The Glenn Beck Program - Best of The Program ｜ Guests： Thomas W. King & Carrie Severino ｜ 9⧸21⧸20

00:00:00.000 hey podcasters what a show today actually uh was a really fun show and uh you know you never know

00:00:06.560 what to expect uh these days it could be okay we're all gonna die or like today i think a fun

00:00:12.100 show even though we're all gonna die um we tell you all you need to know about uh what the the

00:00:19.460 house and the senate are saying what the democrats what the far left is saying what the president is

00:00:24.920 planning on doing and we talked to carrie severino from uh judicial crisis and the judicial network

00:00:31.740 uh and she said some really positive and encouraging things we can get this done there's no excuse to

00:00:39.660 not get this done by election day uh 33 days for o'connor uh ginsburg it was only a 42 day process

00:00:47.780 uh 19 days for stevens it can be done and all of these guys have already had their fbi vetting

00:00:55.500 they've been seen by the senate before they've testified in front of the senate so we can we can

00:01:02.400 go and donald trump tells us we'll go by saturday find out all about it on today's podcast

00:01:08.860 you're listening to the best of the glenn beck program

00:01:19.200 i think we just need to start with uh first of all the president uh finding out uh while being

00:01:31.360 asked a question by the press he comes right off of the stage from a rally and they're playing

00:01:37.220 if you don't know this already it wasn't uh it wasn't something they added but he comes right

00:01:41.880 off the stage and everything i mean seeing i'm like oh no no no no no no no wait what is he gonna

00:01:48.120 say everything that he said is exactly what you've ever wanted from donald trump listen

00:01:54.860 walks up to the press

00:01:58.380 she just died wow i didn't know that i just uh you're telling me now for the first time

00:02:09.760 she led an amazing life what else can you say she was an amazing woman 0.92

00:02:17.540 whether you agreed or not she was an amazing woman who led an amazing life

00:02:23.360 i'm actually sad to hear that i am sad to hear that thank you very much

00:02:29.540 so absolutely true and fantastic now i don't believe he didn't know because he had to you know

00:02:38.980 he had to tell him to up the morphine just to push it no i'm kidding

00:02:42.480 uh but uh uh that is the way the president should have reacted i think that's the way everybody

00:02:49.040 reacted well i was out to dinner with a bunch of friends uh on friday and uh none of us were

00:02:54.540 wearing masks i mean we wore a mask while we were standing up to come in and out but then when we sat

00:03:00.560 down they said we could take our masks off which made total sense it's a covid free zone when you're

00:03:05.420 sitting at a restaurant table yeah right right right right um so anyway we were at dinner and my first

00:03:11.460 reaction was oh no oh no oh not another log on the fire this is a big big log this is the yule log

00:03:19.580 they're just this is the third log that doc brown put into the steam engine right before it went off

00:03:27.300 the bridge yeah that's this is the last log this is number three um and uh so my reaction was that

00:03:34.420 first uh and then i told everybody at the table that she had just died and everybody did the same thing

00:03:40.400 that is that's sad sorry to lose her and especially at this time and it's not like

00:03:48.020 we didn't like her rulings no she was a you you mourn for her family and the people who knew her and

00:03:56.740 you know i want people to live i actually respect all human life so yeah would uh would want everyone

00:04:02.240 to be alive doesn't seem to be the uh opinion of a lot of people uh these days um but i know but i

00:04:09.420 will say you know as a supreme court justice she was obviously terrible well like i now what makes

00:04:14.520 you say that and she was on the wrong side of now literally every single issue okay let me let me

00:04:20.360 just say this in an interview in 2012 uh she said that she wouldn't look to the u.s constitution if she

00:04:26.740 were drafting a constitution in the year 2012 she said quote i might look at the constitution of

00:04:32.180 south africa i mean that was a deliberate attempt to have fundamental instrument of government that

