Ep 3 | Michael Rectenwald | The Glenn Beck Podcast
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 35 minutes
Words per Minute
170.95259
Summary
In this episode, Michael Reckenwald shares the story of how he came to realize that he was a libertarian communist. He talks about how he woke up, what woke him up, and how he went on to become a self-proclaimed "Libertarian communist."
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey, welcome to the podcast episode number three. It features Michael Reckenwald, who is honestly a guy, and you'll understand right at the beginning, I wasn't sure if he was the real deal. I started reading his book and thought, boy, this is a great story. But is it real? Wow, it's even better than I thought.
00:00:22.320
And listen all the way to the end of the podcast, because it's remarkable. So he's a self-described former libertarian communist. I know, I asked him about that. He's worked in the university system his whole life. He has been part of the radical Marxist left until a few months ago.
00:00:41.080
Today on this episode, he's going to share what happened to him when he finally woke up, what woke him up, and what happened to him. He's been busy on Twitter as deplorable NYU professor. He's a guy who's published white papers on communists for communists. He is well-respected in the communist community, or was, but now he's writing tweets like this.
00:01:07.000
Hey, Paul Parrott and robotic chanting leftists, you are losing the actual war of the intellect. Your minds are so utterly flabby from disuse that it's almost unfair to ask you to express a thought.
00:01:18.740
The moon is the sun because I say it is, and if you disagree, you're a bigot. I see the right doesn't know a fraction regarding the insanity of the identitarian left. No father-daughter dances? Try people who identify as yellow-scaled wingless dragon kin.
00:01:33.640
And, quote, and, quote, an expensive ornate building. It's way crazier than you think.
00:01:42.620
His new book is Springtime for Snowflakes. I think it's a must-read. You're gonna love. Michael Rechtenwald.
00:01:49.980
So, I wanted to sit down and talk to you because your story is absolutely incredible and fascinating, um, and I'm not sure I know who you are yet.
00:02:15.560
So, let's start at the beginning. Tell me who you were 10 years ago, or who you've spent your life being and studying and thinking.
00:02:23.980
Okay. Well, I mean, let me, let me give you a, a sort of a, um, anecdote that I'll tell you who I was.
00:02:30.500
Um, I'd say about 10 years ago, I used to be a regular on Joe Scarborough's show called Scarborough Country.
00:02:37.920
I was brought on as the standard liberal pundit who they beat up on and then dispensed with, you know.
00:02:46.020
Uh, and so, you know, at one point, Joe Scarborough even suggested I might be a, I might be a traitor against the country that I should be tried for treason.
00:02:55.920
Well, because I, because I took exception with George Bush's, uh, execution of the war in Iraq.
00:03:03.380
And, um, you know, so they, since he's leaned forward, I've leaned the other way.
00:03:17.720
Because that's where, that's where I find your, um, transformation a little profound.
00:03:25.600
How deeply into that theory and that belief are anti-capitalist, pro-communist were you?
00:03:32.820
Well, I was very well published as a, as a known, uh, communist writer.
00:03:41.920
I had, it was, uh, I have essays that have been read by thousands of people.
00:03:45.480
Um, I, they were critiques of certain other aspects of the left a lot of the times, but
00:03:50.640
they were committed to, uh, what I called a libertarian version of communism.
00:03:56.460
That the idea was the Bolsheviks, they were right in having a revolution, but they were
00:04:04.700
So, but how does coming a serious, this is a serious question.
00:04:10.420
Like, for instance, I think the, you know, everybody just make money, put it in a big
00:04:30.900
I mean, just tell you what it's really, what the people that, that espouse this belief
00:04:37.520
This is a story you'll never have heard before.
00:04:42.240
They think because they have this ideal that, that we can establish a de facto, you know,
00:04:50.400
uh, equality in the world as it is because we have this idea, we're better than you.
00:05:01.580
And another thing about Marxism is it gives you a lot of intellectual grist to, to grind
00:05:08.060
And it gives you a lot of intellectual work to do.
00:05:10.860
And it's, it's a sort of self flattery that comes with that.
00:05:14.020
Um, it's very highly engaging intellectually in Marxism is, uh, and there's a lot of different
00:05:23.540
I mean, they're, it's, it's a good exercise for the mind.
00:05:26.080
Um, it, I will, but I will tell you, I've, I, uh, I am a baby in any of, uh, of, uh, Marx
00:05:38.220
It pushes you to think differently because it's, it's completely different.
00:05:43.200
And so I was one of those people that thought that the world could be a much, much better
00:05:50.920
place and that this was the way to go about it.
00:05:54.580
Now we'll get to what I think now, but it's quite, quite different.
00:05:59.340
I mean, it's completely radically different from that.
00:06:01.900
And you are, uh, you're a professor of global liberal studies.
00:06:08.060
Basically anything I want to teach is what that means.
00:06:17.320
Uh, it's called academic writing real world topics.
00:06:20.120
And I approach, uh, various worldly topics from different, I let the students read about
00:06:25.960
very controversial contemporary issues, but I make them look at all these topics from
00:06:30.960
multiple perspectives so that people aren't, I'm not indoctrinating anybody.
00:06:36.220
I'm not trying to inculcate some particular ideology.
00:06:41.260
I've never been, I don't believe the classroom should ever be a site of indoctrination.
00:06:46.620
And I've, I've, I've differed with people, colleagues of my own, uh, and other friends
00:06:51.560
who are also professors and leftists who were, you know, they were trying to drive somebody
00:06:56.480
to Marxist feminist, you know, and that's just how they work.
00:07:02.220
Best professor you could have is one that you, you might think for half the class, he's
00:07:07.920
And then the other half, he's arguing the exact opposite and you have no idea where
00:07:13.160
I embody different positions, you know, rather believably.
00:07:19.020
But, um, when it comes to, uh, my own change, it came basically from, uh, the terrible run
00:07:26.320
in I had with the left and, and the, you know, I thought the, you know, the utopian and the
00:07:31.380
egalitarian veneer, uh, of leftists really is very thin.
00:07:36.200
And when you scratch it a bit underneath of that, I found totalitarians.
00:07:42.800
And that really is what caused my political conversion.
00:07:46.480
I've had, um, I've had a, um, daughter of one of the communists that was arrested during
00:07:52.640
the, you know, communist trials from Hollywood.
00:07:56.440
She still says, you'd call me a communist Glenn.
00:08:01.200
Um, but she, she, we've had several conversations and she and her friends are more afraid right
00:08:08.900
now of what's happening on the campuses and the left than they are on the right.
00:08:17.020
I said this from the beginning, uh, when Trump, uh, got into office or before he got into
00:08:22.900
office, even, Oh, I guess it was after when they, we found that the resistance, I said,
00:08:31.380
I mean, the resistance is really unhinged and it's, it's fueled by all kinds of, um, ideological
00:08:40.720
And it's fueled by a conviction, an absolute conviction of total moral certainty.
00:08:47.040
When people believe they're absolutely morally superior and certain than, and they're absolutely
00:08:55.260
Well, the, it is why totalitarianism always ends in massive death, because if, if you get
00:09:05.900
to a point, I've asked this question from the left and the right, just let's imagine
00:09:09.800
tomorrow you have your way and everybody you've elected is in an area, you still have 50% of
00:09:20.660
Well, even, you know, this is most Marxists won't admit this, but Marx himself said, you
00:09:28.520
And they got this idea of the terror from, of course, the French revolution and the aftermath.
00:09:33.580
Uh, you know, they said that there, that is the model after a revolution, you must go on
00:09:40.300
You must get rid of ideological opponents and you must get rid of the bourgeoisie if they
00:09:47.400
Otherwise, you know, if they're willing to convert then fine.
00:09:50.440
But, uh, people are killed for having the wrong thoughts.
00:09:53.960
It's that's, that's basically what it comes down to.
00:09:57.160
So you're a guy who you weren't, I mean, you weren't against this stuff, but you didn't
00:10:11.400
In fact, I was never, you know, I've had friends that were communists that would joke
00:10:16.720
about putting a bullet to the people's heads, you know, and they actually said, if I had
00:10:25.700
I thought that that violates the deepest moral system that I have, the beliefs that I have
00:10:30.700
that each person has an absolute right to live.
00:10:33.460
And nobody here on earth has a right to take that away.
00:10:36.620
So, um, one more thing, and then I want to go to, to, to the first thing that it was
00:10:44.160
Um, but, uh, no pun intended, uh, in the opposite direction.
