Ep 245 ļ½ Should the US Own Gazaļ¼ Ben Shapiro Explains Trumpās REAL AgendaĀ ļ½ The Glenn BeckĀ PodcastĀ Ā
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 19 minutes
Words per Minute
214.98685
Summary
Ben Shapiro joins Glenn to talk about the Trump administration and how the deep state can t figure out what to do with a president who's moving at a blistering pace. Glenn and Ben also talk about Preborn, a non-profit organization that rescues babies from abortion.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
This winter, take a trip to Tampa on Porter Airlines.
00:00:05.460
Enjoy the warm Tampa Bay temperatures and warm Porter hospitality on your way there.
00:00:11.420
All Porter fares include beer, wine, and snacks and free, fast-streaming Wi-Fi on planes with no middle seats.
00:00:18.860
And your Tampa Bay vacation includes good times, relaxation, and great Gulf Coast weather.
00:00:25.240
Visit flyporter.com and actually enjoy economy.
00:00:34.180
Trump is turning Gaza into Vegas and we're in a constitutional crisis.
00:00:43.060
The media and the expert class told us no one can think outside the box in the Middle East.
00:00:48.600
They warned us that moving the embassy to Jerusalem would be a disaster.
00:00:54.200
They assured us that all of the surrounding Arab nations were very passionate about a Palestinian state.
00:01:07.060
America is being shaken up like a snow globe right now.
00:01:10.380
And the deep state can't figure out what end is up.
00:01:15.160
My next guest is always good at breaking things down.
00:01:21.420
Go really, really slow so bureaucrats can understand him.
00:01:27.560
Welcome, co-founder of the Daily Wire, number one New York Times bestselling author, wildly popular podcast host, and my good friend, Ben Shapiro.
00:01:38.940
But before we get to Ben, let me talk to you a little bit about pre-born.
00:01:43.360
Imagine for a second that you made a horrible decision that's going to cost your innocent child's life.
00:02:01.740
It's now responsible for over 60% of abortions.
00:02:07.620
This is why pre-born is so important, because in addition to what they're doing with free ultrasounds, they're also administering this protocol for women who've attempted abortion but want to reverse it.
00:02:23.660
Rescued over now 300,000 babies from abortion, and every day on average they rescue another 200.
00:02:31.620
When a woman is considering an abortion, she hears that baby's heartbeat.
00:02:36.840
The baby's life, the chance of it being born doubles.
00:02:42.600
If you have the means, would you consider a leadership gift to save babies in a big way?
00:02:47.120
Your tax-deductible donation of $5,000 would sponsor pre-born's entire network all across the nation for 24 hours.
00:02:54.420
You would be directly responsible for saving 200 babies.
00:03:29.640
And three weeks in, this is a hell of an administration.
00:03:31.400
Are you, I mean, he told me several times over the summer, he's like, I got it.
00:03:38.000
And I'm like, but you, I mean, we have four years and he's like, I got it.
00:03:50.640
I've never seen an administration move this fast.
00:03:53.200
And granted, I'm not as old as you, Glenn, but, but still, I've been alive for 41 years.
00:03:58.520
I've seen a fair number of, I've seen a fair number of presidents and I've never seen anything like this.
00:04:07.060
I also have never seen a team defend itself this way.
00:04:10.240
I'm old enough to remember the Bush administration and I just remember being very frustrated with
00:04:14.440
Team Bush being totally ineffectual at defending its own agenda.
00:04:18.260
They would put out an agenda item and then they would sort of let it sit there in the legacy
00:04:21.440
media and let the legacy media spin everything from social security, privatization to the war
00:04:26.000
in Iraq and in the way that the media so chose.
00:04:30.980
And Trump's entire team is mobilized to defend his agenda.
00:04:36.660
And it's not just that they're defending the, the agenda in that particular agency, it's
00:04:44.700
And so there, I've never seen the agencies work together like this and be so coordinated.
00:04:51.400
I mean, I am, I'm blown away at how this, this is, this shows the businessman that he really
00:05:00.840
is, the negotiator that he really is, the businessman, the sharp mind that he has.
00:05:10.440
And I think that he's kind of a different person.
00:05:12.560
You know, it was kind of funny during his first term.
00:05:15.500
Well, this was the day that Donald Trump became president.
00:05:20.820
But the truth is that him winning the second time, I think, has removed a lot of these sort
00:05:25.580
of personal questions that he had maybe about his role in the world or about himself.
00:05:29.380
And it feels like he's incredibly comfortable in his own skin.
00:05:33.980
This sort of combative, angry Trump is not there.
00:05:36.560
Like he knows precisely who he is, what his job is.
00:05:39.740
He knows what the agenda is and he is enacting it.
00:05:42.480
So all the democratic attempts that you've seen, for example, that might have been more
00:05:45.460
successful in the first term to try and put a wedge, for example, between him and Musk.
00:05:49.900
You'll have Elon in the Oval Office and he'll just delegate to Elon.
00:05:54.920
And the entire media will say, oh, it's President Musk and Time magazine will put Musk on the cover.
00:05:58.680
That kind of stuff might have bugged Trump in the first term.
00:06:00.860
And this time Trump's like, well, yeah, I mean, he works for me.
00:06:04.820
And that's just that's so different and almost strange to watch.
00:06:09.180
And what they've done over the course of the first three weeks is the most transformative
00:06:15.100
If he continues at anything remotely like this pace, he's going to go down in history as
00:06:19.500
probably one of the three most transformative presidents of the last century.
00:06:23.560
And it's maybe the most transformative, depending on which way it goes.
00:06:26.380
Yeah, I mean, I think you could say he'll be next to Abraham Lincoln.
00:06:31.860
I mean, if he continues at this pace and everything gets done, I'm concerned about the economy
00:06:40.920
I'm concerned about the economy because we are we're cutting spending.
00:06:44.440
But a lot of our GDP is coming from the government right now.
00:06:51.040
And as we cut that and we cut jobs in the government, you're going to see the numbers start to change.
00:06:58.780
And have you seen have you seen the doge of regulations yet?
00:07:04.840
Because I haven't seen the regulations on business.
00:07:08.160
I haven't seen the strong unleashing of small business people.
00:07:20.100
Well, I mean, I think that everybody is concerned that it should hurry.
00:07:22.560
I think that, look, he's barely getting his nominees through at this point.
00:07:28.400
And so a lot of those regulations aren't going to get cut until those nominees are actually in place
00:07:32.660
at their various agencies cutting those various regulations.
00:07:37.500
Now, obviously, I think actually it'll be a militating factor against inflation
00:07:40.980
that will get these cuts from government spending.
00:07:42.740
I mean, you spend too much money into the economy via the government.
00:07:45.180
You end up artificially raising the prices of goods and services.
00:07:48.240
And so if you actually cut the amount of money that's kind of being flooded into the economy
00:07:52.180
and has been for the past, you know, 100 years, then what you will end up with is presumably
00:07:57.060
prices starting to stabilize, maybe going down a little bit.
00:08:02.000
As far as the tax cuts being enshrined in the law.
00:08:06.340
And I think that it'll be interesting to see whether the sort of one big, beautiful bill strategy
00:08:10.540
or the two separate bills strategy ends up being pursued here.
00:08:13.980
The way I've been talking about it on my show is that you can you can do it as two bills.
00:08:22.520
It's almost impossible to get two bills through under reconciliation.
00:08:26.300
And what that means that even if you do, let's say best case scenario, you get both of them
00:08:30.400
through, they will both be individually purer than the one big, beautiful bill.
00:08:33.920
It's just there's a lower chance of getting through.
00:08:36.180
If you did one big, beautiful bill, there's it's going to be more crap in the crap sandwich.
00:08:39.660
But you'll also get everything that you that you want on the upside.
00:08:44.960
And, you know, again, I'm sort of risk averse here, which is get everything you can early
00:08:49.380
I think that's the way also Trump is approaching this administration.
00:08:54.940
By this time next year, everybody's running for reelection and basically everything stops
00:08:58.600
So he he doesn't have two years to get his agenda done.
00:09:00.880
He basically has a year to get the vast majority of his agenda.
00:09:03.520
I said to him, you know, you only have four years and really two years before the midterms.
00:09:12.080
He said, I have to have the majority of stuff done in the first 100 days because then it
00:09:18.540
It needs time to kick in before those midterms because it's not going to turn around on a
00:09:24.320
Um, you know, it's, uh, it is refreshing to see the no nonsense.
00:09:31.960
And, and I, I have to tell you when he had Benjamin Netanyahu, uh, and they did that joint
00:09:36.700
press conference, I had a whole new level of respect for him, uh, a his negotiating power
00:09:45.360
with the tariffs and what he, he took, uh, oh my gosh, you're talking about a genocide
00:09:51.160
in, uh, with the Palestinians and you're just going to liquidate all of them and try to
00:10:05.020
It's only right and compassionate, but they got to go someplace else.
00:10:09.000
And then he said, and you know, maybe we'll build a Trump golf course, you know, maybe
00:10:15.420
That's what everybody in the middle East was talking about saying, no, no, no, no, no.
00:10:25.060
He totally changed the way everybody was talking about this because this is the thing that Trump
00:10:28.540
really understands about the middle East better than any president in my lifetime, bar none
00:10:31.620
and better than any president in American history.
00:10:33.600
So long as the middle East has sort of been an agenda item and that is, he just doesn't
00:10:37.140
buy into the sort of state department, foreign policy nostrums.
00:10:41.740
The, the kind of centrality of the Palestinian question must be solved before anything else gets
00:10:45.900
He totally blew that out of the water in his first term when he brokered the Abraham
00:10:48.980
accords by basically taking that issue and putting it to the side.