00:04:37.020 embraced human rights and have an independent judiciary really i think it's a great piece of work that was

00:04:42.760 done so she wouldn't look to our constitution she'd look to south africa um also she uh she called for

00:04:50.100 the sex integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment security and

00:04:55.740 housing could be equal she said if the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates to

00:05:01.140 return to a community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society then

00:05:06.520 perpetuation of a single sex institution should be rejected okay it's a little out there i mean

00:05:12.500 might cause some problems but uh she called for the sex integration of the boy scouts and the girl scouts 0.95

00:05:17.660 because of the stereotypes of gender roles she insisted on integrating college fraternity and 0.74

00:05:23.500 sorority chapters um having college social societies she may have missed the point of the sex drive 1.00

00:05:30.960 uh you know putting all these people together she may have uh anyway um she also cast constitutional 0.95

00:05:38.240 doubt on the legality of mothers and father's day as separate holidays because mothers can be fathers and

00:05:48.540 fathers can be mothers i guess she asserted the laws against bigamists persons cohabitating with

00:05:56.260 more than one woman and a woman cohabitating with a bigamist are unconstitutional um i agree with the

00:06:04.360 way they're reading it now i happen to agree with her on that one uh she objected to laws against 1.00

00:06:08.560 prostitution uh prostitution because prostitution as a consensual act between adults is within the zone of

00:06:15.340 privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions but she's right about that the way it's being

00:06:21.440 interpreted now well thanks to her right i mean she's a big reason it's being interpreted that way

00:06:26.360 right she also said that the concept of a husband breadwinner and wife homemaker must be eliminated 1.00

00:06:32.240 uh from the code if it's to reflect if it's to reflect an equality principle she called for

00:06:38.100 comprehensive program of government supported child care she also wrote that the man act listen to this

00:06:44.560 that publishes those uh punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls

00:06:50.940 the man act that punishes those who engage in interstate estate sex traffic of women and girls

00:07:02.300 is offensive such acts should be considered within the zone of privacy

00:07:08.760 so she's not exactly not my favorite she's not my favorite she's not my favorite she also found

00:07:18.360 words offensive and she said these words needed to go from all official documents uh man woman man 1.00

00:07:24.880 made mankind husband wife mother father sister brother son daughter serviceman longshoreman postmaster

00:07:30.460 watchman seamanship uh and uh to man a vessel i i uh agree with all that except longshoreman right

00:07:38.580 right i have a strong yeah disagreement on the very strong and i understand with your history

00:07:43.160 uh she she even wanted he she him his and hers to be dropped down the memory hole uh had to be 0.99

00:07:50.340 replaced by him uh he she her him or his hers boy she's out of date huh uh not only was uh she very 0.55

00:07:58.580 pro-abortion she was also on the record uh as opposing what was settled law that the constitution does not

00:08:05.420 compelled taxpayers to pay for abortions she said fully funded abortions should be a constitutional

00:08:13.580 right again i might disagree with her here and there right she also called for affirmative action 0.50

00:08:20.360 hiring quotas for women using the police as an example she said affirmative action is called for 0.99

00:08:25.940 in this situation so anyway she's she's done a lot of things that you disagree with um however

00:08:32.460 today today today after her death i think it's important to remember one of her her really strong

00:08:42.520 arguments um she said she couldn't imagine donald trump back in 2016 getting elected um you know for

00:08:51.120 the country it could be four years for the court it could be i don't even want to contemplate that

00:08:55.980 um but so she didn't really like donald trump at all but she did come out in 2016 and uh make it very

00:09:05.880 very clear that the sitting president even a lame duck president in the last months of his term had to

00:09:14.880 fulfill his constitutional duty and she made a very very big point about this now i have heard from aoc that

00:09:24.300 her dying wish which we can't violate her dying wish is that donald trump does not nominate somebody

00:09:32.300 else didn't realize the supreme court was a make-a-wish foundation i did not uh realize that's how they're