00:10:48.840
Um, uh, you describe yourself as not a, uh, John Stuart Mill kind of guy.
00:10:57.520
So, cause that's, gives us life, liberty, and the pursuit of individual.
00:11:02.000
I'm basically a classical liberal, uh, a libertarian.
00:11:07.760
That is, I believe people should be allowed to do what they want.
00:11:11.040
As long as they're not infringing on my rights, other people's rights.
00:11:14.640
If you want to live as a communist with 10 people.
00:11:18.920
And you don't have a right, but I have a right to get, I have a right to not be a part
00:11:23.980
I mean, I started a criticism of Marxism from the standpoint that, you know, the worst thing
00:11:31.940
Then second, I got to the point where I understood the economics of it as well and why it's, why
00:11:40.300
You can't have individual rights without the market.
00:11:42.760
Um, and so, and also that you can't have, uh, what socialists want most, which is what
00:11:50.540
You can't have that without the market because without a market, you have to have a
00:11:55.140
And if you have no prices, you have no way of knowing what something's worth to people.
00:12:03.600
It's the opposite of what you've tried to attain.
00:12:18.320
So let's go to your, the first thing that woke you up and said, you know what?
00:12:28.320
Uh, there was a student at the university of Michigan who posted when asked by the university
00:12:34.360
or given the right to, to, uh, use any pronoun he wanted and to enter it into the system under
00:12:46.820
And, uh, so I posted, I simply posted a link to that article having, you know, thousands of,
00:12:52.740
uh, leftist friends, a lot of trans friends at that time.
00:12:55.560
And the, uh, vitriol, the outrage, the hysteria was just unbelievable.
00:13:03.260
They called me everything from a transphobe to a, uh, to committing discursive violence,
00:13:09.300
a phrase I will explain later, uh, and, uh, of treason, uh, you know, on and on and on,
00:13:17.240
just for posting a link to an article with no comment.
00:13:22.740
And then I realized that everybody was, everybody was kowtowing to this kind of ideological pressure.
00:13:29.080
Everybody I knew, uh, they were all careful not to say something that would offend this
00:13:33.860
crowd, uh, this trans crowd and this social justice crowd.
00:13:39.160
How many of your friends, cause you being a professor at NYU living in Manhattan, I've done
00:13:50.840
Um, how many would you say of your friends are quietly have a couple of glasses of wine
00:14:00.160
and go, you know, Michael, don't say this to anybody, but I'm with you.
00:14:04.300
And how many are diehard, you know, social justice, post-modernist radicals from the
00:14:12.100
earlier group of friends that I used to have or from earlier, from earlier, they were, uh,
00:14:17.560
I would say that it was about 90% socialist, social justice, the whole nine yards and about
00:14:27.820
Otherwise, you know, it's people that were less, uh, enthusiastic, shall we say about the
00:14:33.300
How many of those, if any, are waking up with you?
00:14:37.440
Well, I've actually led some people out of Egypt, if you will.
00:14:41.700
Uh, I'm not, I'm not, I don't mean to have any main grandiosity here, but I'm saying a
00:14:47.020
lot of people followed me out of that and they, they followed my.
00:14:52.620
It just takes one person to say, guys, what are you doing?
00:14:56.060
Uh, you know, so that I saw that and then I set up the Twitter account.
00:14:58.980
And I said, and I had been thinking that there's a lot of things are going wrong here in the
00:15:03.140
left, this identity politics and a social justice fanaticism.
00:15:07.940
So I set up that Twitter account and started tweeting that, and I did it anonymously and
00:15:15.520
I did that not as so much as a, as a sign of a support of Trump as a sign of solidarity
00:15:21.500
with the Trump people who were treated so miserably and called, you know, those people holding
00:15:27.200
onto their guns and Bibles, those people, those fly over state people who were called
00:15:32.100
the, you know, thrown into the basket of deplorables by Hillary Clinton.
00:15:35.980
I just thought that was a despicable way to talk about people.
00:15:39.480
And I, I just felt that these people, these are the people that are most maligned in our
00:15:44.980
They're the most maligned people in our country.
00:15:47.760
And I thought I'll call myself by that name because I want to stand with them.
00:15:51.440
How did you, and, and I want you to know, Michael, I think we're repeating.
00:15:57.200
We're repeating the Obama years just at volume 10.
00:16:03.300
Perhaps there are things that the people on the left see about Trump.
00:16:19.680
And so we've just switched places and people don't realize none of us should be this afraid
00:16:26.480
of a government or a president, no matter which side.
00:16:33.480
As I think your work is pointing out, something's seriously wrong.
00:16:39.980
So you, uh, you start your tweets and you, you, you have just awesome tweets.
00:16:53.800
I had a NYU student newspaper reporter contact me and said, you know, these tweets are really
00:17:04.540
And so she asked me if I would sit down for an interview and I said, yes, I wasn't sure
00:17:08.940
I would go on the record, but I, I would talk to her.
00:17:12.000
And after I was done talking to her, I said, there's, there's really nothing, what I've
00:17:17.360
And I actually want to put my name on it, frankly.
00:17:20.220
Um, because I think it's, there's, there's nothing objectionable into some, you know, there's
00:17:25.020
nothing fundamentally abhorrent or deplorable about it.
00:17:29.500
It's just, it's just another viewpoint and it's a vantage point I think needs to be aired.
00:17:38.220
She took a picture of me laughing and that made the heresy, you know, somewhat redoubled.
00:17:44.680
Uh, and then all hell broke loose on, uh, within my university.
00:17:48.880
Uh, you were called in the middle of a class, were you not?
00:17:51.080
I was called out in the middle of the class by the Dean and said, you know, can you come
00:18:00.200
Although I was saying that this really is happening.
00:18:01.960
I'm being called, uh, in for my political views.
00:18:06.980
I mean, I have, I mean, I have thought, I mean, because that's, if you're a conservative,
00:18:15.400
if you're a conservative, I've talked to so many people that want to be a professor.
00:18:24.100
But for you now to see this and you, now it's, now maybe some things are starting to
00:18:31.400
I'm guessing that you're like, oh, oh, oh, oh, they came to me right away.
00:18:35.640
And so I go over and, uh, he comes up really close to me, but pulls me into the office.
00:18:41.940
He pulls me real close with, by a handshake, you know, Michael, I want you to know this
00:18:47.020
has nothing to do with your Twitter account or the publicity you're getting.
00:18:54.220
And then he said, just after that, hang on before this, you are a well-liked professor.
00:19:04.000
My student, you know, evaluations are very high.
00:19:07.140
I mean, I have done everything you're supposed to do.
00:19:09.980
And you were liked by your peers up until most of my colleagues like me.
00:19:16.240
And I had done everything that an academic is supposed to do.
00:19:19.600
Published widely, committee work, all that stuff.
00:19:33.520
And if you don't mind, I would like the head of human resources to join us.
00:19:39.580
And so he continues by saying, people are worried about you.
00:19:44.940
He said, uh, they think that this Twitter account, which this has nothing to do with,
00:19:50.580
represents a cry for help as one of the people.
00:19:58.220
Somebody in the department said they thought my Twitter account was a cry for help.
00:20:03.020
And, you know, in other words, they were, he was suggesting something was wrong with me
00:20:06.480
mentally, like that I had some sort of a psychological problem.
00:20:10.080
So in other words, I'm being called crazy for my views.
00:20:14.820
And, um, then the pressure came, you know, to, to accede to their view.
00:20:20.860
They wanted me to take a leave of absence, get off campus, get out of here.
00:20:28.080
Well, for your own good, because it would become unsafe or because, well, because they
00:20:40.920
If you take that, I am admitting in a way that I am exhausted and need.
00:20:48.100
And I might need, you know, some sort of, uh, I might need therapy, whatever.
00:20:52.680
Whatever they, they thought or trying to insinuate rather.
00:20:59.340
Well, I did because there was something else at stake.
00:21:01.840
That is, I had been up for a promotion to full professor since the previous April.
00:21:08.040
Now we're sitting here in September at this point, or October, I guess, by this time.
00:21:13.300
And, um, this, this, this promotion was largely dependent upon, uh, the upper administration
00:21:21.480
approving me as, and I needed this, this promotion because, um, I've worked your whole.
00:21:30.180
There was nobody that had done more, uh, publishing and, uh, and so forth in the department.
00:21:34.760
I ran a massive, uh, uh, um, conference on secularism and brought scholars from all over
00:21:43.160
The first conference by this, uh, that it was ever put up by this department.
