On May 9th 1968, a nondescript 76-year-old Russian man, a former low-level Communist Party member, a technician in the People's Commissariat of Machine Tools, a gulag prisoner, and a defector, was paid a visit at his bungalow in San Francisco s South Bay in Mountain View, California. The devil, you see, is in the details.
00:29:54.600But if it's a private company, they can make up any rule they want.
00:29:57.720They can change them every day if they wanted.
00:29:59.260And the other scary thing, the other reason for that, I think, is that when you have a totalitarian state, it's it's pretty it's pretty, shall I say, it's pretty natural to oppose it.
00:30:11.660But when you're when you're talking about a corporate totalitarianism, I think, which is like a state that's being effectively off, you know, passed off to the corporate powers that be.
00:30:24.440And they're running the they're running the state.
00:30:27.500They're effectively amplifying and undertaking state functions.
00:30:32.140It's it's it's much more difficult to point to them and say this is what they are because they're they're matching it through other things.
00:33:02.140Because the corporations will be able to control and move things across borders and and track you everywhere and do everything they want to do.
00:33:26.040See, this is a very big deception, because, first of all, anybody that says that like the corporate America is is embracing leftist ideology is considered a loon because, you know, the story goes, oh, of course, corporations and capitalism always favors right wing ideology.
00:33:44.620It supports their interests, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:33:46.820There's no way that they would ever be leftist.
00:43:50.540And so, you know, the information that will be coming in front of your eyes will be that same information that could be skewed one way or another.
00:44:05.080You'll have a living kind of Wikipedia that's feeding your glasses or your eyes.
00:45:45.760Now, the thing is about this is that you don't know if you're being observed or not, but because of the possibility of being observed at all times, you become your own surveiller.
00:45:58.640You become your own, well, he puts it, you become the principle of your own subjection.
00:46:11.760That's where the conscience comes from.
00:46:14.340You know, like I, I wrote a paper about, uh, Milton's paradise lost and talked about how God was the panoptic guard.
00:46:20.780And then because we thought we, you know, he could see because he can't see, and I believe we can, he can't see into our minds that we do, you know, basically act accordingly or not.
00:46:32.740And that, you know, conscience comes from that.
00:46:35.260Well, this is a kind of reinstalled technologically, you know, God produced God.
00:46:42.600There's a, there's a sect of, uh, technology people in, uh, Silicon Valley who I'm not sure if they're serious or they're just trying to make a point, but they have built a church for the, the AI God.
00:46:59.740Because they say a SI, super intelligence is going to be so God-like that we will worship it.
00:47:08.660Kurzweil, you know, who became, you know, who, who, who might've been taken for a total crank for a while, but he wasn't.
00:47:16.860Now he's of course a chief senior engineer at Google.
00:47:19.960You know, he, he, his envision was that the God didn't make the universe.
00:47:25.100The universe will make God vis-a-vis human technology so that the universe will, he calls it all the dumb matter of the universe will be saturated with knowledge and it'll wake up and it'll be omniscient because they'll, it'll know everything that there is to know that makes it omniscient.
00:48:10.580The, the, the worst thing I've heard, um, Mark Zuckerberg or any of these guys say is that we have a responsibility to make the world a better place.
00:48:27.460You have a responsibility to produce your product that people want.
00:48:34.660The minute you start to say, and you know what, with this could change the world because we can help shape it, you're in very evil, dangerous territory.
00:48:45.240You're in a totally different register.
00:49:05.620Well, it is, you know, we, we've seen many instances of it, you know, like the advertisements, you know, for example, the Gillette ad, speaking of Gillette, where the toxic masculinity was, you know, uh, derided.
00:49:17.300And, you know, these guys are looking into the mirror, not to shave, but to, to rue and, and try to excise from their psyche, this horrible, toxic masculinity, you know.
00:49:28.220And then there's these scenes going on in which all these men are doing these terrible things, predation on women, uh, you know, mansplaining, uh, you know, which means, you know, guy telling, actually talking, guy talking when a woman is in a room, that's the mansplaining, things like that.
00:49:46.080And it just was this whole, you know, this, this whole moral, uh, rhetoric and this whole moral story they were trying to purvey about how men should be.
00:50:15.280Uh, and then of course the Kaepernick ad, and, and then you have all of these, uh, corporations that are just chiming in to prove how virtuous they are.
00:50:54.260And so, so going deeply into it, looking at it and really trying to analyze it, I think that it's very clear that it's not just a marketing ploy.
00:51:03.560It is not just a, a way to assuage their customer base to be, you know, placate, uh, diverse, uh, peoples.
00:51:12.220It is part of their real agenda and it suits their perfect, their aims perfectly.
00:51:17.860Um, and Gillette, I mean, I've studied the history of Gillette now going all the way back to the beginning.
00:51:23.880They had a, an ad in 1905 that had a baby boy shaving himself to, to say to the public that you shouldn't be shaved by someone else because that's a form of putting them into slavery for you.