00:09:38.380 taking her body to disneyland uh right now she wanted to see that one last time uh and this was

00:09:45.060 her final wish that was her make-a-wish this one's her final wish okay i was like really they're

00:09:51.040 we're in a dizzy world that's so weird it's so strange like 2020 you could be like okay

00:09:58.520 i was like wow all right she's laying in state in the magic castle huh okay

00:10:02.520 that's a screw to the series i totally bought that

00:10:06.460 and i'm the one on tranquilizers

00:10:11.040 oh man this is the best of the glenbeck program

00:10:20.760 thomas king is uh the attorney in pennsylvania that uh went into court fighting the covid

00:10:31.200 19 lockdown we welcome him to the program now how are you sir oh i'm just fine thank you glenn i'm

00:10:38.580 honored to be here thank you congratulations on the uh win uh tell me about tell me what you were

00:10:43.620 fighting and how it went uh we were fighting um the governor of pennsylvania and the secretary of

00:10:50.880 health like in a lot of places across the country um decided that it would be a great idea to lock down

00:10:56.980 13 million pennsylvanians in their homes and to shut down half of our businesses uh to put people out

00:11:03.840 of work um in order to to on the on the guys that uh they were going to protect the public health

00:11:09.720 um they also prohibited people from attending uh rallies for 250 people or more um or any sort

00:11:18.380 of events although our governor marched in a protest that had hundreds of people and our health secretary

00:11:24.260 did a secret deal that came out in our case that allowed 20 000 people a day to go to a car show

00:11:30.900 in carlisle and they told president trump he couldn't come to gettysburg and accept the

00:11:36.160 republican nomination if he had more than 250 people wow so what happened in the court case

00:11:43.220 um we were in front of uh judge william stickman in the federal court in the united states district court

00:11:50.720 for the western district of pennsylvania and judge stickman uh last week issued a wonderful

00:11:57.140 opinion and order um upholding the constitutional rights of pennsylvanians striking down their um

00:12:04.420 stay-at-home orders their business closure orders and uh their congregate number orders um allowing

00:12:10.820 people to have uh to go watch their kids play high school football uh have weddings uh have political

00:12:17.360 events and so pennsylvania the yoke of of uh the yoke of the of the governor and secretary of health

00:12:24.140 were lifted by a federal court from our backs and shoulders in pennsylvania last week are they going

00:12:30.440 to argue and take it up to a higher court oh they are they they've already said that they intend to

00:12:36.620 appeal um actually we have until noon today to tell judge stickman why uh he should not stay the uh order

00:12:44.660 and so we're uh after i get off this interview we're going to be uh filing with uh judge stickman

00:12:50.440 and telling him to stick to his guns and uh do not uh issue a stay so we hope that we're successful and

00:12:58.100 pennsylvania is they're breathing uh some some breath of freedom here today glenn there's um uh some

00:13:03.960 frightening things happening in pennsylvania now with the with the um vote that is coming up uh you're

00:13:12.020 looking now it's going in through your highest court on uh they're trying to get uh this cleared through

00:13:18.360 the court to be able to say you don't need a postmark for your mail-in ballot until the friday

00:13:24.440 after the election there's there's no way people will you you think that they will rule against it

00:13:31.880 they already have and it's all it's worse than that um they've okayed uh putting in these uh collection

00:13:40.000 bins um much of which is being funded by mark zuckerberg um 250 million dollars was put

00:13:48.140 into a uh a very small charity um that that he's now using to try to uh uh fund the the blue cities

00:13:57.340 and counties um to put in these boxes and um really to obviate uh what would have been years and years

00:14:03.820 of election law in pennsylvania our supreme court has already ruled that uh recently this past week

00:14:09.680 they've ruled that they're gonna they're gonna be able to count ballots three days after the

00:14:14.200 presidential election um and they're gonna collect these things in bins so there's not going to be