00:21:46.640
And I needed this, this, uh, this promotion badly and I wanted it badly.
00:21:52.880
And I thought that if I didn't, uh, you know, if I didn't go along or acquiesce with what
00:21:57.600
they wanted, that they would, um, you know, that I wouldn't get the promotion that, that,
00:22:03.480
Maybe you could, maybe you could just do this thing and then it would be over and you could
00:22:09.280
And then I, you know, also the promotion would be announced and I'd get it because I gave
00:22:15.440
But then after I left, you know, I felt very coerced into that.
00:22:19.800
And the, and the, and the leftists are saying that I lied because they said, you know, and
00:22:24.200
the university later said, you know, all leaves of absence for medical reasons are voluntary.
00:22:28.660
Yes, it was voluntary, but they were twisting my arm, you know, certainly leftists should
00:22:44.140
They actually had the head of human resources shadow me on the campus for the rest of the
00:22:50.940
As if I was opposing some sort of a threat or somebody might pose a threat to me.
00:22:54.880
I don't know why, but they just suggested that she stay with me while I was on campus.
00:23:01.460
And then I got uncomfortable with her and I said, listen, I just think you can go.
00:23:07.560
I said, I'll lock the door, whatever you're worried about.
00:23:11.160
So she left and I got a call from the New York post like five minutes later saying, you
00:23:17.300
know, we, we are following this case with a great keen interest.
00:23:20.560
And we think, you know, we really support what you're saying and what you're doing.
00:23:23.500
And we think the university's treatment of you is bad, deplorable.
00:23:31.900
Well, there was an open letter that had been published in the same newspaper where my
00:23:36.260
interview was published in which I was denounced really wildly by this committee calling itself
00:23:41.680
the diversity, equity, and inclusion group, which I've later dubbed the conformity, inequity,
00:23:52.520
They wanted to, you know, debunk, they wanted me out.
00:23:55.960
They, they came out against me in no uncertain terms, basically calling me guilty for the
00:24:04.400
That is for my, you know, for my thinking of wrong.
00:24:09.160
But, and, um, so she told me about this open letter and I said, oh wow, do you think there's
00:24:14.160
any connection between my Twitter account, the interview and this open letter and the
00:24:23.020
So I said, I better, you know, so she convinced me to go on the record.
00:24:25.960
I had to, because I thought if I don't, they could just bury me, I'd be out of there and
00:24:31.500
So I went on the record and they, you know, they accused me of being, you know, media, uh,
00:24:35.660
you know, the university accused me of being sort of like media hungry or something.
00:24:43.780
I was trying to, I didn't have opinions, but I certainly wasn't looking for this kind
00:24:49.700
And, um, so I, I went on the record and I started to go on the record and tell them
00:24:54.240
that, uh, you know, tell them what I released that I, uh, to let them publish the story
00:25:00.440
So I went on, you know, she asked them questions about what I thought about this and that.
00:25:19.060
The biggest betrayal your friends must've felt was going on Fox.
00:25:31.740
Uh, I was expecting supportive, uh, conversation.
00:25:34.300
I didn't expect to be attacked and they didn't, you know, nobody on Fox attacked me at all.
00:25:39.320
So if you're being chased and be, uh, you know, called a devil and, uh, Satan and white
00:25:45.840
pants or shirt pants, white boy by these other people.
00:25:48.600
And, uh, and, uh, and this other group is being very friendly and nice and cordial and welcoming
00:25:55.380
So it made perfect sense for me to, to talk to that, to Fox and other, uh, right leaning
00:26:01.420
And, um, because they, they really having been the victims, if you will, of this very kind
00:26:13.520
Um, and, uh, so, uh, I couldn't help but think that I've been with the wrong people for a
00:26:22.400
Uh, in fact, I've had no better friends than I've had since this.
00:26:29.140
It's, um, I think there's a different, you know, there's, um, some people, not all people,
00:26:36.920
but some people, because they've really been pushed for so long on what they believe they've
00:26:43.220
You, at least for me, when I left Fox, before I went to Fox, I was on CNN.
00:26:53.920
I was, I was tied for fourth between Nelson Mandela and the Pope.
00:27:12.560
Uh, the platform was so huge and, um, and, uh, I just, I think I misjudged and I think
00:27:28.620
I went back from that and I went, how does 50% of the country who didn't have a problem
00:27:39.620
I know I'm not, you know, the hero that the right thinks I am.
00:27:49.060
I don't think people on the left for a long time, um, have had to self-reflect.
00:27:56.720
And it's, it's amazing to me that we're repeating McCarthyism in reverse.
00:28:04.040
And it's, and it's also involving the Russians.
00:28:09.660
It's the same characters, you know, with different, different script.
00:28:14.940
So let me, let me take you now into something that I, um, I think that people on the right
00:28:20.460
have absolutely no clue of what it really means.
00:28:27.000
Father, father, no, no more father, daughter dances.
00:28:31.440
And what was the person that was, it was somebody actually, it came out of the Google
00:28:34.960
lawsuit with James DeMora and this person who identifies as a, uh, yellow, uh, wingless
00:28:50.840
So don't, don't ask me how this, you know, sexuality works because it's an ornate building.
00:28:57.200
I'm sure there's some portals there, but I mean, you know, but that's, you just parked
00:29:03.980
Those are, those are some of the people that work at Google that James DeMora who got, you
00:29:08.420
know, got fired for expressing the view that there were, there was a difference between
00:29:13.540
Uh, those are the kinds of people, those identities are actually venerated.
00:29:23.420
I mean, so you have to, you have to refer to people as if they are what they say they
00:29:31.820
I don't know if you go up and knock on their head or what.
00:29:35.120
So, so let me just, let me, one more before we back up into all of this stuff.
00:29:40.720
Um, uh, were you for the gender thing when you were?
00:29:55.720
It, it, it was disturbing to me from the beginning to tell you the truth.
00:30:00.800
I figured it was like, there were, there were some touch, you know, touchy subjects on
00:30:07.000
Because you'd just be, you'd just be vilified instantly.
00:30:16.780
You know, I was, you know, you'd be just vilified for being who you are.
00:30:21.040
And you're only saying that because you are a cis, a cis hetero male, you know, cis means.
00:30:28.360
This is the word they made up for other than trans.
00:30:34.640
So yeah, you just, I knew that you didn't touch these things unless you wanted all, all this
00:30:40.860
So I've, I've written a book called Addicted to Outrage.
00:30:45.260
And addict, we know the addiction is happening.
00:30:48.520
I mean, these companies are designing those, you know, those apps to be addicted.
00:30:54.000
Then we're, on top of that, we're yelling at each other, calling each other names, which
00:31:10.220
We have this when somebody says something, we now can say it back twice as loud.
00:31:18.040
But, um, and when I found post-modernism about two years ago, I started going, whoa, whoa,
00:31:33.900
And you don't know, you, you, you just hear these words and you're like, what the hell does
00:31:42.380
And when you understand the, the, um, original birth and point of post-modernism, um, you
00:31:54.740
realize, I mean, I cannot find a reason that that isn't just 100% destructive.
00:32:09.520
And so if we are, if we are ramping it back up on our side, it doesn't leave a place for
00:32:17.980
anyone like you or like me that goes, I don't want to be with either of those people.
00:32:24.300
Let me give you a little, a very short little metaphorical way of understanding the difference
00:32:32.300
If, if Marxism is about blowing up the house and to, and you know, raising it to the, to
00:32:38.200
the ground, post-modernism is about putting a few little termites here and there in the,
00:32:44.840
in the walls and watch the house get eaten up slowly until it finally collapses out of
00:32:53.600
So the point being that Marxism was about overthrowing everything, overthrowing the whole social
00:33:00.120
order, overthrowing capitalism, overthrowing the ruling class.
00:33:04.560
Post-modernism said that can't be done because you can't tackle the totality of the world.
00:33:10.840
You can only do these little subversive things at one at a time here and there, and that we'll
00:33:21.200
So please, um, I know, uh, I could tell you everything there is to know about progressivism
00:33:32.980
Let me lay this out and you correct me where I, where I don't have it and I am wrong.
00:33:37.940
And then we'll, and then we'll, you can fill in all of the gaps.
00:33:41.540
Um, the turn of the century, uh, the American system is not moving fast enough.
00:33:50.040
We have science, we have eugenics, we have all these things, bright horizon.