00:51:52.040It said, um, so I forget what the term, what the, uh, byline is on the ad, but it's basically start immediately shaving yourself.
00:52:00.400And it, and it's, it seems kind of crazy to put a, a, a razor blade in the hands of an infant, but I mean, I said, what are they trying to kill the kid or are they suggesting they should slide slots, cut their throats?
00:52:13.000But no, they were saying that they want to train you early, not to depend on others.
00:52:17.480Just, you know, use people used to go to the barber to get a shave, right?
00:52:20.480The idea was now be self-sufficient, not only because it's self-reliance and all that.
00:52:25.740No, it's so that you're not putting anyone else at your service.
00:52:29.060He's already starting this kind of social justice moralizing from the start.
00:52:33.860And, of course, he wrote a book called World Corporation in 1910, in which he talked about the corporation that expands and subsumes all other corporations and finally becomes the singular monopoly of the entire globe and the government at once.
00:52:50.600Seems like Google, yes, that's what I'm trying to hint at, you know, but, and it only really could work with this kind of technology.
00:53:00.140It takes the digital world to make that possible.
00:53:04.440It's, it takes digital, digitalization and high speed, high, high speed internet to, to create a world corporation or a world system.
00:53:20.600You know, it's a, it's a, it's a amazing to me that, um, all of the things, I grew up Catholic, I went to a Catholic school and, uh.
00:53:43.700And all of that stuff seemed like that's never going to happen.
00:53:47.720That's just never, there's no way, no currency, you know, everybody's got a number that you won't be able to buy certain goods without the mark.
00:54:42.900But that technology is, when we get rid of currency, which I could have, I would have said 30 years ago, we're not going to get rid of currency.
00:55:15.100And once you do, the thing that people have not talked about is what New York state, what the governor of New York is doing to get around the Second Amendment.
00:55:28.100And he's saying to the banks, you know, we have to do an audit of you every year.
00:55:35.480We have to send our federal regulators to just do an audit.
00:55:43.400We feel that any of these corporations or any of these groups that are building or selling guns, that will kick you into a more extensive audit.
00:55:55.800So we would just suggest that you don't do business.
00:55:59.300And you're seeing these these giant banks say, I'm not going to do business.
00:56:07.240An individual makes a Facebook post in support of the Second Amendment and, you know, the bank sees it, which they can, obviously, and that's it.
00:56:17.560You know, they're already having you're already having people that are speaking out.
00:56:23.100I mean, people that used to advise presidents about Islam and know the difference between a Muslim and an Islamist.
00:57:08.840I want to go back to something we touched on earlier, but I want to hear you talk more about the concept of nudge, which we've gone through.
00:57:19.660But talk about it in a way of the philosophical argument on free will.
00:57:26.460Yeah, I mean, it's really – well, you know, this is a big issue already, a problem in philosophy, of course.
00:57:35.080And, you know, determinism is of – you know, determinism is really the ruling, you know, belief amongst most philosophers today.
00:57:49.960We get this idea that we decide on things, but it's really deterministic like anything else in nature.
00:57:57.540You know, there's always a cause for every action, right?
00:58:00.180So we're just billiard balls on the table, if you will, and we're getting knocked around.
00:58:07.400We think we're doing it out of our own volition, but no.
00:58:10.680That's basically the philosophical line, you know, for the most part in the dominance.
00:58:15.440And when you see companies like the – I can't remember his name.
00:58:21.240He's a professor up at Harvard, well-respected guy, Hillary Clinton voter, who is ringing the bell so hard saying Google is manipulating the elections.
00:58:35.820And he said in 2020, it could be a total skewing of this election because they're so good and no one even will recognize that they're being manipulated.
00:58:49.400They won't know because they're going to be – I mean, you said nudging.
00:58:53.300They're going to have – everybody has predilections and beliefs, and these are going to be read.
00:58:58.620You know, they're going to be read like, you know, an open book now.
00:59:01.400And so using those predilections and those, you know, desires or, you know, tendencies and so forth, this just – let me just get you a little bit closer with another little dark ad that says, you know, Hillary Clinton is this or Trump is that.
00:59:19.160And it's just a little bit closer to the side and on and on.
00:59:23.580And it's not going to go towards Trump, okay?
00:59:25.920No, it's going to go towards the Democratic side and they're going to – you know, they're going to disappear stories that are positive.
01:00:10.400So I wanted to do something on the passion behind the Donald Trump people in his second term, which no president has had like Trump has, even Obama.
01:00:56.600But it is – it's – that's how hard – most people would say, I guess it didn't exist.
01:01:02.580It's – you're going to have to deep – you know, dark web, deep VPN, all that, I think, basically, where these things are going to be hidden to keep it out of Google's purview.
01:01:13.940You know, because otherwise – or purview, they'll otherwise totally control it.
01:01:17.440So I don't like the dark web and I don't want to be a part of it.
01:01:34.900And it's – black markets are always caused by governments or institutions that are out of touch with either human nature or society in general.