00:14:18.880 any postmarks on on on most of these uh ballots so it's uh really abominable i look for uh uh almost

00:14:26.860 instantaneous challenges i suspect that uh the the house of representatives will file a challenge here

00:14:33.420 and uh that that will be in federal court not in the state supreme court where the democrats hold a

00:14:39.180 five to two majority in our state supreme court because this won't this won't that americans

00:14:46.440 won't accept things like that i mean you know the rest of the country pennsylvanians might but the rest

00:14:51.800 of the country won't if you if you didn't play by the rules and you can just throw things in with even

00:14:56.560 without a postmark uh you know three up to three days after the election who's gonna who's gonna believe

00:15:03.020 that's real well i don't believe it's real and i don't think uh i don't think most pennsylvanians

00:15:09.120 think it's real um but it is certainly where we are today um and this this so-called new normal you

00:15:16.140 know when judge dickman said there is no new normal under the pennsyl under the united states constitution

00:15:22.040 there is no new normal we have a constitution and that's what we have to abide by

00:15:26.440 it's bad news glenn it's really bad news are good i don't i think i don't think people are

00:15:33.020 going to stand for it are good um good attorneys who are on the right are they volunteering their

00:15:40.800 time to to fight and to monitor and to be there to be able to file the other side because we know

00:15:47.920 the the left has attorneys already assigned all over the country yeah we have lots of we have lots of

00:15:55.560 legal power we have uh just from our case we've received uh literally dozens and dozens of offers

00:16:02.180 and calls um and so we also know that in pennsylvania we have terrific lawyers uh representing

00:16:09.880 uh the republican party and the and the and the people um in this particular fight so um i look look

00:16:17.080 forward to a to a real battle here over these recent pronouncements from the supreme court all right let me

00:16:23.460 uh just take you back one last question on on pennsylvania the ruling that happened last week with

00:16:28.760 you uh where you got a judge to say these things are uh are unconstitutional you can't lock the people up

00:16:36.700 uh like this for covid if the judge grants the stay then that means it goes to the uh higher court right

00:16:47.140 no well whether he whether he grants whether he grants a stay or not um it's going to go to the

00:16:53.760 third circuit court of appeals um which covers pennsylvania new jersey delaware and the virgin islands

00:16:59.360 and um so it'll go to that court which is the court right below the u.s supreme court but you

00:17:04.880 how what does he have to rule so you can start to open things up uh he just has to deny their the stay

00:17:12.580 deny the stay um yeah and that's that's today now they can also file again for a stay in the third

00:17:19.580 circuit court of appeals so we'll see what happens there as well okay thank you very much thomas i

00:17:24.820 appreciate it thomas king attorney for uh the pennsylvania counties that were fighting covid19

00:17:30.660 you're listening to the best of the glenbeck program

00:17:36.760 so you said you'll make the announcement this week can you tell us more about that will it be

00:17:56.500 the beginning of the week what day i think it'll be on friday or saturday and we want to pay respect

00:18:04.500 we uh it looks like it looks like uh we will have probably services on thursday or friday as i

00:18:12.740 understand it i think in all due respect we should wait till the services are over for justice ginsburg

00:18:17.980 and so we're looking probably at friday or maybe saturday so i think that's nice um i would imagine

00:18:25.920 that there are some radicals out out there going well just don't bury her for a month uh because we can

00:18:31.840 make it uh in time and i think it's really important that the republicans and the president

00:18:37.260 do this we have uh carrie severino on with us she is the president of judicial crisis uh and we wanted

00:18:43.880 to talk to her and i guess i guess carrie the first question is do we have enough time to confirm a scotus

00:18:50.000 replacement before the election uh the answer is yes absolutely you look at like justice o'connor she was

00:18:57.720 confirmed 33 days after her nomination was submitted and she was unanimously confirmed you have justice

00:19:03.260 ginsburg herself 42 days again almost unanimously and uh justice stevens 19 days now that was you know