00:33:55.660
And because, you know, um, a Republic is plotting and ugly and, you know, it just doesn't move
00:34:06.460
The idea is if we just put an authoritarian in, now this is before any of that's bad.
00:34:14.680
He'll be able to lead us and he'll, the state will be able to say, no, we have to make this,
00:34:21.860
And it's all going to, cause we're working together.
00:34:32.960
And the progressives have been arguing in the West, they want communism or fascism.
00:34:39.840
I think this is right before fascism really starts.
00:34:51.080
So they're, they're moving towards that, but they see the revolution and, and the West
00:35:04.420
So we want to, we will just take progressive steps.
00:35:07.920
At what point does the postmodern theory of let's add some termite, let's speed this
00:35:22.480
Well, the way to understand the birth of postmodernism is this, it is a philosophical
00:35:28.320
and social cultural response to the failure of the 1968 student rebellion in France.
00:35:35.500
The student rebellion, it also involved, you know, union workers from, from public, uh, from
00:35:42.540
publicly held, uh, organizations or companies, you know, like the, the railroads, uh, the
00:35:48.020
subways and all that it, you know, the students and these workers, they were on the verge, they
00:35:53.420
thought of overthrowing capitalism in France and therefore throughout Europe.
00:35:57.680
And therefore, perhaps after that in the United States and it failed, it, it did not end in a revolution.
00:36:10.420
Tell me the significance of the Frankfurt school meeting in 1959.
00:36:13.880
Well, the Frankfurt school is another, I would call them neo-Marxist.
00:36:22.120
They left, uh, Nazi Germany just in the beginning in like 33, uh, after Hitler comes to power and
00:36:30.480
If they stay, they're intellectuals, they're Jewish.
00:36:33.480
And, uh, they're, they're, they'd be on the, the hunt list right away.
00:36:37.880
Uh, so they escaped to the United States and, uh, they set up at Columbia actually first.
00:36:48.900
They're not, they're theorists, but they're not theorists who are going to be, uh, they're
00:36:54.860
not the kind of theory that you read and say, let's put this into practice.
00:36:58.640
Uh, they're rather theorists who say, basically, let's just keep it theoretical, frankly.
00:37:05.280
Uh, but that's not the case with what happens after the 1968, uh, failure of the 1968 rebellion.
00:37:11.820
As a matter of fact, Hork, um, Adorno, Theodore Adorno, who's one of the major players in the,
00:37:17.440
um, in that, uh, that movement, the, the, uh, Frankfurt school, he, he was appalled by the
00:37:24.740
1968, uh, student rebellion, which spread to Germany as well.
00:37:37.880
Cause every, I think everybody knows 1968 in America, horrible.
00:37:42.760
RFK, Martin Luther King, I think Malcolm X in the same year.
00:37:46.160
Um, we have the same year we're doing the moonshot.
00:38:00.580
Um, and it, I'd love to hear your theory of why it falls apart here.
00:38:06.360
You know, this is when the Beatles come out with revolution and their answer saying, I'm
00:38:13.820
Um, and so the whole thing kind of falls apart here.
00:38:17.740
How much of that is connected America 1968 to Paris 1968?
00:38:27.400
Uh, it's the same kind of people in the same spirit.
00:38:30.020
You know, the movement, it's not necessarily like, there's no tactical connections that
00:38:34.680
But it's the, they're in the same spirit of a kind of cultural revolution, uh, that
00:38:40.460
we had here, of course, but a cultural revolution that they also wanted to become political and
00:38:46.880
And so postmodernism was born as a response to that.
00:38:54.820
Um, and so they're, even though they were moving away from Marxism as such, they all,
00:39:00.880
they did incorporate some techniques from Maoism.
00:39:04.000
Uh, people were, feminists were sitting around reading miles, red book and in France and they
00:39:10.640
didn't know about the horrors that were happening there.
00:39:14.760
The cultural revolution, you know, we, we can, you know, have a full communism, a total
00:39:20.940
communistic revolution, culturally, socially, politically, and every other way.
00:39:27.320
I'm sorry to pull you off again, but how do people still Marxists and communists, how do
00:39:33.940
they still not see every time it's tried and then just draw the conclusion that you're going
00:39:39.660
to have a great number of people that don't want to do it?
00:39:43.780
It's, it's always next time, next time it's going to be right.
00:39:48.380
So they say that, you know, there was mistakes made or that wasn't really socialism.
00:39:54.760
That was actually state capitalism, blah, blah, blah.
00:39:57.580
So they have every type of excuse instead of seeing that when you run an experiment X amount
00:40:03.360
of times and the result is the same, no matter where it's run.
00:40:06.080
So it can't be blamed on the people and their regional differences or peculiarities.
00:40:11.040
It's got to be on the system that's being implemented.
00:40:16.320
Pol Pot, uh, you know, Mao, Stalin, it happens.
00:40:20.940
I'm sorry, but I put, I put, I put Hitler in, I know there's a difference, but to me, it
00:40:26.740
is a difference of how much the state actually owns and, uh, and, uh, and, and, and, uh, and
00:40:34.760
if it's international or national, but I mean, those are, those are both the same idea.
00:40:42.000
And that is the type of people that are deemed villains or vilified and the reason they're
00:40:47.100
vilified in, in the case of, uh, Nazism, the difference is that the Nazis and Hitler is
00:40:54.000
of course the main agent here, they see the, the enemy to the state in terms of race, whereas
00:41:03.600
in the Soviet union and, uh, communist China and, uh, Vietnam, North Vietnam, et cetera,
00:41:10.160
et cetera, they see the enemy of the state in terms of ideology.
00:41:14.600
So because putatively people can change their ideology, you're not trapped.
00:41:20.700
Like you are in the cases of race where you can't get out of your racial identity.
00:41:28.060
Marxism, Marxism though does, it does carry with it a lot of antisemitism.
00:41:35.580
I mean, it's usually, usually when you start to hear antisemitic things, that's the first,
00:41:43.120
This happened in the labor party in England is going, in Great Britain is going through this
00:41:47.440
I mean, there's the, the, the antisemitism on the left is just viral over there.
00:41:55.920
So what happens is these theorists say, okay, so you can't overthrow the totality.
00:42:04.020
In effect, let's attack the character of language.
00:42:20.240
He says this in his book of grammatology in 1968.
00:42:31.080
And, and what he's saying is this, that language doesn't have any real connection to anything
00:42:39.820
So this is, I'm sorry, this, I mean, you may not even know this reference.
00:42:45.960
And he, and he basically, a wheel is a wheel because we call it a wheel.
00:42:54.800
For example, tree has no relation to the plant.
00:43:00.720
I mean, when you think of the wheel is the wheel because we call it a wheel.
00:43:04.420
It, it, it, I've always used that as an understanding of handicapable.
00:43:11.580
But in one generation, it's, you're going to think, well, I have to build a ramp for Superman.
00:43:16.960
So it, it, it, it doesn't matter what word you attach to it.
00:43:21.060
But from that, he decides the idea is that all philosophy, all of Western philosophy, all
00:43:29.860
of Western thought, he thinks is invalidated by the idea that these words that are supposedly
00:43:36.120
connected to real things are not connected to real things at all.
00:43:40.180
And so the whole of Western society and Western philosophy is just like, is bogus.
00:43:47.200
And, uh, it's different from the Christian notion or the Judeo-Christian notion that in
00:44:00.760
So there is an ontological connection and ontology means on the register of being, whether something
00:44:06.640
exists or not, there is an ontological connection between the word and God.
00:44:16.040
So here in this case, language is broken off from the world.
00:44:20.420
And, but they also, this suggests there's nothing but language, nothing but language.
00:44:30.820
And therefore they say, if we really want to subvert society, we've got to subvert it textually.
00:44:36.240
We've got to subvert it through textual politics.
00:44:43.780
Harvard, I think is the first one that starts to say, forget reading the constitution.
00:44:47.720
Harvard is the first one that takes up deconstruction.
00:44:52.760
Let me go, let me go back to the twenties here for a second.
00:44:55.200
They're saying, um, you know, in law school, don't study the constitution.
00:45:01.300
And they start to study case law, which gets us away from the text.
00:45:04.640
You also, in the twenties, start to have people rewriting history books.
00:45:14.300
It's Yale that takes, uh, takes up the construction.
00:45:20.260
Sitting on the tarmac after they landed in the United States in Boston, Derrida and his
00:45:26.680
co-conspirator of deconstructionism said to each, they said to each other, one of them
00:45:31.940
said to the other, you know, we're about to unleash a virus on this culture.