00:10:51.880
The entire foreign policy establishment said there'll be the Arab street will rise up.
00:10:56.480
If you move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and Israel, and you just did it and nothing
00:11:01.380
And now what he's basically saying is, listen, I understand that y'all are pretending that
00:11:05.800
the Palestinian issue is central to your national calculus.
00:11:08.720
I know that it's not central to your national calculus.
00:11:11.200
And in fact, you wish it to be a thorn in the side of anything that happens in the
00:11:18.200
And you have proposed no solutions at all for 80 years on this particular question.
00:11:23.180
And here I am saying, let's take some people who are obviously living in a hellhole.
00:11:29.100
And then let's move those people to a place where they're not living in rubble.
00:11:32.260
And by the way, then we can rebuild this place and actually turn it into a functioning
00:11:38.960
And everybody who's freaking out about this, I have a question.
00:11:41.500
Because it seems to me your alternative is pouring billions more dollars internationally
00:11:45.560
into a rat's nest of terror because Hamas is still running the place.
00:11:50.980
We do this whole shtick again in five or 10 years?
00:11:57.140
And so for him saying the thing that has been taboo for so long, which is this is unworkable.
00:12:06.340
People see this as something different than what he's doing with, for example, Ukraine.
00:12:12.580
I mean, this is an actual pragmatic answer to a question.
00:12:15.400
The question is, you have a group of people who do not wish to live side by side in peace
00:12:20.880
They elected a body of people who then launched a terror attack.
00:12:24.240
Many of the civilians were involved in the terror attack.
00:12:30.160
What do you do so that the future looks better than the past?
00:12:32.600
He says, OK, well, some of those people are going to have to move and then we're going to
00:12:35.160
build it up and we'll invest and we'll make it nice.
00:12:38.320
And when it comes to Ukraine, his solution there is, listen, we all known for several
00:12:42.120
years that Ukraine is not wanting back Donbass.
00:12:51.680
And that's just a question of getting from point A to point B.
00:12:54.020
And by the way, all these all the sort of isolationist talk on the one end and the and
00:12:57.480
the sort of accusations of Trump being a Russian cat's paw on the other end.
00:13:02.320
He said, listen, we are going to continue funding Ukraine sufficient.
00:13:07.360
That's what's pushing Vladimir Putin to the table.
00:13:13.520
It's just that in foreign policy, common sense very rarely seems to take the four.
00:13:18.920
It's always establishment wisdom that tends to be tried no matter how often it's failed.
00:13:22.800
Well, I think him cleaning out USAID, which is a CIA State Department, you know, operation
00:13:30.720
and saying to the State Department, you work for me and we're not doing any of this crap
00:13:38.960
That's the first time in maybe 100 years since Woodrow Wilson that the State Department
00:13:52.800
I mean, I don't know if people really understand how transformative it's not just the size of
00:13:59.880
It's the role of each of these agencies and the arm of the administration.
00:14:13.940
And what he's doing here, along with Elon, because both of them know how businesses work,
00:14:17.780
is what you would do if you ran a business and you spotted a part of your business that
00:14:21.080
was totally not working, which is you can't go in and pare around the edges.
00:14:24.080
You just have to break the thing and then you have to rebuild it.
00:14:26.840
And so if you look at USAID, for example, USAID was initiated in 61 by JFK in an attempt
00:14:32.060
And many of the things that it was doing were setting up, for example, pro-democracy organizations
00:14:36.080
in countries that were sort of wavering between the support of the Soviet Union and the support
00:14:43.140
We want to fund pro-democracy organizations in Cuba, for example, or in Venezuela to,
00:14:49.680
But that's after the Cold War that stopped and it suddenly became, for USAID, a giant
00:14:57.280
It became just a way to spread sort of blue America values abroad without any reference
00:15:02.960
And so what Trump has said, and this is what Elon is saying, too, is, OK, we'll just we'll
00:15:07.600
And then we'll figure out what was good because we can redo the good stuff.
00:15:12.560
And this is a completely different approach than any Republican of my lifetime has taken.
00:15:16.500
Republicans tend to say, OK, we need to shift the sort of policy direction of a particular
00:15:22.700
We'll find the bad stuff and like cut like a little bit off the end.
00:15:27.460
And what Trump is saying, listen, these institutions and this is not just USAID, it's a huge number
00:15:33.020
These institutions have been internally gutted by the left.
00:15:36.020
And the face of the institution has been worn around like a Hannibal Lecter mask.
00:15:40.420
And now the only way to cure this thing is to just break it.
00:15:45.100
And then if we want to rebuild parts of it that are good, we can rebuild parts of it
00:15:48.660
that are good, which is basically what Elon did, for example, with X.
00:15:53.620
And then he rebuilt kind of on an ad hoc basis how the systems had to work.
00:15:57.340
Trump is doing that with a lot of these agencies.
00:16:00.940
But it's also one of the reasons why, as you say, he has to move fast because he has to
00:16:03.860
break it and then rebuild the parts that we want to keep.
00:16:06.240
He has to do that quickly before, you know, all of these sort of resistance sets in.
00:16:11.400
The tale that he's telling right now on a PR level is really smart.
00:16:14.100
What he's doing is he's he's saying, OK, listen, we have a mountain in Pennsylvania under which
00:16:19.880
we're filing manila envelopes and that needs to be stopped.
00:16:24.240
Is that most of the waste and fraud and uselessness in the government?
00:16:28.500
But what he's doing is he's saying this is representative of the kind of thing that needs
00:16:32.300
And the only way we can get rid of this thing is to chemotherapy.
00:16:35.520
With the only way to get rid of this cancer before it spreads and already has spread is
00:16:40.520
And that's going to kill some good things, but it's going to kill the bad things, too.
00:16:45.000
All the money is still that we can redo the good things.
00:16:49.580
You know, he's going to move into two new areas, which let's just start with the Department
00:16:56.480
of Education, he came out this week and said, you know, I just want to shut the whole thing
00:17:08.320
I was talking to Betsy DeVos, our former secretary of education, and she said, no, Glenn, she'll
00:17:19.600
If that's what Trump tells her to do, she will just manage the end.
00:17:23.600
And it looks like that's what's going to happen.
00:17:26.800
What are we going to find in the Department of Education and the teachers unions?
00:17:36.380
Well, again, I think that so much of this is going to be attached to a public relations
00:17:40.000
strategy that points out exactly the kind like the worst examples of the stuff the DOE
00:17:45.720
I know my friend Chris Ruffo, we're going to have on tomorrow to talk about some of his
00:17:49.400
He's been talking about bringing out insane videos from the DOE and from DOE funded agencies
00:18:02.000
It's one thing to say the DOE wastes hundreds of millions, hundreds of billions of dollars
00:18:05.140
on educational grants that just go down the toilet and the kids aren't getting any smarter.
00:18:09.200
But it's another thing to say, here is DOE money that is going to drag queen story out
00:18:15.320
And this needs to be zeroed out and everything like it needs to be zeroed out.
00:18:21.740
Linda McMahon was involved with the American First Policy Institute.
00:18:24.020
So it's kind of fascinating to see how Trump's actually staffed the administration.
00:18:29.600
AFPI was essentially created as a think tank, as an alternative to some of the other big
00:18:34.160
think tanks in Washington, specifically dedicated to trying to flesh out sort of the philosophy
00:18:38.240
of Trump and making, you know, putting flesh on the bones of sort of the Trumpian impulse.
00:18:43.520
And he's drawing very, very heavily from that group.
00:18:45.420
So, yeah, I'm sure Linda McMahon has been thinking about this for a very long time.
00:18:48.700
And I think the ad hoc-ery of the first administration is totally gone.
00:18:52.500
This thing is working like a smoothly oiled machine, which is the last thing anyone expected.
00:18:55.960
And it's why the Democrats are freaking out right now, because they were expecting
00:19:02.320
And then there'd be a mistake and they'd have to walk it back.
00:19:04.940
And then it would just be it would be chaos because the first Trump term, it was chaos.
00:19:08.360
And it was chaos because Trump didn't have a staff.
00:19:12.500
And then he was staffed up by a bunch of people he didn't like.
00:19:16.080
He told me himself over the summer, he said, Glenn, I wasn't prepared.
00:19:24.960
I didn't know how many people were going to be put into my orbit that were stabbing me
00:19:33.220
I think the loss of 2020 turned out to be a huge blessing.
00:19:39.680
You know, it's one of those things where and this happens so much in life where you're
00:19:45.640
And then only in retrospect can you actually look back and say, oh, thank God.
00:19:50.460
It turns out that you knew what you were doing all along.
00:19:55.520
But now he had four years to sit and think, what do I do with my first hundred days?
00:20:04.760
Basically, you go off the air and within an hour, your show is dated.
00:20:13.760
And that's the other thing Trump really understands.
00:20:15.420
He understands that the news cycle can't keep up with him.
00:20:18.080
And so on a day to day level, he will drop a new giant measure literally every day.
00:20:23.060
I mean, last week he ended transgenderism in college athletics.
00:20:26.300
And then like the next day, he announced that the United States was going to be effectively
00:20:32.680
And then the day after that, he announced that he was going to be zeroing out the Department
00:20:37.340
And so by the time there starts to be any sort of point of opposition that perhaps the
00:20:41.220
the enemy of his agenda can kind of coalesce around, he's already moved on to the next
00:20:48.060
Well, I tell you, when I was at Fox, this is exactly what Obama was doing, but not at
00:20:53.020
I kept saying over and over again, they're overwhelming the system.