00:19:10.580 that was you know a couple decades ago but we can we can totally do it and what's interesting is all of

00:19:15.320 these women that the president is looking at they have been recently confirmed by the senate and i think

00:19:20.200 all with bipartisan majority so the senate has seen them recently their information like their

00:19:25.920 background file from the fbi all is almost up to date already i think there's not a lot standing

00:19:31.660 in the way of moving forward we already know you know even the senators are familiar with all of these

00:19:36.560 not potential nominees okay so um he said he had a list of five but three of them we know are you

00:19:43.300 familiar with those three female judges yes yeah the three that we hear a lot about um are amy coney 0.89

00:19:50.280 barrett obviously everyone remembers her dogma lives loudly within you moment with senator feinstein last

00:19:55.400 year those anti-catholic attacks that went on she held her own with grace under pressure she's the

00:20:00.880 mother of seven including two children who were adopted from haiti just a really inspiring story

00:20:05.040 in her life barbara lagoa who uh had spent over a decade in the florida state courts now is on the 0.99

00:20:12.000 11th circuit thanks to donald trump she is the daughter of cuban immigrants um who really speaks

00:20:17.080 eloquently about her own parents uh desire to come here because they wanted their children to grow up in a

00:20:23.060 nation of laws not a tyrannical government and so she's very committed to making sure that the role 0.99

00:20:28.040 of a judge is to just interpret the law not make it up and then allison rushing is someone else the 1.00

00:20:32.480 president mentioned she's a fourth circuit nominee um she is someone who has a distinguished legal

00:20:38.020 career she clerked for justice thomas like i did she also came under fire like barrett during her 0.99

00:20:42.980 confirmation process because she'd been involved in the group alliance defending freedom which stands for

00:20:47.320 religious freedom and things like that so she understands also what it's like to be attacked

00:20:52.660 for your faith so the one that i mean let's just play politics here for a second then i'll quickly

00:20:58.000 switch to constitution but the one who makes sense i think on both sides politically and also uh with

00:21:06.140 the constitution is uh barbara lagoa i mean the background of her being cuban she's from florida 0.98

00:21:13.020 cuban and then uh more importantly being the first american generation i think those people get it

00:21:21.640 much more than anybody else and i think that that's a strong vote for her on sticking to the

00:21:29.120 constitution would you agree or all three of them that way who's the best on holding to the

00:21:35.440 constitution do you think you know the great thing about that these these final shortlisters that we're

00:21:41.880 we're hearing about i honestly i think all of them would be outstanding i could put my seal of approval

00:21:46.660 on all of them in terms of what i've seen of their record on the court so that's really encouraging

00:21:51.060 yeah they all have slightly different stories but i think all have inspiring stories and it's

00:21:56.700 interesting they're going to all thankfully very much diverge from where justice ginsburg would be in

00:22:02.420 terms of her jurisprudence right but i do think they carry on that same tradition of being strong

00:22:07.160 women you know being path-breaking in many ways um you know in particular when you think of barrett 0.65

00:22:13.540 you know doing all this with seven kids how many how many mothers of seven do you know who are

00:22:16.840 that accomplished in their field and have have risen that far uh lagoa obviously with her

00:22:21.620 your inspiring story of coming here and and being the first generation so it's these are these are

00:22:28.080 people who can really fit into that um that legacy nicely in terms of all of the best things i think

00:22:34.100 about justice ginsburg of of her uh her strength and her courage do you um do you see any of these

00:22:41.920 fitting a scalia or a thomas kind of standard oh that's that's the reason they're on the list

00:22:49.020 right i mean you've got people like barrett who was a scalia clerk and i've heard one of his favorite

00:22:53.000 clerks uh rushing was a thomas clerk um and and uh lagoa didn't clerk for either one of them but i i

00:22:59.360 love that there was a meme that went around right after she was nominated it said lagoa it's spanish