00:45:37.580
They saw it as a virus that would, that would eat at the very foundations of all of our cultural
00:45:46.840
I think that's what people are feeling now, but they don't understand it.
00:45:51.180
This virus was unleashed on us and has worked its way into the entire body politic and it's,
00:45:56.860
it's undermined all of our ontological beliefs.
00:46:00.300
And this was where all of this crazy stuff about gender and gender differences and non-binariness
00:46:06.760
and all this that has nothing to do with biology.
00:46:10.700
So I had, I had somebody who is a lefty, but reasonable, um, say, um, you know, postmodernism
00:46:19.160
Um, you know, but it has its place in, for instance, um, the literary realm.
00:46:24.280
But as I understand it, and please help me understand this, as I understand it, what postmodernism
00:46:30.940
gives you license to do is to go up and say, well, this is what this word means.
00:46:39.560
So you can basically deconstruct and reconstruct any story out of its time.
00:46:48.200
Well, the, what it really is, is that that this isn't important.
00:46:53.560
No, this is important because the thing is about, about the idea that it's valuable in
00:46:59.240
That's a good point, but they believe they're undertaking politics through literature, right?
00:47:04.460
That this is all, this is all political, right?
00:47:15.400
You can see the, you can see the patriarchy here.
00:47:20.000
You can see all this literature now is not read for this, the aesthetic value anymore.
00:47:24.360
It's read for the political valences that it supposedly contains.
00:47:28.520
And deconstruction is like, is a way of saying, let's expose the way Western culture has been
00:47:34.180
setting up this hegemony over all of, over all these people.
00:47:40.320
Let's take these texts and take them apart and show how, in fact, they're kind of, they're
00:47:44.500
trying to make me the other, they're trying to demote these people, that people, the other
00:47:49.880
So that's, it's, it's, it is, it is, it is something that they, you know, that was used
00:47:56.140
in literature, but literature studies now, literary studies was not deemed anything but political
00:48:04.060
So, um, again, it helped me in this, I got to go back to Frankfurt because the Frankfurt
00:48:09.340
school in 59, they're, they're kind of, I could be wrong.
00:48:14.080
Um, they're kind of seeing the post-world war or the post-war world.
00:48:19.680
And they're saying, these guys are not going to stand up and be, they're not going to,
00:48:24.920
they're, they're, they are driving those huge cars with big fins and they're just not
00:48:34.040
And so they said the working class is not do, is not the agent that Mark said they were.
00:48:41.960
And so then they come to this understanding that, and I don't know how much of this they
00:48:46.780
actually believed or how much they just thought this was a working way to get around it was,
00:48:54.280
It's almost like they're hypnotized by all this.
00:48:58.040
Well, one of the things is that, you know, they've been bought off by consumerism is one
00:49:03.060
Also, they have been, um, they've been duped and completely sort of drugged by the culture
00:49:12.360
The culture industry has inculcated their minds with capitalist ideology.
00:49:17.840
Um, that's what, uh, Horkheimer and Adorno said in their essay, the culture industry, enlightenment
00:49:24.580
And in, and in some ways though, I mean, if you, if you read, uh, I'm trying to remember
00:49:30.240
his name, uh, the, the, the guy who really came up with propaganda under Wilson.
00:49:37.600
Um, anyway, now known as the greatest advertising man.
00:49:42.700
I know who you're referring to, but the name is also losing me.
00:49:45.320
He had women, you know, with the cigarettes and the Statue of Liberty and okay.
00:49:49.200
So in some ways the left is the one who created this way through Freud of, of actually indoctrinating
00:50:09.000
Politics as we now see it, but we know this now we see it.
00:50:12.180
We're living this politics is so far downstream from culture.
00:50:15.060
It's, it's, it's impossible to, it is the beginning of the poop coming out of the dog.
00:50:20.420
Not even that's what we're, that's what we're experiencing here.
00:50:23.500
And this is where this whole, this whole, let's, I call them the robotic left.
00:50:38.840
Um, uh, no, it was actually, uh, somebody else during that week, there was, uh, uh, uh,
00:50:44.620
disruption on a campus in a class where these people came in and one person was shouting
00:50:51.580
And I thought this is a, uh, I mean, almost what they accused the Catholic church of doing
00:50:58.780
You're just, you're just garbage in garbage out.
00:51:03.240
This is, this has been one of my major complaints, you know, is to say what's happened to academia
00:51:07.740
with the left and their, their, their just robotic repeating of mantras, political mantras.
00:51:16.080
Like, uh, you know, it started, I guess, at Stanford when, when they had the chant to get
00:51:21.000
rid of a Western Civ and then they didn't mean the whole of Western civilization.
00:51:29.020
You know, now that chant, Hey ho, Western Civ has got to go.
00:51:32.800
So that became not the, not the course, but Western civilization itself has got to go.
00:51:39.980
They want to get rid of Western civilization entirely.
00:51:43.760
So tell me, explain how, cause I don't think people really get this.
00:51:47.560
They hear people are conservative, especially here postmodernism and they don't even know
00:51:52.760
But if you, if, if you don't understand that it is the modern world is the world created
00:52:00.460
by the enlightenment and the enlightenment took us out of the dark ages, this is why
00:52:06.000
anything that stands to prop Western civilization up is, uh, needs to be destroyed.
00:52:14.280
And that's why you, that's why you can say mathematics is racist.
00:52:18.380
You say mathematics is racist, that it's, it's patriarchal, it's phallic, it's white supremacist.
00:52:24.160
And you say that because if you convince enough people, then you reject math.
00:52:32.900
Well, this is, you know, you, you're hitting a very big point here is that postmodernism
00:52:40.120
It's considers the enlightenment a means of, uh, of rationality used for power and domination
00:52:58.240
Well, in some ways, eugenics, it didn't necessarily start that way, but it certainly ended that way.
00:53:02.960
I mean, some, some, you, you know, eugenics, I would call eugenics more a social, uh, experiment,
00:53:11.200
It's not sick, strictly, you know, genetics is the science.
00:53:15.080
Uh, eugenics is the social project that uses science, but yeah.
00:53:21.940
Social media can be used to oppress, but that's, you know, it's, uh, there's nothing
00:53:27.780
intrinsic about rationality that oppresses anyone just like language.
00:53:32.660
Another phrase that postmodernists through Iran was this thing called what they called
00:53:36.040
logocentrism and what they meant, logocentrism, which means a centering, centering on the
00:53:42.740
And it was, the idea was languages is a form of domination over people.
00:53:48.920
That's why deconstruction comes in because it wants to undo that domination of language.
00:53:55.480
So you're, if you were to ask me what then is postmodernism, Michael, I would say it is a,
00:54:01.960
a toolkit for dismantling all power structures without bombing the building.
00:54:12.680
Beyond, it's almost an, it's a, it's a neutron bomb.
00:54:24.380
Anything standing, anything, anything established is bad.
00:54:29.520
Any types of organization, structural hierarchies, anything like that is bad, bad, bad, just by
00:54:36.060
And I mean, you know, colonialism, everything and everything is the white man's fault.
00:54:40.520
I mean, everything where the only evil, the only evil that's ever been done on earth has
00:54:46.940
Europeans and Western Western, other Westerners.
00:54:57.920
They have a cartoon version of history that they follow.
00:55:02.360
And you can't even, if you say something like, did you know that there's still slavery
00:55:06.780
going on today and that it's being undertaken by Islamists over people that are actually
00:55:13.600
Did you know that's happening and that this is not, this is not the white man that's doing
00:55:18.540
In fact, the only people that ever ended slavery in history were European, were based, were
00:55:28.040
But if you say that, they're just going to say, you're just saying that because you
00:55:30.780
are one of them and you're one of the oppressors.
00:55:35.920
In the 90s, when we started first to become politically correct, you know, I knew control the
00:56:03.460
language win the argument, you know, but there's something in humans, maybe it's, you know, Americans
00:56:12.240
or I think it's all of us, I don't know, that I don't want to hurt your feelings.
00:56:17.620
You know, I don't, I want to get along with you.
00:56:19.480
So if you want to be called this, you want this to happen, I don't care.
00:56:29.020
So political correctness, this kind of creeped up on us because it played to our heart.
00:56:35.420
Um, but this is not political correctness that we're seeing now.
00:56:46.020
If you're in line and you're correct with the political power.
