of the great revolt is a uh a poll that we did who were in with
00:39:03.140 self-identified trump voters in michigan wisconsin pennsylvania ohio and iowa and we asked them did you
00:39:09.540 tell a family member friend or a pollster that you were going to vote for trump 34 of them said no
00:39:16.420 and 2016 is like a disney movie compared to what we're experiencing right now
00:39:22.020 all right selena thank you so much we'll talk again um and by the way happy birthday
00:39:27.140 thank you glenn 20 again