01:06:59.200But if you don't believe in a spirit, if you don't believe in a divine spark, what's life?
01:07:07.820I think, I think, I think it is this to do something that is not rational, that is not self-interested, that doesn't make sense, that follows no algorithms, that has no purpose in terms of the worldly value system.
01:07:26.480If you don't believe in a robot, that will prove you're not a robot, that will prove you're a living thing, a sentient being who is endowed with a will and a spirit.
01:07:38.400Because you will resist this whole shebang.
01:07:43.340And this is what I get into in the conclusion of the book.
01:07:45.880I'm not talking about revolution, take over Google.
01:07:49.280We must storm, you know, Google, we must overcome and we take over the information means of production.
01:07:56.240That'll be a worse nightmare because then we'll have totalitarians that want to kill people instead of just people that want to control.
01:08:04.580They want to kill the controllers and it'll be a new set of oligarchs in any way.
01:08:09.480So it's a spiritual situation, in my opinion.
01:08:15.500It's a situation in which they're going to be purveying narratives to greater and greater extents with more data to back them up.
01:08:23.640Which means they're going to be harder to harder to resist, harder to deny, you know, and harder to overcome, harder to have a prerogative different from that.
01:08:37.260And so I think the battle is in the soul.
01:08:40.940I know I think it's actually in the soul.
01:08:47.100Because that's where I think it's the only thing that's the only thing is the is they're going to be telling you who you are, what you are, what you're going to do, all these things and predicting it.
01:08:57.180And one is going to have to draw from some other source that isn't theirs, that isn't their narrative.
01:09:05.960My father said the two most powerful words in any language is I am.
01:09:10.660That's what God said to Moses, I am that I am.
01:09:15.240You shall always say send me, I am that I am.
01:10:49.580And so the thing is, every every server or every every servant, as they call it in computer technology, their servants with the ENT and their servers.
01:11:17.080But they'll have to have a way to translate the thinking or consciousness into a language that is readable by the machine and then translatable to the human.
01:11:27.220But that's very it's I mean, so I say that I think consciousness is going to be not only that we're going to be the Internet.
01:11:33.940We're not going to be just bathed in it.
01:11:35.240It's going to be in our heads and it's going to be able to tap into our humanism.
01:11:40.600Anybody who thinks that's crazy, that was the first chapter in I don't remember which book from Al Gore, but one of his big, you know, one of his big books.
01:19:05.300And you have this disease, why even look for the cure for that disease or spend any money on that disease if I can say, oh, well, I'm just going to download you.
01:19:19.220So you're going to live forever anyway.
01:20:49.060I'm told the number one, the number one problem at Wharton School of Business now is, you know, they'll lay out a case study and they'll say, okay, was this right or wrong?
01:21:05.060And there's no basis to determining it.
01:21:06.960And they, the, the number one question from the whole class is, did it make money?
01:21:12.460And he's like, I'm not asking you that.
01:21:44.700So that's, what's beautiful about the theory of, uh, theory of moral sentiments.
01:21:49.220It is a, it's a co, it's a co-recognition of each other's rights and each other's, um, needs and each other's, um, relate, you know, relationships to each other.
01:22:05.960Like how we're, how we're connected and all that.
01:22:08.220So, and it's done, it's done through visuality.
01:22:10.440I mean, he talks about, you know, it's a lot of visual recognition, right?
01:22:13.700The eyesight is a big part of, um, of this.
01:22:17.400I don't mean necessarily physical eyesight, but it is the acknowledgement of others.
01:22:21.640It's seeing the homeless person, not walking by them.
01:22:25.140Actually acknowledging and seeing and feeling something in connection with that.
01:22:29.760Percy Shelley wrote a very similar thing in the, um, you know, in the defense of poetry in which he said that, uh, without sympathy or without imagination, you can't have sympathy.
01:22:41.140And without sympathy, you can have, you cannot have morality.
01:22:43.540So you have to be able to imagine what it's like to be in someone else's shoes in order to be moral toward them.
01:22:52.000So, but it, you know, this, but the thing to, you know, that I want to emphasize here, and I, it's a great book to bring up is that it's done on the individual level and it's not superimposed by anybody.
01:23:44.160I said, I said the same thing I said in the book.
01:23:46.440It's, it's, it's not so much the state of the art as it is the state of the world.
01:23:50.940And because the state of the art doesn't necessarily determine, you know, there are technological determinists out there and they're very rife now.
01:23:59.820There's a ton of them that think, they think that actually we have no control of technology at all.
01:24:05.300It's almost autonomously developing itself in effect, parallel to our existence.
01:29:58.080Because there's got to be, this is like, to me, it's the etching in the stone.
01:30:02.800I mean, this is because otherwise we have nothing.
01:30:06.400But here's the, here's the, here's the thing that makes me really sad about this.
01:30:10.960Knowing this piece of work and knowing that Rudyard Kipling has been utterly excised from all reading lists in every, every place on earth.