00:56:54.540
And it seems every day, I think the, I think the enemy of civilization is obviously chaos.
00:57:03.000
And people feel that they are surrounded by chaos because you get up every day and there's
00:57:12.060
a new term that you'll be crucified for if you don't use today, even though yesterday
00:57:22.780
And, and so there's lots of people who have never heard any of these terms.
00:57:27.820
They don't have any idea the source of where this stuff is coming from.
00:57:34.780
I, even in the, while I was amongst the left, in the left, I saw these terms coming up all
00:57:42.320
Somebody said, well, you're as a cis hetero male, you dot, dot, dot, dot.
00:57:50.300
You know, and I, you know, the term, I had no idea.
00:57:53.280
Yeah, I think this was about 2015 or 14 when this term first surfaced in my consciousness.
00:58:00.720
And then I found out it was something bad to be.
00:58:03.560
I mean, and what it meant was somebody who accepts the gender, they were assigned at birth.
00:58:12.000
I didn't know I was assigned a gender and they mean socially assigned.
00:58:20.440
When you come out looking like this or that, that you were assigned to a gender.
00:58:27.620
And I mean, he's an evolutionary scientist and that's why he got in trouble.
00:58:33.280
You can't, you don't just assign, it's assigned by science.
00:58:44.880
That are XXY or XYY, but you know, the great majority fall at the pools, at the binary ends.
00:58:51.820
You know, so those kinds of terms, you know, so they were subverting ontologies again, right?
00:58:57.140
Ontology is that entities, the beings, you know, established entities in the social order
00:59:06.160
See how language is working to undercut social certainties of all types.
00:59:11.920
So tell me, because this is an argument that I had with my daughter.
00:59:19.520
Fordham is a Catholic social justice university.
00:59:22.820
Well, she was taught by the Jesuits there that the Bible is nonsense and that, I mean,
00:59:29.720
And she was taught that in Sodom, Sodom and Gomorrah, that sodomy was just a greeting.
00:59:39.740
And I'm like, wow, that's quite an aggressive greeting.
00:59:46.580
So, but she had, it took me, it took me almost three or four years to get my relationship back
00:59:51.780
on track with my daughter after this indoctrination because she wouldn't even talk about it with
00:59:58.560
I would be like, okay, wait, okay, let's just, let's think here for a second.
01:00:03.400
And there is this, um, there's this underlying thing that if, if you don't know, then you're
01:00:14.540
And, um, and the, the professor or whoever is at the top of the ladder here knows.
01:00:20.500
And I think some of the students, they are told you don't even have to talk about it.
01:00:26.340
You don't have to, they just won't ever get it.
01:00:28.380
And some of it is such nonsense that I think that the weaker will, won't even want to talk
01:00:37.300
about it because you start to think about it and it all falls apart.
01:00:41.760
The reason why your daughter's not talking to you about it and not even soliciting your
01:00:46.240
view is because you're, you're going to try to think about it using rationality.
01:00:50.860
And rationality has been, it's been banished from the start.
01:00:56.240
So, you know, terms like you, you want to talk about some terms like intersectionality.
01:01:05.340
Intersectionality was actually came, uh, was derived, uh, or I guess inaugurated by a law,
01:01:12.660
a legal, uh, person, a legal, a lawyer, a feminist lawyer who said that, uh, it wasn't
01:01:19.760
satisfactory to call somebody just, you know, to, to, to refer somebody as black or as a
01:01:26.220
woman or as, you know, some other marginalized, supposedly subordinated type.
01:01:31.300
There are, it's called intersectionality because there's the vectors of power intersect people in different ways.
01:01:46.000
So being a white, I am, I am being a white male who is heterosexual.
01:01:53.600
You have no power vectors intersecting over you.
01:01:56.700
You're not being subordinated by any of these vectors.
01:01:59.280
And even if, because I'm conservative, that says, well, you're, you have the hierarchy and you're trying to keep things.
01:02:07.020
Because I'm Christian or faith believer, if it's not really Christian, well, the Christians have dominated everything.
01:02:15.480
You've got, so I'm, I'm intersecting everyone else.
01:02:17.840
Because you're at the top, you're at the bottom.
01:02:22.400
Being at the top is not where you want to be in this, in this social justice realm.
01:02:38.300
I mean, this is something that we, it's beyond politically correct to talk about.
01:02:41.880
Now, the Judeo-Christian world has done a whole bunch of bad things.
01:02:46.520
You know, it's like Winston Churchill and Gandhi.
01:02:57.280
You look at Churchill in, in the Western point of view, he's great.
01:03:00.600
You learn about Churchill, what he did in India.
01:03:09.740
And also, how, what were the founding principles?
01:03:15.000
So when you look at the Judeo-Christian world, it has been really modeled around two guys,
01:03:23.900
I don't think there's anybody that would say, you know, if, you know, I'm, I'm alone in a,
01:03:30.920
in a very white neighborhood, but it's a dangerous, you know, the, the cisgender neighborhood
01:03:41.080
And it's in the middle of the night, your car broke down, you're changing your tire and
01:03:45.040
you see all these white guys, you know, I mean, you know, obviously, and they're coming
01:03:56.100
If you knew that they were coming from, um, uh, uh, church choir practice or a, a Bible
01:04:06.260
Most people would say, yes, yes, but they'll say no.
01:04:13.280
You've taken, you're taking our pinnacle of Jesus of be good to each other.
01:04:18.700
Or, you know, don't lie, don't cheat, don't steal, help the poor.
01:04:29.460
Well, we're replacing it with this, with this ideology that says Christianity has been part
01:04:43.600
The people that are Christian have been, as you said, the hegemonic people.
01:04:49.040
They're, they're mostly white or they're mostly, and they're mostly, you know, European and
01:04:57.520
They don't, they don't say do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
01:05:01.280
They, they say do unto others as they've done unto you.
01:05:08.040
So theirs is a vindictive religious belief system.
01:05:11.300
And it's about, and it's about taking the hierarchy and on which men are putatively on
01:05:17.740
And it goes down this scale to the subordinated, the most subordinated, you know, you'd get
01:05:23.120
African Americans or Africans or blacks and you'd get women, you'd get trans people, everybody.
01:05:30.100
And those people, it's not about equalizing everything, even though they say they're for
01:05:35.060
It's about flipping that hierarchy so that those who.
01:05:46.980
So how does the mind work when it comes to, for instance, um, I think there's a difference
01:06:12.720
Or they say that if you criticize them, you're a Islamophobic.
01:06:22.500
How do, how do you, how does an intelligent person get to that point?
01:06:32.740
One of the main things that has been inaugurated by the left is cultural relativism and cultural
01:06:39.900
relativism also brings with it a more relativism, but main thing about cultural relativism is
01:06:45.400
that you can't, from your, from your culture, you're not allowed to criticize people of another
01:06:51.280
culture because you're in, you're, you're suggesting that your culture is better than
01:06:56.220
And that's, so when I meet in this actually happened, I met, I asked for a meeting with
01:07:01.940
people of glad this is when the height of, uh, Ahmadinejad throwing people off the building,
01:07:09.520
you know, gay people off, torturing them, killing them.
01:07:12.200
Uh, Russia is starting to take driver's license away and, and absconding people at night.
01:07:17.440
And they're never seen again because they're homosexual.
01:07:23.880
But we all know, yeah, killing is someone because they're homosexual is a no go zone.
01:07:39.060
The other thing is the enemy of my enemy is my friend and you're there.
01:07:44.280
You, they are the enemy of, you know, Western civilization.
01:07:49.120
So intersectionality is how many times that's why basically how many?
01:07:53.840
How many power vectors are intersecting you and subordinating you?
01:07:59.180
Once you have more vectors, the lower you are, the higher you are.
01:08:03.040
This is why there's a race to the bottom in the oppression Olympics.
01:08:08.480
You want to rush to the bottom because when, by the time you get there, you're going to be on top.
01:08:15.420
What are the other words that we need to really understand?
01:08:21.980
That's, you know, accepting the, the gender you were quote unquote assigned at first.
01:08:35.420
What is their, what is their ultimate goal here?
01:08:41.480
Oh, well, it undermines many of the basic structures of the social order, like the family.
01:08:49.000
I mean, that's the object here, by the way, is to get rid of the family.
01:08:55.340
Because the family is a source of power in itself and it's a source of cohesion.
01:09:03.020
Because there, there are, there are forces here that want to get rid of any kinds of, any kinds of organizational adhesions or groups of solidarity or, you know, cohesion that, that, that, that, that take power away from the state or that take power away from other forces outside of the state and cultural, you know, cultural power and cultural politics too.
01:09:29.100
So the family's got to get rid of, got to get, to undermine gender is to undermine the family.
01:09:39.880
Michael, I mean, I, I, I hate to use this language because it's so condemning.
01:09:47.500
Um, and you know, it, it pits us against each other, but I have, I have honestly thought like, for instance, progressivism, I can look and say, okay, I understand that we have a difference.
01:09:58.300
It's of opinion of either the welfare state on how big it should be or whatever.
01:10:03.340
That's, that's, that's, that's aggressive tax system.
01:10:05.540
So I get that and I disagree with the way it's done, et cetera, et cetera.
01:10:11.220
But postmodernism, I cannot, the, the first word that comes to mind when I hear, when I, when I read it, hear about it or anything is it's just evil.
01:10:22.300
There's no, I don't know of any other thing that is just pure poison.
01:10:31.260
And social justice is the practical, is practical postmodernism.
01:10:37.140
You write in your book that postmodernism is dead.
01:10:45.260
That was the, the, the era in which people were theorizing all these things.
01:10:50.080
Now this is the era of practical, pragmatic postmodernism.
01:10:55.420
Is the practical, so social justice is practical postmodern theory.
01:11:01.840
Postmodern theory reduced and put in that kind of cartoon version too.
01:11:08.140
And, but that's what has to happen when you want to, you know, when you want to proliferate something across the whole mass of humanity.
01:11:14.860
You know, do you believe there is good social justice?
01:11:23.340
And this is one of the tricks of the left is to use abstractions that sound wonderful.
01:11:34.520
There's been a lot of different versions of social justice over time.
01:11:38.340
I mean, Catholics will say that that's one of our.
01:11:41.720
The phrase was founded by Luigi Tapparelli in 1841 when he, when he wrote a massive, uh, uh, tome about, uh, Catholic social justice.
01:11:56.400
And this is, here's the case of cultural appropriation by the socialists and the left of a term that was actually a conservative term in the beginning.
01:12:04.680
It was about establishing a kind of, uh, charity between people.
01:12:11.920
It was a way of mitigating the difficulties that came with laissez-faire capitalism and the beginning of the industrial revolution.
01:12:20.920
It was all based on individuals and small groups undertaking charity to try to mitigate the, you know, the, the hardships of people on the bottom.
01:12:32.480
But not, not about equal, not about equating them or making an equality in real time and real life.
01:12:40.760
So there is a, I'm trying to remember what the theology is in, it started in South America.
01:12:48.140
The, the, the president, uh, president Obama used to talk about this, um, that it is, um, that there, that social justice is required because there is no individual salvation.
01:13:05.280
It's funny because it's social justice was about individual salvation and individuals helping other individuals.
01:13:12.500
He believed that charity was a part of human nature and, and social justice was just a way of, of, of talking about how human nature should be tapped, how human nature should be understood so that we could act properly towards our neighbors.
01:13:30.020
But it got hijacked by even within the Catholic church.
01:13:34.000
They hijacked it and turned it into socialism in effect.
01:13:39.320
Liberate, uh, liberation theology is, is, is, is, is, is, is, is socialism with holy water sprinkled on it.
01:13:47.340
But if you could, um, look at the future and nobody can, nobody knows what tomorrow is going to hold.
01:13:56.680
But if we don't change course, what does our future look like near future, even scary what's coming?
01:14:06.180
I mean, it scares me to think that children are being indoctrinated for lack of a better term.
01:14:14.540
And I don't think it's really overstating it either into this system of practical postmodernism or social justice from kindergarten up.
01:14:22.700
I mean, this is, and they're being told that this undermining of all of these social ontologies, like gender, like, uh, the family are, that that is good.
01:14:38.780
This is the good that it's good to be like this and it's evil to oppose it.
01:14:44.120
What do you do if you're, I, my granddaughter just started kindergarten.
01:14:49.620
Um, I have to tell you that I, I pulled them out of every public school and most private ones as well.
01:14:55.740
I'd, I'd be very, very careful where I'd send my kids.
01:14:58.700
If I sent them anywhere outside of the house for education, I'm not, I was never believed that I would be somebody saying homeschooling might be the best option, but I'm starting to think, yes, it might be the only option.
01:15:11.120
If you don't want to end up with a kid who tells, who comes home one day as somebody else, uh, because they're being encouraged to get rid of these identities.
01:15:22.860
What are the warning signs that most people won't know?
01:15:26.740
What is, what's like buzz language that, uh, yeah, you'll hear, uh, people talking about, um,
01:15:34.120
the female brain, you'll hear people talking about, uh, the, um, you know, you'll hear the terms that we've talked about and you'll hear people talking about transitioning to hear.
01:15:47.240
If you hear a child come home and say, oh, my friend in school was in trans.
01:15:52.800
This means this is a party of celebrating their transition from one gender to the other.
01:15:58.920
This happened in California just recently in August.
01:16:17.840
You started off saying you were a libertarian communist.
01:16:27.580
It was a, there was a movement, uh, when people recognize what the Bolsheviks did, you know,
01:16:35.240
when they started the terror right after the revolution, there was no delay till Stalin, you know.
01:16:42.320
They even killed workers who, workers who had the audacity to go on strike were murdered, you
01:16:54.180
There were the concentration camp came first and the Nazis, by the way, got their idea for
01:17:03.080
Anyway, um, there was a movement that said this, that the Bolsheviks went wrong already, right
01:17:10.060
early, you know, that they became authoritarian.
01:17:16.420
And instead of being democratic and so libertarian or that's already, I mean, we are living in
01:17:25.040
We're seeing that, that if they take control, you will toe the line or they'll be, they'll
01:17:32.120
You know, and they don't maybe shoot you in the back of the head, but if you, if you lose
01:17:35.340
your job and every respectability that you need to survive in society, it's the same
01:17:40.960
So I thought that there was a better socialist, a better version, you know, now I think that
01:17:49.240
there's, now I think there's no way it could ever be any different than that because you
01:17:53.840
can't enforce equality unless you squelch many people in the process and get rid of a lot
01:18:01.380
And you, you don't, I'm, I, it's why I was so against, well, I mean, for one reason, why
01:18:06.600
I was so against like, for instance, TARP and the bank bailout.
01:18:09.280
We can talk about, yeah, you could talk about, that's not a role of government.
01:18:13.800
We could talk about, but that also takes away your right to fail.
01:18:19.060
And the learning, you have learned more because you dipped your toe and you dared to make a
01:18:27.420
mistake and look who you are now that you don't, nobody has a right to take my failures
01:18:33.740
away from me, away from me because it's what makes me.
01:18:38.680
It's just a step on the way to where you're going.
01:18:42.620
And sometimes there are steps that are missteps, but in any way, if you take that away, you
01:18:48.020
take away person, you take away the person's actual rights.
01:18:50.580
You take away their rights to be self-determined.
01:18:57.340
Well, politically, I would call myself a classical liberal or, you know, social and cultural
01:19:03.420
libertarian in terms of the, the market or in terms of the economic aspect, I would call
01:19:10.120
myself, um, I, I, I'm a believer in the market.
01:19:13.740
I believe that you, unless you have a free market where people can take their talents
01:19:17.660
to the marketplace and do what they will with them under their own free will, then you
01:19:32.580
Without volume one of Adam Smith, moral sentiments.
01:19:45.540
So it has, that's what Tapparelli was trying to mitigate as well.
01:19:48.700
That, that, uh, Jesuit would have founded the real social justice, uh, or the first
01:19:55.300
So I say, um, uh, I call myself a classical liberal, uh, liberal, uh, uh, social and cultural
01:20:01.640
libertarian in the sense that I believe people, not that people should be excessive in there,
01:20:07.840
You should not violate other people's rights, but you should have the self-determination,
01:20:12.600
the freedom, the individual freedom to pursue your dream, which not only is your dream, but
01:20:26.540
Um, and for years because I was on Fox, people thought I was against,
01:20:33.100
I'm against the state being involved in marriage at all.
01:20:39.640
I don't get any value from the state forcing me to take a blood test and, and give me a
01:20:47.740
Um, so do what you want, but how do we close the loop of, look, you want to be transgender?
01:20:57.600
But I don't, my church might marry gay couples, might not.
01:21:06.720
Um, we, you know, we might believe that transgendered is the absolute way to go.
01:21:12.080
We might look at the stats and say, it doesn't look like it's healthy long-term because suicide
01:21:19.480
Um, I mean, without judgment, let's just talk about that.
01:21:23.600
But we get into this place to where now who's teaching what is the norm?
01:21:31.680
How do we have an open society that says, look, everybody's got to be left alone.
01:21:37.220
But there are moral principles or there are eternal value.
01:21:44.720
I can't remember the name of the building, but it's one of the first modern as first modern
01:22:00.880
They didn't, they didn't monkey with the actual foundation.
01:22:05.140
So you're asking me, how do we have, how do we reconcile social and cultural libertarianism
01:22:10.400
with holding on to values that we believe are necessary for a healthy and functioning
01:22:20.040
You have to have, you have to have an unum that you come running around and the only one
01:22:28.240
E pluribus unum and without which we have chaos.
01:22:36.440
And tell me if I'm wrong in thinking that we might, I think we, it requires a struggle
01:22:44.660
We're not going to, we're not going to have, we're going to have to gain consent.
01:22:48.460
We're going to have to actually gain hegemony by duking it out, not physically in the marketplace
01:22:58.660
But the problem we have now is that the marketplace of ideas has been greatly curtailed, greatly
01:23:04.320
abbreviated by the social justice left such that we can't even get different ideas into
01:23:10.640
So we're being banned from, there's putting tariffs that are impenetrable to our bringing
01:23:16.720
those goods to the marketplace of ideas at all.
01:23:24.020
When I was interviewing schools for my kids to go to, I met with a science teacher and,
01:23:30.220
uh, and I said, you teach, you teach evolution.
01:23:50.020
How, what, what was the first cause that lit that fuse?
01:24:02.440
Teach the controversy, but we're not letting that happen.
01:24:04.600
But so I, you know, I'm a, I am a social cultural and, you know, uh, libertarian and,
01:24:10.440
and libertarian in the marketplace of ideation or ideas.
01:24:13.880
And I think we have to have that, or we're going to have real problems because that's
01:24:19.920
There's no competition in these places for, for thought.
01:24:22.900
So that's why our children are being told, you know, come and have a gender transition
01:24:30.580
Uh, and if you oppose it, you must be some Neanderthal.
01:24:33.060
Well, so the difference I'm thinking that we might have is I know you're real big on
01:24:37.520
reconciliation and I'm not sure we can have reconciliation with people whose ideas are
01:24:46.940
I do not believe, um, I mean, I couldn't reconcile with Adolf Hitler.
01:24:57.100
But there's a lot of people who like you have kind of gone along and now these signs
01:25:04.180
are starting to pop up and they're like, wait a minute, just like me in 2004, 2003,
01:25:12.720
Well, about 2005, I'm starting to wake up going, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
01:25:21.340
And I started seeing the game that was played, but I had no place to go.
01:25:28.000
Um, that was, it was either this or that it's binary.
01:25:41.560
You know, we might've, we might, I might've seen you with Joe Scarborough and thought this
01:25:46.580
You might've watched me and said the same thing, but we now realize, no, we don't have
01:25:53.800
to agree on anything, but the unum for me, it's the bill of rights.
01:26:00.120
We have to have the standing principles, standing foundational beliefs.
01:26:04.240
Unless we have that and unless they're good ones, right?
01:26:07.540
Ones that are based on what we think are, or make the happiness of everybody possible,
01:26:17.640
We do, but we're, it's being utterly avoided, utterly eschewed and actually dispensed with.
01:26:24.160
So Michael, my theory is, um, we need to start a whole different system of education.
01:26:34.160
But let me ask you in the short, in the short term.
01:26:36.740
Um, we, my theory is if we play into this outrage and we continue to call each other
01:26:47.740
names, um, we are going to miss the opportunity to meet people like you or for people like
01:26:55.480
Because we're just going to say, you're on the other side.
01:26:59.000
Um, and, and we, we play in and actually accelerate the chaos.
01:27:07.220
So what, if you had one piece of advice, what does somebody on a conservative side or a liberal
01:27:15.900
side say to the other to bring them to some sort of understanding of reason?
01:27:26.700
To tell, tell, tell either a conservative or somebody on the other side, how to broach.
01:27:32.040
How do I, how do I, how do I, what, I mean, there's a study and I write about it in the
01:27:38.680
There's a study that says you have a great impact.
01:27:42.080
I think it's 65 or 75% chance of actually opening a door.
01:27:50.860
One of the big mistakes that I made was X, Y, and Z.
01:27:55.640
Because people put their shields down and they go, oh, yeah.
01:27:58.360
And then they usually go, oh, I know I've done that too.
01:28:06.120
Leading with questions rather than leading with declarations might be a way, you know, leading
01:28:12.320
with invitations rather than leading with daggers.
01:28:17.720
But we have to, how do we deal with something like Antifa?
01:28:27.960
And we're, we're talking about reconciliation or understanding each other.
01:28:32.620
And we think that we have to, everybody has to agree from the 50 yard line to the end
01:28:38.900
No, those people at the three yard line, we're never going to get that.
01:28:46.200
So that's a, that's what we're looking for is a quorum.
01:28:51.400
I know, we spoke beforehand and, you know, I know that you would say that, uh, oh no,
01:29:15.260
But there had to be at least a lot of your friends who hated my guts and thought I was
01:29:21.640
I would have, I mean, the fact that I'm sitting down with you now is just further validation
01:29:36.640
And so I look at this and I think, um, uh, I'm an alcoholic.
01:29:45.600
When I sobered up, all my friends changed and a lot of my old friends didn't want me
01:30:01.180
You are going from respected intellectual New York, NYU.
01:30:07.300
It doesn't get any, no offense, easier in some ways.
01:30:12.700
Uh, then pretty elite, you know, you were in the in crowd and the in place doing the right
01:30:29.700
I gave up something and it might look like I've lost something by having given it up, but
01:30:47.580
I have a relationship with my family that was never like this before.
01:30:51.920
I mean, I lost, I got divorced over this stuff.
01:30:55.820
I turned into a weirdo in graduate school and I couldn't have a relationship with my wife
01:31:12.980
I have a relationship with somebody that's far more powerful and meaningful and, and
01:31:28.360
So you never rejected, but I was like, uh, I wanted to be, it wasn't about being tepid or
01:31:33.600
anything, but I said, you know, you can't really know.
01:31:39.520
I would never say I would, I would never say I was atheist.
01:31:41.840
I never did because I thought that's arrogant and I still think it's arrogant.
01:31:50.160
I, I got to, when I sobered up, I got to a point where I was like, you know what?
01:31:54.160
I believe in stuff because people told me I believed in it and I don't, I don't have
01:32:01.960
Oh, uh, and, uh, and thought, you know, if God is real, he'd want me to find him.
01:32:09.140
And if he's a good God, he'll help me to get there.
01:32:13.440
And he wants me to challenge him because he doesn't know what being, you know, the thing
01:32:18.380
I thought about is, you know, I thought that, uh, you know, way, the way I was raised in
01:32:22.880
sort of the, the religiosity of my family, I'm talking about not my kids and wife, but
01:32:29.720
I thought that I couldn't trust God because he would take away my gifts, my intellect,
01:32:34.580
what I wanted, you know, what I, my goals and stuff like that, what I wanted to do for
01:32:40.780
I thought he would, if he was there, he would take it away.
01:32:45.300
So, uh, it's been a, I would say that this happened for a reason, what happened to me
01:33:00.280
Now I'm not saying I'm some sort of a Moses here, but I'm saying that I have a small mission
01:33:08.020
I can't get over, I can't get over the idea that we were all born.
01:33:15.300
In this country, with this technology, at this time, with this struggle, and we're not
01:33:22.920
supposed to stand up one way or another, you're not supposed to, we're all placed exactly where
01:33:29.880
And, and the people we meet and the seat, even sitting in an airport, the stranger right
01:33:45.220
I don't, you know, I, I'm trying to follow the path that I've been put on and I believe
01:33:50.740
the next right thing will be revealed, you know, at the right time.
01:33:54.760
I can't say where the plans, where the plan leads, but I know it's really not, not up
01:34:01.840
So I'll just follow the lead that I get and the hints that I get and the cues and the very
01:34:08.620
Just a reminder, I'd love you to rate and subscribe to the podcast and pass this on to a friend
01:34:38.620
I'll just follow the lead that I get and the hints that I get and the hints that I get