00:23:03.380 for clarence thomas um in that and that's really how i think a lot of the conservative

00:23:07.680 movement in in florida views her i don't think she's has as much you know known as much nationally

00:23:13.560 but so i think all of them that's the reason they're picked is this approach to the law where

00:23:18.040 you look first and foremost at what the text says it's not what i wish it said it's not what i think

00:23:23.380 in 2020 we should update it to say it's what did our elected representatives pass what does the

00:23:28.360 constitution itself actually say and then you know let the chips fall where they may and if it's not the

00:23:33.660 result you want go back to congress and fix it so you were just concerned i think all americans are

00:23:38.400 just concerned that we would have another roberts pick that oh yes you know that's been devastating

00:23:44.680 devastating well that's why i think what you're seeing and this is something that all of trump's

00:23:50.640 list was really chosen with robert in mind when when when uh molly hemmingwood and i were working

00:23:55.380 on a book on the kavanaugh nomination justice on trial we learned that part of his vetting process

00:24:00.560 was trying to find like the anti-roberts someone who they thought would be strong in the face of

00:24:06.140 pressure that's why it's so exciting to see people for example you know like like the the barrett or

00:24:11.980 the russian who got pressure during their confirmation process and nonetheless stood up to

00:24:16.920 it you know lagoa has had she already on the 11th circuit has had people trying to launch politically 1.00

00:24:22.680 motivated recusal campaigns and she stood firm she's like no i don't have to recuse in this case this is

00:24:27.040 an important case i i'm gonna sit on it so you have to have someone who has illustrated in their

00:24:32.320 career that they've got that spine and what's exciting is all these women i have shown they

00:24:36.800 have spines but but lagoa is the only one that hasn't been already in front of of uh a hearing 0.95

00:24:45.060 right oh no she she was just recently confirmed to the 11th circuit okay by the senate so so all three

00:24:52.500 of them have been confirmed by this senate well or this this is the previous senate but within the

00:24:57.360 trump administration so again all of their you know their their vetting has been recently updated

00:25:03.060 they have been um they've gone through that kind of harrowing process once recently so i feel like

00:25:09.640 you know we we're talking about people all of whom are ready um well if you can ever be ready for what

00:25:15.800 we expect is coming because we know that you know the kavana nomination was crazy i don't know how you

00:25:20.620 make it crazier but i know that there's democrats right now having brainstorming sessions trying to

00:25:25.580 figure out i mean but you're a little boy that cried wolf i mean you you do that a second time i

00:25:32.000 think that galvanized uh the country a lot of people changed their view of what was going on in

00:25:38.740 the democratic party because of that and to have that kind of an outrageous scene again i think would

00:25:44.940 be devastating to the democrats yeah i know i think you're exactly right they totally overstepped and

00:25:50.820 i think it really hurt them yet somehow you know when you look at all the stuff going on they don't

00:25:55.520 think they've gotten that message there's i i think that the radical edge of the party is um you know

00:26:01.900 it's going crazy and they're kind of setting themselves on fire sometimes literally in ways that

00:26:06.980 i don't think is what most americans and certainly not independents and you know the moderate

00:26:11.040 wing of the democratic party wants to see so you know have at it over overstep again let's see how

00:26:17.000 that works for you is there anything in their records that that has been drug out that uh could

00:26:23.740 be expanded as you have you seen anything that is bad or not bad but just like oh geez that's there

00:26:30.400 uh and they had to explain it but it could be made up into something bigger have you seen any trouble

00:26:37.400 or weak spots in any of these people well there's certainly stuff in their records that's going to

00:26:41.940 get controversy but i think generally it's controversy for all the right reasons you know

00:26:45.480 it's going to get stuff people going oh my gosh how could you have you know there's there's cases

00:26:50.400 where they've all ruled and someone's going to go well that's a really sympathetic plaintiff and their