00:21:04.880
This is hyper speed in comparison and massive, huge, massive, huge.
00:21:12.840
And I think this is the thing that the Democrats are so upset about in kind of their gut.
00:21:17.380
What they're really upset about is that the thing that he is now dismantling is the thing
00:21:23.580
There is a permanent blue pipeline that was created over the course of the last 120 years
00:21:28.580
It was just a permanent taxpayer funded mechanism for funding their friends.
00:21:31.960
And when they were out of power, that mechanism kept working.
00:21:35.280
They just kept sending money out to the American Federation of Teachers.
00:21:37.700
They kept sending money out via USAID to blue organizations that they knew were going to
00:21:46.400
The legislature never had any real oversight over it.
00:21:49.400
He says, well, hey, I'm the head of the executive branch, actually.
00:21:54.300
And that was the thing that no other Republican had done was basically say, well, if they're
00:21:57.860
going to treat the executive when they're in power like a unitary executive, but then
00:22:01.780
shout balance of power the minute a Republican gets elected, that doesn't work.
00:22:04.660
I think one of the differences between the Trump movement and sort of the MAGA movement
00:22:07.640
and everything else, and I think this is a function of that statement that people have
00:22:15.800
The Obama era, I think, in many ways broke the country.
00:22:18.160
And I think what we're seeing now is a restoration.
00:22:20.220
That restoration can't take place unless the rules are equivalent for everybody.
00:22:23.620
I think Republicans kept saying, OK, we're going to play by the rules.
00:22:27.080
We're going to, you know, Marcus of Queensberry rules all the time.
00:22:34.740
And Trump is saying, listen, they set the rules.
00:22:38.760
And now it turns out mutually assured destruction.
00:22:41.080
If you don't like those rules being set that way, well, let's talk about switching the
00:22:45.160
But Democrats cannot in principled fashion claim that Barack Obama gets to use a pen
00:22:49.320
and a phone to rewrite the way American government has done.
00:22:51.240
And the minute Trump does the reverse, they start screaming constitutional crisis.
00:22:58.280
But the administrator, the CEO, if you will, of the administration runs the administration,
00:23:06.900
the bureaucracy that is his branch of government.
00:23:10.680
If they don't work for him, who the hell do they work for?
00:23:13.960
Well, here's the other thing is that they keep saying constitutional crisis because J.D.
00:23:21.160
First of all, the executive has struggled with the judiciary for literally the entire
00:23:27.440
I mean, Marbury versus Madison, there's a solid case to be made, is legally erroneous.
00:23:30.440
But even assuming that Marbury versus Madison is legally correct, the extent of Marbury
00:23:37.200
And even if you accept the most maximalist version of Marbury versus Madison, the court says what
00:23:40.780
the law is, nothing in Marbury versus Madison says that a federal district court judge in
00:23:45.640
Washington gets to put a nationwide temporary injunction on a presidential measure for the
00:23:51.820
whole country because there's one judge in California or Washington or New York.
00:23:57.760
I mean, that, by the way, only became an issue in the 1960s.
00:24:00.320
Before that, nobody had ever assumed that a district court judge had the ability to issue
00:24:04.020
a temporary nationwide injunction on a gigantic piece of executive action.
00:24:08.440
Before that, it was basically there might be an injunction as applied to this plaintiff
00:24:12.780
So if you sue against a law in California, maybe they put a hold on it in California,
00:24:19.020
And so if you're creating a constitutional crisis, that's largely because the judiciary is
00:24:26.440
And if and by the way, it will be found to be over its skis if it reaches the Supreme Court.
00:24:30.860
So Democrats are picking the form of their destroyer.
00:24:32.960
If they really wish to launch 100 different lawsuits claiming that Trump is wildly overshooters,
00:24:38.420
including executive power, maybe they went on two of them and maybe that power gets
00:24:45.040
And so you actually have not defeated Donald Trump at all.
00:24:48.460
All you have done is actually give the is the Supreme Court the opportunity to clarify
00:24:51.860
the unitary executive theory and actually spell out what the lines of that authority are.
00:24:56.440
Um, let me switch to, uh, well, before I leave this section entirely, let me go back to Israel.
00:25:18.380
Um, I think this is a massive, uh, negotiation tactic and like with everything with Donald
00:25:26.060
Trump, if they said, okay, you rebuild, would he do it?
00:25:32.060
Yeah, I think he would, but I don't think that's the, I don't think that's the plan, but he'd
00:25:39.700
Um, I think this is a negotiation, um, and I'm, I'm hoping that's true, but I can't understand
00:25:46.840
how Israel would even be for this, that sacred land.
00:25:50.480
I think this would be so bad in the spiritual sense for the United States to take that land
00:25:59.220
So, you know, we can, my view on Trump with Middle East is basically just let him cook,
00:26:04.100
I mean, like he seems to know what he's doing over the, right.
00:26:05.840
But I think that what he's told one, one of two things is happening with regard to his
00:26:09.920
One is a syndicated real estate deal under no circumstances.
00:26:14.200
Will there be U S troops on the ground in Gaza policing the place?
00:26:19.460
What he has talked about pretty openly is having the IDF basically do all that work for him,
00:26:23.900
Essentially having the IDF clear the ground, make sure that it's terrorist free.
00:26:28.380
And then, you know, the United States gets 99 year ground leases on all the really nice
00:26:33.280
And you get a bunch of investors from the United States and from UAE and from, and from Saudi
00:26:38.300
and from all these other places to actually put in the money to build.
00:26:41.440
I think that's kind of what Trump is thinking actually.
00:26:44.240
And so what that means for the American taxpayer is not that the United States quote unquote
00:26:48.440
owns it in terms of like, it's the 50, Gaza is the 51st state or something.
00:26:54.240
But if you're, but what it really, what he's talking about really is basically an American
00:26:59.940
economic interest in a place that could be, that could be lucrative.
00:27:05.180
So he's talking about an economic interest and he's saying that Israel should go guarantee
00:27:09.180
I think Israel would, would be very much in favor of that because I don't think that
00:27:12.640
Israel would give up probably the ground rights to the area in that circumstance, mainly
00:27:16.220
because the United States again, does not want the ground rights because then the United
00:27:20.380
I don't think the United States, I don't want us doing that.
00:27:24.020
No, I mean, no, I don't want American soldiers on the ground over there.
00:27:29.660
But having the idea of clear something and the U.S. makes money off of it sounds pretty
00:27:34.800
And then it's also possible that it's a bargaining gambit.
00:27:36.700
And basically what he's saying is, listen, I'll take it.
00:27:39.620
You guys kept shouting free Palestine and Trump said, OK, I'll take some.
00:27:43.280
But, you know, but if you guys, you know, I'm offering to like build it up.
00:27:48.420
If you don't want me doing it, I need an alternative plan.
00:27:54.280
If you want to provide me alternative, I'm happy to hear your alternative.
00:27:56.800
And we'll see whether they come up with an alternative.
00:27:59.940
But yeah, again, without getting into sort of like biblical borders of historic Israel
00:28:03.720
and whether the Gaza Strip actually is within those biblical borders, there's some questions
00:28:08.960
The truth is Israel has never wanted sovereignty over the Gaza Strip in terms of controlling that
00:28:15.720
In fact, in 1967, during the Six Day War, there was an open debate inside the war cabinet
00:28:20.900
in Israel over whether to go into the Gaza Strip.
00:28:23.260
They tried desperately to tell the Egyptians to keep it.
00:28:28.160
Like this is this has been like a perennial problem over there.
00:28:32.060
So whether it is an opening gambit for Trump to get the place rebuilt and refunded by other
00:28:36.260
people or whether it is a serious proposal that effectively that Israel is capable of
00:28:43.840
And then the United States makes bank on the on the real estate upside.
00:28:49.980
And I think that, you know, the Israelis are probably OK with either one of those as well.
00:28:57.380
And I love this because what are the Democrats going to say?
00:29:02.320
The right wing warmongers that just are always for defense every time.
00:29:08.340
When we start screaming from the rafters, are you kidding me?
00:29:18.900
Yeah, I mean, this is again, he's wrong footing them at every turn here.
00:29:22.840
And I think one of the big things that's going to happen in DOD, obviously, they're going to
00:29:25.700
be examples of screws that cost eight hundred thousand dollars and a million dollar gold
00:29:34.400
But what will happen is the giant weapon systems that are basically a waste of money are going
00:29:39.520
What you're going to see is a shift in the kinds of weapon systems that the United States
00:29:44.880
Aircraft carriers are aircraft carriers are a thing of the past.
00:29:50.240
So I was talking with Sham Sankar, who's the the CTO of Palantir, and he was talking about
00:29:55.160
the kinds of new technologies that need to be pursued by the Department of Defense.
00:29:58.740
And he has a website called 18 Theses, where he spells out what needs to happen with
00:30:03.500
He basically says this place is a bureaucratic nightmare.
00:30:08.100
Everything moves through establishment proxies, which means that there's a bunch of people
00:30:11.900
who have a stake in just doubling down on the stuff that's already not working.
00:30:15.960
And basically, you need to break the system and you make it more innovative, faster.
00:30:19.620
You need to experiment in kind of a free market way with 10 different things.
00:30:24.400
And those two that work are just groundbreaking and dominant and are new technologies that nobody
00:30:28.740
And that's where the United States really can leverage our innovative workforce and the fact
00:30:32.620
that we are a leader in innovation in every sphere to really leap ahead of our of our
00:30:38.360
That's the kind of stuff I hope that that Secretary of Defense Hegseth is going to do.
00:30:42.060
Aside from the fact, I think that it makes an absolutely enormous difference to have a
00:30:45.180
Secretary of Defense who isn't wearing a face mask to meetings.
00:30:49.600
And it's actually, you know, actually going and training with the troops and and is giving
00:30:53.320
off an image of what young men would like to be if they join the military.
00:30:57.280
I think that actually makes an enormous difference, both domestically as well as internationally.
00:31:04.560
And I couldn't be more enthusiastic about that.
00:31:06.660
But yeah, I mean, what are Democrats going to say when Hegseth and Doge go through and
00:31:10.520
they say, you know, we need to cut one hundred billion dollars from the defense budget
00:31:14.200
this year just to get rid of the waste, fraud and abuse.
00:31:33.420
I mean, I mean, kind of in the sense that, like, screw those guys for the Battle of Montreal.
00:31:41.880
But but yeah, aside from kind of generalized antipathy for
00:31:46.720
Canadian maple syrup, I'm not sure exactly what what this is about.
00:31:51.160
I think that it's more about giving off an image of maximalism.
00:31:57.260
Again, I would prefer that it be directed against countries that we have more antipathy for and
00:32:02.320
I mean, I'm glad that he's putting serious pressure on Mexico.
00:32:04.360
I wish we're putting even more pressure on China.
00:32:06.540
I would like to see him actually ramp up the pressure on China.
00:32:09.200
I think so far we've been a little bit too soft for my liking with regard to some of the
00:32:12.420
measures that we're taking with regard to China, whether it's tick tock or a 10 percent tariff
00:32:16.060
rate on China, but a 25 percent threatened tariff rate on Canada and Mexico.
00:32:20.620
It seems to me that we should reverse that when it comes to Canada.
00:32:24.020
Now, listen, what I want out of Canada is Pierre Poliev to be the prime minister.
00:32:30.420
And so anything that gets in the way of that, I'm kind of against.
00:32:32.840
And anything that that facilitates that, I'm very much for.
00:32:36.280
Um, do you think he's running a risk with these tariffs?
00:32:44.260
Um, he does believe in tariffs and he believes in tariffs in the way I think our founders did
00:32:49.860
get rid of the income tax, let tariffs pay for everything.
00:32:54.540
Um, but he also looks at him as a big stick to negotiate and, and, and maneuver.
00:33:02.340
Um, it, do you think he runs the risk of the world kind of going, Hey, why don't we all
00:33:11.660
get together, uh, and say, no, once they all start to band together and it's an actual trade
00:33:23.160
So I think this is one of the mistakes that could be made here.
00:33:29.200
You're never going to be able to replace the income tax at the current levels with tariffs.
00:33:33.920
The amount that we brought in off tariffs last year was like $80 billion, right?
00:33:37.240
It was $80 billion and the amount of tax revenue to the federal government was, you
00:33:41.860
So you're not going to replace that by any stretch of the imagination.
00:33:45.280
So the idea of substituting one for the other, I'm for it, but that also means you have to
00:33:47.980
cut the government by 98%, which I'm also for actually, but I don't think that that's
00:33:58.700
You know, I'll have what, I'll have what we're having.
00:34:01.460
You know, the, the, the, you know, so I think that, you know, as a, as a replacement mechanism
00:34:05.560
for revenue, I think unlikely to replace the income tax as a, as a threat.
00:34:10.640
It seems to have worked a little bit on Canada.
00:34:12.200
It worked a little bit on Mexico as, as sort of negotiation tactic, you know, bullying
00:34:16.480
other countries into doing what we want, Panama.
00:34:20.280
I think it's a good negotiation tactic as a sort of principled war in favor of tariffs.
00:34:26.000
And the reason that's a bad idea is because exactly what you're talking about, the first
00:34:29.860
move that Canada and Mexico are going to make, if those tariffs were to go into place, say
00:34:34.200
permanently without a negotiated way out is to open their door to China because they're
00:34:38.700
going to have to have another market to which they can send all of their stuff.
00:34:42.160
And so actually it's going to open the door to China.
00:34:43.860
And this is one of the things that I think we have to be very careful about, even with
00:34:50.560
And then we actually do need to rebuild some of the structures that were there, but in a
00:34:54.480
better way, because otherwise China will fill the gap in a globally competitive environment.
00:34:58.940
I think one of the mistakes that sometimes people on the right make is assuming, you know,
00:35:02.200
in a vacuum, in a vacuum, we're never in a vacuum.
00:35:04.560
I mean, if we actually create a vacuum, that vacuum is very likely to be filled by China.
00:35:09.780
I mean, we did create a vacuum, which is why China ended up taking over both ends of the
00:35:12.820
Panama Canal, for example, or ended up intervening pretty significantly in Mexico and so, or is
00:35:20.740
Vacuums are abhorred when it comes to international politics, and they're generally filled by our
00:35:24.260
enemies if the United States is not in a pinpoint accurate, not bloated way trying to
00:35:31.120
But yeah, I mean, I'm deeply fearful that I don't think the trade wars are good or easy
00:35:36.920
I think that they can be a good negotiation tactic.
00:35:39.160
And I think this is where Trump excels, is that he, you know, he plays chicken a lot.
00:35:46.140
One of the ways you win when you play chicken is before you play the game, you take a brick
00:35:50.180
and you hold it up and you say, this is going right on the accelerator.
00:35:52.860
You think I'm not willing to go over the cliff?
00:35:57.660
And listen, my feet are up on the dash and the brick's on the gas.
00:36:05.680
And I think that that's a lot of Trump when it comes to tariffs.
00:36:12.860
So if you want to have this fight, like, man, not just don't threaten me with a good time.
00:36:17.660
I think that's that's part of the negotiation tactic as well.
00:36:30.280
Yeah, I mean, his negotiation, the skill that he has in negotiating is the fact that people look at him and go, that son of a pit might just do it.
00:36:46.320
He told me he said he was having dinner with the leader of China.
00:36:56.340
And he said, we're at Mar-a-Lago and we're having dinner.
00:36:59.460
And he said, I knew I was going to strike Iran.
00:37:03.940
And he said, so I scheduled that to happen right in the middle of our dinner.
00:37:09.320
He said, so they came, whispered in my ear, Mr. President, we're about to go.
00:37:16.760
20 minutes later, he sat down at the table and said, yeah, I just struck Iran, killed this guy, this guy.
00:37:22.640
And he said, President Xi looked at him like, whoa, you know, that that's not what the president usually does.
00:37:30.800
And then he said, as they continue to talk, President Xi said something that he was thinking about doing.
00:37:36.840
And Donald Trump said, you're not going to do that.
00:37:45.800
And Xi kind of laughed kind of half-heartedly and just stared at Donald Trump.
00:37:54.960
And he walked away with not knowing if the president was serious or not.
00:38:02.940
I mean, when we did a fundraiser for him down here at Trump Doral, and we were kind of in the back room.
00:38:08.660
And he said, they never would have gone to Ukraine if I'd been president.
00:38:12.940
And he's like, well, because I told Vlad, I called up Vlad.
00:38:15.220
I said, Vlad, Vlad, if you go into Ukraine, I'm going to bomb the out of you.
00:38:20.040
And he said, and Vladimir Putin said, no, you won't, Mr. President.
00:38:31.020
And the punchline is, he says, if there's a 5% chance the most powerful military in the world is going to bomb you, you don't do it.
00:38:38.840
I mean, because Joe Biden is the least credible president in American history.
00:38:41.980
Joe Biden would say, no, all I'm saying is don't do it.
00:38:48.060
Everyone's like, well, he ain't going to do nothing.
00:38:54.040
Ain't nothing stopping me from going across that line.
00:38:55.880
Like, Trump, it's like if you get within 100 miles of that line, maybe he warned you and maybe he didn't.
00:39:04.560
And I think that that's part of the magic of it.
00:39:06.000
So let me ask you, when this podcast is released globally, it will be Saturday noon.
00:39:17.260
The president said earlier this week, all hell will break loose.
00:39:22.440
I mean, every single hostage, if they if Hamas does not release them by noon on Saturday, all hell will break loose.
00:39:33.060
He's not one to paint a very vivid red line without backing it up.
00:39:38.700
If you if you cross it, what do you think is coming?
00:39:43.800
Well, I mean, I think that what he's doing there is something that's strategically quite smart.
00:39:47.800
So he's basically saying, listen, if there is no phase two of this negotiation, right, it was a hostage deal that was supposed to have a phase one with these kind of drips and drabs.
00:39:55.400
And then it goes to phase two, which is supposed to be, quote unquote, the end of the war and gradual release of more of the hostages.
00:40:01.060
He's saying, listen, I'm not invested in that deal.
00:40:04.760
If this deal goes sideways and Israel has to go back in, that's not on me.
00:40:08.360
You're the ones who are who are who are doing this.
00:40:10.540
So I think that's the first thing that he's doing is disconnecting himself from the, quote unquote, permanent end of the war nonsense that was supposed to be in phase two of this deal.
00:40:19.520
The truth is that, listen, I agree with Trump and I disagree with the Israeli government.
00:40:23.020
I think the Israeli government is wedded to the idea of trying to get back as many hostages as they can, even with drips and drabs and and releasing hundreds of terrorists in the past.
00:40:32.380
I think that they actually should do exactly what Trump is saying.
00:40:36.860
Whether the government actually does that, I think it's wrong.
00:40:39.280
I think that I think that Trump is exactly right on this.
00:40:42.300
And that's precisely what Israel's position should have been literally day one.
00:40:45.220
I mean, it should have been their position October 8th.
00:40:46.900
Should have been either all those hostages go out or we're going in and we are not stopping for for love or money.
00:40:52.100
We will do whatever it takes to get our people back.
00:40:54.600
And we don't care what the rest of the world has to say.
00:40:58.040
For Israel not to actually enact that, I think, is actually a political miscalculation.
00:41:03.940
Obviously, the politics are different in Israel.
00:41:05.640
The families of the people who are there in Israel.
00:41:07.320
If you're one of the families of the three people who are supposed to come out on Saturday and suddenly they're not coming out and it's full-scale war again and you've got to assume that those people are going to die, that's got to be extraordinarily difficult.
00:41:18.760
With that said, if I were advising it, I would say, listen to the president.
00:41:24.440
You know, you've got a window to do the things you need to do.
00:41:28.000
You need to go do the things that you need to do and you can't win a war with drips and drabs and negotiating with terrorists.
00:41:32.660
But that's been my position since literally day one.
00:41:34.800
So I have a friend who was part of an elite military team years ago and he said he was just in Israel and he said he saw all these operators that he knew.
00:41:49.800
And he said, he's like, Glenn, these are the people that don't write books.
00:41:52.820
These are the people that go in and kill people and then go to the beach afterwards.
00:42:09.760
OK, and his theory was he said, I don't know, but his theory was.
00:42:15.780
If they don't release him by noon, Trump will go in with our special forces, our special teams and get them and kill the people that had them.
00:42:37.200
I'm not in favor of American boots on the ground.
00:42:39.260
Now, there are American hostages who are being held.
00:42:40.940
So I could see a world where Trump authorizes the attempted extraction of those hostages.
00:42:44.460
But from what I understand from from military intel on sort of both sides, meaning America and also Israel, is that the reason that Israel has not attempted a rescue of these people is because they're basically on hair trigger, meaning that all of the hostages they know.
00:42:58.520
Apparently, Israel is exactly where every hostage is in the Gaza Strip, like down to the room.
00:43:02.440
But the problem is that the minute that they go in, they're standing orders from Hamas to just shoot the hostages.
00:43:07.020
And so any any sort of operation, because Israel is excellent at these operations, like truly amazing at these operations.
00:43:13.520
So if Israel can't do the operation, it's going to be difficult to see what United States operators on the ground would be able to do that the Israelis can't, given Israel's experience with this sort of stuff.
00:43:25.280
But again, I think that Trump's baseline proposal is correct here, and that is that either they all come out or none of them come out and like release them now or all hell breaks loose is the proper approach.
00:43:38.540
Again, I agree in a conflict between Netanyahu's sort of slow rolling approach, trying to get as many hostages out for humanitarian purposes for the families and Trump's let them all out or we're going to kill them or you will not exist tomorrow.
00:43:55.180
I think that Trump's perspective on this is exactly correct.
00:43:58.980
I mean, that that that press conference between Netanyahu and and Donald Trump was like almost two hours late.
00:44:06.900
I mean, they were in the office two hours after they were supposed to be talking.
00:44:11.720
And I and I saw him take to the stage and say things like all the Palestinians have to go.
00:44:21.680
That's not something Benjamin Netanyahu can say.
00:44:25.040
That's that it that's not that's also not something that Benjamin Netanyahu proposed.
00:44:33.300
Donald Trump literally told Netanyahu probably five minutes before they went on stage what he was going to say, if at all.
00:44:39.040
I mean, if you were watching that presser, Netanyahu looked like he'd been blindsided in the same way as the rest of us were.
00:44:45.460
I was watching it and I'm pretty in the know about these particular issues.
00:44:50.260
Like, I feel like I have good connections on pretty much all sides of these issues from literally like the Arab side to the Israeli side to the American side.
00:44:56.660
I talk to people all the time on this particular issue.
00:45:02.140
I have never heard anything remotely like this, which, by the way, also shows, number one, Trump's the one in control.
00:45:11.620
And two, this White House is run like a machine, like a damn machine, because that, you know, that in Trump, number one, that thing is leaked three weeks before.
00:45:21.280
That's in the front page of The New York Times, three weeks beforehand.
00:45:24.520
And this thing, not only didn't it leak, people like Susie Wiles, right, who is his chief of staff.
00:45:38.680
And she looked like, OK, this is the first I'm hearing about all of this.
00:45:42.880
And, you know, it's all I can say is I've and I feel tired saying this, but I've never seen anything like it.
00:45:51.340
He said that I would tire of the winning and I have not yet tired of the winning.
00:45:56.960
But it is supply of winning is insufficient to meet demand.
00:46:05.560
You know, people always said that he was stupid and, you know, he's not an intellect.
00:46:10.060
He's he's probably one of our dumbest presidents ever.
00:46:14.720
I look at him, especially in things like you were just saying that came from him.
00:46:30.000
I think he is one of the most out of the box genius thinkers we may have had.
00:46:39.480
I mean, the thing about him is because he's undefined as a sort of political entity, meaning that he doesn't have a thoroughgoing ideology.
00:46:47.920
And like some of us have spent our entire lives creating a thoroughgoing worldview on politics.
00:46:53.880
And then things kind of fit within that worldview.
00:47:01.320
What is the easiest, best way to get to point B?
00:47:02.960
And that means he ends up cutting an enormous number of Gordian knots because those of us who are sort of in the business of how does this fit into our ideology?
00:47:09.180
It's like, OK, well, I want to do this policy, but it does kind of cross swords with this other thing that I think in general about the world and about kind of this principle that I have.
00:47:18.120
And these two principles are always in tension.
00:47:19.460
But how do how do I push them to the brink without break?
00:47:29.160
And that's what, you know, true innovators in a lot of spaces do is they think simply.
00:47:33.600
And by thinking simply, they end up cutting out all the complications.
00:47:40.300
He's breaking a lot of the systems that have existed before.
00:47:43.900
And it's also why I have a lot of faith that, of course, correct.
00:47:46.400
I think that there are a bunch of things that have changed between Trump one and Trump two.
00:47:49.220
I think the number one thing that has changed is just, as I say, his emotional state makes an enormous difference.
00:47:53.900
Cool, collected Donald Trump is so good at this.
00:47:57.840
And I think that was the thing that was missing in Trump term number one, both because he didn't expect to win and he was badly staffed at the beginning.
00:48:03.340
And then because he was running up against the Mueller investigation every single day and to impeachments and all the things that we know about, that's likely to stagger anybody and put them on the back heel.
00:48:11.900
Because if you have to spend eight hours a day talking about, you know, how you're not a tool of Russia and then being subpoenaed by lawyers, obviously that's going to kind of mess up your presidency.
00:48:20.620
He's got an overwhelming mandate from the American people.
00:48:27.060
And he's had four years to sit there and think of the things that he wants to do.
00:48:31.340
So it's not like he has to, like, win another thing.
00:48:34.840
And so that means that he can just sit there knowing that his balance ā he's playing with house money now.
00:48:40.180
And because he's playing with house money, he can be as cool ā he doesn't have to actually throw out the big gamble or he can.
00:48:46.400
He can make those decisions on a sort of calm and collected basis.
00:48:51.560
That was the thing that we thought would never change.
00:48:53.460
We always thought, okay, Truth Social is going to be the place where he just kind of throws out random ideas and angry tweets.
00:49:08.580
The thing that changed is that the American people ā I've talked about this before.
00:49:12.040
Usually when you have a first presidency, and this is a second first presidency.
00:49:17.280
When you usually have a first presidency, it's unclear what the mandate is exactly for.
00:49:21.860
When Trump won the first time, was that a rebuke of Obama or is that a mandate for Trump's agenda?
00:49:26.780
And we tend to equate the two things, but they're not the same thing, right?
00:49:29.080
Because most elections are about rebuking the other party very often.
00:49:32.920
You can say that Biden was elected because it was a rebuke of Trump in some way.
00:49:37.100
Trump was elected the first time in some way because it was a rebuke of Hillary Clinton.
00:49:46.880
Normally, because he was elected the first ā so the question remains, is it a mandate for Trump's agenda or is it a rebuke of the other guy?
00:49:53.200
In this particular case, because Trump had already won once, because he'd been president once, it wasn't like there was a roll of the dice.
00:50:01.240
We knew precisely what we were going to get from him.
00:50:03.960
Like down to the jot and tittle, like literally everything.
00:50:08.160
And so what that means is that is a mandate for his precise agenda.
00:50:14.380
We rejected Joe Biden in favor of a person that we knew better than any person on earth.
00:50:18.820
So what it's more like ā it's not like a guy leaves his first wife for the second wife and then finds a third wife.
00:50:25.420
What it's more like on sort of a personal level is a guy leaves his first wife for a second wife, and then he decides, no, no, no.
00:50:31.040
I'm going back to my first wife, knowing all the flaws, knowing all the problems, knowing all the risks.
00:50:35.340
OK, so that's not falling out of love with the second wife.
00:50:40.580
And I think that Trump acknowledges that and realizes that, and that's why the mandate feels different.
00:50:45.980
I've been watching politics my entire life basically, and I've never seen a just generalized feeling in the public like there is right now that a mandate has actually been given to the president.
00:51:00.020
But the mandate that he claimed in 2008, what was that about?
00:51:03.160
What it really was about is America wanted a black president.
00:51:05.320
We wanted to get past the sort of racial problems of the past in the United States.
00:51:10.080
And as soon as he rolled out Obamacare, he got whomped, right?
00:51:12.520
The 2010 elections just go wildly the wrong way.
00:51:17.420
For Trump, right now, he's at somewhere between plus six and plus ten in the public approval ratings.
00:51:23.660
And 70 percent of Americans are saying he's keeping his promises.
00:51:30.000
And this is the thing Democrats are having such a tough time with.
00:51:33.420
We're all saying, no, he's doing exactly what he said he was going to do.
00:51:39.400
They're saying, how dare you leave Elon Musk in these places?
00:51:45.360
He said he was going to do the Department of Governmental Efficiency.
00:51:48.320
During the campaign, he was a public speaker at the RNC.
00:51:53.440
He's been at every single one of these big events for the last year.
00:51:59.600
And that means there's a mandate for those things.
00:52:03.100
Could there be an exogenous situation where the economy tanks, for example, and throws everything
00:52:10.520
But Donald Trump has a mandate to do what he's doing.
00:52:12.920
And that's why the American people are giving him a lot of wherewithal to do it.
00:52:15.940
Do you think there is anything other than the economy that could slow this down?
00:52:25.540
I mean, I look at David Hogg as, you know, vice chair.
00:52:42.620
The only thing that I think can turn this is if things get, if they go poorly, really poorly
00:53:02.200
I think that the economy is the thing that people really elected Trump based on.
00:53:07.380
If the inflation doesn't come down for another year, it's going to be a real problem for him.
00:53:11.280
You know, the inflation is still running too hot because we're in sort of the aftermath
00:53:15.920
I'm very hopeful that the inflation does come down.
00:53:19.280
The economy is really the big one because Trump promised to be a pro-business president.
00:53:25.680
The mood right now in the country about business is, oh, my God, I can actually invest and
00:53:29.000
be sure the government isn't going to try to steal my money or destroy my business.
00:53:32.420
The NLRB isn't going to be just sitting on my shoulders every single day waiting for
00:53:39.320
So if he's got all those things going for him and the economy tanks, it's going to be
00:53:44.680
Like this is, this is the way it could go wrong is that it goes all wrong at once.
00:53:47.780
And that, that could be a really, really like enormously horrifying thing because right
00:53:53.200
now, the forces, as we've been discussing with all this, I mean, Glenn, you've known
00:54:00.260
And yet a new sense of optimism has pervaded my being.
00:54:05.200
I mean, and so when I get optimistic, I start to get a little worried because it's just
00:54:09.520
And so it's like, okay, things are going really, really right.
00:54:12.840
And if, if they do go wrong, here's what I see.
00:54:15.640
What I see is that he has perceived President Trump correctly as an incredibly pro-business president.
00:54:19.600
He's up there at the inauguration with the heads of all the big tech companies standing
00:54:25.820
The most powerful, richest people on earth standing next to him.
00:54:29.340
He has unleashed Elon Musk on the federal government.
00:54:32.600
If the economy were to tank, the claim that he was leading a greedy business oligarchy
00:54:39.420
and that capitalism is to blame would go through the roof.
00:54:43.280
And you'd get a progressive revolution very quickly, right?
00:54:45.940
You could, you could see the American people swivel from side to side and wouldn't take
00:54:50.280
I mean, Trump won, he won by 10 million votes, right?
00:54:52.640
He won fairly, he won large, large in the electoral college, but relatively narrowly in
00:54:58.300
And so you could easily see a world horrifying as it sounds where, you know, a Bernie Sanders
00:55:02.980
acolyte ends up running on a super progressive, a populist progressive agenda and ends up winning
00:55:09.260
That, that to me is the most predictable bad thing that could happen.
00:55:11.840
And then of course there are unpredictable bad things that can happen, but I don't think
00:55:17.860
I mean, only if they lead to an economic downturn.
00:55:20.180
So for example, China tries to take Taiwan, economic downturn breaks out, right?
00:55:24.640
Like that, like that, that sort of thing could, could, but that would be more of an economic
00:55:28.540
I think security issues tend to play in favor of Republicans generally.
00:55:30.820
So if there's an economic downturn due to war or a strategic move by somebody else, you
00:55:40.940
think that hurts him as much as just an economic downturn?
00:55:45.480
I think that the willingness to attribute economic downturn to whoever is in office is almost
00:55:54.540
And it almost doesn't matter even if a recovery begins, right?
00:55:58.300
Bush, where there, there was an economic downturn in 91 by 92, the economy was already recovering.
00:56:03.240
His approval rating had dropped from 73% down into the thirties.
00:56:06.580
And the American people are really unforgiving of bad times economically.
00:56:10.680
And they tend to attribute it to whomever is the president, regardless of sort of the underlying
00:56:17.500
And so, you know, whether it's China attacking Taiwan, disrupting all of the microchip markets
00:56:22.160
and, and disrupting the trade routes, and that leads to a bad thing, or, or whether it's
00:56:26.280
just the bottom falls out of the price earnings ratio, uh, you know, any one of those things
00:56:33.460
So, um, you know, you look at, you look at this and, um, it is the strategy.
00:56:42.760
If I were evil on the other side, the strategy was how do we trigger that?
00:56:49.780
You know, because we're losing all of our money, all of our funding.
00:57:03.900
How, what are the odds that there are those of our own country that are thinking that way?
00:57:11.100
You know, I, I always hesitate to call anybody a traitor because what you're talking about is
00:57:17.260
If you're attempting to tank the economy in order to get a president out of office, like
00:57:21.320
deliberately tank the American economy and hurt all of your fellow Americans in order
00:57:24.820
to get a president out of office, that makes you a traitor by definition.
00:57:27.960
Uh, so I'm always hesitant to sort of accuse people outright of, of treason.
00:57:31.660
Uh, I'd be more worried about a foreign adversary doing it.
00:57:33.740
I mean, China has an enormous amount of control.
00:57:37.240
Uh, China has bought an awful lot of people in this country and, and a lot of people have
00:57:41.660
made themselves willing to be bought by, by China.
00:57:43.960
Um, again, I think all it would take to trigger a global economic downturn, if that's what
00:57:47.920
China wanted to do, would be some sort of blockade of Taiwan.
00:57:50.820
And that, that, that's sort of the most predictable action that could be taken that would almost
00:57:56.460
overnight destroy a huge percentage of the world economy.
00:58:00.360
Because people don't understand it's not about the United States intervening in Taiwan.
00:58:02.880
It's about the fact that 92% of all sophisticated superconductors on the planet are
00:58:08.800
And so if, even if the flow stops, forget about trying to get in control, even if the
00:58:12.000
flow stops, then stuff stops working really, really, really quickly.
00:58:16.260
It's one of the reasons why president Trump is trying to reshore a bunch of this stuff.
00:58:19.460
The problem is it takes a long time to reshore a lot of that stuff, right?
00:58:22.440
He's trying to convince TSMC, which is the chip maker in Taiwan to start building domestically
00:58:27.340
But the ramp up period there is fairly significant.
00:58:33.000
So to me, that is the single greatest risk is that China decides to go for it with Taiwan
00:58:37.740
simply to screw Trump, feeling that their window is closing.
00:58:42.120
That to me is the single greatest, which is one of the reasons we really need to upgrade
00:58:46.580
We need to start thinking creatively about the kinds of, you know, to get back to what
00:58:49.880
we were talking about with the Department of Defense, we need to modernize a lot of the
00:58:53.180
Aircraft carriers ain't going to do it anymore.
00:58:57.100
The aircraft carrier is the horse of World War I.
00:59:00.080
I mean, we'll send them in and they'll all be dead.
00:59:03.440
It'll all be dead because it's just, it's not feasible anymore.
00:59:18.600
I was struck this week with our vice president compared to our last vice president who sat with
00:59:25.720
the tech moguls and said, AI is, it's two letters, but it actually means artificial intelligence.
00:59:36.820
And then, and then here comes JD Vance this week, laying out our position on AI.
00:59:44.060
Our energy, where we don't have the power systems at this point to be able to really actually command
00:59:56.780
We're going to need new power plants, new nuclear power plants, most likely, and server farms that
01:00:08.580
I mean, they're, they're building it like, I think they have 14 nuclear power plants under
01:00:19.460
I mean, I think that it's certainly possible, but it will require an effort to, as you say,
01:00:25.720
And the truth is that China, because it essentially has a fascist economy, top-down directed, largely
01:00:35.360
I mean, even, even some of the claims that were being made about DeepSeq originally, that
01:00:38.460
it was running, you know, they built it for a few million dollars, or they weren't using
01:00:44.140
They were using the crap that was in your Teddy Ruxpin from 1992.
01:00:51.060
A lot of it was being made with NVIDIA chips that had been basically pirated or bought through
01:00:56.420
The innovation that could be unlocked in the American economy is always, I think, going to put
01:01:02.140
But China is going to pour tremendous resources into one type of specific AGI, right?
01:01:07.580
There are a bunch of kind of angles that you can take.
01:01:09.940
And it's not that they didn't do something clever.
01:01:11.280
They actually did something quite clever with DeepSeq.
01:01:12.860
I mean, for those who are sort of interested in AI, you know, AI has been seen as sort of
01:01:19.040
ChatDB is basically reading all the internet and then trying to predict.
01:01:22.740
It's effectively a very, very sophisticated predictive text mechanism, trying to predict what would
01:01:28.660
What DeepSeq did is it basically siloed information into, I think, 17 different silos and then said,
01:01:36.700
That meant it was faster because it was now referring to the experts within this silos.
01:01:41.400
You're just combing this particular section of human knowledge.
01:01:44.980
But the sort of constraints that are going to be put on AI in China for political reasons
01:01:49.140
are going to be pretty significant and pretty severe.
01:01:52.100
And that's not true with all of the iterations that we're seeing.
01:01:54.740
I mean, I am constantly astonished by what the AI can do now and whatever it can do now.
01:02:00.080
Remember, you are seeing the worst version it will ever be right now.
01:02:04.740
Tomorrow is going to be better and it's going to be better the day after that.
01:02:07.060
The stuff that this stuff can do is, I mean, it's world breaking what it's going to be able
01:02:14.720
And the other day I was working with Perplexity, which is another one of these AIs.
01:02:17.580
And Perplexity, I wanted to summarize the arguments in like a three hour YouTube video.
01:02:25.120
I said, summarize the main points of this video.
01:02:27.320
And within two seconds, two seconds, it had scraped the entire video and provided me a
01:02:32.620
full breakdown and outline form of the arguments that were being made on both sides.
01:02:37.080
I mean, that sort of that sort of efficiency is insane and radical.
01:02:42.560
If we don't win that race, then China is going to win because they're just going to be
01:02:47.120
able to do things faster and better than we are.
01:02:49.600
And if you want to see what that looks like, just look at Europe.
01:02:50.980
Europe, there are all these memes online about China is having like a wrestling match with
01:02:55.180
the United States and Europe is over there playing with a TI-82.
01:03:01.400
They've regulated themselves out of the game, which is the point that JD was making.
01:03:04.260
I mean, the thing about JD that people forget is JD's a tech bro, right?
01:03:07.420
I mean, he got started by going over to Silicon Valley and working with Peter Thiel and starting
01:03:12.280
And like JD knows all the people who are doing the AIs.
01:03:15.580
So it's not as though JD is some sort of like backwoodsman from Ohio.
01:03:18.820
You know, he's never seen a computer before and he's not old either.
01:03:22.340
I mean, he's younger than I am and he's the vice president of the United States.
01:03:25.360
So, yeah, again, I think that I'm optimistic about the future of AI in the country.
01:03:30.580
And I think the Trump administration understands that if we don't win that battle, we're going
01:03:47.940
I didn't think there'd ever be an investigation.
01:03:50.300
I was so jaded and so blackpilled on these people get away with everything.
01:03:55.200
I think there's a chance Fauci goes to jail and it may happen through the states.
01:04:07.780
I think that to peg him down to a particular crime, just putting on the lawyer hat for a
01:04:12.400
second, to peg him down to a particular violation of particular statute is much more difficult
01:04:17.720
than to sort of generically say he's a criminal.
01:04:19.980
I think that many of the things that he did were criminal.
01:04:21.860
I think that he effectively committed perjury when he was talking about the funding of the
01:04:30.780
I think that his attempt to suppress alternative methodologies of addressing the pandemic by
01:04:35.680
going after people like the new head of the NIH, Jay Bhattacharya, those should be criminal.
01:04:40.840
But again, putting on my lawyer hat, I'd have to find which statute he actually violated.
01:04:45.300
And then what is the likelihood that you can actually convict him on violation of the statute?
01:04:52.220
I mean, there'll be it'll they'll go down a lot of paths.
01:04:54.420
I think there'll be a lot of paths going down with Fauci.
01:05:04.960
Is there going to be anything done on the Bidens that that seems to keep rearing its head
01:05:11.640
Yeah, well, I mean, I think that, you know, presidential we now are in an era where Trump on his way out
01:05:16.780
the door is going to pardon himself and his kids, because now that Biden has done it,
01:05:21.560
That's just going to be the way this goes from now on, because Biden breaking that sort
01:05:25.160
of taboo by accusing Trump of wanting to prosecute his kids and him.
01:05:28.940
It means that Trump can't now leave it up to chance, whether that's going to happen with
01:05:33.720
And so this is just going to be the way that it goes from now on, probably to the end of
01:05:37.820
Whenever that is a thousand years from now, it's going to be every president who is, you
01:05:41.580
know, pardoning his kids and himself on the way out the door.
01:05:44.500
The only person that Biden didn't pardon, obviously, was himself.
01:05:48.420
I think the idea that Trump is going to put Biden in the dock, I don't think that Trump
01:05:53.060
I don't actually think that in this particular way, he is that vindictive.
01:05:57.660
There's this kind of feeling in the public that he sometimes is.
01:06:00.540
And you can see evidence of it and removing security details from people that he feels
01:06:05.200
But when it comes to like actually putting Joe Biden in jail as an 80 some year old man who's
01:06:10.600
clearly seen out, I think that his judgment is probably the same as Robert hers was.
01:06:13.660
And that judgment lost Joe Biden like history's judgment has already been made on Joe Biden.
01:06:20.460
I mean, Joe Biden is going to go down in history as the interregnum between two Donald Trump
01:06:25.140
And as a person, Joe Biden's entire image, which was based on this lie that he was sort
01:06:30.040
of a garrulous, kindly, you know, well-spoken, glib young man who then became a nice uncle,
01:06:38.120
He leaves office as one of the most disgraced people in American history, both on a scandal
01:06:42.600
level, from a pardoning his own family level, to not being able to speak words out of his
01:06:46.620
face hole, to just, you know, to being effectively dead and being wheeled around.
01:06:51.040
I mean, the minute that Donald Trump was elected, he was president and he wasn't president yet.
01:06:54.700
I mean, November 5th, Donald Trump was effectively the president of the United States.
01:07:01.300
And so, yeah, I think that any more, you know, kind of jumping on the corpse, it's we're
01:07:09.060
He's already dead, but he's actually already dead.
01:07:10.960
Is there is there something to be said with setting the precedent that no, we're at least
01:07:20.600
going to expose you if we can't put you in jail?
01:07:26.460
I think there'll be House investigations of Joe Biden.
01:07:29.540
I think that there should be investigations into nearly every aspect of the Biden administration.
01:07:33.340
I think the amount of money that was flowing around the Biden administration is insane.
01:07:37.680
I think that the amount of misappropriation of funds to, again, these, I think what Doge
01:07:45.380
What Congress should be uncovering should be for purposes of prosecution.
01:07:48.740
And I think that a lot of what was going on inside the Biden administration, I think,
01:07:52.880
probably does violate statute and it needs to be investigated every which way.
01:08:01.800
I talked to Alan Dershowitz today and, you know, he was adamant.
01:08:15.640
However, I am a little concerned on how these lists are being made.
01:08:24.280
Is it a client list that we're signing up for the massages?
01:08:32.200
But I do think that all of it needs to come out.
01:08:36.020
It's too much information and power for anyone to hold.
01:08:43.840
And absence of information isn't going to cut down on the conspiracy theorizing.
01:08:48.080
So if you say, well, we don't want to let out the list because we're afraid that somebody
01:08:51.260
who's mistakenly mentioned on the list is going to then become a target of ire.
01:08:54.900
I promise you that person has probably already become a target of ire just because people
01:08:57.780
are speculating about who the hell's on the list.
01:09:04.900
I mean, Dershowitz has been mentioned in sort of proximity to Epstein Island.
01:09:08.440
And the reason he's saying that is because he's saying, OK, put all of it out there.
01:09:11.580
And then if you find me guilty, find me guilty.
01:09:13.040
But that's actually the way that an innocent person would act.
01:09:15.020
If you were on the list or if I were on the list, I'd be like, I want all the information
01:09:18.640
I don't want anything held back because you guys are just sitting there speculating about
01:09:22.260
Like, put everything out there, every single little bit of it.
01:09:24.540
Of course, the American public have a right to see all that information.
01:09:29.080
What I want to know is where the hell the guy's money was coming from.
01:09:33.980
Like, nobody ever talks about, like, where his money was coming from.
01:09:37.700
Like, what the hell was ā there are too many questions, right?
01:09:41.260
I'm the least conspiracy-minded person that I personally know in this space.
01:09:44.820
I mean, you know, as we discussed this before, I tend to believe that conspiracies require
01:09:48.340
actual intelligence and a coherent ability to put together a plan.
01:09:52.440
And I think most people are morons with no ability to do any of that.
01:09:55.080
And so I tend to attribute nearly everything to human stupidity, frailty, and idiocy as
01:09:59.860
opposed to, you know, kind of malevolence and people in back rooms.
01:10:03.180
But when you look at Epstein, you're like, um, something was going on.
01:10:06.480
I would love to know all the things that were going on.
01:10:08.360
Of all the sort of scandals and conspiracy theories that are floating around, I always
01:10:12.520
found the Epstein ones to be the most plausible and most credible as opposed to many of the
01:10:16.300
Yeah, I think there was ā I mean, I don't know if he was gathering information.
01:10:20.320
He was getting people that, you know, are CIA, you know, needed to have in their pocket.
01:10:26.520
I don't know what it was, but something ā it was very, very wrong.
01:10:31.340
I mean, besides the children's stuff, something was very wrong.
01:10:39.260
And you can't ā and the problem is I can't ā I like debunking conspiracy ā I like
01:10:43.780
So, like, give me the material so I can debunk it or give a good explanation or at least
01:10:48.500
get to the ā as you know, I'm not a fan of just asking questions.
01:10:52.120
I think just asking questions is very often cover for people pushing an agenda without
01:10:57.920
It's one thing if my children are just asking me questions, they're children.
01:11:00.800
If I'm an adult and I'm just asking questions, typically it's because I have an idea of what
01:11:05.300
But in this particular case, I think that we're allowed to just ask questions because I have
01:11:10.000
And it's hard for me to determine what's even a plausible conspiracy theory.
01:11:23.500
I'm a super big believer that Lee Harvey Oswald shot the president.
01:11:29.060
If there is any conspiracy related to Lee Harvey Oswald, by far the most plausible theory
01:11:35.120
The communists were very much afraid that that was going to be the conclusion that was drawn
01:11:37.880
by the United States government in the aftermath of JFK's assassination.
01:11:41.880
I mean, Lee Harvey Oswald had literally been in the Soviet Union.
01:11:44.140
He went to the Cuban embassy shortly before he went and tried to assassinate JFK.
01:11:50.160
He tried to assassinate somebody like a week before he failed.
01:11:52.900
There was a general in Texas, and he shot through his window and missed him.
01:11:55.500
So I've never been a believer in the sort of like dark CIA, JFK wanted him dead kind
01:12:02.320
I've never seen the plausible evidence for that.
01:12:06.760
It felt very, you know, bizarrely Agatha Christie to me.
01:12:10.420
So, yeah, we're all on the train and we're all combining to stab this guy.
01:12:14.280
Or maybe all the forensic evidence stacks up in one particular direction.
01:12:18.700
And I've done a fair bit of reading on the JFK, like every other American.
01:12:24.960
I just, I find the conspiracy theories surrounding JFK the least plausible because we have the
01:12:32.560
And if I'm wrong, then okay, let's talk about it.
01:12:36.440
I would be, I think, remiss if I don't, if I have you on a disruptor, early disruptor of
01:12:46.840
the media, and me, an early disruptor of the media, you did Daily Wire, I did Blaze.
01:12:56.180
I have to ask you, Ben, the state of the media and the power of the, what now is, I think,
01:13:07.220
mainstream, but was called the alternative media, it's astonishing what's happened, isn't
01:13:18.080
There are people who are claiming all the way back in like 2004, I remember when Dan
01:13:21.420
Rather put out that fake letter about George W. Bush.
01:13:25.280
And people on our side were like, ah, the mainstream media is dead.
01:13:28.680
And then they spent the next, you know, nearly 20 years proving they certainly were not dead
01:13:32.260
and they could define narratives and they could lie and they could really define how Americans
01:13:36.120
thought on a wide variety of issues ranging from BLM to COVID to Russiagate to all of that
01:13:42.000
sort of stuff. I think 2024 was definitive nail in the coffin, maybe the last nail in
01:13:46.420
the coffin for the legacy media. The legacy media's ratings are awful, awful. It doesn't
01:13:51.600
mean their numbers are awful, meaning they're a fan club, right? The New York Times is a
01:13:54.500
left-wing fan club. It's no longer seen as the sort of objective source of news. The New
01:13:58.560
York Times is what we are, but for the left, right? I mean, everyone knows we're conservative.
01:14:03.280
And so if you're conservative, maybe you subscribe to Daily Wire, you're subscribed to the Blaze.
01:14:06.240
And if you're a lefty, you subscribe to the New York Times. It's the paper of record for leftists.
01:14:11.180
But no one perceives the New York Times as a sort of middle of the road, objective newspaper that's
01:14:15.380
simply trying to separate the facts from the opinion. No one perceives them that way.
01:14:18.800
And with that, they lose an enormous amount of their sort of brand leverage.
01:14:22.380
That's even more for the Washington Post, which doesn't have the circulation of the New York Times
01:14:25.580
and is beclowning itself every single day. And I think one of the things that the media are
01:14:29.660
struggling with right now is they keep trying to turn the ship and they don't realize that the
01:14:33.120
wheel has been disconnected from the rudder. They actually don't have control of the ship
01:14:37.460
anymore. That rudder is not connected to the thing they're trying to steer. And so they keep
01:14:40.760
trying to create and craft new narratives and throw them out there. So they went from
01:14:45.100
it's a threat to democracy to constitutional crisis. And everybody's just like, no, no,
01:14:50.100
no. The answer is no. And I think that that is a tribute to what all of us in the alternative
01:14:56.480
media have done. Weathering, by the way, an extraordinary number of storms thrown at us by the federal
01:15:01.700
government and its apparatchiks in social media. I mean, I think people need to understand we've
01:15:06.260
spoken about this before between us and also just generally the amount of pressure that was put on
01:15:11.600
social media by Democrats in the federal government to shut down alternative media was extraordinary.
01:15:16.180
And it was real. It was an attempt to destroy all competition to the legacy media. And that was the
01:15:21.240
prevailing way that social media acted basically from 2017 all the way until 2024. There were
01:15:27.540
intermittent periods where they sort of let up the boot off the neck briefly and then the Democrats
01:15:32.680
would threaten them and they put the boot right back down on the neck. And I think that 2024 by
01:15:36.860
Trump winning in spite of all of that, by Democrats not being able to control the narrative, I think
01:15:41.760
that the legacy media has been definitively castrated here. And I think, by the way, the turning point
01:15:47.200
is not just the perseverance of people in the alternative media, which obviously is a huge thing.
01:15:52.640
The thing is that Joe Biden is guilty. Joe Biden did this. And the reason Joe Biden did this,
01:15:56.860
I think that the most undercover story of the last election is maybe the most covered story,
01:16:01.800
but still, I think people underestimate its significance. Joe Biden effing that debate with
01:16:06.140
Trump was the single most important political moment probably of our lifetimes because it wasn't
01:16:12.740
just that it forced him out of the race. What it did is it exposed the entire legacy media
01:16:17.880
infrastructure, all of them, all at once, right? They had been saying for years, for years,
01:16:22.460
you and I were talking about Joe Biden being senile in like 2019, right? And they were like,
01:16:27.860
no, no, no, he's fine. He's totally fine. It was a cheap, like weeks before, literally weeks before
01:16:32.360
that debate, they were saying it was a cheap fake to show tape of him on stage with Obama,
01:16:36.440
Obama guiding him off stage because he didn't know where the hell he was, right? Like that.
01:16:40.440
So they were, they were maintaining that narrative consistently. And then Joe Biden was stupid
01:16:44.980
enough to get on that debate stage. And I was like, well, maybe he knows something we don't,
01:16:49.880
maybe the media knows something we don't, because what moron would go on a debate stage
01:16:53.440
knowing he's senile only to, I said, I remember, cause we were covering the debate for, for Daily
01:16:58.660
Wire. We'd be there backstage and then we covered the debate. I remember saying right before,
01:17:01.980
and well, the one thing we know is not going to happen is he's not going to just die up there,
01:17:04.840
right? I mean, like he wouldn't do it if you were going to just die up there. That'd be crazy if
01:17:08.140
you were just going to go up there, like they'll shoot him up with something, right? We were all
01:17:10.480
having these conversations between us. It's like, okay, what, what sort of concoction are they
01:17:13.940
going to pump meth? Like what's it going to be? What, what, what's the, what's the jab that goes into him
01:17:17.900
to keep him fairly alive throughout this debate? Cause we'd seen it before, right? State of the
01:17:21.960
union, you get him a little bit pumped up. It's like eight Oh five at night. He could go for like
01:17:25.400
30 minutes. He'd start to wind down, but he wasn't going to like die up there. And then he went up
01:17:29.180
there and he died. I mean, he almost literally died on the stage. Almost immediately. Right out
01:17:34.060
the gate. I mean, it started and there was a picture of him staring at the grim visage of death
01:17:38.160
off screen with the, with the goggly eyes. And you were like, oh my God, death is going to take him
01:17:44.020
in the middle of this. Like he can actually see the grim reaper with the Sid standing off to the
01:17:48.820
side. No one else can see it. It's an episode of the twilight zone and he's staring at it and we're
01:17:53.160
watching him on split screen. And I think in that moment, the legacy media died in that moment,
01:17:58.220
it became clear that they were not surprised by this because none of us had access to Biden,
01:18:03.460
right? You had an interview, Biden, I didn't interview Biden and they wouldn't give us access
01:18:06.580
to Biden, but all these guys had access to Biden. And so that means they knew they were in the
01:18:10.360
know for years. And then the story started coming out about how the legacy media actually did
01:18:13.900
know for years about how they'd been at events with him where he'd had to be basically guided
01:18:17.880
out or he would blankly stare at people, not understanding that he was in the middle of a
01:18:21.320
conversation. And so at that very moment, the entire American public was subjected to the
01:18:26.020
reality, which is these people lie and they lie with an agenda. And you can't put that genie back
01:18:30.420
in the bottle. They tried to do it by pretending they were shocked. They went on TV that night. Oh my
01:18:33.880
God, we're so shocked. No, you're not. You all knew him. You saw him last week. You went to the
01:18:38.400
White House and watched him fall asleep and his face fall into his gruel. Like you watched it happen.
01:18:42.120
And then you lied to us with motivation. And so, you know, you don't get back your credibility
01:18:46.400
after that. You blew it and you blew it irreparably. Ben, it's great to talk to you in a, I mean,
01:18:52.240
because we're both optimistic for the first time in our relationship. I haven't been optimistic
01:18:58.840
since, I don't know, 1974, maybe. I don't even know. It's been a long time, but it's a nice
01:19:09.140
respite and nice to have the faith that there are people who are actually looking out for the future
01:19:17.740
of our country and freedom. I hope this continues for a very long time, but it's good to have this
01:19:24.820
and good to be with you. Thank you. You and me both. And I hope that we look back on this in a
01:19:29.020
couple of years and we say that that was just the beginning of the good stuff. And then we don't look
01:19:32.080
back in a couple of years and think, man, were we, were we optimistic at that point?
01:19:39.960
Said like a true pessimist. Thanks, Ben. God bless. Thanks. You too.
01:19:51.080
Just a reminder, I'd love you to rate and subscribe to the podcast and pass this on to a friend so it