00:26:53.600 answer which is the right answer to be you know what that's what the law said and i don't write the

00:26:58.120 law that's not my job as a judge so so what i what i have seen is you're of course you're going to get

00:27:03.520 controversy but i think it's going to be the right kind of controversy on these nominees that we're

00:27:07.900 looking at and that's that's really excited now they haven't none of them have had case in every

00:27:11.340 single area of law no one has um but i think we have a lot of really you know these are all people

00:27:16.320 with with records that we can look at and that's what that's what it has to come down to is you look

00:27:20.140 at the objective record that they have um so you can see how they really perform on the bench is there

00:27:25.300 anything that the democrats can do seeing that the senate is controlled by the republicans

00:27:31.000 and a lot of weenie republicans but is there anything that the senate can do uh the democrats

00:27:37.000 can do to stop this dead in its tracks is there any any trick you know in the parliamentary rules

00:27:44.200 to be able to stop this or can can mitch mcconnell if he can keep his crowd together proceed

00:27:50.880 i think if he's got 50 votes he can do it because we got we got the vice president and and i hope he

00:27:56.520 gets more than 50 votes but um you know obviously i'm i am not a senate rules expert that stuff is

00:28:02.060 crazy it's really yeah i'm sure they're out there brainstorming again trying to find some hole but if

00:28:07.560 they couldn't do it for kavanaugh i don't think they're going to be able to find it now and uh you

00:28:12.100 know we will see we'll see crazy stuff going on like where they remember what even during the first

00:28:17.520 kavanaugh hearing where they tried to just talk over chairman grassley oh it took an hour to get

00:28:22.700 stuff like that you know made for tv little moment right but i don't think they actually

00:28:27.940 at the end of the day are going to have the vote and last question um as they uh as they go through

00:28:34.580 and you're looking and saying you know they need to have 50 we're going to lose romney which would

00:28:39.740 bring us 250 uh we've got the two the two that have already said they're not on board uh and then

00:28:46.820 if you lose romney you're at 50 is there anybody else that you're concerned that might go would you

00:28:52.460 watch any of that stuff you know it's it's hard to keep track i know there's people who they don't

00:28:58.000 want to have a vote now or whatever i do think it's going to be hard when you are looking at one

00:29:02.900 of these women in the face and you see the outstanding role models that they are the path

00:29:07.380 breaking careers that they've led i think it's going to be hard to come to a point and say yeah i'm

00:29:11.020 gonna i don't think this person deserves vote so you know we'll see i think leader mcconnell

00:29:14.840 knows better than anyone where his votes are and he's going to be in charge of how to how to

00:29:18.760 navigate this to the senate he did it for gorsuch he did it for kavanaugh those are really controversial

00:29:22.880 i'm confident he can do that again that's great well you i feel so much better talking to you

00:29:27.920 uh let's please stay in touch because i'm gonna i'm gonna need to stay uh in a happy mood and i think

00:29:34.140 america needs to uh carrie thank you very much for your analysis appreciate it

00:29:38.480 nah nah nah nah nah nah

00:29:49.440 nah

00:29:51.440 nah nah nah nah nah uh

00:29:52.600 nah nah nana na

00:29:56.360 nah nana 0.86

00:29:57.240 nah nah nah

00:29:57.720 nah nah nah nah nah no

00:29:58.320 nah nah nah nah nah nah

00:30:00.860 nah nah nah nah so

00:30:02.820 nah nah nah ti Nah i nah nah NE coco

00:30:03.320 nah nah nah nah nah nah nah nah terrorism

00:30:04.280 nah nah nah nah nah nah ah ah

00:30:05.860 nah nah nah nah nah nah Salesiments

00:30:07.760 nah nah nah nah nah nah nahah

The Glenn Beck Program - September 21, 2020

Best of The Program ｜ Guests： Thomas W. King & Carrie Severino ｜ 9⧸21⧸20

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript